Processing math: 60%
Research article

Limited type subsets of locally convex spaces

  • Received: 19 July 2024 Revised: 12 October 2024 Accepted: 25 October 2024 Published: 05 November 2024
  • MSC : 46A03, 46E10

  • Let 1pq. Being motivated by the classical notions of limited, p-limited, and coarse p-limited subsets of a Banach space, we introduce and study (p,q)-limited subsets and their equicontinuous versions and coarse p-limited subsets of an arbitrary locally convex space E. Operator characterizations of these classes are given. We compare these classes with the classes of bounded, (pre)compact, weakly (pre)compact, and relatively weakly sequentially (pre)compact sets. If E is a Banach space, we show that the class of coarse 1-limited subsets of E coincides with the class of (1,)-limited sets, and if 1<p<, then the class of coarse p-limited sets in E coincides with the class of p-(V) sets of Pełczyński. We also generalize a known theorem of Grothendieck.

    Citation: Saak Gabriyelyan. Limited type subsets of locally convex spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31414-31443. doi: 10.3934/math.20241513

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ziteng Zhao, Jing Wang, Yali Wu . Note on $ p $-ideals set of orthomodular lattices. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31947-31961. doi: 10.3934/math.20241535
    [2] Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam . Some weighted estimates for the commutators of $p$-adic Hardy operator on two weighted $p$-adic Herz-type spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9633-9646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021561
    [3] Premyuda Dechboon, Abubakar Adamu, Poom Kumam . A generalized Halpern-type forward-backward splitting algorithm for solving variational inclusion problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11037-11056. doi: 10.3934/math.2023559
    [4] Chuan-Yu Cai, Qiu-Ying Zhang, Ti-Ren Huang . Properties of generalized $ (p, q) $-elliptic integrals and generalized $ (p, q) $-Hersch-Pfluger distortion function. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31198-31216. doi: 10.3934/math.20231597
    [5] Muh Nur, Moch Idris, Firman . Angle in the space of $ p $-summable sequences. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2810-2819. doi: 10.3934/math.2022155
    [6] Abdelatif Boutiara, Mohamed Rhaima, Lassaad Mchiri, Abdellatif Ben Makhlouf . Cauchy problem for fractional $ {(p, q)} $-difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15773-15788. doi: 10.3934/math.2023805
    [7] Hanan Alohali, Muhammad Bilal Khan, Jorge E. Macías-Díaz, Fahad Sikander . On $ \left(\mathit{p}, \mathit{q}\right) $-fractional linear Diophantine fuzzy sets and their applications via MADM approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35503-35532. doi: 10.3934/math.20241685
    [8] Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Qasim Ali Malik . Some new characterizations of boundedness of commutators of $p$-adic maximal-type functions on $p$-adic Morrey spaces in terms of Lipschitz spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19756-19770. doi: 10.3934/math.2024964
    [9] Ruishen Qian, Xiangling Zhu . Embedding of Qp spaces into tent spaces and Volterra integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 698-711. doi: 10.3934/math.2021042
    [10] Hui Liang, Yueqiang Song, Baoling Yang . Some results for a supercritical Schrödinger-Poisson type system with $ (p, q) $-Laplacian. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13508-13521. doi: 10.3934/math.2024658
  • Let 1pq. Being motivated by the classical notions of limited, p-limited, and coarse p-limited subsets of a Banach space, we introduce and study (p,q)-limited subsets and their equicontinuous versions and coarse p-limited subsets of an arbitrary locally convex space E. Operator characterizations of these classes are given. We compare these classes with the classes of bounded, (pre)compact, weakly (pre)compact, and relatively weakly sequentially (pre)compact sets. If E is a Banach space, we show that the class of coarse 1-limited subsets of E coincides with the class of (1,)-limited sets, and if 1<p<, then the class of coarse p-limited sets in E coincides with the class of p-(V) sets of Pełczyński. We also generalize a known theorem of Grothendieck.



    Let E be a locally convex space (lcs for short), and let E denote the topological dual of E. For a bounded subset AE and a functional χE, we put

    χA:=sup{|χ(x)|:xA{0}}.

    Definition 1.1. A bounded subset A of a Banach space E is called limited if each weak null sequence {χn}nω in E converges to zero uniformly on A, that is limnχnA=0. Denote by L(E) the family of all limited subsets of E.

    It is well-known that any compact subset of a Banach space E is limited; on the other hand, by the Josefson-Nissenzweig theorem, the closed unit ball BE of E is limited if, and only if, E is finite-dimensional. Limited sets in Banach spaces were systematically studied by Bourgain and Diestel [5]; see also Schlumprecht [38]. Among other things, they proved the following result (all relevant definitions are given in Section 2).

    Theorem 1.1 ([5]). Let E be a Banach space. Then,

    (ⅰ) L(E) is closed under taking subsets, finite sums, and absolutely convex hulls;

    (ⅱ) if E contains no copy of 1, then each AL(E) is relatively weakly compact;

    (ⅲ) every AL(E) is weakly sequentially precompact;

    (ⅳ) if E is separable or reflexive, then each AL(E) is relatively compact.

    Let E and H be locally convex spaces. Denote by L(E,H) the family of all operators ( = continuous and linear maps) from E to H. If p[1,], a sequence {xn}nω in E is called weakly p-summable if for every χE it follows that (χ,xn)p if p[1,), or (χ,xn)c0 if p=. The family wp(E) (or cw0(E) if p=) of all weakly p-summable sequences in E is a vector space which admits a natural locally convex vector topology such that it is complete if so is E; for details, see Section 19.4 in [27] or Section 4 in [17]. Analogously, we say that a sequence {χn}nω in E is weak p-summable if (χn,x)p (or (χn,x)c0 if p=) for every xE. For the basic theory of locally convex spaces, see the classical books [26,27,32,34].

    Let p[1,], and let X and Y be Banach spaces. Generalizing the notion of completely continuous operators, Castillo and Sánchez defined in [6] an operator T:XY to be p-convergent if T sends weakly p-summable sequences of X into norm null-sequences of Y. The influential article of Castillo and Sánchez [6] inspired an intensive study of p-versions of numerous geometrical properties of Banach spaces. In particular, the following p-versions of limitedness were introduced by Karn and Sinha [28] and Galindo and Miranda [20].

    Definition 1.2. Let p[1,], and let X be a Banach space. A bounded subset A of X is called

    (ⅰ) a p-limited set if

    (supaA|χn,a|)p(or(supaA|χn,a|)c0ifp=),

    for every (χn)wp(X) (or (χn)cw0(X) if p=) ([28]);

    (ⅱ) a coarse p-limited set if for every TL(X,p) (or TL(X,c0) if p=), the set T(A) is relatively compact ([20]).

    Every p-limited subset of X is coarse p-limited, but the converse is not true in general; see [20]. It turns out that the family Lp(X) of all p-limited subsets of X and the family CLp(X) of all coarse p-limited subsets of X have similar properties as L(X), described in Theorem 1.1; see [28] and [20], respectively.

    Limited sets in Fréchet spaces were studied by Alonso [1]. The notion of a limited set in general locally convex spaces was introduced by Lindström and Schlumprecht in [30] and independently by Banakh and Gabriyelyan in [3]. Since limited sets in the sense of [30] are defined using equicontinuity, to distinguish both notions we called them in [3] by E-limited sets. Recall that a subset B of E is equicontinuous if there is a neighborhood U of zero in E such that B is contained in the polar U.

    Definition 1.3. A subset A of a locally convex space E is called

    (ⅰ) E-limited if χnA0 for every equicontinuous weak null sequence {χn}nω in E ([30]);

    (ⅱ) limited if χnA0 for every weak null sequence {χn}nω in E ([3]).

    It is clear that if E is a c0-barrelled space (i.e., all weak null sequences are equicontinuous; and Banach space is c0-barrelled), then A is limited if, and only if, it is E-limited.

    Definitions 1.1–1.3 and the notions of (p,q)-(V) subsets and (p,q)-(EV) subsets of a locally convex space E introduced and studied in [17] motivate the following notions.

    Definition 1.4. Let p,q[1,]. A non-empty subset A of a separated topological vector space E (i.e., E separates the points of E) is called

    (ⅰ) a (p,q)-limited set (resp., (p,q)-E-limited set) if

    (χnA)qifq<,orχnA0ifq=,

    for every (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in E. We denote by L(p,q)(E) and EL(p,q)(E) the family of all (p,q)-limited subsets and all (p,q)-E-limited subsets of E, respectively. (p,p)-limited sets and (,)-limited sets will be called simply p-limited sets and limited sets, respectively.

    (ⅱ) a coarse p-limited set if for every TL(E,p) (or TL(E,c0) if p=), the set T(A) is relatively compact. The family of all coarse p-limited sets is denoted by CLp(E).

    The purpose of the article is to study (p,q)-limited subsets and coarse p-limited subsets of locally convex spaces in the spirit of Theorem 1.1 and the articles [28] and [20]. Now, we describe the content of the article.

    In Section 2, we fix the main notions and some auxiliary results used in what follows.

    In Section 3, we study the classes L(p,q)(E) and EL(p,q)(E). In Lemma 3.1, we generalize (ⅰ) of Theorem 1.1, and show that L(p,q)(E)=EL(p,q)(E)={0} if q<p. In Proposition 3.1, we characterize (p,q)-limited subsets and (p,q)-E-limited subsets in products and direct sums of locally convex spaces. In Theorem 3.1 we give an operator characterization of (p,q)-limited and (p,q)-E-limited subsets of the locally convex space E. The following diagram easily follows from Definition 1.4 (see also (ⅵ) of Lemma 3.1)

     limited (p,q)-limited }(p,)-limited (1,)-limited. 

    This diagram motivates the study of (p,)-limited sets and (1,)-limited sets. It is well-known that any (pre)compact subset of a Banach space is limited. In Proposition 3.2, we generalize this useful result by showing that each precompact subset of an lcs E is (p,)-E-limited, and if, in addition, E is p-barrelled, then every precompact subset of E is (p,)-limited. Consequently, each precompact subset of a c0-barrelled space is limited. In Theorem 3.3, we show that every precompact subset of Cp(X) ( = the space C(X) of all continuous functions over a Tychonoff space X endowed with the pointwise topology) is (p,q)-limited if, and only if, X has no infinite functionally bounded subsets. As a corollary (see Example 3.1), we obtain that the metrizable space Cp([0,ω]) has even compact subsets which are not limited. Being motivated by (ⅳ) of Theorem 1.1, it is natural to consider the case when every (p,q)-limited set is precompact. This problem is solved in Theorem 3.4. In Proposition 3.3, we characterize (1,)-limited subsets of barrelled locally convex spaces. In [23] (see also Theorem 3.11 of [25]), Grothendieck proved that if E is a Banach space, then a bounded subset B of (E,μ(E,E)) is precompact if, and only if, it is limited. In Theorem 3.5, we generalize this result.

    In Section 4, we study coarse p-limited subsets of locally convex spaces. Generalizing Proposition 2 of [20], we show in Lemma 4.1 that the family CLp(E) of all coarse p-limited sets in E is closed under taking subsets, finite unions, closed absolutely convex hulls, and continuous linear images. In Proposition 4.1 we show that every p-limited subset of E is coarse p-limited (this generalizes Proposition 1 of [20]), and under addition assumption we prove that even every (p,p)-(V) subset of E is coarse p-limited. A description of coarse p-limited subsets of direct products and direct sums is given in Proposition 4.2.

    Let 1pq. In Section 16 of [17], we naturally extend the notion of p-convergent operators between Banach spaces to the general case saying that a linear map T:EL between locally convex spaces E and L is (q,p)-convergent if it sends weakly p-summable sequences in E to strongly q-summable sequences in L (so (,p)-convergent operators are exactly p-convergent operators). The notion of (q,p)-convergent operators is useful to solve the following general problem: Characterize those operators T which map all bounded sets into (p,q)-limited sets (or into coarse p-limited sets). If E and L are Banach spaces and p=q, a partial answer to this problem is given by Ghenciu; see Theorem 14 of [22]. In Section 5 we give a complete answer to this problem; see Theorem 5.1. The clauses (ⅱ)–(ⅳ) of Theorem 1.1 motivate the problem of finding conditions on a space E under which (p,q)-limited sets and coarse p-limited sets have additional topological properties. For p-limited subsets of Banach spaces, this problem was considered by Ghenciu; see Theorem 15 of [22]. In Theorem 5.2, we generalize Ghenciu's result. In Theorem 5.5, we characterize coarse 1-limited sets. As a consequence of the obtained results, we show in Corollary 5.5 that: (1) if p=1, then the class of coarse 1-limited subsets of a Banach space E coincides with the class of (1,)-limited sets, and (2) if 1<p<, then the class of coarse p-limited sets in E coincides with the class of p-(V) sets. It should be mentioned that p-(V) sets in Banach spaces were defined and studied by Chen, Chávez-Domínguez, and Li in [7] and [29]. Using the idea of the proof of (ⅲ) of Theorem 1.1, Galindo and Miranda proved in Proposition 3 of [20] that if 2p<, then every coarse p-limited set is weakly sequentially precompact. In Theorem 5.6, we extend this result to locally convex spaces with the Rosenthal property.

    The clause (ⅳ) of Theorem 1.1 implies that each separable or reflexive Banach space has the Gelfand-Phillips property. By this reason generalizations of this clause will be given in the forthcoming article [18].

    We start with some necessary definitions and notations used in the article. Set ω:={0,1,2,}. All topological spaces are assumed to be Tychonoff ( = completely regular and T1). The closure of a subset A of a topological space X is denoted by ¯A, ¯AX, or clX(A). A function f:XY between topological spaces X and Y is called sequentially continuous if for any convergent sequence {xn}nωX, the sequence {f(xn)}nω converges in Y and limnf(xn)=f(limnxn). A subset A of a topological space X is called functionally bounded in X if every fC(X) is bounded on A.

    All topological vector spaces are over the field F of real or complex numbers. The closed unit ball of the field F is denoted by D.

    Let E be a locally convex space. The span of a subset A of E and its closure are denoted by EA:=span(A) and ¯span(A), respectively; the absolutely convex hull of A and its closure are denoted by acx(A) and ¯acx(A), respectively. We denote by N0(E) (resp., Nc0(E)) the family of all (resp., closed absolutely convex) neighborhoods of zero of E. The family of all bounded subsets of E is denoted by Bo(E). The value of χE on xE is denoted by χ,x or χ(x). A sequence {xn}nω in E is said to be Cauchy if for every UN0(E) there is Nω such that xnxmU for all n,mN. It is easy to see that a sequence {xn}nω in E is Cauchy if, and only if, xnkxnk+10 for every (strictly) increasing sequence (nk) in ω. If E is a normed space, BE denotes the closed unit ball of E.

    For an lcs E, we denote by Ew and Eβ the space E endowed with the weak topology σ(E,E) and with the strong topology β(E,E), respectively. The topological dual space E of E endowed with weak topology σ(E,E) or with the strong topology β(E,E) is denoted by Ew or Eβ, respectively. The closure of a subset A in the weak topology is denoted by ¯Aw or ¯Aσ(E,E), and ¯Bw (or ¯Bσ(E,E)) denotes the closure of BE in the weak topology. The polar of a subset A of E is denoted by A:={χE:χA1}. A subset B of E is equicontinuous if BU for some UN0(E).

    A subset A of a locally convex space E is called

    precompact if for every UN0(E) there is a finite set FE such that AF+U;

    sequentially precompact if every sequence in A has a Cauchy subsequence;

    weakly (sequentially) compact if A is (sequentially) compact in Ew;

    relatively weakly compact if its weak closure ¯Aσ(E,E) is compact in Ew;

    relatively weakly sequentially compact if each sequence in A has a subsequence weakly converging to a point of E;

    weakly sequentially precompact if each sequence in A has a weakly Cauchy subsequence.

    Note that each sequentially precompact subset of E is precompact, but the converse is not true in general; see Lemma 2.2 of [17].

    In what follows, we shall actively use the following classical completeness type properties and weak barrelledness conditions. A locally convex space E is

    quasi-complete if each closed bounded subset of E is complete;

    sequentially complete if each Cauchy sequence in E converges;

    locally complete if the closed absolutely convex hull of a null sequence in E is compact;

    (quasi)barrelled if every σ(E,E)-bounded (resp., β(E,E)-bounded) subset of E is equicontinuous;

    c0-(quasi)barrelled if every σ(E,E)-null (resp., β(E,E)-null) sequence is equicontinuous.

    It is well-known that Cp(X) is quasibarrelled for every Tychonoff space X.

    Recall that a locally convex space (E,τ) has the Schur property (resp., the Glicksberg property) if E and Ew have the same convergent sequences (resp., the same compact sets). If an lcs E has the Glicksberg property, then it has the Schur property. The converse is true for strict (LF)-spaces (in particular, for Banach spaces), but not in general; see Corollary 2.13 and Proposition 3.5 of [14]. We shall use the next two lemmas.

    Lemma 2.1. A locally convex space (E,τ) has the Schur property if, and only if, E and Ew have the same relatively sequentially compact sets.

    Proof. Assume that (E,τ) has the Schur property. If A is a relatively sequentially compact subset of E, then evidently A is relatively sequentially compact in Ew. Conversely, let A be a relatively sequentially compact subset of Ew. Take a sequence S={an}nω in A. Then S has a subsequence {ank}kω weakly converging to a point xE. By the Schur property ankx in τ. Hence A is a relatively sequentially compact subset of E. Thus, E and Ew have the same relatively sequentially compact sets.

    Assume that E and Ew have the same relatively sequentially compact sets. To show that E has the Schur property, let S={an}nω be a weakly null sequence. Then, S is relatively sequentially compact in Ew and hence, also in E. We show that an0 also in E. Suppose for a contradiction that there is a UN0(E) such that anU for each nI for some infinite Iω. Since S is relatively sequentially compact in E, the sequence S={an}nI has a subsequence {bn}nω converging to some point bE. As {bn}nω is also weakly null, we have b=0. However, since {bn}nωS, it follows that bnU for every nω; so bnb, a contradiction.

    Lemma 2.2. Every weakly sequentially precompact subset A of a Schur space E is sequentially precompact. If, in addition, E is sequentially complete, then Ew is sequentially complete.

    Proof. Let {xn}nω be a sequence in A. As A is weakly sequentially precompact, there is a subsequence {yn}nω of {xn}nω which is weakly Cauchy. Let (nk) be a strictly increasing sequence in ω. Then, {ynk+1ynk}nω is weakly null. By the Schur property of E, we obtain that ynk+1ynk0 in E. Thus, {yn}nω is a Cauchy sequence in E, and hence, A is sequentially precompact.

    Assume that E is, in addition, a sequentially complete space. Let S={xn}nω be a weakly Cauchy sequence. As we proved above, S is a Cauchy sequence in E. Since E is sequentially complete, there is aE such that xna. Thus, xn converges to a also in the weak topology.

    Two vector topologies τ and T on a vector space L are called compatible if (L,τ)=(L,T) algebraically. If (E,τ) is a locally convex space, then there is a finest locally convex vector topology μ(E,E) compatible with τ. The topology μ(E,E) is called the Mackey topology, and if τ=μ(E,E), the space E is called a Mackey space. Set Eμ:=(E,μ(E,E)). It is well-known that any quasibarrelled space is Mackey; see Theorem 11.11.6 of [32].

    Recall that an lcs E is called semi-reflexive if the canonical map JE:EE=(Eβ)β defined by JE(x),χ:=χ,x (χE) is an isomorphism; if in addition JE is a topological isomorphism, the space E is called reflexive. Each reflexive space is barrelled; see Proposition 11.4.2 of [27].

    We denote by iIEi and iIEi the locally convex direct sum and the topological product of a nonempty family {Ei}iI of locally convex spaces, respectively. If 0x=(xi)iIEi, then the set supp(x):={iI:xi0} is called the support of x. The support of a subset A, {0}A, of iIEi is the set supp(A):=aAsupp(a). We shall also consider elements x=(xi)iIEi as functions on I and write x():=xi.

    Below, we recall some of the basic classes of compact-type operators.

    Definition 2.1. Let E and L be locally convex spaces. An operator TL(E,L) is called compact (resp., sequentially compact, precompact, sequentially precompact, weakly compact, weakly sequentially compact, weakly sequentially precompact, bounded) if there is UN0(E) such that T(U) a relatively compact (relatively sequentially compact, precompact, sequentially precompact, relatively weakly compact, relatively weakly sequentially compact, weakly sequentially precompact or bounded) subset of E.

    Let p[1,]. Then, p is defined to be the unique element of [1,] which satisfies 1p+1p=1. For p[1,), the space p is the dual space of p. We denote by {en}nω the canonical basis of p, if 1p<, or the canonical basis of c0, if p=. The canonical basis of p is denoted by {en}nω. Denote by 0p and c00 the linear span of {en}nω in p or c0 endowed with the induced norm topology, respectively. We shall use repeatedly the following well-known description of relatively compact subsets of p and c0, see [8, p. 6].

    Proposition 2.1. (ⅰ) A bounded subset A of p, p[1,), is relatively compact if, and only if,

    limmsup{mn|xn|p:x=(xn)A}=0.

    (ⅱ) A bounded subset A of c0 is relatively compact if, and only if, limnsup{|xn|:x=(xn)A}=0.

    One of the most important classes of locally convex spaces is the class of free locally convex spaces introduced by Markov in [31]. The free locally convex space L(X) over a Tychonoff space X is a pair consisting of a locally convex space L(X) and a continuous map i:XL(X) such that every continuous map f from X to a locally convex space E gives rise to a unique continuous linear operator ΨE(f):L(X)E with f=ΨE(f)i. The free locally convex space L(X) always exists and is essentially unique, and X is the Hamel basis of L(X). So, each nonzero χL(X) has a unique decomposition χ=a1i(x1)++ani(xn), where all ak are nonzero and xk are distinct. The set supp(χ):={x1,,xn} is called the support of χ. In what follows, we shall identify i(x) with x and consider i(x) as the Dirac measure δx at the point xX. We also recall that Cp(X)=L(X) and L(X)=C(X). It is worth mentioning that L(X) has the Glicksberg property for every Tychonoff space X, and if X is non-discrete, then L(X) is not a Mackey space; see [15] and [12], respectively.

    Let p[1,]. A sequence {xn}nω in a locally convex space E is called

    weakly p-summable if for every χE, it follows:

    (χ,xn)nωpifp<, and(χ,xn)nωc0ifp=;

    weakly p-convergent to xE if {xnx}nω is weakly p-summable;

    weakly p-Cauchy if for each pair of strictly increasing sequences (kn),(jn)ω, the sequence (xknxjn)nω is weakly p-summable.

    A sequence {χn}nω in E is called weak p-summable (resp., weak p-convergent to χE or weak p-Cauchy) if it is weakly p-summable (resp., weakly p-convergent to χE or weakly p-Cauchy) in Ew.

    The following weak barrelledness conditions introduced and studied in [17] will play a considerable role in the article. Let p[1,]. A locally convex space E is called p-barrelled (resp., p-quasibarrelled) if every weakly p-summable sequence in Ew (resp., in Eβ) is equicontinuous.

    We shall consider also the following linear map introduced in [17]

    Sp:L(E,p)wp(Ew)( or S:L(E,c0)cw0(Ew) if p=)

    defined by Sp(T):=(T(en))nω.

    The following class of subsets of an lcs E was introduced and studied in [17], and it generalizes the notion of p-(V) subsets of Banach spaces defined in [7].

    Definition 2.2. Let p,q[1,]. A nonempty subset A of a locally convex space E is called a (p,q)-(V) set (resp., a (p,q)-(EV) set) if

    (supaA|χn,a|)qifq<,or(supaA|χn,a|)c0ifq=,

    for every (resp., equicontinuous) weakly p-summable sequence {χn}nω in Eβ. (p,)-(V) sets and (1,)-(V) sets will be called simply p-(V) sets and (V) sets, respectively. Analogously, (p,)-(EV) sets and (1,)-(EV) sets will be called p-(EV) sets and (EV) sets, respectively.

    The family of all (p,q)-(V) sets (resp. p-(V) sets, (p,q)-(EV) sets, (V) sets etc.) of an lcs E is denoted by V(p,q)(E) (resp. Vp(E), EV(p,q)(E), V(E) etc.).

    Following [17], a nonempty subset B of E is called a (p,q)-(V) set if

    (supχB|χ,xn|)q ifq<,or(supχB|χ,xn|)c0ifq=,

    for every weakly p-summable sequence {xn}nω in E. (p,)-(V) sets and (1,)-(V) sets will be called simply p-(V) sets and (V) sets, respectively.

    Let 1pq, and let E and L be locally convex spaces. Following [17], a linear map T:EL is called (q,p)-convergent if it sends weakly p-summable sequences in E to strongly q-summable sequences in L.

    The following p-versions of weakly compact-type properties are defined in [17] generalizing the corresponding notions in the class of Banach spaces introduced in [6] and [22]. Let p[1,]. A subset A of a locally convex space E is called

    • (relatively) weakly sequentially p-compact if every sequence in A has a weakly p-convergent subsequence with limit in A (resp., in E);

    weakly sequentially p-precompact if every sequence from A has a weakly p-Cauchy subsequence.

    A Tychonoff space X is called Fréchet-Urysohn if for any cluster point aX of a subset AX there is a sequence {an}nωA which converges to a. A Tychonoff space X is called an angelic space if (1) every relatively countably compact subset of X is relatively compact, and (2) any compact subspace of X is Fréchet-Urysohn. Note that any subspace of an angelic space is angelic, and a subset A of an angelic space X is compact if, and only if, it is countably compact if, and only if, A is sequentially compact; see Lemma 0.3 of [35].

    Let p[1,]. Following [16], a locally convex space E is called a weakly sequentially p-angelic space if the family of all relatively weakly sequentially p-compact sets in E coincides with the family of all relatively weakly compact subsets of E. The space E is a weakly p-angelic space if it is a weakly sequentially p-angelic space and each weakly compact subset of E is Fréchet-Urysohn.

    Many of the results included in this section are similar to the corresponding results from [17] in which (p,q)-(V) sets are substituted by (p,q)-limited sets. In the next lemma we summarize some basic elementary properties of (p,q)-limited sets, cf. (ⅰ) of Theorem 1.1 (compare this lemma with Lemma 7.2 of [17]).

    Lemma 3.1. Let p,q[1,], and let (E,τ) be a locally convex space. Then,

    (ⅰ) every (p,q)-limited set is (p,q)-E-limited; the converse is true if E is a p-barrelled space;

    (ⅱ) every (p,q)-E-limited set in E is bounded;

    (ⅲ) the family of all (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) sets in E is closed under taking subsets, finite unions and sums, and closed absolutely convex hulls;

    (ⅳ) the family of all (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) sets in E is closed under taking continuous linear images; in particular, if H is a subspace of E, then every (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in H is (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) in E;

    (ⅴ) a subset A of E is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set if, and only if, every countable subset of A is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set;

    (ⅵ) if p,q[1,] are such that pp and qq, then every (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E is also (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited); in particular, any (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set is (1,)-limited (resp., (1,)-E-limited);

    (ⅶ) the property of being a (p,q)-limited set depends only on the duality (E,E), i.e., if T is a locally convex vector topology on E compatible with the topology τ of E, then the (p,q)-limited sets of (E,T) are exactly the (p,q)-limited sets of (E,τ);

    (ⅷ) every (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E is a (p,q)-(V) (resp., (p,q)-(EV)) set; the converse is true for semi-reflexive spaces;

    (ⅸ) every (p,q)-limited subset of Eβ is a (p,q)-(V) set;

    (ⅹ) if q<p and A is a (p,q)-E-limited subset of E, then A={0};

    (xi) if qp, then any finite subset of E is (p,q)-limited;

    (xii) a bounded subset A of E is (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) if, and only if, for every sequence {xn}nω in A and each (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in E, it follows that (|χn,xn|)q (or c0 if p=).

    Proof. (ⅰ) and (ⅲ) are clear, and (ⅷ) follows from Definitions 1.4 and 2.2 and the trivial fact that every (equicontinuous) weakly p-summable sequence {χn}nω in Eβ is (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable in E. The clause (ⅱ) follows from (ⅷ) and (ⅱ) of Lemma 7.2 of [17] (which states that every (p,q)-(EV) set is bounded). (ⅶ) follows from the definition of (p,q)-limited sets, and (ⅸ) follows from the easy fact that for every weakly p-summable sequence {xn}nω in E, the sequence {JE(xn)}nω is weak p-summable in E.

    (ⅳ) Let T:EL be an operator from E to an lcs L, and let A be a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E. Observe that the adjoint map T:LwEw is continuous. Fix a (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence S={χn}nω in L. It is easily seen (see Lemma 4.5 of [17]) that the sequence {T(χn)} is weak p-summable in E. If, in addition, the sequence S is equicontinuous, then its image T(S) is equicontinuous as well.

    Therefore,

    (supaA|χn,T(a)|)=(supaA|T(χn),a|)q(orc0 ifq=).

    Thus, T(A) is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in L.

    The last assertion follows from the proved one applied to the identity embedding T:HE.

    (ⅴ) The necessity follows from (ⅲ). To prove the sufficiency suppose for a contradiction that A is not a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E. Then, there is a (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in E such that

    (supaA|χn,a|)q ifq<,or(supaA|χn,a|)c0ifq=.

    Assume that q< (the case q= can be considered analogously). For every nω, choose anA such that |χn,an|12supaA|χn,a|. Then,

    nω|χn,an|q12qnω(supaA|χn,a|)q=.

    Thus, the countable subset {an}nω of A is not a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E, a contradiction.

    (ⅵ) Take any (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in E. Since pp, {χn}nω is also (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable and hence, (supaA|χn,a|)q (or c0 if q=). It remains to note that qq because qq.

    (ⅹ) Let q<p and A be a (p,q)-E-limited subset of E. Then, by (viii), A is a (p,q)-(EV) set. Therefore, by Proposition 7.5 of [17], A={0}.

    (xi) By (ⅲ), it suffices to show that A={x} is a (p,q)-limited set for every xE. Let {χn}nω be a weak p-summable sequence in Eβ. Then, (χn,x)p (or c0 if p=). Since pq it follows that (supxA|χn,x|)q (or c0 if q=). Thus, A is a (p,q)-limited set.

    (xii) The necessity is clear. To prove the sufficiency, for every nω, choose xnA such that |χn,xn|12supaA|χn,a|. By assumption, (|χn,xn|)q (or c0 if q=). Therefore, also (supaA|χn,a|)q (or c0 if q=). Thus, A is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set.

    According to (ⅷ) of Lemma 3.1, every (p,q)-limited set is a (p,q)-(V) set, but the converse is not true in general; see Corollary 3.2 below. It follows from (x) and (xi) that there is sense to consider only the case when 1pq.

    Notation 3.1. The family of all (p,q)-limited (resp., p-limited, limited, (p,q)-E-limited, p-E-limited, or E-limited) sets of an lcs E is denoted by L(p,q)(E) (resp., Lp(E), L(E), EL(p,q)(E), ELp(E), or EL(E)).

    Below we characterize (p,q)-limited sets in products and direct sums.

    Proposition 3.1. Let 1pq, and let {Ei}iI be a nonempty family of locally convex spaces. Then,

    (ⅰ) a subset K of E=iIEi is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set if, and only if, so are all its coordinate projections;

    (ⅱ) a subset K of E=iIEi is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set if, and only if, so are all its coordinate projections and the support of K is finite.

    Proof. The necessity follows from (ⅳ) of Lemma 3.1 because Ei is a direct summand of E and, for the case (ⅱ), the well-known fact that any bounded subset of a locally convex direct sum has finite support.

    To prove the sufficiency, let K be a subset of E such that each projection Ki of K is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in Ei, and, for the case (ⅱ), Ki={0} for all but finitely many indices iI. We distinguish between the cases (ⅰ) and (ⅱ).

    (ⅰ) Take an arbitrary (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in E, where χn=(χi,n)iI. By Lemma 4.18 of [17], the sequence {χn}nω has finite support FI (i.e., χi,n=0 for all nω and iIF), and for every iF, each sequence {χi,n}nω is weak p-summable in Ei. If in addition {χn}nω is equicontinuous, then for every iF, the sequence {χi,n}nωEi is also equicontinuous (indeed, if Ti:EiE is the identity embedding, then {χi,n}n={Ti(χn)}n is equicontinuous). Then,

    supxK|χn,x|=supxK|iFχi,n,x()|iFsupx()Ki|χi,n,x()|.

    Since all Ki are (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) sets, we have (supx()Ki|χi,n,x()|)q (or c0 if q=). Therefore, also (supxK|χn,x|)q (or c0 if q=). Thus, K is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E.

    (ⅱ) Let FI be the finite support of K. Take an arbitrary (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in Eβ, where χn=(χi,n)iI with χi,nEi. As in (ⅰ) above, if {χn}nω is equicontinuous, then for every iF, the sequence {χi,n}nωEi is also equicontinuous. Then, by Lemma 4.18 of [17], for every iF, the sequence {χi,n}nω is weak p-summable in Ei and hence,

    supxK|χn,x|=supxK|iFχi,n,x()|iFsupx()Ki|χi,n,x()|.

    Since all Ki are (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) sets, we have (supx()Ki|χi,n,x()|)q (or c0 if q=). Therefore, also (supxK|χn,x|)q (or c0 if q=). Thus, K is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set in E.

    Let A be a bounded subset of a locally convex space E. We denote by 01(A) the subspace of the Banach space 1(A) consisting of all vectors with finite support. Then, by Proposition 16.10 of [17], the map TA:01(A)E defined by

    TA(λ0a0++λnan):=λ0a0++λnan(nω,λ0,,λnF,a0,,anA) (3.1)

    is an operator. Now, we characterize (p,q)-limited sets (compare with Theorem 16.11 of [17]).

    Theorem 3.1. Let 1pq, and let E be a (resp., p-barrelled) locally convex space. Then a bounded subset A of E is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set if, and only if, the adjoint operator TA:Ew(A) is (q,p)-convergent.

    Proof. Consider an operator TA:01(A)E defined in (3.1). Observe that for each χE, the a-th coordinate TA(χ)(a) of TA(χ) is

    TA(χ)(a)=TA(χ),a=χ,TA(a)=χ,a,

    and hence,

    TA(χ)(A)=supaA|TA(χ)(a)|=supaA|χ,a|. (3.2)

    Now, by definition, a subset A of E is a (p,q)-limited set if, and only if, (supaA|χn,a|)q (or c0 if q=) for every weak p-summable sequence {χn}nω in E, and hence, by (3.2), if, and only if, (TA(χn)(A))q (or c0 if q=) for every weakly p-summable sequence {χn}nω in Ew, i.e., TA is a (q,p)-convergent linear map.

    The case when E is p-barrelled follows from the fact that (p,q)-limited subsets of E are exactly (p,q)-E-limited (see (ⅰ) of Lemma 3.1).

    We select the next theorem (compare with Theorem 16.8 of [17]).

    Theorem 3.2. Let 1pq, E be a locally convex space, and let T be an operator from a normed space L to E. Then, T(BL) is a (p,q)-limited subset of E if, and only if, T:EwLβ is (q,p)-convergent.

    Proof. Observe that for every χE, we have

    T(χ)Lβ=supyBL|T(χ),y|=supyBL|χ,T(y)|. (3.3)

    Let {χn}nω be a weak p-summable sequence in E. Then, by (3.3), we have

    (T(χn)Lβ)nω=(supyBL|χn,T(y)|)nω.

    Now, the theorem follows from the definition of (p,q)-limited sets and the definition of (q,p)-convergent linear map.

    It is natural to find some classes of subsets which are (p,q)-limited. Below, under additional assumption on an lcs E, we show that any precompact subset A of E is (p,)-limited (compare with Proposition 7.6 of [17]).

    Proposition 3.2. Let p[1,], and let E be a locally convex space.

    (ⅰ) Every precompact subset A of E is (p,)-E-limited.

    (ⅱ) If E is p-barrelled, then every precompact subset A of E is (p,)-limited.

    Proof. Let S={χn}nω be a (resp., equicontinuous) weak p-summable sequence in E. If E is p-barrelled, then S is equicontinuous. Therefore, in both cases (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) we can assume that S is equicontinuous. Hence, by Proposition 3.9.8 of [26], the weak topology σ(E,E) and the topology τpc of uniform convergence on precompact subsets of E coincide on S. Since S is weak p-summable, it is a weak null-sequence. Therefore, χn0 also in τpc. As A is precompact, we obtain supxA|χn,x|0. Thus, A is a (p,)-limited set (resp., a (p,)-E-limited set).

    Since, by definition, -barrelled spaces are exactly c0-barrelled, setting p= in (ⅱ) of Proposition 3.2, we obtain the next assertion.

    Corollary 3.1. If E is a c0-barrelled space, then every precompact subset of E is limited.

    The condition in (ⅱ) of Proposition 3.2 that E is p-barrelled is essential as the following theorem shows. Moreover, it may happen that a non-p-barrelled space contains even compact sets which are not limited; see Example 3.1 below.

    Theorem 3.3. Let p[1,], X be a Tychonoff space, and let T be a locally convex vector topology on L(X) compatible with the duality (L(X),C(X)). Then, the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) the space Cp(X) is p-barrelled;

    (ⅱ) every precompact ( = bounded) subset of Cp(X) is (p,)-limited;

    (ⅲ) X has no infinite functionally bounded subsets;

    (ⅳ) each bounded subset of Cp(X) is (p,q)-limited for some (every) pq;

    (ⅴ) LT(X) is quasi-complete;

    (ⅵ) LT(X) is sequentially complete;

    (ⅶ) LT(X) is locally complete.

    Proof. (ⅰ)(ⅱ) follows from (ⅱ) of Proposition 3.2.

    (ⅱ)(ⅲ) Assume that every bounded subset of Cp(X) is (p,)-limited, and suppose for a contradiction that X has an infinite functionally bounded subset A. Then, one can find a sequence {xn}nω in A and a sequence {Un}nω of open subsets of X such that xnUn and UnUm= for all distinct n,mω. Set

    B:={fCp(X):f(Un)[0,2n+1] for allnω,andf(XnωUn){0}}.

    Then, B is a bounded subset of Cp(X), and hence, B is (p,)-limited. For every nω, set χn:=12nδxn. Since A is functionally bounded, we obtain that the sequence S={χn}nω is weak p-summable in the dual space Cp(X). For every nω, take a continuous function gn:X[0,2n] such that gn(XUn){0} and gn(xn)=2n. It is clear that gnB for all nω. However, since

    supfB|χn,f||χn,gn|=10,

    we obtain that B is not (p,)-limited, a contradiction.

    (ⅲ)(ⅰ) Assume that X has no infinite functionally bounded subsets. By the Buchwalter-Schmets theorem, the space Cp(X) is barrelled and hence, it is p-barrelled.

    (ⅲ)(ⅳ) Fix pq, and let B be a bounded subset of Cp(X). Take an arbitrary weak p-summable sequence S={χn}nω in Cp(X)=L(X). Since S is weak bounded and the topology of the free lcs L(X) is compatible with σ(L(X),Cp(X)), it follows that S is a bounded subset of L(X). As all functionally bounded subsets of X are finite, Proposition 2.7 of [13] implies that S is finite-dimensional. By Lemma 4.6 of [17], there are linearly independent elements η1,,ηsL(X) and sequences (a1,n),,(as,n)p (or c0 if p=) such that

    χn=a1,nη1++as,nηs for everynω.

    Now, since B is a bounded subset of Cp(X), we obtain

    supfB|χn,f|si=1|ai,n|supfB|ηi,f|,

    and hence, the inequality pq implies (supfB|χn,f|)nq (or c0 if q=). Therefore, B is a (p,q)-limited set, as desired.

    (ⅳ)(ⅱ) Assume that each bounded subset of Cp(X) is (p,q)-limited for some pq. Then, by (ⅵ) of Lemma 3.1, every bounded subset of Cp(X) is (p,)-limited.

    (ⅲ)(ⅴ) Since all functionally bounded subsets of X are finite, Proposition 2.7 of [13] implies that any bounded subset of LT(X) is finite-dimensional. Thus, LT(X) is quasi-complete.

    The implication (ⅴ)(ⅵ) and (ⅵ)(ⅶ) hold true for any lcs.

    (ⅶ)(ⅰ) Assume that LT(X) is locally complete. Since (L(X),C(X)) is a dual pair, and LT(X) is locally complete, it follows that L(X)w is also locally complete. As Cp(X) is quasibarrelled hence Mackey, Theorem 5.6 of [17], implies that Cp(X) is p-barrelled.

    For numerous other equivalent conditions to (ⅰ)–(ⅶ) of Theorem 3.3, see Theorem 3.5 of [2].

    Corollary 3.2. Let 1pq, and let X be a Tychonoff space which has infinite functionally bounded subsets. Then, Cp(X) contains (p,q)-(V) sets which are not (p,q)-limited.

    Proof. By Corollary 7.11 of [17], for every Tychonoff space X, we have V(p,q)(Cp(X))=Bo(Cp(X)). Now, the assertion follows from Theorem 3.3 (ⅳ).

    For a better understanding, it is convenient to have a concrete example of a compact subset which is not limited. Denote by s=[0,ω] a convergent sequence.

    Example 3.1. There are compact subsets of Cp(s) which are not limited.

    Proof. For every nω, let fn=1{n} be the characteristic function of the set {n} and let χn:=δnδn+1, where δx denoted the Dirac measure at the point x. Evidently, the sequence S={fn}nω is a null sequence in Cp(s), and the sequence {χn}nω is weak null. Since sup{|χn,fi|:iω}|χn,fn|=10, it follows that S is not limited.

    Proposition 3.2 motivates the following inverse problem: Characterize locally convex spaces whose (p,q)-limited subset (resp., (p,q)-E-limited subset) of E are precompact. We solve this problem in the next theorem (compare with Theorem 7.13 of [17]).

    Theorem 3.4. Let 1pq. For a locally convex space E, the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) every (p,q)-limited subset (resp., (p,q)-E-limited subset) of E is precompact;

    (ⅱ) each operator T:LE from an lcs L to E, which transforms bounded subsets of L to (p,q)-limited subsets (resp., (p,q)-E-limited subset) of E, transforms bounded subsets of L to precompact subsets of E;

    (ⅲ) as in (ⅱ) with a normed space L.

    If in addition E is locally complete, then (ⅰ)–(ⅲ) are equivalent to

    (ⅳ) as in (ⅱ) with a Banach space L.

    Proof. (ⅰ)(ⅱ) Let T:LE be an operator which transforms bounded subsets of an lcs L to (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) subsets of E. Let A be a bounded subset of L. Then T(A) is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) subset of E, and hence, by (ⅰ), T(A) is precompact. Thus, T transforms bounded subsets of L to precompact subsets of E.

    (ⅱ)(ⅲ) and (ⅱ)(ⅳ) are trivial.

    (ⅲ)(ⅰ) and (ⅳ)(ⅰ): Fix a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) subset A of E. By (ⅲ) of Lemma 3.1, without loss of generality we can assume that A=A. Consider the normed space EA (if E is locally complete, then EA is a Banach space), where the norm on EA is defined by the gauge of A, and recall that the closed unit ball BA of EA is exactly A. By Propositions 3.2.2 and 5.1.6 of [34], the identity inclusion T:EAE is continuous and the set T(BA)=A is a (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) set. Since any bounded subset of EA is contained in some aBA, a>0, Lemma 3.1 implies that T transforms bounded subsets of the normed (resp., Banach) space EA to (p,q)-limited (resp., (p,q)-E-limited) subsets of E. Therefore, by (ⅲ) or (ⅳ), the set A=T(B) is precompact.

    By (ⅵ) of Lemma 3.1, every (p,q)-limited set is (1,)-limited. Therefore to characterize (1,)-limited sets in locally convex spaces is an important problem. For barrelled spaces we solve this problem in Proposition 3.3 below (compare with Theorem 4.17 of [17]). Our proof is similar to the proof of Proposition 1.1 of [4], where it is obtained a characterization of (V) sets in Banach spaces. First, we prove the next lemma.

    Lemma 3.2. If a subset A of a locally convex space E is a (1,)-limited set, then T(A) is relatively compact for every operator T:E1.

    Proof. Suppose for a contradiction that T(A) is not relatively compact in 1 for some operator T:E1. By (ⅰ) of Proposition 4.17 of [17], T(x)=(χn,x)nω for some equicontinuous weak 1-summable sequence {χn}nω in E. Then, Proposition 2.1 implies that there are ε>0, a sequence r0<s0<r1<s1< in ω, and a sequence {aj}jω in A such that

    sjn=rj|χn,aj|>ε for every jω.

    For every jω, by Lemma 6.3 of [36], there is a subset Fj of [rj,sj] such that

    |nFjχn,aj|>ε4. (3.4)

    For every jω, set ηj:=nFjχn. Then, the sequence {ηj}jω is weak 1-summable in E. By (3.4), we have

    supaA|ηj,a||ηj,aj|>ε4, for every jω,

    and hence, A is not a (1,)-limited set, a contradiction.

    Proposition 3.3. For a bounded subset A of a barrelled locally convex space E the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) A is a (1,)-limited set;

    (ⅱ) T(A) is relatively compact for every operator T:E1;

    (ⅲ) for any weak 1-summable sequence {χn}nω in E, it follows:

    limmsup{mn|χn,x|:xA}=0.

    Proof. (ⅰ)(ⅱ) follows from Lemma 3.2.

    (ⅱ)(ⅲ) Let {χn}nω be a weak 1-summable sequence in E. Then, by Proposition 4.19 of [17], there is an operator T:E1 such that T(x):=(χn,x) for every xE. By (ⅱ), the set T(A) is relatively compact in 1. Therefore, by Proposition 2.1, we obtain

    limmsup{mn|yn|:y=(yn)T(A)}=0.

    It remains to note that if y=(yn)=T(x) for some xA, then yn=χn,x for all nω.

    (ⅲ) implies (ⅰ) since supaA|χm,a|sup{mn|χn,x|:xA}0 for every weak 1-summable sequence {χn}nω in E.

    Corollary 3.3. Weakly sequentially precompact subsets and precompact subsets of a barrelled locally convex space E are (1,)-limited.

    Proof. Let A be a weakly sequentially precompact subset of E or a precompact subset of E. Then, for every operator T:E1, the image T(A) is also weakly sequentially precompact or precompact in 1. By Lemma 2.2, T(A) is (sequentially) precompact and hence, relatively compact in 1. Thus, by Proposition 3.3, A is a (1,)-limited set.

    It is natural to characterize spaces for which all relatively weakly sequentially p-compact sets are (q,)-limited. For the case when E is a Banach space and q=, the next proposition gives (a)(b) of Proposition 2.10 of [11]. The next assertion can be compared with Proposition 14.12 of [17].

    Proposition 3.4. Let 1pq. For a locally convex space E, the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) all relatively weakly sequentially p-compact subsets of E are (q,)-limited (resp., (q,)-E-limited);

    (ⅱ) every weakly p-summable sequence in E is (q,)-limited (resp., (q,)-E-limited).

    Proof. (ⅰ)(ⅱ) is clear because every weakly p-summable sequence is relatively weakly sequentially p-compact.

    (ⅱ)(ⅰ) Suppose for a contradiction that there is a relatively weakly sequentially p-compact subset A of E which is not (q,)-limited (resp., (q,)-E-limited). Then, there are a weak (resp., equicontinuous) q-summable sequence {χn}nω in E and ε>0 such that supaA|χn,a|ε for every nω. For every nω, choose anA such that

    |χn,an|ε2. (3.5)

    Since A is relatively weakly sequentially p-compact, there are aE and a subsequence {ank}kω of {an}nω such that {anka}nω is weakly p-summable. Taking into account that {χnk}kω is also weak null, (ⅱ) and (3.5) imply

    ε2|χnk,ank||χnk,anka|+|χnk,a|supiω|χnk,ania|+|χnk,a|0,

    a contradiction.

    If E is a Banach space and p=, the next theorem was proved by Grothendieck in [23]. Note that Example 3.5 of [16] (which states that Fω is a weakly p-angelic space for every p[1,]) shows that our result is indeed more general than the Grothendieck theorem.

    Theorem 3.5. Let p[1,], E be a weakly p-angelic and locally complete space, and let H:=(E,μ(E,E)). Then, a bounded subset B of H is precompact if, and only if, it is a (p,)-limited set.

    Proof. Assume that B is a μ(E,E)-precompact subset of E. Let S={xn}nω be a weak p-summable sequence in H=E. Then, S is weakly p-summable in E. Since E is locally complete, the set K:=¯acx(S) is weakly compact, and hence, by the Mackey-Arens theorem 8.7.3 of [32], K is a neighborhood of zero in H. Consequently, K=K and hence, also S are μ(E,E)-equicontinuous. The weak p-summability of S implies that S is weak null. Hence, by Proposition 3.9.8 of [26], xn0 in the topology of uniform convergence on precompact subsets of H, in particular, xn0 uniformly on B. Since S was arbitrary, by definition this means that B is a (p,)-limited subset of H.

    Conversely, assume that B is a (p,)-limited subset of H. Let u = \mathsf{id}_E:E\to E be the identity map, \mathfrak{S} be the family of all absolutely convex weakly compact subsets of E , and \mathfrak{T} be the family of all (p, \infty) -limited subsets of H . Then, the equivalence of (1) and (1') in Theorem 12 of [24]HY__HY, p. 91] can be formulated as follows: the (p, \infty) -limited sets of H are precompact if, and only if, any set K\in \mathfrak{S} is precompact for the topology \mathcal{T} of uniform convergence on all (p, \infty) -limited sets of H . Therefore to prove that B is precompact it suffices to show that any K\in \mathfrak{S} is \mathcal{T} -precompact. To this end, fix a K\in \mathfrak{S} .

    We claim that the topology \mathcal{T} and the weak topology \sigma(E, E') coincide on K . By (xi) of Lemma 3.1, we have \sigma(E, E')\subseteq \mathcal{T} . Therefore to prove the claim we have to show only that any \mathcal{T} -closed subset A of K is also weakly closed. Let z\in \overline{A}^{\, \sigma(E, E')} . Since E is a weakly p -angelic space and K is weakly compact, (ⅰ) of Lemma 3.6 of [16] implies that there is a sequence \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} in A which weakly p -converges to z , i.e., the sequence \{x_n-z\}_{n\in \omega} is weakly p -summable. By the definition of (p, \infty) -limited sets we obtain that x_n\to z in the topology \mathcal{T} and hence, z\in A . Thus, A is weakly closed. The claim is proved.

    Since K is weakly compact, the claim implies that also K is compact for the topology \mathcal{T} .

    It is convenient to formulate Theorem 3.5 in a dual form.

    Corollary 3.4. Let p\in[1, \infty] , and let E be a Mackey space. If the space E'_{w^\ast} is weakly p -angelic and locally complete, then a bounded subset A of E is precompact if, and only if, it is a (p, \infty) -limited set.

    Proof. Set E_1: = E'_{w^\ast} (so E_1 carries its weak topology) and H_1: = \big(E_1', \mu(E'_1, E_1)\big) . Then, E'_1 = E algebraically. Since, by the Mackey-Arens theorem, the polars of the weak ^\ast compact absolutely convex subsets of E'_{w^\ast} = E_1 define the Mackey topology on E and the Mackey topology \mu(E'_1, E_1) on E'_1 = E , we obtain \mu(E'_1, E_1) = \mu(E, E') . As E is a Mackey space, it follows H_1 = E . Now, Theorem 3.5 applies.

    Theorem 5.6 of [17] (which states that a Mackey space E is p -barrelled if, and only if, E'_{w^\ast} is locally complete) and Corollary 3.4 imply the following.

    Corollary 3.5. Let p\in[1, \infty] , and let E be a Mackey p -barrelled space (for example, E is barrelled) . If E'_{w^\ast} is a weakly p -angelic space, then a bounded subset A of E is precompact if, and only if, it is a (p, \infty) -limited set.

    The case p = \infty is of independent interest.

    Corollary 3.6. Let a locally convex space E satisfy one of the following conditions:

    (ⅰ) E is a Mackey c_0 -barrelled space such that E'_{w^\ast} is a weakly angelic space;

    (ⅱ) E is a reflexive space such that E'_{\beta} is a weakly angelic space;

    (ⅲ) E is a separable Mackey c_0 -barrelled space.

    Then, a bounded subset A of E is precompact if, and only if, it is a limited set. Moreover, if in addition E is von Neumann complete, then a bounded subset A of E is relatively compact if, and only if, it is a limited set.

    Proof. (ⅰ) Proposition 3.4 of [16] states that every weakly angelic space E is weakly \infty -angelic. Now Corollary 3.5 applies.

    (ⅱ) Recall that any reflexive space is barrelled; see Proposition 11.4.2 of [27]. Since E is semi-reflexive, E'_{\beta} is a weakly angelic space if, and only if, so is E'_{w^\ast} . Now (ⅰ) applies.

    (ⅲ) Since E is separable, the space E'_{w^\ast} admits a weaker metrizable locally convex topology \mathcal{T} . Therefore, (E', \mathcal{T}) and hence, also E'_{w^\ast} are even (weakly) angelic spaces. By Proposition 3.4 of [16], the space E'_{w^\ast} is weakly (sequentially) \infty -angelic. Now, (ⅰ) applies.

    The last assertion follows from the fact that if, in addition, E is von Neumann complete, then any precompact subset of E is relatively compact.

    Below we summarize some basic properties of coarse p -limited sets, cf. Proposition 2 of [20].

    Lemma 4.1. Let p, q\in[1, \infty] , and let (E, \tau) be a locally convex space. Then,

    (ⅰ) every coarse p -limited subset of E is bounded;

    (ⅱ) the family \mathsf{CL}_p(E) of all coarse p -limited sets in E is closed under taking subsets, finite unions and sums, and closed absolutely convex hulls;

    (ⅲ) if L is a locally convex space and T\in \mathcal{L}(E, L) , and if A\subseteq E is coarse p -limited, then T(A) is a coarse p -limited subset of L ;

    (ⅳ) a subset A of E is a coarse p -limited set if, and only if, every countable subset of A is a coarse p -limited set;

    (ⅴ) ([20, Remark 2]) in general, even for Banach spaces, there is no inclusion relationships between the class of coarse p -limited sets and the class of coarse q -limited sets for p\not = q ;

    (ⅵ) in general, the property of being a coarse p -limited set is not the property of the duality (E, E') .

    Proof. The clauses (ⅰ)–(ⅲ) are clear.

    (ⅳ) The necessity follows from (ⅱ). To prove the sufficiency, we consider the case 1\leq p < \infty since the case p = \infty can be considered analogously. Suppose for a contradiction that A is not a coarse p -limited set in E . Then there is an operator T:E\to\ell_p such that T(A) is not relatively compact in \ell_p . Then, by Proposition 2.1, there is \varepsilon > 0 such that

    \sup\limits_{ a\in A}\Big\{ \sum\limits_{m\leq n} |\langle T^\ast(e^\ast_n), a\rangle|^p\Big\} \geq \varepsilon \;\; \text{ for every }\; m\in \omega.

    For every m\in \omega , choose a_m\in A such that \sum_{m\leq n} |\langle T^\ast(e^\ast_n), a_m\rangle|^p > \tfrac{ \varepsilon}{2} . By assumption, the sequence \{a_m\}_{m\in \omega} is a coarse p -limited set. Therefore, by Proposition 2.1 and the choice of a_m , we have

    \tfrac{ \varepsilon}{2} < \sup\limits_{m\in \omega}\Big\{ \sum\limits_{m\leq n} |\langle T^\ast(e^\ast_n), a_m\rangle|^p\Big\} \to 0,

    a contradiction.

    (ⅵ) Let 1\leq p < \infty , and let E = \ell_p (for p = \infty , one can consider E = c_0 ). Then, the unit ball B_E is not a coarse p -limited set in E (if \mathsf{id}:E\to \ell_p is the identity map then \mathsf{id}(B_E) is not relatively compact in \ell_p ). However, since every T\in \mathcal{L}(E_w, \ell_p) is finite-dimensional by Lemma 17.18 of [17], it follows that B_E is a coarse p -limited set in E_w .

    If 1\leq p < \infty , Proposition 1 of [20] states that every p -limited subset of a Banach space is a coarse p -limited set. Below, we generalize this result.

    Proposition 4.1. Let E be a locally convex space. Then,

    (ⅰ) if p\in[1, \infty] and S_p\big(\mathcal{L}(E, \ell_p)\big)\subseteq\ell_p^w(E'_\beta) , then every (p, p) - (V^\ast) subset of E is a coarse p -limited set;

    (ⅱ) if 1 < p < \infty , then every (p, p) - (V^\ast) subset A of E is a coarse p -limited set;

    (ⅲ) if p = \infty and S_\infty\big(\mathcal{L}(E, c_0)\big) = c_0^w(E'_\beta) , then the class of \infty - (V^\ast) subsets of E coincides with the class of coarse \infty -limited subsets of E ;

    (ⅳ) if p\in[1, \infty] , then every p -limited subset of E is coarse p -limited; in particular, every finite subset of E is coarse p -limited.

    Proof. (ⅰ) Let A be a (p, p) - (V^\ast) subset of E , and let T:E\to \ell_p (or T:E\to c_0 if p = \infty ) be an operator. For every n\in \omega , we set \chi_n: = T^\ast(e^\ast_n) . Then, the inclusion S_p\big(\mathcal{L}(E, \ell_p)\big)\subseteq\ell_p^w(E'_\beta) implies that the sequence \{\chi_n\}_n is weakly p -summable in E'_\beta . Since A is a (p, p) - (V^\ast) set, it follows that

    \begin{equation} \big( \sup\limits_{a\in A}|\langle\chi_n, a\rangle|\big) \in \ell_p \; (\text{or} \; \in c_0 \; \text{if}\; p = \infty ). \end{equation} (4.1)

    Assume that p < \infty . Then, (4.1) implies

    \sup\left\{ \sum\limits_{n = m}^\infty |\langle e^\ast_n, T(a)\rangle|^p: a\in A\right\} \leq \sum\limits_{n = m}^\infty\Big(\sup\limits_{a\in A}|\langle e^\ast_n, T(a)\rangle|\Big)^p < \infty.

    Therefore, by (ⅰ) of Proposition 2.1, T(A) is relatively compact in \ell_p . Thus, A is a coarse p -limited set.

    If p = \infty , then (4.1) yields \lim_{n\to\infty} \sup\big\{|\langle e^\ast_n, T(a)\rangle|: a\in A\big\} = 0 . Hence, by (ⅱ) of Proposition 2.1, T(A) is relatively compact in c_0 . Thus, A is a coarse \infty -limited set.

    (ⅱ) Assume that 1 < p < \infty . Then, by (ⅲ) of Proposition 4.17 of [17], S_p\big(\mathcal{L}(E, \ell_p)\big)\subseteq\ell_p^w(E'_\beta) . Thus, by (ⅰ), A is a coarse p -limited set.

    (ⅲ) Taking account (ⅰ), we have to prove that every coarse \infty -limited subset A of E is an \infty - (V^\ast) set. To this end, let \{\chi_n\}_n be a weakly \infty -summable sequence in E'_\beta . Then, the equality S_\infty\big(\mathcal{L}(E, c_0)\big) = c_0^w(E'_\beta) implies that there is T\in \mathcal{L}(E, c_0) such that \chi_n = T^\ast(e^\ast_n) for every n\in \omega . Since A is a coarse \infty -limited set, we obtain that T(A) is a relatively compact subset of c_0 . Therefore, by (ⅱ) of Proposition 2.1, we have

    \sup\big\{ |\langle \chi_n, a\rangle|: a\in A\big\} = \sup\big\{ |\langle e^\ast_n, T(a)\rangle|: a\in A\big\}\to 0 \; \text{ as}\; n\to\infty ,

    which means that A is an \infty - (V^\ast) set.

    (ⅳ) Let A be a p -limited subset of E , and let T:E\to \ell_p (or T:E\to c_0 if p = \infty ) be an operator. For every n\in \omega , we set \chi_n: = T^\ast(e^\ast_n) . Then, by Proposition 4.17(ⅰ) of [17], the sequence \{\chi_n\}_n is weakly p -summable in E'_{w^\ast} . Now proceeding exactly as in (ⅰ), we obtain that A is a coarse p -limited subset of E .

    For the last assertion it suffices to note that, by (xi) of Lemma 3.1, every finite subset of E is a p -limited set.

    Proposition 4.2. Let p\in[1, \infty] , and let \{E_i\}_{i\in I} be a nonempty family of locally convex spaces. Then,

    (ⅰ) a subset K of E = \prod_{i\in I} E_i is a coarse p -limited set if, and only if, so are all its coordinate projections;

    (ⅱ) a subset K of E = \bigoplus_{i\in I} E_i is a coarse p -limited set if, and only if, so are all its coordinate projections and the support of K is finite.

    Proof. The necessity follows from (ⅲ) of Lemma 4.1 since E_i is a direct summand of E and, for the case (ⅱ), the well-known fact that any bounded subset of a direct locally convex sum has finite support.

    To prove the sufficiency, let K be a subset of E such that each coordinate projection K_i of K is a coarse p -limited set in E_i , and, for the case (ⅱ), K_i = \{0\} for all but finitely many indices i\in I . By (ⅱ) of Lemma 4.1, we can assume that 0\in K . We distinguish between the cases (ⅰ) and (ⅱ).

    (ⅰ) Let T:E\to\ell_p (or T:E\to c_0 if p = \infty ) be an operator. It is easy to show (see for example, Lemma 2.6 in [17]) that there is a finite subset F of I such that \{0\}^F\times \prod_{i\in I {\setminus} F} E_i is in the kernel of T . Then, taking into account that 0\in K , we obtain T(K)\subseteq \sum_{i\in F} T(K_i) . Since, by assumption, all T(K_i) are relatively compact in the Banach space \ell_p (or in c_0 ) it follows that \sum_{i\in F} T(K_i) (we identify K_i with K_i\times \prod_{I {\setminus} \{i\}} \{0_i\} ) and hence, also T(K) are relatively compact in \ell_p (or c_0 ). Thus, K is a coarse p -limited set in E .

    (ⅱ) Let F\subseteq I be the finite support of K . Then T(K)\subseteq \sum_{i\in F} T(K_i) . As above in (ⅰ), it follows that T(K) is relatively compact in \ell_p (or c_0 ). Thus, K is a coarse p -limited set in E .

    Let 1\leq p\leq q\leq\infty , and let E be a locally convex space. By Lemma 7.2 of [17] and Lemmas 3.1 and 4.1, the family \mathsf{V}^\ast_{(p, q)}(E) of all (p, q) - (V^\ast) sets, the family \mathsf{L}_{(p, q)}(E) of all (p, q) -limited sets and the family \mathsf{CL}_{p}(E) of all coarse p -limited sets in E are saturated bornologies. Therefore, one can naturally define the following polar topologies on the dual space E' .

    Definition 5.1. Let 1\leq p\leq q\leq\infty , and let E be a locally convex space. Denote by V^\ast_{(p, q)}(E', E) (resp., EV^\ast_{(p, q)}(E', E) , L_{(p, q)}(E', E) , EL_{(p, q)}(E', E) , and CL_{p}(E', E) ) the polar topology on E' of uniform convergence on (p, q) - (V^\ast) (resp., (p, q) - (EV^\ast) , (p, q) -limited, (p, q) - {\mathcal E} -limited, or coarse p -limited) subsets of E .

    Since the families \mathsf{V}^\ast_{(p, q)}(E) and \mathsf{L}_{(p, q)}(E) depend only on the duality, the topologies V^\ast_p(E', E) and L_{(p, q)}(E', E) are topologies of the dual pair (E, E') . However, (ⅵ) of Lemma 4.1 shows that the topology CL_{p}(E', E) is not a topology of (E, E') . By this reason, in what follows we consider only the topologies \mathsf{V}^\ast_{(p, q)}(E) and \mathsf{L}_{(p, q)}(E) .

    For further references, we select the next simple lemma.

    Lemma 5.1. Let 1\leq p\leq q\leq\infty , and let E be a locally convex space. Then,

    (ⅰ) \sigma(E', E)\subseteq L_{(p, q)}(E', E) \subseteq V^\ast_{(p, q)}(E', E) \subseteq \beta(E', E) ;

    (ⅱ) L_{(p, q)}(E', E) \subseteq \mu(E', E) if, and only if, every (p, q) -limited set A in E is relatively weakly compact;

    (ⅲ) L_{(p, q)}(E', E) = \mu(E', E) if, and only if, every (p, q) -limited set A in E is relatively weakly compact and every weakly compact absolutely convex subset of E is (p, q) -limited.

    Proof. (ⅰ) follows from (viii) and (xi) of Lemma 3.1.

    (ⅱ) and (ⅲ) follow from the Mackey-Arens theorem and the fact that \mathsf{L}_{(p, q)}(E) is a saturated bornology (see (ⅲ) of Lemma 3.1).

    Remark 5.1. The inclusion L_{(p, q)}(E', E) \subseteq V^\ast_{(p, q)}(E', E) can be strict. Indeed, let X be a Tychonoff space containing an infinite functionally bounded subset. Then, by Corollary 3.2, the space C_p(X) contains (p, q) - (V^\ast) sets which are not (p, q) -limited. This fact, the inclusion L_{(p, q)}(E', E) \subseteq V^\ast_{(p, q)}(E', E) and the fact that \mathsf{V}_{(p, q)}^\ast\big(C_p(X)\big) and \mathsf{L}_{(p, q)}^\ast\big(C_p(X)\big) are saturated bornologies imply that L_{(p, q)}(E', E) \subsetneq V^\ast_{(p, q)}(E', E) .

    It is well-known that if T\in \mathcal{L}(E, L) , then, T^\ast is weak ^\ast and strongly continuous. The following assertion shows that T^\ast is also continuous with respect to the topology L_{(p, q)} .

    Proposition 5.1. Let 1\leq p\leq q\leq\infty , and let T:E\to L be an operator between locally convex spaces E and L . Then,

    (ⅰ) the adjoint map T^\ast: \big(L', L_{(p, q)}(L', L)\big) \to \big(E', L_{(p, q)}(E', E)\big) is continuous;

    (ⅱ) the adjoint map T^\ast: L'_{w^\ast} \to \big(E', L_{(p, q)}(E', E)\big) is p -convergent.

    Proof. (ⅰ) To show that T^\ast is continuous, let A^\circ be a standard L_{(p, q)}(E', E) -neighborhood of zero, where A is a (p, q) -limited set in E . Then, by Lemma 3.1, T(A) is a (p, q) -limited set in L . Then for every \eta\in T(A)^\circ and each a\in A , we have |\langle T^\ast(\eta), a\rangle| = |\langle \eta, T(a)\rangle|\leq 1 and hence, T^\ast\big(T(A)^\circ\big) \subseteq A^\circ . Thus, T^\ast is continuous.

    (ⅱ) Since L_{(p, q)}(E', E)\subseteq L_{(p, \infty)}(E', E) by (ⅵ) of Lemma 3.1, it suffices to consider the case q = \infty . Let \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} be a weakly p -summable sequence in L'_{w^\ast} . To show that T^\ast(\chi_n)\to 0 in \big(E', L_{(p, \infty)}(E', E)\big) , fix an arbitrary B\in\mathsf{L}_{(p, \infty)}(E) . By Lemma 3.1, T(B) is a (p, \infty) -limited set in L and hence,

    \lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\sup\limits_{b\in B} \big|\langle T^\ast (\chi_n), b\rangle\big| = \lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\sup\limits_{b\in B} \big|\langle\chi_n, T(b)\rangle\big| = 0 .

    Therefore, T^\ast (\chi_n)\in B^\circ for all sufficiently large n\in \omega . Since B was arbitrary this means that T^\ast (\chi_n)\to 0 in L_{(p, \infty)}(E', E) , as desired.

    Below we give a complete answer to the problem posed in the introduction for the (p, \infty) -case (namely, characterize those operators T which map all bounded sets into (p, q) -limited sets or into coarse p -limited sets). We are interested in this special case because it is dually connected with p -convergent operators; see in particular Theorems 5.1 and 5.2 for the case q = \infty .

    One can naturally also ask when the topology L_{(p, q)}(E', E) in (ⅱ) of Proposition 5.1 can be replaced by the strong topology \beta(E', E) . We answer this question in the next theorem. For 1\leq p < \infty , it generalizes a characterization of operators T between Banach spaces for which T^\ast is p -convergent; see Ghenciu [22]. Following Definition 13.8 of [17], if p\in[1, \infty] , a locally convex space E is called weakly sequentially p -complete if every weakly p -Cauchy sequence is weakly p -convergent.

    Theorem 5.1. Let p\in[1, \infty] , and let T:E\to L be an operator between locally convex spaces E and L . Then, the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) for every B\in \mathsf{Bo}(E) , the image T(B) is a (p, \infty) -limited set in L ;

    (ⅱ) T^\ast: L'_{w^\ast} \to E'_\beta is p -convergent.

    If L'_{w^\ast} is sequentially complete and T^\ast:L'_{w^\ast} \to \big(E'_\beta\big)_w is sequentially continuous, then (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) are equivalent to

    (ⅲ) T^\ast\circ S is a sequentially precompact operator for any operator S:\ell_{p^\ast} \to L'_{w^\ast} (or S:c_0 \to L'_{w^\ast} if p = 1 ) .

    If 1 < p < \infty , L'_{w^\ast} is sequentially complete and T^\ast:L'_{w^\ast} \to \big(E'_\beta\big)_w is sequentially continuous, then (ⅰ)–(ⅲ) are equivalent to the following:

    (ⅳ) T^\ast\circ S is a sequentially compact operator for any operator S:\ell_{p^\ast} \to L'_{w^\ast} .

    If p = 1 , E'_\beta and L'_{w^\ast} are sequentially complete, T^\ast:L'_{w^\ast} \to \big(E'_\beta\big)_w is sequentially continuous and L'_{w^\ast} is weakly sequentially 1 -complete, then (ⅰ)–(ⅲ) are equivalent to the following:

    (ⅴ) T^\ast\circ S is a sequentially compact operator for any operator S:c_0 \to L'_{w^\ast} .

    Proof. (ⅰ) \Rightarrow (ⅱ) Let \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} be a weak ^\ast p -summable sequence in L' . To show that T^\ast(\chi_n)\to 0 in E'_\beta , fix an arbitrary B\in \mathsf{Bo}(E) . Since T(B) is a (p, \infty) -limited set in L , we have

    \sup\limits_{b\in B} \big|\langle T^\ast (\chi_n), b\rangle\big| = \sup\limits_{b\in B} \big|\langle\chi_n, T(b)\rangle\big| \to 0 \; \text{ as }\; n\to\infty,

    and hence, T^\ast (\chi_n)\in B^\circ for all sufficiently large n\in \omega . Since B was arbitrary, this means that T^\ast (\chi_n)\to 0 in E'_\beta , as desired.

    (ⅱ) \Rightarrow (ⅰ) Let B\in \mathsf{Bo}(E) . To show that T(B) is a (p, \infty) -limited set in L , take any weakly p -summable sequence \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} in L'_{w^\ast} . For every \varepsilon > 0 , the polar \varepsilon B^\circ = \big(\tfrac{1}{ \varepsilon}B\big)^\circ is a neighborhood of zero in E'_\beta . Since T^\ast is p -convergent, we have T^\ast(\chi_n)\to 0 in E'_\beta and hence, there is N_ \varepsilon\in \omega such that T^\ast(\chi_n) \in \varepsilon B^\circ for all n\geq N_ \varepsilon . Therefore,

    \sup\limits_{b\in B} \big|\langle\chi_n, T(b)\rangle\big| = \sup\limits_{b\in B} \big|\langle T^\ast (\chi_n), b\rangle\big| \leq \varepsilon \; \text{ for all }\; n\geq N_ \varepsilon.

    As \varepsilon was arbitrary, it follows that \sup_{b\in B} \big|\langle\chi_n, T(b)\rangle\big|\to 0 . Thus, T(B) is a (p, \infty) -limited set.

    The equivalences (ⅱ) \Leftrightarrow (ⅲ), and (ⅱ) \Leftrightarrow (ⅲ) \Leftrightarrow (ⅳ) \Leftrightarrow (ⅴ) immediately follow from Theorem 13.17 of [17] applied to E_1 = L'_{w^\ast} , L_1 = E'_\beta and T_1 = T^\ast .

    Remark 5.2. The condition on T to be such that T^\ast:L'_{w^\ast} \to E'_\beta is continuous is sufficiently strong. It is satisfied if E is a feral space because E'_\beta = E'_{w^\ast} and hence, T^\ast is automatically continuous by Theorem 8.10.5 of [32]. Recall that an lcs E is feral if every bounded subset of E is finite-dimensional.

    Theorem 5.1 applied to the identity map T = \mathsf{id}_{E}: E \to E immediately implies the following characterization of spaces for which every bounded subset is a (p, \infty) -limited set. Recall that a locally convex space E is called Grothendieck or has the Grothendieck property if the identity map \mathsf{id}_{E'}: E'_{w^\ast} \to \big(E'_\beta\big)_w is sequentially continuous.

    Corollary 5.1. Let p\in[1, \infty] , and let E be a locally convex space. Then, the following conditions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) every bounded subset of E is a (p, \infty) -limited set \big(i.e., \mathsf{Bo}(E) = \mathsf{L}_{(p, \infty)}(E) \big) ;

    (ⅱ) the identity map \mathsf{id}_{E'}: E'_{w^\ast} \to E'_\beta is p -convergent.

    If E'_{w^\ast} is sequentially complete and E has the Grothendieck property, then (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) are equivalent to

    (ⅲ) any operator S:\ell_{p^\ast} \to E'_{w^\ast} (or S:c_0 \to E'_{w^\ast} if p = 1 ) is sequentially precompact.

    If 1 < p < \infty , E'_{w^\ast} is sequentially complete and E has the Grothendieck property, then (ⅰ)–(ⅲ) are equivalent to the following:

    (ⅳ) any operator S:\ell_{p^\ast} \to E'_{w^\ast} is sequentially compact.

    If p = 1 , E'_{w^\ast} is a sequentially complete, weakly sequentially 1 -complete, Grothendieck space and E'_\beta is sequentially complete, then (ⅰ)–(ⅲ) are equivalent to the following

    (ⅴ) any operator S:c_0 \to E'_{w^\ast} is sequentially compact.

    Applying Corollary 5.1 for p = \infty , we obtain the following assertion.

    Corollary 5.2. Let E be a locally convex space. Then, the following conditions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) every bounded subset of E is limited \big(i.e., \mathsf{Bo}(E) = \mathsf{L}(E) \big) ;

    (ⅱ) the identity map \mathsf{id}_{E'}: E'_{w^\ast} \to E'_\beta is completely continuous ( = \infty-\text{convergent}) ; in particular, E is a Grothendieck space.

    Below we give a useful construction of operators from \ell_1^0 into locally convex spaces whose adjoint is p -convergent.

    Proposition 5.2. Let \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} be a bounded sequence in a locally convex space (E, \tau) , and let T:\ell_1^0 \to E be a linear map defined by

    T(a_0 e_0+\cdots+a_ne_n): = a_0 x_0+\cdots+ a_n x_n \quad (n\in \omega, \; a_0, \dots, a_n\in \mathbb{F}).

    Then, T is continuous. Moreover, if E is locally complete, then, T can be extended to a continuous operator from \ell_1 to E . In any case, if \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} is a (p, \infty) -limited set, then, T^\ast: E'_{w^\ast}\to\ell_\infty is p -convergent.

    Proof. The continuity of T and, in the case E is locally complete, the existence of the extension of T are proved in Proposition 14.9 of [17]. Assume now that A = \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} is a (p, \infty) -limited set. To show that the adjoint linear map T^\ast is p -convergent, let \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} be a weak ^\ast p -summable sequence in E' . Since A is a (p, \infty) -limited set, by definition, we have \lim_{n\to\infty} \sup_{x\in A} |\langle\chi_n, x\rangle| = 0 . Therefore,

    \| T^\ast(\chi_n)\|_{\ell_\infty} = \sup\limits_{k\in \omega} \big|\langle T^\ast(\chi_n), e_k\rangle\big| = \sup\limits_{k\in \omega} \big|\langle \chi_n, x_k\rangle\big| \leq \sup\limits_{x\in A} \big|\langle \chi_n, x\rangle\big| \to 0\;\; \text{ as } \; n\to\infty.

    Thus, \big\{T^\ast(\chi_n)\big\}_{n\in \omega} is a null sequence in \ell_\infty , and hence, T^\ast is p -convergent.

    We know that (p, q) -limited sets are bounded. In the next theorem, we give an operator characterization of those spaces E in which the (p, q) -limited sets have stronger topological properties than just being bounded as, for example, being weakly sequentially (pre)compact.

    Theorem 5.2. Let 1\leq p\leq q\leq \infty , and let E be a locally convex space. Then, the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) if L is a normed space and T:L\to E is an operator such that T^\ast: E'_{w^\ast} \to L'_\beta is (q, p) -convergent, then, T is weakly sequentially compact (resp., sequentially compact, weakly sequentially precompact, sequentially precompact, weakly sequentially p -compact, or weakly sequentially p -precompact) ;

    (ⅱ) the same as (ⅰ) with L = \ell_1^0 ;

    (ⅲ) each (p, q) -limited subset of E is relatively weakly sequentially compact ( resp., relatively sequentially compact, weakly sequentially precompact, sequentially precompact, relatively weakly sequentially p -compact, or weakly sequentially p -precompact) .

    Moreover, if E is locally complete, then (ⅰ)-(ⅲ) are equivalent to

    (ⅳ) the same as (ⅰ) with L = \ell_1 .

    Proof. (ⅰ) \Rightarrow (ⅱ) and (ⅰ) \Rightarrow (ⅳ) are clear.

    (ⅱ) \Rightarrow (ⅲ) and (ⅳ) \Rightarrow (ⅲ): Let A be a (p, q) -limited subset of E . Fix an arbitrary sequence S = \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} in A , so S is a bounded subset of E . Therefore, by Proposition 5.2, the linear map T:\ell_1^0 \to E (or T:\ell_1 \to E if E is locally complete) defined by

    T(a_0 e_0+\cdots+a_ne_n): = a_0 x_0+\cdots+ a_n x_n \quad (n\in \omega, \; a_0, \dots, a_n\in \mathbb{F})

    is continuous. For every n\in \omega and each \chi\in E' , we have \langle T^\ast(\chi), e_n\rangle = \langle \chi, T(e_n)\rangle = \langle\chi, x_n\rangle and hence, T^\ast(\chi) = \big(\langle\chi, x_n\rangle\big)_n\in\ell_\infty . In particular, \|T^\ast(\chi)\|_{\ell_\infty} = \sup_{n\in \omega} |\langle\chi, x_n\rangle| .

    Let now \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} be a weak ^\ast p -summable sequence in E'_{w^\ast} . Since A and hence, also S are (p, q) -limited sets, we obtain \big(\|T^\ast(\chi_n)\|_{\ell_\infty}\big) = \big(\sup_{i\in \omega} |\langle\chi_n, x_i\rangle|\big)\in\ell_q (or \in c_0 if q = \infty ). Therefore, T^\ast is (q, p) -convergent, and hence, by (ⅱ) or (ⅳ), the operator T belongs to the corresponding class described in (ⅰ). Therefore, S = \{T(e_n)\}_{n\in \omega} has a weakly convergent (resp., convergent, weakly Cauchy, Cauchy, weakly p -convergent, or weakly p -Cauchy) subsequence, as desired.

    (ⅲ) \Rightarrow (ⅰ) Let T:L\to E be an operator from a normed space such that T^\ast: E'_{w^\ast} \to L'_\beta is a (q, p) -convergent operator. Then, by Theorem 3.2, T(B_L) is a (p, q) -limited set and hence it is relatively weakly sequentially compact (resp., relatively sequentially compact, weakly sequentially precompact, sequentially precompact, relatively weakly sequentially p -compact, or weakly sequentially p -precompact). Thus, T belongs to the corresponding class described in (ⅰ).

    The definition of coarse p -limited sets allows us to reformulate Theorem 14.16 of [17] as follows.

    Theorem 5.3. Let 1 < p < \infty , and let E be a quasibarrelled space such that E'_\beta is an \ell_\infty - V_p -barrelled space. Then, the class of p - (V^\ast) sets in E coincides with the class of coarse p -limited sets.

    In Theorem 5.3, the condition on E being a quasibarrelled space is essential as Example 5.1 below shows. First, we prove the next simple lemma.

    Lemma 5.2. Let E be a locally convex space such that E = E_w , and let L be a normed space. Then, every T\in \mathcal{L}(E, L) is finite-dimensional.

    Proof. Observe that T can be extended to an operator {\bar T} from a completion {\bar E} of E to a completion {\bar L} of L . As E carries its weak topology, we obtain {\bar E} = \mathbb{F}^\kappa for some cardinal \kappa . Since {\bar T} is continuous, there is a finite subset \lambda of \kappa such that {\bar T}\big(\{0\}^\lambda \times \mathbb{F}^{\kappa {\setminus} \lambda} \big) is contained in the unit ball B_{{\bar L}} of {\bar L} . Taking into account that B_{{\bar L}} contains no nontrivial linear subspaces we obtain that \{0\}^\lambda \times \mathbb{F}^{\kappa {\setminus} \lambda} is contained in the kernel \ker({\bar T}) of {\bar T} . Therefore, {\bar T}[\mathbb{F}^\kappa] = {\bar T}[\mathbb{F}^\lambda] is finite-dimensional. Thus, also T is finite-dimensional.

    Example 5.1. Let 1 < q \leq p < \infty . Then the space E: = (\ell_q)_w satisfies the following conditions:

    (ⅰ) E is not quasibarrelled, but E'_\beta = \ell_{q^\ast} is a Banach space;

    (ⅱ) B_{\ell_q} is a coarse p -limited set in E which is not a p - (V^\ast) set.

    Proof. The clause (ⅰ) is clear, and Lemma 5.2 shows that B_{\ell_q} is a coarse p -limited set in E . To show that B_{\ell_q} is not a p - (V^\ast) set, let \chi_n = e^\ast_n for every n\in \omega . Then, the sequence \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} \subseteq E'_\beta = \ell_{q^\ast} is weakly p -summable (indeed, if (x_k)\in \ell_q = \big(\ell_{q^\ast}\big)' , then, \big(\langle(x_k), \chi_n\rangle\big)_n = (x_n)\in \ell_q\subseteq \ell_p ). However, \sup_{(x_k)\in B_{\ell_q}} |\langle\chi_n, (x_k)\rangle| = 1\not\to 0 . Thus, B_{\ell_q} is not a p - (V^\ast) set.

    Below for an important case which includes all strict (LF) -spaces, we characterize coarse 1 -limited sets. To begin, we recall some definitions and results. Following [14], a sequence A = \{ a_n\}_{n\in \omega} in an lcs E is said to be equivalent to the standard unit basis \{ e_n: n\in \omega\} of \ell_1 if there exists a linear topological isomorphism R from \overline{\mathsf{span}}(A) onto a subspace of \ell_1 such that R(a_n) = e_n for every n\in \omega (we do not assume that the closure \overline{\mathsf{span}}(A) of the \mathsf{span}(A) of A is complete or that R is onto). We shall say also that A is an \ell_1 -sequence. Following [19], a locally convex space E is said to have the Rosenthal property if every bounded sequence in E has a subsequence which either (1) is Cauchy in the weak topology, or (2) is equivalent to the unit basis of \ell_1 . The following remarkable extension of the celebrated Rosenthal \ell_1 -theorem was proved by Ruess [37].

    Theorem 5.4. Every locally complete locally convex space E whose separable bounded sets are metrizable has the Rosenthal property.

    Note that for every \ell_1 -sequence A = \{ a_n\}_{n\in \omega} in E in Theorem 5.4, a topological isomorphism R from \overline{ \mathsf{span}}(A) to \ell_1 is onto. Observe also that strict (LF) -spaces satisfy Theorem 5.4 (recall that an lcs E is a strict (LF) -space if E is the strict inductive limit of a sequence \big\{(E_n, \tau_n)\big\}_{n\in \omega} of Fréchet spaces; for more details, we refer the reader to Section 4.5 of [27]).

    Theorem 5.5. Let E be a locally complete space whose separable bounded sets are metrizable. Then for a bounded subset A of E , the following assertions are equivalent:

    (ⅰ) A is a coarse 1 -limited set;

    (ⅱ) A does not contain an \ell_1 -sequence \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} such that the closed span \overline{ \mathsf{span}}\{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} is complemented in E .

    If, in addition, E is barrelled, then, (ⅰ) and (ⅱ) are equivalent to

    (ⅲ) A is a (1, \infty) -limited set.

    Proof. (ⅰ) \Rightarrow (ⅱ) Assume that E has only the Rosenthal property, and suppose for a contradiction that there is an \ell_1 -sequence \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} in A such that L: = \overline{ \mathsf{span}}\{ x_n: n\in \omega\} is complemented in E . Let S be a projection from E onto L , and let R be a linear homeomorphism of L onto a subspace of \ell_1 such that R(x_n) = e_n for every n\in \omega . Then T: = R\circ S: E\to\ell_1 is an operator such that T(A) contains \{ e_n: n\in \omega\} . Therefore, T(A) is not relatively compact in \ell_1 . Thus, A is not coarse 1 -limited, a contradiction.

    (ⅱ) \Rightarrow (ⅰ) Suppose for a contradiction that A is not a coarse 1 -limited set. Then, there is T\in \mathcal{L}(E, \ell_1) such that T(A) is not relatively compact in \ell_1 . By Theorem 1.4 of [33], there is a sequence \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} in A such that the sequence S_0 = \{T(x_n)\}_{n\in \omega} is equivalent to the standard unit basis \{e_n\}_{n\in \omega} of \ell_1 and such that the subspace H_0: = \overline{ \mathsf{span}}(S_0) is a complemented subspace of \ell_1 . Let R_0: H_0\to \ell_1 be a linear topological isomorphism such that R_0\big(T(x_n)\big) = e_n for every n\in \omega . Since a continuous image of a weakly Cauchy sequence is weakly Cauchy, the sequence \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} has no weakly Cauchy subsequences, and hence, by the Rosenthal property of E (see Theorem 5.4), there is a subsequence \{x_{n_k}\}_{k\in \omega} of \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} which is equivalent to \{e_k\}_{k\in \omega} . Let R: \overline{ \mathsf{span}}\{x_{n_k}\}_{k\in \omega}\to \ell_1 be a linear topological isomorphism such that R\big(x_{n_k}\big) = e_k for every k\in \omega . Observe that the subspace H_1: = \overline{ \mathsf{span}}\{T(x_{n_k})\}_{k\in \omega} of H_0 satisfies the following two conditions:

    (1) H_1 is complemented in H_0 (since R_0 is a topological isomorphism, R_0\big(T(x_{n_k})\big) = e_{n_k} , and \overline{\mathsf{span}}\{e_{n_k}\}_{k\in \omega} is complemented in \ell_1 ), and hence, H_1 is complemented also in \ell_1 , and

    (2) H_1 is topologically isomorphic to \ell_1 (since R_0 is a topological isomorphism and \overline{\mathsf{span}}\{e_{n_k}\}_{k\in \omega} is topologically isomorphic to \ell_1 ).

    Let Q:\ell_1\to H_1 be a projection (so Q\big(T(x_{n_k})\big) = T(x_{n_k}) for every k\in \omega ), and let R_1:H_1\to \ell_1 be a linear topological isomorphism such that R_1\big(T(x_{n_k})\big) = e_k for every k\in \omega . Since

    R^{-1}\circ R_1\circ Q\circ T(x_{n_k}) = R^{-1}\circ R_1\big(T(x_{n_k})\big) = R^{-1}(e_k) = x_{n_k} \;\; \text{ for every } \;k\in \omega,

    it follows that R^{-1}\circ R_1\circ Q\circ T is a continuous projection from E onto \overline{ \mathsf{span}}\{x_{n_k}\}_{k\in \omega} and \{x_{n_k}\}_{k\in \omega} is equivalent to \{e_k\}_{k\in \omega} . However, this contradicts (ⅱ).

    (ⅰ) \Leftrightarrow (ⅲ) immediately follows from Proposition 3.3.

    Corollary 5.3. Let E be a strict (LF) -space which does not contain an isomorphic copy of \ell_1 which is complemented in E . Then every bounded subset A of E is a coarse 1 -limited and a (1, \infty) -limited set.

    By the classical Pitt theorem [10]HY__HY, 4.49], all operators \mathcal{L}(\ell_p, \ell_1) ( 1 < p < \infty ) and \mathcal{L}(c_0, \ell_1) are compact. Below, we generalize this result.

    Corollary 5.4. If E is a Banach space containing no an isomorphic copy of \ell_1 which is complemented in E , then the class of all bounded subsets of E coincides with the class of all coarse 1 -limited sets. Consequently, every T\in \mathcal{L}(E, \ell_1) is compact.

    The condition of being a barrelled space in (ⅲ) of Theorem 5.5 is essential as the following example shows.

    Example 5.2 Let E = (c_0)_p be the Banach space c_0 endowed with the pointwise topology induced from \mathbb{F}^ \omega , and let

    B = \big\{ (x_n)_{n\in \omega}\in E: |x_n|\leq (n+1)^2\; for \;every \;n\in \omega\big\}.

    Then, B is a coarse 1 -limited set in E which is not (1, \infty) -limited.

    Proof. It is clear that B is a bounded subset of E . Therefore, by (ⅱ) of Example 5.4 of [17], B is a coarse p -limited set for every p\in[1, \infty] . To show that B is not (1, \infty) -limited, consider the sequence \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} = \big\{ \tfrac{e^\ast_n}{(n+1)^2}\big\}_{n\in \omega} in E' . In the proof of (ⅰ) of Example 5.4 of [17], we showed that \{\chi_n\}_{n\in \omega} is a weak ^\ast 1 -summable sequence in E' . Since

    \sup\limits_{(x_k)\in B} |\langle\chi_n, (x_k)\rangle| = 1 \;\; \text{ for every }\; n\in \omega,

    it follows that B is not a (1, \infty) -limited set in E .

    Corollary 5.5. Let E be a Banach space. Then,

    (ⅰ) if p = 1 , then the class of coarse 1 -limited sets in E coincides with the class of (1, \infty) -limited sets;

    (ⅱ) if 1 < p < \infty , then the class of coarse p -limited sets in E coincides with the class of p - (V^\ast) sets.

    Proof. (ⅰ) follows from Theorem 5.5, and (ⅱ) follows from Theorem 5.3.

    To generalize (ⅲ) of Theorem 1.1 and its extension given in Proposition 3 of [20], first we prove the next lemma. Recall that an lcs X is called injective if for every subspace H of a locally convex space E , each operator T:H\to X can be extended to an operator {\bar T}: E\to X .

    Lemma 5.3. Every injective Banach space is also an injective locally convex space.

    Proof. Let X be an injective Banach space, H be a subspace of a locally convex space E , and let T:H\to X be an operator. It is well-known (see, for example, Exercise 5.27 of [10]) that there are a set \Gamma and a closed subspace Y of \ell_\infty(\Gamma) such that X\oplus Y = \ell_\infty(\Gamma) . Denote by \pi_X:\ell_\infty(\Gamma)\to X the canonical projection, and let I_X:X\to \ell_\infty(\Gamma) , I_X(x): = (x, 0) , be the canonical embedding. Since, by Proposition 7.4.5 of [27], \ell_\infty(\Gamma) is an injective locally convex space, the operator I_X\circ T:H\to \ell_\infty(\Gamma) can be extended to an operator \overline{I_X\circ T}:E\to \ell_\infty(\Gamma) . Set {\bar T}: = \pi_X\circ (\overline{I_X\circ T}) . Then {\bar T} is an operator from E to X such that

    {\bar T}(h) = \pi_X\circ \big(I_X\circ T\big)(h) = \pi_X\big((T(h), 0)\big) = T(h) \;\;\text{ for each}\; h\in H .

    Thus, {\bar T} extends T and hence, X is an injective locally convex space.

    Theorem 5.6. Let 2\leq p\leq\infty , and let E be a locally convex space with the Rosenthal property. Then, every coarse p -limited subset of E is weakly sequentially precompact.

    Proof. We consider only the case 2\leq p < \infty since the case p = \infty can be considered analogously replacing \ell_p by c_0 . Suppose for a contradiction that there is a coarse p -limited subset A of E which is not weakly sequentially precompact. So, there is a sequence S = \{x_n\}_{n\in \omega} in A that does not have a weakly Cauchy subsequence. By the Rosenthal property of E and passing to a subsequence if needed, we can assume that S is an \ell_1 -sequence. Set H: = \overline{\mathsf{span}}(S) and let P:H\to \ell_1 be a topological isomorphism of H onto a subspace of \ell_1 such that P(x_n) = e_n for every n\in \omega . Let J:\ell_1\to \ell_p , I_1:\ell_1\to \ell_2 , and I_2:\ell_2\to \ell_p be the natural inclusions, so J = I_2\circ I_1 . By the Grothendieck Theorem 1.13 of [9], the operator I_1 is 1 -summing. By the Ideal Property 2.4 of [9], J is also 1 -summing, and hence, by the Inclusion Property 2.8 of [9], the operator J is 2 -summing. By the discussion after Corollary 2.16 of [9], the operator J has a factorization

    J: \ell_1 \xrightarrow{R} L_{\infty}(\mu) \xrightarrow{J_2^{\infty}} L_2(\mu) \xrightarrow{Q} \ell_p,

    where \mu is a regular probability measure on some compact space K and J_2^\infty:L_\infty(\mu) \to L_2(\mu) is the natural inclusion. By Theorem 4.14 of [9], the Banach space L_\infty(\mu) is injective. Therefore, by Lemma 5.3, L_\infty(\mu) is an injective locally convex space. In particular, the operator R\circ P:H\to L_\infty(\mu) can be extended to an operator T_\infty:E\to L_\infty(\mu) . Set T: = Q\circ J_2^\infty \circ T_\infty . Then, T is an operator from E to \ell_p such that

    T(x_n) = Q\circ J_2^\infty \circ R\circ P(x_n) = J\circ P(x_n) = e_n \quad \text{ for every} \; n\in \omega .

    Since A and hence, also S are coarse p -limited sets, (ⅲ) of Lemma 4.1 implies that the canonical basis \{e_n\}_{n\in \omega} of \ell_p is also a coarse p -limited set. Therefore, \mathsf{id}_{\ell_p}\circ T (S) = \{e_n\}_{n\in \omega} is a relatively compact subset of \ell_p , a contradiction.

    It is noticed in [20, p. 944] that, in general, Theorem 5.6 is not true for p = 1 , even for Banach spaces (in fact, the closed unit ball of C([0, 1]) is a coarse 1 -limited set which is not weakly sequentially precompact).

    Corollary 5.6. (ⅰ) If 2\leq p\leq\infty and E is a locally convex space with the Rosenthal property, then every p -limited subset of E is weakly sequentially precompact.

    (ⅱ) If E is a Banach space and 1\leq p < \infty , then every p -limited subset of E is relatively weakly (sequentially) compact.

    Proof. (ⅰ) Since p -limited sets are coarse p -limited by Proposition 4.1(ⅳ), the assertion follows from Theorem 5.6.

    (ⅱ) immediately follows from Theorem 17.19 of [17] (which states that every (p, p) - (V^\ast) subset of E is relatively weakly compact) and (viii) of Lemma 3.1.

    Concerning the case p = \infty in (ⅱ) of Corollary 5.6, we note that if a Banach space E does not contain an isomorphic copy of \ell_1 , then every limited subset of E is relatively weakly (sequentially) compact; for the proof, see [5] (an alternative proof is given in Theorem 1.9 of [21]).

    Remark 5.3. By Corollary 5.6, each limited subset of a Banach space is weakly sequentially precompact. It turns out that for non-Banach spaces, this very useful assertion is not true in general. Indeed, by Example 7.12 of [17], the product \mathbb{R}^\mathfrak{c} contains a uniformly bounded sequence S = \{f_n\}_{n\in \omega} , which is a (p, q) - (V^\ast) set for all 1\leq p\leq q\leq\infty but is not (weakly) sequentially precompact. Since \mathbb{R}^\mathfrak{c} is reflexive, by (viii) of Lemma 3.1, S is also a (p, q) -limited set.

    In our work we generalize the classical notions of limited, p -limited, and coarse p -limited subsets of a Banach space by introducing (p, q) -limited subsets and their equicontinuous versions and coarse p -limited subsets of an arbitrary locally convex space E , where 1\leq p\leq q\leq\infty . We give operator characterizations of these classes and compare them with the classes of bounded, (pre)compact, weakly (pre)compact, and relatively weakly sequentially (pre)compact sets. We also generalize numerous results from Banach space theory to the general theory of locally convex spaces, in particular, a generalization of a known theorem of Grothendieck is given. The obtained results motivates the study of limited type sets in non-Banach spaces (such as strict (LF) -space) which are of high importance to applications, and allow us to introduce and study some natural generalizations of the Gelfand-Phillips property in non-Banach cases.

    The author declares no conflicts of interest in this article.



    [1] C. Alonso, Limited sets in Fréchet spaces, Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exact. Fs. Natur. Madrid, 89 (1995), 53–60.
    [2] T. Banakh, S. Gabriyelyan, On free locally convex spaces, Filomat, 36 (2022), 6393–6401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FIL2218393B doi: 10.2298/FIL2218393B
    [3] T. Banakh, S. Gabriyelyan, The b-Gelfand-Phillips property for locally convex spaces, Collect. Math., 75 (2024), 715–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13348-023-00409-5 doi: 10.1007/s13348-023-00409-5
    [4] F. Bombal, On (V^\ast) sets and Pelczynski's property (V^\ast), Glasgow Math. J., 32 (1990), 109–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0017089500009113 doi: 10.1017/S0017089500009113
    [5] J. Bourgain, J. Diestel, Limited operators and strict cosingularity, Math. Nachr., 119 (1984), 55–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mana.19841190105 doi: 10.1002/mana.19841190105
    [6] J. Castillo, F. Sanchez, Dunford-Pettis-like properties of continuous vector function spaces, Rev. Mat. Univ. Complut. Madrid, 6 (1993), 43–59.
    [7] D. Chen, J. Chávez-Domínguez, L. Li, p-Converging operators and Dunford-Pettis property of order p, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 461 (2018), 1053–1066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.01.051 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.01.051
    [8] J. Diestel, Sequences and series in Banach spaces, New York: Springer, 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5200-9
    [9] J. Diestel, H. Jarchow, A. Tonge, Absolutely summing operators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526138
    [10] M. Fabian, P. Habala, P. Hájek, V. Montesinos, V. Zizler, Banach space theory: the basis for linear and nonlinear analysis, New York: Springer, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7515-7
    [11] J. Fourie, E. Zeekoei, On weak-star p-convergent operators, Quaest. Math., 40 (2017), 563–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16073606.2017.1301591 doi: 10.2989/16073606.2017.1301591
    [12] S. Gabriyelyan, The Mackey problem for free locally convex spaces, Forum Math., 30 (2018), 1339–1344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/forum-2018-0067 doi: 10.1515/forum-2018-0067
    [13] S. Gabriyelyan, Locally convex properties of free locally convex spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 480 (2019), 123453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123453 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123453
    [14] S. Gabriyelyan, Locally convex spaces and Schur type properties, Ann. Fenn. Math., 44 (2019), 363–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.5186/aasfm.2019.4417 doi: 10.5186/aasfm.2019.4417
    [15] S. Gabriyelyan, Maximally almost periodic groups and respecting properties, In: Descriptive topology and functional analysis II, Cham: Springer, 2019,103–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17376-0_7
    [16] S. Gabriyelyan, Dunford-Pettis type properties of locally convex spaces, Ann. Funct. Anal., 15 (2024), 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43034-024-00359-4 doi: 10.1007/s43034-024-00359-4
    [17] S. Gabriyelyan, Pełczyński's type sets and Pełczyński's geometrical properties of locally convex spaces, arXiv: 2402.08860. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.08860
    [18] S. Gabriyelyan, Gelfand-Phillips type properties of locally convex spaces, arXiv: 2406.07178. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.07178
    [19] S. Gabriyelyan, J. K \text{a}̧ kol, A. Kubzdela, M. Lopez Pellicer, On topological properties of Fréchet locally convex spaces with the weak topology, Topol. Appl., 192 (2015), 123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2015.05.075 doi: 10.1016/j.topol.2015.05.075
    [20] P. Galindo, V. Miranda, A class of sets in a Banach space coarser than limited sets, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc., New series, 53 (2022), 941–955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00574-022-00290-z doi: 10.1007/s00574-022-00290-z
    [21] I. Ghenciu, Limited sets and bibasic sequences, Can. Math. Bull., 58 (2015), 71–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.4153/CMB-2014-014-6 doi: 10.4153/CMB-2014-014-6
    [22] I. Ghenciu, The p-Gelfand-Phillips property in spaces of operators and Dunford-Pettis like sets, Acta Math. Hungar., 155 (2018), 439–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10474-018-0836-5 doi: 10.1007/s10474-018-0836-5
    [23] A. Grothendieck, Sur les applications linéaires faiblement compactes d'espaces du type C(K), Can. J. Math., 5 (1953), 129–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1953-017-4 doi: 10.4153/CJM-1953-017-4
    [24] A. Grothendieck, Topological vector spaces, New York: Gordon and Breach, 1973.
    [25] P. Hájek, V. Montesinos, J. Vanderwerff, V. Zizler, Biorthogonal systems in Banach spaces, New York: Springer, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68915-9
    [26] J. Horváth, Topological vector spaces and distributions, I, Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1966.
    [27] H. Jarchow, Locally Convex Spaces, Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1981.
    [28] A. Karn, D. Sinha, An operator summability in Banach spaces, Glasgow Math. J., 56 (2014), 427–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0017089513000360 doi: 10.1017/S0017089513000360
    [29] L. Li, D. Chen, J. Chávez-Domínguez, Pełczyński's property (V^\ast) of order p and its quantification, Math. Nachr., 291 (2018), 420–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mana.201600335 doi: 10.1002/mana.201600335
    [30] M. Lindström, Th. Schlumprecht, On limitedness in locally convex spaces, Arch. Math., 53 (1989), 65–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01194874 doi: 10.1007/BF01194874
    [31] A. Markov, On free topological groups (Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 9 (1945), 3–64.
    [32] L. Narici, E. Beckenstein, Topological vector spaces, 2 Eds., New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781584888673
    [33] C. Nicolescu, Weak compactness in Banach lattices, J. Operator Theory, 6 (1981), 217–213.
    [34] P. Pérez Carreras, J. Bonet, Barrelled locally convex spaces, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1987.
    [35] J. Pryce, A device of R. J. Whitley's applied to pointwise compactness in spaces of continuous functions, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 23 (1971), 532–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-23.3.532 doi: 10.1112/plms/s3-23.3.532
    [36] W. Rudin, Real and complex analysis, 3 Eds., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987.
    [37] W. Ruess, Locally convex spaces not containing \ell_{1}, Funct. Approx. Comment. Math., 50 (2014), 351–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.7169/facm/2014.50.2.9 doi: 10.7169/facm/2014.50.2.9
    [38] T. Schlumprecht, Limited sets in Banach spaces, Ph.D Thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 1987.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Saak Gabriyelyan, Gelfand–Phillips Type Properties of Locally Convex Spaces, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 3537, 10.3390/math12223537
    2. Saak Gabriyelyan, Locally Convex Spaces with Sequential Dunford–Pettis Type Properties, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 491, 10.3390/axioms13070491
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(519) PDF downloads(35) Cited by(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog