Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Artificial neural networks for stability analysis and simulation of delayed rabies spread models

  • Rabies remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in areas with substantial dog populations, necessitating a deeper understanding of its transmission dynamics for effective control strategies. This study addressed the complexity of rabies spread by integrating two critical delay effects—vaccination efficacy and incubation duration—into a delay differential equations model, capturing more realistic infection patterns between dogs and humans. To explore the multifaceted drivers of transmission, we applied a novel framework using piecewise derivatives that incorporated singular and non-singular kernels, allowing for nuanced insights into crossover dynamics. The existence and uniqueness of solutions was demonstrated using fixed-point theory within the context of piecewise derivatives and integrals. We employed a piecewise numerical scheme grounded in Newton interpolation polynomials to approximate solutions tailored to handle singular and non-singular kernels. Additionally, we leveraged artificial neural networks to split the dataset into training, testing, and validation sets, conducting an in-depth analysis across these subsets. This approach aimed to expand our understanding of rabies transmission, illustrating the potential of advanced mathematical tools and machine learning in epidemiological modeling.

    Citation: Ramsha Shafqat, Ateq Alsaadi. Artificial neural networks for stability analysis and simulation of delayed rabies spread models[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 33495-33531. doi: 10.3934/math.20241599

    Related Papers:

    [1] Rahat Zarin, Abdur Raouf, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20755-20789. doi: 10.3934/math.20231058
    [2] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241
    [3] E. Bonyah, C. W. Chukwu, M. L. Juga, Fatmawati . Modeling fractional-order dynamics of Syphilis via Mittag-Leffler law. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8367-8389. doi: 10.3934/math.2021485
    [4] Shakeel Muhammad, Obaid J. Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah, Amir Ali . Theoretical and numerical aspects of the Malaria transmission model with piecewise technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28353-28375. doi: 10.3934/math.20231451
    [5] Ateq Alsaadi . Advancing water quality management: A synergistic approach using fractional differential equations and neural networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5332-5352. doi: 10.3934/math.2025246
    [6] Muhammad Rifqy Adha Nurdiansyah, Kasbawati, Syamsuddin Toaha . Stability analysis and numerical simulation of rabies spread model with delay effects. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3399-3425. doi: 10.3934/math.2024167
    [7] Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber . Chaos control and numerical solution of time-varying fractional Newton-Leipnik system using fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25863-25887. doi: 10.3934/math.20231319
    [8] Sabri T. M. Thabet, Reem M. Alraimy, Imed Kedim, Aiman Mukheimer, Thabet Abdeljawad . Exploring the solutions of a financial bubble model via a new fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8587-8614. doi: 10.3934/math.2025394
    [9] Bahar Acay, Ramazan Ozarslan, Erdal Bas . Fractional physical models based on falling body problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2608-2628. doi: 10.3934/math.2020170
    [10] Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Fatimah S. Bayones . On new computations of the fractional epidemic childhood disease model pertaining to the generalized fractional derivative with nonsingular kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4552-4573. doi: 10.3934/math.2022254
  • Rabies remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in areas with substantial dog populations, necessitating a deeper understanding of its transmission dynamics for effective control strategies. This study addressed the complexity of rabies spread by integrating two critical delay effects—vaccination efficacy and incubation duration—into a delay differential equations model, capturing more realistic infection patterns between dogs and humans. To explore the multifaceted drivers of transmission, we applied a novel framework using piecewise derivatives that incorporated singular and non-singular kernels, allowing for nuanced insights into crossover dynamics. The existence and uniqueness of solutions was demonstrated using fixed-point theory within the context of piecewise derivatives and integrals. We employed a piecewise numerical scheme grounded in Newton interpolation polynomials to approximate solutions tailored to handle singular and non-singular kernels. Additionally, we leveraged artificial neural networks to split the dataset into training, testing, and validation sets, conducting an in-depth analysis across these subsets. This approach aimed to expand our understanding of rabies transmission, illustrating the potential of advanced mathematical tools and machine learning in epidemiological modeling.



    The virus that causes rabies targets the neurological system and, if symptoms start to show, can be lethal [1]. Usually, wild animals' bites or scratches are how rabies is transmitted. If wounds or mucosa (such as the mouth and eyes) become contaminated with the saliva of sick animals, it can also spread by direct contact [1,2]. An estimated 59,000 people die from rabies annually worldwide; Asia and Africa account for the majority of cases [1,3]. The most common human carrier of rabies is dogs. Other animals that have it include cats, foxes, and raccoons [1,4]. Even though rabid animals may exhibit odd behaviors, such as aggression and a propensity to bite people or other animals, in addition to excessive drooling, rabies diagnosis is often made through laboratory testing [5]. Rabies requires an incubation time following biting, which can range from weeks to years, depending on several factors [1]. This phase can last up to 2–3 months. After symptoms occur, there are no recognized treatments for rabies. A person should contact a medical practitioner immediately if they believe they have been exposed to rabies through bites or scratches [4]. Dog vaccinations can also be chosen to prevent rabies at its origin. People can receive vaccinations before or after being exposed to rabies [1]. To lower the incidence and fatality rate of rabies, it is also critical to raise public awareness and provide education on the prevention of rabies transmission, particularly from domestic dogs [1,4]. Epidemiological mathematical modeling has provided insights into the dynamics of rabies transmission and potential disease reduction or eradication strategies. The manuscript's approach to modeling rabies transmission through delay differential equations and artificial neural networks (ANNs) aligns with several real-world applications. For instance, in China, researchers have developed models to evaluate strategies like dog vaccination and culling, finding that limiting dog birth rates and boosting vaccinations effectively curb rabies spread. Similarly, in the Philippines, where rabies transmission occurs between islands, authorities have highlighted the importance of controlling dog transport to prevent interisland spread. The manuscript's piecewise delay differential approach could simulate these regional containment strategies by incorporating boundary conditions for limited mobility, effectively capturing island-based containment measures. In Nepal, where rabies impacts dogs and jackals, the challenge of cross-species transmission necessitates a more nuanced approach. Using singular and non-singular kernel integration in the manuscript's piecewise derivative model can address these crossover dynamics, providing insights into interspecies transmission risks. Furthermore, the application of ANNs in the manuscript enhances predictive accuracy by training, testing, and validating real-world datasets, offering an advantage over traditional models that lack machine learning integration. These real-world examples underscore the manuscript's adaptability and relevance in modeling complex rabies transmission scenarios across diverse settings. Several scholars have conducted mathematical studies on the spread of rabies, particularly in Asia. For instance, Zhang et al. [6] created a model to examine the spread of rabies in China. The research also evaluated the effects of dog vaccination and culling on the development of rabies. The model tracked the spread of rabies among human and dog populations. They discovered that restricting dog birth and boosting dog vaccination rates were the best ways to stop the spread of rabies. Based on the developed rabies propagation model across human and dog populations, Chen et al. [3] discovered that dog immigration may create an endemic disease even in cases where the disease eventually becomes extinct. They declared that there should be more oversight and better monitoring of dog migration. In the Philippines, Tohma et al. [7] reported interisland rabies transmission. They claimed that to stop the disease from spreading, it's critical to recognize that rabies may move between islands and that once the virus is introduced to an island that was previously rabies-free, rabies can become endemic. To stop the spread of rabies, the Philippines should implement ongoing rabies control measures, such as limiting dog transportation. After researching the rabies outbreak in China, Huang, and Li [8] created a model of how rabies spreads throughout domesticated and wild dog populations and among humans. Data from Chinese authorities and literature were fitted to the model, and the effectiveness of various suppression techniques was examined. Relative suppression techniques were found to include limiting the number of wild and domesticated dogs born and boosting immunity in domesticated dogs. While dogs were more responsible for the spread of rabies in Nepal, jackals and dogs had a significant impact, according to Pantha et al., [9], who observed rabies among human, dog, and jackal populations. They also noted the possibility of interspecies transmission between dog and jackal populations. A few studies also emphasized how crucial it is to use spread control measures in dog populations. According to Asamoah et al., [10], for example, mass vaccination of susceptible canines and ongoing use, as well as post-exposure prophylaxis on people, might eliminate the deaths utilizing optimal control. Carroll et al. [11] found that major dog vaccination campaigns and population control initiatives are two of the most effective ways to stop the spread. Bornaa et al. [12] discovered that rabies can be prevented by limiting contact with infectious dogs, boosting vaccination rates, screening newly adopted dogs, and culling infected dogs. They concluded that these measures should be prioritized over human rabies prevention. Similarly, Renald et al. [13] discovered that stray dogs should receive more attention to stop rabies spread.

    A system of delay differential equations is another mathematical representation of rabies transmission. A system's inherent ability to respond to an action with a delayed consequence is known as time delay [4]. The population growth at time t is shown by a delay differential equation that is dependent on the population at a previous time [14]. Recent studies have improved the understanding of attraction-repulsion chemotaxis models, focusing on conditions for boundedness and stability. Columbu et al. [15] addressed uniform-in-time boundedness in nonlinear chemotaxis systems, while Jiao et al. [16] established global existence for systems with singular sensitivities and proliferation. Li et al. [17] demonstrated that specific combined effects in chemotaxis models with production and consumption dynamics ensure boundedness. These findings enhance stability predictions for complex biological systems influenced by attraction and repulsion forces. Abdulmajid and Hassan created a SIV (susceptible-infected-vaccinated) epidemic model with delay [2] to assess the impact of time delays for the incubation period and controls on the spread of rabies in canine and human populations. This study is an illustration of delay-incorporated rabies spread modeling research. It was discovered that the best ways to eradicate rabies were to boost dog vaccination rates and reduce the number of puppies born. This study also developed and examined a model of the transmission of rabies in dog and human populations as a system of delay differential equations with delay effects. The vaccination period is also a time delay that influences the model of how rabies spreads and the incubation period. Finding the most effective ways to stop or completely stop the spread of rabies is one of our main research goals, along with analyzing the stability of the delay system and the impact of two delays on it. The thought is to enhance earlier studies on the intricate nonlinear dynamics of rabies transmission.

    Recent studies illustrate the effectiveness of neural networks and mathematical models in handling complex dynamics with delays across various fields. Huang et al. [18] and Liu [19] explored stability in neural networks influenced by mixed and time-varying delays, advancing our understanding of delayed systems. Long and Gong [20] analyzed the stability of Nicholson's blowflies equation under multiple delays, contributing to population dynamics modeling. Sabir et al. [21,22] applied neural networks to language learning and astrophysics, demonstrating versatility in complex problem-solving. Lastly, Kumar et al. [23] modeled Prandtl fluid flow using neural networks, showcasing their utility in fluid dynamics. Together, these works highlight the adaptability of neural and delay models across diverse scientific challenges.

    Fractional calculus has emerged as an alternative mathematical tool for describing models with nonlocal behavior, offering additional interest and flexibility [24,25]. This approach allows for a more accurate model and test data fitting than integer-order models. Historical memory and global knowledge of physical phenomena are captured using fractional differential equations, providing a more comprehensive representation of the dynamics of physical phenomena than integer-order models. There are several applications in the literature for nonlocal operators. Nonlocal operators have found applications that are addressed in various fields of applied mathematics such as disease models [26], biomathematics and chaotic [27], engineering and stochastic models [28,29,30,31], and various other applicable fields of sciences in the literature of fractional differential equations [32,33,34,35,36]. The fractional techniques have been applied to the generalized classical models of the dengue disease model. Indeed, the fractional technique is helpful in generalizing classical models of the dengue model to a large extent. As a result of this modification, we hope to improve our understanding of epidemic trends and the prediction of intervention strategies. Several fractional order models have been developed and found to be extremely useful in identifying specific patterns in the development of patient illness and a better fit for the data. To devise novel therapies tailored to patients' needs, clinicians can use data from the universal fractional order system as a starting point by fitting their data to the most appropriate fixed index. Consequently, the fractional differential equation applying to the disease models gives accurate and exact solutions. To get precise results, choosing a meaningful fractional index based on available accurate data in the literature is essential. A novel approach involving piecewise differentiation and integration has been proposed. This method introduces classical and global piecewise derivatives, accompanied by application examples. Despite this, it should be noted that only real-world problems that follow the crossover properties of these two functions can be modeled, albeit with some limitations. For example, in a real-world situation, these two functions cannot establish the time the crossover took place. The Mittag-Leffler and exponential functions' crossover properties are recognized as powerful mathematical tools to depict real-world problems. As a result of the investigation of crossover problems, various operators were developed, including fractal derivatives, non-integer-order derivatives with singularity and non-singularity kernels, fractal-fractional operators, and others [37,38,39]. It has been observed that, despite stochastic equations incorporating randomness, crossover dynamics remain unsolved in many models, including infectious diseases and complex advection problems [40,41]. The Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu derivatives cannot be used to reproduce real-world issues that display distinct processes from those described by the extended Mittag-Leffler function and exponential decay function. Suppose a real-world situation initially exhibits a power law process, followed by a fading memory process. In this case, neither the general Mittag-Leffler nor the exponential decay functions can adequately describe the observed behavior. The researchers have established a pioneer work on applying different approaches to the fractional order model via time delay term, chaos theory, and bifurcation [42,43,44].

    We reconsidered the rabies disease model [4] in the framework of piecewise differential and integral and analyzed its crossover behaviors. Two populations—the human and dog populations—are included in the model that has been created, and they both reside in the same setting. The susceptible human population (SH), the infected human population (IH), and the vaccinated human population (VH) comprise the three subpopulations that make up the human population. A susceptible dog population (SD), an infected dog population (ID), and a vaccinated dog population (VD) comprise the three subpopulations that make up the dog population. The following vital presumptions form the basis of the model's construction:

    1) There are no migrations into or out of the system. The only factors affecting population size are births and deaths.

    2) Only rabid dogs can spread the rabies virus. There is no rabies transmission between susceptible dogs and diseased humans, nor between susceptible humans and afflicted humans.

    3) Vaccination is thought to confer a long-time immunity. As a result, populations that have received vaccinations do not lose immunity.

    4) New infections do not always arise from contact with affected dogs. Rather, there is a period of incubation.

    5) Immunity is not immediately acquired by vaccination. The vaccination must work for a certain amount of time before it may provide immunity.

    6) Natural death is a possibility during incubation and immunization.

    In this case, natural death is taken to occur randomly. Figure 1 details the dynamic of rabies spread between human and canine populations. As depicted in Figure 1, the average annual human birth rate (AH) increases the susceptible human population. It is lowered by vaccination at rate kHSHτ2emHτ2, natural death at rate mH, and infection by contact with infected dogs at rate βHDSHIDτ1emDτ1. The incubation delay in this case is τ1, while the vaccine delay is τ2. Moreover, emDτ1 represents the likelihood that rabid dogs will die naturally within the time frame [0,τ1],emHτ2 represents the likelihood that susceptible humans will die naturally within the time frame [0,τ2],βHD represents the rate of transmission between susceptible humans and infected dogs, and kH represents the human vaccination rate. The rate of transmission of the infection from susceptible humans to infected dogs is βHDSHIDτ1emDτ1. On the other hand, the rate of natural and rabies-related fatalities is mH and μH, respectively, resulting in a drop in the number of infected people. The rate at which vulnerable persons are vaccinated is kHSHτ2emHτ2; the rate at which natural death occurs is mH.

    Figure 1.  The flow diagram of model 2.1.

    The average annual dog birth rate (AD) increases the susceptible dog population. It is lowered by vaccination at rate kDSDτ2emDτ2, the rates of infection by contact with diseased dogs are βDDSDIDτ1emDτ1 and natural death at mD. In this case, the likelihood that susceptible dogs will die naturally within the time range [0,τ2] is emDτ2; the rate of transmission between susceptible dogs and infected dogs is βDD; and the vaccination rate of dogs is kD. The rate at which the number of infected dogs increases is βDDSDIDτ1emDτ1; the rate at which the number of infected dogs decreases is mD. The rate at which rabies-related deaths occur is μD. At rate kDSDτ2emDτ2, vaccination of susceptible dogs increases the population of vaccinated dogs; at rate mD, natural death reduces it. The description of each variable and model parameter is compiled in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Parameters and description for dengue model.
    Parameters Description
    SH Susceptible human population at time t
    SHτ2 Susceptible human population at time (tτ2)
    IH Infected human population at time t
    VH Vaccinated human population at time t
    SD Susceptible dog population at time t
    SDτ2 Susceptible dog population at time tτ2
    ID Infected dog population at time t
    IDτ1 Infected dog population at time tτ1
    VD Dog population with vaccinations at time t
    AH An average year of human births
    mH Human natural death rate
    βHD Infection transferred from dogs to people
    kH Human vaccination rate
    μH Human mortality rate from rabies
    AD Yearly average of dog births
    mD Dogs' natural death rate
    βDD Rate at which infections spread among dogs
    kD Dog vaccination rates
    μD Dog mortality rate due to rabies
    τ1 Time of incubation
    τ2 Immunization latency period

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The considered model in the sense of piecewise derivative having singular and non-singular kernels with order 0<ν1, ζ[0,T] can be expressed as follows:

    CABC0Dνζ(SH(ζ))=AHmHSHβHDSHIDτ1emDτ1kHSHτ2emHτ2,CABC0Dνζ(IH(ζ))=βHDSHIDτ1emDτ1(mH+μH)IH,CABC0Dνζ(VH(ζ))=kHSHτ2emHτ2mHVH,CABC0Dνζ(SD(ζ))=ADmDSDβDDSDIDτ1emDτ1kDSDτ2emDτ2,CABC0Dνζ(ID(ζ))=βDDSDIDτ1emDτ1(mD+μD)ID,CABC0Dνζ(VD(ζ))=kDSDτ2emDτ2mDVD, (2.1)

    having initial condition

    SH(0)=SH0>0, IH(0)=IH00, VH(0)=VH00,  SD(0)=SD00,ID(0)=ID00,VD(0)=VD00.

    IH(0)0,VH(0)0, and VD(0)0, respectively, are the initial values of IH(t),VH(t), and VD(t). The historical functions of SH(t),SD(t), and ID(t) are ψ1(t)0,ψ2(t)0, and ψ3(t)0, respectively, inside the interval [τ2,0], the functions of ψ1(t) and ψ2(t) are continuous, and ψ3(t) is a continuous function inside the interval [τ1,0].

    The flow chart diagram of the considered model is given in Figure 1. To describe Eq (2.1) more precisely, we can write it as follows:

    CABC0Dνζ(SH(ζ))={C0Dνζ(SH(ζ))=CH1(SH,ζ),  0<ζζ1,ABC0Dνζ(SH(ζ))=ABCH1(SH,ζ),    ζ1<ζT,CABC0Dνζ(IH(ζ))={C0Dνζ(IH(ζ))=CH2(IH,ζ),  0<ζζ1,ABC0Dνζ(IH(ζ))=ABCH2(IH,ζ),    ζ1<ζT,CABC0Dνζ(VH(ζ))={C0Dνζ(VH(ζ))=CH3(VH,ζ),  0<ζζ1,ABC0Dνζ(VH(ζ))=ABCH3(VH,ζ),    ζ1<ζT,CABC0Dνζ(SD(ζ))={C0Dνζ(SD(ζ))=CH4(SD,ζ),  0<ζζ1,ABC0Dνζ(SD(ζ))=ABCH4(SD,ζ),    ζ1<ζT,CABC0Dνζ(ID(ζ))={C0Dνζ(ID(ζ))=CH5(ID,ζ),  0<ζζ1,ABC0Dνζ(ID(ζ))=ABCH5(ID,ζ),    ζ1<ζT,CABC0Dνζ(VD(ζ))={C0Dνζ(VD(ζ))=CH6(VD,ζ),  0<ζζ1,ABC0Dνζ(VD(ζ))=ABCH6(VD,ζ),    ζ1<ζT, (2.2)

    where C0Dνζ and CABC0Dνζ are Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu Caputo (ABC) derivates, respectively.

    Motivated by the above literature, piecewise fractional operators are useful for capturing crossover and abrupt dynamics in system dynamics, which is why we utilized them in our study. This paper examined a set of differential equations under the Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu piecewise fractional operator that characterizes the crossover dynamics of the dengue model. In particular, we applied various fractional operators to various system intervals and offered a qualitative analysis for every subinterval. We employed the Ulam Hyers (UH) stability analysis to evaluate stability. To generate approximation solutions that can accommodate dynamics of both integer and rational orders, we also looked into the use of piecewise terms and fractional orders in the system's final step. The advantage of this paper lies in its novel approach to modeling rabies transmission dynamics through the integration of delay differential equations, piecewise derivatives with singular and non-singular kernels, and ANNs. Unlike traditional models, this work uniquely accounts for delay effects in vaccination efficacy and incubation duration, providing a more realistic simulation of rabies spread. By applying a piecewise derivative framework, this study captures nuanced crossover behaviors often overlooked in existing models, allowing for a more detailed exploration of interspecies transmission risks and control strategies. Furthermore, incorporating ANNs enables the model to enhance predictive accuracy by training on real-world datasets, setting this approach apart from conventional methods lacking machine learning integration. The neural network approach is used, and the dynamics of the proposed model are as follows:

    The rest of the work is organized as follows: In Section 3, we discuss the basic results used in the paper. The existence and uniqueness results are established by using the fixed point approach in Section 4. The numerical approach is analyzed for the considered model (2.2) with fractional order in Section 5. Simulation of the proposed model has been discussed along with ANN and we mention different dynamics graphically in Section 6. Finally, we conclude our work in Section 7.

    Here, we shall provide some basic definitions for fractional derivatives and integrals of ABC and Caputo.

    Definition 3.1. [24] The derivative of a function W(ζ) with respect to the ABC operator, given the condition that W(ζ) belongs to the space H1(0,τ), is defined as below:

    ABC0Dνζ(W(ζ))=ABC(ν)1νζ0ddθW(θ)Eν[ν1ν(ζθ)ν]dθ. (3.1)

    Replace Eν[ν1ν(ζθ)θ] with E1=exp[ν1ν(ζθ)] in Eq (3.1) to obtain the Caputo-Fabrizio differential operator. Additionally, it is noted that ABC0Dνζ[constant]=0. In this context, the normalization operator denoted as ABC(ν) is expressed as ABC(0)=ABC(1)=1. The symbol Kν also signifies the Mittag-Leffler function, a generalized form of the exponential function.

    Definition 3.2. [24] If W(t)L[0,T], then the fractional integral in the ABC sense is expressed as:

    ABC0IνζW(ζ)=1νABC(ν)W(ζ)+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζ0(ζθ)ν1W(θ)dθ. (3.2)

    Definition 3.3. [25] Consider the function W(ζ). For the definition of the arbitrary order derivative in the Caputo sense concerning ζ, it is expressed as:

    C0DνζW(ζ)=1Γ(1ν)ζ0(ζθ)ν[W(θ)]dθ,

    where Γ() represents the gamma function.

    Definition 3.4. Consider the function W(ζ) to be differentiable. For the definition of the Caputo and ABC fractional piecewise derivative, as introduced in [24], it is expressed as:

    PCABC0DνζW(ζ)={C0DνζW(ζ),  0<tζ1,ABC0DνζW(ζ)  ζ1<ζT,

    where, PCABC0DζνW(ζ) represents the Caputo derivative for 0<ζζ1 and the fractional ABC derivative for ζ1<ζT.

    Definition 3.5. Consider the function W(ζ) to be differentiable. For the definition of fractional Caputo and fractional ABC piecewise integration, as introduced in [24], it is expressed as:

    PCABC0IζW(ζ)={1Γνζζ1(ζθ)ν1W(θ)d(θ),  0<tζ1,1νABC(ν)W(ζ)+νABC(ν)Γνζζ1(ζν)ν1W(θ)d(θ)  ζ1<ζT,

    where, PCABC0IζW(ζ) denotes Caputo singular kernel integration for 0<ζζ1 and ABC integration for ζ1<ζT.

    Now, we want to prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution for the considered piecewise derivable function. Further elaborating the system (2.2), we can write it as follows:

    ACABC0DνζW(ζ)=H(ζ,W(tζ)),  0<ν1

    is

    W(ζ)={W0+1Γ(ν)ζ0ζH(θ,W(θ))(ζθ)ν1dθ, 0<ζζ1,W(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)H(ζ,W(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γνζζ1(ζθ)θ1H(θ,W(θ))d(θ),  ζ1<ζT, (4.1)

    where

    W(ζ)={SH(ζ)IH(ζ)VH(ζ)SD(ζ)ID(ζ)VD(ζ)   W0={SH(0)IH(0)VH(0)SD(0)ID(0)VD(0)   W(ζ1)={SH(ζ1)IH(ζ1)VH(ζ1)SD(ζ1)ID(ζ1)VD(ζ1)   Q(ζ,W(ζ))={Hi={CHi(SH,IH,VH,SD,ID,VD,ζ)ABCHi(SH,IH,VH,SD,ID,VD,ζ), (4.2)

    where, i=1,2,3,4,5,6, now, we take >Tζ>0, then X=(C[0,T]×R6,R+) is a Banach space. Further, M=X1×X2×X3×X4×X5×X6 is also a complete norm space endowed with norm

    W=maxζ[0,T]|W(ζ)|=supζ[0,T][|SH(ζ)|+|IH(ζ)|+|VH(ζ)|+|SD(ζ)|+|ID(ζ)|+|VD(ζ)|+|W(ζ)|],

    which can be written as in Eq (4.1).

    To obtain the desired outcome, we take into account the nonlinear operator's growth condition:

    (C1) LW>0; K, ˉWK, we have

    |K(ζ,W)K(ζ,ˉW)|LK|WˉW|.

    (C2) CK>0&MK>0,

    |K(ζ,W(ζ))|CK|W|+MK.

    Theorem 4.1. If H is piecewise continuous on the subintervals 0<ζζ1 and ζ1<ζT within the interval [0,T], it also satisfies condition (C2). The piecewise problem (2.2) has at least one solution on each subinterval.

    Proof. Let us define a closed subset in both subintervals of 0 to T as G of E by using the Schauder fixed-point theorem in the following manner:

    G={WK: WR1,2, R>0}.

    Next, we present the following operator: Using (4.1) as well as T:GG,

    T(W)={W0+1Γ(ν)ζ10H(θ,W(θ))(ζθ)θ1dθ, 0<ζζ1,W(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)H(ζ,W(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)θ1H(θ,W(θ))d(θ),  ζ1<ζT, (4.3)

    and on any WG, we get

    |T(W)(ζ)|{|W0|+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζθ)ν1|H(θ,W(θ))|dθ,|W(ζ1)|+1νABC(ν)|H(ζ,W(ζ))|+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1|H(θ,W(θ))|d(θ),{|W0|+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζθ)ν1[CH|W|+MH]dθ,|W(ζ1)|+1νABC(ν)[CH|W|+MH]+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1[CH|W|+MH]d(θ),{|W0|+TνΓ(ν+1)[CH|W|+MH]=R1, 0<ζζ1,|W(ζ1)|+1νABC(ν)[CH|W|+MH]+σ(TT)νABC(ν)Γ(ν+1)[CH|W|+MH]d(θ)=R2, ζ1<ζT,{R1, 0<ζζ1,R2, ζ1<ζT.

    Based on the previous equation, WG. T(G)G, as a result, demonstrates the completeness and closeness of T. In addition, for total consistency, we write as follows: Assume that ζz<ζj[0,ζ1] is the first interval of the Caputo sense:

    |T(W)(ζj)T(W)(ζz)|=|1Γ(ν)ζj0(ζjθ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))dθ1Γ(ν)ζz0(ζzθ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))dθ|1Γ(ν)ζz0[(ζzθ)ν1(ζjθ)ν1]|H(θ,W(θ))|dθ+1Γ(ν)ζjζi(ζjθ)ν1|H(θ,W(θ))|dθ1Γ(ν)[ζi0[(ζzθ)ν1(ζjθ)ν1]dθ+ζjζz(ζjθ)ν1dθ](CH|W|+MH)(CHW+MH)Γ(ν+1)[ζνjζνz+2(ζjζz)ν]. (4.4)

    Next, from (4.4), we get ζzζj, then,

    |T(W)(ζj)T(W)(ζz)|0, as ζzζj.

    So, T is equi-continuous in [0,ζ1] interval. Next, we take the other interval ζz,ζj[ζ1,T] in the ABC sense as

    |T(W)(ζj)T(W)(ζz)|=|1νABC(ν)H(t,W(t))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζjζ1(ζjθ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))dθ,1νABC(ν)H(ζ,W(ζ))+(ν)ABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζzζ1(ζzθ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))dθ|νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζzζ1[(ζzθ)ν1(ζjθ)ν1]|H(θ,W(θ))|dθ+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζjζz(ζjθ)ν1|H(θ,W(θ))|dθνABC(ν)Γ(ν)[ζzζ1[(ζzθ)ν1(ζjθ)ν1]dθ+ζjζz(ζjθ)ν1dθ](CH|W|+MH)ν(CHW+MH)ABC(ν)Γ(ν+1)[ζνjζνz+2(ζjζz)ν]. (4.5)

    Next, as (4.5), we get ζzζj, then

    |T(W)(ζj)T(W)(ζz)|0, as ζzζj.

    T is therefore equi-continuous in the interval [ζ1,T]. As a result, the mapping T is equi-continuous. The operator T is bounded, uniformly continuous, and continuous using the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem. As a result, the piecewise derivable problem (2.2) has at least one solution on each subinterval according to Schauder's fixed-point theorem.

    Theorem 4.2. With (C1), the proposed model has a unique solution if T is a construction operator.

    Proof. As we have defined an operator T:GG to be piecewise continuous, consider W and ˉWG on [0,ζ1] in the Caputo sense, as follows:

    T(W)T(ˉW)=maxζ[0,t1]|1Γ(ν)ζ0(ζθ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))dθ1Γ(ν)ζ0(ζθ)ν1H(θ,ˉW(θ))dθ|TνΓ(ν+1)LHWˉW. (4.6)

    From (4.6), we have

    T(W)T(ˉW)TνΓ(ν+1)LHWˉW. (4.7)

    Thus, T is bounded. Thus, in the context of the Banach contraction theorem, the issue under consideration has a unique solution inside the specified subinterval. Next, in terms of the ABC derivative, for the other interval ζ[ζ1,T] as

    T(W)T(ˉW)1θABC(ν)LHWˉW+ν(TTν)ABC(ν)Γ(ν+1)LHWˉW, (4.8)

    or

    T(W)T(ˉW)LH[1νABC(ν)+ν(TT)νABC(ν)Γ(ν+1)]WˉW. (4.9)

    T is a contraction as a result. Accordingly, the issue under consideration has a unique solution in the specified subinterval in the sense of the Banach contraction theorem. The piecewise derivable issue thus has an unconventional resolution on each subinterval by Eqs (4.7) and (4.9).

    To ensure the stability of the considered model, we need the following analysis:

    Definition 4.1. The model (2.1) under consideration is U-H stable; if each ß>0, the following inequality will be held.

    |CABCDνtW(ζ)H(ζ,W(ζ))|<ß,ζT. (4.10)

    A unique solution will have ¯WZ and a constant >0,

    ||W¯W||Zß,ζT. (4.11)

    Moreover, the inequality above can be written as follows if we consider an increasing function θ:[0,)R+.

    ||W¯W||Zθ(ß),  ζT.

    If θ(0)=0, the obtained solution will be generalized U-H stable (G-U-H).

    Remark 4.1. Given that a function θC(T) satisfies θ(0)=0 and is independent of WW, the following can be concluded:

    |θ(ζ)|ß,ζT,CABCDνtW(ζ)=H(ζ,W(ζ))+θ(ζ),ζT.

    Lemma 4.1. Suppose the following function:

    CABC0DνtW(ζ)=H(ζ,W(ζ)),  0<ν1. (4.12)

    The solution for Eq (4.12) can be

    W(ζ)={W0+1Γ(ν)ζ0H(θ,W(θ))(ζθ)ν1dθ, 0<ζζ1,W(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)H(ζ,W(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))d(θ),  ζ1<ζT. (4.13)
    ||F(W)F(¯W)||{Tν1Γ(ν+1)ß,ζT1,[(1ν)Γ(ν)+(Tν2)ABC(ν)Γ(ν)]ß=Λß,ζT2. (4.14)

    Theorem 4.3. Lemma 4.1 implies that the solution to model (2.1) is both G-U-H and U-H stable if LfTνΓ(ν)<1.

    Proof. We can determine that ¯WW is a unique solution of (2.1) if WW is a solution of (2.1).

    Case 1: For ζT, we obtain

    ||W¯W||=supζT|W(W+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζ1θ)ν1H(θ,¯W(θ))dθ)|suptT|W(W+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζ1θ)ν1H(θ,¯W(θ))dθ)|+supζT|+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζ1θ)ν1H(θ,W(θ))dθ1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζ1θ)ν1H(θ,¯W(θ))dθ|T1νΓ(ν+1)ß+LfT1Γ(ν+1)||W¯W||. (4.15)

    Along with the following:

    ||W¯W||(T1Γ(ν+1)1LfT1Γ(ν+1))ß. (4.16)

    Case 2:

    ||W¯W||supζT|W[W(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)[H(ζ,W(ζ))]+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)[tt1(ζθ)ν1H(θ,¯W(θ))d(θ)]]|+supζT1νABC(ν)|H(ζ,W(ζ))H(ζ,¯W(ζ))|+supζTνABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1|H(θ,W(θ))H(θ,¯W(θ))|ds.

    Using Λ=[(1ν)Γ(ν)+Tν2ABC(ν)Γ(ν)], and further calculation, we have

    ||W¯W||WΛß+ΛLf||W¯W||W,

    or

    ||W¯W||W(Λ1ΛLf)ß. (4.17)

    We use

    =max{(T1Γ(ν+1)1LfT1Γ(ν+1)),Λ1ΛLf1Mf}.

    Now, from inequalities (4.16) and (4.17), we have

    ||W¯W||Wß,ζT.

    As a result, we may say that model (2.1) has a U-H stable solution. Furthermore, we obtain the following results in (4.18) if we replace ß with θ(ß):

    ||W¯W||Wθ(ß),at eachζT.

    Thus, the results show that the system under consideration is G-U-H stable because θ(0)=0.

    The following numerical approach is shown for the piecewise differentiable issue (2.2). We shall create a numerical scheme for the two subintervals of [0,T] in the Caputo and ABC senses. The integer order numerical approach used in [24] will be the foundation for our piecewise derivative. We express it as follows by using the piecewise integration to solve Eq (2.2) for the Caputo and ABC formats:

    SH(ζ)={SH0+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζθ)ν1CH1(θ),SH(θ)dθ,  0<ζζ1,SH(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH1(ζ,S(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1ABCH1(θ,SH(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT,IH(ζ)={IH0+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζθ)ν1CH2(θ,IH(θ))dθ,  0<ζζ1,IH(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH2(ζ,I(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1ABCH2(θ,IH(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT,VH(ζ)={VH0+1Γ(θ)ζ10(ζθ)ν1CH3(θ,VH(θ))dθ,  0<ζζ1,VH(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH3(ζ,VH(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)θ1ABCH3(θ,VH(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT,SD(ζ)={SD0+1Γ(ν)ζ10(tζθ)ν1CH4(θ,SD(θ))dθ,  0<ζζ1,SD(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH4(ζ,SD(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1ABCH4(θ,SD(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT,ID(ζ)={ID0+1Γ(θ)ζ10(ζθ)ν1CH5(θ,ID(θ))dθ,  0<ζζ1,ID(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH5(ζ,ID(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)θ1ABCH5(θ,ID(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT,VD(ζ)={VD0+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζθ)ν1CH6(θ,VD(θ))dθ,  0<ζζ1,VD(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH6(ζ,VD(ζ))+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζζ1(ζθ)ν1ABCH6(θ,VD(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT, (5.1)

    where CHz(ζ)=CHz(SH,IH,VH,SD,ID,VD,ζ) and ABCHz(ζ)=ABCHz(SH,IH,VH,SD,ID,VD,ζ) are the left-hand side of Eq (2.1) for z=1,2,3,4,5,6, also given in Eq (2.2). The scheme for the system's first equation, (5.1), will be derived, and the remaining compartments will be treated similarly. When ζ=ζn+1,

    SH(ζn+1)={SH0+1Γ(ν)ζ10(ζθ)ν1CH1(SH(θ),θ)dθ,SH(ζ1)+1νABC(ν)ABCH1(SH(ζ),ζ),+νABC(ν)Γ(ν)ζn+1ζ1(ζθ)ν1ABCH1(θ,SH(θ))dθ,  ζ1<ζT, (5.2)

    writing Eq (5.2) in the Newton interpolation approximation given in [24] is as follows:

    SH(ζn+1)={SH(0)+{(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)zk=2[CH1(Sk2H,ζk2)]Π+(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)zk=2[CH1(Sk1H,ζk1)CH1(Sk2H,ζk2)]+ν(Λζ)ν12Γ(ν+3)zk=2[CH1(SkH,ζk)2CH1(Sk1H,ζk1)+CH1(Sk2H,ζk2)]Λ},SH(ζ1)+{1νABC(ν)ABCH1(SnH,ζn)+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Sk2H,ζk2)]Π+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Sk1H,ζk1)+ABCH1(Sk2H,ζk2)]+νABC(ν)ν(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+3)nk=z+3[ABCH1(SkH,ζk)2ABCH1(Sk1H,ζk1)+ABCH1(Sk2H,ζk2)]Λ.}. (5.3)

    We can write the Newton interpolation estimate for the remaining compartments as follows:

    IH(ζn+1)={IH(0)+{(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)zk=2[CH1(Ik2H,ζk2)]Π+(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)zk=2[CH1(Ik1H,ζk1)CH1(Ik2H,ζk2)]+ν(Λζ)ν12Γ(ν+3)zk=2[CH1(IkH,ζk)2CH1(Ik1H,ζk1)+CH1(Ik2H,ζk2)]Λ},IH(ζ1)+{1νABC(ν)ABCH1(InH,ζn)+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Ik2H,ζk2)]Π+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Ik1H,ζk1)+ABCH1(Ik2H,ζk2)]+νABC(ν)ν(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+3)nk=z+3[ABCH1(IkH,ζk)2ABCH1(Ik1H,ζk1)+ABCH1(Ik2H,ζk2)]Λ.}. (5.4)
    VH(ζn+1)={VH(0)+{(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)zk=2[CH1(Vk2H,ζk2)]Π+(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)zk=2[CH1(Vk1H,ζk1)CH1(Vk2H,ζk2)]+ν(Λζ)ν12Γ(ν+3)zk=2[CH1(VkH,ζk)2CH1(Vk1H,ζk1)+CH1(Vk2H,ζk2)]Λ},VH(ζ1)+{1νABC(ν)ABCH1(VnH,ζn)+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Vk2H,ζk2)]Π+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Vk1H,ζk1)+ABCH1(Vk2H,ζk2)]+νABC(ν)ν(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+3)nk=z+3[ABCH1(VkH,ζk)2ABCH1(Vk1H,ζk1)+ABCH1(Vk2H,ζk2)]Λ.}. (5.5)
    SD(ζn+1)={SD(0)+{(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)zk=2[CH1(Sk2D,ζk2)]Π+(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)zk=2[CH1(Sk1D,ζk1)CH1(Sk2D,ζk2)]+ν(Λζ)ν12Γ(ν+3)zk=2[CH1(SkD,ζk)2CH1(Sk1D,ζk1)+CH1(Sk2D,ζk2)]Λ},SD(ζ1)+{1νABC(ν)ABCH1(SnD,ζn)+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Sk2D,ζk2)]Π+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Sk1D,ζk1)+ABCH1(Sk2D,ζk2)]+νABC(ν)ν(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+3)nk=z+3[ABCH1(SkD,ζk)2ABCH1(Sk1D,ζk1)+ABCH1(Sk2D,ζk2)]Λ.}. (5.6)
    ID(ζn+1)={ID(0)+{(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)zk=2[CH1(Ik2D,ζk2)]Π+(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)zk=2[CH1(Ik1D,ζk1)CH1(Ik2D,ζk2)]+ν(Λζ)ν12Γ(ν+3)zk=2[CH1(IkD,ζk)2CH1(Ik1D,ζk1)+CH1(Ik2D,ζk2)]Λ},ID(ζ1)+{1νABC(ν)ABCH1(InD,ζn)+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Ik2D,ζk2)]Π+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Ik1D,ζk1)+ABCH1(Ik2D,ζk2)]+νABC(ν)ν(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+3)nk=z+3[ABCH1(IkD,ζk)2ABCH1(Ik1D,ζk1)+ABCH1(Ik2D,ζk2)]Λ.}. (5.7)
    VD(ζn+1)={VD(0)+{(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)zk=2[CH1(Vk2D,ζk2)]Π+(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)zk=2[CH1(Vk1D,ζk1)CH1(Vk2D,ζk2)]+ν(Λζ)ν12Γ(ν+3)zk=2[CH1(VkD,ζk)2CH1(Vk1D,ζk1)+CH1(Vk2D,ζk2)]Λ},VD(ζ1)+{1νABC(ν)ABCH1(VnD,ζn)+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+1)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Vk2D,ζk2)]Π+νABC(ν)(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+2)nk=z+3[ABCH1(Vk1D,ζk1)+ABCH1(Vk2D,ζk2)]+νABC(ν)ν(Λζ)ν1Γ(ν+3)nk=z+3[ABCH1(VkD,ζk)2ABCH1(Vk1D,ζk1)+ABCH1(Vk2D,ζk2)]Λ.}. (5.8)

    Here

    Λ=[(1+nk)ν(2(nk)2+(3ν+10)(nk)+2ν2+9ν+12)(nk)(2(nk)2+(5ν+10)(k+n)+6ν2+18ν+12)],
    =[(1+nk)ν(3+2νk+n)(nk)(nk+3ν+3)],
    Λ=[(1+nk)ν(nk)ν],

    and

    CH1=ABCH1=(SH,ζ)=AHmHSHβHDSHIDτ1emDτ1kHSHτ2emHτ2,CH2=ABCH2=(IH,ζ)=βHDSHIDτ1emDτ1(mH+μH)IH,CH3=ABCH3=(VH,ζ)=kHSHτ2emHτ2mHVH,CH4=ABCH4=(SD,ζ)=ADmDSDβDDSDIDτ1emDτ1kDSDτ2emDτ2,CH5=ABCH5=(ID,ζ)=βDDSDIDτ1emDτ1(mD+μD)ID,CH6=ABCH6=(VD,ζ)=kDSDτ2emDτ2mDVD.

    We have implemented an ANN to analyze the piecewise derivative models of rabies transmission. The datasets are taken from the piecewise Adams-Bashforth numerical methods. ANN trains the datasets, and the model's accuracy is shown in the figures. In the context of rabies disease, primarily transmitted by dogs to humans, Figure 2 shows how the illness spreads to human populations and eventually dies out after about eight years, with no surge in the number of cases because there is little contact between susceptible humans and canine rabies. As seen in Figure 3, the proportion of susceptible people gradually declines, suggesting that high vaccination rates cause many susceptible people to move into the vaccinated subpopulation. Figure 4 shows that the number of susceptible dog populations gradually declines. Figure 5 shows that while the number of vaccinated people continues to rise, its growth is slower each time, suggesting that an equilibrium condition will eventually be reached. Figure 6 shows that the number of instances of infection in dog populations increases, albeit to less than thirty within the first years. After that, the infection progressively declines until the disease eventually goes extinct in roughly ten years. Additionally, Figure 7 illustrates how a high vaccination rate contributes to a rising number of vaccinated dogs, correlated with a declining susceptible dog population.

    Figure 2.  The graphs of numerical simulation of infected humans.
    Figure 3.  The graphs of numerical simulation of susceptible humans.
    Figure 4.  The graphs of numerical simulation of susceptible dogs.
    Figure 5.  The graphs of numerical simulation of vaccinated humans.
    Figure 6.  The graphs of numerical simulation of infected dogs.
    Figure 7.  The graphs of numerical simulation of vaccinated dogs.

    We simulate the outcomes of the preceding algorithms for the different categories in (27)–(32) using Matlab and the parameter values from Table 2, as shown in Figures 27.

    Table 2.  Initial and parameter numerical values for rabies model.
    Parameter value Parameter Source Parameter Source
    AH 2,000humans/year Assumed mH 0.04/year [10]
    βHD 0.0001dog/year Assumed kH 0.5/year Assumed
    μH 300 dH 0.004 p1 0.0012
    RH 1/year [13] AD 200 dogs/year Assumed
    mD 0.06/year [10] βDD 0.001 dog/year Assumed
    kD 0.5/year [10] μD 1/year [13]
    τ1 1/6year [13] τ2 1/10year Assumed

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The model's dataset identifies three groups: 70% are designated for training, 15% for testing, and 15% for validation. Each category's fractional order is distinct. The approach of ANN using the Adam Bashforth method is shown in Figure 8 (a). Figure 8 (b) displays the model's performance at epoch 1000, with mean square errors of 4.8072e07. Figure 8 (c) displays the training state. Figure 8 (d) shows the error histogram, and 0.00606 is the best number we could discover in this instance. Figure 8 (e) displays the errors in the exact figure and the best fit of the training and testing data.

    Figure 8.  The model under consideration's statistical dynamics include (a) comparison, (b) mean square error, (c) regression, (d) error histogram, and (e) training fit for the ANN.

    Figure 9 shows the regression of the model under examination for all data, testing data, and training data. The data's obvious placement on the regression line suggests that the final solution was accurately trained. The value of R is about 1.

    Figure 9.  Regression with ANN represented dynamically for the system under consideration.

    The approach of ANN using the Adam Bashforth method is shown in Figure 10 (a). Figure 10 (b) displays the performance of the studied model at epoch 1000, with mean square errors of 6.3956e06. The state of training is shown in Figure 10 (c). The state of training is displayed in Figure 10 (d). The error histogram is given in Figure 10 (e), with the best value we could discover in this example being 0.00171. Figure 10 (e) displays the optimal fit of the training and testing data and errors, as indicated by the exact figure.

    Figure 10.  The model under consideration's statistical dynamics include (a) comparison, (b) mean square error, (c) regression, (d) error histogram, and (e) training fit for the ANN.

    Figure 11 shows the regression of the model under examination for all data, testing data, and training data. The data's prominent placement on the regression line suggests that the final solution was accurately trained. The value of R is about 1.

    Figure 11.  Regression with ANN represented dynamically for the system under consideration.

    The approach of ANN using the Adam Bashforth method is shown in Figure 12 (a). Figure 12 (b) displays the performance of the studied model at epoch 1000, with mean square errors of 7.8687e06. The state of training is displayed in Figure 12 (c). The state of training is displayed in Figure 12 (d). The error histogram is displayed in Figure 12 (d), and 0.000107 is our best result. Figure 12 (e) displays the best fit of the training and testing data along with the errors in the same figure.

    Figure 12.  The model under consideration's statistical dynamics include (a) comparison, (b) mean square error, (c) regression, (d) error histogram, and (e) training fit for the ANN.

    Figure 13 displays the regression for all testing and training data for the model under discussion. The data's obvious placement on the regression line suggests that the final solution was accurately trained. The value of R is about 1.

    Figure 13.  Regression with ANN represented dynamically for the system under consideration.

    The approach of ANN using the Adam Bashforth method is shown in Figure 14 (a). Figure 14 (b) displays the performance of the studied model at epoch 1000, with mean square errors of 0.0001399. The state of training is displayed in Figure 14 (c). The error histogram is displayed in Figure 14 (d), and 0.002694 is our best result. Figure 14 (e) displays the best fit of the training and testing data and the errors mentioned in the figure.

    Figure 14.  The model under consideration's statistical dynamics include (a) comparison, (b) mean square error, (c) regression, (d) error histogram, and (e) training fit for the ANN.

    Figure 15 illustrates the regression of the model under examination for all testing and training data. The data's obvious placement on the regression line suggests that the final solution was accurately trained. The value of R is about 1.

    Figure 15.  Regression with ANN represented dynamically for the system under consideration.

    The approach of ANN using the Adam Bashforth method is shown in Figure 16 (a). The performance of the studied model at epoch 1000 is displayed in Figure 16 (b), with mean square errors of 9.0969e09. Figure 16 (c) displays the training state. The error histogram is displayed in Figure 16 (d), and 9.3e06 is the best result we obtain. Figure 16 (e) displays the errors and the best fit of the training and testing data.

    Figure 16.  The model under consideration's statistical dynamics include (a) comparison, (b) mean square error, (c) regression, (d) error histogram, and (e) training fit for the ANN.

    The regression of the model under investigation for all training, testing, and data is displayed in Figure 17. The resultant solution was accurately trained, as evidenced by these graphs that show where the data falls on the regression line. The value of R is about 1.

    Figure 17.  Regression with ANN represented dynamically for the system under consideration.

    The approach of ANN using the Adam Bashforth method is shown in Figure 18 (a). Figure 18 (b) displays the performance of the studied model at epoch 1000, with mean square errors of 5.2036e13. Figure 18 (c) displays the training state. The error histogram is displayed in Figure 18 (d), and 1.38e07 is the best result. Figure 18 (e) displays the errors and the best fit of the training and testing data.

    Figure 18.  The model under consideration's statistical dynamics include (a) comparison, (b) mean square error, (c) regression, (d) error histogram, and (e) training fit for the ANN.

    The regression of the model under investigation for all training, testing, and data is displayed in Figure 19. The resultant solution was accurately trained, as evidenced by these graphs that show where the data falls on the regression line. The value of R is about 1.

    Figure 19.  Regression with ANN represented dynamically for the system under consideration.

    This study aimed to examine the dynamics of a rabies epidemic model using a unique piecewise derivative approach based on the Caputo and ABC operators. A piecewise derivative solution for the disease model outlined in our paper was investigated to establish its existence and uniqueness. We used the piecewise Newton polynomial approach to approximate the solution. The paper introduces a numerical method for piecewise derivatives using singular and non-singular kernels. We did numerical simulations of the piecewise rabies model at different fractional orders and found that piecewise operators have better dynamics than classical ones. Using ANN approaches on a piecewise model, the dataset is split into training, testing, and validation sets. A detailed analysis is conducted for each category. Our work advances the concept of piecewise derivatives by providing a clearer understanding of crossover behavior dynamics. A significant outcome of our simulations is that greater vaccine efficiency resulted in a greater recovery rate. We identified substantial correspondences by analyzing large quantities of numerical and graphical data. Research into incorporating additional factors in this study is an exciting avenue for future research. These factors may include evolving vaccination strategies, weather, or socioeconomic variables to improve the model's predictive capabilities. As a result of this holistic approach, we are likely to develop more effective strategies for controlling and preventing the disease.

    Ramsha Shafqat: conceptualized and designed the study, supervised the research process, conducted the investigation, prepared the original draft of the manuscript, validated the results, reviewed and edited the manuscript for clarity and accuracy, contributed to the development of the software tools used in the study, and secured funding; Ateq Alsaadi: responsible for data curation, formal analysis, visualization, managed the project, overseeing research activities, and ensuring the timely completion of tasks. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number (TU-DSPP-2024-259).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] M. S. Shenoy, A. Santra, A. K. Giri, Rabies elimination policy guidelines: Where do we stand, Indian J. Community He., 35 (2023), 258–263. http://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2023.v35i03.002 doi: 10.47203/IJCH.2023.v35i03.002
    [2] S. Abdulmajid, A. S. Hassan, Analysis of time delayed Rabies model in human and dog populations with controls, Afr. Mat., 32 (2021), 1067–1085. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-021-00882-w doi: 10.1007/s13370-021-00882-w
    [3] J. Chen, L. Zou, Z. Jin, S. G. Ruan, Modeling the geographic spread of rabies in China, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., 9 (2015), e0003772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003772 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003772
    [4] M. R. A. Nurdiansyah, Kasbawati, S. Toaha, Stability analysis and numerical simulation of rabies spread model with delay effects, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 3399–3425. http://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024167 doi: 10.3934/math.2024167
    [5] V. Bay, M. R. Shirzadi, M. J. Sirizi, I. M. Asl, Animal bites management in Northern Iran: Challenges and solutions, Heliyon, 9 (2023), e18637. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18637 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18637
    [6] J. Zhang, Z. Jin, G. Q. Sun, T. Zhou, S. G. Ruan, Analysis of rabies in China: Transmission dynamics and control, PLoS One, 6 (2011), e20891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020891 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020891
    [7] K. Tohma, M. Saito, C. S. Demetria, D. L. Manalo, B. P. Quiambao, T. Kamigaki, et al., Molecular and mathematical modeling analyses of inter-island transmission of rabies into a previously rabies-free island in the Philippines, Infect. Genet. Evol., 38 (2016), 22–28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.12.001
    [8] Y. H. Huang, M. T. Li, Application of a mathematical model in determining the spread of the rabies virus: simulation study, JMIR Med. Inform., 8 (2020), e18627. http://doi.org/10.2196/18627 doi: 10.2196/18627
    [9] B. Pantha, S. Giri, H. R. Joshi, N. K. Vaidya, Modeling transmission dynamics of rabies in Nepal, Infectious Disease Modelling, 6 (2021), 284–301. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2020.12.009 doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.12.009
    [10] J. K. K. Asamoah, F. T. Oduro, E. Bonyah, B. Seidu, Modelling of rabies transmission dynamics using optimal control analysis, J. Appl. Math., 2017 (2017), 2451237. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2451237 doi: 10.1155/2017/2451237
    [11] M. J. Carroll, A. Singer, G. C. Smith, D. P. Cowan, G. Massei, The use of immunocontraception to improve rabies eradication in urban dog populations, Wildlife Res., 37 (2010), 676–687. http://doi.org/10.1071/WR10027 doi: 10.1071/WR10027
    [12] C. S. Bornaa, B. Seidu, M. I. Daabo, Mathematical analysis of rabies infection, J. Appl. Math., 2020 (2020), 1804270. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1804270 doi: 10.1155/2020/1804270
    [13] E. K. Renalda, D. Kuznetsov, K. Kreppel, Desirable Dog-Rabies control methods in an urban setting in Africa–A mathematical model, International Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Computing(IJMSC), 6 (2020), 49–67. http://doi.org/10.5815/ijmsc.2020.01.05 doi: 10.5815/ijmsc.2020.01.05
    [14] R. Haberman, Mathematical models: mechanical vibrations, population dynamics, and traffic flow, New Jersey: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1998.
    [15] A. Columbu, R. D. Fuentes, S. Frassu, Uniform-in-time boundedness in a class of local and nonlocal nonlinear attraction–repulsion chemotaxis models with logistics, Nonlinear Anal.-Real, 79 (2024), 104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2024.104135 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2024.104135
    [16] Z. Jiao, I. Jadlovská, T. X. Li, Global existence in a fully parabolic attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with singular sensitivities and proliferation, J. Differ. Equations, 411 (2024), 227–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2024.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2024.07.005
    [17] T. X. Li, S. Frassu, G. Viglialoro, Combining effects ensuring boundedness in an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis model with production and consumption, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 74 (2023), 109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-023-01976-0 doi: 10.1007/s00033-023-01976-0
    [18] C. X. Huang, B. W. Liu, H. D. Yang, J. D. Cao, Positive almost periodicity on SICNNs incorporating mixed delays and D operator, Nonlinear Anal.-Model., 27 (2022), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2022.27.27417 doi: 10.15388/namc.2022.27.27417
    [19] B. W. Liu, Finite-time stability of CNNs with neutral proportional delays and time-varying leakage delays, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3976 doi: 10.1002/mma.3976
    [20] X. Long, S. H. Gong, New results on stability of Nicholson's blowflies equation with multiple pairs of time-varying delays, Appl. Math. Lett., 100 (2020), 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.106027 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.106027
    [21] Z. Sabir, S. B. Said, Q. Al-Mdallal, An artificial neural network approach for the language learning model, Sci. Rep., 13 (2023), 22693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50219-9 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50219-9
    [22] Z. Sabir, S. B. Said, Q. Al-Mdallal, M. R. Ali, A neuro swarm procedure to solve the novel second order perturbed delay Lane-Emden model arising in astrophysics, Sci. Rep., 12 (2022), 22607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26566-4 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26566-4
    [23] P. Kumar, A. Felicita, B. Nagaraja, A. R. Ajaykumar, Q. Al-Mdallal, Neural network model using Levenberg Marquardt backpropagation algorithm for the prandtl fluid flow over stratified curved sheet, IEEE Access, 12 (2024), 102242–102260. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3422099 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3422099
    [24] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, 2016, arXiv: 1602.03408.
    [25] I. Podlubny, Geometric and physical interpretation of fractional integration and fractional differentiation, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 5 (2002), 367–386.
    [26] L. Zhang, M. Ur Rahman, H. D. Qu, M. Arfan, Adnan, Fractal-fractional Anthroponotic Cutaneous Leishmania model study in sense of Caputo derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 4423–4433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.001
    [27] C. J. Xu, M. X. Liao, P. L. Li, L. Y. Yao, Q. W. Qin, Y. L. Shang, Chaos control for a fractional-order jerk system via time delay feedback controller and mixed controller, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040257 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040257
    [28] B. W. Zhou, X. B. Shu, F. Xu, F. Y. Yang, Y. Wang, Exponential synchronization of dynamical complex networks via random impulsive scheme, Nonlinear Anal.-Model., 29 (2024), 816–832. http://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-1992-1124979-1 doi: 10.1090/S0894-0347-1992-1124979-1
    [29] S. Li, L. X. Shu, X. B. Shu, F. Xu, Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability of random impulsive stochastic functional differential equations with finite delays, Stochastics, 91 (2019), 857–872. http://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2018.1551400 doi: 10.1080/17442508.2018.1551400
    [30] X. Zhu, P. Xia, Q. He, Z. Ni, L. Ni, Ensemble classifier design based on perturbation binary salp swarm algorithm for classification, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci,, 135 (2023), 653-671. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.022985
    [31] B. Li, Z. Eskandari, Dynamical analysis of a discrete-time SIR epidemic model, J. Franklin I., 360 (2023), 7989-8007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.06.006
    [32] B. Li, T. X. Zhang, C. Zhang, Investigation of financial bubble mathematical model under fractal-fractional Caputo derivative, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2350050. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500500 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23500500
    [33] X. H. Zhu, P. F. Xia, Q. Z. He, Z. W. Ni, L. P. Ni, Coke price prediction approach based on dense GRU and opposition-based learning salp swarm algorithm, Int. J. Bio-Inspir. Com., 21 (2023), 106–121. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2022.10047653 doi: 10.1504/IJBIC.2022.10047653
    [34] B. Li, Z. Eskandari, Z. Avazzadeh, Dynamical behaviors of an SIR epidemic model with discrete time, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6110659 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6110659
    [35] K. Abuasbeh, R. Shafqat, A. Alsinai, M. Awadalla, Analysis of controllability of fractional functional random integroevolution equations with delay, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 290. http://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020290 doi: 10.3390/sym15020290
    [36] K. Abuasbeh, R. Shafqat, Fractional Brownian motion for a system of fuzzy fractional stochastic differential equation, J. Math., 2022 (2022), 3559035. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3559035 doi: 10.1155/2022/3559035
    [37] A. Atangana, S. İ. Araz, New concept in calculus: Piecewise differential and integral operators, Chaos. Soliton. Fract., 145 (2021), 110638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638
    [38] Y. N. Anjam, R. Shafqat, I. E. Sarris, M. Ur Rahman, S. Touseef, M. Arshad, A fractional order investigation of smoking model using Caputo-Fabrizio differential operator, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6110623 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6110623
    [39] A. Sami, A. Ali, R. Shafqat, N. Pakkaranang, M. Ur Rahmamn, Analysis of food chain mathematical model under fractal fractional Caputo derivative, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 2094–2109. http://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023097 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023097
    [40] K. Abuasbeh, R. Shafqat, A. Alsinai, M. Awadalla, Analysis of the mathematical modelling of COVID-19 by using mild solution with delay Caputo operator, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020286 doi: 10.3390/sym15020286
    [41] A. Turab, R. Shafqat, S. Muhammad, M. Shuaib, M. F. Khan, M. Kamal, Predictive modeling of hepatitis B viral dynamics: A caputo derivative-based approach using artificial neural networks, Sci. Rep., 42 (2024), 21853. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70788-7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70788-7
    [42] H. D. Qu, S. Saifullah, J. Khan, A. Khan, M. Ur Rahman, G. Z. Zheng, Dynamics of leptospirosis disease in context of piecewise classical-global and classical-fractional operators, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240216. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22402162 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22402162
    [43] C. J. Xu, Z. X. Liu, P. L. Li, J. L. Yan, L. Y. Yao, Bifurcation mechanism for fractional-order three-triangle multi-delayed neural networks, Neural Process. Lett., 55 (2023), 6125–6151. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-11130-y doi: 10.1007/s11063-022-11130-y
    [44] Q. Z. He, P. F. Xia, C. Hu, B. Li, Public information, actual intervention and inflation expectations, Transform. Bus. Econ., 21 (2022), 644–666.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ateq Alsaadi, Advancing water quality management: A synergistic approach using fractional differential equations and neural networks, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 5332, 10.3934/math.2025246
    2. Ayesha Saleem, Mati ur Rahman, Salah Boulaaras, Rafik Guefaifia, Dumitru Baleanu, Exploring the dynamics of HIV and HCV co-infection through piecewise modified Mittag-Leffler fractional derivatives, 2025, 33, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2025.2478038
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(793) PDF downloads(99) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(19)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog