Discrete generalized Darboux transformation and rational solutions for the three-field Blaszak-Marciniak lattice equation

Ting Zhang; Xiaoyong Wen; Ting Zhang; Xiaoyong Wen

doi:10.3934/math.2023793

AIMS Mathematics

2023, Volume 8, Issue 7: 15553-15568. doi: 10.3934/math.2023793

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Discrete generalized Darboux transformation and rational solutions for the three-field Blaszak-Marciniak lattice equation

Ting Zhang ,
Xiaoyong Wen ^,

School of Applied Science, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China

Received: 24 February 2023 Revised: 02 April 2023 Accepted: 03 April 2023 Published: 27 April 2023
MSC : 35Q51, 35Q35, 37K40

Under consideration is the discrete three-field Blaszak-Marciniak lattice equation. Firstly, this discrete equation is mapped to the continuous nonlinear equations under the continuous limit. Secondly, the generalized $(m, 3N-m)$ -fold Darboux transformation of this discrete equation is constructed and established. Finally, by applying the resulting Darboux transformation, some singular rational solutions and mixed exponential-rational solutions are presented, in particular, their limit state analysis and singular trajectories are analyzed graphically. These results may be helpful to explain some relevant physical phenomena.

Keywords:

Citation: Ting Zhang, Xiaoyong Wen. Discrete generalized Darboux transformation and rational solutions for the three-field Blaszak-Marciniak lattice equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15553-15568. doi: 10.3934/math.2023793

Related Papers:

[1]	Muqeem Ahmad, Mobin Ahmad, Fatemah Mofarreh . Bi-slant lightlike submanifolds of golden semi-Riemannian manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19526-19545. doi: 10.3934/math.2023996
[2]	Aliya Naaz Siddiqui, Meraj Ali Khan, Amira Ishan . Contact CR $\delta$ -invariant: an optimal estimate for Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29220-29234. doi: 10.3934/math.20241416
[3]	Biswabismita Bag, Meraj Ali Khan, Tanumoy Pal, Shyamal Kumar Hui . Geometric analysis on warped product semi-slant submanifolds of a locally metallic Riemannian space form. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8131-8143. doi: 10.3934/math.2025373
[4]	Mehmet Gülbahar . Qualar curvatures of pseudo Riemannian manifolds and pseudo Riemannian submanifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1366-1376. doi: 10.3934/math.2021085
[5]	Oğuzhan Bahadır . On lightlike geometry of indefinite Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12845-12862. doi: 10.3934/math.2021741
[6]	Richa Agarwal, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, Shahid Ali, Abdul Haseeb . On Riemannian warped-twisted product submersions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2925-2937. doi: 10.3934/math.2024144
[7]	Fatimah Alghamdi, Fatemah Mofarreh, Akram Ali, Mohamed Lemine Bouleryah . Some rigidity theorems for totally real submanifolds in complex space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8191-8202. doi: 10.3934/math.2025376
[8]	Fatemah Mofarreh, S. K. Srivastava, Anuj Kumar, Akram Ali . Geometric inequalities of $\mathcal{PR}$ -warped product submanifold in para-Kenmotsu manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19481-19509. doi: 10.3934/math.20221069
[9]	Mehmet Atçeken, Tuğba Mert . Characterizations for totally geodesic submanifolds of a $K$ -paracontact manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7320-7332. doi: 10.3934/math.2021430
[10]	Yusuf Dogru . $\eta$ -Ricci-Bourguignon solitons with a semi-symmetric metric and semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11943-11952. doi: 10.3934/math.2023603

Abstract

1. Introduction

The concept of lightlike submanifolds in geometry was initially established and expounded upon in a work produced by Duggal and Bejancu ^[1]. A nondegenerate screen distribution was employed in order to produce a nonintersecting lightlike transversal vector bundle of the tangent bundle. They defined the CR-lightlike submanifold as a generalization of lightlike real hypersurfaces of indefinite Kaehler manifolds and showed that CR-lightlike submanifolds do not contain invariant and totally real lightlike submanifolds. Further, they defined and studied GCR-lightlike submanifolds of Kaehler manifolds as an umbrella of invariant submanifolds, screen real submanifolds, and CR-lightlike and SCR-lightlike submanifolds in ^[2,3], respectively. Subsequently, B. Sahin and R. Gunes investigated geodesic property of CR-lightlike submanifolds ^[4] and the integrability of distributions in CR-lightlike submanifolds ^[5]. In the year 2010, Duggal and Sahin published a book ^[6]pertaining to the field of differential geometry, specifically focusing on the study of lightlike submanifolds. This book provides a comprehensive examination of recent advancements in lightlike geometry, encompassing novel geometric findings, accompanied by rigorous proofs, and exploring their practical implications in the field of mathematical physics. The investigation of the geometric properties of lightlike hypersurfaces and lightlike submanifolds has been the subject of research in several studies (see ^{[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]}).

Crasmareanu and Hretcanu^[15] created a special example of polynomial structure ^[16] on a differentiable manifold, and it is known as the golden structure $(\overline{M}, g)$ . Hretcanu C. E. ^[17] explored Riemannian submanifolds with the golden structure. M. Ahmad and M. A. Qayyoom studied geometrical properties of Riemannian submanifolds with golden structure ^{[18,19,20,21]} and metallic structure ^[22,23]. The integrability of golden structures was examined by A. Gizer et al. ^[24]. Lightlike hypersurfaces of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold was investigated by N. Poyraz and E. Yasar ^[25]. The golden structure was also explored in the studies ^{[26,27,28,29]}.

In this research, we investigate the CR-lightlike submanifolds of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold, drawing inspiration from the aforementioned studies. This paper has the following outlines: Some preliminaries of CR-lightlike submanifolds are defined in Section 2. We establish a number of properties of CR-lightlike submanifolds on golden semi-Riemannian manifolds in Section 3. In Section 4, we look into several CR-lightlike submanifolds characteristics that are totally umbilical. We provide a complex illustration of CR-lightlike submanifolds of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold in the final section.

2. Opening statements

Assume that $(\overline{\aleph}, g)$ is a semi-Riemannian manifold with $(k + j)$ -dimension, $k, j \ge 1$ , and $g$ as a semi-Riemannian metric on $\overline{\aleph}.$ We suppose that $\overline{\aleph}$ is not a Riemannian manifold and the symbol $q$ stands for the constant index of $g$ .

^[15] Let $\overline{\aleph}$ be endowed with a tensor field $\psi$ of type $(1, 1)$ such that

$\begin{equation} \psi^{2} = \psi+I, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $I$ represents the identity transformation on $\Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph})$ . The structure $\psi$ is referred to as a golden structure. A metric $g$ is considered $\psi$ -compatible if

$\begin{equation} g(\psi \gamma, \zeta) = g(\gamma, \psi \zeta) \end{equation}$

(2.2)

for all $\gamma$ , $\zeta$ vector fields on $\Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph})$ , then $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is called a golden Riemannian manifold. If we substitute $\psi \gamma$ into $\gamma$ in (2.2), then from (2.1) we have

$\begin{equation} g(\psi \gamma, \psi \zeta) = g(\psi \gamma, \zeta)+g(\gamma, \zeta). \end{equation}$

(2.3)

for any $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph}).$

If $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is a golden Riemannian manifold and $\psi$ is parallel with regard to the Levi-Civita connection $\overline{\nabla}$ on $\overline{\aleph}:$

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}\psi = 0, \end{equation}$

(2.4)

then $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is referred to as a semi-Riemannian manifold with locally golden properties.

The golden structure is the particular case of metallic structure ^[22,23] with $p = 1, \ q = 1$ defined by

$\psi^{2} = p\psi+ qI,$

where $p$ and $q$ are positive integers.

^[1] Consider the case where $\aleph$ is a lightlike submanifold of $k$ of $\overline{\aleph}.$ There is the radical distribution, or $Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)$ , on $\aleph$ that applies to this situation such that $Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) = \Upsilon\aleph \cap \Upsilon\aleph^{\bot},$ $\forall$ $p \in \aleph.$ Since $Rad\Upsilon\aleph$ has rank $r \ge 0,$ $\aleph$ is referred to as an $r$ -lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph}.$ Assume that $\aleph$ is a submanifold of $\aleph$ that is $r$ -lightlike. A screen distribution is what we refer to as the complementary distribution of a Rad distribution on $\Upsilon \aleph$ , then

$\begin{equation} \label{1e1} \nonumber \Upsilon \aleph = Rad\Upsilon\aleph \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph). \end{equation}$

As $S(\Upsilon\aleph)$ is a nondegenerate vector sub-bundle of $\Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph},$ we have

$\begin{equation} \label{1e2} \nonumber \Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph} = S(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot}, \end{equation}$

where $S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot}$ consists of the orthogonal vector sub-bundle that is complementary to $S(\Upsilon\aleph)$ in $\Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph}.$ $S(\Upsilon\aleph), S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})$ is an orthogonal direct decomposition, and they are nondegenerate.

$\begin{equation} \label{1e3} \nonumber S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot} = S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})^{\bot}. \end{equation}$

Let the vector bundle

$\begin{equation} \label{1e4} \nonumber tr(\Upsilon\aleph) = ltr(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}). \end{equation}$

Thus,

$\begin{equation} \label{1e5} \nonumber \Upsilon\overline{\aleph} = \Upsilon\aleph \oplus tr(\Upsilon\aleph) = S(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}) \bot (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)\oplus ltr(\Upsilon\aleph). \end{equation}$

Assume that the Levi-Civita connection is $\overline{\nabla}$ on $\overline{\aleph}.$ We have

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta + h(\gamma, \zeta), \; \forall \, \gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph) \end{equation}$

(2.5)

and

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = - A_{h}\zeta + \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}h, \; \forall \gamma \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)\; and \; h \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)), \end{equation}$

(2.6)

where $\{ \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, A_{h}\gamma \}$ and $\{ h(\gamma, \zeta), \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}h \}$ belongs to $\Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)$ and $\Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ respectively.

Using projection $L : tr(\Upsilon\aleph) \rightarrow ltr(\Upsilon\aleph),$ and $S: tr(\Upsilon\aleph) \rightarrow S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}),$ we have

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta + h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta) + h^{s}(\gamma, \zeta), \end{equation}$

(2.7)

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\aleph = - A_{\aleph}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}\aleph + \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \aleph), \end{equation}$

(2.8)

and

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \chi = - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s} + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi) \end{equation}$

(2.9)

for any $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \aleph \in \Gamma (ltr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ and $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ where $h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta) = Lh(\gamma, \zeta), \; h^{s}(\gamma, \zeta) = Sh(\gamma, \zeta), \; \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}\aleph, \; \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi) \in \Gamma (ltr(\mathcal{T}\aleph)), \; \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\; \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \aleph) \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ and $\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \; A_{\aleph}\gamma, \; A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph).$

The projection morphism of $\Upsilon\aleph$ on the screen is represented by $P$ , and we take the distribution into consideration.

$\begin{array}{c} \nabla_{\gamma}P\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}^{*}P\zeta + h^{*}(\gamma, P\zeta), \\ \nabla_{\gamma}\xi = - A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{*t}\xi, \end{array}$

(2.10)

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma(\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma(Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)).$

Thus, we have the subsequent equation.

$\begin{equation} {g}(h^{*}(\gamma, P\zeta), \aleph) = g(A_{\aleph}\gamma, P\zeta), \end{equation}$

(2.11)

Consider that $\overline{\nabla}$ is a metric connection. We get

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}{g})(\zeta, \eta) = {g}(h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta), \eta)+ {g}(h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta \eta), \zeta). \end{equation}$

(2.12)

Using the characteristics of a linear connection, we can obtain

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \eta) = \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}(h^{l}(\zeta, \eta))- h^{l}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \eta)-h^{l}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\eta), \end{equation}$

(2.13)

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \eta) = \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}(h^{s}(\zeta, \eta))- h^{s}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \eta)-h^{s}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\eta). \end{equation}$

(2.14)

Based on the description of a CR-lightlike submanifold in ^[4], we have

$\Upsilon\aleph = \lambda \oplus \lambda',$

where $\lambda = Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot {\psi} Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot \lambda_{0}.$

$S$ and $Q$ stand for the projection on $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ , respectively, then

$\begin{equation} \label{1e11} \nonumber {\psi}\gamma = f\gamma + w\gamma \end{equation}$

for $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph),$ where $f\gamma = {\psi}S\gamma$ and $w\gamma = {\psi}Q\gamma.$

On the other hand, we have

$\begin{equation} \label{1e12} \nonumber {\psi}\zeta = B\zeta + C\zeta \end{equation}$

for any $\zeta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ $B\zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)$ and $C\zeta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ unless $\aleph_{1}$ and $\aleph_{2}$ are denoted as ${\psi}L_{1}$ and ${\psi}L_{2},$ respectively.

Lemma 2.1. Assume that the screen distribution is totally geodesic and that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold, then $\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon N)),$ where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)).$

Proof. For $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph)),$

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - h(\gamma, \zeta), \aleph)\\ & = & - {g} (\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \aleph). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.8),

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) & = & - {g}(\zeta, -A_{\aleph}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}\aleph) \\ & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\aleph}\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.11),

${g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) = {g}(h^{*}(\gamma, \zeta), \aleph).$

Since screen distribution is totally geodesic, $h^{*}(\gamma, \zeta) = 0,$

${g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) = 0.$

Using Lemma 1.2 in ^[1] p.g. 142, we have

$\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)),$

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)).$

Theorem 2.2. Assume that $\aleph$ is a locally golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ with CR-lightlike properties, then $\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma = \psi\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma$ for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

Proof. Assume that $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$ Using (2.5), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\psi\gamma-h(\gamma, \psi\gamma), \zeta)\\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta) \\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta), \\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma - \psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta) & = & 0. \end{eqnarray}$

Nondegeneracy of $\lambda_{0}$ implies

$\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma = \psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma),$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

3. Geodesic CR-lightlike submanifolds

Definition 3.1. ^[4] A CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold is mixed geodesic if $h$ satisfies

$h(\gamma, \alpha) = 0,$

where $h$ stands for second fundamental form, $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda),$ and $\alpha \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

For $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda)$ and $\alpha, \beta \in \Gamma (\lambda')$ if

$h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

and

$h(\alpha, \beta) = 0,$

then it is known as $\lambda$ -geodesic and $\lambda'$ -geodesic, respectively.

Theorem 3.2. Assume $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph}$ , which is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold. $\aleph$ is totally geodesic if

$(L_{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

and

$(L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

for $\alpha, \beta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)) \;$ , and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. Since $\aleph$ is totally geodesic, then

$h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

for $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph).$

We know that $h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$ if

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0$

and

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0.$

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \xi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \xi] + \overline{\nabla}_{\xi}\gamma \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \xi]) + {g}(\gamma, [\xi, \zeta]) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\xi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\xi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) - {g}(\xi, h(\gamma, \zeta))) \\ 2{g}(h(\gamma, \zeta) & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Since ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0,$ we have

$\begin{equation} \label{2e1} \nonumber (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0. \end{equation}$

Similarly,

$\begin{eqnarray} \ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \chi]) + {g}(\gamma, [\chi, \zeta]) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\chi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\chi, \gamma) \\ 2{g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Since ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0,$ we get

$\begin{equation} \label{2e2} \nonumber (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0 \end{equation}$

for $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Lemma 3.3. Assume that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold whose submanifold $\aleph$ is CR-lightlike, then

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, \zeta)$

for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda') \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. Using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {g} (h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & {g}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.9), it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - {g}(\zeta, - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \chi)) \\ {} & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma) - {g} (\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi) - {g}(\zeta, \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \chi)) \\ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma), \end{eqnarray}$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda') \; , \; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Theorem 3.4. Assume that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold and $\overline{\aleph}$ is mixed geodesic if

$A^{*}_{\xi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot {\psi}L_{1})$

and

$A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot {\psi}L_{1})$

for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)), \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. For $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda'), \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ we get

Using (2.5),

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \xi) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Again using (2.5), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & - {g}(\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}\xi + h(\gamma, \xi)) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.10), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & - {g}( \zeta, - A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma + \nabla^{*t}_{\gamma}\xi) \\ {g}( \zeta, A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma)& = & 0. \end{eqnarray}$

Since the CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ is mixed geodesic, we have

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g}( \zeta, A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma) = 0$

$\Rightarrow A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot {\psi}L_{1}),$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

From (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - {g} (\zeta, - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi))\\ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g} (\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

Since, $\aleph$ is mixed geodesic, then ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g} (\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma) = 0.$

$A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot\psi_{1}).$

Theorem 3.5. Suppose that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph},$ then $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ -geodesic if $A_{\chi}\eta$ and $A_{\xi}^{*}\eta$ have no component in $\aleph_{2}\bot {\psi}Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)$ for $\eta \in \Gamma (\lambda'), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)), \; \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. From (2.5), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - \overline{g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi), \end{eqnarray}$

where $\chi, \beta \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & - {g}(\beta, - A_{\chi}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{s}+ \lambda^{l}(\eta, \chi)) \\ {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & {g}(\beta, A_{\chi}\eta) . \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

Since $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ -geodesic, then ${g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) = 0.$

From (3.1), we get

${g}(\beta, A_{\chi}\eta) = 0.$

Now,

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta - \nabla_{\eta}\beta, \xi) \\ {} & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta, \xi) = - {g}(\beta, \overline{\nabla}_{\eta} \xi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & - {g}(\eta, - A_{\xi}^{*}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{*t}\xi) \\ {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\xi}^{*}\beta, \eta). \label{2e4} \end{eqnarray}$

Since $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ - geodesic, then

${g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g}( A_{\xi}^{*}\beta, \eta) = 0.$

Thus, $A_{\chi}\eta$ and $A^{*}_{\xi}\eta$ have no component in $M_{2}\bot \psi Rad(\Upsilon\aleph).$

Lemma 3.6. Assume that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold that has a CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ . Due to the distribution's integrability, the following criteria hold.

(ⅰ) $\psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) - {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi}\zeta),$

(ⅱ) ${g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma), \xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi} \xi),$

(ⅲ) ${g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi),$

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ and $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. From Eq (2.9), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\chi + A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma - \nabla_{\psi\gamma}^{s}\chi, \zeta) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & - {g}(\chi, {\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\zeta + h({\psi}\gamma, \zeta)) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta)\\ {} & = & - {g}(\chi, h(\gamma, {\psi}\zeta)) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Again, using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}{\psi}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}{\psi}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) \\ {} & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi, {\psi}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & {g}(- A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) + \\ {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi}\zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

(ⅱ) Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma - \nabla_{{\psi}\gamma}^{s}\chi + {\nabla}_{{\psi}\gamma}\chi, \xi ) \\ {} & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \xi) - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{{\psi}\gamma}\xi ). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \xi) + {g}(\chi, A^{*}_{\xi}{\psi}\gamma ) - {g}(\chi, \nabla^{*t}_{{\psi}\gamma}, \xi) \\ {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi} \xi). \end{eqnarray}$

(ⅲ) Replacing $\zeta$ by $\psi\xi$ in (ⅰ), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi^{2}}\xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi^{2}}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Using Definition 2.1 in ^[18] p.g. 9, we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), (\psi+I)\xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, (\psi+I)\xi)\\ \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - \\ && {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \xi).\\ {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

4. Totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifolds

Definition 4.1. ^[12] A CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold is totally umbilical if there is a smooth transversal vector field $H \in tr\ \Gamma (\Upsilon \aleph)$ that satisfies

$h(\chi, \eta) = H g(\chi, \eta),$

where $h$ is stands for second fundamental form and $\chi, \ \eta \in \ \Gamma (\Upsilon \aleph).$

Theorem 4.2. Assume that the screen distribution is totally geodesic and that $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ , then

$A_{\psi \eta}\chi = A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \; \forall \; \chi, \eta \in \Gamma \lambda'.$

Proof. Given that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold,

$\psi\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\chi = \overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\psi\chi.$

Using (2.5) and (2.6), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi(\nabla_{\eta}\chi) + \psi(h(\eta, \chi)) & = & - A_{\psi\chi}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{t}\psi\chi. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

Interchanging $\eta$ and $\chi$ , we obtain

$\begin{equation} \psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta) + \psi(h(\chi, \eta)) = - A_{\psi \eta}\chi + \nabla_{\chi}^{t}\psi \eta. \end{equation}$

(4.2)

Subtracting Eqs (4.1) and (4.2), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi(\nabla_{\eta}\chi - \nabla_{\chi}\eta) - \nabla_{\eta}^{t}\psi\chi + \nabla_{\chi}^{t}\psi \eta & = & A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

Taking the inner product with $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0})$ in (4.3), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \gamma) - {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \gamma) & = & {g}(A_{\psi \eta}\chi, \gamma) \\ && -{g}(A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma). \\ {g}(A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma) = {g}&(\nabla_{\chi}\eta,&- \psi\gamma) {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.4)

Now,

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\eta - h(\chi, \eta), \psi\gamma) \\ {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & - {g}(\eta, (\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\psi)\gamma - \psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\gamma)). \end{eqnarray}$

Since $\psi$ is parallel to $\overline{\nabla},$ i.e., $\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\psi = 0,$

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = - \psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\gamma)).$

Using (2.7), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = &- {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma + h^{s}(\chi, \gamma) + h^{l}(\chi, \gamma))\\ {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & - {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma) - {g}(\psi \eta, h^{s}(\chi, \gamma)) - {g}(\psi \eta, h^{l}(\chi, \gamma)). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

Since $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold and the screen distribution is totally geodesic,

$h^{s}(\chi, \gamma) = H^{s}{g}(\chi, \gamma) = 0$

and

$h^{l}(\chi, \gamma) = H^{l}{g}(\chi, \gamma) = 0,$

where $\chi \in \Gamma (\lambda')$ and $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

From (4.5), we have

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = - {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma).$

From Lemma 2.1, we get

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = 0.$

Similarly,

${g}(\nabla_{\eta}\chi, \psi\gamma) = 0$

Using (4.4), we have

$g(A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma) = 0.$

Since $\lambda_{0}$ is nondegenerate,

$A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi \chi}\eta = 0$

$\Rightarrow A_{\psi \eta}\chi = A_{\psi\chi}\eta.$

Theorem 4.3. Let $\aleph$ be the totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ . Consequently, $\aleph$ 's sectional curvature, which is CR-lightlike, vanishes, resulting in $\overline{K}(\pi) = 0,$ for the entire CR-lightlike section $\pi.$

Proof. We know that $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph},$ then from (2.13) and (2.14),

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma}H^{l}-H^{l}\{ (\nabla_{\gamma}g)(\zeta, \omega)\} , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma}H^{s}-H^{s}\{ (\nabla_{\gamma}g)(\zeta, \omega)\} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

for a CR-lightlike section $\pi = \gamma\wedge \omega, \; \gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}), \omega \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

From (2.12), we have $(\nabla_{U}g)(\zeta, \omega) = 0.$ Therefore, from (4.6) and (4.7), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma}H^{l} , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma}H^{s} . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.9)

Now, from (4.8) and (4.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \{\overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta)\omega \}^{tr} & = & g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}- g(\gamma, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\zeta} H^{l} + g(\zeta, \omega)\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}) \\ && - g(\gamma, \omega)\lambda^{l}(\zeta, H^{s})+g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}-g(\gamma, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\zeta}H^{s} \\ && +g(\zeta, \omega)\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l})-g(\gamma, \omega)\lambda^{s}(\zeta, H^{l}). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.10)

For any $\beta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph))$ , from Equation (4.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta, \omega, \beta ) & = & g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}, \beta)- g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\zeta} H^{l}, \beta) + \\ && g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}), \zeta) - g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\lambda^{l}(\zeta, H^{s}), \beta)+ \\ && g(\zeta, \omega) {g}(\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}, \beta)-g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\nabla^{s}_{\zeta}H^{s}, \beta) \\ && +g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l}), \beta)- g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\lambda^{s}(\zeta, H^{l}, \beta). \label{4e11} \end{eqnarray}$

$\begin{eqnarray} {R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega ) & = & g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}, \psi\omega)- g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\omega} H^{l}, \psi\omega) + \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}), \psi\omega) - g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{l}(\omega, H^{s}), \psi\omega)+ \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma) {g}(\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}, \psi\omega)-g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{s}_{\omega}H^{s}, \psi\omega) + \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l}), \psi\omega)- g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{s}(\omega, H^{l}, \psi U). \label{4e13} \end{eqnarray}$

For any unit vectors $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda)$ and $\omega \in \Gamma (\lambda'),$ we have

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega) = \overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \gamma, \omega) = 0.$

We have

$K(\gamma) = K_{N}(\gamma \wedge \zeta) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta)\zeta, \gamma),$

where

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \gamma, \omega) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega)\gamma, \omega)$

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega)\psi\gamma, \psi\omega)$

i.e.,

$\overline{K}(\pi) = 0$

for all CR-sections $\pi.$

5. Example

Example 5.1. We consider a semi-Riemannian manifold $R_{2}^{6}$ and a submanifold $\aleph$ of co-dimension $2$ in $R_{2}^{6},$ given by equations

$\upsilon_{5} = \upsilon_{1}{\mathrm{cos}}\alpha - \upsilon_{2}{\mathrm{sin}}\alpha - \upsilon_{3}z_{4} {\mathrm{tan}}\alpha,$

$\upsilon_{6} = \upsilon_{1}{\mathrm{sin}}\alpha - \upsilon_{2}{\mathrm{cos}}\alpha - \upsilon_{3}\upsilon_{4},$

where $\alpha \in R - \{ \frac{\pi}{2} + k\pi; \ k \in z \}.$ The structure on $R^{6}_{2}$ is defined by

$\psi( \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} , \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}) = (\overline{\phi} \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \overline{\phi} \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} ).$

Now,

$\psi^{2} ( \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} , \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}) = ((\overline{\phi}+ 1) \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, (\overline{\phi} + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, (\phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, (\phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}},$

$( \phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}}, ( \phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} )$

$\psi^{2} = \psi + I.$

It follows that $(R_{2}^{6}, \psi)$ is a golden semi-Reimannian manifold.

The tangent bundle $\Upsilon\aleph$ is spanned by

$Z_{0} = - {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \mathrm{cos}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} - \phi \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}},$

$Z_{1} = - \phi \ {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \phi \ {\mathrm{cos}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} + \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}},$

$Z_{2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \overline{\phi} \ {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}},$

$Z_{3} = - \overline{\phi} \ {\mathrm{cos}} \alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}} + i \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}.$

Thus, $\aleph$ is a 1-lightlike submanifold of $R_{2}^{6}$ with $Rad\Upsilon\aleph = \mathrm{Span}\{X_{0}\}$ . Using golden structure of $R_{2}^{6},$ we obtain that $X_{1} = \psi(X_{0}).$ Thus, $\psi(Rad\Upsilon\aleph)$ is a distribution on $\aleph.$ Hence, the $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold.

6. Conclusions

In general relativity, particularly in the context of the black hole theory, lightlike geometry finds its uses. An investigation is made into the geometry of the $\aleph$ golden semi-Riemannian manifolds that are CR-lightlike in nature. There are many intriguing findings on completely umbilical and completely geodesic CR-lightlike submanifolds that are examined. We present a required condition for a CR-lightlike submanifold to be completely geodesic. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the sectional curvature $K$ of an entirely umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ disappears.

Use of AI tools declaration

The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Acknowledgments

The present work (manuscript number IU/R $\&$ D/2022-MCN0001708) received financial assistance from Integral University in Lucknow, India as a part of the seed money project IUL/IIRC/SMP/2021/010. All of the authors would like to express their gratitude to the university for this support. The authors are highly grateful to editors and referees for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving the paper. The present manuscript represents the corrected version of preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2210.10445. The revised version incorporates the identities of all those who have made contributions, taking into account their respective skills and understanding.

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interests.

References

[1]	M. Blaszak, K. Marciniak, R-matrix approach to lattice integrable systems, J. Math. Phys., 35 (1994), 4661–4682. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.530807 doi: 10.1063/1.530807
[2]	D. J. Zhang, D. Y. Chen, The conservation laws of some discrete soliton systems, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 14 (2002), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(01)00238-7 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(01)00238-7
[3]	Y. T. Wu, X. G. Geng, A new integrable symplectic map associated with lattice soliton equations, J. Math. Phys., 37 (1996), 2338. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.531512 doi: 10.1063/1.531512
[4]	X. B. Hu, Z. N. Zhu, Some new results on the Blaszak-Marciniak lattice: Bäcklund transformation and nonlinear superposition formula, J. Math. Phys., 39 (1998), 4766. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532535 doi: 10.1063/1.532535
[5]	X. B. Hu, H. W. Tam, Some new results on the Blaszak-Marciniak 3-field and 4-field lattices, Rep. Math. Phys., 46 (2000), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(01)80012-4 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(01)80012-4
[6]	D. J. Zhang, D. Y. Chen, Hamiltonian structure of discrete soliton systems, J. Phys. A, 35 (2002), 7225–7241. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/35/33/316 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/35/33/316
[7]	R. Sahadevan, S. Khousalya, Master symmetries for Volterra equation, Belov-Chaltikian and Blaszak-Marciniak lattice equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 280 (2003), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00032-5 doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00032-5
[8]	J. B. Zhang, J. Ji, Y. Q. Yao, From the conservation laws to the Hamiltonian structures of discrete soliton systems, Phys. Scr., 84 (2011), 015001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/84/01/015001 doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/84/01/015001
[9]	X. Y. Wen, X. H. Meng, X. G. Xu, J. T. Wang, N-fold Darboux transformation and explicit solutions in terms of the determinant for the three-field Blaszak-Marciniak lattice, Appl. Math. Lett., 26 (2013), 1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2013.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2013.06.004
[10]	D. S. Wang, Q. Li, X. Y. Wen, L. Liu, Matrix spectral problems and integrability aspects of the Blaszak-Marciniak lattice equations, Rep. Math. Phys., 86 (2020), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(20)30087-2 doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(20)30087-2
[11]	R. Hirota, The direct method in soliton theory, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[12]	W. X. Zhang, Y. Q. Liu, Solitary wave solutions and integrability for generalized nonlocal complex modified Korteweg-de Vries (cmKdV) equations, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 11046–11075. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021641 doi: 10.3934/math.2021641
[13]	M. J. Ablowitz, P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, nonlinear evolution equations and inverse scattering, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[14]	J. Weiss, M. Tabor, G. Carnevale, The Painleve property for partial differential equations, J. Math. Phys., 24 (1983), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525721 doi: 10.1063/1.525721
[15]	Q. L. Zhao, M. A. Amin, X. Y. Li, Classical Darboux transformation and exact soliton solutions of a two-component complex short pulse equation, AIMS Math., 8 (2022), 8811–8828. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023442 doi: 10.3934/math.2023442
[16]	M. Wadati, Transformation theories for nonlinear discrete systems, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 59 (1976), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.59.36 doi: 10.1143/PTPS.59.36
[17]	Manjeet, R. K. Gupta, On nonclassical symmetries, Painlevé analysis and singular, periodic and solitary wave solutions of generalized Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV system, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 115 (2022), 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106710 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106710
[18]	N. A. Kudryashov, A. Biswas, A. G. Borodina, Y. Yıldırım, H. M. Alshehri, Painlevé analysis and optical solitons for a concatenated model, Optik, 272 (2023), 170255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170255 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170255
[19]	X. Wang, Darboux transformation for two discrete soliton equations, Zhengzhou China: Zhengzhou University, 2012.
[20]	V. B. Matveev, M. A. Salle, Darboux transformations and solitons, Berlin: Springer, 1991.
[21]	X. Y. Wen, Y. Q. Yang, Z. Y. Yan, Generalized perturbation (n, M)-fold Darboux transformations and multi-rogue-wave structures for the modified self-steepening nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. E, 92 (2015), 012917. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012917 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012917
[22]	S. Dong, Z. Z. Lan, B. Gao, Y. J. Shen, Bäcklund transformation and multi-soliton solutions for the discrete Korteweg-de Vries equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 125 (2022), 107747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107747 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107747
[23]	X. P. Xin, Y. R. Xia, L. H. Zhang, H. Z. Liu, Bäcklund transformations, symmetry reductions and exact solutions of (2+1)-dimensional nonlocal DS equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 132 (2022), 108157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108157 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108157
[24]	X. Y. Wen, Z. Y. Yan, B. A. Malomed, Higher-order vector discrete rogue-wave states in the coupled Ablowitz-Ladik equations: exact solutions and stability, Chaos, 26 (2016), 123110. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972111 doi: 10.1063/1.4972111
[25]	X. Y. Wen, Z. Y. Yan, Modulational instability and dynamics of multi-rogue wave solutions for the discrete Ablowitz-Ladik equation, J. Math. Phys., 59 (2018), 073511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048512 doi: 10.1063/1.5048512
[26]	X. K. Liu, X. Y. Wen, Z. Lin, Continuous limit and position adjustable rogue wave solutions for the semi-discrete complex coupled system associated with 4 $\times$ 4 Lax pair, Appl. Math. Lett., 133 (2022), 108279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108279 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108279
[27]	T. Zhang, X. Y. Wen, Continuous limit, higher-order rational solutions and relevant dynamical analysis for Belov-Chaltikian lattice equation with 3 $\times$ 3 Lax pair, Pramana J. Phys., 97 (2023), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02502-z doi: 10.1007/s12043-022-02502-z
[28]	P. Liu, M. Jia, S. Y. Lou, Lax pair and exact solutions of a discrete coupled system related to coupled KdV and coupled mKdV equations, Phys. Scr., 76 (2007), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/76/6/015 doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/76/6/015

This article has been cited by:

Bang-Yen Chen, Majid Ali Choudhary, Afshan Perween, A Comprehensive Review of Golden Riemannian Manifolds, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 724, 10.3390/axioms13100724

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)