The Climate Transition Strategy of the city of Brescia (Italy)

Marcello Magoni; Rachele Radaelli; Marcello Magoni; Rachele Radaelli

doi:10.3934/urs.2023012

Urban Resilience and Sustainability

2023, Volume 1, Issue 3: 163-187. doi: 10.3934/urs.2023012

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

The Climate Transition Strategy of the city of Brescia (Italy)

Marcello Magoni ,
Rachele Radaelli ^,

Department of Architecture and Urban Study, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 26, 20133 Milano, Italy

Received: 12 May 2023 Revised: 29 August 2023 Accepted: 29 August 2023 Published: 07 September 2023

To build climate-neutral, and at the same time sustainable and highly resilient cities, it is necessary to act on their infrastructures and activities that take place in them, which constitutes an operation that requires activating a long and pervasive planning process based on a highly integrated use of the intervention tools available to a municipality. Furthermore, it is necessary to have a specific tool which, in addition to structuring actions to counteract climate change, stimulates and coordinates this integration. A voluntary tool that has established itself in European cities committed to combating climate change is the Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP), which, subsequently and as a complement to the Sustainable Energy Action Plan, was promoted by the European Union to contribute from below to policies to counter climate change. Currently, one or both instruments have been adopted by around 8,000 municipalities or groups of municipalities. Furthermore, in recent years another tool has been emerging, which is often developed to replace or complement the SECAP to increase the effectiveness of the Municipalities' actions to combat climate change. This new tool, which has taken on different names, is referred to here as Climate Transition Strategy. The experience of the elaboration and the initial implementation of the Climate Transition Strategy of Brescia (Italian municipality of 200,000 inhabitants) is critically described, which was activated together with SECAP to achieve higher levels of mitigation and adaptation to climate change. In particular, the theoretical-methodological characteristics and the initial implementation of this strategy are described, comparing them with the performances required for the adoption of the SECAP and with the experiences that have been had with the latter tools. In this way, the performance of this new tool was compared with that of a consolidated and constantly evolving tool.
- urban planning,
- Climate Transition Strategy,
- climate mitigation and adaptation,
- 21st century,
- municipality of Brescia (Italy)
Citation: Marcello Magoni, Rachele Radaelli. The Climate Transition Strategy of the city of Brescia (Italy)[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2023, 1(3): 163-187. doi: 10.3934/urs.2023012

Related Papers:

Abstract

To build climate-neutral, and at the same time sustainable and highly resilient cities, it is necessary to act on their infrastructures and activities that take place in them, which constitutes an operation that requires activating a long and pervasive planning process based on a highly integrated use of the intervention tools available to a municipality. Furthermore, it is necessary to have a specific tool which, in addition to structuring actions to counteract climate change, stimulates and coordinates this integration. A voluntary tool that has established itself in European cities committed to combating climate change is the Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP), which, subsequently and as a complement to the Sustainable Energy Action Plan, was promoted by the European Union to contribute from below to policies to counter climate change. Currently, one or both instruments have been adopted by around 8,000 municipalities or groups of municipalities. Furthermore, in recent years another tool has been emerging, which is often developed to replace or complement the SECAP to increase the effectiveness of the Municipalities' actions to combat climate change. This new tool, which has taken on different names, is referred to here as Climate Transition Strategy. The experience of the elaboration and the initial implementation of the Climate Transition Strategy of Brescia (Italian municipality of 200,000 inhabitants) is critically described, which was activated together with SECAP to achieve higher levels of mitigation and adaptation to climate change. In particular, the theoretical-methodological characteristics and the initial implementation of this strategy are described, comparing them with the performances required for the adoption of the SECAP and with the experiences that have been had with the latter tools. In this way, the performance of this new tool was compared with that of a consolidated and constantly evolving tool.

References

[1]	UNFCCC (2015) Key aspects of the Paris Agreement. Available from: https://unfccc.int/most-requested/key-aspects-of-the-paris-agreement.
[2]	European Commission, Covenant of Mayors. Available from: https://eu-mayors.ec.europa.eu/en/home.
[3]	European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Rivas S, Bertoldi P, Melica G, et al. (2018) Guidebook 'How to develop a Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP)'. Part 1, The SECAP process, step-by-step towards low carbon and climate resilient cities by 2030. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/223399
[4]	Kona A, Bertoldi P, Kilkiş S (2019) Covenant of mayors: Local energy generation, methodology, policies and good practice examples. Energies 12(6): 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12060985 doi: 10.3390/en12060985
[5]	Pasimeni M, Petrosillo I, Aretano R, et al. (2014) Scales, strategies and actions for effective energy planning: A review. Energ Policy 65: 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.027 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.027
[6]	Croci E, Lucchitta B, Janssens-Maenhout G, et al. (2017) Urban CO₂ mitigation strategies under the Covenant of Mayors: An assessment of 124 European cities. J Clean Prod 169: 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.165 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.165
[7]	EEA (European Environment Agency) (2020) Monitoring and evaluation of national adaptation policies throughout the policy cycle. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/national-adaptation-policies.
[8]	EEA (European Environment Agency) (2020) Urban adaptation in Europe: how cities and towns respond to climate change. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-adaptation-in-europe.
[9]	ISPRA (2020) Stato di attuazione del Patto dei Sindaci in Italia. Available from: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/rapporti/stato-di-attuazione-del-patto-dei-sindaci-in-italia.
[10]	Palermo V, Bertoldi P, Apostolou M, et al. (2020) Assessment of climate change mitigation policies in 315 cities in the Covenant of Mayors initiative. Sustain Cities Soc 60: 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102258 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102258
[11]	UNFCCC (2008) Compendium on methods and tools to evaluate impacts of, and vulnerability and adaptation to, climate change, 2008. Available from: https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/20080307_compendium_m_t_complete.pdf.
[12]	Litt G, Ferraioli E, Magni F, et al. (2022) Inter-municipal methodology for climate transition strategies: The first case in Italy. Sustainability 14: 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052529 doi: 10.3390/su14052529
[13]	Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, van der Knaap WGM (2009) The mitigation-adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat Int 33: 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.001
[14]	Cajot S, Peter M, Bahu JM, et al. (2017) Obstacles in energy planning at the urban scale. Sustain Cities Soc 30: 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.003
[15]	ISPRA (2014) Planning for adaptation to climate change- Guidelines for municipalities. Available from: https://base-adaptation.eu/sites/default/files/306-guidelinesversionefinale20.pdf.
[16]	Laukkonen J, Kim-Blanco P, Lenhart J, et al (2009) Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures. Habitat Int 33: 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003
[17]	Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith T, et al. (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16: 889–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2 doi: 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
[18]	Delponte I, Pittaluga I, Schenone C (2017) Monitoring and evaluation of sustainable energy action plan: Practice and perspective. Energy Policy 100: 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.003
[19]	Mathew S, Trueck S, Truong C (2016) Methods for evaluation the results of monitoring adaptation projects and programs. CoastAdapt. Available from: https://coastadapt.com.au/sites/default/files/factsheets/T4M4_3_Methods%20of%20evaluation.pdf.
[20]	European Commission, DG Climate Action (2016) Mainstreaming of climate action into ESI funds. Available from: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/report_mainstreaming_of_climate_action_en.pdf.
[21]	Wamsler C, Pauleit S (2016) Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries, different pathways, one goal. Clim Change 137: 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1660-y doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1660-y
[22]	Pietrapertosa F, Salvia M, de Gregorio-Hurtado S, et al. (2018) Urban climate change mitigation and adaptation planning: Are Italian cities ready? Cities 91: 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.009
[23]	Bauer A, Feichtinger J, Steurer R (2012) The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: challenges and approaches. J. Environ Policy Plan 14: 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.707406 doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.707406
[24]	Cinocca A, Santini F, Cipollone R (2018) Monitoring methodologies and tools for sustainable energy action plans to support the public administration. Energy Procedia 148: 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.135 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.135
[25]	Castán Broto V, Bulkeley, H (2013) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Change 23: 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
[26]	IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf.
[27]	Comune di Brescia, Un filo naturale: una comunità che partecipa per trasformare la sfida del cambiamento climatico in opportunità, 2023. Available from: https://www.comune.brescia.it/aree-tematiche/urban-center/progetto-un-filo-naturale/un-filo-naturale-una-comunita-che-partecipa/un-filo-naturale-una-comunita-che-partecipa.
[28]	Comune di Brescia, Un filo naturale: una comunità che partecipa per trasformare la sfida del cambiamento climatico in opportunità. Strategia di Transizione Climatica, 2022. Available from: https://www.comune.brescia.it/sites/default/files/imported/servizi/urbancenter/unfilonaturale/Documents/210720_UC_AT_188-RELAZIONE_STC_BS_rev2.pdf.
[29]	Göpfert C, Wamsler C, Lang W (2019) A framework for the joint institutionalization of climate change mitigation and adaptation in city administrations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 24: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9789-9 doi: 10.1007/s11027-018-9789-9
[30]	Casado-Asensio J, Steurer R (2014) Integrated strategies on sustainable development, climate change mitigation and adaptation in Western Europe: communication rather than coordination. J Public Policy 34: 437–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X13000287 doi: 10.1017/S0143814X13000287
[31]	Sanderson H, Hilden M, Russel D, et al. (2018) Adapting to climate change in Europe: Exploring sustainable pathways-from local measures to wider policies. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-02106-X doi: 10.1016/C2016-0-02106-X
[32]	Pablo-Romero M, Pozo-Barajas R, Sánchez-Braza A (2015) Understanding local CO₂ emissions reduction targets. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48: 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.01 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.01
[33]	Davoudi S, Brooks E, Mehmood A (2013) Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Plan Pract Res 28: 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.787695 doi: 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
[34]	Jabareen J (2013) Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities 31: 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
[35]	Bours D, McGinn C, Pringle P (2014) Monitoring and Evaluation for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience: A Synthesis of Tools, Frameworks and Approaches. Oxford: SEA Change CoP, UKCIP.
[36]	Christiansen L, Schaer C, Larsen C, et al. (2016) Monitoring and evaluation for climate change adaptation: A summary of key challenges and emerging practice. Understanding, discussing and exemplifying the key challenges of M and E for adaptation. UNEP DTU Partnership, Copenhagen.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)