This paper considers an output-based event-triggered control approach for discrete-time systems and proposes three new types of performance measures under unknown disturbances. These measures are motivated by the fact that signals in practical systems are often associated with bounded energy or bounded magnitude, and they should be described in the $ \ell_{2} $ and $ \ell_\infty $ spaces, respectively. More precisely, three performance measures from $ \ell_{q} $ to $ \ell_{p} $, denoted by the $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances with $ (p, q) = (2, 2), \ (\infty, 2) $ and $ (\infty, \infty) $, are considered for event-triggered systems (ETSs) in which the corresponding event-trigger mechanism is defined as a function from the measured output of the plant to the input of the dynamic output-feedback controller with the triggering parameter $ \sigma (>0) $. Such a selection of the pair $ (p, q) $ represents the $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances to be bounded and well-defined, and the three measures are natural extensions of those in the conventional feedback control, such as the $ H_\infty $, generalized $ H_2 $ and $ \ell_1 $ norms. We first derive the corresponding closed-form representation with respect to the relevant ETSs in terms of a piecewise linear difference equation. The asymptotic stability condition for the ETSs is then derived through the linear matrix inequality approach by developing an adequate piecewise quadratic Lyapunov function. This stability criterion is further extended to compute the $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances. Finally, a numerical example is given to verify the effectiveness of the overall arguments in both the theoretical and practical aspects, especially for the trade-off relation between the communication costs and $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances.
Citation: Hyung Tae Choi, Hae Yeon Park, Jung Hoon Kim. Output-based event-triggered control for discrete-time systems with three types of performance analysis[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17091-17111. doi: 10.3934/math.2023873
This paper considers an output-based event-triggered control approach for discrete-time systems and proposes three new types of performance measures under unknown disturbances. These measures are motivated by the fact that signals in practical systems are often associated with bounded energy or bounded magnitude, and they should be described in the $ \ell_{2} $ and $ \ell_\infty $ spaces, respectively. More precisely, three performance measures from $ \ell_{q} $ to $ \ell_{p} $, denoted by the $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances with $ (p, q) = (2, 2), \ (\infty, 2) $ and $ (\infty, \infty) $, are considered for event-triggered systems (ETSs) in which the corresponding event-trigger mechanism is defined as a function from the measured output of the plant to the input of the dynamic output-feedback controller with the triggering parameter $ \sigma (>0) $. Such a selection of the pair $ (p, q) $ represents the $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances to be bounded and well-defined, and the three measures are natural extensions of those in the conventional feedback control, such as the $ H_\infty $, generalized $ H_2 $ and $ \ell_1 $ norms. We first derive the corresponding closed-form representation with respect to the relevant ETSs in terms of a piecewise linear difference equation. The asymptotic stability condition for the ETSs is then derived through the linear matrix inequality approach by developing an adequate piecewise quadratic Lyapunov function. This stability criterion is further extended to compute the $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances. Finally, a numerical example is given to verify the effectiveness of the overall arguments in both the theoretical and practical aspects, especially for the trade-off relation between the communication costs and $ \ell_{p/q} $ performances.
| [1] | W. P. M. H. Heemels, K. H. Johansson, P. Tabuada, An introduction to event-triggered and self-triggered control, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2012, 3270–3285. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2012.6425820 |
| [2] |
Y. Wang, L. Xiao, Y. Guo, Finite-time stability of singular switched systems with a time-varying delay based on an evnet-triggered mechanism, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 1901–1924. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023098 doi: 10.3934/math.2023098
|
| [3] |
L. Cao, Y. Pan, H. Liang, T. Huang, Observer-based dynamic event-triggered control for multiagent systems with time-varying delay, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 53 (2022), 3376–3387. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2022.3226873 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2022.3226873
|
| [4] | L. Cao, Z. Cheng, Y. Liu, H. Li, Event-based adaptive NN fixed-time cooperative formation for multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3210269 |
| [5] |
H. Yu, F. Hao, Periodic event-triggered state-feedback control for discrete-time linear systems, J. Franklin Inst., 353 (2016), 1809–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.03.002
|
| [6] |
W. Wu, S. Reimann, D. Görges, S. Liu, Event-triggered control for discrete-time linear systems subject to bounded disturbance, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 26 (2016), 1902–1918. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3388 doi: 10.1002/rnc.3388
|
| [7] | A. Eqtami, D. V. Dimarogonas, K. J. Kyriakopoulos, Event-triggered control for discrete-time systems, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference, 2010, 4719–4724. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2010.5531089 |
| [8] |
S. Ding, X. Xie, Y. Liu, Event-triggered static/dynamic feedback control for discrete-time linear systems, Inf. Sci., 524 (2020), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.044 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.044
|
| [9] |
P. H. S. Coutinho, M. L. C. Peixoto, I. Bessa, R. M. Palhares, Dynamic event-triggered gain-scheduling control of discrete-time quasi-LPV systems, Automatica, 141 (2022), 110292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110292 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110292
|
| [10] |
W. P. M. H. Heemels, M. C. F. Donkers, Model-based periodic event-triggered control for linear systems, Automatica, 49 (2013), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.025 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.025
|
| [11] |
Y. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Xu, A dual neural network for bi-criteria kinematic control of redundant manipulators, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 18 (2002), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRA.2002.805651 doi: 10.1109/TRA.2002.805651
|
| [12] |
Y. Oh, M. H. Lee, J. Moon, Infinity-norm-based worst-case collision avoidance control for quadrotors, IEEE Access, 9 (2021), 101052–101064. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3096275 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3096275
|
| [13] |
J. Imura, A. van der Schaft, Characterization of well-posedness of piecewise-linear systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 45 (2000), 1600–1619. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.880612 doi: 10.1109/9.880612
|
| [14] |
G. Ferrari-Trecate, F. A. Cuzzola, D. Mignone, M. Morari, Analysis of discrete-time piecewise affine and hybrid systems, Automatica, 38 (2002), 2139–2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00142-5 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00142-5
|
| [15] | J. Doyle, K. Glover, P. Khargonekar, B. Francis, State-space solutions to standard $H_2$ and $H_\infty$ control problems, 1988 American Control Conference, 1988, 1691–1696. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1988.4789992 |
| [16] |
C. E. Souza, L. Xie, On the discrete-time bounded real lemma with application in the characterization of static state feedback $H_\infty$ controllers, Syst. Control Lett., 18 (1992), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(92)90108-5 doi: 10.1016/0167-6911(92)90108-5
|
| [17] |
S. Luemsai, T. Botmart, W. Weera, S. Charoensin, Improved results on mixed passive and $H_{\infty}$ performance for uncertain neural networks with mixed interval time-varying delays via feedback control, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 2653–2679. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021161 doi: 10.3934/math.2021161
|
| [18] |
D. A. Wilson, M. A. Nekoui, G. D. Halikias, An LQR weight selection approach to the discrete generalized $H_2$ control problem, Int. J. Control, 71 (1998), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/002071798221948 doi: 10.1080/002071798221948
|
| [19] |
J. H. Kim, T. Hagiwara, Upper/lower bounds of generalized $H_2$ norms in sampled-data systems with convergence rate analysis and discretization viewpoint, Syst. Control. Lett., 107 (2017), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2017.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2017.06.008
|
| [20] |
J. H. Kim, T. Hagiwara, The generalized $H_2$ controller synthesis problem of sampled-data systems, Automatica, 142 (2022), 110400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110400 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110400
|
| [21] |
J. H. Kim, T. Hagiwara, $L_1$ discretization for sampled-data controller synthesis via piecewise linear approximation, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 61 (2016), 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2015.2452815 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2015.2452815
|
| [22] |
J. H. Kim, T. Hagiwara, $L_1$ optimal controller synthesis for sampled-data systems via piecewise linear kernel approximation, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 31 (2021), 4933–4950. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.5513 doi: 10.1002/rnc.5513
|
| [23] |
W. P. M. H. Heemels, M. C. F. Donkers, A. R. Teel, Periodic event-triggered control for linear systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 58 (2013), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2012.2220443 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2012.2220443
|
| [24] | T. Chen, B. A. Francis, Optimal sampled-data control systems, London: Springer, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3037-6 |
Figures(4) / Tables(3)
Hyung Tae Choi, Hae Yeon Park, Jung Hoon Kim. Output-based event-triggered control for discrete-time systems with three types of performance analysis[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17091-17111. doi: 10.3934/math.2023873
DownLoad: