Research article

Multivariate Mittag-Leffler function and related fractional integral operators

  • Received: 09 February 2023 Revised: 19 March 2023 Accepted: 20 March 2023 Published: 04 April 2023
  • MSC : 26A33, 33E12

  • In this paper, we describe a new generalization of the multivariate Mittag-Leffler (M-L) function in terms of generalized Pochhammer symbol and study its properties. We provide a few differential and fractional integral formulas for the generalized multivariate M-L function. Furthermore, by using the generalized multivariate M-L function in the kernel, we present a new generalization of the fractional integral operator. Finally, we describe some fundamental characteristics of generalized fractional integrals.

    Citation: Gauhar Rahman, Muhammad Samraiz, Manar A. Alqudah, Thabet Abdeljawad. Multivariate Mittag-Leffler function and related fractional integral operators[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13276-13293. doi: 10.3934/math.2023671

    Related Papers:

    [1] Gauhar Rahman, Iyad Suwan, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Thabet Abdeljawad, Muhammad Samraiz, Asad Ali . A basic study of a fractional integral operator with extended Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12757-12770. doi: 10.3934/math.2021736
    [2] Ye Yue, Ghulam Farid, Ayșe Kübra Demirel, Waqas Nazeer, Yinghui Zhao . Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized $ k $-fractional integrals involving further extension of Mittag-Leffler function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 681-703. doi: 10.3934/math.2022043
    [3] Bushra Kanwal, Saqib Hussain, Thabet Abdeljawad . On certain inclusion relations of functions with bounded rotations associated with Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7866-7887. doi: 10.3934/math.2022440
    [4] Rana Safdar Ali, Saba Batool, Shahid Mubeen, Asad Ali, Gauhar Rahman, Muhammad Samraiz, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Roshan Noor Mohamed . On generalized fractional integral operator associated with generalized Bessel-Maitland function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3027-3046. doi: 10.3934/math.2022167
    [5] Sabir Hussain, Rida Khaliq, Sobia Rafeeq, Azhar Ali, Jongsuk Ro . Some fractional integral inequalities involving extended Mittag-Leffler function with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35599-35625. doi: 10.3934/math.20241689
    [6] Anumanthappa Ganesh, Swaminathan Deepa, Dumitru Baleanu, Shyam Sundar Santra, Osama Moaaz, Vediyappan Govindan, Rifaqat Ali . Hyers-Ulam-Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional differential equations with two caputo derivative using fractional fourier transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1791-1810. doi: 10.3934/math.2022103
    [7] Erhan Set, M. Emin Özdemir, Sevdenur Demirbaş . Chebyshev type inequalities involving extended generalized fractional integral operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3573-3583. doi: 10.3934/math.2020232
    [8] Maryam Saddiqa, Ghulam Farid, Saleem Ullah, Chahn Yong Jung, Soo Hak Shim . On Bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions for generalized exponentially convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6454-6468. doi: 10.3934/math.2021379
    [9] Ghulam Farid, Maja Andrić, Maryam Saddiqa, Josip Pečarić, Chahn Yong Jung . Refinement and corrigendum of bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7332-7349. doi: 10.3934/math.2020469
    [10] Hari M. Srivastava, Artion Kashuri, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Abdullah M. Alsharif, Juan L. G. Guirao . New Chebyshev type inequalities via a general family of fractional integral operators with a modified Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11167-11186. doi: 10.3934/math.2021648
  • In this paper, we describe a new generalization of the multivariate Mittag-Leffler (M-L) function in terms of generalized Pochhammer symbol and study its properties. We provide a few differential and fractional integral formulas for the generalized multivariate M-L function. Furthermore, by using the generalized multivariate M-L function in the kernel, we present a new generalization of the fractional integral operator. Finally, we describe some fundamental characteristics of generalized fractional integrals.



    The field of mathematical analysis that deals with the study of arbitrary order integrals and derivatives is known as fractional calculus. Because of its numerous applications across a wide range of fields, this field has increased in importance and recognition over the past few years. According to researchers, this field is the most effective at identifying anomalous kinetics and has numerous uses in a variety of fields. Ordinary differential equations with fractional derivatives can be used to simulate a variety of issues, including statistical, mathematical, engineering, chemical, and biological issues. Several distinct forms of fractional integrals and derivative operators (see e.g., [1,2,3,4]), including Riemann-Liouville, Caputo, Riesz, Hilfer, Hadamard, Erdélyi-Kober, Saigo, Marichev-Saigo-Maeda and others, have been thoroughly investigated by researchers. From an application perspective, we suggest the readers to see the work related to the fractional differential equations presented by [5,6,7,8]. In [9], the authors studied symmetric and antisymmetric solitons in the defocused saturable nonlinearity and the PT-symmetric potential of the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. In [10], the fractional exponential function approach is used to study a time-fractional Ablowitz-Ladik model, and bright and dark discrete soliton solutions, discrete exponential solutions, and discrete peculiar wave solutions are discovered. In [11], the authors presented the rich vector exact solutions for the coupled discrete conformable fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations by taking into account the conformable fractional derivative.

    On the other hand, special functions like Gamma, Beta, Mittag-Leffler, et al. play a vital part in the foundation of fractional calculus. Moreover, the Mittag-Leffler function is regarded as the fundamental function in fractional calculus. The Prabhakar fractional operator containing a three-parameter version of the aforementioned function in the kernel. The M-L function has been extensively studied to construct solutions of fractional PDEs, such as dynamical characteristic of analytical fractional solitons for the space-time fractional Fokas-Lenells equation, soliton dynamics based on exact solutions of conformable fractional discrete complex cubic Ginzburg-Landau equation and Abundant fractional soliton solutions of a space-time fractional perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation by a fractional mapping method, see [12,13,14]. Strong generalizations of the univariate and bivariate Mittag-Leffler functions, which are known to be important in fractional calculus, are the multivariate Mittag-Leffler functions.

    The well-known one-parameter Mittag-Leffler (M-L) function is defined by [15,16] as follows

    εa(z1)=l=0zl1Γ(al+1)(aC;(a)>0,z1C), (1.1)

    where C represents the set of complex numbers and (a) denotes the real part of the complex number.

    The generalization of (1.1) with two parameters is defined by [17,18] as

    εa,b(z1)=l=0zl1Γ(al+b)(a,bC;(a)>0,(b)>0), (1.2)

    Later on, Agarwal [19], Humbert [20] and Humbert and Agarwal [21] studied the properties and applications of M-L functions. In [22], the generalization of (1.1) and (1.2) is defined by

    εca,b(z1)=l=0(c)lΓ(al+b)zl1l!(a,b,cC;(a)>0,(b)>0). (1.3)

    In [23], the following generalization of the M-L function is defined by

    εc,qa,b(z1)=l=0(c)lqΓ(al+b)zl1l!(a,b,cC;(a)>0,(b)>0,q>0). (1.4)

    In [24], Rahman et al. proposed the following generalized of M-L function by

    εc,q,da,b,p(z1)=l=0Bp(c+lq;dc)(d)lqB(c,dc)Γ(al+b)zl1l!, (1.5)

    where a,b,c,dC;(c)>0,(a)>0,(b)>0,q>0 and Bp(x,y)=10tx1(1t)y1etptdt is the extension of beta function (see [25]).

    Gorenflo et al. [26] and Haubold et al. [27]) studied the various properties of generalized M-L function. In [28], a new generalization of M-L function (1.3) is presented by

    εca,b,p(z1)=l=0(c;p)lΓ(al+b)zl1l!(p0,a,b,cC;,(a)>0,(b)>0,), (1.6)

    where (λ;p)l is the Pochhammer symbol defined by Srivastava et al. [29,30] as

    (λ;p)μ={Γp(λ+μ)Γ(λ);(p>0,λ,μC)(λ)μ;(p=0, λ,μC{0}.             (1.7)

    The researchers examined the developments of these extension, (1.6) and (1.7) and studied their related features and applications. In [30], Srivastava et al. proposed the following generalized hypergeometric function

    sFt[(δ1;p),,(δs);(ζ1),,(ζt);z1]=l=0(δ1;p)l(δs)l(ζ1)l(ζt)l zl1l!, (1.8)

    where δjC for j = 1, 2, , s, ζkC for k=1,2,,t, and ζk 0, -1, -2, .

    The integral representation of (μ;p)η is explained by

    (μ;p)η=1Γ(μ) 0 sμ+η1 espsds, (1.9)

    where (ρ)>0 and (μ+η)>0. In particular, the related confluent hypergeometric function 1F1 and the Gauss hypergeometric function 2F1 are given by

    2F1[(δ1;p),b;λ;z1]=l=0(δ1;p)l(b)l(λ)l zl1l!, (1.10)

    and

    1F1[(δ1;p);λ;z1]=Φ[(δ1;p);λ;z1]=l=0(δ1;p)l(λ)l zl1l!. (1.11)

    The expansion of the generalised hypergeometric function rFs, which was studied by [30], has r numerator and s denominator parameters. Researchers recently developed several extensions of special functions, together with their corresponding characteristics and applications. Using extended beta functions as its foundation, Nisar et al. [31], Bohner et al. [32] and Rahman et al. [33] developed an enlargement of fractional derivative operators.

    The multivariate M-L function is defined by [34] as follows:

    E(cj)(aj),b(z1,z2,,zj)=E(c1,c2,,cj)(a1,a2,,aj),b(z1,z2,zj)=m1,m2,,mj=0(c1)m1(c2)m2(cj)mj(z1)m1(zj)mjΓ(a1m1+a2m2+ajmj+b)m1!mj!, (1.12)

    where zi,ai,b,ciC; i=1,2,,j, (ai)>0, (b)>0 and (ci)>0.

    In [35,36,37,38,39], the authors have studied various properties and applications of different type of generalized M-L functions. For real (complex) valued functions, the Lebesgue measurable space is defined by

    L(r,s)={h:h1=sr|h(x)|dx<}. (1.13)

    The left and right sides fractional integral operators of the Riemann-Liouville type are defined by [3,4] as follows:

    (Iλr+h)(x)=1Γ(λ)xrh(ϱ)(xϱ)1λdϱ,(x>r), (1.14)

    and

    (Iλsh)(x)=1Γ(λ)sxh(ϱ)(ϱx)1λdϱ,(x<s),

    where hL(r,s), λC and (λ)>0.

    The left and right sides Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives for the function h(x)L(r,s), λC, (λ)>0 and n=[(λ)]+1 are defined in [3,4] by

    (Dλr+h)(x)=(ddx)n(Inλr+h)(x) (1.15)

    and

    (Dλsh)(x)=(ddx)n(Inλsh)(x),

    respectively. The generalized differential operator Dλ,vr+ of order 0<λ<1 and type 0<v<1 with respect to x can be found in [2,4] as

    (Dλ,vr+h)=(Iv(1λ)r+ddx(I(1v)(1λ)r+h))(x). (1.16)

    In particular, if v=0, then (1.16) will lead to the operator Dλr+ defined in (1.15).

    We also take into account the aforementioned well-known results.

    Theorem 1.1. In [40], the following result for the fractional integral is presented by

    Iλr+(ϱr)η1=Γ(η)Γ(λ+η)(xr)λ+η1, (1.17)

    where λ, ηC, (λ)>0, (η)>0,

    Theorem 1.2. [41] Suppose that the function h(z) has a power series expansion h(z)=k=0knzk and it is analytic in the disc |z|<R, then we have the following result

    Dλz{zη1h(z)}=Γ(η)Γ(λ+η)n=0an(η)n(λ+η)nzn.

    Lemma 1.1. (Srivastava and Tomovski [42]) Suppose that x>r, λ(0,1), v[0,1], (η)>0 and (λ)>0, then we have

    Dλr+[(ϱr)η1](x)=Γ(η)Γ(ηλ)(xr)ηλ1. (1.18)

    The generalized multivariate M-L function (1.12) is then defined in terms of the modified Pochhammer symbol (1.7) and its different features as well as the accompanying integral operators are examined. This is driven by the aforementioned modifications of special functions.

    Motivated by the above results and literature, the paper has the following structure: First, we describe and investigate a novel generalization of the multivariate M-L function using a generalized Pochhammer symbol. Secondly, we offer a few differential and fractional integral formulas for the explored multivariate M-L function. By using the new form of the multivariate M-L function, a new generalization of the fractional integral operator is introduced, and some fundamental characteristics of the operator are discussed.

    We are in a position to present the generalized multivariate M-L function by utilizing the extended Pochhammer symbol in (1.7) as follows:

    ε(cj)(aj),b;p(z1,z2,,zj)=l1,,lj=0(c1;p)l1(c2)l2(cj)ljΓ(a1l1+a2l2++cjlj+b)zl11zl22zljjl1!lj!, (2.1)

    where ai,b,ciC;(ai)>0,(b)>0,,p0 for i=1,2,,j. The special case for a1=1 and l2==lj=0 in (2.1) can be reduced to extended confluent hypergeometric function (1.11) as follows:

    εc11,b;p(z1)=1Γ(b)1F1[(c1;p);b;z1]=1Γ(b)Φ[(c1;p);b;z1]. (2.2)

    In coming results, we demonstrate some fundamental characteristics and integral representations of the generalized multivariate M-L function.

    Theorem 2.1. For the multivariate M-L function defined in (2.1), the following relation holds true:

    ε(cj)(aj),b;p(z1,z2,,zj)=bε(cj)(aj),b+1;p(z1,z2,,zj) (2.3)
    +[a1z1ddz1++ajzjddzj]ε(cj)(aj),b+1;p(z1,,zj),

    where ai,b,ciC;(ai)>0,(b)>0,,p0 for i=1,2,,j.

    Proof. From (2.1), we have

    bε(cj)(aj),b+1,p(z1,,zj)+[a1z1ddz1++ajzjddzj]ε(cj)(aj),b+1;p(z1,,zj)=bl1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zljjl1!lj!+[a1z1ddz1++ajzjddzj]l1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zljjl1!lj!=bl1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zljjl1!lj!+[a1z1ddz1++ajzjddzj]l1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(c2)l2(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zjljl1!lj!=bl1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zljjl1!lj!+l1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(c2)l2(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zljjl1!lj!(a1l1++ajlj)=l1,,lj=0(c1,p)l1(c2)l2(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+1)zl11zljjl1!lj!(a1l1++ajlj+b)  (using Γ(z1+1)=z1Γ(z1))=l=0(c1,p)l1(c2)l2(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)zl11zljjl1!lj!=ε(cj)(aj),b,p(z1,z2,,zj),

    which is the desired result (2.3).

    Theorem 2.2. For the generalized multivariate M-L function defined in (1.12), the following relations hold true:

    (ddz1)m(ddzj)mε(cj)(aj),b;p(z1,z2,,zj)=(c1)m(cj)mε(cj)+m(aj),b+(aj)m;p(z1,,zj), (2.4)

    and

    (ddz1)m[zb11ε(cj)(aj),b;p(ϖ1za11,,ϖjzaj1))]=zbm11ε(cj)(aj),bm;p(ϖ1za11,,ϖjzaj1), (2.5)

    where ai,b,ciC;(ai)>0,(b)>0,,p0 for i=1,2,,j, and (bm)>0 with mN.

    Proof. Differentiating (1.12) m times with respect to z1,z2,,zj respectively, we get

    (ddz1)m(ddzj)mε(cj)(aj),b;p(z1,,zj)=(ddz1)m(ddzj)ml1=l2==lj=0(c1;p)l1(c2)l2(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)zl11zljjl1!lj!=l1==lj=m(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj! zl1m1zljmj(l1m)!(ljm)! l1!lj!=l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1+m(cj)lj+mΓ(a1(l1+m)+aj(lj+m)+b)zl11zljjl1!lj!  (Replacing li by li+m)=l1==lj=0(c1)m(cj)m (c1+m;p)l1(cj+m)ljΓ(a1l1+ajlj+b+(a1++aj)m)zl11zljjl1!lj!.

    Now using (λ;σ)μ+p=(λ)μ(λ+μ;σ)p and (λ)μ+p=(λ)μ(λ+μ)p, we get

    (ddz1)m(ddzj)mε(cj)(aj),b;p(z1,,cj)=(c1)m(cj)ml1==lj=0(c1+m;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1+ajlj+b+(a1++aj)m)zl1zljjl1!lj!=(c1)m(cj)m ε(cj)+m(aj),b+(aj)m;p(z1,z2,,zj),

    which is the desired result (2.4). Similarly, to prove (2.5), we have

    (ddz1)m[zb11ε(cj)(aj),b;p(ϖ1za11,ϖjzajj)]=(ddz1)mzb11l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)(ϖ1za11)l1(ϖjzaj1)ljl1!lj!=(ddz1)ml1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)zb1+a1l1++ajlj1l1!lj!ϖl11ϖljj=l1=lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)ϖl11ϖljjl1!lj!(a1l1++ajlj+b1)!(a1l1++ajlj+bm1)! za1l1++ajlj+bm11.

    Differentiating m times and using the relation l(l1)!=l!, we get

    (ddz1)m[zb11ε(cj)(aj),b;p(ϖ1za11,ϖjzajj)]=l1=lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+bm)ϖl11ϖljjza1l1++ajlj+b1m1l1!lj!=zbm11l1=lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+bm)(ϖ1za11)l1(ϖ1zaj1)ljl1!lj!=zbm11ε(cj)(aj),bm;p(ϖ1za11,,ϖjzaj1).

    The proof is completed.

    Corollary 2.1. The generalized multivariate M-L function has the following integral representations:

    z10tb1ε(cj)(aj),b;p(ϖ1ta1,,ϖjtaj)dt=zb1ε(cj)(aj),b+1;p(ϖ1za11,,ϖjzaj1),

    where ai,b,ci,ϖiC;(ai)>0,(b)>0,p0 for i=1,2,,j.

    In this section, we present some fractional integration and differentiation formulas of generalized M-L function given in (2.1).

    Theorem 3.1. Suppose x>r(rR+=[0,)), ai, b, ci, ϖC, (ai)>0 and (ci)>0, (b)>0 and (λ)>0, then the following relations hold true:

    Iλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(cj)(aj),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)](x)=(xr)λ+b1ε(ci)(ai),b+λ;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj), (3.1)
    Dλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)](x)=(xr)bλ1ε(ci)(ai),bλ;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj) (3.2)

    and

    Dλ,vr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)](x)=(xr)bλ1ε(ci)(ai),bλ;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj). (3.3)

    Proof. Consider

    Iλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)](x)=1Γ(λ)xr(xr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖ1(ϱr)aj)(xϱ)1λdϱ=1Γ(λ)n=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)lnϖl1ϖljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!xr(ϱr)b+a1l1++ajlj1(xϱ)λ1dϱ=n=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)lnϖl1ϖljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!(Iλr+[(ϱr)b+a1l1++ajlj1]).

    By the use of (1.17), we have

    Iλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)](x)=n=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)lnϖl1ϖljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!(xr)b+λ+a1l1++ajlj1.Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b+λ)=(xr)b+λ1n=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b+λ)[ϖl11(xr)a1l1ϖljj(xr)ajlj]l1!lj!=(xr)b+λ1ε(ci)(ai),b+λ;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj),

    which gives the proof of (3.1).

    Next, we have

    Dλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)]=(ddx)n{Inλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)]},

    which on using (3.1) takes the following form:

    Dλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)]=(ddx)n{(xr)bλ+n1ε(ci)(ai),bλ+n;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)}.

    Applying (2.5), we get

    Dλr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)](x)={(xr)ηλ1ε(ci)(ai),bλ;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)},

    which gives the proof of (3.2).

    To obtain (3.3), we have

    (Dλ,vr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)])(x)=(Dλ,vr+[l1==lj=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)ϖl1ϖljl1!lj!(ϱr)a1l1++ajlj+b1])(x)=l1==lj=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)ϖl1ϖljl1!lj!×(Dλ,vr+[(ϱr)a1l1++ajlj+b1])(x).

    By applying (1.18), we get

    (Dλ,vr+[(ϱr)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱr)a1,,ϖj(ϱr)aj)])(x)=l1==lj=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)ϖl1ϖljl1!lj!×Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+bλ)(xr)a1l1++ajlj+bλ1=(xr)bλ1l1==lj=0(c1;p,v)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+bλ)ϖl1(xr)a1ϖlj(xr)ajl1!lj!=(xr)bλ1ε(ci)(ai),bλ;p(ϖl1(xr)a1,,ϖlj(xr)aj),

    which completes the required proof.

    Remark 3.1. Applying Theorem 3.1 for p=0, then we obtain the result presented in [34].

    In this section, we define a fractional integral involving newly defined multivariate M-L function and discuss its properties.

    Definition 4.1. Let b,ai,ci,ϖiC, (ci)>0, (ai)>0 and (b)>0 and hL(r,s). Then the generalized left and right sided fractional integrals are defined by

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph)(x)=xr(xϱ)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)h(ϱ)dϱ,(x>r) (4.1)

    and

    (R(ϖi);(ci)s;(ai),b;ph)(x)=sx(ϱx)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱx)a1,,ϖj(ϱx)aj)h(ϱ)dϱ,(x<s), (4.2)

    respectively.

    Remark 4.1. If we consider p=0, then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form defined earlier by [34]. Similarly, if we consider p=0 and j=1, then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form defined by [22]. If we take j=1, then the work done in this paper will lead to the work presented by [28]. Also, if we consider one of ϖi=0, for i=1,2,,j, then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will take the form of the classical operators.

    Next, we prove the following properties of integral operator defined in (4.1).

    Theorem 4.1. Suppose that b,ai,λ,ci,ϖiC, (ai)>0, (b)>0, (λ)>0, p0 and (ci)>0 for i=1,2,,j, then the following result holds true:

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;p[(ϱr)λ1])(x)=(xr)λ+b1Γ(λ)ε(ci);p(ai),b+λ(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj).

    Proof. By the use of definition (4.1), we have

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph)(x)=xr(xϱ)b1ε(ci)(ai),b(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)h(ϱ)dϱ.

    Therefore, we get

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;p[(ϱr)λ1])(x)=xr(xϱ)b1(ϱr)λ1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)dϱ=l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b))ϖl11ϖljjl1!lj!(xr(ϱr)λ1(xϱ)λ+a1l1++ajlj1dϱ)=l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b))ϖl11ϖljjl1!lj!Ia1l1++ajlj+br+[(ϱr)λ1]=(xr)b+λ1l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b))[ϖ1(xr)a1l1ϖj(xr)ajlj]l1!lj!×Γ(λ)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b+λ)=(xr)b+λ1Γ(λ)ε(ci)(ai),b+λ;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj),

    which gives the desired proof.

    Theorem 4.2. Suppose that ci,ai,b,ϖiC, (ai)>0, (b)>0, p0 for i=1,2,,j, then the following result holds true:

    R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;pΦ1KΦ1.

    Where

    K:=(sr)Re(b)l1==lj=0|(c1;p)l1(cj)lj|Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)((b)+(a1)l1++(aj)lj)×|ϖl11(sr)a1l1ϖljj(sr)ajlj|l1!lj!.

    Proof. By the use of (1.13) and (4.1) and by interchanging integration and summation order, we have

    R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;pΦ1=sr|xr(xϱ)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)Φ(ϱ)dϱ|dxsr[xϱ(xϱ)(b)1|ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)|dx]|Φ(ϱ)|dϱ=sr[xϱ0u(b)1|ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1ua1,,ϖjuaj)|du]|Φ(ϱ)|dϱ,

    by setting u=xϱ. After simplification, we obtain

    R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;pΦ1sr[l1==lj=0|(c1;p)l1(cj)lj|Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)|ϖa11ϖljj|l1!lj!×((u)(b)+(a1)l1++(aj)lj((b)+(a1)l1++(aj)lj))sr0]|Φ(ϱ)|dϱ.

    It follows that

    R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;pΦ1{(sr)(b)l1==lj=0|(c1;p)l1(cj)lj|Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)((b)+(a1)l1++(aj)lj)×|ϖl11(sr)a1l1ϖljj(sr)ajlj|l1!lj!}sr|Φ(ϱ)|dϱ=K||Φ||1,

    where

    K=(sr)Re(b)l1==lj=0|(c1;p)l1(cj)lj|Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)((b)+(a1)l1++(aj)lj)×|ϖl11(sr)a1l1ϖljj(sr)ajlj|l1!lj!,

    which gives the desired result.

    Corollary 4.1. If we take ai,b,ci,ϖiC, (ai)>0, (b)>0, (ci)>0 with i=1,2,,j, then the following result holds true:

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;p1)(x)=(xr)bε(ci)(ai),b+1;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj).

    Proof. Consider

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b1)(x)=xr(xϱ)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj)dϱ=xr(xϱ)b1(l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljϖl11(xϱ)a1l1ϖljj(xϱ)ajljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!)dϱ.

    It follows that

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;p1)(x)=l1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljϖl11ϖljjΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!xr(xϱ)b+a1l1++ajlj1dϱ=(xr)bl1==lj=0(c1;p)l1(cj)ljϖl11(xr)a1l1ϖljj(xr)ajljΓ(a1l1++ajlj+b)(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!=(xr)bε(ci)(ai),b+1;p(ϖ1(xr)a1,,ϖj(xr)aj),

    which gives the desired proof.

    Theorem 4.3. The generalized fractional operator can be represented in term of Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals for ci, ai, b, ϖiC with (ai)>0, (b)>0, (ci)>0 for i=1,2,,j, p0 and x>r as follows:

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),bh)(x)=l1==lj=0Γ(c1+l1;p)(c2)l2(cj)ljϖa11ϖajjΓ(c1)l1!lj!Ia1l1++ajlj+br+h(x).

    Proof. By utilizing (2.1) in (4.1) and then interchanging the order of summation and integration, we have

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),bh)(x)=xr(xϱ)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)h(ϱ)dϱ=xr(xϱ)b1l1==lj=0Γ(c1+l1;p)(c2)l2(cj)ljϖl11(xϱ)a1l1ϖljj(xϱ)ajljΓ(c1)Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)l1!lj!h(ϱ)dϱ=l1==lj=0Γ(c1+l1;p)(c2)l2(cj)ljϖa1l11ϖajljjΓ(c1)l1!lj!1Γ(a1l1++ajlj+b)×xr(xϱ)a1l1++ajlj+b1h(ϱ)dϱ=l1==lj=0Γ(c1+l1;p)(c2)l2(cj)ljϖa1l11ϖajljjΓ(c1)l1!lj!Ia1l1++ajlj+br+h(x),

    which gives the desired proof.

    Theorem 4.4. For λ, ci, ai, b, ϖiC with (ai)>0, (b)>0, (ci)>0, (λ)>0, for i=1,2,,j, p0 and x>r, then the following result holds true:

    (Iλr+[R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph])(x)=(R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b+λh)(x)=(R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b[Iλr+h])(x), (4.3)

    where hL(r,s).

    Proof. By employing (1.14) and (4.1), we have

    (Iλr+[R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph])(x)=1Γ(λ)xr[(R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph)(ϱ)](xϱ)1λdϱ=1Γ(λ)xr(xϱ)λ1[ϱr(ϱu)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱu)a1,,ϖj(ϱu)aj)h(u)du]dϱ.

    It follows that

    (Iλr+[R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),bh])(x)=xr[1Γ(λ)xu(xϱ)λ1(ϱu)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(ϱu)a1,,ϖj(ϱu)aj)dϱ]h(u)du.

    By considering ϱu=θ, we get

    (Iλr+[R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph])(x)=xr[1Γ(λ)xu0(xuθ)λ1θb1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1θa1,,ϖjθaj)dθ]h(u)du=xr[1Γ(λ)xu0θb1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1θa1,,ϖjθaj)(xuθ)1λdθ]h(u)du.

    Hence, from (1.14) and applying (3.1), we obtain

    (Iλr+[R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph])(x)=xr[θλ+b1ε(ci)(ai),b+λ;p(ϖ1θa1,,ϖjθaj)]h(u)du=xr(xu)λ+b1ε(ci)(ai),b+λ(ϖ1(xu)a1,,ϖj(xu)aj)h(u)du.

    Thus, we have

    (Iλr+[R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;ph])(x)=(R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b+λh)(x). (4.4)

    Next, consider the right hand side of (4.3) and employing (4.1) to derive the second part, we have

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;p[Iλr+h])(x)=xr(xϱ)b1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)[Iλr+h](ϱ)dϱ=xrε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)(1Γ(λ)ϱrh(u)(ϱu)1λdu)dϱ.

    It follows that

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b[Iλr+h])(x)=xr1Γ(λ)[xu(xϱ)b1(ϱu)λ1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1(xϱ)a1,,ϖj(xϱ)aj)dϱ]h(u)du.

    By setting xϱ=θ, we get

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b[Iλr+h])(x)=xr1Γ(λ)[0xuθb1(xθu)λ1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1θa1,,ϖjθaj)(dθ)]h(u)du=xr1Γ(λ)[xu0θb1(xθu)λ1ε(ci)(ai),b;p(ϖ1θa1,,ϖjθaj)dθ]h(u)du.

    Further, by using (1.14) and applying (3.1), we obtain

    (R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b;p[Iλr+h])(x)=(R(ϖi);(ci)r+;(ai),b+λh)(x). (4.5)

    Thus, (4.4) and (4.5) gives the desired proof.

    Nowadays, the theories are developed very rapidly. The scientists are introducing more advanced and generalized forms of the classical ones. In this present study, we introduced a generalized form of the multivariate M-L function (2.1) by employing the generalized Pochhammer symbol and its properties. By using this more extended form of M-L, we introduced a fractional integral operator and studied some of the basic properties of this operator. The special cases of the main results are if we take p=0, then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will reduce to the work done by [34]. Similarly, if we take j=1 and p=0, then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will lead to the work done by [22]. If we take j=1, then the work done in this paper will lead to the work presented by [28]. Moreover, if we consider one of ϖi=0, for i=1,2,,j, then the operators defined in (4.1) and (4.2) will reduce to the classical R-L operators. We believe that our proposed operator will be more applicable in the fields of fractional integral inequalities and operator theory.

    The author T. Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for supporting through TAS research lab. Manar A. Alqudah: Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R14), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] R. Hilfer, Applications of fractional calculus in physics, Singapore: World Scientific, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/3779
    [2] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2006.
    [3] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, London: Academic Press, 1999.
    [4] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives: theory and applications, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach, 1993.
    [5] I. Ahmad, H. Ahmad, M. Inc, S. W. Yao, B. Almohsen, Application of local meshless method for the solution of two term time fractional-order multi-dimensional PDE arising in heat and mass transfer, Therm. Sci., 24 (2020), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI20S1095A doi: 10.2298/TSCI20S1095A
    [6] H. Ahmad, T. A. Khan, P. S. Stanimirović, Y. M. Chu, I. Ahmad, Modified variational iteration algorithm-Ⅱ: convergence and applications to diffusion models, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 8841718. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8841718 doi: 10.1155/2020/8841718
    [7] H. Ahmad, A. Agkül, T. A. Khan, P. S. Stanimirović, Y. M. Chu, New perspective on the conventional solutions of the nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 8829017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8829017 doi: 10.1155/2020/8829017
    [8] H. Ahmad, T. A. Khan, I. Ahmad, P. S. Stanimirović, Y. M. Chu, A new analyzing technique for nonlinear time fractional Cauchy reaction-diffusion model equations, Results Phys., 19 (2020), 103462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103462 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103462
    [9] W. B. Bo, W. Liu, Y. Y. Wang, Symmetric and antisymmetric solitons in the fractional nonlinear schrödinger equation with saturable nonlinearity and PT-symmetric potential: stability and dynamics, Optik, 255 (2022), 168697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168697 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168697
    [10] J. J. Fang, D. S. Mou, H. C. Zhang, Y. Y. Wang, Discrete fractional soliton dynamics of the fractional Ablowitz-Ladik model, Optik, 228 (2021), 166186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166186 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166186
    [11] Da. S Mou, C. Q. Dai, Vector solutions of the coupled discrete conformable fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Optik, 258 (2022), 168859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168859 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168859
    [12] B. H. Wang, Y. Y. Wang, C. Q. Dai, Y. X. Chen, Dynamical characteristic of analytical fractional solitons for the space-time fractional Fokas-Lenells equation, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 4699–4707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.027 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.027
    [13] J. J. Fang, D. S. Mou, Y. Y. Wang, H. C. Zhang, C. Q. Dai, Y. X. Chen, Soliton dynamics based on exact solutions of conformable fractional discrete complex cubic Ginzburg–Landau equation, Results Phys., 20 (2021), 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103710 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103710
    [14] P. H. Lu, Y. Y. Wang, C. Q. Dai, Abundant fractional soliton solutions of a space-time fractional perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation by a fractional mapping method, Chinese J. Phys., 74 (2021), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2021.08.020 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.08.020
    [15] G. M. Mittag-Leffler, Sur la nouvelle fonction Eα(x), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 137 (1903), 554–558.
    [16] G. M. Mittag-Leffler, Sur la representation analytique d'une branche uniform d'une fonction monogene: sixième note, Acta Math., 29 (1905), 101–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403200 doi: 10.1007/BF02403200
    [17] A. Wiman, Uber den fundamental satz in der teorie der funktionen Eα(x), Acta Math., 29 (1905), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403202 doi: 10.1007/BF02403202
    [18] A. Wiman, Uber die nullstellen der funktionen Eα(x), Acta Math., 29 (1905), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403204 doi: 10.1007/BF02403204
    [19] N. Agarwal, A propos d'une note de H4. pierre humbert, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 236 (1953), 2031–2032.
    [20] P. Humbert, Quelques resultats relatifs a la fonction de Mittag-Leffler, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 236 (1953), 1467–1468.
    [21] P. Humbert, R. P. Agarwal, Sur la fonction de Mittag-Leffler et quelques-unes de ses generalisation, Bull. Sci. Math., 77 (1953), 180–185.
    [22] T. R. Prabhakar, A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel, Yokohama Math. J., 19 (1971), 7–15.
    [23] A. K. Shukla, J. C. Prajapati, On a generalization of Mittag-Leffler functions and its properties, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 336 (2007), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.018
    [24] G. Rahman, D. Baleanu, M. A. Qurashi, S. D. Purohit, S. Mubeen, M. Arshad, The extended Mittag-Leffler function via fractional calculus, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 10 (2017), 4244–4253. https://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.010.08.19 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.08.19
    [25] M. A. Chaudhry, S. M. Zubair, On a class of incomplete gamma functions with applications, New York: Chapman and Hall, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420036046
    [26] R. Gorenflo, A. A. Kilbas, F. Mainardi, S. V. Rogosin, Mittag-Leffler functions, related topics and applications, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43930-2
    [27] H. J. Haubold, A. M. Mathai, R. K. Saxena, Mittag-Leffler functions and their applications, J. Appl. Math., 2011 (2011), 298628. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/298628 doi: 10.1155/2011/298628
    [28] J. Choi, R. K. Parmar, P. Chopra, Extended Mittag-Leffler function and associated fractional calculus operators, Georgian Math. J., 27 (2020), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1515/gmj-2019-2030 doi: 10.1515/gmj-2019-2030
    [29] H. M. Srivastava, G. Rahman, K. S. Nisar, Some extension of the Pochhammer symbol and the associated hypergeometric functions, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. A, 43 (2019), 2601–2606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-019-00756-8 doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00756-8
    [30] H. M. Srivastava, A. Cetinkaya, O. I. Kiymaz, A certain generalized pochhammer symbol and its applications to hypergeometric functions, Appl. Math. Comput., 226 (2014), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.10.032 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.10.032
    [31] K. S. Nisar, G. Rahman, Z. Tomovski, On a certain extension of Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative operator, Commun. Korean Math. Soc., 34 (2019), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.c180140 doi: 10.4134/CKMS.c180140
    [32] M. Bohner, G. Rahman, S. Mubeen, K. S. Nisar, A further extension of the extended Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative operator, Turk. J. Math., 42 (2018), 2631–2642. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1805-139 doi: 10.3906/mat-1805-139
    [33] G. Rahman, S. Mubeen, K. S. Nisar, J. Choi, Certain extended special functions and fractional integral and derivative operators via an extended beta functions, Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl., 24 (2019), 1–13.
    [34] R. K. Saxena, S. L. Kalla, R. Saxena, Multivariate analogue of generalized Mittag–Leffler function, Integr. Transf. Spec. F., 22 (2011), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2010.533474 doi: 10.1080/10652469.2010.533474
    [35] A. A. Kilbas, M. Saigo, R. K. Saxena, Generalized Mittag-Leffler function and generalized fractional calculus operators, Integr. Transf. Spec. F., 15 (2004), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652460310001600717 doi: 10.1080/10652460310001600717
    [36] M. A. Özarslan, A. Fernandez, On the fractional calculus of multivariate Mittag-Leffler functions, Int. J. Comput. Math., 99 (2022), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2021.1906869 doi: 10.1080/00207160.2021.1906869
    [37] A. Nazir, G. Rahman, A. Ali, S. Naheed, K. S. Nisar, W. Albalawi, et al., On generalized fractional integral with multivariate Mittag-Leffler function and its applications, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 9187–9201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.02.044 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.02.044
    [38] M. Samraiz, A. Mehmood, S. Naheed, G. Rahman, A. Kashuri, K. Nonlaopon, On novel fractional operators involving the multivariate Mittag-Leffler function, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 3991. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10213991 doi: 10.3390/math10213991
    [39] M. Samraiz, M. Umer, T. Abdeljawad, S. Naheed, G. Rahman. K. Shah, On Riemann-type weighted fractional operators and solutions to Cauchy problems. CMES Comp. Model. Eng., 136 2023,901–919. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.024029 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2023.024029
    [40] A. M. Mathai, H. J. Haubold, Special functions for applied scientists, New York: Springer, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75894-7
    [41] H. M. Srivastava, H. L. Manocha, A treatise on generating functions, New York: Halsted Press, 1984.
    [42] H. M. Srivastava, Z. Tomovski, Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel, Appl. Math. Comput., 211 (2009), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.055 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.055
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Noreen Saba, Sana Maqsood, Muhammad Asghar, Ghulam Mustafa, Faheem Khan, An extended Mittag Leffler function in terms of extended Wright complex hypergeometric function, 2025, 117, 11100168, 364, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.065
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1706) PDF downloads(126) Cited by(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog