The present paper examines the differential analysis of flows on normal congruence of spacelike curves with spacelike normal vector in terms of anholonomic coordinates in three dimensional Lorentzian space. Eight parameters, which are related by three partial differential equations, are discussed. Then, it is seen that the curl of tangent vector field does not include any component with principal normal direction. Thus there exists a surface which contains both s−lines and b−lines. Also, we examine a normal congruence of surfaces containing the s−lines and b−lines. By compatibility conditions, Gauss-Mainardi-Codazzi equations are obtained for this normal congruence of surface. Intrinsic geometric properties of this normal congruence of surfaces are given.
Citation: Melek Erdoğdu, Ayșe Yavuz. On differential analysis of spacelike flows on normal congruence of surfaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 13664-13680. doi: 10.3934/math.2022753
[1] | Cai-Yun Li, Chun-Gang Zhu . Construction of the spacelike constant angle surface family in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6341-6354. doi: 10.3934/math.2020408 |
[2] | Yanlin Li, Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy . On simultaneous characterizations of partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22256-22273. doi: 10.3934/math.20231135 |
[3] | Haiming Liu, Xiawei Chen, Jianyun Guan, Peifu Zu . Lorentzian approximations for a Lorentzian $ \alpha $-Sasakian manifold and Gauss-Bonnet theorems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 501-528. doi: 10.3934/math.2023024 |
[4] | Özgür Boyacıoğlu Kalkan, Süleyman Şenyurt, Mustafa Bilici, Davut Canlı . Sweeping surfaces generated by involutes of a spacelike curve with a timelike binormal in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 988-1007. doi: 10.3934/math.2025047 |
[5] | Maryam T. Aldossary, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky . On the Blaschke approach of Bertrand offsets of spacelike ruled surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17843-17858. doi: 10.3934/math.2022983 |
[6] | Emel Karaca . Non-null slant ruled surfaces and tangent bundle of pseudo-sphere. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22842-22858. doi: 10.3934/math.20241111 |
[7] | Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao . Geometric invariants and focal surfaces of spacelike curves in de Sitter space from a caustic viewpoint. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3177-3204. doi: 10.3934/math.2021192 |
[8] | Wei Zhang, Pengcheng Li, Donghe Pei . Circular evolutes and involutes of spacelike framed curves and their duality relations in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5688-5707. doi: 10.3934/math.2024276 |
[9] | Ayşe Yavuz, Melek Erdoǧdu . Non-lightlike Bertrand W curves: A new approach by system of differential equations for position vector. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5422-5438. doi: 10.3934/math.2020348 |
[10] | Nural Yüksel, Burçin Saltık . On inextensible ruled surfaces generated via a curve derived from a curve with constant torsion. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11312-11324. doi: 10.3934/math.2023573 |
The present paper examines the differential analysis of flows on normal congruence of spacelike curves with spacelike normal vector in terms of anholonomic coordinates in three dimensional Lorentzian space. Eight parameters, which are related by three partial differential equations, are discussed. Then, it is seen that the curl of tangent vector field does not include any component with principal normal direction. Thus there exists a surface which contains both s−lines and b−lines. Also, we examine a normal congruence of surfaces containing the s−lines and b−lines. By compatibility conditions, Gauss-Mainardi-Codazzi equations are obtained for this normal congruence of surface. Intrinsic geometric properties of this normal congruence of surfaces are given.
In general, differential geometry of surfaces examines the geometric structure of smooth surfaces. In this context, there are many studies on differential geometry of surfaces in different spaces such as Euclidean and non-Euclidean spaces. In many of these studies, the arc length of the curves on the surface is used to obtain the distance over the surfaces. For this reason, curves on the surface have an important role in the field of differential geometry. Investigations of curves on the surface, not only their geometric properties but also their physical structures are considered. From this point of view, it is the most preferred way of examining the local differential geometric structure of the curve. In many studies dealing with differential geometric properties of curves, some methods and tools of differential calculus are used. This review makes use of the well-known Frenet-Serret frame {→t,→n,→b}. Considering that σ=σ(s,n,b) is a given curve in Euclidean space, where s, n and b are the distance along s−lines, n−lines and b−lines respectively. The main object is to obtain the system by the directional derivatives of Frenet-Serret frame [1]. The quantities, the normal deformations of the vector-tube in the directions →n and →b,
ξns=g(→n,∂∂n→t) and ξbs=g(→b,∂∂b→t) |
are firstly introduced in [2], respectively.
Since it has many physical applications, Lorentzian geometry is the most studied geometry among non-Euclidean geometries [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Also, this geometry is a very common research area of physical problems on integrable systems, soliton theory, fluid dynamics, field theories, etc. [1,9,10,11]. Since Lorentz-Minkowski spacetime was extended to a curved spacetime by A. Einstein in order to model nonzero gravitational fields, this geometry has been the mathematical theory which is used by general relativity.
In this study, it is aimed to examine spacelike curve flow on Lorentzian space from a different perspective. The three dimensional real vector space equipped with Lorentzian metric
⟨→x,→y⟩L=−x1y1+x2y2+x3y3 |
is named after Lorentzian space and denoted by E31. In second section, the three dimensional vector field and the differential geometric aspects of curvature and torsion of vector lines are investigated by means of anholomonic coordinates. We describe Frenet-Serret frame {→t,→n,→b} of a given spacelike space curve in E31 in terms of anholonomic coordinates which includes eight parameters, related by three partial differential equations. It is proved that the curl of tangent vector field has no component in the direction of principal normal vector field. Thus, there exists a surface which contains both s−lines and b−lines. For this reason, the expression of this normal congruence is also discussed in the last section. Then, intrinsic geometric properties of this normal congruence of surfaces are also given.
Suppose that σ=σ(s,n,b) is a given spacelike curve with spacelike normal vector in three dimensional Lorentzian space. And the distance along s−lines, n−lines and b−lines of the curve σ are denoted by s,n and b, respectively. The unit spacelike tangent vector of s−lines and n−lines of the curve σ are given by
→t=∂σ∂s,→n=∂σ∂n, |
respectively. Then the unit timelike tangent vector of b−lines is given by [12,13]
→b=∂σ∂b. |
A three-dimensional vector field can be considered in terms of anholonomic coordinates which includes eight parameters, related by three partial differential equations [14].
Theorem 1. Suppose that σ=σ(s,n,b) is a given spacelike curve Lorentzianspace. Directional derivatives of the unit vectors {→t,→n,→b} are given as follows :
i)
∂∂s[→t→n→b]=[0κ0−κ0τ0τ0][→t→n→b], | (1) |
ii)
∂∂n[→t→n→b]=[0ξnsτ+μb−ξns0divbτ+μbdivb0][→t→n→b], | (2) |
iii)
∂∂b[→t→n→b]=[0μn−τ−ξbsτ−μn0−(div→n+κ)−ξbs−(div→n+κ)0][→t→n→b]. | (3) |
The normal deformations of the vector-tube in the directions →n and →b are given as
ξns=⟨→n,∂→t∂n⟩L,ξbs=⟨→b,∂→t∂b⟩L |
and abnormality of →n and →b are statedas
μn=⟨curl→n,→n⟩L,μb=⟨curl→b,→b⟩L |
respectively. Curvature and torsion function of the unit speed spacelike curveσ=σ(s,n,b) are denoted by κ=κ(s,n,b) and τ=τ(s,n,b) respectively.
Proof. Proof of ⅰ) is clear by Frenet-Serret equation for unit speed spacelike curve. So, the proof of ⅱ) and ⅲ) will be given. It is known that for i=1,2,3 there exist smooth functions; αi and βi where
∂∂n[→t→n→b]=[0α1α2−α10α3α2α30][→t→n→b], |
∂∂b[→t→n→b]=[0β1β2−β10β3β2β30][→t→n→b]. |
We need to find these functionals. Firstly, we get
α1=⟨∂→t∂n,→n⟩L=ξns,−β2=⟨∂→t∂b,→b⟩L=ξbs |
by our assumptions. Then, we also obtain divergence of Serret-Frenet frame fields as follows
div→t=⟨→t,∂→t∂s⟩L+⟨→n,∂→t∂n⟩L+⟨→b,∂→t∂b⟩L=⟨→t,κ→n⟩L+⟨→n,ξns→n+α2→b⟩L+⟨→b,β1→n−ξbs→b⟩L=ξns−β2, |
div→n=⟨→t,∂→n∂s⟩L+⟨→n,∂→n∂n⟩L+⟨→b,∂→n∂b⟩L=⟨→t,−κ→t+τ→b⟩L+⟨→n,−ξns→t+α3→b⟩L+⟨→b,−β1→t+β3→b⟩L=−κ−β3 |
and
div→b=⟨→t,∂→b∂s⟩L+⟨→n,∂→b∂n⟩L+⟨→b,∂→b∂b⟩L=⟨→t,τ→n⟩L+⟨→n,α2→t+α3→n⟩L+⟨→b,−ξbs→t+β3→n⟩L=α3. |
Therefore, we get
β3=−(div→n+κ) and α3=divb. |
On the other hand, we also obtain
curl→t=→t×L∂→t∂s+→n×L∂→t∂n+→b×L∂→t∂b=κ→b−α2→t+β1→t=(β1−α2)→t+κ→b, |
curl→n=→t×L∂→n∂s+→n×L∂→n∂n+→b×L∂→n∂b=τ→n+ξns→b−divb→t+β1→n=−div→b→t+(τ+β1)→n+ξns→b |
and
curl→b=→t×L∂→b∂s+→n×L∂→b∂n+→b×L∂→b∂b=→t×L(τ→n)+→n×L(α2→t+div→b→n)+→b×L(−ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n)=τ→b−α2→b+ξbs→n−(div→n+κ)→t=−(div→n+κ)→t+ξbs→n+(τ−α2)→b. |
Therefore, we get
μs=⟨curl→t,→t⟩L=⟨(β1−α2)→t+κ→b,→t⟩L=β1−α2,μn=⟨curl→n,→n⟩L=⟨−div→b→t+(τ+β1)→n+ξns→b,→n⟩L=τ+β1,μb=⟨curl→b,→b⟩L=⟨−(div→n+κ)→t+ξbs→n+(τ−α2)→b,→b⟩L=α2−τ. |
Thus, we obtain
β1=μn−τ,α2=τ+μb. |
Finally, if we substitute obtained values of the smooth functions; αi and βi for i=1,2,3, then we get
∂∂n[→t→n→b]=[0ξnsτ+μb−ξns0divbτ+μbdivb0][→t→n→b],∂∂b[→t→n→b]=[0μn−τ−ξbsτ−μn0−(div→n+κ)−ξbs−(div→n+κ)0][→t→n→b]. |
Corollary 2. The following relation between abnormalities of →t,→n and →b is given by
μs+τ=12(μs+μn−μb). |
Above equation proves that important results involving Dupin theorem. This means that all coordinate surfaces intersect along common curvature lines in a triply orthogonal coordinate system.
Remark 3 In vectorial analysis, the vector operator curl describes the infinitesimal circulation of a vector field in three-dimensional space. So, the curl of a vector field refers to the idea of how a fluid may rotate. It is seen that
curl→t=μs→t+κ→b | (4) |
by proof of above theorem. The results of Eq (4) will be discussed in the next sections. Since curl→t does not include any component in the direction of principal normal →n, then there exists a surface which contains both s−lines and b−lines.
Considering the identity curlgradf=0, we obtain
curlgradf=→t×L(∂∂s(→t∂f∂s+→n∂f∂n+→b∂f∂b))+→n×L(∂∂n(→t∂f∂s+→n∂f∂n+→b∂f∂b))+→b×L(∂∂b(→t∂f∂s+→n∂f∂n+→b∂f∂b))=→t×L(∂→t∂s∂f∂s+→t∂2f∂s2+∂→n∂s∂f∂n+→n∂2f∂s∂n+∂→b∂s∂f∂b+→b∂2f∂s∂b)+→n×L(∂→t∂n∂f∂s+→t∂2f∂n∂s+∂→n∂n∂f∂n+→n∂2f∂n2+∂→b∂n∂f∂b+→b∂2f∂n∂b)+→b×L(∂→t∂b∂f∂s+→t∂2f∂b∂s+∂→n∂n∂f∂n+→n∂2f∂b∂n+∂→b∂b∂f∂b+→b∂2f∂b2)=∂f∂scurl→t+∂f∂ncurl→n+∂f∂bcurl→b+→t×L(→t∂2f∂s2+→n∂2f∂s∂n+→b∂2f∂s∂b)+→n×L(→t∂2f∂n∂s+→n∂2f∂n2+→b∂2f∂n∂b)+→b×L(→t∂2f∂b∂s+→n∂2f∂b∂n+→b∂2f∂b2)=∂f∂scurl→t+∂f∂ncurl→n+∂f∂bcurl→b+(∂2f∂b∂n−∂2f∂n∂b)→t+(∂2f∂s∂b−∂2f∂b∂s)→n+(∂2f∂s∂n−∂2f∂n∂s)=→0. |
By using of above relations, we get
0=(∂2f∂b∂n−∂2f∂n∂b+∂f∂sμs−∂f∂ndiv→b−∂f∂b(div→n+κ))→t+(∂2f∂s∂b−∂2f∂b∂s+∂f∂nμn+∂f∂bξbs)→n+(∂2f∂s∂n−∂2f∂n∂s+∂f∂sκ+∂f∂nξns−∂f∂bμb)→b. |
This gives the following relations
∂2f∂b∂n−∂2f∂n∂b=−∂f∂sμs+∂f∂ndiv→b+∂f∂b(div→n+κ), | (5) |
∂2f∂s∂b−∂2f∂b∂s=−∂f∂nμn−∂f∂bξbs, | (6) |
∂2f∂s∂n−∂2f∂n∂s=−∂f∂sκ−∂f∂nξns+∂f∂bμb. | (7) |
In general, the mixed derivatives of order two don't commute. This means that s, n and b represent anholonomic coordinates.
Theorem 4. The intrinsic representations of grad→t, grad→n and grad→b give following conditions on geometric parameters κ, τ, μs, μb, div→n, div→b, ξns, ξbs by thecompatibility of the linear systems
∂ξns∂b−∂(μn−τ)∂n=(μb+μn)(div→n+κ)+(−ξbs+ξns)div→b−μsκ, | (8) |
∂(μb+τ)∂b+∂ξbs∂n=(ξns−ξbs)(div→n+κ)+(μb+μn)div→b, | (9) |
∂div→b∂b+∂(div→n+κ)∂n=−ξbsξns+(μb+τ)(τ−μn)+div2→b−(div→n+κ)2−μsτ, | (10) |
∂(μn−τ)∂s−∂κ∂b=ξbs2τ−μn(ξns+ξbs), | (11) |
∂ξbs∂s=κ(div→n+κ)−τ2+(μb+2τ)μn−ξ2bs, | (12) |
∂(div→n+κ)∂s+∂τ∂b=−(div→n+2κ)ξbs+div→bμn, | (13) |
∂ξns∂s−∂κ∂n=−(μb+τ)τ−κ2−ξ2ns+(μn−τ)μb, | (14) |
∂(μb+τ)∂s=−τξns+κdiv→b−(μb+τ)ξns−ξbsμb, | (15) |
∂div→b∂s−∂τ∂n=−(μb+2τ)κ−div→bξns−(div→n+κ)μb. | (16) |
Proof. By using Eq (5), we may write
∂2→t∂b∂n−∂2→t∂n∂b=−∂→t∂sμs+∂→t∂ndiv→b+∂→t∂b(div→n+κ). |
By compatibility of the linear systems in Eqs (2) and (3), we obtain
∂2→t∂b∂n−∂2→t∂n∂b=∂∂b(ξns→n+(μb+τ)→b)−∂∂n((μn−τ)→n−ξbs→b)=∂ξns∂b→n+ξns∂→n∂b+∂(μb+τ)∂b→b+(μb+τ)∂→b∂b−∂∂n(μn−τ)→n−(μn−τ)∂→n∂n+∂ξbs∂n→b+ξbs∂→b∂n=∂ξns∂b→n+ξns((τ−μn)→t+(div→n+κ)→b)+∂(−μb−τ)∂b→b+(−μb−τ)(ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n)−∂∂n(τ−μn)→n−(τ−μn)(ξns→t−div→b→b)−∂ξbs∂n→b−ξbs((−μb−τ)→t+div→b→n)=(ξns(τ−μn)+ξbs(−μb−τ)−ξns(τ−μn)−ξbs(−μb−τ))→t+(∂ξns∂b−(−μb−τ)(div→n+κ)−∂∂n(τ−μn)−ξbsdiv→b)→n+(ξns(div→n+κ)+∂(−μb−τ)∂b+(τ−μn)div→b−∂ξbs∂n)→b. |
Therefore, we get
∂2→t∂b∂n−∂2→t∂n∂b=(∂ξns∂b−(μb+τ)(div→n+κ)−∂∂n(μn−τ)+ξbsdiv→b)→n+(−ξns(div→n+κ)+∂(μb+τ)∂b−(μn−τ)div→b+∂ξbs∂n)→b. |
On the other hand, we have
−∂→t∂sμs+∂→t∂ndiv→b+∂→t∂b(div→n+κ)=−(κ→n)μs+(ξns→n+(μb+τ)→b)div→b+((μn−τ)→n−ξbs→b)(div→n+κ)=(κμs−ξnsdiv→b−(τ−μn)(div→n+κ))→n+((μb+τ)div→b−ξbs(div→n+κ))→b. |
Therefore, we get
∂ξns∂b+∂(μn−τ)∂n=(μb+μn)(div→n+κ)+(−ξbs+ξns)divb→b−μsκ. |
By equality of the coefficient of binormal vector fields, we obtain
∂(μb+τ)∂b+∂ξbs∂n=(ξns−ξbs)(div→n+κ)+(μb+μn)divb→b. |
By using Eq (5), we have
∂2→n∂b∂n−∂2→n∂n∂b=∂∂b(−ξns→t+divb→b)−∂∂n((τ−μn)→t−(div→n+κ)→b)=(−∂∂bξns−ξbsdivb−∂∂n(τ−μn)+(τ+μn)−(div→n+κ))→t+(ξnsξbs+∂∂bdivb−(τ−μn)(μb+τ)+∂∂n(div→n+κ))→b. |
and
−μs∂n∂s+divb∂n∂n+(div→n+κ)∂n∂b=(μsκ−ξnsdivb+(div→n+κ)(τ−μn))→t+(−μs+(divb)2−(div→n+κ)2)→b. |
By using coefficient of binormal vector field, we get
∂div→b∂b+∂(div→n+κ)∂n=−ξbsξns+(μb+τ)(τ−μn)+div2→b−(div→n+κ)2−μsτ. |
Similarly, we have
∂2→t∂s∂b−∂2→t∂b∂s=∂∂s(∂→t∂b)−∂∂b(∂→t∂s) |
by Eq (6). By compatibility of the linear systems in Eqs (1) and (3), we obtain
∂2→t∂s∂b−∂2→t∂b∂s=∂∂s((μn−τ)→n−ξbs→b)−∂∂b(κ→n)=∂(μn−τ)∂s→n+(μn−τ)∂→n∂s−∂ξbs∂s→b−ξbs∂→b∂s−∂κ∂b→n−κ∂→n∂b. |
Then, we get
∂2→t∂s∂b−∂2→t∂b∂s=∂(τ−μn)∂s→n+(τ−μn)(κ→t+τ→b)+∂ξbs∂s→b+ξbs(−τ→n)−∂κ∂b→n−κ((τ−μn)→t+(div→n+κ)→b)=(∂(μn−τ)∂s−τξbs−∂κ∂b)→n+((μn−τ)τ−∂ξbs∂s+κ(div→n+κ))→b. |
Moreover, we have
−∂→t∂nμn−∂→t∂bξbs=−(ξns→n+(μb+τ)→b)μn−((μn−τ)→n−ξbs→b)ξbs=(−ξnsμn−ξbs(μn−τ))→n+(−(μb+τ)μn+ξ2bs)→b. |
This gives the following equation
∂(μn−τ)∂s−∂κ∂b=2τξbs−(ξns+ξbs)μn). |
And we obtain
∂ξbs∂s=κ(div→n+κ)−τ2+(μb+2τ)μn−ξ2bs |
by coefficients of binormal vector fields. Similarly, we get
∂2→b∂s∂b−∂2→b∂b∂s=∂∂s(∂→b∂b)−∂∂b(∂→b∂s). |
Then, we also have
∂∂s(∂→b∂b)−∂∂b(∂→b∂s)=(−∂(ξbs)∂s+κ(div→n+κ)−τ(τ−μn))→t+(−∂(div→n+κ)∂s−∂τ∂b−κξbs)→n. |
We obtain
−∂→b∂bξbs−∂→b∂nμn=(ξ2bs−μn(τ+μb))→t+(ξbs(div→n+κ)−μndiv→b)→n |
by Eq (6). Then, we get
∂(div→n+κ)∂s+∂τ∂b=−(div→n+2κ)ξbs+div→bμn. |
The last three equations can be obtained by similar way to the others.
There exists a normal congruence of surfaces including the s−lines and b−lines if and only if
μn=0. | (17) |
Theorem 5. Gauss-Mainardi-Codazzi equations are obtained as follows:
∂τ∂s+∂κ∂b=−2τξbs, |
∂ξbs∂s=−ξ2bs−τ2+κ(div→n+κ), |
∂(div→n+κ)∂s+∂τ∂b=−ξbs(div→n+2κ). |
Proof. The proof can be stated by using the compatibility conditions of Eqs (10), (11) and (16) in Theorem 4. In the case of μn=0, these equations reduces to Gauss-Mainardi-Codazzi equations for this normal congruence of surfaces.
Corollary 6. In the case of μn=0, since the s−lines and b−lines lie on theconstituent surfaces Ψ, this means that →n isperpendicular to surface. Thus →n parallel to the normalvector field →N of the surfaces Ψ.
Proof. By definitions of the vector fields →t and →b, we obtain
∂Ψ∂s=∂σ∂s=→t and ∂Ψ∂b=∂σ∂b=→b. |
Then, we have
∂Ψ∂s×L∂Ψ∂b=→t×L→b=→n. |
Thus we obtain
→N=∂Ψ∂s×L∂Ψ∂b‖∂Ψ∂s×L∂Ψ∂b‖=→n. |
Remark 7. The one-parameter family of surfaces Ψ, which contain the s−lines and b−lines, are timelike surfaces, since →n is a spacelike vector field.
Theorem 8. The geodesic curvature of b−lines of the surface Ψ is given as follows
kgb=ξbs. |
And s−lines are the geodesics of the surface Ψ.
Proof. It is known that
∂2Ψ∂b2=∂→b∂b=−ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n |
by Eq (3) in Theorem 1. Then we get the geodesic curvatures of b−lines as follows
kgb=⟨∂2Ψ∂b2,→n×L→b⟩L=⟨−ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n,→n×L→b⟩L=⟨−ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n,−→t⟩L=ξbs. |
Similarly, we get
∂2Ψ∂s2=∂2σ∂s2=∂→t∂s=κ→n |
by Eq (1) in Theorem 1. So, we get the geodesic curvatures of s−lines as follows
kgs=⟨∂2Ψ∂s2,→n×L→t⟩L=⟨κ→n,→n×L→t⟩=⟨κ→n,−→b⟩=0. |
This implies that s−lines are the geodesics of the surface Ψ.
Theorem 9. The normal curvatures of b−lines and s−lines of the surface Ψ aregiven as follows
knb=−(div→n+κ),kns=κ |
respectively.
Proof. Again by using the equation
∂2Ψ∂b2=−ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n, |
we obtain the normal curvatures of b−lines as follows
knb=⟨∂2Ψ∂b2,→n⟩L=⟨−ξbs→t−(div→n+κ)→n,→n⟩L=−(div→n+κ). |
And so, the normal curvatures of s−lines are obtained as follows
kns=⟨∂2Ψ∂s2,→n⟩L=⟨κ→n,→n⟩L=κ. |
Theorem 10. The geodesic torsion of b−lines and s−lines of the surface Ψ areobtained as follows
τgb=τ,τgs=−τ, |
respectively.
Proof. We obtain the geodesic torsion of b−lines as follows:
τgb=⟨∂→n∂b,→n×L→b⟩L=⟨τ→t−(div→n+κ)→b,−→t⟩L=τ |
by Eq (3) in Theorem 1. Similarly, the geodesic torsion of s−lines is given as follows
τgs=−⟨∂→n∂s,→n×L→t⟩L=−⟨−κ→t+τ→b,−→b⟩L=−τ |
by Eq (1) in Theorem 1.
Theorem 11. Gaussian and mean curvatures of the surface Ψ are given as follows
K=κ(div→n+κ),H=−divn+2κ2, |
respectively.
Proof. The first fundamental form of the surface Ψ is obtained as
I=⟨dΨ,dΨ⟩L=⟨∂Ψ∂sds+∂Ψ∂bdb,∂Ψ∂sds+∂Ψ∂bdb⟩L=⟨→tds+→bdb,→tds+→bdb⟩L=ds2−db2. |
We get g11=1, g12=0 and g22=−1. Since normal vector field of the surface Ψ is equal to →n, we find the second fundamental form as follows
II=⟨dΨ,d→n⟩L=⟨∂Ψ∂sds+∂Ψ∂bdb,∂→n∂sds+∂→n∂bdb⟩L=⟨→tds+→bdb,(κ→t+τ→b)ds+(τ→t+(div→n+κ→b)db⟩L=−κds2+(div→n+κ)db2. |
We have l11=−κ, l12=0 and l22=div→n+κ. Thus, Gaussian curvature K of the surface Ψ is given
K=l11l22−l212g11g22−g212=−κ(div→n+κ)−1=κ(div→n+κ). |
And the mean curvature H of the surface Ψ is obtained as
H=g11l22−2g12l12+g22l112(g11g22−g212)=(div→n+κ)+κ−2=div→n+2κ−2. |
Corollary 12. If the following equality is satisfied
κ(div→n+κ)=0, |
then the surface Ψ is developable.
Remark 13. We know that Gaussian curvature of the surface Ψ is found as
K=κ(div→n+κ). |
By following equation
∂ξbs∂s=−ξ2bs+κ(div→n+κ), |
we obtain that
K=∂ξbs∂s+ξ2bs. |
If b−lines are geodesics and s−lines are plane curves, then the surface Ψ is developable.
Corollary 14. The surface Ψ is minimal if and only if
div→n=−2κ. |
Corollary 15. The surface Ψ is a NLS surface if and only if κ=1.
Proof. It is easily seen that the equality
∂Ψ∂s×L∂2Ψ∂s2=∂Ψ∂b |
is satisfied if and only if κ=1.
Example 16. Let the surface Ψ=Ψ(s,b) containing the s−lines and b−lines be given as follows
Ψ(s,b)=(12sinh(s+√5b),12cosh(s+√5b),√52s+12b) |
where
∂Ψ∂s(s,b)=(12cosh(s+√5b),12sinh(s+√5b),√52) |
is a unit spacelike vector field. We obtain that
→t(s,b)=(12cosh(s+√5b),12sinh(s+√5b),√52),→n(s,b)=(sinh(s+√5b),cosh(s+√5b),0). |
And we also see that
∂Ψ∂b(s,b)=(√52cosh(s+√5b),√52sinh(s+√5b),12). |
Thus, we get
→b(s,b)=(√52cosh(s+√5b),√52sinh(s+√5b),12). |
Furthermore, we obtain that
κ(s,b)=12,τ(s,b)=√52. |
Then, we also have
ξbs(s,b)=μn(s,b)=0,divn(s,b)=−2 |
which implies that
kns(s,b)=12,τgb(s,b)=√52,τgs(s,b)=−√52. |
Gaussian and mean curvature of the surface Ψ=Ψ(s,b) are obtained as follows
K(s,b)=−54,H(s,b)=1, |
respectively.
This study investigates spacelike curves with spacelike normal vector field by means of anholomonic coordinates on Lorentzian space. Frenet-Serret formulas {→t,→n,→b} of a given spacelike space curve are described which includes eight parameters related to three partial differential equations. It is proved that the curl of tangent vector field has no component in the direction of principal normal vector field. This means that there exists a surface which contains both s−lines and b−lines. For this reason, the expression of this normal congruence is also discussed with intrinsic geometric properties. Finally, an example is stated to explain the obtained results.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
A. W. Marris, S. L. Passman, Vector fields and flows on developable surfaces, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 32 (1969), 29–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253256 doi: 10.1007/BF00253256
![]() |
[2] | O. Bjørgum, T. Godal, On Beltrami vector fields and flows, Universitetet i Bergen, 1951. |
[3] |
A. Yavuz, M. Erdoğdu, Non-lightlike Bertrand W curves: A new approach by system of differential equations for position vector, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 5422–5438. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020348 doi: 10.3934/math.2020348
![]() |
[4] |
M. Erdoğdu, Parallel frame of non-lightlike curves in Minkowski space-time, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 12 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219887815501091 doi: 10.1142/S0219887815501091
![]() |
[5] | A. Yavuz, M. Erdoğdu, A different approach by system of differential equations for the characterization position vector of spacelike curves, Punjab Univ. J. Math., 53 (2021), 231–245. |
[6] |
G. A. Șekerci, A. C. Çöken, C. Ekici, On Darboux rotation axis of lightlike curves, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887816501127 doi: 10.1142/S0219887816501127
![]() |
[7] |
G. Yüca, Kinematics applications of dual transformations, J. Geom. Phys., 163 (2021), 104139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104139 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104139
![]() |
[8] |
Z. Yang, Y. Li, M. Erdoğdu, Y. Zhu, Evolving evolutoids and pedaloids from viewpoints of envelope and singularity theory in Minkowski plane, J. Geom. Phys., 176 (2022), 104513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104513 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104513
![]() |
[9] | C. Rogers, W. K. Schief, Backlund and Darboux transformations: Geometry of modern applications in soliton theory, Cambridge University Press, 2002. |
[10] |
C. Rogers, J. G. Kingston, Nondissipative magneto-hydrodynamic flows with magnetic and velocity field lines orthogonal geodesics, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 26 (1974), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1137/0126015 doi: 10.1137/0126015
![]() |
[11] |
C. Rogers, W. K. Schief, Intrinsic geometry of the NLS equation and its auto-Bäcklund transformation, Stud. Appl. Math., 101 (1998), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9590.00093 doi: 10.1111/1467-9590.00093
![]() |
[12] |
T. Körpinar, R. C. Demirkol, Z. Körpinar, V. Asil, Maxwellian evolution equations along the uniform optical fiber, Optik, 217 (2020), 164561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164561 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164561
![]() |
[13] |
T. Korpinar, R. C. Demirkol, Z. Korpinar, Magnetic helicity and normal electromagnetic vortex filament flows under the influence of Lorentz force in MHD, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821501644 doi: 10.1142/S0219887821501644
![]() |
[14] | G. Vranceanu, Les espaces non holonomes et leurs applications mécaniques, 1936. |
1. | YANLIN LI, AYŞE YAVUZ, MELEK ERDOĞDU, SURFACES WITH VANISHING ABNORMALITY OF NORMAL DIRECTION IN MINKOWSKI SPACE, 2022, 22, 2068-3049, 907, 10.46939/J.Sci.Arts-22.4-a12 |