
Citation: Jalil Manafian, Onur Alp Ilhan, Sizar Abid Mohammed. Forming localized waves of the nonlinearity of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2461-2483. doi: 10.3934/math.2020163
[1] | Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264 |
[2] | Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Sherif I. Ammar, Kholod M. Abualnaja, Mustafa Inc . New solutions for the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation arising in natural science. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1893-1912. doi: 10.3934/math.2020126 |
[3] | M. Hafiz Uddin, M. Ali Akbar, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Abdul Haque . New exact solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional differential equations with conformable derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 199-214. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.199 |
[4] | Huaji Cheng, Yanxia Hu . Exact solutions of the generalized (2+1)-dimensional BKP equation by the G'/G-expansion method and the first integral method. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(3): 562-579. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.2.562 |
[5] | Yongyi Gu, Najva Aminakbari . Two different systematic methods for constructing meromorphic exact solutions to the KdV-Sawada-Kotera equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3990-4010. doi: 10.3934/math.2020257 |
[6] | S. Owyed, M. A. Abdou, A. Abdel-Aty, H. Dutta . Optical solitons solutions for perturbed time fractional nonlinear Schrodinger equation via two strategic algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2057-2070. doi: 10.3934/math.2020136 |
[7] | Weiping Gao, Yanxia Hu . The exact traveling wave solutions of a class of generalized Black-Scholes equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(3): 385-399. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.3.385 |
[8] | Ayyaz Ali, Zafar Ullah, Irfan Waheed, Moin-ud-Din Junjua, Muhammad Mohsen Saleem, Gulnaz Atta, Maimoona Karim, Ather Qayyum . New exact solitary wave solutions for fractional model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18587-18602. doi: 10.3934/math.20221022 |
[9] | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Mirfa Dawood, Muhammad Abbas, Dumitru Baleanu . Solitary wave solutions to Gardner equation using improved tan$ \left(\frac{\Omega(\Upsilon)}{2}\right) $-expansion method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4390-4406. doi: 10.3934/math.2023219 |
[10] | Hammad Alotaibi . Solitary waves of the generalized Zakharov equations via integration algorithms. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12650-12677. doi: 10.3934/math.2024619 |
Traveling wave and soliton solutions are one of the most interesting and fascinating areas of research in different fields of engineering and physical sciences. These models are basic ingredients of sciences in which play important roles in numerous areas such as biology, physics, chemistry, fluid mechanics and many engineering and science applications among others [1,2,3,4,5]. Furthermore, the approaches to solving these types of equations alongside nonlinear PDEs ranging from analytical to numerical methods are very important in many engineering and sciences applications. Some of these methods include finding the exact solutions by using the special techniques in which can be manifested to new works with vigorous references. Consequently, it is imperative to address the dynamics of these soliton pulses from a mathematical aspect. This will lead to a deeper understanding of the engineering perspective of these solutions [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
In this paper, we will study the different kinds of traveling wave solutions in mathematical model in DNA dynamics from a purely mathematical viewpoint. Therefore, the importance of this paper will be to extract the exact traveling wave solution for the nonlinear model. This model is described for first by Peyrard-Bishop, that takes into consideration the inclusion of nonlinear interaction between adjacent displacements along with the Hydrogen bonds [14]. There are several integration tools available to solve the model. Many such nonlinear equations as DNA dynamics have been examined with regards to soliton theory, where complete integrability was emphasized by various analytical techniques.
For investigating the appearance of solitonic structures of the oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model has been analyzed by [14,15]. The balance between weak nonlinearity and dispersion in DNA dynamic model with linear dispersion and nonlinear dispersion arise in works of Dusuel et al. [16] and Alvarez et al. [17]. Treatment of mathematical and physical modeling of equations of DNA dynamics show that those can be reduced to a significant nonlinear formations. The nonlinearity of the DNA dynamic model arises in localized waves in which have a few considerable features, as example in transporting energy without dissipation. A few methods in which physical properties of DNA dynamics have been investigated by the numerous authors [18,19,20,21,22,23]. There are techniques usually used in biological systems such as the discrete derivative operator (DDO) technique applying to long-range interactions systems [24,25], the semi-discrete approximation [26,27,28], the solitary perturbation technique [29,30], the modified extended tanh function method [31,32,33].
Author of [34] made use of the Hirota bilinear method of the bidirectional Sawada-Kotera equation to obtain new lump-type solutions and interaction phenomenon. In [35], author found the lump soliton and novel solitary wave solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional extended Jimbo-Miwa equations. Manafian and co-author found the interaction phenomenon to the (2+1)-dimensional Breaking Soliton equation [36]. Moreover, Ilhan et al. determined lump wave solutions and the interactions between lump solutions for a variable-coefficient Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation [37]. Authors of [38] obtained the stationary solutions of various nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Younas and co-authors [38] studied the nonlinear chirp solitons for the model of Schröodinger-Hirota equation with concluding the bright, dark and singular solitons. Ali and co-workers [39] utilized the extended trial equation method and retrieved Jacobi elliptic, periodic, bright and singular solitons for paraxial nonlinear Schröodinger equation. In [40], the first and second-order rogue wave solutions were gained for the coupled Schrödinger equations. Arif et al. investigated the solitons and lump wave solutions to the graphene thermophoretic motion system [41]. Structures of this paper as follows, the nonlinear DNA dynamics model has been summarized in section 2. In sections 3–7, an overview of the integration schemes are given along with the analysis of the model including the improved tan(ϕ/2)-expansion method, exp(−Ω(η))-expansion method, improved exp(−Ω(η))-expansion method, generalized (G'/G)-expansion method, and exp-function method, respectively. The next section gives the discussions about the model. In the last section, the conclusions have been given.
It is popular that DNA molecule is a double helix. This means that it consists of two complementary polymeric chains twisted around each other [42]. The B-form DNA in theWatsonCrick model is a double helix, which contains of two strands. The masses of nucleotides do not vary too much which means that one can assume a homogeneous crystal structure. The strands are coupled to each other through the hydrogen bonds, so that these bonds are weak while the harmonic longitudinal are strong the PB model neglects all the displacements beside the transversal [43]. The Hamiltonian model of Peyrard and Bishop [43], and the equations found in the literature, is modeled by the Morse potential as
VM(un−vn)=D[e−a(un−vn)−1]2, | (2.1) |
in which un and vn are the displacements of the nucleotides. Also, the Hamiltonian for the DNA chain was described by Zdravković [43]. Moreover, the improved version of the PB model, introduced by Dauxois [44]. The Hamiltonian for describing the strand aperture the hydrogen bonds can be stated as [45]
H(u)=12mq2n+k12Δ2un+k24Δ4un+δ(e−√2aun−1)2, Δun=un+1−un, | (2.2) |
in which k1 and k2 denote the strength for the linear and nonlinear couplings respectively and qn=m˙un is the momentum for the displacement un. Searching Starting with the hamiltonian (2.2) the equation of motion in the continuum limit can be stated by the following form
∂2u∂t2−(l1+3l2∂2u∂x2)−2√2aD e−au(e−au−1), | (2.3) |
with l1=k1md2, l2=k2md4, D=δm, α≡√2a and being d the inter-site nucleotide distance in the DNA ladder ([46,47,48]). In this paper, consider the Peyrard-Bishop DNA dynamic model equation as follows
utt−(l1+3l2u2x)uxx−2αΩe−αu(e−αu−1)=0, | (2.4) |
where l1,l2,α and Ω=D are constants. By make the following transformations
u(x,t)=u(ξ),ξ=x−βt, | (2.5) |
then the Eq. (2.4), can be reduced to the ordinary differential equation as
β2u″−(l1+3l2(u′)2)u″−2αΩe−αu(e−αu−1)=0. | (2.6) |
By multiplying the Eq. (2.6) by u′ and integrating once with respect to ξ, we get
(β2−l1)2(u′)2−34l2(u′)4+Ωe−αu(e−αu−2)+R=0. | (2.7) |
By starting hypothesis is taken to be
v(ξ)=e−αu(ξ). | (2.8) |
By appending (2.8) into Eq. (2.7), the nonlinear equation is achieved as follows
(β2−l1)2α2v2(v′)2−34α4l2(v′)4+Ωv5(v−2)+Rv4=0. | (2.9) |
In this section, the improved tan(ϕ/2)-expansion method [8,9] has been summarized to obtain the solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs). Hence, consider the NPDEs in the following way:
N(u,ux,ut,uxx,utt,...)=0, | (3.1) |
where N is a polynomial of u and its partial derivatives in which the relationship of higher order derivatives and nonlinear terms. To find the traveling wave solutions, we outline the following sequence of steps towards the extended tanh method:
Step 1. Firstly, by using traveling wave transformation
ξ=x−βt, | (3.2) |
where β is non-zero arbitrary constant, permits to reduce Eq. (6.1) to an ODE of u=u(ξ) in the following form
Q(u,u′,−βu′,u″,β2u″,...)=0. | (3.3) |
Step 2. Assuming that the solution of Eq. (6.1) can be expressed by the following ansatz:
u(ξ)=S(ϕ)=m∑k=0Ak[tan(ϕ/2)]k, | (3.4) |
where Ak(0≤k≤m) are the parameters to be determined and Am≠0 and ϕ=ϕ(ξ) satisfies in the ordinary differential equation as follows:
ϕ′(ξ)=asin(ϕ(ξ))+bcos(ϕ(ξ))+c. | (3.5) |
The particular solutions of Eq. (3.5) will be read as:
Family 1: When Δ=a2+b2−c2<0 and b−c≠0, then ϕ(ξ)=2tan−1[ab−c−√−Δb−ctan(√−Δ2¯ξ)].
Family 2: When Δ=a2+b2−c2>0 and b−c≠0, then ϕ(ξ)=2tan−1[ab−c+√Δb−ctanh(√Δ2¯ξ)].
For see the rest seventeen families refer to Ref. [8,9]. Also, ¯ξ=ξ+C,p,Ak,Bk(k=1,2,...,m),a,b and c are constants to be determined later.
Step 3. To determine the positive integer m, we usually balance linear terms of the highest order in the resulting equation with the highest order nonlinear terms appearing in equation (3.3).
Step 4. We collect all the terms with the same order of tan(ϕ/2)k,(k=0,1,2,...) together. Equate each coefficient of the polynomials to zero, yields the set of algebraic equations for A0,Ak(k=1,2,...,m),a,b and c with the aid of the Maple.
Step 5. Solving the algebraic equations in Step 4, then substituting A0,A1,...,Bm,a,b,c in (3.4).
Consider the homogeneous balance principle between the highest order derivatives (v′)4 and nonlinear terms v6, and get
A4m+4tan4m+4(ϕ/2)≅(v′)4=v6≅A6mtan6m(ϕ/2)⟹4m+4=6m⟹m=2. |
Therefore, the equation (3.4) takes the form
v(ξ)=2∑k=0Aktank(ϕ/2). | (3.6) |
Substitute equation (3.6) and its derivatives into equation (2.9). Algebraic equations set can be obtained after equating the coefficients of tanp(ϕ/2) for p=0,1,...,12, and setting equal to zero. After solving the nonlinear algebraic equations, the following values of a,b,c,β,A0,A1,A2 can be obtained:
Set Ⅰ.
β=√2l1+2√3Ωl2−3Rl2, a=Ξ13A2l2, b=4√108ΩA22l23α3l2,c=c,Δ=α2A2(β2−2l1)−3l2(b−c)23A2l2, | (3.7) |
A0=−2Ωα4A22+3l2(b−c)32Ωα4A2, A1=−Ξ1(b−c)32Ωα4A22, A2=A2, |
Ξ1=√3A2l2(α2β2A2−2α2A2l1−3b2A2l2+3c2A2l2−3b2l2+6bcl2−3c2l2). |
By utilizing of Family 1, the trigonometric function solution becomes
u1(x,t)=−1αln[−2Ωα4A22+3l2(b−c)32Ωα4A2−Ξ1(b−c)32Ωα4A22[ab−c−√−Δb−ctan(√−Δ2¯ξ)] | (3.8) |
+A2[ab−c−√−Δb−ctan(√−Δ2¯ξ)]2], ¯ξ=x−√2l1+2√3Ωl2−3Rl2t+C. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as A2(β2−2l1)3l2<(4√108ΩA22l23α3l2−cα)2.
By utilizing of Family 2, the hyperbolic function solution becomes
u1(x,t)=−1αln[−2Ωα4A22+3l2(b−c)32Ωα4A2−Ξ1(b−c)32Ωα4A22[ab−c−√−Δb−ctan(√−Δ2¯ξ)] | (3.9) |
+A2[ab−c−√−Δb−ctan(√−Δ2¯ξ)]2], ¯ξ=x−√2l1+2√3Ωl2−3Rl2t+C. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as A2(β2−2l1)3l2>(4√108ΩA22l23α3l2−cα)2.
This section elucidates a systematic explanation of the exp(−Ω(η))-expansion method to obtain the solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs). Hence, take the NPDEs in the following way:
N(u,ux,ut,uxx,utt,...)=0, | (4.1) |
where N is a polynomial of u and its partial derivatives in which the relationship of higher order derivatives and nonlinear terms. To find the traveling wave solutions, we outline the following sequence of steps towards the extended tanh method:
Step 1. Firstly, by utilizing the traveling wave transformation
ξ=x−βt, | (4.2) |
where β is non-zero arbitrary constant, permits to reduce equation (4.1) to an ODE of u=u(ξ) in the following form
Q(u,u′,−βu′,u″,β2u″,...)=0, | (4.3) |
Step 2. Assuming that the solution of equation (4.1) can be expressed by the following ansatz:
U(ξ)=m∑j=0AjFj(ξ), | (4.4) |
where F(η)=exp(−Φ(ξ)) and Aj(0≤j≤m), are the parameters to be determined Am≠0, and, Φ=Φ(ξ) satisfying the ODE given below
Φ′=μF−1(ξ)+F(ξ)+λ. | (4.5) |
The particular solutions of equation (4.5) will be read as:
Solution-1: When μ≠0 and λ2−4μ>0, therefore we attain Φ(η)=ln(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(ξ+E))−λ2μ).
Solution-2: When μ≠0 and λ2−4μ<0, therefore we attain Φ(η)=ln(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2(ξ+E))−λ2μ).
Solution-3: When μ=0, λ≠0, and λ2−4μ>0, therefore we attain Φ(η)=−ln(λexp(λ(ξ+E))−1).
Solution-4: When μ≠0, λ≠0, and λ2−4μ=0, therefore we attain Φ(η)=ln(−2λ(ξ+E)+4λ2(ξ+E)).
Solution-5: When μ=0, λ=0, and λ2−4μ=0, therefore we attain Φ(η)=ln(ξ+E), where Aj(0≤j≤m), E,λ and μ are also the constants to be explored later.
Step 3. To determine the positive integer m, we usually balance the linear terms of the highest order in the resulting equation with the highest order nonlinear terms appearing in equation (4.3).
Step 4. We collect all the terms with the same order of F(ξ)k,(k=0,1,2,...) together. Equate each coefficient of the polynomials of F(ξ)k to zero, yields the set of algebraic equations for A0,Ak(k=1,2,...,m),λ and μ with the aid of the Maple.
Step 5. Solving the algebraic equations in Step 4, then substituting A0,A1,...,Am,λ,μ in (4.4).
Consider the homogeneous balance principle between the highest order derivatives (v′)4 and nonlinear terms v6, we obtain 4m+4=6m, then m=2. The exact solution can be expressed in the following form
v(ξ)=2∑k=0AkFk(η), | (4.6) |
Substitute equation (4.6) and its derivatives into equation (2.9). The algebraic equations set can be obtained after equating the coefficients of F(ξ) for p = 0, 1, ..., 20, and setting equal to zero. After solving the nonlinear algebraic equations, the following values of λ,μ,β,A0,A1,A2 can be obtained:
Set Ⅰ.
Σ1=−125Ω5α3de3Ξ3Ξ31(λ2−4μ)−250Ω4Rα4de2Ξ1Ξ2Ξ3−1250Ω5Rα5e3Ξ3Ξ21+5000Ω6α6d(45Ω−4R)Ξ31− | (4.7) |
6α2l1l2Ξ42−9l22Ξ3Ξ32(λ2−4μ)+5000Ω5α6l1Ξ41−3Ωαl2Ξ2(50ΩRα2eΞ2Ξ3+2αd(2025Ω2+65ΩR+R2)Ξ22+ |
5ΩeΞ1Ξ3(225Ω2αe+5ΩRαe+2025Ω2d+115ΩRd+R2d)(λ2−4μ)), |
Σ2=25000Ω6Rα6dΞ31+1250Ω5Rα5e3Ξ3Ξ21+15Ω2αdel2Ξ1Ξ3Ξ22(λ2−4μ) |
−18l22Ξ32(225Ω2λ2+5ΩRλ2+11250Ω2μ+670ΩRμ+6R2μ)+25Ω2α3eΞ3(5Ω3de2Ξ31(λ2−4μ)+6l2RΞ22) |
75Ω2α2l2Ξ2(Ωe2Ξ3Ξ21)(λ2−4μ)−4RdΞ2+250Ω4α4Ξ1(30Ωl2Ξ31(λ2+8μ)+Rde2Ξ2Ξ3), |
Ξ1=45Ω+R, Ξ2=2025Ω2+115ΩR+R2, Ξ3=1575Ω2+105ΩR+R2, β=√(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42)Σ1α(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42), |
d=√3Ωl2Ω, e=4√12Ω3l2Ω, A0=Σ26α2Ωd(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42), A1=2λdα2, A2=2dα2. |
By utilizing of Family 1, the hyperbolic function solution becomes
u1(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2λdα2(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(η+E))−λ2μ)−1 | (4.8) |
+2dα2(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2(η+E))−λ2μ)−2], η=x−βt. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)−eα3Ω)>0.
By utilizing of Family 2, the trigonometric function solution becomes
u2(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2λdα2(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2(η+E))−λ2μ)−1 | (4.9) |
+2dα2(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2(η+E))−λ2μ)−2], η=x−βt. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)−eα3Ω)<0.
By utilizing of Family 3, the hyperbolic function solution becomes
u3(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2λdα2(λexp(λ(η+E))−1)+2dα2(λexp(λ(η+E))−1)2], η=x−βt. | (4.10) |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)−eα3Ω)>0, and
λ=√3l2(−eα3Ω+12μl2+√Ω2α6e2−12Rα4l2)3l2, λ2−4μ=−eα3Ω+√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)3l2. |
In this section the improved exp(−Ω(η))-expansion method is utilized to obtain the solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs). Hence, consider the NPDEs in the following way:
N(u,ux,ut,uxx,utt,...)=0, | (5.1) |
where N is a polynomial of u and its partial derivatives in which the relationship of higher order derivatives and nonlinear terms. To find the traveling wave solutions, we outline the following sequence of steps towards the extended tanh method:
Step 1. Firstly, by using the traveling wave transformation
ξ=x−βt, | (5.2) |
where β is non-zero arbitrary constant, permits to reduce equation (4.1) to an ODE of u=u(ξ) in the following form
Q(u,u′,−βu′,u″,β2u″,...)=0, | (5.3) |
Step 2. Assuming that the solution of equation (5.1) can be expressed by the following ansatz:
U(ξ)=m∑j=0AjFj(ξ)+m∑j=1BjFj(ξ), | (5.4) |
where F(η)=exp(−Φ(ξ)) and Aj(0≤j≤m),Bj(1≤j≤m), are the parameters to be determined Am≠0, and, Φ=Φ(ξ) satisfying the ODE given below
Φ′=μF−1(ξ)+F(ξ)+λ. | (5.5) |
The particular solutions of equation (5.5) will be read like before section.
Step 3. To determine the positive integer m, we usually balance the linear terms of the highest order in the resulting equation with the highest order nonlinear terms appearing in equation (4.3).
Step 4. We collect all the terms with the same order of F(ξ)k,(k=0,1,2,...) together. Equate each coefficient of the polynomials of F(ξ)k to zero, yields the set of algebraic equations for A0,Ak,Bk(k=1,2,...,m),λ and μ with the aid of the Maple.
Step 5. Solving the algebraic equations in Step 4, then substituting A0,A1,B1,...,Am,Bm,λ,μ in (5.4).
The exact solution will be the same as the previous section as
v(ξ)=2∑k=0AkFk(η)+2∑k=1BkF−k(η), | (5.6) |
Substitute equation (5.6) and its derivatives into equation (2.9). The algebraic equations set can be obtained after equating the coefficients of F(ξ) for p=0,1,...,20, and setting equal to zero. After solving the nonlinear algebraic equations, the following values of λ,μ,β,A0,A1,B1,A2,B2 can be obtained:
Set Ⅰ.
Σ1=5000Ω5α6Ξ31(45Ω2d−4ΩRd+45Ωl1+Rl1)−1250Ω5Rα5e3Ξ3Ξ21−250Ω4Rα4de2Ξ1Ξ2Ξ3 | (5.7) |
−25Ω2α3eΞ2(5Ω3de2Ξ31(λ2−4μ)+6Rl2Ξ22)−3α2l2Ξ2(25Ω3e2Ξ3Ξ21(λ2−4μ)+ |
2Ξ22(2025Ω3d+65Ω2Rd+ΩR2d+2025Ω2l1+115ΩRl1+R2l1))−15Ω2αdel2Ξ1Ξ3Ξ22(λ2−4μ) |
−9l22Ξ3Ξ32(λ2−4μ), d=√3Ωl2Ω, e=4√12Ω3l2Ω, β=√(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42)Σ1α(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42), |
A0=Σ26α2Ωd(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42), A1=2λdα2, A2=2dα2, B1=0, B2=Σ2360dl2Σ3, |
Σ2=25000Ω6Rα6dΞ31+1250Ω5Rα5e3Ξ3Ξ21+15Ω2αdel2Ξ1Ξ3Ξ22(λ2−4μ)+25Ω2α3eΞ3(5Ω3de2Ξ31(λ2−4μ)+6l2RΞ22) |
−18l22Ξ32(225Ω2λ2+5ΩRλ2+11250Ω2μ+670ΩRμ+6R2μ)+75Ω2α2l2Ξ2(Ωe2Ξ3Ξ21(λ2−4μ)−4RdΞ22) |
+250Ω4α4Ξ1(30Ωl2Ξ31(λ2+8μ)+Rde2Ξ2Ξ3), |
Σ3=6250000Ω10α8Ξ81−3l2(Ξ42)(5000Ω5α4Ξ41−3l2Ξ42), |
Ξ1=45Ω+R, Ξ2=2025Ω2+115ΩR+R2, Ξ3=1575Ω2+105ΩR+R2. |
By utilizing of Family 1, the hyperbolic function solution becomes
u1(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2λdα2(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)−1 | (5.8) |
+2dα2(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)−2+Σ2360dl2Σ3(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)2]. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)−eα3Ω)>0.
By utilizing of Family 2, the trigonometric function solution becomes
u2(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2λdα2(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)−1 | (5.9) |
+2dα2(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)−2+Σ2360dl2Σ3(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)2]. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)−eα3Ω)<0.
By utilizing of Family 3, the kink-soliton solution becomes
u3(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2λdα2(λexp(λ¯η)−1)+2dα2(λexp(λ¯η)−1)2+Σ2360dl2Σ3(λexp(λ¯η)−1)−2]. | (5.10) |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)−eα3Ω)>0 and
¯η=x−βt+E, λ=√3l2(−eα3Ω+12μl2+√Ω2α6e2−12Rα4l2)3l2, λ2−4μ=−eα3Ω+√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)3l2. |
Set Ⅱ.
Σ1=5000Ω5α6Ξ31(45Ω2d−4ΩRd+45Ωl1+Rl1)−1250μΩ5Rα5e3Ξ3Ξ21−250μ2Ω4Rα4de2Ξ1Ξ2Ξ3 | (5.11) |
−25Ω2α3eμΞ3(5Ω3de2Ξ31(λ2−4μ)+6Rl2μ2Ξ22)−3α2l2μ2Ξ2(25Ω3e2Ξ3Ξ21(λ2−4μ)+ |
2μ2Ξ22(2025Ω3d+65Ω2Rd+ΩR2d+2025Ω2l1+115ΩRl1+R2l1))−15μ3Ω2αdel2Ξ1Ξ3Ξ22(λ2−4μ) |
−9μ4l22Ξ3Ξ32(λ2−4μ), d=√3Ωl2Ω, e=4√12Ω3l2Ω, β=√(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3μ4l2Ξ42)Σ1α(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3μ4l2Ξ42), |
Σ2=1250μΩ5Rα5e3Ξ3Ξ21+15μ3Ω2αdel2Ξ1Ξ3Ξ22(λ2−4μ)+250Ω4α4Ξ1(30Ωl2Ξ31(λ2+8μ)+Rde2μ2Ξ2Ξ3) |
−18μ4l22Ξ32(225Ω2λ2+5ΩRλ2+11250Ω2μ+670ΩRμ+6R2μ)+25μΩ2α3eΞ3(5Ω3de2Ξ31(λ2−4μ)+6μ2l2RΞ22)+ |
75μ2Ω2α2l2Ξ2(Ωe2(1575Ω2+105ΩR+R2)Ξ21(λ2−4μ)−4μ2RdΞ2)+25000Ω6Rα6dΞ31, |
A0=Σ26α2Ωd(2500Ω5α4Ξ41−3μ4l2Ξ42), A1=0, A2=0, B1=2dλμα2, B2=2dμ2α2, |
Ξ1=45Ω+R, Ξ2=2025Ω2+115ΩR+R2, Ξ3=1575Ω2+105ΩR+R2. |
By utilizing of Family 1, the hyperbolic function solution becomes
u1(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2dλμα2(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)+ | (5.12) |
2μ2dα2(−√λ2−4μ2μtanh(√λ2−4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)2], ¯η=x−βt+E. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2μ(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12μ2Rl2)−eα3Ω)>0.
By utilizing of Family 2, the trigonometric function solution becomes
u2(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2dλμα2(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)+ | (5.13) |
2μ2dα2(√−λ2+4μ2μtan(√−λ2+4μ2¯η)−λ2μ)2], ¯η=x−βt+E. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2μ(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12μ2Rl2)−eα3Ω)<0.
By utilizing of Family 3, the exponential function solution becomes
u3(x,t)=−1αln[A0+2μλdα2(exp(λ¯η)λ)+2dμα2(exp(λ¯η)λ)2], ¯η=x−βt+E. | (5.14) |
λ=√3l2(−eα3Ω+12μl2+√Ω2α6e2−12Rα4l2)3l2, λ2−4μ=−eα3Ω+√α4(Ω2α2e2−12Rl2)3l2. |
The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as l2μ(√α4(Ω2α2e2−12μRl2)−eα3Ω)>0.
As the fourth method, the generalized (G'/G)-expansion method has been summarized to obtain the solutions of NPDEs. Hence, consider the NPDEs of in the following way:
N(u,ux,ut,uxx,utt,...)=0, | (6.1) |
where N is a polynomial of u and its partial derivatives in which the relationship of higher order derivatives and nonlinear terms. To find the traveling wave solutions, we outline the following sequence of steps towards the GGM:
Step 1. Firstly, by using traveling wave transformation
ξ=x−βt, | (6.2) |
where β is non-zero arbitrary constant, permits to reduce equation (6.1) to an ODE of u=u(ξ) in the following form
Q(u,u′,−βu′,u″,β2u″,...)=0, | (6.3) |
Step 2. Assuming that the solution of equation (6.1) can be expressed by the following ansatz:
u(ξ)=S(Φ(ξ))=m∑k=0AkΦ(ξ)k, | (6.4) |
where, Ak(0≤k≤m) are constants to be determined, such that Am≠0, and Φ(ξ)=G′(ξ)/G(ξ) satisfies the following ODE:
k1GG″−k2GG′−k3(G′)2−k4G2=0. | (6.5) |
The particular solutions of equation (6.5) will be read as:
Family 1: When k2≠0, f=k1−k3 and s=k22+4k4(k1−k3)>0, then Φ(ξ)=k22f+√s2fC1sinh(√s2k1ξ)+C2cosh(√s2k1ξ)C1cosh(√s2k1ξ)+C2sinh(√s2k1ξ).
Family 2: When k2≠0, f=k1−k3 and s=k22+4k4(k1−k3)<0, then Φ(ξ)=k22f+√−s2f−C1sin(√−s2k1ξ)+C2cos(√−s2k1ξ)C1cos(√−s2k1ξ)+C2sin(√−s2k1ξ).
Family 3: When k2≠0, f=k1−k3 and s=k22+4k4(k1−k3)=0, then Φ(ξ)=k22f+C2C1+C2ξ.
Family 4: When k2=0, f=k1−k3 and g=fk4>0, then Φ(ξ)=√gfC1sinh(√gk1ξ)+C2cosh(√gk1ξ)C1cosh(√gk1ξ)+C2sinh(√gk1ξ).
Family 5: When k2=0, f=k1−k3 and g=fk4<0, then Φ(ξ)=√−gf−C1sin(√−gk1ξ)+C2cos(√−gk1ξ)C1cos(√−gk1ξ)+C2sin(√−gk1ξ).
Family 6: When k4=0 and f=k1−k3, then Φ(ξ)=C1k22exp(−k2k1ξ)fk1+C1k1k2exp(−k2k1ξ).
Family 7: When k2≠0 and f=k1−k3=0, then Φ(ξ)=−k4k2+C1exp(k2k1ξ),
Family 8: When k1=k3, k2=0 and f=k1−k3=0, then Φ(ξ)=C1+k4k1ξ,
Family 9: When k3=2k1, k2=0 and k4=0, then Φ(ξ)=−1C1+(k3k1−1)ξ, where d0,dj,ej(j=1,...,m),k1,k2,k3 and k4 are constants to be determined later.
Step 3. To determine the positive integer m, we usually balance linear terms of the highest order in the resulting equation with the highest order nonlinear terms appearing in equation (3.3).
Step 4. We collect all the terms with the same order of Φ(ξ)k,(k=0,1,2,...) together. Equate each coefficient of the polynomials of i to zero, yields the set of algebraic equations for A0,Ak(k=1,2,...,m),k1,k2,k3, and k4 with the aid of the Maple.
Step 5. Solving the algebraic equations in Step 4, then substituting A0,A1,...,Bm,k1,k2,k3,k4 in (6.4).
By processing the generalized G′/G-expansion method and considering the homogeneous balance principle, we get the exact solution in the following form
u(ξ)=A0+A1Φ(ξ)+A1Φ(ξ)2. | (6.6) |
Solving the nonlinear algebraic equations, we have the following sets of coefficients for the solutions of (6.6) as given below:
Subset Ⅰ.
β=√A2(2α2A2k12l1−12k12l2ϵ1(ϵ1−2)(A0−1)−3l2(4A0k12−A2ϵ32−4k12))k1αA2, | (6.7) |
ε1=123/44√ΩA22l23α12l2, ε2=√3√l2k1(4√ΩA22l23123/4α+12l2)6l2, |
ε3=13A2l2√6A2l2((A0−1)(6ϵ2l2(ϵ2−2k1)+6k12l2)+√ε4, |
ε4=36ϵ2l22(ϵ2−2k1)(ϵ22−2ϵ2k1+2k12)(A0−1)2−3α4A22k14l2(ΩA02−2ΩA0+R)+36k14l22(A0−1)2, |
A1=12ε3l2(ε1−1)3k1Ωα4A2, A2=A2, k1=k1, k2=ε3, k3=ε1, k4=Ωα4A0A2k112l2(ϵ13−3ϵ12+3ϵ1−1), |
s=k22+4k4(k1−k3)=ϵ32−Ωα4A0A2k123(ϵ1−1)2l2. |
Based on the Family 1, the exact soliton solution can be written as
u1(x,t)=−1αln[A0+12ε3l2(ε1−1)3k1Ωα4A2{k22f+√s2fC1sinh(√s2k1ξ)+C2cosh(√s2k1ξ)C1cosh(√s2k1ξ)+C2sinh(√s2k1ξ)}+ | (6.8) |
A2{k22f+√s2fC1sinh(√s2k1ξ)+C2cosh(√s2k1ξ)C1cosh(√s2k1ξ)+C2sinh(√s2k1ξ)}2], |
in which ξ=x−√A2(2α2A2k12l1−12k12l2ϵ1(ϵ1−2)(A0−1)−3l2(4A0k12−A2ϵ32−4k12))k1αA2t. The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as |ε3|>α2|k1||ε1−1|√A0A2Ω3l2.
Based on the Family 2, the exact periodic solution can be written as
u2(x,t)=−1αln[A0+12ε3l2(ε1−1)3k1Ωα4A2{k22f+√−s2f−C1sin(√−s2k1ξ)+C2cos(√−s2k1ξ)C1cos(√−s2k1ξ)+C2sin(√−s2k1ξ)}+ | (6.9) |
A2{k22f+√−s2f−C1sin(√−s2k1ξ)+C2cos(√−s2k1ξ)C1cos(√−s2k1ξ)+C2sin(√−s2k1ξ)}2], |
in which ξ=x−√A2(2α2A2k12l1−12k12l2ϵ1(ϵ1−2)(A0−1)−3l2(4A0k12−A2ϵ32−4k12))k1αA2t. The existence of the solution for the constraint condition is as |ε3|<α2|k1||ε1−1|√A0A2Ω3l2.
Based on the Family 3, the exact singular solution can be written as
u3(x,t)=−1αln[A0+(2Ω2α4A04k14+3ΩA02l2−6ΩA0l2+3Rl2)ε3(ε1−1)32Ω2A02k1α4(ϵ2−k1)2(A0−1){k22f+C2C1+C2ξ}+ | (6.10) |
24ΩA02l2(ϵ2−k1)2(A0−1)4Ω2α4A04k14+3ΩA02l2−6ΩA0l2+3Rl2{k22f+C2C1+C2ξ}2], |
in which ξ=x−√A2(2α2A2k12l1−12k12l2ϵ1(ϵ1−2)(A0−1)−3l2(4A0k12−A2ϵ32−4k12))k1αA2t and A2=24ΩA02l2(ϵ2−k1)2(A0−1)4Ω2α4A04k14+3ΩA02l2−6ΩA0l2+3Rl2.
Based on the Family 6, the exact kink solution can be written as
u4(x,t)=−1αln[12ε3l2(ε1−1)3k1Ωα4A2{C1k22exp(−k2k1ξ)fk1+C1k1k2exp(−k2k1ξ)}+A2{C1k22exp(−k2k1ξ)fk1+C1k1k2exp(−k2k1ξ)}2], | (6.11) |
in which ξ=x−√A2(2α2A2k12l1+12k12l2ϵ1(ϵ1−2)−3l2(−A2ϵ32−4k12))k1αA2t.
We first consider the nonlinear equation of form
N(u,ut,ux,uxx,utt,utx,...)=0, | (7.1) |
and introduce a transformation as
u(x,t)=u(η),ξ=x−βt, | (7.2) |
where β is constant to be determined later. Therefore the Eq. (7.1) is reduced to an ODE as follows
M(u,−βu′,u′,u″,...)=0. | (7.3) |
The EFM is based on the assumption that the travelling wave solutions can be expressed in the form
u(ξ)=∑dn=−canexp(nξ)∑qm=−pbmexp(mξ), | (7.4) |
where c, d, p and q are positive integers which could be freely chosen, an's and bm's are unknown constants to be determined.
We apply the Exp-function method to Eq. (2.9). In order to determine values of c and p, we balance the terms (v′)4 and v6 in Eq. (2.9) along with Eq. (7.4), then we get
(v′)4=c1exp(4(c+p)ξ)+...c2exp(8pξ)+...,v6=c3exp((6c+2p)ξ)+...c4exp(8pξ)+..., | (7.5) |
respectively. Balancing highest order of the Exp–function in (7.5) and get 4c+4p=6c+2p, which leads to the result c=p. Similarly, to find values of d and q, for the terms (v′)4 and v6 in Eq. (2.9) by simple calculation, we attain
(v′)4=d1exp(−4(d+q)ξ)+...d2exp(−8qξ)+...,v6=d3exp(−(6d+2q)ξ)+...d4exp(−8qξ)+..., | (7.6) |
respectively. Balancing lowest order of the Exp–function in (7.6), we achieve d=q.
Case Ⅰ: p=c=1 and q=d=1.
For simplicity, we set a−1=0,b1=1, p=c=1 and d=q=1. Then Eq. (7.4) reduces to
v(ξ)=a1exp(ξ)+a0exp(ξ)+b0+b−1exp(−ξ). | (7.7) |
Substituting (7.7) into Eq. (2.9), we get an equation in the following form
([b−1exp(−ξ)+b0+exp(ξ)]4)−14∑n=−4Cnexp(nξ)=0, | (7.8) |
where Cn(−4≤n≤4) are polynomial expressions in terms of a1,a0,a−1,b0,b−1 and β. Thus, solving the resulting system Cn=0(−4≤n≤4) simultaneously, we acquire the following set as
(Ⅰ) The first set is:
a1=0,a0=b0(4α2R+β2−l1)2α2Ω,b0=b0,b−1=14b20,R=3l2+2α2(l1−β2)4α4,β=±1α√3l2+α2(l1±2√3l2Ω), | (7.9) |
v(ξ)=2b0(4α2R+β2−l1)α2Ω(2eξ/2+b0e−ξ/2)2,ξ=x∓1α√3l2+α2(l1±2√3l2Ω)t, | (7.10) |
then the solution equation (2.4) will be as
u1(x,t)=−1αln[2b0(4α2R+β2−l1)α2Ω(2e12[x∓1α√3l2+α2(l1±2√3l2Ω)t]+b0e−12[x∓1α√3l2+α2(l1±2√3l2Ω)t])2]. | (7.11) |
If we choose b0=2 and b0=−2, then the solution equation (7.11), respectively, give:
u2(x,t)=−1αln[b0(4α2R+β2−l1)8α2Ωsech2(x2∓12α√3l2+α2(l1±2√3l2Ω)t)], | (7.12) |
u3(x,t)=−1αln[b0(4α2R+β2−l1)8α2Ωcsch2(x2∓12α√3l2+α2(l1±2√3l2Ω)t)], | (7.13) |
(Ⅱ) The second set is:
a1=Ω±√Ω2−ΩRΩ,a0=b0(a1(R−2Ω)+R)R−a1Ω,b0=b0,b−1=0,R=R,β=β, | (7.14) |
v(ξ)=a0+a1eξb0+eξ,ξ=x−βt, | (7.15) |
then the solution equation (2.4) will be as
u4(x,t)=−1αln[b0(a1(R−2Ω)+R)R−a1Ω+Ω±√Ω2−ΩRΩex−βtb0+ex−βt]. | (7.16) |
Case Ⅱ: p=c=2 and q=d=2.
Since the values of c and d can be freely chosen, we set p=c=2 and d=q=2 and then the trial function (7.4) becomes
u(ξ)=a2exp(2ξ)+a1exp(ξ)+a0+a−1exp(−ξ)+a−2exp(−2ξ)b2exp(2ξ)+b1exp(ξ)+b0+b−1exp(−ξ)+b−2exp(−2ξ). | (7.17) |
There are some free parameters in (7.17), we set b2=1 and a1=a−1=a−2=b1=b−1=0 for simplicity, the trial function, (7.17) is simplified as follows
u(ξ)=a0+a2exp(2ξ)exp(2ξ)+b0+b−2exp(−2ξ). | (7.18) |
Substituting (7.18) into Eq. (2.9), we get an equation in the following form
([b−2exp(−2ξ)+b0+exp(2ξ)]8)−18∑n2=−4Cnexp(nξ)=0, | (7.19) |
where Cn(−8≤n≤16) are polynomial expressions in terms of a2,a0,a−1,b0,b−2 and β. Thus, solving the resulting system Cn=0(−8≤n≤16) simultaneously, we obtain the following set of algebraic equations
(Ⅰ) The first set is:
a2=0,a0=2b0(α2R+β2−l1)α2Ω,b0=b0,b−1=14b20,R=6l2+α2(l1−β2)α4,β=±1α3Ω√Ω(36l22+α4Ω(α2l1−6l2)), | (7.20) |
v(ξ)=8b0(α2R+β2−l1)α2Ω(2eξ+b0e−ξ)2,ξ=x∓1α3Ω√Ω(36l22+α4Ω(α2l1−6l2))t, | (7.21) |
then the solution equation (2.4) will be as
u5(x,t)=−1αln[8b0(α2R+β2−l1)α2Ω(2e[x∓1α3Ω√Ω(36l22+α4Ω(α2l1−6l2))t]+b0e−[x∓1α3Ω√Ω(36l22+α4Ω(α2l1−6l2))t])2]. | (7.22) |
If we choose b0=2 and b0=−2, then the solution equation (7.22), respectively, give:
u6(x,t)=−1αln[b0(α2R+β2−l1)2α2Ωsech2(x∓1α3Ω√Ω(36l22+α4Ω(α2l1−6l2))t)], | (7.23) |
u7(x,t)=−1αln[b0(α2R+β2−l1)2α2Ωcsch2(x∓1α3Ω√Ω(36l22+α4Ω(α2l1−6l2))t)], | (7.24) |
(Ⅱ) The second set is:
a2=Ω±√Ω2−ΩRΩ,a0=b0(a1(R−2Ω)+R)R−a1Ω,b0=b0,b−2=0,R=R,β=β, | (7.25) |
v(ξ)=a0+a2e2ξb0+e2ξ,ξ=x−βt, | (7.26) |
then the solution equation (2.4) will be as
u8(x,t)=−1αln[b0(a2(R−2Ω)+R)R−a2Ω+Ω±√Ω2−ΩRΩe2x−2βtb0+e2x−2βt]. | (7.27) |
This paper finds many novel hyperbolic, trigonometric, kink, and kink-singular soliton solutions to governing model. With the help of some calculations, surfaces of results reported have been observed in Figures 1–5. These figures are depended on the family conditions which are of important physically. It has been investigated that all figures plotted have symbolized the nonlinear DNA dynamics. These mathematical properties come from trigonometric and hyperbolic function properties. In this sense, from the mathematical and physical points of views, these results take play an important role in explaining waves propagation in nonlinear dispersion. Hence, we consider surfaces plotted in this paper have proved such physical meaning of the solutions. In Figure 1 and Figure 2, we have depicted the 3D, 2D, contour, and density schematic representation of the analytical and numerical solutions at few space positions for three different waves at x=−1, x=0, and x=1 by taking l1=1,l2=−1,α=3,Ω=1,R=−1,μ=1.5 for (5.8) and l1=1,l2=2,α=3,Ω=10,R=5,μ=1.5 for (5.9). We observe that the breathe soliton wave move in direction (x,t) and increases with move of negative (x,t) to positive (x,t). Also, the periodic wave solution for (6.9) by taking A0=1,A2=2,k1=2,l1=3,l2=2,α=2,Ω=5,C1=2,C2=3,R=5 is presented in Figure 3. Moreover, the rational kink wave solution for the DNA dynamics (6.10) by taking A0=1,A2=1,k1=2,l1=3,l2=2,α=2,Ω=5,C1=2,C2=3,R=5, is offered in Figure 4. Likewise, the DNA dynamics for (6.11) by taking A0=0,A2=1,k1=2,l1=3,l2=2,α=2,Ω=5,R=5, along with 3D plot, density plot, contour plot, and 2D plot with at spaces at x=−1, x=0, and x=1 are plotted in Figure 5.
The article obtains, the traveling wave solutions of different kinds, which are solitary, topological, singular, periodic and rational solutions to the model for DNA dynamics. The integration mechanisms that are adopted, are improved tan(ϕ/2)-expansion scheme, exp(−Ω(η))-expansion scheme, improved exp(−Ω(η))-expansion scheme, generalized (G'/G)-expansion scheme, and exp-function scheme. It is quite visible that these integration schemes has its limitations. Thus, this paper are provides a lot of encouragement for future research in DNA dynamics. Afterwards extra solution methods will be applied to obtain lump and singular soliton solutions to the nonlinear model. In addition to, this model will be considered with other forms of nonlinear media. The constructed results may be helpful in explaining the physical meaning of the studied models and other related nonlinear phenomena models. Results are beneficial to the study of the nonlinear DNA dynamics. All calculations in this paper have been made quickly with the aid of the Maple.
The authors would like to thank the given comments and valuable recommendations by respected Editor and the reviewers provided to improve the paper.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
[1] | M. Dehghan, J. Manafian, A. Saadatmandi, Solving nonlinear fractional partial differential equations using the homotopy analysis method, Num. Meth. Partial Diff. Eq. J., 26 (2010), 448-479. |
[2] | M. Dehghan, J. Manafian, A. Saadatmandi, Application of semi-analytic methods for the Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation, which models the transmission of nerve impulses, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 33 (2010), 1384-1398. |
[3] |
M. Dehghan, J. Manafian, A. Saadatmandi, Application of the Exp-function method for solving a partial differential equation arising in biology and population genetics, Int. J. Num. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 21 (2011), 736-753. doi: 10.1108/09615531111148482
![]() |
[4] |
X. G. Geng, Y. L. Ma, N-soliton solution and its wronskian form of a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation, Phys. Lett. A, 369 (2007), 285-289. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.04.099
![]() |
[5] |
J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, Optical solitons with Biswas-Milovic equation for Kerr law nonlinearity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 130 (2015), 1-12. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2015-15001-1
![]() |
[6] |
J. Manafian, On the complex structures of the Biswas-Milovic equation for power, parabolic and dual parabolic law nonlinearities, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 130 (2015), 1-20. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2015-15001-1
![]() |
[7] | J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, Solitary wave and periodic wave solutions for Burgers, Fisher, Huxley and combined forms of these equations by the (G'/G)-expansion method, Pramana, 130 (2015), 31-52. |
[8] | J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, New improvement of the expansion methods for solving the generalized Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation with time-dependent coefficients, Int. J. Eng. Math., 2015 (2015), Article ID 107978. |
[9] |
J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, Application of tan(φ/2)-expansion method for solving the Biswas-Milovic equation for Kerr law nonlinearity, Optik, 127 (2016), 2040-2054. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.11.078
![]() |
[10] | J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, Dispersive dark optical soliton with Tzitzéica type nonlinear evolution equations arising in nonlinear optics, Opt. Quan. Elec., 48 (2016), 16. |
[11] |
J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, Optical soliton solutions for Schrödinger type nonlinear evolution equations by the tan(φ/2)-expansion method, Optik, 127 (2016), 4222-4245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.01.078
![]() |
[12] | H. M. Baskonus, H. Bulut, Exponential prototype structures for (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli systems in mathematical physics, Waves in Random and Complex Media, 26 (2016), 201-208. |
[13] | H. M. Baskonus, D. A. Koç, H. Bulut, New travelling wave prototypes to the nonlinear Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with power law nonlinearity, Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A, 7 (2016), 67-76. |
[14] |
M. Peyrard, A. R. Bishop, Statistical mechanics of a nonlinear model for DNA denaturation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62 (1989), 2755-2758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2755
![]() |
[15] |
R. Abazari, S. Jamshidzadeh, G. Wang, Mathematical modeling of DNA vibrational dynamics and its solitary wave solutions, Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 64 (2018), 590-597. doi: 10.31349/RevMexFis.64.590
![]() |
[16] |
S. Dusuel, P. Michaux, M. Remoissenet, From Kinks to compactonlike Kinks, Phys. Rev. E, 57 (1998), 2320-2326. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.2320
![]() |
[17] |
A. Alvarez, S. R. Romero, J. F. R. Archilla, et al. Breather trapping and breather transmission in a DNA model with an interface, Eur. Phys. J. B, 51 (2006), 119-130. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00191-0
![]() |
[18] | L. Yakushevich, Nonlinear Physics of DNA, Wiley and Sons, 1998. |
[19] | Mika Gustafsson, Coherent waves in DNA within the Peyrard Bishop model, Master thesis, Linopings Universitet, 2003. |
[20] | E. Villagran, Estructuras solitonicas y su influencia en la dinamica vibraional del ADN, PhD Thesis, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Mexico, 2007. |
[21] |
Z. Wang, B. Zineddin, J. Liang, et al. A novel neural network approach to cDNA microarray image segmentation, Comput Methods Programs Biomed., 111 (2013), 189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.03.013
![]() |
[22] |
M. Aguero, M. Najera, M. Carrillo, Nonclassic solitonic structures in DNA's vibrational dynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 22 (2008), 2571-2582. doi: 10.1142/S021797920803968X
![]() |
[23] |
G. Gaeta, Results and limitations of the soliton theory of DNA transcription, J. Biol. Phys., 24 (1999), 81-96. doi: 10.1023/A:1005158503806
![]() |
[24] |
J. B. Okaly, A. Mvogo, R. L. Woulaché, et al. Nonlinear dynamics of damped DNA systems with long-rangeinteractions, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 55 (2018), 183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.06.017
![]() |
[25] | G. Miloshevich, J. P. Nguenang, T. Dauxois, et al. Traveling solitons in long-range oscillator chains, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 50 (2017), 12LT02. |
[26] |
J. B. Okaly, A. Mvogo, R. L. Woulaché, et al. Semi-discrete breather in a helicoidal DNA double chain-model, Wave Motion, 82 (2018), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.06.005
![]() |
[27] | J. B. Okaly, F. L. Ndzana, R. L. Woulaché, et al. Base pairs opening and bubble transport in damped DNA dynamics with transport memory effects, Chaos, 29 (2019), 093103. |
[28] | M. Peyrard, Nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics of DNA, Nonlinearity, 17 (2004), R1-R40. |
[29] |
J. B. Okaly, A. Mvogo, R. L. Woulaché, et al. Nonlinear dynamics of DNA systems with inhomogeneity effects, Chin. J. of Phys., 56 (2018), 2613-2626. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2018.07.006
![]() |
[30] | A. Mvogo, G. H. Ben-Bolie, T. C. Kofané, Solitary waves in an inhomogeneous chain of α-helical proteins, Int. J. Mod. Phys B., 28 (2014), 1-14. |
[31] | S. Zdravković, D. Chevizovich, A. N. Bugay, et al. Stationary solitary and kink solutions in the helicoidal Peyrard-Bishop model of DNA molecule, Chaos, 29 (2019), 053118. |
[32] |
S. Zdravković, S. Zeković, Nonlinear dynamics of microtubules and series expansion unknown function method, Chin. J. Phys., 55 (2017), 2400-2406. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2017.10.009
![]() |
[33] |
E. Tala-Tebue, Z. I. Djoufack, D. C. Tsobgni-Fozap, et al. Traveling wave solutions along microtubules and in theZhiber-Shabat equation, Chin. J. Phys., 55 (2017), 939-946. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2017.03.004
![]() |
[34] | J. Manafian, M. Lakestani, Lump-type solutions and interaction phenomenon to the bidirectional Sawada-Kotera equation, Pramana, 92 (2019), 41. |
[35] |
J. Manafian, Novel solitary wave solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional extended Jimbo-Miwa equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 76 (2018), 1246-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.06.018
![]() |
[36] | J. Manafian, B. Mohammadi-Ivatlo, M. Abapour, Lump-type solutions and interaction phenomenon to the (2+1)-dimensional Breaking Soliton equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 13 (2019), 13-41. |
[37] |
O. A. Ilhan, J. Manafian, M. Shahriari, Lump wave solutions and the interaction phenomenon for a variable-coefficient Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 78 (2019), 2429-2448. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.03.048
![]() |
[38] |
S. T. R. Rizvi, I. Afzal, K. Ali, et al. Stationary Solutions for Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations by Lie Group Analysis, Acta Physica Polonica A., 136 (2019), 187-189. doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.136.187
![]() |
[39] | K. Ali, S. T. R. Rizvi, B. Nawaz, et al. Optical solitons for paraxial wave equation in Kerr media, Modern Phys. Let. B, 33 (2019), 1950020. |
[40] | S. Ali, M. Younis, M. O. Ahmad, et al. Rogue wave solutions in nonlinear optics with coupled Schrodinger equations, Opt. Quan. Elec., 50 (2018), 266. |
[41] | A. Arif, M. Younis, M. Imran, et al. Solitons and lump wave solutions to the graphene thermophoretic motion system with a variable heat transmission, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 303. |
[42] |
S. Zdravković, Helicoidal PeyrardBishop Model of DNA Dynamics, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 18 (2011), 463-484. doi: 10.1142/S1402925111001635
![]() |
[43] |
M. Peyrard, A. R. Bishop, Statistical mechanics of a nonlinear model for DNA denaturation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62 (1989), 2755-2758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2755
![]() |
[44] |
T. Dauxois, Dynamics of breather modes in a nonlinear helicoidal model of DNA, Phys. Lett. A, 159 (1991), 390-395. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(91)90367-H
![]() |
[45] |
M. A. Aguero, M. D. L. Najera, M. Carrillo, Nonclassic solitonic structures in DNA's vibrational dynamics, Int. J. Modern Physics B, 22 (2008), 2571-2582. doi: 10.1142/S021797920803968X
![]() |
[46] | L. Najera, M. Carrillo, M. A. Agüero, Non-classical solitons and the broken hydrogen bonds in DNA vibrational dynamics, Adv. Studies Theor. Phys., 4 (2010), 495-510. |
[47] | S. Zdravković, J. A. Tuszyński, M. V. Satarić, Peyrard-Bishop-Dauxois model of DNA dynamics and impact of viscosity, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 2 (2005), 1-9. |
[48] |
S. Zdravković, M. V. Satarić, Parameter selection in a PeyrardBishopDauxois model for DNA dynamics, Phys. Let. A, 373 (2009), 2739-2745. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.05.032
![]() |
1. | Loubna Ouahid, Plenty of soliton solutions to the DNA Peyrard-Bishop equation via two distinctive strategies, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 035224, 10.1088/1402-4896/abdc57 | |
2. | Jianguo Ren, Jalil Manafian, Muhannad A. Shallal, Hawraz N. Jabbar, Sizar A. Mohammed, Quintic B-spline collocation method for the numerical solution of the Bona–Smith family of Boussinesq equation type, 2021, 0, 2191-0294, 10.1515/ijnsns-2020-0241 | |
3. | Asim Zafar, Khalid K. Ali, M. Raheel, Numan Jafar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Soliton solutions to the DNA Peyrard–Bishop equation with beta-derivative via three distinctive approaches, 2020, 135, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00751-8 | |
4. | Khalid K. Ali, Carlo Cattani, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Dumitru Baleanu, M.S. Osman, Analytical and numerical study of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model, 2020, 139, 09600779, 110089, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110089 | |
5. | Loubna Ouahid, M. A. Abdou, Sachin Kumar, Saud Owyed, S. Saha Ray, A plentiful supply of soliton solutions for DNA Peyrard–Bishop equation by means of a new auxiliary equation strategy, 2021, 35, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979221502659 | |
6. | Mostafa M. A. Khater, Mustafa Inc, Raghda A. M. Attia, Dianchen Lu, Jorge E. Macias-Diaz, Computational Simulations; Abundant Optical Wave Solutions Atangana Conformable Fractional Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/2196913 | |
7. | Attia Rani, Muhammad Ashraf, Muhammad Shakeel, Qazi Mahmood-Ul-Hassan, Jamshad Ahmad, Analysis of some new wave solutions of DNA-Peyrard–Bishop equation via mathematical method, 2022, 36, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984922500476 | |
8. | Loubna Ouahid, M. A. Abdou, S. Owyed, Sachin Kumar, New optical soliton solutions via two distinctive schemes for the DNA Peyrard–Bishop equation in fractal order, 2021, 35, 0217-9849, 2150444, 10.1142/S0217984921504443 | |
9. | Hao-Han Chen, Jie-Feng Xu, Xiang-Bo Yang, Zhan-Hong Lin, Extraordinary optical characteristics of one-dimensional double anti-PT-symmetric ring optical waveguide networks, 2022, 77, 05779073, 816, 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.07.039 | |
10. | Attia Rani, Muhammad Shakeel, Mohammed Kbiri Alaoui, Ahmed M. Zidan, Nehad Ali Shah, Prem Junsawang, Application of the Exp−φξ-Expansion Method to Find the Soliton Solutions in Biomembranes and Nerves, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 3372, 10.3390/math10183372 | |
11. | Ghazala Akram, Saima Arshed, Zainab Imran, Soliton solutions for fractional DNA Peyrard-Bishop equation via the extended G′G2 -expansion method, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 094009, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac0955 | |
12. | Leilei Liu, Weiguo Zhang, Jian Xu, On a Riemann–Hilbert problem for the NLS-MB equations, 2021, 35, 0217-9849, 2150420, 10.1142/S0217984921504200 | |
13. | Lu Tang, Shanpeng Chen, The classification of single traveling wave solutions for the fractional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equation, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-03496-5 | |
14. | Yeşim Sağlam Özkan, Mostafa Eslami, Hadi Rezazadeh, Pure cubic optical solitons with improved $$tan(\varphi /2)$$-expansion method, 2021, 53, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-03120-6 | |
15. | Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Sharifah E. Alhazmi, Abid Hussanan, The modulation instability analysis and generalized fractional propagating patterns of the Peyrard–Bishop DNA dynamical equation, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-022-04477-y | |
16. | Xiaoming Wang, Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Hajra Mariyam, Muhammad Abbas, Soliton Solution of the Peyrard–Bishop–Dauxois Model of DNA Dynamics with M-Truncated and β-Fractional Derivatives Using Kudryashov’s R Function Method, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 616, 10.3390/fractalfract6100616 | |
17. | Umme Sadiya, Mustafa Inc, Mohammad Asif Arefin, M. Hafiz Uddin, Consistent travelling waves solutions to the non-linear time fractional Klein–Gordon and Sine-Gordon equations through extended tanh-function approach, 2022, 16, 1658-3655, 594, 10.1080/16583655.2022.2089396 | |
18. | Emad H. M. Zahran, Ahmet Bekir, New variety diverse solitary wave solutions to the DNA Peyrard–Bishop model, 2023, 37, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984923500276 | |
19. | Aydin Secer, Muslum Ozisik, Mustafa Bayram, Neslihan Ozdemir, Melih Cinar, Investigation of soliton solutions to the Peyrard-Bishop-Deoxyribo-Nucleic-Acid dynamic model with beta-derivative, 2024, 38, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924502634 | |
20. | Mostafa M. A. Khater, Mohammed Zakarya, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty, Dynamics and stability analysis of nonlinear DNA molecules: Insights from the Peyrard-Bishop model, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 23449, 10.3934/math.20241140 | |
21. | A. Hussain, M. Usman, F.D. Zaman, S.M. Eldin, Optical solitons with DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard–Bishop model, 2023, 50, 22113797, 106586, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106586 | |
22. | A. Tripathy, S. Sahoo, New Dynamic Multiwave Solutions of the Fractional Peyrard–Bishop DNA Model, 2023, 18, 1555-1415, 10.1115/1.4063223 | |
23. | Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Marriam Fayyaz, Riaz Ur Rahman, Jan Martinovic, Osman Tunç, Analytical study of fractional DNA dynamics in the Peyrard-Bishop oscillator-chain model, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102864, 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102864 |