
In this paper, we generate some non-classical variants of Julia and Mandelbrot sets, utilizing the Jungck-Ishikawa fixed point iteration system equipped with s-convexity. We establish a novel escape criterion for complex polynomials of a higher degree of the form zn+az2−bz+c, where a,b and c are complex numbers and furnish some graphical illustrations of the generated complex fractals. In the sequel, we discuss the errors committed by the majority of researchers in developing the escape criterion utilizing distinct fixed point iterations equipped with s-convexity. We conclude the paper by examining variation in images and the impact of parameters on the deviation of dynamics, color and appearance of fractals. It is fascinating to notice that some of our fractals represent the traditional Kachhi Thread Works found in the Kutch district of Gujarat (India) which is useful in the Textile Industry.
Citation: Swati Antal, Anita Tomar, Darshana J. Prajapati, Mohammad Sajid. Variants of Julia and Mandelbrot sets as fractals via Jungck-Ishikawa fixed point iteration system with s-convexity[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10939-10957. doi: 10.3934/math.2022611
[1] | Haixia Zhang, Muhammad Tanveer, Yi-Xia Li, Qingxiu Peng, Nehad Ali Shah . Fixed point results of an implicit iterative scheme for fractal generations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13170-13186. doi: 10.3934/math.2021761 |
[2] | Arunachalam Murali, Krishnan Muthunagai . Generation of Julia and Mandelbrot fractals for a generalized rational type mapping via viscosity approximation type iterative method extended with $ s $-convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20221-20244. doi: 10.3934/math.2024985 |
[3] | Tunçar Şahan, Yunus Atalan . Novel escape criteria for complex-valued hyperbolic functions through a fixed point iteration method. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1529-1554. doi: 10.3934/math.2025071 |
[4] | Buthinah A. Bin Dehaish, Rawan K. Alharbi . On fixed point results for some generalized nonexpansive mappings. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5763-5778. doi: 10.3934/math.2023290 |
[5] | Muhammad Tanveer, Imran Ahmed, Ali Raza, Sumaira Nawaz, Yu-Pei Lv . New escape conditions with general complex polynomial for fractals via new fixed point iteration. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5563-5580. doi: 10.3934/math.2021329 |
[6] | Hasanen A. Hammad, Hassan Almusawa . Modified inertial Ishikawa iterations for fixed points of nonexpansive mappings with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6984-7000. doi: 10.3934/math.2022388 |
[7] | Chonjaroen Chairatsiripong, Tanakit Thianwan . Novel Noor iterations technique for solving nonlinear equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10958-10976. doi: 10.3934/math.2022612 |
[8] | Dong Ji, Yao Yu, Chaobo Li . Fixed point and endpoint theorems of multivalued mappings in convex $ b $-metric spaces with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7589-7609. doi: 10.3934/math.2024368 |
[9] | Doaa Filali, Mohammad Dilshad, Mohammad Akram . Generalized variational inclusion: graph convergence and dynamical system approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24525-24545. doi: 10.3934/math.20241194 |
[10] | Mohammad Reza Haddadi, Vahid Parvaneh, Monica Bota . Further generalizations of the Ishikawa algorithm. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 12185-12194. doi: 10.3934/math.2023614 |
In this paper, we generate some non-classical variants of Julia and Mandelbrot sets, utilizing the Jungck-Ishikawa fixed point iteration system equipped with s-convexity. We establish a novel escape criterion for complex polynomials of a higher degree of the form zn+az2−bz+c, where a,b and c are complex numbers and furnish some graphical illustrations of the generated complex fractals. In the sequel, we discuss the errors committed by the majority of researchers in developing the escape criterion utilizing distinct fixed point iterations equipped with s-convexity. We conclude the paper by examining variation in images and the impact of parameters on the deviation of dynamics, color and appearance of fractals. It is fascinating to notice that some of our fractals represent the traditional Kachhi Thread Works found in the Kutch district of Gujarat (India) which is useful in the Textile Industry.
The Mandelbrot and Julia sets are celebrated graphics of a very complex chaotic system created by a straightforward mathematical practice. Julia sets were explored in the early twentieth century by French mathematician Gaston Maurice Julia [10] and a French mathematician and astronomer Pierre Joseph Louis Fatou [9]. However, Mandelbrot sets were proposed by a Polish-born French-American mathematician and polymath Benoit B. Mandelbrot [15] much later in the late 1970s. Mandelbrot visualized the Julia sets for z2+c, while working at IBM. Later on, numerous mathematicians explored distinct characteristics of Mandelbrot and Julia sets and generalized these in different directions. For instance, some generalizations of quadratic functions are anti-polynomials [5], transcendental functions [7], elliptic functions [14], rational functions [27], and so on. The most natural and first generalization is the function of the form zn+c which was utilized by Mandelbrot [15]. In 2004, Rani and Kumar [30,31] initiated the use of fixed point iteration process in the visualization of some interesting fractals, by utilizing the Mann iteration process. Since then various iteration processes have been exploited like Ishikawa iteration [17], Noor iteration [23], S-iteration [11], Jungck-Ishikawa iteration [25], Jungck-Noor iteration [12], Jungck-CR iteration [34], Picard-Mann iteration with s-convexity [32], Jungck-SP iteration with s-convexity [19], implicit iterative scheme [40], and so on. Recently, Antal et al. [1] obtained interesting Julia sets of complex sine functions using celebrated fixed point iterations.
The Julia and Mandelbrot sets are fascinating from both a mathematical as well as application viewpoint having several applications in real life. In biology, fractals have been utilized to understand the nerve fibbers pattern [28], the growth culture of micro-organisms (like Chlamydomonas, bacteria, and amoeba) [13], and so on. In physics (in Fluid Mechanics), fractals have been utilized to understand turbulent flows [33]. In telecommunication, fractals have been utilized to manufacture antennae [4]. In computer networking, fractals have been utilized in architectural models, radar systems, and so on [24]. Some more applications are in computer graphics, dictionaries with domain blocks, image encryption algorithms, and the arts (see [16,26,36]). Recently, Usurelu et al. [35] initiated two Newton-like methods to provide necessary postulates for the convergence of the induced iterative procedures and obtained visual investigations of some modified Thakur iteration processes, via polynomiographic practices which are not the outcome of an artistic methodology but these graphics encode specific mathematical data.
There are numerous conclusions related to characteristics of fractional order dynamic in physical phenomena. For instance, heat transfer [2], a novel fractional order hydro-turbine-generator unit [39], and so on. The fractional order system also finds applications in cellulose degradation [8], digital cryptography [21], and so on. A modified DLA (diffusion-limited aggregation) model relying on a fractional diffusion mechanism, provides a new dimension to modeling fractal growth [38], and so on. A fractal simulation of flocculation processes utilizing the DLA model with different particle numbers, launch radii, motion step lengths, and finite motion steps are also significant. These four model parameters have a huge impact on the morphology and structures of the model parameters/the DLA aggregates [20]. Flocculation is a significant procedure in the area of water and wastewater treatment that may help in migrating, removing and transforming particulate matter in water. Recently, Wang et al. [37] addressed the significant problem of the parameter estimation of the Julia set because without knowing the precise system parameters, the existing theoretical results cannot be effectively applied to applications areas.
In this work, we concentrate just on the visualization of Julia and Mandelbrot sets via Jungck-Ishikawa fixed point iteration system with s-convexity. We establish a novel escape criterion for complex polynomials of a higher-order of the form zn+az2−bz+c, where a,b and c are complex numbers. This polynomial is a slight modification of nth degree polynomial studied by Jolaoso et al. [18] for the development of biomorphs. The motivation behind this is the fact that on altering the iteration process the dynamics and behavior of the generated fractals are also altered, which are significant from the graphical as well as applications point of view. Our theorems and corollaries are generalizations, enrichment, and sharpened versions of some existing conclusions. Towards the end, we visualize aesthetic non-classical fractals and give concluding remarks to demonstrate the significance of our conclusion.
Definition 2.1. (Julia set [3,10]) The set of all points in C for which the orbits do not converge to a point at infinity is a filled Julia set of the polynomial p:C→C of degree ≥2 and we denote it by Fp, that is,
Fp={z∈C:{|p(zk)|}∞k=0isbounded}. |
The Julia set of p is the boundary of Fp, that is, Jp=∂Fp.
Definition 2.2. (Mandelbrot set [6,15]) The Mandelbrot set M is the set of parameters c∈C for which the filled Julia set Fpc of the polynomial pc(z)=z2+c is connected, that is,
M={c∈C:Fpcisconnected}. |
Equivalently
M={c∈C:{|pc(zk)|}↛∞ask→∞}. |
Nazeer et al. [22] utilized Jungck-Mann and Jungck-Ishikawa iterations with s-convexity to generate Julia and Mandelbrot sets. If S,T:C→C is two complex-valued maps so that the degree of T is greater or equal to two and S is injective. Then sequence {zk} of iterates for any initial point z0∈C, u,v,s∈(0,1], k=1,2,…, is known as:
(i) Jungck-Mann orbit (JMOs) with s-convexity if
Szk:Szk=(1−u)sSzk−1+usTzk−1. |
Clearly, it is a function of four arguments (T,z0,u,s) and is a one-step feedback procedure.
(ii) Jungck-Ishikawa orbit (JIOs) with s-convexity if
Szk:Szk=(1−u)sSzk−1+usTyk−1,Syk−1=(1−v)sSzk−1+vsTzk−1. |
Clearly, it is a function of five arguments (T,z0,u,v,s) and is a two-step feedback procedure.
Remark 2.1. The Jungck-Ishikawa orbit reduces to: Picard orbit [42] when S(z)=z,u=1,v=0 and s=1; Mann orbit [41] when S(z)=z,v=0 and s=1; Ishikawa orbit [17] when S(z)=z and s=1; Jungck-Mann orbit with s-convexity [22] when v=0.
Motivated by numerous applications of complex polynomials in science and engineering, we establish the escape time algorithm via Jungck-Ishikawa fixed point iteration system extended with s-convex combination for complex polynomials of the type p(z)=zn+az2−bz+c, where n≥3 and a,b and c are complex numbers. We break the polynomial p(z) into two maps S and T so that p(z)=Tz−Sz, where Sz is injective. Consequently, we establish a novel threshold escape radii and utilize these to visualize some nonclassical variants of classical fractals in the following result.
Theorem 3.1. Let p(z)=zn+az2−bz+c be a higher-order complex polynomial. Assume that z0∈C, |z0|≥|c|>(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) and |z0|≥|c|>(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|), where 0<u,v,s≤1, and c is a complex parameter. Define
Szk=(1−u)sSzk−1+usTyk−1, |
where
Syk−1=(1−v)sSzk−1+vsTzk−1, |
where Sz=bz is injective, Tz=zn+az2+c is a higher-order polynomial, and k=1,2,3,4,5,…. Then the orbit of z0 tends to ∞ as k tends to ∞.
Proof. For k=1,
Syk−1=(1−v)sSzk−1+vsTzk−1 |
implies
|Sy0|=|(1−v)sSz0+vsTz0|=|(1−v)sbz0+vs(zn0+az20+c)|. |
Since v,s∈(0,1], so vs≥sv, we get
|Sy0|≥|(1−v)sbz0+sv(zn0+az20+c)|≥|sv(zn0+az20)+(1−v)sbz0|−sv|c|≥|sv(zn0+az20)+(1−v)sbz0|−sv|z0|,|z0|≥|c|≥|sv(zn0+az20)|−|(1−v)sbz0|−sv|z0|. |
Utilizing binomial expansion of (1−v)s up to linear terms of v, we attain
|Sy0|≥|sv(zn0+az20)|−|(1−sv)bz0|−sv|z0|=sv|(zn0+az20)|−|bz0|+|svbz0|−sv|z0|≥sv|(zn0+az20)|−|bz0|−sv|z0|, |b|≥|0|, |
which gives us
|by0|≥sv|(zn0+az20)|−|z0|−|bz0|, sv<1=sv|z20||(zn−20+a)|−|z0|(1+|b|)≥|z0|(sv|z0||(cn−2+a)|−(1+|b|))=|z0|(1+|b|)(sv|z0||(cn−2+a)|(1+|b|)−1). |
Thus,
|y0|≥|by0|(1+|b|)≥|z0|(sv|z0||(cn−2+a)|(1+|b|)−1). |
Now
|z0|≥|c|>2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|impliesthatsv|z0||(cn−2+a)|(1+|b|)−1>1. |
Hence |y0|>|z0|.
Now
Szk=(1−u)sSzk−1+usTyk−1 |
implies
|Sz1|=|(1−u)sSz0+usTy0|=|(1−u)sbz0+us(yn0+ay20+c)|. |
Since u,s∈(0,1], so us≥su, we get
|Sz1|≥|(1−u)sbz0+su(zn0+az20+c)|≥|su(yn0+ay20)+(1−u)sbz0|−su|c|≥|su(yn0+ay20)+(1−u)sbz0|−su|z0|,|z0|≥|c|≥|su(yn0+ay20)|−|(1−u)sbz0|−su|z0|. |
Utilizing binomial expansion of (1−u)s up to linear terms of u, we attain
|Sz1|≥|su(yn0+ay20)|−|(1−su)bz0|−su|z0|=su|(yn0+ay20)|−|bz0|+|subz0|−su|z0|≥su|(yn0+ay20)|−|bz0|−su|z0|, |b|≥|0|, |
which gives us
|bz1|≥su|(yn0+ay20)|−|z0|−|bz0|, su<1=su|y20||(yn−20+a)|−|z0|(1+|b|)>su|z20||(zn−20+a)|−|z0|(1+|b|), |y0|>|z0|≥|z0|(su|z0||(cn−2+a)|−(1+|b|))=|z0|(1+|b|)(su|z0||(cn−2+a)|(1+|b|)−1). |
Thus,
|z1|≥|bz1|(1+|b|)≥|z0|(su|z0||(cn−2+a)|(1+|b|)−1). |
Since |z0|≥|c|>2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|, there exists λ>0 so that su|z0||(cn−2+a)|(1+|b|)−1>1+λ.
As a result,
|z1|≥(1+λ)|z0|. |
Following the same pattern repeatedly, we obtain |zk|>(1+λ)k|z0|. Consequently, |zk|→∞ as k→∞, that is, the orbit of z0 tends to infinity.
Corollary 3.1. If we consider |zm|>max{|c|,2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|,2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|}, m≥0, then |zm+k|>(1+λ)k|zk| and the Jungck-Ishikawa orbit with s-convexity of sequence {zk} of iterates for any initial point z0∈C tends to ∞ as k tends to ∞.
Remark 3.1.
(i) Jolaoso et al. [18] considered a={0,1}, and b,c to be complex numbers. However, we have considered a,b,c to be complex numbers by taking −b instead of b. The selection of these parameters is new and has not been studied till now in this perspective.
(ii) Similarly, we can easily derive the escape criterion for Jungck-Mann fixed point iteration with s-convexity for a higher-order complex polynomial of the type p(z)=zn+az2−bz+c, where n≥3 and a,b,c∈C by taking v=0 and making use of simple algebraic calculations. The term az2, where a is any complex number makes our conclusions very fascinating. On the other hand, Nazeer et al. [22] had investigated the escape criterion via Jungck-Mann and Jungck-Ishikawa iterations with s-convexity for p(z)=zn−az+c, without actually exploring the fractals. Further, in the proof of Theorem 4.9 (respectively Theorem 3.9) [22], the authors claimed that they follow the mathematical induction but this is not true. They used Theorems 4.1 and 4.5 (respectively Theorems 3.1 and 3.5) to show that for the first steps the theorem is true, then they made an inductive assumption. But in the whole proof for n+1, they did not use the inductive assumption, so actually, they did not use the principle of mathematical induction. Besides this, the proofs of other theorems also contain mathematical mistakes since authors have utilized binomial series up to linear terms which is not true for the assumed parameters. One may easily check that neither (1−v)s≥1−sv nor (1−(1−v))s≥1−s(1−v) is true in (0,1]. If we take a=0, then we get the function p(z)=zn−bz+c which is utilized by Nazeer et al. [22]. However, when we take a=0 in Theorem 3.1, we do not get the desired conclusion [22]. This discrepancy is due to the involved mathematical technique. In the sequel, we have suggested the technique to obtain the escape criterion for more general higher-order polynomials. Similar mathematical errors may also be seen in papers involving complex polynomials equipped with convexity parameter s, for instance Kumari et al. [19], Kwun et al. [29] and many others existing in the literature.
(iii) Corollary 3.1 provides algorithms for exploring Julia and Mandelbrot sets of Tc. If |z0|≤|c|, we obtain the orbit JIOs of z. If |zk| lies in the exterior of the circle of radius max{|c|,2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|,2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|} for some n, then the orbit JIOs escapes meaning thereby that z0 is not inside the Julia or Mandelbrot sets. However, if |zk| does not exceed this bound, then utilizing the definitions of the Julia and Mandelbrot sets, we utilize these algorithms to generate fractals in the next section.
We use MATLAB 7.5.0 (R2007b) via colourmap (Figure 1), Algorithm 1 (for Julia set), and Algorithm 2 (for Mandelbrot set) for developing fractals for higher-order polynomials. During the simulation process, we have obtained and analyzed many fractals. But in this paper, we discuss the behavior of only a limited number of fractals for the different parameter values associated with it. The parameters u,v and the convexity s perform a very significant role in giving the vibrant colors and exploring the characteristics of the associated Julia sets and Mandelbrot sets. The structure of the fractals is very much dependent on the iterative method we choose. The number of petals in a standard fractal is (n−1), for the nth order polynomial. As n increases the fractal takes a circular shape. Throughout the paper, we are using a maximum number of iterations K=30.
Algorithm 1 Geometry of Julia-Set |
Input: T(z)=zn+az2+c, Sz=bz where a,b,c∈C,b≠0 and n=1,2,3,…; A⊂C− area; K− a maximum number of iterations; u,v,s∈(0,1]−parameter of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity; colourmap[0..C−1]−color with C colors. Output: Julia set for area A. for z0∈A do R1=(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) R2=(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|) R=max(|c|,R1,R2) n=0 while n≤K do yn=(1−v)sSzn+vsT(zn)b zn+1=(1−u)sSzn+usT(yn)b if |zn+1|>R then break end if n=n+1 end while i=⌊(C−1)nK⌋ color z0 with colourmap[i] end for |
Algorithm 2 Geometry of Mandelbrot-Set |
Input: T(z)=zn+az2+c, Sz=bz where a,b,c∈C,b≠0 and n=1,2,3,…; A⊂C− area; K− a maximum number of iterations; u,v,s∈(0,1]−parameter of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity; colourmap[0..C−1]−color with C colors. Output: Mandelbrot set for area A. for c∈A do R1=(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) R2=(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|) R=max(|c|,R1,R2) n=0 z0=0 while n≤K do yn=(1−v)sSzn+vsT(zn)b zn+1=(1−u)sSzn+usT(yn)b if |zn+1|>R then break end if n=n+1 end while i=⌊(C−1)nK⌋ color z0 with colourmap[i] end for |
For n=3, the parameter values as given in Table 1, we get amazing fractal objects, which are visible in Figure 2(ⅰ, ⅱ).
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | -1+90i | 100 | -60i | 0.045 | 0.045 | 3 | 0.45 | [-7, 7] × [-5.5, 9.5] |
(ii) | 8i | 100 | -60i | 0.045 | 0.045 | 3 | 0.10 | [-17, 17]× [-19.5, 15.5] |
The parameter s, which denotes the convexity is responsible for the volume of the fractal. As s decreases from 0.95 to 0.55555, the resulting fractal shrinks as shown in Figure 3(ⅰ, ⅱ). The parameters used in Figure 3(ⅰ, ⅱ) are as in Table 2.
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -190i | -6.0+60i | 0.0005 | 0.045 | 4 | 0.95 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | -190i | -6.0+60i | 0.0005 | 0.045 | 4 | 0.55555 | [-18, 18] × [-18, 18] |
The parameters used in Figure 4(ⅰ, ⅱ) are as in Table 3. The parameter b affects the volume of the entire fractal. As the absolute value of b decreases, the volume of the fractal decreases, as shown in Figure 4(ⅰ, ⅱ).
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -190i | -17 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 4 | 0.0195 | [-9, 9] × [-9, 9] |
(ii) | 0 | -9.2i | -17 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 4 | 0.0195 | [-3, 3] × [-3.5, 2.5] |
The parameter b also gives rotational symmetry when it is purely real (imaginary) and changes the sign. For the same set of parameters and different values of b (change in sign in the real and complex values of b as in Table 4), the resultant fractals can be seen in Figure 5(ⅰ–ⅳ).
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | 44 | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(ii) | 0 | -44 | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(iii) | 0 | 44i | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(iv) | 0 | -44i | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
The parameters used in Figure 6(ⅰ–ⅴ) are as in Table 5.
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 4 | 0.55 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 5 | 0.55 | [-10, 10] × [-10, 10] |
(iii) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 6 | 0.55 | [-7, 7] × [-7, 7] |
(iv) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 9 | 0.55 | [-3.5, 3.5] × [-3.5, 3.5] |
(v) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 15 | 0.55 | [-2, 2] × [-2, 2] |
During the generation of fractals, it is surprising to see that, for the same parameter values of a,b,c,u,v,s and different values of n artistic fractals are obtained which are similar to Kachhi Tread Work found in the Kutch district of Gujarat (India). Noticeably, the number of petals in each figure is (n−1) (one less than the degree of polynomial) which represents the effect of Threadwork of these.
For a variety of parameter sets (see Table 6), we obtain aesthetic Julia fractals (see Figure 7(ⅰ–ⅲ)). Figure 7 demonstrates the effect of a decrease in values of u and v on Septic Julia sets. To be specific, Figure 7(ⅰ) is for higher values of u and v (greater than 0.5) whereas Figure 7(ⅱ, ⅲ) is for lower values of u and v (nearly 0). Noticeably each figure has 6 leaves (one less than the degree of polynomial).
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | ||
(i) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.6 | 0.6 | 7 | 0.51 | [-2.5, 2.5] × [-2.5, 2.5] |
(ii) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 7 | 0.51 | [-5, 5] × [-5, 5] |
(iii) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.0000056 | 0.00054 | 7 | 0.51 | [-4, 4] × [-4, 4] |
As u tends to 0 and a=0, the stunning fractal can be seen in Figure 8. The parameter used in the Figure 8 are a=0,b=−44−44i,c=88,v=0.0045,u=0.000000045,n=5,s=0.264973, and A=[−10,10]×[−10,10].
Remark 4.1. It has been observed that not only does the polynomial of degree n give a beautiful fractal but sometimes the simple expressions having a non-integer value as a degree also gives beautiful fractal, as seen in Figure 9. It is a great task to select appropriate parameters to obtain the desired fractal pattern. The parameter used in Figure 9 are a=0,b=90.8i,c=0,u=0.067,v=0.067,n=3.14, s=0.4, and A=[−17,17]×[−17,17].
To generate Mandelbrot sets, the parameters used in Figure 10(ⅰ, ⅱ) are as in Table 7.
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0.02 | -3 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.394 | [-42, 34] × [-38, 38] |
(ii) | -1.87897 | -3 | 0.04045 | 0.04045 | 4 | 0.00612 | [-5, 5]×[-5, 5] |
In the overall analysis, we say that the effect of even minor changes in one parameter causes a major effect on the appearance of the resultant fractal. The parameters used in Figure 11(ⅰ–ⅲ) are as in Table 8. Figure 11(ⅱ, ⅲ) shows the variation in shape when only a is varied and all the other parameters are fixed.
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 3 | 1 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 5 | 0.394 | [-0.9, 0.3]×[-0.6, 0.4] |
(ii) | 2i | -3 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 | 5 | 0.394 | [-38, 38]×[-30, 35] |
(iii) | 5i | -3 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 | 5 | 0.394 | [-27, 27] × [-21, 33] |
For values of the parameter as shown in Table 9 given below, we found very interesting fractal patterns in the Mandelbrot set of n=3,4,5,6,9 and 50 (Figure 12(ⅰ–ⅵ)).
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 3 | 0.00612 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 4 | 0.00612 | [-15, 15] × [-15, 15] |
(iii) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 5 | 0.00612 | [-11, 11] × [-11, 11] |
(iv) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 6 | 0.00612 | [-7, 7] × [-7, 7] |
(v) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 9 | 0.00612 | [-4, 4]×[-4, 4] |
(vi) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 50 | 0.00612 | [-1.5, 1.5]× [-1.5, 1.5] |
Figure 13(ⅰ, ⅱ) demonstrate the effect of a increase in values of parameters u and v (see Table 10) on Quintic Mandelbrot sets. Noticeably as the values of both the parameters u and v increase from 0.0006 to 0.9 the Quintic Mandelbrot set become fatter.
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 2+2i | -10 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 5 | 0.05 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 2+2i | -10 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 5 | 0.05 | [-20, 20] × [-20, 20] |
As the convexity parameter s decreases from 0.99 to 0.1 (see Table 11) the Quartic Mandelbrot set shrinks (see Figure 14). Noticeably each figure has 3 branches (one less than the degree of polynomial).
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.99 | [-25, 25] × [-40, 10] |
(ii) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.5 | [-2, 2] × [-3, 1] |
(iii) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.1 | [-0.2, 0.2]×[-0.3, 0.1] |
Remark 4.2. (i) It is sometimes difficult, for anybody, to command perfectly on the results and discussion section, as the fixed point iteration (Jungck-Ishikawa) itself, involves three parameters (u,v,s). Moreover, some additional parameters come from the polynomial p(z) under consideration (like a,b,c). It is again a topic of research to comment on the effect of resulting fractals when we make changes in any of these parameters. Even if we keep all the parameters fixed and vary only any one of them (for instance, s), then also we may obtain a variety of fractals. This comment applies to other parameters also (see, Table 10 in which all the parameters are fixed and only n varies. For n=3,4,5,6,9 and 10 we have obtained a variety of stunning variants of classical Mandelbrot set). Therefore, we have restricted our discussion to a limited type of combination of parameters. However, we have tried to cover the maximum possible combination of parameters involved in developing the algorithm (escape criterion) in Corollary 3.1. We have generated Mandelbrot and Julia sets of various polynomials and showed some selected fractals only. We notice that the role of each parameter is distinct. For instance, as n increases the fractal takes a circular shape (see, Figure 12(vi) looks like a stunning sunflower of a higher-order Mandelbrot set) and the area covered by the fractal decreases.
(ii) Our theorem and corollary demonstrate the significance of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity in the generation of complex graphs of fractal sets. For s=1, we obtain the improvements of analogous conclusions for the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration existing in the literature. Noticeably, the value of s has a great impact on the shape and the obtained sets are completely different from the original Julia set (see Figure 3).
We have established the escape radii and escape criteria of Julia and Mandelbrot sets for the nth degree complex polynomials of a special kind in Jungck-Ishikawa orbit equipped with s-convexity. Consequently, we have provided the technique to obtain an escape criterion for a more general higher-order polynomial that is not correct in related results (for instance [19,22,29], and so on). We have developed and analyzed the behavior of variants of the Julia set and the Mandelbrot set for different parameter values after obtaining fascinating non-classical variants of classical Mandelbrot and Julia fractals using MATLAB software. It is worth mentioning here that polynomials are often utilized to encode information about different objects and are useful in distinct branches of science and engineering. Also, we have observed that as we zoom in on the edges of the petals of the Mandelbrot set, we come across the Julia set meaning thereby each point of the Mandelbrot set includes massive image data of a Julia set. Also, the size of fractals explored using the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration depends on the parameter u and the convexity parameter s, whereas the shape and symmetry depend on the parameter a,b and c. As n increases the area occupied by the fractals decreases. In the sequel, we have provided some interesting features to compare with the existing one and demonstrate the significance of our outcomes such as some of our fractals resemble the traditional Kachhi Thread Works (see Figure 15) found in the Kutch district of Gujarat (India) which are useful in the textile industry.
The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University for funding the publication of this project. We are also thankful to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that help us to improve the manuscript.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
S. Antal, A. Tomar, D. J. Parjapati, M. Sajid, Fractals as Julia sets of complex sine function via fixed point iterations, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040272 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040272
![]() |
[2] | A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. |
[3] | M. F. Barnsley, Fractals everywhere, San Francisca: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993. |
[4] |
N. Cohen, Fractal antenna applications in wireless telecommunications, Prof. Program Proc. Electron. Ind. Forum New Engl., 1997, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIF.1997.605374 doi: 10.1109/EIF.1997.605374
![]() |
[5] | W. D. Crowe, R. Hasson, P. J. Rippon, P. E. D. Strain-Clark, On the structure of the Mandelbar set, Nonlinearity, 2 (1989), 541–553. |
[6] | R. L. Devaney, A first course in chaotic dynamical systems: Theory and experiment, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429503481 |
[7] | P. Domínguez, N. Fagella, Residual Julia sets of rational and transcendental functions, In: P. J. Rippon, G. M. Stallard, Transcendental dynamics and complex analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2008,138–164. |
[8] |
E. F. D. Goufo, A biomathematical view on the fractional dynamics of cellulose degradation, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 18 (2015), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2015-0034 doi: 10.1515/fca-2015-0034
![]() |
[9] | P. Fatou, Sur les équations fonctionnelles, Bull. S. M. F., 47 (1919), 161–271. |
[10] | G. Julia, Mémoire sur l'itération des fonctions rationnelles, J. Math. Pures Appl., 8 (1918), 47–245. |
[11] |
S. M. Kang, A. Rafiq, A. Latif, A. A. Shahid, Y. C. Kwun, Tricorns and multicorns of S-iteration scheme, J. Funct. Space., 2015 (2015), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/417167 doi: 10.1155/2015/417167
![]() |
[12] | S. M. Kang, A. Rafiq, M. Tanveer, F. Ali, Y. C. Kwun, Julia and Mandelbrot sets in modified Jungck three-step orbit, Wulfenia, 22 (2015), 167–185. |
[13] | N. C. Kenkel, D. J. Walker, Fractals in the biological sciences, Coenoses, 11 (1996), 77–100. |
[14] |
L. Koss, Elliptic functions with disconnected Julia sets, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 26 (2016), 1650095. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127416500954 doi: 10.1142/S0218127416500954
![]() |
[15] | B. B. Mandelbrot, The fractal geometry of nature, San Francisco: Freeman, 1982. |
[16] |
K. Nakamura, Iterated inversion system: An algorithm for efficiently visualizing Kleinian groups and extending the possibilities of fractal art, J. Math. Arts, 15 (2021), 106–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2021.1943998 doi: 10.1080/17513472.2021.1943998
![]() |
[17] |
S. Ishikawa, Fixed points by a new iteration method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 44 (1974), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5
![]() |
[18] |
L. O. Jolaoso, S. H. Khan, Some escape time results for general complex polynomials and biomorphs generation by a new iteration process, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122172 doi: 10.3390/math8122172
![]() |
[19] | S. Kumari, M. Kumari, R. Chugh, Dynamics of superior fractals via Jungck SP orbit with s-convexity, An. Univ. Craiova Math. Comput. Sci. Ser., 46 (2019), 344–365. |
[20] |
D. J. Liu, W. G. Zhou, X. Song, Z. M. Qiu, Fractal simulation of flocculation processes using a diffusion-limited aggregation model, Fractal Fract., 1 (2017), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract1010012 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract1010012
![]() |
[21] |
P. Muthukumar, P. Balasubramaniam, Feedback synchronization of the fractional order reverse butterfly-shaped chaotic system and its application to digital cryptography, Nonlinear Dyn., 74 (2013), 1169–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1032-3 doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-1032-3
![]() |
[22] |
W. Nazeer, S. M. Kang, M. Tanveer, A. A. Shahid, Fixed point results in the generation of Julia and Mandelbrot sets, J. Inequal. Appl., 2015 (2015), 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-015-0820-3 doi: 10.1186/s13660-015-0820-3
![]() |
[23] |
M. A. Noor, New approximation schemes for general variational inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 251 (2000), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.7042 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7042
![]() |
[24] | F. Orsucci, Complexity science, living systems, and reflexing interfaces: New models and perspectives, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012. |
[25] | M. O. Olatinwo, C. O. Imoru, Some convergence results for the Jungck-Mann and the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration processes in the class of generalized Zamfirescu operators, Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae, 77 (2008), 299–304. |
[26] |
P. C. Ouyang, K. W. Chung, A. Nicolas, K. Gdawiec, Self-similar fractal drawings inspired by M. C. Escher's print square limit, ACM Trans. Graphic., 40 (2021), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456298 doi: 10.1145/3456298
![]() |
[27] |
F. Peherstorfer, C. Stroh, Connectedness of Julia sets of rational functions, Comput. Methods Funct. Theory, 1 (2001), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320977 doi: 10.1007/BF03320977
![]() |
[28] |
C. C. King, Fractal and chaotic dynamics in nervous systems, Prog. Neurobiol., 36 (1991), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0082(91)90003-J doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(91)90003-J
![]() |
[29] |
Y. C. Kwun, A. A. Shahid, W. Nazeer, M. Abbas, S. M. Kang, Fractal generation via CR iteration scheme with s-convexity, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 69986-69997. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919520 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919520
![]() |
[30] | M. Rani, V. Kumar, Superior Julia sets, J. Korea Soc. Math. Edu. Ser. D Res. Math. Edu., 8 (2004), 261–277. |
[31] | M. Rani, V. Kumar, Superior Mandelbrot set, J. Korea Soc. Math. Edu. Ser. D Res. Math. Edu., 8 (2004), 279–291. |
[32] |
A. A. Shahid, W. Nazeer, K. Gdawiec, The Picard-Mann iteration with s-convexity in the generation of Mandelbrot and Julia sets, Monatsh. Math., 195 (2021), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-021-01591-z doi: 10.1007/s00605-021-01591-z
![]() |
[33] |
K. R. Sreenivasan, Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 23 (1991), 539–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543 doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543
![]() |
[34] |
M. Tanveer, W. Nazeer, K. Gdawiec, New escape criteria for complex fractals generation in Jungck-CR orbit, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 51 (2020), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-020-0466-9 doi: 10.1007/s13226-020-0466-9
![]() |
[35] |
G. I. Usurelu, A. Bejenaru, M. Postolache, Newton-like methods and polynomiographic visualization of modified Thakur processes, Int. J. Comput. Math., 98 (2021), 1049–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2020.1802017 doi: 10.1080/00207160.2020.1802017
![]() |
[36] | J. J. Ventrella, Evolving the Mandelbrot set to imitate figurative art, In: P. F. Hingston, L. C. Barone, Z. Michalewicz, Design by evolution, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008,145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74111-4_9 |
[37] |
D. Wang, S. C. Zhao, K. Chen, S. T. Liu, Parameter estimation of the classical fractal map based on a given Julia set's shape, Fractals, 29 (2021), 2150247. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21502479 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X21502479
![]() |
[38] |
Y. P. Wang, S. T. Liu, H. Li, Fractional diffusion-limited aggregation: Anisotropy originating from memory, Fractals, 27 (2019), 1950137. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X19501378 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X19501378
![]() |
[39] |
B. B. Xu, D. Y. Chen, H. Zhang, R. Zhou, Dynamic analysis and modeling of a novel fractional-order hydro-turbine-generator unit, Nonlinear Dyn., 81 (2015), 1263–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2066-5 doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-2066-5
![]() |
[40] |
H. X. Zhang, M. Tanveer, Y. X. Li, Q. X. Peng, N. A. Shah, Fixed point results of an implicit iterative scheme for fractal generations, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 13170–13186. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021761 doi: 10.3934/math.2021761
![]() |
[41] |
W. R. Mann, Mean value methods in iteration, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 4 (1953), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2032162 doi: 10.2307/2032162
![]() |
[42] | E. Picard, Mémoire sur la théorie des équations aux dérivées partielles et la méthode des approximations successives, J. Math. Pures Appl., 6 (1890), 145–210. |
1. | Darshana J. Prajapati, Shivam Rawat, Anita Tomar, Mohammad Sajid, R. C. Dimri, A Brief Study on Julia Sets in the Dynamics of Entire Transcendental Function Using Mann Iterative Scheme, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 397, 10.3390/fractalfract6070397 | |
2. | Nihal Özgür, Swati Antal, Anita Tomar, Jia-Bao Liu, Julia and Mandelbrot Sets of Transcendental Function via Fibonacci-Mann Iteration, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/2592573 | |
3. | Anita Tomar, Vipul Kumar, Udhamvir Singh Rana, Mohammad Sajid, Fractals as Julia and Mandelbrot Sets of Complex Cosine Functions via Fixed Point Iterations, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 478, 10.3390/sym15020478 | |
4. | Nabaraj Adhikari, Wutiphol Sintunavarat, Exploring the Julia and Mandelbrot sets of zp+logct using a four-step iteration scheme extended with s-convexity, 2024, 220, 03784754, 357, 10.1016/j.matcom.2024.01.010 | |
5. | Shivam Rawat, Darshana J. Prajapati, Anita Tomar, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Generation of Mandelbrot and Julia sets for generalized rational maps using SP-iteration process equipped with s-convexity, 2024, 220, 03784754, 148, 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.12.040 | |
6. | Bashir Nawaz, Kifayat Ullah, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Generation of Mandelbrot and Julia sets by using M-iteration process, 2024, 188, 09600779, 115516, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115516 | |
7. | Swati Antal, Nihal Özgür, Anita Tomar, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Fractal generation via generalized Fibonacci–Mann iteration with s-convexity, 2024, 0019-5588, 10.1007/s13226-024-00537-z | |
8. | Khairul Habib Alam, Yumnam Rohen, An efficient iterative procedure in hyperbolic space and application to non-linear delay integral equation, 2024, 70, 1598-5865, 4297, 10.1007/s12190-024-02134-z | |
9. | Liliana Guran, Khurram Shabbir, Khushdil Ahmad, Monica-Felicia Bota, Stability, Data Dependence, and Convergence Results with Computational Engendering of Fractals via Jungck–DK Iterative Scheme, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 418, 10.3390/fractalfract7060418 | |
10. | Saurabh Sharma, Anita Tomar, Sanjay Kumar Padaliya, On the evolution and importance of the Fibonacci sequence in visualization of fractals, 2025, 191, 09600779, 115851, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115851 | |
11. | Khairul Habib Alam, Yumnam Rohen, Naeem Saleem, Maggie Aphane, Asima Razzaque, Rizwan Anjum, On escape criterion of an orbit with s−convexity and illustrations of the behavior shifts in Mandelbrot and Julia set fractals, 2025, 20, 1932-6203, e0312197, 10.1371/journal.pone.0312197 | |
12. | Khairul Habib Alam, Yumnam Rohen, Anita Tomar, Naeem Saleem, Maggie Aphane, Asima Razzaque, An Effective Iterative Process Utilizing Transcendental Sine Functions for the Generation of Julia and Mandelbrot Sets, 2025, 9, 2504-3110, 40, 10.3390/fractalfract9010040 | |
13. | Bashir Nawaz, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Kifayat Ullah, Maggie Aphane, Naeem Saleem, A study of Mandelbrot and Julia Sets via Picard–Thakur iteration with s-convexity, 2025, 20, 1932-6203, e0315271, 10.1371/journal.pone.0315271 | |
14. | Pragati Gautam, , Generating Mandelbrot and Julia sets using PV iterative technique, 2025, 196, 09600779, 116346, 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116346 | |
15. | Bashir Nawaz, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Kifayat Ullah, Analyzing complex dynamics of Mandelbrot and Julia sets generated using Picard–SP iteration scheme, 2025, 1951-6355, 10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01579-y |
Algorithm 1 Geometry of Julia-Set |
Input: T(z)=zn+az2+c, Sz=bz where a,b,c∈C,b≠0 and n=1,2,3,…; A⊂C− area; K− a maximum number of iterations; u,v,s∈(0,1]−parameter of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity; colourmap[0..C−1]−color with C colors. Output: Julia set for area A. for z0∈A do R1=(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) R2=(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|) R=max(|c|,R1,R2) n=0 while n≤K do yn=(1−v)sSzn+vsT(zn)b zn+1=(1−u)sSzn+usT(yn)b if |zn+1|>R then break end if n=n+1 end while i=⌊(C−1)nK⌋ color z0 with colourmap[i] end for |
Algorithm 2 Geometry of Mandelbrot-Set |
Input: T(z)=zn+az2+c, Sz=bz where a,b,c∈C,b≠0 and n=1,2,3,…; A⊂C− area; K− a maximum number of iterations; u,v,s∈(0,1]−parameter of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity; colourmap[0..C−1]−color with C colors. Output: Mandelbrot set for area A. for c∈A do R1=(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) R2=(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|) R=max(|c|,R1,R2) n=0 z0=0 while n≤K do yn=(1−v)sSzn+vsT(zn)b zn+1=(1−u)sSzn+usT(yn)b if |zn+1|>R then break end if n=n+1 end while i=⌊(C−1)nK⌋ color z0 with colourmap[i] end for |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | -1+90i | 100 | -60i | 0.045 | 0.045 | 3 | 0.45 | [-7, 7] × [-5.5, 9.5] |
(ii) | 8i | 100 | -60i | 0.045 | 0.045 | 3 | 0.10 | [-17, 17]× [-19.5, 15.5] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -190i | -6.0+60i | 0.0005 | 0.045 | 4 | 0.95 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | -190i | -6.0+60i | 0.0005 | 0.045 | 4 | 0.55555 | [-18, 18] × [-18, 18] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -190i | -17 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 4 | 0.0195 | [-9, 9] × [-9, 9] |
(ii) | 0 | -9.2i | -17 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 4 | 0.0195 | [-3, 3] × [-3.5, 2.5] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | 44 | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(ii) | 0 | -44 | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(iii) | 0 | 44i | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(iv) | 0 | -44i | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 4 | 0.55 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 5 | 0.55 | [-10, 10] × [-10, 10] |
(iii) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 6 | 0.55 | [-7, 7] × [-7, 7] |
(iv) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 9 | 0.55 | [-3.5, 3.5] × [-3.5, 3.5] |
(v) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 15 | 0.55 | [-2, 2] × [-2, 2] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | ||
(i) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.6 | 0.6 | 7 | 0.51 | [-2.5, 2.5] × [-2.5, 2.5] |
(ii) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 7 | 0.51 | [-5, 5] × [-5, 5] |
(iii) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.0000056 | 0.00054 | 7 | 0.51 | [-4, 4] × [-4, 4] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0.02 | -3 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.394 | [-42, 34] × [-38, 38] |
(ii) | -1.87897 | -3 | 0.04045 | 0.04045 | 4 | 0.00612 | [-5, 5]×[-5, 5] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 3 | 1 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 5 | 0.394 | [-0.9, 0.3]×[-0.6, 0.4] |
(ii) | 2i | -3 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 | 5 | 0.394 | [-38, 38]×[-30, 35] |
(iii) | 5i | -3 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 | 5 | 0.394 | [-27, 27] × [-21, 33] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 3 | 0.00612 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 4 | 0.00612 | [-15, 15] × [-15, 15] |
(iii) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 5 | 0.00612 | [-11, 11] × [-11, 11] |
(iv) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 6 | 0.00612 | [-7, 7] × [-7, 7] |
(v) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 9 | 0.00612 | [-4, 4]×[-4, 4] |
(vi) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 50 | 0.00612 | [-1.5, 1.5]× [-1.5, 1.5] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 2+2i | -10 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 5 | 0.05 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 2+2i | -10 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 5 | 0.05 | [-20, 20] × [-20, 20] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.99 | [-25, 25] × [-40, 10] |
(ii) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.5 | [-2, 2] × [-3, 1] |
(iii) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.1 | [-0.2, 0.2]×[-0.3, 0.1] |
Algorithm 1 Geometry of Julia-Set |
Input: T(z)=zn+az2+c, Sz=bz where a,b,c∈C,b≠0 and n=1,2,3,…; A⊂C− area; K− a maximum number of iterations; u,v,s∈(0,1]−parameter of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity; colourmap[0..C−1]−color with C colors. Output: Julia set for area A. for z0∈A do R1=(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) R2=(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|) R=max(|c|,R1,R2) n=0 while n≤K do yn=(1−v)sSzn+vsT(zn)b zn+1=(1−u)sSzn+usT(yn)b if |zn+1|>R then break end if n=n+1 end while i=⌊(C−1)nK⌋ color z0 with colourmap[i] end for |
Algorithm 2 Geometry of Mandelbrot-Set |
Input: T(z)=zn+az2+c, Sz=bz where a,b,c∈C,b≠0 and n=1,2,3,…; A⊂C− area; K− a maximum number of iterations; u,v,s∈(0,1]−parameter of the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration with s-convexity; colourmap[0..C−1]−color with C colors. Output: Mandelbrot set for area A. for c∈A do R1=(2(1+|b|)su|(cn−2+a)|) R2=(2(1+|b|)sv|(cn−2+a)|) R=max(|c|,R1,R2) n=0 z0=0 while n≤K do yn=(1−v)sSzn+vsT(zn)b zn+1=(1−u)sSzn+usT(yn)b if |zn+1|>R then break end if n=n+1 end while i=⌊(C−1)nK⌋ color z0 with colourmap[i] end for |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | -1+90i | 100 | -60i | 0.045 | 0.045 | 3 | 0.45 | [-7, 7] × [-5.5, 9.5] |
(ii) | 8i | 100 | -60i | 0.045 | 0.045 | 3 | 0.10 | [-17, 17]× [-19.5, 15.5] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -190i | -6.0+60i | 0.0005 | 0.045 | 4 | 0.95 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | -190i | -6.0+60i | 0.0005 | 0.045 | 4 | 0.55555 | [-18, 18] × [-18, 18] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -190i | -17 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 4 | 0.0195 | [-9, 9] × [-9, 9] |
(ii) | 0 | -9.2i | -17 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 4 | 0.0195 | [-3, 3] × [-3.5, 2.5] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | 44 | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(ii) | 0 | -44 | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(iii) | 0 | 44i | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
(iv) | 0 | -44i | -19 | 0.000005 | 0.00045 | 5 | 0.33 | [-6.5, 6.5]× [-6.5, 6.5] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 4 | 0.55 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 5 | 0.55 | [-10, 10] × [-10, 10] |
(iii) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 6 | 0.55 | [-7, 7] × [-7, 7] |
(iv) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 9 | 0.55 | [-3.5, 3.5] × [-3.5, 3.5] |
(v) | 0 | 44+44i | -30i | 0.000005 | 0.000545 | 15 | 0.55 | [-2, 2] × [-2, 2] |
a | b | c | u | v | n | s | ||
(i) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.6 | 0.6 | 7 | 0.51 | [-2.5, 2.5] × [-2.5, 2.5] |
(ii) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 7 | 0.51 | [-5, 5] × [-5, 5] |
(iii) | 0 | -19 | 0.285 + 0.01i | 0.0000056 | 0.00054 | 7 | 0.51 | [-4, 4] × [-4, 4] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0.02 | -3 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.394 | [-42, 34] × [-38, 38] |
(ii) | -1.87897 | -3 | 0.04045 | 0.04045 | 4 | 0.00612 | [-5, 5]×[-5, 5] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 3 | 1 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 5 | 0.394 | [-0.9, 0.3]×[-0.6, 0.4] |
(ii) | 2i | -3 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 | 5 | 0.394 | [-38, 38]×[-30, 35] |
(iii) | 5i | -3 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 | 5 | 0.394 | [-27, 27] × [-21, 33] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 3 | 0.00612 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 4 | 0.00612 | [-15, 15] × [-15, 15] |
(iii) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 5 | 0.00612 | [-11, 11] × [-11, 11] |
(iv) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 6 | 0.00612 | [-7, 7] × [-7, 7] |
(v) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 9 | 0.00612 | [-4, 4]×[-4, 4] |
(vi) | 0 | -6.9 | 0.094045 | 0.094045 | 50 | 0.00612 | [-1.5, 1.5]× [-1.5, 1.5] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 2+2i | -10 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 5 | 0.05 | [-25, 25] × [-25, 25] |
(ii) | 2+2i | -10 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 5 | 0.05 | [-20, 20] × [-20, 20] |
a | b | u | v | n | s | A | |
(i) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.99 | [-25, 25] × [-40, 10] |
(ii) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.5 | [-2, 2] × [-3, 1] |
(iii) | 90 | 1.7+1.7i | 0.05 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.1 | [-0.2, 0.2]×[-0.3, 0.1] |