Processing math: 100%
Research article

On simultaneous characterizations of partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space

  • Received: 16 May 2023 Revised: 21 June 2023 Accepted: 29 June 2023 Published: 13 July 2023
  • MSC : 53A04, 53A05

  • In this study, the partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, which are defined according to the Frenet vectors of non-null space curves, are introduced with extra conditions that guarantee the existence of definite surface normals. First, the requirements of each pair of partner-ruled surfaces to be simultaneously developable and minimal (or maximal for spacelike surfaces) are investigated. The surfaces also simultaneously characterize the asymptotic, geodesic and curvature lines of the parameter curves of these surfaces. Finally, the study provides examples of timelike and spacelike partner-ruled surfaces and includes their graphs.

    Citation: Yanlin Li, Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy. On simultaneous characterizations of partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22256-22273. doi: 10.3934/math.20231135

    Related Papers:

    [1] Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy, Mohammad Nazrul Islam Khan . Simultaneous characterizations of alternative partner-ruled surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8891-8906. doi: 10.3934/math.2025407
    [2] Yanlin Li, Kemal Eren, Kebire Hilal Ayvacı, Soley Ersoy . Simultaneous characterizations of partner ruled surfaces using Flc frame. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20213-20229. doi: 10.3934/math.20221106
    [3] Emad Solouma, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Meraj Ali Khan, Youssef A. A. Lazer . Characterization of imbricate-ruled surfaces via rotation-minimizing Darboux frame in Minkowski 3-space $ \mathrm{E}_1^3 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13028-13042. doi: 10.3934/math.2024635
    [4] Chang Sun, Kaixin Yao, Donghe Pei . Special non-lightlike ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26600-26613. doi: 10.3934/math.20231360
    [5] Özgür Boyacıoğlu Kalkan, Süleyman Şenyurt, Mustafa Bilici, Davut Canlı . Sweeping surfaces generated by involutes of a spacelike curve with a timelike binormal in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 988-1007. doi: 10.3934/math.2025047
    [6] Kemal Eren, Hidayet Huda Kosal . Evolution of space curves and the special ruled surfaces with modified orthogonal frame. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2027-2039. doi: 10.3934/math.2020134
    [7] Ayman Elsharkawy, Clemente Cesarano, Abdelrhman Tawfiq, Abdul Aziz Ismail . The non-linear Schrödinger equation associated with the soliton surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17879-17893. doi: 10.3934/math.2022985
    [8] Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy, Mohammad Nazrul Islam Khan . Novel theorems on constant angle ruled surfaces with Sasai's interpretation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8364-8381. doi: 10.3934/math.2025385
    [9] Emad Solouma, Mohamed Abdelkawy . Family of ruled surfaces generated by equiform Bishop spherical image in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4372-4389. doi: 10.3934/math.2023218
    [10] Nural Yüksel, Burçin Saltık . On inextensible ruled surfaces generated via a curve derived from a curve with constant torsion. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11312-11324. doi: 10.3934/math.2023573
  • In this study, the partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, which are defined according to the Frenet vectors of non-null space curves, are introduced with extra conditions that guarantee the existence of definite surface normals. First, the requirements of each pair of partner-ruled surfaces to be simultaneously developable and minimal (or maximal for spacelike surfaces) are investigated. The surfaces also simultaneously characterize the asymptotic, geodesic and curvature lines of the parameter curves of these surfaces. Finally, the study provides examples of timelike and spacelike partner-ruled surfaces and includes their graphs.



    The surface concept has been researched by many mathematicians, philosophers and scientists for thousands of years over the course of history. In the process, the theory of surfaces has been greatly consolidated through the development of differential geometry. As well as Gauss, Riemann and Poincaré being the pioneers in this research area, Monge also made some significant contributions to the study of surfaces. Based on Monge's approach, surfaces are represented as graphs of functions of two variables. This approach has deeply influenced the progress of the theory of surfaces and their application areas in the 19th and 20th centuries and is still popular. Guggenheimer (1963) and Hoschek (1971) examined the ruled surfaces from different perspectives with some significant contributions to differential geometry. A ruled surface is a surface that can be generated by moving a straight line along a curve in space [1,2]. Ruled surfaces are preferred to study since they have relatively simple structures and allow us to interpret more complex surfaces. The classification of ruled surfaces, properties related to the base curve, geodesics, shape operators of surfaces and the study of developable and non-developable ruled surfaces are among the major areas of research on ruled surfaces. The survey of ruled surfaces in Minkowski space shows similar characteristics in Euclidean space, but there are exciting differences due to the structure of Minkowski space. Since the characterization of ruled surfaces depends on the base curve and the direction, the geometry of ruled surfaces in Minkowski space is more complex than that in Euclidean space. As it is known, the ruled surfaces can be classified as developable and non-developable ones. The developable ruled surfaces are ruled surfaces whose tangent planes are the same along the main lines. A classic result in differential geometry states that the elements of developable ruled surfaces can be expressed as cylinders, cones and tangent surfaces. This is valid for both Euclidean and Minkowski spaces. Naturally, degenerate tangent planes are excluded from this rule. Generally, the first fundamental form must be non-degenerate for a surface in Minkowski space. A spacelike surface is obtained if the first fundamental form is positively defined. If the first fundamental form is indefinite, a timelike surface is constructed. The surfaces that fit into the curvature situations where the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature are constant, or one of them is constant, have been studied in different studies [3,4,5,6]. Rich data on ruled surfaces can be found in detail in [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Recently, Li et al. investigated partner-ruled surfaces formed from polynomial curves with the Flc frame [16], and Soukaina also studied the developability of partner-ruled surfaces using the Darboux frame simultaneously [17].

    In this study, partner-ruled surfaces generated by the vectors of the Frenet frame of non-null space curves in Minkowski 3-space are introduced. Then, conditions are simultaneously provided for each partner-ruled surface to be developable or minimal (or maximal for spacelike surfaces), depending on the curvatures of the base curve. These conditions are also associated with the characterizations of parametric curves such as asymptotic, geodesic or curvature lines. At the end of the study, examples related to partner-ruled surfaces are provided, and the graphics of the surfaces are presented using the MATLAB R2023a program.

    The Minkowski 3-space R31 is given by the Lorentzian inner product

    x,y=x1y1+x2y2+x3y3,

    where x=(x1,x2,x3),y=(y1,y2,y3)R3. The norm of arbitrary vector xR31 is x=|x,x|. Also, the vector product of any vectors x=(x1,x2,x3) and y=(y1,y2,y3) in R31 is defined by

    x×y=|e1e2e3x1x2x3y1y2y3|=(x3y2x2y3,x1y3x3y1,x1y2x2y1),

    where e1×e2=e3,e2×e3=e1,e3×e1=e2. The character of an arbitrary vector xR31 is defined as follows:

    (i) if x,x>0 or x=0 then x is a spacelike vector,

    (ii) if x,x<0, then x is a timelike vector,

    (iii) if x,x=0, x0, then x is a lightlike (or null) vector.

    Let α:IR be a regular unit speed non-null curve parametrized by arc-length s in Minkowski 3-space. If the vectors T, N and B denote the tangent, principal normal and binormal unit vectors at any point α(s) of the non-null curve α, respectively. Then the Frenet formulas are given

    [TNB]s=[0κ0ε1ε2κ0τ0ε2ε3τ0][TNB], (2.1)

    where T,T=ε1, N,N=ε2 and B,B=ε3. Also, N×T=ε3B, B×N=ε1T, T×B=ε2N and ε1ε2ε3=1. Here κ(s) and τ(s) are the curvature and the torsion of the curve α, respectively, s is the arc-length of the non-null curve [18,19]. Let {T,N,B} be the moving frame of α satisfying the following conditions:

    (i) ε1=1,ε2=1,ε3=1 for the timelike curve,

    (ii) ε1=1,ε2=1,ε3=1 for the spacelike curve with timelike normal,

    (iii) ε1=1,ε2=1,ε3=1 for the spacelike curve with timelike binormal.

    In Minkowski 3-space R31, a ruled surface M is a regular surface that is parameterized as:

    φ:I×RR31 (s,v)φ(s,v)=α(s)+vr(s),

    where α(s) and r(s) are known as base and director curves of a ruled surface, respectively. By restricting ourselves to the non-null cases, classification of the character of a ruled surface φ(s,v) can be formed according to whether the base curve α and the director curve r are timelike or spacelike curves [8,9];

    (i) if the curve α is timelike and the curve r is spacelike, the ruled surface φ(s,v) indicates a timelike surface,

    (ii) if the curve α is spacelike and the curve r is spacelike, the ruled surface φ(s,v) indicates a spacelike surface,

    (iii) if the curve α is spacelike and the curve r is timelike, the ruled surface φ(s,v) indicates a timelike surface.

    Let φ(s,v) be a ruled surface in R31, then the various quantities associated with the ruled surface are given as follows:

    (i) The unit normal vector field: U=φs×φvφs×φv, where φs=φs and φv=φv.

    (ii) First fundamental form: I=Eds2+2Fdsdv+Gdv2, where the coefficients of I are

    E=φs,φs,F=φs,φv,G=φv,φv. (2.2)

    (iii) Second fundamental form: II=eds2+2fdsdv+gdv2, where the coefficients of II are

    e=φss,U,f=φsv,U,g=φvv,U. (2.3)

    Moreover, the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of the surface φ(s,v) are defined by

    K=εegf2EGF2andH=εEg2Ef+Ge2(EGF2), (2.4)

    respectively, and ε=1(=1) for timelike (spacelike) surfaces. Also, the surfaces with vanishing Gaussian curvature are called developable and any surfaces with vanishing mean curvature are called minimal (or maximal for spacelike surfaces) [8,9,19].

    Two ruling lines generate the partner-ruled surfaces if they simultaneously move along their respective curves. On the other hand, it is a usual approach to examine the Frenet vectors and their relationships in the field of differential geometry since the Frenet vectors provide a framework for deep insight into the geometry of curves. In these regards, by considering the tangent, principal normal and binormal vectors of the Frenet frame along a differentiable unit speed non-null space curve parametrized by arc-length as ruling lines of partner-ruled surfaces, we study the following surfaces couples in Minkowski 3-space. These surfaces can be classified according to the causal characters of the non-null base curve, as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Surface classification based on causal features of non zero basis curve.
    Base curve α TN-partner-ruled surface TB-partner-ruled surface NB-partner-ruled surface
    Timelike Timelike Timelike Spacelike
    Spacelike with timelike normal Timelike Spacelike Timelike
    Spacelike with timelike binormal Spacelike Timelike Timelike

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Definition 3.1. Let α:IR be a differentiable unit speed non-null space curve parametrized by arc-length s in R31 with Frenet elements {T,N,B,κ,τ} such that τ(s)κ(s) and τ(s)vκ(s) for all sI. The two ruled surfaces represented by

    {φTN(s,v)=T(s)+vN(s),φNT(s,v)=N(s)+vT(s), (3.1)

    are called TN-partner-ruled surfaces with respect to the Frenet frame of the space curve in R31.

