By means of Whipple's quadratic transformations, two classes of hypergeometric 3F2-series are expressed in terms of the Lerch transcendent function. Several difficult series with a free variable are explicitly evaluated in closed form, including Yabu's three remarkable identities.
Citation: Marta Na Chen, Wenchang Chu. Yabu's formulae for hypergeometric 3F2-series through Whipple's quadratic transformations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21799-21815. doi: 10.3934/math.20241060
[1] | Zunyuan Hu, Can Li, Shimin Guo . Fast finite difference/Legendre spectral collocation approximations for a tempered time-fractional diffusion equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34647-34673. doi: 10.3934/math.20241650 |
[2] | Sarkhel Akbar Mahmood, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Dumitru Baleanu, Hassen Aydi, Yasser S. Hamed . Analysing discrete fractional operators with exponential kernel for positivity in lower boundedness. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10387-10399. doi: 10.3934/math.2022579 |
[3] | Maryam Saddiqa, Ghulam Farid, Saleem Ullah, Chahn Yong Jung, Soo Hak Shim . On Bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions for generalized exponentially convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6454-6468. doi: 10.3934/math.2021379 |
[4] | Juan L. G. Guirao, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Hari Mohan Srivastava, Dumitru Baleanu, Marwan S. Abualrub . Relationships between the discrete Riemann-Liouville and Liouville-Caputo fractional differences and their associated convexity results. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18127-18141. doi: 10.3934/math.2022997 |
[5] | Erdal Bas, Ramazan Ozarslan . Theory of discrete fractional Sturm–Liouville equations and visual results. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 593-612. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.593 |
[6] | Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Donal O'Regan, Aram Bahroz Brzo, Khadijah M. Abualnaja, Dumitru Baleanu . Analysis of positivity results for discrete fractional operators by means of exponential kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15812-15823. doi: 10.3934/math.2022865 |
[7] | Hengxiao Qi, Muhammad Yussouf, Sajid Mehmood, Yu-Ming Chu, Ghulam Farid . Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6030-6042. doi: 10.3934/math.2020386 |
[8] | Dong Pan, Huizhen Qu . Finite-time boundary synchronization of space-time discretized stochastic fuzzy genetic regulatory networks with time delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2163-2190. doi: 10.3934/math.2025101 |
[9] | Erdal Bas, Ramazan Ozarslan, Resat Yilmazer . Spectral structure and solution of fractional hydrogen atom difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1359-1371. doi: 10.3934/math.2020093 |
[10] | Mohammad Tamsir, Neeraj Dhiman, Deependra Nigam, Anand Chauhan . Approximation of Caputo time-fractional diffusion equation using redefined cubic exponential B-spline collocation technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3805-3820. doi: 10.3934/math.2021226 |
By means of Whipple's quadratic transformations, two classes of hypergeometric 3F2-series are expressed in terms of the Lerch transcendent function. Several difficult series with a free variable are explicitly evaluated in closed form, including Yabu's three remarkable identities.
Fractional differential equations have developed rapidly due to their applications, see[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Compared to classical integer-order equations, fractional differential equations offer a more accurate representation of memory effects in diverse materials and processes. Many scholars have devoted their efforts to exploring this topic and have achieved significant advancements. By using semigroup theory, the noncompact measures conditions, the references [8] studied local and global existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for fractional impulisive evolution differential equations of order 0<α≤1. By using semigroup theory, the properties of noncompact measures, the references [10,11,12] studied local and global existence of solutions for a class of fractional evolution equations of order 0<α≤1. By the generalized Darbo fixed point theorem and Schauder fixed point theorem, the reference [14] investigated the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for fractional impulsive integro-differential evolution equations of order 1<β≤2 with nonlocal conditions. By using the cosine family theory, the Mönch fixed point theorem, the reference [15] studied the existence of mild solutions for fractional impulsive integro-differential evolution equations of order 1<β≤2 with nonlocal conditions. By using the two-step Adomian decomposition method, the reference [16,17] found an analytical solution of for fractional order integro-differential equation, meanwhile, established results for the existence and uniqueness of a solution with the help of some fixed point theorems and the Banach contraction principle. Many evolution processes are characterized by abrupt state changes, which can be effectively modeled using impulsive differential equations. There are two types of impulses: instantaneous impulses and non-instantaneous impulses. The theory of instantaneous impulses often describes some processes which have a sudden change in their states at certain times, particularly in the fields of biology, dynamics, physics, and engineering. However, in the management and optimal control of life phenomena, there exist numerous non-instantaneous impulsive phenomena. The classical instantaneous impulsive differential system is not suitable to describe such phenomena, whereas differential equations with the non-instantaneous impulse offer a more suitable framework. Differential equations with non-instantaneous impulses have found extensive applications in areas such as pesticide dynamics, pest control, integrated environmental management, and fishery resources. Therefore, it is worthwhile to explore the non-instantaneous impulsive differential system. Many scholars have dedicated their efforts to investigating this subject and have achieved notable advancements. For further details, please refer to[18,19,20,21,22,23]. In comparison to the results of differential equations with instantaneous impulses, there are fewer results available for differential equations with non-instantaneous impulses.
The non-instantaneous impulses were first proposed by Hernandez and Regan[18]. In [18], the authors studied the following integer order equations:
{u′(t)=Au(t)+f(t,u(t)),t∈(si,ti+1],i=1,2,...,n,u(t)=gi(t,u(t)),t∈(ti,si],i=1,2,...,n,u(0)=u0, |
where A:D(A)⊂X→X is the generator of a C0-semigroup of bounded linear operators (T(t)),t≥0 is defined on a Banach space X, and the impulses start abruptly at the points ti and their action continues on the interval [ti,si]. Utilizing the semigroup theory and fixed point theory, they established the existence of mild solutions.
Pierri et al.[20] studied the following differential equation:
{x′(t)=Ax(t)+f(t,x(t)),t∈(si,ti+1],x(t)=gi(t,Ni(t)(x)),t∈(ti,si],i∈N,x(0)=x0, |
where they gave the existence of mild solutions on [0,+∝).
The literature[21] considered the following fractional nonautonomous evolution equations with delay:
{CDβtx(t)=A(t)x(t)+f(t,x(τ1(t)),x(τ2(t)),...,x(τl(t))),t∈J=[0,T],x(0)=x0∈E, |
where A(t)t∈J is a family of closed and linear operators defined on a dense domain D(A) in Banach space E into E and the operator A(t) depends on t.
In [18,20], the authors studied the integer order equation with non-instantaneous impulse, where the operator A did not depend on t. In the process of proving the theorem, the nonlinear function f required the Lipschitz condition; meanwhile, the compression coefficient was less than 1. In [21], the authors derived mild solutions using the Banach contraction mapping principle without employing the contraction coefficient 0<k<1.
Inspired by the literature mentioned earlier, we explore the following nonlinear fractional integro-differential equations with nonlocal conditions and non-instantaneous impulses:
{C0Dβtu(t)=A(t)u(t)+f(t,u(t),(H1u)(t),(H2u)(t)),t∈(si,ti+1],i=1,2,...,n,u(t)=li(t,u(t)),t∈(ti,si],i=1,2,...,n,u(0)+g1(u)=u0∈X, | (1.1) |
where C0Dβt represents the Caputo fractional derivatives of order β∈(0,1], u(⋅)∈X, A(t)⊂X is a closed linear operator, and A(t) depends on t. J=[0,T],0=s0<t1≤s1<t2≤...<tn≤sn<tn+1=T<+∞. f∈C[J×X3,X],li:J×X→X, and g1:X→X are also continuous. H1 and H2 are defined by
H1u(t)=∫t0h1(t,s,u(s))ds, H2u(t)=∫T0h2(t,s,u(s))ds, |
D={(t,s) | 0≤s≤t≤T},h1∈C[D×X,X], h2∈C[J×J×X,X]. |
In this paper, we utilize the Mönch fixed point theorem, the non-compact measure, and the method of stepwise estimation to eliminate the Lipschitz condition for the nonlinear function f. Additionally, we do not require the compressibility coefficient to be less than 1. The key findings in this study enhance and extend some previous results.
We suppose that (X,∥⋅∥) is a Banach space, J=[0,T], J0=[0,t1],Ji=(ti,ti+1],i=1,2,...n−1,Jn=(tn,T], and
PC[J,X]={u:J→X∣u∈C[(ti,ti+1],X], |
and there exist
u(t−i),u(t+i) with u(t+i)=u(t−i),i=1,2,..,n}. |
Obviously, PC[J,X] is a Banach space endowed with PC-norm ‖u‖pc=supt∈Ju(t).
Definition 2.1. [2] The Caputo fractional derivative of order β∈(0,1] for a function u(t) is given by
Ct0Dβt=1Γ(p−β)∫tt0u(p)(s)(t−s)1+β−pds, |
where p=[β]+1.
Definition 2.2. [24] We assume that A(t):D(A)⊂E→E is a closed linear operator. We define the resolvent set of A(t) by ρ[A(t)]. If there exist a nonnegative constant ω≥0 and a strongly continuous function Uβ:R2+→B(E) satisfying
(λβI−A(s))−1x=∫∞0e−λ(t−s)Uβ(t,s)xdt,Reλ>ω,x∈E, |
then we call A(t) the generator of a β-resolvent family. Uβ(t,s) is called the β-resolvent family generated by A(t).
Property 2.1. [24] Uβ(x,y) has the following properties:
(1) Uβ(x,x)=I,Uβ(x,y)=Uβ(x,r)Uβ(r,y) for 0≤x≤r≤y≤T;
(2) For 0≤x≤y≤T,(x,y)→Uβ(x,y) is strongly continuous.
Definition 2.3. [25] We suppose that D is a space and mapping T:D→D. If there exists x0∈D such that Tx0=x0, then x0∈D is called the fixed point of operator T.
Lemma 2.1. [14] Suppose B⊂PC[J,X] is equi-continuous and bounded, then for t∈Ji, α({u(t)|u∈B}) is continuous and
α({∫Ju(t)dt:u∈B})≤∫Jα(B(t))dt. |
Lemma 2.2. [26] Suppose B⊂PC[J,X] is equi-continuous and bounded, then ¯CoB⊂PC[J,X] is equi-continuous and bounded.
Lemma 2.3. [27] For any R>0, the function f is uniformly continuous and bounded on J×B4R where BR={u∈X:‖u‖≤R}, if B⊂PC[J,X] is equi-continuous and bounded, then {f(t,u(t),u(τ(t)),(H1u)(t),(H2u)(t):u∈B}⊂PC[J,X] is also equi-continuous and bounded.
Lemma 2.4. [27] Suppose B⊂PC[J,X] is bounded and equi-continuous, then
αPC(B)=supt∈Jα(B(t)). |
Lemma 2.5. [6] Suppose B⊂PC[J,X] is a bounded set, then
α(B(J)≤αPC(B)). |
Lemma 2.6. [27] Suppose that r∈C[J,R+] meets
r(t)≤N1∫t0r(s)ds+N2t∫t0r(s)ds+N3t∫T0r(s)ds,t∈J, |
where N1>0,N2≥0,N3≥0 are constants. If one of the following conditions holds
(i) TN3(eT(N1+TN2)−1)<N1+TN2,
(ii) T(2N1+TN2+TN3)<2,
then r(t)≡0, t∈J.
Lemma 2.7. (Mönch fixed point theorem) [7] We assume that X is a Banach space, Ω⊂X is open and bounded, θ∈Ω, and Q:¯Ω→¯Ω is a continuous operator and meets the following condition:
(i) u≠λQu,0≤λ≤1,u∈∂Ω;
(ii) If W⊂¯Ω is countable and W⊂¯co({θ}∪Q(W)), then W is relatively compact.
Thus, Q exists at least a fixed point on Ω.
Definition 2.4. u∈PC[J,X] is called a mild solution of (1.1) if u(t) satisfies equations:
u(t)={Uβ(t,0)(u0−g1(u))+∫t0Uβ(t,s)f(s,u(s),(H1u)(s),(H2u)(s))ds,t∈[0,t1],li(t,u(t)),t∈(ti,si],i=1,2,...,n,Uβ(t,si)li(si,u(si))+∫tsiUβ(t,s)f(s,u(s),(H1u)(s),(H2u)(s))ds,t∈(si,ti+1],i=1,2,...,n. |
We first give the following hypotheses.
(H1) f:J×T3R→X is uniformly continuous and bounded, where TR={u∈PC[J,X]:‖u‖PC≤R}.
(H2) There exist p(t,⋅),q(t,⋅)∈L[J,R+], such that
∥h1(t,s,u(s))∥≤p(t,s)∥u(s)∥+eh,(t,s)∈D,u∈X, |
∥h2(t,s,u(s))∥≤q(t,s)∥u(s)∥+eg,(t,s)∈J×J,u∈X, |
h0=max0≤s≤t≤T∫t0p(t,s)ds<+∞,g0=max0≤s,t≤T∫T0q(t,s)ds<+∞. |
(H3) There exist b1∈L[J,R+],b2,b3∈L2[J,R+] satisfying
∥f(s,u(s),u1,u2)∥≤b1(s)+b2(s)∥u1∥+b3(s)∥u2∥. |
(H4) Suppose li∈C[J×X,X],g1∈C[PC[J,X],X]. For u∈PC[J,X], there are nonnegative constants d≥0,e≥0 such that
∥g1(u)∥≤d∥u∥PC+e. |
(H5) There exist nonnegative constants Lh,Lg,Lli(i=1,2,...,n) such that for any bounded subset B⊂X, we have
α(h1(t,s,B))≤Lhα(B),α(h2(t,s,B))≤Lgα(B),α(li(t,B))≤Lli∫t0α(B)ds. |
(H6) There exist constants Lk≥0(k=1,2,3) satisfying one of the following conditions:
(i)TM∗(2(L1+Lli)+TLhL2+TLgL3)<2,
(ii)TLgL3(eTM∗(L1+Lli+TL2Lh)−1)<(L1+Lli)+TL2Lh,
and for any bounded subset Sk⊂X(k=1,2,3), we have
α(f(t,S1,S2,S3)≤3∑k=1Liα(Sk). |
(H7) There exists a constant Lg1>0 such that for any bounded subset B⊂PC[J,X], we obtain
α(g1(B))≤Lg1∫t0α(B)ds. |
(H8) There exist constants Yk≥0(k=1,2,3) meeting conditions (i) or (ii):
(i) TLgY3(eTM∗(Y1+Lli+Lg1+TY2Lh)−1)<(Y1+Lli+Lg1)+TY2Lh,
(ii) TM∗(2(Y1+Lli+Lg1)+TLhY2+TLgY3)<2,
and for any bounded subset Sk⊂X(k=1,2,3),
α(f(t,S1,S2,S3)≤3∑i=1Yiα(Sk). |
Theorem 3.1. We assume that conditions (H1)−(H6) are fulfilled, and g1 is compact, then the problem (1.1) exists at least one mild solution.
Proof. We initially define the operator Q:PC[J,X]→PC[J,X] by
Qu(t)={Uβ(t,0)(u0−g1(u))+∫t0Uβ(t,s)f(s,u(s),(H1u)(s),(H2u)(s))ds,t∈[0,t1],li(t,u(t)),t∈(ti,si],i=1,2,...,n,Uβ(t,si)li(si,u(si))+∫tsiUβ(t,s)f(s,u(s),(H1u)(s),(H2u)(s))ds,t∈(si,ti+1],i=1,2,...,n. | (3.1) |
The fixed point of operator Q in PC[J,X] is a solution of problem (1.1). Next, we will prove that operator Q has a fixed point in PC[J,X].
As f is uniformly continuous, g1,li are continuous, and Uβ(t,s) is strongly continuous, we can get that Q is continuous.
Next, we prove that Ω0={u∈PC[J,X]|u=λQu,λ∈[0,1]} is bounded. In fact, if y0∈Ω0, then there exists 0≤λ0≤1 satisfying y0(t)=λ0(Qy0)(t),t∈J.
When t∈[0,t1], we have
y0(t)=λ0(Qy0)(t)=λ0Uβ(t,0)[u0−g1(y0)]+λ0∫t0Uβ(t,s)f(s,y0(s),(H1y0)(s),(H2y0)(s))ds. | (3.2) |
Let y(t)=∥y0(t)∥. By (H2)−(H4) and (3.2), we get
y(t)≤M∗(∥u0∥+∥g1(y0)∥)+M∗∫t0[b1(s)+b2(s)∥H1y0(s)∥+b3(s)∥H2y0(s)∥]ds, |
where M∗=max0≤s≤t≤a∥Uβ(t,s)∥.
Since
∥H1y0(t)∥≤∫t0∥h1(t,s,y0(s))∥ds≤(p(t,s)∥y0(s)∥+eh)t1≤t1h0∥y0(s)∥+t1eh,=t1h0y(s)+t1eh, |
similarly, we can get ∥H2y0(t)∥≤t1g0y(s)+t1eg, then
y(t)≤M∗(∥u0∥+∥g1(y0)∥)+M∗∫t0[b3(s)aeh+b4(s)aeg]ds+M∗∫t0[b1(s)+t1b2(s)y(s)h0+t1b3(s)y(s)g0]ds≤M1+M2+M∗Fy(t), |
where
M1=M∗(∥u0∥+∥g1(y0)∥)+M∗∫t0[b2(s)t1eh+b3(s)t1eg]ds, |
M2=M∗∫t10b1(s)ds,Fy(t)=∫t0[t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0]y(s)ds. |
Therefore F:C[J0,R+]→C[J0,R+] is completely continuous.
As b2,b3,b4∈L2[J,R+], then
M=(∫T0[(t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0)]2ds)12<+∞. |
Next, we will demonstrate rσ(F)=0. Because
∥Fy(t)∥≤∫t0∥[t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0]y(s)∥ds≤(∫t0[t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0]2ds)12(∫t0∥y∥2ds)12≤M∥y∥t12, |
∥F2y(t)∥≤∫t0∥(t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0)By(s)∥ds≤(∫t0[(t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0)]2ds)12(∫t0(M∥y∥t12)2ds)12≤1√2M2∥y∥t, |
∥F3y(t)∥≤∫t0∥(t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0)F2y(s)∥ds≤(∫t0[(t1b2(s)h0+t1b3(s)g0)]2ds)12(∫t0(1√2M2∥y∥t)2ds)12≤1√3√2M3∥y∥t32, |
for any n∈N, by mathematical induction, we can obtain
∥Fny(t)∥≤1√n!Mn∥y∥tn2, |
then
∥Fn∥≤1√n!Mnan2, |
rσ(F)=limn→+∞∥Fn∥1n=0. |
There is a nonnegative constant C1≥0 independent of function u satisfying
‖y0(t)‖≤C1,t∈J0. |
Since l1 is continuous, there is a nonnegative constant β1≥0 satisfying
∥l1(t,u(t))∥≤β1,∀t∈J,‖u‖≤C1. |
Let
z0(t)={l1(t,y0(t)),t∈(t1,s1],Uβ(t,s1)l1(s1,y0(s1))+∫ts1Uβ(t,s)f(s,y0(s),(H1y0)(s),(H2y0)(s))ds,t∈(s1,t2],l1(t,y0(t+1)),t=t1, |
then z0∈C[[t1,t2],X] and
∥z0(t)∥≤∥l1(t,y0(t))∥+∥Uβ(t,s1)l1(s1,y0(s1))+∫ts1Uβ(t,s)f(s,y0(s),(H1y0)(s),(H2y0)(s))ds∥≤∥β1∥+M∗∥β1∥+∫ts1∥Uβ(t,s)f(s,y0(s),(H1y0)(s),(H2y0)(s))∥ds≤(1+M∗)∥β1∥+M∗∫ts1b1(s)ds+M∗∫t0[b2(s)Teh+b3(s)Teg]ds+M∗∫t0[t1b2(s)y(s)h0+Tb3(s)y(s)g0]ds. |
Similar to the method from the previous step, we get that there exists C2≥0 satisfying
‖z0(t)‖≤C2,t∈[t1,t2], |
therefore,
‖y0(t)‖≤C2,t∈J1. |
Likewise, we obtain that there exist Cn+1≥0 satisfying
‖y0(t)‖≤Cn+1,t∈Jn. |
Let
C=max{Cj|1≤j≤n+1}, |
then
‖y0(t)‖≤C,t∈J. |
Hence
‖y0‖PC≤C,y0∈Ω0, |
so Ω0 is bounded.
We take a constant R satisfying R>C and Ω={u∈PC[J,X]|‖u‖PC≤R}, then Ω is bounded and open. When u∈∂Ω,0≤λ≤1, we obtain
u(t)≠λ(Qu(t)). |
We suppose that W⊂¯Ω is a countable set and W⊂¯co({θ}∪Q(W)),θ∈Ω, then W is relatively compact.
In fact, as Uβ(t,s) is strong continuity, by the assumption (H1), we obtain that Q(W) is equi-continuous on Ji(i=0,1,...n), then W is equi-continuous on Ji.∀u∈TR,u1,u2∈[0,t1].
Case 1: ∀t∈J0=[0,t1]. Since g1 is compact, by the assumption (H6) and Lemma 2.1, we obtain
α(W(t))≤α(QW(t))=α(∫t0Uβ(t,s)f(s,W(s),(H1W)(s),(H2W)(s))ds)≤M∗∫t0(L1α(W(s))+L2α((H1W)(s))+L3α((H2W)(s)))ds, |
because
α(H1W(t))=α(∫t0h1(t,τ,W(τ))dτ)≤∫t0α(h1(t,τ,W(τ))dτ)≤∫t0Lhα(W(τ))dτ=Lh∫t0α(W(τ))dτ, |
then
∫t0α(H1W(s))ds≤Lh∫t0(∫s0α(W(τ))dτ)ds=Lh∫t0dτ∫tτα(W(τ))ds=Lh∫t0α(W(τ))(t−τ)dτ≤Lht∫t0α(W(τ))dτ. |
Similarly, we can obtain
∫t0α(H2W(s))ds≤Lg∫t0α(∫T0W(τ)dτ)ds=Lg∫t0ds∫T0α(W(τ))dτ=Lgt∫T0α(W(τ))dτ, |
hence
α(W(t))≤M∗L1∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗LhL2t∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗LgL3t∫T0α((W(s)))ds). | (6) |
By assumption (H6) and Lemma 2.6, we get α(W(t))=0,t∈J0=[0,t1], and especially α(W(t1))=0, then W is relatively compact on C[J0,X].
Case 2: ∀t∈(t1,s1]. We obtain
α(W(t))≤α(QW(t))=α(li(t,u(t)))≤Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds. |
By the assumption (H6) and Lemma 2.6, we have α(W(t))=0,t∈(t1,s1].
Case 3: ∀t∈(s1,t2]. We obtain
α(W(t))≤M∗[Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds+α(∫tsif(s,W(s),(H1W)(s),(H2W)(s))ds)]≤M∗[Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds+∫tsiα(f(s,W(s),(H1W)(s),(H2W)(s)))ds]≤M∗[Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds+∫tsiL1α(W(s)+L2α(H1W(s))+L3α(H2W(s)))ds]≤M∗[Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds+L1∫tsiα(W(s))ds+L2Lh∫tsiα(W(s))ds+L3Lg∫tsiα(W(s))ds], |
since
∫tsiα(H1W(s))ds≤∫t0α(H2W(s))ds≤Lht∫t0α(W(τ))dτ, |
∫tsiα(H2W(s))ds≤∫t0α(H2W(s))ds≤Lgt∫T0α(W(τ))dτ. |
Thus
α(W(t))≤M∗[Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds+L1∫t0α(W(s))ds+L2Lht∫t0α(W(s))ds+L3Lgt∫T0α(W(s))ds]=M∗(Llk+L1)∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗L2Lht∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗L3Lgt∫T0α(W(s))ds. |
By (H6) and Lemma 2.6, we get α(W(t))=0,t∈(s1,t2], then α(W(t))=0,t∈J1=(t1,t2], especially α(W(t2))=0; then W is relatively compact on C[J1,X].
Similarly, we can prove that W is relatively compact on C[Ji,X](i=2,3,...,n), so W is relatively compact on C[J,X].
By Lemma 2.7, Q exists a fixed point, thus problem (1.1) exists a solution u∗∈PC[J,X].
Theorem 3.2. We suppose that (H1−H5),(H7),(H8) are fulfilled, then problem (1.1) exists at least a mild solution.
Proof. By Theorem 3.1, we obtain that Ω0={u∈PC[J,X]|u=λQu,λ∈[0,1]} is bounded. ∀t∈J0, by (H8). We obtain
α(W(t))≤α(QW(t))≤M∗α(g1W(t))+α(∫t0Uβ(t,s)f(s,W(s),(H1W)(s),(H2W)(s))ds)≤M∗[Lg1∫t0α(W(s))ds+∫t0(Y1α(W(s))+Y2α((H1W)(s))+Y3α((H2W)(s)))ds], |
since
∫t0α(H1W(s))ds≤Lht∫t0α(W(τ))dτ, |
∫T0α(H2W(s))ds≤Lgt∫T0α(W(τ))dτ, |
then
α(W(t))≤M∗(Lg1+Y1)∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗LhY2t∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗LgY3t∫T0α(W(s))ds. |
By assumption (H8) and Lemma 2.6, we get α(W(t))=0,t∈J0=[0,t1], especially α(W(t1))=0, then W is relatively compact on C[J0,X]. ∀t∈J1=(t1,s1],
α(W(t))≤α(QW(t))=α(li(t,u(t)))≤Lli∫t0α(W(s))ds, |
by assumption (H8) and Lemma 2.6, we get α(W(t))=0,t∈(t1,s1].
∀t∈(s1,t2], resembling Theorem 3.1. We obtain
α(W(t))≤M∗(Lli+Y1)∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗Y2Lht∫t0α(W(s))ds+M∗Y3Lgt∫T0α(W(s))ds. |
By (H8) and Lemma 2.6, we get α(W(t))=0,t∈(s1,t2]; hence, α(W(t))=0,t∈J1=(t1,t2], especially α(W(t2))=0, then W is relatively compact on C[J1,X].
Similarly, we obtain that W is relatively compact on C[Ji,X],(i=2,3,...,n), then W is relatively compact on C[J,X]. By Lemma 2.7, Q exists a fixed point; therefore, problem (1.1) exists a solution.
Remark 3.1. When L4=0, the condition (ii) in assumption (H6) is clearly valid. In this situation, the assumption (H6) can be removed.
We study the following problem:
{C0D12tu(t)=u(t)1+√t+e−t1+etsin(u(t−τ))+12(1+t)∫t0tu(s)cossds+12(1+et)∫10ssint2u(s)ds,t∈[0,1/4]∪(1/2,3/4],u(t)=u(t)5+4t,t∈(1/4,1/2],u(0)+14sinu=u0∈X. | (4.1) |
Define
g1(u)=14sinu,τ(t)=t−τ≤t,(H1u)(t)=∫t0tcossu(s)ds,li(t,u(t))=u(t)5+4t, |
(H2u)(t)=∫10ssint2u(s)ds,h1(t,s,u)=tucoss,h2(t,s,u)=ssint2u, |
f(t,u1,u2,u3,u4)=u11+√t+e−t1+etsinu2+12(1+t)u3+12(1+et)u4, |
then Eq (4.1) can be transformed into the following form:
{C0D12tu(t)=A(t)u(t)+f(t,u(t),u(τ(t)),(H1u)(t),(H2u)(t)),t∈[0,1/4]∪(1/2,3/4],u(t)=li(t,u(t)),t∈(1/4,1/2],u(0)+g1(u)=u0∈X. | (4.2) |
For any xk,yk∈X(k=1,2,3,4),t∈[0,1], we obtain
‖f(t,y1,y2,y3,y4)−f(t,x1,x2,x3,x4)‖≤1(1+√t)∥y1−x1∥+e−t1+et∥y2−x2∥+12(1+t)∥y3−x3∥+12(1+et)∥y4−x4∥, |
‖h1(t,s,y1)−h1(t,s,x1)‖≤‖y1−x1‖,‖h2(t,s,y1)−h2(t,s,x1)‖≤12‖y1−x1‖, |
‖li(t,y1)−lk(t,x1)‖≤19‖y1−x1‖,‖g1(y1)−g1(x1)‖≤14‖y1−x1‖. |
If other assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are fulfilled, then system (4.1) exists a mild solution.
The literatures [15,17] studied the problem of non-instantaneous impulses of integer order. In process of proving the theorem, the author used the Lipschitz condition and required the compression coefficient to be less than 1. By employing the non-compact measure, the method of stepwise estimation, and the Mönch fixed point theorem, we eliminated the need for the Lipschitz condition and the requirement of a compressibility coefficient less than 1. The literature [18] studied the problem of non-instantaneous impulses of fractional order. They gave the mild solutions via the Banach contraction mapping principle without the condition of compressibility coefficient less than 1, but did not consider the impulses and nonlocal conditions. Through the use of the β-order solution operator, the Mönch fixed point theorem, and the method of stepwise estimation, we eliminated the Lipschitz condition and the requirement of the compressibility coefficient less than 1. This work discusses the existence of mild solutions, with our future focus directed toward investigating the stability outcomes of fractional non-instantaneous impulse integro-differential equations.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This research was funded by the Project of Shandong Province Teaching Reform(M2021049).
The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
M. Asakura, T. Yabu, Explicit logarithmic formulas of special values of hypergeometric functions 3F2, Commun. Contemp. Math., 22 (2020), 1950040. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199719500408 doi: 10.1142/S0219199719500408
![]() |
[2] |
M. Asakura, N. Otsubo, T. Terasoma, An algebro-geometric study of special values of hypergeometric functions 3F2, Nagoya Math. J., 236 (2019), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/nmj.2018.36 doi: 10.1017/nmj.2018.36
![]() |
[3] | W. N. Bailey, Generalized hypergeometric series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1935. |
[4] | Y. A. Brychkov, Handbook of special functions: derivatives, integrals, series and other formulas, 1 Ed., New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781584889571 |
[5] |
M. N. Chen, W. Chu, Evaluation of certain exotic 3F2(1)-series, Nagoya Math. J., 249 (2023), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/nmj.2022.23 doi: 10.1017/nmj.2022.23
![]() |
[6] | W. Chu, Analytical formulae for extended 3F2-series of Watson–Whipple–Dixon with two extra integer parameters, Math. Comp., 81 (2012), 467–479. |
[7] |
I. M. Gessel, D. Stanton, Strange evaluations of hypergeometric series, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 13 (1982), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1137/0513021 doi: 10.1137/0513021
![]() |
[8] |
F. J. W. Whipple, Some transformations of generalized hypergeometric series, Proc. London Math. Soc., 26 (1927), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-26.1.257 doi: 10.1112/plms/s2-26.1.257
![]() |
[9] | T. Yabu, Explicit logarithmic formulas for hypergeometric function 3F2, P.h.D. Thesiss, Hokkaido University, 2022. |
1. | Mesfin Teshome Beyene, Mitiku Daba Firdi, Tamirat Temesgen Dufera, Existence and Ulam–Hyers stability results for Caputo–Hadamard fractional differential equations with non-instantaneous impulses, 2025, 2025, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-024-01958-9 | |
2. | Kanagaraj Muthuselvan, Baskar Sundaravadivoo, Shankar Rao Munjam, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Novel exploration of topological degree method for noninstantaneous impulsive fractional integro-differential equation through the application of filtering system, 2025, 2025, 2730-5422, 10.1186/s13663-024-00778-x |