This paper aims to study the existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance. Based on the coincidence degree theory, some new results are established. Moreover, an example is given to verify our main results.
Citation: Teng-Fei Shen, Jian-Gen Liu, Xiao-Hui Shen. Existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28895-28905. doi: 10.3934/math.20241402
[1] | Xiping Liu, Mei Jia, Zhanbing Bai . Nonlocal problems of fractional systems involving left and right fractional derivatives at resonance. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3331-3345. doi: 10.3934/math.2020214 |
[2] | Choukri Derbazi, Hadda Hammouche . Caputo-Hadamard fractional differential equations with nonlocal fractional integro-differential boundary conditions via topological degree theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2694-2709. doi: 10.3934/math.2020174 |
[3] | Lei Hu, Cheng Wang, Shuqin Zhang . New results for nonlinear fractional jerk equations with resonant boundary value conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5801-5812. doi: 10.3934/math.2020372 |
[4] | Hui Huang, Kaihong Zhao, Xiuduo Liu . On solvability of BVP for a coupled Hadamard fractional systems involving fractional derivative impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19221-19236. doi: 10.3934/math.20221055 |
[5] | Muath Awadalla, Manigandan Murugesan, Subramanian Muthaiah, Bundit Unyong, Ria H Egami . Existence results for a system of sequential differential equations with varying fractional orders via Hilfer-Hadamard sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9926-9950. doi: 10.3934/math.2024486 |
[6] | Subramanian Muthaiah, Manigandan Murugesan, Muath Awadalla, Bundit Unyong, Ria H. Egami . Ulam-Hyers stability and existence results for a coupled sequential Hilfer-Hadamard-type integrodifferential system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16203-16233. doi: 10.3934/math.2024784 |
[7] | Pinghua Yang, Caixia Yang . The new general solution for a class of fractional-order impulsive differential equations involving the Riemann-Liouville type Hadamard fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11837-11850. doi: 10.3934/math.2023599 |
[8] | Subramanian Muthaiah, Dumitru Baleanu, Nandha Gopal Thangaraj . Existence and Hyers-Ulam type stability results for nonlinear coupled system of Caputo-Hadamard type fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 168-194. doi: 10.3934/math.2021012 |
[9] | Cuiying Li, Rui Wu, Ranzhuo Ma . Existence of solutions for Caputo fractional iterative equations under several boundary value conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 317-339. doi: 10.3934/math.2023015 |
[10] | Shaista Gul, Rahmat Ali Khan, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . On a general class of $ n $th order sequential hybrid fractional differential equations with boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9740-9760. doi: 10.3934/math.2023491 |
This paper aims to study the existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance. Based on the coincidence degree theory, some new results are established. Moreover, an example is given to verify our main results.
In this paper, we are concerned with the following nonlocal fractional integral boundary value problem with mean curvature operator.
{HDβ1+(φp(HDα1+u(t))√1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2)=f(t,u(t)), t∈(1,T),u(1)=HDα1+u(1)=0, HDα−11+u(T)=m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα−11+u(ξi)), | (1.1) |
where HDβ1+,HDα1+ are Hadamard fractional derivatives and RIγi1+ are Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, 1<α<2, 0<β<1, 2<α+β<3, γi>0, ζi>0, 1<ξi<T i=1.2.3,...,m, m are positive integers, f:[1,T]×R→R is continuous, φp is a p-Laplacian operator that for s∈R and s≠0, φp(s)=|s|p−2s, φp(0)=0, and its inverse is φq, p>1, q>1, 1p+1q=1.
With the development of the fundamental theory of fractional calculus, fractional order differential equations have been applied in many practical problems (see [1,2]). For more research on the qualitative theory of fractional differential equations, it can be found in [3,4] and references therein. The Hadamard fractional order differential equation that comes from mechanical problems is one of the more important types of fractional order differential equations. Based on the Dhage-type fixed point theorem, Ahmad and Ntouyas [5] investigated the existence of solutions for a nonlocal initial value problem of Hadamard fractional hybrid differential equations as follows:
{HDα1+(u(t)f(t,u(t)))=g(t,u(t)), t∈[1,T],HI1−α1+u(t)∣t=1=η, | (1.2) |
where HDα1+ is Hadamard fractional derivative, HI1−α1+ is Hadamard fractional integral, 0<α≤1, f∈C([1,T]×R,R∖{0}) and g∈C([1,T]×R,R). Moreover, in [6], they also considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a Hadamard fractional integral boundary value problem via some fixed-point theorems. Recently, Ahmad and Ntouyas [7] and Ahmad, Alsaedi, Ntouyas, Tariboon [8] further discussed the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Hilfer-Hadamard and Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems. Subsequently, Pei, Wang, and Sun [9] studied the existence of solutions for the Hadamard fractional integro-differential equation on infinite domain with a nonlocal boundary condition by the monotone iterative method. Based on Mawhin's continuation theorem, Zhang and Liu [10] considered a Hadamard fractional integral boundary value on an infinite interval at resonance. Meanwhile, there are many scholars studying boundary value problems of Hadamard fractional order differential equations by some different methods such as fixed point index (see [11]), fixed point theorem (see [12,13,14]), coincidence degree theory (see [15]). Furthermore, for more papers on the qualitative analysis of fractional order models, please refer to [16,17,18] and references therein. On the other hand, in recent years, many scholars have paid more attention to second-order integer differential equations with mean curvature operators from the perspective of qualitative theory, which originates from relativity theory (see [19,20,21]). Therefore, this topic is very meaningful. Recently, Alves and Torres Ledesma [22] obtained the existence of infinite many solutions to the prescribed mean curvature equation on the smooth bounded domain via Clark's theorem. Subsequently, Torres Ledesma [23] considered the multiplicity of solutions for the following prescribed mean curvature equations with local conditions by variational methods.
{−div(▽u√1+|▽u|2)=f(x,u), in Ω,u=0 on ∂Ω, | (1.3) |
where Ω⊂RN that N≥1 is a smooth bounded domain, f∈C(Ω×R,R) and satisfies the local conditions with respect to u at the origin.
Motivated by the works mentioned above, by the coincidence degree theory, which is a classical method and can be used to deal with the boundary value problems at resonance, the existence of solutions for a nonlocal boundary value problem of Hadamard fractional order differential equations with mean curvature operator at resonance (1.1) has been studied. The innovations of our paper are presented in the following aspects: To begin with, the mean curvature operator is a nonlinear operator, which is more complex than the linear case and brings some difficulties in the estimation of the boundedness of solutions. Moreover, our main results provide a perspective for future research of fractional order differential equations with mean curvature operators.
For the basic definitions and properties of Hadamard fractional integral and derivative, one can refer to [1,2].
Definition 2.1. [1,2] The Hadamard-type fractional integral of order α>0 of a function u:[1,T]→R, is defined by
HIα1+u(t)=1Γ(α)∫t1(lnts)α−1u(s)dss, |
provided the integral exists, where Γ(⋅) means the well-known Gamma function.
Definition 2.2. [1,2] The Hadamard-type fractional derivative of order α>0 of a function u:[1,T]→R, is defined by
HDα1+u(t)=1Γ(n−α)(tddt)n∫t1(lnts)n−α−1u(s)dss, |
provided the integral exists that can be operated by (tddt)n, where n=[α]+1.
Lemma 2.3. [1] Setting α>0, n=[α]+1, the equation HDα1+u(t)=0 is valid if and only if
u(t)=n∑i=1ci(lnt)α−i, |
where ci∈R, i=1,2,...,n.
Lemma 2.4. [1] Letting α>0, 1≤γ≤+∞, then for u∈Lγ(1,T)
HDα1+HIα1+u=u. |
And if HDα1+u∈Lγ(1,T), one has
HIα1+HDα1+u(t)=u(t)+n∑i=1ci(lnt)α−i, |
where ci∈R,i=1,2,...,n,n−1<α<n.
Next, some basic knowledge with regard to coincidence degree theory will be presented, which can be founded in [24]. Let X and Y be real Banach spaces, and L:dom L⊂X→Y be a Fredholm operator with index zero, which yields that there exist two continuous linear projectors P:X→X, Q:Y→Y such that Im P=Ker L, Ker Q=Im L, X=Ker L⊕Ker P, Y=Im L⊕Im Q and L|domL ⋂ Ker P:dom L∩Ker P→Im L is invertible. Let KP represent the inverse of L|dom L ⋂ Ker P.
Definition 2.5. [24] Let L:dom L⊂X→Y be a Fredholm operator with index zero. Assuming that U⊂X is an open bounded subset and dom L∩¯U≠∅, if QN:¯U→Y is bounded and KP,QN:=KP(I−Q)N:¯U→X is compact, the map N:X→Y is called L−compact on ¯U.
Lemma 2.6. [24] Let L:dom L⊂X→Y be a Fredholm operator of index zero and N:X→Y be L−compact on ¯U. Assume that the following conditions are satisfied
(i) Lu≠λNu for every (u,λ)∈[(dom L∖Ker L)∩∂U]×(0,1),
(ii) Nu∉Im L for every u∈Ker L∩∂U,
(iii) deg(JQN|Ker L,Ker L∩U,0)≠0, where Q:Y→Y is a projection such that Im L=Ker Q, J:Im Q→Ker L is a homeomorphism. Then the equation Lu=Nu admits at least one solution in dom L∩¯U.
Let Y=C[1,T] with the norm ‖u‖∞=maxt∈[1,T]|u(t)|, X=Cα[1,T]. Throughout this article, assume that m∑i=1ζi(ξi−1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1 and m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1lns ds<lnT. Since HDα1+u(1)=0, the problem (1.1) is equivalent to the following problem.
{HDα1+u(t)=φq(√1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2HIβ1+f(t,u(t))), t∈(1,T),u(1)=0, HDα−11+u(T)=m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα−11+u(ξi)). | (3.1) |
In fact, on one hand, if HDα1+u(1)=0, by Lemma 2.4 and the invertibility of φp, we have
HDα1+u(t)=φq(√1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2HIβ1+f(t,u(t))). |
On the other hand, letting t=1, one has HIβ1+f(t,u(t))∣t=1=0. By the above equation, we have HDα1+u(1)=0.
Let the operator L:dom L⊂X→Y be defined by
Lu=HDα1+u, | (3.2) |
where
dom L={u∈X|HDα1+u∈Y, u(1)=0, HDα−11+u(T)=m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα−11+u(ξi))}. |
Let N:X→Y be given by
Nu=φq(√1+|φp(HDα1+u)|2HIβ1+f(t,u)). |
Therefore, the problem (3.1) can be convert to the following operator equation.
Lu=Nu, u∈dom L. |
Next, some important conclusions will be given, which play an important role in proving the main results.
Lemma 3.1. Let L be given by (3.2). Then
Ker L={u∈X|u(t)=c(lnt)α−1,c∈R}, | (3.3) |
Im L={y∈Y|m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))−HI11+y(T)=0}. | (3.4) |
Proof. Based on m∑i=1ζi(ξi−1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1, it is not difficult to obtain (3.3). If y∈Im L, it follows that there exists a function u∈dom L such that y(t)=HDα1+u(t). By u(1)=0, one has
u(t)=HIα1+y(t)+c(lnt)α−1, HDα−11+u(t)=HI11+y(t)+cΓ(α), |
which implies that
m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα−11+u(ξi))=m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))+m∑i=1cΓ(α)ζi(ξi−1)γiΓ(γi+1), |
where c∈R. Based on the boundary condition
HDα−11+u(T)=m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HDα−11+u(ξi)), |
we have
m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))+m∑i=1cΓ(α)ζi(ξi−1)γiΓ(γi+1)=HI11+y(T)+cΓ(α). |
From m∑i=1ζi(ξi−1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1, it follows that
m∑i=1ζiRIγi1+(HI11+y(ξi))−HI11+y(T)=0. | (3.5) |
On the other hand, assuming that y∈Y satisfies (3.5) and letting u(t)=HIα1+y(t), we have u∈dom L and Lu(t)=HDα1+u(t)=y(t), which implies that y∈Im L. Thus, (3.4) holds.
Let P:X→X and Q:Y→Y be the linear continuous operators given by
Pu(t)=1Γ(α)HDα−11+u(1)(lnt)α−1,Qy(t)=Λ(m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1∫s1y(τ)dττds−∫T1y(s)dss), |
where
Λ=1m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1lns ds−lnT. |
It implies that
P2u(t)=1Γ(α)HDα−11+(Pu(t))∣t=1(lnt)α−1=Pu(t),Q2y(t)=Λ(m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1∫s1Qy(τ)dττds−∫T1Qy(s)dss)=Qy(t). |
So, the operators P and Q are idempotent, which yields that they are projector operators. It is obvious that X=Ker L⊕Ker P, Y=Im L⊕Im Q. Since dimIm Q=1, we can obtain dimKer L=codim Im L=1, and L is a Fredholm operator of index zero. Define KP:Im L→dom L∩Ker P by KPy=HIα1+y, which implies that its inverse is L|dom L ⋂ Ker P. Based on the continuity of f and the standard arguments, it follows that N is L-compact on ¯U.
Theorem 3.2. Assume that the following conditions hold.
(G1) There exists a positive function ψ∈X such that |f(t,u)|≤ψ(t) for any (t,u)∈[1,T]×R.
(G2) For any u∈dom L, there exist constants A>0,1<κ<T such that if |u(t)|>A for any t∈[κ,T], either
sgn{u(t)}QN(u(t))>0, |
or
sgn{u(t)}QN(u(t))<0. |
Then the problem (1.1) admits at least one solution, provided that
(lnT)2β‖ψ‖2∞(Γ(β+1))2<1. | (3.6) |
Proof. Define
U1={u∈dom L∖Ker L | Lu=λNu, λ∈(0,1)}. |
If u∈U1, it follows Nu∈Im L. In view of Im L=Ker Q, one has QNu=0. Based on (G2), we can find a constant η∈[κ,T] such that |u(η)|≤A. Since u(1)=0, it implies
u(t)=HIα1+HDα1+u(t)+c(lnt)α−1, |
where c∈R, which leads to
|c|≤1(lnη)α−1[|u(η)|+1Γ(α)∫η1(lnη−lns)α−1|HDα1+u(s)|dss]≤1(lnη)α−1(A+(lnη)αΓ(α+1)‖HDα1+u‖∞), |
and
‖u‖∞≤2(lnT)αΓ(α+1)‖HDα1+u‖∞+A(lnTlnκ)α−1. | (3.7) |
In view of Lu=λNu, one has
HDα1+u(t)=λφq(√1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2HIβ1+f(t,u(t))), |
which leads to
|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2=λ2p−2[(1+|φp(HDα1+u(t))|2)(HIβ1+f(t,u(t)))2]. | (3.8) |
Since
|HIβ1+f(t,u(t))|≤(lnT)β‖ψ‖∞Γ(β+1), |
and |φp(HDα1+u(t))|2=|HDα1+u(t)|2p−2, from (3.8), it follows
|HDα1+u(t)|2p−2≤(1+|HDα1+u(t)|2p−2)(lnT)2β‖ψ‖2∞(Γ(β+1))2. | (3.9) |
Since (lnT)2β‖ψ‖2∞(Γ(β+1))2<1, there exists a constant r1>0 such that ‖HDα1+u‖∞<r1. From (3.7), we have
‖u‖∞≤2(lnT)αr1Γ(α+1)+A(lnTlnκ)α−1, | (3.10) |
which means that U1 is bounded.
Define
U2={u|u∈Ker L, Nu∈Im L}. |
If u∈U2, it follows u(t)=c(lnt)α−1, c∈R and Nu∈Im L, which imply QN[c(lnt)α−1]=0. By (G2), we can find that |c|≤A(lnκ)α−1. which means that U2 is bounded.
Define J−1:Ker L→Im Q by J−1(c(lnt)α−1)=c, c∈Rt∈[1,T]. Set
U3={u∈Ker L|λJ−1u+(1−λ)QNu=0, λ∈[0,1]}. |
It follows
λc+(1−λ)Λ[m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1∫s1φq(HIβ1+f(τ,c(lnτ)α−1))dττds −∫T1φq(HIβ1+f(s,c(lns)α−1))dss]=0. | (3.11) |
From the first assumption of (G2), if λ=0, one has |c|≤A(lnκ)α−1. Let λ∈(0,1], it follows |c|≤A(lnκ)α−1. Otherwise, if |c|>A(lnκ)α−1, based on the first assumption of (G2), we can obtain
λsgn[c(lnt)α−1]c +(1−λ)Λsgn[c(lnt)α−1][m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1∫s1φq(HIβ1+f(τ,c(lnτ)α−1))dττds −∫T1φq(HIβ1+f(s,c(lns)α−1))dss]>0, | (3.12) |
for any t∈[κ,T]. By choosing t=T, it is in direct contradiction to (3.11). So, U3 is bounded.
Define
U′3={u∈Ker L|−λJ−1u+(1−λ)QNu=0, λ∈[0,1]}. |
By the same way, from the second assumption of (G2), U′3 is bounded.
Define U={u∈X|‖u‖∞<2(lnT)αr1Γ(α+1)+A(lnTlnκ)α−1+1}, which implies that the conditions (i) and (ii) of Lemma 2.6 is satisfied. Let
F(u,λ)=±λJ−1(u)+(1−λ)QNu. |
It follows F(U,λ)≠0 for U∈Ker L∩∂U. So, we have
deg(JQN|Ker L,U∩Ker L,0)=deg(F(⋅,0),U∩Ker L,0)=deg(F(⋅,1),U∩Ker L,0)=deg(±I,U∩Ker L,0)≠0, |
which tell us that the condition (iii) of Lemma 2.6 is fulfilled. Hence, we know that Lu=Nu admits at least one solution in dom L∩¯U. Then the problem (1.1) has at least one solution.
Example. The following example was given to verify our main results.
{HD341+(HD321+u(t)√1+|HD321+u(t))|2)=12lnt+124sin(u(t))+124, t∈(1,e),u(1)=HD321+u(1)=0, HD121+u(e)=RI11+(HD121+u(2)), | (3.13) |
where α=32, β=34, T=e, m=1, p=q=2, γ1=1, ζ1=1, ξ1=2, f(t,u(t))=12lnt+124sin(u(t))+124. It follows that
m∑i=1ζi(ξi−1)γiΓ(γi+1)=1Γ(2)=1, |
and
m∑i=1ζiΓ(γi)∫ξi1(ξi−s)γi−1lns ds=∫21lns ds=2ln2−1<1. |
Let ψ(t)=23lnt+112, t∈[1,e], which implies that the (G1) of Theorem 3.2 is satisfied and
(lnT)2β‖ψ‖2∞(Γ(β+1))2=916(Γ(74))2≈0.67<1. |
Set κ=32. For t∈[κ,e], we have
QN(u(t))=12ln2−2(∫21∫s1√1+|HD321+u(τ)|2HI341+(12lnτ+124sin(u(τ))+124)dττds−∫T1√1+|HD321+u(s)|2HI341+(12lns+124sin(u(s))+124)dss)=12ln2−2(∫21∫s1√1+|HD321+u(τ)|2HI341+(12lnτ+124sin(u(τ))+124)dττds−∫21∫e1√1+|HD321+u(τ)|2HI341+(12lnτ+124sin(u(τ))+124)dττds)>0. |
Letting A=2, if u(t)>2, the first part of (G2) in Theorem 3.2 is satisfied. Moreover, if u(t)<−2, the second part of (G2) in Theorem 3.2 is fulfilled. Thus, from Theorem 3.2, the problem (3.13) admits at least one solution.
In this paper, we are concerned with the existence of solutions for Hadamard fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with mean curvature operator at resonance via the coincidence degree theory. By constructing the continuous linear projectors and performing spatial decomposition, we obtained some new results. Formally, we have extended the form of the integer order equation in [22,23] to the Hadamard fractional order case. Methodologically, we use the coincidence degree theory to study the existence of solutions to nonlocal boundary problems of Hadamard fractional order mean curvature equations, while [22,23] use the variational method to study the existence of solutions to Dirichlet boundary value problems of integer order mean curvature equations. Moreover, our results may provide a perspective for future research of fractional order differential equations with mean curvature operators. Furthermore, in the future, we will attempt to investigate the multiplicity and stability of solutions to such fractional boundary value problems with mean curvature operators.
Tengfei Shen: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-review and editing; Jiangen Liu: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-review and editing; Xiaohui Shen: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-review and editing. All authors of this article have been contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.12101532), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No.BK20230708) and the Natural Science Foundation for the Universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 23KJB110003).
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
[1] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. |
[2] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equation, San Diego: Academic Press, 1999. |
[3] | S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives, theory and applications, Yverdon: Gordon and Breach, 1993. |
[4] | Y. Zhou, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, Singapore: World Scientific, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1142/9069 |
[5] | B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, Initial-value problems for hybrid Hadamard fractional differential equations, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 2014 (2014), 1–8. Available from: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu/. |
[6] |
B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, On Hadamard fractional integro-differential boundary value problems, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 47 (2015), 119–131. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-014-0765-6 doi: 10.1007/s12190-014-0765-6
![]() |
[7] |
B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, Hilfer-Hadamard fractional boundary value problems with nonlocal mixed boundary conditions, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040195 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040195
![]() |
[8] | B. Ahmad, A. Alsaedi, S. K. Ntouyas, J. Tariboon, Hadamard-type fractional differential equations, inclusions and inequalities, Berlin: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52141-1 |
[9] |
K. Pei, G. T. Wang, Y. Y. Sun, Successive iterations and positive extremal solutions for a Hadamard type fractional integro-differential equations on infinite domain, Appl. Math. Comput., 312 (2017), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.05.056 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.05.056
![]() |
[10] |
W. Zhang, W. B. Liu, Existence of solutions for several higher-order Hadamard-type fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions on infinite interval, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-018-1053-4 doi: 10.1186/s13661-018-1053-4
![]() |
[11] |
J. Jiang, D. O'Regan, J. Xu, Y. Cui, Positive solutions for a Hadamard fractional p-laplacian three-point boundary value problem, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050439 doi: 10.3390/math7050439
![]() |
[12] |
J. R. Wang, Y. Zhang, On the concept and existence of solutions for fractional impulsive systems with Hadamard derivatives, Appl. Math. Lett., 39 (2015), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2014.08.015 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.08.015
![]() |
[13] |
C. Zhai, W. Wang, H. Li, A uniqueness method to a new Hadamard fractional differential system with four-point boundary conditions, J. Inequal. Appl., 2018 (2018), 207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1801-0 doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1801-0
![]() |
[14] |
T. Shen, Multiplicity of positive solutions to Hadamard-type fractional relativistic oscillator equation with p-Laplacian operator, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7060427 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7060427
![]() |
[15] | M. Benchohra, S. Bouriah, A. Salim, Y. Zhou, Fractional differential equations: A coincidence degree approach, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111334387 |
[16] |
P. L. Li, R. Gao, C. J. Xu, Y. Li, A. Akgül, D. Baleanu, Dynamics exploration for a fractional-order delayed zooplankton-phytoplankton system, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 166 (2023), 112975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112975 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112975
![]() |
[17] |
Z. H. Liu, X. W. Li, Approximate controllability of fractional evolution systems with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives, SIAM J. Control Optim., 53 (4) (2015), 1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1137/1209038 doi: 10.1137/1209038
![]() |
[18] |
X. W. Li, Z. H. Liu, J. Li, C. Tisdell, Existence and controllability for nonlinear fractional control systems with damping in Hilbert spaces, Acta Math. Sci., 39 (1) (2019), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-019-0118-5 doi: 10.1007/s10473-019-0118-5
![]() |
[19] |
C. Bereanu, J. Mawhin, Existence and multiplicity results for some nonlinear problems with singular ϕ-Laplacian, J. Differ. Equations., 243 (2007), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.014
![]() |
[20] |
P. Jebelean, J. Mawhin, C. Şerban, Multiple periodic solutions for perturbed relativistic pendulum systems, P. Am. Math. Soc., 143 (2015), 3029–3039. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2015-12542-7 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2015-12542-7
![]() |
[21] |
D. Arcoya, C. Sportelli, Relativistic equations with singular potentials, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 74 (2023), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-023-01977-z doi: 10.1007/s00033-023-01977-z
![]() |
[22] |
C. Alves, C. T. Ledesma, Multiplicity of solution for some slasses of prescribed mean curvature equation with Dirichlet boundary condition, J. Geom. Anal., 32 (2022), 262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-01010-1 doi: 10.1007/s12220-022-01010-1
![]() |
[23] |
C. T. Ledesma, Multiplicity of solutions for some classes of prescribed mean curvature equations with local conditions, Mediterr. J. Math., 20 (2023), 215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-023-02418-x doi: 10.1007/s00009-023-02418-x
![]() |
[24] |
J. Mawhin, Topological degree and boundary value problems for nonlinear differential equations in topological methods for ordinary differential equations, Lect. Notes Math., 1537 (1993), 74–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0085076 doi: 10.1007/BFb0085076
![]() |