Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator

Muhammad Tariq; Asif Ali Shaikh; Sotiris K. Ntouyas; Jessada Tariboon; Muhammad Tariq; Asif Ali Shaikh; Sotiris K. Ntouyas; Jessada Tariboon

doi:10.3934/math.20231306

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 11: 25572-25610. doi: 10.3934/math.20231306

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator

1.
Department of Basic Sciences and Related Studies, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan
2.
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
3.
Intelligent and Nonlinear Dynamic Innovations Research Center, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand

Received: 10 July 2023 Revised: 20 August 2023 Accepted: 27 August 2023 Published: 05 September 2023
MSC : 26A33, 26A51, 26D07, 26D10, 26D15

In this article, we aim to introduce and explore a new class of preinvex functions called $\mathfrak{n}$ -polynomial $m$ -preinvex functions, while also presenting algebraic properties to enhance their numerical significance. We investigate novel variations of Pachpatte and Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities pertaining to the concept of preinvex functions within the framework of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator. By utilizing this direction, we establish a novel fractional integral identity that relates to preinvex functions for differentiable mappings of first-order. Furthermore, we derive some novel refinements for Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for functions whose first-order derivatives are polynomial preinvex in the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional sense. To demonstrate the practical utility of our findings, we present several inequalities using specific real number means. Overall, our investigation sheds light on convex analysis within the context of fractional calculus.

Keywords:

Citation: Muhammad Tariq, Asif Ali Shaikh, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon. Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25572-25610. doi: 10.3934/math.20231306

Related Papers:

[1]	Yinwan Cheng, Chao Yang, Bing Yao, Yaqin Luo . Neighbor full sum distinguishing total coloring of Halin graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6959-6970. doi: 10.3934/math.2022386
[2]	Shabbar Naqvi, Muhammad Salman, Muhammad Ehtisham, Muhammad Fazil, Masood Ur Rehman . On the neighbor-distinguishing in generalized Petersen graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13734-13745. doi: 10.3934/math.2021797
[3]	Xiaoxue Hu, Jiangxu Kong . An improved upper bound for the dynamic list coloring of 1-planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7337-7348. doi: 10.3934/math.2022409
[4]	Baolin Ma, Chao Yang . Distinguishing colorings of graphs and their subgraphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26561-26573. doi: 10.3934/math.20231357
[5]	Zongpeng Ding . Skewness and the crossing numbers of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23989-23996. doi: 10.3934/math.20231223
[6]	Zongrong Qin, Dingjun Lou . The k-subconnectedness of planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5762-5771. doi: 10.3934/math.2021340
[7]	Xin Xu, Xu Zhang, Jiawei Shao . Planar Turán number of double star $S_{3, 4}$ . AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1628-1644. doi: 10.3934/math.2025075
[8]	Yunfeng Tang, Huixin Yin, Miaomiao Han . Star edge coloring of $K_{2, t}$ -free planar graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13154-13161. doi: 10.3934/math.2023664
[9]	Ana Klobučar Barišić, Antoaneta Klobučar . Double total domination number in certain chemical graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19629-19640. doi: 10.3934/math.20221076
[10]	Gohar Ali, Martin Bača, Marcela Lascsáková, Andrea Semaničová-Feňovčíková, Ahmad ALoqaily, Nabil Mlaiki . Modular total vertex irregularity strength of graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7662-7671. doi: 10.3934/math.2023384

Abstract

1. Introduction

Differential equations of arbitrary order have been shown to be useful in the study of models of many phenomena in various fields such as: Electrochemistry and material science, they are in fact described by differential equations of fractional order ^{[9,10,15,16,25,26,27,28,29]}. For more details, we refer the reader to the books of Hilfer ^[30], Podlubny ^[31], Kilbas et al. ^[34], Miller and Ross ^[2] and to the following research papers ^{[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,11,12,14,16,17,19,20,24,31,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]}. In this work, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of the solutions for multi-point boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations with two Riemann-Liouville fractionals:

$\begin{equation} \left\{\begin{array}{llll} D^{\alpha}x(t) = \sum^{m}_{i = 1}f_{i}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t)) , \alpha\in]1, 2], t\in[0, T] &\\ D^{\beta }y(t) = \sum_{i = 1}^{m}g_{i}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{2}x(t), \phi_{2}y(t)) , \beta\in]1, 2], t\in[0, T]& \\ I^{2-\alpha}x(0) = 0, \ D^{\alpha-2}x(T) = \theta I^{\alpha-1}(x(\eta)), \ 0 < \eta < T, &\\ I^{2-\beta}y(0) = 0, \ D^{\beta-2}x(T) = \omega I^{\beta-1}(x(\gamma)), \ 0 < \gamma < T, & \end{array}\right. \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where $D^{(.)}$ , $I^{(.)}$ denote the Riemann-Liouville derivative and integral of fractional order $(.)$ , respectively, $f_{i},$ $g_{i}:\left[0, T\right] \times \mathbb{R}^{4}\rightarrow \mathbb{R},$ $i = 1, \cdots, m$ are continuous functions on $[0, T]$ and

$(\varphi_{1}x)(t) = \int_{0}^{t}A_{1}'(t, s)x(s)ds, \ (\phi_{1}y)(t) = \int_{0}^{t}B_{1}'(t, s)y(s)ds,$

$(\varphi_{2}x)(t) = \int_{0}^{t}A_{2}'(t, s)x(s)ds, \ (\phi_{1}y)(t) = \int_{0}^{t}B_{2}'(t, s)y(s)ds,$

with $A_{i}$ and $B_{i}$ being continuous functions on $[0, 1]\times[0, 1].$ However, it is rare to find a work in nonlinear term $f_{i}$ depends on fractional derivative of unknown functions $x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t)$ and solutions for multi-order fractional differential equations on the infinite interval $[0, T)$ . Motivated by ^{[8,11,12,13,14]} and the references therein, we consider the existence and unicity of solution for multi-order fractional differential equations on infinite interval $[0, T)$ .

The rest of this paper is organized as follow. In section 2, we present some preliminaries and lemmas. Section 3 is dedicated to showing the existence of a solution for problem (1.1). Finally, section 4 illustrated the proposed results with two examples.

Remark 1.1. This work generalizes the work of Houas and Benbachir ^[14] on different boundary conditions and for another type of integral.

2. Preliminaries

This section covers the basic concepts of Riemann-Liouville type fractional calculus that will be used throughout this paper.

Definition 2.1. ^[31,32] The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order $\alpha \geq 0,$ of a function $f:\left(0, \infty \right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is defined as

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left\{\begin{array}{ll} J^{\alpha }f\left( t\right) = \frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) }\int_{0}^{t}\left( t-\tau \right) ^{\alpha -1}f\left( \tau \right) d\tau , & \\ J^{0}f\left( t\right) = f\left( t\right) , & \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray*}$

where $\Gamma \left(\alpha \right) : = \int_{0}^{\infty }e^{-u}u^{\alpha -1}du.$

Definition 2.2. ^[31,32] The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order $\alpha > 0,$ of a continuous function $h:\left(0, \infty \right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is defined as

$\begin{equation*} D^{\alpha}h\left( t\right) = \frac{1}{\Gamma \left( n-\alpha \right) } \left( \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{n}\int_{0}^{t}\left( t-\tau \right) ^{n-\alpha-1}h\left( \tau \right) d\tau = \left(\dfrac{d}{dt}\right)^{n}I^{n-\alpha}h(\tau), \end{equation*}$

where $n = \left[\alpha \right] +1.$

For $\alpha < 0$ , we use the convention that $D^{\alpha }h = J^{-\alpha}h.$ Also for $0\leq \rho < \alpha$ , it is valid that $D^{\rho }J^{\alpha }h = h^{\alpha -\rho }.$ We note that for $\varepsilon > -1$ and $\varepsilon \neq \alpha -1, \alpha-2, ..., \alpha-n,$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} D^{\alpha}t^{\varepsilon } & = &\frac{\Gamma \left( \varepsilon +1\right) }{\Gamma \left( \varepsilon -\alpha +1\right) }t^{\varepsilon -\alpha }, \\ D^{\alpha}t^{\alpha -i} & = &0, \text{ }i = 1, 2, ..., n. \end{eqnarray*}$

In particular, for the constant function $h(t) = 1$ , we obtain

$D^{\alpha}1 = \dfrac{1}{\Gamma(1-\alpha)}t^{-\alpha}, \alpha\notin\mathbb{N}.$

For $\alpha\in\mathbb{N}$ , we obtain, of course, $D^{\alpha}1 = 0$ because of the poles of the gamma function at the points $0, -1, -2, ...$ For $\alpha > 0$ , the general solution of the homgeneous equation $D^{\alpha}h(t) = 0$ in $C(0, T)\cap L(0, T)$ is

$h(t) = c_{0}t^{\alpha-n}+c_{1}t^{\alpha-n-1}+......+c_{n-2}t^{\alpha-2}+c_{n-1}t^{\alpha-1},$

where $c_{i}, i = 1, 2, ...., n-1$ , are arbitrary real constants. Further, we always have $D^{\alpha}I^{\alpha}h = h$ , and

$D^{\alpha}I^{\alpha}h(t) = h(t)+c_{0}t^{\alpha-n}+c_{1}t^{\alpha-n-1}+......+c_{n-2}t^{\alpha-2}+c_{n-1}t^{\alpha-1}.$

Lemma 2.1. ^[33] Let $E$ be Banach space. Assume that $T : E\longrightarrow E$ is a completely continuous operator. If the set $V = \{x \in E : x = \mu T x, \ 0 < \mu < 1\}$ is bounded, then $T$ has a fixed point in $E$ .

To define the solution for problem (1.1). We consider the following lemma.

Lemma 2.2. Suppose that $(H_{i})_{i = 1, \ldots, m}\subset C([0, 1], \mathbb{R})$ , and consider the problem

$\begin{equation} D^{\alpha}h(t)-\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}H_{i}(t) = 0, \ t\in j, \ 1 < \alpha < 2, \ m\in\mathbb{N}^{\ast}, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

with the conditions

$\begin{equation} I^{2-\alpha}h(0) = 0, \ D^{\alpha-2}h(T) = \theta I^{\alpha-1}(h(\eta)), \ 0 < \eta < T. \end{equation}$

(2.2)

Then we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} h(t)& = &\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{t}_{0}(t-\tau)^{\alpha-1}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau\\ &&+\dfrac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\psi}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{T}_{0}(T-\tau)H_{i}(\tau)d\tau \right. \left. -\dfrac{\theta}{\Gamma(2\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{\eta}_{0}(\eta-\tau)^{2\alpha-2}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau\right) \end{eqnarray*}$

with $\psi = \theta\dfrac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\eta^{2\alpha-2}-\Gamma(\alpha)T.$

Proof. We have

$h(t) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{\alpha}H_{i}(t)+c_{0}t^{\alpha-2}+c_{1}t^{\alpha-1},$

where $c_{i}\in\mathbb{R}, \ i = 0, 1.$

We obtain

$\begin{eqnarray*} I^{2-\alpha}h(\tau)& = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2}H_{i}(\tau)+c_{0}I^{2-\alpha}\tau^{\alpha-2}+c_{1}I^{2-\alpha}\tau^{\alpha-1}\\ & = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2}H_{i}(\tau)+c_{0}+c_{1}\tau , \\ I^{\alpha-1}h(\tau)& = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2\alpha-1}H_{i}(\tau)+c_{0}I^{\alpha-1}\tau^{\alpha-2}+c_{1}I^{\alpha-1}\tau^{\alpha-1}\\ & = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2\alpha-1}H_{i}(\tau)+c_{0}\dfrac{\Gamma(\alpha-1)}{\Gamma(2\alpha-2)}\tau^{2\alpha-3}+c_{1}\dfrac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\tau^{2\alpha-2}, \\ D^{\alpha-2}h(\tau)& = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2}H_{i}(\tau)+c_{0}\Gamma(\alpha-1)+c_{1}\Gamma(\alpha)\tau. \end{eqnarray*}$

Using the given conditions: $I^{2-\alpha}h(0) = 0$ , we find that $c_{0} = 0$ , and since $D^{\alpha-2}h(T)-\theta I^{\alpha-1}(h(\eta)) = 0$ , we have

$\begin{equation*} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2}h_{i}(T)+c_{1}\Gamma(\alpha)T-\theta\left[\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2\alpha-1}h_{i}(\eta)+c_{1}\dfrac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\eta^{2\alpha-2}\right] = 0, \end{equation*}$

then

$\begin{equation*} c_{1}\left[\dfrac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\eta^{2\alpha-2}-\Gamma(\alpha)T\right] = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2}h_{i}(T)-\theta\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2\alpha-1}h_{i}(\eta) \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray*} c_{1}& = &\dfrac{1}{\psi}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2}H_{i}(T)-\theta\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}I^{2\alpha-1}H_{i}(\eta)\right)\\ & = &\dfrac{1}{\psi}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int_{0}^{T}(T-\tau)H_{i}(\tau)d\tau-\dfrac{\theta}{\Gamma(2\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int_{0}^{\eta}(\eta-\tau)^{2\alpha-2}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau\right) \end{eqnarray*}$

with

$\begin{eqnarray*} \psi = \theta\dfrac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\eta^{2\alpha-2}-\Gamma(\alpha)T. \end{eqnarray*}$

Finally, the solution of (2.1) and (2.2) is

$\begin{eqnarray*} h(t)& = &\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{t}_{0}(t-\tau)^{\alpha-1}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau+\dfrac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\psi}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{T}_{0}(T-\tau)H_{i}(\tau)d\tau \right. \\ &&\qquad \left. -\dfrac{\theta}{\Gamma(2\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{\eta}_{0}(\eta-\tau)^{2\alpha-2}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau\right). \end{eqnarray*}$

3. Main results

We denote by

$E = \{x, y\in C\left( \left[ 0, T\right], \mathbb{R} \right); \varphi_{i}x, \phi_{i}y\in C\left( \left[ 0, T\right], \mathbb{R} \right)\ \ i = 1, 2\},$

and the Banach space of all continuous functions from $\left[0, T \right]$ to $\mathbb{R}$ endowed with a topology of uniform convergence with the norm defined by

$||(x, y)||_{E} = \max\left(||x||, ||y||, ||\varphi_{1} x||, ||\phi_{1}y||, ||\varphi_{2}x||, ||\phi_{2}y||\right),$

where

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&||x|| = \sup\limits_{t\in j}|\varphi_{i}x(t)|, \; \; ||y|| = \sup\limits_{t \in j}|y(t)|, \\ && ||\phi_{i}x|| = \sup\limits_{t\in j}|\varphi_{i}x(t)|, \; \; ||\phi_{i}y|| = \sup\limits_{t \in j}|\phi_{i}y(t)|. \end{eqnarray*}$

In this section, we prove some existence and uniqueness results to the nonlinear fractional coupled system (1.1).

For the sake of convenience, we impose the following hypotheses:

$(H1)$ For each $i = 1, 2, \cdots, m$ , the functions $f_{i}$ and $g_{i}\ \ : [0, T]\times\mathbb{R}^4\longrightarrow\mathbb{R}$ are continuous.

$(H2)$ There exist nonnegative real numbers $\xi^{i}_{k}, \varphi^{i}_{k}, k = 1, 2, 3, 4, i = 1, 2, \cdots, m$ , such that for all $t\in \left[0, T\right]$ and all $(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}),$ $(y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}, y_{4})\in \mathbb{R}^{4},$ we have

$\begin{equation*} |f_{i}(t, x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4})-f_{i}(t, y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}, y_{4})|\leq\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{4}\ \xi^{i}_{k} |x_{k}-y_{k}|, \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} |g_{i}(t, x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4})-g_{i}(t, y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}, y_{4})|\leq\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{4}\ \chi^{i}_{k} |x_{k}-y_{k}|. \end{equation*}$

$(H3)$ There exist nonnegative constants $(L_{i}) \ \text{and}\ \ (K_{i}) \ i = 1, ..., m$ , such that: For each $t \in [0, T]$ and all $(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}) \in \mathbb{R}^{4},$

$\begin{equation*} | f_{i} (t, x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4})| \leq L_{i}, |g_{i} (t, x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4})| \leq K_{i}, i = 1, ..., m. \end{equation*}$

We also consider the following quantities:

$\begin{eqnarray*} A_{1}& = &\dfrac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha +1)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}(\xi_{1}^{i}+\xi_{2}^{i}+\xi_{3}^{i}+\xi_{4}^{i}), \\ A_{2}& = &\dfrac{T^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta +1)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}(\chi_{1}^{i}+\chi_{2}^{i}+\chi_{3}^{i}+\chi_{4}^{i}), \\ A_{3}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}||A'_{1}(t, s)||\times A_{1}, \\ A_{4}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}||A'_{2}(t, s)||\times A_{1}, \\ A_{5}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}||B'_{1}(t, s)||\times A_{2}, \\ A_{6}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}||B'_{2}(t, s)||\times A_{2}, \\ \nu_{1}& = &\left[\dfrac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}+\dfrac{1}{\psi}\left(\dfrac{T^{\alpha+1}}{2}+\dfrac{\theta T^{3\alpha-2}}{(2\alpha-1)^{2}\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\right)\right], \\ \nu_{2}& = &\left[\dfrac{T^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}+\dfrac{1}{\psi'}\left(\dfrac{T^{\beta+1}}{2}+\dfrac{\omega T^{3\beta-2}}{(2\beta-1)^{2}\Gamma(2\beta-1)}\right)\right], \\ \nu_{3}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}|A'_{1}(t, s)|\nu_{1}, \\ \nu_{4}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}|A'_{2}(t, s)|\nu_{1}, \\ \nu_{5}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}|B'_{1}(t, s)|\nu_{2}, \\ \nu_{6}& = &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}|B'_{2}(t, s)|\nu_{2}. \end{eqnarray*}$

3.1. Existence of solutions

The first result is based on Banach contraction principle. We have

Theorem 3.1. Assume that $(H2)$ holds. If the inequality

$\begin{equation} \max(A_{1}, A_{2}, A_{3}, A_{4}, A_{5}, A_{6}) < 1, \end{equation}$

(3.1)

is valid, then the system (1.1) has a unique solution on $[0, T]$ .

Proof. We define the operator $T : E\longrightarrow E$ by

$T(x, y)(t) = (T_{1}(x, y)(t) , T_{2} (x, y)(t)) , t \in[0, T],$

such that

$\begin{eqnarray} T_{1}(x, y)(t)& = &\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{t}_{0}(t-\tau)^{\alpha-1}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau+\dfrac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\psi}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{T}_{0}(T-\tau)H_{i}(\tau)d\tau \right.\\ &&\qquad \left. -\dfrac{\theta}{\Gamma(2\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{\eta}_{0}(\eta-\tau)^{2\alpha-2}H_{i}(\tau)d\tau\right) \end{eqnarray}$

(3.2)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} T_{2}(x, y)(t)& = &\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\beta)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{t}_{0}(t-\tau)^{\beta-1}G_{i}(\tau)d\tau+\dfrac{t^{\beta-1}}{\psi'}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{T}_{0}(T-\tau)G_{i}(\tau)d\tau \right.\\ &&\qquad \left. -\dfrac{\omega}{\Gamma(2\beta)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{\gamma}_{0}(\gamma-\tau)^{2\beta-2}G_{i}(\tau)d\tau\right) \end{eqnarray}$

(3.3)

where

$H_{i}(\tau) = f_{i}(\tau, x(\tau), y(\tau), \varphi_{1}x(\tau), \phi_{1}y(\tau))$

and

$G_{i}(\tau) = g_{i}(\tau, x(\tau), y(\tau), \varphi_{2}x(\tau), \phi_{2}y(\tau)).$

We obtain

$\varphi_{i} T_{1}(x, y)(t) = \int^{t}_{0}A_{i}(t, s)T_{1}(x, y)(s)ds, \ \phi_{i}T_{2}(x, y)(t) = \int^{t}_{0}B_{i}(t, s)T_{2}(x, y)(s)ds$

where $i = 1, 2.$

We shall now prove that T is contractive.

Let $T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1}), T_{2} (x_{2}, y_{2})\in E$ . Then, for each $t\in [0, T]$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray} |T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2})|&\leq &\left[\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{t}_{0}(t-\tau)^{\alpha-1}d\tau+\dfrac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\psi}\left(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{T}_{0}(T-\tau)d\tau \right.\right. \\ &&\qquad \left.\left. -\dfrac{\theta}{\Gamma(2\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}\int^{\eta}_{0}(\eta-\tau)^{2\alpha-2}d\tau\right)\right]\\ &&\times\max\limits_{\tau\in[0, T]}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} \left|\left(\begin{array}{ll} f_{i}(\tau, x_{1}(\tau), y_{1}(\tau), \varphi_{1}x_{1}(\tau), \phi_{1}y_{1}(\tau))& \\ -f_{i}(\tau, x_{2}(\tau), y_{2}(\tau), \varphi_{1}x_{2}(\tau), \phi_{1}y_{2}(\tau)) & \end{array}\right)\right|\\ &\leq &\dfrac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha +1)}\max\limits_{\tau\in[0, T]}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} \left|\left(\begin{array}{ll} f_{i}(\tau, x_{1}(\tau), y_{1}(\tau), \varphi_{1}x_{1}(\tau), \phi_{1}y_{1}(\tau)) & \\ -f_{i}(\tau, x_{2}(\tau), y_{2}(\tau), \varphi_{1}x_{2}(\tau), \phi_{1}y_{2}(\tau)) \end{array}\right)\right|. \end{eqnarray}$

By $(H2)$ , it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray*} ||T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2})||&\leq &\dfrac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha +1)}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}(\xi_{1}^{i}+\xi_{2}^{i}+\xi_{3}^{i}+\xi_{4}^{i})\times\max(||x_{1}-x_{2}||, ||y_{1}-y_{2}||, \\ &&||\varphi_{1}(x_{1}-x_{2})||, ||\varphi_{2}(x_{1}-x_{2})||, ||\phi_{1}(y_{1}-y_{2})||, ||\phi_{2}(y_{1}-y_{2})||). \end{eqnarray*}$

Hence,

$\begin{equation} ||T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2})||\leq A_{1}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E}. \end{equation}$

(3.4)

With the same arguments as before, we can show that

$\begin{equation} ||T_{2}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{2}(x_{2}, y_{2})||\leq A_{2}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E}. \end{equation}$

(3.5)

On the other hand, we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} ||\varphi_{1}(T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2}))||&\leq &\int_{0}^{t}||A'_{1}(t, s)||||T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2})||ds\\ &\leq &\max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}||A'_{1}(t, s)||\times A_{1}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Hence,

$\begin{equation} ||\varphi_{1}(T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2}))||\leq A_{3}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

and

$\begin{equation} ||\varphi_{2}(T_{1}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{1}(x_{2}, y_{2}))||\leq A_{4}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E}. \end{equation}$

(3.7)

Also, we have

$\begin{equation} ||\phi_{1}(T_{2}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{2}(x_{2}, y_{2}))||\leq A_{5}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E} \end{equation}$

(3.8)

and

$\begin{equation} ||\phi_{2}(T_{2}(x_{1}, y_{1})-T_{2}(x_{2}, y_{2}))||\leq A_{6}||x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2}||_{E}. \end{equation}$

(3.9)

Thanks to (3.4)–(3.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} ||T(x_{1}, y_{1})-T(x_{2}, y_{2})|| & \leq \max(A_{1}, A_{2}, A_{3}, A_{4}, A_{5}, A_{6})\\ & \times ||(x_{1}-x_{2}, y_{1}-y_{2})||_{E}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.10)

Thanks to (3.10), we conclude that T is a contractive operator. Therefore, by Banach fixed point theorem, $T$ has a unique fixed point which is the solution of the system (1.1).

3.2. Uniqueness of solutions

Our second main result is based on Lemma 2.1. We have

Theorem 3.2. Assume that the hypotheses $(H1)$ and $(H3)$ are satisfied. Then, system (1.1) has at least a solution on $[0, T]$ .

Proof. The operator $T$ is continuous on $E$ in view of the continuity of $f_{i}$ and $g_{i}$ (hypothesis ( $H1$ )).

Now, we show that $T$ is completely continuous:

(i) First, we prove that $T$ maps bounded sets of $E$ into bounded sets of $E$ . Taking $\lambda > 0$ , and $(x, y)\in \Omega_{\lambda} = \{(x, y) \in E; ||(x, y)||\leq\lambda\}$ , then for each $t\in [0, T]$ , we have:

$\begin{eqnarray*} |T_{1}(x, y)|&\leq &\left[\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int^{t}_{0}(t-\tau)^{\alpha-1}d\tau+\dfrac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\psi}\left(\int^{T}_{0}(T-\tau)d\tau \right.\right. \\ \nonumber &&\qquad \left.\left. -\dfrac{\theta}{\Gamma(2\alpha)}\int^{\eta}_{0}(\eta-\tau)^{2\alpha-2}d\tau\right)\right]\\ &&\times\sup\limits_{t\in[0, T]}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} |f_{i}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))|\\ &\leq & \left[\dfrac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}+\dfrac{1}{\psi}\left(\dfrac{T^{\alpha+1}}{2}+\dfrac{\theta T^{3\alpha-2}}{(2\alpha-1)^{2}\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\right)\right] \\ &&\times\sup\limits_{t\in[0, T]}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} |f_{i}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))|, \end{eqnarray*}$

Thanks to ( $H3$ ), we can write

$||T_{1}(x, y)||\leq\left[\dfrac{T^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}+\dfrac{1}{\psi}\left(\dfrac{T^{\alpha+1}}{2}+\dfrac{\theta T^{3\alpha-2}}{(2\alpha-1)^{2}\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\right)\right]\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}.$

Thus,

$\begin{equation} ||T_{1}(x, y)||\leq \nu_{1} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}. \end{equation}$

(3.11)

As before, we have

$\begin{equation} ||T_{2}(x, y)||\leq \nu_{2} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} K_{i}. \end{equation}$

(3.12)

On the other hand, for all $j = 1, 2$ , we get

$\begin{eqnarray*} |\phi_{j}T_{1}(x, y)(t)| = \left|\int_{0}^{t}A'_{j}(t, s)T_{1}(x, y)(s)ds\right| \leq \max\limits_{t, s\in[0, 1]}|A'_{j}(t, s)|\nu_{1}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}. \end{eqnarray*}$

This implies that

$\begin{eqnarray} ||\phi_{1}T_{1}(x, y)(t)||&\leq &\nu_{3}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.13)

$\begin{eqnarray} ||\phi_{2}T_{1}(x, y)(t)||&\leq &\nu_{4}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.14)

Similarly, we have

$\begin{eqnarray} ||\varphi_{1}T_{2}(x, y)(t)||&\leq &\nu_{5}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} K_{i}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.15)

$\begin{eqnarray} ||\varphi_{2}T_{2}(x, y)(t)||&\leq &\nu_{6}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} K_{i}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.16)

It follows from (3.11)–(3.16) that:

$\begin{eqnarray*} ||T(x, y)||_{E}\leq \max \left(\begin{array}{ll} \nu_{1} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, \nu_{2} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} K_{i}, \nu_{3}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, &\\ \nu_{4}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, , \nu_{5}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}, \nu_{6}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}& \end{array}\right). \end{eqnarray*}$

Thus,

$||T(x, y)||_{E} < \infty.$

(ii) Second, we prove that $T$ is equi-continuous:

For any $0 \leq t_{1} < t_{2} \leq T$ and $(x, y) \in\Omega_{\lambda}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&|T_{1}(x, y)(t_{2})-T_{1}(x, y)(t_{1})|\\ &&\qquad\leq \left[\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int^{t_{1}}_{0}(t_{2}-\tau)^{\alpha-1}-(t_{1}-\tau)^{\alpha-1}d\tau+\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int^{t_{2}}_{t_{1}}(t_{2}-\tau)^{\alpha-1}d\tau\right. \\ &&\qquad\quad\left.+\dfrac{t_{2}^{\alpha-1}-t_{1}^{\alpha-1}}{\psi}\left(\dfrac{T^{2}}{2}-\dfrac{\theta\eta^{2\alpha-1}}{\Gamma(2\alpha-1)^{2}\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}\right)\right]\\ &&\qquad\times\sup\limits_{t\in[0, T]}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m} |f_{i}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))|\\ &&\qquad\leq\left[\dfrac{2}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}(t_{2}-t_{1})^{\alpha-1}+(t_{2}^{\alpha-1}-t_{1}^{\alpha-1})\left[\dfrac{T^{2}}{2\psi}\right.\right.\\ &&\qquad\quad\left.\left.-\dfrac{\theta\eta^{2\alpha-1}}{\psi\Gamma(2\alpha-1)^{2}\Gamma(2\alpha-1)}+\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}\right]\right]\times\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}L_{i}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Therefore,

$\begin{eqnarray} &&||T_{1}(x, y)(t_{2})-T_{1}(x, y)(t_{1})||_{E} \\ &&\quad\left[\dfrac{2}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}(t_{2}-t_{1})^{\alpha-1}+(t_{2}^{\alpha-1}-t_{1}^{\alpha-1})\left[\dfrac{T^{2}}{2\psi}+\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}\right]\right]\times\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}L_{i}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.17)

We also have

$\begin{eqnarray} &&||T_{2}(x, y)(t_{2})-T_{2}(x, y)(t_{1})||_{E} \\ &&\quad\left[\dfrac{2}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}(t_{2}-t_{1})^{\beta-1}+(t_{2}^{\beta-1}-t_{1}^{\beta-1})\left[\dfrac{T^{2}}{2\psi'}+\dfrac{1}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}\right]\right]\times\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}K_{i}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.18)

On the other hand,

$\begin{eqnarray*} &&|\phi_{i}T_{1}(x, y)(t_{2})-\phi_{i}T_{1}(x, y)(t_{1})|\\ &&\quad\leq\left[\max\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|A_{i}'(t_{2}, s)-A_{i}'(t_{1}, s)|+(t_{2}-t_{1})\max\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|A_{i}'(t_{1}, s)|\right] \times\sup\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|T_{1}(x, y)(s)|. \end{eqnarray*}$

Consequently, for all $i = 1, 2,$ we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} &&||\phi_{i}T_{1}(x, y)(t_{2})-\phi_{i}T_{1}(x, y)(t_{1})||\\ &&\quad\leq\left[\max\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|A_{i}'(t_{2}, s)-A_{i}'(t_{1}, s)|+(t_{2}-t_{1})\max\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|A_{i}'(t_{1}, s)|\right] \nu_{1}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}L_{i}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.19)

Similarly,

$\begin{eqnarray} &&||\varphi_{i}T_{1}(x, y)(t_{2})-\varphi_{i}T_{1}(x, y)(t_{1})||\\ &&\quad\leq\left[\max\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|B_{i}'(t_{2}, s)-B_{i}'(t_{1}, s)|+(t_{2}-t_{1})\max\limits_{s\in[0, 1]}|B_{i}'(t_{1}, s)|\right] \nu_{2}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}K_{i}. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.20)

where $i = 1, 2$ . Using (3.17)–(3.20), we deduce that

$||T(x, y)(t_{2})-T(x, y)(t_{1})||_{E}\longrightarrow 0$

as $t_{2}\rightarrow t_{1}.$

Combining (i) and (ii), we conclude that $T$ is completely continuous.

(iii) Finally, we shall prove that the set $F$ defined by

$F = \{(x, y) \in E, (x, y) = \rho T (x, y), \ 0 < \rho < 1 \}$

is bounded.

Let $(x, y)\in F$ , then $(x, y) = \rho T (x, y)$ , for some $0 < \rho < 1$ . Thus, for each $t \in [0, T]$ , we have:

$\begin{equation} x(t) = \rho T_{1}(x, y)(t), \ y (t) = \rho T_{2}(x, y)(t) . \end{equation}$

(3.21)

Thanks to ( $H3$ ) and using (3.11) and (3.12), we deduce that

$\begin{equation} ||x||\leq\rho\nu_{1}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}L_{i}, \ ||y|| \leq\rho\nu_{2} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}K_{i} . \end{equation}$

(3.22)

Using (3.13)–(3.16), it yields that

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{llll} ||\phi_{1}x||\leq \rho\nu_{3} \sum_{i = 1}^{m}L_{i} & \\ ||\phi_{2}x||\leq \rho\nu_{4} \sum_{i = 1}^{m}L_{i} & \\ ||\varphi_{1}y||\leq \rho\nu_{5} \sum_{i = 1}^{m}K_{i} & \\ ||\varphi_{2}y||\leq \rho\nu_{6} \sum_{i = 1}^{m}K_{i} & \end{array}\right.. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.23)

It follows from (3.22) and (3.23) that

$\begin{eqnarray*} ||T(x, y)||_{E}\leq \rho\max \left(\begin{array}{ll} \nu_{1} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, \nu_{2} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} K_{i}, \nu_{3}\sum_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, &\\ \nu_{4}\sum_{i = 1}^{m} L_{i}, , \nu_{5}\sum_{i = 1}^{m}, \nu_{6}\sum_{i = 1}^{m}& \end{array}\right). \end{eqnarray*}$

Consequently,

$||(x, y)||_{E} < \infty.$

This shows that $F$ is bounded. By Lemma (2.1), we deduce that $T$ has a fixed point, which is a solution of (1.1).

4. Related examples

To illustrate our main results, we treat the following examples.

Example 4.1. Consider the following system:

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{llllll} D^{\frac{3}{2}}x(t) = \dfrac{\cos(\pi t)(x+y+\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}{10\pi(x+y+\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}+\dfrac{1}{32\pi^{2}e}&\\ \\ \qquad\qquad\qquad \left(\cos x(t)+\cos y(t)+\dfrac{\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t)}{4\pi}\right), &\\ \\ D^{\frac{3}{2}}y(t) = \dfrac{1}{8\pi^{3}(t+1)}\left(\dfrac{x+y+\varphi_{2}x(t)+\phi_{2}y(t)}{3+x+y+\varphi_{2}x(t)+\phi_{2}y(t)}\right)+\dfrac{1}{(10\pi+e^{t})e^{(t+1)}}&\\ \\ \qquad\qquad\qquad \left(\dfrac{\sin x(t)+\sin y(t)+\cos\varphi_{2}x(t)+\cos\phi_{2}y(t) }{2+\sin x(t)+\sin y(t)+\cos\varphi_{2}x(t)+\cos\phi_{2}y(t)}\right), \\ \\ I^{\frac{1}{2}}x(0) = 0, \ D^{-\frac{1}{2}}x(T) = I^{\frac{1}{2}}(x(1)), &\\ I^{\frac{1}{2}}y(0) = 0, \ D^{-\frac{1}{2}}y(T) = I^{\frac{1}{2}}(y(1)).& \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

We have

$\alpha = \dfrac{3}{2}, \ \beta = \dfrac{3}{2}, \ T = 1, \ \theta = 1, \ \omega = 1, \ \gamma = 1, \ m = 2, \ \eta = 1.$

Also,

$\begin{eqnarray} f_{1}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))& = & \dfrac{\cos(\pi t)(x+y+\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}{10\pi(1+x+y+\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}, \end{eqnarray}$

(4.2)

$\begin{eqnarray} f_{2}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))& = &\dfrac{1}{32\pi^{2}e}\left(\cos x(t)+\cos y(t)+\dfrac{\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t)}{4\pi}\right).\\ \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

For $t \in [0, 1]$ and $(x_{1}, y_{1}, \varphi_{1}x_{1}, \phi_{1}y_{1}), (x_{2}, y_{2}, \varphi_{1}x_{2}, \phi_{1}y_{2})\in\mathbb{R}^{4}$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray} &&|f_{1}(t, x_{1}, y_{1}, \varphi_{1}x_{1}, \phi_{1}y_{1})-f_{1}(t, x_{2}, y_{2}, \varphi_{1}x_{2}, \phi_{1}y_{2})|\\ &&\leq\dfrac{|\cos(\pi t)|}{10\pi}\left|\dfrac{x_{1}+y_{1}+\varphi_{1}x_{1}+\phi_{1}y_{1}}{1+x_{1}+y_{1}+\varphi_{1}x_{1}+\phi_{1}y_{1}}-\dfrac{x_{2}+y_{2}+\varphi_{1}x_{2}+\phi_{1}y_{2})}{1+x_{2}+y_{2}+\varphi_{1}x_{2}+\phi_{1}y_{2})}\right|\\ &&\leq \dfrac{1}{10\pi}(|x_{1}-x_{2}|+|y_{1}-y_{2}|+|\varphi_{1}x_{1}-\varphi_{1}x_{2}|+|\phi_{1}y_{1}-\phi_{1}y_{2}|) \end{eqnarray}$

(4.4)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} &&|f_{2}(t, x_{1}, y_{1}, \varphi_{1}x_{1}, \phi_{1}y_{1})-f_{2}(t, x_{2}, y_{2}, \varphi_{1}x_{2}, \phi_{1}y_{2})|\\ &&\quad\leq \dfrac{1}{32\pi e}(|x_{1}-x_{2}|+|y_{1}-y_{2}|+|\varphi_{1}x_{1}-\varphi_{1}x_{2}|+|\phi_{1}y_{1}-\phi_{1}y_{2}|). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

So, we can take

$\xi_{1}^{1} = \xi_{2}^{1} = \xi_{3}^{1} = \xi_{4}^{1} = \dfrac{1}{10\pi},$

$\xi_{1}^{2} = \xi_{2}^{2} = \xi_{3}^{2} = \xi_{4}^{2} = \dfrac{1}{32\pi e}.$

We also have

$\begin{eqnarray} g_{1}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{2}x(t), \phi_{2}y(t))& = &\dfrac{1}{8\pi^{3}(t+1)}\left(\dfrac{x+y+\varphi_{2}x(t)+\phi_{2}y(t)}{3+x+y+\varphi_{2}x(t)+\phi_{2}y(t)}\right) \end{eqnarray}$

and

$\begin{eqnarray} && g_{2}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{2}x(t), \phi_{2}y(t))\\ && = \dfrac{1}{(10\pi +e^{t})e^{t+1}} \left(\dfrac{\sin x(t)+\sin y(t)+\cos\varphi_{2}x(t)+\cos\phi_{2}y(t) }{2+\sin x(t)+\sin y(t)+\cos\varphi_{2}x(t)+\cos\phi_{2}y(t)}\right) \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

For $t \in [0, 1]$ and $(x_{1}, y_{1}, \varphi_{2}x_{1}, \phi_{2}y_{1}), (x_{2}, y_{2}, \varphi_{2}x_{2}, \phi_{2}y_{2})\in\mathbb{R}^{4}$ , we can write

$\begin{eqnarray} &&|g_{1}(t, x_{1}, y_{1}, \varphi_{2}x_{1}, \phi_{2}y_{1})-g_{1}(t, x_{2}, y_{2}, \varphi_{2}x_{2}, \phi_{2}y_{2})|\\ &&\quad \leq \dfrac{1}{8\pi^{3}}(|x_{1}-x_{2}|+|y_{1}-y_{2}|+|\varphi_{2}x_{1}-\varphi_{2}x_{2}|+|\phi_{2}y_{1}-\phi_{2}y_{2}|), \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} &&|g_{2}(t, x_{1}, y_{1}, \varphi_{2}x_{1}, \phi_{2}y_{1})-g_{2}(t, x_{2}, y_{2}, \varphi_{2}x_{2}, \phi_{2}y_{2})|\\ &&\quad \leq \dfrac{1}{10\pi e^{2}}(|x_{1}-x_{2}|+|y_{1}-y_{2}|+|\varphi_{2}x_{1}-\varphi_{2}x_{2}|+|\phi_{2}y_{1}-\phi_{2}y_{2}|). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

Hence,

$\chi_{1}^{1} = \chi_{2}^{1} = \chi_{3}^{1} = \chi_{4}^{1} = \dfrac{1}{8\pi^{3}},$

$\chi_{1}^{2} = \chi_{2}^{2} = \chi_{3}^{2} = \chi_{4}^{2} = \dfrac{1}{10\pi e^{2}}.$

Therefore,

$A_{1} = 0.0589009676, \; \; A_{2} = 0.0250930393.$

Suppose

$A'_{i} = B'_{i} = 1, \ i = 1, 2,$

so,

$A_{1} = A_{3} = A_{4}, \; \; A_{2} = A_{5} = A_{6}.$

Thus,

$\begin{equation} \max(A_{1}, A_{2}, A_{3}, A_{4}, A_{5}, A_{6}) < 1, \end{equation}$

(4.9)

and by Theorem 3.1, we conclude that the system (4.1) has a unique solution on $[0, 1]$ .

Example 4.2.

$\begin{eqnarray} \left\{\begin{array}{llllll} D^{\frac{3}{2}}x(t) = \dfrac{\pi( t+1)\sin(\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}{2-\cos(x(t)+y(t))}&\\ \\ \qquad\qquad\qquad +\dfrac{e^{t}}{2\pi+\cos(x(t)+\varphi_{1}x(t))+\sin(\sin(y(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}, \ t\in[0, 1], &\\ \\ D^{\frac{4}{3}}y(t) = \dfrac{e^{2}\sin(x(t)+y(t))}{2\pi+\cos(\varphi_{2}x(t)+\phi_{2}y(t))}&\\ \\ \qquad\qquad\qquad +\dfrac{3 t^{2}\cos y(t)}{e^{t^{3}+1}-\cos( x(t)+y(t)-\varphi_{2}x(t)-\phi_{2}y(t))}, \ t\in[0, 1], \\ \\ I^{\frac{1}{2}}x(0) = 0, \ D^{-\frac{1}{2}}x(T) = I^{\frac{1}{2}}(x(1)), &\\ I^{\frac{2}{3}}y(0) = 0, \ D^{-\frac{2}{3}}y(T) = I^{\frac{1}{3}}(y(1)).& \end{array}\right. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.10)

We have

$\alpha = \dfrac{3}{2}, \ \beta = \dfrac{4}{3}, \ T = 1, \ \theta = 1, \ \omega = 1, \ \gamma = 1, \ m = 2, \ \eta = 1.$

Since

$\begin{eqnarray} |f_{1}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))|& = &\left|\dfrac{\pi( t+1)\sin(\varphi_{1}x(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}{2-\cos(x(t)+y(t))}\right| \leq 2\pi , \\ |f_{2}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{1}x(t), \phi_{1}y(t))|& = &\left|\dfrac{e^{t}}{2\pi+\cos(x(t)+\varphi_{1}x(t))+\sin(\sin(y(t)+\phi_{1}y(t))}\right| \leq \dfrac{e}{2\pi +2}, \\ |g_{1}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{2}x(t), \phi_{2}y(t))|& = &\left|\dfrac{e^{2}\sin(x(t)+y(t))}{2\pi+\cos(\varphi_{2}x(t)+\phi_{2}y(t))}\right| \leq \dfrac{e^{2}}{2\pi +1}, \\ |g_{2}(t, x(t), y(t), \varphi_{2}x(t), \phi_{2}y(t))|& = &\left|\dfrac{3 t^{2}\cos y(t)}{e^{t^{3}+1}-\cos( x(t)+y(t)-\varphi_{2}x(t)-\phi_{2}y(t))}\right| \leq \dfrac{3}{e-1}. \end{eqnarray}$

The functions $f_{1}, \ f_{2}, \ g_{1}\ \text{and}\ g_{2}$ are continuous and bounded on $[0, 1]\times\mathbb{R}^{4}$ . So, by Theorem 3.2, the system (4.10) has at least one solution on $[0, 1]$ .

5. Conclusions

We have proved the existence of solutions for fractional differential equations with integral and multi-point boundary conditions. The problem is solved by applying some fixed point theorems. We also provide examples to make our results clear.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this paper.

References

[1]	G. H. Hardy, J. E. Little, G. Polya, Inequalities, Cambridge University Press, 1952.
[2]	T. Pennanen, Convex duality in stochastic optimization and mathematical finance, Math. Oper. Res., 36 (2011), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1110.0485 doi: 10.1287/moor.1110.0485
[3]	A. Föllmer, A. Schied, Convex measures of risk and trading constraints, Financ. Stoch., 6 (2002), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007800200072 doi: 10.1007/s007800200072
[4]	Z. Q. Luo, W. Yu, An introduction to convex optimization for communications and signal processing, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm., 24 (2006), 1426–1438. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2006.879347 doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2006.879347
[5]	S. Boyd, C. Crusius, A. Hansson, New advances in convex optimization and control applications, IFAC Proc., 30 (1997), 365–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)43183-1 doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)43183-1
[6]	V. Chandrasekarana, M. I. Jordan, Computational and statistical tradeoffs via convex relaxation, P. Natl. A. Sci., 110 (2013), E1181–E1190. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302293110 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302293110
[7]	B. S. Mordukhovich, N. M. Nam, An easy path to convex analysis and applications, 2013.
[8]	W. Zhang, X. Lu, X. Li, Similarity constrained convex nonnegative matrix factorization for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE T. Geosci Remote, 57 (2019), 4810–4822. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2893116 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2893116
[9]	J. Green, P. H. Walter, Chapter 1 Mathematical analysis and convexity with applications to economics, Handbook Math. Econ., 1 (1981), 15–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4382(81)01005-9 doi: 10.1016/S1573-4382(81)01005-9
[10]	R. T. Rockafellar, Convex analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873173
[11]	S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe, Convex optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804441
[12]	Y. Nesterov, Introductory lectures on convex optimization: A basic course, New York: Springer, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8853-9
[13]	J. B. Hiriart-Urruty, C. Lemarechal, Convex analysis and minimization algorithms II: Advanced theory and bundle methods, Berlin: Springer, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06409-2
[14]	J. M. Borwein, A. S. Lewis, Convex analysis and nonlinear optimization: Theory and examples, New York: Springer, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9859-3
[15]	F. Cingano, Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth, OECD Publishing, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en
[16]	M. J. Cloud, B. C. Drachman, L. P. Lebedev, Inequalities with applications to engineering, Springer, 2014.
[17]	R. P. Bapat, Applications of inequality in information theory to matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 78 (1986), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(86)90018-2 doi: 10.1016/0024-3795(86)90018-2
[18]	C. J. Thompson, Inequality with applications in statistical mechanics, J. Math. Phys., 6 (1965), 1812–1813. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704727 doi: 10.1063/1.1704727
[19]	S. I. Butt, L. Horváth, D. Pečarić, J. Pečarić, Cyclic improvements of Jensen's inequalities (Cyclic inequalities in information theory), Monogr. Inequal., 18 (2020).
[20]	T. Rasheed, S. I. Butt, D. Pečarić, J. Pečarić, Generalized cyclic Jensen and information inequalities, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 163 (2022), 112602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112602 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112602
[21]	S. I. Butt, D. Pečarić, J. Pečarić, Several Jensen-Gruss inequalities with applications in information theory, Ukrain. Mate. Zhurnal, 74 (2023), 1654–1672. https://doi.org/10.37863/umzh.v74i12.6554 doi: 10.37863/umzh.v74i12.6554
[22]	N. Mehmood, S. I. Butt, D. Pečarić, J. Pečarić, Generalizations of cyclic refinements of Jensen's inequality by Lidstone's polynomial with applications in information theory, J. Math. Inequal., 14 (2020), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.7153/jmi-2020-14-17 doi: 10.7153/jmi-2020-14-17
[23]	M. Z. Sarikaya, E. Set, H. Yaldiz, N. Aşak, Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities, Math. Comput. Model., 57 (2013), 2403–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.048 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.048
[24]	P. Agarwal, Some inequalities involving Hadamard-type $k$ -fractional integral operators, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 3882–3891. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4270 doi: 10.1002/mma.4270
[25]	S. I. Butt, M. Umar, S. Rashid, A. O. Akdemir, Y. M. Chu, New Hermite-Mercer type inequalities via k-fractional integrals, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03093-y doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03093-y
[26]	Q. Kang, S. I. Butt, W. Nazeer, M. Nadeem, J. Nasir, H. Yang, New variants of Hermite-Jensen-Mercer inequalities Via Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators, J. Math., 2020 (2020), 4303727. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4303727 doi: 10.1155/2020/4303727
[27]	S. I. Butt, M. Umar, K. A. Khan, A. Kashuri, H. Emadifar, Fractional Hermite-Jensen-Mercer integral inequalities with respect to another function and application, Complexiy, 2021 (2021), 9260828. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9260828 doi: 10.1155/2021/9260828
[28]	M. Tariq, S. K. Ntouyas, A. A. Shaikh, A comprehensive review of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality pertaining to fractional integral operators, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 1953. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11081953 doi: 10.3390/math11081953
[29]	M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
[30]	M. U. Rahman, S. Ahmad, R. T. Matoog, N. A. Alshehri, T. Khan, Study on the mathematical modelling of COVID-19 with Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Chaos Soliton. Frac., 150 (2021), 111121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111121 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111121
[31]	S. Ahmad, D. Qiu, M. U. Rehman, Dynamics of a fractional-order COVID-19 model under the nonsingular kernel of Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Math. Model. Numer. Simul. Appl., 4 (2022), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.53391/mmnsa.2022.019 doi: 10.53391/mmnsa.2022.019
[32]	S. Ahmad, M. U. Rehman, M. Arfan, On the analysis of semi-analytical solutions of Hepatitis B epidemic model under the Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 146 (2021), 110892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110892 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110892
[33]	B. Li, T. Zhang, C. Zhang, Investigation of financial bubble mathematical model under fractal-fractional Caputo derivative, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2350050. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500500 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23500500
[34]	A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, Caputo-Fabrizio derivative applied to groundwater flow within confined aquifer, J. Eng. Mech., 143 (2017), D4016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001091 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001091
[35]	J. L. W. V. Jensen, Sur les fonctions convexes et les inegalites entre les valeurs moyennes, Acta Math., 30 (1906), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418571 doi: 10.1007/BF02418571
[36]	C. P. Niculescu, L. E. Persson, Convex functions and their applications, New York: Springer, 2006.
[37]	J. Hadamard, Étude sur les propriétés des fonctions entiéres en particulier d'une fonction considéréé par Riemann, J. Math. Pure. Appl., 9 (1893), 171–215.
[38]	H. Ahmad, M. Tariq, S. K. Sahoo, J. Baili, C. Cesarano, New estimations of Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for special functions, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040144 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040144
[39]	M. Tariq, S. K. Sahoo, H. Ahmad, T. Sitthiwirattham, J. Soontharanon, Several integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type related to k-fractional conformable integral operators, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13101880 doi: 10.3390/sym13101880
[40]	M. Tariq, H. Ahmad, S. K. Sahoo, L. S. Aljoufi, S. K. Awan, A novel comprehensive analysis of the refinements of Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities involving special functions, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 26 (2022), 330–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jmcs.026.04.02 doi: 10.22436/jmcs.026.04.02
[41]	T. S. Du, J. G. Liao, Y. J. Li, Properties and integral inequalities of Hadamard-Simpson type for the generalized $(s, m)$ -preinvex functions, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 9 (2016), 3112–3126.
[42]	Y. Deng, H. Kalsoom, S. Wu, Some new Quantum Hermite-Hadamard-type estimates within a class of generalized $(s, m)$ -preinvex functions, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11101283 doi: 10.3390/sym11101283
[43]	T. S. Du, J. G. Liao, L. G. Chen, M. U. Awan, Properties and Riemann-Liouville fractional Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for the generalized $(\alpha, m)$ -preinvex functions, J. Inequal. Appl., 2016 (2016), 306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-016-1251-5 doi: 10.1186/s13660-016-1251-5
[44]	M. Tariq, H. Ahmad, S. K. Sahoo, A. Kashuri, T. A. Nofal, C. H. Hsu, Inequalities of Simpson-Mercer-type including Atangana-Baleanu fractional operators and their applications, AIMS Math., 7 (2021), 15159–15181. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022831 doi: 10.3934/math.2022831
[45]	M. Gürbüz, A. O. Akdemir, S. Rashid, E. Set, Hermite-Hadamard inequality for fractional integrals of Caputo-Fabrizio type and related inequalities, J. Inequl. Appl., 2020 (2020), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02438-1 doi: 10.1186/s13660-020-02438-1
[46]	E. R. Nwaeze, M. A. Khan, A. Ahmadian, M. N. Ahmad, A. K. Mahmood, Fractional inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard type for $m$ -polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 1889–1904. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021115 doi: 10.3934/math.2021115
[47]	M. Z. Sarikaya, H. Yildirim, On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, Miskolc Math. Notes, 17 (2016), 1049–1059. https://doi.org/10.18514/MMN.2017.1197 doi: 10.18514/MMN.2017.1197
[48]	S. K. Sahoo, M. Tariq, H. Ahmad, J. Nasir, H. Aydi, A. Mukheimer, New Ostrowski-type fractional integral inequalities via generalized exponential-type convex functions and applications, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13081429 doi: 10.3390/sym13081429
[49]	S. K. Sahoo, H. Ahmad, M. Tariq, B. Kodamasingh, H. Aydi, M. De la Sen, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities involving $k$ -fractional operator for $(\overline{h}, m)$ -convex functions, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1686. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091686 doi: 10.3390/sym13091686
[50]	T. Abdeljawad, S. Rashid, Z. Hammouch, Y. M. Chu, Some new local fractional inequalities associated with generalized $(s, m)$ -convex functions and applications, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 406. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02865-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02865-w
[51]	S. S. Dragomir, R. P. Agarwal, Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means for real numbers and to trapezoidal formula, Appl. Math. Lett., 11 (1998), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00086-X doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00086-X
[52]	H. Kalsoom, M. Idrees, D. Baleanu, Y. M. Chu, New estimates of $q_{1}q_{2}$ -Ostrowski-type inequalities within a class of $\mathfrak{n}$ -polynomial prevexity of function, J. Funct. Space., 2020 (2020), 3720798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3720798 doi: 10.1155/2020/3720798
[53]	T. Weir, B. Mond, Pre-inven functions in multiple objective optimization, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 136 (1988), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(88)90113-8 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(88)90113-8
[54]	C. P. Niculescu, L. E. Persson, Convex functions and their applications, New York: Springer, 2006.
[55]	S. K. Mishra, G. Giorgi, Invexity and Optimization, Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
[56]	B. Y. Xi, F. Qi, Some integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for convex functions with applications to means, J. Funct. Space. Appl., 2012 (2012), 980438. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/980438 doi: 10.1155/2012/980438
[57]	K. Mehren, P. Agarwal, New Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for the convex functions and theirs applications, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 350 (2019), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.10.022
[58]	U. S. Kirmaci, On some inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to midpoint formula, Appl. Math. Comput., 147 (2004), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00657-4 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00657-4
[59]	H. Hudzik, L. Maligranda, Some remarks on $s$ -convex functions, Aeq. Math., 48 (1994), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01837981 doi: 10.1007/BF01837981
[60]	S. S. Dragomir, S. Fitzpatrik, The Hadamard inequality for $s$ -convex functions in the second sense, Demonstr. Math., 32 (1999), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-1999-0403 doi: 10.1515/dema-1999-0403
[61]	S. Özcan, İ. İşcan, Some new Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for the $s$ -convex functions and theirs applications, J. Inequal. Appl., 2019 (2019), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-019-2151-2 doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2151-2
[62]	S. I. Butt, A. Kashuri, M. Tariq, J. Nasir, A. Aslam, W. Geo, Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities via $\mathfrak{n}$ -polynomial exponential-type convexity and their applications, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02967-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02967-5
[63]	S. Rashid, İ. İşcan, D. Baleanu, Y. M. Chu, Generation of new fractional inequalities via $\mathfrak{n}$ -polynomials $s$ -type convexity with applications, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02720-y doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02720-y
[64]	T. Toplu, M. Kadakal, İ. İşcan, On $n$ -polynomial convexity and some related inequalities, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 1304–1318. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020089 doi: 10.3934/math.2020089
[65]	M. A. Noor, Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities for $\log$ -preinvex functions, J. Math. Anal. Approx. Theory, 2 (2007), 126–131.
[66]	A. Barani, G. Ghazanfari, S. S. Dragomir, Hermite-Hadamard inequality for functions whose derivatives absolute values are preinvex, J. Inequal. Appl., 2012 (2012), 247. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-247 doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2012-247
[67]	M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, M. Awan, J. Li, On Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for $h$ -preinvex functions, Filomat, 28 (2014), 1463–1474. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1407463N doi: 10.2298/FIL1407463N
[68]	S. Wu, I. A. Baloch, İ. İşcan, On harmonically $(p, h, m)$ -preinvex functions, J. Funct. Space., 2017 (2017), 2148529. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2148529
[69]	J. Park, Simpson-like and Hermite-Hadamard-like type integral inequalities for twice differentiable preinvex functions, Int. J. Pure. Appl. Math., 79 (2012), 623–640.
[70]	M. Z. Sarikaya, N. Alp, H. Bozkurt, On Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for preinvex and log-preinvex functions, 2012. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1203.4759
[71]	S. H. Wang, X. M. Liu, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for operator $s$ -preinvex functions, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8 (2015), 1070–1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.008.06.17 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.008.06.17
[72]	İ. İşcan, New refinements for integral and sum forms of Holder inequality, J. Inequal. Appl., 2019 (2019), 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-019-2258-5 doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2258-5
[73]	M. Kadakal, İ. Íscan, H. Kadakal, On improvements of some integral inequalities, J. Honam Math., 43 (2021), 441–452.
[74]	W. N. Li, Some Pachpatte-type inequalities on time scales, Comput. Math. Appl., 57 (2009), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.09.040 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.09.040
[75]	S. I. Butt, S. Yousaf, K. A. Khan, R. M. Mabela, A. M. Alsharif, Fejér-Pachpatte-Mercer-type inequalities for harmonically convex functions involving exponential function in kernel, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022 (2022), 7269033. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7269033 doi: 10.1155/2022/7269033
[76]	S. K. Sahoo, M. A. Latif, O. M. Alsalami, S. Treanta, W. Sudsutad, J. Kongson, Hermite-Hadamard, Fejér and Pachpatte-type integral inequalities for center-radius order interval-valued preinvex functions, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6090506 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6090506
[77]	H. M. Srivastava, S. K. Sahoo, P. O. Mohammed, B. Kodamasingh, K. Nonlaopon, M. Abualnaja, Interval valued Hadamard-Fejér and Pachpatte type inequalities pertaining to a new fractional integral operator with exponential kernel, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 15041–15063. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022824 doi: 10.3934/math.2022824
[78]	M. Tariq, S. K. Sahoo, S. K. Ntouyas, O. M. Alsalami, A. A. AShaikh, K. Nonlaopon, Some Hermite-Hadamard and Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type fractional inclusions pertaining to different kinds of generalized preinvexities, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14101957 doi: 10.3390/sym14101957

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(1561) PDF downloads(78) Cited by(0)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

AIMS Mathematics

Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Main results

3.1. Existence of solutions

3.2. Uniqueness of solutions

4. Related examples

5. Conclusions

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Preliminaries

3. Main results

3.1. Existence of solutions

3.2. Uniqueness of solutions

4. Related examples

5. Conclusions

Conflict of interest

References

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog