Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Finite groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free

  • Received: 20 September 2024 Revised: 05 November 2024 Accepted: 13 November 2024 Published: 25 November 2024
  • Assume that G is a finite group. The coprime graph of G, denoted by Γ(G), is an undirected graph whose vertex set is G and two distinct vertices x and y of Γ(G) are adjacent if and only if (o(x),o(y))=1, where o(x) and o(y) are the orders of x and y, respectively. This paper gives a characterization of all finite groups with AT-free coprime graphs. This answers a question raised by Swathi and Sunitha in Forbidden subgraphs of co-prime graphs of finite groups. As applications, this paper also classifies all finite groups G such that Γ(G) is AT-free if G is a nilpotent group, a symmetric group, an alternating group, a direct product of two non-trivial groups, or a sporadic simple group.

    Citation: Huani Li, Xuanlong Ma. Finite groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6443-6449. doi: 10.3934/era.2024300

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xiaoyan Xu, Xiaohua Xu, Jin Chen, Shixun Lin . On forbidden subgraphs of main supergraphs of groups. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(8): 4845-4857. doi: 10.3934/era.2024222
    [2] Lie Fu, Victoria Hoskins, Simon Pepin Lehalleur . Motives of moduli spaces of rank $ 3 $ vector bundles and Higgs bundles on a curve. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(1): 66-89. doi: 10.3934/era.2022004
    [3] Xiaoguang Li . Normalized ground states for a doubly nonlinear Schrödinger equation on periodic metric graphs. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4199-4217. doi: 10.3934/era.2024189
    [4] Yongzhong Hu . An application of the Baker method to a new conjecture on exponential Diophantine equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 1618-1623. doi: 10.3934/era.2024073
    [5] Agustín Moreno Cañadas, Pedro Fernando Fernández Espinosa, Natalia Agudelo Muñetón . Brauer configuration algebras defined by snake graphs and Kronecker modules. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 3087-3110. doi: 10.3934/era.2022157
    [6] Natália Bebiano, João da Providência, Wei-Ru Xu . Approximations for the von Neumann and Rényi entropies of graphs with circulant type Laplacians. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(5): 1864-1880. doi: 10.3934/era.2022094
    [7] Jingjing Hai, Xian Ling . Normalizer property of finite groups with almost simple subgroups. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 4232-4237. doi: 10.3934/era.2022215
    [8] A. A. Heliel, A. Ballester-Bolinches, M. M. Al-Shomrani, R. A. Al-Obidy . On $ \sigma $-subnormal subgroups and products of finite groups. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 770-775. doi: 10.3934/era.2023038
    [9] Xue Yu . Orientable vertex imprimitive complete maps. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2466-2477. doi: 10.3934/era.2024113
    [10] Xinzheng Xu, Xiaoyang Zhao, Meng Wei, Zhongnian Li . A comprehensive review of graph convolutional networks: approaches and applications. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 4185-4215. doi: 10.3934/era.2023213
  • Assume that G is a finite group. The coprime graph of G, denoted by Γ(G), is an undirected graph whose vertex set is G and two distinct vertices x and y of Γ(G) are adjacent if and only if (o(x),o(y))=1, where o(x) and o(y) are the orders of x and y, respectively. This paper gives a characterization of all finite groups with AT-free coprime graphs. This answers a question raised by Swathi and Sunitha in Forbidden subgraphs of co-prime graphs of finite groups. As applications, this paper also classifies all finite groups G such that Γ(G) is AT-free if G is a nilpotent group, a symmetric group, an alternating group, a direct product of two non-trivial groups, or a sporadic simple group.



    In the field of algebraic graph theory, the study of graph representations according to their algebraic structures is a popular and interesting research topic. For example, a well-known graph representation from the algebraic structure group is the Cayley graph, which has a long history of research. On the other hand, graph representations of some algebraic structures have been actively studied in the literature, because of some valuable applications [1,2].

    One can define a special graph on a group, such as, power graph [3] and commuting graph [4]. Considering the order of an element in a group is one of the most basic and important concepts in group theory, we may define a graph over a group using its element order. Given a finite group G, the coprime graph of G, denoted by Γ(G), is the undirected graph with vertex set G, and two distinct x,yG are adjacent if and only if o(x) and o(y) are relatively prime, namely, (o(x),o(y))=1, where o(x) and o(y) are the orders of x and y, respectively. In 2014, the authors [5] introduced the concept of a coprime graph of a group. Afterwards, Dorbidi [6] proved that for every finite group G, the clique number of Γ(G) is equal to the chromatic number of Γ(G), namely, Γ(G) is a weakly perfect graph. Also, Dorbidi [6] classified such finite groups whose coprime graph is a complete r-partite graph. In 2017, Selvakumar and Subajini [7] obtained all finite groups G such that Γ(G) is toroidal. In 2021, Hamm and Way [8] determined the independence number of the coprime graph on a dihedral group, and they also studied this question: which coprime graphs are perfect? Alraqad et al. [9] classified the finite groups whose coprime graph has exactly three end-vertices.

    Every graph considered in our paper is undirected without loops and multiple edges. Let Γ and Δ be two graphs. If Γ contains no induced subgraph isomorphic to Δ, then Γ is called a Δ-free graph. This is equivalent to saying that Δ is a forbidden subgraph of Γ. Three independent vertices of a graph form an asteroidal triple if every two of them are connected by a path avoiding the neighborhood of the third one. A simple graph is called asteroidal triple-free (AT-free, for short) if it contains no asteroidal triple [10]. The AT-free graphs provide a common generalization of interval, permutation, trapezoid, and cocomparability graphs. In [10], Lekkerkerker and Boland demonstrated the importance of asteroidal triples in the theorem: a graph is an interval graph if and only if it is chordal and AT-free. Thus, it appears that the condition of being AT-free prohibits a chordal graph from growing in three directions at once. Later, Golumbic et al. [11] showed that cocomparability graphs (and, thus, permutation and trapezoid graphs) are also AT-free. In [12], Swathi and Sunitha studied the finite groups whose co-prime graphs are C4-free, claw-free, cographs, split-graphs, and AT-free. Also, they proposed the following question.

    Question 1.1. ([12]) Find a characterization for the finite groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free.

    The purpose of this paper is to give a characterization of the finite groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free (see Theorem 2.3). This gives an answer to Question 1.1. As applications, we classify the finite groups G such that Γ(G) is AT-free if G is a nilpotent group (see Corollary 2.5), a symmetric group (see Proposition 2.7), an alternating group (see Proposition 2.7), a direct product of two non-trivial groups (see Proposition 2.8), or a sporadic simple group (see Proposition 2.10).

    This section will prove our main results. Every group considered in this paper is finite. For convenience, we always assume that G is a finite group with the identity e. Denote by πe(G) and π(G) the set of orders of elements of G and the set of prime divisors of |G|, respectively. As usual, denote by Zn the cyclic group having order n. Given a graph, say Γ, denote by V(Γ) and E(Γ) the vertex set and edge set of Γ, respectively. If {x,y}E(Γ), then we also denote this by xy. In a graph, we use x1x2xn to denote a path of length n. The neighborhood of a vertex x in Γ, denoted by N(x), is the set {vV(Γ):vx}.

    We first give two results before giving the proof of our main theorem.

    Observation 2.1. (1) Suppose that {p1p2,p1p3,p1p4}πe(G), where p1,p2,p3,p4 are pairwise distinct primes. Let a,b,cG with o(a)=p1p2, o(b)=p1p3, and o(c)=p1p4. Then acp1b is a path such that N(c){a,cp1,b}=, abp1c is a path such that N(b){a,bp1,c}=, and bap1c is a path such that N(a){b,ap1,c}=. As a result, {a,b,c} is an AT in Γ(G).

    (2) Suppose that {p1p2,p1p3,p2p3}πe(G), where p1,p2,p3 are pairwise distinct primes. Let a,b,cG with o(a)=p1p2, o(b)=p1p3, and o(c)=p2p3. Then acp2cp3b is a path such that N(c){a,cp2,cp3,b}=, abp1bp3c is a path such that N(b){a,bp1,bp3,c}=, and bap1ap2c is a path such that N(a){b,ap1,ap2,c}=. As a result, {a,b,c} is an AT in Γ(G).

    Lemma 2.2. ([12]) Let x,yG. Then π(x)π(y) if and only if N(y)N(x) in Γ(G).

    Theorem 2.3. Let G be a finite group. Then Γ(G) is AT-free if and only if neither {p1p2,p1p3,p1p4} nor {p1p2,p1p3,p2p3} is a subset of πe(G) where p1,p2,p3,p4 are pairwise distinct primes.

    Proof. The necessity follows trivially from Observation 2.1. We next prove the sufficiency. Suppose that neither {p1p2,p1p3,p1p4} nor {p1p2,p1p3,p2p3} is a subset of πe(G); here p1,p2,p3,p4 are pairwise distinct primes. Then it is clear that πe(G) has no element, which is a product of three pairwise distinct primes. Assume, to the contrary, that Γ(G) has an AT, say {x1,x2,x3}. If π(xi)π(xj) for two distinct i,j{1,2,3} and t{1,2,3}{i,j}, then by Lemma 2.2, we have that every path from xj to xt must contain at least one vertex in N(xi); this contradicts that {x1,x2,x3} is an AT. It follows that π(xi)π(xj) for each two distinct i,j{1,2,3}. Since {x1,x2,x3} is an independent set of Γ(G), it follows that for any i{1,2,3}, o(xi) is not a prime power. As a result, |π(xi)|=2 for any i{1,2,3}.

    Now let π(x1)={p1,p2} where p1 and p2 are distinct primes. Note that (o(x1),o(x2))1. We may assume that π(x2)={pi,p3}, where i=1 or 2 and p3 is a prime, which is different from p1 and p2. Similarly, we also can conclude that π(x3)={pj,p4}, where j=1 or 2 and p4 is a prime, which is different from p1 and p2. If p3=p4, then ij, and so {p1p2,p1p3,p2p3}πe(G), a contradiction. Now assume that p3p4. Since (o(x2),o(x3))1, it must be that i=j. It follows that either {p1p2,p1p3,p1p4}πe(G) or {p1p2,p2p3,p2p4}πe(G), which is impossible. Consequently, Γ(G) is AT-free. The proof is now complete.

    Corollary 2.4. (1) If |π(G)|2, then Γ(G) is AT-free; (2) Let π(G)={p1,p2,p3}. Then Γ(G) is AT-free if and only if {p1p2,p1p3,p2p3}πe(G); (3) If Γ(G) is AT-free and |π(G)|4, then Z(G)={e}.

    Recall that a finite group is nilpotent if and only if it is the direct product of its Sylow subgroups. In particular, in a finite nilpotent group, two elements a,b with (o(a),o(b))=1 must commute. Thus, if G is a nilpotent group such that π(G)={p1,p2,p3} for different primes p1,p2,p3, then G has elements of order p1p2p3. The following result classifies all nilpotent groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free.

    Corollary 2.5. Let G be a nilpotent group. Then Γ(G) is AT-free if and only if G=P×Q, where P and Q are respectively a p-group and a q-group for distinct primes p and q.

    Clearly, for any subgroup H of G, Γ(H) is an induced subgraph of Γ(G). Thus, we have the following result.

    Observation 2.6. If Γ(G) is AT-free, then Γ(H) is also AT-free for any subgroup H of G.

    The symmetric group of order n!, denoted by Sn, is the group consisting of all permutations on n objects. As we know, the symmetric group is important in many different areas of mathematics, including combinatorics and group theory, since every finite group is a subgroup of some symmetric group. In Sn, the set of all even permutations is a group, which is called the alternating group on n objects and is denoted by An. Note that An is a simple group for any n5.

    Proposition 2.7. For symmetric groups and alternating groups, we have the following:

    (1) The graph Γ(Sn) is AT-free if and only if n7;

    (2) The graph Γ(An) is AT-free if and only if n8.

    Proof. (1) We first prove that Γ(S8) is not an AT-free graph. Note that the facts that o((1,2)(3,4,5))=6, o((1,2)(3,4,5,6,7))=10, and o((1,2,3)(4,5,6,7,8))=15. As a consequence, we have that {6,10,15}πe(S8), and so by Theorem 2.3, Γ(S8) is not AT-free, as desired. Now by Observation 2.6, it suffices to prove that Γ(S7) is AT-free. Note that πe(S7)={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,10,12}. Since S7 has no elements of order 15, it follows from Theorem 2.3 that Γ(S7) is AT-free, as desired.

    (2) We first prove that Γ(A9) is not an AT-free graph. Note that the facts that o((1,2)(3,4,5)(6,7))=6, o((1,2)(3,4,5,6,7)(8,9))=10, and o((1,2,3)(4,5,6,7,8))=15. Thus, we have that {6,10,15}πe(A9), which implies that Γ(A9) is not AT-free by Theorem 2.3, as desired. Now in view of Observation 2.6, it suffices to prove that Γ(A8) is AT-free. It is easy to check that πe(A8)={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,15}, so πe(A8) has only two elements that are not prime powers. By Theorem 2.3, we have that Γ(A8) is AT-free, as desired.

    Given a finite group G, if any non-trivial element of G is of prime power order, then G is a CP-group [13]. For example, for a prime p, any p-group is also a CP-group. Also, both the symmetric group on four letters and the alternating group of degree five are CP-groups. Given two non-trivial groups H and K, for which the direct product H×K is the coprime graph an AT-free graph? Next, we will characterize the direct products H×K whose coprime graph is AT-free.

    Proposition 2.8. Let H and K be two non-trivial groups. Then Γ(H×K) is AT-free if and only if one of the following holds:

    (a) π(H)=π(K)={p,q}, where p,q are distinct primes;

    (b) Both H and K are CP-groups with π(H)={p,q}, π(K)={r,s}, where p,q,r,s are pairwise distinct primes;

    (c) One of H and K is a p-group; without loss of generality, let π(H)={p}. Also, π(K){p,q,r} and qrπe(K), where p,q,r are pairwise distinct primes.

    Proof. If (a) occurs, then Corollary 2.4 (1) implies that Γ(H×K) is AT-free. If (b) occurs, then by Theorem 2.3, it is easy to see that Γ(H×K) is AT-free. Now consider (c). If π(K){p,r} or {p,q}, then Corollary 2.4 (1) also implies the desired result. Now suppose that qrπe(K), and π(K)={p,q,r} or {q,r}. Then π(H×K)={p,q,r}. If xH×K and o(x) is not a prime power, then π(x)={p,q} or {p,r}. Hence, by Corollary 2.4 (2), we have that Γ(H×K) is AT-free.

    Conversely, suppose that Γ(H×K) is AT-free. We next consider two cases.

    Case 1. Neither H nor K is a p-group for some prime p.

    We next prove that one of (a) and (b) holds. Firstly, by Theorem 2.3 and the fact that K is not trivial, it is easy to see that π(H) has at most 3 pairwise prime divisors. Assume now that π(H){p,q,r} for pairwise distinct primes p,q,r. We next consider two subcases.

    Subcase 1.1. π(H)={p,q,r}.

    Then π(K){p,q,r}; otherwise, the case in Observation 2.1 (2) occurs, and so Γ(H×K) is not AT-free, a contradiction. It follows that there exist at least two distinct prime divisors in π(K). Without loss of generality, suppose that {p,q}π(K). Then it must be that pq,pr,qrπe(H×K). It follows from Theorem 2.3 that Γ(H×K) is not AT-free, a contradiction.

    Subcase 1.2. |π(H)|=2, and without loss of generality, let π(H)={p,q}.

    Suppose that there exists one prime divisor in π(H)π(K), say p. If there exists rπ(K){p,q}, then pq,rp,rqπe(H×K), which is impossible as per Theorem 2.3. It follows that π(K){p,q}. Since K is not a p-group, we must have {p,q}=π(K), and so (a) occurs.

    Suppose now that π(H)π(K)=. By Theorem 2.3, we clearly have |π(K)|2. As a result, we can conclude that |π(K)|=2 since K is not a primary group. Also, Theorem 2.3 implies that any of H and K can not have elements whose order is the product of two distinct primes. Hence, both H and K are CP-groups, and so (b) holds.

    Case 2. One of H and K is a p-group; without loss of generality, let π(H)={p}.

    In this case, we prove that (c) holds. Clearly, π(K){p} has no three pairwise distinct primes. It follows that π(K){p,q,r}, where p,q,r are pairwise distinct primes. It suffices to show that qrπe(K). If qrπe(K), then {q,r}π(K), and so pq,pr,qrπe(H×K), which is a contradiction by Theorem 2.3. Thus, we obtain qrπe(K), and so (c) holds.

    By Proposition 2.8, we have the following examples.

    Example 2.9. The graph Γ(G) is not AT-free if G is isomorphic to one of the following:

    S3×A5,D6×D10,A5×D10,S4×L3(2),S5×L3(2),Z2×Sz(8).

    Theorem 2.10. Let G be a sporadic simple group. Then Γ(G) is AT-free if and only if G is isomorphic to one of the following Mathieu groups:

    M11,M12,M22,M23.

    Proof. It is well known that there are precisely 26 sporadic simple groups. We first consider Mathieu groups. For M11, we have that πe(M11)={1,2,3,4,5,6,8,11}, and so it is clear that Γ(M11) is AT-free by Theorem 2.3. For M12, one has πe(M12)={1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11}, and so Γ(M12) is AT-free by Theorem 2.3. For M22, we have πe(M22)={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,11}, and similarly, Γ(M22) is AT-free. For M23, we have πe(M23)={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,11,14,15,23}, and similarly, Γ(M23) is AT-free. Note that both M23 and M12 are subgroups of M24 by the ATLAS of finite groups [14]. Hence, we have that 6,10,15πe(M24), and so Γ(M24) is not AT-free by Theorem 2.3.

    By [14], it follows that Janko group J1, Janko group J2, Janko group J4, Held group He, Harada-Norton group HN, Thompson group Th, Baby Monster group B, Monster group M, O'Nan group ON, Lyons group Ly, Rudvalis group Ru, Suzuki group Suz, Fischer group Fi22, and Higman-Sims group HS contain D6×D10, A5×D10, M24, S4×L3(2), A12, A9, S5×L3(2), A12, J1, A11, Z2×Z2×Sz(8), S3×A5, S10, and S8 as subgroups, respectively. By Example 2.9 and Proposition 2.7, we see that the above simple groups do not have AT-free coprime graphs.

    Now, note that {6,10,15}πe(Mcl)πe(J3), and so both Γ(Mcl) and Γ(J3) are not AT-free by Theorem 2.3. Now every of Fi23 and Fi24 contains Fi22 as a subgroup, which implies that the coprime graphs of these two groups are not AT-free. Finally, note that the fact that for each 1i3, the Conway group Coi has a subgroup isomorphic to McL [14]. As a consequence, Γ(Coi) is not AT-free for each 1i3.

    The study of graphical representations of algebraic structures, especially groups, has been an energizing and fascinating research area originating from the Cayley graphs. The coprime graph Γ(G) of a finite G is a fairly recent development in the realm of graphs from groups. In this paper, "Forbidden subgraphs of co-prime graphs of finite groups", the authors raised the following question: what is a characterization for the finite groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free? For the above question, in this paper we give a characterization of the finite groups whose coprime graphs are AT-free. As applications, we also classify all finite groups G such that Γ(G) is AT-free if G is a nilpotent group, a symmetric group, an alternating group, a direct product of two non-trivial groups, or a sporadic simple group.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The second author was supported by the Shaanxi Fundamental Science Research Project for Mathematics and Physics (Grant No. 22JSQ024).

    The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.



    [1] A. Kelarev, Graph Algebras and Automata, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482276367
    [2] A. Kelarev, J. Ryan, J. Yearwood, Cayley graphs as classifiers for data mining: The influence of asymmetries, Discrete Math., 309 (2009), 5360–5369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2008.11.030 doi: 10.1016/j.disc.2008.11.030
    [3] J. Abawajy, A. Kelarev, M. Chowdhury, Power graphs: A survey, Electron. J. Graph Theory Appl., 1 (2013), 125–147. http://doi.org/10.5614/ejgta.2013.1.2.6
    [4] R. Brauer, K. A. Fowler, On groups of even order, Ann. Math., 62 (1955), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/1970080
    [5] X. Ma, H. Wei, L. Yang, The coprime graph of a group, Int. J. Group Theory, 3 (2014), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.22108/IJGT.2014.4363
    [6] H. R. Dorbidi, A note on the coprime graph of a group, Int. J. Group Theory, 5 (2016), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.22108/IJGT.2016.9125 doi: 10.22108/IJGT.2016.9125
    [7] K. Selvakumar, M. Subajini, Classification of groups with toroidal coprime graphs, Australas. J. Combinatorics, 69 (2017), 174–183.
    [8] J. Hamm, A. Way, Parameters of the coprime graph of a group, Int. J. Group Theory, 10 (2021), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.22108/IJGT.2020.112121.1489 doi: 10.22108/IJGT.2020.112121.1489
    [9] T. A. Alraqad, M. S. Saeed, E. S. Alshawarbeh, Classification of groups according to the number of end vertices in the coprime graph, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 52 (2021), 105–111. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-021-00132-6 doi: 10.1007/s13226-021-00132-6
    [10] C. Lekkerkerker, J. Boland, Representation of a finite graph by a set of intervals on the real line, Fundam. Math., 51 (1962), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.4064/FM-51-1-45-64 doi: 10.4064/FM-51-1-45-64
    [11] M. C. Golumbic, C. L. Monma, W. T. Trotter Jr., Tolerance graphs, Discrete Appl. Math., 9 (1984), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(84)90016-7
    [12] V. V. Swathi, M. S. Sunitha, Forbidden subgraphs of co-prime graphs of finite groups, Trans. Combinatorics, 14 (2025), 109–116.
    [13] A. L. Delgado, Y. Wu, On locally finite groups in which every element has prime power order, Illinois J. Math., 46 (2002), 885–891. https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1258130990 doi: 10.1215/ijm/1258130990
    [14] R. Curtis, R. Wilson, J. H. Conway, S. P. Norton, R. A. Parker, An ATLAS of Finite Groups, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(434) PDF downloads(25) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog