Research article

New escape conditions with general complex polynomial for fractals via new fixed point iteration

  • Received: 19 December 2020 Accepted: 08 March 2021 Published: 19 March 2021
  • MSC : 47H10, 54H25

  • The aim of this paper is to generalize the results regarding fractals and prove escape conditions for general complex polynomial. In this paper we state the orbit of a newly defined iterative scheme and establish the escape criteria in fractal generation for general complex polynomial. We use established escape criteria in algorithms to generate Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets. In addition, we present some graphs of quadratic, cubic and higher Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets and discuss how the alteration in parameters make changes in graphs.

    Citation: Muhammad Tanveer, Imran Ahmed, Ali Raza, Sumaira Nawaz, Yu-Pei Lv. New escape conditions with general complex polynomial for fractals via new fixed point iteration[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5563-5580. doi: 10.3934/math.2021329

    Related Papers:

    [1] Haixia Zhang, Muhammad Tanveer, Yi-Xia Li, Qingxiu Peng, Nehad Ali Shah . Fixed point results of an implicit iterative scheme for fractal generations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13170-13186. doi: 10.3934/math.2021761
    [2] Swati Antal, Anita Tomar, Darshana J. Prajapati, Mohammad Sajid . Variants of Julia and Mandelbrot sets as fractals via Jungck-Ishikawa fixed point iteration system with s-convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10939-10957. doi: 10.3934/math.2022611
    [3] Tunçar Şahan, Yunus Atalan . Novel escape criteria for complex-valued hyperbolic functions through a fixed point iteration method. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1529-1554. doi: 10.3934/math.2025071
    [4] Arunachalam Murali, Krishnan Muthunagai . Generation of Julia and Mandelbrot fractals for a generalized rational type mapping via viscosity approximation type iterative method extended with s-convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20221-20244. doi: 10.3934/math.2024985
    [5] Rabha W. Ibrahim, Dumitru Baleanu . Global stability of local fractional Hénon-Lozi map using fixed point theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11399-11416. doi: 10.3934/math.2022636
    [6] Aleksa Srdanov . Fractal form of the partition functions p (n). AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2539-2568. doi: 10.3934/math.2020167
    [7] Najmeddine Attia, Neji Saidi, Rim Amami, Rimah Amami . On the stability of Fractal interpolation functions with variable parameters. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2908-2924. doi: 10.3934/math.2024143
    [8] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, Anwar Shah, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, Choonkil Park . A study on the fractal-fractional tobacco smoking model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 13887-13909. doi: 10.3934/math.2022767
    [9] Shahram Rezapour, Maryam Iqbal, Afshan Batool, Sina Etemad, Thongchai Botmart . A new modified iterative scheme for finding common fixed points in Banach spaces: application in variational inequality problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5980-5997. doi: 10.3934/math.2023301
    [10] Najmeddine Attia, Taoufik Moulahi, Rim Amami, Neji Saidi . Note on fractal interpolation function with variable parameters. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2584-2601. doi: 10.3934/math.2024127
  • The aim of this paper is to generalize the results regarding fractals and prove escape conditions for general complex polynomial. In this paper we state the orbit of a newly defined iterative scheme and establish the escape criteria in fractal generation for general complex polynomial. We use established escape criteria in algorithms to generate Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets. In addition, we present some graphs of quadratic, cubic and higher Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets and discuss how the alteration in parameters make changes in graphs.



    Although fractal geometry is closely connected with computer techniques, some people had worked on fractals long before the invention of computers. Those people were British cartographers, who encountered the problem in measuring the length of Britain coast. The coastline measured on a large scale map was approximately half the length of coastline measured on a detailed map. The closer they looked, the more detailed and longer the coastline became. They did not realize that they had discovered one of the main properties of fractals. In 1919, Gaston Julia worked on it and explained how to iterate this function. The resulting sequence of iterates are now called as Julia set and the boundary of this set had infinite length and it was impracticable to sketch by hand in those days. The generation of Mandelbrot set in 1985 with the help of computer made it exceptionally attractive amongst the computer experts of that era. The emerging attraction established under the humongous complexity, intricate aesthetic geometry and fascinating patterns [1]. Moreover, the most phenomenal work was the extension of the quadratic function to higher exponents: zzn+c [2]. In 1989 Crowe et al. [3] initially demonstrated the connected locus and graphics of conjugate complex polynomial ˉz2+c. Its visualized graphs were called "tricorn" [4]. Later on the use of fixed point theory in the generation of fractals generalized the Mandelbrot and Julia sets (see in [5,6]). Now the fixed point theory is a key to fascinating the image encryption or compression and cryptography [7]. Due to diversity and self-similarity in graphics, fractals have been used in art, design and engineering. The use of fractal theory in electrical and electronics engineering enhance the way to develop security control system, radar system, capacitors, radio and antennae for wireless system [8,9]. Furthermore, architectonic sketches and ornament patterns are also a part of fractals [10].

    Some generalizations for Julia and Mandelbrot sets by rational and transcendental complex functions were discussed in [11]. Fractals with quaternions, vectors (i.e. 4D and 3D fractals), bi-complex and tri-complex functions were studied in ([12,13,14]. Some generalized fractals via one, two and three steps feedback iterations elaborated in [15,16,17,18,19,20]. The implicit iterative methods were used to develop convergence criterion for fractals in [21,22,23,24,25,26].

    Over the last forty years complex fractals have been studied in the form of Mandelbrot and Julia sets for a complex polynomial p(z)=zn+c by using different fixed point algorithms. Some researchers extended the established results for the complex polynomial p(z)=zn+a1z+a0 where a1 and a0C. They discussed that images change with variation in input parameters (i.e. Variations in α,β and γ). Here, we apply a new iteration (i.e. MM-iteration) proposed in [27] to establish the escape criteria in fractal generation for general complex polynomial p(z)=anzn+an1zn1++a1z+a0 where all aiC for i=0,1,2,,n. We use proposed escape criteria in algorithms to generate Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets. In addition, we present some graphs of quadratic, cubic and higher Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets and compare their images. We discuss how the alteration in parameters ai make changes in graphs.

    The composition of this paper is as follows: The section 2 presents preliminaries. We establish escape criteria for complex polynomial p(z)=anzn+an1zn1++a1z+a0 via MM-iteration and generalize algorithms in section 3. We discuss the behavior of Mandelbrot set for different ai via proposed method in section 4. At the end we add some concluding remarks in section 5.

    In this section we present some basic definitions and results.

    Definition 1 (Julia set [28]). Let p(zk)=anznk+an1zn1k++a1zk+a0 be a complex polynomial with n2. Then the set of points Jpa0 in C is named as filled Julia set. The orbits of points in Jpa0 does not moves to as k, i.e.,

    Jpa0={zC:{|pka0|}k=0 is bounded}, (2.1)

    where pka0 is the kth iterate of z. The set of boundary points of Jpa0 is called simple Julia set.

    Definition 2 (Mandelbrot set [29]). Let p(zk)=anznk+an1zn1k++a1zk+a0 be a complex polynomial with n2. Then the multitude of all connected Julia sets is called as Mandelbrot set M, i.e.,

    M={a0C:Jpa0 is connected}, (2.2)

    equivalently Mandelbrot set is defined as [30]:

    M={a0C:{pka0(θ)} as k}, (2.3)

    where θ is any critical point of pa0, so mostly authors used z0=θ as an initial guess.

    Definition 3 (Multi-corns set [3]). Let p(zk)=an¯zkn+an1¯zkn1++a1¯zk+a0 be a conjugate complex polynomial with n2. Then the Multi-corns set M is defined as multitude of all connected Julia sets is called as Multi-corns or Mandelbar set M, i.e.,

    M={a0C:{pka0(θ)} as k}, (2.4)

    where pka0(θ) is the kth iterate of pka0(ˉz).

    As mentioned in introduction section that many fixed point iterative methods have been used for generation of fractal images in past years. Her we aim to use a new iteration named as MM-iteration to visualize Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets. The MM-iteration is defined as follows:

    Definition 4 (MM-iteration [27]). Let p:CC be a complex polynomial of with p2. For any z0C, the MM-iteration is defined as:

    {zk+1=p(vk),vk=(1α2α3)zk+α2p(zk)+α3p(uk),uk=(1α1)zk+α1p(zk), (2.5)

    where α1,α2,α3(0,1] and k=0,1,2,.

    Remark 1. The MM-iteration reduces to Picard-Ishikawa iteration when α2=0.

    Definition 5 (MM-orbit). Let p(zk)=anznk+an1zn1k++a1zk+a0 be a complex polynomial with n2. Then the sequence of iterates {zk}kW from 2.5 is called MM-orbit if its points does not moves to as k.

    Here we prove some escape criterion for complex polynomial p(z)=anzn+an1zn1++a1z+a0 where n2 and all aiC for i=0,1,2,,n via MM-iteration. Without escape criterion, we cannot generate fractal because escape criterion is the basic key to run the algorithms. Throughout this section we use p(z) as pa0(z), z0=z, u0=u and v0=v.

    Theorem 3.1. Assume that pa0(z)=ni=0aizi where n2, aiC for i=0,1,2,,n be a complex polynomial with |z||a0|>(2(1+|a1|)α1(αβ))1n1, |z||a0|>(2(1+|a1|)α1(αβ))1n1 and |z||a0|>(2(1+|a1|)α1(αβ))1n1 where n2,α1,α2,α3(0,1] and a0C. The sequence of iterates {zk}kW for MM-iteration is define as follows:

    {zk+1=p(vk),vk=(1α2α3)zk+α2p(zk)+α3p(uk),uk=(1α1)zk+α1p(zk), (3.1)

    where α1,α2,α3(0,1] and k=0,1,2,. Then |zk| as k.

    Proof. Since p(z)=ni=0aizi, where aiC for i=0,1,2,,n, z0=x, v0=v and u0=u, then

    |uk|=|(1α1)zk+α1p(zk)|.

    For k=0, we have

    |u0|=|(1α1)z0+α1p(z0)|.=|(1α1)z+α1(ni=1aizi+a0)|α1|ni=1aizi|α1|a1z|α1|a0||z|+α1|z|α1|ni=1aizi|(1+|a1|)|z|.

    Because |z||a0| and α1<1.

    |u0|=(1+|a1|)|z|(α1|ni=2aizi1|1).

    Since (1+|a1|)>1, then

    |u0||z|(α1|ni=2aizi1|1+|a1|1)|z|(α1|zp1|(|an|n1i=2|ai|)1+|a1|1)=|z|(α1|zn1|(βγ)1+|a1|1)|u0|α1|z|.

    Because |z||a0|>(2(1+|a1|)α1(βγ))1n1 where β=|an|,γ=n12|ai|, this produced the situation |z|(|z|n1(α1(βγ))1+|a1|1)>|z|α1|z|.

    In second step of MM-iteration we have

    |vk|=|(1α2α3)zk+α2p(zk)+α3p(uk)|, (3.2)

    For k=0 we get

    |v0|=|(1α2α3)z0+α2p(z0)+α3p(u0)||α3(ni=1aiui+a0)+α2(ni=1aizi+a0)|(1α2α3)|z||α2ni=1aizi+α3ni=1aiui|α2|a0|α3|a0|(1α2α3)|z|α3α1|ni=1aizi||z|

    Because |u0|α1|z| implies |un|α1|zn| and |z|a0>2. Since α1α3>α1α2α3, then

    |v0|α1α2α3|ni=1aizi||z|α1α2α3|ni=2aizi|(1|a1|)|z||z|(α1α2α3|ni=2aizi1|1+|a1|1)|z|(α1α2α3|zn1|(|an|n1i=2|ai|)1+|a1|1)=|z|(α1α2α3|zn1|(βγ)1+|a1|1)|v0|α1α2α3|z|.

    The last step of MM-iteration is

    zk+1=p(vk)

    For k=0 we have

    |z1|=|p(v0)|=|(ni=1aivi+a0)||ni=1aivi||a0|z1α1α2α3|ni=1aizi||z|.

    Therefore

    |z1||z|(α1α2α3|zn1|(αβ)1+|a1|1). (3.3)

    Since |z|>(2(1+|a1|)α1(αβ))1n1,|z|>(2(1+|a1|)α2(αβ))1n1 and |z|>(2(1+|a1|)α3(αβ))1n1, then |z|n1>(2(1+|a1|)α1α2α3(αβ)) and this implies α1α2α3(αβ)|z|n11+|a1|1>1. Therefore there exists η>0 such that α1α2α3(αβ)|z|n11+|a1|1>1+η. Consequently

    |z1|>(1+η)|z|. (3.4)

    Iterate upto kth term

    |z2|>(1+η)2|z||z3|>(1+η)3|z||zk|>(1+η)k|z|.

    Hence |zk| as k.

    Corollary 3.2. Assume that

    |zm|>max{|a0|,ζ1,ζ1,ζ1},

    for some m0. Where ζ1=(2(1+|a1|)α1(αβ))1n1, ζ2=(2(1+|a1|)α2(αβ))1n1 and ζ3=(2(1+|a1|)α3(αβ))1n1. Thus there exists η>0 such that |zm+k|>(1+η)k|zk| and |zk| as k.

    There are some well-known criterion to generate the fractals, for example distance estimator [31], potential function algorithms [32] and escape criteria [33]. In this paper we use escape criterion to sketch some fascinating Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets. In literature authors fixed maximum number of iteration upto hundred and checked the alteration of images with input parameters (i.e. like α1,α2,α3). In this paper we fixed some parameters as follows:

    K=100, (Number of iterations)

    α1=0.9,α2=0.05 and α3=0.005.

    In this section we present two algorithms, one for Mandelbrot set and other for Multi-corns set with proposed iteration. We visualize some Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for different values of ai for i=0,1,2,..,n. Since |z|=|ˉz|, therefore to generate Multi-corns set we just replace |z| with |ˉz|.

    Example 4.1. In this example we present Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for a polynomial p(z)=a2z2+a1z+a0 where a2,a1,a0C via proposed orbit. The graphs in Figures 16 are quadratic Mandelbrot sets and graphs in Figures 711 are tri-corns sets (special case of Multi-corns sets). The ai and area for these images were as follows:

    Figure 1.  Classical Mandelbrot for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+i, a1=sin(c) and A=[1.4,1.4]×[1,1].
    Figure 2.  Mandelbrot for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+i, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.
    Figure 3.  Mandelbrot for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1i, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1.5]2.
    Figure 4.  Mandelbrot for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1i, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1.5]×[1.5,1].
    Figure 5.  Mandelbrot for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+i, a1=0.5 and A=[1.5,1]×[1.5,1].
    Figure 6.  Mandelbrot for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+sin(c), a1=1 and A=[1.5,1]×[1,1.5].
    Figure 7.  Tri-corns set for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+i, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.
    Figure 8.  Tri-corns set for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1i, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1.5]2.
    Figure 9.  Tri-corns set for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1i, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1.5]×[1.5,1].
    Figure 10.  Tri-corns set for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+i, a1=0.5 and A=[1.5,1]×[1.5,1].
    Figure 11.  Tri-corns set for p(z) with n=2 in MM-Orbit, where a2=1+sin(c), a1=1 and A=[1.5,1]×[1,1.5].

    Figure 1: a2=1+i, a1=sin(c), A=[1.4,1.4]×[1,1],

    Figures 2 and 7: a2=1+i, a1=0.5, A=[1,1]2,

    Figures 3 and 8: a2=1i, a1=0.5, A=[1,1.5]2,

    Figures 4 and 9: a2=1i, a1=0.5, A=[1,1.5]×[1.5,1],

    Figures 5 and 10: a2=1+i, a1=0.5, A=[1.5,1]×[1.5,1],

    Figures 6 and 11: a2=1+sin(c), a1=1, A=[1.5,1]×[1,1.5].

    We observe that the image in 1 is a classical Mandelbrot set with one large bulb symmetry along horizontal axis while the images in 2–5 are also classical Mandelbrot sets but due to alteration in a2 images rotate clock wise with angle 900. Since in classical Mandelbrot set small bulbs symmetry along vertical axis but the image in 6 presents an interesting view like a classical Mandelbrot set is laying on surface. The images in Figures 710 are tri-corns sets with three corns, one main large corn and two small corns are twisted. We see the main corn in Figures 710 also have symmetrical rotation of 900. In Figure 11 the secondary corns rotate clockwise.

    Example 4.2. In this example we present the Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for a polynomial p(z)=a3z3+a2z2+a1z+a0 where a3,,a0C in proposed orbit. We notice that the image in Figure 12 is symmetrical along y-axis and is resemble with classical cubic Mandelbrot set. When we change a3 the image rotate left and right of vertical axis with angle Π4 (see in Figures 13 and 14) and the large bulbs also twisted. In Figures 15 and 16 images also change their positions with changes in a3's. The image in Figures 1721 are Multi-corns sets at different a3. The image in Figure 17 is classical Multi-corns with n+1 corns. We see a little bit in lower corn of image in Figure 18 and in upper corn of image in Figure 19. The images in Figures 20 and 21 have a sharp edge and a disjoint corn each.

    Figure 12.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=2, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 13.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1+i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 14.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 15.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1+i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 16.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 17.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=2, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 18.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1+i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 19.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 20.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1+i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.
    Figure 21.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=3 in MM-Orbit, where a3=1i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13 and A=[1.5,1.5]2.

    Figures 12 and 17 a3=2, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13, A=[1.5,1.5]2,

    Figures 13 and 18 a3=1+i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13, A=[1.5,1.5]2,

    Figures 14 and 19 a3=1i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13, A=[1.5,1.5]2,

    Figures 15 and 20 a3=1+i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13, A=[1.5,1.5]2,

    Figures 16 and 21 a3=1i, a2=2, a1=1, a1=13, A=[1.5,1.5]2.

    Example 4.3. In this example we present the Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for a polynomial p(z)=a5z5+a4z4+a3z3+a2z2+a1z+a0 where a5,,a0C in proposed orbit. The graphs in Figures 22 and 23 are Mandelbrot sets for n=5 and graphs in Figures 24 and 25 are Multi-corns sets for n=5. Here we also observe that a very small change in a5 cause drastically changes in images.

    Figure 22.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=5 in MM-Orbit, where a5=15,a4=1,a3=0.5,a2=13, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.
    Figure 23.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=5 in MM-Orbit, where a5=1+14i,a4=1,a3=0.5,a2=13, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.
    Figure 24.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=5 in MM-Orbit, where a5=15,a4=1,a3=0.5,a2=13, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.
    Figure 25.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=5 in MM-Orbit, where a5=1+14i,a4=1,a3=0.5,a2=13, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.

    a5=15,a4=1,a3=0.5,a2=13, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2,

    a5=1+14i,a4=1,a3=0.5,a2=13, a1=0.5 and A=[1,1]2.

    Example 4.4. we also present the Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for a polynomial p(z)=a7z7+a6z6+a5z5+a4z4+a3z3+a2z2+a1z+a0 where a7,,a0C in proposed orbit. The graphs in Figure 26 Mandelbrot sets and graphs in Figure 27 is a multi-corns sets for a7=70,a6=0,a5=15,a4=12,a3=12,a2=13, a1=125 and A=[1,1]2.

    Figure 26.  Mandelbrot set for p(z) with n=7 in MM-Orbit, where a7=70,a6=0,a5=15,a4=12,a3=12,a2=13, a1=125 and A=[1,1]2.
    Figure 27.  Multi-corns set for p(z) with n=7 in MM-Orbit, where a7=70,a6=0,a5=15,a4=12,a3=12,a2=13, a1=125 and A=[1,1]2.

    We analyzed a new three step fixed point iteration (i.e. MM-iteration) in the generation of fractals. We established escape conditions for the orbit of MM-iteration. We used the established escape conditions in algorithm to draw some Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for n=2,3 and for higher powers. First time we generated fascinating Mandelbrot and Multi-corns sets for different ai for i=0,1,2,..,n and compared the images. We observed that the alteration in an change the symmetrical angle of images.

    The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.



    [1] B. B. Mandelbrot, The fractal geometry of nature, New York: WH freeman, 1982.
    [2] A. Lakhtakia, V. V. Varadan, R. Messier, V. K. Varadan, On the symmetries of the Julia sets for the process zzp+c, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 20 (1987), 3533. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/20/11/051
    [3] B. Branner, The mandelbrot set, Proc. Symp. Appl. Math., 39 (1989), 75–105.
    [4] J. W. Milnor, Dynamics in one complex variable: Introductory lectures, Southgate Publishers, 1999.
    [5] M. Rani, V. Kumar, Superior julia set, Res. Math. Educ., 8 (2004), 261–277.
    [6] M. Rani, V. Kumar, Superior mandelbrot set, Res. Math. Educ., 8 (2004), 279–291.
    [7] X. Zhang, L. Wang, Z. Zhou, Y. Niu, A chaos-based image encryption technique utilizing hilbert curves and H-fractals, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 74734–74746. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921309
    [8] N. Cohen, Fractal antenna applications in wireless telecommunications, In: Professional Program Proceedings, Electronic Industries Forum of New England, IEEE, 1997.
    [9] K. J. Krzysztofik, F. Brambila, Fractals in antennas and metamaterials applications, INTECH Open Sci., Open Minds, Fractal Anal.-Appl. Phys., Eng. Technol., (2017), 45–81.
    [10] F. Orsucci, Complexity science, living systems, and reflexing interfaces: New models and perspectives: New models and perspectives, IGI Global, 2012.
    [11] P. Blanchard, R. L. Devaney, A. Garijo, E. D. Russell, A generalized version of the McMullen domain, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 18 (2008), 2309–2318. doi: 10.1142/S0218127408021725
    [12] T. Kim, Quaternion Julia set shape optimization, Comput. Graphics Forum, 34 (2015), 167–176.
    [13] V. Drakopoulos, N. Mimikou, T. Theoharis, An overview of parallel visualisation methods for Mandelbrot and Julia sets, Comput. Graphics, 27 (2003), 635–646. doi: 10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00106-7
    [14] Y. Sun, L. Chen, R. Xu, R. Kong, An image encryption algorithm utilizing Julia sets and Hilbert curves, PloS one, 9 (2014), e84655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084655
    [15] M. Rani, R. Agarwal, Effect of stochastic noise on superior Julia sets, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 36 (2010), 63–68. doi: 10.1007/s10851-009-0171-0
    [16] M. Rani, R. Chugh, Julia sets and Mandelbrot sets in Noor orbit, Appl. Math. Comput., 228 (2014), 615–631. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.11.077
    [17] S. M. Kang, W. Nazeer, M. Tanveer, A. A. Shahid, New fixed point results for fractal generation in jungck noor orbit with s-convexity, J. Funct. Spaces, 2015, (2015).
    [18] M. Tanveer, S. M. Kang, W. Nazeer, Y. C. Kwun, New tricorns and multicorns antifractals in Jungck mann orbit, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 111 (2016), 287–302.
    [19] K. Goyal, B. Prasad, Dynamics of iterative schemes for quadratic polynomial, In: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 1897 (2017), 020031.
    [20] M. Kumari, R. C. Ashish, New Julia and Mandelbrot sets for a new faster iterative process, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 107 (2016), 161–177.
    [21] W. Nazeer, S. M. Kang, M. Tanveer, A. A. Shahid, Fixed point results in the generation of Julia and Mandelbrot sets, J. Inequal. Appl., 2015 (2015), 1–16. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2015-1
    [22] S. M. Kang, A. Rafiq, A. Latif, A. A. Shahid, Y. C. Kwun, Tricorns and multicorns of-iteration scheme, J. Funct. Spaces, 2015, (2015).
    [23] Y. C. Kwun, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, M. Abbas, S. M. Kang, Fractal generation in modified Jungck-S orbit, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 35060–35071. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904677
    [24] Y. C. Kwun, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, K. Gdawiec, S. M. Kang, Mandelbrot and Julia sets via Jungck-CR iteration with s-convexity, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 12167–12176. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892013
    [25] D. Li, M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, X. Guo, Boundaries of filled julia sets in generalized jungck mann orbit, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 76859–76867. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920026
    [26] K. Koyas, S. Gebregiorgis, Coupled coincidence and coupled common fixed points of a pair for mappings satisfying a weakly contraction type T-coupling in the context of quasi ab-metric space, Open J. Math. Sci., 4 (2020), 369–376. doi: 10.30538/oms2020.0114
    [27] M. Tesfaye, K. Koyas, S. Gebregiorgis, A coupled fixed point theorem for maps satisfying rational type contractive condition in dislocated quasi b-metric space, Open J. Math. Sci., 4 (2020), 27–33. doi: 10.30538/oms2020.0091
    [28] A. Barcellos, Fractals everywhere, by Michael Barnsley, Am. Math. Mon., 97 (1990), 266–268.
    [29] R. L. Devaney, P. B. Siegel, A. J. Mallinckrodt, S. McKay, A first course in chaotic dynamical systems: Theory and experiment, Comput. Phys., 7 (1993), 416–417. doi: 10.1063/1.4823195
    [30] X. Liu, Z. Zhu, G. Wang, W. Zhu, Composed accelerated escape time algorithm to construct the general Mandelbrot sets, Fractals, 9 (2001), 149–153. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X01000580
    [31] V. V. Strotov, S. A. Smirnov, S. E. Korepanov, A. V. Cherpalkin, Object distance estimation algorithm for real-time fpga-based stereoscopic vision system, In: High-Performance Computing in Geoscience and Remote Sensing VIII, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2018.
    [32] O. Khatib, Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots, In: Autonomous robot vehicles, Springer, New York, NY, (1986), 396–404.
    [33] J. Barrallo, D. M. Jones, Coloring algorithms for dynamical systems in the complex plane, In: Visual Mathematics, Mathematical Institute SASA, 1999.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Pavel Trojovský, K Venkatachalam, The Proof of a Conjecture Relating Catalan Numbers to an Averaged Mandelbrot-Möbius Iterated Function, 2021, 5, 2504-3110, 92, 10.3390/fractalfract5030092
    2. Asifa Tassaddiq, Muhammad Tanveer, Muhammad Azhar, Muhammad Arshad, Farha Lakhani, Escape Criteria for Generating Fractals of Complex Functions Using DK-Iterative Scheme, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 76, 10.3390/fractalfract7010076
    3. Asifa Tassaddiq, Muhammad Tanveer, Muhammad Azhar, Farha Lakhani, Waqas Nazeer, Zeeshan Afzal, Escape criterion for generating fractals using Picard–Thakur hybrid iteration, 2024, 100, 11100168, 331, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.074
    4. Naila Shabir, Ali Raza, Manuel De la Sen, Mujahid Abbas, Shahbaz Ahmad, Common Attractor for Hutchinson θ-Contractive Operators in Partial Metric Spaces, 2025, 30, 2297-8747, 27, 10.3390/mca30020027
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2972) PDF downloads(171) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(27)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog