Research article

Stochastic solitons of a short-wave intermediate dispersive variable (SIdV) equation

  • Received: 16 January 2024 Revised: 08 March 2024 Accepted: 11 March 2024 Published: 19 March 2024
  • MSC : 35C05, 35C07, 35C08

  • It is necessary to utilize certain stochastic methods while finding the soliton solutions since several physical systems are by their very nature stochastic. By adding randomness into the modeling process, researchers gain deeper insights into the impact of uncertainties on soliton evolution, stability, and interaction. In the realm of dynamics, deterministic models often encounter limitations, prompting the incorporation of stochastic techniques to provide a more comprehensive framework. Our attention was directed towards the short-wave intermediate dispersive variable (SIdV) equation with the Wiener process. By integrating advanced methodologies such as the modified Kudrayshov technique (KT), the generalized KT, and the sine-cosine method, we delved into the exploration of diverse solitary wave solutions. Through those sophisticated techniques, a spectrum of the traveling wave solutions was unveiled, encompassing both the bounded and singular manifestations. This approach not only expanded our understanding of wave dynamics but also shed light on the intricate interplay between deterministic and stochastic processes in physical systems. Solitons maintained stable periodicity but became vulnerable to increased noise, disrupting predictability. Dark solitons obtained in the results showed sensitivity to noise, amplifying variations in behavior. Furthermore, the localized wave patterns displayed sharp peaks and periodicity, with noise introducing heightened fluctuations, emphasizing stochastic influence on wave solutions.

    Citation: Shabir Ahmad, Saud Fahad Aldosary, Meraj Ali Khan. Stochastic solitons of a short-wave intermediate dispersive variable (SIdV) equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10717-10733. doi: 10.3934/math.2024523

    Related Papers:

    [1] Areej A. Almoneef, Abd-Allah Hyder, Mohamed A. Barakat, Abdelrheem M. Aly . Stochastic solutions of the geophysical KdV equation: Numerical simulations and white noise impact. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5859-5879. doi: 10.3934/math.2025269
    [2] F. A. Mohammed . Soliton solutions for some nonlinear models in mathematical physics via conservation laws. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15075-15093. doi: 10.3934/math.2022826
    [3] Nafissa T. Trouba, Huiying Xu, Mohamed E. M. Alngar, Reham M. A. Shohib, Haitham A. Mahmoud, Xinzhong Zhu . Soliton solutions and stability analysis of the stochastic nonlinear reaction-diffusion equation with multiplicative white noise in soliton dynamics and optical physics. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1859-1881. doi: 10.3934/math.2025086
    [4] Shami A. M. Alsallami . Investigating exact solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional KdV-CBS equation: A non-traveling wave approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6853-6872. doi: 10.3934/math.2025314
    [5] Shumoua F. Alrzqi, Fatimah A. Alrawajeh, Hany N. Hassan . An efficient numerical technique for investigating the generalized Rosenau–KDV–RLW equation by using the Fourier spectral method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8661-8688. doi: 10.3934/math.2024420
    [6] Zhi-Ying Feng, Xiang-Hua Meng, Xiao-Ge Xu . The data-driven localized wave solutions of KdV-type equations via physics-informed neural networks with a priori information. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 33263-33285. doi: 10.3934/math.20241587
    [7] Islam Samir, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Wafaa Rabie, W. Abbas, Ola Mostafa . Construction optical solitons of generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with quintuple power-law nonlinearity using Exp-function, projective Riccati, and new generalized methods. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3392-3407. doi: 10.3934/math.2025157
    [8] Da Shi, Zhao Li, Dan Chen . New traveling wave solutions, phase portrait and chaotic patterns for the dispersive concatenation model with spatio-temporal dispersion having multiplicative white noise. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25732-25751. doi: 10.3934/math.20241257
    [9] Dumitru Baleanu, Kamyar Hosseini, Soheil Salahshour, Khadijeh Sadri, Mohammad Mirzazadeh, Choonkil Park, Ali Ahmadian . The (2+1)-dimensional hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its optical solitons. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9568-9581. doi: 10.3934/math.2021556
    [10] Yu-Lan Ma, Bang-Qing Li . Mixed lump and soliton solutions for a generalized (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1162-1176. doi: 10.3934/math.2020080
  • It is necessary to utilize certain stochastic methods while finding the soliton solutions since several physical systems are by their very nature stochastic. By adding randomness into the modeling process, researchers gain deeper insights into the impact of uncertainties on soliton evolution, stability, and interaction. In the realm of dynamics, deterministic models often encounter limitations, prompting the incorporation of stochastic techniques to provide a more comprehensive framework. Our attention was directed towards the short-wave intermediate dispersive variable (SIdV) equation with the Wiener process. By integrating advanced methodologies such as the modified Kudrayshov technique (KT), the generalized KT, and the sine-cosine method, we delved into the exploration of diverse solitary wave solutions. Through those sophisticated techniques, a spectrum of the traveling wave solutions was unveiled, encompassing both the bounded and singular manifestations. This approach not only expanded our understanding of wave dynamics but also shed light on the intricate interplay between deterministic and stochastic processes in physical systems. Solitons maintained stable periodicity but became vulnerable to increased noise, disrupting predictability. Dark solitons obtained in the results showed sensitivity to noise, amplifying variations in behavior. Furthermore, the localized wave patterns displayed sharp peaks and periodicity, with noise introducing heightened fluctuations, emphasizing stochastic influence on wave solutions.



    Over the past several years, integrable systems (IS) have been a captivating field of research for their applications in science and engineering [1]. The unique features of these IS and their wide range of implications make them intriguing. In the context of science, IS provides insightful solutions and analytical methods that improve our understanding of complex processes [2]. Moreover, they serve as important tools for optimizing processes and addressing intricate problems in engineering applications. Li and Tian systematically solved the Cauchy problem of the general n-component nonlinear Schrödinger equations based on the Riemann-Hilbert method, and given the N-soliton solutions. Moreover, they proposed a conjecture about the law of nonlinear wave propagation [3]. With respect to soliton resolution conjecture, Li, Tian, Yang, and Fan have done some interesting work in deriving the solutions of Wadati-Konno-Ichikawa equation, complex short pulse equation and short pulse equation with the help of Dbar-steepest descent method [4]. They solved the long-time asymptotic behavior of the solutions of these equations, and proved the soliton resolution conjecture and the asymptotic stability of solutions of these equations [5,6,7].

    Throughout the recent years several useful works have been observed in the literature. For instance, exploring wave phenomena across various disciplines such as oceanography, acoustics, and hydrodynamics is achieved through an extended coupled (2+1)-dimensional Burgers system [8]. Investigation of ultra-short optical pulses within a birefringent fiber employs a generalized coupled Hirota system, incorporating singular manifold analysis and symbolic computation [9,10]. The study of solitons and generalized Darboux transformations is conducted for the Ablowitz–Ladik equation within an electrical lattice [11]. Analysis of multi-pole solitons is carried out in an inhomogeneous multi-component nonlinear optical medium [12]. Auto-Bäcklund transformations and soliton solutions on non-zero backgrounds are explored for a (3+1)-dimensional Korteweg-de Vries-Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schif equation in a fluid medium [13]. Some more works include [14,15,16,17,18].

    The study of IS became significant when studying famous examples like the Korteweg-de-Vries (KdV) equation [19]. During past years, researchers have focused on the KdV equation [20]. The integrability of this system makes it a noteworthy illustration of an integrable system, connecting theoretical phenomena with practical applications [21]. Two-layer liquid and lattice considerations are investigated through a (3+1)-dimensional generalized Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama system [22]. Similarly, oceanic shallow-water investigations are conducted on a generalized Whitham-Broer-Kaup-Boussinesq-Kupershmidt system [23]. Recent works include the bifurcations and chaos analysis of several PDEs. For example, the investigation delves into the dynamic behavior and the emergence of multiple optical solitons in optical fibers through the fractional Ginzburg–Landau equation incorporating β-derivative terms [24]. Analyzing bifurcation phenomena, the study explores optical soliton perturbations employing the Radhakrishnan–Kundu–Lakshmanan equation [25]. Investigating bifurcations and the existence of dispersive optical solitons, the research focuses on the nonlinear Schrödinger–Hirota equation within DWDM networks [26]. Additionally, examining bifurcation dynamics and the formation of multiple solitons, attention is given to birefringent fibers utilizing the coupled Schrödinger-Hirota equation [27]. The basic version of KdV equation is expressed as:

    Gt+6GGx+Gxxx=0. (1.1)

    In the field of science, the study of nonlinear waves leads to the emergence of the KdV equation, giving a mathematical framework for analyzing phenomena like solitons. These solitary waves solutions find implications in different physical contexts, containing fluid mechanics and plasma physics, where the characteristics are expressed by the KdV equation. The integrability of the KdV equations permits researchers to attain closed form solutions, leading to a more profound comprehension of the given behavior. For Eq (1.1), the order one soliton is expressed as:

    G(x,t)=β2sech2[β2(xβtx0)]. (1.2)

    A remarkable recent finding in the field of nonlinear PDEs is the SIdV equation. The SIdV equation portrays an important extension of the famous KdV equation, renown for its capacity to study different physical phenomena, specifically those related to waves in shallow water. The unique combination of the short wave and intermediate dispersive properties in the SIdV equation is what makes it so fascinating. By involving features from the both regimes, the SIdV acts a link between the KdV equation and the conventional short wave, offering a more complex point of view. Compared to the standard short wave equations or KdV equation, the equation's applicability is increased by its special mix of short wave and intermediate dispersive features, which allows it to simulate a wider range of wave events. The equation of the SIdV is given as [28]:

    Gt+(2GxxG)Gx=Gxxx. (1.3)

    The SIdV equation is interesting owing to the way its intermediate features and short wave dispersive characteristics are structured. Due to the capacity of the SIdV equation to capture intricate wave dynamics that other models may ignore, the SIdV equation is desirable to both scholars and practitioners. Exploring the SIdV equation thereby enriches our knowledge of nonlinear wave process and offers new prospects to usage in fluid and plasma physics, among other fields. Its role as a generalized KdV equation provides the basis for a better understanding of nonlinear PDEs and their applications. The literature [29,30] provides documentation of several studies on the SIdV equation. The authors in [31] constructed the following version of SIdV equation as:

    Gt+(3(1ϱ)G+(1+ϱ)GxxG)GxΥGxxx=0. (1.4)

    An integrable system acquires the stochasticity when the random or probabilistic elements affect its dynamics. This can occur from the system having random components such as a stochastic differential equation (SDE), Brownian motion, or other causes. The analysis of the stochastic integrable system is inspired by the demand to analyze and understand physical systems that contain both stochastic and deterministic aspects. This approach is particulary useful in areas where the interaction of deterministic laws with random oscillation is essential to the process under investigation such as quantum mechanics. Many researchers have employed a stochastic technique to examine the soliton of integrable systems, see [32,33,34,35]. Encouraged by proceeding studies, we seek to explore the Eq (1.4) using a stochastic approach. The SIdV model (1.4) can be reconsidered in stochastic form as

    Gt+(3(1ϱ)G+(1+ϱ)GxxG)GxΥGxxx=εdW(t)dt. (1.5)

    In the above equation, the W(t) denotes the Wiener process (WP), where dW(t)dt shows white noise. One can obtain the Eq (1.4) when considering ε=0 in the Eq (1.5). () The WP W(t) for t0 has the following characteristics:

    1) W(t)=0, for t=0.

    2) W(ti)W(tj), for ti<tj is independent.

    3) W(t), t0 is a continuous function for t.

    4) W(tj)W(ti) has a Gaussian distribution having variance tjti and mean 0.

    () The time derivative of a Wiener process, known as white noise, serves as a mathematical abstraction representing phenomena characterized by significant and abrupt fluctuations.

    To get analytic solutions for nonlinear PDEs, several methods have been devised. They consist of the extended tanh function method [36], Darboux transformation [37], the Sardar-subequation method [38], and additional ways [39,40,41]. Three analytical techniques are used in this study: the sine-cosine approach, the modified Kudryashov Technique (KT), and the generalised Kudryashov Technique (KT). These techniques are applied to explore novel analytic solutions for the given model in the stochastic scenario. As far as we know from the literature, this model has not been studied with the proposed methods in the stochastic perspective.

    The significance and practicality of the generalized Kudryashov (GK) method are evident in its ability to pinpoint analytical soliton solutions for nonlinear partial PDEs. In this section, we elucidate the overall procedure of the GK technique to acquire a spectrum of precise solutions for the given model. The GK technique is applied to establish the general form of the solution for the following nonlinear PDE:

    P(C,Cx,Ct,Cxx,Cxt,)=0, (2.1)

    where C=C(x,t). Consider the transformation presented below

    ξ=ϖxβt. (2.2)

    Now, putting Eq (2.2) into the Eq (2.1), the following ODE can be obtained:

    G(C,C,C,C,)=0, (2.3)

    where "" denotes ordinary derivatives with respect to ξ. Subsequently, adopt the provided format for the solution of Eq (2.3), we have

    G(x,t)=Q0+ςΥ=1QΥRΥ(ξ)ϱ0+σΥ=1ϱΥRΥ(ξ), (2.4)

    here, ς and σ are positive integers, and the coefficients QΥ and ϱΥ (where Υ takes values from 1 to ς and from 1 to σ) are unspecified and will be determined subsequently. Further ξ is defined in Eq (2.2). Additionally,

    R(ξ)=11+Aexp(ξ), (2.5)

    here A denotes constant of integration and R(ξ) satisfies the Riccati equation, which is given below:

    R(ξ)=R2(ξ)R(ξ), (2.6)

    In this context, the symbol "" denotes an ordinary derivative w.r.t ξ. By applying the homogeneous balance law, ς and σ may be found by comparing the major terms involving the nonlinear term and the highest-order derivative in the resultant ODE, which is generated from several integrations of Eq (2.3). Subsequently, inserting the solutions given by (2.4) and Eq (2.5) into the resulting ODE yields a polynomial in different exponents of R(ξ). Additionally, by setting the powers of R(ξ) to zero and equating them, an algebraic system emerges. Evaluating the obtained system allows for the determination of the values of QΥ, ϱΥ, and other parameters, facilitating the finding of solitary waves solution.

    Here, the general strategy for the modified KT method is explained. The first step involves identifying an ODE given by Eq (2.3). Subsequently, the expansion that follows can be used:

    G(ξ)=ϑκ=0Fκ(1+exp(ξ))κ, (3.1)

    where F0,F1,F2,,Fϑ provide constants which can be obtained from Eq (2.3). The values of ϑ may be found by applying the homogeneous balancing principle to the ODE that is produced by repeatedly integrating Eq (2.3). The resultant ODE may be solved by replacing Eq (3.1) and establishing a polynomial in various powers of exp(ξ). An algebraic system results from putting the coefficients of these exponents of exp(ξ) to zero. The results for Fκ and other parameters are obtained by analyzing this system, which makes it easier to derive analytic solutions.

    Several novel soliton solutions are computed in this part by applying the suggested approaches to the provided model. Using the following transformation, we start here in order to accomplish this:

    G(x,t)=V(ξ)=(ϖxβt)eεW(t)ε2t22,ξ=ϖxβt. (4.1)

    On inserting the Eq (4.1) into Eq (1.5), following ODE can be obtained

    V(ξ)(ϖ3ΥV(ξ)3βV(ξ)+ϖV(ξ)(ϖ2(ϱ+1)V(ξ)V(ξ)+3(1ϱ)V(ξ)))=0. (4.2)

    Integrating Eq (4.2) and considering integration constant as zero we get:

    2ϖ3ΥV(ξ)V(ξ)+ϖ3(Υ+ϱ+1)V(ξ)2βV(ξ)22ϖ(ϱ1)V(ξ)3=0. (4.3)

    By the homogenenous balancing rule, we can articulate:

    ς=σ+2, (4.4)

    where σ0.

    To study implications of the GK technique, considering Eq (4.4) with σ=1, it follows from Eq (4.4) that ς=3. Consequently, the general solution of the Eq (4.3) takes the form:

    G(x,t)=V(ξ)=Q0+Q1R(ξ)+Q2R2(ξ)+Q3R3(ξ)ζ0+ζ1R(ξ). (4.5)

    Inserting Eq (4.5) into the Eq (4.3), we get

    2ϖ3Υ(R(ξ))1)R(ξ))R(ξ)2(Q2+Q3)+Q1)+Q0)(R(ξ))(R(ξ))(Q2+Q3)(ζ1R(ξ))(2ζ1R(ξ))+6ζ0ζ1)+3ζ0(2ζ0ζ1))+ζ0ζ1(Q12Q0)Q0ζ21+2ζ20(Q12(Q2+Q3)))+ζ0(Q0ζ1Q1ζ0))+ϖ3(R(ξ))1)2R(ξ))2(Υ+ϱ+1)(R(ξ))(Q2+Q3)(ζ1R(ξ))+2ζ0)Q0ζ1+Q1ζ0)22ϖ(ϱ1)(ζ1R(ξ))+ζ0)×R(ξ)2(Q2+Q3)+Q1)+Q0)3β(ζ1R(ξ))+ζ0)2R(ξ)2×(Q2+Q3)+Q1)+Q0)2=0. (4.6)

    By comparing various powers of R(ξ), we derived a system of algebraic equations, the solution of which yields the following values for the unknown parameters:

    SetI:Q0=ϖ2Υζ0ϱ1,Q2=Q3,ζ1=Q1ϱQ1ϖ2Υ,β=2ϖ3ΥSetII:Q0=ϖ2Υζ0ϱ1,Q1=ϖ2Υζ0ϱ1,Q2=Q3,ζ1=ζ0,β=2ϖ3ΥSetIII:Q0=0,Q1=2ϖ2ζ0(ϱ2Υ+1)ϱ1,Q2=2ϱϖ2ζ04ϖ2Υζ0+2ϖ2ζ0ϱQ3+Q3ϱ1,ζ1=0,β=ϖ3(Υ+1+ϱ).

    Inserting the aforementioned sets of parameters into Eq (4.5) and utilizing Eq (4.1), one derive:

    S1=eεW(t)ε2t22(Q3(Aeϖx2ϖ3Υt+1)3Q3(Aeϖx2ϖ3Υt+1)2ϖ2Υζ0ϱ1+ϖ2Υζ0(ϱ1)(Aeϖx2ϖ3Υt+1)ζ0ζ0Aeϖx2ϖ3Υt+1). (4.7)
    S2=eεW(t)ε2t22(ϖ2Υζ0(ϱ1)(Aeϖxβt+1)ϖ2Υζ0ϱ1Q3(Aeϖxβt+1)2+Q3(Aeϖxβt+1)3ζ0ζ0Aeϖxβt+1). (4.8)
    S3=eεW(t)ε2t22(Q3(Aeϖxϖ3t(ϱΥ+1)+1)3+2ϱϖ2ζ04ϖ2Υζ0+2ϖ2ζ0ϱQ3+Q3(ϱ1)(Aeϖxϖ3t(ϱΥ+1)+1)22ϖ2ζ0(ϱ2Υ+1)(ϱ1)(Aeϖxϖ3t(ϱΥ+1)+1)ζ0). (4.9)

    In this section, we demonstrate the implication of the MK method. By employing the homogeneous balance principle on Eq (3.1), we determine that ϑ=2. Consequently, using Eq (3.1), one obtain:

    G(x,t)=V(ξ)=F0+F11+exp(ξ)+F2(1+exp(ξ))2. (4.10)

    By substituting Eq (4.10) into Eq (4.2), we derive the following:

    2ϖ3Υeϖx+βt(F1(e2ϖx+βt1)+2F2(2eϖx+βt1))(F0(eϖx+βt+1)2+F1eϖx+βt+F1+F2)+2(1ϱ)ϖ(F0(eϖx+βt+1)2+F1eϖx+βt+F1+F2)3(eϖx+βt+1)2ϱ(F0(eϖx+βt+1)2+F1eϖx+βt+F1+F2)2+ϖ3e2ϖx+βt(β+Υ+1)(F1eϖx+βt+F1+2F2)2=0. (4.11)

    Comparing various powers of exp(ξ),ξ=2ϖx+βt, we get

    (eξ)0:2ϱF30ϖ+2F30ϖ6ϱF20F1ϖ+6F20F1ϖ6ϱF20F2ϖ+6F20F2ϖF20β6ϱF0F21ϖ12ϱF0F1F2ϖ+12F0F1F2ϖ2F0F1β6ϱF0F22ϖ+6F0F22ϖ2F0F2β2ϱF31ϖ+2F31ϖ6ϱF21F2ϖ+6F21F2ϖF21β6ϱF1F22ϖ+6F1F22ϖ2F1F2β2ϱF32ϖ+2F32ϖF22β+6F0F21ϖ=0(eξ)1:2ϱF30ϖ+2F30ϖF20β=0(eξ)2:12ϱF30ϖ+12F30ϖ6ϱF20F1ϖ+6F20F1ϖ6F20β2F0F1ϖ3Υ2F0F1β=0
    (eξ)3:30ϱF30ϖ+30F30ϖ30ϱF20F1ϖ+30F20F1ϖ6ϱF20F2ϖ+6F20F2ϖ15F20β+6F0F21ϖ4F0F1ϖ3Υ10F0F1β8F0F2ϖ3Υ2F0F2β+ϱF21ϖ3F21ϖ3Υ+F21ϖ3F21β6ϱF0F21ϖ=0(eξ)4:40ϱF30ϖ+40F30ϖ60ϱF20F1ϖ+60F20F1ϖ24ϱF20F2ϖ+24F20F2ϖ+24F0F21ϖ12ϱF0F1F2ϖ+12F0F1F2ϖ20F0F1β12F0F2ϖ3Υ8F0F2β2ϱF31ϖ+2ϱF21ϖ3+2F21ϖ34F21β+4ϱF1F2ϖ36F1F2ϖ3Υ+4F1F2ϖ32F1F2β20F20β24ϱF0F21ϖ+2F31ϖ=0exp(ξ)5:12ϱF30ϖ+12F30ϖ30ϱF20F1ϖ+30F20F1ϖ24ϱF20F2ϖ+24F20F2ϖ6F20β+24F0F21ϖ36ϱF0F1F2ϖ+36F0F1F2ϖ+2F0F1ϖ3Υ10F0F1β12ϱF0F22ϖ+12F0F22ϖ+4F0F2ϖ3Υ8F0F2β6ϱF31ϖ+6F31ϖ12ϱF21F2ϖ+12F21F2ϖ+2F21ϖ3Υ4F21β6ϱF1F22ϖ+6F1F22ϖ+6F1F2ϖ3Υ6F1F2β+4F22ϖ3Υ2F22β24ϱF0F21ϖ=0(eξ)6:30ϱF30ϖ+30F30ϖ60ϱF20F1ϖ+60F20F1ϖ36ϱF20F2ϖ+36F20F2ϖ15F20β+36F0F21ϖ36ϱF0F1F2ϖ+36F0F1F2ϖ+4F0F1ϖ3Υ20F0F1β6ϱF0F22ϖ+6F0F22ϖ12F0F2β6ϱF31ϖ+6F31ϖ6ϱF21F2ϖ+6F21F2ϖ+ϱF21ϖ3+3F21ϖ3Υ+F21ϖ36F21β+4ϱF1F2ϖ3+4F1F2ϖ36F1F2β+4ϱF22ϖ34F22ϖ3Υ+4F22ϖ3F22β36ϱF0F21ϖ=0. (4.12)

    Upon solving the aforementioned system, we acquire:

    F0=0,F1=2ϖ2(ϱ2Υ+1)ϱ1,F2=2(ϱϖ22ϖ2Υ+ϖ2)ϱ1,β=ϖ3(ϱΥ+1), (4.13)

    Putting the values presented above in Eq (4.10), we obtained the following solution

    S4=eεW(t)ε2t22(2(ϱϖ22ϖ2Υ+ϖ2)(ϱ1)(eϖxϖ3t(ϱΥ+1)+1)22ϖ2(ϱ2Υ+1)(ϱ1)(eϖxϖ3t(ϱΥ+1)+1)). (4.14)

    Here, the sine-cosine method to compute more closed form solutions for the proposed stochastic nonlinear equation is presented. This method involves utilizing the sine expansion give as:

    G(x,t)=V(ξ)=Ωsin(μξ)r, (4.15)

    where

    V(ξ)=r(r1)Ωμ2sin(μξ)r2r2Ωμ2sin(μξ)r. (4.16)

    Inserting Eq (4.15) and the Eq (4.16) into Eq (4.2), we get

    Ω2β(sin(μξ))2r2ϖ(1+β)Ω3(sin(μξ))3r+(ϖ)3r2(1+β+Υ)Ω2 (μ)2(1(sin(μξ))2)(sin(μξ))2+2r2ϖ3ΥΩ(sin(μξ))r((1+r)rΩμ2(1(sin(μξ))2)(sin(μξ))2+rrΩ(μ)2(sin(μξ))r)=0. (4.17)

    One reach to:

    r203r+22r=0βr2ϖ3Ω2μ2r2ϖ3ΥΩ2μ2+r2ϖ3Ω2μ2+2rϖ3ΥΩ2μ22ϱϖΩ3+2ϖΩ3=0ϱr2ϖ3Ω2μ2+r2ϖ3ΥΩ2μ2ϖ3r2Ω2μ2Ω2ν=0. (4.18)

    Solving system (4.18), we get the following

    r=2,μ=μ2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3,Ω=ϱμ+2Υμμ2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1),r=2,μ=μ2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3,Ω=ϱμ+2Υμμ2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1). (4.19)

    By substituting the aforementioned values into Eq (4.15), we reach:

    S5=eεW(t)ε2t22((ϱμ+2Υμμ)csc2(μ(ϖxβt)2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3)2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1)). (4.20)
    S6=eεW(t)ε2t22((ϱμ+2Υμμ)csc2(μ(ϖxβt)2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3)2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1)). (4.21)

    Next suppose the Cosine expansion:

    G(x,t)=V(ξ)=Ωcos(μξ)r, (4.22)

    here

    V(ξ)=r(r1)Ωμ2cos(μξ)r2r2Ωμ2cos(μξ)r. (4.23)

    Inserting Eq (4.22) and the Eq (4.23) into Eq (4.2), we get

    Ω2β(cos(μξ))(2r)2ϖ(1+β)Ω3(cos(μξ))3r+ϖ3r2(1+β+Υ)Ω2 μ2(1(cos(μξ))2)(cos(μξ))2+2r2ϖ3ΥΩ(cos(μξ))r((1+r)rΩμ2(1(cos(μξ))2)(cos(μξ))2+rrΩμ2(cos(μξ))r)=0. (4.24)

    One scenario that may occur is as:

    r203r+22r=0βr2ϖ3Ω2μ2r2ϖ3ΥΩ2μ2+r2ϖ3Ω2μ2+2rϖ3ΥΩ2μ22ϱϖΩ3+2ϖΩ3=0ϱr2ϖ3Ω2μ2+r2ϖ3ΥΩ2μ2ϖ3r2Ω2μ2Ω2ν=0. (4.25)

    The values obtained by solving the given system are:

    r=2,μ=μ2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3,Ω=ϱμ+2Υμμ2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1),r=2,μ=μ2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3,Ω=ϱμ+2Υμμ2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1). (4.26)

    We obtain the following solutions by entering the aforementioned values into Eq (4.22).

    S7=eεW(t)ε2t22((ϱβ+2Υββ)sec2(β(ϖxβt)2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3)2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1)). (4.27)
    S8=eεW(t)ε2t22((ϱβ+2Υββ)sec2(β(ϖxβt)2ϱϖ3+ϖ3Υϖ3)2(1+ϱ)ϖ(Υ+ϱ+1)). (4.28)

    This section provides a detailed analysis of the geometric characteristics of various solutions we have derived. It includes both 2D and 3D visual representations to elucidate their physical implications. Specifically, we examine the shape of solution S1, as depicted in Figure 1. Here, the behavior of the kink solitary wave is presented in both two and three dimensions, characterized by a localized wave profile with a sharply defined amplitude shift. Additionally, Figure 1 contains subfigures that investigate the influence of noise on these observations. We particularly focus on how the kink solitary waves respond to varying levels of ω, demonstrating that these waves undergo significant changes. This observation underscores the sensitivity of kink solitary wave dynamics to fluctuations in the ω parameter, thereby shedding light on the impact of noise on the dynamic properties of the solutions being studied.

    Figure 1.  Three and two dimensional dynamics of S1 for Υ=2,A=2,ϖ=1,Q3=1,ζ0=1,ϱ=1.1.

    The graphical view of the solution S2 is presented in Figure 2, revealing periodic solitonic patterns in two- and three-dimensional representations. Solitons are waves that travel alone and maintain their shape and speed. The steady, recurring waveforms in this illustration are known as soliton waveforms. Additionally, a graphic explanation of the noise term's influence is provided. A comparable increase in the periodic soliton's unpredictability is observed when the noise term's amplitude increases. The impact of the noise factor on the formerly stable and periodic solitonic patterns is well depicted in this visual aid, highlighting the system's vulnerability to changes in the noise parameter.

    Figure 2.  Three and two dimensional dynamics of S2 for Υ=1,A=1,ϖ=0.1,Q3=1,ζ0=0.2,ϱ=0.1.

    Furthermore, Figure 3 shows the dynamics of the solution S4 in two- and three-dimensional representations, illustrating a dark soliton configuration typical. The visualization's subfigures illuminate how the noise term affects the dynamics that are intrinsic to the dark soliton structure. In particular, a visual representation of the effect of changing the noise term is provided. There is a discernible impact on the dark soliton's behaviour as the noise term's amplitude increases. This indicates a significant rise in the variation that the dark soliton displays. Essentially, the graphic conveys how sensitive the behavior of the dark soliton is to changes in the noise parameter, offering important information on the complex interactions between the soliton structure and the stochasticity of the environment.

    Figure 3.  Three and two dimensional dynamics of S4 for ϱ=1,Υ=1,ϖ=1.

    A graphic depiction of the solution S5 is shown in Figure 4, which depicts a localised wave with sharp peaks and periodicity. Localized wave patterns become crucial in our analysis, as the well-defined, sharp peaks they exhibit signify the presence of a distinct wave packet. The graphical representation not only offers insights into the periodic behavior and amplitude distribution of these localized waves but also elucidates their dynamic properties. The series culminates with Figure 5, presenting a detailed portrayal of the geometric attributes of solution S6. The bell-shaped contour characteristic of this solution distinctly indicates a localized wave. The clearly defined concentration region suggests that the bell-shaped form may mirror specific physical events. The graphical depiction facilitates a better understanding of solution S6, which has unique wave profile properties. Additionally, by incorporating noise terms in the subfigures, we explore the impact of unpredictability on the system. Observations from these subfigures reveal that as the value of the noise term increases, the dynamics of the wave behavior fluctuate more intensely. This research underscores how stochastic factors influence localized wave solutions and provides valuable insights into the system's response to heightened ambient noise levels.

    Figure 4.  Three and two dimensional dynamics of S5 for ϱ=0.1,Υ=1.5,β=1,ϖ=1.
    Figure 5.  Three and two dimensional dynamics of S6 for ϱ=0.1,Υ=2,β=5,ϖ=1.

    In summary, the inherent stochasticity of many physical systems necessitates the use of stochastic methods to effectively seek soliton solutions. Incorporating randomness into our models provides invaluable insights into the impact of uncertainty on soliton dynamics, offering a deeper understanding of their stability and interactions within real-world scenarios. By introducing the Wiener process into the SIdV equation, we aim to capture the realistic behavior of solitons under stochastic influences. Through meticulous analysis utilizing advanced techniques like the generalized KT, its modified counterpart, and the sine-cosine procedure, we unveil a diverse array of traveling wave solutions. These solutions encompass both solitary waves and bounded waveforms, offering a comprehensive view of soliton dynamics. This underscores the significance of stochastic methodologies in unraveling the complexities of physical systems, emphasizing their role in enhancing our comprehension of fundamental phenomena.

    Solitons exhibit stable, periodic waveforms unaffected by external influences, while increased noise disrupts their predictability, revealing system vulnerability. Dark solitons, depicted in Figure 3, display sensitivity to noise, with amplified variation in behavior as noise amplitude rises, highlighting complex soliton-environment interactions. Localized wave patterns in Figures 4 and 5 reveal distinct wave packets, with sharp peaks and periodicity, while noise introduction demonstrates heightened fluctuations in wave behavior, emphasizing stochastic influence on localized wave solutions. Furthermore, the diverse physical explanation of acquired solutions highlight the wide-ranging evolution produced by the generalized stochastic SIdV equation. The findings offer new perspectives on wave propagation in stochastic environments, unveiling various phenomena like dark soliton structures, periodic solitonic patterns, and kink-solitary waves. Analyzing and interpreting these geometric characteristics is vital for unraveling the complex relationship between dispersive and nonlinear effects in various physical contexts. Future work includes analysis of the proposed model where the neural networks will be carried out [42,43].

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This study is supported via funding from Prince sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2024/R/1445).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] A.-M. Wazwaz, Two new integrable fourth-order nonlinear equations: multiple soliton solutions and multiple complex soliton solutions, Nonlinear Dyn., 94 (2018), 2655–2663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4515-4 doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4515-4
    [2] A.-M. Wazwaz, W. Alhejaili, S. A. El-Tantawy, Study on extensions of (modified) Korteweg–de Vries equations: Painlevé integrability and multiple soliton solutions in fluid mediums, Phys. Fluids, 35 (2023), 093110. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0169733 doi: 10.1063/5.0169733
    [3] Y. Li, S.‐F. Tian, J.‐J. Yang, Riemann–Hilbert problem and interactions of solitons in the‐component nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Stud. Appl. Math., 148 (2022), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/sapm.12450 doi: 10.1111/sapm.12450
    [4] Z.-Q. Li, S.-F. Tian, J.-J. Yang, On the soliton resolution and the asymptotic stability of N-soliton solution for the Wadati-Konno-Ichikawa equation with finite density initial data in space-time solitonic regions, Adv. Math., 409 (2022), 108639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2022.108639 doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2022.108639
    [5] Z.-Q. Li, S.-F. Tian, J.-J. Yang, Soliton resolution for the Wadati–Konno–Ichikawa equation with weighted Sobolev initial data, Ann. Henri Poincaré, 23 (2022), 2611–2655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-021-01143-z doi: 10.1007/s00023-021-01143-z
    [6] Z.-Q. Li, S.-F. Tian, J.-J. Yang, E. Fan, Soliton resolution for the complex short pulse equation with weighted Sobolev initial data in space-time solitonic regions, J. Differ. Equations, 329 (2022), 31–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2022.05.003
    [7] Z.-Q. Li, S.-F. Tian, J.-J. Yang, On the asymptotic stability of N-soliton solution for the short pulse equation with weighted Sobolev initial data, J. Differ. Equations, 377 (2023), 121–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2023.08.028 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2023.08.028
    [8] X.-Y. Gao, Considering the wave processes in oceanography, acoustics and hydrodynamics by means of an extended coupled (2+1)-dimensional Burgers system, Chinese J. Phys., 86 (2023), 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2023.10.051 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2023.10.051
    [9] X.-Y. Gao, Letter to the Editor on the Korteweg-de Vries-type systems inspired by Results Phys. 51, 106624 (2023) and 50, 106566 (2023), Results Phys., 53 (2023), 106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106932 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106932
    [10] X.-Y. Gao, Y.-J. Guo, W.-R. Shan, Ultra-short optical pulses in a birefringent fiber via a generalized coupled Hirota system with the singular manifold and symbolic computation, Appl. Math. Lett., 140 (2023), 108546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108546 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108546
    [11] X.-H. Wu, Y.-T. Gao, Generalized Darboux transformation and solitons for the Ablowitz–Ladik equation in an electrical lattice, Appl. Math. Lett., 137 (2023), 108476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108476 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108476
    [12] Y. Shen, B. Tian, T.-Y. Zhou, C.-D. Cheng, Multi-pole solitons in an inhomogeneous multi-component nonlinear optical medium, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 171 (2023), 113497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113497 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113497
    [13] T.-Y. Zhou, B. Tian, Y. Shen, X.-T. Gao, Auto-Bäcklund transformations and soliton solutions on the nonzero background for a (3+1)-dimensional Korteweg-de Vries-Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schif equation in a fluid, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 8647–8658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08260-w doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08260-w
    [14] C. Xu, M. Farman, Z. Liu, Y. Pang, Numerical approximation and analysis of epidemic model with constant proportional caputo(CPC) operator, Fractals, in press. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X24400140
    [15] C. Xu, Y. Zhao, J. Lin, Y. Pang, Z. Liu, J. Shen, et al., Mathematical exploration on control of bifurcation for a plankton-oxygen dynamical model owning delay, J. Math. Chem., in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-023-01543-y
    [16] W. Ou, C. Xu, Q. Cui, Y. Pang, Z. Liu, J. Shen, et al., Hopf bifurcation exploration and control technique in a predator-prey system incorporating delay, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 1622–1651. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024080 doi: 10.3934/math.2024080
    [17] Q. Cui, C. Xu, W. Ou, Y. Pang, Z. Liu, P. Li, et al., Bifurcation behavior and hybrid controller design of a 2D Lotka-Volterra commensal symbiosis system accompanying delay, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11234808 doi: 10.3390/math11234808
    [18] C. Xu, M. Farman, A. Shehzad, Analysis and chaotic behavior of a fish farming model with singular and non-singular kernel, Int. J. Biomath., in press. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179352452350105X
    [19] W. X. Ma, Complexiton solutions to the Korteweg–de Vries equation, Phys. Lett. A, 301 (2002), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00971-4 doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00971-4
    [20] L. Ma, H. Li, J. Ma, Single-peak solitary wave solutions for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 79 (2015), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1668-7 doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1668-7
    [21] Z.-Y. Ma, J.-X. Fei, J.-C. Chen, Nonlocal symmetry and explicit solution of the Alice-Bob modified Korteweg-de Vries equation, Commun. Theor. Phys., 70 (2018), 031. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/70/1/31 doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/70/1/31
    [22] X.-Y. Gao, Two-layer-liquid and lattice considerations through a (3+1)-dimensional generalized Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama system, Appl. Math. Lett., 152 (2024), 109018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2024.109018 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2024.109018
    [23] X.-Y. Gao, Oceanic shallow-water investigations on a generalized Whitham–Broer–Kaup–Boussinesq–Kupershmidt system, Phys. Fluids, 35 (2023), 127106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0170506 doi: 10.1063/5.0170506
    [24] L. Tang, Dynamical behavior and multiple optical solitons for the fractional Ginzburg–Landau equation with β-derivative in optical fibers, Opt. Quant. Electron., 56 (2024), 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05761-1 doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-05761-1
    [25] L. Tang, A. Biswas, Y. Yıldırım, M. Aphane, A. A. Alghamdi, Bifurcation analysis and optical soliton perturbation with Radhakrishnan–Kundu–Lakshmanan equation, P. Est. Acad. Sci., 73 (2024), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2024.1.03 doi: 10.3176/proc.2024.1.03
    [26] L. Tang, Bifurcations and dispersive optical solitons for the nonlinear Schrödinger–Hirota equation in DWDM networks, Optik, 262 (2022), 169276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169276 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169276
    [27] L. Tang, Bifurcation analysis and multiple solitons in birefringent fibers with coupled Schrödinger-Hirota equation, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 161 (2022), 112383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112383 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112383
    [28] A. Sen, D. P. Ahalpara, A. Thyagaraja, G. S. Krishnaswami, A KdV-like advection–dispersion equation with some remarkable properties, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 17 (2012), 4115–4124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.03.001
    [29] O. González-Gaxiola, J. R. de Chávez, Traveling wave solutions of the generalized scale-invariant analog of the KdV equation by tanh–coth method, Nonlinear Engineering, 12 (2023), 20220325. https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2022-0325 doi: 10.1515/nleng-2022-0325
    [30] S. Saifullah, M. M. Alqarni, S. Ahmad, D. Baleanu, M. A. Khan, E. E. Mahmoud, Some more bounded and singular pulses of a generalized scale-invariant analogue of the Korteweg–de Vries equation, Results Phys., 52 (2023), 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106836 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106836
    [31] L. Alzaleq, V. Manoranjan, B. Alzalg, Exact traveling waves of a generalized scale-invariant analogue of the Korteweg-de Vries equation, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030414 doi: 10.3390/math10030414
    [32] W. W. Mohammed, C. Cesarano, The soliton solutions for the (4+1)‐dimensional stochastic Fokas equation, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 7589–7597. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8986 doi: 10.1002/mma.8986
    [33] Y. Chen, Q. Wang, B. Li, The stochastic soliton-like solutions of stochastic KdV equations, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 23 (2005), 1465–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.06.049 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.06.049
    [34] I. Onder, H. Esen, A. Secer, M. Ozisik, M. Bayram, S. Qureshi, Stochastic optical solitons of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation with Kerr law via Ito calculus, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 138 (2023), 872. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04497-x doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04497-x
    [35] S. U. Rehman, J. Ahmad, T. Muhammad, Dynamics of novel exact soliton solutions to stochastic chiral nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Alex. Eng. J., 79 (2023), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.014 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.014
    [36] O. El-shamy, R. El-barkoki, H. M. Ahmed, W. Abbas, I. Samir, Exploration of new solitons in optical medium with higher-order dispersive and nonlinear effects via improved modified extended tanh function method, Alex. Eng. J., 68 (2023), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.01.053 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.01.053
    [37] X. Zhao, B. Tian, D.-Y. Yang, X.-T. Gao, Conservation laws, N-fold Darboux transformation, N-dark-bright solitons and the Nth-order breathers of a variable-coefficient fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger system in an inhomogeneous optical fiber, Chaos, Soliton. Fract., 168 (2023), 113194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113194 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113194
    [38] S. Yasin, A. Khan, S. Ahmad, M. S. Osman, New exact solutions of (3+1)-dimensional modified KdV-Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation by Sardar-subequation method, Opt. Quant. Electron., 56 (2024), 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05558-2 doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-05558-2
    [39] M. ur Rahman, M. Alqudah, M. A. Khan, B. E. H. Ali, S. Ahmad, E. E. Mahmoud, et al., Rational solutions and some interactions phenomena of a (3+1)-dimensional BLMP equation in incompressible fluids: A Hirota bilinear method and dimensionally reduction approach, Results Phys., 56 (2024), 107269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107269 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107269
    [40] J. Ahmad, Z. Mustafa, S. U. Rehman, N. B. Turki, N. A. Shah, Solitary wave structures for the stochastic Nizhnik–Novikov–Veselov system via modified generalized rational exponential function method, Results Phys., 52 (2023), 106776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106776 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106776
    [41] F. Liu, Y. Feng, The modified generalized Kudryashov method for nonlinear space–time fractional partial differential equations of Schrödinger type, Results Phys., 53 (2023), 106914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106914 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106914
    [42] P. Li, R. Gao, C. Xu, J. Shen, S. Ahmad, Y. Li, Exploring the impact of delay on Hopf bifurcation of a type of BAM neural network models concerning three nonidentical delays, Neural Process. Lett., 55 (2023), 5905–5921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-023-11392-0 doi: 10.1007/s11063-023-11392-0
    [43] M. Chinnamuniyandi, S. Chandran, C. Xu, Fractional order uncertain BAM neural networks with mixed time delays: An existence and Quasi-uniform stability analysis, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 46 (2024), 4291–4313. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-234744 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-234744
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mustafah Abou-Dina, Amel Alaidrous, Impact of the climate variations in nonlinear topographies on some vast oceans, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 17932, 10.3934/math.2024873
    2. Laila A. Al-Essa, Mati ur Rahman, Novel stochastic multi breather type, a-periodic, hybrid periodic and other type of waves of the Shrödinger–Hirota model with Wiener process, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-07042-x
    3. Abdelkader Moumen, Khaled A. Aldwoah, Muntasir Suhail, Alwaleed Kamel, Hicham Saber, Manel Hleili, Sayed Saifullah, Investigation of more solitary waves solutions of the stochastics Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation under beta operator, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 27403, 10.3934/math.20241331
    4. Aseervatham Ludvin Felcy, Mony Mary Latha, Kink-soliton propagation associated with a (2+1)-dimensional antiferromagnetic spin system comprising the biquadratic interactions, 2024, 90, 05779073, 979, 10.1016/j.cjph.2024.06.023
    5. Lewa’ Alzaleq, Valipuram Manoranjan, Exploring third-order KdV–SIdV families: Analytical solutions, conservation properties, and phase plane trajectories, 2024, 64, 22113797, 107938, 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107938
    6. Shabir Ahmad, Nidhal Becheikh, Lioua Kolsi, Taseer Muhammad, Zubair Ahmad, Mohammad Khalid Nasrat, Uncovering the stochastic dynamics of solitons of the Chaffee–Infante equation, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-67116-4
    7. Alwaleed Kamel, Hanen Yossef Louati, Khaled Aldwoah, Faez Alqarni, Mohammed Almalahi, Manel Hleili, Stochastic analysis and soliton solutions of the Chaffee–Infante equation in nonlinear optical media, 2024, 2024, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-024-01930-7
    8. Xiang Hu, Yue Kai, Bailin Zheng, Study of a generalized stochastic scale-invariant analogue of the Korteweg-de Vries equation, 2025, 0924-090X, 10.1007/s11071-025-10862-5
    9. Khaled Aldwoah, Alaa Mustafa, Tariq Aljaaidi, Khidir Mohamed, Amer Alsulami, Mohammed Hassan, Rab Nawaz, Exploring the impact of Brownian motion on novel closed-form solutions of the extended Kairat-II equation, 2025, 20, 1932-6203, e0314849, 10.1371/journal.pone.0314849
    10. Amjad E. Hamza, Khidir Shaib Mohamed, Alaa Mustafa, Khaled Aldwoah, Mohammed Hassan, Hicham Saber, Abundant novel stochastic fractional solitary wave solutions of a new extended (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, 2025, 119, 11100168, 45, 10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.073
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1206) PDF downloads(73) Cited by(10)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog