Research article

Dynamical significance of generalized fractional integral inequalities via convexity

  • Received: 30 April 2021 Accepted: 22 June 2021 Published: 28 June 2021
  • MSC : 26A33, 33C10, 33C20

  • The main goal of this paper is to develop the significance of generalized fractional integral inequalities via convex functions. We obtain the new version of fractional integral inequalities with the extended Wright generalized Bessel function acting as a kernel for the convex function, which deals with the Hermite-Hadamard type and trapezoid type inequalities. Moreover, we establish new mid-point type and trapezoid type integral inequalities for (η1,η2)-convex function related to Hermite-Hadamard type inequality. We establish new version of integral inequality for (η1,η2)-convex function related to Fejér type. The results discussed in this paper are a generalized version of many inequalities in literature.

    Citation: Sabila Ali, Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Ahmed Morsy, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Sunil Dutt Purohit, M. Zakarya. Dynamical significance of generalized fractional integral inequalities via convexity[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9705-9730. doi: 10.3934/math.2021565

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Hijaz Ahmad, Chahn Yong Jung . Riemann-Liouville Fractional integral operators with respect to increasing functions and strongly (α,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11403-11424. doi: 10.3934/math.2021661
    [2] Hengxiao Qi, Muhammad Yussouf, Sajid Mehmood, Yu-Ming Chu, Ghulam Farid . Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6030-6042. doi: 10.3934/math.2020386
    [3] Xiuzhi Yang, G. Farid, Waqas Nazeer, Muhammad Yussouf, Yu-Ming Chu, Chunfa Dong . Fractional generalized Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for m-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6325-6340. doi: 10.3934/math.2020407
    [4] Thongchai Botmart, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Bibhakar Kodamasingh, Muhammad Amer Latif, Fahd Jarad, Artion Kashuri . Certain midpoint-type Fejér and Hermite-Hadamard inclusions involving fractional integrals with an exponential function in kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5616-5638. doi: 10.3934/math.2023283
    [5] Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu . New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6874-6901. doi: 10.3934/math.2020441
    [6] Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf . The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7040-7055. doi: 10.3934/math.2022392
    [7] Atiq Ur Rehman, Ghulam Farid, Sidra Bibi, Chahn Yong Jung, Shin Min Kang . k-fractional integral inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 882-892. doi: 10.3934/math.2021052
    [8] Maimoona Karim, Aliya Fahmi, Shahid Qaisar, Zafar Ullah, Ather Qayyum . New developments in fractional integral inequalities via convexity with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15950-15968. doi: 10.3934/math.2023814
    [9] Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Iqra Nayab, Gauhar Rahman, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dumitru Baleanu . Some generalized fractional integral inequalities with nonsingular function as a kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3352-3377. doi: 10.3934/math.2021201
    [10] Maryam Saddiqa, Ghulam Farid, Saleem Ullah, Chahn Yong Jung, Soo Hak Shim . On Bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions for generalized exponentially convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6454-6468. doi: 10.3934/math.2021379
  • The main goal of this paper is to develop the significance of generalized fractional integral inequalities via convex functions. We obtain the new version of fractional integral inequalities with the extended Wright generalized Bessel function acting as a kernel for the convex function, which deals with the Hermite-Hadamard type and trapezoid type inequalities. Moreover, we establish new mid-point type and trapezoid type integral inequalities for (η1,η2)-convex function related to Hermite-Hadamard type inequality. We establish new version of integral inequality for (η1,η2)-convex function related to Fejér type. The results discussed in this paper are a generalized version of many inequalities in literature.



    Fractional calculus is one of the renowned fields in recent research due to its inherent applications in various areas such as mathematical physics, fluid dynamics, mathematical biology etc. [1,2,3,4,5,6]. On the other hand, the fractional integral inequalities with the fractional operators are developed by many researchers because these inequalities are used to verify various results of applied problems [7,8]. In particular, the researchers [30,31,32,33] have recently studied many remarkable fractional integral inequalities and their applications. In [39], Mehmood et al. discussed the Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér inequality for fractional integrals involving preinvex functions. Mehreen and Anwar [40] estimated he Hermite-Hadamard and Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for p-convex functions by utilizing conformable fractional integrals. In [41], Almutairi and Adem Kılıçman discussed new integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type involving s-convexity and studied their properties. Budak [42] establish Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for convex function involving fractional integrals with respect to another function. The Hermite-Hadamard inequality is defined can be found in [9] for convex function by

    Ψ(m+n2)1nmnmΨ(x)dxΨ(m)+Ψ(n)2

    Ψ:IR,m,nI,m<n,m,nR,IR and is playing a significant role in the field of inequalities and are widely used by the researchers [10].

    Fejér type integral inequalities can be found in [27,28,29] by

    Ψ(m+n2)nmΦ(x)dxnmΨ(x)Φ(x)dxΨ(m)+Ψ(n)2nmΦ(x)dx (1.1)

    for convex function Ψ:[m,n]R and Φ:[m,n]R+,m,nR where the function Φ is integrable and is symmetric about x=m+n2. Note that the Hermite- Hadamard inequality is obtained if Φ=1 in Fejér inequality (1.1).

    The (η1,η2)-convex function has been presented [11,12,13] by obtaining the generalization of η-convex function [14,15,16,17] and preinvex function [18,19,20].

    Sarikaya [25] discussed the Hermite and trapezoid inequalities related to the Hermite-Hadamard inequality, and Rostamian Delavar [13] discussed Fejér, midpoint and trapezoid type inequalities related to the Hermite-Hadamard inequalities.

    Definition 1.1. [26] The convex function Ψ:IR is defined for t[0,1],u,vI as follows:

    Ψ[tu+(1t)v]tΨ(u)+(1t)Ψ(v).

    Definition 1.2. [13] An invex set IR with respect to a real bifunction θ:I×IR, is defined for m,nI,λ[0,1] as follows

    n+λθ(m,n)I.

    Definition 1.3. [13] The preinvex function Ψ:IR is defined for m,nI and λ[0,1] as follows

    Ψ(n+λθ(m,n))λΨ(m)+(1λ)Ψ(n),

    where I is an invex set with respect to θ.

    Definition 1.4. [13] A function Ψ:IR is said to be convex with respect to η i.e (ηconvex) if it satisfies

    Ψ(λm+(1λ)n)Ψ(n)+λη(Ψ(m),Ψ(n))

    for all m,nI and λ[0,1] and IR is a convex function and η:Ψ(I)×Ψ(I)R is a bifunction.

    Definition 1.5. [13] Let Ψ:IR, η1:I×IR, and η2:Ψ(I)×Ψ(I)R, then Ψ is called (η1,η2)-convex function if

    Ψ(x+λη1(y,x))Ψ(x)+λη2(Ψ(y),Ψ(x))

    holds for all x,yI and λ[0,1].

    Example 1.1. [12] Let Ψ be the function such that Ψ:R+R+ defined by

    Ψ(x)={x,for0x1;1,forx>1.}.

    Let the two bifunctions η1:R+×R+R and η2:R+×R+R defined by

    η1(x,y)={y,for0y1;x+y,fory>1.}
    η2(x,y)={x+y,forxy;2(x+y),forx>y.}

    Then Ψ is (η1,η2)-convex function.

    Definition 1.6. [43] The Pochhammer's symbol is defined for tN as

    ()t={1,fort=0,0,(+1)(+t1),fort1.}
    ()n=Γ(+n)Γ()()kn=Γ(+kn)Γ()

    for C, where Γ being the gamma function.

    Definition 1.7. [43] The integral representation of gamma function is defined as

    Γ(t)=0xt1exdx

    for ,(t)>0.

    Definition 1.8. [35,36,37] The Classical beta function is defined for (m)>0 and (n)>0,

    B(m,n)=10tm1(1t)n1dt,=Γ(m)Γ(n)Γ(m+n).

    Definition 1.9. [38] Extended beta functions is defined for (m)>0,(n)>0,(p)>0 is

    Bp(m,n)=10tm1(1t)n1exp(pt(1t))dt.

    Definition 1.10. [34] Ali et al. defined and investigated the generalized Bessel-Maitland function (eight-parameters) with a new fractional integral operator and discussed its properties and relations with Mittag-Leffler functions. The function of generalized Bessel-Maitland as follows:

    Jν,η,ρ,γμ,ξ,m,σ(y)=p=0(θ)ξp(ϑ)σp(y)pΓ(ϕp+ψ+1)(δ)mp,

    where ϕ,ψ,θ,δ,ϑC, (ϕ)>0, (ν)1, (θ)>0, (δ)>0, (ϑ)>0; ξ,m,σ0 and m,ξ>(ϕ)+σ.

    Definition 1.11. The extended generalized Bessel-Maitland function is defined for μ,ν,η,ρ,γ,cC, (μ)>0, (ν)1, (η)>0, (ρ)>0, (γ)>0; ξ,m,σ0 and m,ξ>(μ)+σ by

    Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω;p)=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n.

    In the recent era of research, the field of fractional calculus has gained more recognition due to its wide range of applications in different sciences [44,45]. Such new developments in fractional calculus motivate the researchers to establish some new innovative ideas to unify the fractional operators and propose new inequalities involving new fractional operators.

    The Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities and their extensions have been widely studied for a different type of convexities [46,47,48,49,50]. Here, we defined the following generalized fractional integral operators containing generalized Bessel-Maitland function as its kernel defined, which are the generalization of many well-known fractional integrals:

    Definition 1.12. The generalized fractional integral operators with extended generalized Bessel-Maitland function acting as kernel, is defined for μ,ν,η,ρ,γ,cC, (μ)>0, (ν)1, (η)>0, (ρ)>0, (γ)>0; ξ,m,σ0 and m,ξ>(μ)+σ as follows

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;p+f)(x,r)=xp(xt)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xt)μ;r)f(t)dt

    and

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;qf)(x,r)=qx(tx)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(tx)μ;r)f(t)dt.

    Remark 1.1. 1. If we put r=0, w=0 and replacing v by v1 in definition 1.12, we get the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators [21].

    2. If we put σ=0 and replace v by v1 in definition 1.12, ω by ω, we get generalized fractional integral operator containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function as their kernels defined by Andric et al.[22].

    3. If we put r=0, ξ=0 and replacing v by v1, ω by ω in definition 1.12, we get generalized fractional integral operator containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function as their kernels defined in [23].

    4. If we put r=0, ξ=0, σ=0, ρ=m=1 in definition 1.12, we get the Srivastava fractional integral operator [24].

    This paper aims to obtain Hermite Hadamard and Fejér inequalities using generalized fractional integral having extended generalized Bessel-Maitland function as its kernel.

    The structure of the paper follows: In section 2, we present Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for convex function using generalized fractional operator. Section 3 is devoted to Trapezoid type inequalities related to Hermite-Hadamard inequalities. Fejér type inequalities for (η1,η2)- convex function using the generalized fractional operator are presented in section 4.

    In this section, we obtain the Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for convex function using generalized fractional operator as follows:

    Theorem 2.1. Let Ψ:[u,v]R be a convex function where 0<u<v and ΨL1[u,v]. If Ψ is an increasing function on [u,v], then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition 1.12, we have

    Ψ(u+v2)(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;v1)(u,p)12[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u,p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(v,p)]Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;u+1)(v,p).

    Proof. By the convexity of Ψ on the interval [u,v], let x,y[u,v] with t=12, we have

    Ψ(x+y2)Ψ(x)+Ψ(y)2,

    where if we takes

    x=tu+(1t)v,y=(1t)u+tv

    leads to

    2Ψ(u+v2)Ψ(tu+(1t)v)+Ψ((1t)u+tv).

    Multiplying both sides by (1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p) and integrating the resulting inequality on [0,1] with respect to t, we have

    2Ψ(u+v2)10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)dt10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ(tu+(1t)v)dt+10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ((1t)u+tv)dt
    2Ψ(u+v2)n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n10(1t)v+μndtn=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×[10(1t)v+μnΨ(tu+(1t)v)dt+10(1t)v+μnΨ((1t)u+tv)dt]. (2.1)

    By making suitable substitutions in inequality (2.1), we obtain

    2Ψ(u+v2)(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;v1)(u,p)[vu(zuvu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(zuvu)μ;p)Ψ(z)dz+vu(vzvu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(vzvu)μ;p)Ψ(z)dz]orΨ(u+v2)(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;v1)(u,p)12[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;vΨ)(u;p)]. (2.2)

    For second part of inequality, again using the convexity of Ψ,

    Ψ(tu+(1t)v)tΨ(u)+(1t)ψ(v)

    and

    Ψ((1t)u+tv)(1t)Ψ(u)+tψ(v).

    Addition of these inequalities, gives

    Ψ(tu+(1t)v)+Ψ((1t)u+tv)(Ψ(u)+ψ(v)).

    Multiplying both sides by (1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p) and integrating the resulting inequality on [0,1] with respect to t, we get

    10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ(tu+(1t)v)dt+10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ((1t)u+tv)dt(Ψ(u)+Ψ(v))10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)dt.

    Making substitution in the integrals involved leads to

    12[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;vΨ)(u;p)]Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;u+1)(v,p), (2.3)

    combining (2.2) and (2.3), we get the desired result.

    The Trapezoid type inequalities related to the Hermite-Hadamard inequalities are presented in this section.

    Lemma 3.1. Let a function Ψ:IR with I=[u,v]R, ΨL1[u,v] be a differentiable function on (u,v). Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition (1.12), we have

    Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]=vu2IwhereI=10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ(ut+(1t)v)dt+10tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(ut+(1t)v)dt.

    Proof. If we consider the integral

    I=10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ(ut+(1t)v)dt+10tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(ut+(1t)v)dt.

    Let

    I=I1+I2.

    Firstly, we consider I1

    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n10(1t)v+μnΨ(ut+(1t)v)dt.

    Integrating by parts, we have

    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[(1t)v+μnΨ(ut+(1t)vuv|10+v+μnuv10(1t)v+μn1Ψ(ut+(1t)v)dt]I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[Ψ(v)vuv+μn(vu)2vu(xuvu)v+μn1Ψ(x)dx]I1=Ψ(v)vuJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)1(vu)2(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(v;p).

    On the same lines, we get

    I2=Ψ(u)vuJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)1(vu)2(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)impliesI=Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)vuJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)1(vu)2×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)+Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ](v;p)].

    Multiplying by vu2, we have the required result.

    By using Lemma 3.1, we present the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.1. Let a function Ψ:I=[u,v]R with IR be a differentiable function on (u,v). Also, suppose that |Ψ| is a convex function on I, then for the generalized fractional integrals in definition 1.12, we have

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]|vu2|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|],

    where v0.

    Proof. If we consider the following integral expression

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]|=|vu2I|vu2n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×10|(1t)v+μntv+μn||Ψ(ut+(1t)v)|dtvu2n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×10|(1t)v+μntv+μn|[|Ψ(u)|t+(1t)|Ψ(v)|]dt]=vu2n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×[120((1t)v+μntv+μn)[|Ψ(u)|t+(1t)|Ψ(v)|]dt+112(tv+μn(1t)v+μn)[|Ψ(u)|t+(1t)|Ψ(v)|]dt].

    Solving the integrals involved by using integrating by parts method, we obtain

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]|vu2|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|].

    Here, we present Fejér type inequalities for (η1,η2)-convex function by using the generalized fractional operator in definition 1.12.

    Theorem 4.1. Let Ψ:IR, be an (η1,η2)-convex functions such that η2 is an integrable bi-function on Ψ(I)×Ψ(I) and for any u,vI,η1(v,u)>0 with ΨL1[u,u+η1(v,u)] and the function Φ:[u,u+η1(v,u)]R+ is integrable and symmetric to u+12η1(v,u) i.e., Φ(2u+η1(v,u)x)=Φ(x), where IR be an invex set with respect to η1 such that

    η1(v+t2η1(u,v),v+t1η1(u,v))=(t2t1)η1(u,v), (4.1)

    for all t1,t2[0,1]. Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition (1.12), the following Fejér type inequality holds:

    Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Φ)(u,p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(u+η1(v,u),p)]12u+η1(v,u)u[(u+η1(v,u)x)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(u+η1(v,u)x)μ;p)+(xu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xu)μ;p)]×η2(Ψ(x),Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)x)).Φ(x)dx(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u,p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u),p).

    Proof. By the (η1,η2)-convexity of the function Ψ and using (4.1), we get

    Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)=Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2tη1(v,u)2)=Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2+12η1(u+(1t)2η1(v,u),u+(1+t)2η1(v,u))),

    or

    Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2+12η2(Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2),Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2))). (4.2)

    Now by adapting the same procedure as above, we obtain

    Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2+12η2(Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2),Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2))). (4.3)

    Using the generalized fractional integral operators defined in 12, we have

    I1=(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u;p)=u+η1(v,u)u(xu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xu)μ;p)Ψ(x)Φ(x)dx=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)nu+η1(v,u)u(xu)v+μnΨ(x)Φ(x)dx
    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[u+12η1(v,u)u(xu)v+μnΨ(x)Φ(x)dx+u+η1(v,u)u+12η1(v,u)(xu)v+μnΨ(x)Φ(x)dx]. (4.4)

    By making the substitution x=2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2 and x=2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2 respectively in the integrals appearing in (4.4), we have

    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n(η1(v,u)2)v+μn+1[10(1t)v+μnΨ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2)Φ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2)dt+10(1+t)v+μnΨ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2)Φ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2dt)].

    By using the inequalities (4.2) and (4.3), we proceed

    I1n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n(η1(v,u)2)v+μn+1[10(1t)v+μnΨ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Φ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2)dt1210(1t)v+μnη2(Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2),Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2))Φ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2)dt+10(1+t)v+μnΨ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Φ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2)dt1210(1+t)v+μnη2(Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2),Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2))Φ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2)dt],

    or

    I1Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)(η1(v,u)2)v+μn+1n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[10(1t)v+μnΦ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2)dt12n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×(η1(v,u)2)v+μn+110(1t)v+μnη2(Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2),Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2))×Φ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2)dt+Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)(η1(v,u)2)v+μn+1n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×10(1+t)v+μnΦ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2)dt12(η1(v,u)2)v+μn+1n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n10(1+t)v+μnη2(Ψ(2u+(1t)η1(v,u)2),Ψ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2))Φ(2u+(1+t)η1(v,u)2)dt].

    Again by simplification and using the above mentioned substitution as well as the symmetry of Φ to u+12η1(v,u) leads to the following

    I1Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[u+η1(v,u)u(xu)v+μnΦ(x)dx12n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×u+η1(v,u)u(u+η1(v,u)x)v+μnη2(Ψ(x),Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)x))Φ(x)dx.

    It follows that

    I1Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Φ)(u,p)12u+η1(v,u)u(u+η1(v,u)x)v×Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(u+η1(v,u)x)μ;p)×η2(Ψ(x),Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)x)).Φ(x)dx.

    Now, consider

    I2=(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u),p)=u+η1(v,u)u(u+η1(v,u)x)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(u+η1(v,u)x)μ;p)Ψ(x)Φ(x)dx.

    Solving on the same pattern as used above, we get

    I2Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;u+Φ)(u+η1(v,u),p)×12u+η1(v,u)u(xu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xu)μ;p)×η2(Ψ(x),Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)x)).Φ(x)dx.

    By adding I1 and I2, we get the required inequality.

    Lemma 4.1. Let I be an invex subset of R with respect to η1:I×IR. Let u,vI satisfying η1(v,u)>0 and Φ:[u,u+η1(v,u)]R be integrable and symmetric about u+12η1(v,u). Then for the integrals defined in definition (1.12), the following holds;

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)=(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u)Ψ)(u;p)=12[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)].

    Proof. If we consider

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);r)=u+η1(v,u)u(u+η1(v,u)x)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(u+η1(v,u)x)μ;p)Ψ(x)dx. (4.5)

    By substituting x=2u+η1(v,u)t in (4.5), we get

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);r)=u+η1(v,u)u(tu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(tu)μ;p)Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)t)dt
    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)=(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p). (4.6)

    Addition of (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p) in Eq (4.6) on both sides, leads to the required result.

    Theorem 4.2. Let Ψ:IR, be an (η1,η2)-convex functions such that η2 is an integrable bifunction on Ψ(I)×Ψ(I) and for any u,vI, η1(v,u)>0 with ΨL1[u,u+η1(v,u)] and the function Φ:[u,u+η1(v,u)]R+ is integrable and symmetric to u+12η1(v,u) i.e Φ(2u+η1(v,u)x)=Φ(x), where IR be an invex set with respect to η1. Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition (1.12), the following Fejér type inequality holds:

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u,p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u),p)(2Ψ(u)+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))2)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u,p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u),p)].

    Proof. If we consider the integral

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u;p)=u+η1(v,u)u(xu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xu)μ;p)Ψ(x)Φ(x)dx=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)nu+η1(v,u)u(xu)v+μnΨ(x)Φ(x)dx.

    Making substitution x=u+tη1(v,u) leads to following integral,

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u;p)=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×(η1(v,u))v+μn+110(t)v+μnΨ(u+tη1(v,u))Φ(u+tη1(v,u))dt.

    Using the (η1,η2)-convexity of Ψ, we get

    n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×(η1(v,u))v+μn+110(t)v+μn(Ψ(u)+tη2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u)))Φ(u+tη1(v,u))dt
    =n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n(η1(v,u))v+μn+1[Ψ(u)10(t)v+μnΦ(u+tη1(v,u))dt+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))10(t)v+μn+1Φ(u+tη1(v,u))dt]. (4.7)

    Now, consider

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u);p)=u+η1(v,u)u(u+η1(v,u)x)v×Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(u+η1(v,u)x)μ;p)Ψ(x)Φ(x)dx=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)nu+η1(v,u)u(u+η1(v,u)x)v+μnΨ(x)Φ(x)dx
    n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×(η1(v,u))v+μn+110(t)v+μn(Ψ(u)+(1t)η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u)))Φ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt
    =n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n(η1(v,u))v+μn+1[Ψ(u)10(t)v+μnΦ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))×10(t)v+μn(1t)Φ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt]. (4.8)

    Adding Eqs (4.7) and (4.8) and using the symmetry of Φ about u+12η1(v,u), we have

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ(u;p))n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n(η1(v,u))v+μn+1×[2Ψ(u)10(t)v+μnΦ(u+tη1(v,u))dt+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))10(t)v+μnΦ(u+tη1(v,u))dt]=(2Ψ(u)+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u)))n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n(η1(v,u))v+μn+1×10(t)v+μnΦ(u+(t)η1(v,u))dt.=(2Ψ(u)+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))2)(2Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Φ)(u;p).

    By using lemma 4.1, we have

    (Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u);p)(2Ψ(u)+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Φ)(u;p)].

    Corollary 4.1. In Fejér type inequalities defined in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2, if we take η1(u,v)=uv, u,vI,

    Ψ(u+v2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)Φ)(u;p)]12vu[(vx)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(vx)μ;p)+(xu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xu)μ;p)]×η2(Ψ(x),Ψ(u+vx)).Φ(x)dx(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)ΨΦ)(u;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(v;p)(2Ψ(u)+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)Φ)(u;p)],

    which is Fejér inequality for generalized fractional integral can be obtained by considering the function Ψ to be η-convex.

    Corollary 4.2. In Theorems 4.1 and 4.2, if we put η2(u,v)=uv, forallu,vΨ(I), then

    Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Φ)(u;p)](Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))ΨΦ)(u;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(u+η1(v,u);p)(Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Φ)(u;p)],

    which is Fejér inequality for generalized fractional integral can be obtained by considering the function Ψ to be preinvex convex.

    Corollary 4.3. In Fejér type inequalities 4.1 and 4.2, if we put η1(u,v)=uv,u,vI and η2(x,y)=xy,x,yΨ(I),

    Ψ(u+v2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)Φ)(u;p)](Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)ΨΦ)(u;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+ΨΦ)(v;p)(Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Φ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(v)Φ)(u;p)],

    which is Fejér type inequality for generalized fractional integral can be obtained by considering the function Ψ to be convex.

    Corollary 4.4. In corollary 4.3, if we take Φ=1, we get Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for convex function discussed in 2.1.

    Corollary 4.5. In Fejér type inequalities defined in 4.1 and 4.2, if we take Φ=1 then can obtain the Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for (η1,η2)-convex function as

    Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))1)(u,p)14u+η1(v,u)u[(u+η1(v,u)x)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(u+η1(v,u)x)μ;p)+(xu)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(xu)μ;p)]×η2(Ψ(x),Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)x))dx12[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u),p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u,p)](2Ψ(u)+η2(Ψ(v),Ψ(u))2)(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ;(u)+1)(u+η1(v,u),p).

    In the section, we discuss the midpoint and trapezoid type inequalities connected to Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for the function whose absolute value of the derivative is (η1,η2)-convex function. The following lemma will help us in the next result.

    Lemma 5.1. Let a function Ψ:IR with IR, ΨL1[u,u+η1(v,u)] be a differentiable function where I is taken to be an open invex set with respect to η1:I×IR with η1(v,u)>0, for u,vI. Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition 1.12, we have

    η1(v,u)24k=1Ik=Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]whereI1=120tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dtI2=120(t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dtI3=112tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt112Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dtI4=112Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)Ψ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt112tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt.

    Proof. If we consider

    I1=120tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dtI1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n120(t)v+μnΨ(u+tη1(v,u))dt.

    Solving the integrals by using integrating by parts method leads to

    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[tv+μnΨ(u+tη1(v,u))η1(v,u)|120v+μnη1(v,u)120(t)v+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt]=n=0βp(η+ξη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[(2)(v+μn)η1(v,u)Ψ(2u+η1(v,u))2v+μnη1(v,u)120(t)v+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt].

    Similarly,

    I2=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[(2)(v+μn)η1(v,u)Ψ(2u+η1(v,u))2v+μnη1(v,u)120(t)v+μn1Ψ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt].

    Now

    I3=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n112(tv+μn1)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dtI3=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[(tv+μn1)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))η1(v,u)|112v+μnη1(v,u)112(t)v+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt]=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[12(v+μn)η1(v,u)Ψ((2u+η1(v,u))2)v+μnη1(v,u)112(t)v+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt].

    Similarly,

    I4=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[12(v+μn)η1(v,u)Ψ((2u+η1(v,u))2)v+μnη1(v,u)112(t)v+μn1Ψ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt].

    Adding I1,I2,I3 and I4, we proceed to the desired result as,

    4k=1Ik=2η1(v,u)Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)nn=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)nv+μnη1(v,u)×[10tv+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt+10tv+μn1Ψ(u+(1t)η1(v,u))dt]orη1(v,u)24k=1Ik=Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)].

    Next, we present mid-point type inequalities related to Hermite-Hadamard inequalities:

    Theorem 5.1. Consider a function Ψ:IR with IR, ΨL1[u,u+η1(v,u)] be a differentiable function where I is taken to be an open invex set with respect to η1:I×IR with η1(v,u)>0 for u,vI. Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition 1.12, we have

    |Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]|η1(v,u)2[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|+12η2(|Ψ(u)|,|Ψ(v)|)+12.η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)],

    for 0<v+μn1.

    Proof. By using lemma 5.1 and using the property of absolute function for addition, leads to

    |Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u) (5.1)
    [(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]| (5.2)
    η1(v,u)24k=1|Ik|. (5.3)

    To solve |Ik|,k=1,2,3,4, we further move by using (η1,η2)-convexity of |Ψ|

    |I1|120tv|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)||Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))|dt120tv|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)||Ψ(u)|dt+120(t)v+1|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)|η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)dtn=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|[|Ψ(u)|12v+μn+1(v+μn+1)+η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)12v+μn+2(v+μn+2)]Analogously|I2|n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|[|Ψ(v)|12v+μn+1(v+μn+1)+η2(|Ψ(u)|,|Ψ(v)|)12v+μn+2(v+μn+2)].

    For |Ik|,k=3,4. We will use the fact that for all j(0,1] and u1,u2[0,1]. Therefore, we have

    |uj1uj2||u1u2|j
    |I3|n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×[|Ψ(u)|12v+μn+1(v+μn+1)+η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)v+μn+32v+μn+2(v+μn+1)(v+μn+2)]

    and

    |I4|n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×[|Ψ(v)|12v+μn+1(v+μn+1)+η2(|Ψ(u)|,|Ψ(v)|)v+μn+32v+μn+2(v+μn+1)(v+μn+2)].

    Using the above evaluated absolute values in (5.1), we have

    |Ψ(2u+η1(v,u)2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]|n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|η1(v,u)2v+μn+1(v+μn+1)[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|+12.η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)+12η2(|Ψ(u)|,|Ψ(v)|)]=η1(v,u)2v+1|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|+12.η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)+12η2(|Ψ(u)|,|Ψ(v)|)].

    Corollary 5.1. In Theorem 5.1, if we take η1(u,v)=uv, u,vI, then

    |Ψ(u+v2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]|vu2v+1|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|+12.η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)+12η2(|Ψ(u)|,|Ψ(v)|)].

    Corollary 5.2. In Theorem 5.1, if we take η1(u,v)=uv, u,vI and η2(x,y)=xy, x,yΨ(I), then

    |Ψ(u+v2)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]|vu2v+1|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|].

    Lemma 5.2. If we consider a function Ψ:IR with IR, ΨL1[u,u+η1(v,u)] be a differentiable function where I is taken to be an open invex set with respect to η1:I×IR with η1(v,u)>0 for u,vI. Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition (1.12), we have

    Ψ(u)+Ψ(u+η1(v,u))2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]=η1(v,u)2IwhereI=10tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt+10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt.

    Proof. We consider the fractional integral

    I=10tvJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt+10(1t)vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1t)μ;p)Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt.

    Let

    I=I1+I2.

    First, we consider I1

    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n10tv+μnΨ(u+tη1(v,u))dt.

    Integrating by parts, we have

    I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n[tv+μnΨ(u+tη1(v,u))η1(v,u)|10v+μnη1(v,u)10tv+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt]I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×[Ψ(u+η1(v,u))η1(v,u)v+μnη1(v,u)10tv+μn1Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))dt]I1=n=0βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n×[Ψ(u+η1(v,u))η1(v,u)v+μn(η1(v,u))2u+η1(v,u)u(xuu+η1(v,u)u)v+μn1Ψ(x)dx]I1=Ψ(u+η1(v,u))η1(v,u)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)1(η1(v,u))2(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p).

    On the same lines, we get

    I2=Ψ(u)η1(v,u)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)1(η1(v,u))2(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)I=Ψ(u)+Ψ(u+η1(v,u))η1(v,u)Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)1(η1(v,u))2×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)+Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u)+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)].

    Multiplying by η1(v,u)2, we get the required result.

    Here, we are able to give trapezoid-type inequalities related to Hermite-Hadamard inequalities:

    Theorem 5.2. If we consider a function Ψ:IR with IR, ΨL1[u,u+η1(v,u)] be a differentiable function where I is taken to be an open invex set with respect to η1:I×IR with η1(v,u)>0 for u,vI. Suppose also that |Ψ| is an (η1,η2)-convex function on I. Then for the generalized fractional integrals defined in definition 1.12, we have

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(u+η1(v,u))2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]|η1(v,u)2|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[2|Ψ(u)|+η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)],

    where v0.

    Proof.

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(u+η1(v,u))2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]|=|η1(v,u)2I|η1(v,u)2n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×10|tv+μn(1t)v+μn||Ψ(u+tη1(v,u))|dtη1(v,u)2n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×10|tv+μn(1t)v+μn|[|Ψ(u)|+tη2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)]dt=η1(v,u)2n=0|βp(η+ξn,cη)(c)ξn(γ)σnβ(η,cη)Γ(μn+v+1)(ρ)mn(ω)n|×[120((1t)v+μntv+μn)[|Ψ(u)|+tη2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)dt]+112(tv+μn(1t)v+μn)[|Ψ(u)|+tη2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)dt].

    Solving the integrals involved by using integrating by parts method, we obtain the desired result

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(u+η1(v,u))2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12η1(v,u)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(u+η1(v,u);p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(u+η1(v,u))Ψ)(u;p)]|η1(v,u)2|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[2|Ψ(u)|+η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)].

    Corollary 5.3. In theorem 5.2, η1(u,v)=uv, u,vI gives

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]vu2|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[2|Ψ(u)|+η2(|Ψ(v)|,|Ψ(u)|)].

    Corollary 5.4. In theorem (5.2), η1(u,v)=uv, u,vI, and η2(u,v)=uv, u,vΨ(I) gives

    |Ψ(u)+Ψ(v)2Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12(vu)×[(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;u+Ψ)(v;p)+(Tμ,ξ,m,σ,cv1,η,ρ,γ;(v)Ψ)(u;p)]|vu2|Jμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(1)μ;p)12vJμ,ξ,m,σ,cv+1,η,ρ,γ(ω(12)μ;p)|[|Ψ(u)|+|Ψ(v)|].

    Various researchers have studied integral inequalities due to their wide applications in both pure and applied mathematics. This paper discussed the new version of integral inequalities such as Hermite-Hadamard type and trapezoid type inequalities for the convex function by utilizing generalized fractional integrals concerning the extended Wright generalized Bessel function as a kernel. Also, we established new mid-point type and trapezoidal type integral inequalities for (η1,η2)-convex function related to Hermite-Hadamard and Fejér type inequalities. All the inequalities presented in this paper are more general than the inequalities available in the literature, which can easily observe from the corollaries.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Research Group Program under Grant No. RGP. 2/51/42.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interest.



    [1] S. Kumar, K. S. Nisar, R. Kumar, C. Cattani, B. Samet, A new Rabotnov fractional exponential functional based fractional derivative for diffusion equation under external force, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 4460–4471.
    [2] B. Ghanbari, S. Kumar, R. Kumar, A study of behaviour for immune and tumor cells in immunogenetic tumour model with non-singular fractional derivative, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 133 (2020), 109619. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109619
    [3] K. K. Ali, M. A. Abd El Salam, E. M. Mohamed, B. Samet, S. Kumar, M. S. Osman, Numerical solution for generalized nonlinear fractional integro-differential equations with linear functional arguments using Chebyshev series, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2438-0
    [4] S. Kumar, S. Ghosh, M. S. Lotayif, B. Samet, A model for describing the velocity of a particle in Brownian motion by Robotnov function based fractional operator, Alexandria Eng. J., 59 (2020), 1435–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.04.019
    [5] S. Kumar, R. Kumar, J. Singh, K. S. Nisar, D. Kumar, An efficient numerical scheme for fractional model of HIV-1 infection of CD4+ T-cells with the effect of antiviral drug therapy, Alexandria Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2053–2064. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.046
    [6] C. Ravichandran, K. Logeswari, S. K. Panda, K. S. Nisar, On new approach of fractional derivative by Mittag-Leffler kernel to neutral integro-differential systems with impulsive conditions, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 139 (2020), 110012. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110012
    [7] G. Rahman, K. S. Nisar, T. Abdeljawad, M. Samraiz, Some new tempered fractional Pólya-Szegö and Chebyshev-Type inequalities with respect to another function, J. Math., 2020 (2020), 9858671.
    [8] M. Samraiz, F. Nawaz, S. Iqbal, T. Abdeljawad, G. Rahman, K. S. Nisar, Certain mean-type fractional integral inequalities via different convexities with applications, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2265-6
    [9] J. E. Peajcariaac, Y. L. Tong, Convex functions, partial orderings, and statistical applications, Academic Press, 1992.
    [10] S. S. Dragomir, C. Pearce, Selected topics on Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and applications, Math. Prepr. Arch., 2003 (2003), 463–817.
    [11] S. Mehmood, F. Zafar, N. Yasmin, New Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for (η1,η2)-convex functions via fractional calculus, ScienceAsia, 46 (2020), 102–108. doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2020.012
    [12] S. M. Aslani, M. R. Delavar, S. M. Vaezpour, Inequalities of Fejér Type related to generalized convex functions, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 16 (2018), 38–49.
    [13] M. Rostamian Delavar, S. Mohammadi Aslani, M. De La Sen, Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér inequality related to generalized convex functions via fractional integrals, J. Math., 2018 (2018), 5864091.
    [14] M. E. Gordji, M. R. Delavar, M. De La Sen, On ϕ-convex functions, J. Math. Inequal., 10 (2016), 173–183.
    [15] M. E. Gordji, M. R. Delavar, S. S. Dragomir, Some inequalities related to η-convex functions, Prepr. Rgmia Res. Rep. Coll., 18 (2015), 1–14.
    [16] M. R. Delavar, S. S. Dragomir, On η-convexity, J. Inequal. Appl., 20 (2017), 203–216.
    [17] M. Eshaghi, S. S. Dragomir, Rostamian Delavar, M. An inequality related to η-convex functions (Ⅱ), Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., 6 (2015), 27–33.
    [18] V. Jeyakumar, (1984) Strong and weak invexity in mathematical programming, In: Methods of Operations Research, Vol. 55,109–125.
    [19] A. Ben-Israel, B. Mond, What is invexity? J. Aust. Math. Soc., 28 (1986), 1–9.
    [20] M. A. Hanson, B. Mond, (1987) Convex transformable programming problems and invexity, J. Inf. Optim. Sci., 8(2), 201-207.
    [21] R. Gorenflo, F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus: integral and differential equations of fractional order, arXiv Preprint, (2008), arXiv: 0805.3823.
    [22] M. Andric, G. Farid, (2019) A generalization of Mittag-Leffler function associated with Opial type inequalities due to Mitrinovic and Pecaric, Preprint.
    [23] T. O. Salim, A. W. Faraj, A generalization of Mittag-Leffler function and integral operator associated with fractional calculus, J. Fract. Calc. Appl, 3 (2012), 1–13. doi: 10.1142/9789814355216_0001
    [24] T. N. Srivastava, Y. P. Singh, On Maitland's generalised Bessel Function, Can. Math. Bull., 11 (1968), 739–741. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1968-091-5
    [25] M. Z. Sarikaya, E. Set, H. Yaldiz, N. Basak, Hermite-Hadamard's inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities, Math. Comput. Modell., 57 (2013), 2403–2407. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.048
    [26] G. H. Toader, (1984) Some generalizations of the convexity, Proceedings of the Colloquium on Approximation and Optimization, Univ. Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, 1985,329–338.
    [27] L. Fejér, Über die fourierreihen, Ⅱ, Math. Naturwiss. Anz Ungar. Akad. Wiss, (1906), 24.
    [28] K. L. Tseng, S. R. Hwang, S. S. Dragomir, Fejér-type inequalities (Ⅰ), J. Inequalities Appl., 2010 (2010), 531976. doi: 10.1155/2010/531976
    [29] H. Chen, U. N. Katugampola, Hermite-Hadamard and Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for generalized fractional integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 446 (2017), 1274–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.09.018
    [30] C. J. Huang, G. Rahman, K. S. Nisar, A. Ghaffar, F. Qi, Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for k-fractional conformable integrals, Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 16 (2019), 1–9.
    [31] K. S. Nisar, G. Rahman, K. Mehrez, Chebyshev type inequalities via generalized fractional conformable integrals, J. Inequal. Appl., 2019 (2019), 245. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2197-1
    [32] K. S. Niasr, A. Tassadiq, G. Rahman, A. Khan, (2019) Some inequalities via fractional conformable integral operators, J. Inequal. Appl., 2019 (2019), 217. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2170-z
    [33] G. Rahmnan, T. Abdeljawad, F. Jarad, K. S. Nisar, Bounds of generalized proportional fractional integrals in general form via convex functions and their applications, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 113. doi: 10.3390/math8010113
    [34] R. S. Ali, S. Mubeen, I. Nayab, S. Araci, G. Rahman, K. S. Nisar, Some fractional operators with the generalized Bessel-Maitland function, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2020 (2020), 1378457.
    [35] A. Petojevic, A note about the Pochhammer symbol, Math. Moravica, 12 (2008), 37–42.
    [36] S. Mubeen, R. S. Ali, Fractional operators with generalized Mittag-Leffler k-function. Adv. Differ. Equ., 2019 (2019), 520.
    [37] R. S. Ali, S. Mubeen, M. M. Ahmad, A class of fractional integral operators with multi-index Mittag-Leffler k-function and Bessel k-function of first kind, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 22 (2020), 266–281. doi: 10.22436/jmcs.022.03.06
    [38] S. Mubeen, R. S. Ali, I. Nayab, G. Rahman, T. Abdeljawad, K. S. Nisar, Integral transforms of an extended generalized multi-index Bessel function, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 7531–7547. doi: 10.3934/math.2020482
    [39] S. Mehmood, F. Zafar, N. Yasmin, Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for Preinvex functions using fractional integrals, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 467. doi: 10.3390/math7050467
    [40] N. Mehreen, M. Anwar, Hermite-Hadamard and Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for p-convex functions via conformable fractional integrals, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 107. doi: 10.1186/s13660-020-02363-3
    [41] O. Almutairi, A. Kılıçman, New fractional inequalities of midpoint type via s-convexity and their application, J. Inequal. Appl., 2019 (2019), 267. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2215-3
    [42] H. Budak, On Fejér type inequalities for convex mappings utilizing fractional integrals of a function with respect to another function, Res. Math., 74 (2019), 29. doi: 10.1007/s00025-019-0960-8
    [43] E. D. Rainville, Special functions, Chelsea Publ. Co., Bronx, New York, 1971.
    [44] P. Agarwal, M. Chand, D. Baleanu, D. ÓRegan, S. Jain, On the solutions of certain fractional kinetic equations involving k-Mittag-Leffler function, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 249. doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1694-8
    [45] K. Saoudi, P. Agarwal, P. Kumam, A. Ghanmi, P. Thounthong, The Nehari manifold for a boundary value problem involving Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative, Adv. Differ, Equ., 2018 (2018), 263. doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1722-8
    [46] P. Agarwal, J. Choi, Certain fractional integral inequalities associated with pathway fractional integral operators, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 53 (2016), 181–193. doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2016.53.1.181
    [47] P. O. Mohammed, T. Abdeljawad, M. A. Alqudah, F. Jarad, New dscrete inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for convex functions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 122. doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03290-3
    [48] D. Baleanu, A. Kashuri, P. O. Mohammed, B. Meftah, General Raina fractional integral inequalities on coordinated of convex functions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 82. doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03241-y
    [49] P. O. Mohammed, M. Z. Sarikaya, On generalized fractional integral inequalities for twice differentiable convex functions, J. Compt. Appl. Math., 2020 (2020), 372.
    [50] A. Fernandez, P. O. Mohammed, Hermite-Hadamard inequalities in fractional calculus defined using Mittag-Leffler kernels, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 2020 (2020), 1–18.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Rana Safdar Ali, Shahid Mubeen, Sabila Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Jihad Younis, Asad Ali, Umair Ali, Generalized Hermite–Hadamard-Type Integral Inequalities forh-Godunova–Levin Functions, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/9113745
    2. Muhammad Tariq, Omar Mutab Alsalami, Asif Ali Shaikh, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, New Fractional Integral Inequalities Pertaining to Caputo–Fabrizio and Generalized Riemann–Liouville Fractional Integral Operators, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 618, 10.3390/axioms11110618
    3. Majid Choudhary, Mohammad Khan, Mohd Siddiqi, Some Basic Inequalities on (ϵ)-Para Sasakian Manifold, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2585, 10.3390/sym14122585
    4. Shabir Ahmad, Aman Ullah, Mohammad Partohaghighi, Sayed Saifullah, Ali Akgül, Fahd Jarad, Oscillatory and complex behaviour of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order HIV-1 infection model, 2021, 7, 2473-6988, 4778, 10.3934/math.2022265
    5. Saowaluck Chasreechai, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Surapol Naowarat, Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Kamsing Nonlaopon, On some Simpson's and Newton's type of inequalities in multiplicative calculus with applications, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 3885, 10.3934/math.2023193
    6. YONGFANG QI, QINGZHI WEN, GUOPING LI, KECHENG XIAO, SHAN WANG, DISCRETE HERMITE–HADAMARD-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR (s,m)-CONVEX FUNCTION, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22501602
    7. Wedad Saleh, Abdelghani Lakhdari, Adem Kiliçman, Assia Frioui, Badreddine Meftah, Some new fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for functions with co-ordinated extended s,m-prequasiinvex mixed partial derivatives, 2023, 72, 11100168, 261, 10.1016/j.aej.2023.03.080
    8. Yaqun Niu, Rana Safdar Ali, Naila Talib, Shahid Mubeen, Gauhar Rahman, Çetin Yildiz, Fuad A. Awwad, Emad A. A. Ismail, Wilfredo Urbina, Exploring Advanced Versions of Hermite‐Hadamard and Trapezoid‐Type Inequalities by Implementation of Fuzzy Interval‐Valued Functions, 2024, 2024, 2314-8896, 10.1155/2024/1988187
    9. Asif Ali Shaikh, Evren Hincal, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon, Muhammad Tariq, Some Hadamard-Type Integral Inequalities Involving Modified Harmonic Exponential Type Convexity, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 454, 10.3390/axioms12050454
    10. Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Rana Safdar Ali, Humira Saif, Mdi Begum Jeelani, Gauhar Rahman, Yasser Elmasry, Certain Novel Fractional Integral Inequalities via Fuzzy Interval Valued Functions, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 580, 10.3390/fractalfract7080580
    11. Xuewu Zuo, Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Umar, Hüseyin Budak, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Novel q-Differentiable Inequalities, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1576, 10.3390/sym15081576
    12. Badreddine Meftah, Djamal Foukrach, Some new Gronwall–Bellman–Bihari type integral inequality associated with ψ-Hilfer fractional derivative, 2023, 43, 0174-4747, 117, 10.1515/anly-2022-1073
    13. Khaled Mehrez, Kamel Brahim, Sergei M. Sitnik, Class of bounds of the generalized Volterra functions, 2024, 74, 0139-9918, 365, 10.1515/ms-2024-0028
    14. Rana Safdar Ali, Humira Sif, Gauhar Rehman, Ahmad Aloqaily, Nabil Mlaiki, Significant Study of Fuzzy Fractional Inequalities with Generalized Operators and Applications, 2024, 8, 2504-3110, 690, 10.3390/fractalfract8120690
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2704) PDF downloads(127) Cited by(14)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog