
Citation: Weiwei Sun, Mengyang Qiu, Xinyu Lv. H∞ filter design for a class of delayed Hamiltonian systems with fading channel and sensor saturation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2909-2922. doi: 10.3934/math.2020188
[1] | Chen Wang, Jun Hu, Hui Yu, Dongyan Chen . Optimized distributed fusion filtering for singular systems with fading measurements and stochastic nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2543-2567. doi: 10.3934/math.2022143 |
[2] | Yakufu Kasimu, Gulijiamali Maimaitiaili . Non-fragile H∞ filter design for uncertain neutral Markovian jump systems with time-varying delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15559-15583. doi: 10.3934/math.2024752 |
[3] | Shutong Liu, Renming Yang . Adaptive predefined-time robust control for nonlinear time-delay systems with different power Hamiltonian functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28153-28175. doi: 10.3934/math.20231441 |
[4] | Danhua He, Baizeng Bao, Liguang Xu . Robust stability and boundedness of uncertain conformable fractional-order delay systems under input saturation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21123-21137. doi: 10.3934/math.20231076 |
[5] | Guijun Xing, Huatao Chen, Zahra S. Aghayan, Jingfei Jiang, Juan L. G. Guirao . Tracking control for a class of fractional order uncertain systems with time-delay based on composite nonlinear feedback control. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 13058-13076. doi: 10.3934/math.2024637 |
[6] | Yifan Liu, Guozeng Cui, Ze Li . Fixed-time consensus control of stochastic nonlinear multi-agent systems with input saturation using command-filtered backstepping. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14765-14785. doi: 10.3934/math.2024718 |
[7] | Yantong Mu, Huihong Zhao, Zhifang Li . White noise estimation for linear discrete fractional order system. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10009-10023. doi: 10.3934/math.2022558 |
[8] | Nasser. A. Saeed, Amal Ashour, Lei Hou, Jan Awrejcewicz, Faisal Z. Duraihem . Time-delayed control of a nonlinear self-excited structure driven by simultaneous primary and 1:1 internal resonance: analytical and numerical investigation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27627-27663. doi: 10.3934/math.20241342 |
[9] | Andrey Borisov . Filtering of hidden Markov renewal processes by continuous and counting observations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30073-30099. doi: 10.3934/math.20241453 |
[10] | Gaoran Wang, Weiwei Sun, Shuqing Wang . Stabilization of wind farm integrated transmission system with input delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9177-9193. doi: 10.3934/math.2021533 |
As a special class of nonlinear systems, port-Hamiltonian system has distinct structural feature and is easier to perform stability analysis than general nonlinear systems. The superiority of Hamiltonian systems is that Hamilton function in the system can be used as a candidate of Lyapunov function, and it can provide a more convenient way for system performance analysis. Many researches closely related to Hamiltonian systems can be found in recent years [1,2,3,4,5]. Some control synthesis problems based on Hamiltonian systems framework have been well studied [6,7,8]. Considering the inevitable time-delay phenomenon [9,10,11,12], some studies on the time-delay Hamiltonian system have also been investigated [13,14,15,16]. Besides, the issue of state estimation for Hamiltonian system has also received some attentions. For example, passivity-based approach is proposed in [17,18] in order to obtain full-order observer for Hamiltonian systems. Output feedback stabilization based on observer method is concerned in [19] for a class of delayed Hamiltonian systems with external disturbances.
As we all know, to study state estimation and filtering technology has important significance in control field, such as target tracking and signal processing. Up to now, plenty of results have been reported in the literature on the state estimation problem for linear or nonlinear systems [20,21,22,23,24]. Among these results, the Kalman filtering scheme is proposed in [20] for the case that the dynamic system and its external noise information are completely known. In [21], H∞ filtering was firstly introduced where the input signal is assumed to be energy limited. Compared to Kalman filter, H∞ filter does not require too much known prior statistics of external noises. Up to now, H∞ filter design has become a hot research topic in complex dynamic systems analysis, such as two-dimensional systems [22], time-delay systems [23], stochastic uncertain systems [24], delta operator systems [25], etc. However, the problem of H∞ filter design for continuous Hamiltonian systems has not been studied yet.
On the other hand, with the rapid development of wireless communication technology, networked control system is becoming increasingly popular due to its strong applicability in factory automation, vehicle automated driving and other fields [26,27,28]. In practical applications, limited channel capacity always bring incomplete measurements which appear as the networked induced phenomenon. Comparing to the plenty of existing results on missing measurements, the fading channel problem in the wireless network communication systems has not yet received adequate research attentions. The existing studies show that the main causes of fading channel are some special physical factors such as reflection, diffraction and scattering [29,30]. If the phenomenon of fading measurement can't be handled carefully, it will inevitably affect the stability of the systems. So far, some efforts on networked systems with fading channel have been made [31,32,33,34]. In these works, state estimator or H∞ filter has been designed, feedback stabilization has been solved for the systems with fading channels.
In the process of communication signal transmission in networked system, another phenomenon that occurs frequently due to the physical limitations of system components is called saturation. Such nonlinear characteristic of sensor saturation not only degrades system performance, but also causes instability of the system more severely. Even worse, this feature is almost impossible to eliminate. By now, much progress has been made on filter/estimator design for systems with sensor saturation [35,36,37]. In [35], the fault estimation problem for a class of uncertain time-varying stochastic systems with randomly occurring fault and sensor saturations is investigated. A performance index function is proposed in [36] to deal with actuator saturation under denial-of-service attacks by an iterative adaptive dynamic programming algorithm. Nevertheless, as for filter design of Hamiltonian system with sensor saturation, to the authors' best knowledge, there is seldom relevant research reported.
Considering the factors discussed above, we can conclude that H∞ filtering problems have achieved some preliminary results for linear and nonlinear systems. But when it comes to fading channel and sensor saturation for Hamiltonian systems, although it is important in control analysis, the H∞ filtering problems have not been fully studied. In this paper, we will focus on this problem and propose some new results. The main contributions in this paper lie in two aspects: (1) a measurement output model with fading channel and sensor saturation is proposed for Hamiltonian systems with wireless network communication; (2) the filter design problem is, for the first time, solved for time delay Hamiltonian system considering network induced phenomenon.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The considered class of Hamiltonian system is introduced and some preliminaries are presented in Section 2. In Section 3, the main results of this paper are presented, and H∞ filtering performance analysis of the augmented system is given. Furthermore, some sufficient conditions are given to obtain appropriate filter gain. Two simulation examples are given in Section 4 to illustrate the validity of the main results. Finally, we conclude this paper in Section 5.
Consider the following time varying delay Hamiltonian system
{˙x(t)=A∇H(x(t))+B∇H(x(t−d(t)))+Lv1(t)z(t)=M∇H(x(t)) | (2.1) |
where x(t)=[x1(t)⋯xn(t)]T∈Rn stands for the system state vector, z(t)=[z1(t)⋯zp(t)]T∈Rp represents the output to be estimated; v1(t)∈Rs represents the disturbance input and belongs to L2([0,∞),Rs); ∇H(x(t)) is the gradient of H(x(t)), ∇H(x):=∂H(x)/∂x; the Hamiltonian H(x(t)):Rn↦R is smooth which represents the total energy, H(x)≥0,H(0)=0; A∈Rn×n is the structure matrix of the Hamiltonian system with AT+A≤0; B, L and M are constant matrices with appropriate dimensions. d(t) denotes the time-varying delay, and satisfies the following assumptions:
0≤d(t)≤τ,˙d(t)≤μ<1, | (2.2) |
where τ and μ are scalars.
The fading channel and sensor saturation are considered in the measurement model in this paper. The actual measurement output is described as
y(t)=C(t)N∇H(x(t))+σ(E∇H(x(t)))+Dv2(t), | (2.3) |
where y(t)=[y1(t)⋯yq(t)]∈Rq is the actual measurement output; v2(t)∈Rq stands for the measurement noise and belongs to L2([0,∞),Rq); N, E and D are known real matrix with appropriate dimensions; N is a full rank matrix; C(t)=diag{α1(t),⋯,αq(t)}∈Rq×q denotes the memoryless multiplicative fading channel. αi(t) is independently and identically distributed for each channel, and its probability density function is distributed on the interval [0,1] with E{αi(t)}=ˉαi,Var{αi(t)}=σ2i, where ˉαi represents the mathematical expectation of αi(t) and σ2i is the variance of αi(t). Both ˉαi and σ2i are known constants.
Remark 1. In wireless network systems, signals are transmitted between the various sensors through the channels. These measurement signals experience stochastic fading or information losses during the transmissions. This random fading phenomenon is manifested in Eq 2.3, where the random variable αi(t) obeys any probability distribution over the interval [0,1]. The probability of the attenuation coefficient αi(t) can be estimated by statistical tests in practical applications. Moreover, in addition to the random fading phenomenon, data error or packet loss in some digital network systems can also be expressed by (2.3).
The saturation function σ(⋅) is defined as
σ(ϑ)=[σ(ϑ1)⋯σ(ϑq)]T,∀ϑ∈Rq |
where σ(ϑi)=sign(ϑi)min{1,|ϑi|} for each i=1,⋅⋅⋅,q. Here, the notation of "sign" denotes the signum function, ϑ is the saturation level. There exists scalar 0<bi<1 such that
[σ(ϑi)−biϑi][σ(ϑi)−ϑi]⩽0. | (2.4) |
For system (2.1), the filter is constructed as the following structure:
{˙ˆx(t)=A∇H(ˆx(t))+B∇H(ˆx(t−d(t)))+K[y(t)−ˉCN∇H(ˆx(t))]ˆz(t)=M∇H(ˆx(t)), | (2.5) |
where ˆx(t)∈Rn represents the estimate of the state, ˆz(t)∈Rp stands for the estimate of the output z(t), ˉC=diag{ˉα1,⋯,ˉαq}, and K is the filter gain to be determined.
Letting η(t)=[xT(t),ˆxT(t)]T, ˜z(t)=[zT(t),ˆzT(t)]T, we get the following augmented system:
{˙η(t)=A∗∇H(η(t))+B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))+K∗σ(EE1∇H(η(t)))+L∗v(t)˜z(t)=M∗∇H(η(t)), | (2.6) |
where
A∗=[A0KC(t)NA−KˉCN],B∗=[B00B],L∗=[L00KD], |
K∗=[0K],E1=[I0]T,M∗=[M00M]T,v(t)=[v1(t)v2(t)], |
∇H(η(t))=[∇TH(x(t))∇TH(ˆx(t))],∇H(η(t−d(t)))=[∇H(x(t−d(t)))∇H(ˆx(t−d(t)))]. |
According to (2.4), the saturation function σ(⋅) satisfies
[σ(E1E∇H(η(t)))−ΛE1E∇H(η(t))]T⋅[σ(E1E∇H(η(t)))−E1E∇H(η(t))]⩽0, | (2.7) |
where Λ=diag{b1,⋯,bq}.
We give the following assumption which will be used in the following proofs.
Assumption 1. The Hamilton function H(η(t)) and its gradient ∇H(η(t)) satisfies
1) ε1(‖η(t)‖)≤H(η(t))≤ε2(‖η(t)‖),
2) ι1(‖η(t)‖)≤∇TH(η(t))∇H(η(t))≤ι2(‖η(t)‖),
where ε1,ε2,ι1,ι2 are class-K functions.
Our objective of this paper is to design a filter (2.5) for the delayed Hamiltonian system with fading channel and sensor saturation. More specifically, we need to find out the filtering gain matrix K such that the augmented system (2.6) satisfies the following requirements simultaneously:
ⅰ) The augmented system (2.6) with v(t)=0 is asymptotically stable in the mean square;
ⅱ) For a given scalar γ>0, under the zero-initial condition, the system (2.6) with v(t)≠0 is L2 gain output stability, i.e.,
‖˜z(t)‖2≤γ‖v(t)‖2,∀v(t)≠0. | (2.8) |
In this section, let us investigate the filtering performance and filter design problems for system (2.6). Firstly, we shall propose the following filtering performance criterion for the delayed Hamiltonian systems (2.1) and (2.3) with fading channel and sensor saturation.
Theorem 1. Given scalar μ<1 and a time-varying delay d(t) satisfying (2.2), if there exist matrices Q=QT>0, Y=YT with proper dimensions and filtering gain K such that
Φ1=[Π1B∗−(Y/2)−YΠ2∗−(1−μ)QY/20∗∗Y0∗∗∗−I]<0 | (3.1) |
holds, then the augmented system (2.6) is mean-square asymptotically stable with v(t)=0, where
Π1=¯A∗+¯A∗T+Q+Y−ETET1ΛTE1E, |
Π2=(K∗T+K∗+ETET1ΛT+E1E)/2, |
and
¯A∗=[A0KˉCNA−KˉCN]. |
Proof: Choose a Lyapunov functional candidate as follows:
V(t)=2H(η(t))+∫tt−d(t)∇TH(η(θ))Q∇H(η(θ))dθ. | (3.2) |
Due to Assumption 1, we have
2ε1(‖η(t)‖)≤V(t)≤2ε2(‖η(t)‖)+τπι2(η(t)), |
where π=λmax(Q), λmax(⋅) (respectively, λmin(⋅)) means the largest (respectively, smallest) eigenvalue.
Thus, the derivative of V(t) along the trajectory of system (2.6) is given as
d(E[V(t)])dt=E[LV(t)]=E[2∇TH(η(t))˙η(t)+∇TH(η(t))Q∇H(η(t))−(1−˙d(t))∇TH(η(t−d(t)))Q∇H(η(t−d(t)))]=E[∇TH(η(t))(A∗+A∗T+Q)∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))+2∇TH(η(t))K∗σ(EE1∇H(η(t)))−(1−˙d(t))∇TH(η(t−d(t)))Q∇H(η(t−d(t)))]=∇TH(η(t))(¯A∗+¯A∗T+Q)∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))+2∇TH(η(t))K∗σ(EE1∇H(η(t)))−(1−˙d(t))∇TH(η(t−d(t)))Q∇H(η(t−d(t)))≤∇TH(η(t))(¯A∗+¯A∗T+Q)∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))+2∇TH(η(t))K∗σ(EE1∇H(η(t)))−(1−μ)∇TH(η(t−d(t)))Q∇H(η(t−d(t))), | (3.3) |
where the last inequality is based on (2.2).
It is easy to know that, for any symmetric matrix Y with proper dimensions, the following equation is true
[∇TH(η(t))−∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′ds]Y[∇H(η(t))−∇H(η(t−d(t)))−∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds]≡0, | (3.4) |
where [⋅]′ represents the derivative of the matrix in parentheses.
Furthermore, (3.3) can be rewritten as
d(E[V(t)])dt≤∇TH(η(t))(¯A∗+¯A∗T+Q+Y)∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))−∇TH(η(t))Y∇H(η(t−d(t)))+2∇TH(η(t))K∗σ(EE1∇H(η(t)))−2∇TH(η(t))Y∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds−(1−μ)∇TH(η(t−d(t)))⋅Q∇H(η(t−d(t)))+∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′dsY∇H(η(t−d(t)))+∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′dsY∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds. | (3.5) |
From (2.7), the above formula can be rewritten as the following formula
d(E[V(t)])dt≤∇TH(η(t))(¯A∗+¯A∗T+Q+Y)∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))−∇TH(η(t))Y∇H(η(t−d(t)))+2∇TH(η(t))K∗σ(EE1∇H(η(t)))−2∇TH(η(t))Y∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds−(1−μ)∇TH(η(t−d(t)))Q∇H(η(t−d(t)))+∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′dsY∇H(η(t−d(t)))+∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′dsY∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds−σT(E1E∇H(η(t)))σ(E1E∇H(η(t)))+∇TH(η(t))ETET1ΛTσ(E1E∇H(η(t)))+σT(E1E∇H(η(t)))E1E∇H(η(t))−∇TH(η(t))ETET1ΛTE1E∇H(η(t))=ξT1Φ1ξ1, | (3.6) |
where
ξ1=[∇H(η(t))∇H(η(t−d(t)))∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′dsσ(E1E∇H(η(t)))]. |
According to Assumption 1 and (3.1), we have
d(E[V(t)])dt≤ξT1Φ1ξ1≤−φ‖∇H(η(t))‖2≤−φι1(‖η(t)‖)<0, | (3.7) |
where φ=λmin(−Φ1).
By Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability theorem, we can conclude that the augmented system (2.6) is mean-square asymptotically stable with v(t)=0. The proof is completed.
Theorem 1 shows that the system is asymptotically stable in mean square without external disturbance. Next, we prove that the system satisfies L2 gain output stability in the presence of external disturbance.
Theorem 2. Given H∞ performance index γ>0 and a known scalar μ<1, the system (2.6) satisfies:
1) asymptotically stable in the mean square with v(t)=0;
2) for all v(t)≠0, under the zero-initial condition, the system (2.6) satisfies L2 gain output stability if there exist matrices Q=QT>0, Y=YT and filter gain K such that
Φ2=[ˉΠ1B∗−(Y/2)−YˉΠ2L∗∗−(1−μ)QY/200∗∗Y00∗∗∗−I0∗∗∗∗−γ2I]<0, | (3.8) |
where
ˉΠ1=A∗+A∗T+Q+Y−ETET1ΛTE1E+M∗TM∗,ˉΠ2=(K∗T+K∗+ETET1ΛT+E1E)/2. |
{Proof:} According to Theorem 1, the system (2.6) with v(t)=0 is mean-square asymptotically stable. Next we prove that for all v(t)≠0, under the zero initial condition, the system (2.6) satisfies L2 gain output stability.
Consider a Lyapunov functional candidate which is defined in (3.2). The derivative of V(t) along the trajectory of system (2.6) satisfies:
d(E[V(t)])dt≤∇TH(η(t))(¯A∗+¯A∗T+Q+Y−ET1ETΛTEE1)∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))B∗∇H(η(t−d(t)))−∇TH(η(t))Y∇H(η(t−d(t)))−2∇TH(η(t))Y∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds−(1−μ)∇TH(η(t−d(t)))Q∇H(η(t−d(t)))+∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′dsY∇H(η(t−d(t)))+∫tt−d(t)[∇TH(η(s))]′dsY∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′ds−σT(E1E∇H(η(t)))σ(E1E∇H(η(t)))+∇TH(η(t))ETET1ΛTσ(E1E∇H(η(t)))+σT(E1E∇H(η(t)))E1E∇H(η(t))−∇TH(η(t))ETET1ΛTE1E∇H(η(t))+2∇TH(η(t))L∗v(t)+γ2vT(t)v(t)−γ2vT(t)v(t)+˜zT(t)˜z(t)−˜zT(t)˜z(t)=ξT2Φ2ξ2+γ2vT(t)v(t)−˜zT(t)˜z(t), | (3.9) |
where
ξ2=[∇H(η(t))∇H(η(t−d(t)))∫tt−d(t)[∇H(η(s))]′dsσ(E1E∇H(η(t)))v(t)]. |
From (3.8), we obtain
d(E[V(t)])dt≤γ2vT(t)v(t)−˜zT(t)˜z(t). | (3.10) |
Furthermore, simultaneously integrating both sides of (3.10) from [0,T], we have
E[V(T)]−E[V(0)]≤γ2∫T0vT(t)v(t)dt−∫T0˜zT(t)˜z(t)dt. |
Since E[V(T)]−E[V(0)]≥0, then
∫T0˜zT(t)˜z(t)dt≤γ2∫T0vT(t)v(t)dt. | (3.11) |
According to the definition of L2 norm, there is ‖˜z(t)‖2≤γ‖v(t)‖2. This completes the proof.
Remark 2. There are two main difficulties in the theoretical derivation of this paper. The first difficulty is how to establish the measurement output model. Due to the particularity of the Hamiltonian system, its measurement output model is different from the general ones. Considering fully the structural properties of the system and combining with the existing literatures on the sensor model, we introduce a constant matrix N with suitable dimension in constructing the sensor model. The second difficulty is how to solve the random term in the channel attenuation coefficient. For overcoming this difficulty, we use the mean value in the stability derivation using Lyapunov-Krasovsill functional theorem.
Remark 3. Specifically, when the Hamiltonian in the Hamiltonian system (2.1) is H(x)=12x2, then the system can be expressed as
{˙x(t)=Ax(t)+Bx(t−d(t))+Lv1(t)z(t)=Mx(t). | (3.12) |
Obviously, it is a linear system formulation. We may achieve the H∞ filter result for system (3.12) according to Theorem 1 and Theorem 2. It can be seen that the main results of this paper can also applicable for linear systems in the form of (3.12).
In this section, our main purpose is to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of the method proposed in this paper. Two examples are given below.
Example 1. Consider the Hamiltonian systems described by (2.1) with the following parameters:
M=[−0.30.20.6−0.7],L=[0.80.50.30.6],A=[−0.63−0.70−0.9],B=[0.2000.15], |
and the Hamiltonian H(x) is given as H(x)=12x21+1−cosx2. It can be seen that the above nonlinear functions satisfy Assumption 1 with ε2=2 and ι2=1. The time-varying delay is taken as d(t)=(π+2arctant)/6 from which we have μ=0.33 and τ=1.04.
In this example, the intensity of the measurement noise is given by D=[0.50.7]T, the constant matrices are represented by
N=[1001],E=[0.30.20.40.2]. |
The information received by each sensor is transmitted over the network with fading channel. The channel attenuation coefficient of each sensor channel can be obtained by statistical experiments, and the measurement signal has the following probability density function
p1t(s)={0.05,s=00.10,s=0.50.85,s=1,p2t(s)={0.06,s=00.30,s=0.50.60,s=1 |
with expectation ˉα1=0.9 and variance σ21=0.065, expectation ˉα2=0.75 and variance σ22=0.124.
The H∞ performance attenuation level is set as γ=0.6. We solve the LMI (3.8) via Matlab and obtain the filter gain
K=[1.3635−0.7680−0.99930.4183]. |
In the simulation, the external disturbance inputs are selected as v1(t)=sin(10t/3), v2(t)=cos(10t/3). The initial state of the system and its estimate are chosen as x(0)=[0.4,0.4]T and ˆx(0)=[0.5,0.5]T. Simulation results for this example are shown in Figures 1–3. The states of the Hamiltonian system xi(i=1,2) and their estimates are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The output of the Hamiltonian system z and its estimates are depicted in Figure 3. The simulation results show that the proposed filters can guarantee the asymptotically stability and L2 gain output stability of delayed Hamiltonian system under fading channel and sensor saturation.
Example 2. The selected system model in this example is a test runs of an aircraft which is powered by two F-404 engines. We intend to track this aircraft through wireless communication, which is affected by fading channel and sensor saturation. In practical applications, the probability C(t) can be determined by statistical tests. Consider the system model (2.1) in [32] and [38], where the nominal system matrix A is linearized models from the F-404 aircraft engine system:
A=[−0.9158−0.5380−0.26980.1368−1.5070−0.36250.28690.1304−1.1990]. |
Each channel measurement attenuation coefficient is chosen as follows
p1t(s)={0.05,s=00.10,s=0.50.85,s=1,p2t(s)={0.06,s=00.30,s=0.50.60,s=1,p3t(s)={0.04,s=00.10,s=0.50.75,s=1. |
Through the above probability density functions, we can obtained the mathematical expectation ˉγi and variance σ2i(i=1,2,3) are 0.9,0.75,0.8 and 0.065,0.124,0.248, respectively.
As discussed in [32], almost all aircraft engine systems are subject to uncontrolled external forces. These external disturbances, such as gravity gradients, wind gusts, sensor and actuator noise can affect the stability and reduce the control performance of the system. In this example, the intension of measurement noise is given by D=[0.10.20.2]T.
In this model, a series of path points (x1,x2,x3) are used to track the position of the aircraft, x1 and x2 represent the horizontal positions, and x3 represents the altitude of the aircraft. Now, we design the time-varying filter in the form of (2.5) in the network communication environment to track the state of the F-404 aircraft engine system. Actually, when we model aircraft engine system, fading channel and sensor saturation must be taken into account. The corresponding parameters are given as follows:
M=[0.30.20.70.80.70.50.80.830.6],L=[0.80.60.5],B=[−0.2000−0.75000−0.86], |
N=[100010001],E=[0.270.160.320.230.140.210.270.310.14], |
and select the Hamilton function as
H(x)=12x21+1−cosx2+12x23, |
In this example, the H∞ performance attenuation level is taken as γ=0.7. We solve the LMI (3.8) via MATLAB and get the filter gain
K=[−0.40830.20260.28780.1954−0.75880.17190.26080.1630−0.6488]. |
The exogenous disturbance inputs are selected as v1(t)=sin(10t/3), v2(t)=cos(10t/3), which are same as in Example 1. The initial states of the system and its estimate are selected as x(0)=[0.4,0.4,0,4]T and ˆx(0)=[0.5,0.5,0.5]T. Simulation results for this example are shown in Figures 4–7. The states of the system xi(i=1,2,3) and their estimates are shown in Figures 4–6. The output of the system z and its estimates are presented in Figure 7. The simulation results show that the filters designed according to Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 can accurately estimate the system states and make the augmented system L2 gain output stability in the presence of fading channel and sensor saturation.
In this paper, we have dealt with the H∞ filtering design problem for a class of delayed Hamiltonian systems with fading channel and sensor saturation. In this issue, a sensor model with fading channel and sensor saturation are established. By Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability theorem, some sufficient conditions have been proposed to ensure that the augmented system satisfies L2 gain output stability under zero-initial condition. At the end of this paper, two illustrative examples give prominence to the validity of H∞ filtering technology presented in this paper. A possible future research may be feedback stabilization of nonlinear Hamiltonian systems with fading noisy channel.
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (G61703232), and in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017MF068, ZR2017QF013).
The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.
[1] | B. Fu, S. Li, J. Yang, Global output regulation for a class of single input Port-controlled Hamiltonian disturbed systems, Appl. Math. Comput., 325 (2018), 322-331. |
[2] |
A. Macchelli, Passivity-based control of implicit port-Hamiltonian systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 52 (2014), 2422-2448. doi: 10.1137/130918228
![]() |
[3] |
R. Ortega, A. J. van der Schaft, F. Castanos, et al. Control by interconnection and standard passivity-based control of port-Hamiltonian systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 53 (2008), 2527-2542. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2008.2006930
![]() |
[4] | W. Sun, Stabilization analysis of time-delay Hamiltonian systems in the presence of saturation, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2011), 9625-9634. |
[5] |
G. Liu, X. Liao, Fixed-time H∞ control for port-controlled Hamiltonian systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 64 (2018), 2753-2765. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2874768
![]() |
[6] |
S. Aoues, F. L. FCardoso-Ribeiro, D. Matignon, et al. Modeling and control of a rotating flexible spacecraft: A port-Hamiltonian approach, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 27 (2017), 355-362. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2771244
![]() |
[7] |
B. Fu, S. Li, X. Wang, et al. Output feedback based simultaneous stabilization of two Portcontrolled Hamiltonian systems with disturbances, J. Franklin Inst., 356 (2019), 8154-8166. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.02.039
![]() |
[8] |
W. Sun, Y. Wu, L. Wang, Trajectory tracking of constrained robotic systems via a hybrid control strategy, Neurocomputing, 330 (2019), 188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.11.008
![]() |
[9] |
D. Yang, X. Li, J. Qiu, Output tracking control of delayed switched systems via state-dependent switching and dynamic output feedback, Nonlinear Anal.: Hybrid Syst., 32 (2019), 294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2019.01.006
![]() |
[10] |
R. Yang, G. Zhang, L. Sun, Finite-time robust simultaneous stabilization of a set of nonlinear time-delay systems, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 30 (2020), 1733-1753. doi: 10.1002/rnc.4848
![]() |
[11] | X. Li, X. Yang, T. Huang, Persistence of delayed cooperative models: Impulsive control method, Appl. Math. Comput., 342 (2019), 130-146. |
[12] | X. Li, J. Shen, R. Rakkiyappan, Persistent impulsive effects on stability of functional differential equations with finite or infinite delay, Appl. Math. Comput., 329 (2018), 14-22. |
[13] |
J. Schiffer, E. Fridman, R. Ortega, Stability of a class of delayed port-Hamiltonian systems with application to microgrids with distributed rotational and electronic generation, Automatica, 74 (2016), 71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.07.022
![]() |
[14] |
W. Sun, B. Fu, Adaptive control of time-varying uncertain nonlinear systems with input delay: A Hamiltonian approach, IET Control Theory Appl., 15 (2016), 1844-1858. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.1165
![]() |
[15] |
R. Yang, L. Sun, G. Zhang, et al. Finite-time stability and stabilization of nonlinear singular timedelay systems via Hamiltonian method, J. Franklin Inst., 356 (2019), 5961-5992. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.04.033
![]() |
[16] | R. Yang, W. Pei, Y. Han, et al. Finite-time adaptive robust simultaneous stabilization of nonlinear delay systems by the Hamiltonian function method, Sci. China: Inform. Sci., in press, doi: 10.1007/s11432-019-2804-2. |
[17] |
A. Venkatraman, A. J. van der Schaft, Full-order observer design for a class of Port-Hamiltonian systems, Automatica, 46 (2010), 555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.01.019
![]() |
[18] |
A. Yaghmaei, M. J. Yazdanpanah, Structure preserving observer design for port-Hamiltonian systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 64 (2019), 1214-1220. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2847904
![]() |
[19] |
W. Sun, X. Lv, K. Wang, et al. Observer-based output feedback stabilisation and L2-disturbance attenuation of uncertain Hamiltonian systems with input and output delays, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 50 (2019), 2565-2578. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2019.1671532
![]() |
[20] |
M. Fu, C. de Souza, Z. Luo, Finite-horizon robust Kalman filter design, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 49 (2001), 2103-2112. doi: 10.1109/78.942638
![]() |
[21] |
A. Elsayed, M. J. Grimble, A new approach to the H∞ design of optimal digital linear filters, IMA J. Math. Control Inform., 6 (1989), 233-251. doi: 10.1093/imamci/6.2.233
![]() |
[22] |
F. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Liang, et al. A survey on filtering issues for two-dimensional systems: Advances and challenges, Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst., 18 (2020), 629-642. doi: 10.1007/s12555-019-1000-x
![]() |
[23] |
D. Chen, W. Chen, J. Hu, et al. Variance-constrained filtering for discrete-time genetic regulatory networks with state delay and random measurement delay, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 50 (2019), 231-243. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2018.1542045
![]() |
[24] |
S. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Chen, et al. Protocol-based unscented Kalman filtering in the presence of stochastic uncertainties, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 65 (2020), 1303-1309. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2929817
![]() |
[25] | H. Yang, P. Li, Y. Xia, et al. Reduced-order H∞ filter design for delta operator systems over multiple frequency intervals, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, in press, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2020.2968962. |
[26] |
B. Umberto, K. Dongnam, Z. Enrique, Dynamics and control for multi-agent networked systems: A finite-difference approach, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 29 (2019), 755-790. doi: 10.1142/S0218202519400050
![]() |
[27] |
Y. Li, H. Li, W. Sun, Event-triggered control for robust set stabilization of logical control networks, Automatica, 95 (2018), 556-560. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.06.030
![]() |
[28] |
W. Sun, X. Lv, Practical finite-time fuzzy control for Hamiltonian systems via adaptive eventtriggered approach, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst, 22 (2020), 35-45. doi: 10.1007/s40815-019-00773-0
![]() |
[29] |
S. Dey, A. S. Leong, J. S. Evans, Kalman filtering with faded measurements, Automatica, 45 (2009), 2223-2233. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.06.025
![]() |
[30] |
D. E. Quevedo, A. Ahlén, A. S. Leong, et al., On Kalman filtering over fading wireless channels with controlled transmission powers, Automatica, 48 (2012), 1306-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.025
![]() |
[31] |
Y. Chen, Z. Wang, Y. Yuan, et al., Distributed H∞ filtering for switched stochastic delayed systems over sensor networks with fading measurements, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 50 (2020), 2-14. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2852290
![]() |
[32] |
H. Dong, Z. Wang, H. Gao, et al., Event-based H∞ filter design for a class of nonlinear timevarying systems with fading channels and multiplicative noises, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 63 (2015), 3387-3395. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2422676
![]() |
[33] |
Q. Liu, W. Chen, Z. Wang, et al., Stabilization of MIMO systems over multiple independent and memoryless fading noisy channels, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 64 (2019), 1581-1594. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2854643
![]() |
[34] | Y. Li, S. Liu, M. Zhong, State estimation for stochastic discrete-time systems with multiplicative noises and unknown inputs over fading channels, Appl. Math. Comput., 320 (2018), 116-130. |
[35] |
J. Hu, Z. Wang, H. Gao, et al., Joint state and fault estimation for time-varying nonlinear systems with randomly occurring faults and sensor saturations, Automatica, 97 (2018), 150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.07.027
![]() |
[36] |
H. Yang, Y. Li, H. Yuan, et al., Adaptive dynamic programming for security of networked control systems with actuator saturation, Inform. Sci., 460 (2018), 51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.05.039
![]() |
[37] |
Z. Wang, B. Shen, X. Liu, H∞ filtering with randomly occurring sensor saturations and missing measurements, Automatica, 48 (2012), 556-562. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.01.008
![]() |
[38] |
R. W. Eustace, B. A. Woodyatt, G. L. Merrington, et al., Fault signatures obtained from fault implant tests on an F404 engine, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 116 (1994), 178-183. doi: 10.1115/1.2906789
![]() |
1. | Yaping Tang, Weiwei Sun, Dongqing Liu, Xiaodi Li, Finite-Time Simultaneous Stabilization for Stochastic Port-Controlled Hamiltonian Systems over Delayed and Fading Channels, 2020, 2020, 1099-0526, 1, 10.1155/2020/6387025 | |
2. | Xu-Hui Cheng, Guo-Qing Huang, A Comparison between Second-Order Post-Newtonian Hamiltonian and Coherent Post-Newtonian Lagrangian in Spinning Compact Binaries, 2021, 13, 2073-8994, 584, 10.3390/sym13040584 | |
3. | Gaoran Wang, Weiwei Sun, Shuqing Wang, Stabilization of wind farm integrated transmission system with input delay, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 9177, 10.3934/math.2021533 | |
4. | Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Lv, Mengyang Qiu, Distributed Estimation for Stochastic Hamiltonian Systems With Fading Wireless Channels, 2022, 52, 2168-2267, 4897, 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3023547 |