Research article Special Issues

On dual surfaces in Galilean 3-space

  • In the present paper, we describe dual translation surfaces in the Galilean 3-space having the constant Gaussian and mean curvatures as well as Weingarten and linear Weingarten dual translation surfaces. We also study dual translation surfaces in G3 under the condition ΔIIr=λiri, where λiR and ΔII denotes the Laplacian operator respect to the second fundamental form.

    Citation: Nural Yüksel. On dual surfaces in Galilean 3-space[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4830-4842. doi: 10.3934/math.2023240

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zuhal Küçükarslan Yüzbașı, Dae Won Yoon . On geometry of isophote curves in Galilean space. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 66-76. doi: 10.3934/math.2021005
    [2] Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao . Geometric invariants and focal surfaces of spacelike curves in de Sitter space from a caustic viewpoint. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3177-3204. doi: 10.3934/math.2021192
    [3] Rawya A. Hussein, Ali A. Ali . Geometry of the line space associated to a given dual ruled surface. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8542-8557. doi: 10.3934/math.2022476
    [4] M. Khalifa Saad, Nural Yüksel, Nurdan Oğraş, Fatemah Alghamdi, A. A. Abdel-Salam . Geometry of tubular surfaces and their focal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12479-12493. doi: 10.3934/math.2024610
    [5] Ibrahim AL-Dayel, Emad Solouma, Meraj Khan . On geometry of focal surfaces due to B-Darboux and type-2 Bishop frames in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13454-13468. doi: 10.3934/math.2022744
    [6] Yanlin Li, Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy . On simultaneous characterizations of partner-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22256-22273. doi: 10.3934/math.20231135
    [7] Mehmet Önder . Non-null slant ruled surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 384-396. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.384
    [8] Ayman Elsharkawy, Clemente Cesarano, Abdelrhman Tawfiq, Abdul Aziz Ismail . The non-linear Schrödinger equation associated with the soliton surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17879-17893. doi: 10.3934/math.2022985
    [9] Hassan Al-Zoubi, Bendehiba Senoussi, Mutaz Al-Sabbagh, Mehmet Ozdemir . The Chen type of Hasimoto surfaces in the Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16062-16072. doi: 10.3934/math.2023819
    [10] Fatemah Mofarreh, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky . Singularities of swept surfaces in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 26049-26064. doi: 10.3934/math.20241272
  • In the present paper, we describe dual translation surfaces in the Galilean 3-space having the constant Gaussian and mean curvatures as well as Weingarten and linear Weingarten dual translation surfaces. We also study dual translation surfaces in G3 under the condition ΔIIr=λiri, where λiR and ΔII denotes the Laplacian operator respect to the second fundamental form.



    A surface that arises when a curve α(u) is translated over another curve β(v) is called a translation surface. A translation surface is defined to be the sum of two curves α(u) and β(v), which are called generating curves. Therefore, translation surfaces are made up of quadrilateral, that is, four sided, facets. Because of this property, translation surfaces are used in architecture to design and construct free-form glass roofing structures. A translation surface in Euclidean 3-space by two curves in orthogonal planes, is given in [2,3] as a graph of the function z(u,v)=f(u)+g(v), such that f(u) and g(v) are smooth functions defined on an interval of R.

    The translation surfaces in E3 studied by H. F. Scherk [1] are obtained as a graph of the sum z(u,v)=f(u)+g(v), and where he proved that the only minimal translation surfaces are the those denoted by

    z(u,v)=1alog|cos(au)cos(av)|=1alog|cos(au)|1alog|cos(av)|,

    where a is a non-zero constant. These surfaces[12,13] are nowadays said to be Scherk's minimal surfaces.

    Constant mean curvature and constant Gaussian curvature surfaces have been the main problem for the geometers for a long time. Translation surfaces with constant mean curvature, in particular, zero mean curvature, in the Euclidean space and the Minkowski space are stated in [7]. Lone and Karacan yield categorization of dual translation surface, which has constant dual isotropic mean curvature or constant dual isotropic Gaussian curvature [8]. Dillen, Goemans and Woestyne obtained a categorization of translation surfaces in the 3-dimensional Euclidean and Minkowski space such that the Weingarten circumstance is satisfying [5].

    Sipus and Divjak [11] explained translation surfaces in the Galilean space having constant Gaussian and mean curvatures together with translation Weingarten surfaces. Yoon searched coordinate finite type translation surfaces in G3 and explained some examples of new classes of translation surfaces [12]. He also studied a translation surface in G3 with a log-linear density and classified such a surface with vanishing weighted mean curvature[13].

    LN-surfaces, which were taken into account in [6] with enough elasticity to model smooth surfaces. Peternell and Odehnal generalized the idea of LN-surfaces to R4 [9]. Bulca calculated the Gaussian, normal and mean curvatures of LN- surfaces in E4. Further, she pointed out the flat and minimal points of the surfaces in [3]. Sampoli, Peternell and Jüttler indicate that even the convolution surface of an LN-surface and any rational surface admits rational parametrization [10]. Moreover, LN and LCN translation surfaces have been characterized in 3-dimensional affine and Euclidean spaces in [14,15].

    In this study, the dual translation surfaces defined by z=f(u)+g(v), are considered in the three dimensional Galilean space G3.

    We emphasize that the Galilean space G3 is a Cayley-Klein space associated with a 3-dimensional projective space P(R3) with the absolute figure. The reader is referred to [11,12] for more details of

    d(P1,P2)={|x2x1|      ,  if   x1x2(y2y1)2+(z2z1)2 ,  if   x1=x2.   (2.1)

    The group of motions of G3 is a six-parameter group given in affine coordinates by

    ¯x=a+x,¯y=b+cx+ycosθ+zsinθ,¯z=d+exysinθ+zcosθ,

    with respect to the absolute figure, there are two types of lines in the Galilean space - isotropic lines which intersect the absolute line f and non-isotropic lines which do not. A plane is called Euclidean if it includes f, whereas it is said isotropic. In the given affine coordinates, isotropic vectors are of the form (0,y,z), but Euclidean planes are of the form x=k,k R. The induced geometry of a Euclidean plane is Euclidean, and of an isotropic plane isotropic (i.e., 2-dimensional Galilean or flag-geometry).

    A Cr-surface S, r1, immersed in the Galilean space, Ψ :UG3,UR2, Ψ(u,v)=(x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v)) has the following first fundamental form

    I=(g1du+g2dv)2+ϵ(h11du2+2h12dudv+h22dv2),

    where the symbols gi=xi, hij=Ψi.Ψj stand for derivatives of the first coordinate function x(u,v) with respect to u,v and for the Euclidean scalar product of the projections Ψk of vectors Ψk onto the yz -plane, respectively. Furthermore,

    ϵ={0,   ifdirectiondu:dvisnonisotropic,1,         ifdirectiondu:dvisisotropic.

    At every point of a surface, there exists a unique isotropic direction defined by g1du+g2dv=0. In that direction, the arc length is measured by

    ds2=h11du2+2h12dudv+h22dv2=h11g222h12g1g2+h22g21g21=W2g21dv2,

    where g10. A surface is called admissible if it has no Euclidean tangent planes. Therefore, for an admissible surface either g10 or g20 holds. The Gaussian curvature K and mean curvature H are Cr2 functions, r2, defined by

    K=LNM2W2, H=g22L2g1g2M+g21N2W2,

    where

    Lij=x1ΨijxijΨ1x1U,  x1=g10.

    We will use Lij, i,j=1,2, for L, M, N. The vector U defines a normal vector to a surface and given by

    U=1W(0,x1z2x2z1,x2y1x1y2),

    where W2=(x2Ψ1x1Ψ2)2 [11]. It is well known that in terms of local coordinates {u,v} of S, the Laplacian operator ΔII according to the second fundamental form on S is defined by [4]

    ΔIIΨ=1LNM2[u(NΨuMΨvLNM2)v(MΨuLΨvLNM2)]. (2.2)

    Consider a surface in G3 as the graph of a function z=h(u,v). We will consider translation surfaces of Type 1 that are obtained by translating two planar curves. Translation surfaces of Type 1 in the Galilean 3-space can be locally represented by

    z=f(u)+g(v), (2.3)

    which yields the parametrization

    Ψ(u,v)=(u,v,f(u)+g(v)). (2.4)

    One translated curve is a non-isotropic curve in the plane y=0 and given as

    α(u)=(u,0,f(u)),

    and the other is an isotropic curve in the plane x=0 and it is expressed as

    β(v)=(0,v,g(v)).

    Let S be a Monge patch parametrized by z=h(u,v), then the surface

    Ψ=(zu,zv,z+uzu+vzv), (2.5)

    is called a dual surface of  S in G3 and the normal vector of S is given by

    U=(±(zuuzvv(zuv)2)W)(0,v,1). (2.6)

    The Gaussian curvature of the dual surface is

    K=1(zuuzvv(zuv)2)(1+v2)2. (2.7)

    Definition 1. A surface S in G3 is said to be Weingarten surface if and only if there exists a non-trivial functional relation Φ(K,H)=0 between the Gaussian curvature and mean curvature of S. The condition Φ(K,H)=0 is equivalent to the vanishing of the corresponding Jacobian determinant, i.e., |(K,H)(u,v)|=0. A linear Weingarten surface in Galilean 3-space is a surface where there exists a relation aK+bH=c for some non-zero real numbers a,b,c [5,10].

    In [11], Sipus and Divjak analyzed the translation surface of Type 1, which has the constant Gaussian and mean curvatures in the Galilean 3-space G3 and they showed the following theorems:

    Theorem 1. If S is a translation surface of Type 1 of constant Gaussian curvature in the Galilean 3-space, then S is congruent to a particular surface with

    f(x)=ax2+bx+c,

    a,b,cR, and

    k(u)=12Au2+Bu+C,h(u)=Au+BA1(Au+B)2+12Aarcsin(Au+B)+C1

    for A,B,C,C1R, where K=f(x)k(u) and h2+k2=1.

    Theorem 2. If S is a translation surface of Type 1 of constant mean curvature H 0 in the Galilean 3-space, then S is congruent to a surface

    z=f(u)12H1(2Hv+c1)2+c2,

    where c1,c2R.

    The main aim of this section is to give a classification of dual translation surfaces with constant Gaussian and mean curvatures in the Galilean 3-space. Let S  be a dual translation surface. Using (2.3) and (2.5), we can define dual translation surfaces as

    Ψ(u,v)=(f(u),g(v),uf(u)+vg(v)f(u)g(v)). (3.1)

    The unit normal vector field U of the surface (3.1) is

    U=11+v2(0,v,1). (3.2)

    By a straightforward computation, the Gaussian and mean curvatures of the dual translation surface are given by

    K=1fg(1+v2)2,H=12(1+v2)32g, (3.3)

    where f,g0. Thus we have the following result.

    Corollary 1. If S is a dual translation surface in the Galilean 3-space, then there are no flat and minimal dual translation surfaces.

    Proof. The proof is obvious by Eq (3.3).

    Theorem 3. Let S be a dual translation surface which has constant Gaussian curvature in G3. Then it is congruent to an open part of the surface (3.1) with

     z=f(u)+(c1+c2v+c32varctanv).

    Proof. Dual translation surface with constant curvature K0 is described by the ordinary differential equation

    K0fg(1+v2)21=0, K0R. (3.4)

    By partial differentiation of the previous expression with respect to v, we get

    f(4v(1+v2)g+(1+v2)2g)=0.

    Therefore either f=0 or

    4v(1+v2)g+(1+v2)2g=0. (3.5)

    If f=0, then we have a contradiction. The general solution of (3.5) is given by

    g(v)=c1+c2v+c32varctanv,

    where ciR. Therefore, S is determined by

     z=f(u)+(c1+c2v+c32varctanv), (3.6)

    where f0 (see Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  z=cosu+(c1+c2v+c32varctanv).

    Theorem 4. Let S be a dual translation surface which has constant mean curvature in G3. Then it is congruent to an open part of the surface (3.1) with

     z=f(u)+(c1+c2v1+v22H0).

    Proof. We suppose that dual translation surface has constant mean curvature. Then we obtain

    2(1+v2)32gH01=0, H0R. (3.7)

    After solving (3.7), we get

    g(v)=c1+c2v1+v22H0.

    Therefore S is determined by

     z=f(u)+(c1+c2v1+v22H0), (3.8)

    where ciR (see Figure 2).

    Figure 2.  z=cosu+(c1+c2v1+v22H0).

    Theorem 5. Let S be a Weingarten dual translation surface in G3. Then it is congruent to an open part of the surface (3.1) with

     z=(c1+c2u+c3u2)+g(v),

    or

     z=f(u)+(c4+c5v+c61+v2).

    Proof. The condition (K,H)(u,v)=0 must be satisfied for the Weingarten surface S, it leads to KuHvKvHu=0. Since the mean curvature Hv is a function of v only, the previous equation reduces KuHv=0. Therefore, either Ku =0 or Hv=0. The first condition Ku =0 describes that a dual translation surface satisfies

    f(1+v2)2f2g=0.

    Therefore f =0 which implies

    f(u)=c1+c2u+c3u2.

    If the second condition Hv=0, then we have

    3vg+(1+v2)g2(1+v2)52g2=0,

    and

    g(v)=c4+c5v+c61+v2,

    where ciR. Thus S is determined by either

     z=(c1+c2u+c3u2)+g(v), (3.9)

    see Figure 3,

    Figure 3.  z=cosv+(c1+c2u+c3u2).

    or

     z=f(u)+(c4+c5v+c61+v2), (3.10)

    see Figure 4.

    Figure 4.  z=eu+(c4+c5v+c61+v2).

    Theorem 6. Let S be a linear Weingarten dual translation surface satisfying aK+bH=c, where a,b,c are real constants. Then S is congruent to (3.1) with

    z=c1+c2u+m2u2+c3+c4v+bm1+v2+av arctanv2cm.

    Proof. Let us consider surface with a0,b0. A dual translation surface is linear Weingarten if and only if

    2a1+v2+f(bbv22cg(1+v2)(1+2v2+v4))=0, (3.11)

    which can be written as

    f=2a1+v2(bbv22cg(1+v2)(1+2v2+v4))=m,

    where mR. Therefore, we get

    f(u)=c1+c2u+m2u2,g(v)=c3+c4v+bm1+v2+av arctanv2cm, (3.12)

    where ci,mR and they satisfy the functional relationship aK+bH=c for any constants a,b,c, (see Figure 5).

    Figure 5.  z=c1+c2u+m2u2+c3+c4v+bm1+v2+av arctanv2cm.

    Theorem 7. Let S be a dual translation surface given by (3.1) in the three dimensional Galilean space G3. Then there is no surface S satisfies the condition ΔIIΨ=λiΨi, where λiR, i=1,2,3.

    Proof. We classify dual translation surfaces in G3 satisfying the equation

    ΔIIΨ=λixi, (3.13)

    where λiR, i=1,2,3 and

    ΔIIΨ=(ΔIIΨ1,ΔIIΨ2,ΔIIΨ3). (3.14)

    By a straightforward computation, using Eq (2.2), the Laplacian operator on S turns out to be

    ΔIIΨ=(1+v2f2f,1+v2g2g,21+v2+u1+v2f2f+v1+v2g2g). (3.15)

    So Eq (3.13) by means of (3.15) gives the following system of ordinary differential equations

    1+v2f2f=λ1f, (3.16)
    1+v2g2g=λ2g, (3.17)
    21+v2+u1+v2f2f+v1+v2g2g=λ3(uf(u)+vg(v)f(u)g(v)), (3.18)

    where λi R. On combining Eqs (3.16)–(3.18), we have

    21+v2+λ1uf+vλ2g=λ3(uf+vgfg), (3.19)

    which can be written as

    λ1ufλ3(uf+f)=m,λ3(vgg)λ2vg21+v2=m, (3.20)

    where λi,m R. If {λ1,λ2,λ3}={0,0,0}, hence we have a contradiction. In the cases {λ1,λ20,λ30}, there are no analytical solutions for the function g(v). We discuss three cases with respect to constants λ1,λ2,λ3. We summarized the solutions of (3.20) in the following:

    λ10,λ2=0,λ30{f(u)=mλ3+c1(u(λ1λ3))λ3λ1λ3g(v)=c2vλ3m21+v2+2varcsinvλ3},λ10,λ20,λ3=0{f(u)=c1+mln|u|λ1g(v)=c1λ221+v2(2+m)ln|v|+2ln|1+1+v2|λ2},λ1=0,λ2=0,λ30{f(u)=c1u+mλ3g(v)=c2vλ3m21+v2+2varcsinvλ3},

    for some constants ci0 and λi0. In the third row, we have a contradiction for the function f(u), because substituting the first and second rows into (3.14)–(3.16), respectively we can easily see that they do not satisfy these equations.

    Theorem 8. The dual translation surface H2K =0 is locally a generalized umbilical surface and it can be stated to be a surface (3.1) by

    z=c1+c2u+m2u2+c3+c4v+14m(v arctanv12ln|1+v2|).

    Proof. Next, we aim to classify the dual translation surfaces given by (3.1) in G3 that satisfy

    H2K =0. By considering Eq (3.3), we have

    f4g4v2g2(1+v2)3fg2=0. (3.21)

    We can rewrite (3.21) as

    f4g4v2g=0,

    which implies

    f=4g+4v2g=m.

    Solving this, we obtain

    f(u)=c1+c2u+m2u2,g(v)=c3+c4v+14m(v arctanv12ln|1+v2|), (3.22)

    where m,ci R (see Figure 6).

    Figure 6.  z=c1+c2u+m2u2+c3+c4v+14m(v arctanv12ln|1+v2|).

    A rational surface S in R3 is called LN-surface if its tangent planes admit the representation T(u,v)=ux+vy+z=h(u,v) with a rational function h(u,v)=f(u)+g(v). In the present study, we have defined these surfaces in Galilean 3-space and called these surfaces as dual translation surfaces.

    We also have calculated the Gaussian and mean curvatures of these surfaces. Further, we have pointed out the constant Gaussian and mean curvatures of these surfaces.

    We have discussed whether these surfaces satisfy the Laplacian operator with respect to the second fundamental form.

    The author states that she has no conflict of interests.



    [1] H. Scherk, Bemerkungen über die kleinste Fläche innerhalb gegebener Grenzen, J. Reine Angew. Math., 1835 (1835), 185–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/crll.1835.13.185 doi: 10.1515/crll.1835.13.185
    [2] K. Arslan, B. Bayram, B. Bulca, G. Ozturk, On translation surfaces in 4-dimensional Euclidean space, Acta Comment. Univ. Ta., 20 (2016), 123–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/ACUTM.2016.20.11 doi: 10.12697/ACUTM.2016.20.11
    [3] B. Bulca, On generalized LN-Surfaces in E4, Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, 1 (2013), 35–41.
    [4] A. Cakmak, M. Karacan, S. Kiziltug, D. Yoon, Translation surfaces in the 3 dimensional Galilean space satisfying ΔIIxi=λixi, B. Korean Math. Soc., 54 (2017), 1241–1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.b160442 doi: 10.4134/BKMS.b160442
    [5] F. Dillen, W. Goemans, I. Woestyne, Translation surfaces of Weingarten type in 3-space, Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 1 (2008), 1–12.
    [6] B. Juttler, M. Sampoli, Hermite interpolation by piecewise polynomial surfaces with rational offsets, Comput. Aided Geom. D., 17 (2000), 361–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8396(00)00002-9 doi: 10.1016/S0167-8396(00)00002-9
    [7] H. Liu, Translation surfaces with constant mean curvature in 3-dimensional spaces, J. Geom., 64 (1999), 141–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01229219 doi: 10.1007/BF01229219
    [8] M. Lone, M. Karacan, Dual translation surfaces in the three-dimensional simply isotropic space I13, Tamkang J. Math., 49 (2018), 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5556/j.tkjm.49.2018.2476 doi: 10.5556/j.tkjm.49.2018.2476
    [9] M. Peternell, B. Odehnal, On generalized LN-surfaces in 4-space, Proceedings of the twenty-first international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation, 2008,223–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1390768.1390800 doi: 10.1145/1390768.1390800
    [10] M. Sampoli, M. Peternell, B. Jüttler, Rational surfaces with linear normals and their convolutions with rational surfaces, Comput. Aided Geome. D., 23 (2006), 179–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2005.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cagd.2005.07.001
    [11] Z. Sipus, B. Divjak, Translation surfaces in the Galilean space, Glas. Mat., 46 (2011), 455–469. http://dx.doi.org/10.3336/gm.46.2.14 doi: 10.3336/gm.46.2.14
    [12] D. Yoon, Some classification of translation surfaces in Galilean 3-space, International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 6 (2012), 1355–1361.
    [13] D. Yoon, Weighted minimal translation surfaces in the Galilean space with density, Open Math., 15 (2017), 459–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/math-2017-0043 doi: 10.1515/math-2017-0043
    [14] M. Karacan, N. Yüksel, Y. Tunçer, LCN-translation surfaces in Affine 3-space, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ., 69 (2020), 461–472.
    [15] N. Yüksel, M. Karacan, Y. Tunçer, Convulation of LN-translation surfaces in Euclidean 3-space, Acta Universitatis Apulensis, 68 (2021), 13–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17114/j.aua.2021.68.02 doi: 10.17114/j.aua.2021.68.02
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Nural Yüksel, Burçin Saltık, On inextensible ruled surfaces generated via a curve derived from a curve with constant torsion, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 11312, 10.3934/math.2023573
    2. Esra Damar, Adjoint curves of special Smarandache curves with respect to Bishop frame, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 35355, 10.3934/math.20241680
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1775) PDF downloads(117) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog