Search Advanced

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 7: 17112-17141. doi: 10.3934/math.2023874
Previous Article Next Article
Research article

Spherical fuzzy rough Hamacher aggregation operators and their application in decision making problem

  • 1.
    Department of Mathematics Deanship of Applied Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
  • 2.
    Department of Mathematics, Riphah International University, Faisalabad Campus, Pakistan
  • 3.
    Programme of Mathematics, Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus Terengganu, Malaysia
  • 4.
    Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan
  • 5.
    Department of Computer Science, Abdul Wali khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan
  • Received: 01 January 2023 Revised: 05 March 2023 Accepted: 04 April 2023 Published: 17 May 2023

  • MSC : 03E72, 47S40

  • Aggregation operators are the most effective mathematical tools for aggregating many variables into a single result. The aggregation operators operate to bring together all of the different assessment values offered in a common manner, and they are highly helpful for assessing the options offered in the decision-making process. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) and rough sets are common mathematical tools that are capable of handling incomplete and ambiguous information. We also establish the concepts of spherical fuzzy rough Hamacher averaging and spherical fuzzy rough Hamacher geometric operators. The key characteristics of the suggested operators are thoroughly described. We create an algorithm for a multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problem to cope with the ambiguity and uncertainty. A numerical example of the developed models is shown in the final section. The results show that the specified models are more efficient and advantageous than the other existing approaches when the offered models are contrasted with specific present methods.

    Citation: Muhammad Naeem, Muhammad Qiyas, Lazim Abdullah, Neelam Khan, Salman Khan. Spherical fuzzy rough Hamacher aggregation operators and their application in decision making problem[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 17112-17141. doi: 10.3934/math.2023874

    Related Papers:

  • Aggregation operators are the most effective mathematical tools for aggregating many variables into a single result. The aggregation operators operate to bring together all of the different assessment values offered in a common manner, and they are highly helpful for assessing the options offered in the decision-making process. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) and rough sets are common mathematical tools that are capable of handling incomplete and ambiguous information. We also establish the concepts of spherical fuzzy rough Hamacher averaging and spherical fuzzy rough Hamacher geometric operators. The key characteristics of the suggested operators are thoroughly described. We create an algorithm for a multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problem to cope with the ambiguity and uncertainty. A numerical example of the developed models is shown in the final section. The results show that the specified models are more efficient and advantageous than the other existing approaches when the offered models are contrasted with specific present methods.


    加载中


    [1] K. T. Atanassov, More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set Syst., 33 (1989), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(89)90215-7 doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90215-7
    [2] M. I. Ali, F. Feng, T. Mahmood, I. Mahmood, H. Faizan, A graphical method for ranking Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy values using the uncertainty index and entropy, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 2692–2712. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22174 doi: 10.1002/int.22174
    [3] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, F. Ghani, T. Mahmood, Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 2829–2844. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172009 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-172009
    [4] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, M. Aslam, M. Qiyas, M. A. Kutbi, Spherical fuzzy sets and its representation of spherical fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 6089–6102. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181941 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-181941
    [5] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, Spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in group decision making problems, J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput., 11 (2020), 2731–2749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01333-y doi: 10.1007/s12652-019-01333-y
    [6] D. Ahmed, B. X. Dai, Picture fuzzy rough set and rough picture fuzzy set on two different universes and their applications, J. Math., 2020 (2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8823580 doi: 10.1155/2020/8823580
    [7] S. An, Q. H. Hu, C. Z. Wang, Probability granular distance-based fuzzy rough set model, Appl. Soft Comput., 102 (2021), 107064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107064 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107064
    [8] M. Brandenburg, K. Govindan, J. Sarkis, S. Seuring, Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 233 (2014), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032
    [9] C. Chandra, S. Kumar, An application of a system analysis methodology to manage logistics in a textile supply chain, Supply Chain Manag., 5 (2000), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540010350493 doi: 10.1108/13598540010350493
    [10] D. Dubois, H. Prade, Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 17 (1990), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079008935107 doi: 10.1080/03081079008935107
    [11] I. Deli, N. Çagman, Spherical fuzzy numbers and multi-criteria decision-making, In: Decision making with spherical fuzzy sets, Cham: Springer, 2021, 53–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45461-6_3
    [12] A. P. Darko, D. C. Liang, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 87 (2020), 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103259 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103259
    [13] B. Fahimnia, J. Sarkis, H. Davarzani, Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 162 (2015), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
    [14] M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, M. Amiri, Z. Turskis, Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control, 11 (2016), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.2557 doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.2557
    [15] X. J. Gou, Z. S. Xu, P. J. Ren, The properties of continuous Pythagorean fuzzy information, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 31 (2016), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21788 doi: 10.1002/int.21788
    [16] H. Garg, A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 31 (2016), 886–920. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21809 doi: 10.1002/int.21809
    [17] Y. D. He, H. Y. Chen, L. G. Zhou, J. P. Liu, Z. F. Tao, Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interaction averaging operators and their application to multi-criteria decision making, Inform. Sci., 259 (2014), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.018
    [18] J. Y. Huang, Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 27 (2014), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-131019 doi: 10.3233/IFS-131019
    [19] Y. D. He, H. Y. Chen, Z. He, L. G. Zhou, Multi-attribute decision making based on neutral averaging operators for intuitionistic fuzzy information, Appl. Soft Comput., 27 (2015), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.039 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.039
    [20] A. Hadrani, K. Guennoun, R. Saadane, M. Wahbi, Fuzzy rough sets: survey and proposal of an enhanced knowledge representation model based on automatic noisy sample detection, Cogn. Syst. Res., 64 (2020), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.05.001
    [21] M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica, 26 (2015), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57 doi: 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
    [22] F. Kutlu Gündoğdu, C. Kahraman, Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-181401
    [23] Q. Lei, Z. S. Xu, Relationships between two types of intuitionistic fuzzy definite integrals, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 24 (2016), 1410–1425. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2516583 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2516583
    [24] P. D. Liu, P. Wang, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 33 (2018), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21927 doi: 10.1002/int.21927
    [25] P. D. Liu, W. Q. Liu, Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on power Bonferroni operators of linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 652–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22071 doi: 10.1002/int.22071
    [26] P. D. Liu, P. Wang, Multiple-attribute decision-making based on Archimedean Bonferroni operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 27 (2019), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2826452 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2826452
    [27] X. D. Peng, Y. Yang, Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 30 (2015), 1133–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21738 doi: 10.1002/int.21738
    [28] M. R. Seikh, U. Mandal, Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making, Granular Comput., 6 (2021), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00209-y doi: 10.1007/s41066-019-00209-y
    [29] M. Qiyas, S. Abdullah, Sine trigonometric spherical fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in decision support system, TOPSIS, VIKOR, Korean J. Math., 29 (2021), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.11568/kjm.2021.29.1.137 doi: 10.11568/kjm.2021.29.1.137
    [30] M. Qiyas, S. Abdullah, S. Khan, M. Naeem, Multi-attribute group decision making based on sine trigonometric spherical fuzzy aggregation operators, Granular Comput., 7 (2022), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00256-4 doi: 10.1007/s41066-021-00256-4
    [31] M. Qiyas, S. Abdullah, M. Naeem, Spherical uncertain linguistic Hamacher aggregation operators and their application on achieving consistent opinion fusion in group decision making, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern., 14 (2021), 550–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-09-2020-0120 doi: 10.1108/IJICC-09-2020-0120
    [32] M. Qiyas, N. Khan, M. Naeem, S. Abdullah, Intuitionistic fuzzy credibility Dombi aggregation operators and their application of railway train selection in Pakistan, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 6520–6542. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023329 doi: 10.3934/math.2023329
    [33] P. J. Ren, Z. S. Xu, X. J. Gou, Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making, Appl. Soft Comput., 42 (2016), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.020 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.020
    [34] M. Rafiq, S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, S. Muhammad, The cosine similarity measures of spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in decision making, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 6059–6073. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181922 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-181922
    [35] L. Sun, T. Y. Yin, W. P. Ding, Y. H. Qian, J. C. Xu, Feature selection with missing labels using multilabel fuzzy neighborhood rough sets and maximum relevance minimum redundancy, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2022), 1197–1211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3053844 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3053844
    [36] G. W. Wei, Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Expert Syst. Appl., 38 (2011), 11671–11677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.048 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.048
    [37] W. Z. Wang, X. W. Liu, Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 26 (2011), 1049–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20498 doi: 10.1002/int.20498
    [38] J. Q. Wang, H. Y. Zhang, Multicriteria decision-making approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets with incomplete certain information on weights, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 21 (2013), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2210427 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2210427
    [39] G. W. Wei, H. Gao, Y. Wei, Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 33 (2018), 1426–1458. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21985 doi: 10.1002/int.21985
    [40] C. Z. Wang, Y. Huang, M. W. Shao, X. D. Fan, Fuzzy rough set-based attribute reduction using distance measures, Knowl. Based Syst., 164 (2019), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.038 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.038
    [41] Z. S. Xu, R. R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 35 (2006), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600574353 doi: 10.1080/03081070600574353
    [42] Z. S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 15 (2007), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678
    [43] M. M. Xia, Z. S. Xu, B. Zhu, Some issues on intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm, Knowl. Based Syst., 31 (2012), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.02.004
    [44] Y. Xu, X. P. Shang, J. Wang, W. Wu, H. Q. Huang, Some q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy Heronian mean operators with their application to multiple attribute group decision-making, Symmetry, 10 (2018), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10100472 doi: 10.3390/sym10100472
    [45] L. Xu, Y. Liu, H. B. Liu, Some improved q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiattribute group decision-making, Math. Probl. Eng., 2019 (2019), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036728 doi: 10.1155/2019/2036728
    [46] J. C. Xu, K. L. Shen, L. Sun, Multi-label feature selection based on fuzzy neighborhood rough sets, Complex Intell. Syst., 8 (2022), 2105–2129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00636-y doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00636-y
    [47] K. P. Yoon, C. L. Hwang, Multiple attribute decision making, Sage Publications, 1995. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161
    [48] R. R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2016), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
    [49] M. Yazdani, S. H. Zolfani, E. K. Zavadskas, New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 17 (2016), 1097–1113. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1165282 doi: 10.3846/16111699.2016.1165282
    [50] W. Yang, Y. F. Pang, New q-rung orthopair fuzzy partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22060 doi: 10.1002/int.22060
    [51] Z. Yuan, H. M. Chen, P. Xie, P. F. Zhang, J. Liu, T. R. Li, Attribute reduction methods in fuzzy rough set theory: an overview, comparative experiments, and new directions, Appl. Soft Comput., 107 (2021), 107353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107353 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107353
    [52] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.2307/2272014 doi: 10.2307/2272014
    [53] L. Zhou, W. Z. Wu, On generalized intuitionistic fuzzy rough approximation operators, Inform. Sci., 178 (2008), 2448–2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.01.012 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.01.012
    [54] H. Zhao, Z. S. Xu, M. F. Ni, S. S. Liu, Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 25 (2010), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20386 doi: 10.1002/int.20386
    [55] X. L. Zhang, Z. S. Xu, Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29 (2014), 1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676 doi: 10.1002/int.21676
    [56] S. Z. Zeng, Y. Xiao, TOPSIS method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making and its application to investment selection, Kybernetes, 45 (2016), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2015-0093 doi: 10.1108/K-04-2015-0093
    [57] S. Z. Zeng, S. M. Chen, L. W. Kuo, Multiattribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method, Inform. Sci., 488 (2019), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.018
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Mathematics
1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(1221) PDF downloads(65) Cited by(1)

Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(6)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog