Research article

Time-dependent fractional second-grade fluid flow through a channel influenced by unsteady motion of a bottom plate

  • Received: 29 June 2022 Revised: 06 September 2022 Accepted: 20 September 2022 Published: 08 October 2022
  • MSC : 26A33, 42A38, 44A10, 44A35

  • This investigation theoretically describes the exact solution of an unsteady fractional a second-grade fluid upon a bottom plate constrained by two walls at the sides which are parallel to each other and are normal to the bottom plate. The flow in the fluid is induced by the time dependent motion of the bottom plate. Initially the flow equation along with boundary and initial conditions are considered which are then transformed to dimensionless notations using suitable set of variables. The Laplace as well as Fourier transformations have been employed to recover the exact solution of flow equation. The time fractional differential operator of Caputo-Fabrizio has been employed to have constitutive equations of fractional order for second-grade fluid. After obtaining the general exact solutions for flow characteristics, three different cases at the surface of bottom plate are discussed; namely (i) Stokes first problem (ii) Accelerating flow (iii) Stokes second problem. It has noticed in this study that, for higher values of Reynolds number the flow characteristics have augmented in all the three cases. Moreover, higher values of time variable have supported the flow of fractional fluid for impulsive and constantly accelerated motion and have opposeed the flow for sine and cosine oscillations.

    Citation: Zehba Raizah, Arshad Khan, Saadat Hussain Awan, Anwar Saeed, Ahmed M. Galal, Wajaree Weera. Time-dependent fractional second-grade fluid flow through a channel influenced by unsteady motion of a bottom plate[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 423-446. doi: 10.3934/math.2023020

    Related Papers:

    [1] Sami Ul Haq, Saeed Ullah Jan, Syed Inayat Ali Shah, Ilyas Khan, Jagdev Singh . Heat and mass transfer of fractional second grade fluid with slippage and ramped wall temperature using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3056-3088. doi: 10.3934/math.2020198
    [2] Kehong Zheng, Fuzhang Wang, Muhammad Kamran, Rewayat Khan, Ali Sikandar Khan, Sadique Rehman, Aamir Farooq . On rate type fluid flow induced by rectified sine pulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1615-1627. doi: 10.3934/math.2022094
    [3] J. Kayalvizhi, A. G. Vijaya Kumar, Ndolane Sene, Ali Akgül, Mustafa Inc, Hanaa Abu-Zinadah, S. Abdel-Khalek . An exact solution of heat and mass transfer analysis on hydrodynamic magneto nanofluid over an infinite inclined plate using Caputo fractional derivative model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3542-3560. doi: 10.3934/math.2023180
    [4] Muhammad Imran Asjad, Muhammad Haris Butt, Muhammad Armaghan Sadiq, Muhammad Danish Ikram, Fahd Jarad . Unsteady Casson fluid flow over a vertical surface with fractional bioconvection. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8112-8126. doi: 10.3934/math.2022451
    [5] Asifa, Poom Kumam, Talha Anwar, Zahir Shah, Wiboonsak Watthayu . Analysis and modeling of fractional electro-osmotic ramped flow of chemically reactive and heat absorptive/generative Walters'B fluid with ramped heat and mass transfer rates. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5942-5976. doi: 10.3934/math.2021352
    [6] Ritu Agarwal, Mahaveer Prasad Yadav, Dumitru Baleanu, S. D. Purohit . Existence and uniqueness of miscible flow equation through porous media with a non singular fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1062-1073. doi: 10.3934/math.2020074
    [7] Álvaro Abucide, Koldo Portal, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz, Ekaitz Zulueta, Iker Azurmendi . Unsteady-state turbulent flow field predictions with a convolutional autoencoder architecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29734-29758. doi: 10.3934/math.20231522
    [8] Geetika Saini, B. N. Hanumagowda, S. V. K. Varma, Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan, Nehad Ali Shah, Yongseok Jeon . Impact of couple stress and variable viscosity on heat transfer and flow between two parallel plates in conducting field. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16773-16789. doi: 10.3934/math.2023858
    [9] M. Hamid, T. Zubair, M. Usman, R. U. Haq . Numerical investigation of fractional-order unsteady natural convective radiating flow of nanofluid in a vertical channel. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1416-1429. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1416
    [10] Shabiha Naz, Tamizharasi Renganathan . An exact asymptotic solution for a non-Newtonian fluid in a generalized Couette flow subject to an inclined magnetic field and a first-order chemical reaction. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20245-20270. doi: 10.3934/math.2024986
  • This investigation theoretically describes the exact solution of an unsteady fractional a second-grade fluid upon a bottom plate constrained by two walls at the sides which are parallel to each other and are normal to the bottom plate. The flow in the fluid is induced by the time dependent motion of the bottom plate. Initially the flow equation along with boundary and initial conditions are considered which are then transformed to dimensionless notations using suitable set of variables. The Laplace as well as Fourier transformations have been employed to recover the exact solution of flow equation. The time fractional differential operator of Caputo-Fabrizio has been employed to have constitutive equations of fractional order for second-grade fluid. After obtaining the general exact solutions for flow characteristics, three different cases at the surface of bottom plate are discussed; namely (i) Stokes first problem (ii) Accelerating flow (iii) Stokes second problem. It has noticed in this study that, for higher values of Reynolds number the flow characteristics have augmented in all the three cases. Moreover, higher values of time variable have supported the flow of fractional fluid for impulsive and constantly accelerated motion and have opposeed the flow for sine and cosine oscillations.



    Fractional calculus plays a significant role in the solution of complex engineering problems. To tackle with solutions of different flow problems many researchers and scientists choose fractional model due to its important role in physical elaboration of flow problems. In contrast of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), the fractional model recovers the solution in more precise and accurate form and describes the solution of flow system at minute level. The operator used by Caputo and other scientists has involved kernel of singular form and has resulted in complex series solutions even for Newtonian fluid models. In order to overcome this complexity Fabrizio and Caputo [1] has introduced new operator of fractional form, the utilization of which was a simple task. Later, many researchers have used this concept for discussion of various fluid flow problems with the influence of various flow conditions and different geometries. A new fractional order derivative consisting of nonsingular kernel has introduced by Alshabanat et al. [2]. The authors of this study have used exponential as well as trigonometric functions in the flow problem. Hamid et al. [3] have studied numerically the unsteady fractional fluid flow upon a plate placed vertically subject to naturally convective thermal radiations. Singh et al. [4] have used the idea of fractional derivatives for determination of virus in computer system by considering epidemiological fractional model and have solved the modeled equations using the iterative method. Shah and Khan [5] have used the concept of Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives to discuss the heat transfer characteristics for oscillatory fluid motion past a vertical surface. In this study the exact solution has been determined for thermal and velocity profiles by using Laplace transformation. A comparative work has also been conducted in this study for integer and fractional orders where the authors have established that fractional parameter has augmented the flow of fluid. Hamid et al. [6] have evaluated a numerical solution efficiently, for MHD fractional model and have concluded that thermal profiles have been augmented with upsurge in radiation factor. Usman et al. [7] have analyzed the fractional model for Jeffery fluid past a vertical plate subject to unsteady diffusivity and conductivity. Other similar studies can be seen in Refs. [8,9,10].

    The growing tendency in various applications at industrial level has appealed many researchers to analyze the mathematical models for non-Newtonian fluid. The important applications of these fluids at industrial level have enhanced this desire to a maximum level. The main applications of these fluids include spinning of metals, refinement of melted metals from non-metallic inclusion, shoes manufacturing (some shoes are normally filed with non-Newtonian fluid to protect feet from injury), metal extrusion, food, medicine industry etc. Many attempts have been made by different researchers to determine the exact solutions to different flow problems involving non-Newtonian fluid of second grade. Ali et al. [11] have determined the closed form solution for free convective unsteady fluid flow over oscillating vertical plate. The authors of this study have used Laplace transformation to determine the closed form solution of flow problem and have also discussed the influence of different substantial parameters upon velocity and temperature profiles. The closed form solution of Stokes flow problem for nanofluid has been determined by Taha et al. [12]. In this work the flow has induced by motion of lower plate and the partial differential equations have converted to dimensionless form by implementing Lie symmetry approach. For free convection unsteady fluid flow, the closed form solution has determined by Toki and Tokis [13] by employing Laplace transformation. Different cases such as impulsive flow and accelerating have also investigated in this study along with the effects of different flow parameters upon motion of fluid. Asif et al. [14] have determined the closed form solution for fluid flow through channel by considering different form of solution under the impact of various cases.

    The flows bounded by side walls and a solid surface are the channel flows. Due to its important applications various researchers have carried out many investigations with main focus upon fluid flow characteristics. The influence of Dufour effects upon free convection fluid flow inside a vertical channel has been investigated by Jha and Ajibade [15]. Ingham [16] has determined transition flow for free convective fluid over a flat sheet in vertical form. Raptis and Singh [17] have discussed the MHD convective flow past a flat surface where the surface has taken to be accelerated in vertical direction. The exponential plate has used by Singh and Kumar [18] for fluid flow and have determined the exact solution for expressions of skin friction and velocity of fluid. The MHD fluid flow past a flat surface has deliberated by Khan et al. [19] along with the influence of side walls upon the flow of fluid. Haq et al. [20] discussed flow of MHD fluid over a penetrable sheet. The authors of this study have investigated the influence of side boundaries over the liquid flow by considering the limiting cases for second grade fluid. Fetecau [21] has investigated the analytical solution for flow of fluid in a pipe. The author has used the Steklov expansion theorem to determine the exact solution for modeled equations. Bandelli and Rajagopal [22] have inspected the second grade fluid flow in a finite and unidirectional domain. The Fourier and Laplace transformations have applied by the authors to determine the closed form solution. Fetecau et al. [23] have used the Fourier sine transformation for exact solution of time dependent second grade fluid past a sheet. Different cases imposed upon the bottom plate have considered by the authors by addressing the limiting cases under the influence of side boundaries. Fetecau and Zierep [24] have determined the analytical solutions for fluid flow upon a surface. In this studt a sudden jerk has given to the bottom plate for inducing motion into the fluid and Fourier transformation has used for finding exact solution.

    From the above cited literature and other similar work, it has revealed that many investigations have been conducted for second grade fluid along with the determination of exact solutions by using different geometries. But no work has yet been conducted for exact solution of fractional second grade fluid flow through channel, which is the main novelty in the current work and is also a source of attraction for authors to conduct this investigation. In this study the authors have made an endeavor to determine the exact solution at the first time for second grade fractional fluid flowing in a channel by incorporating the combination of Laplace and Fourier transformations. The momentum equation is converted into dimensionless form by using set of suitable variables. The exact solution of resultant equations has been determined by employing Laplace and Fourier transformations [25,26]. After obtaining the general exact solutions for flow characteristics, three different cases at the surface of bottom plate are discussed; namely (i) Stokes first problem (ii) Accelerating flow (iii) Stokes second problem. The time fractional differential operator of Caputo-Fabrizio has employed to have constitutive equations of fractional order for second grade fluid. After recovering the exact solution for different cases we have then used Mathcad-15 for discussion of graphical view of the momentum equation.

    Since the equation of motion for Newtonian as well as non-Newtonian fluid is described as [20]

    ρdVdt=divT, (1)

    In Eq (1) T is the Cauchy stress tensor which can mathematically be expressed for second grade fluid as follows

    T=pI+μA1+α1A2+α2A21, (2)

    In Eq (2) I is the identity tensor, p is pressure, α1,α2 are normal stress moduli and A1,A2 are first two Rivlin-Ericken kinematic tensors and can be expressed mathematically as

    A1=L+L, (3)
    A2=dA1dt+A1L+LA1, (4)

    In above equations L presents the gradient of velocity while () is used for matrix transposition.

    In this problem we have considered a time-dependent flow of fractional second grade fluid past an endless plate bounded by two side walls with a distance ' d 'between them. These walls at the sides are normal to the plate at the bottom but are parallel to each other. The bottom plate supports the fluid flow because the plate along with fluid is at rest for t=0 while with t=+0 the plate at the bottom gets into motion with time-dependent flow U0f(t) such that f(0)=0 . The flow of fluid is unidirectional which is mathematically described as V=u(y,z,t)i with v=w=0 (see Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  Graphical view of flow problem.

    The equation that governs the flow problem is mathematically expressed as [14,20]

    ρut=τxzz+τxyy,y>0,with0zd, (5)

    From above we have

    τxy=uy(μ+α1t)whileτxz=uz(μ+α1t), (6)

    The related conditions at boundaries are described as [27]

    u(y,d,t)=u(y,0,t)=0,τxz(y,z,0)=τxz(y,z,0)=0,U0f(t)=u(0,z,t),u(y,z,0)=0,
    whileu(y,z,t)0,u(y,z,t)y0fory (7)

    In above equations ρ is density, μ is dynamic viscosity, while f(t)0 for t>0 and f(0)=0

    For the purpose of converting the momentum equation and initial, boundary conditions into dimensionless form, the following set of variables is used [27]

    z=zd0,y=yd0,t=tU0d0,L=dd0,u=uU0,τxy=τxyρU02,τxz=τxzρU02, (8)

    By substituting Eq (8) in Eqs (5) and (6) we obtain the following set of equations [20,27]

    ut=τxzz+τxyy,y>0,0zL, (9)
    τxy=uy(αt+1Re),τxz=uz(αt+1Re) (10)

    The conditions defined at boundaries along with initial condition are

    u(y,0,t)==0,u(0,z,t)=f(d0tU0)=f(t),u(y,L,t)=0,u(y,z,0)=0,u(y,z,t)0,u(y,z,t)y0fory (11)

    In above equations the symbol d0 presents specified length, α=α1ρd0 is dimensionless parameter for second grade fluid and Re =U0d0v portrays Reynolds number.

    The constitutive equations for fractional derivative in generalized form are

    τxy=(1Re+αCFDα0t)uy,τxz=(1Re+αCFDα0t)uz. (12)

    Applying Laplace transform to Eqs (9) and (10) and employing Eq (12) we have

    sˉu=ˉτxyy+ˉτxzz and ˉτxy=1Reˉuy+(αs(1β)s+β)ˉuy,ˉτxz=1Reˉuz+(αs(1β)s+β)ˉuz

    After simplification of above equation we have

    2ˉuy2+2ˉuz2=[Re((1β)s+β)(1β)s+β+Reαs]sˉu (13)

    The conditions given in Eq (11) after using Laplace transform we have

    ˉu(y,z,0)=0,ˉu(y,L,s)=ˉu(y,0,s)=0,ˉu(0,z,s)=ˉF(s),ˉu(y,z,s)0,ˉu(y,z,s)y0whenevery (14)

    Multiplying the term 2π0L0sin(yζ).sin(ψnz)dydz with Eq (13) and employing Eq (14) with ψn=nπL we have

    ˉusn(ζ,s)=2π(F(s)(β+Reαs+s(1β))ζRe(β+(1β)s)s+(β+s(1β)+αRes)(ψn2+ζ2))(1(1)nψn) (15)

    Rearrange Eq (15) to get

    ˉusn(ζ,s)=2π(1(1)nψn)[F(s)ζψn2+ζ2]2π(1(1)nψn)(F(s)ζψn2+ζ2)(s2+(β+α(1+ψn2+ζ2)ReRe(1β))s+(1+ψn2+ζ2)β(1β)Res2+(β+Reα+(ψn2+ζ2)(1β)Re(1β))s+β(1β)Re) (16)

    Using Laplace inversion in combination of convolution theorem we have after simplification

    usn(ζ,t)=2π(1(1)nψn)[f(t)ζψn2+ξ2]+2π(1(1)nψn)(ζ2c1n(ζ)(ψn2+ξ2))(f(t)+A1n(ζ)f(t)+A2n(ζ)f(t))(eD1n(ζ)teD2n(ζ)t) (17)

    Following relations have been incorporated in Eq (17) which are constant terms and have been used for convenience. These terms are carried out till the end of solutions with slight changes in notation only.

    A1n(ζ)=β+αRe(1+ψn2+ζ2)(1β)Re,A2n(ζ)=β(1+ψn2+ζ2)(1β)Re,A3n(ζ)=β+αRe+(ψn2+ζ2)(1β)(1β)Re,E=β(1β)Re,c1n(ζ)=A3n2(ζ)4E,D1n(ζ)=c1n(ζ)+A3n(ζ)2,D2n(ζ)=c1n(ζ)+A3n(ζ)2 (18)

    Now in light of Fourier inversion formulae, Eq (17) has simplified to following form

    u(y,z,t)=4f(t)Ln=1eψmysin(ψmz)ψm+4πLn=1sin(ψmz)ψm×o(((f(t)+f(t))sin(ζy)A11m(ζ)+f(t)sin(ζy)A22m(ζ))ζ(etD11m(ζ)etD22m(ζ))sin(yζ)(ψm2+ζ2)c11m(ζ))dζ (19)

    In above equation m=2n1 whereas

    A11m(ζ)=β+αRe(1+ψm2+ζ2)(1β)Re,A22m(ζ)=β(1+ψm2+ζ2)(1β)Re,A33m(ζ)=β+Reα+(1β)(ψm2+ζ2)(1β)Re,c11m(ζ)=A33m2(ζ)4E,D11m(ζ)=c11m(ζ)+A33m(ζ)2,D22m(ζ)=c11m(ζ)+A33m(ζ)2 (20)

    Substitute L=2h and transform the axis of coordinates by putting z=h+z,γm=π(2n1)2h while γm=ψm in Eq (19) which simplifies to

    u(y,z,t)=(2f(t)h)n=1cos(γmz)eγmy(1)n+1γm+(2hπ)n=1cos(γmz)(1)n+1γm×0(((f(t)+f(t))sin(ζy)A1m(ζ)+sin(ζy)A2m(ζ)f(t))(ξ(eD1m(ξ)teD2m(ξ)t)sin(yζ)(γm2+ζ2)c1m(ζ)))dζ (21)

    In Eq (21) the following relations have been incorporated

    A1m(ζ)=β+αRe(1+γm2+ζ2)(1β)Re,A2m(ζ)=β(1+γm2+ζ2)(1β)Re,A3m(ζ)=β+αRe+(1β)(γm2+ζ2)(1β)Re,c1m(ζ)=A3m2(ζ)4E,D1m(ζ)=c1m(ζ)+A3m(ζ)2,D2m(ζ)=c1m(ζ)+A3m(ζ)2 (22)

    Next different cases will be considered keeping in mind the side walls of the flow system

    Whenever the gap between the walls of the system is maximized the flow will remain unaltered due to these side walls, in such situation Eqn. (21) simplifies to

    u(y,t)=(1/π)0((((f(t)+f(t))sin(ζy)A1(ζ))+A2(ζ)sin(yζ)f(t))(eL1(ζ)teL2(ζ)t)sin(ζy)ζ.c1(ζ))dζ+f(t) (23)

    In above equation, the following relations have been incorporated

    A1(ζ)=β+αRe(1+ζ2)(1β)Re,A2(ζ)=β(1+ζ2)(1β)Re,A3(ζ)=β+αRe+ζ2(1β)(1β)Rec1(ζ)=A32(ζ)4E,D1(ζ)=c1(ξ)+A3(ζ)2,D2(ζ)=c1(ζ)+A3(ζ)2

    Replace f(t) by H(t) in Eq (21) where H(t) is named as unit step function, we will have in this case

    u(y,z,t)=2H(t)hn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1eγmyγm+2πhn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γm.0(D2m(ζ)(A1m(ζ)D1m(ζ)D21m(ζ)A2m(ζ))etD1m(ζ)D1m(ζ)(A1m(ζ)D2m(ζ)A2m(ζ)D22m(ζ))etD2m(ζ))D1m(ζ)c1m(ζ)D2m(ζ)(ψn2+ζ2).sin(ζy)dζ (24)

    By removing the side walls we will have mathematically as h , in this situation Eq (24) reduces as

    u(y,t)=H(t)+1π0(L2(ζ)(A1(ζ)L1(ζ)A2(ζ)L21(ζ))etL1(ζ)L1(ζ)(A1(ζ)L2(ζ)A2(ζ)L22(ζ))etL2(ζ))L1(ζ)c1(ζ)L2(ζ)ζ.sin(ζy)dζ (25)

    By employing f(t)=ta in Eq (21) the following relation has obtained

    u(y,z,t)=2tahn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1eγmyγm+2hπn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γm×0((A2m(ζ)sin(ζy)ta+(d2(ta)dt2+d(ta)dt)A1m(ζ)sin(ζy))ζ(etD1m(ζ)etD2m(ζ))sin(ζy)c1m(ξ)(γm2+ζ2))dζ (26)

    Equation (26) depicts the solution of an accelerated case for fluid flow. Specifically if the bottom plate is moving with a constant acceleration then one can have f(t)=t . With this value, Eq (21) simplifies to

    u(y,z,t)=2thn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γmeγmy+2hπn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γm×0ζsin(ζy)c1m(ζ)(ζ2+γm2)[A1m(ζ)D1m(ζ)D2m(ζ)(D1m(ζ)eD2m(ζ)tD2m(ζ)eD1m(ζ)t)+A2m(ζ)D21m(ζ)D22m(ζ)(2c1m(ζ)(D1m(ζ)D2m(ζ)tA3m(ζ))+D22m(ζ)eD1m(ζ)tD21m(ζ)eD2m(ζ)t)]dζ (27)

    For limiting case we have h , for which the flow field is expressed as

    u(y,t)=t+(1/π)0sin(ζy)c1(ζ)ζ[A1(ζ)L2(ζ)L1(ζ)(L1(ζ)eL2(ζ)tL2(ζ)eL1(ζ)t)+A2(ζ)L22(ζ)L21(ζ)(2c1(ζ)(L2(ζ)L1(ζ)tA3(ζ))L21(ζ)etL2(ζ)+L22(ζ)etL1(ζ))]dζ (28)

    It is to be noticed that if the bottom plate is moving with some oscillation then the fraction fluid will have oscillational velocities denoted by uc and us . These oscillating velocities correspond to cosine as well as sine oscillations and we have

    ucs(y,z,t)=2costωhn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γmeγmy+2πhn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γm×02sin(ζy).ζ(γm2+ζ2)(D21m(ζ)+ω2)(D22m(ζ)+ω2)×[((D2m(ζ)D1m(ζ)ω2)(ω2A2m(ζ)A3m(ζ)A1m(ζ)ω2))cos(ωt)+(A3m(ζ)(A2m(ζ)+ω2)+D1m(ζ)D2m(ζ)A1m(ζ)ω2A1m(ζ))sin(ωt)]dζ (29)
    uct(y,z,t)=21hπn=1(1)n+1cos(zγm)γm02sin(ζy).ζc1m(ζ)(ζ2+γm2)×((D1m(ζ)(A2m(ζ)ω2)+ω2A1m(ζ)ω2+D21m(ζ))etD1m(ζ)+(D2m(ζ)(A2m(ζ)ω2)+ω2A1m(ζ)ω2+D22m(ζ))etD2m(ζ))dζ (30)
    uss(y,z,t)=2sinωthn=1cos(zγm)eyγm(1)n+1γm+2πhn=1cos(zγm)(1)n+1γm×0sin(ζy)ζ(γm2+ζ2)(ω2+D21m(ζ))(ω2+D22m(ζ))c1m(ζ)×[((ω2+D2m(ζ)D1m(ζ))((1A3m(ζ)A1m(ζ))ω2A2m(ζ)))sin(tω)+((ω2D1m(ζ)D2m(ζ))ωA1m(ζ)(A2m(ζ)ω2)A3m(ζ)ω)cosωt]dζ (31)
    ust(y,z,t)=21πhn=1(1)n+1cos(zγm)γm0sin(ζy).ζc1m(ζ)(γm2+ξ2)×((ω(ω2D1m(ζ)A1m(ζ)+A2m(ζ))ω2+D21m(ζ))eD1m(ζ)t+(ω(A2m(ζ)+ω2+D2m(ζ)A1m(ζ))D22m(ζ)+ω2)eD2m(ζ)t)dζ (32)

    Now if the effect of the side walls upon the motion of fractional fluid is ignored then as a limiting case we have h and in such a case we have from above equations

    ucs(y,t)=costω+1π0sin(ζy)ζc1(ζ)(L21(ζ)+ω2)(L22(ζ)+ω2)×[(A3(ζ)(A2(ζ)+ω2)+L1(ζ)A1(ζ)L2(ζ)A1(ζ)ω2)sintω+((ω2+L2(ζ)L1(ζ))(ω2A2(ζ)A3(ζ)A1(ζ)ω2))costω]dζ (33)
    uct(y,t)=( 2 /2π π )0sin(ζy)ζc1(ζ)(((ω2+A2(ζ))L1(ζ)+ω2A1(ζ)ω2+L21(ζ))etL1(ζ)+((ω2+A2(ζ))L2(ζ)+ω2A1(ζ)ω2+L22(ζ))etL2(ζ))dζ (34)
    uss(y,t)=sintω+1π0sin(ζy)ζc1(ζ)(L21(ζ)+ω2)(ω2+L22(ζ))×[((ω2+L2(ζ)L1(ζ))(A2(ζ)+ω2A1(ζ)A3(ζ)ω2))sin(tω)+(A1(ζ)ω(L2(ζ)L1(ζ)+ω2)ω(A2(ζ)+ω2)A3(ζ))cos(tω)]dζ (35)
    ust(y,t)=1π0sin(ζy)c1(ζ)ζ((ω(A2(ζ)ω2L1(ζ)A1(ζ))ω2+L21(ζ))eL1(ζ)t+(ω(ω2+L2(ζ)A1(ζ)A2(ζ))ω2+L22(ζ)2)eL2(ζ)t)dζ (36)

    It is obvious that by taking β1 our fractional second grade fluid model reduces to the solutions obtained by Haq et al. [20] that validates our solutions.

    By using the property we have:

    ABlimβ1Dβτu(ξ,τ)=limβ1L1[L{ABDβτu(ξ,τ)}]=L1{limβ1qβ¯u(ξ,q)u(ξ,0)(1β)qβ+β}=L1{q¯u(ξ,q)u(ξ,0)}=L1[L{u(ξ,τ)}]=u(ξ,τ). (37)

    Using the above limiting case in all the fractional order solutions we see that our solution has reduced to published results as given in Ref [20] which verifies and validates our solutions as a limiting case.

    This investigation theoretically describes the exact solution of an unsteady fractional fluid flow upon a bottom plate bounded by two side walls. The flow is induced by the time dependent motion of the bottom plate. Initially the flow equation along with boundary and initial conditions are considered which are then transformed to dimensionless notations using suitable set of variables. The Laplace as well as Fourier transformations have been employed to recover the exact solution of flow equation. The time fractional differential operator of Caputo-Fabrizio has been employed to have constitutive equations of fractional order for second grade fluid. After obtaining the general exact solutions for flow characteristics, three different cases at the surface of bottom plate have been discussed.

    Figures 25 describe the flow profiles for Stokes first problem. It has noticed from Figure 2 that augmentation in the values of time variable (t) results in decay in fractional fluid flow profiles for α=0.1,Re=20,β=0.1,h=1.0 . Figure 3 portrays the influence of Reynolds number (Re) upon flow profiles. Since it is the ratio of inertial to viscous forces so for augmentation in values of (Re) up to a specific range the behavior of fluid flow is laminar so flow profiles will augment in such case by keeping α=0.1,t=3.2,β=0.1,h=1.0 as depicted in Figure 3. Form Figures 4 and 5 it has noticed that there is an inverse relationship between fractional parameter (β) and second grade parameter (α) , because flow is a declining function of these parameters.

    Figure 2.  Flow profiles for fluid impulsive motion versus variations in t.
    Figure 3.  Flow profiles for fluid impulsive motion versus variations in Re.
    Figure 4.  Flow profiles for fluid impulsive motion versus variations in β.
    Figure 5.  Flow profiles for fluid impulsive motion versus variations in α.

    Figures 69 depict the flow characteristics for constantly accelerated flow of fractional fluid. It has observed from Figure 6 that by keeping α=0.1,β=0.1 and Re=10 with augmentation in time variable (t) the fractional fluid motion declines within the prescribed domain. Similar to Stokes first problem in response of augmentation in Reynolds number (Re) the flow characteristics jumps up by considering α=0.15,β=0.003,t=2.5,h=1.0,ω=π/3 as depicted in Figure 7. It has also concluded that with augmentation in fractional parameter (β) and second grade parameter (α) there is a reduction in momentum of fractional fluid. So an inverse relationship between flow characteristics and these parameters exists as presented in Figures 8 and 9.

    Figure 6.  Flow of fluid with constant acceleration versus variations in t.
    Figure 7.  Flow of fluid with constant acceleration versus variations in Re.
    Figure 8.  Flow of fluid with constant acceleration versus variations in β.
    Figure 9.  Flow of fluid with constant acceleration versus variations in α.

    Figures 1013 exhibit the behavior of flow characteristics in response of variations in different parameters for sine oscillation. Figures 10 and 11 depict that augmentation in time variable and Reynolds number results a corresponding growth in fraction second grade fluid motion for fixed values of the parameters α=0.01,β=0.01,Re=20,h=1,ω=π/3 in case of variations in time, and α=0.01,β=0.01,t=1.05,h=1,ω=π/3 in case of variations in Reynolds number. On the other hand Figures 12 and 13 show that flow profiles of fractional fluid reduced with augmentation in the values of fractional parameter (β) and second grade parameter (α) . Actually with augmenting values of these parameters the momentum boundary layer thickness reduced. The influence of different parameters upon flow profiles for cosine oscillations is presented in Figures 1417. A similar behavior for fractional fluid motion is observed in response of variations in different flow parameters. Furthermore, it is of worth noting that Figures 13 and 17 are plotted to compare the fractional solutions to the classical solutions for (β=1) which are reduced to the solutions obtained by Haq et al. [20] that validates our obtained solutions.

    Figure 10.  Fluid flow with sine oscillations versus variations in t.
    Figure 11.  Fluid flow with sine oscillations versus variations in Re.
    Figure 12.  Fluid flow with sine oscillations versus variations in α.
    Figure 13.  Fluid flow with sine oscillations versus variations in β.
    Figure 14.  Fluid flow with cosine oscillations versus variations in t.
    Figure 15.  Fluid flow with cosine oscillations versus variations in Re.
    Figure 16.  Fluid flow with cosine oscillations versus variations in α.
    Figure 17.  Fluid flow with cosine oscillations versus variations in β.

    In Figure 18 a graphical comparison between α=0.8,α=1.0 has been carried out in current investigation by taking other parameter values as Re =20,t=3.2,β=0.1,h=1.0 .

    Figure 18.  Flow profiles for fluid motion for α=0.8,1.0.

    This investigation theoretically describes the exact solution of an unsteady fractional fluid flow upon a bottom plate bounded by two side walls. The flow is induced by the time dependent motion of the bottom plate. Initially the flow equation along with boundary and initial conditions are considered which are then transformed to dimensionless notations using suitable set of variables. The Laplace as well as Fourier transformations have been employed to recover the exact solution of flow equation. After obtaining the general exact solutions for flow characteristics, three different cases at the surface of bottom plate have been discussed with the help of graphical view. The following points are concluded after an insight of the problem:

    ● It has established in this investigation that augmentation in time variable declines the flow profiles for impulsive and constantly acceleration cases. On the other hand a growth in flow characteristics has been observed for higher values of time variable for both sine and cosine oscillations.

    ● Growth in Reynolds number results an augmentation in the flow characteristics for impulsive and constantly acceleration as well as for sine and cosine oscillations.

    ● It has also concluded that augmentation in fractional parameter and second grade parameter supports the flow profiles in all the three cases namely Stokes first problem, accelerating flow and Stokes second problem.

    Symbol Description Symbol Description
    u,v,w Velocity components (m.s1) f Constant velocity (m.s1)
    y,z Cartesian coordinates (m) uc , us Oscillational velocities (m.s1)
    t Time variable (Sec) Re Reynolds number
    d Distance between plates (m) Dα0t Fractional derivative
    Greek letters
    β Fractional parameter τxz.τxy Shear stresses (Pa)
    α Dimensionless parameter for second grade fluid μ Dynamic viscosity (m2..s1)
    ρ Fluid density (kgm3)
    Abbreviations
    ODEs Ordinary differential equations MHD Magneto-hydrodynamics

    The author (Z. Raizah) extends her appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia, for funding this work through the Research Group Project under Grant Number (RGP.1/334/43).

    The authors have declared no conflict of interest.



    [1] M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.12785/pfda/010201 doi: 10.12785/pfda/010201
    [2] A. Alshabanat, M. Jleli, S. Kumar, B. Samet, Generalization of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and applications to electrical circuits, Front. Phys., 8 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00064 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00064
    [3] M. Hamid, T. Zubair, M. Usman, R. U. Haq, Numerical investigation of fractional-order unsteady natural convective radiating flow of nanofluid in a vertical channel, AIMS Math., 4 (2019), 1416–1429. http://doi:10.3934/math.2019.5.1416 doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1416
    [4] J. Singh, D. Kumar, Z. Hammouch, A. Atangana, A fractional epidemiological model for computer viruses pertaining to a new fractional derivative, Appl. Math. Comput., 316 (2018), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.08.048 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.08.048
    [5] N. A. Shah, I. Khan, Heat transfer analysis in a second grade fluid over and oscillating vertical plate using fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives. Eur. Phys. J. C, 76 (2016), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4209-3 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4209-3
    [6] M. Hamid, M. Usman, Y. Yan, Z. Tian, An efficient numerical scheme for fractional characterization of MHD fluid model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 162 (2022), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112475 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112475
    [7] M. Usman, W. Alhejaili, M. Hamid, N. Khan, Fractional analysis of Jeffrey fluid over a vertical plate with time-dependent conductivity and diffusivity: A low-cost spectral approach, J. Comput. Sci., 63 (2022), 101769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101769 doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101769
    [8] M. Hamid, M. Usman, W. Wang, Z. Tian, Hybrid fully spectral linearized scheme for time‐fractional evolutionary equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 3890–3912. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6996 doi: 10.1002/mma.6996
    [9] M. Hamid, M. Usman, R. U. Haq, W. Wang, A Chelyshkov polynomial based algorithm to analyze the transport dynamics and anomalous diffusion in fractional model, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl., 551 (2020), 124227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124227 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124227
    [10] M. Hamid, M. Usman, W. Wang, Z. Tian, A stable computational approach to analyze semi‐relativistic behavior of fractional evolutionary problems, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ., 38 (2022), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22617 doi: 10.1002/num.22617
    [11] F. Ali, I. Khan, S. Shafie, Closed form solutions for unsteady free convection flow of a second grade fluid over an oscillating vertical plate, PLoS One, 9 (2014), e85099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085099 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085099
    [12] A. Taha, A. Aziz, C. M. Khalique, Exact solutions for Stokes' Flow of a Non-Newtonian nanofluid model: A Lie similarity approach, Z. Naturforsch. A, 71 (2016), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2016-0031 doi: 10.1515/zna-2016-0031
    [13] C. J. Toki, J. N. Tokis, Exact solutions for the unsteady free convection flows on a porous plate with time-dependent heating, ZAMM-Z. Angew. Math. Me., 87 (2007), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.200510291 doi: 10.1002/zamm.200510291
    [14] M. Asif, S. U. Haq, S. Islam, I. Khan, I. Tlili, Exact solution of non-Newtonian fluid motion between side walls, Results Phys., 11 (2018), 534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.09.023 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.09.023
    [15] B. K. Jha, A. O. Ajibade, Free convection heat and mass transfer flow in a vertical channel with the Dufour effect, J. Mech. Eng., 224 (2010), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544089JPME318 doi: 10.1243/09544089JPME318
    [16] D. B. Ingham, Transient free convection on an isothermal vertical flat plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 21 (1978), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(78)90159-X doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(78)90159-X
    [17] A. Raptis, A. K. Singh, MHD free convection flow past an accelerated vertical plate, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 10 (1983), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1933(83)90016-7 doi: 10.1016/0735-1933(83)90016-7
    [18] A. K. Singh, N. Kumar, Free-convection flow past an exponentially accelerated vertical plate, Astrophys. Space Sci., 98 (1984), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00651403 doi: 10.1007/BF00651403
    [19] M. Khan, R. Malik, A. Anjum, Analytic solutions for MHD flow of an Oldroyd-B fluid between two side walls perpendicular to the plate, Chem. Eng. Commun., 198 (2011), 1415–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2011.560521 doi: 10.1080/00986445.2011.560521
    [20] S. U. Haq, A. ur Rahman, I. Khan, F. Ali, S. I. A. Shah, The impact of side walls on the MHD flow of a second-grade fluid through a porous medium, Neural. Comput. Appl., 30 (2016), 1103–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2733-6 doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2733-6
    [21] C. Fetecau, Analytical solutions for non-Newtonian fluid flows in pipe-like domains, Int. J. Nonliner Mech., 39 (2004), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(02)00170-1 doi: 10.1016/S0020-7462(02)00170-1
    [22] R. Bandelli, K. R. Rajagopal, Start-up flows of second grade fluids in domains with one finite dimension, Int. J. Nonliner Mech., 30 (1995), 817–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7462(95)00035-6 doi: 10.1016/0020-7462(95)00035-6
    [23] C. Fetecau, T. Hayat, C. Fetecau, N. Ali, Unsteady flow of a second grade fluid between two side walls perpendicular to a plate, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 9 (2008), 1236–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2007.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2007.02.014
    [24] C. Fetecǎu, J. Zierep, On a class of exact solutions of the equations of motion of a second grade fluid, Acta Mech., 150 (2001), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178551 doi: 10.1007/BF01178551
    [25] I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products Seventh Edition, Academic Press (Elsevier): Burlington, MA and London, UK, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-22516-5
    [26] L. Debnath, D. Bhatta, Integral Transforms and Their Applications Second Edition, Chapman & Hall/CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420010916 doi: 10.1201/9781420010916
    [27] S. U. Haq, M. A. Khan, Z. A. Khan, F. Ali, MHD effects on the channel flow of a fractional viscous fluid through a porous medium: An application of the Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional derivative, Chin. J. Phys., 65 (2020), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2020.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2020.02.014
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Rashid Nawaz, Nicholas Fewster-Young, Nek Muhammad Katbar, Nasir Ali, Laiq Zada, Rabha W. Ibrahim, Wasim Jamshed, Haifa Alqahtani, Numerical inspection of (3 + 1)- perturbed Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation via fractional variational iteration method with Caputo fractional derivative, 2024, 85, 1040-7790, 1162, 10.1080/10407790.2023.2262123
    2. Sakthi I, Raja Das, Bala Anki Reddy P, Entropy generation analysis on MHD flow of second-grade hybrid nanofluid over a porous channel with thermal radiation, 2024, 85, 1040-7790, 623, 10.1080/10407790.2023.2252600
    3. Zafar Hayat Khan, Waqar A. Khan, Ilyas Khan, Farhad Ali, Transient Newtonian fluid flow in a two-dimensional channel with convection and viscous dissipation, 2025, 1040-7790, 1, 10.1080/10407790.2024.2393271
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1925) PDF downloads(95) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(18)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog