Research article Special Issues

The effects of fear and delay on a predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response and stage structure for predator

  • Received: 12 September 2023 Revised: 16 October 2023 Accepted: 23 October 2023 Published: 27 October 2023
  • MSC : 34C23, 92D25

  • Taking into account the delayed fear induced by predators on the birth rate of prey, the counter-predation sensitiveness of prey, and the direct consumption by predators with stage structure and interference impacts, we proposed a prey-predator model with fear, Crowley-Martin functional response, stage structure and time delays. By use of the functional differential equation theory and Sotomayor's bifurcation theorem, we established some criteria of the local asymptotical stability and bifurcations of the system equilibrium points. Numerically, we validated the theoretical findings and explored the effects of fear, counter-predation sensitivity, direct predation rate and the transversion rate of the immature predator. We found that the functional response as well as the stage structure of predators affected the system stability. The fear and anti-predation sensitivity have positive and negative impacts to the system stability. Low fear level and high anti-predation sensitivity are beneficial to the system stability and the survival of prey. Meanwhile, low anti-predation sensitivity can make the system jump from one equilibrium point to another or make it oscillate between stability and instability frequently, leading to such phenomena as the bubble, or bistability. The fear and mature delays can make the system change from unstable to stable and cause chaos if they are too large. Finally, some ecological suggestions were given to overcome the negative effect induced by fear on the system stability.

    Citation: Weili Kong, Yuanfu Shao. The effects of fear and delay on a predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response and stage structure for predator[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29260-29289. doi: 10.3934/math.20231498

    Related Papers:

  • Taking into account the delayed fear induced by predators on the birth rate of prey, the counter-predation sensitiveness of prey, and the direct consumption by predators with stage structure and interference impacts, we proposed a prey-predator model with fear, Crowley-Martin functional response, stage structure and time delays. By use of the functional differential equation theory and Sotomayor's bifurcation theorem, we established some criteria of the local asymptotical stability and bifurcations of the system equilibrium points. Numerically, we validated the theoretical findings and explored the effects of fear, counter-predation sensitivity, direct predation rate and the transversion rate of the immature predator. We found that the functional response as well as the stage structure of predators affected the system stability. The fear and anti-predation sensitivity have positive and negative impacts to the system stability. Low fear level and high anti-predation sensitivity are beneficial to the system stability and the survival of prey. Meanwhile, low anti-predation sensitivity can make the system jump from one equilibrium point to another or make it oscillate between stability and instability frequently, leading to such phenomena as the bubble, or bistability. The fear and mature delays can make the system change from unstable to stable and cause chaos if they are too large. Finally, some ecological suggestions were given to overcome the negative effect induced by fear on the system stability.



    加载中


    [1] A. Lotka, Elements physical biology, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1924.
    [2] V. Volterra, Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically, Nature, 118 (1926), 558–560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/118558a0 doi: 10.1038/118558a0
    [3] J. Collings, The effects of the functional response on the bifurcation behavior of a mite predator-prey interaction model, J. Math. Biol., 36 (1997), 149–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002850050095 doi: 10.1007/s002850050095
    [4] T. Kar, Modelling and analysis of a harvested prey-predator system incorporating a prey refuge, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 185 (2006), 19–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2005.01.035 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2005.01.035
    [5] Y. Huang, F. Chen, Z. Li, Stability analysis of a prey-predator model with holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge, Appl. Math. Comput., 182 (2006), 672–683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.030
    [6] J. Dawes, M. Souza, A derivation of Hollings type I, II and III functional responses in predator-prey systems, J. Theor. Biol., 327 (2017), 11–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.017
    [7] K. Antwi-Fordjour, R. Parshad, M. Beauregard, Dynamics of a predator-prey model with generalized functional response and mutual interference, Math. Biosci., 360 (2020), 108407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108407 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108407
    [8] J. Roy, D. Barman, S. Alam, Role of fear in a predator-prey system with ratio-dependent functional response in deterministic and stochastic environment, Biosystems, 197 (2020), 104176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104176 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104176
    [9] P. Panja, Dynamics of a predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response, refuge on predator and harvesting of super-predator, J. Biol. Syst., 29 (2021), 631–646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218339021500121 doi: 10.1142/S0218339021500121
    [10] J. Danane, Stochastic predator-prey Lévy jump model with Crowley-Martin functional response and stage structure, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 67 (2021), 41–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12190-020-01490-w doi: 10.1007/s12190-020-01490-w
    [11] J. Tripathi, S. Abbas, M. Thakur, Dynamical analysis of a prey-predator model with Beddington-DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge, Nonlinear Dyn., 80 (2015), 177–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1859-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1859-2
    [12] C. Xu, P. Li, Oscillations for a delayed predator-prey modelwith Hassell-Varley-type functional response, C. R. Biol., 338 (2015), 227–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2015.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.01.002
    [13] J. Tripathi, S. Tyagi, S. Abbas, Global analysis of a delayed density dependent predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 30 (2016), 45–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.06.008
    [14] A. De Roos, L. Persson, H. Thieme, Emergent allee effects in top predators feeding on structured prey populations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270 (2003), 611–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2286 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2286
    [15] V. Pavlov$\acute{a}$, L. Berec, Impacts of predation on dynamics of age-structured prey: Allee effects and multi-stability, Theor. Ecol., 5 (2012), 533–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12080-011-0144-y doi: 10.1007/s12080-011-0144-y
    [16] J. Cui, L. Chen, W. Wang, The effect of dispersal on population growth with stage-structure, Comput. Math. Appl., 39 (2000), 91–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00316-8 doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00316-8
    [17] P. Panday, N. Pal, S. Samanta, P. Tryjanowski, J. Chattopadhyay, Dynamics of a stage-structured predator-prey model: cost and benefit of fear-induced group defense, J. Theor. Biol., 528 (2021), 110846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110846 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110846
    [18] X. Sun, H. Huo, H. Xiang, Bifurcation and stability analysis in predator-prey model with a stage-structure for predator, Nonlinear Dyn., 58 (2009), 497–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9495-y doi: 10.1007/s11071-009-9495-y
    [19] T. Kostova, J. Li, M. Friedman, Two models for competition between age classes, Math. Biosci., 157 (1999), 65–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(98)10077-9 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(98)10077-9
    [20] R. Taylor, Predation, New York: Chapman and Hall, 1984.
    [21] S. Lima, L. Dill, Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus, Can. J. Zool., 68 (1990), 619–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z90-092 doi: 10.1139/z90-092
    [22] J. Brown, Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk, Evol. Ecol. Res., 1 (1999), 49–71.
    [23] W. Cresswell, Predation in bird populations, J. Ornithol., 152 (2011), 251–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1 doi: 10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1
    [24] A. Wirsing, W. Ripple, A comparison of shark and wolf research reveals similar behavioral responses by prey, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9 (2011), 335–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/090226 doi: 10.1890/090226
    [25] S. Mortoja, P. Panja, S. Mondal, Dynamics of a predator-prey model with stage-structure on both species and anti-predator behavior, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 10 (2018), 50–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2017.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2017.12.004
    [26] W. Ripple, R. Beschta, Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems? BioScience, 54 (2004), 755–766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755: WATEOF]2.0.CO; 2
    [27] A. Sih, Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands, Science, 210 (1980), 1041–1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.210.4473.1041 doi: 10.1126/science.210.4473.1041
    [28] B. Pierce, R. Bowyer, V. Bleich, Habitat selection by mule deer: forage benefits or risk of predation? J. Wildl. Manage., 68 (2004), 533–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0533: HSBMDF]2.0.CO; 2
    [29] S. Creel, D. Christianson, S. Liley, J. Winnie, Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk, Science, 315 (2007), 960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1135918 doi: 10.1126/science.1135918
    [30] Y. Kuang, Delay differential equations: with applications in population dynamics, New York: Academic Press, 1993.
    [31] S. Gourley, Y. Kuang, A stage structured predator-prey model and its dependence on maturation delay and death rate, J. Math. Biol., 49 (2019), 188–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00285-004-0278-2 doi: 10.1007/s00285-004-0278-2
    [32] N. Pal, S. Samanta, S. Biswas, M. Alquran, K. Al-Khaled, J. Chattopadhyay, Stability and bifurcation analysis of a three-species food chain model with delay, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 25 (2015), 1550123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218127415501230 doi: 10.1142/S0218127415501230
    [33] S. Pal, N. Pal, S. Samanta, J. Chattopadhyay, Effect of hunting cooperation and fear in a predator-prey model, Ecol. Complex., 39 (2019), 100770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100770 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100770
    [34] Y. Shao, Global stability of a delayed predator-prey system with fear and Holling-type II functional response in deterministic and stochastic environments, Math. Comput. Simulat., 200 (2022), 65–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2022.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2022.04.013
    [35] B. Kumar Das, D. Sahoo, G. Samanta, Impact of fear in a delayed-induced predator-prey system with intraspecific competition within predator species, Math. Comput. Simulat., 191 (2022), 134–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.005
    [36] B. Dubey, S. Ankit Kumar, Stability switching and chaos in a multiple delayed prey-predator model with fear effect and anti-predator behavor, Math. Comput. Simulat., 188 (2021), 164–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.037 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.037
    [37] K. Chakraborty, S. Haldar, T. Kar, Global stability and bifurcation analysis of a delay induced prey-predator system with stage structure, Nonlinear Dyn., 73 (2013), 1307–1325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0864-1 doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-0864-1
    [38] S. Mortoja, P. Panja, S. Mondal, Dynamics of a predator-prey model with nonlinear incidence rate, Crowley-Martin type functional response and disease in prey population, Ecological Genetics and Genomics, 10 (2019), 100035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egg.2018.100035 doi: 10.1016/j.egg.2018.100035
    [39] Y. Shao, W. Kong, A predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and multiple delays in deterministic and stochastic environments, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 3378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10183378 doi: 10.3390/math10183378
    [40] E. Beretta, Y. Kuang, Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay-dependent parameters, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 33 (2002), 1144–1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0036141000376086 doi: 10.1137/S0036141000376086
    [41] L. Perko, Differential equations and dynamical systems, New York: Springer, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8
    [42] V. Kolmanovskii, A. Myshkis, Applied theory of functional differential differential equations, Dordrecht: Springer, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8084-7
    [43] A. Dhooge, W. Govaerts, Y. Kuznetsov, H. Meijer, B. Sautois, New features of the software matcont for bifurcation analysis of dynamical systems, Math. Comp. Model. Dyn., 14 (2007), 147–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13873950701742754 doi: 10.1080/13873950701742754
    [44] Y. Zhao, S. Yuan, Stability in distribution of a stochastic hybrid competitive Lotka-Volterra model with Lévy jumps, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 85 (2016), 98–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.01.015 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.01.015
    [45] S. Mondal, A. Maiti, G. Samanta, Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator-prey model, Biophysical Reviews and Letters, 13 (2018), 157–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793048018500091 doi: 10.1142/S1793048018500091
    [46] A. Thirthar, S. Majeed, M. Alqudah, P. Panja, T. Abdeljawad, Fear effect in a predator-prey model with additional food, prey refuge and harvesting on super predator, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 159 (2022), 112091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112091 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112091
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1215) PDF downloads(142) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(14)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog