Research article Special Issues

Study of nonlinear generalized Fisher equation under fractional fuzzy concept

  • Received: 17 February 2023 Revised: 07 April 2023 Accepted: 18 April 2023 Published: 09 May 2023
  • MSC : 34A08, 34A12, 47H10

  • Fractional calculus can provide an accurate model of many dynamical systems, which leads to a set of partial differential equations (PDE). Fisher's equation is one of these PDEs. This article focuses on a new method that is used for the analytical solution of Fuzzy nonlinear time fractional generalized Fisher's equation (FNLTFGFE) with a source term. While the uncertainty is considered in the initial condition, the proposed technique supports the process of the solution commencing from the parametric form (double parametric form) of a fuzzy number. Next, a joint mechanism of natural transform (NT) coupled with Adomian decomposition method (ADM) is utilized, and the nonlinear term is calculated through ADM. The obtained solution of the unknown function is written in infinite series form. It has been observed that the solution obtained is rapid and accurate. The result proved that this method is more efficient and less time-consuming in comparison with all other methods. Three examples are presented to show the efficiency of the proposed techniques. The result shows that uncertainty plays an important role in analytical sense. i.e., as the uncertainty decreases, the solution approaches a classical solution. Hence, this method makes a very useful contribution towards the solution of the fuzzy nonlinear time fractional generalized Fisher's equation. Moreover, the matlab (2015) software has been used to draw the graphs.

    Citation: Muhammad Usman, Hidayat Ullah Khan, Zareen A Khan, Hussam Alrabaiah. Study of nonlinear generalized Fisher equation under fractional fuzzy concept[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16479-16493. doi: 10.3934/math.2023842

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yanlin Li, Dipen Ganguly, Santu Dey, Arindam Bhattacharyya . Conformal η-Ricci solitons within the framework of indefinite Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5408-5430. doi: 10.3934/math.2022300
    [2] Yanlin Li, Shahroud Azami . Generalized -Ricci soliton on Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 7144-7153. doi: 10.3934/math.2025326
    [3] Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Fatemah Mofarreh . Schur-type inequality for solitonic hypersurfaces in (k,μ)-contact metric manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36069-36081. doi: 10.3934/math.20241711
    [4] Rajesh Kumar, Sameh Shenawy, Lalnunenga Colney, Nasser Bin Turki . Certain results on tangent bundle endowed with generalized Tanaka Webster connection (GTWC) on Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30364-30383. doi: 10.3934/math.20241465
    [5] Yusuf Dogru . η-Ricci-Bourguignon solitons with a semi-symmetric metric and semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11943-11952. doi: 10.3934/math.2023603
    [6] Shahroud Azami, Mehdi Jafari, Nargis Jamal, Abdul Haseeb . Hyperbolic Ricci solitons on perfect fluid spacetimes. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18929-18943. doi: 10.3934/math.2024921
    [7] Yanlin Li, Abimbola Abolarinwa, Shahroud Azami, Akram Ali . Yamabe constant evolution and monotonicity along the conformal Ricci flow. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12077-12090. doi: 10.3934/math.2022671
    [8] Noura Alhouiti, Fatemah Mofarreh, Akram Ali, Fatemah Abdullah Alghamdi . On gradient normalized Ricci-harmonic solitons in sequential warped products. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23221-23233. doi: 10.3934/math.20241129
    [9] Richa Agarwal, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, Shahid Ali, Abdul Haseeb . On Riemannian warped-twisted product submersions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2925-2937. doi: 10.3934/math.2024144
    [10] Fatemah Mofarreh, S. K. Srivastava, Anuj Kumar, Akram Ali . Geometric inequalities of PR-warped product submanifold in para-Kenmotsu manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19481-19509. doi: 10.3934/math.20221069
  • Fractional calculus can provide an accurate model of many dynamical systems, which leads to a set of partial differential equations (PDE). Fisher's equation is one of these PDEs. This article focuses on a new method that is used for the analytical solution of Fuzzy nonlinear time fractional generalized Fisher's equation (FNLTFGFE) with a source term. While the uncertainty is considered in the initial condition, the proposed technique supports the process of the solution commencing from the parametric form (double parametric form) of a fuzzy number. Next, a joint mechanism of natural transform (NT) coupled with Adomian decomposition method (ADM) is utilized, and the nonlinear term is calculated through ADM. The obtained solution of the unknown function is written in infinite series form. It has been observed that the solution obtained is rapid and accurate. The result proved that this method is more efficient and less time-consuming in comparison with all other methods. Three examples are presented to show the efficiency of the proposed techniques. The result shows that uncertainty plays an important role in analytical sense. i.e., as the uncertainty decreases, the solution approaches a classical solution. Hence, this method makes a very useful contribution towards the solution of the fuzzy nonlinear time fractional generalized Fisher's equation. Moreover, the matlab (2015) software has been used to draw the graphs.



    Ricci flow is a technique widely used in differential geometry, geometric topology, and geometric analysis. The Yamabe flow that deforms the metric of a Riemannian manifold M is presented by the equations [1,2]

    tg(t)+r(t)g(t)=0, g(0)=g0, (1.1)

    where r(t) is the scalar curvature of M, and t indicates the time. For a 2-dimensional manifold, (1.1) is equivalent to the Ricci flow presented by

    tg(t)+2S(g(t))=0, (1.2)

    where S is the Ricci tensor of M. However, in cases of dimension >2, these flows do not coincide, since the Yamabe flow preserves the conformal class of g(t) but the Ricci flow does not in general. The Ricci flow has been widely used for dealing with numerous significant problems, such as deformable surface registration in vision, parameterization in graphics, cancer detection in medical imaging, and manifold spline construction in geometric modeling. For more utilization in medical and engineering fields, see [3]. It has also been used in theoretical physics, particularly; in the study of the geometry of spacetime in the context of general relativity. In this area, it has been applied to understand the behavior of black holes and the large-scale structure of the universe.

    The self-similar solutions of (1.1) and (1.2) are called the Ricci and Yamabe solitons, respectively [4,5]. They are respectively expressed by the following equations:

    £Fg+2S+2Λg=0, (1.3)

    and

    £Fg+2(Λr)g=0, (1.4)

    where £F is the Lie derivative operator along the smooth vector field F on M, ΛR.

    In 2010, Blair [6] defined the concept of -Ricci tensor S in contact metric manifolds M as:

    S(X,Y)=g(QX,Y)=Trace{φR(X,φY)},

    for any vector fields X and Y on M, here Q is the -Ricci operator, R is the curvature tensor, and φ is a (1,1) tensor field. It is to be noted that the notion of the -Ricci tensor on complex manifolds was introduced by Tachibana [7]. Later, Hamada [8] studied -Ricci flat real hypersurfaces of complex space forms.

    If we replace S with S in (1.3), then we recover the expression of -Ricci soliton, proposed and defined by Kaimakamis and Panagiotidou [9] as follows:

    Definition 1.1. On a Riemannian (or a semi-Riemannian) M, the metric g is called a -Ricci soliton; if

    £Fg+2S+2Λg=0 (1.5)

    holds and ΛR.

    In 2019, a modern class of geometric flows, namely, the Ricci–Yamabe (RY) flow of type (ρ,σ) was established by Güler and Crasmareanu [10]; and is defined by

    tg(t)+2ρS(g(t))+σr(t)g(t)=0, g(0)=g0

    for ρ,σR.

    The RY flow can be Riemannian, semi-Riemannian, or singular Riemannian due to the involvement of the scalars ρ and σ. This kind of different choice is useful in differential geometry and physics, especially in general relativity theory (i.e., a new bimetric approach to space–time geometry [11,12]).

    A Ricci–Yamabe soliton (RYS) is a solution of RY flow; if it depends only on one parameter group of diffeomorphism and scaling. A Riemannian manifold M is said to admit an RYS if

    £Fg+2ρS+(2Λσr)g=0, (1.6)

    where ρ,σR.

    If F=gradf, fC(M), then the RYS is called the gradient Ricci–Yamabe soliton (gradient RYS), and then (1.5) takes the form

    2f+ρS+(Λσr2)g=0, (1.7)

    where 2f indicates the Hessian of f. A RYS of types (ρ,0) and (0,σ) is respectively known as ρ-Ricci soliton and σ-Yamabe soliton.

    A manifold M is said to admit a -Ricci–Yamabe soliton (-RYS) if

    £Fg+2ρS+(2Λσr)g=0 (1.8)

    holds, where ρ,σ, ΛR and r is the -scalar curvature tensor of M.

    In a similar way to (1.7), the gradient -Ricci–Yamabe soliton (gradient -RYS) is defined by

    2f+ρS+(Λσr2)g=0. (1.9)

    A -RYS is said to be shrinking if Λ<0, steady if Λ=0, or expanding if Λ>0. A -RYS is called a

    (i) -Yamabe soliton if ρ=0,σ=1,

    (ii) -Ricci soliton if ρ=1,σ=0,

    (iii) -Einstein soliton if ρ=1,σ=1,

    (iv) -ρ-Einstein soliton if ρ=1,σ=2ρ.

    Note that the -Ricci–Yamabe soliton is the generalization of the aforementioned cases (i)(iv). Thus, the research on -Ricci–Yamabe soliton is more significant and promising.

    On the other hand, the Lorentzian manifold, which is one of the most important subclasses of pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, plays a key role in the development of the theory of relativity and cosmology [13]. In 1989, Matsumoto [14] proposed the notion of LP-Sasakian manifolds, while the same notion was independently studied by Mihai and Rosca [15] in 1992, and they contributed several important results on this manifold. Later, this manifold was studied by many researchers. Recently, in 2021, Haseeb and Prasad proposed and studied LP-Kenmotsu manifolds [16] as a subclass of Lorentzian paracontact manifolds.

    Since the turn of the 21st century, the study of Ricci solitons and their generalizations has become highly significant due to their wide uses in various fields of science, engineering, computer science, medical etc. Here we are going to mention some works on Ricci solitons and their generalizations that were carried out by several authors, such as: the geometric properties of Einstein, Ricci and Yamabe solitons were studied by Blaga [17] in 2019; Deshmukh and Chen [18] find the sufficient conditions on the soliton vector field, where the metric of a Yamabe soliton is of constant scalar curvature; Chidananda et al. [19] have studied Yamabe and Riemann solitons in LP-Sasakian manifolds; the study of LP-Kenmotsu manifolds and ϵ-Kenmotsu manifolds admitting η-Ricci solitons have been carried out by Haseeb and Almusawa [20], and Haseeb and De [21]; in [22], the authors studied conformal Ricci soliton and conformal gradient Ricci solitons on Lorentz-Sasakian space forms; RYSs have been studied by Haseeb et al. [23], Singh and Khatri [24], Suh and De [25], Yoldas [26], Zhang et al. [27]. The study of Ricci solitons and their generalizations has been extended to -Ricci solitons and their generalizations on various manifolds and has been explored by the authors: Dey [28], Dey et al. [29], Ghosh and Patra [30], Haseeb and Chaubey [31], Haseeb et al. [32], and Venkatesha et al. [33]. Recently, Azami et al. [34] investigated perfect fluid spacetimes and perfect fluid generalized Roberston–Walker spacetimes.

    A differentiable manifold M (dim M=n) with the structure (φ,ζ,η,g) is named a Lorentzian almost paracontact metric manifold; in case φ: a (1,1)-tensor field, ζ: a contravariant vector field, η: a 1-form, and g: a Lorentzian metric g satisfy [13]

    η(ξ)=1, (2.1)
    φ2=I+ηξ, (2.2)
    φξ=0,ηφ=0, (2.3)
    g(φ,φ)=g(,)+η()η(), (2.4)
    g(,ξ)=η(). (2.5)

    We define the 2-form Φ on M as

    Φ(X,Y)=Φ(Y,X)=g(X,φY), (2.6)

    for any X,Yχ(M), where χ(M) is the Lie algebra of vector fields on M. If

    dη(X,Y)=Φ(Y,X), (2.7)

    here d is an exterior derivative, then (M,φ,ξ,η,g) is called a paracontact metric manifold.

    Definition 2.1. A Lorentzian almost paracontact manifold M is called a Lorentzian para-Kenmotsu (in brief, LP-Kenmotsu) manifold if

    (Xφ)Y=g(φX,Y)ξη(Y)φX, (2.8)

    for any X and Y on M [16,23,35].

    In the case of an LP-Kenmotsu manifold, we have

    Xξ=Xη(X)ξ, (2.9)
    (Xη)Y=g(X,Y)η(X)η(Y), (2.10)

    where indicates the Levi–Civita connection with respect to g.

    Furthermore, in an LP-Kenmotsu manifold of dimension n (in brief, (LP-K)n), the following relations hold [16]:

    g(R(X,Y)Z,ξ)=η(R(X,Y)Z)=g(Y,Z)η(X)g(X,Z)η(Y), (2.11)
    R(ξ,X)Y=R(X,ξ)Y=g(X,Y)ξη(Y)X, (2.12)
    R(X,Y)ξ=η(Y)Xη(X)Y, (2.13)
    R(ξ,X)ξ=X+η(X)ξ, (2.14)
    S(X,ξ)=(n1)η(X),S(ξ,ξ)=(n1), (2.15)
    Qξ=(n1)ξ, (2.16)

    for any X,Y,Zχ(M).

    Lemma 2.1. [36] In an (LP-K)n, we have

    (XQ)ξ=QX(n1)X, (2.17)
    (ξQ)X=2QX2(n1)X, (2.18)

    for any X on (LP-K)n.

    Lemma 2.2. [37] In an (LP-K)n, we have

    S(Y,Z)=S(Y,Z)ng(Y,Z)η(Y)η(Z)+ag(Y,φZ), (2.19)
    r=rn2+1+a2, (2.20)

    for any Y,Z on (LP-K)n, and a is the trace of φ.

    Lemma 2.3. In an (LP-K)n, the eigenvalue of the -Ricci operator Qcorresponding to the eigenvector ξ is zero, i.e., Qξ=0.

    Proof. From (2.19), we have

    QY=QYnYη(Y)ξ+aφY, (2.21)

    which, by putting Y=ξ; and using (2.1), (2.3), and (2.16) gives Qξ=0.

    Lemma 2.4. The -Ricci operator Q in an (LP-K)n satisfies the following identities:

    (XQ)ξ=QXnXη(X)ξ+aφX, (2.22)
    (ξQ)X=2QX2(n1)X+ξ(a)φX, (2.23)

    for any X on (LP-K)n.

    Proof. By the covariant differentiation of Qξ=0 with respect to X and using (2.9), (2.21) and Qξ=0, we obtain (2.22). Next, differentiating (2.21) covariantly with respect to ξ and using (2.8)–(2.10), (2.18), and (2.21), we obtain (2.23).

    Lemma 2.5. In an (LP-K)n, we have [23]

    ξ(r)=2(rn(n1)), (2.24)
    X(r)=2(rn(n1))η(X), (2.25)
    η(ξDr)=4(rn(n1)), (2.26)

    for any X on M, and Dr stands for the gradient of r.

    Remark 2.1. From the equation (2.24), it is observed that if r of an (LP-K)n is constant, then r=n(n1).

    In this section, we first prove the following result:

    Theorem 3.1. In an (LP-K)n admitting a -RYS, the scalar curvature r of the manifold satisfies the Poisson's equation Δr=Ψ, where Ψ=4(n1)Λσ+2r(n3)+(n1){h2a22(n24n+1)}, σ0.

    Proof. Let the metric of an (LP-K)n be a -RYS, then in view of (2.19), (1.8) takes the form

    (£Fg)(X,Y)=2ρS(X,Y)+2{ρnΛ+σr2}g(X,Y)+2ρη(X)η(Y)2aρg(X,φY),      (3.1)

    for any X, Y on M.

    Taking the covariant derivative of (3.1) with respect to Z, we find

    (Z£Fg)(X,Y)=2ρ(ZS)(X,Y)+σ(Zr)g(X,Y)2ρ{g(X,Z)η(Y)+g(Y,Z)η(X)}+2aρ{g(φZ,Y)η(Y)+g(φZ,X)η(Y)}4ρη(X)η(Y)η(Z). (3.2)

    As g is parallel with respect to , then the following formula [38]

    (£FXgX£Fg[F,X]g)(Y,Z)=g((£F)(X,Y),Z)g((£F)(X,Z),Y)

    turns to

    (X£Fg)(Y,Z)=g((£F)(X,Y),Z)+g((£F)(X,Z),Y).

    Due to the symmetric property of £V, we have

    2g((£F)(X,Y),Z)=(X£Fg)(Y,Z)+(Y£Fg)(X,Z)(Z£Fg)(X,Y),

    which, by using (3.2), becomes

    g((£F)(X,Y),Z)=ρ{(ZS)(X,Y)(XS)(Y,Z)(YS)(X,Z)}+σ2{(Xr)g(Y,Z)+(Yr)g(X,Z)(Zr)g(X,Y)}2ρ{g(X,Y)+η(X)η(Y)}η(Z)+2aρg(φX,Y)η(Z).

    By putting Y=ξ and using (2.3), (2.1), (2.5), (2.17), and (2.18), the preceding equation gives

    (£F)(Y,ξ)=2ρ{QY(n1)Y}+σ2{(Yr)ξ+(ξr)Y(Dr)η(Y)}. (3.3)

    By using the relation (2.20) in (3.3), we have

    (£F)(Y,ξ)=2ρ{QY(n1)Y}+σ2{g(Dr,Y)ξ+2(rn(n1))Y(Dr)η(Y)}+σ2{(Ya2)ξ+(ξa2)Y(Da2)η(Y)}. (3.4)

    The covariant derivative of (3.4) with respect to X leads to

    (X£F)(Y,ξ)=(£F)(Y,X)2ρ{QY(n1)Y}η(X)2ρ(XQ)Y+σ(rn(n1)){η(Y)Xη(X)Y}+σ2(ξa2)η(X)Y+σ2g(XDr,Y)ξσ2(XDr)η(Y)+σ2(Dr)g(X,Y)+σ2{(Ya2)X+X(ξa2)YX(Da2)η(Y)+(Da2)g(X,Y)}, (3.5)

    where (2.1), (2.4), and (3.4) are used.

    Again, in [38], we have

    (£FR)(X,Y)Z=(X£F)(Y,Z)(Y£F)(X,Z),

    which, by setting Z=ξ and using (3.5), becomes

    (£FR)(X,Y)ξ=2ρ{η(Y)QX(n1)η(Y)Xη(X)QY+(n1)η(X)Y}2ρ{(XQ)Y(YQ)X}+σ2(ξa2){η(X)Yη(Y)X}+σ2{g(XDr,Y)ξg(YDr,X)ξ(XDr)η(Y)+(YDr)η(X)}+2σ(rn(n1)){η(Y)Xη(X)Y}+σ2{(Ya2)X+X(ξa2)YX(Da2)η(Y)+(Xa2)YY(ξa2)X+Y(Da2)η(X)}. (3.6)

    Now, by putting Y=ξ in (3.6) and using (2.5), (2.1), (2.17), and (2.18), we have

    (£FR)(X,ξ)ξ=σ2{(ξa2)4(rn(n1))}(X+η(X)ξ)+σ2{η(XDr)ξg(ξDr,X)ξ+(XDr)+(ξDr)η(X)}+σ2{(ξa2)X+X(ξa2)ξ+X(Da2)+(Xa2)ξξ(ξa2)X+ξ(Da2)η(X)}. (3.7)

    For the h constant, we assume that Da2=hξ, and hence we deduce the following values:

    (i)ξa2=h, (ii)X(Da2)=hXhη(X)ξ,(iii)X(a2)=hη(X). (3.8)

    In light of (3.8), (3.7) reduces to

    (£FR)(X,ξ)ξ=σ2{h+4(rn(n1))}(X+η(X)ξ)+σ2{η(XDr)ξg(ξDr,X)ξ+(XDr)+(ξDr)η(X)}. (3.9)

    By contracting (3.9) over X, we lead to

    (£FS)(ξ,ξ)=hσ(n1)22σ(n2)(rn(n1))+σ2Δr, (3.10)

    where (2.26) is used and Δ symbolizes the Laplacian operator of g.

    The Lie derivative of (2.15) along F gives

    (£FS)(ξ,ξ)=2(n1)η(£Fξ). (3.11)

    By setting X=Y=ξ in (3.1) and using (2.3), (2.1), (2.5), and (2.16), we have

    (£Fg)(ξ,ξ)=2Λσr. (3.12)

    The Lie derivative of 1+g(ξ,ξ)=0 gives

    (£Fg)(ξ,ξ)=2η(£Fξ). (3.13)

    Now, combining (3.10)–(3.13), we deduce

    Δr=Ψ, (3.14)

    where Ψ=4(n1)Λσ+2r(n3)+(n1){h2a22(n24n+1)}, σ0.

    For the smooth functions θ and Ψ, an (LP-K)n satisfies Poisson's equation if θ=Ψ holds. In the case; where θ=0, Poisson's equation transforms into Laplace's equation. This completes the proof of our theorem.

    A function υC(M) is said to be subharmonic if Δυ0, harmonic if Δυ=0, and superharmonic if Δυ0. Thus, from (3.14), we state the following corollaries:

    Corollary 3.1. In an (LP-K)n admitting a -RYS, we have

    The values of scalar curvature (r) Harmonicity cases
    (n1)(n3){a2+(n24n+1)h22Λσ} subharmonic
    =(n1)(n3){a2+(n24n+1)h22Λσ} harmonic
    (n1)(n3){a2+(n24n+1)h22Λσ} superharmonic

    Corollary 3.2. In an (LP-K)n admitting a -RYS, the scalar curvature r of the manifold satisfies the Laplace equation if and only if

    r=2(n1)Λ(n3)σ(n1)(n3){h2a2(n24n+1)},σ0. (3.15)

    Let an (LP-K)n admit a -RYS, and if the scalar curvature r of the manifold satisfies Laplace's equation, then (3.15) holds. If this value of r is constant, then by virtue of Remark 2.1, we find Λ=σ2(n+h2a21). Thus, we have:

    Corollary 3.3. In an (LP-K)n admitting a -RYS, we have

    Condition Values of σ Values of Λ Conditions for the -RYS to be shrinking, steady, or expanding
    n1+h2>a2 (i) σ>0 (ii) σ=0 (iii) σ<0 (i) Λ<0 (ii) Λ=0 (iii) Λ>0 (i) shrinking
    (ii) steady
    (iii) expanding
    n1+h2=a2 σ>0, =0 or <0 Λ=0 steady
    n1+h2<a2 (i) σ>0 (ii) σ=0 (iii) σ<0 (i) Λ>0 (ii) Λ=0 (iii) Λ<0 (i) shrinking
    (ii) steady
    (iii) expanding

    This section explores the properties of gradient -RYS on (LP-K)n.

    Let M be an (LP-K)n with g as a gradient -RYS. Then (1.9) can be written as

    XDf+ρQX+(Λσr2)X=0, (4.1)

    for all X on (LP-K)n, where D indicates the gradient operator of g.

    The covariant differentiation of (4.1) along Y leads to

       YXDf=ρ{(YQ)X+Q(YX)}+σY(r)2X(Λσr2)YX. (4.2)

    By virtue of (4.2) and the curvature identity R(X,Y)=[X,Y][X,Y], we find

    R(X,Y)Df=ρ{(YQ)X(XQ)Y}+σ2{X(r)YY(r)X}. (4.3)

    By contracting (4.3) along X, we have

    S(Y,Df)={ρ(n1)σ2}Y(r). (4.4)

    From (2.15), we have

    S(ξ,Df)=(n1)g(ξ,Df). (4.5)

    Thus, from (4.4) and (4.5), it follows that

    g(ξ,Df)=ρ(n1)σ2(n1)g(ξ,Dr). (4.6)

    Now, we divide our study into two cases, as follows:

    Case I. Let ρ=(n1)σ. For this case, we prove the following theorem:

    Theorem 4.1. Let an (LP-K)n admit a gradient -RYS and ρ=(n1)σ. Then, (LP-K)n possesses a constant scalar curvature r.

    Proof. Let ρ=(n1)σ. Then, from (4.6), we obtain

    g(ξ,Df)=0. (4.7)

    The covariant derivative of (4.7) along X gives

    X(f)+(Λσr2)η(X)=0, (4.8)

    where (2.9), (2.19), (4.1), and (4.7) are used.

    By setting X=ξ in (4.8), and then using (4.7) and (2.1), we infer that

    Λ=σr2, (4.9)

    which informs us that r is constant. This completes the proof.

    Corollary 4.1. Let an (LP-K)n admit a gradient -RYS and ρ=(n1)σ. Then, we have:

    Values of σ Values of r Values of Λ Conditions for the -RYS to be shrinking, steady, or expanding
    σ>0 (i) r>0
    (ii) r=0
    (iii) r<0
    (i) Λ>0
    (ii) Λ=0
    (iii) Λ<0
    (i) expanding
    (ii) steady
    (iii) shrinking
    σ=0  r>0, =0 or <0  Λ=0 steady
    σ<0 (i) r>0
    (ii) r=0
    (iii) r<0
    (i) Λ<0
    (ii) Λ=0
    (iii) Λ>0
    (i) shrinking
    (ii) steady
    (iii) expanding

    Now, from (4.8) and (4.9), we conclude that

    X(f)=0. (4.10)

    This indicates that the gradient function f of the gradient -RYS is constant on (LP-K)n. Thus, we have

    Corollary 4.2. Let an (LP-K)n admit a gradient -RYS and ρ=(n1)σ. Then the function f is constant, and hence the gradient -RYS is trivial. Moreover, (LP-K)n is an Einstein manifold.

    Case II. Let ρ(n1)σ. For this case, we prove the following theorem:

    Theorem 4.2. Let an (LP-K)n admit a gradient -RYS and ρ(n1)σ. Then the gradient of the potential function f is pointwise collinear with ξ.

    Proof. Replacing X=ξ in (4.3), then using (2.12) and Lemma 2.5, we have

    R(ξ,Y)Df=ρ{QY+(n2)Yη(Y)ξ+aφYξ(a)φY}+σ2{ξ(r)YY(r)ξ}.

    Also from (2.12), we have

    R(ξ,Y)Df=g(Y,Df)ξη(Df)Y=Y(f)ξξ(f)Y.

    By equating the last two equations, we have

    Y(f)ξξ(f)Y=ρ{QY+(n2)Yη(Y)ξ+aφYξ(a)φY}+σ2{ξ(r)YY(r)ξ}. (4.11)

    By contracting Y in (4.11), we have

    ξ(f)=ρn1{rn(n2)1a(aξ(a))}σ2ξ(r). (4.12)

    Now, from (2.20), (2.24), (2.25), and (3.8), we easily find

    X(r)=2(rn(n1))η(X)+X(a2). (4.13)

    This implies

    ξ(r)=h+2(rn(n1)), (4.14)

    where g(ξ,Da2)=h.

    By using (4.14) in (4.12), we obtain

    ξ(f)=ρn1{rn(n2)1a(aξ(a))}σ(rn(n1))hσ2. (4.15)

    From (4.11) and (4.15), it follows that

    Y(f)ξ=ρn1{rn(n2)1a(aξ(a))}Yρ{QY(n2)Y+η(Y)ξaφY+ξ(a)φY}+σ(rn(n1))η(Y)ξσ2Y(a2)ξ. (4.16)

    The inner product of (4.16) with ξ and using (2.2), (2.1), (2.5), and (2.15) gives

    Y(f)=ρn1{rn(n2)1a(aξ(a))}η(Y)+σ(rn(n1))η(Y)hσ2η(Y), (4.17)

    where we assumed Da2=hξ.

    From (4.17), we conclude that Df=kξ, where k is a smooth function given by

    k=ρn1{rn(n2)1a(aξ(a))}+σ(rn(n1))hσ2.

    This completes the proof.

    We consider the 3-dimensional manifold M={(u1,u2,u3)R3,u3>0}, where (u1,u2,u3) are the standard coordinates in R3. Let e1,e2, and e3 be the vector fields on M given by

    e1=eu3u1,   e2=eu3u2,   e3=eu3u3=ξ,

    which are linearly independent at each point of M.

    Define a Lorentzian metric g on M such that

    g(e1,e1)=g(e2,e2)=1,   g(e3,e3)=1.

    Let η be the 1-form on M defined by η(X)=g(X,e3)=g(X,ξ) for all X on M; and let φ be the (1, 1)-tensor field on M is defined as

    φe1=e2,   φe2=e1,   φe3=0.

    By applying the linearity of φ and g, we have

    {η(ξ)=g(ξ,ξ)=1,   φ2X=X+η(X)ξ,   η(φX)=0,g(X,ξ)=η(X),   g(φX,φY)=g(X,Y)+η(X)η(Y), (5.1)

    for all X, Y on M.

    Let be the Levi–Civita connection with respect to the Lorentzian metric g. Thus, we have

    [e1,e2]=[e2,e1]=0,   [e1,e3]=e1,   [e2,e3]=e2.

    With the help of Koszul's formula, we easily calculate

    eiej={e3,  1i=j2,ei,  1i2, j=3,0,otherwise. (5.2)

    One can also easily verify that

    Xξ=Xη(X)ξ   and   (Xφ)Y=g(φX,Y)ξη(Y)φX.

    Hence, M is a Lorentzian para-Kenmotsu manifold of dimension 3. By using (5.2), we obtain

    R(e1,e2)e1=e2,   R(e1,e3)e1=e3,   R(e2,e3)e1=0,
    R(e1,e2)e2=e1,   R(e1,e3)e2=0,   R(e2,e3)e2=e3,
    R(e1,e2)e3=0,   R(e1,e3)e3=e1,   R(e2,e3)e3=e2.

    Now, with the help of the above components of the curvature tensor, it follows that

    R(X,Y)Z=g(Y,Z)Xg(X,Z)Y. (5.3)

    Thus, the manifold is of constant curvature.

    From (5.3), we get S(Y,Z)=2g(Y,Z). This implies that

    QY=2Y. (5.4)

    Now, by putting Y=ξ in (2.21), then using (5.1) and (5.4), we obtain Qξ=0. This proves Lemma 2.3. Next, by contracting S(Y,Z)=2g(Y,Z), we find r=6. Since r is constant, therefore, (2.24) leads to ξ(r)=0r=6, where n=3. This proves Remark 2.1.

    In the present study, we obtain certain important results on (LP-K)n admitting a -RYS and a gradient -RYS. First, we prove that the scalar curvature r of (LP-K)n admitting a -RYS satisfies Poission's equation, and we discuss the conditions for the -RYS to be shrinking, steady, and expanding. Furthermore, we deal with the study of gradient -RYS on (LP-K)n in two cases: (i) ρ=(n1)σ; in this case, we showed that the gradient function f of the gradient -RYS is constant, and hence the gradient -RYS is trivial. Moreover, (LP-K)n is an Einstein manifold; (ii) ρ(n1)σ, in this case, we proved that if an (LP-K)n admits a gradient -RYS, then the gradient of the potential function f is pointwise collinear with ξ.

    Abdul Haseeb: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing–original draft; Fatemah Mofarreh: Investigation, methodology, writing–review & editing; Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey: Conceptualization, methodology, writing–review & editing; Rajendra Prasad: Conceptualization, investigation, writing–review & editing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors are really thankful to the learned reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and their insightful comments and suggestions that have improved the quality of our manuscript. The author Fatemah Mofarreh (F. M.), expresses her thankful to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R27), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Also, the author Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey was supported by the Internal Research Funding Program of the University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Shinas, Oman.

    The author Fatemah Mofarreh (F. M.), expresses her thankful to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R27), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



    [1] M. Lazarević, M. R. Rapaić, T. B. Šekara, S. B. Stojanovic, D. L. Debeljkovic, Z. Vosika, et al., Advanced topics on applications of fractional calculus on control problems, system stability and modeling, WSEAS Press, 2014.
    [2] O. P. Agarwal, A general formulation and solution scheme for fractional optimal control problems, Nonlinear Dyn., 38 (2004), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-004-3764-6 doi: 10.1007/s11071-004-3764-6
    [3] M. Dehghan, E. A. Hamedi, H. Khosravian-Arab, A numerical scheme for the solution of a class of fractional variational and optimal control problems using the modified Jacobi polynomials, J. Vibration Control, 22 (2016), 1547–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314543727 doi: 10.1177/1077546314543727
    [4] M. D. Ortigueira, J. A. T. Machado, Fractional signal processing and applications, Signal Proc., 83 (2003), 2285–2480.
    [5] R. L. Magin, Fractional calculus models of complex dynamics in biological tissues, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.039
    [6] O. P. Agarwal, Solution for a fractional diffusion-wave equation defined in a bounded domain, Nonlinear Dyn., 29 (2002), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016539022492 doi: 10.1023/A:1016539022492
    [7] D. A. Benson, S. W. Wheatcraft, M. M. Meerschaert, Application of a fractional advection-dispersion equation, Water Resour. Res., 36 (2000), 1403–1412. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900031 doi: 10.1029/2000WR900031
    [8] A. H. Bhrawy, M. A. Zaky, Shifted fractional-order Jacobi orthogonal functions: application to a system of fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.06.012 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.06.012
    [9] F. Bulut, Ö. Oruc, A. Esen, Numerical solutions of fractional system of partial differential equations by Haar wavelets, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 108 (2015), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2015.108.263 doi: 10.3970/cmes.2015.108.263
    [10] W. G. Glöckle, T. F. Nonnenmacher, A fractional calculus approach to self-similar protein dynamics, Biophys. J., 68 (1995), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80157-8 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80157-8
    [11] V. Lupulescu, Fractional calculus for interval-valued functions, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 265 (2015), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.04.005
    [12] F. Mainardi, The fundamental solutions for the fractional diffusion-wave equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 9 (1996), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-9659(96)00089-4 doi: 10.1016/0893-9659(96)00089-4
    [13] E. Babolian, A. R. Vahidi, A. Shoja, An efficient method for nonlinear fractional differential equations: combination of the Adomian decomposition method and spectral method, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 45 (2014), 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-014-0102-7 doi: 10.1007/s13226-014-0102-7
    [14] S. P. Yang, A. G. Xiao, H. Su, Convergence of the variational iteration method for solving multi-order fractional differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 60 (2010), 2871–2879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.09.044 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.09.044
    [15] S. H. Hosseinnia, A. Ranjbar, S. Momani, Using an enhanced homotopy perturbation method in fractional differential equations via deforming the linear part, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 3138–3149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.07.002
    [16] M. Usman, N. Badshah, F. Ghaffar, Higher order compact finite difference method for the solution of 2-D time fractional diffusion equation, Matrix Sci. Math. (MSMK), 2 (2018), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.26480/msmk.01.2018.04.08 doi: 10.26480/msmk.01.2018.04.08
    [17] Z. Tomovskia, R. Hilferband, H. M. Srivastava, Fractional and operational calculus with generalized fractional derivative operators and Mittag-Leffler type functions, Integr. Transf. Spec. Funct., 21 (2010), 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652461003675737 doi: 10.1080/10652461003675737
    [18] A. Mohebbi, M. Abbaszadeh, M. Dehghan, High-order difference scheme for the solution of linear time fractional Klein-Gordon equations, Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ., 30 (2014), 1234–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.21867 doi: 10.1002/num.21867
    [19] S. Chen, X. Jiang, F. Liu, I. Turner, High order unconditionally stable difference schemes for the Riesz space-fractional telegraph equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 278 (2015), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.09.028 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.09.028
    [20] M. Zayermouri, G. E. Karniadakis, Fractioanal spectral collacation methods for linear and nonlinear variable order FPDEs, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 312–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.001
    [21] G. Bengochea, Operational solution of fractional differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 32 (2014), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2014.02.011 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.02.011
    [22] S. Murtaza, Z. Ahmad, I. E. Ali, Z. Akhtar, F. Tchier, H. Ahmad, et al., Analysis and numerical simulation of fractal-fractional order non-linear couple stress nanofluid with cadmium telluride nanoparticles, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 35 (2023), 102618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102618 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102618
    [23] F. Ali, Z. Ahmad, M. Arif, I. Khan, K. S. Nisar, A time fractional model of generalized Couette flow of couple stress nanofluid with heat and mass transfer: applications in engine oil, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 146944–146966. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013701 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013701
    [24] M. Sinan, K. Shah, P. Kumam, I. Mahariq, K. J. Ansari, Z. Ahmad, Z. Shah, Fractional order mathematical modeling of typhoid fever disease, Results Phys., 32 (2022), 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105044 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105044
    [25] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    [26] R. P. Agarwal, V. Lakshmikantham, J. J. Nieto, On the concept of solution for fractional differential equations with uncertainty, Nonlinear Anal., 72 (2010), 2859–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2009.11.029 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.11.029
    [27] M. Z. Ahmad, M. K. Hasan, S. Abbasbandy, Solving fuzzy fractional differential equations using Zadeh's extension principle, Sci. World J., 2013 (2013), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/454969 doi: 10.1155/2013/454969
    [28] A. Ahmadian, M. Suleiman, S. Salahshour, D. Baleanu, A Jacobi operational matrix for solving a fuzzy linear fractional differential equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2013 (2013), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-104 doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-104
    [29] B. Bede, I. J. Rudas, A. L. Bencsik, First order linear fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability, Inform. Sci., 177 (2007), 1648–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.08.021 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.08.021
    [30] T. Allahviranloo, S. Salahshour, S. Abbasbandy, Explicit solutions of fractional differential equations with uncertainty, Soft Comput., 16 (2012), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-011-0743-y doi: 10.1007/s00500-011-0743-y
    [31] A. Khastan, J. J. Nieto, R. Rodriguez-Lopez, Variation of constant formula for first order fuzzy differential equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 177 (2011), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.02.020 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2011.02.020
    [32] D. Takači, A. Takači, A. Takači, On the operational solutions of fuzzy fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 17 (2014), 1100–1113. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13540-014-0216-y doi: 10.2478/s13540-014-0216-y
    [33] V. Lakshmikantham, R. N. Mohapatra, Theory of fuzzy differential equations and inclusions, London: CRC Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203011386
    [34] A. M. Abu-Saman, H. S. El-Zerii, Fuzzy transform algorithm for partial fractional differential equations, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 6 (2016), 235–246.
    [35] S. Salahshour, T. Allahviranloo, S. Abbasbandy, Solving fuzzy fractional differential equations by fuzzy Laplace transforms, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 17 (2012), 1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.07.005
    [36] J. Reunsumrit, M. Sher, K. Shah, N. A. Alreshidi, M. Shutaywi, On fuzzy partial fractional order equations under fuzzified conditions, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240025. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400254 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22400254
    [37] M. Arfan, K. Shah, A. Ullah, S. Salahshour, A. Ahmadian, M. Ferrara, A novel semi-analytical method for solutions of two dimensional fuzzy fractional wave equation using natural transform, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst. S, 15 (2022), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2021011 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021011
    [38] M. Usman, H. Alrabaiah, H. U. Khan, M. Roman, On applicability of fuzzy natural transform for fuzzy fractional order partial differential problems, Fractals, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1142/SO218348X23400091 doi: 10.1142/SO218348X23400091
    [39] O. Kaleva, A note on fuzzy differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 64 (2006), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2005.01.003
    [40] B. Bede, S. G. Gal, Generalizations of the differentiability of fuzzy-number-valued functions with applications to fuzzy differential equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 151 (2005), 581–599 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.001
    [41] R. A. Fisher, The wave of advance of advantageous genes, Ann. Eugenics, 7 (1937), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02153.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02153.x
    [42] A. M. Zidan, A. Khan, R. Shah, M. K. Alaoui, W. Weera, Evaluation of time-fractional Fisher's equations with the help of analytical methods, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 18746–18766. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221031 doi: 10.3934/math.20221031
    [43] W. Zhang, Convergence of the balanced Euler method for a class of stochastic Volterra integro-differential equations with non-globally Lipschitz continuous cofficients, Appl. Numer. Math., 154 (2020), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2020.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2020.03.010
    [44] H. Ahmad, A. Akgül, T. A. Khan, P. S. Stanimirovic, Y. M. Chu, New perspective on the conventional solutions of the nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8829017 doi: 10.1155/2020/8829017
    [45] L. Verma, R. Meher, Solution for generalized fuzzy time-fractional Fisher's equation using a robust fuzzy analytical approach, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.03.019 doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2022.03.019
    [46] D. Ludwig, D. G. Aronson, H. F. Weinberger, Spatial patterning of the spruce budworm, J. Math. Biol., 8 (1979), 217–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276310 doi: 10.1007/BF00276310
    [47] M. O. Vlad, S. E. Szedlacsek, N. Pourmand, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, P. Oefner, J. Ross, Fisher's theorems for multivariable, time- and space-dependent systems, with applications in population genetics and chemical kinetics, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102 (2005), 9848–9853. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504073102 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504073102
    [48] A. J. Ammerman, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, The Neolithic transition and the genetics of populations in Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400853113
    [49] V. M. Kenkre, Results from variants of the Fisher equation in the study of epidemics and bacteria, Phys. A, 342 (2004), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.04.084 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2004.04.084
    [50] M. Merdan, Solutions of time-fractional reaction-diffusion equation with modified Riemann-Liouville derivative, Int. J. Phys. Sci., 7 (2012), 2317–2326. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS12.027 doi: 10.5897/IJPS12.027
    [51] M. J. Ablowitz, A. Zeppetella, Explicit solutions of Fisher's equation for a special wave speed, Bull. Math. Biol., 41 (1979), 835–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462380 doi: 10.1007/BF02462380
    [52] A. Babakhani, V. Daftardar-Gejji, On calculus of local fractional derivatives, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 270 (2002), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00048-3 doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00048-3
    [53] B. Bede, Mathematics of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35221-8
    [54] A. Ullah, Z. Ullah, T. AbdelJawad, Z. Hammounch, K. Shah, A hybrid method for solving fuzzy Volterra equations of separable type kernels, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 33 (2021), 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.101246 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.101246
    [55] F. B. M. Belgacem, R. Silambarasan, Theory of natural transform, Math. Eng. Sci. Aerosp., 3 (2012), 99–124.
    [56] A. M. Wazwaz, Linear and nonlinear integral equations, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21449-3
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1422) PDF downloads(80) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog