
Citation: Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Sherif I. Ammar, Kholod M. Abualnaja, Mustafa Inc. New solutions for the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation arising in natural science[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1893-1912. doi: 10.3934/math.2020126
[1] | Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Wael W. Mohammed, Meshari Alesemi, Sahar Albosaily . The effect of multiplicative noise on the exact solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2970-2980. doi: 10.3934/math.2021180 |
[2] | Jalil Manafian, Onur Alp Ilhan, Sizar Abid Mohammed . Forming localized waves of the nonlinearity of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2461-2483. doi: 10.3934/math.2020163 |
[3] | Yongyi Gu, Najva Aminakbari . Two different systematic methods for constructing meromorphic exact solutions to the KdV-Sawada-Kotera equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3990-4010. doi: 10.3934/math.2020257 |
[4] | P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, Jagdev Singh . Solution for fractional forced KdV equation using fractional natural decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 798-810. doi: 10.3934/math.2020054 |
[5] | M. Hafiz Uddin, M. Ali Akbar, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Abdul Haque . New exact solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional differential equations with conformable derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 199-214. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.199 |
[6] | Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264 |
[7] | Yousef Jawarneh, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi . A new solitary wave solution of the fractional phenomena Bogoyavlenskii equation via Bäcklund transformation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35308-35325. doi: 10.3934/math.20241678 |
[8] | Weiping Gao, Yanxia Hu . The exact traveling wave solutions of a class of generalized Black-Scholes equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(3): 385-399. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.3.385 |
[9] | S. Owyed, M. A. Abdou, A. Abdel-Aty, H. Dutta . Optical solitons solutions for perturbed time fractional nonlinear Schrodinger equation via two strategic algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2057-2070. doi: 10.3934/math.2020136 |
[10] | Safoura Rezaei Aderyani, Reza Saadati, Javad Vahidi, Nabil Mlaiki, Thabet Abdeljawad . The exact solutions of conformable time-fractional modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation by Direct algebraic method and Sine-Gordon expansion method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10807-10827. doi: 10.3934/math.2022604 |
In recent years, nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs) are widely used to describe complex phenomena in various fields of sciences, such as fluid mechanics, plasma, chemical reactions, optical fibers, solid state physics, relativity, ecology, gas dynamics physics and optical fiber, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, exploring exact solutions for NPDEs plays an important role in nonlinear science. These solutions might be essential and important for the exploring some physical phenomena. Therefore investigating new technique to solve so many problems is so interesting topic. Thus, many new methods have been introduced, such as the F-expansion method [12,13], (G′G)− expansion method [14,15], tanh-sech method [16,17,18], exp-expansion method [19,20], the homogeneous balance method [21,22], Jacobi elliptic function method [23,24], sine-cosine method [25,26,27], extended tanh-method [28,29] and the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method [30,31,32,33] proposed for solving more complicated problems. Indeed, there are recent development in analytical methods for investigation solutions for NPDEs, see [34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The nonlinear Schrödinger equations (NLSEs) are so important models in nonlinear evolution equations, which come in many areas of applied sciences such as nonlinear optics, quantum mechanics, fluid dynamics, molecular biology, elastic media, hydrodynamics, biology and plasma physics.
This paper is concerned with the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation (UNS) [41,42] given by
iqt+qxx+2η∣q∣2q−2γq=0,i=√−1, | (1.1) |
where, η,γ is a free parameter and q=q(x,t) is a complex-valued function. Equation (1.1) is a type of nonlinear Schrödinger equation with space and time exchanged. This equation prescribes a time evolution of disturbances in unstable media. The behavior of type occurs for the two-layer baroclinic instability and the lossless symmetric two-stream plasma instability [43]. To the best of our knowledge, no previous research work has been done using the proposed methods for solving the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Actually, many numerical and analytical methods have been also implemented to get solutions for Eq (1.1) such as modified Kudraysov method, the sine-Gordon expansion approach [41], expa method and hyperbolic function method [42], the new Jacobi elliptic function rational expansion method and the exponential rational function method [44], the extended simple equation method[45].
The main aim of this paper is to explore the UNS equation using exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method, sine-cosine method and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method. We also show that the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE technique gives infinite solutions. Actually, we introduce new types of exact analytical solutions. Comparing our results with other results, one can see that our results are new and most extensive. Indeed the new solutions presented in this article are so important in the theory of soliton. Moreover these solutions turn out to be very useful for Physicists to explain many interesting physical phenomena.
The rest of the paper is arranged as follows: In Section 2, the exp-function method, sine-cosine method and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method are briefly reviewed. In Section 3, some new exact solutions of the unstable Schrödinger equation are presented. Discussion of our results and comparing with the results of other authors is in Section 4. Conclusion and future works will appear in Section 5.
We present a brief description about the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method, sine-cosine method and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method to obtain new exact solutions for a given NPDE. For this goal, consider a NPDE in two independent variables x and t as
G(ϑ,ϑt,ϑx,ϑtt,ϑxx,....)=0, | (2.1) |
where G is a polynomial in ϑ(x,t) and its partial derivatives. The main steps are as follows [30]:
Step 1. Introducing the transformation
ϑ(x,t)=ϑ(ξ),ξ=k(x+ςt), | (2.2) |
varies Eq (2.1) to the following ordinary differential equation (ODE):
D(ϑ,ϑ′,ϑ″,ϑ‴,.....)=0, | (2.3) |
where D is a polynomial in ϑ(ξ) and its derivatives such that the superscripts denote the ordinary derivatives with respect to ξ.
According to the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion technique [19,20,31], we assume that the solution of Eq (2.3) can be written in a polynomial form of exp(−φ(ξ)) as follows
ϑ(ξ)=Am(exp(−φ(ξ)))m+....., am≠0, | (2.4) |
where φ(ξ) obeys the following ODE
φ′(ξ)=exp(−φ(ξ))+νexp(φ(ξ))+λ. | (2.5) |
Eq (2.5) has the following solutions:
1. At λ2−4ν>0,ν≠0,
φ(ξ)=ln(−√λ2−4ν tanh(√λ2−4ν2(ξ+C))−λ2ν), | (2.6) |
2. At λ2−4ν<0,ν≠0,
φ(ξ)=ln(√4ν−λ2 tan(√4ν−λ22 (ξ+C))−λ2ν), | (2.7) |
3. At λ2−4ν>0,ν=0,λ≠0
φ(ξ)=−ln(λexp(λ(ξ+C))−1), | (2.8) |
4. At λ2−4ν=0,ν≠0,λ≠0,
φ(ξ)=ln(−2(λ(ξ+C)+2)λ2(ξ+C)), | (2.9) |
5. At λ2−4ν=0,ν=0,λ=0,
φ(ξ)=ln(ξ+C). | (2.10) |
Here C is an arbitrary constant.
Finally, superseding Eq (2.4) with Eq (2.5) into Eq (2.3) and agammaegating all terms of the same power exp(−mφ(ξ)), m=0,1,2,3,.... After that equating them to zero, we get algebraic equations solved by Mathematica or Maple to obtain the values of ai. Hence, we get the solutions (2.4), which give the exact solutions of Eq (2.3).
The solutions of Eq (2.3) can be expressed in the form [46,47]
ϑ(x,t)={αsinr(βξ),∣ξ∣≤πβ,0,otherwise,, | (2.11) |
or in the form
ϑ(ξ)(x,t)={αcosr(βξ),∣ξ∣≤π2μ,0,otherwise,, | (2.12) |
where α,β and r≠0, are parameters determined in sequel. From (2.11) we have
ϑ(ξ)=αsinr(βξ),ϑn(ξ)=αnsinnr(βξ),(ϑn)ξ=nβrαncos(βξ)sinnr−1(βξ),(ϑn)ξξ=−n2β2rαnsinnr(βξ)+nβ2αnr(nr−1)sinnr−2(βξ), | (2.13) |
and from (2.12) we have
ϑ(ξ)=αcosr(βξ),ϑn(ξ)=αncosnr(βξ),(ϑn)ξ=−nβrαnsin(βξ)cosnr−1(βξ),(ϑn)ξξ=−n2β2rαncosnr(βξ)+nβ2αnr(nr−1)cosnr−2(βξ). | (2.14) |
Finally, superseding Eq (2.13) or Eq (2.14) into Eq (2.3), then balance the terms of the cosine functions (2.14) or the sine functions (2.13). Then, we sum all terms with the same power in cosr(βξ) or sinr(βξ) and equating their coefficients to zero in order to obtain an algebraic equations in the unknowns β,α and r. Solving this system yields these unknown constants.
According to description of this method [30,31,32,33,48,49], we assume that Eq (2.3) has the following solution:
ϑ′=aϑ2−n+bϑ+cϑn, | (2.15) |
where a,b,c and n are constants calculated later. From Eq (2.15), we get
ϑ″=ab(3−n)ϑ2−n+a2(2−n)ϑ3−2n+nc2ϑ2n−1+bc(n+1)ϑn+(2ac+b2)ϑ, | (2.16) |
ϑ‴=(ab(3−n)(2−n)ϑ1−n+a2(2−n)(3−2n)ϑ2−2n +n(2n−1)c2ϑ2n−2+bcn(n+1)ϑn−1+(2ac+b2))ϑ′. | (2.17) |
The exact solutions of Eq (2.15), for an arbitrary constant μ are given as follow:
1. For n=1, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=μe(a+b+c)ξ. | (2.18) |
2. For n≠1, b=0 and c=0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(a(n−1)(ξ+μ))1n−1. | (2.19) |
3. For n≠1, b≠0 and c=0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(−ab+μeb(n−1)ξ)1n−1. | (2.20) |
4. For n≠1, a≠0 and b2−4ac<0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a+√4ac−b22atan((1−n)√4ac−b22(ξ+μ)))11−n | (2.21) |
and
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a−√4ac−b22acot((1−n)√4ac−b22(ξ+μ)))11−n. | (2.22) |
5. For n≠1, a≠0 and b2−4ac>0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a−√b2−4ac2acoth((1−n)√b2−4ac2(ξ+μ)))11−n | (2.23) |
and
ϑ(ξ)=(−b2a−√b2−4ac2atanh((1−n)√b2−4ac2(ξ+μ)))11−n. | (2.24) |
6. For n≠1, a≠0 and b2−4ac=0, the solution is
ϑ(ξ)=(1a(n−1)(ξ+μ)−b2a)11−n. | (2.25) |
Bäcklund transformation
When ϑm−1(ξ) and ϑm(ξ)(ϑm(ξ)=ϑm(ϑm−1(ξ))) are the solutions of Eq (2.15), we obtain
dϑm(ξ)dξ=dϑm(ξ)dϑm−1(ξ)dϑm−1(ξ)dξ=dϑm(ξ)dϑm−1(ξ)(aϑ2−nm−1+bϑm−1+cϑnm−1), |
namely
dϑm(ξ)aϑ2−nm+bϑm+cϑnm=dϑm−1(ξ)aϑ2−nm−1+bϑm−1+cϑnm−1. | (2.26) |
Integrating Eq (2.26) once with respect to ξ, we obtain the following Bäcklund transformation of Eq (2.15):
ϑm(ξ)=(−cK1+aK2(ϑm−1(ξ))1−nbK1+aK2+aK1(ϑm−1(ξ))1−n)11−n, | (2.27) |
where K1 and K2 are arbitrary constants. If we get a solution for this equation, we use Eq (2.27) to obtain infinite sequence of solutions of Eq (2.15), as well of Eq (2.1).
In order to solve the Eq (1.1), using exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method and the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method, the following solution structure is selected
q(x,t)=eiχ(x,t)u(ξ),χ(x,t)=px+νt,ξ=kx+ωt, | (3.1) |
where p, ν, k and ω are constants. Substituting (3.1) into (1.1), we have the ODE
k2u″−2u3−(p2+ν+2γ)u=0,ω=−2pk,η=−1. | (3.2) |
Now we apply exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion and the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE methods for Eq (3.2).
According to the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion technique, Eq (3.2) has the following solution
u=A0+A1exp(−φ), | (3.3) |
where A0 and A1 are constants and A1≠0. It is easy to see that
u″=A1(2exp(−3φ)+3λexp(−2φ)+(2μ+λ2)exp(−φ)+λμ), | (3.4) |
u3=A31exp(−3φ)+3A0A21exp(−2φ)+3A20A1exp(−φ)+A30. | (3.5) |
Superseding u, u″, u3 into Eq (3.2) and hence equating the coefficients of exp(−φ) to zero, we obtain
k2A1λμ−2A30−(p2+ν+2γ)A0=0, | (3.6) |
k2A1(λ2+2μ)−6A20A1−(p2+ν+2γ)A1=0, | (3.7) |
k2A1λ−2A0A21=0, | (3.8) |
k2A1−A31=0. | (3.9) |
Solving Eqs (3.6)–(3.9), we get
A0=±kλ2,A1=±k,ν=−12(4γ+k2(λ2−4μ)+2p2). |
We consider only one case, whenever the other cases follow similarly. In this case, the solution of Eq (3.3) reads as:
u(ξ)=±k2(λ+2exp(−φ(ξ))). | (3.10) |
Superseding Eqs (2.6)–(2.7) into Eq (3.10), we obtain:
Case 1. At λ2−4μ>0,μ≠0,
u1,2(x,t)=±k2(λ−4μ√λ2−4μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(ξ+C))+λ). | (3.11) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.11) the solutions of equation (1.1) are
q1,2(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ−4μ√λ2−4μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(ξ+C))+λ). | (3.12) |
Case 2. At λ2−4μ<0,μ≠0,
u3,4(x,t)=±k2(λ+4μ√4μ−λ2tan(√4μ−λ22(ξ+C))−λ). | (3.13) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.13) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q3,4(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ+4μ√4μ−λ2tan(√4μ−λ22(ξ+C))−λ). | (3.14) |
Case 3. At λ2−4μ>0,μ=0,λ≠0
u5,6(x,t)=±k2(λ+2λexp(λ(ξ+C))−1). | (3.15) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.15) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q5,6(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ+2λexp(λ(ξ+C))−1). | (3.16) |
Case 4. At λ2−4μ=0,μ≠0,λ≠0,
u7,8(x,t)=±k2(λ−λ2(ξ+C)λ(ξ+C)+2). | (3.17) |
Using Eq (3.1) and (3.17) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q7,8(x,t)=±k2eiχ(λ−λ2(ξ+C)λ(ξ+C)+2). | (3.18) |
Case 5. At λ2−4μ=0,μ=0,λ=0,
u9,10(x,t)=±k2(1ξt+C). | (3.19) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.19) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
q9,10(x,t)=±k2eiχ(1ξt+C). | (3.20) |
Here k,λ,μ,C are constants, ξ=k(x−2pt) and χ=px−12(4γ+k2(λ2−4μ)+2p2)t.
We have plotted these solutions in Figures 1–5. Figure 1(a) shows the real part of q=q1(x,t) in (3.12), while Figure 1(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 1.5, p = 1.5, γ = 1.3, λ = 2.3, μ=1, ω = -4.5, ν = -6.3012 and C = 1.4.
Figure 2(a) shows the real part of q=q3(x,t) in (3.14), while Figure 2(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 1.2, p = 1.2, γ = 1.8, λ = 1.2, μ=2, ω = -2.88, ν = -0.3168 and C = 0.4.
Figure 3(a) shows the real part of q=q5(x,t) in (3.16), while Figure 3(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.4, p = 0.6, γ = 0.3, λ = 1.2, μ=0, ω = -0.48, ν = -1.0752 and C = 1.
Figure 4(a) shows the real part of q=q7(x,t) in (3.18), while Figure 4(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.5, p = 0.5, γ = 2.3, λ = 2, μ=1, ω = -0.5, ν = -4.85 and C = 4.
Figure 5(a) shows the real part of q=q9(x,t) in (3.20), while Figure 5(b) shows imaginary part of this solution k = -0.7, p = -0.5, γ = 0.8, λ=μ = 0, ω = -0.7, ν = -1.85 and C = 4.
According to sine-cosine technique, subtitling Eq (2.13) into Eq (3.2), gives
k2(−β2r2αsinr(βξ)+β2αr(r−1)sinr−2(βξ))−2α3sin3r(βξ)−(p2+ν+2γ)λsinr(βξ)=0. | (3.21) |
Thus by comparing the coefficients of the sine functions, we get
r−1≠0,r−2=3r, k2β2αr(r−1)−2α3=0, −k2β2r2α−(p2+ν+2γ)α=0. | (3.22) |
Solving this system gives
r=−1,α=±√−p2−ν−2γ,β=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)k, | (3.23) |
for p2+ν+2γ<0 and k≠0. We get the same result if we also use the cosine method (2.14). Thus, the periodic solutions are
˜u1,2(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γsec(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),∣√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)∣<π2 | (3.24) |
and
˜u3,4(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γcsc(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),0<√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)<π. | (3.25) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.19) the solutions of Eq (1.1) are
˜q1,2(x,t)=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)ei(px+νt)sec(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),∣√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)∣<π2 | (3.26) |
and
˜q3,4(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γei(px+νt)csc(√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)),0<√−(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)<π. | (3.27) |
However, for p2+ν+2γ>0 and k≠0. we obtain the soliton and complex solutions
˜u5,6(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γsech(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)) | (3.28) |
and
˜u7,8(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γcsch(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)). | (3.29) |
Using Eqs (3.1) and (3.19) the solutions of equation
˜q5,6(x,t)=±√−p2−ν−2γei(px+νt)sech(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)) | (3.30) |
and
˜q7,8(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γei(px+νt)csch(√(p2+ν+2γ)k(kx+ωt)). | (3.31) |
Figure 6(a) shows the real part of q=˜q1(x,t) in (3.26), while Figure 6(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for p = 2, ν = -2, γ = -3, k = 2 and ω = 1.
Figure 7(a) shows the real part of q=˜q5(x,t) in (3.30), while Figure 7(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for p = 2.6, ν = 2.1, γ = 3.1, k = 1.2 and ω = 2.
According to Riccati-Bernoulli Sub-ODE technique, substituting Eq (2.16) into Eq (3.2), we get
k2(ab(3−n)u2−n+a2(2−n)u3−2n+nc2u2n−1+bc(n+1)un+(2ac+b2)u)−2u3−(p2+ν+2γ)u=0. | (3.32) |
Putting n=0, Eq (3.32) becomes
k2(3abu2+2a2u3+bc+(2ac+b2)u)−2u3−(p2+ν+2γ)u=0. | (3.33) |
Putting each coefficient of ui(i=0,1,2,3) to zero, we get
bc=0, | (3.34) |
k2(2ac+b2)−(p2+ν+2γ)=0, | (3.35) |
3ab=0, | (3.36) |
k2a2−1=0. | (3.37) |
Solving Eqs (3.34)–(3.37), we have
b=0, | (3.38) |
ac=p2+ν+2γ2k2, | (3.39) |
c=±p2+ν+2γ2k, | (3.40) |
a=±1k. | (3.41) |
Hence, we give the cases of solutions for Eq (3.2) as follows
Rational function solutions: (When b=0 and c=0, i.e., p2+ν+2γ=0)
The solution of Eq (3.2) is
ˆu1(x,t)=(−a(kx+ωt+μ))−1. | (3.42) |
Therefore, using Eqs (3.1) and (3.42), the following new explicit exact solution of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be acquired
ˆq1(x,t)=ei(px+νt)(−a(kx+ωt+μ))−1, | (3.43) |
where p,ν,γ,k,ω,μ are arbitrary constants.
Trigonometric function solution: (When p2+ν+2γ>0)
Superseding Eq (3.1) and Eqs (3.38)–(3.41) into Eqs (2.21) and (2.22), then the exact solutions of Eq (1.1) are
ˆu2,3(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.44) |
and
ˆu4,5(x,t)=±√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)). | (3.45) |
Consequently, using Eqs (3.1) and (3.42), the following new explicit exact solution for the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be obtained
ˆq2,3(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.46) |
and
ˆq4,5(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.47) |
where p,ν,γ,k,ω,μ are arbitrary constants.
Hyperbolic function solution : (When p2+ν+2γ<0)
Substituting Eq (3.1) and Eqs (3.38)–(3.41) into Eqs (2.23) and (2.24), then the exact solutions of Eq (1.1) are
ˆu6,7(x,t)=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.48) |
and
ˆu8,9(x,t)=±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)). | (3.49) |
Subsequently, the following new explicit exact solution to the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be gained
ˆq6,7(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)) | (3.50) |
and
ˆq8,9(x,t)=±ei(px+νt)√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.51) |
where p,ν,γ,k,ω,μ are arbitrary constants.
We have plotted these solutions in Figures 8–10. Figure 8(a) shows the real part of q=ˆq2(x,t) in (3.46), while Figure 8(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.5, p = -1.3, ω = 1.3, ν = 1.4, γ = 1.5 and μ = 1.
Figure 9(a) shows the real part of q=ˆq6(x,t) in (3.50), while Figure 9(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 1.5, p = 1.3, ω = -3.9, ν = -2.4, γ = -1.3 and μ = 1.
Figure 10(a) shows the real part of q=ˆq1(x,t) in (3.43), while Figure 10(b) shows imaginary part of this solution for k = 0.2, a = 5, p = 1.2, ω = -0.48, ν = 1.4 and μ = 1.
Remark 1. Using Eq (2.27) for ui(x,y), i = 1, ..., 9, once, then Eq (3.2) as well as for Eq (1.1) has an infinite solutions. In sequence, by applying this process again, we get new families of solutions.
ˆu⋆1(x,t)=B3−aB3(kx+ωt+μ)±1, | (3.52) |
ˆu⋆2,3(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√p2+ν+2γ2tan(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.53) |
ˆu⋆4,5(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√p2+ν+2γ2cot(√p2+ν+2γ√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.54) |
ˆu⋆6,7(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2tanh(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.55) |
ˆu⋆8,9(x,t)=−p2+ν+2γ2±B3√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ))B3±√−(p2+ν+2γ)2coth(√−(p2+ν+2γ)√2k(kx+ωt+μ)), | (3.56) |
where B3,p,ν,γ,k,ω and μ are arbitrary constants.
In this article, the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion, the sine-cosine and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE techniques have been efficiently applied to construct many new solutions. As an outcome, a number of new exact solutions for the UNS equation were formally derived. Namely, the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion method gives a first family of ten solutions. Whereas, sine-cosine method give another different second family of eight solutions. Indeed, Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method gives a wide range of new explicit exact solutions including rational functions, trigonometric functions, hyperbolic functions and exponential functions in a straightforward manner. The effectiveness and helpfulness of the exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion, the sine-cosine and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE methods to deal with UNS equation was proved. As a success, a wide range of new explicit exact solutions were obtained in a straightforward manner. Our study shows that the proposed three methods are reliable in handling NPDEs to establish a variety of exact solutions. Finally, we have plotted some 3D graphs of these solutions and we have shown that these graphs can be controlled by adjusting the parameters.
Remark 2.
1. Comparing our results concerning the UNS equation with the results in [41,42,44,45], one can see that our results are new and most extensive. Indeed, choosing suitable values for the parameters similar solutions can be verified.
2. The Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method has an interesting feature, that admits infinite solutions, which has never given for any other method.
3. The three proposed methods in this article are efficient, powerful and adequate for solving other types of NPDEs and can be easily extended to solve nonlinear fractional differential equations, see [32,33,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
The exp(−φ(ξ))-expansion, sine-cosine and Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE techniques have successfully been applied for the UNS equation. Many new exact solutions are obtained during the analytical treatment. The availability of computer systems like Matlab or Mathematica facilitates avoids us the tedious algebraic calculations. Indeed, the obtained solutions are of significant importance in the studies of applied science as they help in explaining some interesting physical mechanism for the complex phenomena. The 3D graphs of some exact solutions are plotted for suitable parameters. Finally, the proposed methods can be applied for a wide range of nonlinear partial differential equations arising in natural sciences. Currently, work is in progress on the applications of the proposed methods in this paper in order to solve the other nonlinear partial differential equations. Indeed these methods can be extended to solve fractional partial differential equations.
The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, M. Kunik, The interaction of waves for the ultra-relativistic Euler equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 409 (2014), 1140-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.009
![]() |
[2] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, M. Kunik, The ultra-relativistic Euler equations, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 38 (2015), 1247-1264. doi: 10.1002/mma.3141
![]() |
[3] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, Global solutions for the ultra-relativistic Euler equations, Nonlinear Anal, 155 (2017), 140-162. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2017.01.014
![]() |
[4] | M. A. E. Abdelrahman, On the shallow water equations, Z. Naturforsch., 72 (2017), 873-879. |
[5] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, M. A. Sohaly, A. R. Alharbi, The new exact solutions for the deterministic and stochastic (2+1)-dimensional equations in natural sciences, J. Taibah Sci., 13 (2019), 834-843. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2019.1644832
![]() |
[6] |
H. C. Yaslan, E. Girgin, New exact solutions for the conformable space-time fractional KdV, CDG, (2+1)-dimensional CBS and (2+1)-dimensional AKNS equations, J. Taibah Sci., 13 (2019), 1-8. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2018.1515303
![]() |
[7] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, Cone-grid scheme for solving hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and one application, Comp. Appl. Math., 37 (2018), 3503-3513. doi: 10.1007/s40314-017-0527-9
![]() |
[8] |
P. Razborova, B. Ahmed, A. Biswas, Solitons, shock waves and conservation laws of RosenauKdV-RLW equation with power law nonlinearity, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 8 (2014), 485-491. doi: 10.12785/amis/080205
![]() |
[9] |
A. Biswas, M. Mirzazadeh, Dark optical solitons with power law nonlinearity using G0/Gexpansion, Optik, 125 (2014), 4603-4608. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.05.035
![]() |
[10] |
M. Younis, S. Ali, S. A. Mahmood, Solitons for compound KdV Burgers equation with variable coefficients and power law nonlinearity, Nonlinear Dyn., 81 (2015), 1191-1196. doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-2060-y
![]() |
[11] | A. H. Bhrawy, An efficient Jacobi pseudospectral approximation for nonlinear complex generalized Zakharov system, Appl. Math. Comput., 247 (2014), 30-46. |
[12] |
Y. J. Ren, H. Q. Zhang, A generalized F-expansion method to find abundant families of Jacobi elliptic function solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov equation, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 27 (2006), 959-979. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.04.063
![]() |
[13] | J. L. Zhang, M. L. Wang, Y. M. Wang, et al., The improved F-expansion method and its applications, Phys. Lett. A., 357 (2006), 103-109. |
[14] |
M. L. Wang, J. L. Zhang, X. Z. Li, The (G′G)-expansion method and travelling wave solutions of nonlinear evolutions equations in mathematical physics, Phys. Lett. A., 372 (2008), 417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.051
![]() |
[15] |
S. Zhang, J. L. Tong, W. Wang, A generalized (G′G)-expansion method for the mKdv equation with variable coefficients, Phys. Lett. A., 372 (2008), 2254-2257. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.11.026
![]() |
[16] |
W. Malfliet, Solitary wave solutions of nonlinear wave equation, Am. J. Phys., 60 (1992), 650-654. doi: 10.1119/1.17120
![]() |
[17] |
W. Malfliet, W. Hereman, The tanh method: Exact solutions of nonlinear evolution and wave equations, Phys. Scr., 54 (1996), 563-568. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/54/6/003
![]() |
[18] | A. M. Wazwaz, The tanh method for travelling wave solutions of nonlinear equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 154 (2004), 714-723. |
[19] |
J. H. He, X. H. Wu, Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 30 (2006), 700-708. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020
![]() |
[20] | H. Aminikhad, H. Moosaei, M. Hajipour, Exact solutions for nonlinear partial differential equations via Exp-function method, Numer, Methods Partial Differ. Equations, 26 (2009), 1427-1433. |
[21] |
E. Fan, H. Zhang, A note on the homogeneous balance method, Phys. Lett. A., 246 (1998), 403-406. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00547-7
![]() |
[22] |
M. L. Wang, Exct solutions for a compound KdV-Burgers equation, Phys. Lett. A., 213 (1996), 279-287. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00103-X
![]() |
[23] |
C. Q. Dai, J. F. Zhang, Jacobian elliptic function method for nonlinear differential difference equations, Chaos Solutions Fractals, 27 (2006), 1042-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.04.071
![]() |
[24] |
E. Fan, J. Zhang, Applications of the Jacobi elliptic function method to special-type nonlinear equations, Phys. Lett. A., 305 (2002), 383-392. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01516-5
![]() |
[25] |
A. M. Wazwaz, Exact solutions to the double sinh-Gordon equation by the tanh method and a variable separated ODE. method, Comput. Math. Appl., 50 (2005), 1685-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.05.010
![]() |
[26] |
A. M. Wazwaz, A sine-cosine method for handling nonlinear wave equations, Math. Comput. Modell., 40 (2004), 499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2003.12.010
![]() |
[27] |
C. Yan, A simple transformation for nonlinear waves, Phys. Lett. A., 224 (1996), 77-84. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00770-0
![]() |
[28] |
E. Fan, Extended tanh-function method and its applications to nonlinear equations, Phys. Lett. A., 277 (2000), 212-218. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00725-8
![]() |
[29] | A. M. Wazwaz, The extended tanh method for abundant solitary wave solutions of nonlinear wave equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 1131-1142. |
[30] | X. F. Yang, Z. C. Deng, Y. Wei, A Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method for nonlinear partial differential equations and its application, Adv. Diff. Equation., 1 (2015), 117-133. |
[31] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, M. A. Sohaly, On the new wave solutions to the MCH equation, Indian J. Phys., 93 (2019), 903-911. doi: 10.1007/s12648-018-1354-6
![]() |
[32] | M. A. E. Abdelrahman, M. A. Sohaly, Solitary waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger problem with the probability distribution function in stochastic input case, Eur. Phys. J. Plus., 132 (2017), 339. |
[33] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, A note on Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method combined with complex transform method applied to fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Eng. Model. Appl., 7 (2018), 279-285. doi: 10.1515/nleng-2017-0145
![]() |
[34] | J. Liu, M. S. Osman, W. Zhu, et al., Different complex wave structures described by the Hirota equation with variable coefficients in inhomogeneous optical fibers, Appl. Phys. B, 125 (2019), 175. |
[35] | V. S. Kumar, H. Rezazadeh, M. Eslami, et al., Jacobi elliptic function expansion method for solving KdV equation with conformable derivative and dual-power law nonlinearity, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 5 (2019), 127. |
[36] | B. Ghanbari, M. S. Osman, D. Baleanu, Generalized exponential rational function method for extended ZakharovKuzetsov equation with conformable derivative, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 34 (2019) 1950155. |
[37] |
M. S. Osman, A. M. Wazwaz, A general bilinear form to generate different wave structures of solitons for a (3+1)-dimensional BoitiLeonMannaPempinelli equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 6277-6283. doi: 10.1002/mma.5721
![]() |
[38] |
M. S. Osman, Multi-soliton rational solutions for quantum ZakharovKuznetsov equation in quantum magnetoplasmas, Wave Random Complex Media, 26 (2016), 434-443. doi: 10.1080/17455030.2016.1166288
![]() |
[39] | M. S. Osman, B. Ghanbari, J. A. T. Machado, New complex waves in nonlinear optics based on the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 20. |
[40] | M. S. Osman, One-soliton shaping and inelastic collision between double solitons in the fifth-order variable-coefficient SawadaKotera equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 96 (2019), 1491. |
[41] |
K. Hosseini, D. Kumar, M. Kaplan, et al., New exact traveling wave solutions of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Commun. Theor. Phys., 68 (2017), 761-767. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/68/6/761
![]() |
[42] | K. Hosseini, A. Zabihi, F. Samadani, et al. New explicit exact solutions of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger's equation using the expa and hyperbolic function methods, Opt. Quant. Electron., 50 (2018), 82. |
[43] |
M. Pawlik, G. Rowlands, The propagation of solitary waves in piezoelectric semiconductors, J. Phys. C, 8 (1975), 1189-1204. doi: 10.1088/0022-3719/8/8/022
![]() |
[44] |
E. Tala-Tebue, Z. I. Djoufack, E. Fendzi-Donfack, et al., Exact solutions of the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the new Jacobi elliptic function rational expansion method and the exponential rational function method, Optik, 127 (2016), 11124-11130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.116
![]() |
[45] |
D. Lu, A. R. Seadawy, M. Arshad, Applications of extended simple equation method on unstable nonlinear Schrdinger equations, Optik, 140 (2017), 136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.04.032
![]() |
[46] | A. M. Wazwaz, The sine-cosine method for obtaining solutions with compact and noncompact structures, Appl. Math. Comput., 159 (2004), 559-576. |
[47] | F. Tascan, A. Bekir, Analytic solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations using the sinecosine method, Appl. Math. Comput., 215 (2009), 3134-3139. |
[48] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, M. A. Sohaly, The development of the deterministic nonlinear PDEs in particle physics to stochastic case, Results Phys., 9 (2018), 344-350. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.032
![]() |
[49] | S. Z. Hassan, M. A. E. Abdelrahman, Solitary wave solutions for some nonlinear time fractional partial differential equations, Pramana J. Phys., 91 (2018), 67. |
[50] | D. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Baleanu, et al., Analysis of a fractional model of the Ambartsumian equation, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 259. |
[51] | A. Korkmaz, K. Hosseini, Exact solutions of a nonlinear conformable time-fractional parabolic equation with exponential nonlinearity using reliable methods, Opt. Quant. Electron., 49 (2017), 278. |
[52] | K. Hosseini, A. Bekir, R. Ansari, Exact solutions of nonlinear conformable time-fractional Boussinesq equations using the exp(-φ(ξ))-expansion method, Opt. Quant. Electron., 49 (2017), 131. |
[53] | K. Hosseini, A. Bekir, M. Kaplan, et al., On a new technique for solving the nonlinear conformable time-fractional differential equations, Opt. Quant. Electron., 49 (2017), 343. |
[54] |
K. Hosseini, P. Mayeli, A. Bekir, et al., Density-dependent conformable space-time fractional diffusion-Rreaction equation and its exact solutions, Commun. Theor. Phys., 69 (2018), 1-4. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/69/1/1
![]() |
[55] | K. Hosseini, Y. J. Xu, P. Mayeli, et al., A study on the conformable time-fractional Klein-Gordon equations with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities, Optoelectron. Adv. Mat., 11 (2017), 423-429. |
[56] | K. Hosseini, A. Korkmaz, A. Bekir, et al., New wave form solutions of nonlinear conformable time-fractional Zoomeron equation in (2+1)-dimensions, Waves in Random and Complex Media, (2019), Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2019.1579393. |
1. | Mostafa M.A. Khater, Mustafa Inc, K.S. Nisar, Raghda A.M. Attia, Multi–solitons, lumps, and breath solutions of the water wave propagation with surface tension via four recent computational schemes, 2021, 20904479, 10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.029 | |
2. | Mostafa M. A. Khater, Yu-Ming Chu, Raghda A. M. Attia, Mustafa Inc, Dianchen Lu, On the Analytical and Numerical Solutions in the Quantum Magnetoplasmas: The Atangana Conformable Derivative (1+3)-ZK Equation with Power-Law Nonlinearity, 2020, 2020, 1687-9120, 1, 10.1155/2020/5809289 | |
3. | Usman Younas, Muhammad Bilal, Tukur Abdulkadir Sulaiman, Jingli Ren, Abdullahi Yusuf, On the exact soliton solutions and different wave structures to the double dispersive equation, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-03445-2 | |
4. | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Iqra Zainab, Observations of fractional effects of β-derivative and M-truncated derivative for space time fractional Phi-4 equation via two analytical techniques, 2022, 154, 09600779, 111645, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111645 | |
5. | Mojtaba Shahraki, Hossein Malekpoor, The effects of polarization on soliton interactions inside optical fibers, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-022-03514-0 | |
6. | Md. Abdul Kayum, Ripan Roy, M. Ali Akbar, M. S. Osman, Study of W-shaped, V-shaped, and other type of surfaces of the ZK-BBM and GZD-BBM equations, 2021, 53, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-03031-6 | |
7. | Khalid K. Ali, Hadi Rezazadeh, Nauman Raza, Mustafa Inc, Highly dispersive optical soliton perturbation with cubic–quintic–septic law via two methods, 2021, 35, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979221502763 | |
8. | Delmar Sherriffe, Diptiranjan Behera, P. Nagarani, Different forms for exact traveling wave solutions of unstable and hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equations, 2024, 38, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979224501315 | |
9. | Handenur Esen, Neslihan Ozdemir, Aydin Secer, Mustafa Bayram, Tukur Abdulkadir Sulaiman, Hijaz Ahmad, Abdullahi Yusuf, M. Daher Albalwi, On the soliton solutions to the density-dependent space time fractional reaction–diffusion equation with conformable and M-truncated derivatives, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05109-9 | |
10. | Hira Tariq, Hira Ashraf, Hadi Rezazadeh, Ulviye Demirbilek, Travelling wave solutions of nonlinear conformable Bogoyavlenskii equations via two powerful analytical approaches, 2024, 39, 1005-1031, 502, 10.1007/s11766-024-5030-7 | |
11. | Rui Cui, New waveform solutions of Calogero–Degasperis (CD) and potential Kadomtsev–Petviashvili (pKP) equations, 2024, 7, 2520-8160, 1673, 10.1007/s41939-023-00254-w |