Incidence functions | f(I) | Source |
Bi-linear | βI | [27] |
Saturated | βI1+a1I | [28,29,30] |
Beddington-DeAngelis | βI1+a1S+a2I | [31,32] |
Specific nonlinear | βI1+a1S+a2I+a3SI | [33] |
Citation: Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan. Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1856-1880. doi: 10.3934/math.2020124
[1] | Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Fatimah S. Bayones . On new computations of the fractional epidemic childhood disease model pertaining to the generalized fractional derivative with nonsingular kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4552-4573. doi: 10.3934/math.2022254 |
[2] | Fatmawati, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Ebenezer Bonyah, Zakia Hammouch, Endrik Mifta Shaiful . A mathematical model of tuberculosis (TB) transmission with children and adults groups: A fractional model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2813-2842. doi: 10.3934/math.2020181 |
[3] | Shabir Ahmad, Aman Ullah, Mohammad Partohaghighi, Sayed Saifullah, Ali Akgül, Fahd Jarad . Oscillatory and complex behaviour of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order HIV-1 infection model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4778-4792. doi: 10.3934/math.2022265 |
[4] | Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber . Chaos control and numerical solution of time-varying fractional Newton-Leipnik system using fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25863-25887. doi: 10.3934/math.20231319 |
[5] | Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241 |
[6] | Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Aqeel Ahmad, Mustafa Inc, Muhammad Farman, Hadi Rezazadeh, Lanre Akinyemi, Muhammad Mannan Akram . Analysis of dengue transmission using fractional order scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8408-8429. doi: 10.3934/math.2022469 |
[7] | Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15994-16016. doi: 10.3934/math.2022876 |
[8] | Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046 |
[9] | Windarto, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Fatmawati . Parameter estimation and fractional derivatives of dengue transmission model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2758-2779. doi: 10.3934/math.2020178 |
[10] | Yumei Chen, Jiajie Zhang, Chao Pan . Numerical approximation of a variable-order time fractional advection-reaction-diffusion model via shifted Gegenbauer polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15612-15632. doi: 10.3934/math.2022855 |
Infectious diseases are massive threat for humans and also economy of the state. Proper understanding of a disease dynamics plays an important role in curtailing of the infection in a community. Implementation of a suitable strategy against the disease transmission is another challenge. Mathematical modeling approach is one of the key tools in order to handle these challenges. A number of disease models have been developed in existing literature which enables us to explore and control the spread of infectious diseases in a better way [1,2,3].
Most of these models are based on integer-order differential equations (IDEs). However, in the last few years, it is noticed that fractional-order differential equations (FDEs) can be used to model universal phenomena with greater degree of accuracy and its applications can be found in virous fields for example engineering, economics, control theory, finance and in epidemiology [4,5]. Fractional calculus is the generalization of classical integer-order calculus. The increasing interest of using FDEs in modeling of real world complex problems is due to its various properties which are not found in IDEs. In contrast of IDEs which local in nature, the FDEs are non-local and posses the memory effects which make it more superior because in many situations the future state of the model depends not only upon the current state but also on the previous history. These features enables FDEs to model the phenomena having not only the non-Gaussian but also for non-Markovian behavior. Further, the classical IDEs are unable to provide the information in between two different integer values. Various type of fractional-order operators were introduced in existing literature to over come such limitations of integer-order derivative [6,7,8]. The applications of these fractional operators can be found in various fields [9,10,11]. In epidemiology, the previous experiences and history of the past states of an epidemic have a great impact to explored its dynamics in a better way. Additionally, due to the non-Markovian behavior of any real epidemic process, models with FDEs are more realistic and therefore, play an essential role in the understanding the spread and possible control of diseases. Some recent and interesting work regarding fractional analysis to the real life problem have been studied in [12,13,14,15]. In these work, the authors studied mathematical model with delay in fractional derivatives and presented the results for stability and bifurcation.
In Mathematical models, the transmission of a disease i.e., the progression at which susceptible become infected is known as incidence rate function. This function plays a key role in epidemiological models and ensure that the model provides an acceptable qualitative analysis of the disease under consideration. A verity of incidence rate function have been implemented in the literature [16,17,18]. Most commonly, in disease models the bilinear incidence rate of the type bSI has been adopted, where b indicates the per unit contact rate. In 1927 Kermack and McKendrick [19] introduced a simple epidemic model using bilinear incidence rate and the assumptions that there are no births or deaths from the infection and each person of the population is initially susceptible to the disease. In [20] the authors introduced the saturated incidence after the cholera epidemic in Bari. Latter on, Korobeinikov and Maini[20] studied the global analysis of the SIR and SIRS models with nonlinear incidence rate. Recently, a fractional order SIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate has been developed in [21].
Keeping the above discussion in view and applicability of fractional order derivatives, in the preset investigation, we develop a fractional SIR epidemic model with generalized incidence rate function of the form f(I)S. The fractional derivative is considered in the Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu sense. We simulate the proposed SIR model for different values of relevant parameters and α∈(0,1]. Further, we provide a detail stability analysis of both disease free and endemic equilibriums of the model. The reaming sections of the manuscript are organized as: The basic definitions and relevant results are provided in section 2. Model description in Caputo case and its basic properties are presented in section 3. The stability result of the Caputo model is discussed in section in 4 and its numerical simulations and brief discussion are given in section 5. Model formulation of the ABC case and its existence and uniqueness are presented in section 6. In section 7 the iterative scheme is developed for ABC model and simulation results are presented. finally, concluding remarks are given in section 8.
Here some background material for the Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives are presented [7,22,23].
Definition 2.1. Consider h∈Cn be a function then the fractional Caputo derivative of order α is defined as:
CDαt(h(t))=1Γ(n−α)∫t0hn(ℑ)(t−ℑ)α−n+1dℑ, |
where α∈(n−1,n) and n∈N. Clearly, CDαt(h(t)) tends to h′(t) as α→1.
Definition 2.2. The corresponding fractional integral is described as:
Iαt(h(t))=1Γ(α)∫t0(t−ℑ)α−1h(ℑ)dℑ. |
In the above integral Γ represents the Gamma function.
Definition 2.3. A fixed point x=x∗ is said to be the equilibrium point (or solution) of the Caputo fractional system defined by:
CDαtx(t)=F(t,x(t)),α∈(0,1), | (2.1) |
if and only if F(t,x∗)=0.
To present the stability analysis of non linear fractional system in the caputo sense via Lyapunov method we first recall the following necessary results from [24,25].
Theorem 2.4. Suppose x∗ be an equilibrium point for the system (2.1) and Υ∈Rn be a domain containing x∗. Let L:[0,∞)×Υ tend to R be a continuously differentiable function such that
M1(x)≤L(t,x(t))≤M2(x), | (2.2) |
and
CDαtL(t,x(t))≤−M3(x), | (2.3) |
∀ 0<α<1 and x∈Υ. Where M1(x), M2(x) and M3(x) are continuously positive definite functions on Υ, then x∗ is uniformly asymptotically stable equilibrium point for the system (2.1).
Definition 2.5. Let F∈H1(b1,b2), b2>b1, α∈(0,1], then Atangana-Beleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivatives is defined as [7]:
ABCb1DαtF(t)=B(α)1−α∫tb1F′(ζ)Eα[−α(t−ζ)α1−α]dζ. | (2.4) |
The term B(α) represents a normalization function such that B(0)=B(1)=1.
The corresponding AB integral is given as:
ABCb1IαtF(t)=1−αB(α)F(t)+αB(α)Γ(α)∫tb1F(ζ)(t−ζ)α−1dζ. | (2.5) |
To formulate the model, the total population is represented with N(t)=S(t)+I(t)+R(t), where S(t) represents susceptible, I(t) represents number of infected and R(t) represents the number of recovered individuals. The complete model that describes a system of fractional differential equation is presented as follows
{CDαtS(t)=Λ−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR,CDαtI(t)=Sf(I)−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I,CDαtR(t)=μ2I−(d+θ)R. | (3.1) |
The initial condition is given by
S(0)=S0≥0,I(0)=I0≥0,R(0)=R0≥0. |
In the model (3.1), Λ is used for the recruitment rate, d denotes the natural mortality rate in all classes and δ is disease induced death rate. Parameter μ1 shows the rate at which the infected individuals move to the susceptible class and μ2 is the transfer rate from the infected class to the recovered class. The parameter θ is the susceptibility of recovered individuals.
To start the analysis of the system (3.1), it is necessary to present the existence, uniqueness, and non-negativity of the system solution.
To make our study more effective we have assumed that f(I) is to be non-negative and continuously differentiable in the interior of R+ and further, the same hypotheses is taken in account as in [26] that is, f(I) is a real locally Lipschitz function on R+=[0,∞) satisfying
(ⅰ) f(0)=0 and f(I)>0 for I>0;
(ⅱ) f(I)/I is continuous and monotonously non-increasing for I>0 and limI→0+f(I)I exists.
It is easy to analyze from condition (ⅱ) that
f(I)≤βIforI∈R+. |
Then ∫10+1/f(u)du=1 and hence assumption (ⅲ) in [26] is redundant. The incidence rate f(I) is dependent on the concentration of infection. Furthermore, it most famous generalized forms satisfying the above hypothesis are given in the Table 1.
Incidence functions | f(I) | Source |
Bi-linear | βI | [27] |
Saturated | βI1+a1I | [28,29,30] |
Beddington-DeAngelis | βI1+a1S+a2I | [31,32] |
Specific nonlinear | βI1+a1S+a2I+a3SI | [33] |
This section investigates the positivity of the solution of the fractional SIR model system (3.1). Let we consider
R3+={y∈R3∣y≥0}andy(t)=(S(t),I(t),R(t))T. |
To proceed further first we recall the generalized mean values theorem [34].
Lemma 3.1. Consider that h(y)∈C[a1,a2] and CDαth(y)∈(a1,a2], then
h(t)=h(a1)+1Γ(α)(h)(ℑ)(t−a1)α, |
with a1≤ℑ≤t, ∀ t∈(a1,a2].
Corollary 3.2. Consider that h(y)∈C[a1,a2] and CDαth(y)∈(a1,a2], where α∈(0,1], then if
(i).CDαth(y)≥0,∀y∈(a1,a2),thenh(y)isnon−decreasing |
(ii).CDαth(y)≤0,∀y∈(a1,a2),thenh(y)isnon−increasing |
The following main result is presented:
Theorem 3.3. A unique solution y(t) of the system (3.1) will exists and remains in R3+. Furthermore, the solution is positive.
Proof. The existence of the Caputo fractional SIR model can be shown with the help of theorem (3.1) in [35], while the uniqueness of the solution can be easily obtained by making use of the remark 3.2, [35], ∀ t>0. In order to explore the solution non-negativity, it is necessary to show that on each hyperplane bounding the positive orthant, the vector field point R3+. Form the system (3.1) we obtained
CDαtS∣S=0=Λ≥0,CDαtI∣I=0=Sf(I)=0,CDαtR∣R=0=μ2I≥0. |
Therefore, by using the above theorem, we conclude that the solution will stay in R3+
and hence biologically feasible region is constructed as:
Φ={(S,I,R)∈R3+:S,I,R≥0.} |
To obtain the equilibria of the fractional SIR model we solve the system (3.1) at the steady state we have
CDαtS=CDαtI=CDαtR=0. |
then the following is established:
Theorem 3.4. The proposed model (3.1) have at most two equilibria obtained as below:
1. The disease free equilibrium (DFE) expressed by E0=(S0,I0,R0)=(Λd,0,0),
2. and the endemic equilibrium (EE) expressed by E1=(S∗∗,I∗∗,R∗∗),
such that,
S∗∗=(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I∗∗f(I∗∗),R∗∗=μ2I∗∗(d+θ), | (3.2) |
where I∗∗ is a positive solution of the function H,
H(I)=d(d+μ1+μ2+δ)If(I)+(d+δ+dθ(d+θ))I−Λ. | (3.3) |
By condition (ⅱ) H is a strictly increasing function on R+. Furthermore,
limI→0+H(I)=d(d+μ1+μ2+δ)β−Λ and H(Λd)>0. Therefore, H has a positive zero (and only one in this case) iff d(d+μ1+μ2+δ)β−Λ<0 or equivalently
Λβd(d+μ1+μ2+δ)>1. | (3.4) |
The expression for the most biologically important threshold parameter known as the basic reproduction number R0 obtained by the next generation approach which is given as below:
R0=Λd(d+μ1+μ2+δ)∂f(0)∂I, | (3.5) |
where ∂f(0)∂I denote partial dervative of incidence functios with respect to I at disease free state.
In this section we proceed to confirm the stability results in both local and global case. The corrosoponding Jacobian of (3.1) around the DFE is given as
JE0=(−dμ1−S0∂f(0)∂Iθ0S0∂f(0)∂I−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)00μ2−(d+θ)). | (4.1) |
Theorem 4.1. For any p1,p2∈Z, such that gcd(p1,p2)=1. Let α=(p1p2) and consider M=p2, then the DFE of the system (3.1) is locally asymptotically stable (LAS) if |arg(Π)|>π2M, for all roots Π of the characteristic equation (4.2) of the matrix JE0.
det(diag[Πp1Πp1Πp1]−JE0)=0. | (4.2) |
Proof. Evaluating the determinant (4.2), we derived the below equation in term of Π.
(Πp1+d)(Π2p1+a1Πp1+a2)=0, | (4.3) |
where the coefficients are given below:
a1=(d+θ)+(d+δ+μ1+μ2)(1−R0),a2=(d+θ)(d+δ+μ1+μ2)(1−R0). |
The arguments of the roots of the equation Πp1+d=0, are as follow:
arg(Πk)=πp1+k2πp1>πM>π2M,wherek=0,1⋯,(p1−1). | (4.4) |
In similar patren, if R0<1, then the nessarry condition fulfil for all the roots of polynomial (4.3) i.e., |arg(Π)|>π2M. Thus the DFE is LAS for R0<1.
Theorem 4.2. For α∈(0,1) and R0<1 then the DFE, of the fractional SIR model (3.1) is globally asymptotically stable (GAS) and unstable for R0>1.
Proof. To confirm the GAS around the DFE, we formulate the suitable Lyapunov function as:
L(t)=I(t), |
Calculative the time fractional derivative of the above function L(t) we obtain
CDαtL(t)=CDαtI. |
Utilizing system (3.1) we get
CDαtL(t)=Sf(I)−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I,≤{βS0−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)}I,asf(I)≤βI≤{Λβd−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)}I=(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I{R0−1}. |
Clearly once R0<1 then CDαtL(t) is −ve, and hence, by result (2.4), we ensure that the DFE, E0 is GAS in Φ.
Here, we investigate the global stability of the endemic equilibrium of the fractional SIR model (3.1). At the steady state of the model (3.1) we obtained
{Λ=dS∗∗+S∗∗f(I∗∗)−μ1I∗∗−θR∗∗,(d+μ1+μ2+δ)=S∗∗f(I∗∗)I∗∗,(d+θ)=μ2I∗∗R∗∗. | (4.5) |
Theorem 4.3. If R0>1 and with condition (4.10) satisfy, then the endemic equilibrium of the system (3.1) is globally asymptotically stable.
Proof. We define the following Lyapunov function
V(t)=(S−S∗∗−S∗∗lnSS∗∗)+(I−I∗∗−I∗∗lnII∗∗)+(R−R∗∗−R∗∗lnRR∗∗). |
The differentiation of V(t) with the solution of (3.1) is
CDαtV(t)=(1−S∗∗S)CDαtS(t)+(1−I∗∗I)CDαtI(t)+(1−R∗∗R)CDαtR(t). |
By direct calculations, we have
(1−S∗∗S)CDαtS(t)=(1−S∗∗S)[Λ−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR]=(1−S∗∗S)[dS∗∗+S∗∗f(I∗∗)−μ1I∗∗−θR∗∗−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR]=dS∗∗(2−SS∗∗−S∗∗S)+S∗∗f(I∗∗)(1−Sf(I)S∗∗f(I∗∗)−S∗∗S+f(I)f(I∗∗))+θR∗∗(RR∗∗−1−S∗∗RSR∗∗+S∗∗S)+μ1I∗∗(II∗∗−1−S∗∗ISI∗∗+S∗∗S), | (4.6) |
(1−I∗∗I)CDαtI(t)=(1−I∗∗I)[Sf(I)−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I]=(1−I∗∗I)[Sf(I)−S∗∗f(I∗∗)II∗∗]=Sf(I)−S∗∗f(I∗∗)II∗∗−Sf(I)I∗∗I+S∗∗f(I∗∗), | (4.7) |
(1−R∗∗R)CDαtR(t)=(1−R∗∗R)(μ2I−(d+θ)R)=(1−R∗∗R)(μ2I−μ2I∗∗R∗∗R)=μ2I∗∗(II∗∗−RR∗∗−R∗∗IRI∗∗+1). | (4.8) |
After some arrangement we have
CDαtV(t)=dS∗∗(2−SS∗∗−S∗∗S)+μ1I∗∗(II∗∗−1−S∗∗S(II∗∗−1))+θR∗∗(RR∗∗−1−S∗∗S(RR∗∗−1))+μ2I∗∗(1−RR∗∗−II∗∗(R∗∗R−1))+S∗∗f(I∗∗)(2−S∗∗S−II∗∗−f(I)f(I∗∗)(SI∗∗S∗∗I−1)). | (4.9) |
It follows from the property arithmetic mean and we have
(2−SS∗−S∗S)≤0, |
and if
(II∗∗−1−S∗∗S(II∗∗−1))≤0,(RR∗∗−1−S∗∗S(RR∗∗−1))≤0,(1−RR∗−II∗(R∗R−1))≤0,(2−S∗∗S−II∗∗−f(I)f(I∗∗)(SI∗∗S∗∗I−1))≤0, | (4.10) |
then it ensures that the model given by (3.1) at the EE case is GAS when R0>1 and with the condition (4.10) satisfied.
In the current section, we investigate the numerical results of the Caputo SIRS model given by system (3.1) with general incidence rate. The model in each case is solved numerically using predictor corrector of molten type technique. In order to perform the numerical experiment and analyze the importance of incidence function on disease dynamics we assign different incidence rate to the generalized incidence function f and simulate the model with various fractional values of α. The parameter values considered in the numerical solution for the fractional SIRS model are depicted in each Figure caption. Initially, we consider the incidence rate f in the form as a bilinear incidence rate i.e., f(S,I)=βSI and obtain the graphical results in sub-plots (a-c) of Figure 1, while in sub-plot (d), we depicted the phase portrait analysis of the model variables. We can observed that the by decreasing the fractional order α the population in suspectable class is increasing whereas the population of infected and recovered classes is decreasing sharply. The graphical dynamics of the model (3.1) for various values of α with non-linear incidence function is shown in sub-plots (a-c) of Figure 2. The corresponding phase portrait analysis in this case is depicted in sub-plot (d) of Figure 2. The influence of parameter m (the half saturation constant) for different values of α=1,0.8,0.5, is shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5 respectively. We can see that population in the infected class is decreasing sharply with the increasing values of m. The influence of m is more significant biologically for fractional order of ABC operator rather than integer case. Finally, the dynamics of the Caputo model (3.1) with Beddington-DeAngelis incidence function with various fractional order α of the derivative are depicted in Figure 6. The corresponding phase portrait analysis in this case is presented in sub-plot (d) of Figure 6. These graphical interpretations explore the importance of the fractional derivative to the proposed model where one can see the behavior of the model for any non-integer case.
In this part of the paper we reconstruct the proposed model using the generalized fractional operator known as Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivative in order to explore the dynamics of the model in more better way. The model in ABC sense is given by the following system
{ABC0DαtS(t)=Λ−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR,ABC0DαtI(t)=Sf(I)−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I,ABC0DαtR(t)=μ2I−(d+θ)R, | (6.1) |
with some appropriate nonnegative inial conditions. Before to analyze the dynamics of fractional model (6.1), first we study the existence and uniqueness od the model in the following theorem.
We apply the fixed point theory in order to explore the existence and uniqueness of the solution of fractional model (6.1). To do this we firstly re-write the system (6.1) in the following form:
{ABC0Dαtu(t)=G(t,u(t)),u(0)=u0,0<t<T<∞. | (6.2) |
The vector u(t)=(S,I,R) and G in the system (6.2) represent the state variables and a continuous vector function respectively defined as follows:
G=(G1G2G3)=(Λ−dS−Sf(I)+μ1I+θR,Sf(I)−(d+μ1+μ2+δ)I,μ2I−(d+θ)R), |
with the initial condition by u0(t)=(S(0),I(0),R(0)). Furthermore, the G satisfies the Lipschitz condition given as:
‖G(t,u1(t))−G(t,u2(t))‖≤M‖u1(t)−u2(t)‖. | (6.3) |
To confirm the existence and uniqueness for the solution of system (6.1) with fractional order, we proceed as in the following theorem.
Theorem 6.1. The exists a unique solution of the SIR epidemic model (6.1) if the below condition holds:
(1−α)ABC(α)M+αABC(α)Γ(α)MTαmax<1. | (6.4) |
Proof. On applying the ABC fractional integral to both sides of the model (6.2), we get the non-linear Volterra integral equation:
u(t)=u0+1−αABC(α)G(t,u(t))+αABC(α)Γ(α)∫t0(t−ζ)α−1G(ζ,u(ζ))dζ. | (6.5) |
Consider J=(0,T), and Ξ:C(J,R3)→C(J,R3) stated as
Ξ[u(t)]=u0+1−αABC(α)G(t,u(t))+αABC(α)Γ(α)∫t0(t−ζ)α−1G(ζ,u(ζ))dζ. | (6.6) |
Eq (6.5) becomes:
u(t)=Ξ[u(t)]. | (6.7) |
The supremum norm on u denoted by ‖.‖J and is defined as:
‖u(t)‖J=supt∈J‖u(t)‖,u(t)∈C. | (6.8) |
Clearly, C(J,R3) with the norm ‖.‖J construct a Banach space. Further, the following inequality fulfil
‖∫t0K(t,ζ)u(ζ)dζ‖≤T‖K(t,ζ)‖J‖u(t)‖J, | (6.9) |
with w(t)∈C(J,R3), H(t,ζ)∈C(J2,R) such that
‖K(t,ζ)‖J=supt,ζ∈J|K(t,ζ)|. | (6.10) |
Applying result in (6.7), we have
‖Ξ[u1(t)]−Ξ[u2(t)]‖J≤‖(1−α)ABC(α)(G(t,u1(t))−G(t,u2(t))+αABC(α)Γ(α)×∫t0(t−ζ)α−1(G(ζ,u1(ζ))−G(ζ,u2(ζ)))dζ‖J. | (6.11) |
Furthermore, taking in account equations (6.3), (6.9) and triangular inequality, we have:
‖Ξ[u1(t)]−Ξ[u2(t)]‖J≤((1−α)MABC(α)+αΓ(α)ABC(α)MTαmax)‖u1(t)−u2(t)‖J. | (6.12) |
Finally, we derived the following expression
‖Ξ[u1(t)]−Ξ[u1(t)]‖J≤ϝ‖u1(t)−u2(t)‖J, | (6.13) |
where,
ϝ=(1−α)KABC(α)+αABC(α)Γ(α)KTαmax. |
The operator Ξ is known as a contraction if it follows the condition in equation (6.4). Hence, the solution of the model (6.2) will also has a unique solution.
Here firstly, we obtain the iterative scheme for the system (6.1). The approach developed in [36] is applied in order to approximate the ABC integral. To proceed further, using the fundamental theorem on the system (6.2), we obtained
u(t)−u(0)=(1−α)ABC(α)G(t,u(t))+αABC(α)×Γ(α)∫t0G(ζ,u(ζ)(t−ζ)α−1dζ. | (7.1) |
At t=tm+1, m=0,1,2,..., we have
u(tm+1)−u(0)=1−αABC(α)G(tm,u(tm))+αΓ(α)×ABC(α)∫tm+10G(ζ,u(ζ))(tm+1−ζ)α−1dζ,=1−αABC(α)G(tm,u(tm))+αABC(α)×Γ(α)m∑j=0∫tj+1tjG(ζ,u(ζ))(tm+1−ζ)α−1dζ. | (7.2) |
Utilizing the interpolation polynomial approach, the function G(ζ,u(ζ)) can be approximated over [tj,tj+1]:
G(ζ,u(ζ))≅Pk(ζ)=G(tj,u(tj))h(ζ−tj−1)−G(tj−1,u(tj−1))h(ζ−tj). | (7.3) |
Equation (7.2) becomes:
u(tm+1)=u(0)+1−αABC(α)G(tm,u(tm))+αABC(α)×Γ(α)m∑j=0(G(tj,u(tj))h∫tj+1tj(ζ−tj−1)(tm+1−ζ)α−1dζ−G(tj−1,u(tj−1))h∫tj+1tj(ζ−tj)(tm+1−ζ)α−1dζ). | (7.4) |
On further simplifications we finally arrived the approximate solution as below:
u(tm+1)=u(t0)+1−αABC(α)G(tm,u(tm))+αABC(α)m∑j=0(hαG(tj,u(tj))Γ(α+2)((m−j+1)α(m+α−j+2)−(m−j)α(m+2α−j+2))−hαG(tj−1,u(tj−1))Γ(α+2)((m−j+1)α+1−(m−j)α(m+α−j+1))). | (7.5) |
Hence, for the presented fractional system, we have the following recursive formulae:
S(tm+1)=S(t0)+1−αABC(α)G1(tm,u(tm))+αABC(α)m∑j=0(hαG1(tj,u(tj))Γ(α+2)((m−j+1)α(m+α−j+2)−(m−j)α(m+2α−j+2))−hαG1(tj−1,u(tj−1))α(α+2)((m−j+1)α+1−(m−j)α(m+α−j+1))),I(tm+1)=I(t0)+1−αABC(α)G2(tm,u(tm))+αABC(α)m∑j=0(hαG2(tj,u(tj))α(α+2)((m+1−j)α(m+α−j+2)−(m−j)α(m+2α−j+2))−hαG2(tj−1,u(tj−1))α(α+2)((m−j+1)α+1−(m−j)α(m+α−j+1))),R(tm+1)=R(t0)+1−αABC(α)G3(tm,u(tm))+αABC(α)m∑j=0(hαG3(tj,u(tj))α(α+2)((m−j+1)α(m−j+2+α)−(m−j)α(m+2α−j+2))−hαG3(tj−1,u(tj−1))α(α+2)((m−j+1)α+1−(m−j)α(m+α−j+1))). | (7.6) |
Based on numerical scheme derived in (7.6), we present the graphical results of the proposed ABC fractional model (6.1) in Figures 7–9. To analyze the influence of fractional order and incidence function on the disease dynamics and control we simulate the ABC SIRS model (6.1) with different incidence rates as in Caputo case. In Figure 7, we have shown the dynamics of the model by taking bilinear incidence rate in account. The graphical behavior of the model with nonlinear saturated incidence rate and for different values of α∈(0,1] is analyzed in Figure 8. Finally, the graphical results of fractional SIRS model by incorporating Beddington-DeAngelis type incidence function for various values of α are depicted in Figure 9.
From the graphical analysis, we observed that the population in infected class decrease significantly by decreasing the fractional order and the disease endemic state move to disease free state in each case. Further, from the graphical results of ABC model reveal that this operator is more helpful to explore the model dynamics and provide biologically more feasible results in compression with Caputo case.
In this paper, we analyzed the dynamics of a fractional SIR model with nonlinear generalized incidence rate. Initially, we formulated a general SIR model by apply the Caputo derivative. The local and global stability for the fractional SIR model are obtained and discussed in detailed. It is shown that the model at the disease free case is locally asymptotically stable when the basic reproduction number less than 1. Further, we obtain that the fractional SIR model at the disease free case is globally asymptotically stable for the case of basic reproduction number less than 1. We used fractional Lyapunov function for the proof of the global stability of the disease free case and also we proved by defining the fractional Lyapunov function for the proof of the global stability of the endemic equilibrium when the basic reproduction number greater than 1. Numerical results with various values of the fractional order parameter are obtained and discussed in detailed by choosing some different type of incidence functions. Since the Caputo fractional operator has singular kernel and can not explore the crossover behavior of some biological phenomena. Therefore, we further reformulated the proposed model using ABC derivative having nonsingular and nonlocal kernel. The existence and uniqueness of the ABC model is proved via Picard-Landelof approach. An efficient numerical scheme is used to carried out the iterative solution of the model and perform various simulation results r to analyzed the role of different incidence function in disease dynamic and control. These results indicates that the fractional order model in ABC case is more beneficial and important than that of the ordinary integer order model.
All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, J. F. Gez-Aguilar, Mathematical formulation of hepatitis B virus with optimal control analysis, Optim. Contr. Appl. Meth., 40 (2019), 529-544. doi: 10.1002/oca.2493
![]() |
[2] | E. Bonyah, M. A. Khan, K. O. Okosun, et al. A theoretical model for Zika virus transmission, PLoS ONE, 12 (2017), 1-26. |
[3] |
S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, M. Farooq, et al. Modeling and analysis of Tuberculosis (TB) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, Math. Comput. Simulat., 165 (2019), 181-199. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.012
![]() |
[4] | D. P. Ahokpossi, A. Atangana and D. P. Vermeulen, Modelling groundwater fractal flow with fractional differentiation via Mittag effler law, Eur. Phy. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 165. |
[5] |
M. A. Khan, Y. Khan and S. Islam, Complex dynamics of an SEIR epidemic model with saturated incidence rate and treatment, Phy. A., 493 (2018), 210-227. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.038
![]() |
[6] | M. Caputo and M. Fabricio, A New Definition of Fractional Derivative without Singular Kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73-85. |
[7] |
A. Atangana and D. Baleanu, New Fractional Derivatives with Nonlocal and Non-Singular Kernel: Theory and Application to Heat Transfer Model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763-769. doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
![]() |
[8] |
M. A. Khan, S. Ullah, M. Farhan, The dynamics of Zika virus with Caputo fractional derivative, AIMS Math., 4 (2019), 134-146. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.134
![]() |
[9] |
S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, M. Farooq, A new fractional model for tuberculosis with relapse via Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 116 (2018), 227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.039
![]() |
[10] |
S. Qureshi, A. Yusuf, Modeling chickenpox disease with fractional derivatives: From caputo to atangana-baleanu, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 122 (2019), 111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.020
![]() |
[11] | S. Qureshi, E. Bonyah, A. A. Shaikh, Classical and contemporary fractional operators for modeling diarrhea transmission dynamics under real statistical data, Phy. A, 535 (2019), 1-22. |
[12] | Z. Wang, Y. K. Xie, J. Lu, et al. Stability and bifurcation of a delayed generalized fractional-order prey redator model with interspecific competition, Appl. Math. Comput., 347 (2019), 360-369. |
[13] | X. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Huang, et al. Dynamic Analysis of a Delayed Fractional-Order SIR Model with Saturated Incidence and Treatment Functions, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 28 (2018), 1850180. |
[14] |
X. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Shen, Dynamical analysis of a discrete-time SIS epidemic model on complex networks, Appl. Math. Lett., 94 (2019), 292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.03.011
![]() |
[15] |
X. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Xia, Stability and bifurcation control of a delayed fractional-order ecoepidemiological model with incommensurate orders, J. Franklin I., 356 (2019), 8278-8295. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.07.028
![]() |
[16] | M. A. Khan, K. Shah, Y. Khan, et al. Mathematical modeling approach to the transmission dynamics of pine wilt disease with saturated incidence rate, Int. J. Biomath., 11 (2018), 1850035. |
[17] |
F. Rao, P. S. Mandal and Y. Kang, Complicated endemics of an SIRS model with a generalized incidence under preventive vaccination and treatment controls, App. Math. Mod., 67 (2019), 38-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.10.016
![]() |
[18] |
M. A. Khan, M. Farhan, S. Islam, et al. Modeling the transmission dynamics of avian influenza with saturation and psychological effect, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, 12 (2019), 455-474. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019030
![]() |
[19] |
W. O. Kermack, A. G. MCKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 115 (1927), 700-721. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
![]() |
[20] | V. Capasso and G. Serio, A generalization of the Kermack-Mckendrick deterministic epidemic model, Math. Biosci., 42 (1978), 41-61. |
[21] |
A. Korobeinikov and P. K Maini, A Lyapunov function and global properties for SIR and SEIR epidemiological models with nonlinear incidence, Math. Biosci. Eng., 1 (2004), 57-60. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.57
![]() |
[22] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Elsevier, 1999. |
[23] | S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives: theory and applications, 1993. |
[24] |
H. Delavari, D. Baleanu, J. Sadati, Stability analysis of Caputo fractional-order nonlinear systems revisited, Nonlinear Dyn., 67 (2012), 2433-2439. doi: 10.1007/s11071-011-0157-5
![]() |
[25] |
C. Vargas-De-Leon, Volterra-type Lyapunov functions for fractional order epidemic systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 24 (2015), 75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013
![]() |
[26] | J. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Xiao, et al. A class of Lyapunov functions and the global stability of some epidemic models with nonlinear incidence, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 6 (2016), 38-46. |
[27] |
J. J. Wang, J. Z. Zhang and Z. Jin, Analysis of an SIR model with bilinear incidence rate, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 11 (2010), 2390-2402. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.07.012
![]() |
[28] | M. A. Khan, Q. Badshah, S. Islam, et al. Global dynamics of SEIRS epidemic model with non-linear generalized incidences and preventive vaccination, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2015 (2015), 88. |
[29] |
M. A. Khan, Y. Khan and S. Islam, Complex dynamics of an SEIR epidemic model with saturated incidence rate and treatment, Phy. A., 493 (2018), 210-227. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.038
![]() |
[30] |
X. Liu and L. Yang, Stability analysis of an SEIQV epidemic model with saturated incidence rate, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 13 (2012), 2671-2679. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.03.010
![]() |
[31] | J. R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, The Journal of Animal Ecology, (1975), 331-341. |
[32] |
D. L. DeAngelis, R. A. Goldstein and R. V. Oeill, A model for tropic interaction, Ecology, 56 (1975), 881-892. doi: 10.2307/1936298
![]() |
[33] |
K. Hattaf, M. Mahrouf, J. Adnani, et al. Qualitative analysis of a stochastic epidemic model with specific functional response cand temporary immunity, Phys. A, 490 (2018), 591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.043
![]() |
[34] | Z. M. Odibat and N. T. Shawagfeh, Generalized taylor's formula, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 286-293. |
[35] |
W. Lin, Global existence theory and chaos control of fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appli., 332 (2007), 709-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.10.040
![]() |
[36] | M. Toufik, A. Atangana, New numerical approximation of fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel: application to chaotic models, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 444. |
1. | Wenbin Yang, Xiaozhou Feng, Shuhui Liang, Xiaojuan Wang, Asymptotic Behavior Analysis of a Fractional-Order Tumor-Immune Interaction Model with Immunotherapy, 2020, 2020, 1076-2787, 1, 10.1155/2020/7062957 | |
2. | M. Higazy, Novel fractional order SIDARTHE mathematical model of COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, 138, 09600779, 110007, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110007 | |
3. | Sandeep Sharma, Fateh Singh, Backward bifurcation in a cholera model with a general treatment function, 2021, 3, 2523-3963, 10.1007/s42452-021-04189-0 | |
4. | Fehaid Salem Alshammari, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Dynamic behaviors of a modified SIR model with nonlinear incidence and recovery rates, 2021, 60, 11100168, 2997, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.023 | |
5. | R Schlickeiser, M Kröger, Analytical solution of the SIR-model for the temporal evolution of epidemics: part B. Semi-time case, 2021, 54, 1751-8113, 175601, 10.1088/1751-8121/abed66 | |
6. | M. Kröger, R. Schlickeiser, Verification of the accuracy of the SIR model in forecasting based on the improved SIR model with a constant ratio of recovery to infection rate by comparing with monitored second wave data, 2021, 8, 2054-5703, 211379, 10.1098/rsos.211379 | |
7. | Kunquan Lan, Linear first order Riemann-Liouville fractional differential and perturbed Abel's integral equations, 2022, 306, 00220396, 28, 10.1016/j.jde.2021.10.025 | |
8. | ILKNUR KOCA, ABDON ATANGANA, SOME CHAOTIC MATHEMATICAL MODELS WITH STOCHASTIC RESETTING, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22402125 | |
9. | Ankur Jyoti Kashyap, Debasish Bhattacharjee, Hemanta Kumar Sarmah, A fractional model in exploring the role of fear in mass mortality of pelicans in the Salton Sea, 2021, 11, 2146-5703, 28, 10.11121/ijocta.2021.1123 | |
10. | Somayeh Fouladi, Mohammad Kohandel, Brydon Eastman, A comparison and calibration of integer and fractional-order models of COVID-19 with stratified public response, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 12792, 10.3934/mbe.2022597 | |
11. | Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani, Dumitru Baleanu, Jayakumar Thippan, Vinoth Sivakumar, New Fuzzy Fractional Epidemic Model Involving Death Population, 2021, 37, 0267-6192, 331, 10.32604/csse.2021.015619 | |
12. | NAVEED IQBAL, YELIZ KARACA, COMPLEX FRACTIONAL-ORDER HIV DIFFUSION MODEL BASED ON AMPLITUDE EQUATIONS WITH TURING PATTERNS AND TURING INSTABILITY, 2021, 29, 0218-348X, 2140013, 10.1142/S0218348X21400132 | |
13. | Yong-Min Li, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Mohammad Y. Alshahrani, Taseer Muhammad, Modeling and analysis of the dynamics of HIV/AIDS with non-singular fractional and fractal-fractional operators, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 114008, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac15c3 | |
14. | Huaixing Li, Jiaoyan Wang, Global Dynamics of an SEIR Model with the Age of Infection and Vaccination, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 2195, 10.3390/math9182195 | |
15. | Qing Yang, Xinhong Zhang, Daqing Jiang, Asymptotic behavior of a stochastic SIR model with general incidence rate and nonlinear Lévy jumps, 2022, 107, 0924-090X, 2975, 10.1007/s11071-021-07095-7 | |
16. | A.M.S. Mahdy, M. Higazy, K.A. Gepreel, A.A.A. El-dahdouh, Optimal control and bifurcation diagram for a model nonlinear fractional SIRC, 2020, 59, 11100168, 3481, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.05.028 | |
17. | Hassan Aghdaoui, Mouhcine Tilioua, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Ilyas Khan, A Fractional Epidemic Model with Mittag-Leffler Kernel for COVID-19, 2021, 16, 19946538, 39, 10.17537/2021.16.39 | |
18. | F. Talay Akyildiz, Fehaid Salem Alshammari, Complex mathematical SIR model for spreading of COVID-19 virus with Mittag-Leffler kernel, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-021-03470-1 | |
19. | Lylia Salah Derradji, Nacira Hamidane, Sofiane Aouchal, A fractional SEIRS model with disease resistance and nonlinear generalized incidence rate in Caputo–Fabrizio sense, 2023, 72, 0009-725X, 81, 10.1007/s12215-021-00659-x | |
20. | 2021, 9780323854481, 435, 10.1016/B978-0-32-385448-1.00027-5 | |
21. | Abdon Atangana, Seda İğret Araz, 2021, 9780323854481, 11, 10.1016/B978-0-32-385448-1.00008-1 | |
22. | A. Lahrouz, H. El Mahjour, A. Settati, M. Erriani, H. El Jarroudi, Bifurcation from an Epidemic Model in the Presence of Memory Effects, 2022, 32, 0218-1274, 10.1142/S0218127422500778 | |
23. | Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach of Buruli ulcer in Possum mammals, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 065219, 10.1088/1402-4896/acd27d | |
24. | Muhammad Farhan, Fahad Aljuaydi, Zahir Shah, Ebraheem Alzahrani, Ebenezer Bonyah, Saeed Islam, A fractional modeling approach to a new Hepatitis B model in light of asymptomatic carriers, vaccination and treatment, 2024, 24, 24682276, e02127, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02127 | |
25. | Lakhlifa Sadek, A Cotangent Fractional Derivative with the Application, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 444, 10.3390/fractalfract7060444 | |
26. | Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Rashid Jan, Saeed Islam, Mansoor H. Alshehri, Zhi Ling, A fractional modeling approach for the transmission dynamics of measles with double-dose vaccination, 2023, 1025-5842, 1, 10.1080/10255842.2023.2297171 | |
27. | Ankur Jyoti Kashyap, Arnab Jyoti Bordoloi, Fanitsha Mohan, Anuradha Devi, Dynamical analysis of an anthrax disease model in animals with nonlinear transmission rate, 2023, 3, 2767-8946, 370, 10.3934/mmc.2023030 | |
28. | Junseok Kim, Influence of Fractional Order on the Behavior of a Normalized Time-Fractional SIR Model, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3081, 10.3390/math12193081 | |
29. | Muhammad Farhan, Zahir Shah, Zhi Ling, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Saeed Islam, Hakim A. L. Garalleh, Yury E Khudyakov, Global dynamics and computational modeling for analyzing and controlling Hepatitis B: A novel epidemic approach, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0304375, 10.1371/journal.pone.0304375 | |
30. | Ritu Agarwal, Pooja Airan, Ravi P. Agarwal, Exploring the Landscape of Fractional-Order Models in Epidemiology: A Comparative Simulation Study, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 545, 10.3390/axioms13080545 | |
31. | Dipam Das, Debasish Bhattacharjee, An investigation into the impact of odour: A dynamical study of two predators and one prey model, taking into account both integer order and fractional order derivatives, 2025, 03784754, 10.1016/j.matcom.2025.01.026 | |
32. | Ahmed Refaie Ali, Daniyal Ur Rehman, Najeeb Alam Khan, Muhammad Ayaz, Asmat Ara, M. Ijaz Khan, Integrating fractional-order SEI1I2I3QCR model with awareness and non-pharmaceutical interventions for optimal COVID-19 pandemic, 2025, 25, 1471-2288, 10.1186/s12874-024-02452-7 |