Research article

Effects of congestion charging and subsidy policy on vehicle flow and revenue with user heterogeneity

  • Received: 22 March 2023 Revised: 10 May 2023 Accepted: 17 May 2023 Published: 01 June 2023
  • Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes. Travelers' values of time affect their choice of transportation in the congestion network, thus a stochastic user equilibrium model is established by considering travelers' heterogenous values of time to evaluate the effects of different combinations of congestion charging and subsidy policies on vehicle flow and revenue. Numerical results indicate that the effectiveness of congestion charging and subsidy policy in alleviating traffic congestion depends on the object of charging or subsidizing. Congestion charging for private cars can reduce traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion, but charging for ridesharing cars does not reduce traffic flow and may even cause traffic congestion. Subsidizing public buses does not reduce traffic flow, but it can ease congestion by coordinating traffic flow on both edges of the dual-modal transport. The combination of no subsidy for public buses and charging for both private cars and ridesharing cars can obtain the greatest revenue, but it does not alleviate traffic congestion. Although the combination of charging for private cars and subsidizing public buses does not bring the most benefits, it can reduce traffic flow, and its revenue is also considerable. This study can provide quantitative decision support for the government to ease traffic congestion and improve government revenue.

    Citation: Dandan Fan, Dawei Li, Fangzheng Cheng, Guanghua Fu. Effects of congestion charging and subsidy policy on vehicle flow and revenue with user heterogeneity[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 12820-12842. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023572

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jorge Rebaza . On a model of COVID-19 dynamics. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(2): 2129-2140. doi: 10.3934/era.2020108
    [2] Khongorzul Dashdondov, Mi-Hye Kim, Mi-Hwa Song . Deep autoencoders and multivariate analysis for enhanced hypertension detection during the COVID-19 era. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3202-3229. doi: 10.3934/era.2024147
    [3] Yazao Yang, Haodong Tang, Tangzheng Weng . Changes in public travel willingness in the post-COVID-19 era: Evidence from social network data. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 3688-3703. doi: 10.3934/era.2023187
    [4] Zimeng Lv, Jiahong Zeng, Yuting Ding, Xinyu Liu . Stability analysis of time-delayed SAIR model for duration of vaccine in the context of temporary immunity for COVID-19 situation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 1004-1030. doi: 10.3934/era.2023050
    [5] Hao Nong, Yitan Guan, Yuanying Jiang . Identifying the volatility spillover risks between crude oil prices and China's clean energy market. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(12): 4593-4618. doi: 10.3934/era.2022233
    [6] Chengtian Ouyang, Huichuang Wu, Jiaying Shen, Yangyang Zheng, Rui Li, Yilin Yao, Lin Zhang . IEDO-net: Optimized Resnet50 for the classification of COVID-19. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7578-7601. doi: 10.3934/era.2023383
    [7] Gaohui Fan, Ning Li . Application and analysis of a model with environmental transmission in a periodic environment. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5815-5844. doi: 10.3934/era.2023296
    [8] Liling Huang, Yong Tan, Jinzhu Ye, Xu Guan . Coordinated location-allocation of cruise ship emergency supplies under public health emergencies. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(4): 1804-1821. doi: 10.3934/era.2023093
    [9] Zhiliang Li, Lijun Pei, Guangcai Duan, Shuaiyin Chen . A non-autonomous time-delayed SIR model for COVID-19 epidemics prediction in China during the transmission of Omicron variant. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 2203-2228. doi: 10.3934/era.2024100
    [10] Cong Cao, Chengxiang Chu, Jinjing Yang . "If you don't buy it, it's gone!": The effect of perceived scarcity on panic buying. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5485-5508. doi: 10.3934/era.2023279
  • Traffic congestion is a major issue in urban traffic networks. Both congestion charging and subsidy policy can solve traffic congestion to some extent, but which one is better? Based on this, this paper constructs a typical transit network consisting of three travel tools in four common travel modes. Travelers' values of time affect their choice of transportation in the congestion network, thus a stochastic user equilibrium model is established by considering travelers' heterogenous values of time to evaluate the effects of different combinations of congestion charging and subsidy policies on vehicle flow and revenue. Numerical results indicate that the effectiveness of congestion charging and subsidy policy in alleviating traffic congestion depends on the object of charging or subsidizing. Congestion charging for private cars can reduce traffic flow and alleviate traffic congestion, but charging for ridesharing cars does not reduce traffic flow and may even cause traffic congestion. Subsidizing public buses does not reduce traffic flow, but it can ease congestion by coordinating traffic flow on both edges of the dual-modal transport. The combination of no subsidy for public buses and charging for both private cars and ridesharing cars can obtain the greatest revenue, but it does not alleviate traffic congestion. Although the combination of charging for private cars and subsidizing public buses does not bring the most benefits, it can reduce traffic flow, and its revenue is also considerable. This study can provide quantitative decision support for the government to ease traffic congestion and improve government revenue.



    The class of normalized analytic functions in the open unit disc Δ={zC:|z|<1} denoted by Ω consists of the functions f of the form

    f(z)=z+n=2anzn, (1.1)

    where f(0)1=f(0)=0. Let (z)Ω defined by

    (z)=z+n=2bnzn. (1.2)

    Then the Hadamard product, also known as the convolution of two function f(z) and (z) denoted by f is defined as

    (f)(z)=f(z)(z)=z+n=2anbnzn,zΔ.

    Moreover, f(z)(z), if there exist a Schwartz function χ(z) in A, satisfying the conditions χ(0)=0 and |χ(z)|<1, such that f(z)=(χ(z)). The symbol is used to denote subordination.

    Let S denote the subclass of Ω of univalent functions in Δ. Let P,C,S and K represent the subclasses of S known as the classes of Caratheodory functions, convex funtions, starlike functions, and close-to-convex functions, respectively.

    The concept of bounded rotations was introduced by Brannan in [7]. A lot of quality work on the generalization of this concept has already been done. Working in the same manner, we have defined the following new classes.

    Definition 1.1. Let

    ν(z)=1+n=1pnzn (1.3)

    be analytic in Δ such that ν(0)=1. Then for m2, ν(z)Pm((z)), if and only if

    ν(z)=(m4+12)ν1(z)(m412)ν2(z), (1.4)

    where (z) is a convex univalent function in Δ and νi(z)(z) for i=1,2.

    Particularly, for m=2, we get the class P((z)).

    Definition 1.2. Let f(z) and (z) be two analytic functions as defined in (1.1) and (1.2) such that (f)(z)0. Let (z) be a convex univalent function. Then for m2, fVm[(z);(z)] if and only if

    (z(f))(f)Pm((z)),zΔ. (1.5)

    Particularly, for m=2, we will get the class C[(z);(z)]. So, a function fC[(z);(z)] if and only if

    (z(f))(f)(z),zΔ.

    Definition 1.3. Let f(z) and (z) be the functions defined in (1.1) and (1.2), then f(z)Rm[(z);(z)] if and only if

    z(f)(f)Pm((z)),zΔ. (1.6)

    Particularly, for m=2, we get the class SΛ[(z);(z)], i.e., fSΛ[(z);(z)] if and only if

    z(f)(f)(z),zΔ.

    From (1.5) and (1.6) it can be easily noted that fVm[(z);(z)] if and only if zf(z)Rm[(z);(z)]. For m=2, this relation will hold for the classes C[(z);(z)] and SΛ[(z);(z)].

    Definition 1.4. Let f(z) and (z) be analytic function as defined in (1.1) and (1.2) and m2. Let (z) be the convex univalent function. Then, fTm[(z);(z)] if and only if there exists a function ψ(z)SΛ[(z);(z)] such that

    z(f)ψPm((z)),zΔ. (1.7)

    It is interesting to note that the particular cases of our newly defined classes will give us some well-known classes already discussed in the literature. Some of these special cases have been elaborated below.

    Special Cases: Let (z) be the identity function defined as z1z denoted by I i.e., f=fI=f. Then

    (1) For (z)=1+z1z we have Pm((z))=Pm,Rm[(z);(z)]=Rm introduced by Pinchuk [23] and the class Vm[(z);(z)]=Vm defined by Paatero [21]. For m=2, we will get the well-known classes of convex functions C and the starlike functions SΛ.

    (2) Taking (z)=1+(12δ)z1z, we get the classes Pm(δ),Rm(δ) and Vm(δ) presented in [22]. For m=2, we will get the classes C(δ) and SΛ(δ).

    (3) Letting (z)=1+Az1+Bz, with 1B<A1 introduced by Janowski in [12], the classes Pm[A,B],Rm[A,B] and Vm[A,B] defined by Noor [16,17] can be obtained. Moreover, the classes C[A,B] and SΛ[A,B] introduced by [12] can be derived by choosing m=2.

    A significant work has already been done by considering (z) to be different linear operators and (z) to be any convex univalent function. For the details see ([4,9,18,19,24]).

    The importance of Mittag-Leffler functions have tremendously been increased in the last four decades due to its vast applications in the field of science and technology. A number of geometric properties of Mittag-Leffler function have been discussed by many researchers working in the field of Geometric function theory. For some recent and detailed study on the Geometric properties of Mittag-Leffler functions see ([2,3,31]).

    Special function theory has a vital role in both pure and applied mathematics. Mittag-Leffler functions have massive contribution in the theory of special functions, they are used to investigate certain generalization problems. For details see [11,26]

    There are numerous applications of Mittag-Leffler functions in the analysis of the fractional generalization of the kinetic equation, fluid flow problems, electric networks, probability, and statistical distribution theory. The use of Mittag-Leffler functions in the fractional order integral equations and differential equations attracted many researchers. Due to its connection and applications in fractional calculus, the significance of Mittag-Leffler functions has been amplified. To get a look into the applications of Mittag-Leffler functions in the field of fractional calculus, (see [5,27,28,29,30]).

    Here, in this article we will use the operator Hγ,κλ,η:ΩΩ, introduced by Attiya [1], defined as

    Hγ,κλ,η(f)=μγ,κλ,ηf(z),zΔ, (1.8)

    where η,γC, (λ)>max{0,(k)1} and (k)>0. Also, (λ)=0 when (k)=1;η0. Here, μγ,κλ,η is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function, defined in [25]. The generalized Mittag-Leffler function has the following representation.

    μγ,κλ,η=z+n=2Γ(γ+nκ)Γ(λ+η)Γ(γ+κ)Γ(η+λn)n!zn.

    So, the operator defined in (1.8) can be rewritten as:

    Hγ,κλ,η(f)(z)=z+n=2Γ(γ+nκ)Γ(λ+η)Γ(γ+κ)Γ(η+λn)n!anzn,zΔ. (1.9)

    Attiya [1] presented the properties of the aforesaid operator as follows:

    z(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z)))=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,η(f(z)))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z))), (1.10)

    and

    z(Hγ,κλ,η+1(f(z)))=(λ+ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z)))(ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η+1(f(z))). (1.11)

    However, as essential as real-world phenomena are, discovering a solution for the commensurate scheme and acquiring fundamentals with reverence to design variables is challenging and time-consuming. Among the most pragmatically computed classes, we considered the new and novel class which is very useful for efficiently handling complex subordination problems. Here, we propose a suitably modified scheme in order to compute the Janowski type function of the form (z)=(1+Az1+Bz)β, where 0<β1 and 1B<A1, which is known as the strongly Janowski type function. Moreover, for (z), we will use the function defined in (1.9). So, the classes defined in Definition 1.1–1.4 will give us the following novel classes.

    Definition 1.5. A function ν(z) as defined in Eq (1.3) is said to be in the class P(m,β)[A,B] if and only if for m2 there exist two analytic functions ν1(z) and ν2(z) in Δ, such that

    ν(z)=(m4+12)ν1(z)(m412)ν2(z),

    where νi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β for i=1,2. For m=2, we get the class of strongly Janowki type functions Pβ[A,B].

    Moreover,

    V(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]={fΩ:(z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)))(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))P(m,β)[A,B]},
    R(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]={fΩ:z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)P(m,β)[A,B]},
    Cβ[A,B,γ,η]={fΩ:(z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)))(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Pβ[A,B]},
    SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]={fΩ:z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)Pβ[A,B]},
    T(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]={fΩ:z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B],whereψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]},

    where η,γC, (λ)>max{0,(k)1} and (k)>0. Also, (λ)=0 when (k)=1;η0. It can easily be noted that there exists Alexander relation between the classes V(m,β)[A,B;γ,η] and R(m,β)[A,B;γ,η], i.e.,

    fV(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]zfR(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]. (1.12)

    Throughout this investigation, 1B<A1, m2 and 0<β1 unless otherwise stated.

    Lemma 2.1. ([13]) Let ν(z) as defined in (1.3) be in P(m,β)[A,B]. Then ν(z)Pm(ϱ), where 0ϱ=(1A1B)β<1.

    Lemma 2.2. ([8]) Let (z) be convex univalent in Δ with h(0)=1 and (ζ(z)+α)>0(ζC). Let p(z) be analytic in Δ with p(0)=1, which satisfy the following subordination relation

    p(z)+zp(z)ζp(z)+α(z),

    then

    p(z)(z).

    Lemma 2.3. ([10]) Let (z)P. Then for |z|<r, 1r1+r((z)) |(z)|1+r1r, and |h(z)|2r(z)1r2.

    Theorem 3.1. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then for (γκ)>ϱ,

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]. Set

    φ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z), (3.1)

    then φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Now, Assume that

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z). (3.2)

    Plugging (1.10) in (3.2), we get

    ψ(z)=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z).

    It follows that

    Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)(κγ+κ)(ψ(z)+γκ)=Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z).

    After performing logarithmic differentiation and simple computation, we get

    ψ(z)+zψ(z)ψ(z)+γκ=φ(z). (3.3)

    Now, for m2, consider

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z). (3.4)

    Combining (3.3) and (3.4) with the similar technique as used in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z),

    where

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+γκ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+γκ(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i=1,2. By using Lemma 2.1 and the condition (γκ)>ϱ, we have

    (γκ+(1+Az1+Bz)β)>0,

    where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Hence, in view of Lemma 2.2, we have

    ψi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i = 1, 2. This implies ψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], so

    f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    which is required to prove.

    Theorem 3.2. If (λη)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Taking

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z), (3.5)

    we have φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Now, suppose that

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z). (3.6)

    Applying the relation (1.11) in the Eq (3.6), we have

    ψ(z)=(λ+ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))(ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z).

    arrives at

    Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z)(λη+λ)(ψ(z)+ηλ)=Hγ,κλ,ηf(z).

    So by the logarithmic differentiation and simple computation we get,

    ψ(z)+zψ(z)ψ(z)+ηλ=φ(z). (3.7)

    Therefore, for m2, take

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z). (3.8)

    Combining Eqs (3.6) and (3.7) using the similar technique as in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z),

    where

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+ηλ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+ηλ(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i=1,2. Applying Lemma 2.1 and the condition (ηλ)>ϱ, we get

    (ηλ+(1+Az1+Bz)β)>0,

    where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Hence, by Lemma 2.2, we have

    ψi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i = 1, 2. This implies ψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], so

    f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1],

    which completes the proof.

    Corollary 3.1. For m=2, if (γκ)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then

    SΛβ[A,B,γ+1,η]SΛβ[A,B,γ,η].

    Moreover, if (λη)>ϱ, then

    SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]SΛβ[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Theorem 3.3. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then for (γκ)>ϱ,

    V(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. By means of theorem 3.1 and Alexander relation defined in (1.12), we get

    fV(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]zfR(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]zfR(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]fV(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Hence the result.

    Analogously, we can prove the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.4. If (λη)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then

    V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Corollary 3.2. For m=2, if (γκ)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then

    Cβ[A,B,γ+1,η]Cβ[A,B,γ,η].

    Moreover, if (λη)>ϱ, then

    Cβ[A,B,γ,η]Cβ[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Theorem 3.5. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (γκ)>ϱ. Then

    T(m,β)[A,B;γ+1,η]T(m,β)[A,B;γ,η].

    Proof. Let f(z)T(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]. Then there exist ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ+1,η] such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.9)

    Now consider

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.10)

    Since ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ+1,η] and (γκ)>ϱ, therefore by Corollary 3.3, ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]. So

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)Pβ[A,B]. (3.11)

    By doing some simple calculations on (3.11), we get

    (κq(z)+γ)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=(γ+κ)Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.12)

    Now applying the relation (1.10) on (3.10), we get

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=γ+κκHγ+1,κλ,ηf(z)γκHγ,κλ,ηf(z). (3.13)

    Differentiating both sides of (3.13), we have

    ϕ(z)(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z))+ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=γ+κκ(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))γκ(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)).

    By using (3.12) and with some simple computations, we get

    ϕ(z)+zϕ(z)q(z)+γκ=φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], (3.14)

    with (q(z)+γκ)>0, since q(z)Pβ[A,B], so by Lemma 2.1, (q(z)>ϱ and (γκ)>ϱ. Now consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z). (3.15)

    Combining (3.14) and (3.15) with the similar technique as used in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.16)

    where

    φi(z)=ϕ(z)+zϕzq(z)+γκ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    Using the fact of Lemma 2.2, we can say that

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    So, ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Hence we get the required result.

    Theorem 3.6. If (λη)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then

    T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Let f(z)T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then there exist ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η] such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.17)

    Taking

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z). (3.18)

    As we know that, ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η] and (ηλ)>ϱ, therefore by Corollary 3.3, ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η+1]. So

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)Pβ[A,B]. (3.19)

    By doing some simple calculations on (3.19) with the help of (1.11), we get

    (λq(z)+η)Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)=(η+λ)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.20)

    Now, applying the relation (1.11) on (3.18), we get

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)=η+λλHγ,κλ,ηf(z)ηλHγ,κλ,η+1f(z). (3.21)

    Differentiating both sides of Eq (3.21), we have

    ϕ(z)(Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z))+ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)=η+λλ(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))ηλ(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z)),

    some simple calculations along with using (3.20) give us

    ϕ(z)+zϕ(z)q(z)+ηλ=φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], (3.22)

    with (q(z)+ηλ)>0. Since q(z)Pβ[A,B], so applying Lemma 2.1, we have (q(z)>ϱ and (ηλ)>ϱ.

    Assume that

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z). (3.23)

    Combining (3.22) and (3.23), along with using the similar technique as in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.24)

    where

    φi(z)=ϕ(z)+zϕzq(z)+ηλ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    Applying the fact of Lemma 2.2, we have

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    So ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Which gives us the required result.

    Corollary 3.3. If ϱ>min{(γκ),(λη)}, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then we have the following inclusion relations:

    (i) R(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    (ii)V(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    (iii)T(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Now, we will discuss some radius results for our defined classes.

    Theorem 3.7. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (γκ)>ϱ. Then

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]R(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η]

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.25)

    In view of Lemma 2.1 P(m,β)[A,B]Pm(ϱ), for ϱ=(1A1B)β, therefore ψ(z)Pm(ϱ). So by the Definition of Pm(ϱ) given in [22], there exist two functions ψ1(z),ψ2(z)P(ϱ) such that

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z), (3.26)

    with m2 and (ψi(z))>ϱ,i=1,2. We can write

    ψi(z)=(1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ, (3.27)

    where hi(z)P and (hi(z)>0, for i=1,2. Now, let

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z). (3.28)

    We have to check when ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ). Using relation (1.10) in (3.25), we get

    ψ(z)Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z)=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,η(f(z)))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z))).

    So, by simple calculation and logarithmic differentiation, we get

    ψ(z)+zψzψ(z)+γκ=ϕ(z). (3.29)

    Now, consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where

    ϕi(z)=ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+γκ,i=1,2.

    To derive the condition for ϕi(z) to be in P(ϱ), consider

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+γκϱ).

    In view of (3.27), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=((1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ+z(1ϱ)hi(z)γκ+ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(γκ+ϱ)+(1ϱ)(hi(z)). (3.30)

    We have, (γκ+ϱ)>0 since (γκ)>ϱ. Since hi(z)P, hence by using Lemma 2.3 in inequality (3.30), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))1ϱ2r1r2(hi(z))(1ϱ)(1r1+r)=(1ϱ)(hi(z))[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)](1ϱ)(1r1+r)[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)]=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ)1r2. (3.31)

    Since 1r2>0, letting T(r)=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ). It is easy to note that T(0)>0 and T(1)<0. Hence, there is a root of T(r) between 0 and 1. Let ro be the root then by simple calculations, we get

    ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ.

    Hence ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ) for |z|<ro. Thus for this radius ro the function f(z) belongs to the class R(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η], which is required to prove.

    Theorem 3.8. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (λη)>ϱ. Then

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]R(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η],

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]. Then

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.32)

    By applying of Lemma 2.1, we get P(m,β)[A,B]Pm(ϱ), for ϱ=(1A1B)β, therefore ψ(z)Pm(ϱ). Hence, the Definition of Pm(ϱ) given in [22], there exist two functions ψ1(z),ψ2(z)P(ϱ) such that

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z), (3.33)

    with m2 and (ψi(z))>ϱ,i=1,2. We can say that

    ψi(z)=(1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ, (3.34)

    where hi(z)P and (hi(z)>0, for i=1,2. Now, assume

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z). (3.35)

    Here, We have to obtain the condition for which ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ). Using relation (1.11) in (3.51), we get

    ψ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)=(η+λλ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z)))(ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η+1(f(z))).

    Thus, by simple calculation and logarithmic differentiation, we have

    ψ(z)+zψzψ(z)+ηλ=ϕ(z). (3.36)

    Now, consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where

    ϕi(z)=ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+ηλ,i=1,2.

    To derive the condition for ϕi(z) to be in P(ϱ), consider

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+ηλϱ).

    In view of (3.34), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=((1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ+z(1ϱ)hi(z)ηλ+ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(ηλ+ϱ)+(1ϱ)(hi(z)). (3.37)

    Here, (ηλ+ϱ)>0 since (ηλ)>ϱ. We know that hi(z)P, therefore by using Lemma 2.3 in inequality (3.37), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))1ϱ2r1r2(hi(z))(1ϱ)(1r1+r)=(1ϱ)(hi(z))[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)](1ϱ)(1r1+r)[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)]=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ)1r2. (3.38)

    Since 1r2>0, letting T(r)=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ). It can easily be seen that T(0)>0 and T(1)<0. Hence, there is a root of T(r) between 0 and 1. Let ro be the root then by simple calculations, we get

    ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ.

    Hence ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ) for |z|<ro. Thus for this radius ro the function f(z) belongs to the class R(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η], which is required to prove.

    Corollary 3.4. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then, for m=2, and |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,

    (i) If (γκ)>ϱ, then SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]SΛβ[ϱ,γ+1,η].

    (ii) If(λη)>ϱ, then SΛβ[A,B,γ,η+1]SΛβ[ϱ,γ,η].

    Theorem 3.9. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then for |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ, we have

    (1)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]V(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η], if (γκ)>ϱ.

    (2)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]V(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η], if (λη)>ϱ.

    Proof. The above results can easily be proved by using Theorem 3.10, Theorem 3.11 and the Alexander relation defined in (1.12).

    Theorem 3.10. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (γκ)>ϱ. Then

    T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]T(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η],

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Proof. Let fT(m,β)[A,B,γ,η], then there exist ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η] such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.39)

    Since by Lemma 2.1 we know that P(m,β)[A,B]Pm(ϱ), where ϱ=(1A1B)β, therefore φ(z)Pm(ϱ). So by using the Definition of Pm(ϱ) defined in [22], there exist two functions φ1(z) and φ2(z) such that

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.40)

    where φi(z)P(ϱ),i=1,2. We can write

    φi(z)=ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z), (3.41)

    where hi(z)P. Now, let

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z).

    Since ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], therefore

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)Pβ[A,B], (3.42)

    then by using relation (1.10) and doing some simple computation on Eq (3.42), we have

    (κq(z)+γ)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=(γ+κ)Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.43)

    Now, using relation (1.10) in (3.39), we get

    φ(z)=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.44)

    By some simple calculations along with differentiation of both sides of (3.44) and then applying (3.43) we get the following relation

    φ(z)+zφ(z)q(z)+(γκ)=ϕ(z).

    Let us consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where

    ϕi(z)=φi(z)+zφi(z)q(z)+(γκ),

    i=1,2. Since q(z)Pβ[A,B]P(ϱ). Therefore, we can write

    q(z)=ϱ+(1ϱ)qo(z), (3.45)

    where qo(z)P. We have to check when ϕi(z)Pm(ϱ). For this consider

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(φi(z)+zφi(z)q(z)+(γκ)ϱ).

    Using (3.41) and (3.45), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)+(1ϱ)zhi(z)ϱ+(1ϱ)qo(z)+(γκ)ϱ),

    where hi(z),qo(z)P.

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(ϱ+γκ)+(1ϱ)qo(z).

    Since (γκ)>ϱ, so (ϱ+γκ)>0. Now by using the distortion results of Lemma 2.3, we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=((1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ+z(1ϱ)hi(z)γκ+ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(γκ+ϱ)+(1ϱ)(hi(z)). (3.46)

    Since hi(z)P, so (hi(z))>0 and (γκ+ϱ)>0 for (γκ)>ϱ. Hence, by using Lemma 2.3 in inequality (3.46), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))1ϱ2r1r2(hi(z))(1ϱ)(1r1+r)r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ)1r2.

    Since 1r2>0, taking T(r)=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ). Let ro be the root then by simple calculations, we get

    ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ.

    Hence ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ) for |z|<ro. Thus for this radius ro the function f(z) belongs to the class T(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η], which is required to prove.

    Using the analogous approach used in Theorem 3.14, one can easily prove the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.11. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (ηλ)>ϱ. Then

    T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]T(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η]

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Integral Preserving Property: Here, we will discuss some integral preserving properties of our aforementioned classes. The generalized Libera integral operator Iσ introduced and discussed in [6,14] is defined by:

    Iσ(f)(z)=σ+1zσz0tσ1f(t)dt, (3.47)

    where f(z)A and σ>1.

    Theorem 3.12. Let σ>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. If fR(m,β)[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let fR(m,β)[A,B,γ,η], and set

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z))Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z), (3.48)

    where ψ(z) is analytic and ψ(0)=1. From definition of Hγ,κλ,η(f) given by [1] and using Eq (3.47), we have

    z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z))=(σ+1)Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)σHγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z). (3.49)

    Then by using Eqs (3.48) and (3.49), we have

    (σ+1)Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z)=ψ(z)+σ.

    Logarithmic differentiation and simple computation results in

    ϕ(z)=ψ(z)+zψ(z)ψ(z)+σ=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)P(m,β)[A,B], (3.50)

    with (ψ(z)+σ)>0, since (σ)>ϱ. Now, consider

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z). (3.51)

    Combining (3.50) and (3.51), we get

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where ϕi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+σ, i=1,2. Since ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    which implies

    ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+σ(1+Az1+Bz)βi=1,2.

    Therefore, using Lemma 2.2 we get

    ψi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    or ψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Hence the result.

    Corollary 3.5. Let σ>ϱ. Then for m=2, if fSΛβ[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], where ϱ=(1A1B)β.

    Theorem 3.13. Let σ>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. If fV(m,β)[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let fV(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then by using relation (1.12), we have

    zf(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    so by using Theorem 3.16, we can say that

    Iσ(zf(z))R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    equivalently

    z(Iσ(f(z)))R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    so again by using the relation (1.12), we get

    Iσ(f)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Theorem 3.14. Let σ>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. If fT(m,β)[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let fT(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then there exists ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.52)

    Consider

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z))Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z). (3.53)

    Since ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], then by Corollary 3.17, Iσ(ψ)(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]. Therefore

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z))Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)Pβ[A,B]. (3.54)

    By using (3.47) and Definition of Hγ,κλ,η, we get

    q(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)=(σ+1)Hγ,κλ,η(ψ)(z)σHγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z),

    or we can write it as

    Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)=σ+1q(z)+σHγ,κλ,η(ψ)(z). (3.55)

    Now using the relation (3.47) and the Definition of Hγ,κλ,η, in (3.53), we have

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)=(σ+1)Hγ,κλ,η(f)(z)σHγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z). (3.56)

    Differentiating both sides of (3.56), we have

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)+ϕ(z)(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z))=(σ+1)(Hγ,κλ,η(f)(z))σ(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z)),

    then by simple computations and using (3.53)–(3.55), we get

    ϕ(z)+zϕ(z)q(z)+σ=φ(z), (3.57)

    with (σ)>ϱ, so (q(z)+σ)>0, since q(z)Pβ[A,B]P(ϱ). Consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z), (3.58)

    Combining Eqs (3.57) and (3.58), we have

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.59)

    where φi(z)=ϕi(z)+zϕi(z)q(z)+σ, i=1,2.

    Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], thus we have

    φi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    then

    ϕi(z)+zϕi(z)q(z)+σ(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    Since (q(z)+σ)>0, therefore using Lemma 2.2 we get

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2,

    thus ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Hence the result.

    Due to their vast applications, Mittag-Leffler functions have captured the interest of a number of researchers working in different fields of science. The present investigation may help researchers comprehend some stimulating consequences of the special functions. In the present article, we have used generalized Mittag-Leffler functions to define some novel classes related to bounded boundary and bounded radius rotations. Several inclusion relations and radius results for these classes have been discussed. Moreover, it has been proved that these classes are preserved under the generalized Libera integral operator. Finally, we can see that the projected solution procedure is highly efficient in solving inclusion problems describing the harmonic analysis. It is hoped that our investigation and discussion will be helpful in cultivating new ideas and applications in different fields of science, particularly in mathematics.

    Δ Open Unit Disc.

    Ω Class of normalized analytic functions.

    Real part of complex number.

    Γ Gamma function.

    χ(z) Schwartz function.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    The authors would like to thank the Rector of COMSATS Univeristy Islamabad, Pakistan for providing excellent research oriented environment. The author Thabet Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for the support through TAS research Lab.



    [1] S. Dornbush, A. Joshi, StreetSmart traffic: Discovering and disseminating automobile congestion using VANET's, in 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring, (2007), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECS.2007.15
    [2] M. Börjesson, C. J. Hamilton, P. Nasman, C. Papaix, Factors driving public support for road congestion reduction policies: congestion charging, free public transport and more roads in Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 78 (2015), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.008
    [3] L. Han, D. Z. Wang, H. K. Lo, C. Zhu, X. Cai, Discrete-time day-to-day dynamic congestion pricing scheme considering multiple equilibria, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 104 (2017), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.006
    [4] S. Liu, K. P. Triantis, S. Sarangi, A framework for evaluating the dynamic impacts of a congestion pricing policy for a transportation socioeconomic system, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 44 (2010), 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.001
    [5] K. Foreman, Crossing the bridge: The effects of time-varying tolls on curbing congestion, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 92 (2016), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.033 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.033
    [6] R. Chen, L. Nozick, Integrating congestion pricing and transit investment planning, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 89 (2016), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.013
    [7] Y. Bao, E. T. Verhoef, P. Koster, Regulating dynamic congestion externalities with tradable credit schemes: Does a unique equilibrium exist, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 127 (2019), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.012
    [8] B. K. Mohandas, R. Liscano, O. W. W. Yang, Vehicle traffic congestion management in vehicular ad-hoc networks, in 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks, (2009), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2009.5355052
    [9] A. Padiath, L. Vanajakshi, S. C. Subramanian, H. Manda, Prediction of traffic density for congestion analysis under Indian traffic conditions, in 2009 IEEE 12th Int Conf Intell Trans, (2009), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2009.5309716
    [10] N. Petrovska, A. Stevanovic, Traffic congestion analysis visualisation tool, in 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (2015), 1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.243
    [11] D. A. Hensher, S. M. Puckett, Congestion and variable user charging as an effective travel demand management instrument, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 41 (2007), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.07.002
    [12] G. Zhou, K. Huang, L. Mao, Design of commute carpooling based on fixed time and routes, Int. J. Veh. Technol., 2014 (2014), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/634926 doi: 10.1155/2014/634926
    [13] L. J. Basso, C. A. Guevara, A. Gschwender, M. Fuster, Congestion pricing, transit subsidies and dedicated bus lanes: Efficient and practical solutions to congestion, Transp. Policy, 18 (2011), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.002
    [14] A. Aboudina, H. Abdelgawad, B. Abdulhai, K. N. Habib, Time-dependent congestion pricing system for large networks: integrating departure time choice, dynamic traffic assignment and regional travel surveys in the Greater Toronto Area, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 94 (2016), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.005
    [15] Y. M. Nie, Y. Liu, Existence of self-financing and Pareto-improving congestion pricing: impact of value of time distribution, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 44 (2010), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2009.09.004
    [16] L. Chen, H. Yang, Managing congestion and emissions in road networks with tolls and rebates, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 46 (2012), 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.03.001
    [17] J. Eliasson, L. Hultkrantz, L. Nerhagen, L. S. Rosqvist, The Stockholm congestion-charging trial 2006: overview of effects, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 43 (2009), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.007
    [18] M. Börjesson, I. Kristoffersson, The Swedish congestion charges: Ten years on, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 107 (2018), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.001 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.001
    [19] M. Gibson, M. Carnovale, The effects of road pricing on driver behavior and air pollution, J. Urban Econ., 89 (2015), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2015.06.005
    [20] P. Beria, Effectiveness and monetary impact of Milan's road charge, one year after implementation, Int. J. Sustainable Transp., 10 (2016), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2015.1083638 doi: 10.1080/15568318.2015.1083638
    [21] E. Ayrat, X. Lin, Is congestion pricing effective for traffic jams, Promet- Traffic Transp., 34 (2022), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v34i1.3815 doi: 10.7307/ptt.v34i1.3815
    [22] Z. Liu, Q. Meng, Bus-based park-and-ride system: a stochastic model on multimodal network with congestion pricing schemes, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 45 (2014), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2012.743617 doi: 10.1080/00207721.2012.743617
    [23] D. Q. Nguyen-Phuoc, G. Currie, C. de Gruyter, I. Kim, W. Young, Modelling the net traffic congestion impact of bus operations in Melbourne, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 117 (2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.005
    [24] V. T. Thao, S. Imhof, W. von Arx, Integration of ridesharing with public transport in rural Switzerland: Practice and outcomes, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., 10 (2021), 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100340 doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100340
    [25] Y. Q. Dong, S. F. Wang, L. Li, Z. Zhang, An empirical study on travel patterns of internet based ride-sharing, Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., 86 (2018), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.022
    [26] J. Ma, M. Xu, Q. Meng, L. Cheng, Ridesharing user equilibrium problem under OD-based surge pricing strategy, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 134 (2020), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.02.001
    [27] C. Song, J. Monteil, J. L. Ygnace, D. Rey, Incentives for ridesharing: A case study of welfare and traffic congestion, J. Adv. Transp., 5 (2021), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6627660 doi: 10.1155/2021/6627660
    [28] S. Li, H. Yang, K. Poolla, P. Varaiya, Spatial pricing in ride-sourcing markets under a congestion charge, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 152 (2021), 18–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.07.004
    [29] H. Yang, Q. Meng, T. D. Hau, Optimal integrated pricing in a bi-modal transportation network, in Urban and Regional Transportation Modeling: Essays in Honor of David Boyce, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, (2004), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420536
    [30] Y. Liu, X. Guo, H. Yang, Pareto-improving and revenue-neutral congestion pricing schemes in two-mode traffic networks, NETNOMICS: Econ. Res. Electron. Networking, 10 (2009), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-008-9018-x doi: 10.1007/s11066-008-9018-x
    [31] L. J. Basso, S. R. Jara-Diaz, Integrating congestion pricing, transit subsidies and mode choice, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 46 (2012), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.013 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.013
    [32] C. Y. Yan, M. B. Hu, R. Jiang, J. Long, J. Y. Chen, H. X. Liu, Stochastic ridesharing user equilibrium in transport networks, Network Spatial Econ., 19 (2019), 1007–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-019-9442-5 doi: 10.1007/s11067-019-9442-5
    [33] Y. Li, Y. Liu, J. Xie, A path-based equilibrium model for ridesharing matching, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 138 (2020), 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.007
    [34] T. Li, M. Xu, H. Sun, J. Xiong, X. Dou, Stochastic ridesharing equilibrium problem with compensation optimization, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 170 (2023), 102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102999 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102999
    [35] X. Li, J. Bai, A ridesharing choice behavioral equilibrium model with users of heterogeneous values of time, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18 (2021), 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031197 doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031197
    [36] N. Mouter, C. Chorus, Value of time-A citizen perspective, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 91 (2016), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.014
    [37] Z. Li, D. A. Hensher, Estimating values of travel time savings for toll roads: Avoiding a common error, Transp. Policy, 24 (2012), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.015 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.015
    [38] X. Yu, V. A. C. van den Berg, E. T. Verhoef, Carpooling with heterogeneous users in the bottleneck model, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 127 (2019), 178–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.003
    [39] V. A. C. van den Berg, Coarse tolling with heterogeneous preferences, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 64 (2014), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001
    [40] Z. Tan, H. Yang, R. Y. Guo, Dynamic congestion pricing with day-to-day flow evolution and user heterogeneity, Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., 61 (2015), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.013 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.013
    [41] R. M. Braid, Partial peak-load pricing of a transportation bottleneck with homogeneous and heterogeneous values of time, Econ. Transp., 16 (2018), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2018.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2018.08.001
    [42] F. Fakhrmoosavi, A. Zockaie, K. Abdelghany, Incorporating travel time reliability in equitable congestion pricing schemes for heterogeneous users and bimodal networks, Transp. Res. Rec., 2675 (2021), 754–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211019737 doi: 10.1177/03611981211019737
    [43] Y. Yoshida, Commuter arrivals and optimal service in mass transit: does queuing behavior at transit stops matter, Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 38 (2008), 228–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.004
    [44] G. Monchambert, A. De Palma, Public transport reliability and commuter strategy, J. Urban Econ., 81 (2014), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2014.02.001
    [45] W. W. Wang, D. Z. W. Wang, F. Zhang, H. Sun, W. Zhang, J. Wu, Overcoming the downs-thomson paradox by transit subsidy policies, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 95 (2017), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.003
    [46] H. Yang, Y. Tang, Managing rail transit peak-hour congestion with a fare-reward scheme, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 110 (2018), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.005
    [47] Y. Tang, H. Yang, B. Wang, J. Huang, Y. Bai, A Pareto-improving and revenue-neutral scheme to manage mass transit congestion with heterogeneous commuters, Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., 113 (2020), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.016
    [48] H. Xu, J. S. Pang, F. Ordóñez, M. Dessouky, Complementarity models for traffic equilibrium with ridesharing, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 81 (2015), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.08.013 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.08.013
    [49] N. Alisoltani, L. Leclercq, M. Zargayouna, Can dynamic ride-sharing reduce traffic congestion, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 145 (2021), 212–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.004
    [50] S. A. Bagloee, M. Sarvi, A modern congestion pricing policy for urban traffic: subsidy plus toll, J. Mod. Transp., 25 (2017), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-017-0128-8 doi: 10.1007/s40534-017-0128-8
    [51] C. Lucinda, R. Moita, The political economy of an optimal congestion tax: An empirical investigation, Working Papers, Department of Economics from University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), 2019. Available from: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc: spa: wpaper: 2019wpecon10.
    [52] S. Sun, W. Y. Szeto, Multi-class stochastic user equilibrium assignment model with ridesharing: Formulation and policy implications, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 145 (2021), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.011 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.011
    [53] J. de Cea, E. Fernandez, Transit assignment for congested public transport systems: an equilibrium model, Transp. Sci., 27 (1993), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.27.2.133 doi: 10.1287/trsc.27.2.133
    [54] W. H. K. Lam, Z. Y. Gao, K. S. Chan, H. Yang, A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 33 (1999), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00040-X doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00040-X
    [55] L. M. Gardner, M. Duell, S. T. Waller, A framework for evaluating the role of electric vehicles in transportation network infrastructure under travel demand variability, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 49 (2013), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.031 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.031
    [56] L. Zhao, X. Xu, H. O. Gao, J. Wang, Y. Xie, A bi-level model for GHG emission charge based on a continuous distribution of travelers' value of time (VOT), Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 47 (2016), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.07.002
    [57] S. Manzo, O. A. Nielsen, C. G Prato, Effects of uncertainty in speed-flow curve parameters on a large-scale model: case study of the Danish national model, Transp. Res. Rec., 2429 (2014), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3141/2429-04 doi: 10.3141/2429-04
    [58] A. Almotahari, M. A. Yazici, A link criticality index embedded in the convex combinations solution of user equilibrium traffic assignment, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 126 (2019), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.005
    [59] D. C. Novak, J. F. Sullivan, K. Sentoff, J. Dowds, A framework to guide strategic disinvestment in roadway infrastructure considering social vulnerability, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 132 (2020), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.021
    [60] X. Guo, H. Yang, User heterogeneity and bi-criteria system optimum, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 43 (2009), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2008.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.09.001
    [61] M. Ben-Akiva, D. Bolduc, M. Bradley, Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time, Transp. Res. Rec., 1413 (1993), 88–97.
    [62] W. Harrington, A. J. Krupnick, A. Alberini, Overcoming public aversion to congestion pricing, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 35 (2001), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00048-8 doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00048-8
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Georgia Irina Oros, Gheorghe Oros, Shigeyoshi Owa, Subordination Properties of Certain Operators Concerning Fractional Integral and Libera Integral Operator, 2022, 7, 2504-3110, 42, 10.3390/fractalfract7010042
    2. Bushra Kanwal, Saqib Hussain, Afis Saliu, Fuzzy differential subordination related to strongly Janowski functions, 2023, 31, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2023.2170371
    3. Bushra Kanwal, Kashmala Sarfaraz, Munnaza Naz, Afis Saliu, Fuzzy differential subordination associated with generalized Mittag-Leffler type Poisson distribution, 2024, 31, 2576-5299, 206, 10.1080/25765299.2024.2319366
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1932) PDF downloads(94) Cited by(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog