Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Dynamical complexities and chaos control in a Ricker type predator-prey model with additive Allee effect

  • This work investigates the dynamic complications of the Ricker type predator-prey model in the presence of the additive type Allee effect in the prey population. In the modeling of discrete-time models, Euler forward approximations and piecewise constant arguments are the most frequently used schemes. In Euler forward approximations, the model may undergo period-doubled orbits and invariant circle orbits, even while varying the step size. In this way, differential equations with piecewise constant arguments (Ricker-type models) are a better choice for the discretization of a continuous-time model because they do not involve any step size. First, the interaction between prey and predator in the form of the Holling-Ⅱ type is considered. The essential mathematical features are discussed in terms of local stability and the bifurcation phenomenon as well. Next, we apply the center manifold theorem and normal form theory to achieve the existence and directions of flip bifurcation and Neimark-Sacker bifurcation. Moreover, this paper demonstrates that the outbreak of chaos can stabilize in the considered model with a higher value of the Allee parameter. The existence of chaotic orbits is verified with the help of a one-parameter bifurcation diagram and the largest Lyapunov exponents, respectively. Furthermore, different control methods are applied to control the bifurcation and fluctuating phenomena, i.e., state feedback, the Ott-Grebogi-Yorke, and hybrid control methods. Finally, to ensure our analytical results, numerical simulations have been carried out using MATLAB software.

    Citation: Vinoth Seralan, R. Vadivel, Dimplekumar Chalishajar, Nallappan Gunasekaran. Dynamical complexities and chaos control in a Ricker type predator-prey model with additive Allee effect[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 22896-22923. doi: 10.3934/math.20231165

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ismail Aydogdu . On double cyclic codes over Z2+uZ2. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11076-11091. doi: 10.3934/math.2024543
    [2] Fatma Zehra Uzekmek, Elif Segah Oztas, Mehmet Ozen . (θi,λ)-constacyclic codes and DNA codes over Z4+uZ4+u2Z4. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27908-27929. doi: 10.3934/math.20241355
    [3] Shakir Ali, Amal S. Alali, Kok Bin Wong, Elif Segah Oztas, Pushpendra Sharma . Cyclic codes over non-chain ring R(α1,α2,,αs) and their applications to quantum and DNA codes. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7396-7413. doi: 10.3934/math.2024358
    [4] Turki Alsuraiheed, Elif Segah Oztas, Shakir Ali, Merve Bulut Yilgor . Reversible codes and applications to DNA codes over F42t[u]/(u21). AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27762-27774. doi: 10.3934/math.20231421
    [5] Wei Qi . The polycyclic codes over the finite field Fq. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 29707-29717. doi: 10.3934/math.20241439
    [6] Sami Alabiad, Yousef Alkhamees . On classification of finite commutative chain rings. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1742-1757. doi: 10.3934/math.2022100
    [7] Hongfeng Wu, Li Zhu . Repeated-root constacyclic codes of length p1pt2ps and their dual codes. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12793-12818. doi: 10.3934/math.2023644
    [8] Shakir Ali, Amal S. Alali, Atif Ahmad Khan, Indah Emilia Wijayanti, Kok Bin Wong . XOR count and block circulant MDS matrices over finite commutative rings. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30529-30547. doi: 10.3934/math.20241474
    [9] Yousef Alkhamees, Badr Alhajouj . Structure of a chain ring as a ring of matrices over a Galois ring. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15824-15833. doi: 10.3934/math.2022866
    [10] Yang Zhang, Jizhu Nan . A note on the degree bounds of the invariant ring. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 10869-10881. doi: 10.3934/math.2024530
  • This work investigates the dynamic complications of the Ricker type predator-prey model in the presence of the additive type Allee effect in the prey population. In the modeling of discrete-time models, Euler forward approximations and piecewise constant arguments are the most frequently used schemes. In Euler forward approximations, the model may undergo period-doubled orbits and invariant circle orbits, even while varying the step size. In this way, differential equations with piecewise constant arguments (Ricker-type models) are a better choice for the discretization of a continuous-time model because they do not involve any step size. First, the interaction between prey and predator in the form of the Holling-Ⅱ type is considered. The essential mathematical features are discussed in terms of local stability and the bifurcation phenomenon as well. Next, we apply the center manifold theorem and normal form theory to achieve the existence and directions of flip bifurcation and Neimark-Sacker bifurcation. Moreover, this paper demonstrates that the outbreak of chaos can stabilize in the considered model with a higher value of the Allee parameter. The existence of chaotic orbits is verified with the help of a one-parameter bifurcation diagram and the largest Lyapunov exponents, respectively. Furthermore, different control methods are applied to control the bifurcation and fluctuating phenomena, i.e., state feedback, the Ott-Grebogi-Yorke, and hybrid control methods. Finally, to ensure our analytical results, numerical simulations have been carried out using MATLAB software.



    In recent years, human beings have been faced with the problem of resource shortage and environmental deterioration. Therefore, more and more people are interested in the analysis of predator-prey bio-economic systems. The authors proposed a singular bio-economic system with the invasion alien species in [1]. The stability and sliding mode control of a single bio-economic system was analyzed in [2]. The fuzzy stochastic optimal guaranteed cost control of bio-economic singular Markovian jump systems (MJSs) was studied in [3]. A singular bio-economic MJS with commodity prices as Markov chains was proposed in [4]. The exponential stability in mean square for MJSs was discussed in [31]. The problem of bifurcation and control for the biological economic system had been considered in [5]. The optimal harvest of the abstract population model with interval biological parameters was proposed in [6]. The optimal controller was designed by Pontryagin's maximum principle to obtain the optimal harvest. An elastic fuzzy controller was designed in [7] for a class of singular stochastic bio-economic fishery models with variable economic benefits. The fixed-time synchronization and energy consumption of Kuramoto-oscillator networks with multilayer distributed control are studied in [29]. Finite-time synchronization and H synchronization of coupled complex-valued memristive neural networks (CCVMNNs) with or without parameter uncertainty are analyzed in [35]. In order to protect the ecological environment and ensure the synchronous development of economy, it is necessary to research the bio-economic systems.

    Particularly, singular system models hold broader applicability in the realm of the bio-economic systems. In [8], a deterministic two-species predator-prey model with prey herd behavior, mutual disturbance and the effect of fear was introduced. In [9], the stability of a nonlinear population system with a weighted total size of scale structure and migration in a polluted environment was studied, where fertility and mortality depend on the density in different ways. Furthermore, the stability of biological and population systems was studied in [10]. It can be seen that the application of singular systems in the field of bioeconomy is worth exploring. In the biological system, it will be interfered by many noises, which can be divided into Gaussian noise or non Gaussian noise. Among the non Gaussian noises studied, white noise in stochastic systems is a special problem that needs to be studied. In [11], a new stochastic average method was used to analyze the impact vibration system with Gaussian white noise.

    Sliding mode control, also known as variable structure control is a kind of special nonlinear control, and nonlinearity is expressed as control discontinuity. The advantage of sliding mode control mentioned in [12] is that it can overcome the uncertainty of the system, and has strong robustness to disturbance and unmodeled dynamics. In recent years, as we learned in [13,14,15,16], variable structure control had been successfully applied in various projects, such as robotics, aerospace, power systems and so on. In addition, variable structure control had achieved many results through fuzzy sliding mode control in [17]. The finite-time synchronization (FTS) of the prediction of the synchronization time and energy consumption is discussed for multilayer fractional-order networks (MFONs) in [33]. Therefore, we will continue to study variable structure control of the singular bio-economic systems.

    In practice, biological systems are subject to fluctuations in the natural environment. Most of natural phenomena are not certain; they are stochastic. Therefore, it is very difficult to predict the dynamics of biological systems with deterministic methods. Therefore, the stochastic differential equation model is used to predict various dynamic analyses of biological systems to describe the behavior more in line with biological population activities. When existing stochastic factors and disturbance from white noise interfere, the model is changed from a biological model to a singular stochastic model. In [18], the influence of stochastic disturbance on a dynamic system was studied when white noise persists. In [19], the stability for stochastic singular systems with state-dependent noise in both continuous-time and discrete-time cases was discussed. The condition for the existence and uniqueness of the solution to stochastic singular systems is given. Furthermore, in [20], the stochastic Itˆo singular system is transformed into a deterministic standard singular system by means of the H-representation method and the new sufficient conditions for the stability of systems considered are derived in terms of strict linear matrix inequalities. In real life, the system state may be difficult to measure due to high cost or technical limitations. As an alternative method, state observers can overcome this difficulty. In [21], an observer-based nonlinear state delay system sliding mode controller was designed. H. Y. Li, et al. [22] studied observer-based adaptive sliding mode control for nonlinear MJSs. The observer based integral sliding mode control for stochastic systems was studied in [23] and the state observer was designed. The constraints of stochastic Itˆo regular systems were eliminated by designing linear sliding surfaces in [24]. In stochastic systems, the integral sliding mode control scheme requires very strict assumptions and we need to eliminate them. A new integral sliding mode control approach was proposed in [25]. The state of the system is difficult to obtain in practice. Inspired by control inputs and measurement outputs in [26], an observer is constructed to solve this problem in this paper.

    The main contributions of this manuscript include:

    (1) We first consider the capture of alien species and juvenile native species and we develop a more general exotic bioeconomic model of alien species invasion, taking into account the effects of stochastic environmental noise.

    (2) For the error system (i.e., model(3.2)) and observer system, we design two ingenious integral sliding surfaces including the sliding mode observer (SMO) gain matrix and singular matrix. It more effectively handles various uncertainties and white noise in the system, thereby improving the robustness of the system.

    (3) In this paper, we design a sliding mode controller, which is more suitable for biological systems to maintain the accessibility of sliding mode surfaces. A self-feedback term is innovatively introduced into the sliding variables to eliminate the restrictive assumptions often encountered in the sliding mode control of stochastic Ito systems.

    Notations: For the Itô-type stochastic differential equation dζ=f(ζ,t)dt+g(ζ,t)dω where ζRn is the state, ω is the standard Brownian motion Rn, and both f(ζ,t) and g(ζ,t) are locally Lipschitz in ζ and piecewise continuous in t. The differential operator L of V(ζ,t) is defined for the Itô-type stochastic system as LV(ζ,t)=Vt+Vζf+12Tr{gT2Vζ2g}.

    The following model is presented in [27]:

    {˙x1(t)=αx2(t)r1x1(t)βx1(t)ηx21(t)˙x2(t)=βx1(t)r2x2(t), (2.1)

    where x1(t) and x2(t) represent population density of immature species and mature species, respectively; α,r1,β denotes the intrinsic growth rate, death rate and transition rate of the immature population, respectively; r2 is the death rate of the mature population and the growth of the immature population is restricted by population density, which is reflected by ηx21(t).

    In the development of fishery, we mainly catch adult fish for profit and release young fish when we catch them. At the same time, we make the following assumptions:

    Assumption 1. When the living conditions are the same, the population density of early alien species is not affected by the external environment.

    Assumption 2. The competition between native species and alien species is far less than the internal competition of alien species.

    Considering the impact of harvesting effort on a biological system, a singular bio-economic model was established in [28]:

    {˙x1(t)=αx2(t)r1x1(t)βx1(t)ηx21(t)E(t)x1(t)˙x2(t)=βx1(t)r2x2(t)0=E(t)(ρx1(t)c)m(t), (2.2)

    where E(t) represents the harvesting effort of immature population, ρ represents the price coefficient of individual population, c represents the cost coefficient, cE(t) represents the total cost, and m(t) represents the net profit. Based on the system in [30], we can establish the following singular bio-economic model:

    {˙x1(t)=αx2(t)r1x1(t)βx1(t)ηx21(t)E(t)x1(t)˙x2(t)=βx1(t)r2x2(t)˙x3(t)=ax3(t)hx4(t)E(t)x3(t)˙x4(t)=β1x3(t)θ1x2(t)θ2x4(t)0=E(t)(ρ1x1(t)+ρ2x3(t)c)m(t), (2.3)

    where x3(t) represents the population density of alien species at the time t. x4(t) represents its harvesting capacity. a represents the growth rate of alien invasive species. η represents the limiting rate of the growth of alien invasive species on the adult fish population. hx4(t) represents the purification amount of alien species. β1x3(t) represents the fixation purification of alien species. θ1 represents the impact of purification on adult fish populations. θ2x4(t) represents the cost of capturing alien invasive species. E(t)x3(t) represents the harvesting effort amount of alien species and ρ1 and ρ2 represent the price coefficient of x1(t) and x3(t) individual population. There are many stochastic factors in the real environment that interfere with the changes of immature species density and mature species density. Considering these factors, we introduce randomness into the model (2.3) by replacing the parameters r1,r2. First, suppose that the mortality of immature species r1 and mature species r2 will be affected by white noise, by r1r1α1ξ(t) and r2r2α2ξ(t). Second, it is assumed that the population density will also be directly affected by the external stochastic excitation ω(t). If the system is unstable, the expected performance can be achieved by controlling the capture of alien species. Therefore, we add u(t) to the fourth equation of system (2.3).

    {˙x1(t)=αx2(t)r1x1(t)βx1(t)ηx21(t)E(t)x1(t)+α1x1(t)ξ(t)+x1(t)ω(t)˙x2(t)=βx1(t)r2x2(t)+α2x2(t)ξ(t)˙x3(t)=ax3(t)hx4(t)˙x4(t)=β1x3(t)θ1x2(t)θ2x4(t)+u(t)0=E(t)(ρx1(t)+ρ2x3(t)c)m(t), (2.4)

    where α1, α2 represent the intensity of the white noises and ξ(t) and ω(t) are independent, in possession of the zero mean value and standard variance Gauss white noises. i.e., E[ω(t)]=0,E[ω(t)ω(t+τ)]=δ(τ), δ(x) represents the Dirac function.

    Remark 1. Biological system modeling can not only use the Takagi and Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy method, but also use the adaptive T-S neural network method to deal with biological population problems. In particular, a novel hybrid photovoltaic maximum power point tracker structure based on an adaptive T-S fuzzy radial basis function neural network approach is proposed in [34]. Compared with the T-S fuzzy method, it has higher tracking efficiency and minimum tracking deviation, but it will make the system more complicated, which is not conducive to manual intervention in a biological system.

    In this section, we use the T-S fuzzy method to express the nonlinear system as multiple local linear systems to make the analysis easier[32]. System (2.4) can be written as:

    Edx(t)=[Ax(t)+BU(t)]dt+Jx(t)dw(t), (2.5)

    where

    A=[z1(t)α00x1(t)βz2(t)00000ahx3(t)0θ1β1θ20z3(t)0z4(t)0c],E=[1000001000001000001000000],J=[1000000000000000000000000],B=[000000000000000000100000m(t)],U(t)=[111u(t)1]T,x(t)=[x1(t)x2(t)x3(t)x4(t)E(t)]T,

    where z1(t)=r1βηx1(t)+α1ξ(t), z2(t)=x1(t), z3(t)=ρ1E(t), z4(t)=ρ2E(t), z5(t)=x3(t). Thus,

    maxz1(t)=r1βηminx1(t)+α1ξ(t),minz1(t)=r1βηmaxx1(t)+α1ξ(t),maxz2(t)=minx1(t),minz2(t)=maxx1(t),maxz3(t)=ρ1maxE(t),minz3(t)=ρ1minE(t),maxz4(t)=ρ2maxE(t),minz4(t)=ρ2minE(t),maxz5(t)=minx3(t),minz5(t)=maxx3(t).

    Using the maximum and minimum values, z1(t), z2(t), z3(t), z4(t) and z5(t) can be represented by

    z1(t)=M11(z1(t))maxz1(t)+M12(z1(t))minz1(t),z2(t)=M21(z2(t))maxz2(t)+M22(z2(t))minz2(t),z3(t)=M31(z3(t))maxz3(t)+M32(z3(t))minz3(t),z4(t)=M41(z4(t))maxz4(t)+M42(z4(t))minz4(t),z5(t)=M51(z5(t))maxz5(t)+M52(z5(t))minz5(t),

    where Mi1+Mi2=1,i=1,2,3,4,5 and Mij represent the membership functions. Ai is the coefficient matrix of linear system after fuzzy and Bi is the control input matrix. The system (2.5) can be written as

    Edx(t)=32i=1hi(z(t))[(Aix(t)+BiU(t))dt+Jx(t)dw(t)], (2.6)

    where hi(z(t)) are the weight functions defined by

    hi(z(t))=rj=1ωij(zj(t))gi=1rj=1ωij(zj(t)),hi(z(t))0,32i=1hi(z(t))=1.

    The ωij(zj(t)) is called the grade of membership funcition zj(t) in ωij.

    For notational simplicity, 32i=1hi(z(t))Ai and 32i=1hi(z(t))Bi will be written as ˉA and ˉB, respectively. The T-S fuzzy stochastic singular bio-economic system (2.6) is shown as follows:

    {Edx(t)=[ˉAx(t)+ˉBU(t)]dt+Jx(t)dω(t)y(t)=Cx(t). (2.7)

    A schematic diagram of the T-S fuzzy bio-economic systems is shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  T-S fuzzy control algorithm block diagram.

    In this paper, we mainly study the population density of alien species. However, in practice, due to various factors and the rapid reproduction of alien species, it is difficult to measure the real population density. Therefore, the design of the state observer usually provides an approximate estimate for the original system. However, it can be observed that since the sliding mode observer has a discontinuous control law, it can deal with the case where the population density is externally excited. Therefore, the observer (3.1) is proposed in this paper.

    The functions are as follows:

    {Edˆx(t)=[ˉAˆx(t)+ˉB(U(t)Us(t))+G(y(t)ˆy(t))]dtˆy(t)=Cˆx(t), (3.1)

    where ˆx(t)Rn represents the state estimation of x(t), ˆy(t) represents the output vector of the observer, Us(t) represents the input vector of observer and G represents the observer gain to be designed in the sequel.

    Define e(t)=x(t)ˆx(t), which represents state estimation error. Subtracting system (3.1) from system (2.7), according to the systems (2.7) and (3.1), we can obtain (3.2) as follows:

    Ede(t)=[(ˉAGC)e(t)+ˉBUs(t)]dt+Jx(t)dw(t). (3.2)

    We first construct the sliding surface for the error system (3.2). The sliding surface is obtained by making s(t)=0, where the sliding variable s(t) is defined as

    s(t)=SEe(t)SEe(t0)+tt0(SGCe(ν)Qs(ν))dν, (3.3)

    where SRn×n is a known matrix satisfying det(SˉB)0 and rank[SEC]=rankC and G is the observer gain. Q is a known positive definite matrix used to adjust the convergence rate and eliminate the constraint SˉJ=0.

    Remark 2. We limit rank[SEC]=rankC, so that there is a matrix H satisfying SE=HC, so the sliding variable s(t) can be converted into

    s(t)=H(y(t)ˆy(t))H(y(0)ˆy(0))+tt0(SG(y(ν)ˆy(ν))Qs(ν))dν,

    which is accessible.

    Compared with the sliding variable without self feedback term, the advantages of the sliding variable (3.6) are mainly reflected in two points: First, the self-feedback term Qs(t) allows an increase in the stability margin and makes the sliding variable more robust to disturbances beyond the sliding surface. Second, the self-feedback term is also responsible for eliminating the restrictive constraint SJ=0, stabilizing the sliding variable and reducing chattering. From (3.2) and (3.3), it follows that

     ds(t)=SEde(t)+SGCe(t)Qs(t)=S[(ˉAGC)e(t)+ˉBUs(t)]+SJx(t)dw(t)+SGCe(t)Qs(t)=S[ˉAe(t)+ˉBUs(t)]Qs(t)+SJx(t)dw(t)=Ls(t)+SJx(t)dw(t). (3.4)

    When the system is constrained on the sliding surface, we can get E{s(t)}=0, so from (3.4), we get Ls(t)=0. The equivalent control law can be given by Useq(t)=(SˉB)1SˉAe(t). Substituting Useq(t) into (3.2), the sliding mode dynamic can be obtained as

    Ede(t)=(˜AGC)e(t)dt+[Je(t)+Jˆx(t)]dw(t), (3.5)

    where ˜A=(IˉB(SˉB)1S)ˉA.

    According to (3.4), the dynamics of sliding variable s(t) includes a product term Qs(t), which involves a Hurwitz matrix Q and sliding variable itself, which means that the term Qs(t) contained in the sliding variable (3.3) has a stabilizing effect on the sliding variable. It can be seen that by introducing Qs(t) into the sliding variable s(t) and selecting an appropriate positive definite matrix Q, the convergence speed of the sliding variable can be improved to a certain extent.

    By using the state variables of the designed observer, the stability of the system is achieved, and the expected performance is achieved. Therefore, s0=0 can be used to design the observer for (3.1), where

    s0(t)=S0Eˆx(t)S0Eˆx(t0)S0tt0(ˉA+ˉBK)ˆx(ν)dν (3.6)

    and K is the parameter matrix, so that E,ˉA+ˉB are admissible and S0=ˉBTXRm×n is the unknown matrix to be determined later.

    From (3.4) and (3.6), it follows that

    .s0(t)=S0E˙ˆx(t)S0(ˉA+ˉBK)ˆx(t)=S0[ˉAˆx(t)+ˉB(U(t)Us(t))+GCe(t)]S0(ˉA+ˉBK)ˆx(t)=S0ˉB(U(t)Us(t)Kˆx(t))+S0GCe(t)=Ls0(t). (3.7)

    The equivalent control law can be obtained

    Ueq=Kˆx(t)+Us(t)(S0ˉB)1S0GCe(t).

    Further, substituting the equivalent control law into the observer (3.1), we can get the following equation

    E˙ˆx(t)=(A+ˉBK)ˆx(t)+(IˉB(S0ˉB)1S0)GCe(t). (3.8)

    The dynamics of the resultant sliding motion are given

    {E˙ˆx(t)=(A+ˉBK)ˆx(t)+(IˉB(S0ˉB)1S0)GCe(t)E˙e(t)=(˜AGC)e(t)+[Je(t)+Jˆx(t)]˙w(t)
    ˆA=[ˉA+ˉBKIˉB(S0B)1S0GC0ˉAGC].

    In order to analyze the mean-square exponentially admissibility of (3.5) and (3.8) simultaneously, the SMO system (3.1) can track the original system (2.7) and the estimation state variables can converge to zero. Thus, we consider the following augmented system:

    ˆE˙xe(t)=ˆAxe(t)dt+ˆJxe(t)˙w(t), (3.9)

    where

    ˆE=(E00E),xe(t)=[ˆx(t)e(t)],ˆJ=[00JJ]. (3.10)

    Theorem 3.1. The closed-loop system (3.9) is mean-square exponentially admissible if there are matrices K,G,X and Y, and a positive scalar α such that the following inequalities hold:

    ETX=XTE0 (3.11)
    ETY=YTE0, (3.12)
    [Λi+αJT(E+)TETYE+JXT(ˉBK)(ˉBK)TXαΦi]<0, (3.13)

    where

    Λi=(ˉA+ˉBK)TX+XT(ˉA+ˉBK)+JT(E+)TETYE+J. (3.14)
    Φi=(ˉAGC)TY+YT(ˉAGC). (3.15)

    Proof. First, we prove that system (3.9) is impulse free, regular and has a unique solution.

    Let

    ˆZ=[X00αY]. (3.16)

    Using (3.10)–(3.12) and (3.16), we have the following equation

    ˆETˆZ=[ETX00αETY]=[XTE00αYTE]=ˆZTˆE0. (3.17)

    Singular invertible matrix results in

    ˆE+=[E+00E+]. (3.18)

    Calculated by (3.10) and (3.18),

    ˆATˆZ+ˆZTˆA+ˆJT(ˆE+)TˆETˆZˆE+ˆJ=[Λi+αJT(E+)TETYE+JXT(ˉBK)(ˉBK)TXαΦi] (3.19)

    where Λi and Φi are defined in (3.14) and (3.15). It can be seen from Eq (3.16) that the matrix (3.19) is negative definite; that is,

    ˆATˆZ+ˆZTˆA+ˆJT(ˆE+)TˆETˆZˆE+ˆJ<0. (3.20)

    There are non-singular matrixs M and N such that

    MˆEN=[Ir000],MˆAN=[ˆA11ˆA12ˆA21ˆA22],MˆJN=[ˆJ11ˆJ1200],MTˆZN=[ˆZ11ˆZ12ˆZ21ˆZ22],N1xe(t)=[ˆx1(t)ˆx2(t)]. (3.21)

    From (3.17), we can get NTˆETMTMTˆZN=NTˆZTM1MˆEN0; that is,

    [Ir000][ˆZ11ˆZ12ˆZ21ˆZ22]=[ˆZ11TˆZ12TˆZ21TˆZ22T][Ir000]0. (3.22)

    By (3.22), we get

    ˆZ11=ˆZ11T,ˆZ12=0,MTˆZN=[ˆZ110ˆZ21ˆZ22] (3.23)

    then

    NTˆETˆZN=(NTˆETMT)(MTˆZN)=[ˆZ11000]. (3.24)

    It follows that (3.20) implies

    ˆATˆZ+ˆZTˆA<0. (3.25)

    Moreover, pre-multiplying and post-multiplying Eq (3.25) by NT and N gives us

    [Δ1Δ2ˆA22TˆZ22+ˆZ22TˆA22]<0. (3.26)

    Since Δ1 and Δ2 are independent of the results discussed below, the actual expressions for these two variables are omitted. From (3.26), we have ˆA22TˆZ22+ˆZ22TˆA22<0, which makes it easy to find ˆA22 as nonsingular. Therefore, from Eq (3.10), we can obtain the constrained equivalent transformation form of (3.9).

    {˙ˆx1(t)=(ˆA11ˆA12ˆA221ˆA21)ˆx1(t)+(ˆJ11ˆJ12ˆA221ˆA21)ˆx1(t)˙w(t)˙ˆx2(t)=ˆA221ˆA21ˆx1(t). (3.27)

    We get system (3.9) as regular and impulse-free. Based on the stochastic theory, the system (3.9) has a unique solution.

    Next, we will prove that the system (3.9) is the mean-square exponential stability. Select the Lyapunov function candidate as V(xe(t),t)=xeT(t)ˆETˆZxe(t).

    Let W(t)=eεtV(xe(t),t) and using (3.1), we can obtain

    ˙W(t)=εeεtV(xe(t),t)+eεtLV(xe(t),t)+2eεtxeT(t)ˆZTˆJxe(t). (3.28)

    Integrating both sides and then taking expectation yields

    E(W(t))=E(W(t0))+tt0εeενEV(xe(ν),ν)dν+tt0eενEV(xe(ν),ν)dν. (3.29)

    By (2.3), we make

    V(xe(t),t)=xTe(t)ˆETˆZxe(t)=ˆxT1(t)ˆZ11ˆx1(t), (3.30)

    which means that

    λmin(ˆZ11)ˆx1(t)2V(xe(t),t)λmax(ˆZ11)ˆx1(t)2. (3.31)

    On the basis of (3.31), one can obtain

    E(V(xe(t),t))λmax(ˆZ11)Eˆx1(t)2. (3.32)
    E(W(t))=eεtEV(xe(t),t)λmin(ˆZ11)eεtE(ˆx1(t)2). (3.33)

    In terms of ˆx2(t)=ˆA221ˆA21ˆx1(t) given by (3.27), one can find positive scalars f1 and f2 such that

    f1ˆx1(t)2ˆx2(t)2f2ˆx1(t)2. (3.34)

    It is noted that

    N1xe(t)2=ˆx1(t)2+ˆx2(t)2. (3.35)

    By (3.34) and (3.35), we have

    (f1+1)ˆx1(t)2N1xe(t)2(f2+1)ˆx1(t)2, (3.36)

    which indicates

    (f1+1)λmax(NTN1)ˆx1(t)2xe(t)2(f2+1)λmin(NTN1)ˆx1(t)2. (3.37)

    From (3.2) and (3.20), we can find a positive scalar η so that

    LV(xe(t),t)ηxe(t)2. (3.38)

    Substituting (3.37) into (3.38) and then taking expectation, one has

    E(LV(xe(t),t))ϕE(ˆx1(t)2), (3.39)

    where ϕ=η(f1+1)λmax(NTN1). Substituting (3.32), (3.33) and (3.39) into (3.29), one has

    λmin(ˆZ11)eεtEˆx1(t)2E(W(t0))+tt0(ελmax(ˆZ11)ϕ)eενEˆx1(ν)2dν. (3.40)

    If ε is chosen as εϕλmax(ˆZ11), (3.40) becomes

    λmin(ˆZ11)eεtE(ˆx1(t)2)E(W(t0)), (3.41)

    which indicates

    E(ˆx1(t)2)κeεt, (3.42)

    where κ=E(W(t0))λmin(ˆZ11). Using (3.34) and (3.42), one has

    E(ˆx2(t)2)f2κeεt. (3.43)

    It can be seen that system (3.9) is mean-square exponentially admissible.

    Theorem 3.2. Select the appropriate matrix Q>0, K and sliding mode controller

    Us(t)=(SˉB)1SˉAˆx(t)ρ(SˉB)1s(t)s(t), (3.44)

    where ρ=θSˉA+. If (3.13) is feasible, then for all x(t)θ, the sliding mode controller Us(t) given as above will guarantee that state trajectories of error system (3.2) are attracted to a small ball region around the sliding surface s(t)=0 from the beginning almost surely.

    Proof. We can get

     ds(t)=[S(ˉAe(t)+ˉBUs(t))Qs(t)]dt+SJx(t)dw(t). (3.45)

    Select the Lyapunov function as V(s(t))=12sT(t)s(t). According to the formula of Itˆo, it is as follows:

     dV(s(t))=LV(s(t))dt+sT(t)SJx(t) dw(t), (3.46)

    where

    LV(s(t))=sT(t)[S(ˉAe(t)+ˉBUs(t))Qs(t)]+12xT(t)JTSTSJx(t)=ρs(t)+sT(t)SˉAx(t)sT(t)Qs(t)+12xT(t)JTSTSJx(t)ρs(t)+θSˉAs(t)λmin(Q)s(t)2+12λmax(JTSTSJ)x(t)2. (3.47)

    The reachability condition LV(s(t))α1s(t) is satisfied if the following holds

    λmin(Q)s(t)2(α1+θSˉAρ)s(t)12λmax(JTSTSJ)x(t)20, (3.48)

    where ρα1+θSˉA. It can be concluded that the solution of parabolic Eq (3.48) can be divided into two cases: One is that there is a unique solution s(t)=0, and the other is that there are two different solutions

    s(t)1=(α1)2λmin(Q)Ξ,s(t)2=(α1)2λmin(Q)+Ξ,

    where Ξ=(α1)2+2λmin(Q)λmax(JTSTSJ)x(t)22λmin(Q), s(t)=0 can be regarded as a special case of different solutions. Therefore, we only need to analyze the case of two different solutions. According to the parabolic equation in geometry, as long as s(t)s(t)2 is met, (3.48) is true and s(t)s(t)1 is discarded due to s(t)0 and s(t)10.Thus, can get

    LV(s(t))α1s(t),s(t)(α1)2λmin(Q)+Ξ.

    This means that the sliding variable s(t) is limited to a ball region

    Υ(s(t),Q)={s(t)|s(t)(α1)2λmin(Q)+Ξ}

    for the beginning almost surely. As a result, the almost sure attractiveness of ball region Υ(s(t),Q) is proved.

    Theorem 3.3. Select the appropriate matrix Q>0, K and sliding mode controller

    U(t)=((SˉB)1SˉA+K)ˆx(t)(S0ˉB)1S0G(y(t)ˆy(t))ξ(S0ˉB)1s0(t)s0(t), (3.49)

    where ξ=ρ(SˉB)1S0ˉB+μ and ρ=θSˉA+. If (3.12) is feasible, for all x(t)θ, the sliding mode controller U(t) given above will ensure that the state track of the observer system (3.1) is almost certainly pulled to the sliding surface s0(t)=0 from the beginning.

    Proof. We can get

    ˙s0(t)=S0ˉB(U(t)Us(t)Kˆx(t))+S0GCe(t). (3.50)

    Select the Lyapunov function as V(s0(t))=12s0T(t)s0(t). According to the formula of Itˆo, we have

    ˙V(s0(t))=LV(s0(t)), (3.51)

    where

    LV(s0(t))=sT0(t)[S0ˉB(U(t)Us(t)Kˆx(t))]+sT0(t)S0GCe(t)=sT0(t)[S0ˉB(ξ(S0ˉB)1s0(t)s0(t)+ρ(SˉB)1s(t)s(t))]=ξs0(t)+ρsT0(t)S0ˉB(SˉB)1s(t)s(t)ξs0(t)+ρs(t)S0ˉB(SˉB)1s0(t)μs0(t). (3.52)

    It can be concluded that the sliding variable s0(t) has been almost always on the sliding surface s0(t)=0 since the beginning.

    Remark 3. In this paper, we add the product term Qs(t) to the sliding variable s(t) in (3.3) to counteract the 12xT(t)JTSTSJx(t) caused by the presence of random noise. Therefore, it is no longer necessary to consider limiting SJ=0. In addition, when SJ=0 is met, the ideal sliding mode appears, and the ball area Y(s(t),Q) becomes the sliding surface s(t) itself. If this happens, the additional robustness of the self feedback item Qs(t) will also make the proposed integral sliding variable s(t) better than the existing sliding variable.

    Human activities have led to the destruction of the ecological environment of a large number of biological species. For instance, the ocean has been affected by land erosion, which has destroyed the spawning grounds and living environment of young fish. Environmental pollution has also had an increasingly serious impact on people's production and daily life. It is urgent to control and deal with the invasion of alien species.

    In the economic globalization today, invasive species has increasingly become a global hot issue. Since the 1980s, alien species have shown a faster growth trend in China. Up to now, nearly 50 new invasive species have been added, and more than 20 dangerous invasive species have successively erupted in large areas in China.

    We choose the following parameters according to the case of Nile tilapia:

    α=0.4r1=0.5β=0.5η=0.1α1=0.1r2=0.1α2=0.1a=0.6h=0.01β1=0.4θ1=0.1θ2=0.2c=3ρ1=ρ2=4.

    We have:

    {˙x1(t)=0.4x2(t)0.5x1(t)0.5x1(t)0.1x21(t)E(t)x1(t)+0.1x1(t)ξ(t)+x1(t)ω(t)˙x2(t)=0.5x1(t)0.1x2(t)+0.6x2(t)ξ(t)˙x3(t)=0.6x3(t)0.01x4(t)E(t)x3(t)˙x4(t)=0.4x3(t)0.1x2(t)0.2x4(t)+u(t)0=E(t)(4x1(t)+4x3(t)3)m(t),

    where

    x1(t)[8,8],x2(t)[0,6],x3(t)[0,4],x4(t)[6,0],E(t)[6,2],

    then z1(t), z2(t), z3(t), z4(t) and z5(t) are obtained as follows:

    maxz1(t)=0.9,minz1(t)=1.4maxz2(t)=0,minz2(t)=10maxz3(t)=20,minz3(t)=0maxz4(t)=20,minz4(t)=0maxz5(t)=0,minz5(t)=3.

    According to the above fuzzy rules given, the fuzzy model is carried out as (2.6). For the expression of A1, A2, ...A32, see the appendix. The other expression is as follows:

    E=[1000001000001000001000000],Bi=[0000000000000000001000000],i=1,32,Ji=[1000000000000000000000000],i=1,32C=[0.4012102010],M11=z1(t)+1.40.5,M12=0.9z1(t)0.5,M21=z2(t)+1010,M22=z1(t)10,M31=z3(t)20,M32=20z3(t)20.

    Set the initial conditions of system (2.6) and observer system to x(0)=[7.930.87.84.9]T and ˆx(0)=[7.930.87.84.9]T.

    The state trajectory of the open loop system (2.6) can be clearly seen in Figure 2, which is not mean-square exponentially admissible. Next, in order to stabilize the system (2.6), a sliding mode control strategy is designed.

    Figure 2.  Trajectory of open-loop system.

    It can be obtained that

    X=[0.62940.80490.68480.71620.31150.81160.44300.94120.15650.92860.74600.09380.91430.83150.69830.82680.91500.02920.58440.86800.26470.92980.60060.91900.3575],G=[5.15484.12094.86269.36332.15554.46153.10969.07666.57638.0574]×106.

    To design sliding mode control (SMC) laws Us(t) and U(t), take appropriate matrices

    S=[0.22.51.21.82.4],Q=2,K=[1.64690.87750.97950.55210.99671.38970.76310.89121.35941.91950.63421.53101.29261.31020.68081.90041.59041.41870.32521.17050.06890.37371.50940.23800.4476]

    and θ=1.5,=0.001,μ=0.001. Figure 3 shows the trajectory of the closed-loop system, from which it can be found that the state variable of the closed-loop system can converge to zero in a very short time, that is, the observer is asymptotically stable. Figure 4 show the sliding mode surface, respectively. Therefore, the proposed observer and control scheme are effective. To reduce the chattering, by replacing s(t)s(t) and s0(t)s0(t) by s(t)s(t)+0.01 and s0(t)s0(t)+0.01, as can be seen from Figures 36, the simulation results have less chattering and faster convergence. It can be seen that the method of introducing self feedback Qs(t) is improved compared with the existing method, which shows that the self feedback item can play a stable role. Therefore, it should be weighed when selecting Q.

    Figure 3.  Trajectory of the closed-loop system.
    Figure 4.  Trajectory of sliding mode surface s.
    Figure 5.  Trajectory of control signal u.
    Figure 6.  Trajectory of error system.

    In this paper, observer-based integral sliding mode control for singular bio-economic system with stochastic fluctuations is studied. A sliding mode observer is designed and an observer based integral sliding mode control method is proposed. By introducing a term consisting of a sliding variable and a negative definite matrix, a new integral sliding surface is constructed. From the results, it can be concluded that the newly introduced term can eliminate restrictive assumptions and has a stabilizing effect on sliding variables. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the results obtained.

    In biology, up to now, we still need to invest in a lot of manpower and material resources to control the density of alien species. The observer-based integral sliding mode control method proposed by us can effectively control the population density of alien invasive species to ensure that native species and invasive species can coexist within a certain range.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in this paper.

    A1=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01300.10.40.2000003],A2=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01300.10.40.2000000],A3=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.20002003],A4=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.20002000],A5=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.20200003],A6=[0.90.400100.50.9000000.60.01000.10.40.20200000],A7=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.202002003],A8=[0.90.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.202002000],A9=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01300.10.40.2000003],A10=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01300.10.40.2000000],A11=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20002003],A12=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20002000],A13=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20200003],A14=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20200000],A15=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.202002003],A16=[0.90.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.202002000],A17=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01300.10.40.2000003],A18=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01300.10.40.2000000],A19=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.20002003],A20=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.20002000],A21=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.20200003],A22=[1.40.400100.50.9000000.60.01000.10.40.20200000],A23=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.202002003],A24=[1.40.400100.50000000.60.01000.10.40.202002000],A25=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01300.10.40.2000003],A26=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01300.10.40.2000000],A27=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20002003],A28=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20002000],A29=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20200003],A30=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.20200000],A31=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.202002003],A32=[1.40.40000.55000000.60.01000.10.40.202002000],


    [1] P. Turchin, Complex population dynamics, Princeton University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847280
    [2] R. Arditi, L. R. Ginzburg, Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-dependence, J. Theor. Biol., 139 (1989), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80211-5 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80211-5
    [3] P. H. Crowley, E. K. Martin, Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 8 (1989), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467324 doi: 10.2307/1467324
    [4] J. R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Anim. Ecol., 1975,331–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866 doi: 10.2307/3866
    [5] D. L. D. Angelis, R. Goldstein, R. V. O'Neill, A model for tropic interaction, Ecology, 56 (1975), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936298 doi: 10.2307/1936298
    [6] Y. Zhou, W. Sun, Y. Song, Z. Zheng, J. Lu, S. Chen, Hopf bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with Holling-Ⅱ type functional response and a prey refuge, Nonlinear Dynam., 97 (2019), 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05063-w doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-05063-w
    [7] P. Leslie, J. Gower, The properties of a stochastic model for the predator-prey type of interaction between two species, Biometrika, 47 (1960), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333294 doi: 10.2307/2333294
    [8] H. I. Freedman, Deterministic mathematical models in population ecology, Marcel Dekker Incorporated, 1980.
    [9] R. M. May, Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations: Stable points, stable cycles, and chaos, Science, 186 (2007), 645–647. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.186.4164.64 doi: 10.1126/science.186.4164.64
    [10] W. C. Allee, The social life of animals, 1938. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7226
    [11] F. Courchamp, T. C. Brock, B. Grenfell, Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect, Trends Ecol. Evol., 14 (1999), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01683-3 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01683-3
    [12] F. Courchamp, L. Berec, J. Gascoigne, Allee effects in ecology and conservation, Oxford University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198570301.001.0001
    [13] B. Dennis, Allee effects: Population growth, critical density, and the chance of extinction, Nat. Resour. Model., 3 (1989), 481–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.1989.tb00119.x doi: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.1989.tb00119.x
    [14] C. E. Brassil, Mean time to extinction of a metapopulation with an Allee effect, Ecol. Model., 143 (2001), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00351-9 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00351-9
    [15] C. Celik, O. Duman, Allee effect in a discrete-time predator-prey system, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 40 (2009), 1956–1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.09.077 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.09.077
    [16] W. X. Wang, Y. B. Zhang, C. Z. Liu, Analysis of a discrete-time predator-prey system with Allee effect, Ecol. Complex., 8 (2011), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.005
    [17] N. Iqbal, R. Wu, Y. Karaca, R. Shah, W. Weera, Pattern dynamics and turing instability induced by self-super-cross-diffusive predator-prey model via amplitude equations, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 2940–2960. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023153 doi: 10.3934/math.2023153
    [18] N. Iqbal, R. Wu, Turing patterns induced by cross-diffusion in a 2D domain with strong Allee effect, CR. Math., 357 (2019), 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2019.10.011 doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2019.10.011
    [19] N. Iqbal, R. Wu, W. W. Mohammed, Pattern formation induced by fractional cross-diffusion in a 3-species food chain model with harvesting, Math. Comput. Simulat., 188 (2021), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.041 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.041
    [20] Z. Chen, Q. Din, M. Rafaqat, U. Saeed, M. B. Ajaz, Discrete-time predator-prey interaction with selective harvesting and predator self-limitation, J. Math., 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6737098 doi: 10.1155/2020/6737098
    [21] L. G. Yuan, Q. G. Yang, Bifurcation, invariant curve and hybrid control in a discrete-time predator-prey system, Appl. Math. Model., 39 (2015), 2345–2362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.040 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.040
    [22] K. T. Alligood, T. D. Sauer, J. A. Yorke, Chaos, Springer, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97589
    [23] A. Gomes, E. Manica, M. Varriale, Applications of chaos control techniques to a three-species food chain, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 35 (2008), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.05.075 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.05.075
    [24] R. V. Solé, J. G. Gamarra, M. Ginovart, D. López, Controlling chaos in ecology: From deterministic to individual-based models, B. Math. Biol., 61 (1999), 1187–1207. https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0141 doi: 10.1006/bulm.1999.0141
    [25] X. S. Luo, G. Chen, B. H. Wang, J. Q. Fang, Hybrid control of period-doubling bifurcation and chaos in discrete nonlinear dynamical systems, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 18 (2013), 775–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00028-6 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00028-6
    [26] E. Ott, C. Grebogi, J. A. Yorke, Controlling chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990), 1196. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1196 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1196
    [27] M. S. Shabbir, Q. Din, K. Ahmad, A. Tassaddiq, A. H. Soori, M. A. Khan, Stability, bifurcation, and chaos control of a novel discrete-time model involving Allee effect and cannibalism, Adv. Differential Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02838-z doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02838-z
    [28] Y. Lin, Q. Din, M. Rafaqat, A. A. Elsadany, Y. Zeng, Dynamics and chaos control for a discrete-time Lotka-Volterra model, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 126760–126775. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008522 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008522
    [29] Y. Cai, W. Wang, J. Wang, Dynamics of a diffusive predator-prey model with additive Allee effect, Int. J. Biomath., 5 (2012), 1250023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524511001659 doi: 10.1142/S1793524511001659
    [30] P. Aguirre, E. G. Olivares, E. Saez, Three limit cycles in a Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with additive Allee effect, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 69 (2009), 1244–1262. https://doi.org/10.1137/070705210 doi: 10.1137/070705210
    [31] P. Aguirre, E. G. Olivares, E. Saez, Two limit cycles in a Leslie-Gower predator-prey model with additive Allee effect, Nonlinear Anal.-Real, 10 (2009), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.01.022 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.01.022
    [32] S. Vinoth, R. Sivasamy, K. Sathiyanathan, G. Rajchakit, P. Hammachukiattikul, R. Vadivel, et al., Dynamical analysis of a delayed food chain model with additive Allee effect, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03216-z doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03216-z
    [33] M. H. Wang, M. Kot, Speeds of invasion in a model with strong or weak Allee effects, Math. Biosci., 171 (2020), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(01)00048-7 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(01)00048-7
    [34] R. E. Mickens, Nonstandard finite difference models of differential equations, World Scientific, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1142/2081
    [35] L. Dai, Nonlinear dynamics of piecewise constant systems and implementation of piecewise constant arguments, World Scientific, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1142/6882
    [36] S. Vinoth, R. Sivasamy, K. Sathiyanathan, B. Unyong, R. Vadivel, N. Gunasekaran, A novel discrete-time Leslie-Gower model with the impact of Allee effect in predator population, Complexity, 2022 (2022), 6931354. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6931354 doi: 10.1155/2022/6931354
    [37] W. E. Ricker, Stock and recruitment, J. Fish. Boar. Canada, 11 (1954), 559–623. https://doi.org/10.1139/f54-039 doi: 10.1139/f54-039
    [38] J. Guckenheimer, P. Holmes, Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2
    [39] S. Wiggins, Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos, Springer Science & Business Media, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4067-7
    [40] C. Robinson, Dynamical systems: Stability, symbolic dynamics, and chaos, CRC Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482227871
    [41] R. M. May, G. F. Oster, Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models, Am. Nat., 110 (1976), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1086/283092 doi: 10.1086/283092
    [42] W. Krawcewicz, T. Rogers, Perfect harmony: The discrete dynamics of cooperation, J. Math. Biol., 28 (1990), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178325 doi: 10.1007/BF00178325
    [43] G. Chen, X. Dong, From chaos to order: Methodologies, perspectives and applications, World Scientific, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1142/3033
    [44] Q. Din, O. A. Gümüş, H. Khalil, Neimark-sacker bifurcation and chaotic behaviour of a modified host-parasitoid model, Z. Naturforsch. A, 72 (2017), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2016-0335 doi: 10.1515/zna-2016-0335
    [45] Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of applied bifurcation theory, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7
    [46] S. Pal, N. Pal, J. Chattopadhyay, Hunting cooperation in a discrete-time predator-prey system, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 28 (2018), 1850083. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127418500839 doi: 10.1142/S0218127418500839
    [47] M. Y. Hamada, T. E. Azab, H. E. Metwally, Bifurcations and dynamics of a discrete predator-prey model of ricker type, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 69 (2023), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-022-01737-8 doi: 10.1007/s12190-022-01737-8
    [48] Y. H. Chou, Y. Chow, X. Hu, S. R. J. Jang, A Ricker-type predator-prey system with hunting cooperation in discrete time, Math. Comput. Simulat., 190 (2021), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.06.003
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1801) PDF downloads(102) Cited by(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog