Research article Special Issues

A new study on the Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative

  • In this research, we propose a new numerical method that combines with the Caputo-Fabrizio Elzaki transform and the q-homotopy analysis transform method. This work aims to analyze the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel (NWS) equation utilizing the Caputo-Fabrizio q-Elzaki homotopy analysis transform method. The Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation is a partial differential equation employed for modeling the dynamics of reaction-diffusion systems, specifically in the realm of pattern generation in biological and chemical systems. A convergence analysis of the proposed method was performed. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphs of the solutions have been drawn with the Maple software. It is seen that the resulting proposed method is more powerful and effective than the Aboodh transform homotopy perturbation method and conformable Laplace decomposition method in the results.

    Citation: Aslı Alkan, Halil Anaç. A new study on the Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27979-27997. doi: 10.3934/math.20241358

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yudhveer Singh, Devendra Kumar, Kanak Modi, Vinod Gill . A new approach to solve Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion model and fractional diffusion equations with Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 843-855. doi: 10.3934/math.2020057
    [2] Mounirah Areshi, Adnan Khan, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Analytical investigation of fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equations via a novel transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6936-6958. doi: 10.3934/math.2022385
    [3] Zeliha Korpinar, Mustafa Inc, Dumitru Baleanu . On the fractional model of Fokker-Planck equations with two different operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 236-248. doi: 10.3934/math.2020015
    [4] Manal Alqhtani, Khaled M. Saad, Rasool Shah, Thongchai Botmart, Waleed M. Hamanah . Evaluation of fractional-order equal width equations with the exponential-decay kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17236-17251. doi: 10.3934/math.2022949
    [5] Manoj Singh, Ahmed Hussein, Msmali, Mohammad Tamsir, Abdullah Ali H. Ahmadini . An analytical approach of multi-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation in the framework of natural transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8776-8802. doi: 10.3934/math.2024426
    [6] Muammer Ayata, Ozan Özkan . A new application of conformable Laplace decomposition method for fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7402-7412. doi: 10.3934/math.2020474
    [7] Xiaoyong Xu, Fengying Zhou . Orthonormal Euler wavelets method for time-fractional Cattaneo equation with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2736-2762. doi: 10.3934/math.2023144
    [8] Naveed Iqbal, Saleh Alshammari, Thongchai Botmart . Evaluation of regularized long-wave equation via Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20401-20419. doi: 10.3934/math.20221118
    [9] Khalid K. Ali, K. R. Raslan, Amira Abd-Elall Ibrahim, Mohamed S. Mohamed . On study the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio integro differential equation including the fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18206-18222. doi: 10.3934/math.2023925
    [10] Sarkhel Akbar Mahmood, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Dumitru Baleanu, Hassen Aydi, Yasser S. Hamed . Analysing discrete fractional operators with exponential kernel for positivity in lower boundedness. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10387-10399. doi: 10.3934/math.2022579
  • In this research, we propose a new numerical method that combines with the Caputo-Fabrizio Elzaki transform and the q-homotopy analysis transform method. This work aims to analyze the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel (NWS) equation utilizing the Caputo-Fabrizio q-Elzaki homotopy analysis transform method. The Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation is a partial differential equation employed for modeling the dynamics of reaction-diffusion systems, specifically in the realm of pattern generation in biological and chemical systems. A convergence analysis of the proposed method was performed. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphs of the solutions have been drawn with the Maple software. It is seen that the resulting proposed method is more powerful and effective than the Aboodh transform homotopy perturbation method and conformable Laplace decomposition method in the results.



    Differential equations with any real order greater than zero, denoted as n > 0, are employed to represent a wide range of physical phenomena in diverse fields of science and engineering [1,2,3,4,5]. It is demonstrated how a first-order differential equation with a variable coefficient may be comparable to the initial value problem for a relaxation process controlled by a differential equation of non-integer order with a constant coefficient [6]. In [7], the intra-specific relationship between two predators and a food chain system that depends on prey is examined. There is a broad use for the generalized fractional reaction–diffusion equations, which are available in the form of noninteger order partial differential equations, to illustrate significant and practical physical phenomena, like subdiffusive and superdiffusive scenarios [8]. These mathematical models are used in several fields such as statistical mechanics, Brownian motion, visco-elasticity problems, continuum and quantum physics, biosciences, chemical engineering, and control theory [9,10,11,12,13].

    The exponential growth in the popularity of the discipline referred to as fractional calculus (FC) has led to the emergence of multiple distinct approaches for defining fractional derivatives and fractional integrals [14]. Contrary to the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, the fractional derivative has multiple definitions, some of which are only comparable to each other when certain conditions are placed on the function being differentiated [15,16]. Furthermore, there have been recent discussions regarding the categorization of the fractional operators, resulting in the proposal of three new classes [17,18].

    Given the growing use of fractional derivatives in modeling physical problems, it is necessary to establish a clear and widely accepted definition for this type of derivative [19]. Additionally, it is crucial to develop a reliable and precise numerical approximation method to address problems that involve singularities and non-linearities in the systems [20]. Nevertheless, the non-local nature of these fractional operators has imposed constraints on the development of efficient codes, as it necessitates the inclusion of all previous information during simulation [21,22]. The presence of permanent memory, also known as non-volatile memory, leads to increased computational costs and slower performance [23]. There are several short memory principles discussed in recent literature that are commonly employed to minimize computational expenses and the accumulation of rounding-off errors when using numerical techniques [24]. As a result, these short memory principles are highly beneficial in solving fractional initial value problems [25,26,27,28].

    The definition of the Caputo-Fabrizio operator, which is a fractional derivative operator without a singular kernel, is a direct consequence of the traditional Caputo derivative operator. The reason for this is that the later incorporates a unique mathematical expression known as the kernel in its formulation, which presents challenges in solving the related differential equations. In contrast, the kernel of the former does not have any singularity at t=τ [29].

    Additional valuable characteristics and intriguing applications of this novel derivative operator, including the renowned Laplace transform approach, are detailed in [30]. The operator is also applied in recent publications that analyze the Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation in liquids and wave dynamics, the magnetohydrodynamic free convection flow of generalized Walters'-B fluid over a static vertical plate, and the nonlinear Fisher's reaction diffusion equation [31,32,33].

    The advantages of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative include: It offers a method of regularizing the derivative, allowing for the smoothing of functions or signals and improving their behavior, even if they lack differentiability in the traditional sense. The Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative has demonstrated its physical significance in several applications, particularly in viscoelasticity, where it accurately represents the behavior of materials that possess both elastic and viscous characteristics. Its mathematical features, such as the semi-group property, make it ideal for both analytical and numerical analysis, enabling efficient numerical simulations. It is capable of simulating fractional diffusion processes, which are present in several natural and physical systems when traditional diffusion models are insufficient. The Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative is an extension of the Caputo fractional derivative and the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative, offering a more adaptable framework for representing intricate systems [34].

    The Elzaki transform and other transforms, including Laplace and Fourier transforms, are unified to a generalized integral transform [35].

    The Elzaki transform, developed by Elzaki, is a variation of the existing Sumudu transform and is derived from the classical Fourier integral. The Elzaki transform's mathematical simplicity enables the efficient solution of ordinary and partial differential equations in the time domain [36,37,38,39].

    Several powerful numerical methodologies were formed in the scientific literature, and various distinguished scientists made significant contributions to this subject. These approaches comprise the Adomian decomposition method (ADM) [40], the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) [41,42,43], the homotopy analysis method (HAM) [44], the fractional natural transform decomposition method (FNTDM) [45], the Elzaki transform differential transform method (ETDTM) [46], the homotopy perturbation Elzaki transform method [47,48,49], the Elzaki variational iteration method [50], the differential transform method [51,52], the He-Elzaki method [53], the Li-He's modified homotopy perturbation method [54], the Aboodh transform homotopy perturbation method (ATHPM) [55], and the conformable Laplace decomposition method (CLDM) [56].

    Amplitude equations can be used to simulate various striped patterns, such as the fluctuations in sand and the lines on seashells. The Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation (NWSE) holds significant importance in the field of applied sciences as one of the most crucial amplitude equations. This demonstrates the manifestation of stripes in two-dimensional systems [56,57,58,59,60].

    The classical NWSE is formed as [56,57,58,59,60]

    ut(x,t)=ϱ2u(x,t)t2+ou(x,t)ρuI(x,t),t0,xR, (1.1)

    where IZ+, ϱ,o,ρR. The initial condition of Eq (1.1) is u(x,0)=δ.

    The NWSE holds great importance in the examination of pattern creation in diverse physical and biological systems. The NWSE is significant in various application domains due to its importance. The NWSE is a mathematical model that can be used to describe how chemical concentrations change over time and space in reaction-diffusion systems. Understanding the creation of spatial patterns, such as chemical waves and Turing patterns, is crucial. The NWSE is employed to simulate biological pattern production, including the formation of animal coats, the distribution of animal spots and stripes, and the branching of nerve cells. These patterns frequently emerge as the result of reaction-diffusion processes that include chemical signaling. The NWSE is used in the fields of physics and material science to analyze pattern generation in systems such as solidification fronts, where the boundary between solid and liquid phases displays intricate patterns. The NWSE has been utilized to investigate pattern development in fluid dynamics, specifically the emergence of hexagonal convection cells in Rayleigh-Bénard convection. The NWSE is utilized in neuroscience to simulate the transmission of electrical signals in neural networks, a crucial aspect for comprehending brain function and information processing. The NWSE is crucial as it offers a mathematical framework to comprehend the emergence of intricate patterns from basic physical and chemical processes. It aids researchers in comprehending the mechanics underlying pattern development and can provide valuable insights into the self-organization of natural systems [60].

    By adding the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative to the NWSE, we incorporate a memory effect that reflects the system's history and non-local interactions. This is particularly useful in modeling systems where memory and non-local effects play a significant role in dynamics, such as in materials science, biology (for example, in describing anomalous transport in cells), and various physical processes involving complex interactions over time [61,62].

    In this paper, we examine Caputo-Fabrizio NWSE:

    CFt0Dμtu(x,t)=2u(x,t)x2+2u(x,t)3u2(x,t),μ(0,1] (1.2)

    with the initial condition

    u(x,0)=δ.

    The primary objective of this study is to present a novel approach, known as the Caputo-Fabrizio q-Elzaki homotopy analysis transform method (CFq-EHATM), which is combined with the Caputo-Fabrizio Elzaki transform and q-homotopy analysis transform method. The secondary objective of this study is to acquire the novel numerical solutions for the Caputo-Fabrizio NWSE by the utilization of the CFq-EHATM.

    The following portion of the research is provided in further detail. Section 2 of the document provides the basic concepts of fractional derivatives and introduces the Caputo-Fabrizio Elzaki transform (CFET) as a method for calculating these derivatives. Section 3 introduces the CFq-EHATM, which stands for the Caputo-Fabrizio q-Elzaki homotopy analysis transform method. In Section 4, we present the numerical solutions of the Caputo-Fabrizio Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation. Section 5 provides the concluding remarks or results.

    In this section, the basic definitions and theorems will be given.

    Definition 2.1. [62] Suppose that g is a differentiable function. The Caputo derivative of order μ(0,1) is defined by

    t0CDμt[g(t)]=1Γ(nμ)t0g(n)(s)(ts)1+μnds,n1<μn. (2.1)

    Definition 2.2. [63] The He's fractional derivative of order μ of the function g(t) is defined as

    Dμt[g(t)]=1Γ(nμ)dndtntt0(st)nμ1[g0(s)g(s)]ds. (2.2)

    Definition 2.3. [64] The Atangana-Baleanu (AB) fractional derivative of order μ>0 of the function g(t) is defined by

    t0ABDμt[g(t)]=N(μ)1μt0g'(τ)Eμ[μ(tτ)μ1μ]dτ,0<μ1, (2.3)

    where normalization function N(μ) is equal to 1 when μ=0,μ=1 is represented by N(μ), and Eμ represents the Mittag-Leffler function.

    Definition 2.4. [61] The Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) fractional derivative of order μ>0 for the function g(t) is defined by

    CFt0Dμ0,t[g(t)]=M(μ)1μt0g'(τ)exp[μ(tτ)1μ]dτ,τ>0, (2.4)

    where M(μ) is the normalization function such that M(0)=M(1)=1, and gH1(a,b),b>a.

    Definition 2.5. [61] The Caputo-Fabrizio Elzaki transform (ET) of the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative (CFD) for the function g(t) is defined by

    CFt0Eμ{CFt0Dμt[g(t)]}=11μ+μw(CFt0Eμ[g(t)]w2g(0)),0<μ1. (2.5)

    Now, analyze the time-fractional partial differential equations [65]:

    Dμtw(x,t)+Kw(x,t)+Sw(x,t)=ζ(x,t),t(0,),n1<μn, (2.6)

    where K and S are linear and nonlinear operators, ζ(x,t) is a nonhomogeneous function, and Dμt is Caputo fractional derivative of order μ.

    Applying the Laplace transform to Eq (2.6) and using the initial condition, then Eq (2.7) is found by

    L[w(x,t)]1sμn1k=0sμk1w(k)w(x,y,0)+1sμL[Kw(x,t)]+1sμL[Sw(x,t)]=1sμL[ζ(x,t)]. (2.7)

    Via the homotopy analysis method, the nonlinear operator of ψ(x,t;q) is described by

    N[ψ(x,t;q)]=L[ψ(x,t;q)]1sμn1k=0sμk1ψ(k)(x,t;q)(0+)+1sμL[Kψ(x,t;q)]+1sμL[Sψ(x,t;q)]1sμL[ζ(x,t)], (2.8)

    where qϵ[0,1n].

    A homotopy is generated by

    (1nq)L[ψ(x,t;q)w0(x,t)]=hqH(x,t)S[ψ(x,t;q)], (2.9)

    where h0 is an auxiliary parameter and L represents Laplace transform. For q=0 and q=1n, the outcomes of Eq (2.9) are found by

    ψ(x,t;0)=w0(x,t),ψ(x,t;1n)=w(x,t). (2.10)

    Therefore, when q increases from 0 to 1/n, the solution ϕ(x,t;q) converges from w0(x,t) to the solution w(x,t). Using the Taylor theorem around q, then it is found by

    ψ(x,t;q)=w0(x,t)+i=1wm(x,t)qm, (2.11)

    where

    wm(x,t)=1m!mψ(x,t;q)qm|q=0. (2.12)

    Equation (2.11) converges at q=1n for the convenient w0(x,t), n and h. Therefore, the numerical solution of the nonlinear equation is obtained as

    w(x,t)=w0(x,t)+m=1wm(x,t)(1n)m. (2.13)

    Differentiating the 0-th order deformation Eq (2.11) m-times with respect to q and dividing by m!, thus for q=0, one obtains

    L[wm(x,t)kmwm1(x,t)]=hH(x,t)Rm(wm1), (2.14)

    where the vectors are given as

    wm={w0(x,t),w1(x,t),,wm(x,t)}. (2.15)

    When inverse Laplace transform is used on Eq (2.14), the result is acquired as

    wm(x,t)=kmwm1(x,t)+L1[hH(x,t)Rm(wm1)], (2.16)

    where

    Rm(wm1)=L[wm1(x,t)](1kmn)1sμn1k=0sμk1w(k)(x,0)+1sμL[Kwm1(x,t)+Hm1(x,t)ζ(x,t)] (2.17)

    and

    km={0,m1,n,m>1, (2.18)

    where Hm is homotopy polynomials and it is presented as

    Hm1=1(m1)!m1ψ(x,t;q)qm1|q=0,ψ(x,t;q)=ψ0+qψ1+q2ψ2+. (2.19)

    Utilizing Eqs (2.16) and (2.17), one obtains

    wm(x,t)=(km+h)wm1(x,t)(1kmn)1sμn1k=0sμk1w(k)(x,0)+h(L)1[(1sμL[Kwm1(x,t)+Hm1(x,t)ζ(x,t)])]. (2.20)

    Via q-homotopy analysis transform method, then it is obtained as

    w(x,t)=m=0wm(x,t). (2.21)

    In this part, we present the CFq-EHATM, which combines with Caputo-Fabrizio Elzaki transform and q-homotopy analysis transform method.

    Consider the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional order nonlinear partial differential equation (CFTFNPDE) to give the main idea of CFq-EHATM:

    CFt0Dμtu(ξ,τ)+Au(ξ,τ)+Hu(ξ,τ)=ζ(ξ,τ),n1<μn, (3.1)

    where A and H are linear and nonlinear operators, ζ(ξ,τ) is a nonhomogeneous function, and CFt0Dμt is CFD of order μ.

    Step 1. By applying the CFET to Eq (3.1) and utilizing the initial condition, Eq (3.2) can be determined by

    (CFt0Eμ[u(ξ,τ)]w2u(ξ,0))1μ+μw+CFt0Eμ[Au(ξ,τ)+Hu(ξ,τ)]=CFt0Eμ[ζ(ξ,τ)]. (3.2)

    Rewriting the Eq (3.2), Eq (3.3) is obtained by

    CFt0Eμ[u(ξ,τ)]w2u(ξ,0)+(1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[Au(ξ,τ)+Hu(ξ,τ)](1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[ζ(ξ,τ)]=0. (3.3)

    Step 2. Via the HAM, the nonlinear operator of u(ξ,τ;q) is described by

    N1[u(ξ,τ;q)]=CFt0Eμ[u(ξ,τ;q)]w2u(ξ,τ;q)(0+)+(1μ+μw)[CFt0Eμ(Au(ξ,τ)+Hu(ξ,τ)ζ(ξ,τ))], (3.4)

    where qϵ[0,1n].

    A homotopy is generated by

    (1nq)CFt0Eμ[u(ξ,τ;q)u0(ξ,τ)]=qH(ξ,τ)CFt0Eμ[u(ξ,τ;q)], (3.5)

    where CFt0Eμ signifies CFET and 0 is an auxiliary parameter. The outcomes of Eq (3.5) are determined for q=0 and q=1n by

    u(ξ,τ;0)=u0(ξ,τ),u(ξ,τ;1n)=u(ξ,τ). (3.6)

    With q increasing from 0 to 1/n, u(ξ,τ;q) converges to the solution u(ξ,τ) from u0(ξ,τ).

    When the Taylor theorem is applied to q, the result is found by

    u(ξ,τ;q)=u0(ξ,τ)+i=1um(ξ,τ)qm, (3.7)

    where

    um(ξ,τ)=1m!mu(ξ,τ;q)qm|q=0. (3.8)

    For u0(ξ,τ), n and , which are convenient, Eq (3.7) converges at q=1n.

    By dividing by m! and differentiating the 0-th order deformation Eq (3.5) m times with regard to q, one obtains for q=0,

    CFt0Eμ[um(ξ,τ)kmum1(ξ,τ)]=H1(ξ,τ)R1,m(um1). (3.9)

    Step 3. When inverse CFET (ICFET) is used on Eq (3.9), the result is acquired as

    um(ξ,τ)=kmum1(ξ,τ)+(CFt0Eμ)1[H1(ξ,τ)R1,m(um1)], (3.10)

    where

    R1,m(um1)=CFt0Eμ[um1(ξ,τ)]w2(1kmn)u0(ξ,τ)+(1μ+μw)[CFt0Eμ[Au(ξ,τ)+Hu(ξ,τ)ζ(ξ,τ)]] (3.11)

    and

    km={0,m1,n,m>1, (3.12)

    where H1 is homotopy polynomials and it is presented as

    CFt0Eμ[um(ξ,τ)kmum1(ξ,τ)]=H1(ξ,τ)R1,m(um1) (3.13)

    and

    H1=1m!mu(x,t;q)qm|q=0,u(ξ,τ;q)=u0+qu1+q2u2+ (3.14)

    Utilizing Eqs (3.10) and (3.11), one obtains

    um(ξ,τ)=(km+)um1(ξ,τ)w2(1kmn)u0(ξ,τ)+(CFt0Eμ)1[(1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[Aum1(ξ,τ)+H1m1(ξ,τ)ζ(ξ,τ)]]. (3.15)

    Step 4. It is then acquired via CFq-EHATM as

    u(ξ,τ)=u0(ξ,τ)+c=1uc(ξ,τ)(1n)c. (3.16)

    Theorem 4.1. (Uniqueness theorem) [66,67] The solution for the nonlinear Caputo-Fabrizio fractional partial differential Eq (3.1) acquired by CFq-EHATM is unique for μϵ(0,1), where μ=(n+)+(ϖ+υ)Y.

    Proof. The solution of nonlinear Caputo-Fabrizio FPDEs Eq (3.1) is presented as

    ϕ(ξ,τ)=c=1ϕc(ξ,τ)(1n)c, (4.1)

    where

    ϕm(ξ,τ)=(km+)ϕm1(ξ,τ)w2(1kmn)ϕ0(ξ,τ)+(CFt0Eμ)1[(1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[Aum1(ξ,τ)+H1m1(ξ,τ)ζ(ξ,τ)]]. (4.2)

    Let ϕ and φ are two distinct solutions of Eq (3.1), then it is obtained as

    |ϕφ|=|(n+h)(ϕφ)+h(CFt0Eμ)1[(1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[A(ϕφ)+H(ϕφ)]]|. (4.3)

    Via the convolution theorem for the CFET, we have

    |ϕφ|(n+h)|ϕφ|+ht0(|A(ϕφ)|+|H(ϕφ)|)(tτ)μΓ(1+μ)dτ(n+h)|ϕφ|+ht0(ϖ|ϕφ|+υ|ϕφ|)(tτ)μΓ(1+μ)dτ. (4.4)

    Utilizing the integral mean-value theorem (IMVT), then we obtain

    |ϕφ|(n+h)|ϕφ|+h(ϖ|ϕφ|+υ|ϕφ|)Yα|ϕφ|. (4.5)

    Thus, we have (1τ)|ϕφ|0. For τ(0,1), thus, |ϕφ|=0. For μ(0,1), that is ϕ=φ. Therefore, the solution is unique.

    Theorem 4.2. (Convergence theorem) [66,67] Let X is a Banach space (BS) and G:XX is a nonlinear mapping. Assume that the inequality

    G(a)G(h)γah,a,bX (4.6)

    holds, then G has a fixed point in view of Banach fixed point theory. Also, for the arbitrary selection of a0,b0X, the sequence created by the CFq-EHATM converges to a fixed point of G and

    φmφnγn1γφ1φ0,a,bX. (4.7)

    Proof. Let a BS (C[J],.) of all continuous functions on J via the norm expressed as g(t=maxtJ|g(t)|.

    We show that the sequence {φn} is a Cauchy sequence in the BS:

    φmφn=maxtJ|φmφn|=maxtJ|(n+h)(φm1φn1)+h(CFt0Eμ)1[(1μ+μw)×CFt0Eμ[A(φm1φn1)+H(φm1φn1)]|maxtJ[(n+h)|φm1φn1|+h(CFt0Eμ)1[(1μ+μw)×(CFt0Eμ)1(A|φm1φn1|+H|φm1φn1|)]]. (4.8)

    Via the convolution theorem for the CFET, then we obtain

    φmφnmaxtJ[(n+h)|φm1φn1|+(n+h)|φm1φn1|+ht0(A|φm1φn1|+H|φm1φn1|)(tτ)μΓ(1+μ)maxtJ[(n+h)|φm1φn1|+(n+h)|φm1φn1|+ht0(ϖ|φm1φn1|+υ|φm1φn1|)(tτ)μΓ(1+μ)dτ]. (4.9)

    Using the IMVT, then we have

    φmφnmaxtJ[(n+h)|φm1φn1|+h(ρ|φm1φn1|+δ|φm1φn1|)Y]τφm1φn1. (4.10)

    Let m=n+1, then we obtain

    φn+1φnτφnφn1τ2φn1φn2τnφ1φ0. (4.11)

    Via the triangular inequality, we obtain

    φmφnφn+1φn+φn+2φn+1++φmφm1[τn+τn+1++τm1]φ1φ0τn[1+τ+τ2++τmn1]φ1φ0τn[1τmn11τ]φ1φ0. (4.12)

    Since τ(0,1), 1τmn1<1, then we obtain

    φmφnτn1τφ1φ0. (4.13)

    For φ1φ0<, so as m, then φmφn0. Thus, the sequence {φn} is Cauchy sequence in C[J], and so the sequence is convergent.

    The part aims to present visual representations of the time-fractional coupled Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation in a Caputo-Fabrizio sense.

    Example 5.1. Consider the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional NWSE (CFTFNWSE)

    CFt0Dμtu(x,t)=2u(x,t)x2+2u(x,t)3u2(x,t),μ(0,1] (5.1)

    with the initial condition

    u(x,0)=δ. (5.2)

    CFET is applied to Eq (5.1), and by employing Eq (5.2), then we obtain

    CFt0Eμ[u(x,t)]w2u(x,0)(1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[2u(x,t)x2+2u(x,t)3u2(x,t)]=0. (5.3)

    The nonlinear operator is defined by employing Eq (5.3):

    N1[ϕ(x,t;q)]=CFt0Eμ[ϕ(x,t;q)]δw2(1μ+μw)×CFt0Eμ[2ϕ(x,t;q)x2+2ϕ(x,t;q)3ϕ2(x,t;q)]. (5.4)

    The m-th order deformation equation is defined by the application of the proposed algorithm:

    CFt0Eμ[um(x,t)kmum1(x,t)]=hR1,m[um1], (5.5)

    where

    R1,m[um1(x,t)]=CFt0Eμ[um1(x,t)]δw2(1kmn)(1μ+μw)CFt0Eμ[2um1(x,t)x2+2um1(x,t)3m1r=0urum1rx]. (5.6)

    By utilizing the ICFET to Eq (5.5), we obtain

    um(x,t)=kmum1(x,t)+h(CFt0Eμ)1{R1,m[um1(x,t)]}. (5.7)

    By employing initial conditions, we obtain

    u0(x,t)=δ. (5.8)

    To get the value of u1(x,t), we substitute m=1 into Eq (5.7), resulting in the following expression:

    u1(x,t)=h(2δ3δ2)(1μ+μt). (5.9)

    In a similar vein, by substituting m=2 into Eq (5.7), then we obtain the value for u2(x,t):

    u2(x,t)=(n+h)(h(2δ3δ2)(1μ+μt))+h2(2δ3δ2)(26δ)[(1μ)2+2μt2μ2t+μ2t2)]. (5.10)

    By employing this approach, it is possible to identify the remaining terms. The solution of the CFTFNWSE is determined via the CFq-EHATM

    u(x,t)=u0(x,t)+m=1um(x,t)(1n)m. (5.11)

    By substituting μ=1,n=1,h=1 into Eq (5.11), we have that the resulting outcomes, denoted as Mm=1um(x,t)(1n)m converge to the exact solutions u(x,t)=23δexp(2t)23+δδexp(2t) of the CFTFNWSE when M.

    Figure 1 displays the 3D graphical representations of CFq-EHATM, the exact solution, and the absolute error for u(x,t).

    Figure 1.  (a) Nature of CFq-EHATM solution u(x,t), (b) Nature of exact solution u(x,t), (c) Nature of absolute error = |uexactuCFqEHATM| at δ=1,h=1,n=1,μ=1.

    Figure 2 shows the two-dimensional graphical representations of CFq-EHATM for u(x,t) solution and the exact solution for different μ values.

    Figure 2.  The comparison of the CFq-EHATM solutions for u(x,t) when xR,δ=1,h=1,n=1 with different μ.

    Table 1 shows the numerical solution of u(x,t) obtained from the solution of CFTFNWSE with CFq-EHATM for different x,t andμ values.

    Table 1.  Comparision ATHPM [55], CLDM [56] and CFq-EHATM solutions u(x,t) for CFTFNWSE at δ=1,μ=1,h=1,n=1with values of t.
    t |uexactuATHPM| |uexactuCLDM| |uexactuCFqEHATM|
    0.001 8.0×107 7.5×107 2.8×108
    0.002 1.8×106 1.5×106 1.1×107
    0.003 2.5×106 2.2×106 2.6×107
    0.004 3.5×106 3.0×106 4.6×107
    0.005 3.9×106 3.7×106 7.2×107
    0.006 4.8×106 4.5×106 1.0×107
    0.007 5.5×106 5.2×106 1.4×107
    0.008 6.3×106 6.0×106 1.8×107
    0.009 6.3×106 6.0×106 2.3×107
    0.010 7.8×106 7.0×106 2.9×107

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Figure 1 shows the 3D graphs of the numerical solution obtained using CFq-EHATM, together with the exact solution and the absolute error between the Cq-FHATM solutions and the exact solution for the CFTFNWSE. Figure 2 shows the 2D graphs of the solutions u(x,t) of the CFTFNWSE which derived using the CFq-EHATM for different μ values.

    Figure 2 illustrates that as the μ value approaches one, the temperature u(x,t) reaches a state of convergence. The absolute errors of the third-order CFq-EHATM solution were found and are presented in Table 1. According to Table 1, the absolute error experiences a substantial increase when both the values of the space variable x and the value of time t increases. Table 1 illustrates that the CFq-EHATM produces significantly more reliable outcomes compared to ATHPM and CLDM.

    In this article, numerical solutions of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation were obtained for the first time with a new method, CF-qEHATM. It is essential to illustrate the influence of the fractional operator incorporated in the model being examined. Furthermore, the MAPLE software has been utilized to generate 2D and 3D graphs that visually represent the solutions to this system for different values of μ. The Maple software exhibits a significant range of variations in the fundamental structure of surface graphs produced for Eq (5.10). In addition, the MAPLE software was used to provide visual depictions of the numerical solutions of this system for μ=1. Upon evaluating CFTFNWSE, it becomes apparent that the overall configuration of surface graphs produced in Maple software differs. The numerical solutions for CFTFNWSE have been promptly and efficiently obtained. It is seen in Table 1 that the numerical results obtained with CFq-EHATM are better than the results found with ATHPM and CLDM in the current literature. It is concluded that the proposed CFq-EHATM is a more effective method than ATHPM and CLDM. Therefore, the proposed method can be used to obtain the new numerical solutions of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional partial differential equations.

    Aslı Alkan: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Resources, Writing–original draft; Halil Anaç: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



    [1] S. Qureshi, N. A. Rangaig, D. Baleanu, New numerical aspects of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative operator, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7040374 doi: 10.3390/math7040374
    [2] J. Soontharanon, S. Chasreechai, T. Sitthiwirattham, A coupled system of fractional difference equations with nonlocal fractional sum boundary conditions on the discrete half-line, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030256 doi: 10.3390/math7030256
    [3] K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993.
    [4] M. Dalir, M. Bashour, Applications of fractional calculus, Appl. Math. Sci., 4 (2010), 1021–1032.
    [5] D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas, J. J. Trujillo, Fractional calculus: models and numerical methods, World Scientific, 2012.
    [6] F. Mainardi, A note on the equivalence of fractional relaxation equations to differential equations with varying coefficients, Mathematics, 6 (2018), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6010008 doi: 10.3390/math6010008
    [7] K. M. Owolabi, A. Atangana, Chaotic behaviour in system of noninteger-order ordinary differential equations, Chaos Solitons Fract., 115 (2018), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.07.034 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.07.034
    [8] K. M. Owolabi, A. Atangana, Numerical simulations of chaotic and complex spatiotemporal patterns in fractional reaction-diffusion systems, Comput. Appl. Math., 37 (2018), 2166–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0445-x doi: 10.1007/s40314-017-0445-x
    [9] N. A. Rangaig, V. C. Convicto, On fractional modelling of dye removal using fractional derivative with non-singular kernel, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 31 (2019), 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2018.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2018.01.006
    [10] N. A. Rangaig, A. A. G. Pido, C. T. Pada-Dulpina, On the fractional-order dynamics of a double pendulum with a forcing constraint using the nonsingular fractional derivative approach, J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech., 19 (2020), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2020.2.08 doi: 10.17512/jamcm.2020.2.08
    [11] P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, D. Baleanu, An efficient numerical technique for the nonlinear fractional Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030265 doi: 10.3390/math7030265
    [12] P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, H. M. Baskonus, Novel simulations to the time-fractional Fisher's equation, Math. Sci., 13 (2019), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-019-0276-6 doi: 10.1007/s40096-019-0276-6
    [13] A. Alkan, T. Akturk, H. Bulut, The travelıng wave solutıons of the conformable time-fractıonal zoomeron equation by usıng the modıfıed exponentıal functıon method, Eskişehir Tech. Univ. J. Sci. Tech. A Appl. Sci. Eng., 25 (2024), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1370631 doi: 10.18038/estubtda.1370631
    [14] C. Li, F. Zeng, Numerical methods for fractional calculus, New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18503
    [15] N. A. Sheikh, F. Ali, M. Saqib, I. Khan, S. A. A. Jan, A. S. Alshomrani, et al., Comparison and analysis of the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives for generalized Casson fluid model with heat generation and chemical reaction, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.01.025 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.01.025
    [16] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, Caputo-Fabrizio derivative applied to groundwater flow within confined aquifer, J. Eng. Mech., 143 (2017), D4016005.
    [17] K. Diethelm, N. J. Ford, Analysis of fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 265 (2002), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.7194 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7194
    [18] R. Hilfer, Y. Luchko, Desiderata for fractional derivatives and integrals, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020149 doi: 10.3390/math7020149
    [19] A. Yusuf, M. Inc, A. I. Aliyu, D. Baleanu, Efficiency of the new fractional derivative with nonsingular Mittag-Leffler kernel to some nonlinear partial differential equations, Chaos Solitons Fract., 116 (2018), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.036 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.036
    [20] M. Inc, A. Yusuf, A. I. Aliyu, D. Baleanu, Investigation of the logarithmic-KdV equation involving Mittag-Leffler type kernel with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, Phys. A, 506 (2018), 520–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.092 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.092
    [21] M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, Applications of new time and spatial fractional derivatives with exponential kernels, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 2 (2016), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/pfda/020101
    [22] X. J. Yang, H. M. Srivastava, J. A. T. Machado, A new fractional derivative without singular kernel: application to the modelling of the steady heat flow, Thermal Sci., 20 (2016), 753–756. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI151224222Y doi: 10.2298/TSCI151224222Y
    [23] K. Diethelm, N. J. Ford, A. D. Freed, A predictor-corrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 29 (2002), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016592219341 doi: 10.1023/A:1016592219341
    [24] K. Diethelm, N. J. Ford, A. D. Freed, Detailed error analysis for a fractional Adams method, Numer. Algorithms, 36 (2004), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NUMA.0000027736.85078.be doi: 10.1023/B:NUMA.0000027736.85078.be
    [25] K. Diethelm, N. J. Ford, A. D. Freed, Y. Luchko, Algorithms for the fractional calculus: a selection of numerical methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194 (2005), 743–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.006
    [26] R. Garrappa, Numerical solution of fractional differential equations: a survey and a software tutorial, Mathematics, 6 (2018), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6020016 doi: 10.3390/math6020016
    [27] K. L. Wang, C. H. He, A remark on Wang's fractal variational principle, Fractals, 27 (2019), 1950134. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X19501342 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X19501342
    [28] Y. H. Wei, Y. Q. Chen, S. S. Cheng, Y. Wang, A note on short memory principle of fractional calculus, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 1382–1404. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2017-0073 doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0073
    [29] M. Caputo, F. Mauro, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85.
    [30] J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92.
    [31] E. F. D. Goufo, Application of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative without singular kernel to Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation, Math. Model. Anal., 21 (2016), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.3846/13926292.2016.1145607 doi: 10.3846/13926292.2016.1145607
    [32] F. Ali, M. Saqib, I. Khan, N. A. Sheikh, Application of Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives to MHD free convection flow of generalized Walters'-B fluid model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 131 (2016), 377. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2016-16377-x doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2016-16377-x
    [33] A. Atangana, On the new fractional derivative and application to nonlinear Fisher's reaction-diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 273 (2016), 948–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.10.021 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.10.021
    [34] D. Baleanu, A. Jajarmi, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A new study on the mathematical modelling of human liver with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Chaos Solitons Fract., 134 (2020), 109705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705
    [35] J. H. He, N. Anjum, C. H. He, A. A. Alsolami, Beyond Laplace and Fourier transforms challenges and future prospects, Thermal Sci., 27 (2023), 5075–5089. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI230804224H doi: 10.2298/TSCI230804224H
    [36] T. M. Elzaki, The new integral transform Elzaki transform, Global J. Pure Appl. Math., 7 (2011), 57–64.
    [37] T. M. Elzaki, Applications of new transform "Elzaki transform" to partial differential equations, Global J. Pure Appl. Math., 7 (2011), 65–70.
    [38] T. M. Elzaki, S. M. Elzaki, On the Elzaki transform and ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients, Adv. Theor. Appl. Math., 6 (2011), 41–46.
    [39] T. M. Elzaki, S. M. Elzaki, E. A. Elnour, Applications of new transform "Elzaki transform" to mechanics, electrical circuits and beams problems, Global J. Pure Appl. Math., 4 (2012), 25–34.
    [40] A. M. Wazwaz, A reliable modification of Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 102 (1999), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10024-3 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10024-3
    [41] J. H. He, Homotopy perturbation method: a new nonlinear analytical technique, Appl. Math. Comput., 135 (2003), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(01)00312-5 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(01)00312-5
    [42] J. H. He, Homotopy perturbation method for solving boundary value problems, Phys. Lett. A, 350 (2006), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.10.005
    [43] M. Y. Adamu, P. Ogenyi, New approach to parameterized homotopy perturbation method, Thermal Sci., 22 (2018), 1865–1870. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI1804865A doi: 10.2298/TSCI1804865A
    [44] A. Alkan, Improving homotopy analysis method with an optimal parameter for time-fractional Burgers equation, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Ü niv. Mühendislik Doğa Bilim. Derg., 4 (2022), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.55213/kmujens.1206517 doi: 10.55213/kmujens.1206517
    [45] A. Alkan, H. Anaç , The novel numerical solutions for time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation by using fractional natural transform decomposition method, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 25333–25359. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241237 doi: 10.3934/math.20241237
    [46] T. M. Elzaki, Solution of nonlinear differential equations using mixture of Elzaki transform and differential transform method, Int. Math. Forum, 7 (2012), 631–638.
    [47] T. M. Elzaki, E. M. A. Hilal, Homotopy perturbation and Elzaki transform for solving nonlinear partial differential equations, Math. Theory Model., 2 (2012), 33–42.
    [48] T. M. Elzaki, H. Kim, The solution of radial diffusivity and shock wave equations by Elzaki variational iteration method, Int. J. Math. Anal., 9 (2015), 1065–1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2015.5242
    [49] R. M. Jena, S. Chakraverty, Solving time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations using homotopy perturbation Elzaki transform, SN Appl. Sci., 1 (2019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-018-0016-9 doi: 10.1007/s42452-018-0016-9
    [50] H. Anaç , M. Merdan, T. Kesemen, Homotopy perturbation Elzaki transform method for obtaining the approximate solutions of the random partial differential equations, Gazi Univ. J. Sci., 35 (2022), 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.798705 doi: 10.35378/gujs.798705
    [51] M. Merdan, H. Anaç , Z. Bekiryazıcı, T. Kesemen, Solving of some random partial differential equations by using differential transformation method and Laplace-Padé method, Gümüşhane Ü niv. Fen Bilimleri Derg., 9 (2019), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.404332 doi: 10.17714/gumusfenbil.404332
    [52] F. Ayaz, Solutions of the system of differential equations by differential transform method, Appl. Math. Comput., 147 (2004), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00794-4 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00794-4
    [53] J. U. Rahman, D. C. Lu, M. Suleman, J. H. He, M. Ramzan, He-Elzaki method for spatial diffusion of biological population, Fractals, 27 (2019), 1950069. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X19500695 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X19500695
    [54] N. Anjum, J. H. He, Q. T. Ain, D. Tian, Li-He's modified homotopy perturbation method for doubly-clamped electrically actuated microbeams-based microelectromechanical system, Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng., 19 (2021), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210112025A doi: 10.22190/FUME210112025A
    [55] H. P. Jani, T. R. Singh, Aboodh transform homotopy perturbation method for solving fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 47 (2024), 12028–12043. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8886 doi: 10.1002/mma.8886
    [56] M. Ayata, O. Ozkan, A new application of conformable Laplace decomposition method for fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 7402–7412. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020474 doi: 10.3934/math.2020474
    [57] A. C. Newell, J. A. Whitehead, Finite bandwidth, finite amplitude convection, J. Fluid Mech., 38 (1969), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112069000176 doi: 10.1017/S0022112069000176
    [58] U. Bektaş, H. Anaç , A hybrid method to solve a fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, Bound. Value Probl., 2024 (2024), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-023-01795-2 doi: 10.1186/s13661-023-01795-2
    [59] A. Prakash, M. Goyal, S. Gupta, Fractional variational iteration method for solving time-fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, Nonlinear Eng., 8 (2019), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2018-0001 doi: 10.1515/nleng-2018-0001
    [60] M. Areshi, A. Khan, R. Shah, K. Nonlaopon, Analytical investigation of fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equations via a novel transform, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 6936–6958. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022385 doi: 10.3934/math.2022385
    [61] S. Qureshi, N. A. Rangaig, D. Baleanu, New numerical aspects of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative operator, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7040374 doi: 10.3390/math7040374
    [62] K. L. Wang, S. W. Yao, Numerical method for fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations with He's fractional derivative, Thermal Sci., 23 (2019), 2163–2170. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI1904163W doi: 10.2298/TSCI1904163W
    [63] M. A. Hussein, Using the Elzaki decomposition method to solve nonlinear fractional differential equations with the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional operator, Baghdad Sci. J., 21 (2024), 1044–1054. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2023.7310 doi: 10.21123/bsj.2023.7310
    [64] D. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Baleanu, A new analysis for fractional model of regularized long-wave equation arising in ion acoustic plasma waves, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 5642–5653. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4414 doi: 10.1002/mma.4414
    [65] P. Veeresha, D. G. Prakasha, H. M. Baskonus, Solving smoking epidemic model of fractional order using a modified homotopy analysis transform method, Math. Sci., 13 (2019), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-019-0284-6 doi: 10.1007/s40096-019-0284-6
    [66] Á. A. Magreñán, A new tool to study real dynamics: the convergence plane, Appl. Math. Comput., 248 (2014), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.061 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.061
    [67] F. Haroon, S. Mukhtar, R. Shah, Fractional view analysis of Fornberg-Whitham equations by using Elzaki transform, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102118 doi: 10.3390/sym14102118
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yasin Şahin, Mehmet Merdan, The Solutions of Caputo-Fabrizio Random Fractional Ordinary Differential Equations by Aboodh Transform Method, 2025, 18, 1307-9085, 149, 10.18185/erzifbed.1543499
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(681) PDF downloads(71) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog