The major objective of this scheme is to investigate both the existence and the uniqueness of a solution to an integro-differential equation of the second order that contains the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and integral, as well as the q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. The equation in question is known as the integro-differential equation of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and integral. This equation has not been studied before and has great importance in life applications. An investigation is being done into the solution's continued reliance. The Schauder fixed-point theorem is what is used to demonstrate that there is a solution to the equation that is being looked at. In addition, we are able to derive a numerical solution to the problem that has been stated by combining the Simpson's approach with the cubic-b spline method and the finite difference method with the trapezoidal method. We will be making use of the definitions of the fractional derivative and integral provided by Caputo-Fabrizio, as well as the definition of the q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. The integral portion of the problem will be handled using trapezoidal and Simpson's methods, while the derivative portion will be solved using cubic-b spline and finite difference methods. After that, the issue will be recast as a series of equations requiring algebraic thinking. By working through this problem together, we are able to find the answer. In conclusion, we present two numerical examples and contrast the outcomes of those examples with the exact solutions to those problems.
Citation: Khalid K. Ali, K. R. Raslan, Amira Abd-Elall Ibrahim, Mohamed S. Mohamed. On study the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio integro differential equation including the fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18206-18222. doi: 10.3934/math.2023925
[1] | Ibtisam Aldawish, Mohamed Jleli, Bessem Samet . Blow-up of solutions to fractional differential inequalities involving ψ-Caputo fractional derivatives of different orders. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 9189-9205. doi: 10.3934/math.2022509 |
[2] | Tao Yan, Ghulam Farid, Sidra Bibi, Kamsing Nonlaopon . On Caputo fractional derivative inequalities by using strongly (α,h−m)-convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10165-10179. doi: 10.3934/math.2022565 |
[3] | Muhammad Tariq, Asif Ali Shaikh, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25572-25610. doi: 10.3934/math.20231306 |
[4] | Hadjer Belbali, Maamar Benbachir, Sina Etemad, Choonkil Park, Shahram Rezapour . Existence theory and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability for a nonlinear Caputo-Hadamard FIVP via the Lyapunov method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14419-14433. doi: 10.3934/math.2022794 |
[5] | Choukri Derbazi, Hadda Hammouche . Caputo-Hadamard fractional differential equations with nonlocal fractional integro-differential boundary conditions via topological degree theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2694-2709. doi: 10.3934/math.2020174 |
[6] | Deepak B. Pachpatte . On some ψ Caputo fractional Čebyšev like inequalities for functions of two and three variables. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2244-2260. doi: 10.3934/math.2020148 |
[7] | M. A. Zaky, M. Babatin, M. Hammad, A. Akgül, A. S. Hendy . Efficient spectral collocation method for nonlinear systems of fractional pantograph delay differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15246-15262. doi: 10.3934/math.2024740 |
[8] | M. J. Huntul . Inverse source problems for multi-parameter space-time fractional differential equations with bi-fractional Laplacian operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32734-32756. doi: 10.3934/math.20241566 |
[9] | Imran Abbas Baloch, Thabet Abdeljawad, Sidra Bibi, Aiman Mukheimer, Ghulam Farid, Absar Ul Haq . Some new Caputo fractional derivative inequalities for exponentially (θ,h−m)–convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3006-3026. doi: 10.3934/math.2022166 |
[10] | Muhammad Tariq, Hijaz Ahmad, Abdul Ghafoor Shaikh, Soubhagya Kumar Sahoo, Khaled Mohamed Khedher, Tuan Nguyen Gia . New fractional integral inequalities for preinvex functions involving Caputo-Fabrizio operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3440-3455. doi: 10.3934/math.2022191 |
The major objective of this scheme is to investigate both the existence and the uniqueness of a solution to an integro-differential equation of the second order that contains the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and integral, as well as the q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. The equation in question is known as the integro-differential equation of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and integral. This equation has not been studied before and has great importance in life applications. An investigation is being done into the solution's continued reliance. The Schauder fixed-point theorem is what is used to demonstrate that there is a solution to the equation that is being looked at. In addition, we are able to derive a numerical solution to the problem that has been stated by combining the Simpson's approach with the cubic-b spline method and the finite difference method with the trapezoidal method. We will be making use of the definitions of the fractional derivative and integral provided by Caputo-Fabrizio, as well as the definition of the q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. The integral portion of the problem will be handled using trapezoidal and Simpson's methods, while the derivative portion will be solved using cubic-b spline and finite difference methods. After that, the issue will be recast as a series of equations requiring algebraic thinking. By working through this problem together, we are able to find the answer. In conclusion, we present two numerical examples and contrast the outcomes of those examples with the exact solutions to those problems.
Time-fractional differential equations arise in the mathematical modeling of a variety of real-world phenomena in many areas of sciences and engineering, such as elasticity, heat transfer, circuits systems, continuum mechanics, fluid mechanics, wave theory, etc. For more details, we refer the reader to [4,6,7,8,14,15,17,24] and the references therein. Consequently, the study of time-fractional differential equations attracted much attention of many researchers (see e.g. [1,5,9,10,19,22,23] and the references therein).
Multi-time differential equations arise, for example, in analyzing frequency and amplitude modulation in oscillators, see Narayan and Roychowdhury [18]. Some methods for solving Multi-time differential equations can be found in [20,21].
The study of blowing-up solutions to time-fractional differential equations was initiated by Kirane and his collaborators, see e.g. [3,11,12,13]. In particular, Kirane et al. [11] considered the two-times fractional differential equation
{CDα0|tu(t,s)+CDβ0|s|u|m(t,s)=|u|p(t,s),t,s>0,u(0,s)=u0(s),u(t,0)=u1(t),t,s>0, | (1.1) |
where p,m>1, 0<α,β<1, CDα0|t is the Caputo fractional derivative of order α with respect to the first time-variable t, and CDβ0|s is the Caputo fractional derivative of order β with respect to the second time-variable s. Namely, the authors provided sufficient conditions for which any solution to (1.1) blows-up in a finite time. In the same reference, the authors extended their study to the case of systems.
In this paper, we investigate the nonexistence of global solutions to two-times-fractional differential inequalities of the form
{HCDαa|tu(t,s)+CDβa|s|u|m(t,s)≥(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|p(t,s),t,s>a,u(a,s)=u0(s),u(t,a)=u1(t),t,s>a, | (1.2) |
where p>1, m≥1, γ,σ∈R, a>0, 0<α,β<1, HCDαa|t is the Hadamard-Caputo fractional derivative of order α with respect to the first time-variable t, and CDβa|s is the Caputo fractional derivative of order β with respect to the second time-variable s. Using the test function method (see e.g. [16]) and a judicious choice of a test function, we establish sufficient conditions ensuring the nonexistence of global solutions to (1.2). Our obtained conditions depend on the parameters α,β,p,m,γ,σ, and the initial values.
Our motivation for considering problems of type (1.2) is to study the combination effect of the two fractional derivatives of different nature HCDαa|t and CDβa|s on the nonexistence of global solutions to (1.2). As far as we know, the study of nonexistence of global solutions for time fractional differential equations (or inequalities) involving both Hadamard-Caputo and Caputo fractional derivatives, was never considered in the literature.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we recall some concepts from fractional calculus and provide some useful lemmas. In Section 3, we state our main results and provide some examples. Section 4 is devoted to the proofs of our main results.
Let a,T∈R be such that 0<a<T. The left-sided and right-sided Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order θ>0 of a function ϑ∈L1([a,T]), are defined respectively by (see [10])
(Iθaϑ)(t)=1Γ(θ)∫ta(t−τ)θ−1ϑ(τ)dτ |
and
(IθTϑ)(t)=1Γ(θ)∫Tt(τ−t)θ−1ϑ(τ)dτ, |
for almost everywhere t∈[a,T], where Γ is the Gamma function.
Notice that, if ϑ∈C([a,T]), then Iθaϑ,IθTϑ∈C([a,T]) with
(Iθaϑ)(a)=(IθTϑ)(T)=0. | (2.1) |
The Caputo fractional derivative of order θ∈(0,1) of a function ϑ∈AC([a,∞)), is defined by (see [10])
CDθaϑ(t)=(I1−θaϑ′)(t)=1Γ(1−θ)∫ta(t−τ)−θϑ′(τ)dτ, |
for almost everywhere t≥a.
Lemma 2.1. [see [10]]Let κ>0, p,q≥1, and 1p+1q≤1+κ (p≠1, q≠1, in the case 1p+1q=1+κ). Let ϑ∈Lp([a,T] and w∈Lq([a,T]). Then
∫Ta(Iκaϑ)(t)w(t)dt=∫Taϑ(t)(IκTw)(t)dt. |
The left-sided and right-sided Hadamard fractional integrals of order θ>0 of a function ϑ∈L1([a,T]), are defined respectively by (see [10])
(Jθaϑ)(t)=1Γ(θ)∫ta(lntτ)θ−1ϑ(τ)1τdτ |
and
(JθTϑ)(t)=1Γ(θ)∫Tt(lnτt)θ−1ϑ(τ)1τdτ, |
for almost everywhere t∈[a,T].
Notice that, if ϑ∈C([a,T]), then Jθaϑ,JθTϑ∈C([a,T]) with
(Jθaϑ)(a)=(JθTϑ)(T)=0. | (2.2) |
The Hadamard-Caputo fractional derivative of order θ∈(0,1) of a function ϑ∈AC([a,∞)), is defined by (see [2])
HCDθaϑ(t)=(J1−θaδϑ)(t)=1Γ(1−θ)∫ta(lntτ)−θδϑ(τ)1τdτ, |
for almost everywhere t≥a, where
δϑ(t)=tϑ′(t). |
We have the following integration by parts rule.
Lemma 2.2. Let κ>0, p,q≥1, and 1p+1q≤1+κ (p≠1, q≠1, in the case 1p+1q=1+κ). If ϑ∘exp∈Lp([lna,lnT]) and w∘exp∈Lq([lna,lnT]), then
∫Ta(Jκaϑ)(t)w(t)1tdt=∫Taϑ(t)(JκTw)(t)1tdt. |
Proof. Using the change of variable x=lnτ, we obtain
(Jκaϑ)(t)=1Γ(κ)∫ta(lntτ)κ−1ϑ(τ)1τdτ=1Γ(κ)∫lntlna(lnt−x)κ−1(ϑ∘exp)(x)dx, |
that is,
(Jκaϑ)(t)=(Iκlnaϑ∘exp)(lnt). | (2.3) |
Similarly, we have
(JκTw)(t)=(IκlnTw∘exp)(lnt). | (2.4) |
By (2.3), we obtain
∫Ta(Jκaϑ)(t)w(t)1tdt=∫Ta(Iκlnaϑ∘exp)(lnt)w(t)1tdt. |
Using the change of variable x=lnt, we get
∫Ta(Jκaϑ)(t)w(t)1tdt=∫lnTlna(Iκlnaϑ∘exp)(x)(w∘exp)(x)dx. |
Since ϑ∘exp∈Lp([lna,lnT]) and w∘exp∈Lq([lna,lnT]), by Lemma 2.1, we deduce that
∫Ta(Jκaϑ)(t)w(t)1tdt=∫lnTlna(ϑ∘exp)(x)(IκlnTw∘exp)(x)dx. |
Using again the change of variable x=lnt, there holds
∫Ta(Jκaϑ)(t)w(t)1tdt=∫Taϑ(t)(IκlnTw∘exp)(lnt)1tdt. |
Then, by (2.4), the desired result follows.
By elementary calculations, we obtain the following properties.
Lemma 2.3. For sufficiently large λ, let
ϕ1(t)=(lnTa)−λ(lnTt)λ,a≤t≤T. | (2.5) |
Let κ∈(0,1). Then
(JκTϕ1)(t)=Γ(λ+1)Γ(κ+λ+1)(lnTa)−λ(lnTt)κ+λ, | (2.6) |
(JκTϕ1)′(t)=−Γ(λ+1)Γ(κ+λ)(lnTa)−λ(lnTt)κ+λ−11t. | (2.7) |
Lemma 2.4. For sufficiently large λ, let
ϕ2(s)=(T−a)−λ(T−s)λ,a≤s≤T. | (2.8) |
Let κ∈(0,1). Then
(IκTϕ2)(s)=Γ(λ+1)Γ(κ+λ+1)(T−a)−λ(T−s)κ+λ, | (2.9) |
(IκTϕ2)′(s)=−Γ(λ+1)Γ(κ+λ)(T−a)−λ(T−s)κ+λ−1. | (2.10) |
First, let us define global solutions to (1.2). To do this, we need to introduce the functional space
Xa:={u∈C([a,∞)×[a,∞)):u(⋅,s)∈AC([a,∞)),|u|m(t,⋅)∈AC([a,∞))}. |
We say that u is a global solution to (1.2), if u∈Xa and u satisfies the fractional differential inequality
HCDαa|tu(t,s)+CDβa|s|u|m(t,s)≥(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|p(t,s) |
for almost everywhere t,s≥a, as well as the initial conditions
u(a,s)=u0(s),u(t,a)=u1(t),t,s>a. |
Now, we state our main results.
Theorem 3.1. Let u0∈L1([a,∞)), u1∈Lm([a,∞),1tdt), and u1≢0.Let
0<β<1m≤1,γ>max{m−11−mβ,m(σ+1)−1}β. | (3.1) |
If
mmax{γ+1,σ+1}<p<1+γβ, | (3.2) |
then, for all α∈(0,1), (1.2) admits no global solution.
Remark 3.1. Notice that by (3.1), the set of exponents p satisfying (3.2) is nonempty.
Theorem 3.2. Let u0∈L1([a,∞)), u1∈Lm([a,∞),1tdt), and u1≢0. Let
0<β<1m≤1,1−1m<α<1,σ>(m−1)(1−α)1−mβ−α. | (3.3) |
If
βmax{m−11−mβ,m(σ+1)−1}<γ<(σ+α)β1−α | (3.4) |
and
p=1+γβ, | (3.5) |
then (1.2) admits no global solution.
Remark 3.2. Notice that by (3.3), the set of real numbers γ satisfying (3.4) is nonempty.
We illustrate our obtained results by the following examples.
Example 3.1. Consider the fractional differential inequality
{HCDαa|tu(t,s)+CD14a|su2(t,s)≥(s−a)(lnta)−1|u|p(t,s),t,s>a,u(a,s)=(1+s2)−1,u(t,a)=exp(−t),t,s>a, | (3.6) |
where a>0 and 0<α<1. Observe that (3.6) is a special case of (1.2) with
β=14,m=2,σ=−1,γ=1,u0(s)=(1+s2)−1,u1(t)=exp(−t). |
Moreover, we have
0<β=14<12=1m<1,max{m−11−mβ,m(σ+1)−1}β=max{2,0}4=12<γ=1, |
and u0∈L1([a,∞)), u1∈Lm([a,∞),1tdt). Hence, condition (3.1) is satisfied. Then, by Theorem 3.1, we deduce that, if
mmax{γ+1,σ+1}<p<1+γβ, |
that is,
4<p<5, |
then (3.6) admits no global solution.
Example 3.2. Consider the fractional differential inequality
{HCD34a|tu(t,s)+CD12a|s|u|(t,s)≥(s−a)14(lnta)−12|u|32(t,s),t,s>a,u(a,s)=(1+s2)−1,u(t,a)=exp(−t),t,s>a, | (3.7) |
where a>0. Then (3.7) is a special case of (1.2) with
α=34,β=12,m=1,σ=−12,γ=14,p=32,u0(s)=(1+s2)−1,u1(t)=exp(−t). |
On the other hand, we have
0<β=12<1=1m,1−1m=0<α=34<1,σ=−12>−34=(m−1)(1−α)1−mβ−α, |
which shows that condition (3.3) is satisfied. Moreover, we have
βmax{m−11−mβ,m(σ+1)−1}=−14<γ=14<12=(σ+α)β1−α,p=32=1+γβ, |
which shows that conditions (3.4) and (3.5) are satisfied. Then, by Theorem 3.2, we deduce that (3.7) admits no global solution.
In this section, C denotes a positive constant independent on T, whose value may change from line to line.
Proof of Theorem 3.1. Suppose that u∈Xa is a global solution to (1.2). For sufficiently large T and λ, let
φ(t,s)=ϕ1(t)ϕ2(s),a≤t,s≤T, |
where ϕ1 and ϕ2 are defined respectively by (2.5) and (2.8). Multiplying the inequality in (1.2) by 1tφ and integrating over ΩT:=(a,T)×(a,T), we obtain
∫ΩT(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|pφ(t,s)1tdtds≤∫ΩTHCDαa|tuφ(t,s)1tdtds+∫ΩTCDβa|s|u|mφ(t,s)1tdtds. | (4.1) |
On the other hand, using Lemma 2.2, integrating by parts, using the initial conditions, and taking in consideration (2.2), we obtain
∫TaHCDαa|tuφ(t,s)1tdt=∫Ta(J1−αa|tt∂u∂t)(t,s)φ(t,s)1tdt=∫Ta∂u∂t(t,s)(J1−αT|tφ)(t,s)dt=[u(t,s)(J1−αT|tφ)(t,s)]Tt=a−∫Tau(t,s)∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t(t,s)dt=−u0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)−∫Tau(t,s)∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t(t,s)dt. |
Integrating over (a,T), we get
∫ΩTHCDαa|tuφ(t,s)1tdtds=−∫Tau0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)ds−∫ΩTu(t,s)∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t(t,s)dtds. | (4.2) |
Similarly, using Lemma 2.1, integrating by parts, using the initial conditions, and taking in consideration (2.1), we obtain
∫TaCDβa|s|u|mφ(t,s)ds=∫Ta(I1−βa|s∂|u|m∂s(t,s))φ(t,s)ds=∫Ta∂|u|m∂s(t,s)(I1−βT|sφ)(t,s)ds=[|u|m(t,s)(I1−βT|sφ)(t,s)]Ts=a−∫Ta|u|m(t,s)∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s(t,s)ds=−|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)−∫Ta|u|m(t,s)∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s(t,s)ds. |
Integrating over (a,T), there holds
∫ΩTCDβa|s|u|mφ(t,s)1tdtds=−∫Ta|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)1tdt−∫ΩT|u|m(t,s)∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s(t,s)1tdtds. | (4.3) |
It follows from (4.1)–(4.3) that
∫ΩT(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|pφ(t,s)1tdtds+∫Tau0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)ds+∫Ta|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)1tdt≤∫ΩT|u||∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t|dtds+∫ΩT|u|m|∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s|1tdtds. | (4.4) |
On the other hand, by Young's inequality, we have
∫ΩT|u||∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t|dtds≤12∫ΩT(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|pφ(t,s)1tdtds+C∫ΩTt1p−1(s−a)−γp−1(lnta)−σp−1φ−1p−1(t,s)|∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t|pp−1dtds. | (4.5) |
Similarly, since p>m, we have
∫ΩT|u|m|∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s|1tdtds≤12∫ΩT(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|pφ(t,s)1tdtds+C∫ΩT1t(s−a)−γmp−m(lnta)−σmp−mφ−mp−m(t,s)|∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s|pp−mdtds. | (4.6) |
Hence, combining (4.4)–(4.6), we deduce that
∫Tau0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)ds+∫Ta|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)1tdt≤C(K1+K2), | (4.7) |
where
K1=∫ΩTt1p−1(s−a)−γp−1(lnta)−σp−1φ−1p−1(t,s)|∂(J1−αT|tφ)∂t|pp−1dtds |
and
K2=∫ΩT1t(s−a)−γmp−m(lnta)−σmp−mφ−mp−m(t,s)|∂(I1−βT|sφ)∂s|pp−mdtds. |
By the definition of the function φ, we have
(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)=ϕ2(s)(J1−αT|tϕ1)(a). |
Thus, using (2.6), we obtain
(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)=Cϕ2(s)(lnTa)1−α. |
Integrating over (a,T), we get
∫Tau0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)ds=C(lnTa)1−α∫Tau0(s)(T−a)−λ(T−s)λds. | (4.8) |
Similarly, by the definition of the function φ, we have
(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)=ϕ1(t)(I1−βT|sϕ2)(a). |
Thus, using (2.9), we obtain
(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)=Cϕ1(t)(T−a)1−β. |
Integrating over (a,T), we get
∫Ta|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)1tdt=C(T−a)1−β∫Ta|u1(t)|m(lnTa)−λ(lnTt)λ1tdt. | (4.9) |
Combining (4.8) with (4.9), there holds
∫Tau0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)ds+∫Ta|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)1tdt=C(lnTa)1−α∫Tau0(s)(T−a)−λ(T−s)λds+C(T−a)1−β∫Ta|u1(t)|m(lnTa)−λ(lnTt)λ1tdt. |
Since u0∈L1([a,∞)), u1∈Lm([a,∞),1tdt), and u1≢0, by the dominated convergence theorem, we deduce that for sufficiently large T,
∫Tau0(s)(J1−αT|tφ)(a,s)ds+∫Ta|u1(t)|m(I1−βT|sφ)(t,a)1tdt≥C(T−a)1−β∫∞a|u1(t)|m1tdt. | (4.10) |
Now, we shall estimate the terms Ki, i=1,2. By the definition of the function φ, the term K1 can be written as
K1=(∫Ta(s−a)−γp−1ϕ2(s)ds)(∫Tat1p−1(lnta)−σp−1ϕ−1p−11(t)|(J1−αT|tϕ1)′(t)|pp−1dt). | (4.11) |
Next, by (2.8), we obtain
∫Ta(s−a)−γp−1ϕ2(s)ds=(T−a)−λ∫Ta(s−a)−γp−1(T−s)λds≤∫Ta(s−a)−γp−1ds. |
On the other hand, by (3.1) and (3.2), it is clear that γ<p−1. Thus, we deduce that
∫Ta(s−a)−γp−1ϕ2(s)ds≤C(T−a)1−γp−1. | (4.12) |
By (2.5) and (2.7), we have
∫Tat1p−1(lnta)−σp−1ϕ−1p−11(t)|(J1−αT|tϕ1)′(t)|pp−1dt=(lnTa)−λ∫Ta(lnTt)λ−αpp−1(lnta)−σp−11tdt≤(lnTa)−αpp−1∫Ta(lnta)−σp−11tdt. |
Notice that by (3.1) and (3.2), we have σ<p−1. Thus, we get
∫Tat1p−1(lnta)−σp−1ϕ−1p−11(t)|(J1−αT|tϕ1)′(t)|pp−1dt≤C(lnTa)1−αp+σp−1. | (4.13) |
Hence, it follows from (4.11)–(4.13) that
K1≤C(T−a)1−γp−1(lnTa)1−αp+σp−1. | (4.14) |
Similarly, we can write the term K2 as
K2=(∫Ta1t(lnta)−σmp−mϕ1(t)dt)(∫Ta(s−a)−γmp−mϕ−mp−m2(s)|(I1−βT|sϕ2)′(s)|pp−mds). | (4.15) |
By (2.5), we have
∫Ta1t(lnta)−σmp−mϕ1(t)dt=(lnTa)−λ∫Ta(lnta)−σmp−m(lnTt)λ1tdt≤∫Ta(lnta)−σmp−m1tdt. |
Notice that by (3.2), we have σm<p−m. Thus, we get
∫Ta1t(lnta)−σmp−mϕ1(t)dt≤C(lnTa)1−σmp−m. | (4.16) |
On the other hand, by (2.8) and (2.10), we have
∫Ta(s−a)−γmp−mϕ−mp−m2(s)|(I1−βT|sϕ2)′(s)|pp−mds=(T−a)−λ∫Ta(T−s)λ−βpp−m(s−a)−γmp−mds≤(T−a)−βpp−m∫Ta(s−a)−γmp−mds. |
Notice that by (3.2), we have p>m(γ+1). Therefore, we obtain
∫Ta(s−a)−γmp−mϕ−mp−m2(s)|(I1−βT|sϕ2)′(s)|pp−mds≤C(T−a)1−γm+βpp−m. | (4.17) |
Combining (4.16) with (4.17), there holds
K2≤C(lnTa)1−σmp−m(T−a)1−γm+βpp−m. | (4.18) |
Hence, it follows from (4.14) and (4.18) that
K1+K2≤C[(lnTa)1−αp+σp−1(T−a)1−γp−1+(lnTa)1−σmp−m(T−a)1−γm+βpp−m]. | (4.19) |
Thus, by (4.7), (4.10), and (4.19), we deduce that
∫∞a|u1(t)|m1tdt≤C[(lnTa)1−αp+σp−1(T−a)β−γp−1+(lnTa)1−σmp−m(T−a)β−γm+βpp−m]. | (4.20) |
Notice that by (3.1) and (3.2), we have
β−γp−1<0,β−γm+βpp−m<0. |
Hence, passing to the limit as T→∞ in (4.20), we obtain a contradiction with u1≢0. Consequently, (1.2) admits no global solution. The proof is completed.
Proof of Theorem 3.2. Suppose that u∈Xa is a global solution to (1.2). Notice that in the proof of Theorem 3.1, to obtain (4.20), we used that
p>m≥1,p>σ+1,p>m(σ+1),p>m(γ+1). |
On the other hand, by (3.3)–(3.5), it can be easily seen that the above conditions are satisfied. Thus, (4.20) holds. Hence, taking p=1+γβ in (4.20), we obtain
∫∞a|u1(t)|m1tdt≤C[(lnTa)1−αp+σp−1+(lnTa)1−σmp−m(T−a)β−γm+βpp−m]. | (4.21) |
On the other hand, by (3.3)–(3.5), we have
1−αp+σp−1<0,β−γm+βpp−m<0. |
Hence, passing to the limit as T→∞ in (4.21), we obtain a contradiction with u1≢0. This shows that (1.2) admits no global solution. The proof is completed.
The two-times fractional differential inequality (1.2) is investigated. Namely, using the test function method and a judicious choice of a test function, sufficient conditions ensuring the nonexistence of global solutions to (1.2) are obtained. Two cases are discussed separately: 1<p<1+γβ (see Theorem 3.1) and p=1+γβ (see Theorem 3.2). In the first case, no assumption is imposed on the fractional order α∈(0,1) of the Hadamard-Caputo fractional derivative, while in the second case, it is supposed that α>1−1m. About the initial conditions, in both cases, it is assumed that u0∈L1([a,∞)), u1∈Lm([a,∞),1tdt), and u1≢0.
Finally, it would be interesting to extend this study to two-times fractional evolution equations. For instance, the tow-times fractional semi-linear heat equation
{HCDαa|tu(t,s,x)+CDβa|s|u|m(t,s,x)≥(s−a)γ(lnta)σ|u|p(t,s,x),t,s>a,x∈RN,u(a,s,x)=u0(s,x),u(t,a,x)=u1(t,x),t,s>a,x∈RN, |
deserves to be studied.
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for funding this work through Research Group no. RG-21-09-02.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
P. N. Duc, E. Nane, O. Nikan, N. A. Tuan, Approximation of the initial value for damped nonlinear hyperbolic equations with random Gaussian white noise on the measurements, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 12620–12634. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022698 doi: 10.3934/math.2022698
![]() |
[2] |
T. N. Thach, N. H. Tuan, Stochastic pseudo-parabolic equations with fractional derivative and fractional Brownian motion, Stoch. Anal. Appl., 40 (2022), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2021.1906274 doi: 10.1080/07362994.2021.1906274
![]() |
[3] |
A. T. Nguyen, N. H. Tuan, C.Yang, On Cauchy problem for fractional parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 12 (2023), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2022-0256 doi: 10.1515/anona-2022-0256
![]() |
[4] |
N. H. Tuan, N. D. Phuong, T. N. Thach, New well-posedness results for stochastic delay Rayleigh-Stokes equations, AIMS Mathematics, 28 (2023), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2022079 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022079
![]() |
[5] | F. M. Gaafar. The Existence of solution for a nonlocal problem of an implicit fractional-order differential equation, J. Egy. Math. Soc., 26 (2018), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.21608/JOEMS.2018.9473 |
[6] |
S. Abbas, M. Benchohra, J. J. Nieto, Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equations with instantaneous impulses, AIMS Mathematics, 6 (2021), 2932–2946. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021177 doi: 10.3934/math.2021177
![]() |
[7] |
S. K. Ntouyas, M. E. Samei, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for multi-term fractional q-integro-differential equations via quantum calculus, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2019 (2019), 475. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2414-8 doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2414-8
![]() |
[8] |
M. E. Samei, L. Karimi, M. K. A. Kaabar, To investigate a class of multi-singular pointwise defined fractional q–integro-differential equation with applications, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 7781–7816. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022437 doi: 10.3934/math.2022437
![]() |
[9] |
E. Cuesta, C. Palencia, A fractional trapezoidal rule for integro-differential equations of fractional order in Banach spaces, Appl. Numer. Math., 45 (2003), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(02)00186-1 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9274(02)00186-1
![]() |
[10] |
S. S. Ahmed, Solving a system of fractional-order Volterra integro-differential equations based on the explicit finite difference approximation via the trapezoid method with error analysis, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14030575 doi: 10.3390/sym14030575
![]() |
[11] |
F. Mirzaee, S. Alipour, Cubic B-spline approximation for linear stochastic integro-differential equation of fractional order, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 366 (2020), 112440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112440 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.112440
![]() |
[12] |
A. A. Ibrahim, A. A. S. Zaghrout, K. R. Raslan, K. K. Ali, On the analytical and numerical study for nonlinear Fredholm integro-differential equations, Appl. Math. Inform. Sci., 14 (2020), 921–929. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/140520 doi: 10.18576/amis/140520
![]() |
[13] |
A. A. Ibrahim, A. A. S. Zaghrout, K. R. Raslan, K. K. Ali, On study nonlocal integro differetial equation involving the Caputo-Fabrizio Fractional derivative and q-integral of the Riemann Liouville Type, Appl. Math. Inform Sci., 16 (2022), 983–993. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/160615 doi: 10.18576/amis/160615
![]() |
[14] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
![]() |
[15] | J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without Singular Kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010202 |
[16] |
B. Ahmad, J. J. Nieto, A. Alsaedi, H. Al-Hutami, Existence of solutions for nonlinear fractional q-difference integral equations with two fractional orders and nonlocal four-point boundary conditions, J. Franklin I., 351 (2014), 2890–2909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.01.020
![]() |
[17] |
S. Suantai, S. K. Ntouyas, S. Asawasamrit, J. Tariboon, A coupled system of fractional q-integro-difference equations with nonlocal fractional q-integral boundary conditions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2015 (2015), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0462-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-015-0462-2
![]() |
[18] | V. Kac, P. Cheung, Quantum calculus, New York: Springer, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0071-7 |
[19] | M. H. Annaby, Z. S. Mansour, q-fractional calculus and equations, Springer, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30898-7 |
[20] | A. N. Kolomogorov, S. V. Fomin, Inroductory real analysis, Dover Publications, Inc, 1975. |
[21] | R. Saadati, B. Raftari, H. Adibi, S. M. Vaezpour, S. Shakeri, A comparison between the variational iteration method and trapezoidal rule for solving linear integro-differential equations, Word Appl. Sci. J., 4 (2008), 321–325. |
[22] |
R. C. Mittal, R. K. Jain, Numerical solutions of nonlinear Burgers' equation with modified cubic B-splines collocation method, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2012), 7839–7855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.01.059 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.01.059
![]() |
[23] | K. E. Atkinson, An introduction to numerical analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801181 |
1. | Saeed M. Ali, Mohammed D. Kassim, Sufficient Conditions for the Non-Existence of Global Solutions to Fractional Systems with Lower-Order Hadamard-Type Fractional Derivatives, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 1031, 10.3390/math13071031 |