Research article Special Issues

Dynamical and computational analysis of a fractional predator-prey model with an infectious disease and harvesting policy

  • This paper examined the features of an infection therapy for fractional-order quarry-hunter systems in order to control sickness. It focused especially on how illnesses and several populations combine to affect how well harvesting policies work. We created a new dynamic model full of such ideas by examining systems with fractional-order non-integer systems and introducing fractional-order systems that can remember in order to comprehend that specific system. These thresholds are essential for directing management strategies, according to research on the presence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions to these models. Additionally, we presented particular MATLAB-based numerical methods for fractional-order model. Through a series of numerical application experiments, we validated the method's efficacy and its value in guiding strategy modifications regarding harvesting rates in the face of epidemic infections. This demonstrates the necessity of using a fractional approach in ecosystem research in order to improve the methods used for resource management. This paper primarily focused on the unique insight brought into the quarry-hunter models with infectious diseases by the fractional-order dynamics in ecology. The results are meaningful especially since they can be utilized to come up with effective measures to control diseases and even promote the sustainability of ecological systems.

    Citation: Devendra Kumar, Jogendra Singh, Dumitru Baleanu. Dynamical and computational analysis of a fractional predator-prey model with an infectious disease and harvesting policy[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36082-36101. doi: 10.3934/math.20241712

    Related Papers:

    [1] Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, G Ranjith Kumar, K Ramesh . The study on the complex nature of a predator-prey model with fractional-order derivatives incorporating refuge and nonlinear prey harvesting. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13492-13507. doi: 10.3934/math.2024657
    [2] Jie Liu, Qinglong Wang, Xuyang Cao, Ting Yu . Bifurcation and optimal harvesting analysis of a discrete-time predator–prey model with fear and prey refuge effects. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 26283-26306. doi: 10.3934/math.20241281
    [3] Parveen Kumar, Sunil Kumar, Badr Saad T Alkahtani, Sara S Alzaid . A mathematical model for simulating the spread of infectious disease using the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30864-30897. doi: 10.3934/math.20241490
    [4] Xiaohuan Yu, Mingzhan Huang . Dynamics of a Gilpin-Ayala predator-prey system with state feedback weighted harvest strategy. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26968-26990. doi: 10.3934/math.20231380
    [5] Heping Jiang . Complex dynamics induced by harvesting rate and delay in a diffusive Leslie-Gower predator-prey model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20718-20730. doi: 10.3934/math.20231056
    [6] Rongjie Yu, Hengguo Yu, Min Zhao . Steady states and spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive predator-prey system with predator harvesting. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24058-24088. doi: 10.3934/math.20241170
    [7] Jagdev Singh, Behzad Ghanbari, Ved Prakash Dubey, Devendra Kumar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Fractional dynamics and computational analysis of food chain model with disease in intermediate predator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17089-17121. doi: 10.3934/math.2024830
    [8] Xin-You Meng, Fan-Li Meng . Bifurcation analysis of a special delayed predator-prey model with herd behavior and prey harvesting. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5695-5719. doi: 10.3934/math.2021336
    [9] Chengchong Lu, Xinxin Liu, Zhicheng Li . The dynamics and harvesting strategies of a predator-prey system with Allee effect on prey. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28897-28925. doi: 10.3934/math.20231481
    [10] Nadiyah Hussain Alharthi, Mdi Begum Jeelani . Analyzing a SEIR-Type mathematical model of SARS-COVID-19 using piecewise fractional order operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27009-27032. doi: 10.3934/math.20231382
  • This paper examined the features of an infection therapy for fractional-order quarry-hunter systems in order to control sickness. It focused especially on how illnesses and several populations combine to affect how well harvesting policies work. We created a new dynamic model full of such ideas by examining systems with fractional-order non-integer systems and introducing fractional-order systems that can remember in order to comprehend that specific system. These thresholds are essential for directing management strategies, according to research on the presence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions to these models. Additionally, we presented particular MATLAB-based numerical methods for fractional-order model. Through a series of numerical application experiments, we validated the method's efficacy and its value in guiding strategy modifications regarding harvesting rates in the face of epidemic infections. This demonstrates the necessity of using a fractional approach in ecosystem research in order to improve the methods used for resource management. This paper primarily focused on the unique insight brought into the quarry-hunter models with infectious diseases by the fractional-order dynamics in ecology. The results are meaningful especially since they can be utilized to come up with effective measures to control diseases and even promote the sustainability of ecological systems.



    The dynamics between hunters and their quarry are widely studied in the literature. The Lotka-Volterra hunter-quarry system [1,2] was initially presented to elucidate the demographic shifts of two species hunters and their quarry, as they interact. Murray [3] updated the Lokta-Volterra model, and the framework was based on the idea that, with a lack of hunters, the quarry population grows logistically. Kermack and McKendrick [4] proposed a traditional SIR model which is the ancestor of the most significant models for the spread of infectious diseases. Numerous epidemic models that involve disease in quarry have been thoroughly explored in a variety of formats and settings over the past few decades such as Hethcote et al. [5], Johri et al. [6], Rahman et al.[7], Nandi et al. [8], Mbava et al. [9] and Yang [10]. In the early nineteenth century, an eco-epidemiological system comprising three species emerged: healthy quarry (susceptible), infected quarry (infectious), and hunters, described by Chattopadhyay and Arino [11] with the situation where the hunter mostly consumes diseased quarry. Another scenario was also proposed by Das and Chattopadhyay [12] in which infectious disease affects both species.The parasite is transmitted within both the quarry and hunter populations through both direct and indirect means. In the other model by Nandi et al. [8], it is presumed that the victim species is affected by a viral ailment, leading to the emergence of two categories: vulnerable individuals and those in the early stages of infection, who are particularly vulnerable to predation by hunters.

    In recent years, a computational structure to investigate how a disease affects quarry species populations and harvesting in a hunter-hunted model has been examined by Dash et al. [13]. An eco-epidemiological system consisting of two separate infectious diseases in the quarry population was also proposed by Al-Jubouri et al. [14]. Tripathi et al. [15] looked at a four-species model to evaluate the impact of harvesting and the Allee effect inside a sick eco-epidemiological system. The vulnerable quarry, sick quarry, vulnerable hunter, and sick hunter are the four compartments in this paradigm.

    Fractional aspects of various hunter-hunted models have been proposed by many researchers such as Javidi and Nyamoradi [16], Al-Nassir et al. [17], Moustafa et al. [18], and Kaviya and Muthukumar [19]. Xie et al. [20] introduced a non-integer order model for the hunter-hunted relationship, incorporating a Holling Ⅲ-type functional response and an intermittent harvesting component. Djilali and Ghanbari [21] studied a non-integer order hunter-hunted system with sick quarry in which a non-fatal contagious disease has emerged in the quarry population. The presence, singularity, positivity, and limit of solutions are discussed by Ramesh et al.[22] in their research paper. Alidousti and Ghafari [23] considered a non-integer order hunter-hunted model involving a quarry species, two hunter species, and a collective defense capability. He integrated the interplays between quarry and hunter species by utilizing the Monod-Haldane function along with a Holling-Ⅳ functional reaction.

    The foundational literature for fractional calculus is found in the books by Miller and Ross [24], Oldham and Spanier [25], and Podlubny et al. [26]. The propensity of fractional-order systems to approach conventional integer-order systems is among the factors contributing to the growing attention toward fractional differential equations (FDEs). However, the nonlocal quality of fractional derivative operators is what appeals to people the most. Numerous approximate mathematical methods have been devised in recent years to figure out the solutions of FDEs, such as the Adomian decomposition method (ADM) by Wazwaz [27] and Abbasband [28], homotopy analysis method (HAM) by Liao [29], generalized differential transform method (GDTM) by Momani et al. [30], homotopy perturbation method (HPM) by He [31] and Yildirim [32], variational iteration technique by He [33], modified Laplace decomposition by Khan [34], homotopy perturbation transform method (HPTM) by Khan and Wu [35], homotopy sumudu perturbation transform technique by Hao et al. [36], and q-homotopy analysis transform method (q-HATM) by Kumar et al. [37].

    The conventional frameworks for describing the interactions between predators and prey, which include the Lotka-Volterra model, have been sufficient for the analysis of such interactions within species populations over time. On the contrary, these models, especially with regard to pest management and harvesting regimes, seem unable to deal with memory, non-locality, and other factors that are characteristic of real-life settings. Therefore, models based on fractional calculus have become an essential option, as they help in explaining complex phenomena in systems where certain activities vary with time such as diseases and human operations like fishing. For instance, Al-Nassir et al. [17] examined the fractional-order biological systems under harvest and their dynamic performance toward the harvest showing the scope of fractional calculus in ecology models. Similarly, Xie et al. [20] were concerned with the dynamics of the harvested fractional-order predator-prey systems and also the two species prey-predator models without harvest and showed the practical side of the model in real life. In a similar way, Moustafa et al. [18] worked on eco-epidemiological approaches and provided examples where diseases and mortality were integrated into predator-prey dynamics.

    This study builds on these efforts to propose the implementation of fractional-order models in analyzing how disease dynamics and harvesting affect predator-prey interactions, thus offering new perspectives regarding population management and ecosystem stability. In general, our model contains several important details: This class of model implies that in the absence of predation the susceptible-sized prey population increases logistically, but this growth is curtailed due to the spread of a disease. Infected prey do not die or breed but assist the disease by infecting healthy prey. In this study, a collection of robust MATLAB scripts, specially designed for addressing three categories of fractional-order problems, is introduced. These scripts are put forth by Garrappa [38], who has authored a concise guide on numerically solving FDEs and has delved into various intricate issues associated with the effective utilization of techniques, including handling the persistent memory term and tackling equations through implicit methods, among others.

    The fundamental organization of this paper is as follows: In Section 2, we delve into foundational concepts. The fractional problem model is examined within Section 3. Section 4 encompasses the demonstration of the analysis concerning existence, uniqueness, and stability. Section 5 contains instances of development and the application of numerical solutions in model simulations. Finally, in Section 6, we present concluding remarks.

    Let us commence with an exposition of the Caputo derivative with fractional order ρ and the Riemann-Liouville (RL) integral, respectively.

    C0Dρθg(θ)=1Γ(kρ)θ0(θϱ)kρ1gk(ϱ)dϱ,k1<ρk,kz+,C0Iρθg(θ)=1Γ(ρ)θ0(θϱ)ρ1g(ϱ)dϱ,0<ρ1. (2.1)

    Scientists and engineers have made extensive use of the Caputo operator to model memory-dependent behavior in the mathematical formulation such as Singh et al.[39], Baleanu and Agrawal [40], Shah et al.[41], Moa'ath et al.[42], and Mozyrska and Torres [43]. We are spurred on to employ this innovative strategy of non-negative calculus owing to the outstanding usability and effectiveness of the Caputo fractional operator in the realms of science and technology.

    Theorem 2.1. In the fractional-order system [44,45]

    C0Dρθg(θ)=g(θ,X(θ)),X(θ0)=X0, (2.2)

    where J(X) stands for the system's derivative matrix of Eq (2.2) determined at steady state point X:

    (1) The steady state point X is locally asymptotically stable if and only if all the eigenvalues λi, i=1,2,...,n, of J(X) satisfy |arg(λi)|>ρπ2.

    (2) The equilibrium point X is stable if all the eigenvalues λi, i=1,2,...,n, of J(X) satisfy |arg(λi)|ρπ2 and eigenvalues with |arg(λi)|=ρπ2 have the same geometric and algebraic multiplicity.

    (3) The equilibrium point X is unstable if and only if there exist eigenvalues λi for some i=1,2,...,n of J(X) that satisfy |arg(λi)|<ρπ2.

    Since vaccination strategies have proven ineffective, Soni and Chouhan [46] delved into the complex consequences of the hunter-hunted model within the epidemiological system. The model's distinctive characteristics are defined by

    dx(θ)dθ=px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ),dy(θ)dθ=hy(θ)ux(θ)y(θ)vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ),dz(θ)dθ=hz(θ)ux(θ)z(θ)+vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)wz(θ), (3.1)

    where x, y, and z symbolize the quantities of vulnerable hunters, vulnerable quarry, and contaminated quarry, respectively. The other parameters are defined in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Parameter descriptions.
    Parameter Description
    p Amount of healthy, vulnerable hunters dying naturally
    q Amount of interactions among robust, vulnerable hunters and vulnerable quarry
    r Amount of interactions among an infected quarry and a robust, vulnerable hunter
    u Amount of interactions among robust, vulnerable hunters with infected quarry and vulnerable quarry
    v Amount of encounters among diseased and robust susceptible quarry
    w Extraction (harvesting) rate of afflicted quarry
    h Individual offspring rate of vulnerable quarry (per unit of time) and contaminated quarry
    ϕ Fraction of newborns who received vaccinations in succession

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Equation (3.1) in our study represents a traditional model in the eco-epidemiological literature, encapsulating the dynamics between predators and their prey, which may include infectious diseases affecting one or both species. These models stem from the foundational work by Lotka and Volterra in the early 20th century, who pioneered the use of differential equations to describe biological interactions. Subsequent developments by Kermack and McKendrick introduced disease dynamics into these models, paving the way for a rich body of research that integrates epidemiological aspects into predator-prey interactions.

    While classical models have provided significant insights, they inherently assume that responses within the system are instantaneous and often ignore the historical or memory effects that are crucial in natural populations. Typically, these models use integer-order derivatives which assume a local interaction within the system. Such assumptions simplify the complex interactions and can lead to inaccuracies when predicting the behavior of more complex ecological systems. Additionally, traditional models often fail to capture the non-linear and anomalous behaviors that are characteristic of many ecological processes, thereby limiting their application in predicting realistic ecological scenarios.

    The model comprised of fundamental presumptions that we established when creating it, including:

    ● The proportional birth rate of vulnerable quarry and contaminated quarry remains consistent.

    ● Hunters eventually die as a result of the disease's tremendous weakness.

    ● When a hunter becomes infected, its demise may be predicted. Hence, we will only take into account susceptible hunters, the fact that infectious illness spreads through contact among the population of quarry, and the rate of infection matches the combined count of infected and vulnerable quarry.

    ● The hunter does not differentiate between vulnerable and ailing members of the quarry community.

    ● Through the consumption of sick quarry, the hunter contracts the illness.

    ● The pace of hunter contagion correlates with the multiplication of infected quarry and vulnerable hunters.

    ● Quarry that has been infected cannot recover.

    The aim of this work is a presentation of Eq (3.2), which takes on the concept of fractional calculus and incorporates it into the eco-epidemiological model of the predator-prey interaction. The Caputo derivative and the Riemann-Liouville integral are most preferable thanks to their respected attributes and the efficiency with which they represent physical systems. The advantage of the Caputo derivative is that it is applicable in the context of initial value problems because one can readily impose initial conditions in the form of standard derivatives rather than complicated definitions. Thus, the Caputo derivative is practical and effective in real applications. Other types of derivatives such as the conformable and the beta-fractional derivatives have their own merits but the Caputo derivative seems to be more straightforward. Bearing this in mind, let us speak about the Caputo derivative elevation which helps make researchers' claims more relevant and allows us to draw necessary conclusions based on the available research, which is why this concept is very important for studies related to fractional-order dynamics.

    Finnaly, incorporating fractional calculus allows us to minimize the shortcomings of most classic approaches that leave wide gaps into our eco-epidemiological model. It is this innovation that shows a turn from the ordinary methods of modeling. It aids in the understanding of the spread of diseases, stability of populations, and management of resources in the ecosystem.

    Thus, we would like to now go into the fractional part of the model using the Caputo derivative:

    C0Dρθx(θ)=px(θ)+qx(θ)r(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ),C0Dρθy(θ)=hy(θ)ux(θ)y(θ)vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ),C0Dρθz(θ)=hz(θ)ux(θ)z(θ)+vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)wz(θ). (3.2)

    Using fixed-point theory, we will investigate whether there exists a distinctive solution to the mathematical model we are studying. Applying the Caputo fractional integral operator on either side of the equation yields

    x(θ)=x(0)+1Γ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ))dω,y(θ)=y(0)+1Γ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(hy(θ)ux(θ)y(θ)vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ))dω,z(θ)=z(0)+1Γ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(hz(θ)ux(θ)z(θ)+vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)wz(θ)))dω. (4.1)

    To make this simpler, we set the above equations to

    K1(θ,x)=px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ),K2(θ,y)=hy(θ)ux(θ)y(θ)vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ),K3(θ,z)=hz(θ)ux(θ)z(θ)+vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)wz(θ). (4.2)

    Initially, we demonstrate that the kernels K1(θ,x),K2(θ,y), and K3(θ,z) adhere to the Lipschitz criterion.

    Theorem 4.1. Kernels K1(θ,x),K2(θ,y), and K3(θ,z) adhere to the Lipschitz criterion furthermore contractions if 0η1,η2,η3<1, where η1=p+qλ+rμ(1ϕ), η2=h+uα+vμ(1ϕ), η3=h+uα+vλ(1ϕ)+w,||x||α, ||y||λ, and ||z||μ.

    Proof. Let us get started with demonstrating that kernels K1(θ,x) and K2(θ,x) meet the Lipschitz requirement. We hypothesize that x and x are two controlled functions in order to illustrate it. The result listed below is easily attainable.

    ||K1(θ,x)K1(θ,x)||=||{px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)}{px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)}||=||p(x(θ)x(θ))+qy(θ)(x(θ)x(θ))rz(θ)(1ϕ)(x(θ)x(θ))||(p||x(θ)x(θ)||+qy(θ)||x(θ)x(θ)||+rz(θ)(1ϕ)||x(θ)x(θ)||). (4.3)

    Employing the norm property in the above equation, we have

    ||K1(θ,x)K1(θ,x)||{p+qλ+rμ(1ϕ)}||x(θ)x(θ)||. (4.4)

    Taking (p+qλ+rμ(1ϕ))=η1, we have

    ||K1(θ,x)K1(θ,x)||η1||x(θ)x(θ)||. (4.5)

    As a result, kernal K1 meets the Lipschitz criterion. Additionally, if 0η1<1, it is a contraction. Similar results can be obtained as shown below:

    ||K2(θ,y)K2(θ,y)||η2||y(θ)y(θ)||, (4.6)
    ||K3(θ,z)K3(θ,z)||η3||z(θ)z(θ)||. (4.7)

    It demonstrates that K2 and K3 meet the Lipschitz condition, and if 0η2<1 and 0η3<1, then they likewise experience a contraction.

    Using 1Γ(ρ)=σ(ρ) and the notions from Eq (4.2), Eq (4.1) is conveyed as

    x(θ)=x(0)+σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1K1(ω,x)dω, (4.8)
    y(θ)=y(0)+σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1K2(ω,y)dω, (4.9)
    z(θ)=z(0)+σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1K3(ω,z)dω. (4.10)

    The recursive formula of the above equation is

    xn(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1K1(ω,xn1)dω,yn(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1K2(ω,yn1)dω,zn(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1K3(ω,zn1)dω. (4.11)

    The initial conditions are listed below:

    x0(θ)=x(0),y0(θ)=y(0),z0(θ)=z(0). (4.12)

    The difference formula is then presented as follows:

    Pn(θ)=xn(θ)xn1(θ),Qn(θ)=yn(θ)yn1(θ),Rn(θ)=zn(θ)zn1(θ), (4.13)
    Pn(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(K1(ω,xn1)K1(ω,xn2))dω,Qn(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(K2(ω,yn1)K2(ω,yn2))dω,Rn(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(K3(ω,zn1)K3(ω,zn2))dω. (4.14)

    The conclusion that can be made is that

    xn(θ)=ni=0Pi(θ),yn(θ)=ni=0Qi(θ),zn(θ)=ni=0Ri(θ). (4.15)

    The following premises are made:

    x1(0)=x(0),y1(0)=y(0),z1(0)=z(0). (4.16)

    We have an easy deduction of the following conclusions:

    ||Pn(θ)||σ(ρ)η1θ0(θω)ρ1||Pn1(θ)||dω,||Qn(θ)||σ(ρ)η2θ0(θω)ρ1||Qn1(θ)||dω,||Rn(θ)||σ(ρ)η3θ0(θω)ρ1||Rn1(t)||dω. (4.17)

    Now, using Eq (4.17), we show that the fractional model's solution actually exists.

    Theorem 4.2. A solution exists for the mathematical system with a fractional order given by (3.2) if for θ0, we have

    (σ(ρ)η1θρρ)<1.

    Proof. We assume that the functions x(θ) and y(θ) are bounded. The following findings can be derived by applying the recursive technique in conjunction with Eq (4.17):

    ||Pn(θ)||||x(0)||(σ(ρ)η1θρρ)n,||Qn(θ)||||y(0)||(σ(ρ)η2θρρ)n,||Rn(θ)||||z(0)||(σ(ρ)η3θρρ)n. (4.18)

    As a result, all of the three functions described in Eq (4.14) exist and are continuous. The expression represented in Eq (4.11) must then be confirmed to be the fractional model's solution.We have

    x(θ)x(0)=xn(θ)αn(θ),y(θ)y(0)=yn(θ)βn(θ),z(θ)z(0)=zn(θ)γn(θ), (4.19)

    and one obtains

    ||αn(θ)||(σ(ρ)θρρ)n+1ηn+11α. (4.20)

    Take θ=θ0, and we have

    ||αn(θ)||(σ(ρ)θρ0ρ)n+1ηn+11α. (4.21)

    Taking the limit n, Eq (4.21) results in

    ||αn(θ)||0. (4.22)

    Following the same kind of process, we see that

    ||βn(θ)||0,||γn(θ)||0. (4.23)

    This demonstrates that the fractional model under study given by (3.2) has a solution.

    Theorem 4.3. There is just one solution to the fractional-order mathematical model given in Eq (3.2) if

    (1σ(ρ)θρη1ρ)>0. (4.24)

    Proof. We assume the presence of additional solutions x(θ) and y(θ) to Eq (3.2) to assess the singularity of the fractional model outcome.

    Clearly, it becomes evident that

    x(θ)x(θ)=σ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1(K1(ω,x)K1(ω,x))dω. (4.25)

    Using the norm-using characteristic of Eq (4.25), we possess

    ||x(θ)x(θ)||(1σ(ρ)θρη1ρ)0. (4.26)

    If the conclusion in Eq (4.24) is accurate, then we may deduce from Eq (4.26) that

    ||x(θ)x(θ)||=0x(θ)=x(θ). (4.27)

    Using an equivalent process, we have

    y(θ)=y(θ),z(θ)=z(θ). (4.28)

    As a result, a mathematical model of Eq (3.2) of arbitrary order has a unique solution.

    To evaluate the steady-state points of the system of Eq (3.2), we assume

    C0Dρθx(θ)=0,C0Dρθy(θ)=0,C0Dρθz(θ)=0. (4.29)

    That is

    px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)=0,hy(θ)ux(θ)y(θ)vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)=0,hz(θ)ux(θ)z(θ)+vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)wz(θ)=0. (4.30)

    The steady-state points are

    E0=(x0,y0,z0)=(0,0,0),E1=(x1,y1,z1)=(hwu,0,pr(1ϕ)),E2=(x2,y2,z2)=(0,whv(1ϕ),hv(1ϕ)),E3=(x3,y3,z3)=(hu,pq,0),E4=(x4,y4,z4)=(h+vy4wu,vp+rwvq+rv(1ϕ),p+qy4r(1ϕ)). (4.31)

    Theorem 4.4. The equilibrium point E0 of the system of Eq (3.2) is unstable.

    Proof. Given below is the Jacobian matrix for the system of equations investigated at steady-state point E0.

    J(E0)=(p000h000hw).

    Hence, the eigenvalues of J(E0) are λ1=p, λ2=h, and λ3=hw. Since λ1 is negative, then |arg(λ1)|=π>ρπ2 and |arg(λ2)|=|arg(λ3)|=0<ρπ2, and according to Theorem 2.1, E0 is unstable.

    Theorem 4.5. The steady-state point E1 of the system of Eq (3.2) is unstable.

    Proof. Given below is the Jacobian matrix for the system of equations investigated at steady-state point E1.

    J(E1)=(0q(hw)ur(1ϕ)(hw)u0w+vpr0pur(1ϕ)vpr0).

    Hence, the eigenvalues of J(E1) are λ1=nr+mpr, λ2=p(wh), and λ3=p(wh). Since λ1 is positive, then |arg(λ1)|=0<ρπ2. If w>h, then λ2>0 and λ3<0. This implies |arg(λ2)|=0<ρπ2 and |arg(λ3)|=π>ρπ2. According to Theorem 2.1, E1 is unstable. If w<h, then λ2 and λ3 are purely imaginary. It implies |arg(λ2)|=|arg(λ3)|=π2>ρπ2. According to Theorem 2.1, E1 is unstable.

    Theorem 4.6. The steady-state point E2 of the system of Eq (3.2) is asymptotically stable if h<w and (pvϕ+qw+rhϕ<pv+qh+rh).

    Proof. Given below is the Jacobian matrix for the system of equations investigated at steady-state point E2.

    J(E2)=(p+q(wh)v(1ϕ)rhv00u(hw)v(1ϕ)0w+huhv(1ϕ)h0).

    Hence, the eigenvalues of J(E1) are λ1=(pv+pvϕ+qwqhrh+rhϕv(1ϕ)), λ2=h(hw), and λ3=h(hw). If h<w, then λ2 and λ3 are purely imaginary. This implies |arg(λ2)|=|arg(λ3)|=π2>ρπ2. If pvϕ+qw+rhϕ<pv+qh+rh, then λ1 is negative. This implies |arg(λ1)|=π>ρπ2. All three eigenvalues satisfy |arg(λi)|>ρπ2, i=1,2,3. Hence, by Theorem 2.1, E2 is asymptotically stable for the given condition.

    Theorem 4.7. The steady-state point E3 of the system of Eq (3.2) is asymptotically stable if pv<qw+pvϕ.

    Proof. Given below is the Jacobian matrix for the system of equations investigated at steady-state point E3.

    J(E3)=(0qhuc(ϕ1)hupuq0pv(ϕ1)q00pv(1ϕ)qwq).

    Hence, the eigenvalues of J(E3) are λ1=(qnpv+pvϕq), λ2=iph, and λ3=iph. Since λ2 and λ3 are purely imaginary, this implies |arg(λ2)|=|arg(λ3)|=π2>ρπ2. If pv<qw+pvϕ, then λ1<0, so |arg(λ1)|=π>ρπ2, and hence, E3 is asymptotically stable for given condition.

    Let us discuss about the regional stability of the system of Eq (3.2) in the vicinity of the non-zero steady-state point E4. Given below is the Jacobian matrix for the system of equations evaluated at equilibrium point E4.

    J(E4)=(p+qyrz(1ϕ)qxr(1ϕ)xuyhuxvz(1ϕ)vy(1ϕ)uzv(1ϕ)zhux+vy(1ϕ)w),

    where x, y, and z are provided by

    x=h+vywu,y=vp+rwvq+rv(1ϕ),z=p+qyu(1ϕ). (4.32)

    The characteristic equation for the Jacobian matrix J(E4) is provided by

    ϱ3+a1ϱ2+a2ϱ+a3=0, (4.33)

    where

    a1=pqy+rz(1ϕ)2h+2ux+vz(1ϕ)+wvy(1ϕ), (4.34)
    a2=(p+qyrz(1ϕ))(2h2uxvz(1ϕ)+vy(1ϕ)w)+(huxvz(1ϕ))(hux+vy(1ϕ)w+quxyr(1ϕ)xuz), (4.35)
    a3=(huxvz(1ϕ))((pqy+rz(1ϕ))(hux+vy(1ϕ)w)+r(1ϕ)xuz)quxy(hux+vy(1ϕ)w)quvxz(1ϕ)rv(1ϕ)2xyuz. (4.36)

    E4 is asymptotically stable, according to the Routh-Hurwitz conditions, whenever and only if a1>0, a3>0, and a1a2>a3.

    Theorem 4.8. The steady-state point (x,y,z) given by (4.32) is globally asymptotically stable.

    Proof. Examine the subsequent nonlinear Lyapunov function for the model

    L(x(θ),y(θ),z(θ))=A1(x(θ)xxlnx(θ)x)+A2(y(θ)yylny(θ)y)+A3(z(θ)zzlnz(θ)z), (4.37)
    C0DρθL(x(θ),y(θ),z(θ))=A1.C0Dρθ(x(θ)xxlnx(θ)x)+A2.C0Dρθ(y(θ)yylny(θ)y)+A3.C0Dρθ(z(θ)zzlnz(θ)z). (4.38)

    Using the result from [47],

    C0Dρθ(x(θ)xxlnx(θ)x)(1xx(θ)).C0Dρθx(θ),C0Dρθ(y(θ)yylny(θ)y)(1yy(θ)).C0Dρθy(θ),C0Dρθ(z(θ)zzlnz(θ)z)(1zz(θ)).C0Dρθz(θ),C0DρθL(x,y,z)A1(1xx(θ)).C0Dρθx(θ)+A2(1yy(θ)).C0Dρθy(θ)+A3(1zz(θ)).C0Dρtz(θ). (4.39)

    Using the substitution from the system of Eq (3.2),

    C0DρθL(x,y,z)A1(1xx(θ))(px(θ)+qx(θ)y(θ)rx(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ))+A2(1yy(θ))(hy(θ)ux(θ)y(θ)vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ))+A3(1zz(θ))(hz(θ)ux(θ)z(θ)+vy(θ)z(θ)(1ϕ)wz(θ)), (4.40)
    C0DρθL(x,y,z)A1(x(θ)x)(p+qy(θ)rz(θ)(1ϕ))+A2(y(θ)y)(hux(θ)vz(θ)(1ϕ))+A3(z(θ)z)(hux(θ)+vy(θ)(1ϕ)w). (4.41)

    Applying the relationships at the steady state, we have

    p=qy+rz(1ϕ),h=ux+vz(1ϕ),hw=uxvy(1ϕ), (4.42)
    C0DρθL(x,y,z)A1(x(θ)x)(r(1ϕ)(z(θ)z)+q(y(θ)y))+A2(y(θ)y)(u(x(θ)x)v(1ϕ)(z(θ)z))+A3(z(θ)z)(u(x(θ)x)+v(1ϕ)(y(θ)y)), (4.43)
    C0DρθL(x,y,z)[A1r(1ϕ)+A3u)](x(θ)x)(z(θ)z)+(A1qA2u)(x(θ)x)(y(θ)y)+(A2v(1ϕ)+A3v(1ϕ))(y(θ)y)(z(θ)z). (4.44)

    Taking A1=uqA2 and A2=A3, we can deduce that C0DρθL(x,y,z)0. Consequently, the steady state point (x,y,z) given by (4.32) is globally asymptotically stable.

    In this section, we will delve into the utilization of a numerical procedure to obtain an approximate solution to the problem. Let us examine the following equation for this purpose:

    C0DρθA(θ)=S(θ,A(θ)). (5.1)

    The integral operator can be used to write

    A(θ)A(0)=1Γ(ρ)θ0(θω)ρ1S(θ,A(θ))dω. (5.2)

    Taking θ=θn=nh1, we can rewrite the above equation as

    A(θn)=A(0)+1Γ(ρ)n1i=0θi+1θi(θnω)ρ1S(θ,A(θ))dω. (5.3)

    Now, using linear interpolation of S(θ,A(θ)), one obtains

    S(θ,A(θ))S(θi+1,Ai+1)+θθi+1h1(S(θi+1,Ai+1)S(θi,Ai)),θ[θi,θi+1]. (5.4)

    When Eq (5.4) is substituted for Eq (5.3), the problem's approximate solution will appear as

    An=A0+hρ1Γ(ρ+2)(ηnS(θ0,A0)+ni=1θniS(θi,Ai)), (5.5)

    where

    ηn=(n1)ρ+1nρ(nρ1)Γ(ρ+2), (5.6)
    θj={1,if j=0,(j1)ρ+12jρ+1+(j+1)ρ+1,if j=1,2,...,n1.} (5.7)

    The problem will be substantially solved using the above-described numerical technique in a recursive manner as

    xn=x0+hρ1Γ(ρ+2)(ηn(px0+qx0y0rx0z0(1ϕ))+ni=1θni(pxi+qxiyirxizi(1ϕ)))), (5.8)
    yn=y0+hρ1Γ(ρ+2)(ηn(hy0ux0y0vy0z0(1ϕ))+ni=1θni(hyiuxiyivyizi(1ϕ))), (5.9)
    zn=z0+hρ1Γ(ρ+2)(ηn(hz0ux0z0+vy0z0(1ϕ)wz0)+ni=1θni(hziuxizi+vyizi(1ϕ)wzi)). (5.10)

    To get computational experiments for addressing the fractional-order model of Eq (3.2), in this section, we will apply the estimated technique expounded in Eq (5.10).

    In the computational experiments, the parameter values have been set as p=1.0, q=1.5, r=0.1, h=0.5, u=1.5, v=0.1, w=0.1, and ϕ=0.91, with the commencing state (x0,y0,z0)=(0.8,1.7,0.75) and step size h1=1.0×102.

    The results obtained from Figures 13 help to fully understand the interplay between the dynamics of multilayer fractional-order quarry-hunter systems, the effects of diseases, and different harvesting strategies. These figures validate the theoretical models, as they demonstrate how relations involving fractional calculus, which is well known for its ability to describe the dynamics of systems with memory and non-locality, can been used to explain more complicated, biological systems (Figures 13). One of the more interesting results from these simulations concerns when certain harvesting rates (over or under) within the system are crossed or approached, where even small changes in these harvesting rates produce dramatic non-linear effects on the ecosystem. In particular, one of the insets in Figure 2 demonstrates how predator numbers crash after reaching a critical harvesting level, illustrating how fragile the systems that allow for any harvesting are. This finding is important for the development of successful management policies and illustrates the tension between ecological resilience and anthropogenic stress. In addition, the increase in the prevalence of diseases does not lead to the expected demise of prey populations. In fact, Figure 3 shows, instead of these populations stabilizing, that disease and population control are regulated in a rather complex density-dependent manner. Such results create a paradox for models of ecological systems that can hardly be found in any models, since such intricate systems are usually ignored in wildlife management, particularly the control of wildlife diseases. These results contribute to the understanding of ecology as a science but are also important for ecology as a practice, that is in policymaking and management. The fractional-order holos model is capable of predicting bifurcation points and nonlinear dynamics, which is why as recommended to decision-makers to incorporate the effects of their choices on the stability of ecology, and thus it becomes clear that more advanced models should be employed in ecological studies and management.

    Figure 1.  Influence of ρ on the response behaviour of minimal harvesting affecting the population of the robust hunter, vulnerable quarry, and sick quarry.
    Figure 2.  Influence of ρ on the response behaviour of low harvesting (w=0.3) on the population of the robust hunter, vulnerable quarry and, sick quarry.
    Figure 3.  Influence of ρ on the response behaviour of low harvesting (w=0.7) on the population of the robust hunter, vulnerable quarry, and sick quarry.

    The study we have conducted is an improvement on the use of fractional-order calculus in predator-prey dynamics and ecological modeling in general. The models that exist are very limited in their scope of ecological systems. For instance, Bandyopadhyay and Chattopadhyay [48] addressed the ratio-dependent class of functional responses in fluctuating environments; however, we are able to integrate memory-driven behavior, which is better at forecasting ecological stability. Moreover, the nonlinear models in the disease framework developed by Korobeinikov et al. [49] have been extended to historical data on disease prevalence for efficient control of the diseases. Other than that, our results are also consistent with those of Naresh et al. [50] and Venturino et al. [51], introducing a degree of complexity that is rich in detail and accounts for the effects and interactions over considerable periods of time and thus greatly adding to the conventional approaches for ecological modeling. The role of fractional dynamics in biological tissues has also been touched by Magin [52], but the present work goes further in using this principle in natural ecological models. In addition, Bate and Hilker [53] dealt with the effects of such interactions in co-epidemic models but our consideration of such an approach through fractional calculus allows such interactions to be understood differently as their effects on the present state evolve with interaction history.

    In conclusion, this research paper has highlighted the dynamic impact of infectious diseases on fractional-order quarry-hunter systems and harvesting policies. Incorporating fractional calculus has enabled a deeper understanding of the dynamics, stability, and numerical solutions of these models. The review of existing literature has identified various scenarios where infectious diseases affect quarry-hunter dynamics. The investigation into the dynamics and stability of the proposed model has revealed valuable insights into the system's prolonged behavior. The presentation of numerical solution approaches, including specialized MATLAB routines, has facilitated practical implementation. This research contributes to our understanding of ecological dynamics, disease control, and the management of quarry-hunter populations. The findings have implications for ecologists, mathematicians, and policymakers, providing valuable insights for analyzing and mitigating the impact of infectious diseases on quarry-hunter relationships in real-world ecosystems.

    Devendra Kumar and Jogendra Singh: Software, Formal analysis, Writing–review and editing; Devendra Kumar: Supervision; Devendra Kumar and Dumitru Baleanu: Project administration; Devendra Kumar, Jogendra Singh and Dumitru Baleanu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing–original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this manuscript.



    [1] A. J. Lotka, Elements of physical biology, Williams and Wilkins, 1925.
    [2] V. Volterra, Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together, ICES J. Marine Sci., 3 (1928), 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/3.1.3 doi: 10.1093/icesjms/3.1.3
    [3] J. D. Murray, Mathematical biology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08539-4
    [4] W. O. Kermack, A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 115 (1927), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
    [5] H. W. Hethcote, W. D. Wang, L. T. Han, Z. E. Ma, A predator-prey model with infected prey, Theor. Popul. Biol., 66 (2004), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2004.06.010 doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.06.010
    [6] A. Johri, N. Trivedi, A. Sisodiya, B. Singh, S. Jain, Study of a prey-predator model with diseased prey, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 7 (2012), 489–498.
    [7] M. S. S. Rahman, S. Chakravarty, A predator-prey model with disease in prey, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control, 18 (2013), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.15388/NA.18.2.14022 doi: 10.15388/NA.18.2.14022
    [8] S. K. Nandi, P. K. Mondal, S. Jana, P. Haldar, T. K. Kar, Prey-predator model with two-stage infection in prey: concerning pest control, J. Nonlinear Dyn., 2015 (2015), 948728. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/948728 doi: 10.1155/2015/948728
    [9] W. Mbava, J. Y. T. Mugisha, J. W. Gonsalves, Prey, predator and super-predator model with disease in the super-predator, Appl. Math. Comput., 297 (2017), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.10.034 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.10.034
    [10] W. B. Yang, Analysis on existence of bifurcation solutions for a predator-prey model with herd behavior, Appl. Math. Model., 53 (2018), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.09.020 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.09.020
    [11] J. Chattopadhyay, O. Arino, A predator-prey model with disease in the prey, Nonlinear Anal., 36 (1999), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00126-6 doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00126-6
    [12] K. P. Das, J. Chattopadhyay, A mathematical study of a predator-prey model with disease circulating in both populations, Int. J. Biomath., 8 (2015), 1550015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524515500151 doi: 10.1142/S1793524515500151
    [13] K. P. Dash, S. Gnanavel, R. Bhardwaj, R. Kumar, Allee effect in a harvested predator-prey model with disease in both populations, Nonlinear Stud., 29 (2022), 965.
    [14] K. Q. Al-Jubouri, R. M. Hussien, N. M. G. Al-Saidi, The effect of harvesting policy on an eco-epidemiological model, AIP Conf. Proc., 2183 (2019), 070007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5136169 doi: 10.1063/1.5136169
    [15] J. P. Tripathi, K. P. Das, S. Bugalia, H. Choudhary, D. Kumar, J. Singh, Role of harvesting and Allee in a predator-prey model with disease in both populations, Nonlinear Stud., 28 (2021), 939.
    [16] M. M. Khader, J. E. Macías-Díaz, K. M. Saad, W. M. Hamanah, Vieta-Lucas polynomials for the Brusselator system with the Rabotnov fractional-exponential kernel fractional derivative, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15091619 doi: 10.3390/sym15091619
    [17] S. Al-Nassir, Dynamic analysis of a harvested fractional-order biological system with its discretization, Chaos Solitons Fract., 152 (2021), 111308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111308 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111308
    [18] M. Moustafa, M. H. Mohd, A. I. Ismail, F. A. Abdullah, Dynamical analysis of a fractional-order eco-epidemiological model with disease in prey population, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-2522-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-2522-5
    [19] R. Kaviya, P. Muthukumar, Correction to: Dynamical analysis and optimal harvesting of conformable fractional prey-predator system with predator immigration, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136 (2021), 606. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01598-3 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01598-3
    [20] Y. K. Xie, Z. Wang, B. Meng, X. Huang, Dynamical analysis for a fractional-order prey-predator model with Holling Ⅲ type functional response and discontinuous harvest, Appl. Math. Lett., 106 (2020), 106342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106342 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106342
    [21] S. Djilali, B. Ghanbari, The influence of an infectious disease on a prey-predator model equipped with a fractional-order derivative, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03177-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03177-9
    [22] P. Ramesh, M. Sambath, M. H. Mohd, K. Balachandran, Stability analysis of the fractional-order prey-predator model with infection, Int. J. Model. Simul., 41 (2021), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2020.1783131 doi: 10.1080/02286203.2020.1783131
    [23] J. Alidousti, E. Ghafari, Dynamic behavior of a fractional order prey-predator model with group defense, Chaos Solitons Fract., 134 (2020), 109688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109688 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109688
    [24] K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993.
    [25] K. B. Oldham, J. Spanier, The fractional calculus: theory and applications of differentiation and integration to arbitrary order, Elsevier, 1974.
    [26] I. Podlubny, A. Chechkin, T. Skovranek, Y. Q. Chen, B. M. V. Jara, Matrix approach to discrete fractional calculus Ⅱ: partial fractional differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 3137–3153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.014
    [27] A. M. Wazwaz, A new algorithm for calculating adomian polynomials for nonlinear operators, Appl. Math. Comput., 111 (2000), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00063-6 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00063-6
    [28] S. Abbasbandy, A numerical solution of Blasius equation by Adomian's decomposition method and comparison with homotopy perturbation method, Chaos Solitons Fract., 31 (2007), 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.10.071 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.10.071
    [29] S. J. Liao, The proposed homotopy analysis technique for the solution of nonlinear problems, Ph.D. Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1992.
    [30] S. Momani, Z. Odibat, V. S. Erturk, Generalized differential transform method for solving a space- and time-fractional diffusion-wave equation, Phys. Lett. A, 370 (2007), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.05.083 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.05.083
    [31] J. H. He, Homotopy perturbation technique, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 178 (1999), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00018-3 doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00018-3
    [32] A. Yildirim, Application of the homotopy perturbation method for the Fokker-Planck equation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng., 26 (2010), 1144–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1200 doi: 10.1002/cnm.1200
    [33] J. H. He, Variational iteration method–a kind of non-linear analytical technique: some examples, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 34 (1999), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00048-1 doi: 10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00048-1
    [34] Y. Khan, An effective modification of the Laplace decomposition method for nonlinear equations, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 10 (2009), 1373–1376. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.11-12.1373 doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.11-12.1373
    [35] Y. Khan, Q. B. Wu, Homotopy perturbation transform method for nonlinear equations using He's polynomials, Comput. Math. Appl., 61 (2011), 1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.022 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.08.022
    [36] D. Zhao, J. Singh, D. Kumar, S. Rathore, X. J. Yang, An efficient computational technique for local fractional heat conduction equations in fractal media, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 10 (2017), 1478–1486. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.010.04.17 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.04.17
    [37] D. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Baleanu, A hybrid computational approach for Klein-Gordon equations on Cantor sets, Nonlinear Dyn., 87 (2017), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3057-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-3057-x
    [38] R. Garrappa, Numerical solution of fractional differential equations: a survey and a software tutorial, Mathematics, 6 (2018), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6020016 doi: 10.3390/math6020016
    [39] K. Singh, R. Saxena, S. Kumar, Caputo-based fractional derivative in fractional Fourier transform domain, IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Top. Circuits Syst., 3 (2013), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2272837 doi: 10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2272837
    [40] D. Baleanu, O. P. Agrawal, Fractional Hamilton formalism within Caputo's derivative, Czechoslovak J. Phys., 56 (2006), 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-0406-x doi: 10.1007/s10582-006-0406-x
    [41] K. Shah, Z. A. Khan, A. Ali, R. Amin, H. Khan, A. Khan, Haar wavelet collocation approach for the solution of fractional order COVID-19 model using Caputo derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 3221–3231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.028 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.028
    [42] M. N. Oqielat, A. El-Ajou, Z. Al-Zhour, R. Alkhasawneh, H. Alrabaiah, Series solutions for nonlinear time-fractional Schrödinger equations: comparisons between conformable and Caputo derivatives, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2101–2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.023 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.023
    [43] D. Mozyrska, D. F. M. Torres, Minimal modified energy control for fractional linear control systems with the Caputo derivative, Carpathian J. Math., 26 (2010), 210–221.
    [44] I. Petráš, Fractional-order nonlinear systems: modeling, analysis and simulation, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18101-6
    [45] K. Baisad, S. Moonchai, Analysis of stability and Hopf bifurcation in a fractional Gauss-type predator-prey model with Allee effect and Holling type-Ⅲ functional response, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1535-9 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1535-9
    [46] R. Soni, U. Chouhan, A dynamic effect of infectious disease on prey predator system and harvesting policy, Biosci. Biotech. Res. Commun., 11 (2018), 231–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/11.2/6 doi: 10.21786/bbrc/11.2/6
    [47] C. Vargas-De-Leon, Volterra-type Lyapunov functions for fractional-order epidemic systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 24 (2015), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013
    [48] M. Bandyopadhyay, J. Chattopadhyay, Ratio-dependent predator-prey model: effect of environmental fluctuation and stability, Nonlinearity, 18 (2005), 913. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/18/2/022 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/18/2/022
    [49] A. Korobeinikov, Global properties of infectious disease models with nonlinear incidence, Bull. Math. Biol., 69 (2007), 1871–1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-007-9196-y doi: 10.1007/s11538-007-9196-y
    [50] R. Naresh, A. Tripathi, D. Sharma, Modelling and analysis of the spread of AIDS epidemic with immigration of HIV infectives, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.09.013 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.09.013
    [51] E. Venturino, Epidemics in predator-prey models: disease in the predators, Math. Med. Biol., 19 (2002), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/19.3.185 doi: 10.1093/imammb/19.3.185
    [52] R. L. Magin, Fractional calculus models of complex dynamics in biological tissues, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039
    [53] A. M. Bate, F. M. Hilker, Complex dynamics in an eco-epidemiological model, Bull. Math. Biol., 75 (2013), 2059–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9880-z doi: 10.1007/s11538-013-9880-z
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(516) PDF downloads(43) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog