Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Unification of Adomian decomposition method and ZZ transformation for exploring the dynamics of fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems

  • This paper presents a novel approach for exploring the dynamics of fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems by using the unification of the Adomian decomposition method and ZZ transformation. The suggested method combines the Aboodh transform and the Adomian decomposition method, both of which are trustworthy and efficient mathematical tools for solving fractional differential equations (FDEs). This method's theoretical analysis is addressed for nonlinear FDE systems. To find exact solutions to the equations, the method is applied to fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik linked KdV-mKdV systems. The results show that the suggested method is efficient and practical for solving fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik linked KdV-mKdV systems and that it may be applied to other nonlinear FDEs. The suggested method has the potential to provide new insights into the behavior of nonlinear waves in fluid and plasma environments, as well as the development of new mathematical tools for modeling and studying complicated wave phenomena.

    Citation: Yousef Jawarneh, Humaira Yasmin, Abdul Hamid Ganie, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Amjid Ali. Unification of Adomian decomposition method and ZZ transformation for exploring the dynamics of fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 371-390. doi: 10.3934/math.2024021

    Related Papers:

    [1] M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Rasool Shah, Adnan Khan, Osama Y. Ababneh, Thongchai Botmart . Fractional view analysis of Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems with non-singular kernel derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18334-18359. doi: 10.3934/math.20221010
    [2] Ihsan Ullah, Aman Ullah, Shabir Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad, Taher A. Nofal . A survey of KdV-CDG equations via nonsingular fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18964-18981. doi: 10.3934/math.2023966
    [3] Saima Rashid, Rehana Ashraf, Fahd Jarad . Strong interaction of Jafari decomposition method with nonlinear fractional-order partial differential equations arising in plasma via the singular and nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7936-7963. doi: 10.3934/math.2022444
    [4] Aslı Alkan, Halil Anaç . The novel numerical solutions for time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation by using fractional natural transform decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25333-25359. doi: 10.3934/math.20241237
    [5] Rasool Shah, Abd-Allah Hyder, Naveed Iqbal, Thongchai Botmart . Fractional view evaluation system of Schrödinger-KdV equation by a comparative analysis. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 19846-19864. doi: 10.3934/math.20221087
    [6] Khalid Khan, Amir Ali, Manuel De la Sen, Muhammad Irfan . Localized modes in time-fractional modified coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1580-1602. doi: 10.3934/math.2022092
    [7] Saima Rashid, Sobia Sultana, Bushra Kanwal, Fahd Jarad, Aasma Khalid . Fuzzy fractional estimates of Swift-Hohenberg model obtained using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16067-16101. doi: 10.3934/math.2022880
    [8] Muammer Ayata, Ozan Özkan . A new application of conformable Laplace decomposition method for fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7402-7412. doi: 10.3934/math.2020474
    [9] Khalid Khan, Amir Ali, Muhammad Irfan, Zareen A. Khan . Solitary wave solutions in time-fractional Korteweg-de Vries equations with power law kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 792-814. doi: 10.3934/math.2023039
    [10] Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa . Numerical analysis of the fractional nonlinear waves of fifth-order KdV and Kawahara equations under Caputo operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31898-31925. doi: 10.3934/math.20241533
  • This paper presents a novel approach for exploring the dynamics of fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems by using the unification of the Adomian decomposition method and ZZ transformation. The suggested method combines the Aboodh transform and the Adomian decomposition method, both of which are trustworthy and efficient mathematical tools for solving fractional differential equations (FDEs). This method's theoretical analysis is addressed for nonlinear FDE systems. To find exact solutions to the equations, the method is applied to fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik linked KdV-mKdV systems. The results show that the suggested method is efficient and practical for solving fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik linked KdV-mKdV systems and that it may be applied to other nonlinear FDEs. The suggested method has the potential to provide new insights into the behavior of nonlinear waves in fluid and plasma environments, as well as the development of new mathematical tools for modeling and studying complicated wave phenomena.



    Fractional order Kersten-Krasil'shchik (KK) coupled Korteweg-de Vries (KdV)-modified KdV (mKdV) systems have served as the focus of extensive research in recent years due to their potential use in a variety of disciplines, including fluid dynamics, nonlinear optics and plasma physics [1,2,3,4]. These systems are characterized by the presence of fractional derivatives, which introduce non-local and memory effects into the dynamics of the system [5,6,7,8]. The KK coupled KdV-mKdV system is a system of two coupled nonlinear partial differential equations, which describe the evolution of two waves in a dispersive medium. The first equation is the well-known KdV equation, which describes the propagation of small amplitude, long wavelength waves. The second equation is the mKdV equation, which describes the propagation of larger amplitude, shorter wavelength waves. The KK coupling term, which is a nonlinear and non-local term, describes the interaction between the two waves [3,4,7]. Li et al. delved into an epidemic model's analysis and comparisons with other mechanisms in 2018 [12], while Jin and Wang explored chemotaxis phenomena in 2016 [13]. He et al. focused on fixed-point and variational inequality problems for Hadamard manifolds in 2022 [14]; this was followed by He et al. discussing nonexpansive mapping algorithms in 2023 [15]. Chen et al. contributed to particle physics, discovering hidden-charm pentaquarks in 2021 [16]. Lyu et al. analyzed cavity dynamics in water entries [17], whereas Yang and Kai delved into nonlinear Schr¨odinger equations in 2023.

    Time fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV nonlinear system and homogeneous two component time fractional coupled third order KdV systems are very important fractional nonlinear systems for describing the behaviour of waves in multi-component plasma and elaborate various nonlinear phenomena in plasma physics. Other studies have focused on the stability, existence and uniqueness of solutions for KK coupled KdV-mKdV systems of fractional order. In addition to these studies, there have been many other works that have explored the properties of fractional order KK coupled KdV-mKdV systems, such as their integrability, conservation laws and soliton interactions. Overall, the literature on fractional order KK coupled KdV-mKdV systems is rich and diverse, and it continues to grow as researchers explore new properties and applications of these systems [18,19,20].

    There are several methods that have been proposed to solve the fractional KdV (fKdV) equation and the mKdV equation. One of these methods is the homotopy perturbation method; this method uses a perturbation series and a homotopy approach to solve nonlinear differential equations. It has been used to find approximate solutions to the fKdV equation [21]. The variational iteration method uses a variation of a trial solution to find approximate solutions to nonlinear differential equations. The homotopy analysis method uses a homotopy approach and a perturbation series to solve nonlinear differential equations. It has been used to find approximate solutions to the fKdV equation [22] and the mKdV equation [23]. The Adomian decomposition method uses a decomposition of the nonlinear term of a differential equation into a series of simpler functions. It has been used to find approximate solutions to the fKdV equation and the mKdV equation [24,25]. Yang and Kai, dynamical properties, modulation instability analysis and chaotic behaviors to the nonlinear coupled Schrodinger equation in fiber Bragg gratings [26]. Chen et al. presented a linear free energy relationship in chemistry in 2020 [27]. Luo et al. proposed a new gradient method for force identification in vehicle-bridge systems in 2022 [28]. Additionally, Chen et al. focused on adaptive control of underwater vehicles in 2022 [29]. Lastly, Gu, Li and Liao developed an evolutionary multitasking approach for solving nonlinear equation systems in 2024 [30]. These studies collectively offer significant insights and advancements across a broad spectrum of scientific research areas, enriching our understanding and methodologies in their respective domains.

    The ADM is a powerful technique for solving nonlinear differential equations. Developed by George Adomian in the late 1980s, the ADM is based on the idea of decomposing the solution of a nonlinear equation into a series of simpler functions, known as Adomian polynomials. These polynomials are obtained by iteratively applying the nonlinear operator to a constant function [31,32]. The ADM has been applied to a wide range of nonlinear problems, including partial differential equations, integral equations and stochastic differential equations. One of the key advantages of the ADM is its ability to handle equations with singularities, such as those that arise in physics and engineering. In recent years, researchers have been exploring the use of the ADM in combination with other techniques, such as the ZZ transform. The ZZ transform is a mathematical tool that can be used to transform a nonlinear equation into a linear equation, making it easier to solve. By combining the ADM with the ZZ transform, researchers have been able to solve a wide range of nonlinear problems with greater efficiency and accuracy. Many researchers have used the ADM together with the ZZ transform to solve, for example, the nonlinear fractional partial differential equations in fluid dynamics, nonlinear integral equations in quantum mechanics and nonlinear fractional stochastic differential equations in finance. Overall, the ADM with the ZZ transform has been shown to be an efficient and flexible strategy for addressing nonlinear problems, with numerous potential applications in various fields [33,34].

    The current work is organized as follows. In Section 2, some fundamental definitions of fractional calculus are provided. The basic ideas of the Aboodh transform and the ADM are described in Section 3. In Section 4, we build approximate solutions to fractional Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems of partial differential equations. Section 5 contains the conclusions.

    Definition 2.1. For functions, the Aboodh transformation is achieved as follow:

    B={U(ϱ):M,n1,n2>0,|U(ϱ)|<Meεϱ},

    which is described as follows [33,34]:

    A{U(ϱ)}=1ε0U(ϱ)eεϱdϱ,  ϱ>0 and n1εn2.

    Theorem 2.2. Consider G and F as the Aboodh and Laplace transformations, respectively, of U(ϱ) over the set B [35,36]. Then

    G(ε)=F(ε)ε. (2.1)

    Generalizing the Laplace and Aboodh integral transformations, Zain Ul Abadin Zafar created the ZZ transformation [37]. The ZZ transform is described as follows.

    Definition 2.3. For all values of ϱ0, the Z-transform for the function U(ϱ) is Z(κ,ε), which can be expressed as follows [37]:

    ZZ(U(ϱ))=Z(κ,ε)=ε0U(κϱ)eεϱdϱ.

    The Z-transform is linear in nature, just as the Laplace and Aboodh transforms. On the other hand, the Mittag-Leffler function (MLF) is an expansion of the exponential function:

    Eδ(z)=m=0zmΓ(1+mδ),Re(δ)>0.

    Definition 2.4. The Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) derivative of a function U(φ,ϱ) in the space H1(a,b) for β(0,1) has the following definition [38]:

    ABCaDβϱU(φ,ϱ)=B(β)β+1ϱaU(φ,ϱ)Eβ(β(ϱη)ββ+1)dη.

    Definition 2.5. The Atangana-Baleanu Riemann-Liouville (ABR) derivative is a part of the space H1(a,b). The derivative can be represented for any value of β(0,1) as follows [38]:

    ABRaDβϱU(φ,η)=B(β)β+1ddϱϱaU(φ,η)Eβ(β(ϱη)ββ+1)dη.

    The property of the function B(β) is that it tends to 1 for both 0 and 1. Additionally, β>0, B(β)>a.

    Theorem 2.6. The Laplace transformation for the ABR derivative and ABC derivative are given by [38]:

    L{ABCaDβϱU(φ,ϱ)}(ε)=B(β)β+1εβL{U(φ,ϱ)}εβ1U(φ,0)εβ+ββ+1 (2.2)

    and

    L{ABRaDβϱU(φ,ϱ)}(ε)=B(β)β+1εβL{U(φ,ϱ)}εβ+ββ+1. (2.3)

    In the theorems below we assume that U(ϱ)H1(a,b), where b>a and β(0,1).

    Theorem 2.7. The Aboodh transform gives rise to a new ABR derivative, which is known as the Aboodh transformed ABR derivative [36]

    G(ε)=A{ABRaDβϱU(φ,ϱ)}(ε)=1ε[B(β)β+1εβL{U(φ,ϱ)}εβ+ββ+1]. (2.4)

    Theorem 2.8. The Aboodh transformation of ABC derivative is defined as follows [36]:

    G(ε)=A{ABCaDβϱU(φ,ϱ)}(ε)=1ε[B(β)β+1εβL{U(φ,ϱ)}εβ1U(φ,0)εβ+ββ+1]. (2.5)

    Theorem 2.9. The ZZ transformation of U(ϱ)=ϱβ1 is defined as

    Z(κ,ε)=Γ(β)(κε)β1. (2.6)

    Proof. The Aboodh transformation of U(ϱ)=ϱβ,  β0 is given by

    G(ε)=Γ(β)εβ+1.
     Now, G(εκ)=Γ(β)κβ+1εβ+1

    Applying Eq (2.6), we obtain

    Z(κ,ε)=ε2κ2G(εκ)=ε2κ2Γ(β)κβ+1εβ+1=Γ(β)(κε)β1.

    Theorem 2.10. Let β and ω be complex numbers and assume that the real part of β is greater than 0. The ZZ transformation of Eβ(ωϱβ) can be defined as follows [36]:

    ZZ{(Eβ(ωϱβ))}=Z(κ,ε)=(1ω(κε)β)1. (2.7)

    Proof. The Aboodh transformation of Eβ(ωϱβ) is defined as follows:

    G(ε)=F(ε)ε=εβ1ε(εβω). (2.8)

    So,

    G(εκ)=(εκ)β1(εκ)((εκ)βω) (2.9)

    we obtain

    Z(κ,ε)=(εκ)2G(εκ)=(εκ)2(εκ)β1(εκ)((εκ)βω)=(εκ)β(εκ)βω=(1ω(κε)β)1.

    Theorem 2.11. The ZZ transform of the ABC derivative can be defined as follows: If G(ε) and Z(κ,ε) are the ZZ and Aboodh transformations of U(ϱ), respectively [36], they we have

    ZZ{ABC0DβϱU(ϱ)}=[B(β)β+1εa+2κβ+2G(εκ)εβκβf(0)εβκβ+ββ+1]. (2.10)

    Proof. Applying this Eqs (2.1) and (2.5), we get

    G(εκ)=κε[B(β)β+1(εκ)β+1G(εκ)(εκ)β1f(0)(εκ)β+ββ+1]. (2.11)

    The ABC Z transformation is represented as follows:

    Z(κ,ε)=(εκ)2G(εκ)=(εκ)2κε[B(β)β+1(εκ)β+1G(εκ)(εκ)β1f(0)(εκ)β+ββ+1]=[B(β)β+1(εκ)β+2G(εκ)(εκ)βf(0)(εκ)β+ββ+1].

    Theorem 2.12. Let us assume that the ZZ transformation of U(ϱ) is represented by G(ε) and the Aboodh transformation of U(ϱ) is represented by Z(κ,ε). Then, the ZZ transformation of the ABR derivative is defined as [36]

    ZZ{ABR0Dβϱf(ϱ)}=[B(β)β+1εβ+2κβ+2G(εκ)εμκμ+ββ+1]. (2.12)

    Proof. Applying Eqs (2.1) and (2.4), we get

    G(εκ)=κε[B(β)β+1(εκ)β+1G(εκ)(εκ)β+ββ+1]. (2.13)
    Z(κ,ε)=(εκ)2G(εκ)=(εκ)2(κε)[B(β)β+1(εκ)β+1G(εκ)(εκ)β+ββ+1]=[B(β)β+1(εκ)β+2G(εκ)(εκ)β+ββ+1].

    In this section, we will examine the equation known as the fractional partial differential equation:

    DβU(φ,)=L(U(φ,))+N(U(φ,))+h(φ,)=M(φ,), (3.1)

    with the initial condition

    U(φ,0)=ϕ(φ), (3.2)

    where L(φ,) represents linear terms, N(φ,) represents nonlinear terms and h(φ,) represents the source term.

    Using the ZZ transform and ABC fractional derivatives, Eq (3.1) can be re-expressed as follows:

    1q(β,κ,ε)(Z[U(φ,)]ϕ(φ)ε)=Z[M(φ,)], (3.3)

    with

    q(β,κ,ε)=1β+β(κε)βB(β). (3.4)

    By taking the inverse ZZ transform, we get

    U(φ,)=Z1(ϕ(φ)ε+q(β,κ,ε)Z[M(φ,)]). (3.5)

    In terms of Adomain decomposition, we have

    i=0Ui(φ,)=Z1(ϕ(φ)ε+q(β,κ,ε)Z[h(φ,)])+Z1(q(β,κ,ε)Z[i=0L(Ui(φ,))+A]), (3.6)
    UABC0(φ,)=Z1(ϕ(φ)ε+q(β,κ,ε)Z[h(φ,)]),UABC1(φ,)=Z1(q(β,κ,ε)Z[L(U0(φ,))+A0]),UABCl+1(φ,)=Z1(q(β,κ,ε)Z[L(Ul(φ,))+Al]),  l=1,2,3,. (3.7)

    The solution to Eq (3.1) can be expressed by using ADMABC.

    UABC(φ,)=UABC0(φ,)+UABC1(φ,)+UABC2(φ,)+. (3.8)

    Example 4.1. Let us examine the following fractional KK joined KdV-mKdV nonlinear system:

    DβU+U3φ6UUφ+3VV3φ+3VφV2φ3UφV2+6UVVφ=0,  >0,  φR,  0<β1,DβV+V3φ3V2Vφ3UVφ+3UφV=0, (4.1)

    with the initial conditions given by

    U(φ,0)=c2c sech2(cφ),    c>0,V(φ,0)=2c sech(cφ). (4.2)

    By taking the ZZ transform, we get

    Z[DβU(φ,)]=Z[U3φ6UUφ+3VV3φ+3VφV2φ3UφV2+6UVVφ],Z[DβV(φ,)]=Z[V3φ3V2Vφ3UVφ+3UφV]. (4.3)

    Thus we have

    1εβZ[U(φ,)]ε2βU(φ,0)=Z[U3φ6UUφ+3VV3φ+3VφV2φ3UφV2+6UVVφ],1εβZ[V(φ,)]ε2βU(φ,0)=Z[V3φ3V2Vφ3UVφ+3UφV]. (4.4)

    By simplification we get

    Z[U(φ,)]=ε2[c2c sech2(cφ)](1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z[U3φ6UUφ+3VV3φ+3VφV2φ3UφV2+6UVVφ],Z[V(φ,)]=ε2[2c sech(cφ)](1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z[V3φ3V2Vφ3UVφ+3UφV]. (4.5)

    By taking the inverse ZZ transformation, we have

    U(φ,)=[c2c sech2(cφ)]Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{U3φ6UUφ+3VV3φ+3VφV2φ3UφV2+6UVVφ}],V(φ,)=[2c sech(cφ)]Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{V3φ3V2Vφ3UVφ+3UφV}]. (4.6)

    Assume that for the unknown functions U(φ,) and V(φ,), the series form solution is given as

    U(φ,)=l=0Ul(φ,),V(φ,)=l=0Ul(φ,), (4.7)

    The nonlinear components of the Adomian polynomials can be represented as follows: 6UUφ+3VV3φ=m=0Am, 3VφV2φ3UφV2=m=0Bm, 6UVVφ=m=0Cm and 3V2Vφ3UVφ+3UφV=m=0Dm. With the help of these terms, Eq (4.6) can be expressed as follows:

    l=0Ul+1(φ,)=c2c sech2(cφ)Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{U3φ+l=0Al+l=0Bl+l=0Cl}],l=0Vl+1(φ,)=2c sech(cφ)Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{U3φ+l=0Dl}]. (4.8)

    On comparing both sides of Eq (4.8), we have

    U0(φ,)=c2c sech2(cφ),V0(φ,)=2c sech(cφ),
    U1(φ,)=8c52sinh(cφ) sech3(cφ)(1β+ββΓ(β+1)),V1(φ,)=4c2sinh(cφ) sech2(cφ)(1β+ββΓ(β+1)), (4.9)
    U2(φ,)=16c4[2cosh2(cφ)3] sech4(cφ)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2],V2(φ,)=8c72[cosh2(cφ)2] sech3(cφ)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2]. (4.10)

    In this manner, the terms Ul and Vl for (l3) can be easily obtained. As a result, the series solution can be expressed as follows:

    U(φ,)=l=0Ul(φ,)=U0(φ,)+U1(φ,)+U2(φ,)+,U(φ,)=c2c sech2(cφ)+8c52sinh(cφ) sech3(cφ)(1β+ββΓ(β+1))16c4[2cosh2(cφ)3] sech4(cφ)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2]+V(φ,)=l=0Vl(φ,)=V0(φ,)+V1(φ,)+V2(φ,)+,V(φ,)=2c sech(cφ)4c2sinh(cφ) sech2(cφ)(1β+ββΓ(β+1))+8c72[cosh2(cφ)2] sech3(cφ)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2]+ (4.11)

    When β=1, we get the exact solution as

    U(φ,)=c2c sech2(c(φ+2c)),V(φ,)=2c sech(c(φ+2c)). (4.12)

    The graphical discussion involves several key figures illustrate the solutions for U(φ,) and V(φ,) in Example 4.1 at different parameter values. Figure 1 showcases the analytical and exact solutions at β=1 for U(φ,). In Figure 2, the approximate solutions are depicted at β=0.8,0.6.

    Figure 1.  The analytical and exact solutions at β=1 in U(φ,) for Example 4.1.
    Figure 2.  The approximate solutions at β=0.8,0.6 in U(φ,) for Example 4.1.

    Figure 3 extends the analysis by presenting analytical solutions at various values of β for U(φ,). Moving on to V(φ,), Figure 4 exhibits the analytical and exact solutions at β=1, while Figure 5 displays the analytical results at β=0.8,0.6.

    Figure 3.  The analytical solutions at various values of β in U(φ,) for Example 4.1.
    Figure 4.  The analytical and exact solutions at β=1 in V(φ,) for Example 4.1.
    Figure 5.  The analytical result at β=0.8,0.6 in V(φ,) for Example 4.1.

    Lastly, Figure 6 provides a comprehensive overview, presenting analytical results at various values of β, including β=1,0.8,0.6,0.4, for V(φ,). These figures collectively offer a detailed visual representation of the solutions under different conditions, facilitating a thorough understanding of the system's behavior.

    Figure 6.  The analytical result at various values in β for V(φ,) for Example 4.1.

    Example 4.2. Let us examine a homogeneous two-component KdV system of third order with a time-fractional component, as follows:

    DβUU3φUUφVVφ=0,  >0,  φR,  0<β1,DβV+2V3φUVφ=0, (4.13)

    with the initial conditions given by

    U(φ,0)=36tanh2(φ2),V(φ,0)=3c2tanh(φ2). (4.14)

    By taking the ZZ transform, we get

    Z[DβU(φ,)]=Z[U3φUUφVVφ],Z[DβV(φ,)]=Z[2V3φUVφ]. (4.15)

    Thus we have

    1εβZ[U(φ,)]ε2βU(φ,0)=Z[U3φUUφVVφ],1εβZ[V(φ,)]ε2βU(φ,0)=Z[2V3φUVφ]. (4.16)

    By simplification we get

    Z[U(φ,)]=ε2[36tanh2(φ2)](1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z[U3φUUφVVφ],Z[V(φ,)]=ε2[3c2tanh(φ2)](1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z[2V3φUVφ]. (4.17)

    By taking the inverse ZZ transform, we have

    U(φ,)=36tanh2(φ2)Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{U3φUUφVVφ}],V(φ,)=[3c2tanh(φ2)]Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{2V3φUVφ}]. (4.18)

    Assume that for the unknown functions U(φ,) and V(φ,), the series form solution is given as

    U(φ,)=l=0Ul(φ,),V(φ,)=l=0Ul(φ,). (4.19)

    The representation of nonlinear components using Adomian polynomials is shown as follows: UUφVVφ=m=0Am and UVφ=m=0Bm. With these terms, Eq (4.18) can be expressed as follows:

    l=0Ul+1(φ,)=36tanh2(φ2)+Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{U3φ+l=0Al}],l=0Vl+1(φ,)=3c2tanh(φ2)+Z1[(1β+β(κε)β)B(β)Z{2V3φl=0Bl}]. (4.20)

    On comparing both sides of Eq (4.20), we have

    U0(φ,)=36tanh2(φ2),V0(φ,)=3c2tanh(φ2),
    U1(φ,)=6 sech2(φ2)tanh(φ2)(1β+ββΓ(β+1)),V1(φ,)=3c2 sech2(φ2)tanh(φ2)(1β+ββΓ(β+1)), (4.21)
    U2(φ,)=3[2+7 sech2(φ2)15 sech4(φ2)] sech2(φ2)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2],V2(φ,)=3c22[2+21 sech2(φ2)24 sech4(φ2)] sech2(φ2)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2]. (4.22)

    By using this method, the terms Ul and Vl can be easily obtained for l3. Therefore, the solution in the form of a series is as follows:

    U(φ,)=l=0Ul(φ,)=U0(φ,)+U1(φ,)+U2(φ,)+,U(φ,)=36tanh2(φ2)+6 sech2(φ2)tanh(φ2)(1β+ββΓ(β+1))+3[2+7 sech2(φ2)15 sech4(φ2)] sech2(φ2)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2]+.V(φ,)=l=0Vl(φ,)=V0(φ,)+V1(φ,)+V2(φ,)+,V(φ,)=3c2tanh(φ2)+3c2 sech2(φ2)tanh(φ2)(1β+ββΓ(β+1))+3c22[2+21 sech2(φ2)24 sech4(φ2)] sech2(φ2)[β22βΓ(2β+1)+2β(1β)βΓ(β+1)+(1β)2]+. (4.23)

    When β=1, we get the exact solution as

    U(φ,)=36tanh2(φ+2),V(φ,)=3c2tanh(φ+2). (4.24)

    The graphical discussion involves several key figures that illustrate the solutions for U(φ,) and V(φ,) in Example 4.2 at different parameter values. Figure 7 showcases the analytical and exact solutions at β=1 for U(φ,). In Figure 8, the approximate solutions are depicted at β=0.8,0.6.

    Figure 7.  The analytical and exact solutions at β=1 in U(φ,) for Example 4.2.
    Figure 8.  The analytical result at β=0.8,0.6 in U(φ,) for Example 4.2.

    Figure 9 extends the analysis by presenting analytical solutions at various values of β for U(φ,). We will moving on to V(φ,).

    Figure 9.  The analytical result at various values of β in U(φ,) for Example 4.2.

    Figure 10 exhibits analytical and exact solutions at β=1, while Figure 11 displays the analytical results at β=0.8,0.6. Lastly, Figure 12 provides a comprehensive overview, presenting the analytical results at various values of β, including β=1,0.8,0.6,0.4, for V(φ,). These figures collectively offer a detailed visual representation of the solutions under different conditions, facilitating a thorough understanding of the system's behavior.

    Figure 10.  The analytical and exact result at β=1 in V(φ,) for Example 4.2.
    Figure 11.  The analytical solution of β=0.8,0.6 in V(φ,) for Example 4.2.
    Figure 12.  The analytical result at various values in β for V(φ,) for Example 4.2.

    In summary, the combination of the ADM and the ZZ transform has demonstrated its effectiveness in the analysis of the fractional KK coupled KdV-mKdV system encountered in multi-component plasmas. The utilization of this method has yielded accurate and efficient solutions, offering valuable insights into the intricate behavior of these complex systems. Additionally, the incorporation of the ZZ transform has enabled this frequency domain analysis, contributing supplementary information regarding the system's dynamics. This integrated approach stands as a valuable tool for comprehending multi-component plasma behaviors, and it holds the potential for application to analogous systems in future investigations. Future work may explore extending this methodology to different plasma models or investigating the impact of additional physical parameters, thereby broadening the scope of its applicability.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 5081).

    This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 5081).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



    [1] Y. Shen, B. Tian, T. Y. Zhou, In nonlinear optics, fluid dynamics and plasma physics: Symbolic computation on a (2+1)-dimensional extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff system, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136 (2021), 572. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01323-0 doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01323-0
    [2] D. F. Escande, Contributions of plasma physics to chaos and nonlinear dynamics, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 58 (2016), 113001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/58/11/113001 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/11/113001
    [3] H. Yasmin, N. H. Aljahdaly, A. M. Saeed, R. Shah, Probing families of optical soliton solutions in fractional perturbed Radhakrishnan-Kundu-Lakshmanan model with improved versions of extended direct algebraic method, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7070512 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7070512
    [4] H. Yasmin, N. H. Aljahdaly, A. M. Saeed, R. Shah, Investigating families of soliton solutions for the complex structured coupled fractional Biswas-Arshed model in birefringent fibers using a novel analytical technique, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7070491 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7070491
    [5] J. G. Liu, Y. F. Zhang, J. J. Wang, Investigation of the time fractional generalized (2+1)-dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with single-power law nonlinearity, Fractals, 31 (2023), 2350033. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500330 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X23500330
    [6] J. G. Liu, X. J. Yang, Symmetry group analysis of several coupled fractional partial differential equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 173 (2023), 113603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113603 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113603
    [7] S. Alshammari, M. M. Al-Sawalha, R. Shah, Approximate analytical methods for a fractional-order nonlinear system of Jaulent-Miodek equation with energy-dependent Schrodinger potential, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020140 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7020140
    [8] A. A. Alderremy, R. Shah, N. Iqbal, S. Aly, K. Nonlaopon, Fractional series solution construction for nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion brusselator model utilizing Laplace residual power series, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14091944 doi: 10.3390/sym14091944
    [9] A. Atangana, A. Secer, The time-fractional coupled-Korteweg-de-Vries equations, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2013 (2013), 947986. http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/947986 doi: 10.1155/2013/947986
    [10] L. Akinyemi, O. S. Iyiola, A reliable technique to study nonlinear time-fractional coupled Korteweg-de Vries equations. Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02625-w
    [11] K. S. Albalawi, I. Alazman, J. G. Prasad, P. Goswami, Analytical solution of the local fractional KdV equation, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11040882 doi: 10.3390/math11040882
    [12] H. Li, R. Peng, Z. Wang, On a diffusive susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic model with mass action mechanism and birth-death effect: Analysis, simulations, and comparison with other mechanisms, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 78 (2018), 2129–2153. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1167863 doi: 10.1137/18M1167863
    [13] H. Y. Jin, Z. A. Wang, Boundedness, blowup and critical mass phenomenon in competing chemotaxis, J. Differ. Equ., 260 (2016), 162–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.08.040 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.08.040
    [14] H. He, J. Peng, H. Li, Iterative approximation of fixed point problems and variational inequality problems on Hadamard manifolds, U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Ser. A, 84 (2022), 25–36.
    [15] H. He, J. Peng, H. Li, Implicit viscosity iterative algorithm for nonexpansive mapping on Hadamard manifolds, Fixed Point Theor., 24 (2023), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.24193/fpt-ro.2023.1.10 doi: 10.24193/fpt-ro.2023.1.10
    [16] H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, X. H. Liu, Establishing the first hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness, Eur. Phys. J. C, 81 (2021), 409. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09196-4 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09196-4
    [17] X. Lyu, X. Wang, C. Qi, R. Sun, Characteristics of cavity dynamics, forces, and trajectories on vertical water entries with two spheres side-by-side. Phys. Fluids, 35 (2023), 92101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0166794
    [18] S. Alyobi, R. Shah, A. Khan, N. A. Shah, K. Nonlaopon, Fractional analysis of nonlinear boussinesq equation under Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo operator, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14112417 doi: 10.3390/sym14112417
    [19] Z. Li, P. Li, T. Han, White noise functional solutions for wick-type stochastic fractional mixed KdV-mKdV equation using extended G'/G-expansion method, Adv. Math. Phys., 2021 (2021), 9729905. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9729905 doi: 10.1155/2021/9729905
    [20] A. Jamal, A. Ullah, S. Ahmad, S. Sarwar, A. Shokri, A survey of (2+1)-dimensional KdV-mKdV equation using nonlocal Caputo fractal-fractional operator, Results Phys., 46 (2023), 106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106294 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106294
    [21] M. A. Noor, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Homotopy perturbation method for solving nonlinear higher-order boundary value problems, Int. J. Nonlin. Sci. Numer. Simulat., 9 (2008), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2008.9.4.395 doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2008.9.4.395
    [22] S. Momani, An explicit and numerical solutions of the fractional KdV equation. Math Comput. Simulat., 70 (2005), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2005.05.001
    [23] D. J. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, Y. Y. Sun, J. Zhou, Solutions to the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation, Rev. Math. Phys., 26 (2014), 1430006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X14300064 doi: 10.1142/S0129055X14300064
    [24] H. N. A. Ismail, K. R. Raslan, G. S. E. Salem, Solitary wave solutions for the general KDV equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 154 (2004), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00686-6 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00686-6
    [25] T. Geyikli, D. Kaya, An application for a modified KdV equation by the decomposition method and finite element method, Appl. Math. Comput., 169 (2005), 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.11.017 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.11.017
    [26] R. Yang, Y. Kai, Dynamical properties, modulation instability analysis and chaotic behaviors to the nonlinear coupled Schrodinger equation in fiber Bragg gratings, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984923502391
    [27] D. Chen, Q. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Li, H. Zhou, Y. Fan, A general linear free energy relationship for predicting partition coefficients of neutral organic compounds, Chemosphere, 247 (2020), 125869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125869 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125869
    [28] C. Luo, L. Wang, Y. Xie, B. Chen, A new conjugate gradient method for moving force identification of vehicle-bridge system. J. Vib. Eng. Technol., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00824-1
    [29] B. Chen, J. Hu, Y. Zhao, B. K. Ghosh, Finite-time observer based tracking control of uncertain heterogeneous underwater vehicles using adaptive sliding mode approach, Neurocomputing, 481 (2022), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.038 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.038
    [30] Q. Gu, S. Li, Z. Liao, Solving nonlinear equation systems based on evolutionary multitasking with neighborhood-based speciation differential evolution, Expert Syst. Appl., 238 (2024), 122025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122025 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122025
    [31] A. M. Wazwaz, A reliable modification of Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 102 (1999), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10024-3 doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10024-3
    [32] J. S. Duan, R. Rach, D. Baleanu, A. M. Wazwaz, A review of the Adomian decomposition method and its applications to fractional differential equations, Commun. Frac. Calc., 3 (2012), 73–99.
    [33] K. S. Aboodh, Application of new transform "Aboodh Transform" to partial differential equations, Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math., 10 (2014), 249–254.
    [34] K. S. Aboodh, Solving fourth order parabolic PDE with variable coefficients using Aboodh transform homotopy perturbation method, Pure Appl. Math. J., 4 (2015), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20150405.13 doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20150405.13
    [35] R. M. Jena, S. Chakraverty, D. Baleanu, M. M. Alqurashi, New aspects of ZZ transform to fractional operators with Mittag-Leffler Kernel, Front. Phys., 8 (2020), 352.
    [36] L. Riabi, K. Belghaba, M. Hamdi Cherif, D. Ziane, Homotopy perturbation method combined with ZZ transform to solve some nonlinear fractional differential equations, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 17 (2019), 406–419.
    [37] Z. U. A. Zafar, Application of ZZ transform method on some fractional differential equations, Int. J. Adv. Eng. Glob. Technol, 4 (2016), 1355–1363.
    [38] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, 2015, arXiv: 1602.03408v1.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. M. Sivakumar, M. Mallikarjuna, R. Senthamarai, A kinetic non-steady state analysis of immobilized enzyme systems with external mass transfer resistance, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 18083, 10.3934/math.2024882
    2. Sajad Iqbal, Francisco Martínez, An innovative approach to approximating solutions of fractional partial differential equations, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 065259, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad4928
    3. Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa, Dark and bright soliton phenomena of the generalized time-space fractional equation with gas bubbles, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 30043, 10.3934/math.20241451
    4. Nazik J. Ahmed, Abdulghafor M. Al-Rozbayani, 2024, Chapter 43, 978-3-031-70923-4, 571, 10.1007/978-3-031-70924-1_43
    5. Panpan Wang, Xiufang Feng, Shangqin He, Lie Symmetry Analysis of Fractional Kersten–Krasil’shchik Coupled KdV–mKdV System, 2025, 24, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01152-3
    6. Khudhayr A. Rashedi, Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa, Tariq S. Alshammari, Adel Almarashi, Lump-type kink wave phenomena of the space-time fractional phi-four equation, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 34372, 10.3934/math.20241637
    7. Manohar R. Gombi, B. J. Gireesha, P. Venkatesh, M. L. Keerthi, G. K. Ramesh, Fractional-order energy equation of a fully wet longitudinal fin with convective–radiative heat exchange through Sumudu transform analysis, 2025, 29, 1385-2000, 10.1007/s11043-025-09773-0
    8. Galal M. Moatimid, Mona A. A. Mohamed, Khaled Elagamy, Ahmed A. Gaber, Analysis of Eyring–Powell couple stress nanofluid flow with motile microorganisms over a rough sphere: Modified Adomian decomposition, 2025, 105, 0044-2267, 10.1002/zamm.202400981
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1888) PDF downloads(78) Cited by(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog