The aim of this article is to extend the structure of a bialgebra (Hopf algebra) which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to its double Ore extensions of anti-angle type. We construct two non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebras of infinite dimension and investigate the lifting of homological properties.
Citation: Qining Li. Double Ore extensions of anti-angle type for Hopf algebras[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12566-12586. doi: 10.3934/math.2022696
[1] | Haijun Cao, Fang Xiao . The category of affine algebraic regular monoids. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2666-2679. doi: 10.3934/math.2022150 |
[2] | Mingze Zhao, Huilan Li . A pair of dual Hopf algebras on permutations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5106-5123. doi: 10.3934/math.2021302 |
[3] | Xiuhai Fei, Zhonghua Wang, Cuixian Lu, Haifang Zhang . Higher Jordan triple derivations on ∗-type trivial extension algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6933-6950. doi: 10.3934/math.2024338 |
[4] | Yaguo Guo, Shilin Yang . Projective class rings of a kind of category of Yetter-Drinfeld modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10997-11014. doi: 10.3934/math.2023557 |
[5] | Jinlei Dong, Fang Li, Longgang Sun . Derived equivalence, recollements under H-Galois extensions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3210-3225. doi: 10.3934/math.2023165 |
[6] | Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes, Ernesto Estrada . Network bipartitioning in the anti-communicability Euclidean space. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1153-1174. doi: 10.3934/math.2021070 |
[7] | Limei Liu, Xitong Zhong . Analysis and anti-control of period-doubling bifurcation for the one-dimensional discrete system with three parameters and a square term. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3227-3250. doi: 10.3934/math.2025150 |
[8] | Ruifang Yang, Shilin Yang . Representations of a non-pointed Hopf algebra. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10523-10539. doi: 10.3934/math.2021611 |
[9] | Ali N. A. Koam, Azeem Haider, Moin A. Ansari . On an extension of KU-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1249-1257. doi: 10.3934/math.2021077 |
[10] | Arshad Ali, Muhammad Haris Mateen, Qin Xin, Turki Alsuraiheed, Ghaliah Alhamzi . (ϵ,δ)-complex anti fuzzy subgroups and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11580-11595. doi: 10.3934/math.2024568 |
The aim of this article is to extend the structure of a bialgebra (Hopf algebra) which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to its double Ore extensions of anti-angle type. We construct two non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebras of infinite dimension and investigate the lifting of homological properties.
In 2003, Panov studied Ore extensions in the class of Hopf algebras [4]. In 2017, Pansera gave necessary and sufficient conditions to extend the structure of a bialgebra R to the skew polynomial ring of automorphism type R[z;σ], and to define a Hopf algebra structure on the quotient R[z;σ]/I for I a certain bi-ideal of R[z;σ] and construct a class of non-commutative, non-cocommutative, semisimple Hopf algebras of dimension 2n2 through Hopf-Ore extension [5]. In 2008, Zhang and Zhang introduced a new construction for extending a given algebra A, called a double Ore extension, which resembles that of an Ore extension [7]. However, to the best knowledge of the author, there are no studies on extending the structure of a bialgebra (Hopf algebra) to its double Ore extensions which can not be presented as iterated Ore extensions yet.
In this article, we focus on a special type of right double Ore extensions, which is defined in Section 2 and we call it the double Ore extensions of anti-angle type. Our main aim is to extend the structure of a bialgebra (Hopf algebra) which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to its double Ore extensions of anti-angle type. This type of double Ore extensions can not be presented as iterated Ore extensions, thus the extensions are non-trivial. As an example, we construct a non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension. We also investigate the lifting of homological properties from this type of a bialgebra to its double Ore extensions of anti-angle type for a specific Drinfel'd twist and parameter. Furthermore, we extend the construction of double Ore extensions of anti-angle type to multiple Ore extensions and find a class of multiple Ore extensions with good properties, we call it the multiple Ore extensions of circular type. Last but not least, we modified the definition of the comultiplication and get another type, called the double Ore extensions of anti-angle-primitive type. We construct another example and lift other homological properties.
Throughout this article, k is an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0. All vector spaces, algebras, coalgebras and unadorned tensors are over k. H is a Hopf algebra, μ is its multiplication, υ is its unit, Δ is its comultiplication, ϵ is its counit and S is its antipode. For h∈H, we always write Δ(h)=h(1)⊗h(2) with the summation omitted.
The main theorems in this article are as follows:
Theorem 1.1. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, (s,J) be a twisted homomorphism for R. Let H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] be a double Ore extension of anti-angle type. Then the bialgebra structure of R can be extended to H such that Δ(yi)=J(yi⊗yi) and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2). Conversely, if there exist an invertible element J∈R⊗R, s∈Aut(R) which preserves degree such that R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] is a bialgebra with Δ(yi)=J(yi⊗yi) and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2), then (s,J) is a twisted homomorphism for R.
Let H′=H/⟨y1y2−y22⟩, it also extends the bialgebra structure of R as in Theorem 1.1 and we have that H′/I′ is a bialgebra for the bi-ideal I′=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩, where 0≠t∈R and Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t).
Theorem 1.2. Let R be a Hopf algebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 with antipode S, (s,J) be a twisted homomorphism for R. Suppose also that s∘S=S∘s and s2=id. If there exists 0≠t∈R, with Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t), and such that
(1) tJ1S(J2)=1;
(2) ts(S(J1)J2)=1,
where J=J1⊗J2 with the summation omitted, then there exists a Hopf algebra structure on H′/I′ with S(yi)=yi(i=1,2). Conversely, if there exists a Hopf structure on H′/I′ with S(yi)=yi(i=1,2), then tJ1S(J2)=ts(S(J1)J2)=1.
Theorem 1.3. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, s∈Aut(R) be a coalgebra homomorphism for R and H=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] be a double Ore extension of anti-angle type, then as algebras:
(1) If R is a domain, then H is a domain;
(2) If R is prime (semiprime), then H is prime (semiprime).
Theorem 1.4. Let A be a Hopf algebra, which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, the antipode of A preserves degree, then B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] is a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type if and only if there is a character χ:A→k such that s(a)=χ(a(1))a(2)=a(1)χ(a(2)) for all a∈A.
In Section 2, we give necessary and sufficient conditions to extend the structure of a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to the double Ore extensions of anti-angle type H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ], and to define a Hopf algebra structure on the quotient H′/I′ for a certain bi-ideal I′=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩ of H′=H/⟨y1y2−y22⟩. At last, we give the definition of a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-grouplike type.
In Section 3, we give an example for the extending of bialgebra and Hopf algebra structures from a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 and construct a non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension. Unfortunately, we find that it's hard to give the classification of twisted homomorphisms for a given bialgebra R relative to the double Ore extension of anti-angle type. The difficulty of this problem is that we can't provide the form of Φ:R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ]→R′∨{0,1}[y′1,y′2;σ′] such that Φ(R)=R′ as bialgebras, since it is related to the Jacobian conjecture.
In Section 4, we investigate the lifting of some homological properties (being a domain, being prime (semiprime)) from a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to its double Ore extension of anti-angle type R∨P[y1,y2;σ] for a specific Drinfel'd twist J and parameter P. Finally, we find that the above homological properties can't lift to the Hopf algebra H/I=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ]/⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩, since the relations y21=t and y22=t produced zero divisors.
In Section 5, we extend the construction of double Ore extensions of anti-angle type to multiple Ore extensions and find a class of multiple Ore extensions with good properties, called the multiple Ore extensions of circular type. We get a similar conclusion as in Section 4.
In Section 6, we modify the definition of the comultiplication and get another type of Hopf double Ore extensions of anti-angle type, called an anti-angle-primitive type. We give the basic properties of this type and the necessary and sufficient conditions for a Hopf algebra B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] to be this type. At the end, we construct another non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension and lift other homological properties (being right noetherian, having finite right Krull dimension, having finite global dimension) for it.
In this section, we try to give necessary and sufficient conditions to extend the structure of a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to the double Ore extensions of anti-angle type H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ], and to define a Hopf algebra structure on the quotient H′/I′ for I′=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩ a certain bi-ideal of H′=H/⟨y1y2−y22⟩.
Let's recall the definition of a twist for a bialgebra, as given in Pansera [5], and we will start with it.
Definition 2.1. Let R be a bialgebra and J be an invertible element in R⊗R. J is called a Drinfel'd twist for R if J satisfies:
(1) (id⊗Δ)(J)(1⊗J)=(Δ⊗id)(J)(J⊗1);
(2) (id⊗ϵ)(J)=(ϵ⊗id)(J)=1.
Definition 2.2. Let R be a bialgebra. Let J be a Drinfel'd twist for R and s∈End(R). We say that the pair (s,J) is a twisted homomorphism for R if s satisfies:
(1) J(s⊗s)Δ(h)=Δ(s(h))J for all h∈R;
(2) ϵ∘s=ϵ.
Note that, for any homomorphism of coalgebras s∈End(R), the pair (s,1⊗1) is a twisted homomorphism for R.
We will now recall the definition of a double Ore extension, as given in Zhang and Zhang [7].
Definition 2.3. Let A be an algebra and B be another algebra containing A as a subalgebra. We say B is a right double Ore extension of A if the following conditions hold:
(1) B is generated by A and two new variables y1 and y2;
(2) {y1,y2} satisfies a relation
y2y1=p12y1y2+p11y21+τ1y1+τ2y2+τ0, |
where p12,p11∈k and τ1,τ2,τ0∈A;
(3) As a left A-module, B=∑i,j≥0Ayi1yj2 and it is a left free A-module with a basis {yi1yj2|i≥0,j≥0};
(4) y1A+y2A+A⊆Ay1+Ay2+A.
Let P denote the set of scalar parameters {p12,p11} and let τ denote the set {τ1,τ2,τ0}. We call P the parameter and τ the tail. Similarly, we can define the left double Ore extension B of A (see [7]). We say B is a double Ore extension (DOE, for short) if it is a left and right double Ore extension of A with the same generating set {y1,y2}.
Remark 2.1. Condition (4) in Definition 2.3 is equivalent to the existence of two maps
σ=(σ11σ12σ21σ22):A→M2×2(A),δ=(δ1δ2):A→M2×1(A). |
Proof. Consider the necessity. If y1A+y2A+A⊆Ay1+Ay2+A, then for all a∈A, there exist maps σ11,σ12,σ21,σ22,δ1,δ2:A→A, subject to
{y1a=σ11(a)y1+σ12(a)y2+δ1(a),y2a=σ21(a)y1+σ22(a)y2+δ2(a). |
It implies the existence of two maps
σ=(σ11σ12σ21σ22):A→M2×2(A),δ=(δ1δ2):A→M2×1(A), |
which satisfy
(y1y2)a=σ(a)(y1y2)+δ(a) |
for all a∈A.
The sufficiency is obvious.
In [7], the authors have proved that σ is an algebra homomorphism.
Let B be a right double Ore extension of A, we denote B=AP[y1,y2;σ,δ,τ], where P={p12,p11}⊆k, τ={τ1,τ2,τ0}⊆A, and σ,δ are as above.
In this article, we focus on a special type of right double Ore extensions.
Let A be a connected graded algebra which is generated in degree 1, that is, A is N-graded, with A=k⊕⨁n≥1An, where AiAj=Ai+j for i,j≥1. Let B be the right double Ore extension of A, note that B is a k-vector space, so the following fact is automatically established:
σ(k)=(k00k):k→M2×2(k). |
Further we let δ=0,τ=0 and s∈Aut(A) which preserves degree. Suppose that A1 is the k-subspace of A generated by {x1,⋯,xs,⋯}, where x1,⋯,xs,⋯ are the homogeneous elements of degree 1. For all a1∈A1, a1=∑ixi, we define
σ(xi)=(0s(xi)s(xi)0):A1→M2×2(A1). |
Then
σ(a1)=(0∑is(xi)∑is(xi)0)=(0s(a1)s(a1)0). |
Since σ is an algebra homomorphism, the domain can be extended to An and then to A. Let's begin with A2, for all a2∈A2, a2=∑i,jxixj, now
σ(a2)=σ(∑i,jxixj)=∑i,jσ(xi)σ(xj)=∑i,j(0s(xi)s(xi)0)(0s(xj)s(xj)0)=∑i,j(s(xi)s(xj)00s(xi)s(xj))=∑i,j(s(xixj)00s(xixj))=(s(a2)00s(a2)). |
By induction, one can define σ(an). When n is odd, for all an∈An,
σ(an)=(0s(an)s(an)0):An→M2×2(An). |
When n is even, for all an∈An,
σ(an)=(s(an)00s(an)):An→M2×2(An). |
Hence, for all a∈A, a=k0+n∑i=1kiai, where k0,ki∈k and ai∈Ai, then we have
σ(a)=σ(k0)+n∑i=1kiσ(ai). |
Definition 2.4. We call the above type of right double Ore extension of A as a double Ore extension of anti-angle type, denoted by A∨P[y1,y2;σ].
In [2], the authors have proved that this type of double Ore extensions can not be presented as iterated Ore extensions. In [5], the author has extended the structure of a bialgebra R to the skew polynomial ring of automorphism type R[z,σ]. Now we let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1. We try to extend the bialgebra structure of R to its double Ore extension of anti-angle type R∨P[y1,y2;σ] for some specific parameter P.
We further assume that the tensor legs of the Drinfel'd twist J must have degrees of the same parity and Δ preserves the parity, that is, for all hn∈Rn, Δ(hn)=h(1)n⊗h(2)n, where hn,h(1)n and h(2)n have degrees of the same parity.
Theorem 2.1. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, (s,J) be a twisted homomorphism for R. Let H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] be a double Ore extension of anti-angle type. Then the bialgebra structure of R can be extended to H such that Δ(yi)=J(yi⊗yi) and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2). Conversely, if there exist an invertible element J∈R⊗R, s∈Aut(R) which preserves degree such that R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] is a bialgebra with Δ(yi)=J(yi⊗yi) and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2), then (s,J) is a twisted homomorphism for R.
Proof. Since R=k⊕⨁n≥1Rn, we only need to consider the elements from Rn where n is odd. This is because for all h∈R, h=k0+n∑i=1kihi, where k0,ki∈k and hi∈Ri, then we have σ(h)=σ(k0)+n∑i=1kiσ(hi). Notice the fact that yik=kyi(i=1,2) and when n is even, the double Ore extension can be presented as iterated Ore extensions, the proof for the case of the Ore extension was given in [5].
In the remaining part of the proof, we let n be odd. For all hn∈Rn, we have the relations:
y1hn=s(hn)y2,y2hn=s(hn)y1,y2y1=y21. |
(1) Let (s,J) be a twisted homomorphism for the bialgebra R, and let H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] be a double Ore extension of anti-angle type.
Since R is a bialgebra, we have a homomorphism of algebras R→H⊗H. Consider the element J(yi⊗yi)(i=1,2)∈H⊗H. Let J=J1⊗J2 with the summation omitted, then J1 and J2 are the sum of elements in different grades of R. We only need to consider those elements from Rn where n is odd for the same reason. While it may be an abuse of notation, we just assume J1 and J2 are from some Rn where n is odd, then for all hn∈Rn, we have
J(y1⊗y1)Δ(hn)=J(s⊗s)Δ(hn)(y2⊗y2)=Δ(s(hn))J(y2⊗y2), |
J(y2⊗y2)Δ(hn)=J(s⊗s)Δ(hn)(y1⊗y1)=Δ(s(hn))J(y1⊗y1), |
J(y2⊗y2)J(y1⊗y1)=J(s⊗s)(J)(y21⊗y21)=J(s⊗s)(J)(y2y1⊗y2y1)=J(y1⊗y1)J(y1⊗y1). |
Thus Δ satisfies the Ore condition. Hence, there exists a unique algebra homomorphism ¯Δ:H→H⊗H such that ¯Δ|R=Δ and ¯Δ(yi)=J(yi⊗yi)(i=1,2). While it may be an abuse of notation, we just write ¯Δ=Δ.
Furthermore,
(id⊗Δ)Δ(yi)=(id⊗Δ)(J)(yi⊗Δ(yi))=(id⊗Δ)(J)(1⊗J)(yi⊗yi⊗yi)=(Δ⊗id)(J)(J⊗1)(yi⊗yi⊗yi)=(Δ⊗id)(J)(Δ(yi)⊗yi)=(Δ⊗id)Δ(yi). |
This implies that Δ:H→H⊗H is a coassociative map.
Now, since ϵ:R→k is a homomorphism of algebras, then for all hn∈Rn, we have
1⋅ϵ(hn)=1⋅ϵ(s(hn))=ϵ(s(hn))⋅1,ϵ(y2)ϵ(y1)=ϵ(y1)ϵ(y1). |
Thus ϵ satisfies the Ore condition. So, there exists a unique algebra homomorphism ¯ϵ:H→k such that ¯ϵ|R=ϵ and ¯ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2). Again, while it may be an abuse of notation, we just write ¯ϵ=ϵ. Moreover, we have
(id⊗ϵ)Δ(yi)=(id⊗ϵ)(J)yi=yi=(ϵ⊗id)(J)yi=(ϵ⊗id)Δ(yi). |
Thus ϵ satisfies the counit property in H. Therefore, the bialgebra structure of R extends to H as stated in the theorem.
(2) To prove the converse, suppose that there exist an invertible element J∈R⊗R, s∈Aut(R) which preserves degree such that R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] is a bialgebra with Δ(yi)=J(yi⊗yi) and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2).
Since (id⊗ϵ)Δ(yi)=(ϵ⊗id)Δ(yi), we must have that (id⊗ϵ)(J)=(ϵ⊗id)(J)=1. Also
(id⊗Δ)Δ(yi)=(id⊗Δ)(J)(yi⊗Δ(yi))=(id⊗Δ)(J)(1⊗J)(yi⊗yi⊗yi) |
and
(Δ⊗id)Δ(yi)=(Δ⊗id)(J)(Δ(yi)⊗yi)=(Δ⊗id)(J)(J⊗1)(yi⊗yi⊗yi). |
Since R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] is a bialgebra, we have that (id⊗Δ)Δ(yi)=(Δ⊗id)Δ(yi) and hence (id⊗Δ)(J)(1⊗J)=(Δ⊗id)(J)(J⊗1), that is, J is a Drinfel'd twist for R.
Moreover, for all hn∈Rn, y1hn=s(hn)y2. This implies that
ϵ(hn)=ϵ(y1hn)=ϵ(s(hn)y2)=ϵ(s(hn)), |
and then for all h∈R,ϵ(s(h))=ϵ(h).
That is, ϵ∘s=ϵ. Note that for all hn∈Rn, on the one hand
Δ(y1hn)=J(y1⊗y1)Δ(hn)=J(s⊗s)Δ(hn)(y2⊗y2), |
on the other hand
Δ(y1hn)=Δ(s(hn)y2)=Δ(s(hn))J(y2⊗y2). |
Thus, J(s⊗s)Δ(hn)=Δ(s(hn))J and then for all h∈R,J(s⊗s)Δ(h)=Δ(s(h))J, hence the pair (s,J) is a twisted homomorphism for R.
As it was said at the beginning of this section, given a Hopf algebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, we will find conditions to define a Hopf algebra structure on the quotient R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ]/I for some bi-ideal I of R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ]. The following lemma gives us certain conditions to find the bi-ideal on the bialgebra R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] which will be used to define the Hopf algebra structure mentioned.
Lemma 2.1. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, (s,J) be twisted homomorphism for R. Suppose that there exists 0≠t∈R such that Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t). Then, for the double Ore extension of anti-angle type H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] with the bialgebra structure as in Theorem 2.1, I=⟨y21−t⟩ is a bi-ideal of H.
Proof. Let R=k⊕⨁n≥1Rn be a bialgebra and (s,J) be a twisted homomorphism for R, we only consider the elements from Rn and just assume J1 and J2 are from some Rn where n is odd for the same reason. By Theorem 2.1, H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] is also a bialgebra. Let 0≠t∈R as in the hypothesis and let I be the ideal in H generated by y21−t. We have to prove that I=⟨y21−t⟩ is a coideal of H. We note that t necessarily satisfies
t=(ϵ⊗id)Δ(t)=(ϵ⊗id)(J)(ϵ⊗id)(s⊗s)(J)ϵ(t)t=(ϵ⊗id)(s⊗s)(J)ϵ(t)t=(ϵ⊗s)(J)ϵ(t)t=s((ϵ⊗id)(J))ϵ(t)t=s(1)ϵ(t)t=ϵ(t)t, |
which implies ϵ(t)=1. So, ϵ(y21−t)=ϵ(y1)2−ϵ(t)=0. That is, I⊆kerϵ.
Furthermore,
Δ(y21−t)=Δ(y1)2−Δ(t)=J(y1⊗y1)J(y1⊗y1)−Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(y2y1⊗y2y1)−Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(y21⊗y21)−Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)((y21−t)⊗y21)+J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗(y21−t))+J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t)−Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)((y21−t)⊗y21)+J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗(y21−t)), |
which belongs to I⊗H+H⊗I. Therefore, I is a bi-ideal of H.
Remark 2.2. Note that, conversely, if I=⟨y21−t⟩ is a bi-ideal of H, then Δ(t)−J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t)∈I⊗H+H⊗I.
Hence, given a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, (s,J) a twisted homomorphism for R and an element t that satisfies the hypothesis of Lemma 2.1, we have that H/I is a bialgebra, for the double Ore extension of anti-angle type H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] and I=⟨y21−t⟩.
Remark 2.3. By symmetry, one can check that H′=H/⟨y1y2−y22⟩ also extended the bialgebra structure of R as in Theorem 2.1 and further we have that H′/I′ is a bialgebra for the bi-ideal I′=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩ as in Lemma 2.1.
The next theorem presents conditions to extend a Hopf algebra structure from a Hopf algebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to the quotient bialgebra H′/I′.
Theorem 2.2. Let R be a Hopf algebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 with antipode S, (s,J) be a twisted homomorphism for R. Suppose also that s∘S=S∘s and s2=id. If there exists 0≠t∈R, with Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t), and such that
(1) tJ1S(J2)=1;
(2) ts(S(J1)J2)=1,
where J=J1⊗J2 with the summation omitted, then there exists a Hopf algebra structure on H′/I′ with S(yi)=yi(i=1,2). Conversely, if there exists a Hopf structure on H′/I′ with S(yi)=yi(i=1,2), then tJ1S(J2)=ts(S(J1)J2)=1.
Proof. Let R=k⊕⨁n≥1Rn be a Hopf algebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 with antipode S and (s,J) a twisted homomorphism for R such that s2=id, we only consider the elements from Rn and just assume J1 and J2 are from some Rn where n is odd for the same reason. By Remark 2.3, H′=H/⟨y1y2−y22⟩ is a bialgebra, and I′=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩ is the bi-ideal of H′.
We just write h for the element h+I′ of H′/I′. And to define the antipode, we just extend the antipode S of R to H′/I′ defining S(yi)=yi(i=1,2). We note that S:H′/I′→H′/I′ is well defined, since S(y2i−t)=S(yi)2−S(t)=y2i−t∈I and, using that s∘S=S∘s,S(an)y1=y2S(s(an)),S(an)y2=y1S(s(an)) for all an∈Rn. Also, we have that
μ(id⊗S)Δ(y1)=μ(id⊗S)(J(y1⊗y1))=J1y1S(y1)S(J2)=y22s2(J1)S(J2)=tJ1S(J2)=1, |
μ(id⊗S)Δ(y2)=μ(id⊗S)(J(y2⊗y2))=J1y2S(y2)S(J2)=y21s2(J1)S(J2)=tJ1S(J2)=1, |
and
μ(S⊗id)Δ(y1)=μ(S⊗id)(J(y1⊗y1))=S(y1)S(J1)J2y1=y21s(S(J1))s(J2)=ts(S(J1)J2)=1, |
μ(S⊗id)Δ(y2)=μ(S⊗id)(J(y2⊗y2))=S(y2)S(J1)J2y2=y22s(S(J1))s(J2)=ts(S(J1)J2)=1. |
Since S is an antipode for R, the antipode property is verified for R as well. Therefore, S is an antipode of H′/I′ and so H′/I′ is a Hopf algebra.
The converse follows from the above four equations.
Definition 2.5. The right double Ore extension of a Hopf algebra stated in Theorem 2.2 is called a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-grouplike type (HDOE, for short).
Remark 2.4. The condition N-graded in this section is not essential. In fact, we can replace N-graded with G-graded, where G is a cyclic group. In particular, G=Zn for some n∈N.
In this section, we will give an example for the extending of bialgebra and Hopf algebra structures from a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 and construct a non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension.
Example 3.1. Let O(M2(k))=k[a,b,c,d], the polynomial functions on 2×2 matrices. It is a connected graded algebra which is generated in degree 1 and can be described as follows:
As an algebra, O(M2(k)) is simply the commutative polynomial ring.
Define a comultiplication and counit on O(M2(k)) by
Δ(a)=a⊗a+b⊗c,ϵ(a)=1,Δ(b)=a⊗b+b⊗d,ϵ(b)=0,Δ(c)=c⊗a+d⊗c,ϵ(c)=0,Δ(d)=c⊗b+d⊗d,ϵ(d)=1. |
Then O(M2(k)) becomes a bialgebra. If we write
X=(abcd)=(X11X12X21X22), |
the comultiplication and counit are given by Δ(Xij)=∑kXik⊗Xkj and ϵ(Xij)=δij.
The bialgebra O(M2(k)) is not a Hopf algebra, since the group-like element detX is not invertible in O(M2(k)).
However, there is a Hopf algebra closely related to O(M2(k)), that is O(GL2(k)), which equals to O(M2(k))[(detX)−1]. It is a Hopf algebra by defining S(X)=X−1, that is, S(Xij) is the ijth entry of X−1.
For the Hopf algebra R=O(GL2(k)), we let
s(a)=a,s(b)=b,s(c)=c,s(d)=d,J=1⊗1. |
The following claims hold:
(1) The k-map s keeps the defining relations of R. Hence, s∈Aut(R);
(2) J is a Drinfel'd twist for R, and
J(s⊗s)Δ(z)=Δ(s(z))J |
for z=a,b,c,d. Hence, (s,J) is a twisted homomorphism for R;
(3) Setting t=1 and we have Δ(t)=J(s⊗s)(J)(t⊗t)=1⊗1;
(4) The relation s∘S(z)=S∘s(z) and s2(z)=z hold for z=a,b,c,d and tJ1S(J2)=ts(S(J1)J2)=1.
Then the double Ore extension of anti-angle type R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] is a bialgebra with Δ(yi)=yi⊗yi and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2) by Theorem 2.1.
The quotient bialgebra
H∞:=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ]/⟨y1y2−y22,y21−1,y22−1⟩ |
is a bialgebra by Remark 2.3.
By setting S(yi)=yi(i=1,2), H∞ has a Hopf algebra structure by Theorem 2.2. It is generated by a,b,c,d,y1,y2 with relations
y21=y22=y1y2=y2y1=1,y1z=zy2,y2z=zy1,(z=a,b,c,d). |
The coalgebra structure is
Δ(a)=a⊗a+b⊗c,ϵ(a)=1,Δ(b)=a⊗b+b⊗d,ϵ(b)=0,Δ(c)=c⊗a+d⊗c,ϵ(c)=0,Δ(d)=c⊗b+d⊗d,ϵ(d)=1,Δ(y1)=y1⊗y1,ϵ(y1)=1,Δ(y2)=y2⊗y2,ϵ(y2)=1. |
The antipode is
S(X)=X−1,S(y1)=y1,S(y2)=y2. |
H∞ is a non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension.
Remark 3.1. In fact, y1,y2 are invertible in H since y21=y22=y1y2=y2y1=1, then y1=y2, hence H∞=R[y;s] is a Hopf-Ore extension, where y=y1=y2.
The above example shows that Hopf double Ore extensions also play a key role in the theory of constructing the examples of Hopf algebras which are non-commutative and non-cocommutative.
However, it's hard to give the classification of twisted homomorphisms for a given bialgebra R relative to the double Ore extension of anti-angle type.
Let (s,J) and (s′,J′) be twisted homomorphisms for two bialgebras R and R′ respectively, and R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] and R′∨{0,1}[y′1,y′2;σ′] the corresponding double Ore extensions of anti-angle type. The datum (s,J) is said to be equivalent to (s′,J′), denoted by (s,J)≈(s′,J′), if there is a bialgebra isomorphism Φ:R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ]→R′∨{0,1}[y′1,y′2;σ′] such that Φ(R)=R′ as bialgebras.
The difficulty of this problem is that we can't provide the form of Φ, since it is related to the Jacobian conjecture.
In this section, we will investigate the lifting of homological properties from a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to its double Ore extensions of anti-angle type R∨P[y1,y2;σ] for a specific Drinfel'd twist J and parameter P.
In fact, we have noted that H=R∨{0,1}[y1,y2;σ] in Theorem 2.1 is not even a domain since the relation y2y1=y21 produced zero divisors, so we can't lift most of the homological properties from R to H. However, if we choose a specific Drinfel'd twist J=1⊗1 and a specific parameter P={1,0}, this problem can be solved.
Since the parameter is changed, the related theorems need to be modified. As mentioned in Section 2, for any homomorphism of coalgebras s∈End(R), the pair (s,1⊗1) is automatically a twisted homomorphism for R, so we don't need the condition of the twisted homomorphism in the next theorems.
Theorem 4.1. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, s∈Aut(R) be a coalgebra homomorphism for R. Let H=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] be a double Ore extension of anti-angle type. Then the bialgebra structure of R can be extended to H such that Δ(yi)=yi⊗yi and ϵ(yi)=1(i=1,2).
Proof. In this theorem, for all hn∈Rn where n is odd, we have the relations:
y1hn=s(hn)y2,y2hn=s(hn)y1,y2y1=y1y2. |
The remaining part of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1, so we omit it.
The following lemma gives us certain conditions to find the bi-ideal on the bialgebra R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] which will be used to define the Hopf algebra structure on the quotient R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ]/I for some bi-ideal I of R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ].
Lemma 4.1. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, s∈Aut(R) be a coalgebra homomorphism for R. Suppose that there exists 0≠t∈R such that Δ(t)=t⊗t. Then, for the double Ore extension of anti-angle type H=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] with the bialgebra structure as in Theorem 4.1, I=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩ is a bi-ideal of H.
Proof. The proof is similar to that of Lemma 2.1, so we omit it.
Hence, given a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, s∈Aut(R) a coalgebra homomorphism for R and an element t that satisfies the hypothesis of Lemma 4.1, we have that H/I is a bialgebra, for the double Ore extension of anti-angle type H=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] and I=⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩.
The next theorem presents conditions to extend a Hopf algebra structure from a Hopf algebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to the quotient bialgebra H/I.
Theorem 4.2. Let R be a Hopf algebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 with antipode S, s∈Aut(R) be a coalgebra homomorphism for R. Suppose also that s∘S=S∘s and s2=id. If there exists 0≠t∈R, with Δ(t)=t⊗t, then there exists a Hopf algebra structure on H/I with S(yi)=yi(i=1,2).
Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.2, so we omit it.
Now we begin to lift some of the homological properties from a bialgebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 to its double Ore extension of anti-angle type.
Theorem 4.3. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, s∈Aut(R) be a coalgebra homomorphism for R and H=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] be a double Ore extension of anti-angle type, then as algebras:
(1) If R is a domain, then H is a domain;
(2) If R is prime (semiprime), then H is prime (semiprime).
Proof. (1) Let R=k⊕⨁q≥1Rq. Suppose f(y1,y2)=∑i+j≤naijyi1yj2,g(y1,y2)=∑k+l≤mbklyk1yl2, they are polynomials of degree n and m in H respectively, and aij,bkl are the nonzero leading coefficients. Consider the monomials ays11yt12 and bys21yt22, where a,b∈R, the product of the monomials is a map ϕ:H×H→H, now we explain that ϕ is injective. We make a convention:
(i) In the first position of the Cartesian product, if s1<s2, then ays11yt12 is the required unique monomial.
(ii) In the second position of the Cartesian product, if t1<t2, then ays11yt12 is the required unique monomial.
In this sense, we get a unique monomial through ϕ. Then we multiply the monomials and get
(a) If bkl∈k, note that σ12(bkl)=σ21(bkl)=0,p12=1, the leading term of fg is aijbklyk+i1yl+j2. Since aij≠0,bkl≠0, then the leading coefficient is nonzero, so the degree of fg is n+m. Hence H is a domain.
(b) If bkl∈Rn where n is odd, note that σ11(bkl)=σ22(bkl)=0,p12=1, the leading term of fg is aijsi+j(bkl)yk+j1yl+i2. Since aij≠0,bkl≠0 and s∈Aut(R), then the leading coefficient is nonzero, so the degree of fg is n+m. Hence H is a domain.
(c) If bkl∈Rn where n is even, note that σ12(bkl)=σ21(bkl)=0,p12=1, the leading term of fg is aijsi+j(bkl)yk+i1yl+j2. Since aij≠0,bkl≠0 and s∈Aut(R), then the leading coefficient is nonzero, so the degree of fg is n+m. Hence H is a domain.
(d) If bkl∈R, without loss of generality, suppose bkl=b0kl+b1kl+⋯+bqkl, where b0kl∈k,bpkl∈Rp(p=1,2,⋯,q), based on the discussions of (a) (b) (c) above, the leading term of fg is
aijsi+j(q∑p=0b2pkl)yk+i1yl+j2+aijsi+j(q∑p=0b2p+1kl)yk+j1yl+i2. |
Since aij≠0,bkl≠0 and s∈Aut(R), then the leading coefficient is nonzero, so the degree of fg is n+m. Hence H is a domain.
(2) Each element of the leading coefficient in (1) is the leading coefficient of some element of fRg. Thus fRg≠0 and so fHg≠0. Hence H is prime (semiprime).
However, the above homological properties of a Hopf algebra R which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1 can't lift to the Hopf algebra H/I=R∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ]/⟨y21−t,y22−t⟩, since the relations y21=t and y22=t produced zero divisors.
In this section, we extend the construction of double Ore extensions of anti-angle type to multiple Ore extensions. We find a class of multiple Ore extensions with good properties, called the multiple Ore extensions of circular type.
To begin our work, let's recall the definition of a multiple Ore extension introduced in [6].
Definition 5.1. Let A be an algebra and B be another algebra containing A as a subalgebra. We say B is a n-Ore extension of A if the following conditions hold:
(1) B is generated by A and n new variables y1,y2,⋯,yn;
(2) For any 1≤i<j≤n, {y1,y2,⋯,yn} satisfies a relation
yjyi=∑1≤l≤m≤nplmijylym+n∑i=1tlijyl+t0, |
where plmij∈k and tlij∈A;
(3) As a left A-module, B=∑i1,i2,⋯,in≥0Ayi11yi22⋯yinn and it is a left free A-module with a basis {yi11yi22⋯yinn|i1,i2,⋯,in≥0};
(4) There exist a k-linear map σ:A→Mn(A) and a k-linear map δ:A→A⊕n such that
(y1y2⋮yn)a=σ(a)(y1y2⋮yn)+δ(a), |
where Mn(A) is the n×n matrix algebra with entries in A.
Set
P={plmij∈k|1≤i<j≤n,1≤l≤m≤n},T={tlij∈A|1≤i<j≤n,1≤l≤n}, |
then we denote the n-Ore extension B of A by B=A[y1,y2,⋯,yn;σ,δ,P,T].
When n≥2, the n-Ore extension is called a multiple Ore extension.
Now we extend the construction of double Ore extensions of anti-angle type to multiple Ore extensions.
Let A=k⊕⨁n≥1An be a connected graded algebra generated in degree 1 and B be the m-Ore extension of A, note that B is a k-vector space, so the following fact is automatically established:
σ(k)=(k0⋯00k⋯0⋮⋮⋮00⋯k):k→Mm×m(k). |
Further we let s∈Aut(A) which preserves degree. Suppose that A1 is the k-subspace of A generated by {x1,⋯,xs,⋯}, where x1,⋯,xs,⋯ are the homogeneous elements of degree 1. For all a1∈A1, a1=∑ixi, we define
σ(xi)=(0s(xi)0⋯000s(xi)⋯0⋮⋮⋮⋮000⋯s(xi)s(xi)00⋯0):A1→Mm×m(A1). |
Since s is an algebra homomorphism, we have
σ(a1)=(0s(a1)0⋯000s(a1)⋯0⋮⋮⋮⋮000⋯s(a1)s(a1)00⋯0). |
Since σ is an algebra homomorphism, the domain can be extended to An and then to A. Let's begin with A2, for all a2∈A2, a2=∑i,jxixj, now
σ(a2)=σ(∑i,jxixj)=∑i,jσ(xi)σ(xj)=(00s(a2)0⋯0000s(a2)⋯0⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮s(a2)000⋯00s(a2)00⋯0). |
By induction, one can define σ(an).
In fact, the matrix of σ act on ai is the s(ai) times of the corresponding basic circular matrix.
Note that for all a∈A, a=k0+n∑i=1kiai, where k0,ki∈k and ai∈Ai, then we have
σ(a)=σ(k0)+n∑i=1kiσ(ai). |
Assume a0=1, then the matrix of σ(a) is:
(n∑i=0kims(aim)n∑i=0kim+1s(aim+1)⋯n∑i=0kim+m−1s(aim+m−1)n∑i=0kim+m−1s(aim+m−1)n∑i=0kims(aim)⋯n∑i=0kim+m−2s(aim+m−2)⋮⋮⋮n∑i=0kim+1s(aim+1)n∑i=0kim+2s(aim+2)⋯n∑i=0kims(aim)). |
We find that the matrix of σ act on the element of A is a circular matrix.
Definition 5.2. We call the above type of multiple Ore extension of A as a multiple Ore extension of circular type, denoted by Aϵ[y1,y2,⋯,ym;σ,δ,P,T].
It is easy to check that this type of multiple Ore extensions can not be presented as iterated Ore extensions.
Here we can get a similar conclusion as in Section 4.
Theorem 5.1. Let R be a bialgebra which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, s∈Aut(R) be a coalgebra homomorphism for R and H=Rϵ[y1,y2,⋯,ym;σ,δ,P,T] be the multiple Ore extension of circular type, then as algebras:
(1) If R is a domain, then H is a domain;
(2) If R is prime (semiprime), then H is prime (semiprime).
Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 4.3, so we omit it.
If we modified the definition of the comultiplication, we can get another type of Hopf double Ore extensions of anti-angle type.
Definition 6.1. Let A be a Hopf algebra, which is connected graded as algebra and generated in degree 1, a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type (HDOE, for short) of A is an algebra B such that
(1) B is a Hopf algebra with Hopf subalgebra A;
(2) B=A∨{p12,0}[y1,y2;σ] is the double Ore extension of anti-angle type;
(3) y1,y2 are primitive elements, that is:
Δ(y1)=y1⊗1+1⊗y1,Δ(y2)=y2⊗1+1⊗y2. |
The following discussion is closely connected to [1] and [4].
Remark 6.1. Note that the more general definition of the comultiplications in Definition 6.1 should be
Δ(y1)=y1⊗r1+r2⊗y1,Δ(y2)=y2⊗r1+r2⊗y2, |
for some r1,r2∈A. Indeed, since Δ is a coassociative map, comparing
(id⊗Δ)Δ(yi)=yi⊗Δ(r1)+r2⊗yi⊗r1+r2⊗r2⊗yi,(i=1,2) |
with
(Δ⊗id)Δ(yi)=yi⊗r1⊗r1+r2⊗yi⊗r1+Δ(r2)⊗yi,(i=1,2). |
We obtain Δ(ri)=ri⊗ri, which means r1 and r2 are grouplike elements. Furthermore, by the main property of the antipode, r1 and r2 need to be invertible. Note that A is connected graded as algebra, hence ri∈k, then Δ(ri)=ri⊗1, which requires that ri=1.
Now we give the basic properties of the Hopf double Ore extensions of anti-angle-primitive type.
Theorem 6.1. Let A be a Hopf algebra, which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, B=A∨{p12,0}[y1,y2;σ] be the Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type, then
(1) p12=1;
(2) B is a double Ore extension of A;
(3) ϵ(yi)=0,S(yi)=−yi(i=1,2);
(4) Δ∘s=s⊗id=id⊗s for all a∈A, that is
Δ(s(a))=s(a(1))⊗a(2)=a(1)⊗s(a(2)). |
Proof. Let A=k⊕⨁n≥1An be the Hopf algebra. Assume that the comultiplication Δ|A can be extended to B=A∨{p12,0}[y1,y2;σ]. Then the homomorphism Δ preserves relation y2y1=p12y1y2, that is, Δ(y2)Δ(y1)=p12Δ(y1)Δ(y2).
(1) On the one hand,
Δ(y2)Δ(y1)=(y2⊗1+1⊗y2)(y1⊗1+1⊗y1)=p12y1y2⊗1+y2⊗y1+y1⊗y2+p12⊗y1y2. |
On the other hand,
p12Δ(y1)Δ(y2)=p12(y1⊗1+1⊗y1)(y2⊗1+1⊗y2)=p12y1y2⊗1+p12y1⊗y2+p12y2⊗y1+p12⊗y1y2. |
Compare the coefficients of y1⊗y2 and y2⊗y1 on the both sides, we have p12=1.
(2) Since s∈Aut(A),p12=1, then B is a free right A-module with a basis {yi2yj1|i≥0,j≥0} and y1A+y2A+A=Ay1+Ay2+A. Hence B is a double Ore extension of A.
(3) Applying ϵ⊗id to Δ(yi)=yi⊗1+1⊗yi and using the main property of the counit, we see that yi=ϵ(yi)+yi. This implies ϵ(yi)=0. Applying μ(id⊗S) to Δ(yi)=yi⊗1+1⊗yi and by the main property of the antipode, we see that 0=ϵ(yi)=yi+S(yi). This implies S(yi)=−yi.
(4) For any a=n∑i=0ai∈A, where ai∈Ai. Since Δ is an algebra homomorphism, we have
Δ(y1)Δ(a)=Δ(n∑i=0s(a2i))Δ(y1)+Δ(n∑i=0s(a2i+1))Δ(y2),Δ(y2)Δ(a)=Δ(n∑i=0s(a2i+1))Δ(y1)+Δ(n∑i=0s(a2i))Δ(y2). |
Compute in detail and compare the coefficients of yi⊗1 and 1⊗yi, we have
Δ(n∑i=0s(a2i))=n∑i=0s(a(1)2i)⊗a(2)=a(1)⊗n∑i=0s(a(2)2i),Δ(n∑i=0s(a2i+1))=n∑i=0s(a(1)2i+1)⊗a(2)=a(1)⊗n∑i=0s(a(2)2i+1). |
Add up the above two equations, we get
Δ(s(a))=s(a(1))⊗a(2)=a(1)⊗s(a(2)). |
Furthermore, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a Hopf algebra B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] to be a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type.
Theorem 6.2. Let A be a Hopf algebra, which is connected graded as an algebra and generated in degree 1, the antipode of A preserves degree, then B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] is a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type if and only if there is a character χ:A→k such that s(a)=χ(a(1))a(2)=a(1)χ(a(2)) for all a∈A.
Proof. Necessity. For any a∈A, put χ(a):=s(a(1))S(a(2))∈A, then we have
Δ(χ(a))=Δ(s(a(1)))Δ(S(a(2)))=s(a(1)(1))S(a(2)(2))⊗a(1)(2)S(a(2)(1))=s(a(1))S(a(4))⊗a(2)S(a(3))=s(a(1))S(a(3))⊗ϵ(a(2))=s(a(1)ϵ(a(2)))S(a(3))⊗1=s(a(1))S(a(2))⊗1=χ(a)⊗1. |
Using the main property of the counit, we see that χ(a)∈k. One can regard χ as a map χ:A→k. Since s∈Aut(A) and χ is a character, it follows that for all a,b∈A,
χ(ab)=s(a(1)b(1))S(a(2)b(2))=s(a(1))s(b(1))S(b(2))S(a(2))=s(a(1))χ(b)S(a(2))=χ(a)χ(b), |
χ(a+b)=s((a+b)(1))S((a+b)(2))=s(a(1))S(a(2))+s(b(1))S(b(2))=χ(a)+χ(b). |
One can recover s from χ,
χ(a(1))a(2)=s(a(1))S(a(2))a(3)=s(a(1))ϵ(a(2))=s(a(1)ϵ(a(2)))=s(a). |
On the one hand,
Δ(s(a))=Δ(χ(a(1))a(2))=χ(a(1))Δ(a(2))=χ(a(1))a(2)⊗a(3). |
On the other hand,
Δ(s(a))=Δ(χ(a(1))a(2))=a(1)⊗χ(a(2))a(3)=a(1)χ(a(2))⊗a(3). |
We obtain
χ(a(1))a(2)⊗a(3)=a(1)χ(a(2))⊗a(3). |
Then
(χ(a(1))a(2))a(3)S(a(4))=(a(1)χ(a(2)))a(3)S(a(4)). |
Thus
(χ(a(1))a(2))ϵ(a(3))=(a(1)χ(a(2)))ϵ(a(3)). |
Hence
s(a)=χ(a(1))a(2)=a(1)χ(a(2)). |
Sufficiency. If condition s(a)=χ(a(1))a(2)=a(1)χ(a(2)) holds, then
Δ(s(a))=s(a(1))⊗a(2)=a(1)⊗s(a(2)). | (6.1) |
For any a=n∑i=0ai∈A, where ai∈Ai, we have
y1a=n∑i=0s(a2i)y1+n∑i=0s(a2i+1)y2, | (6.2) |
y2a=n∑i=0s(a2i+1)y1+n∑i=0s(a2i)y2. | (6.3) |
It is clear that Δ preserves the above two equations if and only if (6.1) holds.
Since y2y1=y1y2, we have Δ(y2)Δ(y1)=Δ(y1)Δ(y2), then the comultiplication Δ|A can be extended to a homomorphism Δ:B→B⊗B.
If ϵ(yi)=0(i=1,2), we can prove that ϵ preserves (6.2) and (6.3). Similarly, the counit ϵ|A can be extended to a homomorphism ϵ:B→k.
Assume that B admits an antipode S which can be extended as an antiautomorphism from A to B by means of S(yi)=−yi(i=1,2), then S preserves (6.2) and (6.3). This means
S(a)S(y1)=S(y1)S(n∑i=0s(a2i))+S(y2)S(n∑i=0s(a2i+1)), | (6.4) |
S(a)S(y2)=S(y1)S(n∑i=0s(a2i+1))+S(y2)S(n∑i=0s(a2i)). | (6.5) |
Hence the existence of an antipode B satisfying S(yi)=−yi(i=1,2) is equivalent to (6.4) and (6.5). It follows that
S(a)y1=s(S(n∑i=0s(a2i)))y1+s(S(n∑i=0s(a2i+1)))y1, | (6.6) |
S(a)y2=s(S(n∑i=0s(a2i+1)))y2+s(S(n∑i=0s(a2i)))y2. | (6.7) |
Conditions (6.6) and (6.7) hold if and only if S(a)=s(S(s(a))) holds. Let us prove it, we have
s(S(s(a)))=s(S(χ(a(1))a(2)))=s(χ(a(1))S(a(2)))=χ(a(1))s(S(a(2)))=χ(a(1))S(a(3))χ(S(a(2)))=χ(a(1)S(a(2)))S(a(3))=S(a). |
This proves the existence of an antipode. Hence the Hopf algebra B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] is a Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type.
We can construct another non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension through Hopf double Ore extensions of anti-angle-primitive type. It is similar to Example 3.1 but not a Hopf-Ore extension.
Example 6.1. Let A=O(GL2(k)), B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] be the Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type with s=id, then B is a non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebra of infinite dimension. It is generated by a,b,c,d,y1,y2 with relations
y1y2=y2y1,y1z=zy2,y2z=zy1,(z=a,b,c,d). |
The coalgebra structure is
Δ(a)=a⊗a+b⊗c,ϵ(a)=1,Δ(b)=a⊗b+b⊗d,ϵ(b)=0,Δ(c)=c⊗a+d⊗c,ϵ(c)=0,Δ(d)=c⊗b+d⊗d,ϵ(d)=1,Δ(y1)=y1⊗1+1⊗y1,ϵ(y1)=0,Δ(y2)=y2⊗1+1⊗y2,ϵ(y2)=0. |
The antipode is
S(X)=X−1,S(y1)=−y1,S(y2)=−y2. |
The following two useful propositions are related to the dimensions. The right Krull dimension of a ring R is denoted by Kdim(R), the right global dimension of a ring R is denoted by rgld(R).
Proposition 6.1. ([4, Theorem 6.5.4]) Let R be a ring of finite right Krull dimension, σ an automorphism and δ a σ-derivation, then
Kdim(R)≤Kdim(R[x;σ,δ])≤Kdim(R)+1. |
In particular, if δ=0, then
Kdim(R[x;σ])=Kdim(R)+1. |
Proposition 6.2. ([4, Theorem 7.5.3]) Let R be a ring of finite right global dimension, σ an automorphism and δ a σ-derivation, then
rgld(R)≤rgld(R[x;σ,δ])≤rgld(R)+1. |
In particular, if δ=0 and R is right noetherian, then
rgld(R[x;σ])=rgld(R)+1. |
Now we lift other homological properties for Example 6.1.
Theorem 6.3. Let A=O(GL2(k)), B=A∨{1,0}[y1,y2;σ] be the Hopf double Ore extension of anti-angle-primitive type with s=id, then as an algebra:
(1) B is right noetherian.
(2) B has finite right Krull dimension.
(3) B has finite right global dimension.
Proof. Recall that as an algebra A=k[a,b,c,d]/⟨ad−bc⟩ is a finitely generated commutative algebra, then A is right noetherian, has finite right Krull dimension and has finite global dimension.
Since s=id, if we look at it in another light, B is the iterated Ore extensions
k[y1][y2;σ0][a;σ1][b;σ2][c;σ3][d;σ4] |
module the ideal generated by ad−bc, where
σ0(y1)=y1,σi(y1)=y2,σi(y2)=y1,(i=1,2,3,4). |
(1) By Hilbert's Basis Theorem, B is right noetherian.
(2) By Proposition 6.1, we have Kdim(B)=Kdim(A)+2.
(3) By Proposition 6.2, we have rgld(B)=rgld(A)+2.
In this article, we defined the double Ore extensions of anti-angle type, studied Hopf double Ore extensions and focused on three types, they are anti-angle-grouplike type, anti-angle-primitive type and circular type. As examples, we constructed two non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf algebras of infinite dimension and investigated the lifting of homological properties.
The author thanks the supervisors Z. Wu and D. M. Lu for useful conversations on the subject, providing the references, reading an earlier version of the paper and their useful comments.
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.
[1] |
K. A. Brown, S. O'Hagan, J. J. Zhang, G. Zhuang, Connected Hopf algebra and iterated Ore extensions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 219 (2015), 2405–2443. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2014.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2014.09.007
![]() |
[2] |
P. A. A. B. Carvalho, S. A. Lopes, J. Matczuk, Double Ore extensions versus iterated Ore extensions, Commun. Algebra, 39 (2011), 2838–2848. http://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2010.489532 doi: 10.1080/00927872.2010.489532
![]() |
[3] | J. C. McConnell, J. C. Robson, Noncommutative noetherian rings, 2 Eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/gsm/030 |
[4] |
A. N. Panov, Ore extensions of Hopf algebras, Math. Notes, 74 (2003), 401–410. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026115004357 doi: 10.1023/A:1026115004357
![]() |
[5] | D. Pansera, A Class of Semisimple Hopf Algebras Acting on Quantum Polynomial Algebras, Contemp. Math, 727 (2019), 303–316. |
[6] |
Y. J. Xu, H. L. Huang, D. G. Wang, Realization of PBW-deformations of type An quantum groups via multiple Ore extensions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 223 (2019), 1531–1547. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.06.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.06.017
![]() |
[7] |
J. J. Zhang, J. Zhang, Double Ore extensions, J. Pure Appl Algebra, 212 (2008), 2668–2690. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2008.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2008.05.008
![]() |