Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Atangana-Baleanu fractional dynamics of dengue fever with optimal control strategies

  • Received: 04 January 2023 Revised: 23 March 2023 Accepted: 03 April 2023 Published: 26 April 2023
  • MSC : 34H05, 49K15, 49K40

  • Dengue fever, a vector-borne disease, has affected the whole world in general and the Indian subcontinent in particular for the last three decades. Dengue fever has a significant economic and health impact worldwide; it is essential to develop new mathematical models to study not only the dynamics of the disease but also to suggest cost-effective mechanisms to control disease. In this paper, we design modified facts about the dynamics of this disease more realistically by formulating a new basic ShEhIhRh host population and SvIv vector population integer order model, later converting it into a fractional-order model with the help of the well-known Atangana-Baleanu derivative. In this design, we introduce two more compartments, such as the treatment compartment Th, and the protected traveler compartment Ph in the host population to produce ShEhIhThRhPh. We present some observational results by investigating the model for the existence of a unique solution as well as by proving the positivity and boundedness of the solution. We compute reproduction number R0 by using a next-generation matrix method to estimate the contagious behavior of the infected humans by the disease. In addition, we prove that disease free and endemic equilibrium points are locally and globally stable with restriction to reproduction number R0. The second goal of this article is to formulate an optimal control problem to study the effect of the control strategy. We implement the Toufik-Atangana scheme for the first time to solve both of the state and adjoint fractional differential equations with the ABC derivative operator. The numerical results show that the fractional order and the different constant treatment rates affect the dynamics of the disease. With an increase in the fractional order and the treatment rate, exposed and infected humans, as well as the infected mosquitoes, decrease. However, the optimal control analysis reveals that the implemented optimal control strategy is very effective for disease control.

    Citation: Asma Hanif, Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt. Atangana-Baleanu fractional dynamics of dengue fever with optimal control strategies[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15499-15535. doi: 10.3934/math.2023791

    Related Papers:

    [1] Asma Hanif, Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Tariq Ismaeel . Fractional optimal control analysis of Covid-19 and dengue fever co-infection model with Atangana-Baleanu derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5171-5203. doi: 10.3934/math.2024251
    [2] Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Aqeel Ahmad, Mustafa Inc, Muhammad Farman, Hadi Rezazadeh, Lanre Akinyemi, Muhammad Mannan Akram . Analysis of dengue transmission using fractional order scheme. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8408-8429. doi: 10.3934/math.2022469
    [3] Windarto, Muhammad Altaf Khan, Fatmawati . Parameter estimation and fractional derivatives of dengue transmission model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2758-2779. doi: 10.3934/math.2020178
    [4] Puntipa Pongsumpun, Jiraporn Lamwong, I-Ming Tang, Puntani Pongsumpun . A modified optimal control for the mathematical model of dengue virus with vaccination. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27460-27487. doi: 10.3934/math.20231405
    [5] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [6] Noorah Mshary, Hamdy M. Ahmed . Discussion on exact null boundary controllability of nonlinear fractional stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5552-5567. doi: 10.3934/math.2025256
    [7] Rahat Zarin, Abdur Raouf, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20755-20789. doi: 10.3934/math.20231058
    [8] Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber, Hijaz Ahmad . The fractal-fractional Atangana-Baleanu operator for pneumonia disease: stability, statistical and numerical analyses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29382-29410. doi: 10.3934/math.20231504
    [9] Muhammad Altaf Khan, Muhammad Ismail, Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farhan . Fractional order SIR model with generalized incidence rate. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1856-1880. doi: 10.3934/math.2020124
    [10] Mohammed A. Almalahi, Satish K. Panchal, Fahd Jarad, Mohammed S. Abdo, Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of a fuzzy Volterra-Fredholm integrodifferential equation with an Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15994-16016. doi: 10.3934/math.2022876
  • Dengue fever, a vector-borne disease, has affected the whole world in general and the Indian subcontinent in particular for the last three decades. Dengue fever has a significant economic and health impact worldwide; it is essential to develop new mathematical models to study not only the dynamics of the disease but also to suggest cost-effective mechanisms to control disease. In this paper, we design modified facts about the dynamics of this disease more realistically by formulating a new basic ShEhIhRh host population and SvIv vector population integer order model, later converting it into a fractional-order model with the help of the well-known Atangana-Baleanu derivative. In this design, we introduce two more compartments, such as the treatment compartment Th, and the protected traveler compartment Ph in the host population to produce ShEhIhThRhPh. We present some observational results by investigating the model for the existence of a unique solution as well as by proving the positivity and boundedness of the solution. We compute reproduction number R0 by using a next-generation matrix method to estimate the contagious behavior of the infected humans by the disease. In addition, we prove that disease free and endemic equilibrium points are locally and globally stable with restriction to reproduction number R0. The second goal of this article is to formulate an optimal control problem to study the effect of the control strategy. We implement the Toufik-Atangana scheme for the first time to solve both of the state and adjoint fractional differential equations with the ABC derivative operator. The numerical results show that the fractional order and the different constant treatment rates affect the dynamics of the disease. With an increase in the fractional order and the treatment rate, exposed and infected humans, as well as the infected mosquitoes, decrease. However, the optimal control analysis reveals that the implemented optimal control strategy is very effective for disease control.



    The dengue fever caused by mosquitoes is one of the most dangerous transmissible disease. More than 100 countries are effectively facing challenges from this disease. After malaria, dengue is scrutinized as the most life-threatening disease in recent times. It has been shown in WHO reports that every year 50 to 100 million cases of dengue are being observed. Earlier, dengue was considered a disease of hot regions, but now it has spread to the other regions of the world due to global warming. In the past 30 years, dengue infection has increased almost five fold. The symptoms of this disease are identified by high fever, frontal headache, pain behind the eyes, joint pain, nausea, vomiting and some other symptoms. The human population is mainly affected by the bites of the female mosquitoes carrying the dengue virus. The infection occurs when a mosquito sucks the blood from an infected person and transfers the virus to other healthy individuals by biting them. The symptoms do not appear in infected individuals for approximately 4 to 7 days (on average) before they begin to experience a sudden onset of fever.

    There is no specific cure for dengue fever, but some precautions can be suggested to avoid or reduce the effect of disease. They include hospital treatments, with complete bed rest in support of medication to prevent fever and to give relief in pain. In addition, mosquito repellent must be used, wearing long-sleeved shirts and pants. Outdoors must be avoided without having proper preventive measures at dawn and dusk. It is highly recommended to clean uncovered stagnant water properly indoors and outdoors and to avoid camping near still water. According to conventional wisdom, the human body's natural immune system eliminates dengue virus within 7 days of infection [1].

    A useful tool for forecasting the dynamics of communicable diseases with preventive measures is the mathematical modeling technique. Many epidemic models consisting of ordinary, stochastic or delay differential equations have been suggested and investigated to analyze the dynamics of a variety of vector-host infectious diseases. The transmission dynamics of dengue fever can be understood with the help of the variety of models given in [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Researchers have conducted several studies to investigate the transmission of dengue fever to control the disease and to compare various theories to eradicate it from the society. For example, in [6], a compartmental deterministic model including human prevention and vector control interventions for the dynamics of dengue fever spread is presented to analyze the impact of various control strategies on disease control. An optimal control model of dengue infection with partial immune and asymptomatic individuals is analyzed in [13], where the authors introduced four time-dependent control measures and performed a cost-effective analysis by suggesting five strategies for controlling dengue fever. The various modeling approaches used in formulating these models are limited because of the local nature of integer order derivatives. Recently, many researchers have started converting these mathematical models to fractional models in order to add memory effects for the best analysis of dengue fever disease. For example, the authors in [14,15] consider a compartmental model for the transmission dynamics of dengue fever with nonlinear forces of infection through the fractional derivative and show that the biting rate, recruitment rate of mosquitoes and index of memory are the most sensitive factors to lower the level of dengue fever. Vaccination effect on the proposed system's threshold is also explored here.

    Fractional modeling for epidemiology is more productive than integer order with reference to the memory as the past is required to explain the present. Classical integer order models consisting of autonomous differential equations have no memory, as their solution does not depend on previous instant. This means, given an initial value, the solution is determined uniquely for any point of the domain. However, this claim is not true for fractional-order differential equations. Thus, to introduce the memory effect into a mathematical model, the order of the derivative of the classical model is changed to the noninteger order [16,17]. In the recent past, fractional calculus has been considered a key tool to design epidemic models to obtain better results to eradicate diseases from society. Recent literature on fractional modeling [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] shows that the mathematical models constructed by using fractional operators behave more accurately and provide a better fit to the real data.

    A variety of fractional derivative operators have been suggested in the last few decades, but recently the fractional operators, namely, the Caputo [27,28], Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) [29,30,31] and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) [32,33,34] have obtained more attraction of the researchers. The main disadvantage of the Caputo operator is the singularity property of its kernel. Although the CF derivative has a nonsingular kernel, the function space of CF derivative is not clear and has no memory effects [35]. The ABC fractional derivative operator, proposed by Atangana and Baleanu, uses a Mittag-Leffler (ML) kernel with one parameter. The ML function is a generalization of the exponential function in the context of fractional calculus, and the main advantage of this kernel is its nonlocal and nonsingular behavior. The ABC fractional operator is thus considered to be superior and is chosen as the best option for modeling real world phenomena, including epidemic diseases. The applicability of this operator to models can be found in [36,37,38]. Some more attributes of this operator were later reported by Losada and Nieto in [39]. Since then, many mathematical models have been formulated by researchers by using this operator. The results associated with these models have shown both the efficiency and suitability of the ABC operator.

    Optimal control analysis is considered to be a very effective tool to provide reasonable control strategies to eradicate or to minimize an infection in the human population. Moreover, such an analysis gives better understanding of the disease flow pattern. Therefore, conveniently, the optimal control problems involving fractional calculus are called fractional optimal control problems (FOCPs) and are considered to be the general form of classical optimal control problems (OCPs). Many researchers have applied FOCPs for better understanding and for speedy results about the behavior of eradicating diseases [41,42,43]. We can say that by using FOCPs, we are able to do some new analysis to remove the dengue disease from the face of earth. Hence, FOCPs have become potentially the most flexible tool in modeling and analyzing biological systems related to time memory. The main objective of this study is also to design a fractional optimal control problem of eradicating dengue disease from society.

    To demonstrate the usefulness of the ABC fractional operator, we have developed a new ABC fractional-order system of ordinary differential equations to explore the dynamics of dengue fever for optimal control in the context of treated travelers. The choice of ABC operator is due to its nonlocal and nonsingular kernel; moreover, the crossover attribute of epidemic models can be described in a better way via this operator. Another advantage of this operator is its capability to capture more susceptibilities and fewer infections than that of the other fractional operators such as Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio [34]. The purpose of developing this fractional model is to examine the impact of fractional order on disease dynamics and to determine the possible control strategy. For this, we first present some important features of the suggested model, such as the existence and uniqueness of the solution, positivity, invariant regions, reproduction number and stability analysis. An important feature of this study is to use Toufik-Atangana numerical scheme for the first time to optimally analyze the proposed ABC fractional dengue fever model.

    The remaining sections of this paper are structured as follows: In Section 2, we formulate a ShEhIhThRhPh host population and SvIv vector population integer order model by introducing two compartments in the host population, i.e., treatment and protected travelers. Corresponding to this integer-order model, a nonlinear fractional model is formulated with the help of the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative in Section 3 for better analysis of the memory effects. Sections 4 and 5 address the theoretical view of the proposed fractional model where the existence of the unique solution, the positivity and boundedness of solutions, the calculations of the equilibrium points and the basic reproduction number are presented. Section 6 presents the stability analysis of the model, where we analyze the behavior of the model locally as well as globally. In Section 7, a numerical scheme is presented to simulate the effect of order as well as the effect of various treatments levels on the suggested model. In this section, we present sensitivity analysis to determine highly sensitive parameters to reproduction number R0. The model is then adjusted with time-dependent control to formulate an optimal control problem in Section 8. Associated optimality conditions resulting from the Pontryagin principle are numerically solved by using the Toufik-Atangana scheme to determine the best treatment strategy for dengue fever control. Conclusions drawn from numerical simulations are presented in Section 9.

    The central idea about transmission models is to describe the transmission of infected individuals in a mechanical way. This approach makes it easy to transform the evolution of an epidemic in mathematical form. Therefore, designing a mathematical model requires focusing on necessary processes needed in formulating the epidemiology of an infectious disease and discerning the most significant and tractable parameters for control. Consequently, in this section, we formulate a basic ShEhIhRh host and SvIv vector population model with the addition of two new classes, treatment class Th and protected travelers class Ph to make it more realistic. In the treatment class, the infectious subjects receives proper treatment along with some preventive measures, and after treatment, they move to the recovered class and finally become protected travelers. Protected travelers are free to move anywhere in the society without being afraid of becoming infected again[44].

    This model is represented by two populations, i.e., the human population and the vector (mosquitoes) population. The total population is denoted by P(t), which is further partitioned into various compartments, i.e., susceptible human population denoted by Sh(t), the exposed individuals Eh(t) after being bitten by mosquitoes, infected humans denoted with Ih(t), humans under treatment represented by Th(t), Rh(t) are the recovered or removed individuals and the protected travelers represented by Ph(t). The vector (mosquito) population is subdivided into two classes, i.e., susceptible mosquitoes denoted by Sv(t) and the infected mosquitoes represented by Iv(t). The human population recruitment rate is denoted by λh. Susceptible humans are bitten by the mosquitoes at the rate of α. The probabilities of contact between an infectious mosquito and a susceptible person and between an infectious person and a susceptible mosquito are given by βh and βv, respectively. Humans in the exposed class become infectious at a rate ζh. Infected people receiving treatment from the hospital are recruited to the treatment class at the rate vh, and they recover from dengue fever at a rate ξh to move into the class of protected travelers at the rate of δh. Humans die naturally at a rate μh in all compartments and die due to disease at the rates dh1, dh2 in the compartments Ih and Th, respectively. The mosquitoes are recruited at rate λv to the susceptible class Sv and become infected when they have interaction with the infected humans. The mosquitoes die naturally at a rate μv. The real-valued state variables Sh, Eh, Ih, Th, Rh, Ph, Sv, Iv are considered as time dependent functions that belong to class C1[0,). Figure 1 describes the disease flow pattern through the population compartments together with the model assumptions and the parameters for the considered compartments.

    Figure 1.  Flow diagram for the dengue fever model.

    The disease flow pattern given in Figure 1 is described in the form of the following nonlinear coupled ordinary differential equations, called the ShEhIhThRhPhSvIv model.

    dShdt=λhαβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh, (2.1a)
    dEhdt=αβhShIv(ζh+μh)Eh, (2.1b)
    dIhdt=ζhEh(vh+μh+dh1)Ih, (2.1c)
    dThdt=vhIh(ξh+μh+dh2)Th, (2.1d)
    dRhdt=ξhTh(δh+μh)Rh, (2.1e)
    dPhdt=τhSh+δhRhμhPh, (2.1f)
    dSvdt=λvαβvSvIhμvSv, (2.1g)
    dIvdt=αβvSvIhμvIv, (2.1h)

    with the initial conditions

    Sh(0)>0, Eh(0)0, Ih(0)0, Th(0)0, Rh(0)0,Ph(0)0, Sv(0)>0, Iv(0)0, (2.1i)

    where Sh(0), Eh(0), Ih(0), Th(0), Rh(0), Ph(0), Sv(0), Iv(0) represent the initial population sizes. The parameters of this dynamical system for the human population and the vector population are given in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Model parameters along with their numerical values.
    Parameter Description Values Source
    λh Human population recruitment rate 0.05 [44]
    λv Vector population recruitment rate 0.071 [44]
    μh Natural death rate of human population 0.05 Assumed
    βh Probability for a susceptible human to be bitten by an infectious mosquito 0.5 [44]
    βv Probability for an infectious human to be bitten by a susceptible mosquito 0.57 Assumed
    α Rate at which susceptible humans are bitten by the mosquitoes 0.4 [44]
    ζh Rate at which humans become infectious 0.03 [44]
    ξh Rate of becoming recovered 0.02 [44]
    τh Rate of becoming protected from susceptible 0.01 Assumed
    δh Rate of becoming protected from recovered 0.06 [44]
    vh Rate of getting treatment 0.03 Assumed
    dh1 Disease-induced death rate of infectious humans 0.01 Assumed
    dh2 Disease-induced death rate of humans under treatment 0.01 Assumed
    μv Natural death rate of vector population 0.05 Assumed

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Fractional-order derivatives are very useful in the field of mathematical epidemiology, as they give very versatile results as compared to those of classical derivatives. Before applying the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative to our proposed dengue model, we first describe some basic concepts regarding the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative and other associated results.

    Definition 3.1. Let ΩR be open and p ϵ [1,), so Hp(Ω) can be defined as

    Hp(Ω)={ωL2(Ω): DαωL2, for all |α|p}.

    Definition 3.2. [45,46] The Caputo derivative of fractional order ρ with n1<ρ<n, nN, for an integrable function gCn, can be presented as

    CaDρtg(t)=1Γ(nρ)tagn(γ)(tγ)nρ1dγ.

    For either of the cases n=1 or n=2, the Caputo fractional derivative CaDρtg(t) tends to g(t) as its order ρ tends to 1.

    Definition 3.3. [32] The Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative of a differentiable function g(t), i.e., g:[a,b]R of order ρ where ρ (0,1), b>a, is denoted by ABCaDρg(t), where g H1(a,b) is defined as:

    ABCaDρg(t)=M(ρ)(1ρ)tag(γ)Eρ[ρ1ρ(tγ)ρ]dγ,

    where M(ρ) represents the normalization function satisfying M(0) = M(1) = 1 and Eρ is known to be the Mittag-Leffler (ML) function defined as

    Eρ(z)=n=0(z)nΓ(ρn+1).

    Definition 3.4. [32] The Laplace transform of the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative is defined as:

    L[ ABCaDρtg(t)]=M(ρ)(1ρ)[sρL[g(t)](s)sρ1g(0)sρ+ρ1ρ], s0.

    Definition 3.5. [32,46] The fractional integral with a nonlocal kernel can be defined as:

    ABCaIρtg(t)=1ρM(ρ)g(t)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)tag(γ)(tγ)ρ1dγ.

    Definition 3.6. The fractional derivatives and integrals satisfy the following useful relation:

    CIρ[CDρu(t)]=CFIρ[CFDρu(t)]=ABCIρ[ABCDρu(t)]=u(t)u(0).

    Fractional order models are very widely used compared to the integer order models due to hereditary and the description of memory. Therefore, to observe the internal memory effects of the dengue fever biological model, we replace the first-order ordinary derivatives in (2.1) by the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative of order ρ where 0<ρ<1 to obtain:

    ABC0DρtSh(t)=λhαβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh, (3.1a)
    ABC0DρtEh(t)=αβhShIv(ζh+μh)Eh, (3.1b)
    ABC0DρtIh(t)=ζhEh(vh+μh+dh1)Ih, (3.1c)
    ABC0DρtTh(t)=vhIh(ξh+μh+dh2)Th, (3.1d)
    ABC0DρtRh(t)=ξhTh(δh+μh)Rh, (3.1e)
    ABC0DρtPh(t)=τhSh+δhRhμhPh, (3.1f)
    ABC0DρtSv(t)=λvαβvSvIhμvSv, (3.1g)
    ABC0DρtIv(t)=αβvSvIhμvIv, (3.1h)

    with the initial conditions:

    Sh(0)>0, Eh(0)0, Ih(0)0, Th(0)0, Rh(0)0,Ph(0)0, Sv(0)>0, Iv(0)0, (3.1i)

    where 0ttf<. We suppose that

    χ1(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=λhαβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh,χ2(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=αβhShIv(ζh+μh)Eh,χ3(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Ph(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=ζhEh(vh+μh+dh1)Ih,χ4(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=vhIh(ξh+μh+dh2)Th,χ6(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=τhSh+δhRhμhPh,χ5(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=ξhTh(δh+μh)Rh,χ7(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=λvαβvSvIhμvSv,χ8(t,Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))=αβvSvIhμvIv.

    The compact form of the above model is

    ABC0Dρtη(t)=χ(t,η(t)),η(0)=η00. (3.2)

    Since the given system of differential equations is an autonomous system, it can be written as:

    ABC0Dρtη(t)=χ(η(t)),η(0)=η0, (3.3)

    where η(t)=(Sh(t),Eh(t),Ih(t),Th(t),Rh(t),Ph(t),Sv(t),Iv(t))TR8 and η0(t)=(Sh(0), Eh(0), Ih(0), Th(0), Rh(0),Ph(0), Sv(0), Iv(0))T is the initial vector.

    In this section, we prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions with the help of theorems from functional analysis and fractional calculus. Some relevant material in the form of definitions and theorems from fractional calculus and functional analysis is also given in this section to assist in proving the stated theorems.

    Definition 4.1. [48] A sequence (xn) in a metric space X=(X,d) is said to be convergent to x if for every ϵ>0, there is an N=N(ϵ) such that

    d(xn,x)<ϵfor every n>n0N.

    Definition 4.2. [48] A sequence (xn) in a metric space X=(X,d) is said to be a Cauchy sequence if for every ϵ>0, there is an N=N(ϵ) such that

    d(xn,xm)<ϵfor every m,n>n0N.

    Definition 4.3. [48] A metric space X is known as a complete metric space if every Cauchy sequence is convergent in X.

    Definition 4.4. [48] The space of bounded and continuous functions C[a, b] is a complete metric space with the metric defined as:

    d(x,y)=Supt[a,b]f(t)g(t).

    Definition 4.5. [48] A sequence (xn) is contractive in a metric space X if a constant C(0,1) such that

    d(xn,xn1)<Cd(xn1,xn2),

    for all nN. C is called the contractive constant of the sequence.

    Theorem 4.1. [48] A sequence is convergent in a complete metric space X if and only if it is Cauchy sequence.

    Theorem 4.2. [51] Every contractive sequence is a Cauchy sequence, and therefore, convergent in complete metric space.

    Theorem 4.3. [49] Let ϕ:DRn with ϕC1(D) and xDR. Then ϕ fulfills a Lipschitz condition on each convex compact set DD with Lipchitz constant K>0 such that

    K=supxDdϕdx.

    Theorem 4.4. The function χ(η) in Eq (3.3) is Lipschitz continuous.

    Proof. Let S={(t,η)| 0ttf, ηR8+} and US be convex compact.

    Let η1,η2S, then by Mean Value Theorem γ(η1,η2) such that

    χ(η1(t))χ(η2(t))η1(t)η2(t)=χ(γ(t)),

    or

    χ(η1(t))χ(η2(t))=χ(γ(t))(η1(t)η2(t)),
    χ(η1(t))χ(η2(t))=∣χ(γ(t)).(η1(t)η2(t)),χ(γ)η1η2.

    Since χC1[0,tf], over convex compact set U, a constant θ>0 such that

    χ(γ)θ,

    hence,

    χ(η1(t))χ(η2)(t)θη1η2,supt[0,tf]χ(η1)χ(η2)θη1η2,χ(η1)χ(η2)θη1η2.

    Hence, χ(η) is Lipschitz.

    Theorem 4.5. We suppose that the function χ(η) satisfies the Lipschitz condition

    χ(η2)χ(η1)θη2η1,

    then the problem (3.3) has a unique solution for

    θ(1ρM(ρ)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)T)<1.

    Proof. We prove that the function η(t) satisfies Eq (3.3) if and only if the equation

    η(t)=ABCaIρtχ(η(t)),

    is satisfied by it.

    Let η(t) satisfy Eq (3.3). Applying the Atangana-Baleanu fractional integral to Eq (3.3), that is,

    ABCaIρt[ABCaDρtη(t)]=ABCaIρtχ(η(t)).

    After simplification, we obtain the following integral equation:

    η(t)=η(0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(η(t))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)ta(tγ)ρ1χ(γ)dγ. (4.1)

    For the converse implication, we let ηn be a sequence of solutions which converges to the solution (4.1) with Picard successive iteration, defined as follows:

    ηn(t)=η(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(ηn(t))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0(tγ)ρ1χ(ηn)dγ, with η(t0)=η0. (4.2)

    First, we show that the sequence (4.2) is contractive if:

    k=θ(1ρM(ρ)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)T)<1,

    where T=tfΥ and Υ=supt[0,tf](tγ)ρ1.

    ηn(t)ηn1(t)∣=1ρM(ρ)[χ(ηn1(t))χ(ηn2(t))]+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0(tχ)ρ1[χ(ηn1(t))χ(ηn2(t))]dγ,1ρM(ρ)χ(ηn1(t))χ(ηn2(t))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0(tχ)ρ1χ(ηn1(x))χ(ηn2)dγ.

    Using the Lipchitz property of function χ(η), we obtain the following expression:

    ηn(t)ηn1(t)1ρM(ρ)θηn1(t)ηn2(t)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0(tχ)ρ1θηn1(t)ηn2(t)dγ,1ρM(ρ)θsupt[0,tf]ηn1(t)ηn2(t)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0θsupt[0,tf](tχ)ρ1supt[0,tf]ηn1(t)ηn2(t)dγ,ηn(t)ηn1(t)θ(1ρM(ρ)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)T)ηn1ηn2,supt[0,tf]ηn(t)ηn1(t)θ(1ρM(ρ)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)T)ηn1ηn2,ηnηn1kηn1ηn2,

    which implies

    d(ηn,ηn1)k d(ηn1,ηn2). (4.3)

    Thus, from Eq (4.3), the sequence (4.2) is contractive; hence, Theorem 4.2 implies that the sequence is Cauchy sequence. Now for m,nN and m>n,

    ηmηn∣=ηmηm1+ηm1ηm2+ηm2...ηn+1+ηn+1ηn,ηmηm1+ηm1ηm2+...+ηn+1ηn,km1η1η0+km2η1η0+...+kmnη1η0,[km1+km2+...+kn]η1η0,

    where

    k=θ(1ρM(ρ)+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)T)<1.

    Hence, the right-hand side is a geometric series that is always convergent for 0<k<1.

    ηmηn∣≤kn1kmn1kη1η0kn11kη1η0.

    Since 0<k<1, lim(kn)=0. Therefore, we infer that the sequence (ηn) is Cauchy, and hence, from Theorem 4.1, it is convergent. Let lim(ηn)=y; then, Eq (4.2) gives

    limnηn(t)=η(t)=η(0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(η(t))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0(tγ)ρ1χ(η(γ))dγ. (4.4)

    Equation (4.4) is the required solution.

    Uniqueness: To prove the uniqueness of the solution, we suppose on contrary that the sequence (ηn) converges to two different limits η1 and η2. Then, there exist n1 and n2N such that

    ηnη1∣<ϵ1,nn1,ηnη2∣<ϵ2,nn2.

    Let n=max{n1,n2}

    η1η2∣=η1ηn+ηnη2∣≤η1ηn+ηnη2∣<ϵ1+ϵ2=ϵ,

    which implies,

    η1η2∣=0η1=η2.

    Hence, we have proved that solution (4.4) is a unique solution of (3.3).

    In this subsection, we determine the feasible region of solutions (Sh,Eh,Ih,Th,Rh,Ph,Sv,Iv) of the system of Eq (3.1) with initial data having nonnegative values. Here, our focus is to prove that the feasible region lies in R8+, which is a positive invariant region with respect to the model (3.1).

    Theorem 4.6. For the Atangana-Baleanu fractional model (3.1), the epidemiological feasible region is given by

    Π={y=(Sh,Eh,Ih,Th,Rh,Ph,Sv,Iv)R8+: 0Pλμ}, (4.5)

    where λ=λh+λv and μ=min(μh,μv).

    We have already proven the existence and uniqueness of solutions of model (3.1) in the last section; it remains to be proven that the set Π is positively invariant with respect to initial data Sh(0)>0, Eh(0)0, Ih(0)0, Th(0)0, Rh(0)0, Ph(0)0, Sv(0)>0, Iv(0)0. The following Lemma proves Theorem 4.6.

    Lemma 4.1. System (3.1) has bounded solutions.

    Proof. Adding equations of the fractional model (3.1), we have

    ABC0DρtP(t)=ABC0DρtSh(t)+ABC0DρtEh(t)+ABC0DρtIh(t)+ABC0DρtTh(t)+ABC0DρtRh(t)+ABC0DρtPh(t)+ABC0DρtSv(t)+ABC0DρtIv(t),=λh+λvμh(Sh(t)+Eh(t)+Ih(t)+Th(t)+Rh(t)+Ph(t))+μv(Sv(t)+Iv(t))dh1Ih(t)dh2Th(t),

    where P(t) is the total of the host and vector populations. Clearly,

    ABC0DρtP(t)λμP(t)dh1Ih(t)dh2Th(t)λμP(t),

    where λ=λh+λv and μ=min(μh,μv). Therefore, it follows that

    ABC0DρtP(t)λμP(t).

    By applying the Laplace transform on both sides:

    L[ABC0DρtP(t)](s)λsμL[P(t)](s),

    or

    M(ρ)sρρ+(1ρ)sρP(s)+μP(s)λsρ(ρ+1)+M(ρ)P(0)sρ1ρ+(1ρ)sρ, (4.6)

    where P(s)=[P(t)](s) and P(0) is the total initial population. Solving inequality (4.6) for P(s), we obtain the following expanded expression:

    P(s)λρ(1ρ)μ+M(ρ) sρ(ρ+1)sρ+ρμ(1ρ)μ+M(ρ)+[λ(1ρ)(1ρ)μ+M(ρ)+M(ρ)P(0)(1ρ)μ+M(ρ)]sρ1sρ+ρμM(ρ)+(1ρ)μ.

    Applying the inverse Laplace, we obtain

    P(t)λρtρ(1ρ)μ+M(ρ)Eρ,ρ+1(Ωtρ)+[λ(1ρ)(1ρ)μ+M(ρ)+M(ρ)P(0)M(ρ)+(1ρ)μ]Eρ,1(Ωtρ), (4.7)

    where Ω=ρμM(ρ)+(1ρ)μ, and Eα,β is the ML function with two nonnegative parameters α and β, which are defined by

    Eα,β(z)=n=0znΓ(αn+β).

    The following Laplace transform exists:

    L[tβ1Eα,β(±Λtα)]=sαβsαΛ,

    provided that s>|Λ|1/α. For nonnegative α, β, the ML function satisfies

    Eα,β(z)=1z[Eα,βα(z)1Γ(βα)],

    and in the case α=ρ, β=ρ+1 and z=Ωtρ, we obtain

    Eρ,ρ+1(Ωtρ)=1Ωtρ[1Eρ,1(Ωtρ)]. (4.8)

    The ML function is bounded for all t>0 and behaves asymptotically [32]. By using the expression (4.8) in inequality (4.7), so we obtain P(t)λμ as t. Thus, P(t) is bounded in a region Π, and hence, all the state variables of model (3.1) are bounded.

    Thus, for any set of nonnegative initial data in Π, the corresponding solution y(t) of model (3.1) in R8+

    approach asymptotically in finite time t to enter and remain in Π. This means that the region Π attracts all solutions in R8+. Therefore, the region Π is a positively invariant [34,50] for the model (3.1) and hence, the proposed model (3.1) is epidemiologically correct.

    In this subsection, we prove that the state variables Sh, Eh, Ih, Th, Rh, Ph, Sv, and Iv are greater than or equal to zero for any tR+. This implies that solution y(t) of model (3.1) remains positive corresponding to any initial data in R8+. The proof of this property shows that model (3.1) is physically realizable.

    Theorem 4.7. The solution y(t)=(Sh,Eh,Ih,Th,Rh,Ph,Sv,Iv) of the model (3.1) always remains positive against any positive initial data.

    Proof. Let Eq (3.1a) be rearranged to write

    ABC0DρtSh(t)αβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh. (4.9)

    Since all the solutions are bounded, Eq (4.9) can be rewritten as

    ABC0DρtSh(t)c Sh(t), (4.10)

    where we take c=αβhIv+(τh+μh) as a constant. With the Laplace transform, inequality (4.10) reduces to

    M(ρ)sρρ+(1ρ)sρL[Sh(t)](s)M(ρ)sρ1ρ+(1ρ)sρSh(0)c L[Sh(t)](s),
    [M(ρ)sρ+cρ+c(1ρ)sρ]L[Sh(t)](s)M(ρ)sρ1Sh(0),
    L[Sh(t)](s)M(ρ)Sh(0)M(ρ)+c(1ρ)sρ1sρ+cρM(ρ)+c(1ρ).

    Applying the inverse Laplace transform to the above inequality, we obtain

    Sh(t)M(ρ)Sh(0)M(ρ)+c(1ρ)Eρ,1(cρM(ρ)+c(1ρ)tρ). (4.11)

    Since both terms on the right-hand side of (4.11) are positive, the solution Sh(t) remains positive for all t0. Following a similar technique, it can be proven that other states are positive for all t0 against any initial data in Π. Thus, the solutions in R8+ always remain positive.

    In this section, we describe the existence of disease-free and endemic points for our Atangana-Baleanu fractional order dengue fever model (3.1) to discuss the stability and dynamical behavior of the epidemic.

    The human population and the vector population free of dengue fever virus can be represented by the disease-free point, which is obtained by considering ABC0Dρtηi(t)=0 for each state variable ηi, i=1,2,,8 and substituting E0h=I0h=R0h=P0h=I0v=0. Therefore, with these substitutions, model (3.1) gives:

    S0h=λhτh+μh, P0h=τhλhμh(τh+μh), S0v=λvμv.

    Thus, the disease-free point, denoted by Q0h, can be written as:

    Q0h=(S0h,E0h,I0h,T0h,R0h,P0h,S0v,I0v)=(λhτh+μh,0,0,0,0τhλhμh(τh+μh),λvμv,0).

    Before describing the dynamics of model (3.1), we first determine the reproduction number in the next subsection.

    The reproduction number, denoted by R0, is a basic measure in epidemiology that shows the total number of secondary cases produced by a single infected person in a fully susceptible population during an infectious period. We focus on fractional differential equations associated with the compartments of exposed Eh, infected Ih and receiving treatment Th human population and the infected vector (mosquitoes) population Iv. Here, we used the next generation method strategy to compute the value of R0. The column matrix of the rate of arrival of new infections denoted by F is written as

    F=(αβhShIv00αβvSvIh),

    and the column matrix of transitional terms in Eh, Ih, Th and Iv compartments is given by

    V=((ζh+μh)EhζhEh+(vh+μh+dh1)IhvhIh+(ξh+μh+dh2)ThμvIv).

    Jacobian of the matrices F and V at point Q0h are calculated to give

    F=(000αβhS0h000000000αβvS0v00),V=(ζh+μh000ζhvh+μh+dh1000vhξh+μh+dh20000μv).

    Then,

    FV1=(000L1000000000L200)(1C2000ζhC2C31C300ζhvhC2C3C4vhC3C41C400001μv),

    where L1=(αβh)λhτh+μh and L2=(αβv)λvμv and C2=ζh+μh and C3=vh+μh+dh1 and C4=ξh+μh+dh2.

    After multiplication, we compute the reproduction number R0 as the spectral radius of the matrix FV1, which is given as:

    R0=αβvλvζhμvC2C3.

    Endemic equilibrium point of the fractional order model (3.1), denoted by Q1h, is obtained by considering ABC0Dρtηi(t)=0 for each state variable ηi, i=1,2,,8 and by solving the resultant equations to produce:

    Q1h=(S1h,E1h,I1h,T1h,R1h,P1h,S1v,I1v),

    where

    S1h=C2N1(μvαβvI1h+μ2v)α2βhβvλv,I1h=λhα2βhβvλvC1μ2vC2N1α2βhβvλv+C1C2N1μvαβv,E1h=N1I1h,T1h=N2I1h,R1h=N2N3I1h,P1h=τhαβvλvI1h+δhN2N3I1h(μvαβvI1h+μ2v)μhμvαβvI1h+μhμ2v+μh,S1v=λvαβvI1h+μv,I1v=αβvλvI1hμv(αβvI1h+μv),

    where N1=C3ζh, N2=vhC4, N3=ξhC5.

    In this section, we describe the dynamics of the model (3.1) at disease-free equilibrium point and the endemic equilibrium point with the help of the following analysis. In that analysis, we present the local and global stabilities of model (3.1) at both equilibrium points with the help of reproduction number R0.

    Theorem 6.1. The equilibrium point Q0h is locally asymptotically stable (LAS) when R0<1 and unstable otherwise provided R01.

    Proof. We compute the Jacobian of system (3.1) at Q0h to obtain

    J(Q0h)=(C1000000L10C200000L10ζhC30000000vhC40000τh000μhδh00000ξh0C50000L2000μv000L20000μv). (6.1)

    The disease-free Jacobian matrix (6.1) has the following eigenvalues:

    ˉλ1=μv, ˉλ2=μh, ˉλ3=C3, ˉλ4=C2, ˉλ5=C2C3μvL1L2ζhC2C3, ˉλ6=C5, ˉλ7=C4, ˉλ8=C1. As we can see that C1,C2,C3,C4,C5 are positive so ˉλ1,ˉλ2,ˉλ3,ˉλ4,ˉλ6,ˉλ7,ˉλ8 are negative. ˉλ5 can be written as ˉλ5=μv(R01)<0. Therefore, ˉλ5<0 as R0<1. Therefore, the proposed model is locally asymptotically stable where all the eigenvalues are negative when R0<1.

    Theorem 6.2. A dengue fever present equilibrium Q1h is LAS whenever R0>1 and unstable whenever R0<1.

    Proof. Jacobian for the system (3.1) at Q1h is computed to obtain

    J(Q1h)=(M1C1000000L1M1C200000L10ζhC30000000vhC40000000ξhC5000τh000δhμh0000L2000M2μv000L2000M2μv).

    The following eigenvalues have been computed for matrix J(Q1h).

    ˉλ1=μh,ˉλ2=M2μv,ˉλ3=C3,ˉλ4=C2,ˉλ5=M1C1,ˉλ6=(μv)[C1C2C3M2+C1C2C3μv+C2C3M1M2+C2C3M1μvC1C2L2ζh]C2C3[C1M2+C1μv+M1M2+M1μv],ˉλ7=C5,ˉλ8=C4,

    where M1=αβhI1v, M2=αβvI1h, L1=αβhS1h and L2=αβvS1v. Therefore, ˉλ1 is negative and ˉλ2=αβvIhμv which is negative. We observe that ˉλ3,ˉλ4,ˉλ7,ˉλ8 are all negative as C2,C3,C4,C5 are positive. Therefore, ˉλ6=μv+μvC1C2L2ζhC1M2+C1μv+M1M2+M1μv which is negative if and only if μvC1C2L2ζhC1M2+C1μv+M1M2+M1μv is Positive that is true. Thus, all the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix J(Q1h) are less than zero, so the system is LAS at Q1h=(S1h,E1h,I1h,T1h,R1h,P1h,S1v,I1v).

    Theorem 6.3. A dengue fever free equilibrium Q0h is globally asymptotically stable (GAS) in the region Π when R0<1.

    Proof. Here, we use the disease-free value S0h=λhτh+μh and construct a candidate Lyapunov function Y0:ΠR [50,51,52] such that

    Y0(Sh,Eh,Ih,Th,Rh,Ph,Sv,Iv)=(ShS0hS0hlnShS0h)+Eh+Ih+Th+Rh+Ph+Sv+Iv.

    By applying the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, i.e., ABC0Dρt, we have

    ABC0DρtY0=(1S0hSh) ABC0DρtSh+ABC0DρtEh+ABC0DρtIh+ ABC0DρtTh
    +ABC0DρtRh+ABC0DρtPh+ ABC0DρtSv+ABC0DρtIv.

    Now, from system (3.1), we substitute the values of all fractional derivatives to have

    ABC0DρtY0=(1S0hSh)[λhαβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh]+[αβhShIv(ζh+μh)Eh]+[ζhEh(vh+μh+dh1)Ih]+[vhIh(ξh+μh+dh2)Th]+[ξhTh(δh+μh)Rh]+[τhSh+δhRhμhPh]+[λvαβvSvIhμvSv]+[αβvSvIhμvIv].

    This implies that

    ABC0DρtY0=λhλhS0hSh+μS0hμSh+S0h(αβvIv+τh)+μ(Eh+Ih+Th+Rh+Ph)(dh1Ih+dh2Th)+λv+μv(Sv+Iv).

    Clearly, S0h(αβvIv+τh)0; therefore,

    ABC0DρtY0(μh+τh)Sh(ShS0h)2μh(Eh+Ih+Th+Rh+Ph)μv(Sv+Iv)(Ihdh1+Thdh1)λv+τhSh.

    Then, ABC0DρtY00. We see that ABC0DρtY0=0 if and only if Sh=S0h, Eh=E0h=0, Ih=I0h=0, Th=T0h, Rh=R0h, Ph=P0h, Sv=S0v, Iv=I0v. Hence, by LaSalle's invariance principle [58,59], Q0h is globally asymptotically stable in Π. Therefore, we have the result that the very dangerous virus disappears from the human population.

    Theorem 6.4. Dengue fever present steady state Q1h is GAS in the positively invariant region Π if R0>1.

    Proof. To show the global stability at Q1h, we consider a Lyapunov function Y1:ΠR [50,51,52] such that

    Y1=ShS1hS1hlnShS1h+EhE1hE1hlnEhE1h+IhI1hI1hlnIhI1h+ThT1hT1hlnThT1h+RhR1hR1hlnRhR1h+PhP1hP1hlnPhP1h+SvS1vS1vlnSvS1v+IvI1vI1vlnIhI1h.

    The Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative of Y1 can be written as

    ABC0DρtY1=(1S1hSh) ABC0DρtSh+(1E1hEh) ABC0DρtEh+(1I1hIh) ABC0DρtIh+(1T1hTh) ABC0DρtTh+(1R1hRh) ABC0DρtRh+(1P1hPh) ABC0DρtPh+(1S1vSv) ABC0DρtSv+(1I1vIv) ABC0DρtIv.

    Utilizing the equations of model (3.1), we obtain

    ABC0DρtY1=(1S1hSh)[λh(αβhIv+τh+μh)(ShS1h)(τh+μh)S1h]+(1E1hEh)[αβhShIv(ζh+μh)(EhE1h)(ζh+μh)E1h]+(1I1hIh)[ζhEh(vh+μh+dh1)(IhI1h)(vh+μh+dh1)I1h]+(1T1hTh)[vhIh(ξh+μh+dh2)(ThT1h)(ξh+μh+dh2)T1h]+(1R1hRh)[ξhTh(δh+μh)(RhR1h)(δh+μh)R1h]+(1P1hPh)[τhSh+δhRhμh(PhP1h)μhP1h]+(1S1vSv)[λvαβv(SvS1v)Ihμv(SvS1v)αβvS1vIhμvS1v]+(1I1vIv)[αβvSvIhμv(IvI1v)μvI1v].

    Rearrangement of the terms yields us

    ABC0DρtY1=σ1σ2,

    where

    σ1=λh+λv+(αβhShIv+τh+μh)(S1h)2Sh+(ζh+μh)(E1h)2Eh+(vh+μh+dh1)(I1h)2Ih+(ξh+μh+dh2)(T1h)2Th+(δh+μh)(R1h)2Rh+μh(P1h)2Ph+(αβvIv+μv)(S1v)2Sv+μv(I1v)2Iv+(αβhShIv+ζhEh+υhIh+τhSh+δhRh+ξhTh+αβvSvIh),

    and

    σ2=λhS1hSh+(αβhShIv+τh+μh)(ShS1h)2Sh+(αβhShIv+τh+μh)S1h+(ζh+μh)(EhE1h)2Eh+(ζh+μh)E1h+αβhShIvE1hEh+(vh+μh+dh1)(IhI1h)2Ih+(vh+μh+dh1)I1h+ζhEhI1hIh+(ξh+μh+dh2)(ThT1h)2Th+(ξh+μh+dh2)T1h+υhIhT1hTh+(δh+μh)(RhR1h)2Rh+(δh+μh)R1h+ξhThR1hRh++μh(PhP1h)2Ph+μhP1h+(τhSh+δhRh)P1hPh(αβvIv+μv)(SvS1v)2Sv+(αβvIv+μv)S1v+λvS1vSv+μv(IvI1v)2Iv+μvI1v+αβvSvIvI1vIv.

    As each parameter of the model (3.1) is positive, ABC0DρtY10 for σ1σ2. The equality ABC0DρtY1=0 holds if and only if Sh=S1h, Eh=E1h, Ih=I1h, Th=T1h, Rh=R1h, Ph=P1h, Sv=S1v, Iv=I1v. Implies {Q1h} is the maximum invariant set contained in

    B1={(Sh,Eh,Ih,Th,Rh,Ph,Sv.Iv)Π: ABC0DρtY1=0}.

    Hence, by LaSalle's invariance principle [50], the disease present point Q1h is GAS in Π.

    To obtain a numerical solution for the Atangana-Baleanu fractional order model of dengue fever for the various values of ρ, we implement the Toufik-Atangana scheme [53,54] with the help of MATLAB code. We use the scheme to study the dynamical behavior of The dengue fever epidemic over time t for various values of fractional order ρ. Furthermore, the validity of treatment program given to infected people is analyzed numerically for various treatment levels.

    To discuss the numerical stability of the dengue fractional model (3.1), we present here a finite difference scheme that is based on the Toufik-Atangana scheme [53] for fractional models. First, we present the development of the iterative method for fractional differential equations in brief and then write each fractional equation of the model (3.1) in discrete form. We apply the fundamental theorem of fractional calculus to system (3.2) to obtain:

    η(t)η(0)=1ρM(ρ)χ(t,η(t))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)t0(tγ)ρ1χ(γ,η(γ))dγ.

    In discrete form, we have

    η(tq+1)η(0)=1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)tq+10(tq+1γ)ρ1χ(γ,η(γ))dγ,

    where t=tq+1, q=0,1,,N with h=TfN. Equivalently,

    η(tq+1)=η(0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)qp=0tq+10(tq+1γ)ρ1χ(γ,η(γ))dγ. (7.1)

    The function χ(γ,η(γ)) can be approximated over [tp,tp+1], by using the interpolation polynomial

    χ(γ,η(γ))=χ(tp,η(tp))h(ttp1)χ(tp1,η(tp1))h(ttp).

    Putting in (7.1), we obtain

    η(tq+1)=η(0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(t,η(t))+ρM(ρ)Γ(ρ)qp=0[χ(tp,η(tp))htp+1tp(tq+1t)ρ1(ttp1)dtχ(tp1,η(tp1))htp+1tp(tq+1t)ρ1(ttp)dt].

    Evaluation of the integrals results in the following numerical scheme for solving equations of type (3.2).

    η(tq+1)=η(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}].

    Hence, the discrete form of the equations of the model (3.1) are given as:

    Sh(tq+1)=Sh(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Eh(tq+1)=Eh(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Ih(tq+1)=Ih(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Th(tq+1)=Th(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Rh(tq+1)=Rh(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Ph(tq+1)=Ph(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Sv(tq+1)=Sv(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}],
    Iv(tq+1)=Iv(t0)+1ρM(ρ)χ(tq,η(tq))+ρM(ρ)qp=0[hρχ(tp,η(tp))Γ(ρ+2){(qp+2+ρ)(q+1p)ρ(qp+2+2ρ)(qp)ρ}hρχ(tp1,η(tp1))Γ(ρ+2){(q+1p)ρ+1(qp+1+ρ)(qp)ρ}].

    We use the above approximations to present the graphical picture of the proposed fractional model (3.1) and to observe the impact of memory on the dynamics of the disease, particularly on affected individuals.

    Figure 2 shows the graphical behavior of the state variables under the influence of arbitrary fractional order ρ. We observe that all of the state variables of the host and the vector populations except the susceptibles decrease when the fractional order ρ increases. Initially, the exposed humans increase with order but later on start decreasing. Therefore, we conclude that the number of affected individuals reduce with an increase in the fractional order from 0.6 to 1. However, we notice a significant increase in the vector susceptible population with an increase in fractional order ρ.

    Figure 2.  Dynamics of the state variables of the dengue fever epidemic model (3.1) for various values of fractional order ρ.

    In this section, we quantitatively investigate the influence of different treatment rates on the dynamics of the dengue fever model (3.1). Figures 36 show the impact of different treatment rates to control the disease for fractional order ρ taken as 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0.

    Figure 3.  Treatment impact on dengue fever flow for ρ=0.4.
    Figure 4.  Treatment impact on dengue fever flow for ρ=0.6.
    Figure 5.  Treatment impact on dengue fever flow for ρ=0.8.
    Figure 6.  Treatment impact on dengue fever flow for ρ=1.0.

    It is obvious from Figures 36 that the exposed humans Eh and the infected humans Ih decrease with the rise in the treatment rate vh from 0.1 to 0.9. However, the reduction in infected humans is comparatively higher than that in the exposed individuals. We also observe that the curve for infected humans approaches its disease-free state when the fractional order ρ is increased along with the treatment rate. A decrease in the infected vector population is also noticed when the treatment rate is increased. For ρ=0.4, the susceptible humans decrease by increasing the treatment rate, but this behavior shifts to a rise in susceptibles when the fractional order moves to the higher value i. e., ρ=1. This analysis reveals that the infected host population decrease significantly to approach disease free with a high treatment rate. However, the disease does not die out completely under the considered treatment rates.

    Sensitivity analysis is used to determine those parameters of the model, which are highly sensitive to R0. The parameters having a high sensitivity index are highly sensitive to R0. The approach is very useful to design disease control strategies. The sensitivity index of a parameter ω is determined by using the formula

    IR0ω=R0ωωR0,

    where R0 is the basic reproduction number.

    The sensitivity indices of each of the parameters of R0 have been determined by using this formula and are listed in Table 2. Figure 7 shows the graphical representation of these values where the upward and downward bars show, respectively the direct and indirect relationship of parameters with reproduction number R0. Ignoring the sensitivity indices of parameters representing birth and death rates, we observe that the parameters α, βv and ζh have high positive sensitivity impact on R0. This means that a unit increase or decrease in the value of ζh causes an increase or decrease of 0.6250 in the value of R0. The same logic applies to the parameters α and βv. The parameter νh has a negative high sensitivity index of -0.3333. Thus, a unit increase in the value of νh causes a decrease of 0.3333 in the value of R0.

    Table 2.  Sensitivity index for R0..
    Parameters Sensitivity Indices
    μh -1.18055
    ζh 0.6250
    νh -0.3333
    dh1 -0.1111
    α 1.0
    λv 0.9999
    μv -1.0
    βv 1.0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 7.  Graphical representation of sensitivity indices for R0.

    From the above observations, we conclude that the disease can be controlled significantly if it is possible to reduce the values of the parameters α, βv, ζh by some optimal strategy. However, practically, it appears difficult to control these values. On the other hand, the treatment rate νh of humans can be increased to reduce the impact of disease. Thus, this analysis suggests that we choose the treatment rate νh as the control variable to control the disease optimally.

    In this section, we optimize the dengue fever model. For optimization, we update the dengue fever model (3.1) to adjust the control variable, and we define an optimal control problem by defining an objective functional. Then, the adjoint variables are introduced to attach the updated system of fractional differential equations to the objective functional, resulting in the formation of a function called the Hamiltonian. We consider the treatment rate denoted by vh as a time-dependent control variable denoted by u1(t) and develop optimality conditions from the Hamiltonian function by using Pontryagin's principle [55,56,57]. The conditions are calculated numerically to produce solutions of the optimal control problem.

    The main purpose of introducing an optimal control problem is to optimally explore the effect of the treatment on the spread of dengue fever by implementing the best optimal control strategy. Therefore, we apply a control strategy for the maximization of recovered individuals and for the minimization of exposed or infected individuals at a minimal cost of control.

    The suggested epidemic model of FODEs with the inclusion of control is given by

    ABC0DρtSh(t)=λhαβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh, (8.1a)
    ABC0DρtEh(t)=αβhShIv(ζh+μh)Eh, (8.1b)
    ABC0DρtIh(t)=ζhEh(u1(t)+μh+dh1)Ih, (8.1c)
    ABC0DρtTh(t)=u1(t)Ih(ξh+μh+dh2)Th, (8.1d)
    ABC0DρtRh(t)=ξhTh(δh+μh)Rh, (8.1e)
    ABC0DρtPh(t)=τhSh+δhRhμhPh, (8.1f)
    ABC0DρtSv(t)=λvαβvSvIhμvSv, (8.1g)
    ABC0DρtIv(t)=αβvSvIhμvIv, (8.1h)

    and the initial conditions are

    Sh(0)>0, Eh(0)0, Ih(0)0, Th(0)0, Rh(0)0,Ph(0)0, Sv(0)>0, Iv(0)0. (8.1i)

    The objective cost functional that consists of state and control variables may be defined as

    J(Ih,u1)=Tf0[κ1Ih(t)+12κ2u21(t)]dt, (8.2)

    where Tf is the fixed terminal time, and u1(t) is the control variable.

    The optimal control problem is then defined as:

    minu1(t)UJ(Ih,u1) subject to model (8.1), (8.3)

    where U is the control space.

    To apply Pontryagin's maximum principle for optimality conditions, we constructed the Hamiltonian for the control problem (8.3) as follows:

    H(Θ,u1)=κ1Ih(t)+12κ2u21(t)++G1[λhαβhShIv(τh+μh)Sh]+G2(t)[αβhShIv(ζh+μh)Eh]+G3[ζhEh(u1(t)+μh+dh1)Ih]+G4[u1(t)Ih(ξh+μh+dh2)Th]+G5[ξhTh(δh+μh)Rh]+G6[τhSh+δhRhμhPh]+G7[λvαβvSvIhμvSv]+G8[αβvSvIhμvIv], (8.4)

    where Θ=(Sh,Eh,Ih,Th,Rh,Ph,Sv,Iv) is a vector of state variables, Gi, i=1,,8 are adjoint variables associated with the state equations given in (8.1) and ˆG=(G1,G2,G3,G4,G5,G6,G7,G8) is called the adjoint vector.

    Theorem 8.1. Let ˉSh, ˉEh, ˉIh, ˉTh, ˉRh, ˉPh, ˉSv and ˉIv be optimal state solutions for model (8.1) associated with the optimal control variable u1 for the optimal control problem (8.3). Then, there exist an adjoint system such that

    ABCtDρTfG1(t)=HSh, (8.5a)
    ABCtDρTfG2(t)=HEh, (8.5b)
    ABCtDρTfG3(t)=HIh, (8.5c)
    ABCtDρTfG4(t)=HTh, (8.5d)
    ABCtDρTfG5(t)=HRh, (8.5e)
    ABCtDρTfG6(t)=HPh, (8.5f)
    ABCtDρTfG7(t)=HSv, (8.5g)
    ABCtDρTfG8(t)=HIv, (8.5h)

    along with transversally conditions

    G1(Tf)=G2(Tf)=G3(Tf)=G4(Tf)=G5(Tf)=G6(Tf)=G7(Tf)=G8(Tf)=0,

    and a control variable u1 characterized by

    u1(t)=min{1,max{G3G4κ2Ih(t),0}}.

    Differentiating the Hamiltonian (8.4) with respect to the state variables and then using (8.5), the adjoint system of fractional-order differential equations is obtained as

    ABCtDρTfG1=(G1G2)αβhIv+G1(τh+μh)G5τh, (8.6a)
    ABCtDρTfG2=(G2G3)ζh+G2μh, (8.6b)
    ABCtDρTfG3=κ1+(G3G4)u1+G3(μh+dh1)+(G7G8)αβvSv, (8.6c)
    ABCtDρTfG4=(G4G5)ξh+G4(μh+dh2), (8.6d)
    ABCtDρTfG5=(G5G6)δh+G5μh, (8.6e)
    ABCtDρTfG6=μhG6, (8.6f)
    ABCtDρTfG7=(G7G8)αβvIh+G7μv, (8.6g)
    ABCtDρTfG8=(G1G2)αβhSh+G8μv, (8.6h)

    with transversality conditions

    G1(Tf)=G2(Tf)=G3(Tf)=G4(Tf)=G5(Tf)=G6(Tf)=G7(Tf)=G8(Tf)=0. (8.6i)

    Using the first condition of Pontryagin's principle, we obtain an equation for the control, i.e.,

    Hu1=0u1(t)=G3G4κ2Ih(t).

    Thus, the optimal control characterization for u with bounds is given as

    u1(t)=min{1,max{G3G4κ2Ih(t),0}}. (8.7)

    For an approximate solution of the state system (8.1), we implement the Toufik-Atangana scheme developed and explained in Subsection 7.1, and for the adjoint system (8.6), we make use of the Toufik-Atangana method backward in time t, together with the transversality conditions (8.6i).

    We implement steps of the following algorithm to calculate the optimality conditions for the optimal control problem (8.3). Here, Θ represents each of the state variables, the adjoint variables, the control variable, and σ>0 is the tolerance parameter.

    1. Consider an initial control ukU for k=0.
    2. Solve the state system (8.1) forward in time and the adjoint system (8.6) backward in time for approximate solutions using control uk.
    3. Use (8.7) to determine u.
    4. Update control uk by using uk=(uk+u)/2.
    5. Stop the iterative process when ΘkΘk1<σΘk for k>0,
    otherwise k+1k and move to step 2.

    In this section, we describe the simulation results obtained by solving the necessary optimality conditions derived from the fractional order optimal control problem (8.3). Steps of the algorithm are implemented through MATLAB code. To implement the Toufik-Atangana scheme for approximating solutions of state and adjoint equations, we discretize the domain [0,Tf] into N+1 discrete points tj=jh, j=0,1,,N where h=TfN. The cost functional (8.2) is approximated at these discrete points by using Simpson's one by three rule. Simulation results are presented for different values of fractional order, i.e., for ρ=0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.

    The main purpose of the study was to determine the optimal treatment rate vh(t) (control variable) that minimizes the cost functional (dengue fever infection in the society). Figure 8 shows the plots of optimal control variable and the corresponding cost functional for various values of fractional order ρ. From the figure, we observe that each curve for the cost functional reaches its minimum corresponding to each time-dependent optimal treatment rate vh(t) (control). We notice that the number of solution iterations increases with the fractional order ρ.

    Figure 8.  Optimal control and cost functional for the various values of fractional order ρ.

    Figure 9 shows the solution curves for the state variables before and after optimization at final time Tf. Solid lines represent the optimal solution curves for state variables, whereas the dashed lines represent the curves before optimization. A remarkable decrease in exposed and infected humans is observed after optimization for each of the fractional order ρ=0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1. Each of the optimal curves for recovered and protected individuals rise after optimization. The number of susceptible and treated humans also increases with time under the optimal treatment rate. With the given control strategy, we also observe a significant decrease in the infected mosquitoes for each of the fractional orders ρ. The decline in the infected mosquitoes is another achievement of the implemented control strategy. Thus, we conclude that the fractional order ρ affects the dynamical behavior of the disease for a longer time. The study also reveals that the cost of implementing a treatment strategy reduces continuously with an increase in the value of fractional order ρ. This analysis gives us the importance of considering a fractional order dengue fever model over an integer order model. Further analysis can be done to see the impact of other fractional operators on dengue fever model in comparison to Atangana-Baleanu fractional operator.

    Figure 9.  State variables with and without controls for various ρ values.

    In this study, we proposed a new ABC fractional-order model for dengue fever to analyze the disease flow in the situation of protected travelers with proper treatment. We have proved that there exist a unique solution of the proposed fractional model that lies in a feasibly invariant region. The model also satisfies both the local and global stability properties at the disease free and endemic equilibrium points. All of these proofs conclude that the newly designed fractional model is well-posed. The main objective of this study was to control the disease by minimizing the number of infected humans. For this, we considered treatment rate vh as the control variable. First, we study the impact of the memory index and the effect of different constant treatment rates on the control of disease. We noticed that infected humans decrease by increasing the memory index (fractional order) and by increasing the treatment rate of infected humans. The infected humans vanish with treatment rate vh=0.5 for fractional order ρ=1. Later, we considered treatment rate vh(t) as the time-dependent control in the proposed fractional model. We designed an optimal control problem by defining the objective functional. Pontryagin's maximum principle is used to establish optimality conditions for the solution of the optimal control problem. Graphical results show the effectiveness of the strategy to determine optimal treatment rates for various fractional orders that minimize the cost functional and significantly reduce the number of exposed and infected humans. Numerical analysis of the study revealed that the index of memory and the treatment rate can play a significant role in minimizing the impact of disease. We also conclude that the time dependent control is more cost effective than the time independent control. In future, we plan to consider different nonpharmaceutical control strategies to adjust in the existing ABC fractional model for more reliable optimal control analysis. We are also working on a dengue and COVID-19 coinfection model with an ABC derivative operator to develop various control strategies with cost-effective analysis.

    The authors would like to acknowledge the support from King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. GRANT2397. This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Project No. GRANT2397].

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] D. W. Vaughn, S. Green, S. Kalayanarooj, B. L. Innis, S. Nimmannitya, S. Suntayakorn, et al., Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity, J. Infect. Dis., 181 (2000), 2–9. http://doi.org/10.1086/315215 doi: 10.1086/315215
    [2] C. Li, Y. Lu, J. Liu, X. Wu, Climate change and dengue fever transmission in China: Evidences and challenges, Sci. Total Environ., 622–623 (2018), 493–501. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.326 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.326
    [3] A. Abidemi, N. A. B. Aziz, Analysis of deterministic models for dengue disease transmission dynamics with vaccination perspective in Johor, Malaysia, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-022-01250-3
    [4] A. Dwivedi, R. Keval, Analysis for transmission of dengue disease with different class of human population, Epidemiol. Method., 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2020-0046
    [5] E. Soewono, A. K. Supriatna, A two-dimensional model for the transmission of dengue fever disease, B. Malays. Math. Sci. So., 24 (2001), 49–57.
    [6] A. Abidemi, H. O. Fatoyinbo, J. K. K. Asamoah, Analysis of dengue fever transmission dynamics with multiple controls: A mathematical approach, In: 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Sakheer, Bahrain, 2020,971–978. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317064
    [7] P. Pongsumpun, Mathematical model of dengue disease with the incubation period of virus, World Aca. Sci. Eng. Tech., 44 (2009), 328–332.
    [8] S. T. R. Pinho, C. P. Ferreira, L. Esteva, F. R. Barreto, V. M. Silva, M. G. L. Teixeira, Modelling the dynamics of dengue real epidemics, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 368 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0278
    [9] R. Kongnuy, P. Pongsumpun, Mathematical modeling for dengue transmission with the effect of season, Int. J. Biol. Med. Sci., 7 (2011).
    [10] S. Side, S. M. Noorani, A SIR model for spread of dengue fever disease (simulation for South Sulawesi, Indonesia and Selangor, Malaysia), World J. Model. Simul., 9 (2013), 96–105.
    [11] S. Gakkhar, N. C. Chavda, Impact of awareness on the spread of dengue infection in human population, Appl. Math., 4 (2013), 142–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.48A020 doi: 10.4236/am.2013.48A020
    [12] E. Bonyah, M. A. Khan, K. O. Okosun, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, On the co-infection of dengue fever and Zika virus, Optim. Control Appl. Method., 40 (2019), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2483 doi: 10.1002/oca.2483
    [13] J. K. K. Asamoah, E. Yankson, E. Okyere, G. Q. Sun, Z. Jin, R. Jan, et al., Optimal control and cost-effectiveness analysis for dengue fever model with asymptomatic and partial immune individuals, Results Phys., 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104919
    [14] R. Jan, S. Boulaaras, Analysis of fractional order dynamics of dengue infection with non-linear incidence functions, T. I. Meas. Control, 44 (2022), 2630–2641. https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312221085049 doi: 10.1177/01423312221085049
    [15] R. Jan, S. Boulaaras, S. Alyobi, K. Rajagopal, M. Jawad, Fractional dynamics of the transmission phenomena of dengue infection with vaccination, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst.-S, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2022154
    [16] K. Diethelm, The analysis of fractional differential equations: An application-oriented exposition using differential operators of Caputo type, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, 2010.
    [17] M. Saeedian, M. Khalighi, N. Azimi-Tafreshi, G. Jafari, M. Ausloos, Memory effects on epidemic evolution: The susceptible-infected-recovered epidemic model, Phys. Rev., 95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022409
    [18] K. Diethelm, A fractional calculus based model for the simulation of an outbreak of dengue fever, Nonlinear Dynam., 71 (2013), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-012-0475-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-012-0475-2
    [19] M. A. Khan, S. Ullah, M. Farooq, A new fractional model for tuberculosis with relapse via Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 116 (2018), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.039 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.039
    [20] S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, M. Farooq, A fractional model for the dynamics of tuberculosis virus, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 116 (2018), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.001
    [21] H. W. Berhe, S. Qureshi, A. A. Shaikh, Deterministic modeling of dysentery diarrhea epidemic under fractional Caputo differential operator via real statistical analysis, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 131 (2020), 109536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109536 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109536
    [22] S. Qureshi, Z. N. Memon, Monotonically decreasing behavior of measles epidemic well captured by Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractional operator under real measles data of Pakistan, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 131 (2020), 109478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109478 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109478
    [23] S. E. Alhazmi, S. A. M. Abdelmohsen, M. A. Alyami, A. Ali, J. K. K. Asamoah, A novel analysis of generalized perturbed Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation of fractional-order arising in dusty Plasma by natural transform decomposition method, Hindawi J. Nanomater., 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7036825
    [24] L. Zhang, E. Addai, J. Ackora-Prah, Y. D. Arthur, J. K. K. Asamoah, Fractional-order Ebola-Malaria coinfection model with a focus on detection and treatment rate, Hindawi Comput. Math. Method. Med., 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6502598
    [25] R. Alharbi, R. Jan, S. Alyobi, Y. Altayeb, Z. Khan, Mathematical modeling and stability analysis of the dynamics of monkeypox via fractional calculus, Fractals, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22402666
    [26] E. Addai, L. L. Zhang, J. Ackora-Prah, J. F. Gordon, J. K. K. Asamoah, J. F. Essel, Fractal-fractional order dynamics and numerical simulations of a Zika epidemic model with insecticide-treated nets, Physica A, 603 (2022), 127809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127809 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127809
    [27] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Academic Press, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, 1998.
    [28] J. Ackora-Prah, B. Seidu, E. Okyere, J. K. K. Asamoah, Fractal-fractional Caputo maize streak virus disease model, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020189 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7020189
    [29] M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
    [30] A. I. K. Butt, M. Imran, S. Batool, M. A. Nuwairan, Theoretical analysis of a COVID-19 CF-fractional model to optimally control the spread of pandemic, Symmetry, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020380
    [31] E. Addai, L. L. Zhang, A. K. Preko, J. K. K. Asamoah, Fractional order epidemiological model of SARS-CoV-2 dynamism involving Alzheimer's disease, Healthcare Anal., 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2022.100114
    [32] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
    [33] R. Jan, S. Alyobi, M. Inc, A. S. Alshomrani, M. Farooq, A robust study of the transmission dynamics of malaria through non-local and non-singular kernel, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 7618–7640. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023382 doi: 10.3934/math.2023382
    [34] J. K. K. Asamoah, Fractal fractional model and numerical scheme based on Newton polynomial for Q fever disease under Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Results Phys., 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105189
    [35] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 2006.
    [36] S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, M. Farooq, E. O. Alzahrani, A fractional model for the dynamics of tuberculosis (TB) using Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst.-S, 13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020055
    [37] K. Shah, F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, On a nonlinear fractional order model of dengue fever disease under Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2305–2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.022
    [38] K. M. Altaf, A. Atangana, Dynamics of Ebola disease in the framework of different fractional derivatives, Entropy, 21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/e21030303
    [39] J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a fractional derivative without singular kernel, Prog. Fract. Diff. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010202 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010202
    [40] J. K. K. Asamoah, E. Okyere, E. Yankson, A. A. Opoku, A. Adom-Konadu, E. Acheampong, et al., Non-fractional and fractional mathematical analysis and simulations for Q fever, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111821
    [41] H. Wang, H. Jahanshahi, M. K. Wang, S. Bekiros, J. Liu, A. A. Aly, A Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order model of HIV/AIDS with a treatment compartment: Sensitivity analysis and optimal control strategies, Entropy, 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050610
    [42] C. T. Deressa, Y. O. Mussa, G. F. Duressa, Optimal control and sensitivity analysis for transmission dynamics of coronavirus, Results Phys., 19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103642
    [43] T. T. Yusuf, F. Benyah, Optimal strategy for controlling the spread of HIV/AIDS disease: A case study of South Africa, J. Biol. Dyn., 6 (2012), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2011.628700 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2011.628700
    [44] E. Bonyah, M. L. Juga, C. W. Chukwu, Fatmawati, A fractional order dangue fever model in the context of protected travelers, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.070 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.070
    [45] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Elsevier, 1999.
    [46] D. Baleanu, A. Fernandez, On some new properties of fractional derivatives with Mittag Leffler kernel, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 59 (2018), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.12.003
    [47] A. Atangana, I. Koca, Chaos in a simple nonlinear system with Atangana-Baleanu derivative with fractional order, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 89 (2016), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.02.012 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.02.012
    [48] E. Kreyszig, Introductry functional analysis with application, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1993.
    [49] V. I. Arnold, Ordinary differential equations, MIT Press, London, UK, 1998.
    [50] W. Ahmad, M. Abbas, M. Rafiq, D. Baleanu, Mathematical analysis for the effect of voluntary vaccination on the propagation of Corona virus pandemic, Results Phys., 31 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104917
    [51] W. Ahmad, M. Abbas, Effect of quarantine on transmission dynamics of Ebola virus epidemic: A mathematical analysis, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136 (2021), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01360-9 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01360-9
    [52] W. Ahmad, M. Rafiq, M. Abbas, Mathematical analysis to control the spread of Ebola virus epidemic through voluntary vaccination, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135 (2020), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00683-3 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00683-3
    [53] M. Toufik, A. Atangana, New numerical approximation of fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel: Application to chaotic models, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11717-0
    [54] M. A. Khan, A. Atangana, Modeling the dynamics of novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) with fractional derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2379–2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.033 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.033
    [55] R. Kamocki, Pontryagin maximum principle for fractional ordinary optimal control problems, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 37 (2014), 1668–1686. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.2928 doi: 10.1002/mma.2928
    [56] S. Lenhart, J. T. Workman, Optimal control applied to biological models, CRC Press, 2007.
    [57] H. M. Ali, F. L. Pereira, S. M. Gama, A new approach to the Pontryagin maximum principle for nonlinear fractional optimal control problems, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3811
    [58] C. Vargas-De-Len, Volterra-type Lyapunov functions for fractional-order epidemic systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 24 (2015), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.013
    [59] J. P. LaSalle, The stability of dynamical systems, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1976.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ademe Kebede Gizaw, Chernet Tuge Deressa, Waleed Adel, Analysis of Age-Structured Mathematical Model of Malaria Transmission Dynamics via Classical and ABC Fractional Operators, 2024, 2024, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2024/3855146
    2. Madiha Shafiq, Muhammad Abbas, Emad K. El-Shewy, Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Noura F. Abdo, Ali A. El-Rahman, Numerical Investigation of the Fractional Diffusion Wave Equation with the Mittag–Leffler Function, 2023, 8, 2504-3110, 18, 10.3390/fractalfract8010018
    3. Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Doremure Badalge Duresha Chamaleen, Muhammad Imran, Saira Batool, Muneerah AL Nuwairan, A new design and analysis of optimal control problems arising from COVID‐19 outbreak, 2023, 46, 0170-4214, 16957, 10.1002/mma.9482
    4. Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Atangana-Baleanu Fractional Dynamics of Predictive Whooping Cough Model with Optimal Control Analysis, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1773, 10.3390/sym15091773
    5. Miah Roney, Amit Dubey, Muhammad Hassan Nasir, Akm Moyeenul Huq, Aisha Tufail, Saiful Nizam Tajuddin, Normaiza Binti Zamri, Mohd Fadhlizil Fasihi Mohd Aluwi, Computational evaluation of quinones of Nigella sativa L. as potential inhibitor of dengue virus NS5 methyltransferase , 2024, 42, 0739-1102, 8701, 10.1080/07391102.2023.2248262
    6. W. Ahmad, M. Rafiq, A. I. K. Butt, N. Ahmad, T. Ismaeel, S. Malik, H. G. Rabbani, Z. Asif, Analytical and numerical explorations of optimal control techniques for the bi-modal dynamics of Covid-19, 2024, 112, 0924-090X, 3977, 10.1007/s11071-023-09234-8
    7. Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Muhammad Imran, Brett A. McKinney, Saira Batool, Hassan Aftab, Mathematical and Stability Analysis of Dengue–Malaria Co-Infection with Disease Control Strategies, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 4600, 10.3390/math11224600
    8. Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Saira Batool, Muhammad Imran, Muneerah Al Nuwairan, Design and Analysis of a New COVID-19 Model with Comparative Study of Control Strategies, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 1978, 10.3390/math11091978
    9. Jiraporn Lamwong, Puntani Pongsumpun, A fractional derivative model of the dynamic of dengue transmission based on seasonal factors in Thailand, 2025, 457, 03770427, 116256, 10.1016/j.cam.2024.116256
    10. Hem Raj Pandey, Ganga Ram Phaijoo, Dil Bahadur Gurung, Dengue dynamics in Nepal: A Caputo fractional model with optimal control strategies, 2024, 10, 24058440, e33822, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33822
    11. Snehasis Barman, Soovoojeet Jana, Suvankar Majee, Dhiraj Kumar Das, Tapan Kumar Kar, Complex dynamics of a fractional-order epidemic model with saturated media effect, 2024, 112, 0924-090X, 18611, 10.1007/s11071-024-09932-x
    12. Abu Bakr Elbukhari, Zhenbin Fan, Gang Li, Maximum Principle for Nonlinear Fractional Differential Equations with the Hilfer Derivative, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 515, 10.3390/fractalfract7070515
    13. A.I.K. Butt, W. Ahmad, M. Rafiq, N. Ahmad, M. Imran, Optimally analyzed fractional Coronavirus model with Atangana–Baleanu derivative, 2023, 53, 22113797, 106929, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106929
    14. Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Hassan Aftab, Muhammad Imran, Tariq Ismaeel, Meraa Arab, Maroof Gohar, Muhammad Afzal, Dynamical study of lumpy skin disease model with optimal control analysis through pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical controls, 2023, 138, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04690-y
    15. Ariyanatchi M., Vijayalakshmi G.M., Nonlinear Robust Adaptive Sliding Mode Control Strategies Involve a Fractional Ordered Approach to Reducing Dengue Vectors, 2024, 14, 26667207, 100406, 10.1016/j.rico.2024.100406
    16. Asma Hanif, Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Tariq Ismaeel, Fractional optimal control analysis of Covid-19 and dengue fever co-infection model with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 5171, 10.3934/math.2024251
    17. G. M. Vijayalakshmi, P. Roselyn Besi, Ali Akgül, Fractional commensurate model on COVID‐19 with microbial co‐infection: An optimal control analysis, 2024, 45, 0143-2087, 1108, 10.1002/oca.3093
    18. Hongyan Wang, Shaoping Jiang, Yudie Hu, Supaporn Lonapalawong, Analysis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in a two-patch environment using Caputo fractional-order modeling, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 32696, 10.3934/math.20241565
    19. Pratyay Hasan, Tazdin Delwar Khan, Ishteaque Alam, Mohammad Emdadul Haque, Dengue in Tomorrow: Predictive Insights From ARIMA and SARIMA Models in Bangladesh: A Time Series Analysis, 2024, 7, 2398-8835, 10.1002/hsr2.70276
    20. Lemesa Bedjisa Dano, Dessalegn Geleta Gobena, Legesse Lemecha Obsu, Mesay Hailu Dangisso, Medhanaye Habtetsion Kidanie, Fractional modeling of dengue fever with optimal control strategies in Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, 2025, 27, 24682276, e02500, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02500
    21. Azhar Iqbal Kashif Butt, Waheed Ahmad, Hafiz Ghulam Rabbani, Muhammad Rafiq, Shehbaz Ahmad, Naeed Ahmad, Saira Malik, Exploring optimal control strategies in a nonlinear fractional bi-susceptible model for Covid-19 dynamics using Atangana-Baleanu derivative, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-80218-3
    22. Binandam Stephen Lassong, Shaibu Osman, Christian John Etwire, A fractional-order model of the dynamics of the electorate in a multi-party democracy, 2025, 26668181, 101055, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.101055
    23. G. Manohara, S. Kumbinarasaiah, A study of renewed fractional-order cattle skin disease model by the Gegenbauer wavelet collocation method, 2025, 13, 2195-268X, 10.1007/s40435-024-01501-9
    24. Jiraporn Lamwong, Puntani Pongsumpun, Modeling the spread of hand, foot, and mouth disease using ABC fractional derivatives: a focus on environmental and vaccination impacts in children, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02232-8
    25. G. M. Vijayalakshmi, M. Ariyanatchi, Vediyappan Govindan, Mustafa Inc, Fractal-fractional modelling of thrombocytopenia influence on pregnant women in the context of dengue infection with Mittag–Leffler decay analysis, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02278-8
    26. Sathi Patra, Soovoojeet Jana, Sayani Adak, Suvankar Majee, T. K. Kar, COMPLEX DYNAMICS OF A HOST-VECTOR DYNAMICS OF DENGUE INFECTION INCORPORATING OPTIMAL CONTROL STRATEGY WITH COST-EFFECTIVENESS: A FRACTIONAL-ORDER DERIVATIVE METHOD, 2025, 1072-3374, 10.1007/s10958-025-07608-4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1932) PDF downloads(114) Cited by(26)

Figures and Tables

Figures(9)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog