Citation: Ziqing Yuan, Jing Zhao. Solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations on R2 involving sign-changing potentials[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21337-21355. doi: 10.3934/math.20241036
[1] | Yipeng Qiu, Yingying Xiao, Yan Zhao, Shengyue Xu . Normalized ground state solutions for the Chern–Simons–Schrödinger equations with mixed Choquard-type nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35293-35307. doi: 10.3934/math.20241677 |
[2] | Jishan Fan, Tohru Ozawa . Well-posedness for the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17349-17356. doi: 10.3934/math.2022955 |
[3] | Ye Xue, Zhiqing Han . Existence and multiplicity of solutions for Schrödinger equations with sublinear nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5479-5492. doi: 10.3934/math.2021324 |
[4] | Ya-Lei Li, Da-Bin Wang, Jin-Long Zhang . Sign-changing solutions for a class of p-Laplacian Kirchhoff-type problem with logarithmic nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2100-2112. doi: 10.3934/math.2020139 |
[5] | Yuan Shan, Baoqing Liu . Existence and multiplicity of solutions for generalized asymptotically linear Schrödinger-Kirchhoff equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6160-6170. doi: 10.3934/math.2021361 |
[6] | Ting Xiao, Yaolan Tang, Qiongfen Zhang . The existence of sign-changing solutions for Schrödinger-Kirchhoff problems in $ \mathbb{R}^3 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6726-6733. doi: 10.3934/math.2021395 |
[7] | Kun Cheng, Wentao Huang, Li Wang . Least energy sign-changing solution for a fractional $ p $-Laplacian problem with exponential critical growth. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20797-20822. doi: 10.3934/math.20221140 |
[8] | Yingying Xiao, Chuanxi Zhu, Li Xie . Existence of ground state solutions for the modified Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations with general Choquard type nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7166-7176. doi: 10.3934/math.2022399 |
[9] | Mengyu Wang, Xinmin Qu, Huiqin Lu . Ground state sign-changing solutions for fractional Laplacian equations with critical nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5028-5039. doi: 10.3934/math.2021297 |
[10] | Jiaying Ma, Yueqiang Song . On multi-bump solutions for a class of Schrödinger-Poisson systems with $ p $-Laplacian in $ \mathbb{R}^{3} $. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1595-1621. doi: 10.3934/math.2024079 |
Jackiw and Pi [1,2] introduced a nonrelativistic model in which the nonlinear Schrödinger dynamics are coupled with the Chern-Simons gauge terms as follows:
{iD0ϕ+(D1D1+D2D2)ϕ=−λ|ϕ|p−2ϕ,∂0A1−∂1A0=−Im(ˉϕD2ϕ),∂0A2−∂2A0=Im(ˉϕD1ϕ),∂1A2−∂2A1=−12|ϕ|2, | (1.1) |
where i denotes the imaginary unit, ∂0=∂∂t, ∂1=∂∂x1, ∂2=∂∂x2 for (t,x1,x2)∈R1+2, ϕ:R1+2→C is the complex scalar field, Aμ:R1+2→R is the gauge field, Dμ=∂μ+iAμ is the covariant derivative for μ=0,1,2, and λ is a positive constant representing the strength of interaction potential. This system is very useful in studying the high-temperature superconductor, Aharovnov-Bohm scattering, and fractional quantum Hall effect. For more information on system (1.1), we refer the reader to [3,4,5]. System (1.1) is invariant under the following transformation
ϕ→ϕeiχ,Aμ→Aμ−∂μχ, | (1.2) |
where χ:R1+2→R is an arbitrary C∞ function; this system was studied in[6]. The existence of stationary states to system (1.1) with general p>2 has been studied in [7] by using the ansatz
ϕ(t,x)=u(|x|)eiωt,A0(x,t)=A0(|x|),A1(x,t)=x2|x|H(|x|),A2(x,t)=−x1|x|h(|x|). | (1.3) |
Then the ansatz (1.3) satisfies the Coulomb gauge condition ∂1A1+∂2A2=0. Inserting (1.3) into (1.1), the authors in[7] found that u satisfies the following nonlocal elliptic equation
−Δu+ωu+(ξ+∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(s)ds)u+h2(|x|)|x|2u=λ|u|p−2uinR2, | (1.4) |
where h(s)=12∫s0τu2(τ)dτ, ξ is a constant, ω>0.
As mentioned in[7], taking χ=ct in the gauge invariance (1.1), we derive another stationary solution for any given stationary solution; the functions A1(x), A2(x), u(x) are preserved, and
ω→ω+c,A0(x)→A0(x)−c, |
which means that the constant ω+ξ is a gauge invariant of the stationary solutions of the problem. Thus, we can choose ξ=0 in what follows, i.e.,
lim|x|→∞A0(x)=0, |
which was indeed assumed in [6]. Under this case, (1.1) turns into
−Δu+ωu+(∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(s)ds+h2(|x|)|x|2)u=λ|u|p−2uin R2. | (1.5) |
In [8], by combing the constraint minimization method and quantitative deformation lemma, the authors proved that problem (1.5) possesses at least one energy sign-changing solution. In [9], the authors treated the problem (1.5) via a perturbation approach and the method of invariant sets of descending flow in H1rad(R2) for p∈(4,6). They overcame the difficulty of the boundedness of PS-sequences and proved the existence and multiplicity of sign-changing solutions. More results on nonlinear Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations can be found in [10,11,12,13,14,15] and references therein.
In this paper, when λ=1, we will replace |u|p−2u and ω(x) of problem (1.5) with a more general nonlinearity f(x,u) and sign-changing potential V(x), respectively, as follows:
{−Δu+V(x)u+κ(h2(|x|)|x|2+∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(x)ds)=f(x,u)in R2,u(x)=u(|x|)∈H1(R2), | (1.6) |
where V∈C(R2,R) and f∈(R2×R,R). The hypothesis on V is the following.
(V1) V∈C(RN,R) and infV(x)>−∞. Furthermore, there exists a constant a0>0 such that
lim|y|→∞meas{x∈RN:|x−y|≤a0,V(x)≤K}=0,∀K>0. |
Remark 1.1. The hypothesis of (V1) was first introduced by Bartsch and Wang[16], where infV(x)>0 was required. By virtue of (V1), we know that the potential V(x) is allowed to be sign-changing. Furthermore, lots of papers give the following hypothesis.
(˜V): V∈C(RN,R) satisfies infV(x)≥V0>0 and lim|x|→∞V(x)=+∞ (see [17]).
Under this condition, their working space can compactly embed into Lebesgue spaces. Then, we can see that the condition (V1) is much weaker than (˜V).
From hypothesis (V1) we see that V∈C(RN) is bounded from below. Then, we can take a constant W0>0 such that ˆV(x)=V(x)+W0≥1 for x∈RN and set l(x,u)=f(x,u)+W0u. Thus, (1.6) is equivalent to the following equation
{−Δu+ˆV(x)u+κ(h2(|x|)|x|2+∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(x)ds)=l(x,u)inR2,u(x)=u(|x|)∈H1(R2). | (1.7) |
In order to give our main results, we make the following hypotheses on the function l(x,u) and its primitive function L, and introduce our working space.
(l1) |l(x,t)|≤C1|t|+C2(e4πt2−1) for all (x,t)∈R2×R;
(l2) lim|t|→∞L(x,t)t6=+∞ and lim|t|→0l(x,t)t=0 for all x∈R2;
(l3) tl(x,t)−6L(x,t)≥0 for all (x,t)∈R2×R;
(l4) There are constants p>6 and Cp>0 such that l(x,t)≥Cptp−1 for all (x,t)∈R2×[0,+∞), where Cp>3p−22(p−2p)p−22Spp.
Let H=H1rad(R2) be the standard Sobolev space. Given the linear subspace
E={u∈H:∫R2ˆV(x)u2<∞}, |
we endow with the inner product
⟨u,v⟩=∫R2(∇u⋅∇v+ˆV(x)uv) |
and the corresponding norm ‖u‖=⟨u,u⟩12. Then, (E,‖⋅‖) is a Hilbert space that will be denoted by E for simplicity.
If (V1) holds, from a well-known compact embedding theorem established by Bartsch-Wang[16], we have that the embedding E↪Lq(RN) is compact for q∈[2,+∞). It follows from the spectral theory of self-adjoint compact operators that the eigenvalue problem
−Δu+V(x)u=λu,u∈E, | (1.8) |
has a sequence of eigenvalues
−∞<λ1≤λ2≤⋯<λk<⋯,λk→+∞. |
Every λk has been repeated in the sequence according to its finite multiplicity. Denote by φk the eigenfunction of λk with |φk|2=1, where |⋅|r is the Lr-norm. The energy functional of problem (1.7) is
I(u)=12∫R2(|∇u|2+V(x)u2)dx+12κ∫R2u2|x|2h2(|x|)dx−∫R2L(x,u)dx, |
for simplicity, in what follows, denote by
B(u):=12∫R2u2|x|2h2(|x|)dx, | (1.9) |
then B∈C1(E,R) and
⟨B′(u),v⟩=∫R2(h2(|x|)|x|2+∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(s)ds)u(x)v(x)dx. |
For any u,v∈E, we have
⟨I′(u),v⟩=∫R2(∇u∇v+V(x)uv)+κ⟨B′(u),v⟩−∫R2l(x,u)v. | (1.10) |
Consequently, the critical points of I are weak solutions of problem (1.6).
If κ=0, problem (1.6) does not depend on the Chern-Simons term any more; then, it becomes the following Schrödinger equation:
−Δu+V(x)u=f(x,u)inR2. | (1.11) |
Problem (1.11) was extensively discussed by lots of authors since 1970, see[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] and references therein. Comparing with the above equation, problem (1.6) is nonlocal, which means that it is not a pointwise identity with the appearance of the Chern-Simons term
(∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(s)ds+h2(|x|)|x|2)u. |
Based on such a character, people call it a nonlocal problem and it is quite different from the usual semilinear Schrödinger equation. The nonlocal term brings some mathematical difficulties and makes this problem rough and particularly interesting. One of the main difficulties is to prove the boundedness of PS-sequences if one tries to employ directly the mountain pass theorem to derive critical points of I(u) in E. Furthermore, in order to find critical points of functionals with an indefinite quadratic part, the commonly used method is the linking theorem. More precisely, let
Ω1={u∈X+:‖u‖=ρ},Ω2={u∈X−1⊕R+φ:‖u‖≤R}, |
where φ∈X+∖{0}. If I satisfies the PS-condition and for some 0<ρ<R,
α=infΩ1I>max∂Ω2I, | (1.12) |
then, from the linking Theorem [23], Theorem 5.3], it gives rise to a nontrivial critical of I. In order to check (1.12), one usually needs to prove that I≤0 on X−. However, since the integral ∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(s)ds in our energy functional is positive for u≠0, it seems impossible to derive I∣X−≤0 even if we suppose F(x,u)≥0 for all (x,u)∈RN×R. Thus, unlike many other indefinite problems (see e.g., [29,30,37]), the usual linking theorem is not suitable for our case. Fortunately, we notice that the functional I has a local linking at the origin. Thus, we can combine the local linking theorem [28,33] with infinite dimensional Morse theory[35] to prove our main results. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, there have been few results on the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger system with critical exponential growth until now, that is, it behaves like exp(α|u|2) as |u|→∞. More precisely, there is α0>0 such that
lim|s|→∞|f(x,s)|eαs2=0,∀α>α0,andlim|s|→∞|f(x,s)|eαs2=+∞,∀α<α0. |
Then, in order to discuss this class of problems, the Trudinger-Moser inequalities play an important role in overcoming the difficulty of the critical case.
Our main results are the following:
Theorem 1.1. If (V1), (l1)–(l4) hold, and 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then problem (1.6) has a nontrivial solution.
Theorem 1.2. If (V1), (l1)–(l4) hold, f(x,⋅) is odd for all x∈R2 and 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then problem (1.6) has a sequence of solutions {un} such that I(un)→+∞.
Next, we give an other common hypothesis on the potential V.
(V2) V∈C(RN,R) is a bounded function such that the quadratic form A:E→R,
A(u)=12∫(|∇u|2+V(x)u2) | (1.13) |
is non-degenerate and the negative space of Ais finite-dimensional.
It is easy to see that, under the hypothesis (V2), the working space E cannot be compactly embedded into Lebesgue space Lq(R2) for [2,+∞). In order to better discuss the problem (1.6), without loss of generality, we set f(x,u)=|u|p−2u, κ=1, and p>6, then problem (1.6) turns into
{−Δu+V(x)u+(h2(|x|)|x|2+∫+∞|x|h(s)su2(x)ds)=|u|p−2uinR2,u(x)=u(|x|)∈H1(R2). | (1.14) |
Although we losse the compactness of embedding, under the condition f(x,u)=|u|p−2u, we still have the following result.
Theorem 1.3. Suppose that 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), p>6, and (V2) holds, the problem (1.14) possesses a nontrivial solution u∈E.
Remark 1.2. In the literature [36], by combining the constraint minimization method with the quantitative deformation lemma, the authors obtained at least one least energy sign-changing solution for Eq (1.5) under some assumptions. However, our Theorems 1.1–1.3 extend beyond these constraints. We consider ω not merely as a constant but as a variable function that changes sign, and we replace |u|p−1u with f(x,u), which means that there are lots of functions that satisfy our hypotheses. Furthermore, Theorem 1.2 demonstrates the existence of infinitely many solutions. This broader scope of our study indicates a wider applicability and a more comprehensive understanding of the equations under consideration.
This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 commences with a comprehensive exposition of the foundational concepts and preliminary notions pertinent to our investigation. Subsequently, Section 3 delineates the principal theorems, which are rigorously established through the adept application of Morse theory and variational techniques.
First, we give some notations. (X,‖⋅‖) denotes a (real) Banach space and (X∗,‖⋅‖∗) denotes its topological dual. C and Ci(i=1,2,...) denote estimated constants (the concrete values may be different from one to another one). '→' means the stronger convergence in X and '⇀' stands for the weak convergence in X. |u|p denotes the norm of Lp(R2).
Now, we define the negative space of A, defined in (1.8),
E−=span{φ1,...,φk}. |
Have E+ be the orthogonal complement of E+, thus E=E+⊕E− and there is a constant δ>0 such that
±A(u)≥δ‖u‖2foru∈E±. | (2.1) |
In the following, we give some properties, which are very important in proving our main results.
Lemma 2.1. (see[34]) Set α>0 and k>1. Then, for each β>k, there exists a positive constant C=C(β) such that for all t∈R,
(eαt2−1)k≤C(eαβt2−1). |
Moreover, if u∈H1(R2), then (eαt2−1)k∈L1(R2).
Lemma 2.2. (see[34]) Assume u∈H1(R2), α>0, q>0 and ‖u‖≤M with αM2<4π, then there is C=C(α,M,q)>0 such that
∫R2(eαu2−1)|u|q≤C‖v‖q. |
Lemma 2.3. (see[7]) If un⇀u in H1rad(R2) as n→+∞, then
(ⅰ) limn→+∞B(un)=B(u);
(ⅱ) limn→+∞⟨B′(un),un⟩=⟨B′(u),u⟩;
(ⅲ) limn→+∞⟨B′(un),v⟩=⟨B′(u),v⟩.
Furthermore, for any u∈H1rad(R2),
(ⅳ) B(u)=12∫R2u2∫∞|x|h(s)su2(s)dsdx;
(ⅴ) ⟨B′(u),u⟩=6B(u).
Lemma 2.4. For any u∈H1rad(R2) and x∈R2, 0≤B(u)≤C‖u‖6.
Proof. For any p>2 and x∈R2, one has
h(|x|)=∫|y|≤|x|14πu2(y)dy≤cp|x|2(p−2)p|u|2p. |
Hence, if |x|≤1, then for any p∈(2,4) and p′∈(4,+∞),
∫∞|x|h(s)su2(s)ds=∫1|x|h(s)su2(s)ds+∫∞1h(s)su2(s)ds≤C‖u‖24∫1|x|u2(s)ds+C‖u‖2p∫∞1sp−4pu2(s)ds≤C‖u‖24(∫1|x|s−2p′−2ds)p′−2p′(∫1|x||u(s)|p′sds)2p′+C‖u‖2p(∫∞1sp−8pds)12(∫∞1|u(s)|4sds)12≤‖u‖24(Cp′‖u‖2p′+Cp‖u‖2p). |
If |x|>1, the above inequality is also true.
Consequently,
B(u)=12∫R2u2∫∞|x|h(s)su2(s)dsdx≤12‖u‖24(Cp′‖u‖2p′+Cp‖u‖2p)∫R2u2dx≤C‖u‖6. |
Set X be a Banach space J:X→R be a C1-functional, u is an isolated critical point of J and J(u)=c. Then
Ci(J,u):=Hi(Jc,Jc∖{0}),i∈N={0,1,2,...}, |
is called the i-th critical group of J at u, where Jc:=J−1(−∞,c] and H∗ denotes the singular homology with coefficients in Z.
If J satisfies the (PS)-condition and the critical values of J are bounded from below by Θ, then, from Bartsch and Li[38], we give the i-th critical group of J at infinity by
Ci(J,∞):=Hi(X,JΘ),i∈N, |
since we know that the homology on the right-hand side does not depend on the choice of Θ.
Proposition 2.1. (see[38]) If J∈C1(X,R) satisfies the PS-condition, and Ck(J,0)≠Ck(J,∞) for some k∈N, then J has a nonzero critical point.
Proposition 2.2. (see[32]) Assume that J∈C1(X,R) has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition X=Y⊕Z, i.e., for some ϵ>0,
J(u)≤0foru∈Y∩Bϵ,J(u)>0foru∈(Z∖{0})∩Bϵ, |
where Bϵ={u∈X:‖u‖≤ϵ}. If k=dimY<∞, then Ck(J,0)≠0.
The following Lemma shows that I has a local linking at 0.
Lemma 2.5. If (V1), (l1), and (l2) hold, 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then I has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition E=E−⊕E+.
Proof. From (l1)-(l2), for all ϵ>0, q>2, there exists Cϵ>0 such that
|L(x,u)|≤ϵu2+Cϵ(exp(4πu2)−1)|u|qforallx∈R2. | (2.2) |
Thus, by Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.2, we have that as ‖u‖→0,
B(u)=o(‖u‖2),∫R2L(x,u)=o(‖u‖2). |
Then, when ‖u‖→0,
I(u)=A(u)+κB(u)−∫R2L(x,u)=A(u)+o(‖u‖2). |
From this equality and (2.1), one can derive the conclusion of this lemma.
Remember that I satisfies the (PS)c condition, if any sequence {un}⊂E along with I(un)→c and I′(un)→0 as n→∞ has a convergent subsequence. If I satisfies (PS)c condition for all c∈R, then, I satisfies the (PS) condition.
Lemma 3.1. Assume that (l1) and (l4) hold. Then there is λ∗0>0 such that for any 0<λ<λ∗0, c<13.
Proof. Fix a positive function up∈E,
Sp=infu∈E∖{0}(∫R2(|∇up|2+|up|2))12(∫R2|up|p)1p. |
It is easy to obtain that
maxt≥0I0(tup)≤maxt≥0{t22∫R2(|∇up|2+|up|2)−Cpptp∫R2|up|p}=p−22pS2pp−2pC2p−2p, |
where I0(u)=A(u)−∫R2L(x,u). Thus, from (l4), there exists κ∗0>0 such that for any 0<κ<κ∗0, one has
maxt≥0I(tup)≤p−2pS2pp−2pC2p−2p<13. |
Lemma 3.2. Assume that (V1) and (l3) hold. If {un} is a (PS)c sequence of I, i.e., I(un)→c, I′(un)→0 as n→+∞, then {un} is bounded and ‖un‖<1.
Proof. From (l3), for n large enough, one has
6c+ϵ‖un‖≥6I(un)−I′(un)un=2‖un‖2+∫R2(unl(x,un)−6L(x,un))≥2‖un‖2, |
where ϵn→0. Then, this deduces the boundedness of {un}. According to Lemma 3.1, we infer that ‖un‖≤1.
Lemma 3.3. Assume that (V1) and (l1)–(l3) hold. Then, any bounded PS-sequence of I has a strongly convergent subsequence in E.
Proof. Let {un}⊂E be any bounded PS-sequence of I. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, one has
I(un)→c,I′(un)→0andsupn‖un‖<+∞. | (3.1) |
Noting that the embedding
E↪Lq(R2),2≤q<+∞ |
is compact, up to a subsequence if necessary, there exists u0∈E such that
un⇀u0inE,un→u0inLq(R2)(2≤q<+∞),un(x)→u0(x)a.e.inR2. | (3.2) |
Set un=u0+wn, then wn⇀0 in E and wn→0 in Lq(RN) for all q∈[2,+∞). It follows from Brézis-Lieb lemma[32] that we have
‖un‖2E=‖u0‖2E+‖wn‖2E+on(1). | (3.3) |
In the following we prove that
limn→∞∫R2l(x,un)u0→∫R2l(x,u0)u0. | (3.4) |
Indeed, since C∞0(R2) is dense in E, for any ϵ>0, there is ψ∈C∞0(R2) such that ‖u0−ψ‖<ϵ. Note that
|∫R2l(x,un)u0−∫R2l(x,u0)u0|≤|∫R2l(x,un)(u0−ψ)|+|∫R2l(x,u0)(u0−ψ)|+‖ψ‖∞∫suppψ|l(x,un)−l(x,u0)|. | (3.5) |
For the first integral, using |I′(un)(u0−ψ)|≤ϵn‖u0−ψ‖ with ϵn→0 as n→∞ and Lemma 2.3, we derive
|∫R2l(x,un)(u0−ψ)|≤ϵn‖u0−ψ‖+κ|⟨B′(un),u0−ψ⟩|+|∫R2|∇un∇(u0−ψ)|≤ϵn‖u0−ψ‖+‖un‖‖u0−ψ‖+κ|⟨B′(un),u0−ψ⟩|≤C‖u0−ψ‖≤Cϵ |
for n large enough. Similarly, by I′(u0)(u0−ψ)=0, we derive that
|∫R2l(x,u0)(u0−ψ)|≤Cϵ. |
Since limn→∞∫R2l(x,un)ψ=∫R2l(x,u0)ψ∀ψ∈C∞0(R2), we obtain
limn→∞|∫R2l(x,un)u0−∫R2l(x,u0)u0|≤Cϵ. |
Since ϵ is arbitrary, the above inequalities deduce that (3.4) is true. From (3.3) and Lemma 2.3, one has
I′(un)un=‖un‖2+κ⟨B′(un),u0⟩−∫R2l(x,un)un=‖u0‖2+‖wn‖2+κ⟨B′(u0),u0⟩−∫R2l(x,u0)u0−∫R2l(x,un)wn+on(1)=I′(u0)u0+‖wn‖2−∫R2l(x,un)wn+on(1), |
which means that
‖wn‖2=∫R2l(x,un)wn+on(1). |
It follows from Lemma 2.1 and Hölder inequality that
∫R2l(x,un)wn≤C∫R2|unwn|+C4∫R2(e4πu2n(x)−1)|wn|≤C3|un|2|wn|2+C4(∫R2(e4πu2n(x)−1)s)1s|wn|s′≤C3|un|2|wn|2+C4(∫R2(e4πτu2n(x)−1))1s|wn|s′=C3|un|2|wn|2+C4(∫R2(e4πτ‖un‖2u2n(x)‖un‖2−1))1s|wn|s′, |
where s>1, 1s+1s′=1. From lim supn→∞‖un‖2=ς≤3c<1, we obtain ‖un‖<1 for n enough large. Now, we choose τ>1 and s close to 1 such that 4πτ‖un‖2<4π. It follows from (3.2) that
∫R2l(x,un)wn→0 |
as n→∞. Consequently, we have limn→∞‖wn‖=0, which means that un→u0 in E. This completes the proof.
Lemma 3.4. If (V1) and (l1)–(l3) hold, and 0 is not an eigenvalue of (1.8), then there exists A>0 such that if I(u)≤−A, then ddt∣t=1I(tu)<0.
Proof. Suppose this lemma is false. Then, we would have {un}⊂E such that I(un)≤−n, but
⟨I′(un),un⟩=ddt|t=1I(tun)≥0. |
Consequently, we have ‖un‖→∞ and
‖u+n‖2−‖u−n‖2≤(‖u+n‖2−‖u−n‖2)+∫R2(l(x,un)un−6L(x,un))≤6I(un)−⟨I′(un),un⟩≤−6n. | (3.6) |
Set vn=un‖un‖ and v±n be the orthogonal projection of vn on E±. Then, passing to a subsequence, vn→v− for some v−∈E as dimE−<∞. If v−n≠0, then vn→v in E for some v∈E∖{0}. By (l2) and (l3) one has
l(x,t)tt6≥6L(x,t)t6→+∞ |
as t→∞. Set vn=un‖un‖. Then meas({v≠0})>0. Hence,
1‖un‖6E∫R2l(x,un)un≥∫R26L(x,un)u6nv6n(x)→+∞. | (3.7) |
By B(un)≤C‖un‖6, we derive a contradiction. Note that
0≤⟨I′(un),un⟩‖un‖6=1‖un‖6(‖u+n‖2−‖u−n‖2)+⟨B′(un),un⟩−∫R2l(x,un)un≤on(1)+c−1‖un‖6∫R2l(x,un)un→−∞, |
from which it follows that v−=0. But ‖u+n‖2+‖u−n‖2=1, one derives ‖v+n‖→1. Now, for large n, one has
‖u+n‖=‖un‖‖v+n‖≥‖un‖‖v−n‖=‖u−n‖, |
which is a contradiction to (3.6).
Remark 3.1. We need to emphasize that the proof of this lemma does not depend on the compactness of the embedding E↪L2(R2). Thus, this result remains valid if we replace (V1) with (V2).
Lemma 3.5. Ci(I,∞)=0 for all i=0,1,2,....
Proof. Let B={v∈E:‖v‖≤1}, S=∂B be the unit sphere in E, and A>0 be the number given in Lemma 3.4. Without loss of generality, we may suppose that
−A<inf‖u‖≤2I(u). |
By (l2), it follows that for any v∈S,
I(tv)=t22‖v‖2+t62B(v)−∫R2L(x,tv)=t6(‖v‖22t4+12B(v)−∫R2L(x,tv)t6)→−∞ |
as t→+∞. Thus, there exists tv>0 such that I(tvv)=−A. Let u=tvv. From a simple computation, one has
ddt|t=tvI(tv)=1tvdds|s=1I(su)<0. |
By the implicit function, there exists a map T such that T:v↦tv is a continuous function on S. Applying the function T, as in[25,26], one can construct a strong deformation retract η:E∖B→I−A,
η(u)={u,if I(u)≤−A,T(u‖u‖)u‖u‖,if I(u)>−A, |
and obtain
Ci(I,∞)=Hi(E,I−A)≅Hi(E,E∖B)=0foralli∈N. |
Proof of Theorem 1.1. From Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 2.5, we have proved that Iλ satisfies the (PS)-condition and has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition E=E+⊕E−. Since E−=k, Proposition 2.2 yields Ck(I,0)≠0. By Lemma 3.5, we derive that
Ck(I,0)≠Ck(I,∞). |
Consequently, it follows from Proposition 2.1 that I has a nonzero critical point u, which is a nontrivial solution of problem (1.6).
In order to prove Theorem 1.2, we give the following symmetric mountain pass theorem due to Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz[31]
Proposition 3.1. ([27]) Let X be an infinite dimensional Banach space. I(0)=0, I∈C1(X,R) satisfies the (PS)-condition and is even. If X=Y⊕Z with dimY<∞, and I satisfies
(ⅰ) there are constants ρ,α>0 such that I∣∂Bρ∩Z≥α,
(ⅱ) for any finite dimensional subspace W⊂X, there exists an R=R(W) such that I≤0 on W∖BR(W), then I has a sequence of critical values cj→+∞.
Lemma 3.6. For u∈Ei, let Ei=¯span{φi,φi+1,...} and βi=supu∈Ei,‖u‖=1|u|2. Then βi→0 as i→∞.
Proof. For u∈Ei with ‖u‖=1, one has
∫R2(|∇u|2+V(x)u2)≥λi∫R2u2, |
or equivalently, since ˆV(x)=V(x)+W0,
1=‖u‖2=∫R2(|∇u|2+ˆV(x)u2)≥(λi+W0)∫R2u2=(λi+W0)|u|22. |
Consequently,
|βi|≤1√λi+W0→0asλi→+∞. |
Proof of Theorem 1.2. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2, the functional I satisfies the PS-condition and is even. We only need to verify the assumptions (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) of Lemma 3.1.
Verification of (ⅰ). It follows from (l1) that there exist C5,C6>0 and q>6 such that
|L(x,t)|≤C5|t|2+C6(e4πt2−1)|t|q | (3.8) |
for all (x,t)∈R2×R. For i∈N, let Ei and βi as in Lemma 3.6. Then, one has βi→0 as i→∞. Take k∈N such that
μ=12−C5β2k>0, |
and set
Y=span{φ1,...,φk−1},Z=¯span{φk,φk+1,...}. |
So E=Y⊕Z, by (3.8) and Lemma 2.2, we derive
I(u)=12‖u‖2+κB(u)−∫R2L(x,u)dx≥12‖u‖2−∫R2L(x,u)≥(12−C5β2k)‖u‖2−C6∫R2(e4πu2−1)|u|q≥(12−C5β2k)‖u‖2−C‖u‖q=μ‖u‖2+o(‖u‖2) |
as ‖u‖→0, which is easy to see that (ⅰ) is satisfied.
Verification of (ⅱ). We only need to check that I is anti-coercive on any finite dimensional subspace ˆE. If, otherwise, there are {un}⊂ˆE and A>0 such that ‖un‖→∞, but I(un)≥−A. Set vn=un‖un‖. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, then vn→v for some v∈ˆE∖{0} as dimˆE<∞. Similar to (3.7), one has
1‖un‖6∫R2L(x,u)dx→+∞. |
According to Lemma 2.3, we derive
I(u)=12‖u‖2+κB(u)−∫R2L(x,u)dx≤‖un‖6(12‖un‖4+κC−∫R2L(x,u)‖un‖6)→−∞, |
contrary to I(un)≥−A. Then, the proof of Theorem 1.2 is completed.
In the following, we now assume that V satisfies (V2), then the embedding E↪L2(R2) is not compact anymore. Thus, we need to recover the PS-condition.
Lemma 3.7. Let {un} be a PS-sequence of I, i.e., supn|I(un)|<∞, I′(un)→0. Then {un} is bounded in E.
Proof. Proceeding by contradiction, we may assume that ‖un‖→∞. Set vn=un‖un‖. Then
vn=v+n+v−n⇀v=v++v−∈E,v±n,v±∈E±. |
If v=0, then v−n→v−=0 as dimE−<∞. Noting that
‖v+n‖2+‖v−n‖2=1 |
for n large enough, we obtain
‖v+n‖2−‖v−n‖≥11+δ | (3.9) |
for any δ>0. From (l3), we infer that
1+supn|I(un)|+‖un‖≥I(un)−16⟨I′(un),un⟩=13‖un‖2(‖v+n‖2−‖v−n‖2)+(16−1p)∫R2|un|p≥13(1+δ)‖un‖2, |
contradicting to ‖un‖→∞.
Next, we assume v≠0. Then, the set ⊐={v(x)≠0} has a positive Lebesgue measure. For x∈⊐, one has |un(x)|→∞ and
|un|p‖un‖6=|un|pv6n(x)u6n(x)→+∞. |
It follows from Fatou's Lemma that
∫R2|un|p‖un‖6≥∫⊐|un|p‖un‖6→+∞. | (3.10) |
On the other hand, for large enough n,
∫⊐|un|pu6nv6n=1‖un‖6∫⊐|un|p≤1‖un‖6∫R2|un|p=1‖un‖6(12‖u‖2+κB(u)−∫R2L(x,u)dx)≤1+C, |
which is a contradiction to (3.10). Then, we derive that the sequence {un} is bounded.
Lemma 3.8. If (V2) holds, then I satisfies the PS-condition.
Proof. Let {un} be a PS-sequence. It follows from Lemma 3.8 that {un} is bounded in E. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that un⇀u in E. Then
∫R2(∇un⋅∇u+V(x)unu)→∫R2(|∇u|2+V(x)u2)=‖u+‖2−‖u−‖2. |
Consequently, we have
on(1)=⟨I′(un),un−u⟩=∫R2[∇un⋅∇(un−u)+V(x)un(un−u)]+⟨B′(un),un−u⟩−∫R2|un|p−2un(un−u)=‖u+n‖2−‖u−n‖2−(‖u+‖2−‖u−‖2)+⟨B′(un),un−u⟩−∫R2|un|p−2un(un−u). |
Since dimX−<∞, we have u−n→u−, i.e., ‖u−n‖→‖u−‖. Collecting all infinitesimal terms, one has
‖u+n‖2−‖u+‖2=o(1)+∫R2|un|p−2un(un−u)−⟨B′(un),un−u⟩. |
Since ∫R2|un|p−2un(un−u)→0 and ⟨B′(un),un−u⟩→0 as n→∞, we obtain that ‖u+n‖→‖u+‖ as n→∞, from which we infer that un→u in E.
Proof of Theorem 1.3. From Remark 3.1, we know that Lemma 3.4 remains true if (V1) is replaced by (V2). Hence, under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.3, there is A>0 such that I(u)≤−A, then
ddt|t=1I(tun)≥0. | (3.11) |
Similar to the proof of Lemma 3.5, we can obtain that Ci(Iλ,∞)=0 for all i∈N. On the other hand, by an analysis similar to that in the proof of Lemma 2.5, we can prove that I also has a local linking at 0 with respect to the decomposition E=E−⊕E+; therefore, for k=dimE−, we derive Ck(I,0)≠0, which means that
Ck(I,0)≠Ck(I,∞). |
It follows from Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 2.1 that I has a nonzero critical point, which completes the proof.
In this study, we establish the existence and multiplicity of solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing potentials on the plane. Our approach, which combines the Trudinger-Moser inequality, variational methods, and Morse theory, has proven effective in handling the complexities introduced by nonlocal terms and critical exponential growth. The theorems presented in this paper not only extend the existing knowledge in this research area but also provide new insights into the behavior of solutions under different conditions.
Looking forward, there are several promising directions for future research. Firstly, exploring the stability and dynamics of the solutions found in this study could yield valuable insights into the physical implications of these equations. Second, extending the analysis to higher dimensions or to different types of potentials could broaden the applicability of our results. Additionally, investigating the interplay between the nonlocal terms and the nonlinearities in the equation could lead to the development of more sophisticated analytical tools. Lastly, considering the impact of external fields or boundary conditions on the solutions could enrich the theoretical framework and possibly lead to new applications in physics and engineering.
Overall, this research opens up new avenues for studying nonlinear Schrödinger equations and contributes to a deeper understanding of the underlying mathematical structures and their physical relevance.
Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to thank the editor and the referees for their helpful suggestions. Research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Provincial (Grant No. 2023JJ30559) and the technology plan project of Guizhou (Grant No. [2020]1Y004).
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
[1] |
R. Jackiw, S. Y. Pi, Soliton solutions to the gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the plane, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990), 2969–2972. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969
![]() |
[2] |
R. Jackiw, S. Y. Pi, Classical and quantal nonrelativistic Chern-Simons theory, Phys. Rev. D, 42 (1990), 3500–3513. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3500 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3500
![]() |
[3] |
C. Hagen, A new gauge theory without an elementary photon, Ann. Phys., 157 (1984), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90064-2 doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90064-2
![]() |
[4] |
C. R. Hagen, Rotational anomalies without anyons, Phys. Rev. D, 31 (1985), 2135–2136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2135 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2135
![]() |
[5] |
C. O. Alves, Z. Yuan, L. Huang, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for discontinuous elliptic problems in RN, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sec. A, 151 (2021), 548–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2020.30 doi: 10.1017/prm.2020.30
![]() |
[6] | R. Jackiw, Self-dual Chern-Simons solitons, In: K. Schmdgen, Mathematical Physics X: Proceedings of the Xth Congress on Mathematical Physics, Held at Leipzig, Germany, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77303-7_15 |
[7] |
J. Byeon, H. Huh, J. Seok, Standing waves of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with the gauge field, J. Funct. Anal., 263 (2012), 1575–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2012.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2012.05.024
![]() |
[8] |
G. Li, X. Luo, W. Shuai, Sign-changing solutions to a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 455 (2017), 1559–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048
![]() |
[9] |
Z. Liu, Z. Ouyang, J. Zhang, Existence and multiplicity of sign-changing standing waves for a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation in R2, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), 3082–3111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ab1bc4 doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab1bc4
![]() |
[10] |
J. Zhang, X. Tang, F. Zhao, On multiplicity and concentration of solutions for a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Appl. Anal., 99 (2020), 2001–2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2018.1553033 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2018.1553033
![]() |
[11] |
L. Shen, Zero-mass gauged Schrödinger equations with supercritical exponential growth, J. Differential Equations, 393 (2024), 204–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.02.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2024.02.020
![]() |
[12] |
C. Zhang, Z. Liang, F. Li, Nodal solutions for gauged Schrödinger equation with nonautonomous asymptotically quintic nonlinearity, J. Geom. Anal., 34 (2024), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-023-01454-z doi: 10.1007/s12220-023-01454-z
![]() |
[13] |
N. Zhang, X. Tang, S. Chen, Mountain-pass type solutions for the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equation with zero mass potential and critical exponential growth, J. Geom. Anal., 33 (2023), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-01046-3 doi: 10.1007/s12220-022-01046-3
![]() |
[14] |
T. Gou, Z. Zhang, Normalized solutions to the Chern-Simons-Schrödinger system, J. Funct. Anal., 280 (2021), 108894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108894 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108894
![]() |
[15] |
W. Xie, C. Chen, Sign-changing solutions for the nonlinear Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations, Appl. Anal., 99 (2020), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2018.1514020 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2018.1514020
![]() |
[16] |
T. Bartsch, Z. Q. Wang, Existence and multiplicity results for some superlinear elliptic problems on RN, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 20 (1995), 1725–1741. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309508821149 doi: 10.1080/03605309508821149
![]() |
[17] |
S. Chen, J. Liu, X. Wu, Existence and multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for a class of modified nonlinear fourth-order elliptic equations on RN, Appl. Math. Comput., 248 (2014), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.021 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.021
![]() |
[18] |
B. Hua, R. Li, L. Wang, A class of semilinear elliptic equations on groups of polynomial growth, J. Differential Equations, 363 (2023), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2023.03.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2023.03.025
![]() |
[19] |
G. Cerami, D. Passaseo, S. Solimini, Infinitely many positive solutions to some scalar field equations with nonsymmetric coefficients, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 66 (2013), 372–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21410 doi: 10.1002/cpa.21410
![]() |
[20] |
R. C. López, G. H. Sun, O. Camacho-Nieto, C. Yez-Mrquez, S. H. Dong, Analytical traveling-wave solutions to a generalized Gross–Pitaevskii equation with some new time and space varying nonlinearity coefficients and external fields, Phys. Lett. A, 381 (2017), 2978–2985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2017.07.012
![]() |
[21] | S. Biagi, E. Vecchi, S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci, Semilinear elliptic equations involving mixed local and nonlocal operators, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sec. A, 151 (2021), 1611–1641. |
[22] |
B. Cheng, X. Tang, High energy solutions of modified quasilinear fourth-order elliptic equations with sign-changing potential, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.10.015 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.10.015
![]() |
[23] | P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, Vol. 65, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbms/065 |
[24] |
S. Liu, J. Zhou, Standing waves for quasilinear Schrödinger-Poisson systems with indefinite potentials, J. Differential Equations, 265 (2018), 3970–3987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.05.024
![]() |
[25] | S. Liu, Existence of solutions to a superlinear p-Laplacian equation, Electron. J. Differential Equations, 2001 (2001), 1–6. |
[26] |
Z. Q. Wang, On a superlinear elliptic equation, AIHPC, 8 (1991), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30276-1 doi: 10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30276-1
![]() |
[27] | P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods and their application to partial differential equations, In: S. S. Chern, Seminar on nonlinear partial differential equations, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, Vol. 2, New York: Springer, 1984,307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1110-5_16 |
[28] |
S. J. Li, M. Willem, Applications of local linking to critical point theory, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 189 (1995), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1995.1002 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1002
![]() |
[29] |
Z. Liu, V. D. Radulescu, Z. Yuan, Concentration of solutions for fractional Kirchhoff equations with discontinuous reaction, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-022-01849-y doi: 10.1007/s00033-022-01849-y
![]() |
[30] |
Y. Ding, Variational methods for strongly indefinite problems, Scientia Sinica Mathematica, 47 (2017), 779-810. https://doi.org/10.1360/N012016-00164 doi: 10.1360/N012016-00164
![]() |
[31] |
A. Ambrosetti, P. H. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal., 14 (1973), 349–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7 doi: 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7
![]() |
[32] | J. Q. Liu, The Morse index of a saddle point, J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci., 2 (1989), 32–39. |
[33] |
R. Karasev, A. Skopenkov, Some converses to intrinsic linking theorems, Discrete Comput. Geom., 70 (2023), 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-023-00505-0 doi: 10.1007/s00454-023-00505-0
![]() |
[34] |
J. M. Bezerra do Ó, E. Medeiros, U. Severo, A nonhomogeneos elliptic problem involving critical growth in dimension two, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345 (2008), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.074 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.074
![]() |
[35] |
Z. Yuan, J. Yu, Existence of solutions for Dirichlet elliptic problems with discontinuous nonlinearity, Nonlinear Anal., 197 (2020), 111848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2020.111848 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2020.111848
![]() |
[36] |
G. Li, X. Luo, W. Shuai, Sign-changing solutions to a gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 455 (2017), 1550–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.06.048
![]() |
[37] |
S. Liu, On superlinear Schrödinger equations with periodic potential, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 45 (2012), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-011-0447-2 doi: 10.1007/s00526-011-0447-2
![]() |
[38] |
T. Bartsch, S. Li, Critical point theory for asymptotically quadratic functionals and applications to problems with resonance, Nonlinear Anal., 28 (1997), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(95)00167-T doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(95)00167-T
![]() |