Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Stabilization of wind farm integrated transmission system with input delay

  • Received: 09 May 2021 Accepted: 10 June 2021 Published: 21 June 2021
  • MSC : 35Q93

  • In the process of large-scale wind farms integration, the time delay is usually caused by the introduction of wide area control signal, which leads to the unstable operation of integrated transmission system. In order to solve this problem, using the control principle of interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based (IDA-PB), this paper puts forward a control method which applies voltage source converter high voltage direct current (VSC-HVDC) technology to the integrated system of time-delay wind farm and keeps the system running stably. In this method, the framework of time-delay port controlled Hamiltonian (PCH) system is constructed, and the energy shaping of the system is carried out by extending the IDA-PB control principle, thus the feedback controller of the system is designed. Around the problem of time-delay stabilization, the stability criterion is obtained by constructing Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and introducing free weighting matrices. Finally, the simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively solve the time delay problem of the integrated transmission system and avoid the performance deterioration of the system.

    Citation: Gaoran Wang, Weiwei Sun, Shuqing Wang. Stabilization of wind farm integrated transmission system with input delay[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9177-9193. doi: 10.3934/math.2021533

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mengmeng Jiang, Xiao Niu . A new design method to global asymptotic stabilization of strict-feedforward nonlinear systems with state and input delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9494-9507. doi: 10.3934/math.2024463
    [2] Chantapish Zamart, Thongchai Botmart, Wajaree Weera, Prem Junsawang . Finite-time decentralized event-triggered feedback control for generalized neural networks with mixed interval time-varying delays and cyber-attacks. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22274-22300. doi: 10.3934/math.20231136
    [3] Kunting Yu, Yongming Li . Adaptive fuzzy control for nonlinear systems with sampled data and time-varying input delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2307-2325. doi: 10.3934/math.2020153
    [4] Yonggwon Lee, Yeongjae Kim, Seunghoon Lee, Junmin Park, Ohmin Kwon . An improved reachable set estimation for time-delay linear systems with peak-bounded inputs and polytopic uncertainties via augmented zero equality approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5816-5837. doi: 10.3934/math.2023293
    [5] Erfeng Xu, Wenxing Xiao, Yonggang Chen . Local stabilization for a hyperchaotic finance system via time-delayed feedback based on discrete-time observations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20510-20529. doi: 10.3934/math.20231045
    [6] Rupak Datta, Ramasamy Saravanakumar, Rajeeb Dey, Baby Bhattacharya . Further results on stability analysis of Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy time-delay systems via improved Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16464-16481. doi: 10.3934/math.2022901
    [7] Xingyue Liu, Kaibo Shi . Further results on stability analysis of time-varying delay systems via novel integral inequalities and improved Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1873-1895. doi: 10.3934/math.2022108
    [8] Patarawadee Prasertsang, Thongchai Botmart . Improvement of finite-time stability for delayed neural networks via a new Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 998-1023. doi: 10.3934/math.2021060
    [9] Nayika Samorn, Kanit Mukdasai, Issaraporn Khonchaiyaphum . Analysis of finite-time stability in genetic regulatory networks with interval time-varying delays and leakage delay effects. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25028-25048. doi: 10.3934/math.20241220
    [10] Junkang Tian, Zerong Ren, Shouming Zhong . Stability analysis for time delay systems via a generalized double integral inequality. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6448-6456. doi: 10.3934/math.2020415
  • In the process of large-scale wind farms integration, the time delay is usually caused by the introduction of wide area control signal, which leads to the unstable operation of integrated transmission system. In order to solve this problem, using the control principle of interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based (IDA-PB), this paper puts forward a control method which applies voltage source converter high voltage direct current (VSC-HVDC) technology to the integrated system of time-delay wind farm and keeps the system running stably. In this method, the framework of time-delay port controlled Hamiltonian (PCH) system is constructed, and the energy shaping of the system is carried out by extending the IDA-PB control principle, thus the feedback controller of the system is designed. Around the problem of time-delay stabilization, the stability criterion is obtained by constructing Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and introducing free weighting matrices. Finally, the simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively solve the time delay problem of the integrated transmission system and avoid the performance deterioration of the system.



    At present, the magnitude of wind farms in China has reached tens of millions, and large-scale wind farms are usually located at the far end of the load center. Considering the economy and reliability of grid connection, VSC-HVDC technology is a good technical choice. As a commutation-modulated direct current transmission technology with many advantages [1,2], VSC-HVDC technology has been used in the grid-connection process of many wind farm systems [3,4,5]. However, the power input of remote large-scale wind farm will cause power oscillation between power grids. Wide area damping control can suppress the oscillation, but it will also lead to the existence of time-delay factors in the wind farm side [6,7,8,9], making the wind generation system outputs voltage with time-delay, affecting the performance of the wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system, and even leading to the system out of control. In order to avoid this kind of situation, it is necessary to choose an appropriate control method to ensure the stable operation of the integrated system.

    In recent years, many scholars have studied the control problems of time-delay systems [10,11,12,13], and have even obtained some results on practical systems, including robotic systems [14,15,16], aircraft control systems [17,18], vehicle control systems [19,20,21], and power systems [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In the research field of power systems, when considering the time delay factor, [22] has proposed a control method which can ensure the stable operation of the electrical system when using wide area control. In [24], the H control problem of electrical systems is investigated in the case of considering more than one time delay. The problem of time-delay stabilization for multi-region electrical systems is considered in [25] when the frequency of the controller is constrained. References [26,27] make different studies on the stability of power load frequency control system with time delay, and the corresponding stability conclusions are obtained. Most of the existing research results are processed by approximate linearization of the actual power system, which inevitably deviates from the attributes of the actual system itself, and the designed controller is not completely suitable for the original actual power system. Therefore, it is indispensable to adopt a system model which can fully express and maintain the structural characteristics of the original system in order to put forward a more suitable controller design scheme.

    As a special passive nonlinear processing method, the control method based on PCH model has certain control flexibility and brilliant application characteristics, and has been widely used in the research of practical systems [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In [32], the rotation rate control problem of permanent magnet synchronous motor is solved based on Hamiltonian theory. A full-order observer design scheme for practical physical applications such as mechanical power systems is provided in [33] with the Hamiltonian model as the framework. The control method based on PCH model is adopted in [34] to ensure the stability of the converter system. However, most of the existing literatures on power grid integrated transmission only analyze the grid-connected part independently and do not take into account the time-delay input voltage transmitted by the front-end wide-area wind power system. In fact, there have been some research results on the stability and control of time-delay Hamiltonian systems [37,38,39]. For example, in [37], based on the Hamiltonian method, the authors propose an adaptive controller design strategy for nonlinear systems with input time-delay. As far as the author knows, there are no Hamiltonian control results for the integrated VSC-HVDC system of time-delay wind farms.

    Based on the above analysis, the stabilization problem of wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with input delay is studied in this paper. To start with, the system model is transformed into PCH model by selecting energy function and state variables. Then, the controller is designed by extending IDA-PB control principle, and the time-delay stability criterion is obtained by using free weight matrix and Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method in solving the control problem of wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with input time delay is verified by experimental simulation.

    The contributions of this paper are mainly reflected in the following aspects: (1) for the actual object of wind farm integrated transmission system, the stability control problem under the influence of time-varying delay is studied for the first time; (2) in the process of controller design, the traditional IDA-PB control principle is extended and used in the case of time delay. Compared with the controller given in the previous research on time-delay PCH system, the controller designed in this paper doesn't adopt a single output feedback control, in addition, it also takes into account the non-zero operating point characteristics under the actual working conditions, which can effectively restrain the impact of time delay on wind farm integrated transmission system; (3) the relationship between time-varying delay, time-delay upper bound and their difference is fully taken into account when constructing the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, and the conservatism of the conclusion is reduced to some extent by introducing the free weight matrix method.

    A wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with input delay is studied in this paper. In this part, the research object is elicited and the research ideas are expounded.

    During the integrated transmission process, the complete integrated VSC-HVDC system of input delay wind farm is shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Topology of wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with input delay.

    In Figure 1, R1 and R2 are the alternating current side resistance of rectifier and inverter respectively, and izd1 and izd2 are the alternating current side current of rectifier and inverter respectively. Us1(tb(t)) is the time-delay voltage at the wind farm side, Us2(tb(t)) is the time-delay voltage at the grid side, L1 and L2 are the alternating current side inductance of the rectifier converter and the alternating current side inductance of the inverter converter, Uz and Un are the alternating current side voltage of the rectifier converter and the alternating current side voltage of the inverter converter respectively, Uzd1 and Uzd2 are the direct current voltage of the rectifier converter and the direct current voltage of the inverter converter respectively, C1 and C2 are direct current side capacitors of rectifier and inverter respectively. Rω is the line transmission resistance on the direct current side of the converter.

    Because the power input of long-distance large-scale wind farm will cause power oscillation between power grids, wide-area damping control is usually used to suppress the oscillation, but at the same time, there is a time delay on the side of the wind farm ([6,7,8,9]), As a result, the wind power generation system outputs voltage with time delay. This time-delay voltage is a single-ended (wind farm side) input time-delay factor for the wind farm integrated system with VSC-HVDC. In order to prevent the time-delay factor from continuing to pass downwards, we need to deal with it in time on the wind farm side and design an appropriate controller to ensure the stable operation of the system.

    Therefore, this paper investigates stabilization of the system in the case of single-ended (wind farm side) input voltage Us1 with time delay. Firstly, the mathematical model of the integrated VSC-HCDC system of single-ended wind farm with input time delay in dq synchronous rotating coordinate system is established as follows

    {L1disd1dt= Usd1(tb(t))SdUzd1R1isd1ωL1isq1,L1disq1dt= Usq1(tb(t))SqUzd1R1isq1+ωL1isd1,23C1dUzd1dt= Sdisd1+Sqisq123izd1, (2.1)

    where Usd1(tb(t)) and Usq1(tb(t)) are the d-axis and q-axis components of the time-delay voltages on the wind farm side, Sd and Sq are respectively the d-axis and q-axis components of the switching function, ω is the angular frequency, and the time-delay b(t) is a continuous time-varying function and satisfies

    0b(t)τ,  ˙b(t)μ<1, (2.2)

    where τ and μ are constants.

    Because of izd1=Uzd1/Rzd1 , the Eq (2.1) is further written as follows

    {L1disd1dt=Usd1(tb(t))SdUzd1R1isd1ωL1isq1,L1disq1dt=Usq1(tb(t))SqUzd1R1isq1+ωL1isd1,23C1dUzd1dt=Sdisd1+Sqisq123Uzd1Rzd1, (2.3)

    where Rzd1 is the direct current side equivalent resistance of the rectifier converter.

    The time delay voltage on the side of the wind farm is regarded as the control input. In order to research the stability control problem of the system with input time delay, the next work is to design the feedback controller

    u(t)=[u1(t)u2(t)]=[Usd1(tb(t))Usq1(tb(t))]

    to reduce the impact of time delay on the system, and finally ensure the stable operation of the system.

    A general PCH system can be described as follows

    {˙x=(J(x)R(x))H(x)x+G(x)u,y=GT(x)H(x)x, (2.4)

    where xRn is a state variable, uRm and yRm are input and output vectors, respectively, R(x)Rn×n is a non-negative symmetric matrix, G(x)Rn×m represents a gain matrix, J(x)Rn×n is an antisymmetric matrix, and H(x) is the energy function of the system, which satisfies H(x)0 and H(0)=0.

    Let

    x=[x1x2x3]T=A[isd1isq1Uzd1]T

    be the state variable of the system and select the energy function as

    H(x)=12xTA1x=12(1L1x21+1L1x22+32C1x23) (2.5)

    which satisfies Assumption 1, where A=diag{L1,L1,23C1}.

    Assumption 1. The function H(x), the gradient H(x)x and the Hessian matrix Hess(H(x)) of H(x) satisfy

    ϵ1xb(0)2:=ϵ1x(tb(t))2t=0H(x)ϵ2x2,
    σ1xH(x)xσ2x,
    Hess(H(x))HessT(H(x))ψ2,

    where ϵ1, ϵ2, σ1, σ2, ψ are nonnegative constants.

    By combining Eq (2.3) with Eq (2.4), the PCH model of the integrated VSC-HCDC system of single-ended wind farm with input time delay in dq synchronous rotating coordinate system can be obtained as shown below

    {˙x=(JR)H(x)x+Gu(t),y=GTH(x)x, (2.6)

    where u(t)=[u1(t)u2(t)]T,y=[isd1isq1]T,

    J=[0ωL1SdωL10SqSdSq0],R=[R1000R100023Rzd1],G=[100100].

    The expected balance point is

    x=[x1x2x3]T=[L1isd1L1isq123C1Uzd1]T.

    The goal of this paper is to design a stabilization controller for wind farm systems with input time delay (2.1). The specific steps are as follows: firstly, based on the IDA-PB control energy shaping principle, a controller u(t) is designed for the system with input time delay (2.6). Then, the stability criterion of the closed-loop system is given by dealing with the time delay of the closed-loop system. Finally, for the wind power grid-connected transmission system (2.1), the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by combining with the simulation platform.

    In order to achieve the above purpose, it is necessary to give the following lemmas.

    Lemma 1. (Schur complement) The following linear matrix inequality holds

    [Λ1Λ2Λ3]>0 (2.7)

    if and only if

    Λ1Λ2Λ13ΛT2>0,Λ3>0,

    where Λ1=ΛT1, Λ3=ΛT3, and Λi(i=1,2,3) are constant matrices.

    Lemma 2. For given τ>0, a time varying function b(t) that satisfies 0b(t)τ, any positive definite matrix Z and the vector function ω:[τ,)Rn, the following relation is satisfied.

    τttb(t)ωT(s)Zω(s)dsttb(t)ωT(s)dsZttb(t)ω(s)ds,t0.

    This section puts forward the main results of this paper. Specifically, a feedback controller for single-ended VSC-HVDC systems with input time-delay is designed in subsection A, and stability criterion of time-delay are given in subsection B.

    Through energy shaping, a feedback controller u(t)=c(t) will be designed and the related closed-loop system will be the following form

    ˙x=(JdRd)(Hd(x)x+Hd(x(tb(t)))x), (3.1)

    where, Jd=J+Ja and Rd=R+Ra are skew symmetric and nonnegative symmetric matrices separately, Hd(x)=H(x)+Ha(x) is a new energy function, Hd(x(tb(t)))=H(x(tb(t)))+Ha(x(tb(t))).

    The closed loop system (3.1) is expanded to obtain the following equation

    ˙x=(JR)H(x)x+(JaRa)H(x)x+(JdRd)Ha(x)x+(JdRd)Hd(x(tb(t)))x. (3.2)

    To make the Eq (2.6) equal to the Eq (3.1), the following equation is necessary:

    Gu(t)=(JaRa)H(x)x+(JdRd)Ha(x)x+(JdRd)Hd(x(tb(t)))x. (3.3)

    Note K(x):=Ha(x)x and take Ja=0. From Eq (2.6), it is known that the damping matrix R contains the direct current side equivalent resistance Rzd1 of the converter. Consider offsetting Rzd1 in the process of damping matrix configuration, we select

    Ra=[0000000023Rzd1]. (3.4)

    Take

    K(x)=[kα(x1)kβ(x2)kγ(x3)].

    By substituting J, R, K(x), Ja, Ra, G, u(t) and H(x) into (3.3), we get the following results

    {u1(t)=R1kα(x1)ωL1kβ(x2)Sdkγ(x3)R1[1L1x1(tb(t))+kα(x1(tb(t)))]ωL1[1L1x2(tb(t))+kβ(x2(tb(t)))]Sd[32C1x3(tb(t))+kγ(x3(tb(t)))],u2(t)=ωL1kα(x1)R1kβ(x2)Sqkγ(x3)+ωL1[1L1x1(tb(t))+kα(x1(tb(t)))]R1[1L1x2(tb(t))+kβ(x2(tb(t)))]Sq[32C1x3(tb(t))+kγ(x3(tb(t)))]. (3.5)

    Then the IDA-PB principle is extended to design the controller u(t) for the system. In order to achieve this goal and ensure the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system, so as to ensure the stable operation of the original integrated transmission system (2.1) in the presence of time delay, the following assumptions are made for K(x).

    At x, it satisfies

    (a1)

    K(x)x|x=x>2H(x)x2|x=x,

    (a2)

    K(x)=H(x)x|x=x.

    According to (a1) and (a2), we get

    {kα(x1)=x1L1=isd1,kβ(x2)=x2L1=isq1,kγ(x3)=3x32C1=Uzd1. (3.6)

    Then K(x) is as follows

    {kα(x1)=x1L1+m(x1x1),kβ(x2)=x2L1+n(x2x2),kγ(x3)=3x32C1+p(x3x3), (3.7)

    where m,n,p>0 are the error parameters to be evaluated.

    Solving the following two equations

    Ha(x)x=K(x) (3.8)

    and

    Hd(x)=H(x)+Ha(x) (3.9)

    yield the values of Ha(x) and Hd(x) as

    Ha(x)=m2x21(m+1L1)x1x1+n2x22(n+1L1)x2x2+p2x23(p+32C1)x3x3, (3.10)
    Hd(x)=12(m+1L1)x21(m+1L1)x1x1+12(n+1L1)x22(n+1L1)x2x2+12(p+12C1)x23(p+32C1)x3x3. (3.11)

    Finally, by substituting Eq (3.7) into Eq (3.5), the controller can be obtained as follows

    {u1(t)=mR1x1nωL1x2pSdx3R1(m+1L1)x1(tb(t))ωL1(n+1L1)x2(tb(t))Sd(p+32C1)x3(tb(t))+2R1(m+1L1)x1+2ω(1+nL1)x2+2Sd(p+32C1)x3,u2(t)=mωL1x1nR1x2pSqx3+ωL1(m+1L1)x1(tb(t))R1(n+1L1)x2(tb(t))Sq(p+32C1)x3(tb(t))2ω(1+mL1)x1+2R1(n+1L1)x2+2Sq(p+32C1)x3. (3.12)

    The above form can be abbreviated as

    u(t)=EΔH(x)xΦBH(x(tb(t)))x+Φx, (3.13)

    where Δ=diag{m,n,p},

    E=[R1L1ωL2123C1SdωL21R1L123C1Sq],
    Φ=[2R1(m+1L1)2ω(1+nL1)2Sd(p+32C1)2ω(1+mL1)2R1(n+1L1)2Sq(p+32C1)],
    B=[12L100012L100013C1].

    A time-delay stabilization results of the wind farm integrated transmission system (2.1) will be given in this section. Following Theorem 1 provides conditions to guarantee the time-delay stabilization of the system (2.6).

    Theorem 1. Consider the system (2.6). For given constants τ>0, μ<1, if there exist positive definite matrices Q, Z and matrices Y, Ω with appropriate dimensions, such that the following inequality (3.14) holds, then the system (2.6) is asymptotically stable under the feedback controller (3.13).

    Λ=[Υ11YTΥ13GΦBΥ15Υ22ΩTYΥ250ΩΥ35Z00Z1]<0, (3.14)

    where

    Υ11=2RG(EΔ+ΦB)(EΔ+ΦB)TGT+Q,Υ13=ΩT+GΦ,Υ15=τψ(JRGEΔ)T,Υ22=YYT(1μ)Q,Υ25=τψ(ΦB)TGT,Υ35=τψΦTGT.

    Proof. For the system (2.6), the following closed-loop system can be obtained under the feedback controller (3.13):

    ˙x=(JRGEΔ)H(x)xGΦBH(xb)x+GΦx, (3.15)

    where xb:=x(tb(t)).

    Select a Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional as

    V(xb)=Va+Vb+Vc, (3.16)

    where, Va=2H(x),

    Vb=ttb(t)HT(x(θ))xQH(x(θ))xdθ,
    Vc=τ0τtt+β[HT(x(α))x]Z[H(x(α))x]dαdβ,

    Q and Z are nonnegative definite matrices to be determined.

    For given

    H(x)=12xTD1x=12(1L1x21+1L1x22+32C1x23)0,

    there must be

    σ1xH(x)xσ2x,

    and according to Assumption 1, we can get

    ϵ1xb(0)2V(xb)εxb2, (3.17)

    where ε=2ϵ2+τλmax(Q)σ22+τλmax(Z).

    From Newton-Leibniz formula, we have

    ttb(t)[H(x(s))x]ds=H(x(t))xH(xb)x. (3.18)

    Thus, for matrices Y and Ω of any appropriate dimensions, the following equation

    2[HT(xb)xY+(x)TΩ]×{H(x)xttb(t)[H(x(s))x]dsH(xb)x}=0 (3.19)

    holds.

    From Eq (3.18), the system (3.15) can be rewritten as

    ˙x=(JRG(EΔ+ΦB))H(x)x+GΦBttb(t)[H(x(s))x]ds+GΦx. (3.20)

    Next, the derivatives of Va, Vb and Vc along the trajectory of the system (3.20) are calculated respectively

    ˙Va=2HT(x)x(JRG(EΔ+ΦB))H(x)x+2HT(x)xGΦBttb(t)[H(x(s))x]ds+2HT(x)xGΦx, (3.21)
    ˙Vb=HT(x)xQH(x)x(1˙b(t))HT(xb)xQH(xb)xHT(x)xQH(x)x(1μ)HT(xb)xQH(xb)x, (3.22)
    ˙Vc=τ2˙xTHess(H(x))ZHessT(H(x))˙xτttτ[HT(x(α))x]Z[H(x(α))x]dατ2˙xTHess(H(x))ZHessT(H(x))˙xτttb(t)[HT(x(α))x]Z[H(x(α))x]dατ2ψ2[(JRGEΔ)H(x)xGΦBH(xb)x+GΦx]TZ[(JRGEΔ)H(x)xGΦBH(xb)x+GΦx]ttb(t)[HT(x(α))x]dαZttb(t)[H(x(α))x]dα. (3.23)

    By combining (3.19), (3.21)– (3.23), we can obtain

    ˙V(xb)=˙Va+˙Vb+˙VcξT(t)Θξ(t), (3.24)

    where

    ξ(t)=[HT(x)xHT(xb)xxTttb(t)[HT(x(α))x]dα]T,
    Θ=[Θ11Θ12Θ13GΦBΘ22Θ23YΘ33ΩZ],
    Θ11=2RG(EΔ+ΦB)(EΔ+ΦB)TGT+Q+τ2ψ2(JRGEΔ)TZ(JRGEΔ),Θ12=YTτ2ψ2(JRGEΔ)TZGΦB,Θ13=ΩT+GΦ+τ2ψ2(JRGEΔ)TZGΦ,Θ22=YYT(1μ)Q+τ2ψ2(ΦB)TGTZGΦB,Θ23=ΩTτ2ψ2(ΦB)TGTZGΦ,Θ33=τ2ψ2ΦTGTZGΦ.

    From inequality (3.14) and Lemma 1, it is easy to get Θ<0 and ˙V(xb)<0. According to Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability theorem, the closed-loop system (3.15) is asymptotically stable, that is, the system (2.6) is asymptotically stable under the feedback controller (3.13). The proof is complete.

    For the wind farm integrated transmission system (2.1), the following theorem provides sufficient conditions of stabilization.

    Theorem 2. Considering the wind farm integrated transmission system (2.1). For given constants τ>0, μ<1, if there exist positive definite matrices Q, Z and matrices Y and Ω with appropriate dimensions, such that inequality (3.14) holds, and the wind farm side delay voltages Usd1(tb(t)) and Usq1(tb(t)) of the integrated transmission system (2.1) are maintained in the form of (3.25), then the system (2.1) can overcome the influence of time delay and maintain stable operation.

    {Usd1(tb(t))=mR1L1isd1nωL21isq123pC1SdUzd1R1(mL1+1)isd1(tb(t))ωL1(nL1+1)isq1(tb(t))Sd(23pC1+1)Uzd1(tb(t))+2R1(mL1+1)isd1+2ωL1(1+nL1)isq1+2Sd(23pC1+1)Uzd1,Usq1(tb(t))=mωL21isd1nR1L1isq123pC1SqUzd1+ωL1(mL1+1)isd1(tb(t))R1(nL1+1)isq1(tb(t))Sq(23pC1+1)Uzd1(tb(t))2ωL1(mL1+1)isd1+2R1(nL1+1)isq1+2Sq(23pC1+1)Uzd1. (3.25)

    In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, a simulation model of the two-machine and two-region wind farm integrated transmission system with input delay is established on the simulation platform, as shown in Figure 2. There is a wind farm in area A (wide area signal is introduced into the wind power generation link). The main parameters of the integrated transmission system are set as follows: The inductance of the alternating current side of the rectifying converter L1=0.15pu, the resistance of the alternating current side of the rectifying converter R1=2.5pu, Sd=0.15, Sq=0.05, the capacitor of the direct current side of the rectifying converter C1=0.04pu, the equivalent resistance of the direct current side of the rectifying converter Rzd1=5.1pu, the frequency ω=5pu.

    Figure 2.  Two-machine and two-region wind farm integrated transmission system with input delay.

    The time-varying delay b(t) considered in this paper is selected as b(t)=0.1sin(3t)+0.2. Obviously, 00.1b(t)0.3, ˙b(t)0.3<1. According to the current research situation, the time delay of wide area signal is generally 0.10.3s. Therefore, the input delay in this paper meets the engineering requirements. Here we set τ=0.3s, μ=0.3.

    The Hessian matrix of H(x) satisfies Hess(H(x))HessT(H(x))ψ2, so we can get ψ=0.87.

    Next, we intend to verify that the wind farm side delay voltages Usd1(tb(t)) and Usq1(tb(t)) in the form of (3.25) can ensure the stable operation of the system (2.1).

    Select

    Q=[351051501003],Z=[10010020110110],
    Y=[20210220110030],Ω=[10031120205].

    Then, using MATLAB, we can get

    Δ=diag{2.1201,2.1201,2.1201},Φ=[43.93413.1801511.8860313.1801543.9343.96201].

    Therefore, it can be known that the error parameters m=n=p=2.1201.

    When the system runs stably, the expected results are as follows: the d-axis component isd1 of the alternating current side current of the rectifier converter is stable at 1pu, the q-axis component isq1 is stable at 2pu, and the direct current side voltage Uzd1 of the rectifier converter is stable at 2pu, that is, isd1=1pu, isq1=2pu, Uzd1=2pu.

    Taking the above parameters, the wind farm side delay voltages Usd1(tb(t)) and Usq1(tb(t)) are as follows

    {Usd1(tb(t))=0.7950375isd10.23851125isq10.0084804Uzd13.2950375isd1(tb(t))0.98851125isq1(tb(t))0.1584804Uzd1(tb(t))+11.1780416,Usq1(tb(t))=0.23851125isd10.7950375isq10.0028268Uzd1+0.98851125isd1(tb(t))3.2950375isq1(tb(t))0.0528268Uzd1(tb(t))+11.4144347. (4.1)

    The corresponding waveforms of Usd1(tb(t)), Usq1(tb(t)), isd1, isq1 and Uzd1 under time-varying delay are shown in Figures 37, respectively.

    Figure 3.  The waveform of Usd1(tb(t)) under time-varying delay.
    Figure 4.  The waveform of Usq1(tb(t)) under time-varying delay.
    Figure 5.  The waveform of isd1 under time-varying delay.
    Figure 6.  The waveform of isq1 under time-varying delay.
    Figure 7.  The waveform of Uzd1 under time-varying delay.

    It can be seen from the figures that, in the case of time-varying delay, the proposed method can be used to reasonably regulate the time-delay voltages Usd1(tb(t)) and Usq1(tb(t)) of the wind farm integrated transmission system, so as to avoid the deterioration of the system performance and make the system run stably in the case of input time-delay.

    In this paper, the stabilization problem of wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with input delay has been researched. Based on the PCH theory, we have transformed the model of wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with input delay, and have designed the feedback controller of the system by extending IDA-PB control principle. Meanwhile, under the feedback controller, we have proposed the criterion to ensure the time-delay stabilization of the closed-loop system. Simulation results have shown that the proposed method can effectively avoid the system performance degradation caused by time delay. The limitation of this paper is that the proposed conditions are still conservative to a certain extent, and there is room for further optimization and improvement. The next work of the authors is to investigate the control problem of wind farm integrated VSC-HVDC system with saturation constraints under the influence of time-varying input delay.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (62073189).

    The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.



    [1] T. An, G. Tang, W. Wang, Research and application on multi-terminal and DC grids based on VSC-HVDC technology in China, High Volt., 2 (2017), 1–10.
    [2] Y. F. Guo, H. L. Gao, Q. W. Wu, H. R. Zhao, J. Ostergaard, M. Shahidehpour, Enhanced voltage control of VSC-HVDC connected offshore wind farms based on model predictive control, IEEE T. Sustain. Energ., 9 (2018), 474–487.
    [3] H. Z. Liu, Z. Chen, Contribution of VSC-HVDC to frequency regulation of power systems with offshore wind generation, IEEE T. Energy Conver., 30 (2015), 918–926.
    [4] J. Lin, Integrating the first HVDC-based offshore wind power into PJM system–A real project case study, IEEE T. Ind. Appl., 52 (2016), 1970–1978.
    [5] B. B. Shao, S. Q. Zhao, Y. H. Yang, B. F. Gao, F. Blaabjerg, Sub-synchronous oscillation characteristics and analysis of direct-drive wind farms with VSC-HVDC systems, IEEE T. Sustain. Energ., 12 (2021), 1127–1140.
    [6] S. B. Wang, X. Y. Meng, T. W. Chen, Wide-area control of power systems through delayed network communication, IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T., 20 (2012), 495–503.
    [7] B. Chaudhuri, R. Majumder, B. C. Pal, Wide-area measurement-based stabilizing control of power system considering signal transmission delay, IEEE T. Power Syst., 19 (2004), 1971–1979.
    [8] B. Yang, Y. Z. Sun, Damping factor based delay margin for wide area signals in power system damping control, IEEE T. Power Syst., 28 (2013), 3501–3502.
    [9] M. Li, Y. Chen, Wide-area stabiliser on sliding mode control for cross-area power systems with random delay and packet dropouts, Asian J. Control, 20 (2018), 2130–2142.
    [10] K. T. Yu, Y. M. Li, Adaptive fuzzy control for nonlinear systems with sampled data and time-varying input delay, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 2307–2325.
    [11] D. Yang, X. D. Li, J. L. Qiu, Output tracking control of delayed switched systems via state-dependent switching and dynamic output feedback, Nonlinear Anal.-Hybri., 32 (2019), 294–305.
    [12] X. Y. Yang, X. D. Li, Q. Xi, P. Y. Duan, Review of stability and stabilization for impulsive delayed systems, Math. Biosci. Eng., 15 (2018), 1495–1515.
    [13] W. W. Sun, M. Y. Qiu, X. Y. Lv, H filter design for a class of delayed Hamiltonian systems with fading channel and sensor saturation, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 2909–2922.
    [14] Y. Liu, N. Chopra, Gravity-compensation-driven position regulation for robotic systems under input/output delays, IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T., 22 (2014), 995–1005.
    [15] S. Ahmed, H. P. Wang, M. S. Aslam, I. Ghous, I. Qaisar, Robust adaptive control of robotic manipulator with input time-varying delay, Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., 17 (2019), 2193–2202.
    [16] Y. Kang, Z. J. Li, X. Q. Cao, D. H. Zhai, Robust control of motion/force for robotic manipulators with random time delays, IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T., 21 (2013), 1708–1718.
    [17] Q. He, J. K. Liu, An observer for a velocity-sensorless VTOL aircraft with time-varying measurement delay, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 47 (2016), 652–661.
    [18] S. W. Su, Y. Lin, Output tracking control for a velocity-sensorless VTOL aircraft with measurement delays, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 46 (2015), 885–895.
    [19] X. J. Jin, G. D. Yin, Y. J. Li, J. Q. Li, Stabilizing vehicle lateral dynamics with considerations of state delay of AFS for electric vehicles via robust gain-scheduling control, Asian J. Control, 18 (2016), 89–97.
    [20] M. Z. Huang, W. N. Gao, Z. P. Jiang, Connected cruise control with delayed feedback and disturbance: An adaptive dynamic programming approach, Int. J. Adapt. Control., 33 (2019), 356–370.
    [21] S. Y. Han, G. Y. Tang, Y. H. Chen, X. X. Yang, X. Yang, Optimal vibration control for vehicle active suspension discrete-time systems with actuator time delay, Asian J. Control, 15 (2013), 1579–1588.
    [22] D. Soudbakhsh, A. Chakrabortty, A. M. Annaswamy, A delay-aware cyber-physical architecture for wide-area control of power systems, Control Eng. Pract., 60 (2017), 171–182.
    [23] D. Efimov, J. Schiffer, R. Ortega, Robustness of delayed multistable systems with application to droop-controlled inverter-based microgrids, Int. J. Control, 89 (2016), 909–918.
    [24] J. Li, Z. H. Chen, D. S. Cai, W. Zhen, Q. Huang, Delay-dependent stability control for power system with multiple time-delays, IEEE T. Power Syst., 31 (2016), 2316–2326.
    [25] X. Li, R. Wang, S. Wu, S. N. Wu, G. M. Dimirovski, Exponential stability for multi-area power systems with time delays under load frequency controller failures, Asian J. Control, 19 (2017), 787–791.
    [26] H. Luo, I. A. Hiskens, Z. Hu, Stability analysis of load frequency control systems with sampling and transmission delay, IEEE T. Power Syst., 35 (2020), 3603–3615.
    [27] S. P. Wen, X. H. Yu, Z. G. Zeng, J. J. Wang, Event-triggering load frequency control for multiarea power systems with communication delays, IEEE T. Ind. Electron., 63 (2016), 1308–1317.
    [28] Y. H. Gui, C. H. Kim, C. C. Chung, Improved low-voltage ride through capability for PMSG wind turbine based on port-controlled hamiltonian system, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 14 (2016), 1195–1204.
    [29] H. H. Song, Y. B. Qu, Energy-based modelling and control of wind energy conversion system with DFIG, Int. J. Control, 84 (2011), 281–292.
    [30] W. W. Sun, Y. Wu, L. P. Wang, Trajectory tracking of constrained robotic systems via a hybrid control strategy, Neurocomputing, 330 (2019), 188–195.
    [31] Y. Ren, W. W. Sun, Robust adaptive control for robotic systems with input time-varying delay using Hamiltonian method, IEEE/CAA J. Automat., 5 (2018), 852–859.
    [32] Y. Guo, Z. Xi, D. Cheng, Speed regulation of permanent magnet synchronous motor via feedback dissipative Hamiltonian realisation, IET Control Theory A., 1 (2007), 281–290.
    [33] A. Yaghmaei, M. J. Yazdanpanah, Structure preserving observer design for port-Hamiltonian systems, IEEE T. Automat. Contr, 64 (2019), 1214–1220.
    [34] X. M. Fan, L. Guan, C. J. Xia, T. Y. Ji, IDA-PB control design for VSC-HVDC transmission based on PCHD model, Int. T. Electr. Energy., 25 (2015), 2133–2143.
    [35] S. Y. Dai, X. F. Koutsoukos, Safety analysis of integrated adaptive cruise and lane keeping control using multi-modal port-Hamiltonian systems, Nonlinear Anal.-Hybri., 35 (2020), 100816.
    [36] S. Aoues, F. L. Cardoso-Ribeiro, D. Matignon, D. Alazard, Modeling and control of a rotating flexible spacecraft: A port-Hamiltonian approach, IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T., 27 (2019), 355–362.
    [37] W. W. Sun, B. Z. Fu, Adaptive control of time-varying uncertain nonlinear systems with input delay: A Hamiltonian approach, IET Control Theory A., 10 (2016), 1844–1858.
    [38] W. W. Sun, X. Y. Lv, K. L. Wang, L. P. Wang, Observer-based output feedback stabilisation and L2-disturbance attenuation of uncertain Hamiltonian systems with input and output delays, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 50 (2019), 2565–2578.
    [39] J. Schiffer, E. Fridman, R. Ortega, J. Raischde, Stability of a class of delayed port-Hamiltonian systems with application to microgrids with distributed rotational and electronic generation, Automatica, 74 (2016), 71–79.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Gaoran Wang, Weiwei Sun, Output tracking of time-delay Hamiltonian descriptor systems under saturation constraints, 2022, 359, 00160032, 2976, 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.02.011
    2. Maris Tõnso, Vadim Kaparin, Juri Belikov, Port-Hamiltonian framework in power systems domain: A survey, 2023, 10, 23524847, 2918, 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.077
    3. Gaoran Wang, Weiwei Sun, Lusong Ding, Cooperative control of time-delay wind power grid-connected unit under actuator saturation based on Hamiltonian method, 2023, 152, 01420615, 109188, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109188
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2628) PDF downloads(118) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog