We will focus on the existence of nontrivial, nonnegative solutions to the following quasilinear Schrödinger equation
{−div(loge|x|∇u)−div(loge|x|∇(u2))u = g(x,u), x∈B1,u = 0, x∈∂B1,
where B1 denotes the unit ball centered at the origin in R2 and g behaves like exp(es4) as s tends to infinity, the growth of the nonlinearity is motivated by a Trudinder-Moser inequality version, which admits double exponential growth. The proof involves a change of variable (a dual approach) combined with the mountain pass theorem.
Citation: Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc. Standing waves for quasilinear Schrödinger equations involving double exponential growth[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1682-1695. doi: 10.3934/math.2023086
[1] | Xiaojie Guo, Zhiqing Han . Existence of solutions to a generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equation with concave-convex nonlinearities and potentials vanishing at infinity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27684-27711. doi: 10.3934/math.20231417 |
[2] | Liang Xue, Jiafa Xu, Donal O'Regan . Positive solutions for a critical quasilinear Schrödinger equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19566-19581. doi: 10.3934/math.2023998 |
[3] | Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc . Hamiltonian elliptic system involving nonlinearities with supercritical exponential growth. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19121-19141. doi: 10.3934/math.2023976 |
[4] | Chen Huang, Gao Jia . Schrödinger-Poisson system without growth and the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1319-1332. doi: 10.3934/math.2020090 |
[5] | Ziqing Yuan, Jing Zhao . Solutions for gauged nonlinear Schrödinger equations on $ {\mathbb R}^2 $ involving sign-changing potentials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21337-21355. doi: 10.3934/math.20241036 |
[6] | Jinfu Yang, Wenmin Li, Wei Guo, Jiafeng Zhang . Existence of infinitely many normalized radial solutions for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger-Poisson equations in $ \mathbb{R}^3 $. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19292-19305. doi: 10.3934/math.20221059 |
[7] | Kun Cheng, Wentao Huang, Li Wang . Least energy sign-changing solution for a fractional $ p $-Laplacian problem with exponential critical growth. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20797-20822. doi: 10.3934/math.20221140 |
[8] | Yin Deng, Gao Jia, Fanglan Li . Multiple solutions to a quasilinear Schrödinger equation with Robin boundary condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3825-3839. doi: 10.3934/math.2020248 |
[9] | Shulin Zhang . Positive ground state solutions for asymptotically periodic generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1015-1034. doi: 10.3934/math.2022061 |
[10] | Ninghe Yang . Exact wave patterns and chaotic dynamical behaviors of the extended (3+1)-dimensional NLSE. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31274-31294. doi: 10.3934/math.20241508 |
We will focus on the existence of nontrivial, nonnegative solutions to the following quasilinear Schrödinger equation
{−div(loge|x|∇u)−div(loge|x|∇(u2))u = g(x,u), x∈B1,u = 0, x∈∂B1,
where B1 denotes the unit ball centered at the origin in R2 and g behaves like exp(es4) as s tends to infinity, the growth of the nonlinearity is motivated by a Trudinder-Moser inequality version, which admits double exponential growth. The proof involves a change of variable (a dual approach) combined with the mountain pass theorem.
This paper deals with the existence of a nontrivial, nonnegative solution for the following quasilinear stationary Schrödinger equation
{−div(w(x)∇u)−div(w(x)∇(u2))u = g(x,u), x∈B1,u = 0, x∈∂B1, | (1.1) |
where B1 denotes the unit ball centered at the origin, w(x)=log(e/|x|) and the nonlinearity g possesses maximal growth range. For the case w≡1 the problem (1.1) is reduced to
−Δu−Δ(|u|2)u=g(x,u),x∈B1, | (1.2) |
whose solutions are related to the existence of solitary wave solutions ψ(t,x)=eiωtu(x) for the time-dependent nonlinear Schrödinger equation:
i∂ψ∂t=−Δψ+W(x)ψ−Δ(|ψ|2)ψ−h(|ψ|2)ψ,(t,x)∈R+×Ω, | (1.3) |
where ϕ:R×Ω→C, λ>0, W:Ω→R is a continuous potential and for suitable function h:R+→R. it was shown that the class of equations of the type (1.3) arise many applications. Kurihara in [15] showed that the persistence of the solitonic behavior of superfluid films is modeled by (1.3). Also, The authors in [6,24] used (1.3) to modeled the propagation of a short intense laser pulse through an underdense or cold plasma. For examples of other applications see for instance [1,2,24,32]. Equation of the type (1.2) was treated by many authors using several strategies such as via constrained minimization techniques [10,23], using a change of variable (a dual approach) [7,12,19], a perturbation method [8,9], and a Nehari method [13] among others.
The strategy of variational methods considers an Euler-Lagrange functional J:X→R for a suitable space X, where its critical points result in weak solutions of a nonlinear equation. We say that u is a weak solution of the problem (1.1) if
∫B1w(x)∇u∇ϕdx+∫B1w(x)∇(u2)∇(uϕ)dx=∫B1g(x,u)ϕdx, |
for all ϕ∈X (for some suitable space X to be determinate), which motivates to consider the following Euler-Lagrange functional J:X→R
J(u)=12∫B1w(x)|∇u|2dx+14∫B1w(x)|∇(u2)|2dx−∫B1G(x,u)dx. |
Observe that
∫B1w(x)|∇(u2)|2dx=4∫B1w(x)|u|2|∇u|2dx. |
Thus, we can rewrite J as
J(u)=12∫B1w(x)(1+2|u|2)|∇u|2dx−∫B1G(x,u)dx. | (1.4) |
Observe that the energy functional J requires that w(x)|u|2|∇u|2 belongs to L1(B1). However, there is no a suitable Sobolev space where the above energy functional is well-defined and belongs to the C1-class. Following the ideas developed by Liu, Wang and Wang [12], we make a change of variable to reformulate the quasilinear equation (1.1) to obtain a semilinear problem whose associated functional is well-defined.
Nonlinearities of the form g(x,u)∼|u|p−2u for p∈(4,2⋅2∗) where 2∗ denotes the critical Sobolev exponent, this is, 2∗=2N/(N−2) if N≥3 and 2∗=+∞ if N=2, were considered by several authors, see [10,11,23]. It is important to mention that the presence of the term uΔ(u2) allow us to consider p in a double range of values as in the standard case. In dimension N=2, we notice that every polynomial growth is admitted on g. However, the embedding H10(Ω)↪L∞(Ω) does not hold. In this case, another kind of maximal growth was obtained independently by Yudovich [31], Pohozaev [22], and Trudinger [25]. It was proved that eα|u|2∈L1(Ω) for all u∈H10(Ω) and α>0. Furthermore, Moser [18] improved this result by finding the best exponent α. More precisely, it was showed that
supu∈H10(Ω),‖∇u‖2=1∫Ωeα|u|2dx, |
is finite for α≤4π and infinite if α>4π. Above statements are well known as Trudinger-Moser inequalities.
Motivated for the above results Eq (1.2) involving exponential growth was treated in [17,20,27,28] among others. More precisely, the above papers considered the following condition on g: there exists a constant α0>0 such that
lims→+∞g(x,s)eα|s|4={+∞for α<α0,0for α>α0. | (1.5) |
Similarly to the polynomial growth the expression eα|s|2 is replace by eα|s|4 due to the appearance of the term Δ(|u|2)u. Trudinger-Moser inequalities were extended in many directions [3,4,5,16,26] among others. Calanchi and Ruf in [4] established a Trudinger-Moser version which admits double exponential growth using a Sobolev weighted space.
Let H10,rad(B1,w) be the Sobolev weighted space defined as the subspace of the radially symmetric functions in the closure of C∞0(B1) with respect to the norm
‖u‖:=(∫B1|∇u|2w(x)dx)12. |
where w(x)=log(e|x|). The space H10,rad(B1,w) is a separable Banach space (see [14]). Moreover, we note that H10,rad(B,w) is a Hilbert space endowed with inner product
⟨u,v⟩:=∫B1(0)w(x)∇u∇vdx,for all u, v∈H10,rad(B,w). |
In what follows, we denote by E the space H10,rad(B,w) and by E∗ the dual space of E with the usual norm. We start with the next embedding result.
Lemma 1.1. The space E is continuously embedded in Lp(B1) for 1≤p<+∞, and compactly embedded in Lp(B1) for 1<p<+∞.
Proof. From the radial lemma version on the space E (see [4]), we have
|u(x)|≤1√2πlog1/2(log(e|x|))‖u‖. |
Let consider p>2. Then,
∫B1|u(x)|pdx≤‖u‖p(2π)p/2−1∫10rlogp/2(log(er))dx. | (1.6) |
Observe that the function Φ(r)=rlogp/2(log(er)) is continuous in (0,1] and
limr→0+Φ(r)=elimr→0+logp/2(log(er))logp/2(er)⋅logp/2(er)er=e[limt→+∞logtt]p/2⋅[lims→+∞lnp/2ss]=0. |
Therefore, the integral of the right hand of (1.6) is finite. Then, there exists C>0 such that ‖u‖p≤C‖u‖ for every p>2. Using the fact that the domain B1 is bounded, we get H10,rad(B1,w)↪Lp(B1) for every p≥1. In order to prove compactness, we consider a sequence (un)⊂E such that un⇀0 in E and un→0 almost everywhere in B1. Setting P(s)=|s|p and Q(s)=|s|p−ϵ+|s|p+ϵ where p>1 and 0<ϵ<p−1.
We observe that P(s)/Q(s)→0, as |s|→∞, and P(s)/Q(s)→0, as |s|→0. Using the continuous embeddings E↪Lq−ϵ(B1) and E↪Lq+ϵ(B1), we obtain supn≥1∫B1|Q(un)|dx<+∞. Moreover, P(un)→0 for almost everywhere in B1. Applying the Strauss compactness lemma (see [29]), we get ∫B1P(un)dx→0, as n→+∞. Hence, un→0 in Lp(B1) for p>1.
Next, we state the Trudinger-Moser version inequality which we will use throughout this paper.
Proposition 1.10 (See [4]) It holds
∫B1exp(αeu2)dx<+∞,for allu∈Eandα>0. | (1.7) |
Furthermore, if α≤2, there exists a positive constant C such that
supu∈E, ‖u‖≤1∫B1exp(αe2πu2)dx≤C. | (1.8) |
Concerning to the nonlinearity g, we assume the following conditions.
(g1) g∈C(B1×R) and g(x,s)=o(s) near the origin and g(x,s)=0 for all x∈B1 and s≤0.
(g2) There exists a constant μ>2 such that
0<2μG(x,s)≤sg(x,s),for all x∈B1 and s>0, |
where G(x,s)=∫s0g(x,t)dt.
(g3) There exist constants s0>0 and M>0 such that
0<G(x,s)≤Mg(x,s),for alls>s0. |
(g4) There exists a constant α0>0 such that
lims→+∞g(x,s)exp(eαs4)={0,α>α0,+∞,α<α0, |
uniformly in x∈B1.
(g5) There exist constants p>4 and Cp>0 such that
g(x,s)≥Cpsp−1,for all x∈B1 and s≥0, |
where
Cp>max{30,p[(α0(μ−2)4πμ)(9⋅182/(p−2)−18p/(p−2))](p−2)/2}. |
The following theorem contains our main result.
Theorem 1.1. Suppose that (g1)–(g5) holds. Then, the quasilinear equation (1.1) possesses a nontrivial nonnegative weak solution.
The main difference of our result with previous works is the assumption (g3) which says that g has double exponential critical growth in the sense of Proposition 1.1, we consider the term exp(eαs4) instead of exp(eαs2) in analogy to (1.5). In order to prove the existence of solution of the Eq (1.1) we make a change a variable to reformulate the energy functional (1.4) and apply the mountain pass theorem in the new energy functional.
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 contains some preliminaries results and we set up the reformulate energy functional. In Section 3, we show that the reformulate energy functional possesses the pass mountain geometry. In Section 4, we estimate the Palais-Smale sequences and minimax levels of the new functional. Finally, in Sections 5, we present the proof of our main theorem.
Following [7,12], we make a change of variable v=f−1(u) where f is an invertible function satisfying
f′(t)=1√1+2f2(t)andf(−t)=−f(t). |
Then, J is reformulate as follows
I(v):=J(f(v))=12∫B1w(x)|∇v|2dx−∫B1G(x,f(v))dx, |
for all v∈E, and by standard arguments, one can verify that
I′(v)ϕ=12∫B1w(x)∇v⋅∇ϕdx−∫B1g(x,f(v))f′(v)ϕdx, |
for all v, ϕ∈E. Moreover, I(v) is the energy functional associated to the semilinear equation
{−div(loge|x|∇v) = g(x,f(v))f′(v), x∈B1(0),v = 0, x∈∂B1(0). | (2.1) |
It was observed in [7], if v is a weak solution of the problem (2.1) then v=f−1(u) is a weak solution of the problem (1.1).
The function f satisfies the following properties (see [7,21]).
Lemma 2.1. The function f satisfies the following properties
(i) f∈C1(R) is strictly increasing, in particular, it is invertible.
(ii) |f(t)|≤|t| and 0<|f′(t)|≤1 for all t∈R.
(iii) f(t)/t→0 as t→0 and 0<f′(t)≤1 for all t∈R. (iv)●f(t)/√t→21/4 as t→+∞.
(v) f(t)/2≤tf′(t)≤f(t) for all t≥0
(vi) |f(t)|≤21/4|t|1/2 for all t∈R.
This section is devoted to set the geometry of the linking theorem of the functional I.
Lemma 3.1. Let v∈E, α>0 and q>1 with 2α‖v‖2<π, then there exists C>0 such that
∫B1|f(v)|qexp(eα|f(v)|4)dx≤C‖f(v)‖q. |
Proof. Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Lemma 2.1-(ⅵ), we have
∫B1|f(v)|qexp(eα|f(v)|4)dx≤‖f(v)‖q2q(∫B1exp(2e2α|v|2)dx)1/2≤|f(v)‖q2q(∫B1exp(2e2α‖v‖2(|v|‖v‖)2)dx)1/2≤C|f(v)‖q, |
where we have used Proposition 1.1 and Lemma 1.1.
Lemma 3.2. Suppose that (g1) and (g4) are hold. Then, there exist ρ>0 and σ>0 satisfying
I(v)≥σ,for all u∈E with ‖v‖=ρ. |
Proof. From (g1) and (g4), α>0 and q>2, we can find c>0 such that
|G(x,s)|≤ϵ|s|2+c|s|qexp(eα|s|4)for alls∈R. |
Then,
I(v)=12‖v‖2−∫B1G(x,f(v))dx≥12‖v‖2−∫B1(ϵ|f(v)|2+c|f(v)|qexp(eα|f(v)|4)dx. |
Using Lemma 3.1, Lemma 2.1-(ⅱ) and Lemma 1.1, we obtain
I(v)≥(12−ϵC)‖v‖2−C‖f(v)‖q≥(12−ϵC)‖v‖2−C0‖v‖q, |
provided that ‖u‖≤ρ0 for some ρ0>0 such that 2αρ20<π. Now, taking 0<ϵ<1/4C and ρ1>0 such that (1/2−ϵC)ρ21−C0ρq1>ρ21/4. The result follows considering ρ=min{ρ0,ρ1} and σ=ρ21/4.
Lemma 3.3. Suppose that (g1), (g3) and (g4) are hold. Then, there exists e∈E with ‖e‖>ρ such that
I(e)<0<σ≤inf‖v‖=ρI(v), |
where ρ is given by Lemma 3.2.
Proof. Using (g3), we can find constants positives C1 and C2 such that G(x,s)≥C1|s|2μ−C2 for all x∈B1 and s≥0. Let 0≠ϕ∈C∞0(B1) such that 0<ϕ(x)≤1. Then,
I(tϕ)=t22‖ϕ‖2−∫B1G(x,f(tv))dx≤t22‖ϕ‖2−∫B1(C1|f(tϕ)|2μ−C2)dx. |
By Lemma 2.1-(ⅴ) the function f(t)/t is non-increasing for t>0. Since, 0≤ϕ(|x|)t≤t, we get f(tϕ(|x|))≥f(t)ϕ(|x|) for all t>0 and x∈B1. Then,
I(tv)≤t22‖ϕ‖2+C2|B1|−C1∫B1|f(t)|2μϕ2μdx=t22(‖ϕ‖2−2C1|f(t)|2μt2‖ϕ‖2μ2μ)+C2|B1|. |
By Lemma 2.1-(ⅳ) and the fact that μ>2, we obtain
limt→+∞|f(t)|2μt2=limt→+∞(f(t)√t)2μtμ−2=+∞. |
Thus, there exists T>0 such that ‖ϕ‖2−2C1|f(t)|2μ2t2‖ϕ‖2μ2μ≤−1 for t≥T. Therefore, taking t0>T sufficiently large we can get e=t0ϕ, satisfying I(e)<0 and ‖e‖>ρ.
Lemma 4.1. Suppose that (g1), (g2) and (g4) are hold. Let (vn) be a Palais-Smale sequence of I at level d, that is, I(vn)→d and ‖I′(vn)‖E∗→0 as n→+∞. Then, ‖un‖≤c for all n∈N and some c>0.
Proof. Observe that
I(vn)−1μI′(vn)vn=(12−1μ)‖u‖2−∫B1G(x,f(vn))dx+1μ∫B1g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vndx. |
By Lemma 2.1-(ⅴ), we have f(t)/2≤tf′(t). Then,
I(vn)−1μI′(vn)vn≥(12−1μ)‖u‖2−12μ(∫B1(2μG(x,f(vn))−g(x,f(vn))vn)dx. |
Using (g2), we get
I(vn)−1μI′(vn)vn≥(12−1μ)‖vn‖2. |
On the other hand, using the fact that I(vn)→d and ‖I′(vn)‖E∗→0 as n→+∞. We may assume that |I(vn)|≤d+1 and ‖I(vn)‖E∗≤μ for all n∈N. Hence,
(12−1μ)‖vn‖2≤d+1+‖vn‖,for all n∈N, |
which implies the assertion of the lemma.
Lemma 4.2. Supposed that (g1)–(g4) are hold. Let vn be a Palais-Smale sequence for the functional I. Then, there exists a subsequence (not renamed) of (vn) such that
∫B1g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)ϕdx→∫B1g(x,f(v))f′(v)ϕdx, |
for all ϕ∈C∞0(B1), as n→+∞, where v is the weak limit of (vn) in E.
Proof. From Lemma 4.1, we have that (vn) is bounded. Thus, we can assume that vn converge weakly to v∈E. According to Lemma 1.1, we can assume that vn→v in Lp(B1) for all p≥1, using Lemma 2.1-(ⅱ) and Dominated convergence theorem we have f(vn)→f(v) in Lp(B1) for all p≥1. Combining Proposition 1.1 with the inequality |f′(t)|≤1 for all t∈R given by Lemma 2.1-(ⅱ), we obtain g(x,f(v))f′(v)∈L1(B1). On the other hand, using the boundedness of the sequence (vn) in E, we have
I′(vn)vn=‖vn‖22−∫B1g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vndx→0as n→+∞. |
where we have used that (vn) is a Palais-Smale sequence. Thus, there exists some positive constant C such that
∫B1g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vndx≤Cfor all n≥1. | (4.1) |
Given ϵ>0 there exists δ>0 such that for any measurable subset A⊂B1
∫A|f(v)|dx<ϵand∫Ag(x,f(v))f′(v)vdx<ϵif |A|<δ. |
Using the fact that f(v)∈L1(B1) there exists M0>0 satisfying
|{x∈B1:|f(v(x))|≥M0}|≤δ. | (4.2) |
Setting M=max{M0,C/ϵ} where C and M0 are given by (4.1) and (4.2) respectively. Note that, we can write
|∫B1|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)|dx−∫B1|g(x,f(v))f′(v)|dx|≤I1,n+I2,n+I3,n, |
where
I1,n=∫{x∈B1:f(v(x))≥M}|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)|dx, |
I2,n=|∫{x∈B1:f(vn(x))<M}|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)|dx−∫{x∈B1:f(v(x))<M}|g(x,f(v))f′(v)|dx|, |
and
I3,n=∫{x∈B1:f(v(x))≥M}|g(x,f(v))f′(v)|dx. |
As in [28] we can show that I1,n, I2,n and I3,n go to 0, as n→+∞. Therefore,
g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)→g(x,f(v))f′(v),in L1(B1). |
Now, taking ϕ∈C∞0(B1). Then,
∫B1|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)ϕ−g(x,f(v))f′(v)ϕ|dx≤‖ϕ‖∞‖g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)−g(x,f(v))f′(v)‖1→0, |
as n→+∞, and the assertion of the lemma follows.
Lemma 4.3. Supposed that (g1)–(g4) are hold. Let (vn) be a Palais-Smale sequence for the functional I. Then, there exists a subsequence (not renamed) of (vn) such that
∫B1G(x,f(vn))dx→∫B1G(x,f(v))dx,as n→+∞, |
where v is the weak limit of (vn) in E.
Proof. From Lemma 4.1, we have that (vn) is bounded. Thus, we can assume that vn converge weakly to v∈E. According to Lemma 1.1, we can assume that vn→v in Lp(B1) for all p≥1 and vn→v almost everywhere in B1. Using (g2)–(g3) there exists M>0 such that
|G(x,f(vn))|≤Mg(x,f(vn))for all x∈B1. | (4.3) |
As in Lemma 4.2, we can get
∫B1g(x,f(vn))dx→∫B1g(x,f(v))dx. |
Since g(x,f(vn))→g(x,f(v)) almost everywhere in B1. By (4.3) and the generalized dominated convergence theorem, we obtain
∫B1G(x,f(vn))dx→∫B1G(x,f(v))dx. |
Let ϕ be a function in C∞0,rad(B1) satisfying
(i) ϕ≡1 in B1/2(0) and ϕ≡0 in Bc1/√2(0).
(ii) 0≤ϕ(x)≤1 for all x∈B1.
(iii) 0≤|∇ϕ(x)|≤1 for all x∈B1.
Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3 with ϕ satisfying (ⅰ)–(ⅲ), it follows that I satisfies the mountain pass theorem (see [30]). Therefore, there exists a Palais-Smale sequence (vn)⊂E such that
I(vn)→0and‖I′(vn)‖E∗→0,as n→+∞, | (4.4) |
where d can be characterized as
d=infγ∈Γmaxt∈[0,1]J(γ(t)), | (4.5) |
and
Γ={γ∈C([0,1],E):γ(0)=0,γ(1)=e}. |
Moreover, by Lemma 3.2, we have thar d≥σ>0.
Lemma 4.4. Supposed that (g1)–(g5) are hold. Then, the minimax level d given by (4.5) satisfies
d<π2α0⋅2μμ−2. |
Proof. Let ϕ be a function in C∞0,rad(B1) satisfying (ⅰ)–(ⅲ). Then,
maxt≥0I(tϕ)≤t22∫B1w(x)|∇ϕ|2dx+t4∫B1w(x)|ϕ|2|∇ϕ|2dx−∫B1G(x,tϕ)dx≤t22∫B1w(x)|∇ϕ|2dx+t4∫B1w(x)|∇ϕ|2dx−Cptpp∫B1|ϕ|pdx≤t22∫B1w(x)dx+t4∫B1w(x)dx−Cptpp∫B1/21dx≤3πt24+3πt42−πCptp4p=π4(3t2+6t4−Cpptp). |
From the intermediate value theorem, the function
Φ(t)=3t2+6t4−Cpptpfor t≥0, |
attained its maximum in t0∈(0,1) provided Cp>30. Therefore,
maxt≥0Φ(t)≤maxt∈[0,1]Φ(t)≤maxt∈[0,1](9t2−Cpptp)=(9t2−Cpptp)|(18p/Cp)1/(p−2). |
Hence, by assumption on Cp, we have
maxt≥0I(tϕ)≤π4(9⋅182/(p−2)−18p/(p−2))(pCp)2/(p−2)<π2α0⋅2μμ−2. |
Setting γ0∈Γ, defined by γ0(t)=tt0ϕ=te, where t0 is given by Lemma 3.3. Thus,
d≤maxt∈[0,1]I(γ0(t))≤maxt≥0I(tϕ)<π2α0⋅2μμ−2. |
First, we show the existence of a nontrivial, nonnegative critical point of the functional I. Let (vn) be the Palais-Smale sequence given by (4.4). From Lemma 4.1 the sequence (vn) is bounded in E. Then, we can find a subsequence (not renamed) and v∈E such that vn converges weakly to v in E. In particular,
limn→+∞∫B1w(x)∇vn∇ϕdx=∫B1w(v)∇v∇ϕdx,for all ϕ∈C∞0,rad(B1). |
From Lemma 4.2, we have
limn→+∞∫B1g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)ϕdx=∫B1g(x,f(v))f′(v)ϕdx,for all ϕ∈C∞0,rad(B1). |
Since, ‖I′(vn)‖E∗→0 as n→+∞, we have I′(v)ϕ=0 for all ϕ∈C∞0,rad(B1). Using the density of C∞0,rad(B1) in E, we obtain I′(v)ϕ=0, for all ϕ∈E. Hence, v∈E is a critical point of I. Now, we prove that v is nontrivial. Suppose that vn⇀0 in E. By Lemma 1.1, we have that
vn→0,in Lp(B1)for all p≥1. | (5.1) |
Since (vn) is a Palais-Smale sequence as in Lemma 4.1, we get
(12−1μ)‖vn‖2≤I(vn)−1μI′(vn)vn. |
From (4.5), the boundedness of (vn) in E and Lemma 4.4, we can assume that
‖vn‖2≤π2α0−2δfor all n≥1, |
for some δ>0. Moreover, we can take α>α0 such that
α‖vn‖2≤π2−δfor all n≥1. | (5.2) |
Using (g1)–(g4) and the fact that |f′(t)|≤1, we can find ϵ>0 and C>0 such that
|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vn|≤ϵ|f(vn)vn|+Cexp(eα|f(vn)|4)|vn|,for all n≥1. |
From Lemma 2.1-(ⅱ) and (ⅵ), we obtain
|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vn|≤ϵ|vn|2+Cexp(e2α|vn|2)|vn|,for all n≥1. |
Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
∫B1|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vn|≤ϵ‖vn‖22+C‖vn‖2(∫B1exp(2e2α|vn|2)dx)1/2,for all n≥1. |
Then,
∫B1|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vn|dx≤ϵ‖vn‖22+C‖vn‖2(∫B1exp(2e2α‖vn‖2(|vn|‖vn‖)2)dx)1/2. |
Using Proposition 1.1, (5.1) and (5.2), we have
∫B1|g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vn|dx→0,as n→+∞. | (5.3) |
Note that
d+on(1)=I(vn)=12∫B1w(x)|∇vn|2dx−∫B1G(x,f(vn))dx |
and
on(1)=I′(vn)vn=∫B1w(x)|∇vn|2dx−∫B1g(x,f(vn))f′(vn)vndx. |
From Lemmas 4.3 and 5.3, we obtain d=0 which represents a contradiction. Therefore, v is a nontrivial critical point. Taking v−=max{0,−v}, in particular, we have that −v−∈E. Hence, I′(v)(−v−)=0, since g is nonnegative and f′(s)>0 for all s∈R, we obtain
‖∇v−‖2=−∫B1g(x,f(v))f′(v)v−dx≤0. |
Then, v−=0, which implies that v≥0. Finally, u=f(v) result a nontrivial nonnegative weak solution of the problem (1.1).
In this paper, a dual approach has been applied in order to reformulate the proposed quasilinear equation into a semilinear equation that is suitable for using variational methods. Next, we used a Trudinger-Moser inequality to prove that the geometry of the pass mountain theorem is satisfied. Thus, we obtain a nontrivial, nonnegative weak solutions for the new energy functional. Finally, we recover the solution to our problem through the change of the variable used. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result to demonstrate the existence of solutions for a quasiliner Schrödinger equation involving double exponential growth in the literature. Observe that we required a nonnegative weight. According to our definition of logarithm weight, we restricted the domain to the unit ball. It is of interest to further our results to find standing waves for quasilinear Schrödinger equations involving double exponential growth on the whole space R2 and considering a potential function.
The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for very careful reading of the manuscript and helpful comments. This work was financed by CONCYTEC-PROCIENCIA within the call for proposal "Proyecto de Investigación Básica 2019-01[Contract Number 410-2019]".
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
F. Bass, N. Nasanov, Nonlinear electromagnetic spin waves, Phys. Rep., 189 (1990), 165–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(90)90093-H doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90093-H
![]() |
[2] |
A. de Bouard, N. Hayashi, J. G. Saut, Global existence of small solutions to a relativistic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 189 (1997), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050191 doi: 10.1007/s002200050191
![]() |
[3] |
D. B. Cao, Nontrivial solution of semilinear elliptic equation with critical exponent in R2, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 1 (1992), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309208820848 doi: 10.1080/03605309208820848
![]() |
[4] |
M. Calanchi, B. Ruf, On a Trudinger–Moser type inequality with logarithmic weights, J. Differ. Equ., 258 (2015), 1967–1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2014.11.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.11.019
![]() |
[5] |
D. Cassani, C. Tarsi, A Moser-type inequalities in Lorentz-Sobolev spaces for unbounded domains in RN, Asymptot. Anal., 64 (2009), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.3233/ASY-2009-0934 doi: 10.3233/ASY-2009-0934
![]() |
[6] |
X. Chen, R. Sudan, Necessary and sufficient conditions for self-focusing of short ultraintense laser pulse in underdense plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70 (1993), 2082–2085. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2082 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2082
![]() |
[7] |
M. Colin, L. Jeanjean, Solutions for a quasilinear Schrödinger equation: A dual approach, Nonlinear Anal., 56 (2004), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2003.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2003.09.008
![]() |
[8] |
X. Q. Liu, J. Q. Liu, Z. Q. Wang, Quasilinear elliptic equations with critical growth via perturbation method, J. Differ. Equ., 254 (2013), 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2012.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.09.006
![]() |
[9] |
X. Liu, J. Liu, Z. Wang, Quasilinear elliptic equations via perturbation method, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 141 (2013), 253–263. http://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2012-11293-6 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2012-11293-6
![]() |
[10] |
J. Liu, Z. Q. Wang, Soliton solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations, Ⅰ, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 131 (2003), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/1194312 doi: 10.2307/1194312
![]() |
[11] |
S. Liu, J. Zhou, Standing waves for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with indefinite potentials, J. Differ. Equ., 265 (2018), 3970–3987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.05.024
![]() |
[12] |
J. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, Soliton solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations, Ⅱ, J. Differ. Equ., 187 (2003), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00064-5 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00064-5
![]() |
[13] |
J. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, Solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations via the Nehari method, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ., 29 (2004), 879–901. https://doi.org/10.1081/PDE-120037335 doi: 10.1081/PDE-120037335
![]() |
[14] | A. Kufner, Weighted Sobolev spaces, Leipzig Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik, 1980. |
[15] |
S. Kurihara, Large-amplitude quasi-solitons in superfluids films, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 50 (1981), 326–3267. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.50.3262 doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.50.3262
![]() |
[16] |
Y. Leuyacc, S. Soares, On a Hamiltonian system with critical exponential growth, Milan J. Math., 87 (2019), 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00032-019-00294-3 doi: 10.1007/s00032-019-00294-3
![]() |
[17] |
A. Moameni, On a class of periodic quasilinear Schrödinger equations involving critical growth in R2, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 334 (2007), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.020
![]() |
[18] | J. Moser, A sharp form of an inequality by N. Trudinger, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 20 (1971), 1077–1092. |
[19] |
J. M. B. do Ó, O. H. Miyagaki, S. H. M. Soares, Soliton solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with critical growth, J. Differ. Equ., 248 (2010), 722–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.030 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.030
![]() |
[20] |
J. M. B. do Ó, O. H. Miyagaki, S. H. M. Soares, Soliton solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations: The critical exponential case, Nonlinear Anal., 67 (2007), 3357–3372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2006.10.018 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2006.10.018
![]() |
[21] |
J. M. do Ó, U. Severo, Solitary waves for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations in dimension two, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 38 (2010), 275–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-009-0286-6 doi: 10.1007/s00526-009-0286-6
![]() |
[22] | S. Pohožaev, The Sobolev embedding in the special case pl=n, Moscow. Energet. Inst., 1965,158–170. |
[23] |
M. Poppenberg, K. Schmitt, Z. Q. Wang, On the existence of soliton solutions to quasilinear Schrödinger equations, Calculus Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 14 (2002), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005260100105 doi: 10.1007/s005260100105
![]() |
[24] |
B. Ritchie, Relativistic self-focusing and channel formation in laser-plasma interactions, Phys. Rev., 50 (1994), 687–689. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.R687 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.R687
![]() |
[25] | N. Trudinger, On embedding into Orlicz spaces and some applications, J. Math. Mech., 17 (1967), 473–483. |
[26] |
S. H. M. Soares, Y. R. S. Leuyacc, Hamiltonian elliptic systems in dimension two with potentials which can vanish at infinity, Commun. Contemp. Math., 20 (2018), 1750053. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199717500535 doi: 10.1142/S0219199717500535
![]() |
[27] |
M. X. de Souza, U. B. Severo, G. F. Vieira, Solutions for a class of singular quasilinear equations involving critical growth in R2, Math. Nachr., 295 (2022), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.201900240 doi: 10.1002/mana.201900240
![]() |
[28] |
M. de Souza, U. B. Severo, G. F. Vieira, On a nonhomogeneous and singular quasilinear equation involving critical growth in R2, Comput. Math. Appl., 74 (2017), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.05.002
![]() |
[29] |
W. Strauss, Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys., 55 (1977), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626517 doi: 10.1007/BF01626517
![]() |
[30] | M. Willem, Minimax theorems, Boston Birkhäuser, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4146-1 |
[31] | V. Yudovich, Some estimates connected with integral operators and with solutions of elliptic equations, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 138 (1961), 805–808. |
[32] |
Y. Zhang, H. H. Dong, X. E. Zhang, H. W. Yang, Rational solutions and lump solutions to the generalized (3+1)-dimensional shallow water-like equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.11.009
![]() |
1. | Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc, A class of Schrödinger elliptic equations involving supercritical exponential growth, 2023, 2023, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-023-01725-2 | |
2. | Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc, Hamiltonian elliptic system involving nonlinearities with supercritical exponential growth, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 19121, 10.3934/math.2023976 | |
3. | Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc, Singular Hamiltonian elliptic systems involving double exponential growth in dimension two, 2024, 10, 26668181, 100681, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100681 | |
4. | Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc, Elliptic equations in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ involving supercritical exponential growth, 2024, 32, 2688-1594, 5341, 10.3934/era.2024247 | |
5. | Yony Raúl Santaria Leuyacc, Supercritical Trudinger-Moser inequalities with logarithmic weights in dimension two, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 18354, 10.3934/math.2023933 |