    Theorem 3.1. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously developable and minimal (maximal) surfaces if and only if the curve α is a non-null planar curve.

    Proof. By differentiating the first equation in equation set Eq (3.1) in terms of s and v, respectively and applying the Frenet formulas given by Eq (2.1), we obtain

    (φTN)s=ε3vκT+κN+vτB,(φTN)v=N. (3.2)

    By the cross product of the vectors (φTN)s and (φTN)v described in Eq (3.2), we determine the normal vector field of the surface φTN as follows:

    UTN=(φTN)s×(φTN)v(φTN)s×(φTN)v=ε1τTκB|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|. (3.3)

    Here the condition τκ guarantees ε1τ2+ε3κ20. By taking the scalar product of both vectors in Eq (3.2) using Eq (2.2), we derive the components of the first fundamental form of the ruled surface φTN as follows:

    ETN=ε2κ2+v2(ε1κ2+ε2τ2),FTN=ε2κ,GTN=ε2. (3.4)

    By differentiating Eq (3.2) in terms of s and v, we get

    (φTN)ss=ε3(κ2+vκ)T+(ε3vκ2+ε1vτ2+κ)N+(κτ+vτ)B,(φTN)sv=ε3κT+τB,(φTN)vv=0.

    By taking the scalar product of the last equation derived in the previous step with the normal vector field given in Eq (3.3) using Eq (2.3), we can determine the components of the second fundamental form of the ruled surface φTN as follows:

    eTN=vε3(τκκτ)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|,fTN=0,gTN=0. (3.5)

    The Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of the ruled surface are found by substituting Eqs (3.4) and (3.5) into Eq (2.4) and evaluating the resulting expression. These give us the following expressions for the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of the ruled surface φTN:

    KTN=0,HTN=εε3(κττκ)2v(ε1κ2+ε3τ2)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|. (3.6)

    On the other hand, by differentiating the second equation in equation set Eq (3.1) with respect to s and v, respectively, and applying the Frenet frame derivative formulas, we get

    (φNT)s=ε3κT+vκN+τB,(φNT)v=T. (3.7)

    By determining the cross-product of the partial derivatives of the surface described in Eq (3.7), we determine the normal vector field of the surface φNT as follows:

    UNT=(φNT)s×(φNT)v(φNT)s×(φNT)v=ε2τN+vε3κB|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|. (3.8)

    Here the condition τvκ requires ε2τ2+ε3v2κ20. By applying the scalar product for both vectors in Eq (3.8), we have the components of the first fundamental form of the ruled surface φNT as follows:

    ENT=(v2ε2+ε1)κ2+ε3τ2,FNT=ε2κ,GNT=ε1. (3.9)

    By differentiating Eq (3.7) with respect to s and v, we have

    (φNT)ss=ε3(vκ2+κ)T+(ε3κ2+ε1τ2+vκ)N+(vκτ+τ)B,(φNT)sv=κN,(φNT)vv=0.

    We find the components of the second fundamental form of the ruled surface φNT by taking the scalar product of the last equation obtained in the previous step with the normal vector field given in Eq (3.8). This yields the following expression for the components of the second fundamental form:

    eNT=τ(ε3κ2+ε1τ2+vκ)+vκ(vκτ+τ)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|,fNT=κτ|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|,gNT=0. (3.10)

    Thus, by substituting Eqs (3.9) and (3.10) into Eq (2.4), the Gaussian curvature KNT and the mean curvature HNT of the ruled surface φNT are given by

    KNT=εκ2τ2(ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|,HNT=ε2ε2κ2ττ3ε1((v2+ε3)κ2τ+vτκvκτ)2(ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|. (3.11)

    Therefore, based on Eqs (3.6) and (3.11), we can conclude that the TN-partner-ruled surfaces satisfy the conditions stated in the hypothesis and they are simultaneously developable and minimal (maximal) surfaces.

    Theorem 3.2. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the s-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) not geodesics,

    (ii) asymptotics if τ=0 and κ0.

    Proof. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31.

    (i) The cross products of second partial derivatives of φTN and φNT with the normal vector fields of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are found as:

    (φTN)ss×UTN=(κ(v(ε2κ2+τ2)+ε1κ)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|T+ε3(κ(κ+τ)+v(κ+τ))|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|N+τ(v(ε1κ2+ε3τ2)ε2κ)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|B)

    and

    (φNT)ss×UNT=(vε2κ(ε3κ2+ε1τ2+vκ)+ε3τ(vκτ+τ)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|T+ε2vκ(vκ2+κ)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|N+ε2τ(vκ2+κ)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|B).

    Since (φTN)ss×UTN0 and (φNT)ss×UNT0, s-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces simultaneously are not geodesic.

    (ii) The scalar products of second partial derivatives of φTN and φNT with the normal vector fields of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are given by

    (φTN)ss,UTN=ε3v(τκκτ)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|

    and

    (φNT)ss,UNT=τ(ε3κ2+ε1τ2+vκ)+vκ(vκτ+τ)|ε2τ2+ε3v2κ2|.

    From here, if τ=0 and κ0, then (φTN)ss,UTN=0 and (φNT)ss,UNT=0. So, we can say that s-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously asymptotic if τ=0 and κ0.

    Theorem 3.3. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the v-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) geodesics,

    (ii) asymptotic curves.

    Proof. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31.

    (i) Since (φTN)vv×UTN=0 and (φNT)vv×UNT=0, the v-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces simultaneously are geodesics.

    (ii) Since (φTN)vv,UTN=0 and (φNT)vv,UNT=0, the v-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces simultaneously asymptotic curves.

    Theorem 3.4. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the s and v-parameter curves of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously lines of curvature if and only if κ=0 and τ0.

    Proof. Let φTN and φNT be a pair of the TN-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, From Eqs (3.4), (3.5), (3.9) and (3.10), we have

    FTN=fTN=FNT=fNT=0,

    for κ=0 and τ0, thus, the proof is completed.

    Definition 3.2. Let α:IR be a differentiable unit speed non-null space curve parametrized by arc-length s in R31 with Frenet elements {T,N,B,κ,τ} such that κ(s)ε1vτ(s) and τ(s)ε1v for all sI. The two ruled surfaces represented by

    φTB(s,v)=T(s)+vB(s),φBT(s,v)=B(s)+vT(s) (3.12)

    are called TB-partner-ruled surfaces with respect to the Frenet frame of the curve α in R31.

    Theorem 3.5. Let the surfaces φTB and φBT be a TB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the TB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) developable surfaces,

    (ii) not minimal (maximal) surfaces.

    Proof. By differentiating the first equation of Eq (3.12) with respect to s and v, respectively, and using Eq (2.1), one can obtain

    (φTB)s=(κ+ε1vτ)N,(φTB)v=B. (3.13)

    Then, by considering the cross product of the partial derivatives of the surface φTB given by Eq (3.13), the normal vector field of the surface φTB is found as follows:

    UTB=(φTB)s×(φTB)v(φTB)s×(φTB)v=(ε1κvτ)|ε1κ+vτ|T=±T. (3.14)

    Here κε1vτ satisfies ε1κ+vτ0. By applying the scalar product for both vectors in Eq (3.13), we have the components of the first fundamental form of the ruled surface φTB as follows:

    ETB=ε2(κ+ε1vτ)2,FTB=0,GTB=ε3. (3.15)

    By differentiating Eq (3.13) in terms of s and v, we have

    (φTB)ss=(ε3κ2ε2vκτ)T+(κ+ε1vτ)N+(κτ+ε1vτ2)B,(φTB)sv=ε1τN,(φTB)vv=0,

    and taking the scalar product of the last equation with the normal vector field found as Eq (3.14), we have the component of the second fundamental form of the ruled surface φTB as follows:

    eTB=ε1κ(vτ+ε1κ)(ε3κvε2τ)|ε1κ+vτ|,fTB=0,gTB=0. (3.16)

    Thus, by substituting Eqs (3.15) and (3.16) into Eq (2.4), the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of the ruled surface φTB are given by

    KTB=0,HTB=ε.κ(ε3κε2vτ)2ε2|ε1κ+vτ|(κ+ε1vτ). (3.17)

    On the other hand, by differentiating the second equation of Eq (3.12) with respect to s and v, respectively, and using the Frenet frame derivative formulae, we obtain:

    (φBT)s=(vκ+ε1τ)N,(φBT)v=T. (3.18)

    Then, by considering the cross product of the partial derivatives of the surface φBT given by Eq (3.18), the normal vector field of the surface φBT is found as:

    UBT=(φBT)s×(φBT)v(φBT)s×(φBT)v=ε3(vκ+ε1τ)|vκ+ε1τ|B=ε3B. (3.19)

    Here τε1vκ guarantees vκ+ε1τ0. By applying the scalar product for both vectors in Eq (3.18), we have the components of the first fundamental form of the ruled surface φBT as follows:

    EBT=ε2(vκ+ε1τ)2,FBT=0,GBT=ε1. (3.20)

    By differentiating Eq (3.18) with respect to s and v, we get

    (φBT)ss=(ε3vκ2ε2κτ)T+(vκ+ε1τ)N+(vκτ+ε1τ2)B,(φBT)sv=κN,(φBT)vv=0,

    and from the scalar product of the last equations with the normal vector field given by Eq (3.19), we have the component of the second fundamental form of the ruled surface φBT as follows:

    eBT=τ(vκ+ε1τ)2|vκ+ε1τ|,fBT=0,gBT=0. (3.21)

    So, by substituting Eqs (3.20) and (3.21) into Eq (2.4), the Gaussian curvature KBT and the mean curvature HBT of the ruled surface φBT are given by

    KBT=0,HBT=ετ2ε2|vκ+ε1τ|. (3.22)

    Consequently, from Eqs (3.17) and (3.22), it can easily be said that the TB-partner-ruled surfaces simultaneously can be developable but not minimal (maximal) surfaces.

    In the same way, as for TN-partner ruled surfaces, we can prove the following three theorems:

    Theorem 3.6. Let φTB and φBT be a pair of the TB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then s-parameter curves of the TB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) not geodesics,

    (ii) not asymptotic curves.

    Theorem 3.7. Let φTB and φBT be a pair of the TB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the v-parameter curves of the BT-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) geodesics,

    (ii) asymptotic curves.

    Theorem 3.8. Let φTB and φBT be a pair of the TB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the s and v-parameter curves of TB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously lines of curvature.

    Definition 3.3. Let α:IR be a differentiable unit speed non-null space curve parametrized by arc-length s in R31 with Frenet elements {T,N,B,κ,τ} such that κ(s)vτ(s) and κ(s)τ(s) for all sI. The two ruled surfaces defined by

    {φNB(s,v)=N(s)+vB(s),φBN(s,v)=B(s)+vN(s) (3.23)

    are called NB-partner-ruled surfaces with respect to the Frenet frame of the curve α in R31.

    Theorem 3.9. Let φNB and φBN be a pair of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the NB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) developable surfaces if and only if κ=0 or τ=0,

    (ii) minimal (maximal) surfaces if and only if κ=0.

    Proof. By differentiating the first equation of Eq (3.23) with respect to s and v, respectively, and using Frenet frame derivative formulae, one can obtain

    (φNB)s=ε3κT+ε1vτN+τB,(φNB)v=B. (3.24)

    Then, by considering the partial derivatives of the surface φNB given by Eq (3.24) and the cross product of both vectors, the normal vector field of the surface φNB is found as:

    UNB=(φNB)s×(φNB)v(φNB)s×(φNB)v=vτTε1κN|ε1v2τ2+ε2κ2|. (3.25)

    Here κvτ satisfies ε1v2τ2+ε2κ20. By applying the scalar product for both vectors in Eq (3.24), we have the components of the first fundamental form of the ruled surface φNB as follows:

    ENB=ε1κ2+(ε3+ε2v2)τ2,FNB=ε3τ,GNB=ε3. (3.26)

    By differentiating Eq (3.24) in terms of s and v, we get

    (φNB)ss=(ε2vκτ+ε3κ)T+(ε3κ2+ε1τ2+ε1vτ)N+(ε1vτ2+τ)B,(φNB)sv=ε1τN,(φNB)vv=0,

    and from the scalar product of the last equations with the normal vector field given by Eq (3.25), we have the component of the second fundamental form of the ruled surface φNB as follows:

    eNB=vτ(ε3vκτ+ε2κ)+κ(κ2ε2(τ2+vτ))|ε1v2τ2+ε2κ2|,fNB=ε2κτ|ε1v2τ2+ε2κ2|,gNB=0. (3.27)

    Thus, by substituting Eqs (3.26) and (3.27) into Eq (2.4), the Gaussian curvature KNB and the mean curvature HNB of the ruled surface φNB are given by

    KNB=εκ2τ2ε3|ε1v2τ2+ε2κ2|(ε1κ2+ε2v2τ2),HNB=εε2(v(κττκ)+κτ2)ε2κτ2(ε1v22)κ32|ε1v2τ2+ε2κ2|(ε1κ2+ε2v2τ2). (3.28)

    On the other hand, by differentiating the second equation of Eq (3.23) with respect to s and v, respectively, and using the Frenet frame derivative formulae, we find

    (φBN)s=vε3κT+ε1τN+vτB,(φBN)v=N. (3.29)

    Then, by considering the partial derivatives of the surface φBN given by Eq (3.29) and the cross product of both vectors, the normal vector field of the surface φBN is found as follows:

    UBN=(φBN)s×(φBN)v(φBN)s×(φBN)v=ε1τTκB|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|. (3.30)

    Here κτ satisfies ε1τ2+ε3κ20. By applying the scalar product for both vectors in Eq (3.30), we have the components of the first fundamental form of the ruled surface φBN as follows:

    EBN=ε1v2κ2+(ε3v2+ε2)τ2,FBN=ε3τ,GBN=ε2. (3.31)

    By differentiating Eq (3.29) in terms of s and v, we have

    (φBN)ss=(ε2κτ+ε3vκ)T+(ε3vκ2+ε1vτ2+ε1τ)N+(ε1τ2+vτ)B,(φBN)sv=ε3κT+τB,(φBN)vv=0,

    and taking the scalar product of the last equations with the normal vector field Eq (3.30), we have the component of the second fundamental form of the ruled surface φBN as follows:

    eBN=τ(ε2κτ+ε3κ)ε3κ(ε1τ2+vτ)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|,fBN=0,gBN=0. (3.32)

    Thus, by substituting Eqs (3.31) and (3.32) into Eq (2.4), the Gaussian curvature KBN and the mean curvature HBN of the ruled surface φBN is given by

    K=0,HBN=εε1(κττκ)2v(ε1τ2+ε3κ2)|ε1τ2+ε3κ2|. (3.33)

    Consequently, from Eqs (3.28) and (3.33), it can easily be implied that the NB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously developable and minimal (maximal) surfaces under the conditions stated in the hypothesis.

    In the same way, as for TN-partner ruled surfaces, we can prove the following three theorems:

    Theorem 3.10. Let φNB and φBN be a pair of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the s-parameter curves of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) not geodesics,

    (ii) asymptotics if and only if κ=0 and τ0.

    Theorem 3.11. Let φNB and φBN be a pair of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the v-parameter curves of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously

    (i) geodesics,

    (ii) asymptotics curve.

    Theorem 3.12. Let φNB and φBN be a pair of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces in R31, then the s and v-parameter curves of the NB-partner-ruled surfaces are simultaneously are a line of curvature if and only if τ=0 and κ0.

    In this section, three examples are given according to cases of the curve being timelike or spacelike, and graphs of these examples are drawn.

    Example 4.1. Let us consider a timelike curve parameterized as

    α(s)=(59sinh(3s),59cosh(3s),43s).

    Then, the Frenet vectors of α are given by

    T(s)=(53cosh(3s),53sinh(3s),43),N(s)=(sinh(3s),cosh(3s),0),B(s)=(43cosh(3s),43sinh(3s),53).

    Thus, the partner-ruled surfaces with the parametric forms

    {φTN=(53cosh(3s)vsinh(3s),vcosh(3s)53sinh(3s),43),φNT=(53vcosh(3s)sinh(3s),cosh(3s)53vsinh(3s),4v3),{φTB=(13(5+4v)cosh(3s),13(5+4v)sinh(3s),13(4+5v)),φBT=(13(4+5v)cosh(3s),13(4+5v)sinh(3s),13(5+4v)),{φNB=(43vcosh(3s)sinh(3s),cosh(3s)43vsinh(3s),5v3),φBN=(43cosh(3s)vsinh(3s),vcosh(3s)43sinh(3s),53)

    are drawn in Figure 1, respectively.

    Figure 1.  The partner-ruled surfaces generated by the timelike curve α for s=[π/8,π/8] and v=[5,5].

    Example 4.2. Let us consider a spacelike curve with timelike normal parameterized as

    α(s)=12(cosh(s),sinh(s),s).

    Then, the Frenet vectors of the spacelike curve with timelike normal α are given by

    T(s)=12(sinh(s),cosh(s),1),N(s)=(cosh(s),sinh(s),0),B(s)=12(sinh(s),cosh(s),1).

    Thus, the graphs of the partner-ruled surfaces with the parametric forms

    {φTN=(vcosh(s)+sinh(s)2,cosh(s)2+vsinh(s),12),φNT=(cosh(s)+vsinh(s)2,vcosh(s)2+sinh(s),v2),{φTB=((1+v)sinh(s)2,(1+v)cosh(s)2,1+v2),φBT=((1+v)sinh(s)2,(1+v)cosh(s)2,1+v2),{φNB=(cosh(s)+vsinh(s)2,vcosh(s)2+sinh(s),v2),φBN=(vcosh(s)+sinh(s)2,cosh(s)2+vsinh(s),12)

    are given in Figure 2, respectively.

    Figure 2.  The partner-ruled surfaces generated by the spacelike with timeline normal curve with s=[1,1] and v=[10,10].

    Example 4.3. Let us consider a spacelike curve with timelike binormal parameterized as

    α(s)=(s,ssin(ln(s)),scos(ln(s))).

    Then, the Frenet vectors of the spacelike curve with timelike binormal α are given by

    T(s)=(1,cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s)),cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s))),N(s)=12(0,cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s)),cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s))),B(s)=12(22,cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s)),cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s))).

    Thus, the parametric forms of the partner-ruled surfaces are given as follows:

    {φTN=(1,cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s))+v(cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s)))2cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s))v(cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s)))2),φNT=(u,u(cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s)))+cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s))2+u(cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s)))cos(ln(s))+ssin(ln(s))2),
    {φTB=(1+2v,12(2+2v)(cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s)))12(2+2v)(cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s)))),φBT=(2+v,12(2+2v)(cos(ln(s))+sin(ln(s)))12(2+2v)(cos(ln(s))sin(ln(s)))),
    {φNB=(2v,(1+v)cos(ln(s))+(1+v)sin(ln(s))2(1+v)cos(ln(s))(1+v)sin(ln(s))2),φBN=(2,(1+v)cos(ln(s))+(1v)sin(ln(s))2(1v)cos(ln(s))(1+v)sin(ln(s))2)

    and their graphics are drawn in Figure 3, respectively.

    Figure 3.  The partner-ruled surfaces generated by the spacelike with timelike binormal curve with s=[1,10] and v=[10,10].

    In this paper, the invariants of the partner-ruled surfaces formed by tangent, normal and binormal vector fields of non-null space curves simultaneously have been presented in Minkowski 3-space. As it is recalled, two ruling lines generate the partner-ruled surfaces if they simultaneously move along their respective curves. The simultaneous characterizations of such couples of surfaces can provide insights into the surface theory in Minkowski space. This comprehensive knowledge may lead to the development of surfaces of the dynamics of cosmic objects. With this motivation, some characterizations of the parameter curves have been examined. Examples of these surfaces have been given, and their graphics have been drawn. In future research, we will delve into the practical applications of our main discoveries by integrating concepts from singularity theory, submanifold theory, and other relevant results in [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. These integrations offer promising avenues for future investigation within this article.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12101168), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LQ22A010014).

    We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments from the editor and the anonymous referees.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] H. Guggenheimer, Differential geometry, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
    [2] J. Hoschek, Liniengeometrie, Zürich: Bibliographisches Institute, 1971.
    [3] J. Hano, K. Nomizu, Surfaces of revolution with constant mean curvature in Lorentz-Minkowski space, Tohoku Math. J., 36 (1984), 427–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178228808 doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178228808
    [4] R. Lopez, Surfaces of constant Gauss curvature in Lorentz-Minkowski space, Rocky Mountain J. Math., 33 (2003), 971–993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1216/rmjm/1181069938 doi: 10.1216/rmjm/1181069938
    [5] R. Lopez, Timelike surfaces with constant mean curvature in Lorentz three-space, Tohoku Math. J., 52 (2000), 515–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178207753 doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178207753
    [6] W. Sodsiri, Ruled surfaces of Weingarten type in Minkowski 3-space, Ph. D Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2005.
    [7] K. Akutagawa, S. Nishikawa, The Gauss map and spacelike surfaces with prescribed mean curvature in Minkowski 3-space, Tohoku Math. J., 42 (1990), 67–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1178227694 doi: 10.2748/tmj/1178227694
    [8] A. Turgut, H. Hacısaliho˜glu, Timelike ruled surfaces in the Minkowski 3-space-Ⅱ, Turk. J. Math., 22 (1998), 33–46.
    [9] A. Turgut, H. Hacısaliho˜glu, Spacelike ruled surfaces in the Minkowski 3-space, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ., 46 (1997), 83–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/Commua1_0000000427 doi: 10.1501/Commua1_0000000427
    [10] E. Özyılmaz, Y. Yaylı, On the closed motions and closed space-like ruled surfaces, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ., 49 (2000), 49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/Commua1_0000000378 doi: 10.1501/Commua1_0000000378
    [11] Y. Yaylı, On the motion of the Frenet vectors and spacelike ruled surfaces in the Minkowski 3-Space, Math. Comput. Appl., 5 (2000), 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mca5010049 doi: 10.3390/mca5010049
    [12] I. Van de Woestijne, Minimal surfaces of the 3-dimensional Minkowski space, In: Geometry and topology of submanifolds, II, Singapore: Word Scientific Publishing, 1999,344–369.
    [13] Y. Li, D. Pei, Evolutes of dual spherical curves for ruled surfaces, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 3005–3015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.3748 doi: 10.1002/mma.3748
    [14] S. Şenyurt, S. Gür, Spacelike surface geometry, Int. J. Geom. Methods M., 14 (2017), 1750118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219887817501183 doi: 10.1142/S0219887817501183
    [15] S. Gür Mazlum, Geometric properties of timelike surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski 3-space, Filomat, 37 (2023), 5735–5749. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FIL2317735G doi: 10.2298/FIL2317735G
    [16] Y. Li, K. Eren, K. Ayvacı, S. Ersoy, Simultaneous characterizations of partner-ruled surfaces using Flc frame, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 20213–20229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.20221106 doi: 10.3934/math.20221106
    [17] O. Soukaina, Simultaneous developability of partner-ruled surfaces according to Darboux frame in E3, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2021 (2021), 3151501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3151501 doi: 10.1155/2021/3151501
    [18] J. Choi, Y. Kim, A. Ali, Some associated curves of Frenet non-lightlike curves in E31, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 394 (2012), 712–723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.063 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.063
    [19] R. Lopez, Differential geometry of curves and surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski space, Int. Electron. J. Geom., 7 (2014), 44–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.36890/iejg.594497 doi: 10.36890/iejg.594497
    [20] Y. Li, M. Erdogdu, A. Yavuz, Differential geometric approach of Betchov-Da Rios soliton equation, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 52 (2023), 114–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1052831 doi: 10.15672/hujms.1052831
    [21] Y. Li, K. Eren, K. Ayvacı, S. Ersoy, The developable surfaces with pointwise 1-type Gauss map of Frenet type framed base curves in Euclidean 3-space, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 2226–2239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023115 doi: 10.3934/math.2023115
    [22] Y. Li, Z. Chen, S. Nazra, R. Abdel-Baky, Singularities for timelike developable surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 277. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15020277 doi: 10.3390/sym15020277
    [23] Y. Li, M. Aldossary, R. Abdel-Baky, Spacelike circular surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15010173 doi: 10.3390/sym15010173
    [24] Y. Li, A. Abdel-Salam, M. Khalifa Saad, Primitivoids of curves in Minkowski plane, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 2386–2406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023123 doi: 10.3934/math.2023123
    [25] Y. Li, O. Tuncer, On (contra)pedals and (anti)orthotomics of frontals in de Sitter 2-space, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 11157–11171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.9173 doi: 10.1002/mma.9173
    [26] Y. Li, A. Abolarinwa, A. Alkhaldi, A. Ali, Some inequalities of Hardy type related to Witten-Laplace operator on smooth metric measure spaces, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 4580. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10234580 doi: 10.3390/math10234580
    [27] Y. Li, A. Alkhaldi, A. Ali, R. Abdel-Baky, M. Khalifa Saad, Investigation of ruled surfaces and their singularities according to Blaschke frame in Euclidean 3-space, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 13875–13888. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023709 doi: 10.3934/math.2023709
    [28] Y. Li, D. Ganguly, Kenmotsu metric as conformal η-Ricci soliton, Mediterr. J. Math., 20 (2023), 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00009-023-02396-0 doi: 10.1007/s00009-023-02396-0
    [29] Y. Li, S. Srivastava, F. Mofarreh, A. Kumar, A. Ali, Ricci soliton of CR-warped product manifolds and their classifications, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 976. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15050976 doi: 10.3390/sym15050976
    [30] Y. Li, P. Laurian-Ioan, L. Alqahtani, A. Alkhaldi, A. Ali, Zermelo's navigation problem for some special surfaces of rotation, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 16278–16290. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023833 doi: 10.3934/math.2023833
    [31] Y. Li, A. Çalişkan, Quaternionic shape operator and rotation matrix on ruled surfaces, Axioms, 12 (2023), 486. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/axioms12050486 doi: 10.3390/axioms12050486
    [32] Y. Li, A. Gezer, E. Karakaş, Some notes on the tangent bundle with a Ricci quarter-symmetric metric connection, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 17335–17353. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023886 doi: 10.3934/math.2023886
    [33] Y. Li, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Azami, A. Saha, S. Hui, Harnack estimation for nonlinear, weighted, heat-type equation along geometric flow and applications, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 2516. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math11112516 doi: 10.3390/math11112516
    [34] Y. Li, H. Kumara, M. Siddesha, D. Naik, Characterization of Ricci almost soliton on Lorentzian manifolds, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 1175. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15061175 doi: 10.3390/sym15061175
    [35] Y. Li, S. Gür Mazlum, S. Şenyurt, The Darboux trihedrons of timelike surfaces in the Lorentzian 3-space, Int. J. Geom. Methods M., 20 (2023), 2350030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219887823500305 doi: 10.1142/S0219887823500305
    [36] S. Gür Mazlum, S. Şenyurt, L. Grilli, The invariants of dual parallel equidistant ruled surfaces, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15010206 doi: 10.3390/sym15010206
    [37] S. Gür Mazlum, S. Şenyurt, L. Grilli, The dual expression of parallel equidistant ruled surfaces in Euclidean 3-space, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym14051062 doi: 10.3390/sym14051062
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yanlin Li, Manish Kumar Gupta, Suman Sharma, Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, On Ricci Curvature of a Homogeneous Generalized Matsumoto Finsler Space, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 3365, 10.3390/math11153365
    2. Mohammad Nazrul Islam Khan, Fatemah Mofarreh, Abdul Haseeb, Mohit Saxena, Certain Results on the Lifts from an LP-Sasakian Manifold to Its Tangent Bundle Associated with a Quarter-Symmetric Metric Connection, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1553, 10.3390/sym15081553
    3. Yanlin Li, Fatemah Mofarreh, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Kinematic-geometry of a line trajectory and the invariants of the axodes, 2023, 56, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2022-0252
    4. Esmaeil Peyghan, Davood Seifipour, Ion Mihai, On the Geometry of Kobayashi–Nomizu Type and Yano Type Connections on the Tangent Bundle with Sasaki Metric, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 3865, 10.3390/math11183865
    5. Shehzadi Salma Kanwal, Naveed Yaqoob, Nabilah Abughazalah, Muhammad Gulistan, On Cyclic LA-Hypergroups, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1668, 10.3390/sym15091668
    6. Sahar H. Nazra, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, A Surface Pencil with Bertrand Curves as Joint Curvature Lines in Euclidean Three-Space, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1986, 10.3390/sym15111986
    7. Esra Erkan, Concircular Vector Fields on Radical Anti-Invariant Lightlike Hypersurfaces of Almost Product-like Statistical Manifolds, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1531, 10.3390/sym15081531
    8. Yanlin Li, Mahmut Mak, Framed Natural Mates of Framed Curves in Euclidean 3-Space, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 3571, 10.3390/math11163571
    9. Ali H. Hakami, Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Significance of Solitonic Fibers in Riemannian Submersions and Some Number Theoretic Applications, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1841, 10.3390/sym15101841
    10. Yanlin Li, Erhan Güler, A Hypersurfaces of Revolution Family in the Five-Dimensional Pseudo-Euclidean Space E25, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 3427, 10.3390/math11153427
    11. Yanlin Li, Dhriti Sundar Patra, Nadia Alluhaibi, Fatemah Mofarreh, Akram Ali, Geometric classifications of k-almost Ricci solitons admitting paracontact metrices, 2023, 21, 2391-5455, 10.1515/math-2022-0610
    12. Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Meraj Ali Khan, Mohammad Shuaib, Qingkai Zhao, Homology of Warped Product Semi-Invariant Submanifolds of a Sasakian Space Form with Semisymmetric Metric Connection, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/5035740
    13. Nadia Alluhaibi, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Surface Pencil Couple with Bertrand Couple as Joint Principal Curves in Galilean 3-Space, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 1022, 10.3390/axioms12111022
    14. Meraj Ali Khan, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Foued Aloui, Shyamal Kumar Hui, Contact CR-Warped Product Submanifold of a Sasakian Space Form with a Semi-Symmetric Metric Connection, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 190, 10.3390/sym16020190
    15. Nasser Bin Turki, A Note on Incompressible Vector Fields, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1479, 10.3390/sym15081479
    16. Wei Zhang, Pengcheng Li, Donghe Pei, Circular evolutes and involutes of spacelike framed curves and their duality relations in Minkowski 3-space, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 5688, 10.3934/math.2024276
    17. Jing Li, Zhichao Yang, Yanlin Li, R.A. Abdel-Baky, Khalifa Saad, On the curvatures of timelike circular surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski space, 2024, 38, 0354-5180, 1423, 10.2298/FIL2404423L
    18. Özgür Boyacıoğlu Kalkan, Süleyman Şenyurt, Mustafa Bilici, Davut Canlı, Sweeping surfaces generated by involutes of a spacelike curve with a timelike binormal in Minkowski 3-space, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 988, 10.3934/math.2025047
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1683) PDF downloads(102) Cited by(18)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog