Research article Special Issues

Time optimal problems on Lie groups and applications to quantum control

  • Received: 15 November 2023 Revised: 21 February 2024 Accepted: 26 March 2024 Published: 08 May 2024
  • Primary 53C17, 53C22, 53B21, 53C25, 30C80, 26D05; Secondary 49J15, 58E40

  • In this paper we introduce a natural compactification of a left (right) invariant affine control system on a semi-simple Lie group $ G $ in which the control functions belong to the Lie algebra of a compact Lie subgroup $ K $ of $ G $ and we investigate conditions under which the time optimal solutions of this compactified system are "approximately" time optimal for the original system. The basic ideas go back to the papers of R.W. Brockett and his collaborators in their studies of time optimal transfer in quantum control ([1], [2]). We showed that every affine system can be decomposed into two natural systems that we call horizontal and vertical. The horizontal system admits a convex extension whose reachable sets are compact and hence posess time-optimal solutions. We then obtained an explicit formula for the time-optimal solutions of this convexified system defined by the symmetric Riemannian pair $ (G, K) $ under the assumption that the Lie algebra generated by the control vector fields is equal to the Lie algebra of $ K $.

    In the second part of the paper we applied our results to the quantum systems known as Icing $ n $-chains (introduced in [2]). We showed that the two-spin chains conform to the theory in the first part of the paper but that the three-spin chains show new phenomena that take it outside of the above theory. In particular, we showed that the solutions for the symmetric three-spin chains studied by ([3], [4]) are solvable in terms of elliptic functions with the solutions completely different from the ones encountered in the two-spin chains.

    Citation: Velimir Jurdjevic. Time optimal problems on Lie groups and applications to quantum control[J]. Communications in Analysis and Mechanics, 2024, 16(2): 345-387. doi: 10.3934/cam.2024017

    Related Papers:

  • In this paper we introduce a natural compactification of a left (right) invariant affine control system on a semi-simple Lie group $ G $ in which the control functions belong to the Lie algebra of a compact Lie subgroup $ K $ of $ G $ and we investigate conditions under which the time optimal solutions of this compactified system are "approximately" time optimal for the original system. The basic ideas go back to the papers of R.W. Brockett and his collaborators in their studies of time optimal transfer in quantum control ([1], [2]). We showed that every affine system can be decomposed into two natural systems that we call horizontal and vertical. The horizontal system admits a convex extension whose reachable sets are compact and hence posess time-optimal solutions. We then obtained an explicit formula for the time-optimal solutions of this convexified system defined by the symmetric Riemannian pair $ (G, K) $ under the assumption that the Lie algebra generated by the control vector fields is equal to the Lie algebra of $ K $.

    In the second part of the paper we applied our results to the quantum systems known as Icing $ n $-chains (introduced in [2]). We showed that the two-spin chains conform to the theory in the first part of the paper but that the three-spin chains show new phenomena that take it outside of the above theory. In particular, we showed that the solutions for the symmetric three-spin chains studied by ([3], [4]) are solvable in terms of elliptic functions with the solutions completely different from the ones encountered in the two-spin chains.



    加载中


    [1] R. Brockett, S. J. Glaser, N. Khaneja, Time optimal control in spin systems, Phys. Rev. A, 63 (2001), 032308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032308 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032308
    [2] N. Khaneja, S. J. Glazer, R. Brockett, Sub-Riemannian geometry and time optimal control of three spin systems: quantum gates and coherence transfer, Phys. Rev. A, 65 (2002), 032301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032301 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032301
    [3] H. Yuan, Geometry, Optimal Control and Quantum Computing, Ph.D thesis, Harvard, 2006.
    [4] B. Bonnard, T. Combot, L. Jassionnesse, Integrability methods in the time minimal coherence transfer for Ising chains of three spins, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 35 (2015), 4095–4114. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4095 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4095
    [5] P. Eberlein, Geometry of nonpositively curved manifolds. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996.
    [6] S. Helgason, Differential Geometry, Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces, Academic Press, New York, 1978.
    [7] V. Jurdjevic, Optimal Control and Geometry: Integrable systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, (2016), Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286852
    [8] A. Agrachev, T. Chambrion, An estimation of the controllability time for single input time on compact Lie groups, ESAIM: Control, Optimization and Calculus of Variations, 12 (2006), 409–441. https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2006007 doi: 10.1051/cocv:2006007
    [9] J. P. Gauthier, F. Rossi, A universal gap for non-spin quantum control systems, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 149 (2021), 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15301 doi: 10.1090/proc/15301
    [10] F. Albertini, D. D'Alessandro, B. Sheller, Sub-Riemannian geodesics in $SU(n)/S(U(n-1)\times U(1))$ and Optimal Control of Three Level Quantum Systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 65 (2020), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2019.2950559 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2950559
    [11] V. Jurdjevic, Geometric Control Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, New York, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511530036
    [12] A. A. Kirillov, Lectures on the orbit method., Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/064
    [13] R. Montgomery Isoholonomic Problems and Some Applications, Commun. Math. Phys, 128 (1990), 565–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096874
    [14] V. Jurdjevic, H. J. Sussmann, Control systems on Lie groups, Jour. Diff. Equations, 12 (1972), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(72)90035-6 doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(72)90035-6
    [15] F. Wellstood, Notes about Bloch sphere, Lecture notes, 2016, University of Maryland.
    [16] N. Khaneja, S. J. Glaser, Efficient transfer of coherence through Ising spin chains, Phys. Rev. A, 66 (2002), 060301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.060301 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.060301
    [17] H. Yuan, S. J. Glaser, N. Khaneja, Geodesics for efficient creation and propagation of order along Ising spin chains, Phys. Rev. A, 76 (2007), 012316. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012316 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012316
    [18] U. Boscain, T. Chambrion, J. P. Gauthier, On the K+P problem for a three-level quantum system: optimality implies resonance, J. Dynam. Control Systems, 8 (2002), 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020767419671 doi: 10.1023/A:1020767419671
    [19] H. Yuan, R. Zeier, N. Khaneja, Elliptic functions and efficient control of Ising spin chains with unequal couplings, Phys. Rev. A, 77 (2008), 032340. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032340 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032340
    [20] R. Appell, E. Lacour Principes de la théorie des fonctions elliptiques, Gauthier Villars (1922).
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(707) PDF downloads(81) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog