Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

On ABC coupled Langevin fractional differential equations constrained by Perov's fixed point in generalized Banach spaces

  • Nonlinear differential equations are widely used in everyday scientific and engineering dynamics. Problems involving differential equations of fractional order with initial and phase changes are often employed. Using a novel norm that is comfortable for fractional and non-singular differential equations containing Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractional derivatives, we examined a new class of initial values issues in this study. The Perov fixed point theorems that are utilized in generalized Banach spaces form the foundation for the new findings. Examples of the numerical analysis are provided in order to safeguard and effectively present the key findings.

    Citation: Abdelatif Boutiara, Mohammed M. Matar, Jehad Alzabut, Mohammad Esmael Samei, Hasib Khan. On ABC coupled Langevin fractional differential equations constrained by Perov's fixed point in generalized Banach spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 12109-12132. doi: 10.3934/math.2023610

    Related Papers:

    [1] Taqi A. M. Shatnawi, Nadeem Abbas, Wasfi Shatanawi . Comparative study of Casson hybrid nanofluid models with induced magnetic radiative flow over a vertical permeable exponentially stretching sheet. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20545-20564. doi: 10.3934/math.20221126
    [2] Abdul Rauf, Nehad Ali Shah, Aqsa Mushtaq, Thongchai Botmart . Heat transport and magnetohydrodynamic hybrid micropolar ferrofluid flow over a non-linearly stretching sheet. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 164-193. doi: 10.3934/math.2023008
    [3] Yasir Khan, Sohaib Abdal, Sajjad Hussain, Imran Siddique . Numerical simulation for thermal enhancement of H2O + Ethyl Glycol base hybrid nanofluid comprising GO+(Ag,AA7072,MoS2) nano entities due to a stretched sheet. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11221-11237. doi: 10.3934/math.2023568
    [4] Umar Nazir, Kanit Mukdasai . Combine influence of Hall effects and viscous dissipation on the motion of ethylene glycol conveying alumina, silica and titania nanoparticles using the non-Newtonian Casson model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4682-4699. doi: 10.3934/math.2023231
    [5] K. Veera Reddy, G. Venkata Ramana Reddy, Ali Akgül, Rabab Jarrar, Hussein Shanak, Jihad Asad . Numerical solution of MHD Casson fluid flow with variable properties across an inclined porous stretching sheet. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20524-20542. doi: 10.3934/math.20221124
    [6] Khalil Ur Rehman, Nosheen Fatima, Wasfi Shatanawi, Nabeela Kousar . Mathematical solutions for coupled nonlinear equations based on bioconvection in MHD Casson nanofluid flow. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 598-633. doi: 10.3934/math.2025027
    [7] J. Kayalvizhi, A. G. Vijaya Kumar, Ndolane Sene, Ali Akgül, Mustafa Inc, Hanaa Abu-Zinadah, S. Abdel-Khalek . An exact solution of heat and mass transfer analysis on hydrodynamic magneto nanofluid over an infinite inclined plate using Caputo fractional derivative model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3542-3560. doi: 10.3934/math.2023180
    [8] Gunisetty Ramasekhar, Shaik Jakeer, Seethi Reddy Reddisekhar Reddy, Shalan Alkarni, Nehad Ali Shah . Biomedical importance of Casson nanofluid flow with silver and Fe2O3 nanoparticles delivered into a stenotic artery: Numerical study. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 23142-23157. doi: 10.3934/math.20241125
    [9] Ali Raza, Umair Khan, Aurang Zaib, Wajaree Weera, Ahmed M. Galal . A comparative study for fractional simulations of Casson nanofluid flow with sinusoidal and slipping boundary conditions via a fractional approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19954-19974. doi: 10.3934/math.20221092
    [10] C. S. K. Raju, S.V. Siva Rama Raju, S. Mamatha Upadhya, N. Ameer Ahammad, Nehad Ali Shah, Thongchai Botmart . A numerical study of swirling axisymmetric flow characteristics in a cylinder with suspended PEG based magnetite and oxides nanoparticles. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4575-4595. doi: 10.3934/math.2023226
  • Nonlinear differential equations are widely used in everyday scientific and engineering dynamics. Problems involving differential equations of fractional order with initial and phase changes are often employed. Using a novel norm that is comfortable for fractional and non-singular differential equations containing Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractional derivatives, we examined a new class of initial values issues in this study. The Perov fixed point theorems that are utilized in generalized Banach spaces form the foundation for the new findings. Examples of the numerical analysis are provided in order to safeguard and effectively present the key findings.



    Hybrid nanofluids are an advanced type of fluid generated by combining two or more different categories of nanoparticles with a base fluid. This combination enhances the thermal and mechanical characteristics of the base fluid, surpassing traditional single-component nanofluids. The thermal conductivity, viscosity, and heat transfer capabilities can be improved by including nanoparticles such as metals, oxides, carbides, or carbon-based materials such as graphene. The study of hybrid nanofluid flow has gained noteworthy consideration due to its potential uses in various engineering and industrial processes, including cooling systems, microelectronics, biomedical devices, and energy systems. Analyzing the flow of hybrid nanofluids is a challenging but crucial area of research due to the complex interactions between these factors. Suresh et al. [1] presented the experimental model of hybrid nanofluids. Moin [2] considered the mixed conviction for hybrid nanofluids and performed experimental results using the laminar flow. Madhesh and Kalaiselvam [3] performed the experimental results for cooling using hybrid nanofluids, and explored the force convection and thermal features. Xian et al. [4] reported the impact of hybrid nanofluids and prepared techniques introduced for engineering applications. Shoaib et al. [5] reported a comprehensive analysis of hybrid nanofluids using the radiation impact of a stretchable sheet. They considered the rotating flow having magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) impacts for the phase flow model. Yashkun et al. [6] considered the permeable surface for both stretching and shrinking to analyze the impression of hybrid nanofluids. They applied MHD on the flow to more convenient results for hybrid nanofluids under radiation. Akbar et al. [7] discussed the hybrid nanofluid flow under the with an open-cell metallic foam. Ramesh et al. [8] debated the influence of hybrid nanofluids, while Madhukesh et al. [9] inspected the impression of hybrid nanofluids. Waqas et al. [10] provided comparative results of hybrid nanofluids at a stretchable sheet. Nadeem et al. [11] highlighted the features of the phase flow model using two nanoparticles and a base fluid. They considered the Brinkman phase flow model and produced analytical results. Few authors have developed the feature of their analysis using the phase flow model for different flow assumptions; see Refs. [12,13].

    In the study of heat transfer, particularly in boundary layer problems involving fluid flow over the surface, two essential boundary conditions are commonly used: the prescribed surface temperature and the prescribed heat flux. These conditions are crucial for accurately modeling the thermal behavior and solving practical engineering problems. The prescribed surface temperature specifies that the temperature of the surface remains constant regardless of the heat flux or other thermal conditions of the fluid. This condition is often used when the surface is maintained at a uniform temperature due to external heating or cooling sources. The prescribed heat flux conditions dictate that the rate of heat transfer per unit area across the surface is kept constant. Bataller [14] discussed the impact of the prescribed thermal effects at the stretchable surface. Aman and Ishak [15] debated on the numerically prescribed conditions on the vertical stretching sheet. Qasim et al. [16] deliberated the slip phenomena using the prescribed thermal conditions. They applied the ferrofluid model under the MHD impression to numerically deliberate the consequences. Nabwey et al. [17] highlighted the impression of the prescribed surface temperature on the nanofluid. Ramesh et al. [18] reported the work for the prescribed surface temperature on the nanofluid flow. Reddy et al. [19] explained the features of activation energy for nanofluids. Waini et al. [20] worked on the stability for a shrinking cylinder using the prescribed thermal conditions. Nabwey et al. [21] discussed the impact of nanofluids within a rotating desk. Abdal et al. [22] reported the impact of the prescribed thermal conditions for the Maxwell fluid model. The bioconvection and heat transfer phenomena were comprehensively discussed. Sadighi et al. [23] debated the analysis of the nanofluid model with MHD having prescribed thermal conditions. Recently, authors have studied the prescribed thermal conditions for different fluid models; see Refs. [24,25].

    The Casson fluid theory explains the behavior of non-Newtonian fluids with yield stress. Below this stress, they act like a solid; above it, they flow like a fluid. The model is used for fluids with microstructural compositions such as blood, chocolate, certain slurries, and cosmetic products. It captures the nonlinear flow characteristics of these fluids, which is important to understand their behavior under different flow conditions. The study of Casson fluid flow over a stretchable surface is significant in industrial and biomedical applications because the yield stress of Casson fluid means that the flow behavior is strongly affected by the applied shear stress, which changes across the stretching surface. Batra and Das [26] considered the rotating cylinder to analyze the Casson fluid. In their analysis, the inner cylinder was fixed and outer cylinder was rotating. Vajravelu et al. [27] emphasized the impression of a mixed convection for the Casson fluid at a stretchable vertical sheet. The variable thermal properties have been highlighted analytically. Mustafa et al. [28] considered the stagnation region for the Casson fluid flow at a stretchable sheet. Mukhopadhyay et al. [29] studied the impact of The Casson fluid flow having temperature dependent characteristics over a stretchable sheet. Khan et al. [30] discussed the impact of the Casson fluid and developed the results for closed solutions. The linear stretchable sheet was taken into account. Nawaz et al. [31] numerically implemented the technique of Predictor–corrector on the Casson fluid model. Authors have debated the impact of the Casson fluid model for different assumptions; see refs. [32,33].

    The theory of micropolar fluids extends classical fluid dynamics in view of the fluid particles, microstructure, and local angular momentum. The micropolar fluid theory is particularly useful for studying fluids with internal microstructures, such as liquid crystals, polymeric suspensions, colloidal fluids, and biological fluids. Micropolar fluids contain microelements that can rotate and exhibit micro-inertia effects, offering a more comprehensive description of the fluid behavior, especially when these microstructural effects are significant. One important area of study is the flow of micropolar fluids over a stretchable surface, which is of interest in both theoretical research and practical applications. Often modeled as a linearly or exponentially stretching sheet, a stretchable surface creates complex flow fields that significantly differ from flow over a non-stretchable surface. Such stretching sheets are commonly encountered in industrial processes such as the extrusion of polymer sheets, the cooling of metallic plates in a stretching motion, and manufacturing processes that involve fluids with microstructural components interacting with moving boundaries. Takhar et al. [34] initiated the work on the micropolar fluid with convection effects at a stretching sheet. The numerical scheme was used to develop the theoretical results. Abo-Eldahab and Ghonaim [35] considered the micropolar fluid with electrically conducting with heat convection impression at a stretchable sheet. Mahmoud [36] initiated the work on the micropolar fluid with thermal impacts over a stretching sheet. They considered the variable features of the fluid to analyze the effect of MHD and thermal radiation. Hayat et al. [37] considered the nonlinear stretching sheet to develop the results for the micropolar fluid. The stagnation region with electrically conducting fluid impression has been studied. Ahmad et al. [38] worked on the time dependent flow of micropolar fluids due to a stretchable sheet. The implicit finite difference scheme has been implemented on the fluid model. Hayat et al. [39] considered the chemical reaction with a micropolar fluid by taking the curved sheet into account. Bilal et al. [40] considered the porous surface to analyze the micropolar fluid features. Thermal radiation was studied in their analysis. Sharma et al. [41] initiated the results of micropolar MHD with slip phenomena over a stretching sheet. Authors have studied micropolar fluids with different flow assumptions; see Refs. [42,43].

    Viewing the above literature, we considered the hybrid Casson micropolar nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching cylinder/sheet. The prescribed thermal conditions were implemented, and the flow features were studied. The inclined magnetic field was studied under viscous dissipation and thermal radiation, and the variable temperature features were discussed. The nanoparticles of Ag and CuO with an Ethylene Glycol (EG) base fluid EG were discussed. Additionally, the study explored the impact of an inclined magnetic field on the flow behavior. The governing partial differential equations described the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy, which were transformed into a nonlinear ordinary differential equation using appropriate similarity transformations. Then, these equations were numerically cracked using a reliable computational technique, and the results were presented in detail. The current study addresses the following scientific questions:

    ● How do various Casson fluids, micropolar, temperature properties, radiation, porosity, heat generation, suction, magnetic, and nanoparticle concentration factors impact the fluid temperature (PST and PHF) for both cases under flow conditions over a stretching cylinder/sheet?

    ● How does the rate of heat transfer and skin friction in a Casson micropolar hybrid nanofluid under the flow assumptions differ for both cases of the prescribed conditions (PST and PHF) over a stretching cylinder/sheet?

    ● The numerical outcomes compare the coefficient of Skin friction and the Nusselt number tabulated graphically.

    The steady incompressible flow of a hybrid micropolar Casson nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching cylinder/sheet is deliberated, which is seen in Figure 1. The thermal radiation and temperature dependent properties were considered in the present analysis. The accurate angle of inclined magnetic field Π was applied in the y-direction. As Π=π2, the magnetic field behaves as a transverse magnetic field. U1 and V1 are the velocity mechanisms along the axial and radial directions, respectively, in the case of a stretching cylinder (in case of stretching sheet in x, y directions). The flow is expected to be in the axial (x) direction, with the radial direction being perpendicular to x. The entire analysis is conducted under the assumptions of the boundary layer theory. The expression is presented as follows (see Refs. [7,8,12,18,38]):

    V1ˆr+V1ˆr+U1x=0, (1)
    ρhNF(U1U1x+V1U1ˆr)=1ˆrˆr(ˆr(μhNF+Pˆr2πc+k)U1ˆr)σhNFβ02U1sin2(Π)+k(Nˆr)ˆrνhNFk0U1ˆr, (2)
    ρhNFj(U1Nx+V1Nˆr)=γhNF1ˆrˆr(ˆrNˆr)k(2N+U1ˆr), (3)
    Figure 1.  Flow pattern over stretching sheet/cylinder.

    with the following suitable boundary conditions:

    U1=Uw,N1=nU1ˆr,V1=Vw,atˆrb,
    U10,N10,asˆr, (4)

    where γ1=μB2πcPˆr is the Casson fluid parameter. The thermal expansion coefficient is β0. γhNF=μhNF(T)+k2 is the viscosity of the spin radiation of the hybrid nanofluid. μhNF is the viscosity of the hybrid nanofluid. The special transformation is introduced as follows:

    U1=U0xlFζ(ζ),V1=bυfυfU0lF(ζ),ζ=ˆr2b22bU0υfl,N=3U0lxˆrbυfg(ζ). (5)

    The non-dimensional equations become the following:

    ρFρhNFμhNFμF(1+1R+K1)((1+2ζA)Fζζζ(ζ)+2AFζζ(ζ))+Fζζ(ζ)F(ζ)(Fζ(ζ))2χρFρhNFμhNFμFFζ(ζ)ΩρFρhNFFζ(ζ)sin2(Π)+K1ρFρhNF((1+2ζA)gζ(ζ)+2Ag(ζ))=0, (6)
    ρFρhNF(μhNFμF+K12)((1+2ζA)gζζ(ζ)+4Agζ(ζ))+gζ(ζ)F(ζ)Ag(ζ)F(ζ)2Fζ(ζ)g(ζ)K12ρFρhNF(g(ζ)+Fζζ(ζ))=0, (7)

    with the following boundary condition:

    F(0)=Q,Fζ(0)=1,Fζ()=1,g(0)=nFζζ(0),g()=0. (8)

    The equation of the temperature with boundary layer approximations can be expressed as follows (see Refs. [7,8,25]):

    U1Tx+V1Tˆr=1(ρcp)hnf1ˆrˆr(KhNF(T)ˆrTˆr)+1(ρcp)hNFR1(TT)1(ρcp)hNF1ˆr(ˆrqˆr)ˆr. (9)

    KHNF(T)=khNF(1+EΘ(ζ)) is the variable thermal conductivity of the hybrid nanofluid. σhNF is the electric conductivity of hybrid nanofluid. The thermal expansion coefficient is β0. qˆr is the radiative heat flux. The Reynold approximation of the radiative heat flux is presented as qˆr=4σ3k1T4ˆr. The constant Steffen Boltzmann is σ. k1 is the absorption coefficient. The differences of temperature within the flow are considered to be sufficiently small, so T4 presented as a temperature linear function. T4 expands using the Taylor series about T and diminishes the higher order terms, which is considered as T44T3T3T4.

    The special transformation is introduced as follows (see Ref. [7,25]):

    U1=U0xlFζ(ζ),V1=bυfυfU0lF(ζ),ζ=ˆr2b22bU0υfl,T=T+(TwT)Θ(ζ)(PST). (10)

    The relevant boundary conditions are as follows:

    TTw=0,atˆrb,TT,asˆr. (11)

    The dimensionless system becomes the followings:

    1Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFkhNFkF((1+2Aζ)(1+EΘ(ζ))Θζζ(ζ)+2A(1+EΘ(ζ))Θζ(ζ)+E(1+2ζA)Θζ(ζ)Θζ(ζ))+43Rd((1+2ζA)Θζζ(ζ)+2AΘζ(ζ))+Θζ(ζ)F(ζ)2Fζ(ζ)Θ(ζ)+S(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFΘ(ζ)=0, (12)

    with the following boundary condition:

    Θ(0)1=0,Θ()=0. (13)

    The special transformation is introduced as follows:

    U1=U0xlFζ(ζ),V1=bυfυfU0lF(ζ),ζ=ˆr2b22bU0υfl,T=T+(TwT)Φ(ζ)(PHF). (14)

    The relevant boundary conditions are as follows:

    kTˆrqw=0,atˆrb,TT,asˆr. (15)

    The dimensionless system becomes the following:

    1Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFkhNFkF((1+2ζA)(1+EΦ(ζ))Φζζ(ζ)+2A(1+EΦ(ζ))Φζ(ζ)+E(1+2ζA)Φζ(ζ)Φζ(ζ))+43Rd((1+2ζA)Φζζ(ζ)+2AΦζ(ζ))+Φζ(ζ)F(ζ)2Fζ(ζ)Φ(ζ)+S(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFΦ(ζ)=0, (16)

    with the following boundary condition:

    Φζ(0)+11+E=0,Φ()=0. (17)

    The thermodynamic characteristics are defined in Table 1. The expressions for the thermodynamic properties of the base fluid and nanoparticles are as follows:

    Table 1.  Thermodynamic characteristics of particles and fluid (see Ref. [12]).
    cp ρ k Pr σ
    Heat capacity Density Thermal conductivity Prandtl number Electric conductivity
    Ethyleneglycol 2382.1 1117.48 0.2492 210.3 1.07×108
    Ag 233 10500 429 6.3×107
    CuO 531.8 6320 76.5 5.8×107

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    ρhNF=(1φAg)(1φCuO)ρEG+φAgρAg+φCuOρCuO,
    (cpρ)hNF=(1φAg)(1φCuO)(cpρ)EG+φAg(cpρ)Ag+φCuO(cpρ)CuO,
    khNF=kAg+2kBF2φAg(kBFkAg)kAg+2kBF+φAg(kBFkAg)kBF,
    kBF=kCuO+2kEG2φCuO(kEGkCuO)kCuO+2kEG+φCuO(kEGkCuO)kEG,
    σhNF=σAg+2σBF2φAg(σBFσAg)σAg+2σBF+φAg(σBFσAg)σBF,
    σBF=σCuO+2σEG2φCuO(σEGσCuO)σCuO+2σEG+φCuO(σEGσCuO)σEG.

    Nomenclature

    Density of hybrid nanofluid ρhNF Heat capacity of CuO (cp)CuO
    Solid nanoparticle of Ag φAg Heat Capacity of Ag (cp)Ag
    Solid nanoparticle of CuO φCuO Heat Capacity of Ethylene glycol (cp)EG
    Density of Ethylene glycol ρEG Thermal conductivity of Ag kAg
    Density of CuO ρCuO Thermal conductivity of CuO kCuO
    Electric conductivity of CuO σCuO Thermal conductivity of Ethylene glycol kEG
    Electric conductivity of Ag σBF Electric conductivity of Ethylene glycol σBF
    Casson fluid parameter γ1 Viscosity of spin hybrid nanofluid γhNF
    Thermal expansion coefficient β0 Constant of Steffen Boltzmann σ
    Wall temperature Tw Absorption coefficient k1
    Velocity profile F Temperature profile Θ
    Temperature T Wall velocity Uw
    Velocity components U1,V1 Micropolar component N
    Fluid constant n Vortex viscosity k
    Porosity factor χ Variable thermal conductivity E
    Micropolar factor K1 Magnetic field Ω
    Radiation Rd Casson fluid factor R
    Micro-rotation profile g Prescribe surface temperature PST
    Prescribe heat flux PHF Heat generation S

    Skin friction and the Nusselt number are physical quantities, which are presented as follows:

    Cf=2τwρfUw2,Nux=xqwkf(TwT). (18)

    The Eq 18 becomes non dimensional and is defined as follows:

    CfRe12=ρFρhNF(μhNFμF+1R+K1nK1)(Fζζ(0)),
    NuxRe12=1Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNF(khNFkF(1+EΘ(0))+43Rd)Θζ(0),(PST),
    NuxRe1/2=1Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNF(khNFkF(1+EΦ(0))+43Rd)/Φ(0),(PHF). (19)

    The Reynold number is Re.

    The bvp4c numerical technique is used to elucidate non-linear higher order differential equations that have specific boundary conditions. The Bvp4c method involves breaking down the intricate higher-order differential system into a system of first order differential equations, which can then be numerically elucidated. The model convergence is performed by reducing the residual error and achieving the tolerance threshold. The steps involved in this numerical technique include the following:

    X(1)=F(ζ);X(2)=Fζ(ζ);Fζζ(ζ)=X(3);Fζζζ(ζ)=XX1;X(4)=g(ζ);
    X(5)=gζ(ζ);gζζ(ζ)=XX2;Θ(ζ)=X(6);X(7)=Θζ(ζ);Θζζ(ζ)=XX3;Φ(ζ)=X(8);X(9)=Φζ(ζ);Φζζ(ζ)=XX3; (20)
    XX1=1ρFρhNF(μhNFμF+1R+K1)(1+2ζA)((2ρFρhNF(μhNFμF+1R+K1)AX(3))+X(1)X(3)X(2)X(2)χρFρhNFμhNFμFX(2)ΩρFρhNFX(2)sin2(Π)+K1ρFρhNF((1+2ζA)X(5)+2AX(4))); (21)
    XX2=1ρFρhNF(μhNFμF+K12)(1+2ζA)(ρFρhNF(μhNFμF+K12)(4AX(5))+X(5)X(1)AX(1)X(4)2X(2)X(4)K12ρFρhNF(X(4)+X(3))); (22)
    XX3=11Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNF(khNFkF+43Rd)(1+2ζA)(1+EX(6))(1Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFkhNFkF(2A(1+EX(6))X(7)+E(1+2ζA)X(7)X(7))+43Rd(2AX(7))+X(7)X(1)2X(6)X(2)+S(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFX(6)); (23)
    XX3=11Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNF(khNFkF+43Rd)(1+2ζA)(1+EX(8))(1Pr(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFkhNFkF(2A(1+EX(8))X(9)+E(1+2ζA)X(9)X(9))+43Rd(2AX(9))+X(9)X(1)2X(8)X(2)+S(ρcp)F(ρcp)hNFX(8)); (24)

    The boundary condition at the surface is as follows:

    X0(1)Q;X0(2)1;X(2);X0(4)=nX0(3);X(4);X0(6)1;X(6);X0(9)=1/(1+E);X(8); (25)

    A system of differential equations were developed under the flow assumptions and boundary layer approximations. The mathematical model was cracked through a numerical scheme and involved physical factor impact phenomena offered in the form of graphs and in tabular form. Figures 29 report the physical features of external forces on the temperature (PST and PHF). The difference of joule heating and the prescribed condition for temperature are presented in Figures 2 and 3. The thickness of the thermal layer was enriched due to an increment in the joule heating for both cases of the stretching cylinder and the sheet. As more thermal energy is created within the fluid, the temperature naturally rises because temperature measures the average kinetic energy of the fluid molecules. As more heat is generated, the molecules move more energetically, thus leading to a rise in temperature. Figures 4 and 5 report the difference of variable thermal conductivity and the prescribed condition on temperature. For the case of the prescribed surface temperature (PST) and the variable thermal conductivity, there was a direct relation, which is reported in Figure 4. The prescribed surface temperature (PST) increased as the thermal conductivity parameter values increased, as a higher thermal conductivity improves the heat conduction within the fluid and raises its temperature. Alternatively, the opposite relation found in the case of the prescribed temperature (PHF) and the variable thermal conductivity, which is reported in Figure 5. The prescribed heat flux (PHF) declined due to the increased variable thermal conductivity parameter values. As the thermal conductivity increases, heat spreads more effectively within the fluid, thus reducing the temperature gradient near the surface. Since heat flux is proportional to the temperature gradient, a lower gradient leads to a decrease in the PHF. The difference between the solid nanoconcentration and the prescribed conditions (PHF and PST) for temperature is reported in Figures 6 and 7. The thickness of the thermal layer is boosted up due to an increment in the nanoconcentration factor for both cases for the prescribed conditions (PHF and PST). Due to the physical properties, the thermal conductivity of the fluid gradually enlarg4es due to an enrichment in the nanoconcentration factor. Therefore, the fluid temperature is boosted up. The difference between the solid radiation and the prescribed conditions (PHF and PST) for temperature is reported in Figures 8-9. The thermal thickness of the prescribed conditions (PHF and PST) for temperature is enhanced due to an increment in the factor of radiation. As more radiative heat is absorbed, the fluid internal energy increases, thus leading to a rise in temperature because the absorbed radiation boosts the kinetic energy of the fluid molecules, thereby increasing the fluid temperature.

    Figure 2.  Influence of S on temperature (PST).
    Figure 3.  Influence of S on temperature (PHF).
    Figure 4.  Influence of E on temperature (PST).
    Figure 5.  Influence of E on temperature (PHF).
    Figure 6.  Influence of φ2 on temperature (PST).
    Figure 7.  Influence of φ2 on temperature (PHF).
    Figure 8.  Influence of Rd on temperature (PST).
    Figure 9.  Influence of Rd on temperature (PHF).

    Table 2 displays the physical features of the external forces on the Nusselt number for both cases of temperature (PST and PHF). Moreover, the differences between the variable thermal conductivity and the Nusselt number (PST and PHF) are presented in Table 2. The heat transfer becomes low due to an enrichment in the variable thermal conductivity in both cases of the stretching cylinder and the sheet. As the Nusselt number reflects the efficiency of convection, a decrease in the temperature gradient results in a lower Nusselt number, which indicates a reduced convective heat transfer compared to a conductive heat transfer. Table 2 compares the micropolar factor and Nusselt number (PST and PHF). The higher the micropolar factor, the richer the heat transfer fluid. The enhanced Nusselt number signifies the efficiency, thereby showing that the hybrid nanofluid with more pronounced micropolar characteristics excels in heat transfer through convection compared to one with weaker micropolar effects. The variation of the porosity factor and the Nusselt number is reported in Table 2. The Nusselt number found declines in its behavior by enlarging the values of the porosity factor. The decline in the Nusselt number with an increasing porosity factor indicates that the porous medium structure allows the hybrid nanofluid to flow with less resistance, thus reducing the effectiveness of a convective heat transfer. The nanoconcentration of the particles affects the Nusselt number, which is revealed in Table 2. The temperature gradient shows a decline due to higher values of the solid nanoconcentration. The Nusselt number decreased as the concentration of the solid nanoparticles increased because the hybrid nanofluid improves the internal heat conduction, though it decreases its ability to transfer heat through convection. The Nusselt number becomes enriched due to an increment in the section factor. The Nusselt number increased as the section parameter values rose, thus enhancing the heat transfer efficiency. As the section parameter and the thermal boundary layer increased, the convective heat transport away from the surface improved. The Nusselt number reduced due to an increment in the Casson fluid factor A reduced fluid flow decreased the heat transfer by convection due to a thicker boundary layer, lower shear rates, and the temperature gradient, leading to a decrease in the Nusselt number. The temperature gradient deteriorated due to an addition in the thermal radiation. Increased thermal radiation results in a thicker thermal boundary layer, thereby extending the region where temperature changes occur and reducing the temperature gradient near the surface. The temperature gradient deteriorated due to an addition in the joule heating and the magnetic field. The rate of convective heat transfer decreased as the fluid velocity decreased. Convection depends on the fluid movement to transfer heat from the surface to the bulk of the fluid. Table 3 displays the physical features of external forces on Skin friction for both cases of temperature (PST and PHF). The variation in skin friction remains constant due to different thermal conductivity values. The variation of skin friction diminishes while improving the values of the micropolar polar fluid factor. The rotation dominated the fluid velocity, thus improving the velocity and reducing the friction between the surface and the fluid. The skin friction enriches due to improving the values of the porosity and suction factors. Increasing the porosity improved the fluid permeability at the surface, thus enabling more fluid to flow through. This change disrupted the velocity gradient and increased the resistance to fluid motion. As a result, the shear stress at the wall intensified, thus leading to a higher skin friction. The variation of skin friction is enriched while improving the values of the nanoconcentration. A higher concentration led to an increased effective viscosity, thus enhancing the flow resistance near the surface and raising the skin friction. The variation of skin friction is enriched while improving the values of the Casson factor. A higher yield stress resulted in a greater velocity gradient near the surface, which increased the skin friction. The variation in skin friction remains constant due to different radiation values and joule heating values. The variation of skin friction is enriched while improving the values of the magnetic field. By increasing the values of the magnetic field, the rate of fluid near the surface declined, as well as the friction between the fluid and the surface. Table 4 reports the comparison of present analysis with decay results from Hayat et al. [44] and Fang et al. [45] for different values of Ω, while the other values are as follos: E0,K10.0,χ0.0,φ20.0,φ10.0,Q0.0,R,Rd0.0,S0.0,Π90°. It is noted that our results have been found to be in a good agreement with the decay results.

    Table 2.  Numerical outcome of Nusselt number of (PST and PHF) for different values of physical factors.
    Physical factors Stretching Cylinder NuxRe1/2 Stretching Sheet NuxRe1/2
    E K1 χ φ2 Q R Rd S Ω PST PHF PST PHF
    0.0 2.0 0.5 0.08 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 2.68025501 0.66791955 2.75027385 0.68536824
    1.0 - - - - - - - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    2.0 - - - - - - - - 1.87844944 0.60413293 1.94645449 0.62307621
    3.0 - - - - - - - - 1.65033275 0.59633232 1.71847256 0.61547857
    1.0 0.0 - - - - - - - 2.14724623 0.60586857 2.21015657 0.62292999
    - 1.0 - - - - - - - 2.17573737 0.61385596 2.24076293 0.63148723
    - 2.0 - - - - - - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - 3.0 - - - - - - - 2.21456402 0.62490228 2.28645751 0.64438330
    - 2.0 0.0 - - - - - - 2.23215651 0.62978281 2.29935287 0.64796504
    - - 0.5 - - - - - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - 1.0 - - - - - - 2.16314322 0.61037710 2.23302114 0.62935374
    - - 1.5 - - - - - - 2.13036519 0.60118742 2.20197968 0.62067002
    - - 0.5 0.02 - - - - - 2.31604383 0.58217328 2.37831025 0.59710573
    - - - 0.04 - - - - - 2.27502157 0.59517763 2.33940656 0.61128592
    - - - 0.06 - - - - - 2.23531224 0.60773056 2.30174768 0.62504419
    - - - 0.08 - - - - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - - 0.08 0.1 - - - - 1.85819531 0.51271421 1.93119943 0.53247072
    - - - - 0.3 - - - - 2.02226662 0.56442700 2.09300532 0.58359647
    - - - - 0.5 - - - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - - - 0.7 - - - - 2.38150236 0.67877131 2.44741020 0.69663055
    - - - - 0.5 0.1 - - - 2.33553661 0.65893713 2.38928658 0.67329885
    - - - - - 0.3 - - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - - - - 0.6 - - - 2.09723173 0.59197112 2.18069797 0.61471242
    - - - - - 0.9 - - - 2.03796014 0.57557411 2.13434868 0.60182397
    - - - - - 0.3 0.0 - - 3.72334633 1.43034096 3.79774748 1.45485560
    - - - - - 0.5 - - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - - - - - 1.0 - - 1.57651844 0.41702148 1.67007796 0.44188092
    - - - - - - 1.5 - - 1.17450140 0.30127370 1.32715883 0.34165682
    - - - - - - 0.5 0.1 - 2.45972454 0.69635485 2.51611669 0.71139654
    - - - - - - - 0.3 - 2.33486033 0.65996826 2.39602324 0.67641245
    - - - - - - - 0.5 - 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - - - - - - 0.7 - 2.03752371 0.57376481 2.11934529 0.59610085
    - - - - - - - 0.5 0.0 2.20867198 0.62317212 2.27665787 0.64159023
    - - - - - - - - 0.2 2.19687127 0.61985288 2.26529593 0.63840134
    - - - - - - - - 0.4 2.18524965 0.61658587 2.25413981 0.63527205
    - - - - - - - - 0.6 2.17378184 0.61336406 2.24316693 0.63219606

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Numerical outcome of Skin friction of (PST and PHF) for different values of physical factors.
    Physical factors Stretching cylinder Stretching sheet
    E K1 χ φ2 Q R Rd S Ω PST PHF
    0.0 2.0 0.5 0.08 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    1.0 - - - - - - - - -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    2.0 - - - - - - - - -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    3.0 - - - - - - - - -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    1.0 0.0 - - - - - - - -5.5545630 -5.25811346
    - 1.0 - - - - - - - -5.2792193 -4.93725113
    - 2.0 - - - - - - - -4.9745724 -4.59901144
    - 3.0 - - - - - - - -4.6797115 -4.27967156
    - 2.0 0.0 - - - - - - -4.2167846 -3.85816177
    - - 0.5 - - - - - - -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    - - 1.0 - - - - - - -4.9271602 -4.59046328
    - - 1.5 - - - - - - -5.2407751 -4.91166600
    - - 0.5 0.02 - - - - - -4.1603144 -3.83784846
    - - - 0.04 - - - - - -4.3123313 -3.98120500
    - - - 0.06 - - - - - -4.4548589 -4.11578759
    - - - 0.08 - - - - - -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    - - - 0.08 0.1 - - - - -4.1226179 -3.84484464
    - - - - 0.3 - - - - -4.3496748 -4.03824318
    - - - - 0.5 - - - - -4.5881258 -4.24174000
    - - - - 0.7 - - - - -4.8375862 -4.45535298
    - - - - 0.5 0.1 - - - -1.9035648 -1.71431336
    - - - - - 0.3 - - - -2.8705850 -2.65386694
    - - - - - 0.6 - - - -3.4436681 -3.21613514
    - - - - - 0.9 - - - -3.7195600 -3.48713889
    - - - - - 0.3 0.0 - - -4.58812578 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - 0.5 - - -4.5881257 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - 1.0 - - -4.5881257 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - 1.5 - - -4.5881257 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - 0.5 0.1 - -4.58812578 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - - 0.3 - -4.58812578 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - - 0.5 - -4.58812578 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - - 0.7 - -4.58812578 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - - 0.5 0.0 -4.46578865 -4.11553722
    - - - - - - - - 0.2 -4.58812578 -4.24174000
    - - - - - - - - 0.4 -4.70674735 -4.36392773
    - - - - - - - - 0.6 -4.82195524 -4.48241858

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Comparison of present analysis with decay results Hayat et al. [44] and Fang et al. [45] for different values of Ω and while the other values E0,K10.0,χ0.0,φ20.0,φ10.0,Q0.0,R,Rd0.0,S0.0,Π90°.
    Ω Present analysis Hayat et al.[44] Skin friction Fang et al. [45] Skin friction
    0.2 1.0197685 1.01980 -
    0.5 1.1180253 1.11803 1.1180
    0.8 1.2606271 1.26063 -
    1.0 1.4142057 1.41421 -

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We conducted an analysis of the flow and heat transfer characteristics of a Casson micropolar hybrid nanofluid over a stretching sheet or cylinder. Our study includes factors such as Joule heating, thermal radiation, and variable thermal conductivity. We assessed the prescribed thermal conditions in detail. The governing equations were developed and solved using numerical methods with the Maple software. Below, we highlight the main key findings from our analysis:

    ● The thickness of the thermal layer is enriched due to an increment in the joule heating for both cases of a stretching cylinder and a sheet. As more heat is generated, the molecules move more energetically, thus leading to an increase in temperature.

    ● The thickness of the thermal layer is boosted up due to an increment in the nanoconcentration factor for both cases of the prescribed condition (PHF and PST) for temperature. Due to the physical characteristics, the thermal conductivity of fluid gradually enlarged due to an enrichment in the nanoconcentration factor. As a results, the fluid temperature boosted up.

    ● The enhanced Nusselt number signifies efficiency, showing that the hybrid nanofluid with more pronounced micropolar characteristics excels in heat transfer through convection compared to one with weaker micropolar effects.

    ● The Nusselt number was reduced due to an increment in the Casson fluid factor. A reduced fluid flow decreases the heat transfer by convection due to a thicker boundary layer, lower shear rates, and temperature gradient, leading to a decrease in the Nusselt number.

    ● The PST achieved more heat transfer and friction factor compared to the PHF. The stretching sheet achieved more temperature as compared to the stretching cylinder.

    The limitations associated with the current computational model are as follows:

    ● Models often assume that the nanoparticle dispersion is uniform, overlooking the effects of agglomeration or clustering, which can significantly alter the thermal conductivity and viscosity in real-world applications.

    ● Models may not adequately consider complex heat transfer mechanisms, including particle-particle thermal interactions, thermal resistance, and nanolayer effects.

    ● Computational results are often insufficiently validated against experimental data, which leads to uncertainties regarding the accuracy and reliability of the models.

    In the future, this study can be expanded through various approaches to enhance the understanding and appreciation of the topic. This can be achieved by incorporating diverse geometries with a non-Newtonian fluid model and considering physical impacts that could alter the model performance, such as non-Fourier thermal flux, activation energy, and the Hall and current effects. Additionally, exploring a more complex combination of nanoparticles within the hybrid nanofluid could further extend the scope of this research.

    Nadeem Abbas: Writing–review & editing, Writing–original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization; Wasfi Shatanawi: Writing–review & editing, Writing–original draft, Data curation, Validation, Supervision, Formal analysis; Taqi A.M. Shatnawi: Writing–original draft, Validation, Software, Project administration, Methodology, Visualization, Software, Resources, Investigation, Conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare(s) they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the TAS Lab at Prince Sultan University for funding this work through SEED Project under grant number SEED-CHS-2024-163.

    The authors declare no competing interests.



    [1] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2006.
    [2] L. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, New York: Academic Press, 1999.
    [3] K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, Wiley, 1993.
    [4] R. P. Agarwal, M. Meehan, D. O'regan, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    [5] M. M. Matar, M. abu Jarad, M. Ahmad, A. Zada, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, On the existence and stability of two positive solutions of a hybrid differential system of arbitrary fractional order via Avery-Anderson-Henderson criterion on cones, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03576-6 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03576-6
    [6] K. Deimling, Nonlinear Functional Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
    [7] H. Khan, Y. Li, A. Khan, A. Khan, Existence of solution for a fractional‐order Lotka‐Volterra reaction‐diffusion model with Mittag‐Leffler kernel, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 3377–3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5590 doi: 10.1002/mma.5590
    [8] H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, A. Khan, T. S. Khan, Stability analysis for fractional order advection-reaction diffusion system, Physica A, 521 (2019), 737–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.102 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.102
    [9] G. Rajchakit, A. Pratap, R. Raja, J. Cao, J. Alzabut, C. Huang, Hybrid control scheme for projective lag synchronization of Riemann-Liouville sense fractional order memristive BAM NeuralNetworks with mixed delays, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7080759 doi: 10.3390/math7080759
    [10] J. Alzabut, Almost periodic solutions for an impulsive delay Nicholson's blowflies model, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 234 (2010), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.12.019
    [11] O. Nica, R. Precup, On the nonlocal initial value problem for first order differential systems, Fixed Point Theory, 56 (2011), 113–125.
    [12] A. Boutiara, S. Etemad, J. Alzabut, A. Hussain, M. Subramanian, S. Rezapour, On a nonlinear sequential four-point fractional q-difference equation involving q-integral operators in boundary conditions along with stability criteria, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03525-3 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03525-3
    [13] A. Zada, J. Alzabut, H. Waheed, I. L. Popa, Ulam-Hyers stability of impulsive integrodifferential equations with Riemann-Liouville boundary conditions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-2534-1 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-2534-1
    [14] M. E. Samei, M. M. Matar, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, On the generalized fractional snap boundary problems via G-Caputo operators: Existence and stability analysis, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 498. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03654-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03654-9
    [15] O. Bolojan, Nonlocal initial value problems for first order differential systems, Fixed Point Theory, 13 (2012), 603–612.
    [16] A. Boutiara, M. M. Matar, M. K. Kaabar, F. Martínez, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Some qualitative analyses of neutral functional delay differential equation with generalized Caputo operator, J. Funct. Space, 2021 (2021), 9993177. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9993177 doi: 10.1155/2021/9993177
    [17] A. Berhail, N. Tabouche, M. M. Matar, J. Alzabut, Boundary value problem defined by system of generalized Sturm-Liouville and Langevin Hadamard fractional differential equations, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 2020, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6507 doi: 10.1002/mma.6507
    [18] S. Etemad, B. Tellab, J. Alzabut, S. Rezapour, M. I. Abbas, Approximate solutions and Hyers-Ulam stability for a system of the coupled fractional thermostat control model via the generalized differential transform, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 428. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03563-x doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03563-x
    [19] R. Precup, Methods in Nonlinear Integral Equations, Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.
    [20] A. Boutiara, Multi-term fractional q-difference equations with q-integral boundary conditions via topological degree theory, Commun. Optim. Theory, 2021.
    [21] S. A. Jose, R. Ramachandran, J. Cao, J. Alzabut, M. Niezabitowski, V. E. Balas, Stability analysis and comparative study on different eco-epidemiological models: Stage structure for prey and predator concerning impulsive control, Optim. Control. Appl. Meth., 43 (2022), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2856 doi: 10.1002/oca.2856
    [22] M. Al-Refai, Proper inverse operators of fractional derivatives with nonsingular kernels, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, II. Ser., 71 (2022), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-021-00638-2 doi: 10.1007/s12215-021-00638-2
    [23] B. C. Dhage, Quadratic perturbations of periodic boundary value problems of second order ordinary differential equations, Differ. Equ. Appl., 2 (2010), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.7153/dea-02-28 doi: 10.7153/dea-02-28
    [24] M. Al-Refai, D. Baleanu, On an extension of the operator with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240129. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401296 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22401296
    [25] I. E. Abo Amra, M. M. Matar, Coupled system of fractional differential equations with impulsive and nonlocal coupled boundary conditions, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex., 26 (2020), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40590-019-00254-2 doi: 10.1007/s40590-019-00254-2
    [26] Y. Zhao, S. Sun, Z. Han, Q. Li, Theory of fractional hybrid differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1312–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.041 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.041
    [27] S. Sitho, S. K. Ntouyas, J. Tariboon, Existence results for hybrid fractional integro-differential equations, Bound. Value Probl., 2015 (2015), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-015-0376-7 doi: 10.1186/s13661-015-0376-7
    [28] M. Awadalla, K. Abuasbeh, On system of nonlinear sequential hybrid fractional differential equations, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022 (2022), 8556578. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8556578 doi: 10.1155/2022/8556578
    [29] S. Gul, R. A. Khan, H. Khan, R. George, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Analysis on a coupled system of two sequential hybrid BVPs with numerical simulations to a model of typhoid treatment, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 10085–10098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.020
    [30] K. D. Kucche, S. T. Sutar, Analysis of nonlinear fractional differential equations involving Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo derivative, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 143 (2021), 110556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110556 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110556
    [31] P. Amiri, M. E. Samei, Existence of Urysohn and Atangana-Baleanu fractional integral inclusion systems solutions via common fixed point of multi-valued operators, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 165 (2022), 112822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112822 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112822
    [32] I. A. Rus, Principles and Applications of the Fixed Point Theory, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1979.
    [33] S. Rezapour, S. T. Thabet, M. M. Matar, J. Alzabut, S. Etemad, Some existence and stability criteria to a generalized FBVP having fractional Composite-Laplacian operator, J. Funct. Space, 2021 (2021), 9554076. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9554076 doi: 10.1155/2021/9554076
    [34] A. Boutiara, M. Benbachir, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, Kuratowski MNC method on a generalized fractional Caputo Sturm-Liouville-Langevin q-difference problem with generalized Ulam-Hyers stability, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 454. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03619-y doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03619-y
    [35] S. N. Hajiseyedazizi, M. E. Samei, Jehad Alzabut, Y. Chu, On multi-step methods for singular fractional q–integro-differential equations, Open Math., 19 (2021), 1378–1405. https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0093 doi: 10.1515/math-2021-0093
    [36] A. Boutiara, A coupled system of nonlinear langevin fractional q-difference equations associated with two different fractional orders in Banach space, Kragujevac J. Math., 48 (2024), 555–575.
    [37] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, arXiv, 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.03408
    [38] R. Precup, The role of matrices that are convergent to zero in the study of semilinear operator systems, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.04.006
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1817) PDF downloads(89) Cited by(18)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog