Research article Special Issues

A fixed point theorem for non-negative functions

  • In this paper, we are concerned with the study of the existence and uniqueness of fixed points for the class of functions f:CC satisfying the inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s)

    for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), where C is a closed subset of [0,), α,σ(0,1) are constants, and :[0,)[0,) is a function satisfying the condition inft>0(t)tρ>0 for some constant ρ>0. Namely, under a weak continuity condition imposed on f, we show that f possesses a unique fixed point, and for every t0C, the Picard sequence defined by tn+1=f(tn), n0, converges to this fixed point. Next, we study the special cases when C is a closed interval and is a convex or concave function. Namely, making use of the Hermite-Hadamard inequalities, we obtain several new fixed point theorems. To the best of our knowledge, the considered class of functions was never previously investigated in the literature.

    Citation: Hassen Aydi, Bessem Samet, Manuel De la Sen. A fixed point theorem for non-negative functions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29018-29030. doi: 10.3934/math.20241408

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Umar, Saad Ihsan Butt, Youngsoo Seol . Milne and Hermite-Hadamard's type inequalities for strongly multiplicative convex function via multiplicative calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34090-34108. doi: 10.3934/math.20241625
    [2] Naila Mehreen, Matloob Anwar . Some inequalities via Ψ-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1403-1415. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1403
    [3] Maimoona Karim, Aliya Fahmi, Shahid Qaisar, Zafar Ullah, Ather Qayyum . New developments in fractional integral inequalities via convexity with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15950-15968. doi: 10.3934/math.2023814
    [4] Shima Soleimani Manesh, Mansour Saraj, Mahmood Alizadeh, Maryam Momeni . On robust weakly $ \varepsilon $-efficient solutions for multi-objective fractional programming problems under data uncertainty. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2331-2347. doi: 10.3934/math.2022132
    [5] Sabila Ali, Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Ahmed Morsy, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Sunil Dutt Purohit, M. Zakarya . Dynamical significance of generalized fractional integral inequalities via convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9705-9730. doi: 10.3934/math.2021565
    [6] Yousaf Khurshid, Muhammad Adil Khan, Yu-Ming Chu . Conformable integral version of Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér inequalities via η-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5106-5120. doi: 10.3934/math.2020328
    [7] Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Thabet Abdeljawad, Yenny Rangel-Oliveros . Integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for quasi-convex functions with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7316-7331. doi: 10.3934/math.2020468
    [8] Arshad Iqbal, Muhammad Adil Khan, Noor Mohammad, Eze R. Nwaeze, Yu-Ming Chu . Revisiting the Hermite-Hadamard fractional integral inequality via a Green function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6087-6107. doi: 10.3934/math.2020391
    [9] Jamshed Nasir, Shahid Qaisar, Saad Ihsan Butt, Hassen Aydi, Manuel De la Sen . Hermite-Hadamard like inequalities for fractional integral operator via convexity and quasi-convexity with their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3418-3439. doi: 10.3934/math.2022190
    [10] Sevda Sezer, Zeynep Eken . The Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for quasi $ p $-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10435-10452. doi: 10.3934/math.2023529
  • In this paper, we are concerned with the study of the existence and uniqueness of fixed points for the class of functions f:CC satisfying the inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s)

    for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), where C is a closed subset of [0,), α,σ(0,1) are constants, and :[0,)[0,) is a function satisfying the condition inft>0(t)tρ>0 for some constant ρ>0. Namely, under a weak continuity condition imposed on f, we show that f possesses a unique fixed point, and for every t0C, the Picard sequence defined by tn+1=f(tn), n0, converges to this fixed point. Next, we study the special cases when C is a closed interval and is a convex or concave function. Namely, making use of the Hermite-Hadamard inequalities, we obtain several new fixed point theorems. To the best of our knowledge, the considered class of functions was never previously investigated in the literature.



    The theory of fixed points constitutes one of the important topics in pure and applied mathematics. Indeed, the most results related to the existence of solutions for nonlinear problems arising in physics and engineering are based on the use of certain fixed point theorems. For some contributions related to the applications of the theory of fixed points, we refer to the series of papers [1,2,3].

    One of the most important fixed point results is the Banach fixed point theorem [4], which states that; if (M,d) is a complete metric space and f:MM is a mapping satisfying the inequality

    d(f(u),f(v))kd(u,v) (1.1)

    for every u,vM, where k(0,1) is a constant, then f possesses a unique fixed point, and for every u0M, the Picard sequence un+1=f(un) converges to this fixed point. A mapping f satisfying (1.1) is called a contraction on M. The literature includes several generalizations and extensions of Banach's fixed point theorem. Some of them are concerned with the study of fixed points for mappings satisfying various kinds of contractions. For instance, Boyd and Wong [5] considered nonlinear contractions involving a function φ:[0,)[0,) satisfying certain conditions. Reich [6,7] studied a contraction of the form

    d(f(u),f(v))k1d(f(u),f(v))+k2d(f(u),u)+k3d(f(v),v),

    where k1,k2,k30 and k1+k2+k3<1. Ćirić [8] proposed a contraction of the form

    d(f(u),f(v))kmax{d(f(u),f(v)),d(f(u),u),d(f(v),v),d(f(u),v),d(f(v),u)},

    where k(0,1). Further contributions for other kinds of contractions can be found in [9,10,11]. Other fixed point results were obtained when the underlying set is equipped with a generalized metric such as b-metric spaces [12], rectangular metric spaces [13], G-metric spaces [14], partial metric spaces [15], JS-metric spaces [16], supra-metric spaces [17], Hemi metric spaces [18], and fractional metric spaces [19].

    Another category of fixed point results is concerned with the study of fixed points for mappings satisfying functional inequalities. For instance, in the monograph [20], Guo et al. considered the class of mappings f:Int(P)Int(P) satisfying the inequality

    f(tx)tξf(x),0<t<1,xInt(P),

    where ξ(0,1) is a constant. Here, P is a normal solid cone of a Banach space E and Int(P) is the interior of P. Namely, it was proved that, if f is an increasing operator (with respect to the partial order induced by the cone P), then f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for any x0Int(P), the sequence xn+1=f(xn), n0, converges to this fixed point. Other results that belong to the same category can be found in [21,22,23]. In the mentioned contributions, the mapping f is always supposed to be monotone or mixed monotone with respect to the partial order induced by the cone.

    The present contribution belongs to the category of fixed point results for mappings satisfying functional inequalities. Our main idea is motivated by the following example. Let us consider the function f:[0,1][0,1] defined by

    f(t)={t2if0t<1,14ift=1.

    Let d be the standard metric on [0,1], that is,

    d(u,v)=|uv|,u,v[0,1].

    It is clear that 0 is the unique fixed point of f. However, there is no k[0,1) such that f satisfies (1.1) for every u,v[0,1]. This can be easily seen by remarking that f is not continuous at 1 (with respect to the metric d). Then, the Banach fixed theorem is not applicable in this case. On the other hand, the function f satisfies an interesting property. Indeed, if α(0,1), then for every t,s[0,1], we have

    αf(t)+(1α)f(s)12[αt+(1α)s]. (1.2)

    So, a natural question arises: Is it possible to obtain suitable conditions under which a function f satisfying inequalities of type (1.2) possesses a unique fixed point? The aim of this work is to investigate this question. Namely, we are concerned with the class of real-valued functions f:CC satisfying the inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s)

    for every t,sC with f(t)f(s). Here, C[0,), α,σ(0,1) are constants, and

    :[0,)[0,)

    is a function satisfying inft>0(t)tρ>0 for some constant ρ>0. Notice that in the special case (t)=t, the above inequality reduces to (1.2) with σ=12. First, we establish a fixed point theorem for the above class of functions. Next, we discuss the particular cases when C is an interval and is a convex or concave function. Namely, making use of Hermite-Hadamard inequalities, we deduce several new fixed point theorems. We also provide an example where our approach can be used while the Banach fixed point theorem is not applicable.

    We point out that unlike the most contributions related to the study of fixed points for mappings satisfying functional inequalities, in this paper, no monotony condition is imposed on the function f.

    Our main result is stated and proved in Section 2. Some particular cases of our main result are studied in Section 3.

    We end this section by fixing some notations that will be used throughout this paper. Let f:CC. We denote by Fix(f) the set of fixed points of f, that is,

    Fix(f)={tC:f(t)=t}.

    For tC, we denote by {fn(t)} the sequence in C defined by

    f0(t)=t,fn+1(t)=f(fn(t)),n0.

    For ρ>0, let us denote by Lρ the set of functions :[0,)[0,) satisfying the condition

    cρ:=inft>0(t)tρ>0. (2.1)

    For a nonempty subset C[0,), ρ>0, Lρ, and α,σ(0,1), let FC(ρ,,σ,α) be the set of functions f:CC satisfying the inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s) (2.2)

    for every t,sC with f(t)f(s).

    Our main result is the following fixed point theorem.

    Theorem 2.1. Let C[0,), C, and f:CC. Assume that the following conditions hold:

    (ⅰ) C is a closed subset;

    (ⅱ) fFC(ρ,,σ,α) for some ρ>0, Lρ, and α,σ(0,1);

    (ⅲ) For every t,sC, if limnfn(t)=s, then {fn(t)} admits a subsequence {fnq(t)} such that limqf(fnq(t))=f(s).

    Then, f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for every t0C, the sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point.

    Proof. The first step of the proof is to show that Fix(f). Indeed, for an arbitrary t0C, let {tn}C be the sequence defined by

    tn+1=f(tn)0,n0,

    that is,

    tn=fn(t0),n0.

    If for some k0, we have tk=tk+1, then tkFix(f) and Fix(f). So, we may assume that

    tntn+1,n0,

    which implies that

    f(tn)f(tn+1),n0.

    Then, by (ⅱ), taking (t,s)=(t0,t1) in (2.2), we obtain

    (αf(t0)+(1α)f(t1))σ(αt0+(1α)t1),

    that is,

    (αt1+(1α)t2)σ(αt0+(1α)t1). (2.3)

    Similarly, (2.2) with (t,s)=(t1,t2) yields

    (αf(t1)+(1α)f(t2))σ(αt1+(1α)t2),

    that is,

    (αt2+(1α)t3)σ(αt1+(1α)t2). (2.4)

    Then, from (2.3) and (2.4), we deduce that

    (αt2+(1α)t3)σ2(αt0+(1α)t1).

    Repeating the same argument as above, we obtain by induction that

    (αtn+(1α)tn+1)σn(αt0+(1α)t1),n0. (2.5)

    On the other hand, by (2.1), for all n0, we have

    (αtn+(1α)tn+1)cρ(αtn+(1α)tn+1)ρ,

    which implies by (2.5) that

    (αtn+(1α)tn+1)ρ1cρσn(αt0+(1α)t1),n0. (2.6)

    We now discuss two cases.

    Case 1: If tn>tn+1 for some n0.

    In this case, we obtain

    αtn+(1α)tn+1=α(tntn+1)+tn+1α(tntn+1),

    which implies that

    (αtn+(1α)tn+1)ραρ(tntn+1)ρ.

    Case 2: If tn<tn+1 for some n0.

    In this case, we obtain

    αtn+(1α)tn+1=(1α)(tn+1tn)+tn(1α)(tn+1tn),

    which implies that

    (αtn+(1α)tn+1)ρ(1α)ρ(tn+1tn)ρ.

    Consequently, in both cases, we have

    (αtn+(1α)tn+1)ρτρα|tn+1tn|ρ,n0,

    where

    τα=min{α,1α}.

    Thus, by (2.6), we obtain

    τρα|tn+1tn|ρ1cρσn(αt0+(1α)t1),n0,

    that is,

    |tn+1tn|[1τραcρ(αt0+(1α)t1)]1ρσnρ,n0, (2.7)

    where σρ=σ1ρ(0,1). Hence, for all n0 and m1, using (2.7), we obtain

    |tntn+m||tntn+1|++|tn+m1tn+m|(1τραcρ(αt0+(1α)t1))1ρ(σnρ++σn+m1ρ)=(1τραcρ(αt0+(1α)t1))1ρσnρ1σmρ1σρ11σρ(1τραcρ(αt0+(1α)t1))1ρσnρ.

    Since σnρ0 as n, it holds that {tn} is a Cauchy sequence. Thus, there exists t0 such that

    limnfn(t0)=limntn=t. (2.8)

    Furthermore, since C is closed and {tn}C, then

    tC. (2.9)

    Next, by (ⅲ), (2.8), and (2.9), we deduce that {fn(t0)} admits a subsequence {fnq(t0)} such that

    limqfnq+1(t0)=limqf(fnq(t0))=f(t). (2.10)

    In view of (2.8) and (2.10), we obtain t=f(t), that is, tFix(f).

    The second step is to show that t is the unique fixed point of f. We use the contradiction assuming that there exists sFix(f) such that ts (or, equivalently, f(t)f(s)). Then, using (2.2) with (t,s)=(t,s), we obtain

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s),

    that is,

    (αt+(1α)s)σ(αt+(1α)s). (2.11)

    On the other hand, if

    αt+(1α)s=0,

    then t=s=0, which is impossible, since ts. Then,

    αt+(1α)s>0,

    which implies by (2.1) that

    (αt+(1α)s)>0.

    Hence, dividing (2.11) by (αt+(1α)s), we reach a contradiction with σ<1. Then, t is the unique fixed point of f. The proof of Theorem 2.1 is completed.

    It can be easily seen that, if f is continuous on C, then condition (ⅲ) of Theorem 2.1 is satisfied. Then, from Theorem 2.1, we deduce the following result.

    Corollary 3.1. Let C[0,), C, and f:CC. Assume that the following conditions hold:

    (ⅰ) C is a closed subset;

    (ⅱ) fFC(ρ,,σ,α) for some ρ>0, Lρ, and α,σ(0,1);

    (ⅲ) f is continuous on C.

    Then, f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for every t0C, the sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point.

    Next, we consider the case when C[0,) is a closed interval and is a convex or concave function on C. Just before, we recall the following lemma (see, e.g., [24]).

    Lemma 3.1. (Hermite-Hadamard inequalities) Let C[0,) be an interval.

    (ι) If :CR is a convex function, then for all a,bC with a<b, we have

    (a+b2)1baba(z)dz.

    (ιι) $ If :CR is a concave function, then for all a,bC with a<b, we have

    1baba(z)dz(a+b2).

    Corollary 3.2. Let C[0,), C, and f:CC. Assume that the following conditions hold:

    (ⅰ) C is a closed interval;

    (ⅱ) There exist ρ>0 and Lρ such that is convex on C;

    (ⅲ) There exist α,σ(0,1) such that the inequality

    α(f(t))+(1α)(f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s) (3.1)

    holds for every t,sC with f(t)f(s);

    (ⅳ) f is continuous on C.

    Then, f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for every t0C, the sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point.

    Proof. By the convexity of on C, for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), we obtain

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))α(f(t))+(1α)(f(s)),

    which implies by (3.1) that

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s).

    Consequently, fFC(ρ,,σ,α). Then, applying Corollary 3.1, we obtain the desired result.

    Corollary 3.3. Let C[0,), C, and f:CC. Assume that the following conditions hold:

    (ⅰ) C is a closed interval;

    (ⅱ) There exist ρ>0 and Lρ such that is convex on C;

    (ⅲ) There exist α,σ(0,1) such that the inequality

    1|f(t)f(s)|max{f(t),f(s)}min{f(t),f(s)}(z)dzσ(t+s2) (3.2)

    holds for every t,sC with f(t)f(s);

    (ⅳ) f is continuous on C.

    Then, f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for every t0C, the sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point.

    Proof. Since is convex on C, by Lemma 3.1 (ι), for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), we have

    1|f(t)f(s)|max{f(t),f(s)}min{f(t),f(s)}(z)dz(12f(t)+12f(s)),

    which implies by (3.2) that

    (12f(t)+12f(s))σ(12t+12s).

    This shows that f satisfies (2.2) with α=12, that is, fFC(ρ,,σ,12). Then, applying Corollary 3.1, we obtain the desired result.

    Corollary 3.4. Let C[0,), C, and f:CC. Assume that the following conditions hold:

    (ⅰ) C is a closed interval;

    (ⅱ) There exist ρ>0 and Lρ such that is concave on C;

    (ⅲ) There exist α,σ(0,1) such that the inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ[α(t)+(1α)(s)] (3.3)

    holds for every t,sC with f(t)f(s);

    (ⅳ) f is continuous on C.

    Then, f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for every t0C, the sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point.

    Proof. By the concavity of on C, for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), we obtain

    (αt+(1α)s)α(t)+(1α)(s),

    which implies by (3.3) that

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s).

    This shows that fFC(ρ,,σ,α). Then, applying Corollary 3.1, we obtain the desired result.

    Corollary 3.5. Let C[0,), C, and f:CC. Assume that the following conditions hold:

    (ⅰ) C is a closed interval;

    (ⅱ) There exist ρ>0 and Lρ such that is concave on C;

    (ⅲ) There exist α,σ(0,1) such that the inequality

    (f(t)+f(s)2)σ|ts|max{t,s}min{t,s}(z)dz (3.4)

    holds for every t,sC with f(t)f(s);

    (ⅳ) f is continuous on C.

    Then, f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for every t0C, the sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point.

    Proof. Since is concave on C, by Lemma 3.1 (ιι), for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), we have

    1|ts|max{t,s}min{t,s}(z)dz(t+s2),

    which implies by (3.4) that

    (12f(t)+12f(s))σ(12t+12s).

    This shows that fFC(ρ,,σ,12). Then, applying Corollary 3.1, we obtain the desired result.

    We now give an example to illustrate Theorem 2.1.

    Example 3.1. Let C={0,1,3,5} and f:CC be the function defined by

    f(0)=0,f(1)=5,f(5)=3,f(3)=0.

    Observe that

    |f(0)f(1)||01|=|f(0)f(1)|=5>1,

    which shows that there is no k(0,1) such that

    |f(t)f(s)|k|ts|

    for every t,sC. Then, the Banach fixed point theorem is not applicable in this example.

    We now introduce the function :[0,)[0,) defined by

    (t)={8tif0t12,23tif12<t32,3tif32<t2,45tif2<t52,3tif52<t3,74tift>3.

    It can be easily seen that

    (t)23t,t0,

    which shows that L1. On the other hand, for all t,sC, we have

    f(t)f(s)(t,s)UU,

    where

    U={(0,1),(0,5),(1,3),(1,5),(3,5)}

    and

    U={(t,s):(s,t)U}.

    Let (t,s)U. If (t,s)=(0,1), then

    (f(t)+f(s)2)(t+s2)=(52)(12)=12.

    If (t,s)=(0,5), then

    (f(t)+f(s)2)(t+s2)=(32)(52)=12.

    If (t,s)=(1,3), then

    (f(t)+f(s)2)(t+s2)=(52)(2)=13.

    If (t,s)=(1,5), then

    (f(t)+f(s)2)(t+s2)=(4)(3)=79.

    If (t,s)=(3,5), then

    (f(t)+f(s)2)(t+s2)=(32)(4)=17.

    The above calculations show that for all (t,s)U, we have

    (f(t)+f(s)2)79(t+s2).

    Notice that by symmetry, the above inequality holds also for all (t,s)U. Consequently, f satisfies (2.2) for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), where α=12, σ=79, and is the mapping defined above, that is, fFC(1,,79,12). Furthermore, for all n3, we have

    fn(t)=0,tC.

    This shows that condition (ⅲ) of Theorem 2.1 is satisfied. Thus, Theorem 2.1 applies. Notice that Fix(f)={0}, which confirms Theorem 2.1.

    We introduced the new class of functions f:CC satisfying the functional inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ(αt+(1α)s)

    for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), where C is a closed subset of [0,), α,σ(0,1) are constants, and :[0,)[0,) is a function satisfying the condition inft>0(t)tρ>0 for some constant ρ>0. We proved that, if f is continuous (or, more generally, f satisfies condition (ⅲ) of Theorem 2.1), then f possesses a unique fixed point. Moreover, for any t0C, the Picard sequence {fn(t0)} converges to this fixed point. Next, making use of the Hermite-Hadamard inequalities, we deduced from our main result new fixed point theorems in the special cases when f is a convex or concave function.

    The proposed approach needs to be more developed. For instance, the following issues deserve to be studied:

    Ⅰ. The study of fixed points for mappings f:CC satisfying new functional inequalities of type (2.2). For instance, one can study the possibility of extending the obtained results to functions f satisfying the inequality

    (αf(t)+(1α)f(s))σ1(αt+(1α)s)+σ2(αt+(1α)f(t))+σ3(αs+(1α)f(s))

    for every t,sC with f(t)f(s), where σ1+σ2+σ3>0.

    Ⅱ. The extension of the obtained results from R to a Banach space E partially ordered by a cone P. Indeed, one can study the class of mappings f:CC satisfying the functional inequality

    (αf(u)+(1α)f(v))σ(αu+(1α)v)

    for every u,vC with f(u)f(v), where CP, σ(0,1), :PP, and is the partial order induced by the cone P.

    Ⅲ. It would be interesting to study the possible applications of the obtained results.

    Hassen Aydi: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing review and editing; Bessem Samet: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, writing original draft preparation; Manuel De La Sen: Methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    B. Samet is supported by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R4), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. M. De La Sen is supported by the project: Basque Government IT1555-22.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] H. Aydi, M. Jleli, B. Samet, On positive solutions for a fractional thermostat model with a convex-concave source term via ψ-Caputo fractional derivative, Mediterr. J. Math., 17 (2020), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-019-1450-7 doi: 10.1007/s00009-019-1450-7
    [2] A. Coronel, A. Tello, F. Huancas, M. Rojas-Medar, Application of Tikhonov fixed point theorem to analyze an inverse problem for a bioconvective flow model, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 25 (2023), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-023-01079-3 doi: 10.1007/s11784-023-01079-3
    [3] M. Taleb, V. C. Borkar, Application of fixed point theorems in triple bipolar controlled metric space to solve cantilever beam problem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 533 (2024), 127998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127998 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127998
    [4] S. Banach, Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales, Fundam. Math., 3 (1922), 133–181. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181 doi: 10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181
    [5] D. W. Boyd, J. S. W. Wong, On nonlinear contractions, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 20 (1969), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/2035677
    [6] S. Reich, Kannan's fixed point theorem, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., 4 (1971), 1–11.
    [7] S. Reich, Some remarks concerning contraction mappings, Can. Math. Bull., 14 (1971), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.4153/CMB-1971-024-9 doi: 10.4153/CMB-1971-024-9
    [8] L. Ćirić, A generalization of Banach's contraction principle, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 45 (1974), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0356011-2 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0356011-2
    [9] I. A. Rus, Generalized contractions and applications, Cluj Univ. Press, 2001.
    [10] J. Harjani, K. Sadarangani, Fixed point theorems for weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered sets, Nonlinear Anal., 71 (2009), 3403–3410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2009.01.240 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.240
    [11] V. Berinde, M. Pǎcurar, Approximating fixed points of enriched contractions in Banach spaces, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 22 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-020-0769-9 doi: 10.1007/s11784-020-0769-9
    [12] S. Czerwik, Contraction mappings in b-metric spaces, Acta Math. Inform. Univ. Ostraviensis, 1 (1993), 5–11.
    [13] A. Branciari, A fixed point theorem of Banach-Caccioppoli type on a class of generalized metric spaces, Publ. Math.-Debrecen, 57 (2000), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.5486/PMD.2000.2133 doi: 10.5486/PMD.2000.2133
    [14] Z. Mustafa, B. Sims, A new approach to generalized metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Convex A., 7 (2006), 289–297.
    [15] D. Ilić, V. Pavlović, V. Rakočević, Some new extensions of Banach's contraction principle to partial metric space, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 1326–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.02.025 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.02.025
    [16] M. Jleli, B. Samet, On a new generalization of metric spaces, J. Fix. Point Theory A., 20 (2018), 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-018-0606-6 doi: 10.1007/s11784-018-0606-6
    [17] M. Berzig, First results in suprametric spaces with applications, Mediterr. J. Math., 19 (2022), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-022-02148-6 doi: 10.1007/s00009-022-02148-6
    [18] V. Ozturk, S. Radenović, Hemi metric spaces and Banach fixed point theorem, Appl. Gen. Topol., 25 (2024), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2024.19780 doi: 10.4995/agt.2024.19780
    [19] H. Qawaqneh, H. A. Hammad, H. Aydi, Exploring new geometric contraction mappings and their applications in fractional metric spaces, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024028 doi: 10.3934/math.2024028
    [20] D. Guo, Y. J. Cho, J. Zhu, Partial ordering methods in nonlinear problems, Nova Science, New York, 2004.
    [21] D. Guo, V. Lakshimikantham, Nonlinear problems in abstract cones, Academic Press, New York, 1988.
    [22] D. Guo, Existence and uniqueness of positive fixed point for mixed monotone operators with applications, Appl. Anal., 46 (1992), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036819208840113 doi: 10.1080/00036819208840113
    [23] Z. Zhao, X. Du, Fixed points of generalized e-concave generalized e-convex operators and their applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 334 (2007), 1426–1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.082 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.082
    [24] S. S. Dragomir, C. E. M. Pearce, Selected topics on Hermite-Hadamard inequalities, RGMIA Monographs, Victoria University, 2000.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(616) PDF downloads(38) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog