
In many applications, the investigation of traveling wave solutions is essential in obtaining an accurate description of the dynamical behavior of most physical phenomena. The exact solutions to nonlinear equations can provide more physical descriptions and insightful details for many problems of practical interest. This paper focuses on investigating the solitary wave solutions of the generalized Zakharov equations (GZEs) by using four integration algorithms, namely, the modified (g′/g2)-expansion method, the modified (g′)-expansion method, the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method, and the addendum to Kudryashov's method. The GZEs have been widely used to describe the propagation of Langmuir waves in the field of plasma physics. The efficiency and simplicity of these methods are evaluated based on their application to GZEs, which have yielded multiple new optical solitary wave solutions in the form of rational, trigonometric, and hyperbolic functions. By using a suitable wave transformation, the coupled nonlinear partial differential equations are converted into ordinary differential equations. The derived optical solutions are graphically depicted in 2D and 3D plots for some specific parameter values. The traveling wave solutions discovered in the current study constitute just one example of the desired solutions that may enable the exploration of the physical properties of many complex systems and could also contribute greatly to improving our understanding of many interesting natural phenomena that arise in different applications, including plasma physics, fluid mechanics, protein chemistry, wave propagation, and optical fibers.
Citation: Hammad Alotaibi. Solitary waves of the generalized Zakharov equations via integration algorithms[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12650-12677. doi: 10.3934/math.2024619
[1] | A. K. M. Kazi Sazzad Hossain, M. Ali Akbar . Solitary wave solutions of few nonlinear evolution equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1199-1215. doi: 10.3934/math.2020083 |
[2] | Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264 |
[3] | Junjie Li, Gurpreet Singh, Onur Alp İlhan, Jalil Manafian, Yusif S. Gasimov . Modulational instability, multiple Exp-function method, SIVP, solitary and cross-kink solutions for the generalized KP equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7555-7584. doi: 10.3934/math.2021441 |
[4] | Ibrahim Alraddadi, Faisal Alsharif, Sandeep Malik, Hijaz Ahmad, Taha Radwan, Karim K. Ahmed . Innovative soliton solutions for a (2+1)-dimensional generalized KdV equation using two effective approaches. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34966-34980. doi: 10.3934/math.20241664 |
[5] | Qian Zhang, Ai Ke . Bifurcations and exact solutions of generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5158-5172. doi: 10.3934/math.2025237 |
[6] | F. A. Mohammed, Mohammed K. Elboree . Soliton solutions and periodic solutions for two models arises in mathematical physics. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4439-4458. doi: 10.3934/math.2022247 |
[7] | Maysaa Al-Qurashi, Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Madeeha Tahir, Abdullah M. Alsharif . New computations for the two-mode version of the fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov model in plasma fluid by means of the Shehu decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2044-2060. doi: 10.3934/math.2022117 |
[8] | Chander Bhan, Ravi Karwasra, Sandeep Malik, Sachin Kumar, Ahmed H. Arnous, Nehad Ali Shah, Jae Dong Chung . Bifurcation, chaotic behavior and soliton solutions to the KP-BBM equation through new Kudryashov and generalized Arnous methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8749-8767. doi: 10.3934/math.2024424 |
[9] | Behzad Ghanbari, Mustafa Inc, Abdullahi Yusuf, Dumitru Baleanu . New solitary wave solutions and stability analysis of the Benney-Luke and the Phi-4 equations in mathematical physics. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(6): 1523-1539. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.6.1523 |
[10] | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Mirfa Dawood, Muhammad Abbas, Dumitru Baleanu . Solitary wave solutions to Gardner equation using improved tan(Ω(Υ)2)-expansion method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4390-4406. doi: 10.3934/math.2023219 |
In many applications, the investigation of traveling wave solutions is essential in obtaining an accurate description of the dynamical behavior of most physical phenomena. The exact solutions to nonlinear equations can provide more physical descriptions and insightful details for many problems of practical interest. This paper focuses on investigating the solitary wave solutions of the generalized Zakharov equations (GZEs) by using four integration algorithms, namely, the modified (g′/g2)-expansion method, the modified (g′)-expansion method, the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method, and the addendum to Kudryashov's method. The GZEs have been widely used to describe the propagation of Langmuir waves in the field of plasma physics. The efficiency and simplicity of these methods are evaluated based on their application to GZEs, which have yielded multiple new optical solitary wave solutions in the form of rational, trigonometric, and hyperbolic functions. By using a suitable wave transformation, the coupled nonlinear partial differential equations are converted into ordinary differential equations. The derived optical solutions are graphically depicted in 2D and 3D plots for some specific parameter values. The traveling wave solutions discovered in the current study constitute just one example of the desired solutions that may enable the exploration of the physical properties of many complex systems and could also contribute greatly to improving our understanding of many interesting natural phenomena that arise in different applications, including plasma physics, fluid mechanics, protein chemistry, wave propagation, and optical fibers.
With the advancement of computer methods, the study of the traveling wave solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) has become a key research area in various fields, including mathematics, physics, fluid dynamics, biology, engineering, and computer science. Over the past few years, considerable progress has been made in the area of establishing different approaches to obtaining exact solutions to NLPDEs, and this has greatly improved our understanding of nonlinear phenomena. Such nonlinear phenomena can be observed in many scientific and technological applications, such as plasma physics, nonlinear fiber optics, and the propagation of shallow water waves [1,2]. Scientists and engineers have successfully described many physical phenomena in recent decades by using macroscopic models in the form of NLPDEs, which can be solved for desired quantities [3,4,5]. The most popular examples of such models include the Schrödinger equation, which describes the properties of time-varying quantum states in quantum mechanics. In fluid mechanics, the Navier-Stokes equation is widely used to describe the main properties of incompressible fluids such as velocity, density, temperature, pressure, and viscosity. Furthermore, in the presence of viscosity, the Zakharov equations are considered as continuum models that describe the behavior of blood plasma in biological fluids [6]. However, there is still much to discover by exploring a series of new exact optical solutions to such models with the aim of providing further explanation of physical phenomena of practical interest, from which the NLPDE is formed, and to apply them in practical life. In addition, the stability analysis can be successfully performed if the solutions of NLPDEs are available in closed form.
Solitary and soliton waves are special classes of traveling wave solutions with special properties [7]. These special properties are of fundamental importance in efforts to determine the behavior of the solution, which we seek to understand. Solitary waves arise naturally in many engineering and scientific applications, such as the intensity of light and the elevation of surface water in optical fibers. On the other hand, a soliton is considered to be a nonlinear solitary wave which can provide important insight into the particular features of solitary waves and form a special class of solutions to the generalized Zakharov equations (GZEs). Here, we focus on exploring new solitary solutions for a set of coupled equations, with the aim of deriving an adequate mathematical description for the system of interest.
Despite the great success of NLPDEs as a tool to describe nonlinear phenomena, not all of the complex systems are solvable. Even in some cases, if complex systems are solvable, the obtained solutions are not general; hence, they do not cover every possibility. Therefore, from a modern perspective, familiarity with all traditional and recently created techniques that have been designed to tackle these nonlinear systems is becoming increasingly important. Over the past few years, several techniques have been developed by scientists and mathematicians, such as the exact soliton solution [8,9,10], the tanh-function technique [11], the method of sine-cosine [12], the auxiliary equation method [13], the F-expansion method [14], the exp-function technique [15,16], the variational iteration method [17], and the generalized Kudryashov approach [18]. A more detailed discussion on some recent work on the solutions of nonlinear wave theory can be found in various research papers (see, for example, [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]).
In 1972, Zakharov established a set of nonlinear evolution equations to model and investigate the electromagnetic properties of plasmas, which became known as the Zakharov equations [28]. These equations are also extensively used as fundamental models that govern the nonlinear dynamical systems, and to describe the evolution of Langmuir turbulence in the presence of strong turbulence effects; see, for example, the review by Goldman [29]. By implementing the extended hyperbolic functions approach, Shang et al. [30] explored multiple explicit traveling solutions to the Zakharov equations. Several analytical methods have been previously introduced that aim to explore the exact and explicit solutions to the Zakharov equation [31,32,33,34,35,36].
In this paper, the GZEs which have been extensively used to model the propagation of Langmuir waves in plasmas are explored to find new solitary solutions by using four different algorithms. For the purpose of discussion, we introduce an example model in the class of nonlinear wave equations with constant coefficients
iψt+β(ψxx+α1ψyy)+β1|ψ|2ψ+γ1ψv=0,α2vtt+(vxx−β2vyy+γ2(|ψ|2)xx=0, | (1.1) |
where β,β1,γ1, and γ1 are non-zero constants; and β2,α1, and α2 are real constants. By selecting appropriate values for these constants, we can obtain various equations, such as the nonlinear Schrödinger equations and the Davey-Stewartson equations which have been used to investigate the short-and long-wave resonances and other propagating-wave patterns [37]. By considering v(x,t) to be the plasma density in one-dimensional systems and setting the above constants as follows: β=1, β1=−2λ, α1,α2=−1, γ1=2, and γ2=−1, the system of Eq (1.1) can be reduced to the GZEs as follows [38]:
iψt+ψxx−2λ|ψ|2ψ+2vψ=0,vtt−vxx+(|ψ|2)xx=0, | (1.2) |
where ψ is the high-frequency electric field envelope and v is the plasma density estimated from its equilibrium value. The coefficient λ is a real constant that can be either positive or negative. Note that by setting λ=0, the system (1.2) reduces to the classical Zakharov equations, which describe the nonlinear dynamical systems in plasma physics [39].
In recent years, an explosive growth of activities involving the use of several direct methods to find exact solutions for the GZEs due to their extensive applications in different fields has been seen, especially in the fields of fluid dynamics and plasma physics. For example, Borhanifar et al. [40] used the exp-function approach to construct periodic solutions and a generalized solitary of the GZEs. Wang and Li used an extended F-expansion method to obtain a number of periodic wave solutions to the GZEs [41]. The homotopy analysis method has been applied successfully by Abbasbandy et al. to the GZEs to obtain approximations of the analytic solutions [42]. He's variational technique [43,44] has been applied by Khan et al. to find soliton solutions of the GZEs [45]. By using the q-homotopy analysis transform method, Veeresha and Prakasha obtained the solution for fractional generalized Zakharov equations [46]. Here, we focus on applying four interesting integration methods to obtain new traveling wave solutions of GZEs. The obtained solutions exhibit various wave features including bright solutions and singular wave solutions. By using appropriate parameter values, the obtained solutions were plotted to visualize the dynamical behavior of the corresponding wave solutions. These new solutions show that these methods are simple, effective, and applicable mathematical tools to study the physical nature in different scientific fields, such as, physics, geophysics, engineering, optics, and computer science.
Among the recent techniques used to find the exact traveling wave solutions to NLPDEs is the (G′/G)-expansion approach which has been proposed by Wang et al.[47]. This approach is used widely as a direct and concise technique, where G(ξ) is a function that satisfies the NLPDE of second order:
G″+λG′+μG=0, | (1.3) |
where λ and μ are arbitrary constants. As a generalization of the (G′/G)-expansion method, Li et al. [48] proposed the modified (w/g)-expansion method to construct some new traveling waves for the Vakhnenko equation, which is a very important nonlinear evolution equation that can be used to describe high-frequency wave propagation through relaxing media. Following this method, we aim to illustrate and explore the effectiveness, reliability, and possibility of expanding the applications of four different algorithms by using the GZEs. Also, considering the GZEs as a realistic plasma model motivated us to investigate the solitary wave solutions of such a system [49].
In this paper, Section 2 briefly reviews the methodology of the modified (w/g)-expansion method. Section 3 begins with a brief description of the extended rational (w/g)-expansion method and its application. The first three used approaches, namely, the modified (g′/g2)-expansion method, (g′)-expansion method, and the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method are considered and new solitary wave solutions for the resulting equations are obtained. The addendum to Kudryashov's method (AKM), which has been recently introduced by Zayed et al. [50], is the fourth method used in this paper (Section 4); here, it is applied to the GZEs with the aim of demonstrating the efficiency of this method as a tool to obtain a solitary wave solution for a system of nonlinear evolution equations. With the assistance of symbolic computation software, we present Section 5 with graphical descriptions of the results obtained in this study. Although we focus on investigating the GZEs, we expect that the presented direct approaches should also be able to describe the physical phenomena of a variety of nonlinear problems in different fields.
This section briefly describes the procedure of the modified (w/g)-expansion method for determination of solitary wave solutions of nonlinear equations as discussed in [48,51]. Consider the following NLPDE with two independent variables x and t:
P(u,ut,ux,utt,…)=0, | (2.1) |
where u(x,t) is the solution of the above equation and the subscripts represent the partial derivatives of P, which is a nonlinear function of its arguments in general. The above NLPDE can be solved via the following steps:
Step 1. To convert the spatial and temporal variables x and t, respectively, into a compound variable ξ, we seek the traveling wave transformation in the following form:
u(x,t)=U(ξ),whereξ=x−kt, | (2.2) |
where U=U(ξ) is an unknown function and the constant k is the wave speed. This transformation given by Eq (2.2) allows us to transform the NLPDE (2.1) to the following ordinary differential equation (ODE):
Q(U,U′,U″,…)=0, | (2.3) |
where Q, in general, is a polynomial function in U(ξ) and its derivatives U′ with respect to ξ. Integrating Eq (2.3) with respect to ξ gives Q1(U,U′,…)=0.
Step 2. Assume that the traveling wave solution to the ODE (2.3) is written as a polynomial in (w/g) as follows:
U(ξ)=m∑i=0ai[w(ξ)g(ξ)]i, | (2.4) |
where both functions w=w(ξ) and g(ξ) must satisfy the following auxiliary ODE of first order:
[w(ξ)g(ξ)]′=a+b[w(ξ)g(ξ)]+c[w(ξ)g(ξ)]2, | (2.5) |
where the expansion coefficients ai(i=0,1,2,…,m) and the arbitrary constants a,b, and c are to be further determined.
Step 3. The integer m in Eq (2.4) is determined by balancing the nonlinear terms and the highest-order derivatives of U(ξ) appearing in the ODE (2.3).
Step 4. Substitute the solution given by Eq (2.4) and the first-order equation given by Eq (2.5) into the ODE (2.3); the result implies that the left-hand side of the ODE (2.3) becomes a polynomial in (w/g). In this polynomial, we equate each coefficient to zero to obtain a system of algebraic equations for ai and k.
Step 5. The obtained algebraic equations are solved with the aid of Mathematica or Maple, via which we find ai and k.
The extended rational (w/g)-expansion method, introduced by Li et al. [48], when applied to very important nonlinear evolution equations in many physical or engineering modeling problems, provides a computational shortcut to obtaining desired solutions of complex systems. This approach is based on the assumption that states that the exact solutions are written in the form of a polynomial in (w/g)i for i=0,1,2,…,m); also, both functions, w and g, must satisfy the following equation:
w′g−wg′=ag2+bwg+cw2, | (3.1) |
where a,b, and c are arbitrary constants. By choosing appropriate values for the functions w and g, we obtain different powerful, new suitable methods that have been previously introduced.
The key aim of this section is to demonstrate the validity and advantages of the three expansion methods, namely, the (g′/g2)-expansion method, (g′)-expansion method, and the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method by exploring new optical solitary wave solutions for nonlinear evolution equations through the use of the GZEs in Eq (1.2).
For the purpose of discussion, we investigate the GZEs in Eq (1.2). Since ψ(x,t) in Eq (1.2) is a complex function, we assume that the traveling wave solutions can be expressed in the following form:
ψ(x,t)=eiηU(ξ),η=px+qt,v(x,t)=V(ξ),ξ=k(x−2pt), | (3.2) |
where U(ξ) and V(ξ) are real functions and p,q, and k are arbitrary constants. By substituting Eq (3.2) into the GZEs in Eq (1.2), we obtain
k2U″+2UV−(p2+q)U−2λU3=0,k2(4p2−1)V″+k2(U2)″=0. | (3.3) |
Integrating the second equation of Eq (3.3) twice with respect to ξ and setting the first integration constant to zero, for simplicity, we obtain
V=U21−4p2+C,wherep2≠14, | (3.4) |
where C is the second integration constant. By substituting Eq (3.4) into the first equation of Eq (3.3), we obtain
k2U″+(2C−p2−q)U+2(11−4p2−λ)U3=0. | (3.5) |
To explore the solitary solutions of the above equation and investigate their physical properties, the following sections present three interesting analytical methods.
The principle aim of this section is to explore the solitary solutions of the GZEs in Eq (1.2) by implementing the method of modified (g′/g2)-expansion. By setting the function w=g′/g and the constant b=0 in Eq (3.1), we obtain a new expansion in the following form:
u(ξ)=U(ξ)=m∑i=0ai(g′g2)i, | (3.6) |
where the expansion coefficients denoted by'n0ytgai are constants to be further determined; the function g(ξ) admits the following NLPDE:
g2g″−2(g′)2(2g+c)=ag4, | (3.7) |
hence, this is known as the (g′/g2)-expansion method, as introduced in [48]. By explicitly taking advantage of the homogeneous balance principle [52] between the higher-order nonlinear term U3 and higher-derivative term U′′ in Eq (3.5), we obtain the balance constant m=1. Therefore, Eq (3.5) has a solution in the following form:
U(ξ)=a0+a1(g′g2), | (3.8) |
where a0 and a1 are arbitrary real constants to be further determined so that g(ξ) satisfies Eq (3.7). Substituting Eqs (3.7) and (3.8) into Eq (3.5) implies that the left-hand side of Eq (3.5) becomes a polynomial in (g′/g2). In this polynomial, we equate each coefficient to zero to obtain a system of algebraic equations for a0,a1, and C, which are addressed by using Mathematica software to obtain the following:
a0=0,a1=±√ωck4λp2−λ+1,C=−k2ca+12p2+12q, |
where ω=(4λp2−λ+1)(4p2−1) and k,λ,p,q,c,a are real constants to be further determined. Therefore, Eq (3.7) has general solutions in the following form for some constants A and B:
g(ξ)={2cln(a/c)+ln[Asin(ξ√ac)−Bcos(ξ√ac)]2,ac>0,−2c2ξ√|ac|+ln(4a)−ln[Ace2ξ√|ac|−Bc]2,ac<0,cln[Acξ+Bc],a=0,c≠0. |
The corresponding fields represented by (g′/g2) are as follows:
(g′g2)={√ac[Acos(ξ√ac)+Bsin(ξ√ac)Asin(ξ√ac)−Bcos(ξ√ac)],ac>0,√|ac|c−2Ae2ξ√|ac|√|ac|Ace2ξ√|ac|−Bc,ac<0,−A(Aξ+B)c,a=0,c≠0. |
Hence, three cases can be applied to determine the new types of solitary wave solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2):
Case 1. When ca>0, we obtain a trigonometric function solution in the following form:
U1(ξ)=±√ωck4λp2−λ+1√ac[Acos(ξ√ac)+Bsin(ξ√ac)Asin(ξ√ac)−Bcos(√acξ)]. |
Substituting this equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we obtain solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ1(x,t)=±exp[i(px+qt)]√ωck4λp2−λ+1√ac[Acos[(kx−2kpt)√ac]+Bsin[(kx−2kpt)√ac]Asin[(kx−2kpt)√ac]−Bcos[(kx−2kpt)√ac]], | (3.9) |
and
v1(x,t)=11−4p2{±√ωck4λp2−λ+1√ac[Acos[(kx−2kpt)√ac]+Bsin[(kx−2kpt)√ac]Asin[(kx−2kpt)√ac]−Bcos[(kx−2kpt)√ac]]}2−k2ca+12p2+12q. | (3.10) |
Case 2. When ca<0, we obtain a solution in the following form:
U2(ξ)=±√ωck4λp2−λ+1[√|ac|c−2√|ac|Ae2√|ac|[kx−2kpt] Ace2√|ac|[kx−2kpt]−cB]. |
Substituting this equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we obtain the solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ2(x,t)=±exp[i(px+qt)]√ωck4λp2−λ+1[√|ac|c−2√|ac|Ae2√|ac|[kx−2kpt] Ace2√|ac|[kx−2kpt]−cB], | (3.11) |
and
v2(x,t)=11−4p2{±√ωck4λp2−λ+1[√|ac|c−2√|ac|Ae2√|ac|[kx−2kpt] Ace2√|ac|[kx−2kpt]−cB]}2−k2ca+12p2+12q. | (3.12) |
Case 3. When a=0 and c≠0, we obtain a rational function solution in the following form:
U3(ξ,t)=±√ωck4λp2−λ+1(AAcξ+Bc). |
Substituting this equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we find the solutions of the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ3(x,t)=±exp[i(px+qt)]√ωck4λp2−λ+1[AAc(kx−2kpt)+Bc], | (3.13) |
and
v3(x,t)=11−4p2{±√ωck4λp2−λ+1[AAc(kx−2kpt)+Bc]}2−k2ca+12p2+12q. | (3.14) |
Here, we adopt an efficient technique, namely the modified (g′)-expansion method to explore the traveling wave solutions of the GZEs in Eq (1.2). By setting the function w=gg′ and the constant b=0 in Eq (3.1), we obtain a new expansion in the following form:
u(ξ)=U(ξ)=m∑i=0ai(g′)i, |
where the expansion coefficients denoted by ai are constants to be further determined and the function g(ξ) admits the following NLPDE:
g″=a+bg′+c(g′)2, | (3.15) |
hence, this is known as the (g′)-expansion method, as introduced in [48,53]. Using the homogeneous balance principle between the higher-order nonlinear term U3 and higher-derivative term U′′ in Eq (3.5), we obtain the balance constant m=1. Therefore, Eq (3.5) has a solution in the following form:
U(ξ)=a0+a1g′, | (3.16) |
where a0 and a1 are constants and g(ξ) satisfies Eq (3.15). Substituting Eqs (3.15) and (3.16) into Eq (3.5) implies that the left-hand side of Eq (3.5) becomes a polynomial in g′. In this polynomial, we equate each coefficient to zero to obtain a system of algebraic equations for a0,a1, and C, which are solved by using Mathematica software to obtain the following:
a0=±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1,a1=±√ωck4λp2−λ+1,C= −k2ca+14b2k2+12p2+12q, |
where k,λ,p,q,c,a, and b are arbitrary constants. The general solutions of Eq (3.15) are given as follows:
g(ξ)={12cln[1+tan2(12√Δξ)]−bξ2c,Δ=4ac−b2>0,12cln[tanh2(12√−Δξ)−1]−bξ2c,Δ=4ac−b2<0,−1cln(ξ)−b2cξ,Δ=4ac−b2=0. |
The corresponding derivative fields are as follows:
g′={12c√Δtan(12√Δξ)−b2c,Δ=4ac−b2>0,−12c√−Δtanh(12√−Δξ)−b2c,Δ=4ac−b2<0,−1cξ−b2c,Δ=4ac−b2=0. |
Hence, three cases can be applied to determine the new types of solitary wave solutions for the GZEs in Eq (1.2):
Case 1. If Δ=4ac−b2>0, the solitary wave solution of Eq (3.5) is given by
U4(ξ)=±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[√Δ2tan(√Δ2k(x−2pt))−b2]. |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we find the solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ4(x,t)=exp[i(px+qt)]{±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[√Δ2tan(√Δ2k(x−2pt))−b2]}, | (3.17) |
and
v4(x,t)=11−4p2{±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[√Δ2tan(√Δ2k(x−2pt))−b2]}2−k2ca+14b2k2+12p2+12q. | (3.18) |
Case 2. If Δ=4ac−b2<0, the solitary wave solution of Eq (3.5) is given by
U5(ξ)=±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[−√−Δ2tanh(12√−Δξ)−b2]. |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we find the solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ5(x,t)=exp[i(px+qt)]{±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[−√−Δ2tanh(12√−Δk(x−2pt))−b2]}, | (3.19) |
and
v5(x,t)=11−4p2{±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[−√−Δ2tanh(12√−Δk(x−2pt))−b2]}2−k2ca+14b2k2+12P2+12q. | (3.20) |
Case 3. If Δ=4ac−b2=0, the solitary wave solution of Eq (3.5) is given by
U6(ξ)=±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1(−1ξ−b2). |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we find the solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ6(x,t)=exp[i(px+qt)][±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1(−1k(x−2pt)−b2)], | (3.21) |
and
v6(x,t)=11−4p2{±12√ωbk4λp2−λ+1±√ωk4λp2−λ+1[−1k(x−2pt)−b2]}2−k2ca+14b2k2+12p2+12q. | (3.22) |
In this subsection, the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method is employed to investigate the exact solutions and then explore the solitary wave solutions for Eq (3.5). A new form of exact solutions can be obtained as follows
u(ξ)=U(ξ)=m∑i=0ai(wg)i, |
where the expansion coefficients denoted by ai are arbitrary constants. The functions w and g satisfy the conditions of the following coupled system of differential equations:
w′=λg,g′=μw, | (3.23) |
where λ and μ are arbitrary constants. This is known as the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method. By balancing the highest-order derivative and the nonlinear term in Eq (3.5) by using the homogeneous balance method, we obtain the balance constant m=1. Therefore, Eq (3.5) has a solution which can be written as follows:
U(ξ)=a0+a1(wg), | (3.24) |
where a0 and a1 are constants so that w(ξ) and g(ξ) satisfy Eq (3.23). Substituting Eqs (3.23) and (3.24) into Eq (3.5) implies that the left-hand side of Eq (3.5) becomes a polynomial in (w/g). In this polynomial, we equate each coefficient to zero to obtain a system of algebraic equations for a0,a1, and C, which are solved by using Mathematica software to obtain the following:
a0=0,a1=±√ωμk4λp2−λ+1,C=k2μλ+12p2+12q, |
where k,λ, and μ are constants. Hence, Eq (3.23) has a general solution in the following form:
(wg)={√λ√μ[A√μcosh(√λμξ)+B√λsinh(√λμξ)A√μsinh(√λμξ)+B√λcosh(√λμξ)],λ,μ>0,√λ√μ[A√−μcosh(√λμξ)−B√−λsinh(√λμξ)−A√−μsinh(√λμξ)+B√−λcosh(√λμξ)],λ,μ<0,√λ√−μ[A√−μcos(√−λμξ)+B√λsin(√−λμξ) −A√−μsin(√−λμξ)+B√λcos(√−λμξ)],λ>0andμ<0,√−λ√μ[A√μcos(√−λμξ)−B√−λsin(√−λμξ)A√μsin(√−λμξ)+B√−λcos(√−λμξ)],λ<0andμ>0, |
where A and B are arbitrary constants. Four cases can be applied to determine the new types of solitary wave solutions for the GZEs in Eq (1.2):
Case 1. If λ>0 and μ>0, we can find a hyperbolic function solution of Eq (3.5) in the following form:
U7(ξ)=±√ωk4λp2−λ+1√λμ[A√μcosh(ξ√λμ)+B√λsinh(ξ√λμ)A√μsinh(ξ√λμ)+B√λcosh(ξ√λμ)]. |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we can find the solution to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ7(x,t)=±exp[i(px+qt)]√λμωk4λp2−λ+1[A√μcosh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]+B√λsinh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]A√μsinh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]+B√λcosh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]], | (3.25) |
and
v7(x,t)=11−4p2{±√λμωk4λp2−λ+1[A√μcosh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]+B√λsinh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]A√μsinh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]+B√λcosh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]]}2+k2μλ+12p2+12q. | (3.26) |
Case 2. If λ<0 and μ<0, we can find the solitary wave solution of Eq (3.5) which can be written in the following form:
U8(ξ)=±√ωk(−√λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√−μcosh(ξ√λμ)−B√−λsinh(ξ√λμ)−A√−μsinh(ξ√λμ)+B√−λcosh(ξ√λμ)]. |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4) we find the solution to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ8(x)=exp[i(px+qt)]±√ωk(−√λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√−μcosh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]−B√−λsinh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]−A√−μsinh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]+B√−λcosh[k(x−2pt)√λμ]], | (3.27) |
and
v8(x,t)=11−4p2{±√ωk(−√λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√−μcosh(k(x−2pt)√λμ)−B√−λsinh(k(x−2pt)√λμ)−A√−μsinh(k(x−2pt)√λμ)+B√−λcosh(k(x−2pt)√λμ)]}2+k2μλ+12p2+12q. | (3.28) |
Case 3. If λ>0 and μ<0, we can obtain a trigonometric function solution of Eq (3.5) in the following form:
U9(ξ)=±√ωk(−√−λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√−μcos(ξ√−λμ)+B√λsin(ξ√−λμ)−A√−μsin(ξ√−λμ)+B√λcos(ξ√−λμ)]. |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4), we can find the solution to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ9(x)=±exp[i(px+qt)]√ωk(−√−λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√−μcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)+B√λsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)−A√−μsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)+B√λcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)], | (3.29) |
and
v9(x,t)=11−4p2{±√ωk(−√−λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√−μcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)+B√λsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)−A√−μsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)+B√λcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)]}2+k2μλ+12p2+12q. | (3.30) |
Case 4. If λ>0 and μ<0, we can obtain the periodic wave solution of Eq (3.5) in the following form:
U10(ξ)=±√ωk(√−λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√μcos(ξ√−λμ)−B√−λsin(ξ√−λμ)A√μsin(ξ√−λμ)+B√−λcos(ξ√−λμ)]. |
Substituting the above equation into Eqs (3.2) and (3.4) we find the solution to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ10(x)=±exp[i(px+qt)]√ωk(√−λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√μcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)−B√−λsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)A√μsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)+B√−λcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)], | (3.31) |
and
v10(x,t)=11−4p2{±√ωk(√−λμ)4λp2−λ+1[A√μcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)−B√−λsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)A√μsin(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)+B√−λcos(k(x−2pt)√−λμ)]}2+k2μλ+12p2+12q. | (3.32) |
Remark 1. [48] Setting the constant coefficients c=1 and b=0 and the function g=0 in Eq (3.1), we can obtain a new expansion in the following form:
U(ξ)=m∑i=0aiwi, |
which are identical to the tanh-function approach; thus, it follows that the expansion coefficients denoted by ai are arbitrary constants and the function w(ξ) satisfies the following equation:
w′=a+w2. |
Meanwhile, when the constant coefficients a=b=c≠0 and the function g=1, the expansion given by Eq (2.4) becomes identical to the Riccati expansion [54,55].
Remark 2. [48,53] Setting the constant coefficients a=−μ,b=−λ, and c=−1 and the function w=g′ in Eq (3.1) yields a new expansion in the following form:
U(ξ)=m∑i=0ai(g′g)i, |
which is identical to the (G′/G)-expansion method introduced in [47]; thus, the expansion coefficients denoted by ai are constants and the function g(ξ) satisfies Eq (1.3).
The Kudryashov method was introduced by Kudryashov [49] to efficiently compute and predict the highly dispersive optical solitons of some NLPDEs that arise in different applications. In this scheme, the calculations are performed without using a specific function's form. Inspired by the Kudryashov method, many powerful and efficient methods have been developed over the last few years to find the exact solutions of some NLPDEs. Examples of such methods include the generalized Kudryashov's method [18], the extended Kudryashov's method [56], and the new extended generalized Kudryashov's method [57]. In addition, among these techniques, we should mention the AKM method which was introduced by Zayed et al. [50]. This method is an efficient technique for obtaining exact solutions to the NLPDEs. The objective of the following sections is to implement this approach to explore different types of solitary wave solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2). For convenience, the following section starts by presenting the basic steps of the implemented method.
In this section, we briefly present the basic steps of the AKM as follows:
Step 1. Let us assume that Eq (3.5) has a solution in the following form:
ϕ(ξ)=M∑i=0bi[R(ξ)]i, | (4.1) |
where the expansion coefficients denoted by bi are constants for i=0,1,…,M; thus, the function R(ξ) admits the following equation:
R′2(ξ)=R2(ξ)ln2(K)[1−χR2T(ξ)], | (4.2) |
where k is a positive number, with k≠1, and χ is an arbitrary constant. The solution of Eq (4.2) is written as follows:
R(ξ)=[4b4b2expK(Tξ)+χexpK(−Tξ) ]1/T. | (4.3) |
Here, b and T represent a non-zero real number and a natural number, respectively; also note the function expK(Tξ)=KTξ.
Step 2. To determine the relation between M and T, we consider the following formula:
Let us assume that the function F[ϕ(ξ)]=M; hence, F[ϕ′(ξ)]=M+T and F[ϕ′′(ξ)]=M+2T.
Therefore, F[ϕ(r)(ξ)]=M+rT and F[ϕ(r)(ξ) ϕs(ξ)]=(s+1)M+rT.
Step 3. Substitute Eqs (4.1) and (4.2) into Eq (3.5); then, set each coefficient of the following term to zero:
[R′(ξ)]i[R(ξ)]ffori=0,1,andf=0,1,…, |
resulting in a set of algebraic equations in bi for i=0,1,2,…,M. These equations can be addressed to determine bi and c. Hence, the analytical solutions to Eq (3.5) can be obtained.
Here, we aim to find new solitary wave solutions for nonlinear evolution equations by implementing the AKM. By balancing the nonlinear terms U′′ and U3 in Eq (3.5), we obtain
M+2T=3M⇒M=T. | (4.4) |
Two scenarios are presented here to determine the new types of solitary wave solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2):
Case 1. Choosing T=1 gives M=1. Therefore, Eq (3.5) has a solution in the following form:
U(ξ)=b0+b1R(ξ), | (4.5) |
where b0 and b1 are arbitrary constants such that b1≠0. Substitute Eqs (4.1) and (4.5) into Eq (3.5); then, we can equate each coefficient to zero
[R′(ξ)]i[R(ξ)]ffori=0,1,andf=0,1,…,12. |
This procedure yields a system of algebraic equations as follows:
6b0b21(1−4p2)−6λb0b21=0,−2χk2b1ln2(K)+2b211−4p2−2λb21=0,−b0(p2+q)+2b0C+2b301−4p2−2λb30=0,k2b1ln2(K)−b1p2+2b1C−b1q+6b20b11−4p2−6λb20b1=0. |
The above equations are solved to obtain
b0=0,b1=kln(K) √χ(1−4p2)4λp2−λ+1,C=−12k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.6) |
Substituting Eqs (4.6) and (4.3) into Eq (4.5), we can obtain the straddled solitary solutions of the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ11(x,t)=4bk ln(K) [4b2 expK[k(x−2pt)]+χexpK[−k(x−2pt)]√χ(1−4p2)4λp2−λ+1ei(px+qt), | (4.7) |
and
v11(x,t)=16b2k2χln2(K)(4λp2−λ+1)[4b2 expK[k(x−2pt)]+χexpK[−k(x−2pt)]2−12k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.8) |
It follows that χ(1−4p2)(4λp2−λ+1)>0.
Remark 3. Setting χ=4b2 in Eqs (4.7) and (4.8) yields the bright soliton solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ12(x,t)=kln(K)√(1−4p2)4λp2−λ+1ei(px+qt) sech[(x−2pt)klnK], | (4.9) |
v12(x,t)=k2ln2(K)(4λp2−λ+1)sech2[(x−2pt)klnK]−12k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.10) |
It follows that (1−4p2)(4λp2−λ+1)>0. Meanwhile, setting χ=−4b2 in Eqs (4.7) and (4.8) yields the singular soliton solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ13(x,t)=kln(K)√(4p2−1)4λp2−λ+1ei(px+qt)csch[(x−2pt)k lnK], | (4.11) |
v13(x,t)=−k2ln2(K)(4λp2−λ+1)csch2[(x−2pt)klnK]−12k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.12) |
It follows that (4p2−1)(4λp2−λ+1)>0.
Case 2. Choosing T=2 gives M=2. Therefore, Eq (3.5) has a solution in the form:
U(ξ)=b0+b1R(ξ)+b2R2(ξ), | (4.13) |
where b0,b1, and b2 are constants to be determined such that b2≠0. Substitute Eqs (4.1) and (4.13) into Eq (3.5); then, we can equate each coefficient to zero
[R′(ξ)]i[R(ξ)]ffori=0,1,andf=0,1,…,12. |
This procedure yields a system of algebraic equations which can be solved to get the following results:
b0=b1=0,b2=2kln(K) √χ(1−4p2)4λp2−λ+1,C=−2k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.14) |
Substituting Eqs (4.3) and (4.14) into Eq (4.13), we can calculate the straddled solitary solution of the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ14(x,t)=8bk ln(K) [4b2 expK[2k(x−2pt)]+χexpK[−2k(x−2pt)]√χ(1−4p2)4λp2−λ+1ei(px+qt), | (4.15) |
v14(x,t)=64b2k2χln2(K)(4λp2−λ+1)[4b2expK[2k(x−2pt)]+χexpK[−2k(x−2pt)]2−2k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.16) |
It follows that χ(1−4p2)(4λp2−λ+1)>0.
Remark 4. Setting χ=4b2 in Eqs (4.15) and (4.16) yields the bright soliton solution to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ15(x,t)=2kln(K)√(1−4p2)4λp2−λ+1ei(px+qt) sech[2(x−2pt)klnK], | (4.17) |
v15(x,t)=4k2ln2(K)(4λp2−λ+1)sech2[2(x−2pt)klnK]−2k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.18) |
It follows that (1−4p2)(4λp2−λ+1)>0. Meanwhile, setting χ=−4b2 in Eqs (4.15) and (4.16) yields the singular soliton solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2) as follows:
ψ16(x,t)=2kln(K)√(4p2−1)4λp2−λ+1ei(px+qt)csch[2(x−2pt)klnK], | (4.19) |
v16(x,t)=−4k2ln2(K)(4λp2−λ+1)csch2[2(x−2pt)klnK]−12k2ln2(K)+12p2+12q. | (4.20) |
It follows that (4p2−1)(4λp2−λ+1)>0. It is worth mentioning that, by varying the values of the parameters T and M, we can obtain a variety of solitary wave solutions to the GZEs in Eq (1.2). For the purpose of checking, we verify that all of the obtained results satisfy the GZEs in Eq (1.2).
The GZE is an important model equation in mathematical physics because the derived solutions are particularly useful for modeling different types of Langmuir wave propagation, such as those applied in the field of plasma physics. In solitary wave theory, there are numerous forms of traveling wave solutions that are very interesting to investigate. In this paper, we present different types of traveling wave solutions that have been obtained based on the explicit solutions in Eqs (3.9)–(4.18) when physical parameters are given certain values.
The principle aim of this section is to present graphical illustrations of multiple solitary wave solutions of the GZEs in Eq (1.2) that can be obtained by using the methods discussed in Sections 3 and 4. The obtained solutions have been plotted to facilitate comprehension of the physical principles and efficacy of the used methods. In soliton physics, solitons are localized waves that propagate without changing their shape or velocity, and they are considered one type of solitary waves that are used to describe a wide range of nonlinear physical phenomena, including the propagation of solitons in optical fibers. Particle-like structures like magnetic monopoles and other similar structures can also arise from soliton solutions. Hence, soliton wave solutions may be necessary to obtain comprehension of both the complex and naturally physical properties of the constructed topological, singular soliton, and singular periodic wave solutions.
Solutions ψ3(x,t), ψ6(x,t), and ψ13(x,t) of the GZEs represent singular soliton solutions. Solitary waves with a singularity are referred to as singular soliton solutions. Solutions of ψ5(x,t), ψ8(x,t), and ψ12(x,t) represent the exact solitary wave solution of bright soliton type under different physical parameter conditions. Since the natures of some obtained solutions are identical, and for convenience, we have only plotted some interesting solutions as shown in the following figures. Since the envelope ψ(x,t) is a complex function, we characterize the solitary wave propagation for various instances by using |ψ(x,t)|. Figures 1–6 present the real and imaginary parts and the absolute values of the obtained complex function ψ(x,t), the absolute value of v(x,t) and its projection at t=0. Figure 1 depicts the solutions of Eq (3.13). The 3D figure is portrayed within the interval −5≤x≤5. It is clear that the dynamic behaviors in this figure show an example of singular wave solutions for the GZEs in Eq (1.2) which were successfully obtained by using the modified (g′/g2)-expansion method in Section 3.1. Singular solitons are associated with solitary waves when the solitary wave's center position is imaginary. Note that a singularity commonly appears in the presence of rational or trigonometric functions.
The results for the bright solitons can be seen in Figure 2 for the wave solutions of Eq (3.19), which were obtained by means of the (g′)-expansion method. Moreover, Figure 3 presents the dynamic behaviors of the wave solutions of Eq (3.21), which were also obtained by using the (g′)-expansion method. The bright solitary wave solutions are also shown in Figure 4, and they were determined by using the generalized simple (w/g)-expansion method (Section 3.3). Figures 5 and 6 depict the physical behaviors of the obtained solutions given by Eqs (4.9) and (4.11), which were obtained by using the AKM. It can be observed that the contour of the absolute value plot is a perfect bright wave; however, as for the real and imaginary parts, they are all kinky bright waves as shown in Figure 5. Notice that, if both real and imaginary parts exhibit the bright wave characteristic, we refer to them as rough bright waves. Figure 6 presents the exact singular soliton solutions. It can be observed that, from all of the listed figures we can see that the AKM is more accurate, very effective and easier than other methods purposed to capture the physical behavior of the obtained solutions.
In many applications, physical phenomena can be accurately modeled and described by using NLPDE. Examples of such applications include nonlinear chaotic systems, heat conduction systems, diffusion processes, plasma waves, and chemical physics. This paper served to achieve two aims: First, new solitary wave solutions for a set of coupled equations that is widely used as a realistic model in the field of plasma physics have been discovered by employing four schemes of integration. The second aim of this paper has been achieved by evaluating the effectiveness and reliability of the constructed schemes on GZEs. Therefore, this should empower us, with great flexibility, to expand the applicability of these methods to a wide range of physical problems of special interest. It should be emphasized that the obtained results significantly help to better understand and describe the nonlinear physical phenomena that arise in different fields, including fluid dynamics, quantum mechanics, optical fibers, and plasma physics. These methods can contribute to significantly reduce the computation time for complex systems through the use of computer algebra systems, such as Maple or Mathematica, which can replace much tedious manual calculations.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The author extends his appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number (TU-DSPP-2024-92).
This research was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-92).
The author declares no conflict of interest.
[1] | A. Wazwaz, Partial differential equations and solitary waves theorem, Berlin: Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00251-9 |
[2] |
R. Grimshaw, The solitary wave in water of variable depth, J. Fluid Mech., 42 (1970), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112070001520 doi: 10.1017/S0022112070001520
![]() |
[3] | D. Baleanu, A. Machado, A. Luo, Fractional dynamics and control, New York: Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0457-6 |
[4] | B. Boudjehem, D. Boudjehem, Parameter tuning of a fractional-order PI controller using the ITAE criteria, In: Fractional dynamics control, New York: Springer, 2012, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0457-6_4 |
[5] | H. Alotaibi, Developing multiscale methodologies for computational fluid mechanics, Ph. D Thesis, University of Adelaide, 2017. https://doi.org/10.25909/5ba30242307d5 |
[6] |
A. Zhou, X. Li, Zakharov equations for viscous flow and their use in the blood clot formation, Pramana, 89 (2017), 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-017-1478-9 doi: 10.1007/s12043-017-1478-9
![]() |
[7] |
A. Wazwaz, New solitary wave solutions to the modified forms of Degasperis-Procesi and Camassa-Holm equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.092 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.092
![]() |
[8] | K. Khan, M. Akbar, Application of (exp(−ϕ(ξ)))-expansion method to find the exact solutions of modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation, World Appl. Sci. J., 10 (2013), 1373–1377. |
[9] |
L. Wu, S. Chen, C. Pang, Traveling wave solution for generalized Drinfeld-Sokolov equations, Appl. Math. Model., 33 (2009), 4126–4130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.02.013 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.02.013
![]() |
[10] |
F. Zhang, J. Qi, W. Yuan, Further results about traveling wave exact solutions of the Drinfeld-Sokolov equations, J. Appl. Math., 2013 (2013), 523732. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/523732 doi: 10.1155/2013/523732
![]() |
[11] |
M. Abdou, The extended tanh-method and its applications for solving nonlinear physical models, Appl. Math. Comput., 190 (2007), 988–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.070 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.070
![]() |
[12] |
A. Wazwaz, A sine-cosine method for handling nonlinear wave equations, Math. Comput. Model., 40 (2004), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2003.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2003.12.010
![]() |
[13] |
Sirendaoreji, New exact traveling wave solutions for the Kawahara and modified Kawahara equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 19 (2004), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00102-4 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00102-4
![]() |
[14] |
M. Abd-el-Malek, A. Amin, New exact solutions for solving the initial-value-problem of the KdV-KP equation via the Lie group method, Appl. Math. Comput., 261 (2015), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.117 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.117
![]() |
[15] | M. Akbar, N. Ali, New solitary and periodic solutions of nonlinear evolution equation by exp-function method, World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (2012), 1603–1610. |
[16] |
J. He, X. Wu, Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 30 (2006), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020
![]() |
[17] |
S. Abbasbandy, Numerical solutions of nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation by variational iteration method, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 70 (2007), 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1924 doi: 10.1002/nme.1924
![]() |
[18] |
M. Kaplan, A. Bekir, A. Akbulut, A generalized Kudryashov method to some nonlinear evolution equations in mathematical physics, Nonlinear Dyn., 85 (2016), 2843–2850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2867-1 doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-2867-1
![]() |
[19] |
H. Alotaibi, Traveling wave solutions to the nonlinear evolution equation using expansion method and Addendum to Kudryashov's method, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13112126 doi: 10.3390/sym13112126
![]() |
[20] |
H. Alotaibi, Explore optical solitary wave solutions of the KP equation by recent approaches, Crystals, 12 (2022), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020159 doi: 10.3390/cryst12020159
![]() |
[21] |
K. Gepreel, Exact soliton solutions for nonlinear perturbed Schrödinger equations with nonlinear optical media, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020), 8929. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248929 doi: 10.3390/app10248929
![]() |
[22] |
B. Zhong, J. Jiang, Y. Feng, New exact solutions of fractional Boussinesq-like equations, Commun. Optim. Theory, 2020 (2020), 21. https://doi.org/10.23952/cot.2020.21 doi: 10.23952/cot.2020.21
![]() |
[23] |
E. Zayed, K. Gepreel, M. El-Horbaty, A. Biswas, Y. Yıldırım, H. Alshehri, Highly dispersive optical solitons with complex Ginzburg-Landau equation having six nonlinear forms, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 3270. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243270 doi: 10.3390/math9243270
![]() |
[24] |
J. Xu, E. Fan, Y. Chen, Long-time asymptotic for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with step-like initial value, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 16 (2013), 253–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11040-013-9132-3 doi: 10.1007/s11040-013-9132-3
![]() |
[25] |
L. Xu, D. Wang, X. Wen, Y. Jiang, Exotic localized vector waves in a two-component nonlinear wave system, J. Nonlinear Sci., 30 (2020), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-019-09581-0 doi: 10.1007/s00332-019-09581-0
![]() |
[26] |
C. Charlier, J. Lenells, D. Wang, The "good" Boussinesq equation: long-time asymptotics, Anal. PDE, 16 (2023), 1351–1388. https://doi.org/10.2140/apde.2023.16.1351 doi: 10.2140/apde.2023.16.1351
![]() |
[27] |
D. Bilman, R. Buckingham, D. Wang, Far-field asymptotics for multiple-pole solitons in the large-order limit, J. Differ. Equations, 297 (2021), 320–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.06.016 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.06.016
![]() |
[28] | V. Zakharov, Collapse of Langmuir waves, Sov. Phys. JETP, 35 (1972), 908–914. |
[29] |
M. Goldman, Strong turbulence of plasma waves, Rev. Mod. Phys., 56 (1984), 709. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.56.709 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.56.709
![]() |
[30] |
Y. Shang, Y. Huang, W. Yuan, The extended hyperbolic functions method and new exact solutions to the Zakharov equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 200 (2008), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.10.059 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.10.059
![]() |
[31] |
D. Huang, H. Zhang, Extended hyperbolic function method and new exact solitary wave solutions of Zakharov equations (Chinese), Acta Phys. Sin., 53 (2004), 2434–2438. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.53.2434 doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2434
![]() |
[32] | S. Liu, Z. Fu, S. Liu, Q. Zhao, The envelope periodic solutions to nonlinear wave equations with Jacobi elliptic function (Chinese), Acta Phys. Sin., 51 (2002), 718–722. |
[33] |
G. Wu, M. Zhang, L. Shi, W. Zhang, J. Han, An extended expansion method for Jacobi elliptic functions and new exact periodic solutions of Zakharov equations (Chinese), Acta Phys. Sin., 56 (2007), 5054–5059. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.56.5054 doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5054
![]() |
[34] |
C. Zhao, Z. Sheng, Explicit traveling wave solutions for Zakharov equations (Chinese), Acta Phys. Sin., 53 (2004), 1629–1634. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.53.1629 doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1629
![]() |
[35] |
E. Zayed, M. Abdelaziz, Exact solutions for the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with variable coefficients using the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method, AIP Conf. Proc., 1281 (2010), 2216–2219. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3498415 doi: 10.1063/1.3498415
![]() |
[36] |
Y. Yıldırım, A. Biswas, M. Ekici, O. Gonzalez-Gaxiola, S. Khan, H. Triki, et al., Optical solitons with Kudryashov's model by a range of integration norms, Chinese J. Phys., 66 (2020), 660–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2020.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2020.06.005
![]() |
[37] |
Y. Gurefe, E. Misirli, Y. Pandir, A. Sonmezoglu, M. Ekici, New exact solutions of the Davey-Stewartson equation with power-law nonlinearity, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 38 (2015), 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-014-0075-z doi: 10.1007/s40840-014-0075-z
![]() |
[38] |
H. Zhang, New exact traveling wave solutions of the generalized Zakharov equations, Rep. Math. Phys., 60 (2007), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(07)80101-7 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(07)80101-7
![]() |
[39] |
J. Pava, C. Brango, Orbital stability for the periodic Zakharov system, Nonlinearity, 24 (2011), 2913. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/24/10/013 doi: 10.1088/0951-7715/24/10/013
![]() |
[40] |
A. Borhanifar, M. Kabir, L. Maryam Vahdat, New periodic and soliton wave solutions for the generalized Zakharov system and (2+1)-dimensional Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov system, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 42 (2009), 1646–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.064 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.064
![]() |
[41] |
M. Wang, X. Li, Extended F-expansion method and periodic wave solutions for the generalized Zakharov equations, Phys. Lett. A, 343 (2005), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.085 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.085
![]() |
[42] |
S. Abbasbandy, E. Babolian, M. Ashtiani, Numerical solution of the generalized Zakharov equation by homotopy analysis method, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 14 (2009), 4114–4121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.03.001
![]() |
[43] |
J. He, Variational principles for some nonlinear partial differential equations with variable coefficients, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 19 (2004), 847–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00265-0 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00265-0
![]() |
[44] |
J. He, Erratum to: variational principle for two-dimensional incompressible inviscid flow, Phys. Lett. A, 372 (2008), 5858–5859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.07.043 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.07.043
![]() |
[45] |
Y. Khan, N. Faraz, A. Yildirim, New soliton solutions of the generalized Zakharov equations using He's variational approach, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 965–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.01.006
![]() |
[46] |
P. Veeresha, D. Prakasha, Solution for fractional generalized Zakharov equations with Mittag-Leffler function, Results in Engineering, 5 (2020), 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100085 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100085
![]() |
[47] |
M. Wang, X. Li, J. Zhang, The (G′/G)-expansion method and traveling wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations in mathematical physics, Phys. Lett. A, 372 (2008), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.051 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.051
![]() |
[48] |
W. Li, H. Chen, G. Zhang, The (w/g)-expansion method and its application to Vakhnenko equation, Chinese Phys. B, 18 (2009), 400. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/18/2/004 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/18/2/004
![]() |
[49] |
M. Golman, Langmuir wave solitons and spatial collapse in plasma physics, Physica D, 18 (1986), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(86)90163-6 doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(86)90163-6
![]() |
[50] |
E. Zayed, M. Alngar, A. Biswas, A. Kara, M. Ekici, A. Alzahrani, et al., Cubic-quartic optical solitons and conservation laws with Kudryashov's sextic power-law of refractive index, Optik, 227 (2021), 166059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166059 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166059
![]() |
[51] |
M. Attia, A. Elhanbaly, M. Abdou, New exact solutions for isothermal magne to static atmosphere equations, WJST, 12 (2014), 961–973. https://doi.org/10.14456/WJST.2015.42 doi: 10.14456/WJST.2015.42
![]() |
[52] |
M. Wang, X. Li, Extended F-expansion method and periodic wave solutions for the generalized Zakharov equations, Phys. Lett. A, 343 (2005), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.085 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.085
![]() |
[53] |
K. Gepreel, Exact solutions for nonlinear integral member of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili hierarchy differential equations using the modified (w/g)-expansion method, Comput. Math. Appl., 72 (2016), 2072–2083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.08.005
![]() |
[54] |
H. Abdusalam, On an improved complex tanh-function method, Int. J. Nonlin. Sci. Num., 6 (2005), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2005.6.2.99 doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2005.6.2.99
![]() |
[55] |
E. Zayed, H. Zedan, K. Gepreel, Group analysis and modified extended Tanh-function to find the invariant solutions and soliton solutions for nonlinear Euler equations, Int. J. Nonlin. Sci. Num., 5 (2004), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2004.5.3.221 doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2004.5.3.221
![]() |
[56] |
S. Ege, E. Misirli, Extended Kudryashov method for fractional nonlinear differential equations, Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, 6 (2018), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.36753/mathenot.421751 doi: 10.36753/mathenot.421751
![]() |
[57] |
E. Zayed, R. Shohib, M. Alngar, New extended generalized Kudryashov method for solving three nonlinear partial differential equations, Nonlinear Anal.-Model., 25 (2020), 598–617. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2020.25.17203 doi: 10.15388/namc.2020.25.17203
![]() |