
In this note, we approximate the von Neumann and Rényi entropies of high-dimensional graphs using the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula. The obtained estimations have a considerable degree of accuracy. The performed experiments suggest some entropy problems concerning graphs whose Laplacians are g-circulant matrices, i.e., circulant matrices with g-periodic diagonals, or quasi-Toeplitz matrices. Quasi means that in a Toeplitz matrix the first two elements in the main diagonal, and the last two, differ from the remaining diagonal entries by a perturbation.
Citation: Natália Bebiano, João da Providência, Wei-Ru Xu. Approximations for the von Neumann and Rényi entropies of graphs with circulant type Laplacians[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(5): 1864-1880. doi: 10.3934/era.2022094
[1] | Agustín Moreno Cañadas, Pedro Fernando Fernández Espinosa, José Gregorio Rodríguez-Nieto, Odette M Mendez, Ricardo Hugo Arteaga-Bastidas . Extended Brauer analysis of some Dynkin and Euclidean diagrams. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(10): 5752-5782. doi: 10.3934/era.2024266 |
[2] | Ping Yang, Xingyong Zhang . Existence of nontrivial solutions for a poly-Laplacian system involving concave-convex nonlinearities on locally finite graphs. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7473-7495. doi: 10.3934/era.2023377 |
[3] | Bidi Younes, Abderrahmane Beniani, Khaled Zennir, Zayd Hajjej, Hongwei Zhang . Global solution for wave equation involving the fractional Laplacian with logarithmic nonlinearity. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5268-5286. doi: 10.3934/era.2024243 |
[4] | Mingqi Xiang, Binlin Zhang, Die Hu . Kirchhoff-type differential inclusion problems involving the fractional Laplacian and strong damping. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(2): 651-669. doi: 10.3934/era.2020034 |
[5] | Hanan H. Sakr, Mohamed S. Mohamed . On residual cumulative generalized exponential entropy and its application in human health. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1633-1666. doi: 10.3934/era.2025077 |
[6] | Tao Zhang, Tingzhi Cheng . A priori estimates of solutions to nonlinear fractional Laplacian equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 1119-1133. doi: 10.3934/era.2023056 |
[7] | Xiuhai Fei, Haifang Zhang . Additivity of nonlinear higher anti-derivable mappings on generalized matrix algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6898-6912. doi: 10.3934/era.2023349 |
[8] |
Jiayi Han, Changchun Liu .
Global existence for a two-species chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with |
[9] | Qing-Hu Hou, Yarong Wei . Telescoping method, summation formulas, and inversion pairs. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2657-2671. doi: 10.3934/era.2021007 |
[10] | Wen Huang, Leiye Xu, Shengnan Xu . Ergodic measures of intermediate entropy for affine transformations of nilmanifolds. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2819-2827. doi: 10.3934/era.2021015 |
In this note, we approximate the von Neumann and Rényi entropies of high-dimensional graphs using the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula. The obtained estimations have a considerable degree of accuracy. The performed experiments suggest some entropy problems concerning graphs whose Laplacians are g-circulant matrices, i.e., circulant matrices with g-periodic diagonals, or quasi-Toeplitz matrices. Quasi means that in a Toeplitz matrix the first two elements in the main diagonal, and the last two, differ from the remaining diagonal entries by a perturbation.
The notion of entropy is due to Rudolf Clausius (1850), and is linked with Carnot's famous theorem on the efficiency of thermal machines. This concept has many applications in different research areas, such as statistical mechanics, computation science, information theory, etc. The concept of graph entropy was introduced in information theory and is of special interest for understanding graph structure (see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] and references therein).
Let G be an undirected graph with n vertices and at least one edge. The degree di of a vertex i is the number of edges incident on i. Let L(G) be the Laplacian matrix of G, that is, L(G)=D(G)−A(G), where D(G) is the diagonal matrix whose (i,i)-th entry is di and A(G) is the (0, 1) adjacency matrix of G [9], i.e., aij is 1 if i,j are adjacent, and 0 otherwise. Since L(G) is symmetric, its eigenvalues are real and as each row (and column) sum is 0, L(G) is singular. Normalizing this matrix by its trace, we get the density matrix of G,
ρL(G)=1TrL(G)L(G), |
which is Hermitian with unit trace. By Gershgorin Theorem, all eigenvalues of ρL(G) are nonnegative [10], so G can be seen as a quantum state. The eigenvalues of ρL(G) constitute the spectrum of the graph G. In view of the above, it seems natural to investigate the information content of the graph as a quantum state [11].
For A and B positive semidefinite matrices such that TrA=1, we consider the following matrix functions
S(A)=−Tr(AlogA), | (1.1) |
S(A,B)=TrA(logA−logB), | (1.2) |
Hα(A)=logTrAα1−α,α∈(0,1)∪(1,∞), | (1.3) |
Hα(A,B)=logTrAαB1−αα−1,α∈(0,1)∪(1,∞). | (1.4) |
The functions S(A), S(A,B), Hα(A) and Hα(A,B) are, respectively, the von Neumann entropy of A, the von Neumann relative entropy of A,B, the α-Rényi entropy of A and the α-Rényi relative entropy of A,B.
According to the fundamental inequality of statistical thermodynamics [12]
S(A,B)≥logTrB,Hα(A,B)≥logTrB. |
For TrB=1, we have S(A,B)≥0, and Hα(A,B)≥0, with equality if A=B. So, S(A,B) and Hα(A,B) may be conveniently used to measure the distance between the density matrices A and B. Obviously, limα→1Hα(A)=S(A) and limα→1Hα(A,B)=S(A,B).
Let G be a graph with at least one edge and let ρ1,…,ρn be the eigenvalues of ρL(G). We use the natural logarithm in the definitions of entropy and we make the convention that 0log0=0. The von Neumann entropy of the graph G, denoted SL(G), is the von Neumann entropy of ρL(G). From (1.1),
SL(G):=S(ρL(G))=−n∑i=1ρilogρi, | (1.5) |
because ρL(G) is unitarily diagonalizable and the logarithm is unitarily invariant. In terms of the eigenvalues λ1,…,λn of the Laplacian L(G), the von Neumann entropy of G is expressed as
SL(G)=logn∑k=1λk−(n∑k=1λk)−1n∑k=1λklogλk. | (1.6) |
The α-Rényi entropy of the graph G [13], denoted Hα(G), is the α-Rényi entropy of ρL(G). For α∈(0,1)∪(1,∞) fixed, from (1.3) we have
Hα(G):=Hα(ρL(G))=11−αlogn∑i=1ραi. | (1.7) |
In terms of the eigenvalues λ1,…,λn of the Laplacian L(G), the α-Rényi entropy of G is expressed as
Hα(G)=11−α(logn∑k=1λαk−αlogn∑k=1λk). | (1.8) |
For a fixed graph G, the α-Rényi entropy Hα(G) is a monotonically decreasing function of α [2]:
Hα(G)≤Hα′(G)forα>α′. |
The complete graph Kn is the one with the highest possible entropy. Indeed, if the density matrix ρ is singular, its highest possible entropy is log(n−1) and that is the entropy of the graph Kn. In terms of the eigenvalues λk and λ′k, respectively of the Laplacian L(G) and of the Laplacian L(Kn), the relative entropy of G and Kn is given by
S(G,Kn):=S(ρL(G),ρL(Kn))=(n∑j=1λj)−1n∑j=1λj(logλj−logλ′j)−logn∑j=1λj+logn∑j=1λ′j, | (1.9) |
where λj and λ′j are similarly, increasingly or decreasingly, ordered. Under these assumptions, the α-relative Rényi entropy of G and Kn is
Hα(G,Kn):=Hα(ρL(G),ρL(Kn))=1α−1(log(n∑k=1λαkλ′1−αk)−αlogn∑k=1λk−(1−α)logn∑k=1λ′k). | (1.10) |
In recent years, many approaches to increase the understanding of graphical models have been developed, using entropic quantities associated to the graphs constructs (vertices, edges, etc), see e.g., Simmons et al. [6,7] and references therein. The von Neumann entropy of graphs plays a major role in this program, namely by considering the von Neumann Theil index and its generalization by the Rényi entropy. In this note, using the Euler-Maclaurin formula we approximate the von Neumann and Rényi entropies of graphs of high dimensions whose Laplacians are g-circulant matrices, that is, circulant matrices where each row is a right cyclic shift in g-places to the preceding row. In the six cases we have studied, we observe that the relative entropy of G and Kn does not depend on n, for n sufficiently large. We have approximated the distance of the graph G to the graph Kn because Kn is the graph with n vertices with the highest entropy. From our investigations, the following problems arise.
Problem 1. Does the above mentioned observation hold for a general graph with a g-circulant Laplacian?
Problem 2. According to our experiments, we conclude that, for a fixed number of vertices, when the average number ofincident edges on each vertex increases, the von Neumann and the α-Rényi entropies increase. Does this behaviour hold in general? When the number of vertices n is fixed, the average number of incident edges on each vertex is 2m/n, where m is the number of edges, and the Problem may be rephrased in terms of the edges.
Problem 3. Does the question formulated in Problem 1 have a positive answer for a graph G whose Laplacian is the quasi g-Toeplitz matrix (see Case 6 below), obtained by cutting appropriate edges in a graph G with a g-circulant Laplacian? By a g-Toeplitz matrix we mean a matrix obtained from a g-circulant one by replacing its entries in the upper right and lower left corners by zeros.
Throughout the article the following form of the Euler-Maclaurin (E-M) formula will be used. For a proof, see, e.g., [14,15,16,17].
Lemma 1. Let n be a positive integer and let f be a continuous real functionin [0,1] of class C3(0,1), i.e. with continuous derivaties until order 3. Then
n∑k=1f(kn)=n∫10f(x)dx+12(f(1)−f(0))+112n(f′(1)−f′(0))+Rn, | (2.1) |
with
Rn=16n2∫10B3({nx})f‴(x)dx, | (2.2) |
B3(x)=x3−3x2/2+x/2 the third Bernoulli polynomialand {x} the fractional part of x.
Case 1
The Laplacian matrix of the cycle (or circuit) Cn is the n×n circulant matrix
L(Cn)=[2−10…−1−12−1…00−12…0⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮−100…2], |
whose eigenvalues are
λk=2−2cos(2πk/n),k=1,2,…n. |
Therefore, the eigenvalues of ρL(Cn) are ρk=λk/(2n).
Consider f(x):=(2−2cos(2πx))log(2−2cos(2πx)). By the Euler-Maclaurin formula and having in mind (1.6), we find
S(Cn)=log(2n)−12(2+Rnn)=logn−0.306853+…. |
because the command Integrate of Mathematica yields
∫10(2−2cos(2πx))log(2−2cos(2πx))dx=2. |
We compute an upper bound for |Rn|/n. For f(x)=(2−2cos(2πx))log(2−2cos(2πx)) in (2.2) and using the command NIntegrate of Mathematica, we find
∫10|f‴(x)|dx=24935.8, |
so that
|Rn|n≤16n3×0.0481125×∫10|f‴(x)|dx=16n3×0.0481125×24935.8=199.954n3. |
From (1.9), we obtain the relative entropy of Cn and Kn,
S(Cn,Kn)=−log(2n)+1+log(n−1)+…=−log2+1+…=0.306853+…. |
As S(Kn)=log(n−1), we have
limn→∞S(Cn,Kn)=limn→∞(S(Cn)−S(Kn)). |
We study the asymptotic behavior of the 1/2-Rényi entropy of Cn for large n. We use (1.8), and we introduce the function of the real variable k/n, f(k/n):=λk=2−2cos(2πk/n), with n a positive integer. In the spirit of the Euler-Maclaurin formula, we replace the sum
n∑k=1λ1/2k, |
by the integral
∫n0f(k/n)1/2dk=n∫10f(x)1/2dx=n∫10(2−2cos(2πx))1/2dx=4nπ, |
which has been evaluated using the command Integrate of Mathematica. Obviously, ∑nk=1λk=2n. So, we have for the 1/2-Rényi entropy,
H1/2(Cn)=2(logn∑k=1(2−2cos(2πk/n))1/2−12log(2n))=2(log(n(4π+Rnn))−12log(2n))=logn−0.210018+…. |
We compute an upper bound for |Rn|/n. Using the command NIntegrate of Mathematica we find
∫10|f‴(x)|dx=24935.8, |
so that by (2.2)
|Rn|n≤16n4×0.0481125×∫10|f‴(x)|dx=16n4×0.0481125×24935.8=199.954n4. |
For the 1/2-Rényi relative entropy of Cn and Kn, using (1.10), we obtain
H1/2(Cn,Kn)=−2log(4nπ√n+…)+log2n+logn(n−1)=−2log(4π)+log2+…≈0.210018. |
The asymptotic behavior of the 2-Rényi entropy of Cn for large n follows in a similar way, using the Euler-Maclaurin formula. Indeed, we replace the sum
n∑k=1λ2k, |
by the integral
∫n0(k/n)2dk=n∫10f2(x)dx=n∫10(2−2cos(2πx))2dx=6n, |
and by (1.8), we get
H2(Cn)=−(logn∑k=1(2−2cos(2πk/n))2−2log(2n))≈logn−0.405465. |
Case 2
Next we consider the graph with n vertices of the type represented in Figure 1. Its Laplacian, in the general case of n vertices, is the circulant matrix
An=[4−1−100…0−1−1−14−1−10…00−1−1−14−1−1…0000−1−14−1…00000−1−14…000⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮⋮−10000…−14−1−1−1000…−1−14]∈Rn×n, |
whose eigenvalues are
λk=4−2cos2πk/n−2cos4πk/n, | (2.3) |
with k=1,…,n. The eigenvalues of the density matrix are ρi=λi/(4n). Using the command NIntegrate of Mathematica, we find
κ:=∫10(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))log(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))dx=6.23166. |
Using the Euler-Maclaurin formula, the von Neumann entropy of An is computed as
S(An)=log(4n)−14(κ+Rnn)=log4n−1.55792+…≈logn−0.171621. | (2.4) |
An upper bound to |Rn|/n is now estimated. Using the Command NIntegrate of Mathematica we find
∫|f‴(x)|dx=126619, |
so that
|Rn|n≤302.593n3. |
Notice that, for f(x)=(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))log(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx)), we have
f(0)−f(1)=f′(0)−f′(1)=0. |
In an analogous way, we also find
S(An,Kn)=0.171621+…. |
Since S(Kn)=log(n−1) and as the command NIntegrate of Mathematica yields
∫10(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))1/2dx=1.88305, |
we have
limn→∞S(An,Kn)=limn→∞(S(An)−S(Kn)). |
In order to approximate the 1/2-Renyi entropy an analogous procedure holds. By (1.8) and as the command NIntegrate of Mathematica yields
∫10(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))1/2dx=1.88305, |
we obtain
H1/2(An)=logn+2(log(1.88305+Rnn)−12log4). |
An upper bound to |Rn|/n is estimated noticing that for f(x)=(4−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))1/2, we have
f(0)−f(1)=f′(0)−f′(1)=0. |
Thus
H1/2(An)≈logn−0.12051. |
From (1.10), we get
H1/2(An,Kn)≈0.12051. |
Case 3
The Laplacian of the graph with n vertices of the type represented in Figure 2 is
Bn=[6−1−1−100…−1−1−1−16−1−1−10…0−1−1−1−16−1−1−1…00−1−1−1−16−1−1…0000−1−1−16−1…000⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮⋮−1−10000…−16−1−1−1−1000…−1−16]∈Rn×n. |
Its eigenvalues are
λk=6−2cos(2πk/n)−2cos(4πk/n)−2cos(6πk/n), |
and the eigenvalues of the density matrix are ρi=λi/(6n).
Using the Euler-Maclaurin formula, the von Neumann entropy is computed as
S(Bn)=−n∑k=1ρilogρi=log(6n)−16κ+…. |
As by the command NIntegrate of Mathematica, we obtain
κ:=∫10((6−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx)−2cos(6πx))×log(6−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx))−2cos(6πx))dx=11.4670, |
we get
S(Bn)≈logn−0.119406. |
For the relative entropy, by (1.9), we obtain,
S(Bn,Kn)≈0.119406. |
Using the Euler-MacLaurin formula, for ρ(k)=ρk=λk/∑nj=1λj and f(n/k)=λk, we have
Hα(Bn)=11−α(log(n∫10fα(x)dx)−αlogn∑k=1λk+…)=11−α((1−α)logn+log∫10fα(x)dx−αlog6+…). |
Having in mind that
κ′:=∫10(6−2cos(2πx)−2cos(4πx)−2cos(6πx))1/2dx=2.34793, |
we get
H1/2(Bn)≈logn+2logκ′−log6=logn−0.0846939. |
Case 4
The Laplacian of the graph with n vertices of the type represented in Figure 3 is the 2-circulant matrix
Dn=[4−1−100…0−1−1−12−100…000−1−14−1−1…00000−12−1…00000−1−14…000⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮⋮−10000…−14−1−10000…0−12]∈Rn×n. |
In order to determine the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Dn we consider a vector of the form w=(xeiθk,yeiθk,…,xeimθk,yeimθk)T, θk=2πk/m, k=1,…,m, and the secular equation
Dnw=λw, |
which yields
S(x,y)T=λ(x,y)T, |
where
S=[4−2cosθk−1−e−iθk−1−eiθk2],θk=2πkm,n=2m,k=1,…,m, |
The matrix S is called the symbol associated to Dn, and its eigenvalues are
λ(1,2)k=3−cosθk±√7+cos2θk√2. |
Defining
κ1=∫10(3−cos2πx−√7+cos4πx2)log(3−cos2πx−√7+cos4πx2)dx, |
κ2=∫10(3−cos2πx+√7+cos4πx2)log(3−cos2πx+√7+cos4πx2)dx, |
we obtain, using the command NIntegrate of Mathematica,
κ1=0.429296, |
κ2=7.75746, |
and so
S(ρ(Dn))=logn−0.265847+…. |
For
κ′1:=∫10(3−cos2πx+√7+cos4πx2)1/2dx, |
κ′2:=∫10(3−cos2πx−√7+cos4πx2)1/2dx, |
we find, using the command NIntegrate of Mathematica,
κ′1=2.20059, |
κ′2=0.973707, |
and, using (1.8), we get
H1/2(Dn)≈logn−0.174734, |
and
H2(Dn)≈logn−0.367725. |
Case 5
The Laplacian of the graph with n vertices of the type represented in Figure 4, is the 3-circulant matrix
Fn=[4−1−1000…−1−1−13−1−100…00−1−13−100…000−1−14−1−1…00000−13−1…00000−1−13…00⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮−100000…3−1−100000…−13]∈Rn×n. |
The symbol associated to Fn is
S=[4−1−e−iθk−1−e−iθk−1−eiθk3−1−1−eiθk−13],θk=2πkm,n=3m,k=1,…,m, |
and its spectrum is
σ(S)={4,3−√4cosθk+5,3+√4cosθk+5}. |
With the command NIntegrate of Mathematica, we find
κ1:=∫104log4dx=5.54518,κ2:=∫10(3−√4cosθk+5)log(3−√4cosθk+5)dx=0.19892,κ3:=∫10(3+√4cosθk+5)log(3+√4cosθk+5)dx=8.42759. |
By (1.6), we get
S(Fn)=log10n3−110(κ1+κ2+κ3)+…=logn−0.213196+…. |
Using the command NIntegrate of Mathematica, we find
κ′1:=∫10√4dx=2κ′2:=∫10(3−√4cosθk+5)1/2dx=0.973707,κ′3:=∫10(3+√4cosθk+5)1/2dx=2.20059. |
Thus, by (1.8)
Hα(Fn)=logn3+2log(κ′1+κ′2+κ′3)−log10+…≈logn−0.148615. |
Case 6
Up to now we have considered graphs with g-circulant Laplacians. Next, we evaluate the entropy of the graph of the type of the one in Figure 5, which is obtained by deleting in Figure 1 appropriate edges. Its Laplacian is the matrix
A′n=[2−1−10…000−13−1−1…000−1−14−1…0000−1−14…000⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮⋮0000…−13−10000…−1−12]∈Rn×n. |
Let
A′n=An+Δn, |
where
Δn=−[2000…0−1−10100…00−10000…000⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮⋮0000…000−1000…010−1−100…002]∈Rn×n, |
and let A′n(η)=An+ηΔn. In the end we take η=1. Regarding Δn as a perturbation of An, the eigenvalues of A′n are easily obtained using perturbation theory. The eigenvalues of An are given by (2.3) and the respective eigenvectors are
uk=1√n(eikθ1,…,eikθn)T,θj=2πjn,j=1,…,n. |
We have, for the eigenvalues λk(η) of A′n(η),
λk(η)=λk(0)+ηλ′k(0)+O(η2). |
See e.g., [18]. Then,
δλk=λ′k(0)=u∗kΔnuk=1n(6−4coskθn−2−2coskθn−1). |
Theorem 2.1. Under the above notations, we have
1)limn→∞(S(A′n)−S(An))=0,2)limn→∞(S(A′n,Kn)−S(An,Kn))=0,3)limn→∞(Hα(A′n)−Hα(An))=0,4)limn→∞(Hα(A′n,Kn)−Hα(An,Kn))=0. |
Proof. To approximate the entropy of A′n we need the sum
n∑j=1(λk+δλk)log(λk+δλk)=n∑j=1(λk+δλk)log(λk(1+δλk/λk))=n∑j=1(λk+δλk)(logλk+δλkλk+…)=n∑j=1λklogλk+n∑j=1δλk(1+logλk)+…, |
where we have neglected terms of higher order than the first, in the correction. We are therefore led, by the Euler-Maclaurin formula, to consider the integral
∫10(6−4cos4πxn−2cos2πxn)(1+log(4−2cos2πx−2cos4πx))dx. |
For n large, we may replace this integral by
72n2∫10x2(1+log(4−2cos2πx−2cos4πx))dx, |
which is easily evaluated using Mathematica. If n is sufficiently large, the magnitude of the perturbation will be small enough in comparison with the magnitude of An and first order perturbation theory is valid. An approximation for S(A′n) will now be obtained:
S(A′n)=log(n∑k=1(λk+δλk))−(n∑k=1(λk+δλk))−1n∑k=1(λk+δλk)log(λk+δλk)=log(4n−6)−14n−6(n∑k=1λklogλk+n∑k=1δλk(1+logλk)+⋯)=log(n−32)+2log2−nκ4n−6−36n(2n−3)∫10x2(1+log(4−2cos2πx−2cos4πx))dx+⋯=logn+log(1−32n)+2log2−κ4⋅11−32n−36n(2n−3)∫10x2(1+log(4−2cos2πx−2cos4πx))dx+⋯=logn−32n+⋯+2log2−κ4(1+32n+⋯)−36n(2n−3)∫10x2(1+log(4−2cos2πx−2cos4πx))dx+⋯=S(An)−32n−38nκ−36n(2n−3)∫10x2(1+log(4−2cos2πx−2cos4πx))dx+⋯=logn−0.171621−3.83687n−10.5986n2+…. |
Hence, 1) follows. The remaining assertions are similarly shown.
The obtained results for the first five cases previously considered, are summarized in Table 1. They lead to the conclusion that the relative entropy of the different graphs with respect to the complete graph Kn does not depend on n for sufficiently high n, and that the distance between the graphs G and Kn slightly decreases when the average number of incident edges on each vertex of G increases. We compute H2(G), the 2-Rényi entropy of G, by Eq (2) in [2], and then get the values of log2n−H2(G). Compared with H2(G,Kn), the 2-relative Rényi entropy of G and Kn, our estimation method is better.
G | S(G,Kn) | H1/2(G,Kn) | H2(G,Kn) | log2n−H2(G) | #dav |
Cn | 0.306853 | 0.210018 | 0.405465 | 0.584963 | 2 |
An | 0.171621 | 0.120510 | 0.223144 | 0.321928 | 4 |
Bn | 0.119406 | 0.0846939 | 0.154151 | 0.251062 | 6 |
Dn | 0.265847 | 0.174734 | 0.367725 | 0.530515 | 3 |
Fn | 0.213196 | 0.148615 | 0.277632 | 0.400538 | 10/3 |
We have verified that S(G,Kn) does not depend on n if n is large, and we have determined the limn→∞S(G,Kn), for several cyclic graphs G. We have seen that, asymptotically, S(G,Kn) behaves like S(Kn)−S(G). The following question naturally arises. Does S(Cn,K1,n−1), where K1,n−1 is the star graph, behave asymptotically like S(K1,n−1)−S(Cn)? Let us compute S(Cn,K1,n−1) using (1.6). The eigenvalues of L(Cn) are λk=2−2cos2πk/n, k=1,…,n, so, the highest eigenvalue of L(Cn) is 2. The eigenvalues λ′k of L(K1,n−1) are 0, 1, with multiplicity n−2 and n. We find
S(Cn,K1,n−1)=12n(n∑k=1λklogλk−2log2+2(log2−logn))−log2n+log2(n−1)=1−lognn+log(1−2/n)+…, |
and so
limn→∞S(Cn,K1,n−1)=1. |
On the other hand
S(K1,n−1)=−12(n−1)nlogn+log2(n−1), |
and so
limn→∞S(K1,n−1)logn=12, |
while
limn→∞S(Kn)logn=limn→∞S(Cn)logn=1. |
The answer to the above question is negative.
The first author was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal, under the Project UID/FIS/04564/2019, and by the Centre for Mathematics of the University of Coimbra, under the Project UID/MAT/00324/2013, funded by the Portuguese Government through FCT/MEC and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Partnership Agreement PT2020. The third author was supported by joint research project of Laurent Mathematics Center of Sichuan Normal University and National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of System Credibility Automatic Verification (No. ZD20220106).
The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
N. Bebiano, S. Furtado, J. da Providência, W. R. Xu, J. P. da Providência, Approximations for the von Neumann and Renyi entropies of graphs using the Euler-Maclaurin formula, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 48 (2018), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1553/etna_vol48s227 doi: 10.1553/etna_vol48s227
![]() |
[2] |
M. Dairyko, L. Hogben, J. C. H. Lin, J. Lockhart, D. Roberson, S. Severini, et al., Note on von Neumann and Rényi entropies of a graph, Linear Algebra Appl., 521 (2017), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2017.01.037 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2017.01.037
![]() |
[3] | V. Giovannetti, S. Severini, The Kirchhoff's matrix tree theorem revisited: counting spanning trees with the quantum relative entropy, preprint, arXiv: 1102.2398. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1102.2398 |
[4] |
H. Lin, B. Zhou, On the von Neumann entropy of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math., 247 (2018), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2018.04.004
![]() |
[5] |
G. Minello, L. Rossi, A. Torsello, On the von Neumann entropy of graphs, J. Complex Networks, 7 (2019), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cny028 doi: 10.1093/comnet/cny028
![]() |
[6] |
D. E. Simmons, J. P. Coon, A. Datta, Symmetric Laplacians, quantum density matrices and their von Neumann entropy, Linear Algebra Appl., 521 (2017), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2017.06.038 doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2017.06.038
![]() |
[7] |
D. E. Simmons, J. P. Coon, A. Datta, The von Neumann Theil index: characterizing graph centralization using the von Neumann index, J. Complex Networks, 6 (2018), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnx061 doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnx061
![]() |
[8] |
C. Ye, R. C. Wilson, C. H. Comin, L. F. Costa, E. R. Hancock, Approximate von Neumann entropy for direct graphs, Phys. Rev. E, 89 (2014), 052804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052804 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052804
![]() |
[9] |
R. Grone, R. Merris, V. S. Sunder, The Laplacian spectrum of a graph, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 11 (1990), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.1137/0611016 doi: 10.1137/0611016
![]() |
[10] | R. A. Horn, C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. |
[11] | J. V. Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Number 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1955. |
[12] | L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Pergamon Press, Oxford-Edinburgh-New York, 1969. |
[13] | A. Rényi, On measures of entropy and information, in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, 4 (1961), 547–562. |
[14] |
T. M. Apostol, An elementary view of Euler's summation formula, Amer. Math. Monthly, 106 (1999), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1999.12005063 doi: 10.1080/00029890.1999.12005063
![]() |
[15] |
V. Lampret, The Euler–Maclaurin and Taylor formulas: twin, elementary derivations, Math. Mag., 74 (2001), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.2001.11953046 doi: 10.1080/0025570X.2001.11953046
![]() |
[16] | V. Lampret, The Euler-Maclaurin Formula and Sums of Powers Revisited, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 5 (2010), 2401–2407. |
[17] |
M. Z. Spivey, The Euler-Maclaurin formula and sums of powers, Math. Mag., 79 (2006), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.2006.11953378 doi: 10.1080/0025570X.2006.11953378
![]() |
[18] |
A. Greenbaum, R. C. Li, M. L. Overton, First-order perturbation theory for eigenvalues and eigenvectors, SIAM Rev., 62 (2020), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1137/19M124784X doi: 10.1137/19M124784X
![]() |
G | S(G,Kn) | H1/2(G,Kn) | H2(G,Kn) | log2n−H2(G) | #dav |
Cn | 0.306853 | 0.210018 | 0.405465 | 0.584963 | 2 |
An | 0.171621 | 0.120510 | 0.223144 | 0.321928 | 4 |
Bn | 0.119406 | 0.0846939 | 0.154151 | 0.251062 | 6 |
Dn | 0.265847 | 0.174734 | 0.367725 | 0.530515 | 3 |
Fn | 0.213196 | 0.148615 | 0.277632 | 0.400538 | 10/3 |