Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Modeling and simulations for the mitigation of atmospheric carbon dioxide through forest management programs

  • Received: 12 May 2024 Revised: 01 July 2024 Accepted: 03 July 2024 Published: 23 July 2024
  • MSC : 47H10, 76B15

  • The growing global population causes more anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and raises the need for forest products, which in turn causes deforestation and elevated CO2 levels. A rise in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the major reason for global warming. Carbon dioxide concentrations must be reduced soon to achieve the mitigation of climate change. Forest management programs accommodate a way to manage atmospheric CO2 levels. For this purpose, we considered a nonlinear fractional model to analyze the impact of forest management policies on mitigating atmospheric CO2 concentration. In this investigation, fractional differential equations were solved by utilizing the Atangana Baleanu Caputo derivative operator. It captures memory effects and shows resilience and efficiency in collecting system dynamics with less processing power. This model consists of four compartments, the concentration of carbon dioxide C(t), human population N(t), forest biomass B(t), and forest management programs P(t) at any time t. The existence and uniqueness of the solution for the fractional model are shown. Physical properties of the solution, non-negativity, and boundedness are also proven. The equilibrium points of the model were computed and further analyzed for local and global asymptotic stability. For the numerical solution of the suggested model, the Atangana-Toufik numerical scheme was employed. The acquired results validate analytical results and show the significance of arbitrary order δ. The effect of deforestation activities and forest management strategies were also analyzed on the dynamics of atmospheric carbon dioxide and forest biomass under the suggested technique. The illustrated results describe that the concentration of CO2 can be minimized if deforestation activities are controlled and proper forest management policies are developed and implemented. Furthermore, it is determined that switching to low-carbon energy sources, and developing and implementing more effective mitigation measures will result in a decrease in the mitigation of CO2.

    Citation: Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Nauman Raza, Jan Martinovic, Abu Bakar, Osman Tunç. Modeling and simulations for the mitigation of atmospheric carbon dioxide through forest management programs[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22712-22742. doi: 10.3934/math.20241107

    Related Papers:

    [1] E. Bonyah, C. W. Chukwu, M. L. Juga, Fatmawati . Modeling fractional-order dynamics of Syphilis via Mittag-Leffler law. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8367-8389. doi: 10.3934/math.2021485
    [2] Saima Rashid, Rehana Ashraf, Fahd Jarad . Strong interaction of Jafari decomposition method with nonlinear fractional-order partial differential equations arising in plasma via the singular and nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7936-7963. doi: 10.3934/math.2022444
    [3] Rahat Zarin, Abdur Raouf, Amir Khan, Aeshah A. Raezah, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Computational modeling of financial crime population dynamics under different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20755-20789. doi: 10.3934/math.20231058
    [4] Xiaoxiao Liu, Chunrui Zhang . Forest model dynamics analysis and optimal control based on disease and fire interactions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3174-3194. doi: 10.3934/math.2024154
    [5] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [6] Hasib Khan, Jehad Alzabut, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Praveen Agarwal . Piecewise mABC fractional derivative with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24345-24366. doi: 10.3934/math.20231241
    [7] Ateq Alsaadi . Advancing water quality management: A synergistic approach using fractional differential equations and neural networks. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5332-5352. doi: 10.3934/math.2025246
    [8] Shakeel Muhammad, Obaid J. Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah, Amir Ali . Theoretical and numerical aspects of the Malaria transmission model with piecewise technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28353-28375. doi: 10.3934/math.20231451
    [9] Najat Almutairi, Sayed Saber . Chaos control and numerical solution of time-varying fractional Newton-Leipnik system using fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25863-25887. doi: 10.3934/math.20231319
    [10] Shao-Wen Yao, Saima Rashid, Mustafa Inc, Ehab E. Elattar . On fuzzy numerical model dealing with the control of glucose in insulin therapies for diabetes via nonsingular kernel in the fuzzy sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17913-17941. doi: 10.3934/math.2022987
  • The growing global population causes more anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and raises the need for forest products, which in turn causes deforestation and elevated CO2 levels. A rise in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the major reason for global warming. Carbon dioxide concentrations must be reduced soon to achieve the mitigation of climate change. Forest management programs accommodate a way to manage atmospheric CO2 levels. For this purpose, we considered a nonlinear fractional model to analyze the impact of forest management policies on mitigating atmospheric CO2 concentration. In this investigation, fractional differential equations were solved by utilizing the Atangana Baleanu Caputo derivative operator. It captures memory effects and shows resilience and efficiency in collecting system dynamics with less processing power. This model consists of four compartments, the concentration of carbon dioxide C(t), human population N(t), forest biomass B(t), and forest management programs P(t) at any time t. The existence and uniqueness of the solution for the fractional model are shown. Physical properties of the solution, non-negativity, and boundedness are also proven. The equilibrium points of the model were computed and further analyzed for local and global asymptotic stability. For the numerical solution of the suggested model, the Atangana-Toufik numerical scheme was employed. The acquired results validate analytical results and show the significance of arbitrary order δ. The effect of deforestation activities and forest management strategies were also analyzed on the dynamics of atmospheric carbon dioxide and forest biomass under the suggested technique. The illustrated results describe that the concentration of CO2 can be minimized if deforestation activities are controlled and proper forest management policies are developed and implemented. Furthermore, it is determined that switching to low-carbon energy sources, and developing and implementing more effective mitigation measures will result in a decrease in the mitigation of CO2.



    Carbon dioxide concentrations in the environment have risen rapidly during the last several years. Global warming is primarily caused by excessive carbon dioxide levels, which have detrimental effects on air quality and human health. Climate change has several harmful consequences for people and ecosystems, such as melting glaciers and icecaps, tidal waves, floods, and siltation; increased chances of annihilation of endangered species of animals and plants; alterations in rainfall patterns modifying the global supply of water and food; a rise in food-borne, water-borne, and vector-borne diseases; and a bump in high-temperature diseases [1,2]. The atmospheric CO2 concentration surpassed 418 ppm in 2022, nearly 49% higher than the value of 280 ppm at the start of the industrial age [3]. One of several primary human-caused origins of carbon dioxide emissions is deforestation. Deforestation has resulted in the loss of almost 420 million ha of forests globally since 1990, with an average pace of 10 million ha year1 between 2015 and 2020 [4].

    Many nations worldwide have implemented reforestation and afforestation plans to compensate for the loss of forests driven by deforestation. It was predicted that 27 million acres of new trees would be planted in 2015, an increase of 1.57% yearly [5]. Large-scale plantations are necessary to reduce elevated CO2 concentration in the air; however, reforestation is not possible on the needed scale due to a variety of demographic and economic factors [6]. Nations in this sort of situation are implementing sustainable forestry strategies that enhance forest biomass and minimize deforestation rates, helping to reduce CO2 emissions in the atmosphere. Since being the first tropical nation to successfully control deforestation, Costa Rica increased its forest area from 24.4% in 1985 to more than 50% by 2011. This was accomplished via the use of forest management strategies [7].

    Innovative methods of managing forests are being developed due to global concerns over forest degradation. One of several growth strategies is to enhance the amount of high biomass in the forest and diminish the atmospheric CO2 level using genetically modified plants with longer roots, rapid growth rates, and biomass production [8,9]. Genetically manipulated eucalyptus plants have been shown to grow quicker and soak up more CO2, leading to increased forest biomass output per unit area in Brazil [10]. Another technique that is frequently employed in modern times to boost productivity and forest cover is agroforestry. To increase production and the sustainability of the ecosystem, agroforestry defines the system of land use that incorporates trees into agricultural landscapes and farms [11]. Agroforestry is a crucial component of the broader regional plan for managing forests and reducing climate crises. Indian agroforestry can sequester 25 tonnes of carbon on average per hectare, according to estimates [12,13]. Forests provide a significant source of income, firewood for heating and cooking, and other necessities for people in rural communities. The population's reliance on forestry resources is frequently brought on by the absence of alternatives or the incapacity of the inhabitants to pay for them [14]. Some initiatives offering rural residents government subsidies for their way of life, such as biogas and fuel-efficient stoves, as well as fiber and tin, successfully reduce deforestation rates by promoting alternatives to forest resources [15].

    Multiple approaches to mitigating climate change have been designed in the past few years, with a particular emphasis on reducing atmospheric CO2 emissions from forest degradation and deforestation. Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation plus (REDD+) system, initiated by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference of the Parties, is one of the primary worldwide initiatives in this field. With sustainable forest management, the REDD+ mechanism seeks to direct and financially support actions that minimize deforestation and boost carbon stocks already present in the forest [16,17]. It has been determined that a REDD+ program implemented at the state scale can considerably lower carbon emissions and forest cover loss. According to research, the Norway-Guyana REDD+ initiative prevented 12.8 million metric tons of CO2 emissions and reduced tree cover loss by 35% between 2010 and 2015 [18]. Therefore, the actions involved in forest management play a vital role in lowering the pace of deforestation and increasing the biomass of the forest.

    Recently, several mathematical models have been put out to investigate the behavior of different aspects of the human population [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The authors in [26] investigated the stability criteria of a mathematical model for the equilibrium points. It was revealed that the equilibrium between biomass and carbon dioxide becomes unstable, leading to a rise in atmospheric CO2 at highly elevated deforestation rates. The authors in [27] used a mathematical model to determine how the population, biomass, and atmospheric CO2 interacted. They concluded that the rate of deforestation has adversely affected the system's dynamics. Research on how different plant capacities to absorb CO2 affect atmospheric CO2 level is given in [28]. To investigate the impact of population on the dynamics of CO2, the authors in [29] designed a dynamic model. According to their research, the pressure of population growth increases the rate of forest biomass loss, which raises the equilibrium level of CO2. To preserve forest biomass, several researchers have proposed nonlinear mathematical models [30,31,32]. Depending on these studies, it is possible to preserve forest biomass using technical means such as the cultivation of genetically modified plants and by offering financial incentives to the population, which would eventually result in a decline in the pace of deforestation. These investigations, however, need to examine the consequences of forest management on CO2 concentration. In this manuscript, we formulate a novel fractional mathematical model to explore the influence of forest management strategies on the emission of CO2. According to our assumptions, sustainable management strategies aim to reduce deforestation by offering financial incentives and encouraging individuals to use different resources. These efforts aim to lower deforestation rates and enhance forest biomass via afforestation and the planting of genetically modified plants. The models stated above rely on classical derivatives and frequently fail to adequately represent the complexities of systems that exhibit unusual spreading and non-exponential response.

    Modern research has highlighted the potential of using fractional differential equations to represent a variety of events across various disciplines, especially epidemiology [33,34,35,36,37]. The calculus of arbitrary-order derivatives and integrals is studied in the domain of mathematical analysis known as fractional calculus. The vital feature of utilizing fractional derivatives to describe mathematical models is that they have the quality of being nonlocal. The m-th derivative of a function Φ(ϵ) at ϵ is just a local characteristic when m is an integer. The fractional derivative of Φ(ϵ) at ϵ=a depends on all values of Φ(ϵ), including those farthest from a. Fractional-order derivatives incorporate derivatives and integrals of arbitrary orders; the current and past states determine the future predicament. Memory's inherited qualities and potency are key aspects across many biological systems. A dynamic model can assist in expressing these aspects using fractional-order derivatives in modeling [38].

    The most famous operators are the Caputo fractional derivatives and integrals, which are traditionally employed for simulating several real-life problems. Additionally, there is a close connection between the Riemann-Lioville derivative operator and the Caputo fractional derivative. These operators could yield better findings when used to examine the structure of models. However, the singularity of the kernels of these operators [39,40] is the primary problem. To better comprehend the dynamics of models, researchers have emphasized the need for fractional operators with nonsingular kernels. Many researchers were successful in providing fractional operators with nonsingular kernels to this point, such as the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative [41]. Recently, Atangana and Baleanu introduced a brand-new derivative with a single-parameter Mittag-Leffer (ML) kernel, which is the Atangana-Baleanu (ABC) operator [42]. One of its major achievements is that this operator has a non-local and non-singular kernel. It is advantageous for professionals who work in the dynamic simulation of real-life problems. Various conventional and fractional derivatives were taken into consideration when performing numerical computations in [43,44,45,46,47]. To approximate the ABC fractional derivative, the authors carried out an examination and numerical simulation of a model [45]. They applied a two-step family of Adams-Bash-Forth methodology.

    To overcome these limitations, a unique use of the ABC fractional derivative operator is presented in this study. In contrast to earlier research, which mostly dealt with traditional fractional derivatives, this work makes use of the unique benefits of the ABC operator to improve complex system modeling. This paper's key contribution is its demonstration of how fractional derivatives of ABC can enhance the stability and precision of solutions to fractional differential equations. We demonstrate the superiority of the ABC operator over conventional techniques in terms of solution fidelity and computing economy through several in-depth evaluations and simulations. The suggested method has been widely used in many real-world problems due to its non singular and non-local properties [48,49], and has already been compared and proved to be superior to the method in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, this method has not yet been applied to problems related to climate change and sustainability. Thus, this study introduces a new methodology that not only links theoretical developments with real-world applications but also establishes new standards for precision and effectiveness in complex system modeling. Here is a list of the contributions of this research work:

    ● A novel mathematical fractional model for the dynamics of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is addressed and analyzed using the Atangana-Baleanu derivative.

    ● Non negativity of the solutions is proven, and the conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the considered system are established.

    ● The proposed fractional model is solved numerically using the Atangana-Toufik scheme.

    ● The effects of the fractional ABC derivative on the dynamics of the proposed model are discussed.

    In this section, we recall some fundamental definitions from fractional calculus and a well-known theorem that will be used in the following sections.

    Definition 1.1. Suppose that Λ is an open subset of R, and ω[1,), the Sobolev space Hω(Λ) is stated [35,45] as:

    Hω(Λ)={L2(Λ):DδL2,|δ||ω|}. (1.1)

    Definition 1.2. The ABC fractional operator in the Caputo sense [35,45] is defined for a differentiable function :[a,b]N, which is defined on [a,b] such that H1(a,b), b>a, and δ(0,1] as:

    ABCaDδt(t)=(δ)1δta˙(ϖ)Eδ[δ(tϖ)δ1δ]dϖ, (1.2)

    where Eδ is a ML function of one parameter, and given by

    Eδ(z)=m=0zmΓ(δm+1), (1.3)

    where (δ)>0, is a normalized function, and (0)=(1)=1.

    Definition 1.3. [45] The associated ABC fractional integral with a non-local kernel is expressed as

    ABCaIδt(t)=1δ(δ)(t)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)ta(ϖ)(tϖ)δ1dϖ. (1.4)

    Theorem 1.4. [35] The fractional-order differential equation

    ABCaDδt(t)=G(t), (1.5)

    has the following unique solution

    (t)=(a)+1δ(δ)G(t)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)taG(ϖ)(tϖ)δ1dϖ. (1.6)

    The remaining paper is organized as follows: Section 2 formulates the fractional model and its associated characteristics. In Section 3, the equilibrium states of the proposed fractional model are calculated. Section 4 examines the stability of the equilibrium points of the suggested model. Numerical analysis and simulations are carried out in Section 5. Finally, Section 6 is devoted to the conclusion.

    The growing study of climate change demands a thorough comprehension of greenhouse gas dynamics. The CO2 gas is one of the main greenhouse gases causing global warming. Precisely estimating the gas' concentration and how it impacts the environment is essential in order to forecast future climate circumstances and develop practical mitigation plans. The complex mechanisms controlling CO2 emissions are well represented by the integer-order model, which offers a stable framework. By integrating these processes into a logical system of differential equations, the model allows accurate simulations of time-varying CO2 levels. For researchers and public officials to evaluate the effects of different emission reduction programs and to create well-informed environmental policies, this forecasting endurance is crucial.

    In this study, we consider a geographical region where a growing human population affects the forest cover. Sustainable forest strategies are implemented to decrease deforestation and enhance forest biomass. As it acts as one of the fundamental CO2 sinks, the conservation, and depletion of forest biomass will change the concentration of CO2. To describe the model, we assumed four different state variables: the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere C(t) at any time t, the human population N(t) at any time t, the biomass of the forest B(t) at any time t, and the number of forest management programs P(t) at any time t.

    The differential equation below describes how the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere changes over time:

    dCdt=Q+λNαCλ1BC,t0, (2.1)

    here, the natural emission rate of CO2 from processes including respiration, biological decomposition, and volcanic activity, all of which continuously contribute CO2 to the atmosphere, is represented by the term Q. The concept of λN, which stands for emission rate coefficient and scales with the human population or activities that cause CO2 emissions (such as burning fossil fuels and industrial operations), describes emissions of CO2 that are caused by humans. The term αC refers to the amount of CO2 absorbed by natural sinks other than forest biomass, such as soil and seas; this absorption is proportionate to the amount of CO2, or C, that is currently present in the atmosphere. Last, the absorption of CO2 by forest biomass is denoted by the term λ1BC, where B is the quantity of forest biomass and λ1 is the rate of uptake coefficient. This uptake depends on both the amount of CO2 and the quantity of forest biomass.

    Given that population expansion is dependent on forest resources and causes deforestation it is assumed that both the population and biomass of the forest would expand logistically. A rise in biomass, on the other hand, promotes population expansion. The efficiency of forest management programs decreases with intensity, while they do prevent deforestation and increase forest biomass. A decrease in population is also a result of the negative climatic effects brought on by elevated atmospheric CO2. With the consequences of deforestation, the management of forests, and CO2-induced climate change taken into account, these dynamics are reflected in the following differential equations that describe population and forest biomass as:

    dNdt=sN(1NL)+ξNBθCN,t0, (2.2)
    dBdt=μB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+P,t0. (2.3)

    We assumed that the rate at which forest management initiatives are carried out is proportionate to the gap between the carrying capacity of the forest and its present biomass density. Let ν and ν0 denote the implementation and declination rates of the forest management initiatives, respectively. The following is a description of the dynamics of the forest management programs:

    dPdt=ν(MB)ν0P,t0. (2.4)

    Therefore, the following model incorporates the dynamic nature of the problem:

    {dCdt=Q+λNαCλ1BC,dNdt=sN(1NL)+ξNBθCN,dBdt=μB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+P,dPdt=ν(MB)ν0P, (2.5)

    with the following initial conditions:

    C(0)=C0>0,N(0)=N00,B(0)=B00,andP(0)=P00.

    It is assumed that all the involved parameters and initial data of the model are non-negative. The model parameters used in this model are defined and interpreted in Table 1. Generally, fractional models of real-life phenomena are known to express the memory effect quite effectively; the system (2.6) is considered using the ABC fractional derivative. By applying the ABC fractional derivative of order δ(0,1] of the ML kernel, the system is given as:

    {ABC0DδtC(t)=Q+λNαCλ1BC,t0,ABC0DδtN(t)=sN(1NL)+ξNBθCN,t0,ABC0DδtB(t)=μB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+P,t0,ABC0DδtP(t)=ν(MB)ν0P,t0, (2.6)

    and the following short form can be used to express it as:

    Table 1.  Model parameters and their interpretation [46].
    Description Parameter
    Natural CO2 emission rate Q
    Coefficient of anthropogenic CO2 emission rate λ
    CO2 absorption rate coefficients of forest biomass from the environment λ1
    Natural drains except forest biomass α
    Population's intrinsic rate of growth s
    Population's carrying capacity L
    Population growth rate coefficient induced by forest biomass ξ
    Population decline rate coefficient due to increased CO2 concentration θ
    Population's intrinsic rate of forest biomass μ
    Carrying capacity of forest biomass M
    Half-saturation constant (a measure of forest management activities that have decreased the deforestation rate) k1
    Optimum effectiveness of forest management measures to minimize the rate of deforestation ϕ1
    Half-saturation constant (a measure of forest management activities that have increased the forest biomass) l1
    Optimum effectiveness of forest management measures to increase the forest biomass η1
    Coefficient of implementation of forest management measures ν
    Forest management measures declination rate coefficient ν0
    Deforestation rate coefficient ϕ

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    ABC0Dδt(t)=G(t,(t)),0<t<T<+, (2.7)

    with the initial condition

    (0)=0, (2.8)

    where :[0,+)R4 and G:R4R4 are vector-valued functions such that

    (t)=(C(t)N(t)B(t)P(t)),(0)=(C(0)N(0)B(0)P(0)),

    and

    G((t))=(G1G2G3G4)=(Q+λNαCλ1BCsN(1NL)+ξNBθCNμB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+Pν(MB)ν0P),

    respectively. Clearly, Gj; j=1,2,3,4, are functions of t, C, N, B, and P.

    In this part, we use nonnegative initial information to define the range of solutions to the non-linear system. Our fundamental aim is to present that the observed feasible region in R4+ is positively invariant about the suggested model.

    Theorem 2.1. [46] The set

    Ω={(C,N,B,P)R4+:0<CCm;0NNm;0BM;0PPm}, (2.9)

    is positively invariant for the fractional model (2.6), where Cm=Q+λNmα, Nm=L+ξLMs, and Pm=νMν0.

    Under this section, we explore the physical characteristics of solutions, i.e., non negativity and boundedness of solutions to the presented model. Here, we establish the necessary and sufficient criteria for the existence of positive solutions. Our objective is to demonstrate the qualitative behavior of solutions. Therefore, we suppose that for any initial conditions for the system, C(0)=C0, N(0)=N0, B(0)=B0, and P(0)=P0 Ω, then there is a unique solution for any time t. Let us now define positivity criteria.

    Theorem 2.2. [50] Assume that the initial condition

    {C(0),N(0),B(0),P(0)}Ω,

    then, the solutions exist, and they are all positive for all t0.

    Proof. Let's begin with the C(t) class. We define the following norm:

    ψ=supt[0,T]|ψ|.

    First equation of the system (2.6) is given by

    ABC0DδtC(t)=Q+λNαCλ1BC,t0,(α+λ1B)C,t0,(α+λ1supt[0,T]|B|)C,t0,(α+λ1B)C,t0.

    Then, we get

    C(t)C0Eδ(δ(α+λ1B)tδ(δ)(1δ)(α+λ1B)),t0. (2.10)

    Second equation of the system (2.6) is given by

    ABC0DδtN(t)=sN(1NL)+ξNBθCN,t0,(s(11L)ξB+θC)N,t0,(s(11L)ξsupt[0,T]|B|+θsupt[0,T]|C|)N,t0,(s(11L)ξB+θC)N,t0.

    Then, we have

    N(t)N0Eδ(δ[s(11L)ξB+θC]tδ(δ)(1δ)[s(11L)ξB+θC]),t0. (2.11)

    Third equation of the system (2.6) is given as

    ABC0DδtB(t)=μB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+P,t0,(μ(11M)+(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)Nη1Pl1+P)B,t0,(μ(11M)+(ϕϕ1supt[0,T]|P|k1+supt[0,T]|P|)supt[0,T]|N|η1supt[0,T]|P|l1+supt[0,T]|P|)B,t0,(μ(11M)+(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)Nη1Pl1+P)B,t0.

    Then, we get

    B(t)B0Eδ(δ[μ(11M)+(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)Nη1Pl1+P]tδ(δ)(1δ)[μ(11M)+(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)Nη1Pl1+P]),t0. (2.12)

    Fourth equation of the system (2.6) is written as

    ABC0DδtP(t)=ν(MB)ν0P,t0,(ν0)P,t0.

    Then, we have

    P(t)P0Eδ(δ(ν0)tδ(δ)(1δ)(ν0)),t0. (2.13)

    Thus the suggested model has non-negative solutions t0.

    Theorem 2.3. [51] Along with the initial conditions, the solution of the fractional model considered in (2.6) is unique and bounded in R4+.

    Proof. We obtained the following equations:

    ABC0DδtC(t)|C=0=Q+λN0,ABC0DδtN(t)|N=0=0,ABC0DδtB(t)|B=0=0,ABC0DδtP(t)|P=0=ν(MB)0.

    If (C(0),N(0),B(0),P(0))R4+, it is practically unattainable to move out of R4+. Since the domain is positively invariant, any non negative vector field goes into R4+. For the suggested system, this guarantees a positive and bounded solution.

    In this part, we employ theorems to show the existence and uniqueness of the solution for the suggested model (2.6).

    Theorem 2.4. [47] Suppose that we have eight positive constants ^ρ1, ^ρ2, ^ρ3, ^ρ4, and ¯ρ1, ¯ρ2, ¯ρ3, ¯ρ4, then the following two conditions hold:

    (1)

    |G1(C,t)G1(C1,t)|2^ρ1|CC1|2,|G2(N,t)G2(N1,t)|2^ρ2|NN1|2,|G3(B,t)G3(B1,t)|2^ρ3|BB1|2,|G4(P,t)G4(P1,t)|2^ρ4|PP1|2.

    (2)

    |G1(C,t)|2¯ρ1(1+|C|2),|G2(N,t)|2¯ρ2(1+|N|2),|G3(B,t)|2¯ρ3(1+|B|2),|G4(P,t)|2¯ρ4(1+|P|2).

    Proof. The system (2.6) has a unique solution if the stated requirements are fulfilled. Let us begin with the first equation of the system G1(C,t). Then, we will try to prove the first condition for the following equation:

    |G1(C,t)G1(C1,t)|2^ρ1|CC1|2.

    Define the following norm as:

    ψ2=supt[0,T]|ψ|2.

    Let us consider C, C1 R2 and t[0,T],

    |G1(C,t)G1(C1,t)|2=|(α+λ1B)(CC1)|2{2α2+2λ21|B|2}|CC1|2{2α2+2λ21supt[0,T]|B|2}|CC1|2{2α2+2λ21B2}|CC1|2^ρ1|CC1|2,

    where

    ^ρ1={2α2+2λ21B2}.

    For N, N1 R2 and t[0,T],

    |G2(N,t)G2(N1,t)|2=|{s(11L)+ξBθC}(NN1)|2{3s2(11L)2+3ξ2|B|2+3θ2|C|2}|NN1|2{3s2(11L)2+3ξ2supt[0,T]|B|2+3θ2supt[0,T]|C|2}|NN1|2{3s2(11L)2+3ξ2B2+3θ2C2}|NN1|2^ρ2|NN1|2,

    where

    ^ρ2={3s2(11L)2+3ξ2B2+3θ2C2}.

    For B, B1 R2 and t[0,T],

    |G3(B,t)G3(B1,t)|2=|{μ(11M)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)N+η1Pl1+P}(BB1)|2{4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2|N|2+4ϕ21|P|2|N|2k21+|P|2+η21|P|2l21+|P|2}|BB1|2{4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2supt[0,T]|N|2+4ϕ21supt[0,T]|P|2supt[0,T]|N|2k21+supt[0,T]|P|2+η21supt[0,T]|P|2l21+supt[0,T]|P|2}|BB1|2{4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2N2+4ϕ21P2N2k21+P2+η21P2l21+P2}|BB1|2^ρ3|BB1|2,

    where

    ^ρ3={4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2N2+4ϕ21P2N2k21+P2+η21P2l21+P2}.

    For P, P1 R2 and t[0,T],

    |G4(P,t)G4(P1,t)|2=|ν0(PP1)|2ν20|PP1|2^ρ4|PP1|2,

    where

    ^ρ4={ν20}.

    Finally, we able to establish the given condition (1).

    Now, we will prove the second criterion for the proposed system. (C,t)R2×[t0,T], then we will show that

    |G1(C,t)|2=|Q+λNαCλ1BC|24Q2+4λ2|N|2+4α2|C|2+4λ21|B|2|C|24Q2+4λ2|N|2+(4α2+4λ21|B|2)|C|24Q2+4λ2supt[0,T]|N|2+(4α2+4λ21supt[0,T]|B|2)|C|2(4Q2+4λ2supt[0,T]|N|2)(1+(4α2+4λ21supt[0,T]|B|24Q2+4λ2supt[0,T]|N|2)|C|2)(4Q2+4λ2N2)(1+(4α2+4λ21B24Q2+4λ2N2)|C|2)¯ρ1(1+|C|2),

    where

    ¯ρ1=4Q2+4λ2N2,

    and with under condition

    4α2+4λ21B24Q2+4λ2N2<1.

    Now (N,t)R2×[t0,T], then we will show that

    |G2(N,t)|2=|sN(1NL)+ξNBθCN|23s2|N|2(11L)2+3ξ2|N|2|B|2+3θ2|C|2|N|2(3s2+3ξ2)+(3s2(11L)2+3ξ2|B|2+3θ2|C|2)|N|2(3s2+3ξ2)(1+(3s2(11L)2+3ξ2supt[0,T]|B|2+3θ2supt[0,T]|C|23s2+3ξ2)|N|2)(3s2+3ξ2)(1+(3s2(11L)2+3ξ2B2+3θ2C23s2+3ξ2)|N|2)¯ρ2(1+|N|2),

    where

    ¯ρ2=3s2+3ξ2,

    and with under condition

    3s2(11L)2+3ξ2B2+3θ2C23s2+3ξ2<1.

    Now (B,t)R2×[t0,T], then we will show that

    |G3(B,t)|2=|μB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+P|24μ2|B|2(11M)2+4ϕ2|N|2|B|2+4ϕ21|P|2|N|2|B|2(k1+|P|)2+4η21|B|2|P|2(l1+|P|)2(4μ2+4ϕ2)+(4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2|N|2+4ϕ21|P|2|N|2(k1+|P|)2+4η21|P|2(l1+|P|)2)|B|2,(4μ2+4ϕ2),
    (1+(4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2supt[0,T]|N|2+4ϕ21supt[0,T]|P|2supt[0,T]|N|2(k1+supt[0,T]|P|)2+4η21supt[0,T]|P|2(l1+supt[0,T]|P|)24μ2+4ϕ2)|B|2)(4μ2+4ϕ2)(1+(4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2N2+4ϕ21P2N2(k1+P2)2+4η21P2(l1+P2)24μ2+4ϕ2)|B|2)¯ρ3(1+|B|2),

    where

    ¯ρ3=4μ2+4ϕ2,

    and with under condition

    4μ2(11M)2+4ϕ2N2+4ϕ21P2N2(k1+P2)2+4η21P2(l1+P2)24μ2+4ϕ2<1.

    (P,t)R2×[t0,T], then we will show that

    |G4(P,t)|2=|ν(MB)ν0P|23ν2M2+3ν2|B|2+3ν20|P|2(3ν2M2+3ν2supt[0,T]|B|2)(1+(3ν203ν2M2+3ν2supt[0,T]|B|2)|P|2)(3ν2M2+3ν2B2)(1+(3ν203ν2M2+3ν2B2)|P|2)¯ρ4(1+|P|2),

    where

    ¯ρ4=3ν2M2+3ν2B2,

    and with under condition

    3ν203ν2M2+3ν2B2<1,

    which completes the proof.

    To determine the equilibrium points of the system (2.6), assume that the rate of change with regard to time is zero, then we obtain

    0=Q+λNαCλ1BC,0=sN(1NL)+ξNBθCN,0=μB(1BM)(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+η1BPl1+P,0=ν(MB)ν0P.

    By solving the above system, we get the following four steady states denoted by E1, E2, E3, and E:

    (1) E1(Qα,0,0,νMν0) always exists.

    (2) E2(Qα+λ1M,0,M,0) always exists.

    (3) E3(C3,N3,0,P3) exists, if the following condition is fulfilled:

    sθQα>0,

    where C3=s(Q+λL)sα+θλL, N3=L(sαθQ)sα+θλL, P3=νMν0.

    (4) E(C,N,B,P) exists, if the following conditions are fulfilled:

    μ(ϕϕ1νMk1ν0+νM)(sαθQsα+θλL)L+η1νM31ν0+νM>0, (3.1)
    sθQα+λ1M+ξM>0. (3.2)

    A theoretical discussion on the local and global asymptotic stabilities at the equilibria of a fractional model (2.6) is presented in this section.

    Theorem 4.1. 1) The equilibrium point E1 is always unstable.

    2) The equilibrium point E2 is unstable whenever E exists.

    3) The equilibrium point E3 is unstable whenever E exists.

    4) The equilibrium point E is locally asymptotically stable if and only if the given condition is satisfied:

    Δ3(Δ1Δ2Δ3)Δ21Δ4>0. (4.1)

    Proof. For the proposed fractional system (2.6), the Jacobian matrix ˆJ is evaluated as:

    ˆJ=(αλ1Bλλ1C0θNs(12NL)+ξBθCξN00B(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)μ(12BM)N(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)+η1Pl1+Pϕ1k1NB(k1+P)2+η1l1B(l1+P)200νν0).

    Let ˆJE1, ˆJE2, ˆJE3, and ˆJE represent the Jacobian matrices of the considered fractional model at E1, E2, E3, and E, respectively. Then

    1) The characteristics equation of the ˆJE1 is given by |ˆJE1ˆλI|=0, where I is the unit matrix. This characteristics equation gives the eigenvalues of ˆJE1, which are

    ˆλ1=ν0,ˆλ2=α,ˆλ3=u+η1νMl1ν0+νM,ˆλ4=sQα. (4.2)

    From Eq (4.2), ˆλ3>0, as all the involved parameters are positive; therefore, E1 is always unstable.

    2) The characteristics equation of the ˆJE2 is given by |ˆJE2ˆλI|=0. This characteristics equation gives the eigenvalues of ˆJE2, which are

    ˆλ1=(α+λ1M),ˆλ2=sθQα+λ1M+ξM, (4.3)

    and ˆλ3, ˆλ4 are complex with negative real part.

    Since, ˆλ1<0, as α, λ1, and M are positive. From Eq (4.3), ˆλ2=s+ξMθQα+λ1M>0, if condition (3.2) is satisfied. Hence, E2 is unstable whenever E exists.

    3) The characteristics equation of the ˆJE3 is given by |ˆJE3ˆλI|=0. Then, ˆJE3 has the following eigenvalues:

    ˆλ1=ν0,ˆλ2=μN3(ϕϕ1P3k1+P3)+η1P3l1+P3, (4.4)

    and ˆλ3, ˆλ4 are roots of the following equation

    ψ2+(α+sN3L)ψ+αsN3L+λθN3=0,

    which are complex with negative real part.

    From Eq (4.4), ˆλ2=μN(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)+η1Pl1+P>0, if condition (3.1) is satisfied. Therefore, the considered system at E3 is unstable whenever E exists.

    4) The characteristics polynomial of the ˆJE is given by |ˆJEˆλI|=0, and can be written as:

    ψ4+Δ1ψ3+Δ2ψ2+Δ3ψ+Δ4=0, (4.5)

    where

    Δ1=(α+λ1B)+sNL+μBM+ν0>0,Δ2=ν0(α+λ1B)+(α+λ1B+ν0)(sNL+μBM)+sNL+μBM+ξ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB+θλN+ν(ϕ1k1NB(k1+P)2+η1l1B(l1+P)2)>0,Δ3=ν0(α+λ1B)(sNL+μBM)+(α+λ1B+ν0)sNLμBM+ν(α+λ1B+sNL)(ϕ1k1NB(k1+P)2+η1l1B(l1+P)2)+ξ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB(α+λ1B+ν0)+λ1θ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NCB+θλN(μBM+ν0)>0,
    Δ4=ν0(α+λ1B){sNLμBM+ξ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NB}+ν(αλ1B)sNL(ϕ1k1NB(k1+P)2+η1l1B(l1+P)2)+λ1ν0θ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)NCB+θλN{ν0μBM+ν(ϕ1k1NB(k1+P)2+η1l1B(l1+P)2)}>0.

    On inspection, it is seen that all Δjs>0,j=1,2,3,4. Following the Routh-Hurwitz rule, if the condition (4.1) is achieved, all the solutions of Eq (4.5) will be found in the negative half of the plane, which gives that all of the eigenvalues are negative. Therefore, the equilibrium point E is locally asymptotically stable.

    Theorem 4.2. If the equilibrium E of the presented fractional model (2.6) exists, then it is globally asymptotically stable in Ω, assuming the following conditions are fulfilled:

    λ21C2m<(α+λ1B)ξλμMθ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P), (4.6)
    max{ϕ21N2m(k1+P)2,η21(l1+P)2}<μ21ν209M2ν2. (4.7)

    Proof. To show the global asymptotic stability of the E, we define the following Lyapunov function:

    U=(CC)22+σ1(NNNlnNN)+σ2(BBBlnBB)+σ32(PP)2, (4.8)

    where σ1, σ2, and σ3 are positive constants that will be opted later.

    Applying the ABC derivative with respect to t on Eq (4.8), we have

    ABC0DδtU=(α+λ1B)(CC)2σ1sL(NN)2σ2μM(BB)2σ3ν0(PP)2+(λσ1θ)(CC)(NN)λ1C(CC)(BB)+{σ1ξ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)σ2}(BB)(NN)σ3ν(BB)(PP)+σ2ϕ1k1N(k1+P)(k1+P)(BB)(PP)+σ2η1l1(l1+P)(l1+P)(BB)(PP).

    Choosing σ1=λθ, σ2=σ1ξ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)=ξλθ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P), we have

    ABC0DδtU=(α+λ1B)(CC)2sλθL(NN)2μξλMθ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)(BB)2σ3ν0(PP)2λ1C(CC)(BB)σ3ν(BB)(PP)+ξλθ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)ϕ1k1N(k1+P)(k1+P)(BB)(PP)+ξλθ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P)η1l1(l1+P)(l1+P)(BB)(PP).

    Therefore, ABC0DδtU is negative definite in Ω if the following conditions are hold:

    λ21C2m<(α+λ1B)μξλMθ(ϕϕ1Pk1+P), (4.9)
    σ3<ν0μξλ3Mθν2(ϕϕ1Pk1+P), (4.10)
    σ3>3Mξλϕ21N2mμν0θ(k1+P)2(ϕϕ1Pk1+P), (4.11)
    σ3>3Mξλη21μν0θ(l1+P)2(ϕϕ1Pk1+P). (4.12)

    From inequalities (4.9)–(4.12), and stated condition (4.7) holds, then we can choose σ3>0. Therefore, the conditions (4.6) and (4.7) are achieved, and ABC0DδtU is negative definite, which implies that E is globally asymptotically stable in Ω.

    In this segment, we apply a well-known numerical scheme known as the Atangana-Toufik scheme [35,43,48,49] to find the numerical results of the proposed model for different values of δ. Parameter values used in the simulation are provided in Table 2.

    Table 2.  Numeric values and their units.
    Parameter Value Units Source
    Q 1 ppm month1 [46]
    λ 0.05 ppm [46]
    λ1 0.0001 (ton month)1 [46]
    α 0.003 (month)1 [46]
    s 0.01 month1 [46]
    L 1000 Person [46]
    ξ 0.0000002 (ton month)1 [46]
    θ 0.00001 (ppm month)1 [46]
    μ 0.2 month1 [46]
    M 2000 ton [46]
    k1 100 Million dollar [46]
    ϕ1 0.00007 (person month)1 [46]
    l1 50 Million dollar [46]
    η1 0.01 month1 [46]
    ν 0.01 Million dollar (ton month)1 [46]
    ν0 0.1 month1 [46]
    ϕ 0.0003 (person month)1 [46]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    For the solution of a fractional model, we construct a numerical scheme using the Atangana-Toufik scheme. With this goal, we will consider that we get the following results from the system (2.6):

    C(t)C(0)=1δ(δ)G1(t,C(t))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)t0G1(τ,C(τ))(tτ)δ1dτ, (5.1)
    N(t)N(0)=1δ(δ)G2(t,N(t))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)t0G2(τ,N(τ))(tτ)δ1dτ, (5.2)
    B(t)B(0)=1δ(δ)G3(t,B(t))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)t0G3(τ,B(τ))(tτ)δ1dτ, (5.3)
    P(t)P(0)=1δ(δ)G4(t,P(t))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)t0G4(τ,P(τ))(tτ)δ1dτ. (5.4)

    For a given point t=tm+1, m=0,1,2, then Eqs (5.1)–(5.4) are written as

    C(tm+1)C(0)=1δ(δ)G1(tm,C(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)tk+1tkG1(τ,C(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ,N(tm+1)N(0)=1δ(δ)G2(tm,N(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)tk+1tkG2(τ,N(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ,B(tm+1)B(0)=1δ(δ)G3(tm,B(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)tk+1tkG3(τ,B(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ,P(tm+1)P(0)=1δ(δ)G4(tm,P(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)tk+1tkG4(τ,P(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ.

    Also, we have

    C(tm+1)C(0)=1δ(δ)G1(tm,C(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0tk+1tkG1(τ,C(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ, (5.5)
    N(tm+1)N(0)=1δ(δ)G2(tm,N(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0tk+1tkG2(τ,N(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ, (5.6)
    B(tm+1)B(0)=1δ(δ)G3(tm,B(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0tk+1tkG3(τ,B(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ, (5.7)
    P(tm+1)P(0)=1δ(δ)G4(tm,P(tm))+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0tk+1tkG4(τ,P(τ))(tm+1τ)δ1dτ. (5.8)

    The function Gj(τ,(τ)) can be approximated applying two-step Lagrange polynomial interpolation in the interval [tk,tk+1] as follows:

    Zk(τ)=τtk1tktk1Gj(tk,(tk))τtktktk1Gj(tk1,(tk1))Gj(tk,(tk))h(τtk1)Gj(tk1,(tk1))h(τtk),j=1,2,3,4.

    Therefore, the previous approximation can be added to Eqs (5.5)–(5.8) to give

    Cm+1=C0+1δ(δ)G1(tm,Cm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0G1(tk,C(tk))htk+1tk(τtk1)(tm+1τ)δ1dτG1(tk1,C(tk1))htk+1tk(τtk)(tm+1τ)δ1dτ,Nm+1=N0+1δ(δ)G2(tm,Nm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0G2(tk,N(tk))htk+1tk(τtk1)(tm+1τ)δ1dτG2(tk1,N(tk1))htk+1tk(τtk)(tm+1τ)δ1dτ,Bm+1=B0+1δ(δ)G3(tm,Bm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0G3(tk,B(tk))htk+1tk(τtk1)(tm+1τ)δ1dτG3(tk1,B(tk1))htk+1tk(τtk)(tm+1τ)δ1dτ,Pm+1=P0+1δ(δ)G4(tm,Pm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0G4(tk,P(tk))htk+1tk(τtk1)(tm+1τ)δ1dτG4(tk1,P(tk1))htk+1tk(τtk)(tm+1τ)δ1dτ, (5.9)

    where

    Ψk1=tk+1tk(τtk1)(tm+1τ)δ1dτ=hδ+1δ(δ+1)[(m+1k)δ(mk+2+δ)(mk)δ(mk+2+2δ)],

    and

    Ψk=tk+1tk(τtk)(tm+1τ)δ1dτ=hδ+1δ(δ+1)[(m+1k)δ+1(mk)δ(mk+1+δ)].

    Substituting the above integrals into Eqs (5.5)–(5.8), we have the following iterative schemes for the model equations:

    Cm+1=C0+1δ(δ)G1(tm,Cm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0[hδG1(tk,Ck)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ(mk+2+δ)(mk)δ(mk+2+2δ))hδG1(tk1,Ck1)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ+1(mk)δ(mk+1+δ))],Nm+1=N0+1δ(δ)G2(tm,Nm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0[hδG2(tk,Nk)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ(mk+2+δ)(mk)δ(mk+2+2δ))hδG2(tk1,Nk1)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ+1(mk)δ(mk+1+δ))],Bm+1=B0+1δ(δ)G3(tm,Bm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0[hδG3(tk,Bk)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ(mk+2+δ)(mk)δ(mk+2+2δ))hδG3(tk1,Bk1)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ+1(mk)δ(mk+1+δ))],Pm+1=P0+1δ(δ)G4(tm,Pm)+δ(δ)Γ(δ)mk=0[hδG4(tk,Pk)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ(mk+2+δ)(mk)δ(mk+2+2δ))hδG4(tk1,Pk1)Γ(δ+2)((m+1k)δ+1(mk)δ(mk+1+δ))].

    Figures 14 depict the behavior of all the compartments within the system when the fractional parameter is changed from 0.80 to 1.00. This study sheds light on the advantages of applying the ABC fractional derivative operator by demonstrating the fractional parameter's substantial influence on the dynamics of the system.

    Figure 1.  Behavior of atmospheric carbon dioxide C(t).
    Figure 2.  Behavior of human population N(t).
    Figure 3.  Behavior of forest biomass B(t).
    Figure 4.  Behavior of forest management programs P(t).

    Numerical simulations are carried out for the parameter values listed in Table 2 to examine the consequences of forest management policies and deforestation on the dynamics of atmospheric CO2. Thus, we set the natural CO2 emission rate, Q=1 ppm month1. Since the population's carrying capacity is L=1000 persons, we set the population growth rate coefficient induced by forest biomass, ξ, to be 0.0000002 (ton month)1. For the simulations, the following initial conditions are considered: C(0)=300, N(0)=500, B(0)=500, and P(0)=100 by setting ϕ=0.0003 (person month)1, μ=0.2 month1, and θ=0.00001 (ppm month)1.

    Figure 1 shows that there is a discernible shift in the response of CO2 concentration when the fractional parameter increases from 0.80 to 1.00. The behavior of atmospheric carbon dioxide is reduced with smaller fractional levels. It is evident from Figure 2 that higher values in the fractional parameter lead to a rise in the human population. Figure 3 illustrates an inverse connection between a fractional parameter and the human population. There is a noticeable tendency at lower fractional orders that progressively decreases as the parameter rises. This implies that more complicated, real-world dynamics that are not as well characterized by integer-order derivatives are captured by fractional-order derivatives. Figure 4 illustrates how fractional parameters affect forest management initiatives and exhibit behavior that is comparable to Figure 1. The behavior is more consistent with integer-order derivatives as the parameter gets closer to 1.00, indicating that it is converging to the right steady-state [46]. As seen in these diagrams, the fractional derivative has a significant impact on the concentration of CO2 throughout time. The simulations performed using fractional derivatives produce the reported gap due to the memory effect, which is missing in the classic integer-order derivative. Future CO2 dynamics will be influenced by memory effects on previous data, making it easier to control them.

    Figures 5 and 6 show how deforestation and forest management strategies affect atmospheric CO2 dynamics. These statistics emphasize how important it is to implement effective mitigation techniques and switch to low-carbon energy sources to lower atmospheric CO2 levels.

    Figure 5.  Effect of deforestation rate on the concentration of carbon dioxide C(t) and forest biomass B(t), setting δ=0.90.
    Figure 6.  Effect of forest management measures on the concentration of carbon dioxide C(t) and forest biomass B(t), setting δ=0.90.

    The relationship between deforestation activities and rising CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere is seen in Figure 5. The findings show that regions with considerable deforestation have greater CO2 concentrations. This is explained by the fact that less forest cover means less carbon being sequestered. As essential carbon sinks, forests take up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Deforestation, which removes trees from the forest, causes the atmosphere to re-release stored carbon, intensifying the greenhouse effect and accelerating global warming. The results of using different forest management strategies targeted at reducing CO2 emissions are shown in Figure 6. The picture shows how CO2 levels gradually drop over time in areas with strict forest management strategies. Reforestation, afforestation, and sustainable logging techniques are examples of effective policies that guarantee the maintenance and improvement of forest carbon sinks. By improving tree's capacity to store carbon, these methods can lower the atmospheric concentration of CO2 globally.

    The present study developed a fractional-order model to analyze the dynamics of novel atmospheric CO2 gas through forest management programs. The Atangana-Baleanu derivative operator and generalized Mittag-Leffler function were employed to develop this novel fractional model. Carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas, was mitigated in the atmosphere using sustainable forest management. Our study aimed to examine the memory effect and the impact of forest management initiatives on stabilizing elevated CO2 levels in the atmosphere. The existence and uniqueness of the solution for the proposed model were proven using theorems. Steady states were computed and investigated for stability analysis. The equilibrium point E of the model is locally and globally asymptotically stable in the region Ω using the Lyapunov function theory. The Atangana-Toufik scheme was utilized to find the approximate solution to the proposed model. The results obtained are represented graphically and are consistent with the system. Simulations were conducted for different values of fractional order δ, revealing that the fractional order significantly impacts the concentration of CO2. Analysis of deforestation and forest management programs indicates, that to enhance forest cover and reduce atmospheric CO2 levels, it is more advantageous to implement forest management strategies that reduce the rate of deforestation and increase the growth rate of forest biomass at low implementation costs. A constraint of this research is the assumption of uniformity in forest management methodologies, which does not accurately represent actual diversity in the field. In the future, we will take into account different forest kinds and management techniques. We will also add climate change aspects to the model, which might improve its forecasting power.

    Muhammad Bilal Riaz: Conceptualization, methdology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—review and editing, writing—review and editing; Nauman Raza: Software, formal analysis, visualization; Jan Martinovic: Software, validation, writing—review and editing, project administration; Abu Bakar: Software, investigation, writing—original draft preparation; Osman Tunç: Data curation, writing—review and editing, visualization. The authors declare that this study was accomplished in collaboration with the same responsibility. All the authors read and approved the submitted Manuscript.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This article has been produced with the financial support of the European Union under the REFRESH – Research Excellence For Region Sustainability and High-tech Industries project number CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048 via the Operational Programme Just Transition.

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.



    [1] E. K. Shuman, Global climate change and infectious diseases, N. Engl. J. Med., 362 (2010), 1061–1063. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0912931 doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912931
    [2] J. Yang, M. Zhou, Z. Ren, M. Li, B. Wang, D. L. Liu, et al., Projecting heat-related excess mortality under climate change scenarios in China, Nat. Comm., 12 (2021), 1039. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21305-1 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21305-1
    [3] Global monitoring laboratory, Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide, Available from: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/monthly.html.
    [4] FAO, Global forest resources assessment 2020-Key findings, Rome, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8753en
    [5] Food and agriculture organization of the united nations, Global forest resources assessment 2015, Available from: https://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/past-assessments/fra-2015/en/.
    [6] R. B. Jackson, J. S. Baker, Opportunities and constraints for forest climate mitigation, BioScience, 60 (2010), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.7 doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.7
    [7] K. A. Tafoya, E. S. Brondizio, C. E. Johnson, P. Beck, M. Wallace, R. Quirós, et al., Effectiveness of Costa Ricas conservation portfolio to lower deforestation, protect primates, and increase community participation, Front. Environ. Sci., 8 (2020), 580724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.580724 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.580724
    [8] S. Chang, E. L. Mahon, H. A. MacKay, W. H. Rottmann, S. H. Strauss, P. M. Pijut, et al., Genetic engineering of trees: Progress and new horizons, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant, 54 (2018), 341–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-018-9914-1 doi: 10.1007/s11627-018-9914-1
    [9] M. Verma, K. V. Alok, Effect of plantation of genetically modified trees on the control of atmospheric carbon dioxide: A modeling study, Nat. Resour. Model., 34 (2021), e12300. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12300 doi: 10.1111/nrm.12300
    [10] H. Ledford, Brazil considers transgenic trees, Nature, 512 (2014), 357. https://doi.org/10.1038/512357a doi: 10.1038/512357a
    [11] R. J. Zomer, H. Neufeldt, J. Xu, A. Ahrends, D. Bossio, A. Trabucco, et al., Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets, Sci. Rep., 6 (2016), 29987. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29987 doi: 10.1038/srep29987
    [12] M. van Noordwijk, J. M. Roshetko, Murniati, M. D. Angeles, Suyanto, C. Fay, et al., Agroforestry is a form of sustainable forest management: Lessons from South East Asia, In: UNFF Intersessional experts meeting on the role of planted forests in sustainable forest management conference, New Zealand: Wellington, 2003.
    [13] J. P. Basu, Agroforestry, climate change mitigation and livelihood security in India, New Zealand J. For. Sci., 44 (2014), S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S11 doi: 10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S11
    [14] J. Hussain, K. Zhou, M. Akbar, M. Z. khan, G. Raza, S. Ali, et al., Dependence of rural livelihoods on forest resources in Naltar Valley, a dry temperate mountainous region, Pakistan, Global Ecol. Conser., 20 (2019), e00765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00765 doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00765
    [15] A. Fraser, Achieving the sustainable management of forests, Cham: Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15839-2
    [16] A. R. Saeed, C. McDermott, E. Boyd, Are REDD+ community forest projects following the principles for collective action, as proposed by Ostrom?, Int. J. Commons, 11 (2017), 572–596. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.700 doi: 10.18352/ijc.700
    [17] Y. T. Tegegne, M. Cramm, J. V. Brusselen, Sustainable forest management, FLEGT, and REDD+: exploring interlinkages to strengthen forest policy coherence, Sustainability, 10 (2018), 4841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124841 doi: 10.3390/su10124841
    [18] A. Roopsind, B. Sohngen, J. Brandt, Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116 (2019), 24492–24499. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904027116 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904027116
    [19] T. Hickler, A. Rammig, C. Werner, Modelling CO2 impacts on forest productivity, Curr. Forestry Rep., 1 (2015), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0014-8 doi: 10.1007/s40725-015-0014-8
    [20] N. Solomon, O. Pabi, T. Annang, I. K. Asante, E. Birhane, The effects of land cover change on carbon stock dynamics in a dry Afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia, Carbon Balance Manage., 13 (2018), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0103-7 doi: 10.1186/s13021-018-0103-7
    [21] B. C. Poudel, Forest biomass production potential and its implications for carbon balance, Mid Sweden University Licentiate Thesis, 2012.
    [22] W. Liu, F. Lu, Y. Luo, W. Bo, L. Kong, L. Zhang, et al., Human influence on the temporal dynamics and spatial distribution of forest biomass carbon in China, Ecology Evol., 7 (2017), 6220–6230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3188 doi: 10.1002/ece3.3188
    [23] T. Li, Y. Guo, Modeling and optimal control of mutated COVID-19 (Delta strain) with imperfect vaccination, Chaos Solitons Fract., 156 (2022), 111825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111825 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111825
    [24] Y. Guo, T. Li, Modeling the competitive transmission of the Omicron strain and Delta strain of COVID-19, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 526 (2023), 127283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127283 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127283
    [25] B. Li, Z. Eskandari, Dynamical analysis of a discrete-time SIR epidemic model, J. Franklin Inst., 36 (2023), 7989–8007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.06.006
    [26] K. Tennakone, Stability of the biomass-carbon dioxide equilibrium in the atmosphere: Mathematical model, Appl. Math. Comput., 35 (1990), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(90)90113-H doi: 10.1016/0096-3003(90)90113-H
    [27] A. K. Misra, M. Verma, E. Venturino, Modeling the control of atmospheric carbon dioxide through reforestation: effect of time delay, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 1 (2015), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0028-z doi: 10.1007/s40808-015-0028-z
    [28] M. Thompson, D. Gamage, N. Hirotsu, A. Martin, S. Seneweera, Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning: A perspective on root sugar sensing and hormonal crosstalk, Front. Physiol., 8 (2017), 578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00578 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00578
    [29] W. Fors, Population and greenhouse gas dynamics: An implementation of system dynamics, University of Vaasa, 2021.
    [30] M. Chaudhary, J. Dhar, O. P. Misra, A mathematical model for the conservation of forestry biomass with an alternative resource for industrialization: A modified Leslie Gower interaction, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 1 (2015), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0056-8 doi: 10.1007/s40808-015-0056-8
    [31] M. Agarwal, P. Rachana, Conservation of forestry biomass and wildlife population: A mathematical model, Asian J. Math. Comput. Res., 4 (2015), 1–15.
    [32] M. Chaudhary, J. Dhar, O. P. Misra, A mathematical model for the conservation of forestry biomass with an alternative resource for industrialization: A modified Leslie Gower interaction, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 1 (2015), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0056-8 doi: 10.1007/s40808-015-0056-8
    [33] H. Alrabaiah, M. ur Rahman, I. Mahariq, S. Bushnaq, M. Arfan, Fractional order analysis of HBV and HCV co-infection under ABC derivative, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400369 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22400369
    [34] Y. Guo, T. Li, Fractional-order modeling and optimal control of a new online game addiction model based on real data, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 121 (2023), 107221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107221 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107221
    [35] A. I. K. Butt, W. Ahmad, M. Rafiq, D. Baleanu, Numerical analysis of Atangana-Baleanu fractional model to understand the propagation of a novel corona virus pandemic, Alexandria Eng. J., 61 (2022), 7007–7027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.12.042 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.12.042
    [36] N. Raza, A. Bakar, A. Khan, C. Tunç, Numerical simulations of the fractional-order SIQ mathematical model of Corona virus disease using the nonstandard finite difference scheme, Malaysian J. Math. Sci., 16 (2022), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.47836/mjms.16.3.01 doi: 10.47836/mjms.16.3.01
    [37] V. P. Dubey, S. Dubey, D. Kumar, J. Singh, A computational study of fractional model of atmospheric dynamics of carbon dioxide gas, Chaos Solitons Fract., 142 (2021), 110375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110375 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110375
    [38] W. E. Raslan, Fractional mathematical modeling for epidemic prediction of COVID-19 in Egypt, Ain Shams Eng. J., 12 (2021), 3057–3062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.027 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.027
    [39] A. A. Khan, R. Amin, S. Ullah, W. Sumelka, M. Altanji, Numerical simulation of a Caputo fractional epidemic model for the novel coronavirus with the impact of environmental transmission, Alexandria Eng. J., 61 (2022), 5083–5095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.008 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.008
    [40] N. Raza, S. Arshed, A. Bakar, A. Shahzad, M. Inc, A numerical efficient splitting method for the solution of HIV time periodic reaction-diffusion model having spatial heterogeneity, Phys. A, 609 (2022), 128385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128385 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.128385
    [41] R. Agarwal, R. Hristova, O. R. Donal, Basic concepts of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with non-instantaneous impulses, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050614 doi: 10.3390/sym11050614
    [42] E. Ilhan, P. Veeresha, H. M. Baskonus, Fractional approach for a mathematical model of atmospheric dynamics of CO2 gas with an efficient method, Chaos Solitons Fract., 152 (2021), 111347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111347 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111347
    [43] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Thermal Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
    [44] K. M. Owolabi, Analysis and numerical simulation of multicomponent system with Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, Chaos Solitons Fract., 115 (2018), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.08.022 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.08.022
    [45] S. Uçar, Analysis of a basic SEIRA model with Atangana-Baleanu derivative, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 1411–1424. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020097 doi: 10.3934/math.2020097
    [46] M. Verma, C. Gautam, Optimal mitigation of atmospheric carbon dioxide through forest management programs: A modeling study, Comp. Appl. Math., 41 (2022), 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02028-5 doi: 10.1007/s40314-022-02028-5
    [47] I. Koca, H. Bulut, E. Akçetin, A different approach for behavior of fractional plant virus model, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 15 (2022), 186–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.015.03.02 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.015.03.02
    [48] M. B. Riaz, N. Raza, J. Martinovic, A. Bakar, H. Kurkcu, O. Tunç, Fractional dynamics and sensitivity analysis of measles epidemic model through vaccination, Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci., 31 (2024), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2024.2345424 doi: 10.1080/25765299.2024.2345424
    [49] A. R. Butt, A. A. Saqib, A. Bakar, D. U. Ozsahin, H. Ahmad, B. Almohsen, Investigating the fractional dynamics and sensitivity of an epidemic model with nonlinear convex rate, Res. Phys., 54 (2023), 107089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107089 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107089
    [50] M. Batool, M. Farman, A. S. Ghaffari, K. S. Nisar, S. R. Munjam, Analysis and dynamical structure of glucose insulin glucagon system with Mittage-Leffler kernel for type I diabetes mellitus, Sci. Rep., 14 (2024), 8058. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58132-5 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58132-5
    [51] A. Zehra, P. A. Naik, A. Hasan, M. Farman, K. S. Nisar, F. Chaudhry, et al., Physiological and chaos effect on dynamics of neurological disorder with memory effect of fractional operator: A mathematical study, Comput. Methods Prog. Bio., 250 (2024), 108190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108190 doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108190
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(804) PDF downloads(38) Cited by(0)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog