Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators

  • Received: 17 January 2023 Revised: 19 June 2023 Accepted: 20 June 2023 Published: 29 June 2023
  • MSC : 34A08, 49J15, 65P99

  • This paper presents an analysis and numerical simulation of financial crime population dynamics using fractional order calculus and Newton's polynomial. The dynamics of financial crimes are modeled as a fractional-order system, which is then solved using numerical methods based on Newton's polynomial. The results of the simulation provide insights into the behavior of financial crime populations over time, including the stability and convergence of the systems. The study provides a new approach to understanding financial crime populations and has potential applications in developing effective strategies for combating financial crimes. Fractional derivatives are commonly applied in many interdisciplinary fields of science because of its effectiveness in understanding and analyzing complicated phenomena. In this work, a mathematical model for the population dynamics of financial crime with fractional derivatives is reformulated and analyzed. A fractional-order financial crime model using the new Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivative is introduced. The reproduction number for financial crime is calculated. In addition, the relative significance of model parameters is also determined by sensitivity analysis. The existence and uniqueness of the solution in consideration of the ABC derivative are discussed. A number of conditions are established for the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability of financial crime equilibria. A numerical scheme is presented for the proposed model, starting with the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, followed by the Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives. Finally, we solve the models with fractal-fractional derivatives.

    Citation: Rahat Zarin, Abdur Raouf, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah, Usa Wannasingha Humphries. Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20755-20789. doi: 10.3934/math.20231058

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Aziz-ur Rehman, Muhammad Imran, Nauman Ahmed, Umbreen Fatima, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Rafiq, Ali Raza, Ali Asrorovich Djuraev, Fahd Jarad . A finite difference scheme to solve a fractional order epidemic model of computer virus. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2337-2359. doi: 10.3934/math.2023121
    [2] Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Pushpendra Kumar, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Fractional-order dynamics of Chagas-HIV epidemic model with different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18897-18924. doi: 10.3934/math.20221041
    [3] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1856-1880. doi: 10.3934/math.2020124
    [4] Weerawat Sudsutad, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson, Weerapan Sae-dan . A mathematical model for fractal-fractional monkeypox disease and its application to real data. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8516-8563. doi: 10.3934/math.2024414
    [5] Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber, Hijaz Ahmad . The fractal-fractional Atangana-Baleanu operator for pneumonia disease: stability, statistical and numerical analyses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29382-29410. doi: 10.3934/math.20231504
    [6] Changjin Xu, Chaouki Aouiti, Zixin Liu, Qiwen Qin, Lingyun Yao . Bifurcation control strategy for a fractional-order delayed financial crises contagions model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2102-2122. doi: 10.3934/math.2022120
    [7] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . The dynamics of Zika virus with Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(1): 134-146. doi: 10.3934/Math.2019.1.134
    [8] Ihtisham Ul Haq, Shabir Ahmad, Sayed Saifullah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Ali Akgül . Analysis of fractal fractional Lorenz type and financial chaotic systems with exponential decay kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18809-18823. doi: 10.3934/math.20221035
    [9] Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Aurangzeb, Ali Akgül, Esra Karatas Akgül, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Fractional modeling of COVID-19 pandemic model with real data from Pakistan under the ABC operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15939-15964. doi: 10.3934/math.2022872
    [10] Asma Hanif, Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt . Atangana-Baleanu fractional dynamics of dengue fever with optimal control strategies. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15499-15535. doi: 10.3934/math.2023791
  • This paper presents an analysis and numerical simulation of financial crime population dynamics using fractional order calculus and Newton's polynomial. The dynamics of financial crimes are modeled as a fractional-order system, which is then solved using numerical methods based on Newton's polynomial. The results of the simulation provide insights into the behavior of financial crime populations over time, including the stability and convergence of the systems. The study provides a new approach to understanding financial crime populations and has potential applications in developing effective strategies for combating financial crimes. Fractional derivatives are commonly applied in many interdisciplinary fields of science because of its effectiveness in understanding and analyzing complicated phenomena. In this work, a mathematical model for the population dynamics of financial crime with fractional derivatives is reformulated and analyzed. A fractional-order financial crime model using the new Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivative is introduced. The reproduction number for financial crime is calculated. In addition, the relative significance of model parameters is also determined by sensitivity analysis. The existence and uniqueness of the solution in consideration of the ABC derivative are discussed. A number of conditions are established for the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability of financial crime equilibria. A numerical scheme is presented for the proposed model, starting with the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, followed by the Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives. Finally, we solve the models with fractal-fractional derivatives.



    A country's political and socioeconomic systems can be negatively affected by financial crime and its dynamic spread in a given population. Crimes against property (such as financial crimes) can be defined as unlawful conversions of another's properties for one's own gain [1,2]. Most often, it involves non-violent and subtle methods of gaining financial gain from unsuspecting individuals. Financial crime involves several components, as described by Pickett and Pickett [2], such as trickery, deliberate actions, breach of trust, hidden truths and monetary harm, among other components.

    A number of financial crimes are prevalent, including fraud of advance fees (obtaining money under false pretenses), embezzlement (misappropriating or directing public funds), cybercrime (an internet-based scam), bribery, money laundering (the process of converting illegal proceeds into legal forms), extortion, forgery, stealing and the issuing of fake checks, which are all examples of fraud. The above examples and other related crimes have been categorized into four groups: corruption, fraud, theft and manipulation [3]. There are several reasons why financial crimes occur, such as a lack of income, joblessness, low salaries, avarice, high living expenses, social pressure, a desire to get rich fast, a desire for power, idleness, ineffective criminal investigations and prosecutions and a lack of serious punishments for criminal behavior. There are wide-ranging effects of financial crimes on individuals, organizations, companies and nations. Some of these effects include bankruptcies, increased wealth concentration among criminals, crime rates rising, instability in the economy, trauma-related suicides, a reduction in foreign direct investment in the affected countries, a decrease in the attractiveness of legitimate businesses, a decrease in foreign direct investment in the affected countries, decreased confidence in economies where financial crimes prosper, unrest and decreased moral standards. Through the use of mathematical concepts and language, mathematical modeling can describe and simplify physical phenomena or real-world systems [4]. Modeling aids in the transformation of a complex real-world system with many interconnected variables into a more simplified model in order to demonstrate the effects of these variables on the system's dynamics. To gain a better understanding of crime dynamics in a community, a variety of models have been developed and investigated.

    To gain a changing perspective on how varying intervention parameters affect criminality, Zhao et al. [5] analyzed the stability of poverty-crime dynamics using a system of ordinary differential equations. An interaction model was presented by Nuño et al. [6] to analyze the prey-predator dynamics of three societal types: owners, criminals and security guards. Moreover, Nuño et al. [7] presented a study on society with three major groups, which were the poor, the rich and cheaters, and they outlined their evolution over time in a dynamical system. By considering the immigration and exodus statistics of vulnerable populations and criminals, Shukla et al. [8], using a mathematical model, examined how technology plays a factor in combating social forms in a dynamic population. A series of dynamic systems models of crime, imprisonment and recidivism, using only abstract transition parameters, were proposed and analyzed by McMillon et al. [9]. A study of crime as a social epidemic process using a dynamic system has been introduced by González-Parra et al. [10]. Srivastav et al. [11] studied crime dynamics using a nonlinear mathematical model based on simple mass-action type incidents and constant recruitment and death types of a population. Recently, using a mathematical model with optimal control measures, Akanni et al. [4] developed and analyzed a population dynamics model for financial crime. Ibrahim et al. [12] conducted a study based on an age-structured paradigm to examine how correctional interventions affect criminal gang dynamics in Nigeria. The literature review encompasses several studies related to mathematical modeling and understanding the dynamics of crime, corruption, poverty and the interaction between law enforcement and criminal activities. Athithan et al. [13] has focused on the mathematical modeling and optimal control of corruption dynamics. Roslan et al. [14] presented a mathematical model that examines the dynamics of poverty, the poor and crime in West Malaysia. Chaharborj et al. [15] has proposed a dynamic economic model to understand criminal activity within the framework of criminal law. Nyabadza et al. [16] developed a mathematical model to investigate the role of correctional services in relation to gangs. Sooknanan et al. [17] introduced a modified predator-prey model to analyze the interaction between police and gangs. Finally, Manasevich et al. [18] examined the global existence of solutions for a chemotaxis-type system that arises in crime modeling. Collectively, these studies contribute to our understanding of crime dynamics and provide insights into developing effective strategies for crime prevention and control.

    As a tool for studying dynamical systems, fractional calculus (FC) has become increasingly important. In FC, differentiation and integration are generalized to non-integer orders. A variety of disciplines have applied FC in their research. Modeling fractional-order differential equations gives deeper insight into a disease. Several mathematical models have been proposed and studied for various diseases; for instance, Goyal et al. [19] proposed an efficient technique for modeling the spread of Lassa hemorrhagic fever in pregnant women using a time-fractional model. Gao et al. [20] presented a new approach utilizing the Mittag-Leffler function to describe a deadly disease in pregnant women. Alqahtani et al. [21] conducted a dynamical analysis of a bio-ethanol production model using a generalized nonlocal operator in the Caputo sense. Agarwal and Singh [22] modeled the transmission dynamics of the Nipah virus using a fractional-order approach. Zarin et al. [23] analyzed a fractional COVID-19 epidemic model under the Caputo operator. Lastly, Zarin et al. [24] studied the fractional-order dynamics of a Chagas-HIV epidemic model considering different fractional operators. These studies contribute to the understanding and analysis of epidemic dynamics using FC.

    Moreover, various studies have put forth fractional operators encompassing both singular and nonsingular kernels [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Extensive research has been conducted on these topics and their applications, as evidenced by recent publications [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. In the realm of mathematical modeling, there has been a surge in studies focusing on social issues, particularly those related to criminal matters, utilize (FC). For instance, Bansal et al. proposed a fractional-order crime transmission model, extending it to a delayed model by incorporating a time-delay coefficient to account for the temporal gap between an individual's offense and the corresponding judgment [39]. Pritam et al. examined a fractional-order mathematical model of crime transmission with memory properties by considering the influence of previous inputs when predicting the crime growth rate [40]. In a groundbreaking study by Partohaghighi et al., fractional-order crime systems were devised and contrasted using Caputo-Fabrizio, Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivatives. This research incorporated genuine initial conditions specific to subgroups within the USA. To derive approximate solutions for the proposed models, the researchers developed numerical techniques [41]. Furthermore, Rahman et al. conducted an investigation exploring the dynamics of a fractional mathematical model concerning serial killing, employing the Mittag-Leffler kernel. They utilized the iterative fractional-order Adams-Bashforth approach to find an approximate solution and conducted numerical simulations to assess various control strategies at different fractional orders [42].

    In light of previous studies, we find that the topic of the fractional-order ABC derivative of the financial crime epidemic model has not been addressed before; therefore, in this work, a mathematical model for the population dynamics of financial crime with fractional derivatives is reformulated and analyzed. The paper is arranged as follows. Section 2 is devoted to providing definitions of differential and integral operators. In Section 3, the nonlinear ordinary differential equation model is formulated and the basic reproduction number is derived. Section 4 examines the local stability of the crime-free equilibrium. In Section 5, the sensitivity coefficients for the parameters of the model are calculated. Section 6 focuses on the fractional-order model and investigates the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the ABC model. In Section 7, a number of conditions are established for the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability of financial crime equilibria. Section 8 involves a numerical scheme for the fractional-order model. Concluding remarks are given in Section 9.

    Below are some definitions of differential and integral operators [43]:

    Caputo fractional derivative:

    C0DδtF(t)=1Γ(1δ)t0ddΦf(Φ)(tΦ)δdΦ. (2.1)

    Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative [43]:

    CF0DδtF(t)=M(δ)1δt0ddΦf(Φ)exp[δ1δ(tΦ)]dΦ. (2.2)

    Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative:

    ABCDδtF(t)=AB(δ)1δt0ddΦf(Φ)Ex[δ1δ(tΦ)δ]dΦ. (2.3)

    The fractal-fractional derivatives are given by [43]

    FFP0Dδ,κtF(t)=1Γ(1δ)ddtκt0f(Φ)(tΦ)δdΦ    (withpowerlawkernel),FFE0Dδ,κtF(t)=M(δ)1δddtκt0f(Φ)exp[δ1δ(tΦ)]dΦ (withexponentialdecay),0FFMDδ,κtF(t)=AB(δ)1δddtκt0f(Φ)Eδ[δ1δ(tΦ)δ]dΦ (withMittagLefflerkernel), (2.4)

    where

    dF(t)dtκ=limtt1F(t)f(t1)t2κt2κ1(2κ).

    The fractal-fractional integrals are as below [43].

    FFP0Jδ,κtF(t)=1Γ(δ)t0(tΦ)δ1Φ1κf(Φ)dΦ   (with power-law kernel),FFE0Jδ,κtF(t)=1δM(δ)t1κF(t)+δM(δ)t0Φ1κf(Φ)dΦ  (exponential decay), FFM0Jδ,κtF(t)=1δAB(δ)t1κF(t)+δAB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tΦ)δ1Φ1κf(Φ)dΦ  (Mittag-Leffler kernel). (2.5)

    Mathematical modeling is a powerful tool for understanding the dynamics of financial crime populations. It allows researchers to identify patterns and relationships in the data and make predictions about future trends. This can help law enforcement agencies to allocate resources more effectively, and to target their interventions where they are most needed. There are many different mathematical models used to study financial crime, including agent-based models, network models and time-series models. These models are used to investigate a range of topics, including money laundering, fraud and cybercrime. The precision of these models is contingent upon the caliber of the accessible data and the veracity of the foundational assumptions. In this paper, we revisit the mathematical model of financial crime populations [4] by introducing FC; the employed model adheres to the classical framework, characterized by the following ordinary differential equations:

    {dKdt=ηβK(t)L(t)(ρ+η)K(t),dLdt=βK(t)L(t)+ω(1ρ)P(t)(φ+ρ+η)L(t)+τλM(t),dMdt=φL(t)(λ+σ+η)M(t),dPdt=σM(t)(ω+η)P(t),dQdt=(1τ)λM(t)+ρ(K(t)+L(t)+ωP(t))ηQ(t), (3.1)

    where

    N(t)=K+L+M+P+Q.

    In model (3.1), N(t) represents the total population at time t, divided into five categories: susceptible K(t) (individuals susceptible to financial criminal activities), financial criminal L(t) (individuals who commit financial crimes or are financially dishonest), those under prosecution M(t) (trial defendants), those jailed P(t) (incarcerated for financial crime) and those who are honest Q(t) (individuals without financial criminal history and unaffected by financial criminal activities). Assuming that the population growth (births) and population loss (natural deaths) rates happen at a per capita rate m, then N(t)=N [44,45]. Furthermore, the description of the model parameters are given in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Descriptions of the parameters.
    Parameters Discriptions
    η Rate of recruitment and removal in the susceptible individuals
    β Rate of influence
    ρ The conversion rate to honest individuals
    φ Financial criminal prosecution rate per capita (of financial criminals)
    λ Rate of discharges and acquittals from prosecutions
    τ Proportion of discharge rate from prosecution
    σ Rate of transition to prison
    ω Rate of freedom from prison

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    For model (3.1), there exists a positively invariant set Υ={(K,L,M,P,Q)R5+|0Nση}. In addition, all solutions of (K,L,M,P,Q)R5+ are contained in Υ for all t>0.

    Model (3.1) has a criminal-free equilibrium (CFE), where the population is free of financial crime, denoted by ˇD0 and given by

    ˇD0=(K0,L0,M0,P0,Q0,)=(ηρ+η,0,0,0,ρρ+η).

    Let us define a matrix ˆJ for the Jacobian matrix of the criminal compartment of model (3.1) by the following:

    ˆJ=(βK(t)(φ+ρ+η)τλω(1ρ)φφ(λ+σ+η)000σ(ω+η)).

    Put ˆJ such that ˆJ=ˆUˆV; we get

    ˆU=(βK(t)00000000),
    ˆV=((φ+ρ+η)τλω(1ρ)φ(λ+σ+η)00σ(ω+η)),

    where the matrix ˆU contains the new criminal terms; ˆV represents the exchange of crime from one compartment to another. Thus, R0, which is the spectral radius of a matrix ˆUˆV1, is obtained as

    R0=y1y2y3yy1y2φ(τry2σ+y4),

    where

    y=φ+ρ+η,    y1=r+σ+η,     y2=ω+η,y3=βη/(ρ+η),   y4=ω(1ρ).

    Through simplification, we find that yy1y2>φ(σy4+τry2).R0 represents the financial crime reproduction number and is an indicator of the potential spreading of financial crime among naive or susceptible populations.

    Theorem 1. If R0<1, then ˇD0 of the system (3.1) is locally asymptotically stable.

    Proof. The Jacobian matrix of the system (3.1) at E0 is given by

    ˆJ0=((βC+(θ+μ))βS000βCβS(ϕ+θ+μ)τγω(1θ)00ϕ(γ+σ+μ)0000σ(ω+μ)0θθ(1τ)γθωμ). (4.1)

    The characteristic equation of the matrix ˆJ0 at ˇD0 is calculated as follows:

    f(ξ)=(ξ+η)(ξ4+ϖ1ξ3+ϖ2ξ2+ϖ3ξ+ϖ4.(ξ+η)(ξ4+ϖ1ξ3+ϖ2ξ2+ϖ3ξ+ϖ4=0.

    Here, ϖ1=βK0+y+y1+y2+y3,

    ϖ2=β(y2+y3)K0+y1y2+y2y3+yy2+y1y3+yy3+(yy1τφλ)(1R0),

    ϖ3=β(y2y3K0+τφλ)+y1y2y3+yy2y3+(1R0)(y2+y3)(yy1τφλ),

    ϖ4=βy1y3K0+(1R0)y2y3(yy1τφλ).

    Note that the one eigenvalue of the characteristic equation of ˆJ0 is negative. i.e., ξ1=η.

    The Routh-Hurwitz criteria for polynomials of degree, m=4 are [46]

    ϖ1>0,ϖ3>0,ϖ4>0 and ϖ1ϖ2ϖ3>ϖ23+ϖ21ϖ4.

    Then, in accordance with the Routh-Hurwitz criteria, all roots of f(ξ) have negative real parts. Hence, ˇD0 is locally asymptotically stable. This shows that the CFE ˇD0 is asymptotically stable if R0<1.

    In mathematical epidemiology, many parameters are shrouded in variability and uncertainty, making it necessary to conduct sampling and sensitivity analysis. Through this process, it is possible to determine which parameter has the most significant impact on the model's output and informs decision-making on disease control measures. SaSAT, or Sampling and Sensitivity Analysis Tools, is a software designed specifically for this purpose, as outlined in [47]. Sensitivity analysis identifies the parameters that are most effective in curbing crime spread. Even though forward sensitivity analysis becomes tedious for complex biological models, it is an essential component of phenomenon modeling. Ecologists and epidemiologists have taken an active interest in R0 sensitivity analysis.

    Definition 1. The normalized forward sensitivity index of R0 that depends differentiability on a parameter ϰ is defined as

    Υϰ=ϰR0R0ϰ.

    There are three common methods for calculating the sensitivity indices: (i) via direct differentiation, (ii) by using Latin hypercube sampling and (iii) by linearizing the system (3.1) and then computing the linear algebraic equations obtained. We will utilize the direct differentiation method since it provides analytical expressions for the indices. Besides showing us the effects of several factors involved with financial crime, the indices also supply us with crucial information about the comparative variation between R0 and different parameters. Therefore, it helps to develop control methods [26].

    ΥR0η=R0ηηR0=0.01,ΥR0β=R0ββR0=1.00,ΥR0ρ=R0ρρR0=0.80,ΥR0φ=R0φφR0=0.19,ΥR0λ=R0λλR0=0.49,ΥR0τ=R0ττR0=0.78,ΥR0σ=R0σσR0=0.11,ΥR0ω=R0ωωR0=0.75. (5.1)

    The primary determinant of the model's sensitivity is the conversion rate into the honest class, with the influence rate among other parameters following closely. This indicates that the population free from financial crime relies on decreasing the influence rate for susceptible individuals and increasing the conversion rate into the honest class. Equation (5.1) reveals that the most sensitive parameter is represented by ρ, which signifies the conversion rate to the honest class. Given that ΥR0ρ=0.80, a 10% increase (or decrease) in ρ leads to a corresponding decrease (or increase) of 12.4% in the crime reproduction number, R0. Consequently, a corrective intervention strategy is imperative to mitigate the prevalence of financial crime in the population. The influence rate, β, emerges as the second most sensitive parameter, as evidenced by the positive index. As demonstrated in Eq (5.1), a 10% increase (or decrease) in β results in a 10% increase (or decrease) in R0. Therefore, a preventive intervention strategy should be implemented to hinder the propagation of financial crime in the population. The interpretation of the sensitivity indexes for the remaining parameters follows the same pattern as that of ρ and β. The graphical depiction of the relationship between R0 and these sensitive parameters is illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.

    Figure 1.  The sensitivities of the model parameters that impact the basic reproduction number of model (3.1).
    Figure 2.  R0 versus different sensitive parameters.

    The mathematical modeling of real-world problems has garnered recent attention among researchers, as evidenced by studies conducted by various authors [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. To the best of our knowledge, no work has been conducted on the fractional-order financial crime epidemic model taking the ABC fractional derivative. Hence, based on model (3.1), we introduce a fractional-order financial crime model using the new ABC derivative [55]:

    {ABCDδ0,t[K(t)]={ηβK(t)L(t)(ρ+η)K(t)},ABCDδ0,t[L(t)]={βK(t)L(t)+ω(1ρ)P(t)(φ+ρ+η)L(t)+τλM(t)},ABCDδ0,t[M(t)]={φL(t)(λ+σ+η)M(t)},ABCDδ0,t[P(t)]={σM(t)(ω+η)P(t)},ABCDδ0,t[Q(t)]={(1τ)λM(t)+ρ(K(t)+L(t)+ωP(t))ηQ(t)}, (6.1)

    subject to the following initial conditions:

    K(0)=K0,L(0)=L0,M(0)=M0,P(0)=P0,Q(0)=Q00.

    Below, we examine the existence and uniqueness of the solution of ABC model (6.1). Let X(T) be a Banach space on interval T=[0,Λ], where it is a continuous real-valued function that has the sup norm property X=B(T)×B(T)×B(T)×B(T)×B(T) with norm (K,L,M,P,Q)=K+L+M+P+Q, where K=suptT|K(t)|,L=suptT|L(t)|,M=suptT|M(t)|,P=suptT|P(t)|,Q=suptT|Q(t)|. After applying the ABC fractional integral operator to both sides of Eq (6.1), we get

    {K(t)K(0)=ABCDδ0,t[K(t)]{ηβK(t)L(t)(ρ+η)K(t)},L(t)L(0)=ABCDδ0,t[L(t)]{βK(t)L(t)+ω(1ρ)P(t)},M(t)M(0)=ABCDδ0,t[M(t)]{φL(t)(λ+σ+η)M(t)},P(t)P(0)=ABCDδ0,t[P(t)]{σM(t)(ω+η)P(t)},Q(t)Q(0)=ABCDδ0,t[Q(t)]{(1τ)λM(t)+ρ(K(t)+L(t)+ωP(t))ηQ(t)}. (6.2)

    Now, Definition (2.3) gives us

    {K(t)K(0)=1δB(δ)α1(δ,t,K(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α1(δ,ς,K(ς))dς,L(t)L(0)=1δB(δ)α2(δ,t,L(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α2(δ,ς,L(ς))dς,M(t)M(0)=1δB(δ)α3(δ,t,M(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α3(δ,ς,M(ς))dς,P(t)P(0)=1δB(δ)α4(δ,t,P(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α4(δ,ς,P(ς))dς,Q(t)Q(0)=1δB(δ)α5(δ,t,Q(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α5(δ,ς,Q(ς))dς, (6.3)

    where

    α1(δ,t,K(t))=ηβK(t)L(t)(ρ+η)K(t),α2(δ,t,L(t))=βK(t)L(t)+ω(1ρ)P(t)(φ+ρ+η)L(t)+τλM(t),α3(δ,t,M(t))=φL(t)(λ+σ+η)M(t),α4(δ,t,P(t))=σM(t)(ω+η)P(t),α5(δ,t,Q(t))=(1τ)λM(t)+ρ(K(t)+L(t)+ωP(t))ηQ(t).

    The symbols α1,α2,α3,α4 and α5 must be valid for the Lipschitz condition only if K(t),L(t),M(t),P(t) and Q(t) have an upper bound; we reach

    α1(δ,t,K(t))α1(δ,t,K(t))=(βL+(ρ+η))(K(t)K(t)).

    Taking into account ϑ1:=(βL+(ρ+η)), one reaches

    α1(δ,t,K(t))α1(δ,t,K(t))ϑ1K(t)K(t). (6.4)

    Also, we can get

    α2(δ,t,L(t))α2(δ,t,L(t))ϑ2(L(t)L(t),α3(δ,t,M(t))α3(δ,t,M(t))ϑ3M(t)M(t),α4(δ,t,P(t))α4(δ,t,P(t))ϑ4P(t)P(t),α5(δ,t,Q(t))α5(δ,t,Q(t))ϑ5Q(t)Q(t), (6.5)

    where

    ϑ2=(βK),ϑ3=(λ+σ+η),ϑ4=(ω+η),ϑ5=(η);

    as a result, Lipschitz's condition holds. By continuing in a recursive manner, Eq (6.3) becomes

    Km(t)K(0)=1δB(δ)α1(δ,t,Km1(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α1(δ,ς,Km1(ς))dς,Lm(t)L(0)=1δB(δ)α2(δ,t,Lm1(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α2(δ,ς,Lm1(ς))dς,Mm(t)M(0)=1δB(δ)α3(δ,t,Mm1(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α3(δ,ς,Mm1(ς))dς,Pm(t)P(0)=1δB(δ)α4(δ,t,Pm1(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α4(δ,ς,Pm1(ς))dς,Qm(t)Q(0)=1δB(δ)α5(δ,t,Qm1(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α5(δ,ς,Qm1(ς))dς. (6.6)

    Taking K0(t)=K(0),L0(t)=L(0),M0(t)=M(0),P0(t)=P(0) and Q0(t)=Q(0) into account, the difference of consecutive terms gives

    SK,m(t)=Km(t)Km1(t)=1δB(δ)(α1(δ,t,Km1(t))α1(δ,t,Km2(t)))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1(α1(δ,ς,Km1(ς))α1(δ,ς,Km2(ς)))dς,SL,m(t)=Lm(t)Lm1(t)=1δB(δ)(α2(δ,t,Lm1(t))α2(δ,t,Lm2(t)))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)l0(tς)δ1(α2(δ,ς,Lm1(ς))α2(δ,ς,Lm2(ς)))dς,SM,m(t)=Mm(t)Mm1(t)=1δB(δ)(α3(δ,t,Mm1(t))α3(δ,t,Mm2(t)))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1(α3(δ,ς,Mm1(ς))α3(δ,ς,Mm2(ς)))dς,SP,m(t)=Pm(t)Pm1(t)=1δB(δ)(α4(δ,t,Pm1(t))α4(δ,t,Pm2(t)))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1(α4(δ,ς,Pm1(ς))α4(δ,ς,Pm2(ς)))dς,SQ,m(t)=Qm(t)Qm1(t)=1δB(δ)(α5(δ,t,Qm1(t))α5(δ,t,Qm2(t)))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1(α5(δ,ς,Qm1(ς))α5(δ,ς,Qm2(ς)))dς. (6.7)

    It is important to note that Km(t)=mi=0SK,i(t),Lm(t)=mi=0SL,i(t),Mm(t)=mi=0SM,i(t),Pm(t)=mi=0SP,i(t) and Qm(t)=mi=0SQ,i(t). Furthermore, by using Eqs (6.4)–(6.5) and assuming that SK,m1(t)=Km1(t)Km2(t),SL,m1(t)=Lm1(t)Lm2(t),SM,m1(t)=Mm1(t)Mm2(t),SP,m1(t)=Pm1(t)Pm2(t) and SQ,m1(t)=Qm1(t)Qm2(t), we get

    SK,m(t)1δB(δ)ϑ1SK,m1(t)δB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ1×t0(tς)δ1SK,m1(ς)dς,SL,m(t)1δB(δ)ϑ2SL,m1(t)δB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ2×t0(tς)δ1SL,m1(ς)dς,SM,m(t)1δB(δ)ϑ3SM,m1(t)δB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ3×t0(tς)δ1SM,m1(ς)dς,SP,m(t)1δB(δ)ϑ4SP,m1(t)δB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ4×t0(tς)δ1SP,m1(ς)dς,SQ,m(t)1δB(δ)ϑ5SQ,m1(t)δB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ5×t0(tς)δ1SQ,m1(ς)dς. (6.8)

    Theorem 2. Suppose that the following condition is valid:

    1δB(δ)ϑi+δB(δ)Γ(δ)Λδϑi<1,i=1,2,,5. (6.9)

    Then, model (6.1) has a unique solution for t[0,Λ].

    Proof. Clearly K(t),L(t),M(t),P(t) and Q(t) are bounded functions. Moreover, as shown by Eqs (6.4) and (6.5), the symbols α1,α2,α3,α4 and α5 hold for the Lipchitz condition. Consequently, by utilizing Eq (6.8) in conjunction with a recursive assumption, we can establish

    SK,m(t)K0(t)(1δB(δ)ϑ1+δΛδB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ1)mSL,m(t)L0(t)(1δB(δ)ϑ3+δΛδB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ2)mSM,m(t)M0(t)(1δB(δ)ϑ3+δΛδB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ3)mSP,m(t)P0(t)(1δB(δ)ϑ4+δΛδB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ4)mSQ,m(t)Q0(t)(1δB(δ)ϑ5+δΛδB(δ)Γ(δ)ϑ5)m. (6.10)

    This implies that sequences exist that satisfy SK,m(t)0,SL,m(t)0,SM,m(t)0,SP,m(t)0,SQ,m(t)0 as m. Furthermore, through the utilization of Eq (6.10) and by applying the triangle inequality, we can derive an expression for any given value of k:

    Km+k(t)Km(t)m+kj=m+1Yj1=Ym+11Ym+k+111Y1Lm+k(t)Lm(t)m+kj=m+1Yj2=Ym+12Ym+k+121Y2Mm+k(t)Mm(t)m+kj=m+1Yj3=Ym+13Ym+k+131Y3Pm+k(t)Pm(t)m+kj=m+1Yj4=Ym+14Ym+k+141Y4Qm+k(t)Qm(t)m+ki=m+1Yj5=Ym+15Ym+k+151Y5, (6.11)

    with Yi=1δB(δ)ϑi+δB(δ)Γ(δ)Λδϑi<1 by hypothesis. As well, it can be shown that the proposed model, with various fractional derivatives, has a unique solution.

    The main advantage of Hyers-Ulam stability for dynamical systems is its ability to provide a guarantee of stability even when exact solutions are difficult or impossible to obtain. Hyers-Ulam stability, also known as the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability, is a concept in mathematical analysis that deals with the stability of functional equations. In the context of dynamical systems, it allows us to analyze the behavior of a system without explicitly solving the system's equations of motion. Instead, it provides an approximate solution or an estimate of the solution's behavior based on small perturbations in the initial conditions or the system's parameters. This advantage is particularly valuable when dealing with complex or nonlinear systems where finding exact solutions may be mathematically intractable. Hyers-Ulam stability provides a framework to assess the stability of these systems, even when explicit solutions are elusive. It offers a practical and robust approach to understanding the long-term behavior and sensitivity of dynamical systems to small perturbations. By employing the principles of Hyers-Ulam stability, researchers and engineers can gain insights into the stability and robustness of dynamical systems, which is crucial for a wide range of applications, including physics, engineering, biology, economics and many other fields.

    Definition 2. [26] The ABC fractional integral system given by Eq (6.3) is said to be Hyers-Ulam-stable if there exist constants γi>0, iN5 satisfying the following: For every θi>0,iN5, when

    |K(t)1δB(δ)α1(δ,t,K(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α1(δ,ς,K(ς))dς|θ1,|L(t)1δB(δ)α2(δ,t,L(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α2(δ,ς,L(ς))dς|θ2,|M(t)1δB(δ)α3(δ,t,M(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α3(δ,ς,M(ς))dς|θ3,|P(t)1δB(δ)α4(δ,t,P(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α4(δ,ς,P(ς))dς|θ4,|Q(t)1δB(δ)α5(δ,t,Q(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α5(δ,ς,Q(ς))dς|θ5,

    there exist (˙K(t),˙L(t),˙M(t),˙P(t),˙Q(t)) satisfying

    ˙K(t)=1δB(δ)α1(δ,t,K(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α1(δ,ς,˙K(ς))dς,˙L(t)=1δB(δ)α2(δ,t,L(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α2(δ,ς,˙L(ς))dς,˙M(t)=1δB(δ)α3(δ,t,M(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α3(δ,ς,˙M(ς))dς,˙P(t)=1δB(δ)α4(δ,t,P(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α4(δ,ς,˙P(ς))dς,˙Q(t)=1δB(δ)α5(δ,t,Q(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)×t0(tς)δ1α5(δ,ς,˙Q(ς))dς

    such that

    |K(t)˙K(t)|γ1θ1,|L(t)˙L(t)|γ2θ2,|M(t)˙M(t)|γ3θ3,|P(t)˙P(t)|γ4θ4,|Q(t)˙Q(t)|γ5θ5.

    Theorem 3. With assumption T, the suggested model of fractional order (6.2) is Hyers-Ulam-stable.

    Proof. By Theorem 2, the proposed ABC fractional model (6.2) has a unique solution (K(t),L(t),M(t),P(t),Q(t)) satisfying the equations of system (6.3). Thus, we get

    K(t)˙K(t)1δB(δ)α1(δ,t,K(t))α1(δ,t,˙K(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1α1(δ,t,K(t))α1(δ,t,˙K(t))dς[1δB(δ)+δB(δ)Γ(δ)]S1K˙K,
    L(t)˙L(t)1δB(δ)α2(δ,t,L(t))α2(δ,t,˙L(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1α2(δ,t,L(t))α2(δ,t,˙L(t))dς[1δB(δ)+δB(δ)Γ(δ)]S2L˙L,
    M(t)˙M(t)1δB(δ)α3(δ,t,M(t))α3(δ,t,˙M(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1α3(δ,t,M(t))α3(δ,t,˙M(t))dς[1δB(δ)+δB(δ)Γ(δ)]S3M˙M,
    P(t)˙P(t)1δB(δ)α4(δ,t,P(t))α4(δ,t,˙P(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1α4(δ,t,P(t))α4(δ,t,˙P(t))dς[1δB(δ)+δB(δ)Γ(δ)]S4P˙P,
    Q(t)˙Q(t)1δB(δ)α5(δ,t,Q(t))α5(δ,t,˙Q(t))+δB(δ)Γ(δ)t0(tς)δ1α5(δ,t,Q(t))α5(δ,t,˙Q(t))dς[1δB(δ)+δB(δ)Γ(δ)]S5Q˙Q.

    Taking υi=Si and Si=1δB(δ)+δB(δ)Γ(δ), this implies

    K(t)˙K(t)υ1S1. (7.1)

    In a similar manner, we have

    {L(t)˙L(t)υ2S2,M(t)˙M(t)υ3S3,P(t)˙P(t)υ4S4,Q(t)˙Q(t)υ5S5. (7.2)

    Using Eqs (7.1) and (7.2), the ABC fractional integral system (6.3) is Hyers-Ulam-stable and, consequently, the ABC fractional-order model (6.2) is Hyers-Ulam stable. This completes the proof.

    Newton's polynomial numerical method, named after Sir Isaac Newton, is a powerful technique for approximating the values of functions based on a set of data points. Developed in the 17th century, it revolutionized the field of numerical analysis. This method involves constructing a polynomial function that passes through the given data points, allowing for the estimation of intermediate values. The advantages of Newton's polynomial lie in its simplicity and efficiency. It provides a straightforward approach to interpolation and extrapolation, enabling accurate predictions and computations. Additionally, Newton's polynomial can be easily implemented and computed using finite differences, making it widely applicable in various scientific and engineering disciplines. Its historical significance and practical advantages make Newton's polynomial an essential tool in numerical analysis. Based on the Newton polynomial [56,57], a numerical scheme for the underlying model is presented in this section. The method is structured as follows: in the first step, we will discuss the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, and then the Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. In the final step, we will calculate the models with a fractal-fractional derivative:

    {CF0DδtK=η(β(K(t)L(t)))(ρ+η)K(t),CF0DδtL=βK(t)L(t)+ω(1ρ)P(t)(φ+ρ+η)L(t)+τλM(t),CF0DδtM=φL(t)(λ+σ+η)M(t),CF0DδtP=σM(t)(ω+η)P(t),CF0DδtQ=(1τ)λM(t)+ρ(K(t)+L(t)+ωP(t))ηQ(t). (8.1)

    The above equation is written as follows for simplicity:

    {CF0DδtK=K(t,K,L,M,P,Q),CF0DδtL=L(t,K,L,M,P,Q),CF0DδtM=M(t,M,L,M,P,Q),CF0DδtP=P(t,K,L,M,P,Q),CF0DδtQ=Q(t,K,L,M,P,Q). (8.2)

    Applying fractional integrals with an exponential kernel and putting the Newton polynomial into these equations, the model can be solved as follows:

    Kv+1=Kv+1δM(δ)[K(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)K(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312K(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)Δt43K(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512K(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Lv+1=Lv+1δM(δ)[L(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)L(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312L(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)Δt43L(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512L(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Mv+1=Mv+1δM(δ)[M(tv,Mv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)M(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312P(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)Δt43M(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512M(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Pv+1=Pv+1δM(δ)[P(tv,Mv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)P(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312P(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)Δt43P(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512P(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Qv+1=Qv+1δM(δ)[Q(tv,Mv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)Q(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312Q(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv,)Δt43Q(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512Q(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt.}

    The numerical scheme for the case of Mittag-Leffler is derived as follows.

    Kv+1=1δAB(δ)+K(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{K(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Lv+1=1δAB(δ)+L(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{L(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Mv+1=1δAB(δ)+M(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{M(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Pv+1=1δAB(δ)+P(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{P(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Qv+1=1δAB(δ)+Q(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{Q(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,

    where

    Δ=[(vu+1)δ[2(vu)2+(3δ+10)(vu)+2δ2+9δ+12](vu)δ[2(vu)2+(5δ+10)(vu)+6δ2+18δ+12]],
    Σ=[(vu+1)δ(vu+3+2δ)(vu)δ(vu+3+3δ)],Π=[(vu+1)δ(vu)δ].

    Finally, a numerical approximation is obtained by utilizing the Caputo derivative.

    Kv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{K(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Lv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{L(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Mv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{M(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Pv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{P(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Qv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{Q(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ.

    In the present study, we investigate our model incorporating fractal-fractional operators. The analysis commences by introducing the Caputo-Fabrizio fractal-fractional derivative.

    {FFE0Dδ,κtK=K(t,K,L,M,P,Q),FFE0Dδ,κtL=L(t,K,L,M,P,Q),FFE0Dδ,κtM=M(t,K,L,M,P,Q),FFE0Dδ,κtP=P(t,K,L,M,P,Q),FFE0Dδ,κtQ=Q(t,K,L,M,P,Q). (8.3)

    The following results come from applying a fractal-fractional integral to model (8.3) with an exponential kernel:

    Kv+1=Kv+1δM(δ)[t1κvK(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)t1κv1K(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312t1κvK(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)Δt43t1κv1K(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512t1κv2K(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Lv+1=Lv+1δM(δ)[t1κvL(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)t1κv1L(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312t1κvL(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)Δt43t1κv1L(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512t1κv2L(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Mv+1=Mv+1δM(δ)[t1κvM(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)t1κv1M(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312t1κvM(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)Δt43t1κv1M(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512t1κv2M(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Pv+1=Pv+1δM(δ)[t1κvP(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)t1κv1P(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312t1κvP(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)Δt43t1κv1P(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512t1κv2P(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt,}
    Qv+1=Qv+1δM(δ)[t1κvQ(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)t1κv1Q(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)]+δM(δ){2312t1κvQ(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)Δt43t1κv1Q(tv1,Kv1,Lv1,Mv,Pv1,Qv1)Δt+512t1κv2Q(tv2,Kv2,Lv2,Mv2,Pv2,Qv2)Δt.}

    We obtain the following numerical scheme for the Mittag-Leffler kernel:

    Kv+1=1δAB(δ)t1κvK(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuK(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Lv+1=1δAB(δ)t1κvL(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuL(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Mv+1=1δAB(δ)t1κvM(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuM(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Pv+1=1δAB(δ)t1κvP(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuP(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Qv+1=1δAB(δ)t1κvQ(tv,Kv,Lv,Mv,Pv,Qv)+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+δ(Δt)δAB(δ)Γ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+δ(Δt)δ2AB(δ)Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuQ(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ.

    We obtain the following numerical scheme for the power-law kernel:

    Kv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuK(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1K(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2K(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Lv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuL(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1L(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2L(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Mv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuM(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1M(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2M(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Pv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuP(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1P(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2P(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ,
    Qv+1=(Δt)δΓ(δ+1)vu=2t1κu2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)Π+(Δt)δΓ(δ+2)vu=2[t1κu1Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)t1κu2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)]Σ+(Δt)δ2Γ(δ+3)vu=2{t1κuQ(tu,Ku,Lu,Mu,Pu,Qu)2t1κu1Q(tu1,Ku1,Lu1,Mu1,Pu1,Qu1)+t1κu2Q(tu2,Ku2,Lu2,Mu2,Pu2,Qu2)}Δ.

    In this section of the article, our objective is to obtain an approximate solution for the non-integer-order financial crime model (6.1) using the Newton polynomial method. The simulation was conducted within a time interval ranging from 0 to 50 steps, employing MATLAB 2019. The parameter values for the system were set as follows: η=0.12;β=0.65;ρ=0.05;w=0.75;φ=0.2;τ=0.65;λ=0.43;σ=0.67 [4], and these values were utilized for the graphical representation. Numerical simulations were carried out for different orders of the fractional derivative, denoted as δ. The results demonstrate that the non-integer-order fractional derivative leads to favorable outcomes in terms of controlling the corrupt individuals. The dynamics of each class in the system (6.1) are depicted in Figure 3 for various values of δ, such as 0.90,0.85,0.80,0.75,0.70,0.65,0.60,0.55,0.50. From Figure 3a, it is observed that the number of susceptible individuals in the population decreases more rapidly, with a decay occurring in the fractional order δ. Conversely, in Figure 3b, the magnitude of financial criminals (corrupt individuals) decreases with a decay in the fractional order δ. Similarly, Figure 3c represents the dynamics of individuals under prosecution, showing a decrease in this population within the first 5 days, followed by a slow increase toward the stationary point as the fractional order δ is increased. Furthermore, the population of honest individuals is depicted in Figure 3d, indicating an increase as the fractional order δ is raised. Similarly, Figure 3e demonstrates a decrease in the population of jailed individuals, with a decay in the fractional order δ. Moreover, similar trends are observed in the simulation results of other fractional operators. Figures 4 and 5 represent the simulation results of model (6.1), as obtained by using the Caputo-Fabrizio and Caputo operations, respectively. Similarly, Figures 68 display the simulation results for model (6.1) using the fractal and fractional operators.

    Figure 3.  Graphs illustrating the behavior of each component for the ABC version of model (6.1) at different values of δ.
    Figure 4.  Graphs illustrating the behavior of each component for the Caputo-Fabrizio version of model (6.1) at different values of δ.
    Figure 5.  Graphs illustrating the behavior of each component for the Caputo version of model (6.1) at different values of δ.
    Figure 6.  Graphs illustrating the behavior of each component for the fractal and fractional version of model (6.1) with the Mittag-Leffler kernel and different fractional orders δ and fractal dimensions κ.
    Figure 7.  Graphs illustrating the behavior of each component for the fractal and fractional version of model (6.1) with the power-law kernel and different fractional orders δ and fractal dimensions κ.
    Figure 8.  Graphs illustrating the behavior of each component for the fractal and fractional version of model (6.1) with the exponential decay kernel and different fractional orders δ and fractal dimensions κ.

    In this study, we have redefined the financial crime model by incorporating a fractional derivative. The key focus was on determining the basic reproduction number (R0), establishing a feasible region and identifying a CFE point (ˇD0). It has been mathematically proven that ˇD0 exhibits local asymptotic stability when R0 is less than one. Subsequently, the model was fractionalized by using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative in the Caputo sense. The existence and uniqueness of the solution, along with the Ulam-Hyers stability, were rigorously demonstrated. To solve the model numerically, a novel numerical scheme proposed by Atangana and Seda was employed. This scheme, based on the Newton polynomial, is known for its enhanced accuracy compared to the Lagrange polynomial utilized in the Adams-Bashforth method. Additionally, we explored the numerical solutions of the same model by using other fractional derivatives, including the Caputo-Fabrizio, Caputo and fractal-fractional derivatives, as well as incorporating power law, exponential decay and Mittag-Leffler kernels. Future research could focus on incorporating real-world data on financial crime incidents to enhance the accuracy and applicability of the computational models. By using empirical data, the models can be calibrated and validated, leading to more reliable predictions and insights into the dynamics of financial crime populations. Second, we compared different fractional operators. The study currently focuses on the use of fractional operators such as Newton's polynomial, Caputo-Fabrizio, Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu operators. Future research could explore the comparative performance and suitability of these operators in modeling financial crime dynamics. This comparative analysis can provide insights into the strengths and limitations of different fractional operators and guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate operator for specific modeling scenarios.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia, for funding this work through the Research Group Project under grant number (RGP.2/27/44). The first author appreciates the support provided by Petchra Pra Jom Klao Ph.D. Research Scholarship through grant No. (50/2565), by King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand.

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.



    [1] P. Gottschalk, Categories of financial crime, Journal of Financial Crime, 17 (2010), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791011082797 doi: 10.1108/13590791011082797
    [2] K. H. S. Pickett, J. M. Pickett, Financial crime investigation and control, John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
    [3] H. R. Thieme, Mathematics in population biology, Princeton University Press, 2018.
    [4] J. O. Akanni, F. O. Akinpelu, S. Olaniyi, A. T. Oladipo, A. W. Ogunsola, Modelling financial crime population dynamics: optimal control and cost-effectiveness analysis, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 8 (2020), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-019-00572-3 doi: 10.1007/s40435-019-00572-3
    [5] H. Zhao, Z. Feng, C. Castillo-Chavez, The dynamics of poverty and crime, (Chinese), Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Natural Sciences Mathematics), 43 (2014), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.3969/J.1SSN.100-5137.2014.05.005 doi: 10.3969/J.1SSN.100-5137.2014.05.005
    [6] J. C. Nuño, M. A. Herrero, M. Primicerio, A triangle model of criminality, Physica A, 387 (2008), 2926–2936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.076 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.076
    [7] J. C. Nuño, M. A. Herrero, M. Primicerio, Fighting cheaters: How and how much to invest, Eur. J. Appl. Math., 21 (2010), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792510000094 doi: 10.1017/S0956792510000094
    [8] J. B. Shukla, A. Goyal, K. Agrawal, H. Kushwah, A. Shukla, Role of technology in combating social crimes: a modeling study, Eur. J. Appl. Math., 24 (2013), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792513000065 doi: 10.1017/S0956792513000065
    [9] D. McMillon, C. P. Simon, J. Morenoff, Modeling the underlying dynamics of the spread of crime, PLoS ONE, 9 (2014), e88923. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088923 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088923
    [10] G. González-Parra, B. Chen-Charpentier, H. V. Kojouharov, Mathematical modeling of crime as a social epidemic, J. Interdiscip. Math., 21 (2018), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2015.1132574 doi: 10.1080/09720502.2015.1132574
    [11] A. K. Srivastav, M. Ghosh, P. Chandra, Modeling dynamics of the spread of crime in a society, Stoch. Anal. Appl., 37 (2019), 991–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2019.1636658 doi: 10.1080/07362994.2019.1636658
    [12] O. M. Ibrahim, D. Okuonghae, M. N. O. Ikhile, Mathematical modeling of the population dynamics of age-structured criminal gangs with correctional intervention measures, Appl. Math. Model., 107 (2022), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.30511/mcs.2022.255061 doi: 10.30511/mcs.2022.255061
    [13] S. Athithan, M. Ghosh, X.-Z. Li, Mathematical modeling and optimal control of corruption dynamics, Asian-Eur. J. Math., 11 (2018), 1850090. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793557118500900 doi: 10.1142/S1793557118500900
    [14] U. A. M. Roslan, S. Zakaria, A. Alias, S. M. A. Malik, A mathematical model on the dynamics of poverty, poor and crime in west malaysia, Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 107 (2018), 309–319. http://doi.org/10.17654/MS107020309 doi: 10.17654/MS107020309
    [15] F. S. Chaharborj, B. Pourghahramani, S. S. Chaharborj, A dynamic economic model of criminal activity in the criminal law, International Journal of Basic Applied Sciences, 6 (2017), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v6i4.7969 doi: 10.14419/ijbas.v6i4.7969
    [16] F. Nyabadza, C. P. Ogbogbo, J. Mushanyu, Modelling the role of correctional services on gangs: insights through a mathematical model, R. Soc. Open Sci., 4 (2017), 170511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170511 doi: 10.1098/rsos.170511
    [17] J. Sooknanan, B. Bhatt, D. M. G. Comissiong, A modified predator-prey model for the interaction of police and gangs, R. Soc. Open Sci., 3 (2016), 160083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160083 doi: 10.1098/rsos.160083
    [18] R. Manasevich, Q. H. Phan, P. Souplet, Global existence of solutions for a chemotaxis-type system arising in crime modelling, Eur. J. Appl. Math., 24 (2013), 273–296. http://doi.org/10.1017/S095679251200040X doi: 10.1017/S095679251200040X
    [19] M. Goyal, H. M. Baskonus, A. Prakash, An efficient technique for a time fractional model of lassa hemorrhagic fever spreading in pregnant women, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 482. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12854-0 doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12854-0
    [20] W. Gao, P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, H. M. Baskonus, G. Yel, New approach for the model describing the deathly disease in pregnant women using Mittag-Leffler function, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 134 (2020), 109696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109696 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109696
    [21] R. T. Alqahtani, S. Ahmad, A. Akgül, Dynamical analysis of bio-ethanol production model under generalized nonlocal operator in Caputo sense, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 2370. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192370 doi: 10.3390/math9192370
    [22] P. Agarwal, R. Singh, Modelling of transmission dynamics of Nipah virus (Niv): a fractional order approach, Physica A, 547 (2020), 124243. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124243 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124243
    [23] R. Zarin, A. Khan, A. Yusuf, S. Abdel-Khalek, M. Inc, Analysis of fractional COVID-19 epidemic model under Caputo operator, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 7944–7964. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7294 doi: 10.1002/mma.7294
    [24] R. Zarin, A. Khan, P. Kumar, U. W. Humphries, Fractional-order dynamics of Chagas-HIV epidemic model with different fractional operators, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 18897–18924. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221041 doi: 10.3934/math.20221041
    [25] P. Agarwal, J. Choi, R. B. Paris, Extended Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative operator and its applications, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8 (2015), 451–466. http://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.008.05.01 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.008.05.01
    [26] R. Zarin, A. Khan, M. Inc, U. W. Humphries, T. Karite, Dynamics of five grade leishmania epidemic model using fractional operator with Mittag–Leffler kernel, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 147 (2021), 110985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110985 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110985
    [27] H. M. Srivastava, W. Adel, M. Izadi, A. A. El-Sayed, Solving some physics problems involving fractional-order differential equations with the Morgan-Voyce polynomials, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7040301 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7040301
    [28] W. Weera, T. Botmart, C. Chantawat, Z. Sabir, W. Adel, M. A. Z. Raja, et al., An intelligence computational approach for the fractional 4D chaotic financial model, Comput. Mater. Con., 74 (2023), 2711–2724. http://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.033233 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2023.033233
    [29] A. El-Mesady, A. Elsonbaty, W. Adel, On nonlinear dynamics of a fractional order monkeypox virus model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 164 (2022), 112716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112716 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112716
    [30] R. Zarin, Modeling and numerical analysis of fractional order hepatitis B virus model with harmonic mean type incidence rate, Comput. Method. Biomech. Biomed. Eng., in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2022.2103371
    [31] A. Khan, H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, T. Abdeljawad, Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability for a nonlinear singular fractional differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 127 (2019), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026
    [32] X. Jiang, J. Li, B. Li, W. Yin, L. Sun, X. Chen, Bifurcation, chaos, and circuit realisation of a new four-dimensional memristor system, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., in press. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2021-0393
    [33] B. Li, Z. Eskandari, Z. Avazzadeh, Dynamical behaviors of an SIR epidemic model with discrete time, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6110659 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6110659
    [34] A. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, T. S. Khan, H. Khan, Stability analysis and numerical solutions of fractional order HIV/AIDS model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 122 (2019), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.022 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.022
    [35] Y. Wang, S. Liu, A. Khan, On fractional coupled logistic maps: Chaos analysis and fractal control, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 5889–5904. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-08141-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-08141-8
    [36] A. Khan, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, M. Sher, On fractional order Sine-Gordon equation involving nonsingular derivative, Fractals, in press. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400078
    [37] P. Liu, A. Din, R. Zarin, Numerical dynamics and fractional modeling of hepatitis B virus model with non-singular and non-local kernels, Results Phys., 39 (2022), 105757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105757 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105757
    [38] R. Zarin, H. Khaliq, A. Khan, D. Khan, A. Akgül, U. W. Humphries, Deterministic and fractional modeling of a computer virus propagation, Results Phys., 33 (2022), 105130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105130 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105130
    [39] K. Bansal, S. Arora, K. S. Pritam, T. Mathur, S. Agarwal, Dynamics of crime transmission using fractional-order differential equations, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2250012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22500128 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22500128
    [40] K. S. Pritam, Sugandha, T. Mathur, S. Agarwal, Underlying dynamics of crime transmission with memory, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 146 (2021), 110838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110838 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110838
    [41] M. Partohaghighi, V. Kumar, A. Akgül, Comparative study of the fractional-order crime system as a social epidemic of the USA scenario, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 8 (2022), 190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-022-01399-x doi: 10.1007/s40819-022-01399-x
    [42] M. u. Rahman, S. Ahmad, M. Arfan, A. Akgül, F. Jarad, Fractional order mathematical model of serial killing with different choices of control strategy, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030162 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6030162
    [43] A. Atangana, S. İğret Araz, A novel Covid-19 model with fractional differential operators with singular and non-singular kernels: analysis and numerical scheme based on Newton polynomial, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 3781–3806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.016 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.016
    [44] H. W. Hethcote, The mathematics of infectious diseases, SIAM Rev., 42 (2000), 599–653. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144500371907 doi: 10.1137/S0036144500371907
    [45] P. van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
    [46] R. Mahardika, Widowati, Y. D. Sumanto, Routh-hurwitz criterion and bifurcation method for stability analysis of tuberculosis transmission model, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1217 (2019), 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012056 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012056
    [47] A. Hoare, D. G. Regan, D. P. Wilson, Sampling and sensitivity analyses tools (SaSAT) for computational modelling, Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 5 (2008), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-5-4 doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-5-4
    [48] J. Ding, A. Al dmour, Abnormal behavior of fractional differential equations in processing computer big data, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8 (2023), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.2.00011 doi: 10.2478/amns.2022.2.00011
    [49] D. Zhang, L. Yang, A. Arbab, The uniqueness of solutions of fractional differential equations in university mathematics teaching based on the principle of compression mapping, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8 (2023), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.2.00014 doi: 10.2478/amns.2022.2.00014
    [50] Y. Chen, Z. Chang, H. Mohamed, Mathematical modeling thoughts and methods based on fractional differential equations in teaching, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8 (2023), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.2.00012 doi: 10.2478/amns.2022.2.00012
    [51] Q. Zhao, Optimal model combination of cross-border E-commerce platform operation based on fractional differential equations, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8 (2023), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.2.0036 doi: 10.2478/amns.2022.2.0036
    [52] F. Wang, X. Xue, X. Zhu, A. S. Shatat, Fractional differential equations in the standard construction model of the educational application of the internet of things, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8 (2023), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.2.0037 doi: 10.2478/amns.2022.2.0037
    [53] A. Khan, R. Zarin, S. Khan, A. Saeed, T. Gul, U. W. Humphries, Fractional dynamics and stability analysis of COVID-19 pandemic model under the harmonic mean type incidence rate, Comput. Method. Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 25 (2022), 619–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1972096 doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1972096
    [54] A. Khan, R. Zarin, U. W. Humphries, A. Akgül, A. Saeed, T. Gul, Fractional optimal control of COVID-19 pandemic model with generalized Mittag-Leffler function, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 387. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03546-y doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03546-y
    [55] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model, arXiv: 1602.03408.
    [56] A. Atangana, S. İğret Araz, New numerical scheme with Newton polynomial: theory, methods, and applications, Academic Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-02711-8
    [57] A. Atangana, S. İğret Araz, Mathematical model of COVID-19 spread in Turkey and South Africa: theory, methods, and applications, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 659. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03095-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03095-w
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Farwah Ali Syed, Kwo-Ting Fang, Adiqa Kausar Kiani, Dong-Her Shih, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Novel intelligent supervised neuro-structures for nonlinear financial crime differential systems, 2024, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984924503998
    2. Manohara G, Kumbinarasaiah S, A Study of Fractional Order Financial Crime Model Using the Gegenbauer Wavelet Collocation Method, 2024, 2513-0390, 10.1002/adts.202400998
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1986) PDF downloads(135) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog