Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations on R2 involving sign-changing potentials

  • This study focused on establishing the existence and multiplicity of solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations set on the plane with sign-changing potentials. Our findings contribute to the extension of recent advancements in this area of research. Initially, we examined scenarios where the potential function V is lower-bounded and the function space has a compact embedding into Lebesgue spaces. Subsequently, we addressed more complex cases characterized by a sign-changing potential V and a function space that fails to compactly embed into Lebesgue spaces. The proofs of our results are based on the Trudinger-Moser inequality, the application of variational methods, and the utilization of Morse theory.

    Citation: Ziqing Yuan, Jing Zhao. Solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations on R2 involving sign-changing potentials[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21337-21355. doi: 10.3934/math.20241036

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yipeng Qiu, Yingying Xiao, Yan Zhao, Shengyue Xu . Normalized ground state solutions for the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equations with mixed Choquard-type nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35293-35307. doi: 10.3934/math.20241677
    [2] Jishan Fan, Tohru Ozawa . Well-posedness for the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17349-17356. doi: 10.3934/math.2022955
    [3] Ye Xue, Zhiqing Han . Existence and multiplicity of solutions for Schrödinger equations with sublinear nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5479-5492. doi: 10.3934/math.2021324
    [4] Ya-Lei Li, Da-Bin Wang, Jin-Long Zhang . Sign-changing solutions for a class of p-Laplacian Kirchhoff-type problem with logarithmic nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2100-2112. doi: 10.3934/math.2020139
    [5] Yuan Shan, Baoqing Liu . Existence and multiplicity of solutions for generalized asymptotically linear Schrödinger-Kirchhoff equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6160-6170. doi: 10.3934/math.2021361
    [6] Ting Xiao, Yaolan Tang, Qiongfen Zhang . The existence of sign-changing solutions for Schrödinger-Kirchhoff problems in $ \mathbb{R}^3 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6726-6733. doi: 10.3934/math.2021395
    [7] Kun Cheng, Wentao Huang, Li Wang . Least energy sign-changing solution for a fractional $ p $-Laplacian problem with exponential critical growth. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20797-20822. doi: 10.3934/math.20221140
    [8] Yingying Xiao, Chuanxi Zhu, Li Xie . Existence of ground state solutions for the modified Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations with general Choquard type nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7166-7176. doi: 10.3934/math.2022399
    [9] Mengyu Wang, Xinmin Qu, Huiqin Lu . Ground state sign-changing solutions for fractional Laplacian equations with critical nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5028-5039. doi: 10.3934/math.2021297
    [10] Jiaying Ma, Yueqiang Song . On multi-bump solutions for a class of Schrödinger-Poisson systems with $ p $-Laplacian in $ \mathbb{R}^{3} $. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1595-1621. doi: 10.3934/math.2024079
  • This study focused on establishing the existence and multiplicity of solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations set on the plane with sign-changing potentials. Our findings contribute to the extension of recent advancements in this area of research. Initially, we examined scenarios where the potential function V is lower-bounded and the function space has a compact embedding into Lebesgue spaces. Subsequently, we addressed more complex cases characterized by a sign-changing potential V and a function space that fails to compactly embed into Lebesgue spaces. The proofs of our results are based on the Trudinger-Moser inequality, the application of variational methods, and the utilization of Morse theory.


    Jackiw and Pi [1,2] introduced a nonrelativistic model in which the nonlinear Schrödinger dynamics are coupled with the Chern-Simons gauge terms as follows:

    {iD0ϕ+(D1D1+D2D2)ϕ=λ|ϕ|p2ϕ,0A11A0=Im(ˉϕD2ϕ),0A22A0=Im(ˉϕD1ϕ),1A22A1=12|ϕ|2, (1.1)

    where i denotes the imaginary unit, 0=t, 1=x1, 2=x2 for (t,x1,x2)R1+2, ϕ:R1+2C is the complex scalar field, Aμ:R1+2R is the gauge field, Dμ=μ+iAμ is the covariant derivative for μ=0,1,2, and λ is a positive constant representing the strength of interaction potential. This system is very useful in studying the high-temperature superconductor, Aharovnov-Bohm scattering, and fractional quantum Hall effect. For more information on system (1.1), we refer the reader to [3,4,5]. System (1.1) is invariant under the following transformation

    ϕϕeiχ,AμAμμχ, (1.2)

    where χ:R1+2R is an arbitrary C function; this system was studied in[6]. The existence of stationary states to system (1.1) with general p>2 has been studied in [7] by using the ansatz

    ϕ(t,x)=u(|x|)eiωt,A0(x,t)=A0(|x|),A1(x,t)=x2|x|H(|x|),A2(x,t)=x1|x|h(|x|). (1.3)

    Then the ansatz (1.3) satisfies the Coulomb gauge condition 1A1+2A2=0. Inserting (1.3) into (1.1), the authors in[7] found that u satisfies the following nonlocal elliptic equation

    Δu+ωu+(ξ++|x|h(s)su2(s)ds)u+h2(|x|)|x|2u=λ|u|p2uinR2, (1.4)

    where h(s)=12s0τu2(τ)dτ, ξ is a constant, ω>0.

    As mentioned in[7], taking χ=ct in the gauge invariance (1.1), we derive another stationary solution for any given stationary solution; the functions A1(x), A2(x), u(x) are preserved, and

    ωω+c,A0(x)A0(x)c,

    which means that the constant ω+ξ is a gauge invariant of the stationary solutions of the problem. Thus, we can choose ξ=0 in what follows, i.e.,

    lim|x|A0(x)=0,

    which was indeed assumed in [6]. Under this case, (1.1) turns into

    Δu+ωu+(+|x|h(s)su2(s)ds+h2(|x|)|x|2)u=λ|u|p2uin R2. (1.5)

    In [8], by combing the constraint minimization method and quantitative deformation lemma, the authors proved that problem (1.5) possesses at least one energy sign-changing solution. In [9], the authors treated the problem (1.5) via a perturbation approach and the method of invariant sets of descending flow in H1rad(R2) for p(4,6). They overcame the difficulty of the boundedness of PS-sequences and proved the existence and multiplicity of sign-changing solutions. More results on nonlinear Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations can be found in [10,11,12,13,14,15] and references therein.

    In this paper, when λ=1, we will replace |u|p2u and ω(x) of problem (1.5) with a more general nonlinearity f(x,u) and sign-changing potential V(x), respectively, as follows:

    {Δu+V(x)u+κ(h2(|x|)|x|2++|x|h(s)su2(x)ds)=f(x,u)in R2,u(x)=u(|x|)H1(R2), (1.6)

    where VC(R2,R) and f(R2×R,R). The hypothesis on V is the following.

    (V1) VC(RN,R) and infV(x)>. Furthermore, there exists a constant a0>0 such that

    lim|y|meas{xRN:|xy|a0,V(x)K}=0,K>0.

    Remark 1.1. The hypothesis of (V1) was first introduced by Bartsch and Wang[16], where infV(x)>0 was required. By virtue of (V1), we know that the potential V(x) is allowed to be sign-changing. Furthermore, lots of papers give the following hypothesis.

    (˜V): VC(RN,R) satisfies infV(x)V0>0 and lim|x|V(x)=+ (see [17]).

    Under this condition, their working space can compactly embed into Lebesgue spaces. Then, we can see that the condition (V1) is much weaker than (˜V).

    From hypothesis (V1) we see that VC(RN) is bounded from below. Then, we can take a constant W0>0 such that ˆV(x)=V(x)+W01 for xRN and set l(x,u)=f(x,u)+W0u. Thus, (1.6) is equivalent to the following equation

    {Δu+ˆV(x)u+κ(h2(|x|)|x|2++|x|h(s)su2(x)ds)=l(x,u)inR2,u(x)=u(|x|)H1(R2). (1.7)

    In order to give our main results, we make the following hypotheses on the function l(x,u) and its primitive function L, and introduce our working space.

    (l1) |l(x,t)|C1|t|+C2(e4πt21) for all (x,t)R2×R;

    (l2) lim|t|L(x,t)t6=+ and lim|t|0l(x,t)t=0 for all xR2;

    (l3) tl(x,t)6L(x,t)0 for all (x,t)R2×R;

    (l4) There are constants p>6 and Cp>0 such that l(x,t)Cptp1 for all (x,t)R2×[0,+), where Cp>3p22(p2p)p22Spp.

    Let H=H1rad(R2) be the standard Sobolev space. Given the linear subspace

    E={uH:R2ˆV(x)u2<},

    we endow with the inner product

    u,v=R2(uv+ˆV(x)uv)

    and the corresponding norm u=u,u12. Then, (E,) is a Hilbert space that will be denoted by E for simplicity.

    If (V1) holds, from a well-known compact embedding theorem established by Bartsch-Wang[16], we have that the embedding ELq(RN) is compact for q[2,+). It follows from the spectral theory of self-adjoint compact operators that the eigenvalue problem

    Δu+V(x)u=λu,uE, (1.8)

    has a sequence of eigenvalues

    <λ1λ2<λk<,λk+.

    Every λk has been repeated in the sequence according to its finite multiplicity. Denote by φk the eigenfunction of λk with |φk|2=1, where ||r is the Lr-norm. The energy functional of problem (1.7) is

    I(u)=12R2(|u|2+V(x)u2)dx+12κR2u2|x|2h2(|x|)dxR2L(x,u)dx,

    for simplicity, in what follows, denote by

    B(u):=12R2u2|x|2h2(|x|)dx, (1.9)

    then BC1(E,R) and

    B(u),v=R2(h2(|x|)|x|2++|x|h(s)su2(s)ds)u(x)v(x)dx.

    For any u,vE, we have

    I(u),v=R2(uv+V(x)uv)+κB(u),vR2l(x,u)v. (1.10)

    Consequently, the critical points of I are weak solutions of problem (1.6).

    If κ=0, problem (1.6) does not depend on the Chern-Simons term any more; then, it becomes the following Schrödinger equation:

    Δu+V(x)u=f(x,u)inR2. (1.11)

    Problem (1.11) was extensively discussed by lots of authors since 1970, see[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] and references therein. Comparing with the above equation, problem (1.6) is nonlocal, which means that it is not a pointwise identity with the appearance of the Chern-Simons term

    (+|x|h(s)su2(s)ds+h2(|x|)|x|2)u.

    Based on such a character, people call it a nonlocal problem and it is quite different from the usual semilinear Schrödinger equation. The nonlocal term brings some mathematical difficulties and makes this problem rough and particularly interesting. One of the main difficulties is to prove the boundedness of PS-sequences if one tries to employ directly the mountain pass theorem to derive critical points of I(u) in E. Furthermore, in order to find critical points of functionals with an indefinite quadratic part, the commonly used method is the linking theorem. More precisely, let

    Ω1={uX+:u=ρ},Ω2={uX1R+φ:uR},

    where φX+{0}. If I satisfies the PS-condition and for some 0<ρ<R,

    α=infΩ1I>maxΩ2I, (1.12)

    then, from the linking Theorem [23], Theorem 5.3], it gives rise to a nontrivial critical of I. In order to check (1.12), one usually needs to prove that I0 on X. However, since the integral +|x|h(s)su2(s)ds in our energy functional is positive for u0, it seems impossible to derive IX0 even if we suppose F(x,u)0 for all (x,u)RN×R. Thus, unlike many other indefinite problems (see e.g., [29,30,37]), the usual linking theorem is not suitable for our case. Fortunately, we notice that the functional I has a local linking at the origin. Thus, we can combine the local linking theorem [28,33] with infinite dimensional Morse theory[35] to prove our main results. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, there have been few results on the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger system with critical exponential growth until now, that is, it behaves like exp(α|u|2) as |u|. More precisely, there is α0>0 such that

    lim|s||f(x,s)|eαs2=0,α>α0,andlim|s||f(x,s)|eαs2=+,α<α0.

    Then, in order to discuss this class of problems, the Trudinger-Moser inequalities play an important role in overcoming the difficulty of the critical case.

    Our main results are the following:

    Theorem 1.1. If (V1), (l1)–(l4) hold, and 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then problem (1.6) has a nontrivial solution.

    Theorem 1.2. If (V1), (l1)–(l4) hold, f(x,) is odd for all xR2 and 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then problem (1.6) has a sequence of solutions {un} such that I(un)+.

    Next, we give an other common hypothesis on the potential V.

    (V2) VC(RN,R) is a bounded function such that the quadratic form A:ER,

    A(u)=12(|u|2+V(x)u2) (1.13)

    is non-degenerate and the negative space of Ais finite-dimensional.

    It is easy to see that, under the hypothesis (V2), the working space E cannot be compactly embedded into Lebesgue space Lq(R2) for [2,+). In order to better discuss the problem (1.6), without loss of generality, we set f(x,u)=|u|p2u, κ=1, and p>6, then problem (1.6) turns into

    {Δu+V(x)u+(h2(|x|)|x|2++|x|h(s)su2(x)ds)=|u|p2uinR2,u(x)=u(|x|)H1(R2). (1.14)

    Although we losse the compactness of embedding, under the condition f(x,u)=|u|p2u, we still have the following result.

    Theorem 1.3. Suppose that 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), p>6, and (V2) holds, the problem (1.14) possesses a nontrivial solution uE.

    Remark 1.2. In the literature [36], by combining the constraint minimization method with the quantitative deformation lemma, the authors obtained at least one least energy sign-changing solution for Eq (1.5) under some assumptions. However, our Theorems 1.1–1.3 extend beyond these constraints. We consider ω not merely as a constant but as a variable function that changes sign, and we replace |u|p1u with f(x,u), which means that there are lots of functions that satisfy our hypotheses. Furthermore, Theorem 1.2 demonstrates the existence of infinitely many solutions. This broader scope of our study indicates a wider applicability and a more comprehensive understanding of the equations under consideration.

    This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 commences with a comprehensive exposition of the foundational concepts and preliminary notions pertinent to our investigation. Subsequently, Section 3 delineates the principal theorems, which are rigorously established through the adept application of Morse theory and variational techniques.

    First, we give some notations. (X,) denotes a (real) Banach space and (X,) denotes its topological dual. C and Ci(i=1,2,...) denote estimated constants (the concrete values may be different from one to another one). '' means the stronger convergence in X and '' stands for the weak convergence in X. |u|p denotes the norm of Lp(R2).

    Now, we define the negative space of A, defined in (1.8),

    E=span{φ1,...,φk}.

    Have E+ be the orthogonal complement of E+, thus E=E+E and there is a constant δ>0 such that

    ±A(u)δu2foruE±. (2.1)

    In the following, we give some properties, which are very important in proving our main results.

    Lemma 2.1. (see[34]) Set α>0 and k>1. Then, for each β>k, there exists a positive constant C=C(β) such that for all tR,

    (eαt21)kC(eαβt21).

    Moreover, if uH1(R2), then (eαt21)kL1(R2).

    Lemma 2.2. (see[34]) Assume uH1(R2), α>0, q>0 and uM with αM2<4π, then there is C=C(α,M,q)>0 such that

    R2(eαu21)|u|qCvq.

    Lemma 2.3. (see[7]) If unu in H1rad(R2) as n+, then

    (ⅰ) limn+B(un)=B(u);

    (ⅱ) limn+B(un),un=B(u),u;

    (ⅲ) limn+B(un),v=B(u),v.

    Furthermore, for any uH1rad(R2),

    (ⅳ) B(u)=12R2u2|x|h(s)su2(s)dsdx;

    (ⅴ) B(u),u=6B(u).

    Lemma 2.4. For any uH1rad(R2) and xR2, 0B(u)Cu6.

    Proof. For any p>2 and xR2, one has

    h(|x|)=|y||x|14πu2(y)dycp|x|2(p2)p|u|2p.

    Hence, if |x|1, then for any p(2,4) and p(4,+),

    |x|h(s)su2(s)ds=1|x|h(s)su2(s)ds+1h(s)su2(s)dsCu241|x|u2(s)ds+Cu2p1sp4pu2(s)dsCu24(1|x|s2p2ds)p2p(1|x||u(s)|psds)2p+Cu2p(1sp8pds)12(1|u(s)|4sds)12u24(Cpu2p+Cpu2p).

    If |x|>1, the above inequality is also true.

    Consequently,

    B(u)=12R2u2|x|h(s)su2(s)dsdx12u24(Cpu2p+Cpu2p)R2u2dxCu6.

    Set X be a Banach space J:XR be a C1-functional, u is an isolated critical point of J and J(u)=c. Then

    Ci(J,u):=Hi(Jc,Jc{0}),iN={0,1,2,...},

    is called the i-th critical group of J at u, where Jc:=J1(,c] and H denotes the singular homology with coefficients in Z.

    If J satisfies the (PS)-condition and the critical values of J are bounded from below by Θ, then, from Bartsch and Li[38], we give the i-th critical group of J at infinity by

    Ci(J,):=Hi(X,JΘ),iN,

    since we know that the homology on the right-hand side does not depend on the choice of Θ.

    Proposition 2.1. (see[38]) If JC1(X,R) satisfies the PS-condition, and Ck(J,0)Ck(J,) for some kN, then J has a nonzero critical point.

    Proposition 2.2. (see[32]) Assume that JC1(X,R) has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition X=YZ, i.e., for some ϵ>0,

    J(u)0foruYBϵ,J(u)>0foru(Z{0})Bϵ,

    where Bϵ={uX:uϵ}. If k=dimY<, then Ck(J,0)0.

    The following Lemma shows that I has a local linking at 0.

    Lemma 2.5. If (V1), (l1), and (l2) hold, 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then I has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition E=EE+.

    Proof. From (l1)-(l2), for all ϵ>0, q>2, there exists Cϵ>0 such that

    |L(x,u)|ϵu2+Cϵ(exp(4πu2)1)|u|qforallxR2. (2.2)

    Thus, by Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.2, we have that as u0,

    B(u)=o(u2),R2L(x,u)=o(u2).

    Then, when u0,

    I(u)=A(u)+κB(u)R2L(x,u)=A(u)+o(u2).

    From this equality and (2.1), one can derive the conclusion of this lemma.

    Remember that I satisfies the (PS)c condition, if any sequence {un}E along with I(un)c and I(un)0 as n has a convergent subsequence. If I satisfies (PS)c condition for all cR, then, I satisfies the (PS) condition.

    Lemma 3.1. Assume that (l1) and (l4) hold. Then there is λ0>0 such that for any 0<λ<λ0, c<13.

    Proof. Fix a positive function upE,

    Sp=infuE{0}(R2(|up|2+|up|2))12(R2|up|p)1p.

    It is easy to obtain that

    maxt0I0(tup)maxt0{t22R2(|up|2+|up|2)CpptpR2|up|p}=p22pS2pp2pC2p2p,

    where I0(u)=A(u)R2L(x,u). Thus, from (l4), there exists κ0>0 such that for any 0<κ<κ0, one has

    maxt0I(tup)p2pS2pp2pC2p2p<13.

    Lemma 3.2. Assume that (V1) and (l3) hold. If {un} is a (PS)c sequence of I, i.e., I(un)c, I(un)0 as n+, then {un} is bounded and un<1.

    Proof. From (l3), for n large enough, one has

    6c+ϵun6I(un)I(un)un=2un2+R2(unl(x,un)6L(x,un))2un2,

    where ϵn0. Then, this deduces the boundedness of {un}. According to Lemma 3.1, we infer that un1.

    Lemma 3.3. Assume that (V1) and (l1)–(l3) hold. Then, any bounded PS-sequence of I has a strongly convergent subsequence in E.

    Proof. Let {un}E be any bounded PS-sequence of I. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, one has

    I(un)c,I(un)0andsupnun<+. (3.1)

    Noting that the embedding

    ELq(R2),2q<+

    is compact, up to a subsequence if necessary, there exists u0E such that

    unu0inE,unu0inLq(R2)(2q<+),un(x)u0(x)a.e.inR2. (3.2)

    Set un=u0+wn, then wn0 in E and wn0 in Lq(RN) for all q[2,+). It follows from Brézis-Lieb lemma[32] that we have

    un2E=u02E+wn2E+on(1). (3.3)

    In the following we prove that

    limnR2l(x,un)u0R2l(x,u0)u0. (3.4)

    Indeed, since C0(R2) is dense in E, for any ϵ>0, there is ψC0(R2) such that u0ψ<ϵ. Note that

    |R2l(x,un)u0R2l(x,u0)u0||R2l(x,un)(u0ψ)|+|R2l(x,u0)(u0ψ)|+ψsuppψ|l(x,un)l(x,u0)|. (3.5)

    For the first integral, using |I(un)(u0ψ)|ϵnu0ψ with ϵn0 as n and Lemma 2.3, we derive

    |R2l(x,un)(u0ψ)|ϵnu0ψ+κ|B(un),u0ψ|+|R2|un(u0ψ)|ϵnu0ψ+unu0ψ+κ|B(un),u0ψ|Cu0ψCϵ

    for n large enough. Similarly, by I(u0)(u0ψ)=0, we derive that

    |R2l(x,u0)(u0ψ)|Cϵ.

    Since limnR2l(x,un)ψ=R2l(x,u0)ψψC0(R2), we obtain

    limn|R2l(x,un)u0R2l(x,u0)u0|Cϵ.

    Since ϵ is arbitrary, the above inequalities deduce that (3.4) is true. From (3.3) and Lemma 2.3, one has

    I(un)un=un2+κB(un),u0R2l(x,un)un=u02+wn2+κB(u0),u0R2l(x,u0)u0R2l(x,un)wn+on(1)=I(u0)u0+wn2R2l(x,un)wn+on(1),

    which means that

    wn2=R2l(x,un)wn+on(1).

    It follows from Lemma 2.1 and Hölder inequality that

    R2l(x,un)wnCR2|unwn|+C4R2(e4πu2n(x)1)|wn|C3|un|2|wn|2+C4(R2(e4πu2n(x)1)s)1s|wn|sC3|un|2|wn|2+C4(R2(e4πτu2n(x)1))1s|wn|s=C3|un|2|wn|2+C4(R2(e4πτun2u2n(x)un21))1s|wn|s,

    where s>1, 1s+1s=1. From lim supnun2=ς3c<1, we obtain un<1 for n enough large. Now, we choose τ>1 and s close to 1 such that 4πτun2<4π. It follows from (3.2) that

    R2l(x,un)wn0

    as n. Consequently, we have limnwn=0, which means that unu0 in E. This completes the proof.

    Lemma 3.4. If (V1) and (l1)–(l3) hold, and 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then there exists A>0 such that if I(u)A, then ddtt=1I(tu)<0.

    Proof. Suppose this lemma is false. Then, we would have {un}E such that I(un)n, but

    I(un),un=ddt|t=1I(tun)0.

    Consequently, we have un and

    u+n2un2(u+n2un2)+R2(l(x,un)un6L(x,un))6I(un)I(un),un6n. (3.6)

    Set vn=unun and v±n be the orthogonal projection of vn on E±. Then, passing to a subsequence, vnv for some vE as dimE<. If vn0, then vnv in E for some vE{0}. By (l2) and (l3) one has

    l(x,t)tt66L(x,t)t6+

    as t. Set vn=unun. Then meas({v0})>0. Hence,

    1un6ER2l(x,un)unR26L(x,un)u6nv6n(x)+. (3.7)

    By B(un)Cun6, we derive a contradiction. Note that

    0I(un),unun6=1un6(u+n2un2)+B(un),unR2l(x,un)unon(1)+c1un6R2l(x,un)un,

    from which it follows that v=0. But u+n2+un2=1, one derives v+n1. Now, for large n, one has

    u+n=unv+nunvn=un,

    which is a contradiction to (3.6).

    Remark 3.1. We need to emphasize that the proof of this lemma does not depend on the compactness of the embedding EL2(R2). Thus, this result remains valid if we replace (V1) with (V2).

    Lemma 3.5. Ci(I,)=0 for all i=0,1,2,....

    Proof. Let B={vE:v1}, S=B be the unit sphere in E, and A>0 be the number given in Lemma 3.4. Without loss of generality, we may suppose that

    A<infu2I(u).

    By (l2), it follows that for any vS,

    I(tv)=t22v2+t62B(v)R2L(x,tv)=t6(v22t4+12B(v)R2L(x,tv)t6)

    as t+. Thus, there exists tv>0 such that I(tvv)=A. Let u=tvv. From a simple computation, one has

    ddt|t=tvI(tv)=1tvdds|s=1I(su)<0.

    By the implicit function, there exists a map T such that T:vtv is a continuous function on S. Applying the function T, as in[25,26], one can construct a strong deformation retract η:EBIA,

    η(u)={u,if I(u)A,T(uu)uu,if I(u)>A,

    and obtain

    Ci(I,)=Hi(E,IA)Hi(E,EB)=0foralliN.

    Proof of Theorem 1.1. From Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 2.5, we have proved that Iλ satisfies the (PS)-condition and has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition E=E+E. Since E=k, Proposition 2.2 yields Ck(I,0)0. By Lemma 3.5, we derive that

    Ck(I,0)Ck(I,).

    Consequently, it follows from Proposition 2.1 that I has a nonzero critical point u, which is a nontrivial solution of problem (1.6).

    In order to prove Theorem 1.2, we give the following symmetric mountain pass theorem due to Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz[31]

    Proposition 3.1. ([27]) Let X be an infinite dimensional Banach space. I(0)=0, IC1(X,R) satisfies the (PS)-condition and is even. If X=YZ with dimY<, and I satisfies

    (ⅰ) there are constants ρ,α>0 such that IBρZα,

    (ⅱ) for any finite dimensional subspace WX, there exists an R=R(W) such that I0 on WBR(W), then I has a sequence of critical values cj+.

    Lemma 3.6. For uEi, let Ei=¯span{φi,φi+1,...} and βi=supuEi,u=1|u|2. Then βi0 as i.

    Proof. For uEi with u=1, one has

    R2(|u|2+V(x)u2)λiR2u2,

    or equivalently, since ˆV(x)=V(x)+W0,

    1=u2=R2(|u|2+ˆV(x)u2)(λi+W0)R2u2=(λi+W0)|u|22.

    Consequently,

    |βi|1λi+W00asλi+.

    Proof of Theorem 1.2. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2, the functional I satisfies the PS-condition and is even. We only need to verify the assumptions (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) of Lemma 3.1.

    Verification of (ⅰ). It follows from (l1) that there exist C5,C6>0 and q>6 such that

    |L(x,t)|C5|t|2+C6(e4πt21)|t|q (3.8)

    for all (x,t)R2×R. For iN, let Ei and βi as in Lemma 3.6. Then, one has βi0 as i. Take kN such that

    μ=12C5β2k>0,

    and set

    Y=span{φ1,...,φk1},Z=¯span{φk,φk+1,...}.

    So E=YZ, by (3.8) and Lemma 2.2, we derive

    I(u)=12u2+κB(u)R2L(x,u)dx12u2R2L(x,u)(12C5β2k)u2C6R2(e4πu21)|u|q(12C5β2k)u2Cuq=μu2+o(u2)

    as u0, which is easy to see that (ⅰ) is satisfied.

    Verification of (ⅱ). We only need to check that I is anti-coercive on any finite dimensional subspace ˆE. If, otherwise, there are {un}ˆE and A>0 such that un, but I(un)A. Set vn=unun. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, then vnv for some vˆE{0} as dimˆE<. Similar to (3.7), one has

    1un6R2L(x,u)dx+.

    According to Lemma 2.3, we derive

    I(u)=12u2+κB(u)R2L(x,u)dxun6(12un4+κCR2L(x,u)un6),

    contrary to I(un)A. Then, the proof of Theorem 1.2 is completed.

    In the following, we now assume that V satisfies (V2), then the embedding EL2(R2) is not compact anymore. Thus, we need to recover the PS-condition.

    Lemma 3.7. Let {un} be a PS-sequence of I, i.e., supn|I(un)|<, I(un)0. Then {un} is bounded in E.

    Proof. Proceeding by contradiction, we may assume that un. Set vn=unun. Then

    vn=v+n+vnv=v++vE,v±n,v±E±.

    If v=0, then vnv=0 as dimE<. Noting that

    v+n2+vn2=1

    for n large enough, we obtain

    v+n2vn11+δ (3.9)

    for any δ>0. From (l3), we infer that

    1+supn|I(un)|+unI(un)16I(un),un=13un2(v+n2vn2)+(161p)R2|un|p13(1+δ)un2,

    contradicting to un.

    Next, we assume v0. Then, the set ⊐={v(x)0} has a positive Lebesgue measure. For x∈⊐, one has |un(x)| and

    |un|pun6=|un|pv6n(x)u6n(x)+.

    It follows from Fatou's Lemma that

    R2|un|pun6|un|pun6+. (3.10)

    On the other hand, for large enough n,

    |un|pu6nv6n=1un6|un|p1un6R2|un|p=1un6(12u2+κB(u)R2L(x,u)dx)1+C,

    which is a contradiction to (3.10). Then, we derive that the sequence {un} is bounded.

    Lemma 3.8. If (V2) holds, then I satisfies the PS-condition.

    Proof. Let {un} be a PS-sequence. It follows from Lemma 3.8 that {un} is bounded in E. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that unu in E. Then

    R2(unu+V(x)unu)R2(|u|2+V(x)u2)=u+2u2.

    Consequently, we have

    on(1)=I(un),unu=R2[un(unu)+V(x)un(unu)]+B(un),unuR2|un|p2un(unu)=u+n2un2(u+2u2)+B(un),unuR2|un|p2un(unu).

    Since dimX<, we have unu, i.e., unu. Collecting all infinitesimal terms, one has

    u+n2u+2=o(1)+R2|un|p2un(unu)B(un),unu.

    Since R2|un|p2un(unu)0 and B(un),unu0 as n, we obtain that u+nu+ as n, from which we infer that unu in E.

    Proof of Theorem 1.3. From Remark 3.1, we know that Lemma 3.4 remains true if (V1) is replaced by (V2). Hence, under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.3, there is A>0 such that I(u)A, then

    ddt|t=1I(tun)0. (3.11)

    Similar to the proof of Lemma 3.5, we can obtain that Ci(Iλ,)=0 for all iN. On the other hand, by an analysis similar to that in the proof of Lemma 2.5, we can prove that I also has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition E=EE+; therefore, for k=dimE, we derive Ck(I,0)0, which means that

    Ck(I,0)Ck(I,).

    It follows from Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 2.1 that I has a nonzero critical point, which completes the proof.

    In this study, we establish the existence and multiplicity of solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing potentials on the plane. Our approach, which combines the Trudinger-Moser inequality, variational methods, and Morse theory, has proven effective in handling the complexities introduced by nonlocal terms and critical exponential growth. The theorems presented in this paper not only extend the existing knowledge in this research area but also provide new insights into the behavior of solutions under different conditions.

    Looking forward, there are several promising directions for future research. Firstly, exploring the stability and dynamics of the solutions found in this study could yield valuable insights into the physical implications of these equations. Second, extending the analysis to higher dimensions or to different types of potentials could broaden the applicability of our results. Additionally, investigating the interplay between the nonlocal terms and the nonlinearities in the equation could lead to the development of more sophisticated analytical tools. Lastly, considering the impact of external fields or boundary conditions on the solutions could enrich the theoretical framework and possibly lead to new applications in physics and engineering.

    Overall, this research opens up new avenues for studying nonlinear Schrödinger equations and contributes to a deeper understanding of the underlying mathematical structures and their physical relevance.

    Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors would like to thank the editor and the referees for their helpful suggestions. Research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Provincial (Grant No. 2023JJ30559) and the technology plan project of Guizhou (Grant No. [2020]1Y004).

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.



    [1] R. Jackiw, S. Y. Pi, Soliton solutions to the gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the plane, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990), 2969–2972. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969
    [2] R. Jackiw, S. Y. Pi, Classical and quantal nonrelativistic Chern-Simons theory, Phys. Rev. D, 42 (1990), 3500–3513. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3500 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3500
    [3] C. Hagen, A new gauge theory without an elementary photon, Ann. Phys., 157 (1984), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90064-2 doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90064-2
    [4] C. R. Hagen, Rotational anomalies without anyons, Phys. Rev. D, 31 (1985), 2135–2136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2135 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2135
    [5] C. O. Alves, Z. Yuan, L. Huang, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for discontinuous elliptic problems in RN, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sec. A, 151 (2021), 548–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2020.30 doi: 10.1017/prm.2020.30
    [6] R. Jackiw, Self-dual Chern-Simons solitons, In: K. Schmdgen, Mathematical Physics X: Proceedings of the Xth Congress on Mathematical Physics, Held at Leipzig, Germany, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77303-7_15
    [7] J. Byeon, H. Huh, J. Seok, Standing waves of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with the gauge field, J. Funct. Anal., 263 (2012), 1575–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2012.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2012.05.024
    [8] G. Li, X. Luo, W. Shuai, Sign-changing solutions to a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 455 (2017), 1559–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048
    [9] Z. Liu, Z. Ouyang, J. Zhang, Existence and multiplicity of sign-changing standing waves for a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation in R2, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), 3082–3111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ab1bc4 doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab1bc4
    [10] J. Zhang, X. Tang, F. Zhao, On multiplicity and concentration of solutions for a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Anal., 99 (2020), 2001–2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2018.1553033 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2018.1553033
    [11] L. Shen, Zero-mass gauged Schrödinger equations with supercritical exponential growth, J. Differential Equations, 393 (2024), 204–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.02.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2024.02.020
    [12] C. Zhang, Z. Liang, F. Li, Nodal solutions for gauged Schrödinger equation with nonautonomous asymptotically quintic nonlinearity, J. Geom. Anal., 34 (2024), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-023-01454-z doi: 10.1007/s12220-023-01454-z
    [13] N. Zhang, X. Tang, S. Chen, Mountain-pass type solutions for the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equation with zero mass potential and critical exponential growth, J. Geom. Anal., 33 (2023), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-01046-3 doi: 10.1007/s12220-022-01046-3
    [14] T. Gou, Z. Zhang, Normalized solutions to the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger system, J. Funct. Anal., 280 (2021), 108894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108894 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108894
    [15] W. Xie, C. Chen, Sign-changing solutions for the nonlinear Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations, Appl. Anal., 99 (2020), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2018.1514020 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2018.1514020
    [16] T. Bartsch, Z. Q. Wang, Existence and multiplicity results for some superlinear elliptic problems on RN, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 20 (1995), 1725–1741. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309508821149 doi: 10.1080/03605309508821149
    [17] S. Chen, J. Liu, X. Wu, Existence and multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for a class of modified nonlinear fourth-order elliptic equations on RN, Appl. Math. Comput., 248 (2014), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.021 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.021
    [18] B. Hua, R. Li, L. Wang, A class of semilinear elliptic equations on groups of polynomial growth, J. Differential Equations, 363 (2023), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2023.03.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2023.03.025
    [19] G. Cerami, D. Passaseo, S. Solimini, Infinitely many positive solutions to some scalar field equations with nonsymmetric coefficients, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 66 (2013), 372–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21410 doi: 10.1002/cpa.21410
    [20] R. C. López, G. H. Sun, O. Camacho-Nieto, C. Yez-Mrquez, S. H. Dong, Analytical traveling-wave solutions to a generalized Gross–Pitaevskii equation with some new time and space varying nonlinearity coefficients and external fields, Phys. Lett. A, 381 (2017), 2978–2985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2017.07.012
    [21] S. Biagi, E. Vecchi, S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci, Semilinear elliptic equations involving mixed local and nonlocal operators, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sec. A, 151 (2021), 1611–1641.
    [22] B. Cheng, X. Tang, High energy solutions of modified quasilinear fourth-order elliptic equations with sign-changing potential, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.10.015 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.10.015
    [23] P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, Vol. 65, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbms/065
    [24] S. Liu, J. Zhou, Standing waves for quasilinear Schrödinger-Poisson systems with indefinite potentials, J. Differential Equations, 265 (2018), 3970–3987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.05.024
    [25] S. Liu, Existence of solutions to a superlinear p-Laplacian equation, Electron. J. Differential Equations, 2001 (2001), 1–6.
    [26] Z. Q. Wang, On a superlinear elliptic equation, AIHPC, 8 (1991), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30276-1 doi: 10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30276-1
    [27] P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods and their application to partial differential equations, In: S. S. Chern, Seminar on nonlinear partial differential equations, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, Vol. 2, New York: Springer, 1984,307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1110-5_16
    [28] S. J. Li, M. Willem, Applications of local linking to critical point theory, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 189 (1995), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1995.1002 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1002
    [29] Z. Liu, V. D. Radulescu, Z. Yuan, Concentration of solutions for fractional Kirchhoff equations with discontinuous reaction, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-022-01849-y doi: 10.1007/s00033-022-01849-y
    [30] Y. Ding, Variational methods for strongly indefinite problems, Scientia Sinica Mathematica, 47 (2017), 779-810. https://doi.org/10.1360/N012016-00164 doi: 10.1360/N012016-00164
    [31] A. Ambrosetti, P. H. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal., 14 (1973), 349–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7 doi: 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7
    [32] J. Q. Liu, The Morse index of a saddle point, J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci., 2 (1989), 32–39.
    [33] R. Karasev, A. Skopenkov, Some converses to intrinsic linking theorems, Discrete Comput. Geom., 70 (2023), 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-023-00505-0 doi: 10.1007/s00454-023-00505-0
    [34] J. M. Bezerra do Ó, E. Medeiros, U. Severo, A nonhomogeneos elliptic problem involving critical growth in dimension two, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345 (2008), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.074 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.074
    [35] Z. Yuan, J. Yu, Existence of solutions for Dirichlet elliptic problems with discontinuous nonlinearity, Nonlinear Anal., 197 (2020), 111848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2020.111848 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2020.111848
    [36] G. Li, X. Luo, W. Shuai, Sign-changing solutions to a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 455 (2017), 1550–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048
    [37] S. Liu, On superlinear Schrödinger equations with periodic potential, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 45 (2012), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-011-0447-2 doi: 10.1007/s00526-011-0447-2
    [38] T. Bartsch, S. Li, Critical point theory for asymptotically quadratic functionals and applications to problems with resonance, Nonlinear Anal., 28 (1997), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(95)00167-T doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(95)00167-T
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(933) PDF downloads(63) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog