
As a continuation to our results in [
Citation: Rawya A. Hussein, Ali A. Ali. Geometry of the line space associated to a given dual ruled surface[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8542-8557. doi: 10.3934/math.2022476
[1] | Yanlin Li, Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy . On simultaneous characterizations of partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22256-22273. doi: 10.3934/math.20231135 |
[2] | Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy, Mohammad Nazrul Islam Khan . Simultaneous characterizations of alternative partner-ruled surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8891-8906. doi: 10.3934/math.2025407 |
[3] | Mehmet Önder . Non-null slant ruled surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 384-396. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.384 |
[4] | Fatemah Mofarreh, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky . Spacelike ruled surfaces with stationary Disteli-axis. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7840-7855. doi: 10.3934/math.2023394 |
[5] | Nural Yüksel . On dual surfaces in Galilean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4830-4842. doi: 10.3934/math.2023240 |
[6] | Emad Solouma, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Meraj Ali Khan, Youssef A. A. Lazer . Characterization of imbricate-ruled surfaces via rotation-minimizing Darboux frame in Minkowski 3-space $ \mathrm{E}_1^3 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13028-13042. doi: 10.3934/math.2024635 |
[7] | Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Monia F. Naghi . A study on a line congruence as surface in the space of lines. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11109-11123. doi: 10.3934/math.2021645 |
[8] | Maryam T. Aldossary, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky . On the Blaschke approach of Bertrand offsets of spacelike ruled surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17843-17858. doi: 10.3934/math.2022983 |
[9] | Faik Babadağ . A new approach to Jacobsthal, Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers and dual vectors. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18596-18606. doi: 10.3934/math.2023946 |
[10] | Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao . Geometric invariants and focal surfaces of spacelike curves in de Sitter space from a caustic viewpoint. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3177-3204. doi: 10.3934/math.2021192 |
As a continuation to our results in [
Dual numbers were introduced in the 19th century by Clifford, and their applications to rigid body kinematics were subsequently generalized by Kafelnikov and study in their principle of transference. The principle of transference, states that if dual numbers replace real ones (see [2,3]); then all relations of vector algebra for intersecting lines are also valid for skew lines. In practice, this means that all rules of vector algebra for the kinematics of a rigid body with a fixed point (spherical kinematics) also hold for motor algebra of a free rigid body (spatial kinematics). As a result, a general rigid body motion can be described by only three dual equations rather than six real ones. For several decades there were attempts to apply dual numbers to rigid body dynamics. Investigators showed that the momentum of a rigid body can be described as a motor that obeys the motor transformation rule, hence, its derivative with respect to time yields the dual force. However, in those investigations, while going from the velocity motor to the momentum motor, there was always a need to expand the equation to six dimensions and to treat the velocity motor as two separated real vectors. This process actually diminishes one of the main advantages of dual numbers-namely, compactness of representation. Screws in the space can be represented by dual vectors at the origin. The components of a dual vector consisting of a line vector at the origin and the perpendicular moment vector for the line vector in the space are equal to Plucker's line coordinates. Furthermore, the space of lines could be represented by points on the unit sphere and points in the tangential planes that affiliated to each point on the sphere (see [1,4]).
A dual number ˆx is defined as an ordered pair of real numbers (x,x∗) expressed formally as (see [5]):
ˆx=x+εx∗, | (1.1) |
where x is referred to the real part and x∗ to the dual part. The symbol ε is a multiplier which has the property ε2=0. The algebra of dual numbers results from (1.1). Two dual numbers are equal if and only if their real and dual parts are equal, respectively. As in the case of complex numbers, addition of two dual numbers is defined as (see [4,5])
(x+εx∗)+(y+εy∗)=(x+y)+ε(x∗+y∗). | (1.2) |
Multiplication of two dual numbers result in (see [6]):
(x+εx∗)(y+εy∗)=xy+ε(x∗y+xy∗). | (1.3) |
Division of dual numbers ˆxˆy is defined as (see [1]):
ˆxˆy=xy+ε(x∗y−xy∗y2),y≠0. | (1.4) |
Note that the division is possible and unambiguous only if y≠0.
Dual function of dual number presents a mapping of a space of dual numbers on itself, namely (see [3,6,7]).
ˆf(ˆx)=f(x)+εf∗(x,x∗) | (1.5) |
where ˆx=x+εx∗ is a dual variable, f and f∗are two, generally different, f∗ is a function of two variables. The dual function (1.5) is said to be analytic if it satisfies the following:
ˆf(x+εx∗)=f+εf∗=f(x)+ε(x∗f′(x)+˜f(x)),′=ddx | (1.6) |
where ˜f(x) is an arbitrary function of a real part of a dual variable. The analytic condition for dual function is (see [1]):
∂f∗∂x∗=∂f∂x. | (1.7) |
The derivative of such a dual function with respect to a dual variable is
dˆf(ˆx)dˆx=∂f∗∂x∗+ε∂f∗∂x. | (1.8) |
Taking into account (1.7) we have:
dˆf(ˆx)dˆx=∂f∂x+ε∂f∗∂x=f′(x)+ε(x∗f″(x)+~f′(x)). | (1.9) |
If a function f(x) has the derivative f′(x), its value for the dual argument ˆx=x+εx∗ is denoted by ˆf(ˆx) or ˆf(x). Using the formal Taylor expansion of the function ˆf(x) with the property ε2=0; we have (see [6,8]).
ˆf(x)=f(x+εx∗)=f(x)+εx∗f′(x). | (1.10) |
The set
D3=D×D×D={ˆx_:ˆx_=(x1+εx∗1,x2+εx∗2,x3+εx∗3)=(x1,x2,x3)+ε(x∗1,x∗2,x∗3)=x_+εx_∗,x_,x_∗∈R3}, |
is a module on the ring D and is called the dual space (vector space defined on the field of dual numbers). For any ˆx_=x_+εx_∗,ˆy_=y_+εy_∗∈D3, the scalar or inner product and the vector product <ˆx_,ˆy_>, ˆx_∧ˆy_ of ˆx_ and ˆy_ are defined respectively by (see [9,10]):
<ˆx_,ˆy_>=<x_,y_>+ε(<x_,y_∗>+<x_∗,y_>), | (1.11) |
ˆx_∧ˆy_=(x2_y3_−x3_y2_,x3_y1_−x1_y3_,x1_y2_−x2_y1_), | (1.12) |
where ˆx=(xi+εx∗i), ˆy=(yi+εy∗i) ∈D3, 1⪯i⪯3.
If x≠0, the norm∥ˆx_∥ is defined by (see [11,12])
∥ˆx_∥=√<ˆx_,ˆx_>=∥x_∥+ε<x_,x_∗>∥x_∥. | (1.13) |
A dual vector ˆx_=x_+εx_∗ is a dual unit vector which satisfies the following <x_,x_∗>=0 and <x_,x_>=1. Then, we have that <ˆx_,ˆx_>=1, also a dual vector ˆx_ with the unit norm is called a dual unit vector The subset S2={ˆx_=x_+εx_∗:∥ˆx_∥=(1,0);x_,x_∗∈R3}⊂D3 is called the dual unit sphere with the center ˆO in D3.
If every xi(u) and x∗i(u), 1≤i≤n and u∈Rn, are differentiable dual valued functions, the dual vector field ^x(u) is defined as the following:
ˆx:u⊂Rn→Dn (see [11]),
^x(u)=x(u)+εx∗(u).
Dual space curve is a dual vector field of one variable defined as the following:
ˆx:I⊂R→D3, |
where
u→^x(u)=(x1(u)+εx∗1(u),x2(u)+εx∗2(u),x3(u)+εx∗3(u))=x+εx∗∈D3, |
is differentiable. The real part x_(u) is called the indicatrix of the space curve ˆx(u). The dual arc length of the curve ˆx(u) from u1 to u is defined as (see [2,12])
u∫u1∥(ˆx_)′∥du=u∫u1∥(x_)′∥du+uε∫u1<T_,(x_∗(u))′>du=s+εs∗ |
where T_ is a unit tangent vector of x_(u). From now on, we will take the arc length s of x_(u) as the parameter instead of u.
A dual ruled surface results from the motion of line in the dual space D3, similarly to the way a dual curve represents the motion of a dual point.A dual ruled surface is a surface swept out by a dual straight line L with moving direction ˆw(u1) along a dual curve ˆα. Such a surface always has a parameterization in the ruled form (see [11,13,14])
ˆσ:ˆR(^u1,^u2)=ˆα(^u1)+^u2ˆw(^u1),^u1∈ˆI⊂D,^u2∈D | (2.1) |
where, ˆu1=u1+εu∗1,ˆu2=u2+εu∗2,ˆα(^u1)=α(^u1)+εα∗(^u1),ˆw(^u1)=w(^u1)+εw∗(^u1).
The dual ruled surface generated by the family {ˆα(^u1),ˆw(^u1)}, where ˆα(^u1) is a dual directrix of the dual surface and ˆw(^u1) is the unit dual generator.
Using the formally Taylor expansion and the derivative of a dual function, we can write Eq (2.1) in the dual representation vector as (see [2]),
ˆR(^u1,^u2)=R(u1,u2)+εR∗(uη,u∗γ) | (2.2) |
where
σ:R(u1,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1) | (2.3) |
σ∗:R∗(uη,u∗γ)=α∗(u1)+u∗1α′(u1)+u∗2w(u1)+u2(w∗(u1)+u∗1w′(u1)) | (2.4) |
where ′=ddu1 and R∗=R∗(u1,u2,u∗1,u∗2) is a regular vector function in four variables u1,u2,u∗1,u∗1 This function can be written in the ruled form (see [5]),
R∗(uη,u∗γ)=α∗(u1)+u∗1l(u1)+u∗2w(u1)+u2w∗(u1)l(u1)=α′(u1)+w′(u1). | (2.5) |
From Eqs (2.3)–(2.5) one can see the following:
Theorem 1. (see [5,12]) For any ruled surface defined in the dual space through the vector field ˆR(ˆuβ), there are a real ruled surface R(u1,u2) and 2-parametric family of ruled surfaces given by R∗(uη,u∗γ).
The 2-parametric family of ruled surface is defined through the function R∗(uη,u∗γ) and this function depends on 4 independent parameters uη,u∗γ, thus we have:
Corollary 1. (see [5]) The vector valued function R∗(uη,u∗γ) characterizes the space of lines (4-dimensional Grassmann manifold) or line space attached to the dual ruled surface.
Assume that the dual ruled surface is a non cylindrical with |ˆw(^u1)|=1, ˆu1∈ˆI. i.e <ˆw(ˆu1),ˆw′(ˆu1)>=0 for all ˆu1∈ˆI.
First we construct a parameterized dual curve ˆβ(ˆu1) lies on the trace of ˆR; such that <ˆβ′(ˆu1),ˆw′(ˆu1)>=0, ˆu1∈I that is
ˆβ(ˆu1)=ˆα(ˆu1)+^u2(ˆu1)ˆw(ˆu1). | (2.6) |
Using the formally Taylor expansion and the derivative of a dual function, Eq (2.6) can be written in the dual representation vector as the following (see [2,5]):
ˆβ(ˆu1)=β(u1)+εβ∗(uκ,u∗1), | (2.7) |
where
β(u1)=α(u1)+u2(u1)w(u1),β∗(uκ,u∗1)=α∗(u1)+u∗1α′(u1)+u2(u1)(w∗(u1)+u∗1w′(u1))+w(u1)(u2∗(u1)+u∗1u2′(u1)) | (2.8) |
for some dual valued function ^u2=^u2(ˆu1).
Assuming the existence of such dual curve ˆβ, one obtains
ˆβ′(^u1)=ˆα′+^u2′ˆw+^u2ˆw′. | (2.9) |
Taylor expansion and the derivative of a dual function gives
ˆβ′(ˆu1)=β′(u1)+εβ′∗(u1), | (2.10) |
where
β′(u1)=α′+u2′(u1)w+u2(u1)w′,β′∗(u1,u∗1)=α′∗+u∗1α″+u2′(u1)(w∗+u∗1w′)+w(u2′∗(u1)+u∗1u2″)+u2(u1)(w′∗+u∗1w″)+w′(u2∗(u1)+u∗1u2′). | (2.11) |
Since <ˆw(ˆu1),ˆw′(ˆu1)>=0, we have
^u2=−<ˆα′,ˆw′><ˆw′,ˆw′>. | (2.12) |
Equation (2.12) can be written in the dual representation vector by using Taylor expansion as the following
^u2=u2(u1)+εu2∗(u1) | (2.13) |
where
u2(u1)=−<α′(u1),w′(u1)><w′(u1),w′(u1)>,u2∗(u1)=−<α′,w′∗+u∗1w″>+<w′,α′∗+u∗1α″><w′,w′>−<α′,w′><w′,w∗′+u∗1w″><w′,w′>2. | (2.14) |
Thus, if we define ˆβ(ˆu1) by Eqs (2.4) and (2.12), we obtain the required dual curve, which is called the dual line of striction and its points are called the central points of the dual ruled surface. Thus the striction curve on the real ruled surface σ is given by
β(u1)=α(u1)−<α′(u1),w′(u1)><w′(u1),w′(u1)>w(u1). | (2.15) |
In this case the line space σ∗ degenerate to 1-parametric family of ruled surfaces is given by
R∗=R(uη,u∗γ),u∗2=u∗2(u1) |
such function are defined explicitly by (2.4) and(2.14) respectively.
Now we take the line of striction ˆβ=ˆβ(ˆu1) as the directrix of the dual ruled surface (2.1) which is given by
ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=ˆβ(ˆu1)+ˆu2ˆw(ˆu1), | (2.16) |
where ˆβ=ˆβ(ˆu1) is given through (2.7), (2.8), (2.13) and (2.14).
Thus, we have proved the following:
Lemma 1. (see [11,12]) For the dual line of striction on the dual ruled surfaces. There exists a real line of striction on the real ruled surface attached to the dual ruled surface.
Here, we try to give dual forms for the invariants attached to the dual ruled surface such as, the parameter of distribution and Gaussian curvature. Using the dual differentiation which is presented in section one, one can obtain the dual tangent vector ˆRα to the dual ruled surface as in the following.
ˆR1=R1(u1,u2)+εR∗1(uκ,u∗γ),ˆR2=R2+εR∗2,ˆRα=∂ˆR∂ˆuα | (3.1) |
where
R1(u1,u2)=β′+u2w′,R∗1(uκ,u∗γ)=(β′∗+u∗1β″+u∗2w∗′+u∗1w″),R2(u1,u∗1)=w,R∗2(u1,u∗1)=w∗+u∗1w′, | (3.2) |
and the dual normal vector field is given as
ˆR1∧ˆR2=ˆβ′∧ˆw+ˆu2(ˆw′∧ˆw). | (3.3) |
The dual representation of (2.18) can be written in the form
ˆR1∧ˆR2=ζ(u1,u2)+εζ∗(uη,u∗γ), | (3.4) |
where
ζ=β′∧w+u2w′∧w,ζ∗=(β′+u2w′)∧(w∗+w′)+(u2(w∗′+u∗1β″)+u∗2w′+β∗+u∗1β″)∧w. | (3.5) |
Since <ˆw′,ˆw>=0 and <ˆw′,ˆβ′>=0, we conclude that for some dual function ˆλ=ˆλ(ˆu1), we have
ˆβ′∧ˆw=ˆλˆw′, | (3.6) |
|ˆR1∧ˆR2|2=|ˆλˆw′+ˆu2ˆw′∧ˆw|2=ˆλ2|ˆw′|2+ˆu2|ˆw′|2=(ˆλ2+ˆu2)|ˆw′|2. | (3.7) |
The discriminant ˆg of the first fundamental form can be written as
ˆg=|ˆR1∧ˆR2|2=(ˆλ2+ˆu2)|ˆw′|2=(λ2+u2)|w′|2+2ε((λ2+u2)w′w∗′+w′2(λλ∗+u2u∗2))=g+εg∗, | (3.8) |
where
g=(λ2+u2)|w′|2,g∗=2((λ2+u2)w′w∗′+w′2(λλ∗+u2u∗2)). | (3.9) |
It follows that the only singular point on the ruled surface (2.15) is along the line of striction ˆu2=0, and it will occur if and only if ˆλ(ˆu1)=0. Then from (2.21) one can see that
ˆλ=(ˆβ′,ˆw,ˆw′)|ˆw′|2. | (3.10) |
Remark 1. ˆλ=0⇒λ=λ∗=0,ˆu2=0⇒u2=0,u∗2=0.
Equation (2.23) can be written in the dual vector representation as
ˆλ(ˆu1)=λ(u1)+ελ∗(u1,u∗1), | (3.11) |
where
λ(u1)=(β′,w,w′)|w′|2,λ∗(u1,u∗1)=2(β′,w,w′)<w′,w∗′+u∗1w″>|w′|4+(β′,w′∗+u∗1w″,w′+w)+(β′∗+u∗1β″,w,w′)|w′|2. | (3.12) |
Definition. The dual function ˆλ(ˆu1) is called the dual distribution parameter of the dual ruled surface ˆR.
The dual unit normal vector field on the dual surface (2.15) is
ˆN=ˆR1∧ˆR2|ˆR1∧ˆR2|=ˆR1∧ˆR2√ˆg, | (3.13) |
then from Eqs (3.4) and (3.8) we have
ˆN=ζ(u1,u2)+εζ∗(uη,u∗γ)√g+εg∗=ζg2+εζ∗g2−g∗ζg3=N+εN∗. | (3.14) |
Thus we have the following interesting results
Lemma 2. The unit dual normal vector field of two parts, one is the real unit normal vector field and the other is the vector field depends on the line space attached to the dual ruled surface.
The same lemma can be reformulated for the dual parameter of distribution and the line of striction as shown in the Eqs (2.4), (2.16), (3.11), respectively.
The coefficients of the first fundamental form are given in the following form
ˆg11=<ˆβ′,ˆβ′>+(u2)2<ˆw′,ˆw′>=(<β′,β′>+(u2)2<w′,w′>)+ε(2<β′,β∗′>+2(u2)2<ˆw′,^w∗′>)=g11+εg∗11,ˆg12=<ˆβ′,ˆw>=<β′,w>+ε(<β′,w∗>+<β∗′,w>)=g12+εg∗12,ˆg22=1. | (3.15) |
Using the definition of the Gauss curvature ˆK and routine calculations one obtains
ˆK=−ˆλ2|ˆw′|4(ˆλ2+(ˆu2)2)2|ˆw′|4=−ˆλ2(ˆλ2+(ˆu2)2)2. | (3.16) |
From (2.24) we have
ˆK(ˆu1,ˆu2)=K(u1,u2)+εK∗(uκ,u∗γ), | (3.17) |
where
K(u1,u2)=−λ2¯λ2,¯λ=λ2+(u2)2,K∗(uκ,u∗γ)=(2λλ∗+2u∗1λλ′)((u2)2−λ2)+2λ2u2u∗2¯λ3. | (3.18) |
Remark 2. The function K is the Gauss curvature of the real ruled surface σ.
The vector valued function (2.5) defines a 2-parametric family of ruled surfaces σ∗. Here we give a classification to the ruled surfaces belonging to this family, which are called partially dual ruled surfaces.
(Ⅰ) Consider u∗1=0 and ˆu2=u2+εu∗2 and using Eqs (2.3)–(2.5), we have a partially dual ruled surface σI given by
ˆσI:ˆR(u1,^u2)=R(u1,u2)+εR∗(u1,u2,u∗2), | (4.1) |
where
σI:R(u1,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1), | (4.2) |
σ∗I:R∗(uκ,u∗2)=α∗(u1)+u∗2w(u1)+u2w∗(u1). | (4.3) |
It is easy to see that the function R∗ defines 3-parametric family of lines σ∗Ii,i=1,2,3. Now, we take the line of striction as the directrix of the dual ruled surface and using (2.16), (3.1)–(3.10) we have the following:
Lemma 3. The dual parameter of distribution ^λ1 is given as
^λ1(ˆu1)=λ1(u1)+ελ1∗(u1), | (4.4) |
where
λ1(u1)=(β′,w,w′)|w′|2,λ1∗(u1)=2(β′,w,w′)<w′,w∗′>|w′|4+(β′,w′∗,w′+w)+(β′∗,w,w′)|w′|2. | (4.5) |
Lemma 4. The dual Gaussian curvature ^K2 is given as
^K1(ˆu1,ˆu2)=K1(u1,u2)+εK1∗(uη,u∗2), | (4.6) |
K1(u1,u2)=−λ12¯λ1,¯λ=λ12+(u2)2,K1∗(uη,u∗2)=2λ1λ1∗((u2)2−λ12)+2λ12u2u∗2¯λ13. | (4.7) |
Remark 3. The functions λ1,K1 is defined for the real ruled surface σI.
Geometric interpretation
For the vector valued function R∗=R∗(u1,u2,u∗2) given by Eq (3.3), we consider the following cases:
(1) u2=const=c1, characterizes a dual ruled surface σ∗I1 defined as
σ∗I1:ˆR(u1,u∗2)=˜r(u1)+u∗2¯r(u1), | (4.8) |
where
˜r(u1)=α∗(u1)+c1w∗(u1),¯r(u1)=w(u1). | (4.9) |
(2) u∗2=const=c2, define a dual ruled surface σ∗I2 as
ˆR(u1,u2)=˜r(u1)+u2¯r(u1), | (4.10) |
where
˜r(u1)=α∗(u1)+c2w(u1),¯r(u1)=w∗(u1). | (4.11) |
(3) u1=const=c1, describes a degenerate ruled surface σ∗I3 (plane) passing through the point α(u1) and contains the fixed directions w∗(u1),w.
(⨿) Consider u∗2=0 and ˆu1=u1+εu∗1 and using Eqs (2.3)–(2.5) we have a partially dual ruled surface σ⨿ given as
ˆσ⨿:ˆR(^u1,u2)=R(u1,u2)+εR∗(uη,u∗1), | (4.12) |
where
σ⨿:R(u1,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1), | (4.13) |
σ∗⨿:R∗(uη,u∗1)=α∗(u1)+u∗1α′(u1)+u2(w∗(u1)+u∗1w′(u1)). | (4.14) |
Similarly as in case one, it is easy to see that the function R∗ defines a 3-parametric family of lines σ∗⨿i,i=1,2,3 as in case Ⅰ. Thus we have the following:
Lemma 5. The dual parameter of distribution ^λ2 is given as
^λ2(ˆu1)=λ2(u1)+ελ2∗(u1,u∗1), | (4.15) |
where
λ2(u1)=(β′,w,w′)|w′|2,λ2∗(u1,u∗1)=2(β′,w,w′)<w′,w∗′+u∗1w″>|w′|4+(β′,w′∗+u∗1w″,w′+w)+(β′∗+u∗1β″,w,w′)|w′|2. | (4.16) |
Lemma 6. The dual Gaussian curvature ^K2 is given as
^K2(ˆu1,u2)=K2(u1,u2)+εK∗2(uη,u∗1), | (4.17) |
where
K2(u1,u2)=−λ22¯λ22,¯λ2=λ22+(u2)2,K2∗(uη,u∗1)=2λ2λ2∗+2u∗1λ2λ2′((u2)2−λ22)¯λ23. | (4.18) |
Remark 4. The vector function R represents the real part of the dual ruled surface which coincident with the well known construction of the ruled surface, while the function R∗(uγ,u∗γ) represents the dual part of the dual ruled surface.
Remark 5. The dual part R∗(uη,u∗γ) represents 2-parametric family of ruled surfaces (line space) attached to a given a dual ruled surface
Remark 6. From (3.30), (3.32) one can see that the real parts of the parameter of distribution and the Gauss curvature have the same values for the partially ruled surface, K1=K2,λ1=λ2,¯λ1=¯λ2 (defined on areal ruled surface).
Remark 7. The two partially ruled surfaces ˆσI,ˆσ⨿ have the same geometric interpretation, i.e., consists of two ruled surface and a plane.
As an application to the construction of the dual ruled surfaces we consider the dual helicoid given by
Example 1. The dual vector function:
ˆ∑1:ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=(ˆu2cosˆu1,ˆu2sinˆu1,ˆu1),ˆu2≠0. | (5.1) |
This vector function can be written in the dual form as
σI:ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=R(u1,u2)+εR∗(uη,u∗γ), | (5.2) |
where
σ∗I:R(u1,u2)=(u2cosu1,u2sinu1,u1), | (5.3) |
R∗(uη,u∗γ)=(u∗2cosu1−u2u∗1sinu1,u∗2sinu1+u2u∗1cosu1,u∗1). | (5.4) |
Also, we can write this equation in the dual ruled surface formula as in the following
ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=ˆβ(ˆu1)+ˆu2ˆw(ˆu1), | (5.5) |
where
ˆβ(ˆu1)=(0,0,ˆu1),ˆw(ˆu1)=(cosˆu1,sinˆu1,0). | (5.6) |
Using Eqs (2.25) and (2.29), we have
λI=1,λ∗I=1. | (5.7) |
From (5.7), (5.8) we have the well known results for the parameter of distibution, and Gaussian curvature for the helicoid given by
KI=1(1+(u2)2)2,K∗I=22(u2)2+u2u∗2−1(1+(u2)2)3. | (5.8) |
Example 2. Consider the dual ruled surface:
ˆΣ⨿:ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=(ˆu2cosˆu1,ˆu2sinˆu1,coshˆu1),ˆu2≠0, | (5.9) |
or in the dual form:
ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=R(u1,u2)+εR∗(uη,u∗γ), | (5.10) |
where
σ⨿:R(u1,u2)=(u2cosu1,u2sinu1,coshu1), | (5.11) |
and
σ∗⨿:R∗(uη,u∗γ)=(u∗2cosu1−u2u∗1sinu1,u∗2sinu1+u2u∗1cosu1,u∗1sinhu1). | (5.12) |
As a similar way to example one, we have
λ⨿=sinhu1,λ∗⨿=u∗1coshu1, | (5.13) |
K⨿=sinhu1(sinhu1+(u2)2)2,K∗⨿=2u∗1sinhu1((u2)2−sinhu1)+2u∗2u2sinh2(sinhu1+(u2)2)2. | (5.14) |
The vector valued function R∗(uκ,u∗γ), which is defined in Eq (3.4) depends on 4 independent parametric uκ,u∗γ, thus it characterizes the space of lines (4-dimensional Grassmann manifold). The space of lines and their subfamilies of ruled surface are constructed and plotted in Figures 1–11, for the two dual ruled surfaces (4.1) and (4.9) respectively.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
N. H. Abdel-All, M. Soliman, R. A. Huesien, A. A. Ali, Dual construction of developable ruled surface, J. Am. Sci., 7 (2011), 789–793. https://doi.org/10.7537/marsjas070411.109 doi: 10.7537/marsjas070411.109
![]() |
[2] |
L. M. Hsia, A. T. Yang, On the principle of transference in three-dimensional kinematics, J. Mech. Des., 103 (1981), 652–656. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3254966 doi: 10.1115/1.3254966
![]() |
[3] | J. M. Selig, Note on the principle of transference, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 1986. |
[4] |
V. Brodsky, M. Shoham, Dual numbers representation of rigid body dynamics, Mech. Mach. Theory, 34 (2012), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(98)00049-4 doi: 10.1016/S0094-114X(98)00049-4
![]() |
[5] | R. Ding, Y. Zhang, Dual space drawing methods for ruled surfaces with particular shapes, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Net., 6 (2006), 1–12. |
[6] | M. K. Karacan, B. Bukcu, N. Yuksel, On the dual Bishop Darboux rotation axis of the dual space curve, APPS. Appl. Sci., 10 (2008), 115–120. |
[7] | A. Y¨ucesan, A. C. C¨oken, N. Ayyildiz, On the dual Darboux rotation axis of the timelike dual space curve, Balk. J. Geom. Appl., 7 (2002), 137–142. |
[8] | A. Y¨ucesan, N. Ayyildiz, A. C. C¨oken, On rectifying dual space curves, Rev. Mat. Complut., 20 (2007), 497–506. |
[9] |
H. Pottmanna, M. Peternella, B. Ravanib, An introduction to line geometry with applications, Comput.-Aided Design., 31 (1999), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(98)00076-1 doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(98)00076-1
![]() |
[10] |
J. Mahovsky, B. Wyvill, Fast ray-axis aligned bounding box overlap tests with Plucker coordinates, J. Graphics Tools, 9 (2004), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10867651.2004.10487597 doi: 10.1080/10867651.2004.10487597
![]() |
[11] |
Y. Li, Y. Zhu, Q. Y. Sun, Singularities and dualities of pedal curves in pseudo-hyperbolic and de Sitter space, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 18 (2021), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821500080 doi: 10.1142/S0219887821500080
![]() |
[12] |
G. R. Veldkamp, On the use of dual numbers, vectors and matrices in instantaneous spatial kinematics, Mech. Mach. Theory, 11 (1976), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(76)90006-9 doi: 10.1016/0094-114X(76)90006-9
![]() |
[13] |
F. Messelmi, Analysis of dual functions, Ann. Rev. Chaos Theory, Bifurcations Dyn. Syst., 4 (2013), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1006.4006 doi: 10.13140/2.1.1006.4006
![]() |
[14] |
Y. Li, Z. Wang, T. Zhao, Geometric algebra of singular ruled surfaces, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras, 31 (2021), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00006-020-01097-1 doi: 10.1007/s00006-020-01097-1
![]() |
1. | Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Kinematic Differential Geometry of a Line Trajectory in Spatial Movement, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 472, 10.3390/axioms12050472 | |
2. | Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Kinematic Geometry of a Timelike Line Trajectory in Hyperbolic Locomotions, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 915, 10.3390/axioms12100915 | |
3. | Harun Barış Çolakoğlu, İskender Öztürk, Oğuzhan Çelik, Mustafa Özdemir, Generalized Galilean Rotations, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 1553, 10.3390/sym16111553 |