Research article

Existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance

  • This paper aims to study the existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance. Based on the coincidence degree theory, some new results are established. Moreover, an example is given to verify our main results.

    Citation: Teng-Fei Shen, Jian-Gen Liu, Xiao-Hui Shen. Existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28895-28905. doi: 10.3934/math.20241402

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xiping Liu, Mei Jia, Zhanbing Bai . Nonlocal problems of fractional systems involving left and right fractional derivatives at resonance. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3331-3345. doi: 10.3934/math.2020214
    [2] Choukri Derbazi, Hadda Hammouche . Caputo-Hadamard fractional differential equations with nonlocal fractional integro-differential boundary conditions via topological degree theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2694-2709. doi: 10.3934/math.2020174
    [3] Lei Hu, Cheng Wang, Shuqin Zhang . New results for nonlinear fractional jerk equations with resonant boundary value conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5801-5812. doi: 10.3934/math.2020372
    [4] Hui Huang, Kaihong Zhao, Xiuduo Liu . On solvability of BVP for a coupled Hadamard fractional systems involving fractional derivative impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19221-19236. doi: 10.3934/math.20221055
    [5] Muath Awadalla, Manigandan Murugesan, Subramanian Muthaiah, Bundit Unyong, Ria H Egami . Existence results for a system of sequential differential equations with varying fractional orders via Hilfer-Hadamard sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9926-9950. doi: 10.3934/math.2024486
    [6] Subramanian Muthaiah, Manigandan Murugesan, Muath Awadalla, Bundit Unyong, Ria H. Egami . Ulam-Hyers stability and existence results for a coupled sequential Hilfer-Hadamard-type integrodifferential system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16203-16233. doi: 10.3934/math.2024784
    [7] Pinghua Yang, Caixia Yang . The new general solution for a class of fractional-order impulsive differential equations involving the Riemann-Liouville type Hadamard fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11837-11850. doi: 10.3934/math.2023599
    [8] Subramanian Muthaiah, Dumitru Baleanu, Nandha Gopal Thangaraj . Existence and Hyers-Ulam type stability results for nonlinear coupled system of Caputo-Hadamard type fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 168-194. doi: 10.3934/math.2021012
    [9] Cuiying Li, Rui Wu, Ranzhuo Ma . Existence of solutions for Caputo fractional iterative equations under several boundary value conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 317-339. doi: 10.3934/math.2023015
    [10] Shaista Gul, Rahmat Ali Khan, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . On a general class of $ n $th order sequential hybrid fractional differential equations with boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9740-9760. doi: 10.3934/math.2023491
  • This paper aims to study the existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance. Based on the coincidence degree theory, some new results are established. Moreover, an example is given to verify our main results.



    In this paper, we are concerned with the following nonlocal fractional integral boundary value problem with mean curvature operator.

    {HDβ1+(φp(HDα1+u(t))1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2)=f(t,u(t)), t(1,T),u(1)=HDα1+u(1)=0, HDα11+u(T)=mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα11+u(ξi)), (1.1)

    where HDβ1+,HDα1+ are Hadamard fractional derivatives and RIγi1+ are Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, 1<α<2, 0<β<1, 2<α+β<3, γi>0, ζi>0, 1<ξi<T i=1.2.3,...,m, m are positive integers, f:[1,T]×RR is continuous, φp is a p-Laplacian operator that for sR and s0, φp(s)=|s|p2s, φp(0)=0, and its inverse is φq, p>1, q>1, 1p+1q=1.

    With the development of the fundamental theory of fractional calculus, fractional order differential equations have been applied in many practical problems (see [1,2]). For more research on the qualitative theory of fractional differential equations, it can be found in [3,4] and references therein. The Hadamard fractional order differential equation that comes from mechanical problems is one of the more important types of fractional order differential equations. Based on the Dhage-type fixed point theorem, Ahmad and Ntouyas [5] investigated the existence of solutions for a nonlocal initial value problem of Hadamard fractional hybrid differential equations as follows:

    {HDα1+(u(t)f(t,u(t)))=g(t,u(t)), t[1,T],HI1α1+u(t)t=1=η, (1.2)

    where HDα1+ is Hadamard fractional derivative, HI1α1+ is Hadamard fractional integral, 0<α1, fC([1,T]×R,R{0}) and gC([1,T]×R,R). Moreover, in [6], they also considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a Hadamard fractional integral boundary value problem via some fixed-point theorems. Recently, Ahmad and Ntouyas [7] and Ahmad, Alsaedi, Ntouyas, Tariboon [8] further discussed the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Hilfer-Hadamard and Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems. Subsequently, Pei, Wang, and Sun [9] studied the existence of solutions for the Hadamard fractional integro-differential equation on infinite domain with a nonlocal boundary condition by the monotone iterative method. Based on Mawhin's continuation theorem, Zhang and Liu [10] considered a Hadamard fractional integral boundary value on an infinite interval at resonance. Meanwhile, there are many scholars studying boundary value problems of Hadamard fractional order differential equations by some different methods such as fixed point index (see [11]), fixed point theorem (see [12,13,14]), coincidence degree theory (see [15]). Furthermore, for more papers on the qualitative analysis of fractional order models, please refer to [16,17,18] and references therein. On the other hand, in recent years, many scholars have paid more attention to second-order integer differential equations with mean curvature operators from the perspective of qualitative theory, which originates from relativity theory (see [19,20,21]). Therefore, this topic is very meaningful. Recently, Alves and Torres Ledesma [22] obtained the existence of infinite many solutions to the prescribed mean curvature equation on the smooth bounded domain via Clark's theorem. Subsequently, Torres Ledesma [23] considered the multiplicity of solutions for the following prescribed mean curvature equations with local conditions by variational methods.

    {div(u1+|u|2)=f(x,u), in Ω,u=0 on Ω, (1.3)

    where ΩRN that N1 is a smooth bounded domain, fC(Ω×R,R) and satisfies the local conditions with respect to u at the origin.

    Motivated by the works mentioned above, by the coincidence degree theory, which is a classical method and can be used to deal with the boundary value problems at resonance, the existence of solutions for a nonlocal boundary value problem of Hadamard fractional order differential equations with mean curvature operator at resonance (1.1) has been studied. The innovations of our paper are presented in the following aspects: To begin with, the mean curvature operator is a nonlinear operator, which is more complex than the linear case and brings some difficulties in the estimation of the boundedness of solutions. Moreover, our main results provide a perspective for future research of fractional order differential equations with mean curvature operators.

    For the basic definitions and properties of Hadamard fractional integral and derivative, one can refer to [1,2].

    Definition 2.1. [1,2] The Hadamard-type fractional integral of order α>0 of a function u:[1,T]R, is defined by

    HIα1+u(t)=1Γ(α)t1(lnts)α1u(s)dss,

    provided the integral exists, where Γ() means the well-known Gamma function.

    Definition 2.2. [1,2] The Hadamard-type fractional derivative of order α>0 of a function u:[1,T]R, is defined by

    HDα1+u(t)=1Γ(nα)(tddt)nt1(lnts)nα1u(s)dss,

    provided the integral exists that can be operated by (tddt)n, where n=[α]+1.

    Lemma 2.3. [1] Setting α>0, n=[α]+1, the equation HDα1+u(t)=0 is valid if and only if

    u(t)=ni=1ci(lnt)αi,

    where ciR, i=1,2,...,n.

    Lemma 2.4. [1] Letting α>0, 1γ+, then for uLγ(1,T)

    HDα1+HIα1+u=u.

    And if HDα1+uLγ(1,T), one has

    HIα1+HDα1+u(t)=u(t)+ni=1ci(lnt)αi,

    where ciR,i=1,2,...,n,n1<α<n.

    Next, some basic knowledge with regard to coincidence degree theory will be presented, which can be founded in [24]. Let X and Y be real Banach spaces, and L:dom LXY be a Fredholm operator with index zero, which yields that there exist two continuous linear projectors P:XX, Q:YY such that Im P=Ker L, Ker Q=Im L, X=Ker LKer P, Y=Im LIm Q and L|domL  Ker P:dom LKer PIm L is invertible. Let KP represent the inverse of L|dom L  Ker P.

    Definition 2.5. [24] Let L:dom LXY be a Fredholm operator with index zero. Assuming that UX is an open bounded subset and dom L¯U, if QN:¯UY is bounded and KP,QN:=KP(IQ)N:¯UX is compact, the map N:XY is called Lcompact on ¯U.

    Lemma 2.6. [24] Let L:dom LXY be a Fredholm operator of index zero and N:XY be Lcompact on ¯U. Assume that the following conditions are satisfied

    (i) LuλNu for every (u,λ)[(dom LKer L)U]×(0,1),

    (ii) NuIm L for every uKer LU,

    (iii) deg(JQN|Ker L,Ker LU,0)0, where Q:YY is a projection such that Im L=Ker Q, J:Im QKer L is a homeomorphism. Then the equation Lu=Nu admits at least one solution in dom L¯U.

    Let Y=C[1,T] with the norm u=maxt[1,T]|u(t)|, X=Cα[1,T]. Throughout this article, assume that mi=1ζi(ξi1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1 and mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1lns ds<lnT. Since HDα1+u(1)=0, the problem (1.1) is equivalent to the following problem.

    {HDα1+u(t)=φq(1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2HIβ1+f(t,u(t))), t(1,T),u(1)=0, HDα11+u(T)=mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα11+u(ξi)). (3.1)

    In fact, on one hand, if HDα1+u(1)=0, by Lemma 2.4 and the invertibility of φp, we have

    HDα1+u(t)=φq(1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2HIβ1+f(t,u(t))).

    On the other hand, letting t=1, one has HIβ1+f(t,u(t))t=1=0. By the above equation, we have HDα1+u(1)=0.

    Let the operator L:dom LXY be defined by

    Lu=HDα1+u, (3.2)

    where

    dom L={uX|HDα1+uY, u(1)=0, HDα11+u(T)=mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα11+u(ξi))}.

    Let N:XY be given by

    Nu=φq(1+|φp(HDα1+u)|2HIβ1+f(t,u)).

    Therefore, the problem (3.1) can be convert to the following operator equation.

    Lu=Nu,  udom L.

    Next, some important conclusions will be given, which play an important role in proving the main results.

    Lemma 3.1. Let L be given by (3.2). Then

    Ker L={uX|u(t)=c(lnt)α1,cR}, (3.3)
    Im L={yY|mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))HI11+y(T)=0}. (3.4)

    Proof. Based on mi=1ζi(ξi1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1, it is not difficult to obtain (3.3). If yIm L, it follows that there exists a function udom L such that y(t)=HDα1+u(t). By u(1)=0, one has

    u(t)=HIα1+y(t)+c(lnt)α1, HDα11+u(t)=HI11+y(t)+cΓ(α),

    which implies that

    mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα11+u(ξi))=mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))+mi=1cΓ(α)ζi(ξi1)γiΓ(γi+1),

    where cR. Based on the boundary condition

    HDα11+u(T)=mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα11+u(ξi)),

    we have

    mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))+mi=1cΓ(α)ζi(ξi1)γiΓ(γi+1)=HI11+y(T)+cΓ(α).

    From mi=1ζi(ξi1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1, it follows that

    mi=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))HI11+y(T)=0. (3.5)

    On the other hand, assuming that yY satisfies (3.5) and letting u(t)=HIα1+y(t), we have udom L and Lu(t)=HDα1+u(t)=y(t), which implies that yIm L. Thus, (3.4) holds.

    Let P:XX and Q:YY be the linear continuous operators given by

    Pu(t)=1Γ(α)HDα11+u(1)(lnt)α1,Qy(t)=Λ(mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1s1y(τ)dττdsT1y(s)dss),

    where

    Λ=1mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1lns dslnT.

    It implies that

    P2u(t)=1Γ(α)HDα11+(Pu(t))t=1(lnt)α1=Pu(t),Q2y(t)=Λ(mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1s1Qy(τ)dττdsT1Qy(s)dss)=Qy(t).

    So, the operators P and Q are idempotent, which yields that they are projector operators. It is obvious that X=Ker LKer P, Y=Im LIm Q. Since dimIm Q=1, we can obtain dimKer L=codim Im L=1, and L is a Fredholm operator of index zero. Define KP:Im Ldom LKer P by KPy=HIα1+y, which implies that its inverse is L|dom L  Ker P. Based on the continuity of f and the standard arguments, it follows that N is L-compact on ¯U.

    Theorem 3.2. Assume that the following conditions hold.

    (G1) There exists a positive function ψX such that |f(t,u)|ψ(t) for any (t,u)[1,T]×R.

    (G2) For any udom L, there exist constants A>0,1<κ<T such that if |u(t)|>A for any t[κ,T], either

    sgn{u(t)}QN(u(t))>0,

    or

    sgn{u(t)}QN(u(t))<0.

    Then the problem (1.1) admits at least one solution, provided that

    (lnT)2βψ2(Γ(β+1))2<1. (3.6)

    Proof. Define

    U1={udom LKer L | Lu=λNu, λ(0,1)}.

    If uU1, it follows NuIm L. In view of Im L=Ker Q, one has QNu=0. Based on (G2), we can find a constant η[κ,T] such that |u(η)|A. Since u(1)=0, it implies

    u(t)=HIα1+HDα1+u(t)+c(lnt)α1,

    where cR, which leads to

    |c|1(lnη)α1[|u(η)|+1Γ(α)η1(lnηlns)α1|HDα1+u(s)|dss]1(lnη)α1(A+(lnη)αΓ(α+1)HDα1+u),

    and

    u2(lnT)αΓ(α+1)HDα1+u+A(lnTlnκ)α1. (3.7)

    In view of Lu=λNu, one has

    HDα1+u(t)=λφq(1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2HIβ1+f(t,u(t))),

    which leads to

    |φp(HDα1+u(t))|2=λ2p2[(1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2)(HIβ1+f(t,u(t)))2]. (3.8)

    Since

    |HIβ1+f(t,u(t))|(lnT)βψΓ(β+1),

    and |φp(HDα1+u(t))|2=|HDα1+u(t)|2p2, from (3.8), it follows

    |HDα1+u(t)|2p2(1+|HDα1+u(t)|2p2)(lnT)2βψ2(Γ(β+1))2. (3.9)

    Since (lnT)2βψ2(Γ(β+1))2<1, there exists a constant r1>0 such that HDα1+u<r1. From (3.7), we have

    u2(lnT)αr1Γ(α+1)+A(lnTlnκ)α1, (3.10)

    which means that U1 is bounded.

    Define

    U2={u|uKer L, NuIm L}.

    If uU2, it follows u(t)=c(lnt)α1, cR and NuIm L, which imply QN[c(lnt)α1]=0. By (G2), we can find that |c|A(lnκ)α1. which means that U2 is bounded.

    Define J1:Ker LIm Q by J1(c(lnt)α1)=c, cRt[1,T]. Set

    U3={uKer L|λJ1u+(1λ)QNu=0, λ[0,1]}.

    It follows

    λc+(1λ)Λ[mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1s1φq(HIβ1+f(τ,c(lnτ)α1))dττds   T1φq(HIβ1+f(s,c(lns)α1))dss]=0. (3.11)

    From the first assumption of (G2), if λ=0, one has |c|A(lnκ)α1. Let λ(0,1], it follows |c|A(lnκ)α1. Otherwise, if |c|>A(lnκ)α1, based on the first assumption of (G2), we can obtain

    λsgn[c(lnt)α1]c    +(1λ)Λsgn[c(lnt)α1][mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1s1φq(HIβ1+f(τ,c(lnτ)α1))dττds    T1φq(HIβ1+f(s,c(lns)α1))dss]>0, (3.12)

    for any t[κ,T]. By choosing t=T, it is in direct contradiction to (3.11). So, U3 is bounded.

    Define

    U3={uKer L|λJ1u+(1λ)QNu=0, λ[0,1]}.

    By the same way, from the second assumption of (G2), U3 is bounded.

    Define U={uX|u<2(lnT)αr1Γ(α+1)+A(lnTlnκ)α1+1}, which implies that the conditions (i) and (ii) of Lemma 2.6 is satisfied. Let

    F(u,λ)=±λJ1(u)+(1λ)QNu.

    It follows F(U,λ)0 for UKer LU. So, we have

    deg(JQN|Ker L,UKer L,0)=deg(F(,0),UKer L,0)=deg(F(,1),UKer L,0)=deg(±I,UKer L,0)0,

    which tell us that the condition (iii) of Lemma 2.6 is fulfilled. Hence, we know that Lu=Nu admits at least one solution in dom L¯U. Then the problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

    Example. The following example was given to verify our main results.

    {HD341+(HD321+u(t)1+|HD321+u(t))|2)=12lnt+124sin(u(t))+124, t(1,e),u(1)=HD321+u(1)=0, HD121+u(e)=RI11+(HD121+u(2)), (3.13)

    where α=32, β=34, T=e, m=1, p=q=2, γ1=1, ζ1=1, ξ1=2, f(t,u(t))=12lnt+124sin(u(t))+124. It follows that

    mi=1ζi(ξi1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1Γ(2)=1,

    and

    mi=1ζiΓ(γi)ξi1(ξis)γi1lns ds=21lns ds=2ln21<1.

    Let ψ(t)=23lnt+112, t[1,e], which implies that the (G1) of Theorem 3.2 is satisfied and

    (lnT)2βψ2(Γ(β+1))2=916(Γ(74))20.67<1.

    Set κ=32. For t[κ,e], we have

    QN(u(t))=12ln22(21s11+|HD321+u(τ)|2HI341+(12lnτ+124sin(u(τ))+124)dττdsT11+|HD321+u(s)|2HI341+(12lns+124sin(u(s))+124)dss)=12ln22(21s11+|HD321+u(τ)|2HI341+(12lnτ+124sin(u(τ))+124)dττds21e11+|HD321+u(τ)|2HI341+(12lnτ+124sin(u(τ))+124)dττds)>0.

    Letting A=2, if u(t)>2, the first part of (G2) in Theorem 3.2 is satisfied. Moreover, if u(t)<2, the second part of (G2) in Theorem 3.2 is fulfilled. Thus, from Theorem 3.2, the problem (3.13) admits at least one solution.

    In this paper, we are concerned with the existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance via the coincidence degree theory. By constructing the continuous linear projectors and performing spatial decomposition, we obtained some new results. Formally, we have extended the form of the integer order equation in [22,23] to the Hadamard fractional order case. Methodologically, we use the coincidence degree theory to study the existence of solutions to nonlocal boundary problems of Hadamard fractional order mean curvature equations, while [22,23] use the variational method to study the existence of solutions to Dirichlet boundary value problems of integer order mean curvature equations. Moreover, our results may provide a perspective for future research of fractional order differential equations with mean curvature operators. Furthermore, in the future, we will attempt to investigate the multiplicity and stability of solutions to such fractional boundary value problems with mean curvature operators.

    Tengfei Shen: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-review and editing; Jiangen Liu: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-review and editing; Xiaohui Shen: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-review and editing. All authors of this article have been contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.12101532), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No.BK20230708) and the Natural Science Foundation for the Universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 23KJB110003).

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006.
    [2] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equation, San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.
    [3] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives, theory and applications, Yverdon: Gordon and Breach, 1993.
    [4] Y. Zhou, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, Singapore: World Scientific, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1142/9069
    [5] B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, Initial-value problems for hybrid Hadamard fractional differential equations, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 2014 (2014), 1–8. Available from: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu/.
    [6] B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, On Hadamard fractional integro-differential boundary value problems, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 47 (2015), 119–131. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-014-0765-6 doi: 10.1007/s12190-014-0765-6
    [7] B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, Hilfer-Hadamard fractional boundary value problems with nonlocal mixed boundary conditions, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040195 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040195
    [8] B. Ahmad, A. Alsaedi, S. K. Ntouyas, J. Tariboon, Hadamard-type fractional differential equations, inclusions and inequalities, Berlin: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52141-1
    [9] K. Pei, G. T. Wang, Y. Y. Sun, Successive iterations and positive extremal solutions for a Hadamard type fractional integro-differential equations on infinite domain, Appl. Math. Comput., 312 (2017), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.05.056 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.05.056
    [10] W. Zhang, W. B. Liu, Existence of solutions for several higher-order Hadamard-type fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions on infinite interval, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-018-1053-4 doi: 10.1186/s13661-018-1053-4
    [11] J. Jiang, D. O'Regan, J. Xu, Y. Cui, Positive solutions for a Hadamard fractional p-laplacian three-point boundary value problem, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050439 doi: 10.3390/math7050439
    [12] J. R. Wang, Y. Zhang, On the concept and existence of solutions for fractional impulsive systems with Hadamard derivatives, Appl. Math. Lett., 39 (2015), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2014.08.015 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.08.015
    [13] C. Zhai, W. Wang, H. Li, A uniqueness method to a new Hadamard fractional differential system with four-point boundary conditions, J. Inequal. Appl., 2018 (2018), 207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1801-0 doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1801-0
    [14] T. Shen, Multiplicity of positive solutions to Hadamard-type fractional relativistic oscillator equation with p-Laplacian operator, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7060427 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7060427
    [15] M. Benchohra, S. Bouriah, A. Salim, Y. Zhou, Fractional differential equations: A coincidence degree approach, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111334387
    [16] P. L. Li, R. Gao, C. J. Xu, Y. Li, A. Akgül, D. Baleanu, Dynamics exploration for a fractional-order delayed zooplankton-phytoplankton system, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 166 (2023), 112975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112975 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112975
    [17] Z. H. Liu, X. W. Li, Approximate controllability of fractional evolution systems with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives, SIAM J. Control Optim., 53 (4) (2015), 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1137/1209038 doi: 10.1137/1209038
    [18] X. W. Li, Z. H. Liu, J. Li, C. Tisdell, Existence and controllability for nonlinear fractional control systems with damping in Hilbert spaces, Acta Math. Sci., 39 (1) (2019), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-019-0118-5 doi: 10.1007/s10473-019-0118-5
    [19] C. Bereanu, J. Mawhin, Existence and multiplicity results for some nonlinear problems with singular ϕ-Laplacian, J. Differ. Equations., 243 (2007), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.014
    [20] P. Jebelean, J. Mawhin, C. Şerban, Multiple periodic solutions for perturbed relativistic pendulum systems, P. Am. Math. Soc., 143 (2015), 3029–3039. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2015-12542-7 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2015-12542-7
    [21] D. Arcoya, C. Sportelli, Relativistic equations with singular potentials, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 74 (2023), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-023-01977-z doi: 10.1007/s00033-023-01977-z
    [22] C. Alves, C. T. Ledesma, Multiplicity of solution for some slasses of prescribed mean curvature equation with Dirichlet boundary condition, J. Geom. Anal., 32 (2022), 262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-01010-1 doi: 10.1007/s12220-022-01010-1
    [23] C. T. Ledesma, Multiplicity of solutions for some classes of prescribed mean curvature equations with local conditions, Mediterr. J. Math., 20 (2023), 215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-023-02418-x doi: 10.1007/s00009-023-02418-x
    [24] J. Mawhin, Topological degree and boundary value problems for nonlinear differential equations in topological methods for ordinary differential equations, Lect. Notes Math., 1537 (1993), 74–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0085076 doi: 10.1007/BFb0085076
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(444) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog