In this present investigation, the authors obtain Fekete-Szegö inequality for certain normalized analytic function f(ζ) defined on the open unit disk for which
(f′(ζ)ϑ(ζf′(ζ)f(ζ))1−ϑ≺1+sinζ;(0≤ϑ≤1)
lies in a region starlike with respect to 1 and symmetric with respect to the real axis. As a special case of this result, the Fekete-Szegö inequality for a class of functions defined through Poisson distribution series is obtained. Further, we discuss the second Hankel inequality for functions in this new class.
Citation: Huo Tang, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Shu-Hai Li, Li-Na Ma. Fekete-Szegö and Hankel inequalities for certain class of analytic functions related to the sine function[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6365-6380. doi: 10.3934/math.2022354
[1] | Mohammad Faisal Khan, Jongsuk Ro, Muhammad Ghaffar Khan . Sharp estimate for starlikeness related to a tangent domain. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20721-20741. doi: 10.3934/math.20241007 |
[2] | Jianhua Gong, Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Hala Alaqad, Bilal Khan . Sharp inequalities for q-starlike functions associated with differential subordination and q-calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28421-28446. doi: 10.3934/math.20241379 |
[3] | Huo Tang, Muhammad Abbas, Reem K. Alhefthi, Muhammad Arif . Problems involving combinations of coefficients for the inverse of some complex-valued analytical functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28931-28954. doi: 10.3934/math.20241404 |
[4] | Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Sheza.M. El-Deeb, Daniel Breaz, Wali Khan Mashwani, Bakhtiar Ahmad . Sufficiency criteria for a class of convex functions connected with tangent function. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18608-18624. doi: 10.3934/math.2024906 |
[5] | Wenzheng Hu, Jian Deng . Hankel determinants, Fekete-Szegö inequality, and estimates of initial coefficients for certain subclasses of analytic functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6445-6467. doi: 10.3934/math.2024314 |
[6] | Pinhong Long, Jinlin Liu, Murugusundaramoorthy Gangadharan, Wenshuai Wang . Certain subclass of analytic functions based on q-derivative operator associated with the generalized Pascal snail and its applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13423-13441. doi: 10.3934/math.2022742 |
[7] | Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Nak Eun Cho, Timilehin Gideon Shaba, Bakhtiar Ahmad, Wali Khan Mashwani . Coefficient functionals for a class of bounded turning functions related to modified sigmoid function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3133-3149. doi: 10.3934/math.2022173 |
[8] | G. Murugusundaramoorthy, K. Vijaya, K. R. Karthikeyan, Sheza M. El-Deeb, Jong-Suk Ro . Bi-univalent functions subordinated to a three leaf function induced by multiplicative calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 26983-26999. doi: 10.3934/math.20241313 |
[9] | Hari Mohan Srivastava, Timilehin Gideon Shaba, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Abbas Kareem Wanas, Georgia Irina Oros . The Fekete-Szegö functional and the Hankel determinant for a certain class of analytic functions involving the Hohlov operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 340-360. doi: 10.3934/math.2023016 |
[10] | K. R. Karthikeyan, G. Murugusundaramoorthy, N. E. Cho . Some inequalities on Bazilevič class of functions involving quasi-subordination. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7111-7124. doi: 10.3934/math.2021417 |
In this present investigation, the authors obtain Fekete-Szegö inequality for certain normalized analytic function f(ζ) defined on the open unit disk for which
(f′(ζ)ϑ(ζf′(ζ)f(ζ))1−ϑ≺1+sinζ;(0≤ϑ≤1)
lies in a region starlike with respect to 1 and symmetric with respect to the real axis. As a special case of this result, the Fekete-Szegö inequality for a class of functions defined through Poisson distribution series is obtained. Further, we discuss the second Hankel inequality for functions in this new class.
Let A denote the class of functions f which are analytic in the open unit disk D={ζ:|ζ|<1} of the form
f(ζ)=ζ+a2ζ2+a3ζ3+⋯(ζ∈D) | (1.1) |
and let S denote the subclass of A consisting of univalent functions.
Assume that f and g are two analytic functions in D. Then, we say that the function g is subordinate to the function f, and we write
g(ζ)≺f(ζ)(ζ∈D), |
if there exists a Schwarz function ω(ζ) with ω(0)=0 and |ω(ζ)|<1, such that (see [1])
g(ζ)=f(ω(ζ))(ζ∈D). |
The familiar coefficient conjecture for the functions f∈S having the series form (1.1), was given by Bieberbach in 1916 and it was later proved by de-Branges [2] in 1985. It was one of the most celebrated conjectures in classical analysis, one that has stood as a challenge to mathematician for a very long time. During this period, many mathematicians worked hard to prove this conjecture and as result they established coefficient bounds for some sub-families of the class S of univalent functions. Ma and Minda (see [3]) introduced two classes of analytic functions namely;
S∗(ψ)={f∈A:ζf′(ζ)f(ζ)≺ψ(ζ)(ζ∈D)} |
and
C(ψ)={f∈A:1+ζf′′(ζ)f′(ζ)≺ψ(ζ)(ζ∈D)}, |
where the function ψ is an analytic univalent function such that ℜ(ψ)>0inD with ψ(0)=1,ψ′(0)>0 and ψ maps D onto a region starlike with respect to 1 and symmetric with respect to the real axis and the symbol '≺' denote the subordination between two analytic functions. By varying the function ψ, several familiar classes can be obtained as illustrated below:
(1) For ψ=1+Aζ1+Bζ(−1≤B<A≤1), we get the class S∗(A,B), see [4].
(2) For different values of A and B, the class S∗(α)=S∗(1−2α,−1) is shown in [5].
(3) For ψ=1+2π2(log1+√ζ1−√ζ)2, the class was defined and studied in [6].
(4) For ψ=√1+ζ, the class is denoted by S∗L, details can be seen in [7] and further studied in [8].
(5) For ψ=ζ+√1+ζ2, the class is denoted by S∗l, see [9].
(6) If ψ=1+43ζ+23ζ2, then such class denoted by S∗C was introduced in [10] and further studied by [11].
(7) For ψ=eζ, the class S∗e was defined and studied in [12,13].
(8) For ψ=cosh(ζ), the class is denoted by S∗cosh, see [14].
(9) For ψ=1+sin(ζ), the class is denoted by S∗sin, see [15] for details and further investigation, see [16].
Recently in [17,18,19,20,21,22] by choosing some particular function for ψ as above, inequalities related with coefficient bounds of some sub-classes of univalent functions have been discussed extensively.
The Fekete-Szegö inequality is one of the inequalities for the coefficients of univalent analytic functions found by Fekete and Szegö (1933), related to the Bieberbach conjecture. Another coefficient problem which is closely related with Fekete and Szegö is the Hankel determinant. Hankel determinants are very useful in the investigations of the singularities and power series with integral coefficients. For the functions f∈A of the form (1.1), in 1976, Noonan and Thomas [23] stated the ℓth Hankel determinant as
Hℓ(n)=|an an+1 ⋯ an+ℓ−1an+1 an ⋯ an+ℓ−2⋮ ⋮ ⋮an+ℓ−1 an+ℓ−2 ⋯ an|(a1=1ℓ,n∈N={1,2,⋯.}). |
In particular, we have
H2(1)=|a1 a2a2 a3|=a3−a22(a1=1,n=1,ℓ=2) |
and
H2(2)=|a2 a3a3 a4|=a2a4−a23(n=2,ℓ=2). |
We note that H2(1) is the well-known Fekete-Szegö functional (see [24,25,26]).
In recent years, many papers have been devoted to finding the upper bounds for the second-order Hankel determinant H2(2), for various sub-classes of analytic functions, it is worth mentioning that [13,19,27,28,29,30,31,32] (also see references cited therein) and the upper bounds for the third and forth-order Hankel determinants by many researchers (see [33,34,35,36,37,38]). Recently, Cho et al. [15] introduced the following function class S∗s:
S∗s:={f∈A:ζf′(ζ)f(ζ)≺1+sinζ(ζ∈D)}, | (1.2) |
which implies that the quantity ζf′(ζ)f(ζ) lies in an eight-shaped region in the right-half plane. Inspired by the aforementioned works, in this paper, we mainly investigate upper bounds for the second-order Hankel determinant for the new function class RS∗sin associated with the sine function defined in Definition 1.
Definition 1. Let 0≤ϑ≤1. Then the class RS∗sin(ϑ) consists of all analytic functions f∈A satisfying
(f′(ζ)ϑ(ζf′(ζ)f(ζ))1−ϑ≺1+sinζ=Φ(ζ). |
Note that,
RS∗sin(0)=S∗sin={f∈A:(ζf′(ζ)f(ζ))≺1+sinζ} |
and
RS∗sin(1)=Rsin={f∈A:f′(ζ)≺1+sinζ}. |
To prove our main result, we need the following: Let P represent the family of functions h(ξ) that are regular with positive part in open unit disc D and of the form
p(ζ)=1+∞∑n=1cnζn(ξ∈D). | (2.1) |
Lemma 1. [39] If p(ζ)∈P as given in (2.1), then
∣cn∣≤2foralln≥1and|c2−c212|≤2−|c1|22. |
Lemma 2. [40] If p(ζ)∈P as given in (2.1), then
|c2−vc21|≦2max{1,|2v−1|} |
and the result is sharp for the functions given by
p(ζ)=1+ζ21−ζ2,p(ζ)=1+ζ1−ζ. |
Lemma 3. [41] If p(ζ)∈P as given in (2.1), then
|c2−vc21|≤{−4v+2,ifv≤0,2,if 0≤v≤1,4v−2,if v≥1. |
When v<0 or v>1, the equality holds if and only if p(ζ) is(1+ζ)/(1−ζ) or one of its rotations. If 0<v<1, then equalityholds if and only if p(ζ) is (1+ζ2)/(1−ζ2) or one of itsrotations. If v=0, the equality holds if and only if
p(ζ)=(12+12λ)1+ζ1−ζ+(12−12λ)1−ζ1+ζ(0≤λ≤1) |
or one of itsrotations. If v=1, the equality holds if and only if p isthe reciprocal of one of the functions such that the equalityholds in the case of v=0.
Lemma 4. [40] If p(ζ)∈P, then there exist some x, ζ with |x|≤1, |ζ|≤1, such that
2c2=c21+x(4−c21), |
4c3=c31+2c1x(4−c21)−(4−c21)c1x2+2(4−c21)(1−|x|2)ζ. |
In the first theorem, we will find the coefficient bounds for the function class RS∗sin(ϑ).
Theorem 5. If the function f(ζ)∈RS∗sin(ϑ) and is of the form (1.1), then
|a2|≤11+ϑ, | (3.1) |
|a3|≤12+ϑmax{1,|ϑ2+ϑ−22(1+ϑ)2|}, | (3.2) |
and
|a3−μa22|≤12+ϑmax{1,|ϑ2+ϑ−2+2μ(2+ϑ)2(1+ϑ)2|}, | (3.3) |
where μ∈C.
Proof. Since f(ζ)∈RS∗sin(ϑ), according to subordination relationship, thus there exists a Schwarz function ω(ζ) with ω(0)=0 and |ω(ζ)|<1, satisfying
[f′(ζ)]ϑ(ζf′(ζ)f(ζ))1−ϑ=1+sin(ω(ζ)). |
Here
[f′(ζ)]ϑ(ζf′(ζ)f(ζ))1−ϑ=1+(1+ϑ)a2ζ+ζ22(2+ϑ)[2a3−(1−ϑ)a22]+(3+ϑ)ζ36[(1−ϑ)(2−ϑ)a32−6(1−ϑ)a2a3+6a4]+⋯. | (3.4) |
Now, we define a function
p(ζ)=1+ω(ζ)1−ω(ζ)=1+c1ζ+c2ζ2+⋯. |
It is known that p(ζ)∈P and
ω(ζ)=p(ζ)−11+p(ζ)=c12ζ+(c22−c214)ζ2+(c32−c1c22+c318)ζ3+⋯. | (3.5) |
On the other hand,
1+sin(ω(ζ))=1+12c1ζ+(c22−c214)ζ2+(5c3148+c3−c1c22)ζ3+(c4−c1c32+5c21c216−c224−c4132)ζ4+⋯. | (3.6) |
Comparing the coefficients of ζ, ζ2, ζ3 between the Eqs (3.4) and (3.6), we obtain
a2=c12(1+ϑ), | (3.7) |
12(2+ϑ)[2a3−(1−ϑ)a22]=c22−c214, | (3.8) |
(3+ϑ)6[(1−ϑ)(2−ϑ)a32−6(1−ϑ)a2a3+6a4]=5c3148+c32−c1c22. | (3.9) |
Applying Lemma 1, we easily get
|a2|≤11+ϑ, |
a3=12(2+ϑ)[c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2)],|a3|=12(2+ϑ)|c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2)|=12(2+ϑ)|c2−νc21|, |
where ν=3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2. Now by applying Lemma 2, we get
|a3|≤12+ϑmax{1,|ϑ2+ϑ−22(1+ϑ)2|}. |
From (3.7) and (3.10), we have
a3−μa22=12(2+ϑ)[c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2)−c212μ(2+ϑ)4(1+ϑ)2]=12(2+ϑ)[c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ+2μ(2+ϑ)4(1+ϑ)2)]=12(2+ϑ){c2−vc21}, | (3.10) |
where
v:=3ϑ2+5ϑ+2μ(2+ϑ)4(1+ϑ)2. |
Our result now follows by an application of Lemma 2 to get
|a3−μa22|≤12+ϑmax{1,|ϑ2+ϑ−2+2μ(2+ϑ)2(1+ϑ)2|}. | (3.11) |
Hence the proof is complete.
Remark 1.
By taking μ=1, we have |a3−a22|≤12+ϑmax{1,|ϑ2+3ϑ+22(1+ϑ)2|}.
If ϑ=0 and f∈S∗sin, then we get |a3−a22|≤12 and if ϑ=1 and f∈Rsin, we get |a3−a22|≤13.
Theorem 6. If the function f∈RS∗sin(ϑ) is given by (1.1), with μ∈R, then
|a3−μa22|≤{−12(2+ϑ)(ϑ2+ϑ−2(1+ϑ)2+2μ(2+ϑ)(1+ϑ)2),ifμ<σ1,12+ϑ,ifσ1≤μ≤σ2,12(2+ϑ)(ϑ2+ϑ−2(1+ϑ)2+2μ(2+ϑ)(1+ϑ)2),ifμ>σ2, |
where
σ1:=−3ϑ2−5ϑ2(2+ϑ)andσ2:=ϑ2+3ϑ+42(2+ϑ). |
Proof. From (3.11), we have
a3−μa22=12(2+ϑ)[c2−(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2+2μ(2+ϑ)4(1+ϑ)2)c21]=12(2+ϑ)(c2−νc21), |
where
ν:=3ϑ2+5ϑ+2μ(2+ϑ)4(1+ϑ)2. | (3.12) |
The assertion of Theorem 6 now follows by an application of Lemma 3.
Theorem 7. If the function f∈RS∗sin(ϑ) given by (1.1) and f−1(w)=w+∞∑n=2dnwn is the analytic continuation to D of the inverse function of f with |w|<r0, where r0≥14 the radius of the Koebe domain, then for any complex number μ, we have
|d2|≤11+ϑ, | (4.1) |
|d3|≤1(2+ϑ)max{1,|ϑ2+5ϑ+62(1+ϑ)2|} | (4.2) |
and
∣d3−μd22∣≤1(2+ϑ)max{1,|ϑ2+5ϑ+62(1+ϑ)2−μ(2+ϑ)(1+ϑ)2|}. | (4.3) |
Proof. If
f−1(w)=w+∞∑n=2dnwn | (4.4) |
is the inverse function of f, it can be seen that
f−1(f(ζ))=f(f−1(ζ))=ζ. | (4.5) |
From Eq (4.5), we have
f−1(ζ+∞∑n=2anζn)=ζ. | (4.6) |
Thus (4.5) and (4.6) yield
ζ+(a2+d2)ζ2+(a3+2a2d2+d3)ζ3+⋯=ζ, | (4.7) |
hence by equating the corresponding coefficients of ζ, it can be seen that
d2=−a2, | (4.8) |
d3=2a22−a3. | (4.9) |
From relations (3.7), (3.10), (4.8) and (4.9)
d2=−c12(1+ϑ), | (4.10) |
d3=2c214(1+ϑ)2−12(2+ϑ)[c2−3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2c21];=−12(2+ϑ)[c2−(3ϑ2+9ϑ+84(1+ϑ)2)c21]. | (4.11) |
Taking modulus on both sides and by applying Lemma 2, we get (4.1) and (4.2). For any complex number μ, consider
d3−μd22=−12(2+ϑ)[c2−(3ϑ2+9ϑ+84(1+ϑ)2−μ(2+ϑ)2(1+ϑ)2)c21]. | (4.12) |
Taking modulus on both sides and by applying Lemma 2 on the right hand side of (4.12), one can obtain the result as in (4.3). Hence this completes the proof.
A variable X is said to be Poisson distributed if it takes the values 0,1,2,3,⋯ with probabilities e−κ, κe−κ1!, κ2e−κ2!, κ3e−κ3!,... respectively, where κ is called the parameter. Thus
P(X=τ)=κre−κτ!,τ=0,1,2,3,⋯. |
In [42], Porwal introduced a power series whose coefficients are probabilities of Poisson distribution
I(κ,ζ)=ζ+∞∑n=2κn−1(n−1)!e−κζn,ζ∈D, |
where κ>0. We note that by the ratio test the radius of convergence of the above series is infinity. Due to the recent works in [42,43,44,45], let the linear operator
Iκ(ζ):A→A |
be given by
Iκf(ζ)=I(κ,ζ)∗f(ζ)=ζ+∞∑n=2κn−1(n−1)!e−κanζn=ζ+∞∑n=2Υn(κ)anζn, |
where Υn=Υn(κ)=κn−1(n−1)!e−κ and ∗ denote the convolution or the Hadamard product of two series. In particular
Υ2=κe−κandΥ3=κ22e−κ. | (5.1) |
We define the class RS∗sin(ϑ,Υ) in the following way:
RS∗sin(ϑ,Υ)={f∈A:Iκf∈RS∗sin(ϑ)}, |
where RS∗sin(ϑ) is given by Definition 1 and
Iκf(ζ)=ζ+Υ2a2ζ2+Υ3a3ζ3+Υ4a4ζ4⋯. |
Proceeding as in Theorems 5 and 6, we could obtain the coefficient estimates for functions of this class RS∗sin(ϑ,Υ) from the corresponding estimates for functions of the class RS∗sin(ϑ).
Theorem 8. Let 0≤ϑ≤1 and Iκf(ζ)=ζ+Υ2a2ζ2+Υ3a3ζ3+⋯. If f∈RS∗sin(ϑ,Υ), then for complex μ, we have
|a3−μa22|≤1(2+ϑ)Υ3max{1,|μ(2+ϑ)Υ3(1+ϑ)2Υ22+ϑ2+ϑ−22(1+ϑ)2|}. | (5.2) |
Proof. Since f∈RS∗sin(ϑ,Υ), for Iκf(ζ)=ζ+Υ2a2ζ2+Υ3a3ζ3+⋯ we have
[(Iκf(ζ))′]ϑ(ζ(Iκf(ζ))′Iκf(ζ))1−ϑ=1+sin(ω(ζ)). |
By (3.4), we can easily get
[(Iκf(ζ))′]ϑ(ζ(Iκf(ζ))′Iκf(ζ))1−ϑ=1+(1+ϑ)Υ2a2ζ+(2+ϑ)[2Υ3a3−(1−ϑ)Υ22a22]ζ22+(3+ϑ)[(1−ϑ)(2−ϑ)Υ32a32−6(1−ϑ)Υ2Υ3a2a3+6Υ4a4]ζ36+⋯. | (5.3) |
Thus by (5.3) and (3.6) we have
1+(1+ϑ)Υ2a2ζ+(2+ϑ)[2Υ3a3−(1−ϑ)Υ22a22]ζ22+(3+ϑ)[(1−ϑ)(2−ϑ)Υ32a32−6(1−ϑ)Υ2Υ3a2a3+6Υ4a4]ζ36+⋯=1+12c1ζ+(c22−c214)ζ2+(5c3148+c3−c1c22)ζ3+(c4−c1c32+5c21c216−c224−c4132)ζ4+⋯. |
Now by equating corresponding coefficients of ζ,ζ2 and proceeding as in Theorem 5,
a2=c12(1+ϑ)Υ2, | (5.4) |
a3=12(2+ϑ)Υ3[c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2)]. | (5.5) |
From (5.4) and (5.5), we get
a3−μa22=12(2+ϑ)Υ3[c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2)−c212μ(2+ϑ)Υ34(1+ϑ)2Υ22]=12(2+ϑ)[c2−c21(3ϑ2+5ϑ4(1+ϑ)2+2μ(2+ϑ)Υ34(1+ϑ)2Υ22)]. | (5.6) |
Now by an application of Lemma 2 we get the desired result.
Theorem 9. Let 0≤ϑ≤1 and Iκf(ζ)=ζ+Υ2a2ζ2+Υ3a3ζ3+⋯, with μ∈R, then
|a3−μa22|≤{−12(2+ϑ)Υ3(ϑ2+ϑ−2(1+ϑ)2+2μ(2+ϑ)Υ3(1+ϑ)2Υ22),ifμ<σ1,1(2+ϑ)Υ3,ifσ1≤μ≤σ2,12(2+ϑ)Υ3(ϑ2+ϑ−2(1+ϑ)2+2μ(2+ϑ)Υ3(1+ϑ)2Υ22),ifμ>σ2, |
where
σ1:=−(3ϑ2+5ϑ)2(2+ϑ)Υ22Υ3andσ2:=ϑ2+3ϑ+42(2+ϑ)Υ22Υ3. |
Specially, taking Υ2=κe−κ and Υ3=κ22e−κ, we easily state the above results related with Poisson distribution series.
Using (5.6), and applying Lemma 3 we get desired result.
Theorem 10. If the function f∈RS∗sin(ϑ) and is given by (1.1), then
|a2a4−a23|≤1(2+ϑ)2. |
Proof. Using the Eqs (3.7) and (3.10) in (3.9) it follows that
a4=12(3+ϑ)[c3+((1−ϑ)(3+ϑ)2(1+ϑ)(2+ϑ)−1)c1c2+(524−(1−ϑ)(2−ϑ)(3+ϑ)24(1+ϑ)3−(1−ϑ)(3+ϑ)(3ϑ2+5ϑ)8(1+ϑ)2(2+ϑ))c13]. | (6.1) |
By simple computation we get,
a4=12(3+ϑ)[c3−(3ϑ2+8ϑ+12(1+ϑ)(2+ϑ))c1c2+(13ϑ4+56ϑ3+55ϑ2−2ϑ−224(1+ϑ)3(2+ϑ))c13]=12(3+ϑ)c3−(3ϑ2+8ϑ+14(ϑ3+6ϑ2+11ϑ+6))c1c2+(13ϑ4+56ϑ3+55ϑ2−2ϑ−248(1+ϑ)3(2+ϑ)(3+ϑ))c13. |
Thus we establish that the estimate of the second Hankel determinant,
a2a4−a23=116[−{ϑ4+6ϑ3+5ϑ2+4ϑ+812(1+ϑ)3(2+ϑ)2(3+ϑ)}c14−{4(1+ϑ)(2+ϑ)2(3+ϑ)}c12c2−4(2+ϑ)2c22+4(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)c1c3]. | (6.2) |
Since p∈P it follows that p(e−iθz)∈P;(θ∈R), hence we may assume without loss of generality that c:=c1≥0. Substituting the values of c2 and c3 as in Lemma 4 in (6.2), we get
|a2a4−a23|=116|−(ϑ2+2ϑ+512(1+ϑ)3(3+ϑ))c4−{c2(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)+(4−c2)(2+ϑ)2}(4−c2)x2+2(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)c(4−c2)(1−|x|2)y|. | (6.3) |
Replacing |x| by δ and by making use of the triangle inequality and the fact that |y|≤1 in the above expression, we get
|a2a4−a23|≤116[(ϑ2+2ϑ+512(1+ϑ)3(3+ϑ))c4+2c(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)(4−c2)+{c2(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)−2c(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)+(4−c2)(2+ϑ)2}(4−c2)δ2]=F(c,δ). | (6.4) |
We shall now maximize F(c,δ), for (c,δ)∈[0,2]×[0,1]. Differentiating F(c,δ), partially with respect to δ we get
∂F∂δ=18{c2(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)−2c(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)+(4−c2)(2+ϑ)2}(4−c2)δ. | (6.5) |
For 0≤δ≤1, and for any fixed c∈[0,2], we observe that ∂F∂δ>0. Thus F(c,δ) is an increasing function of δ, and for c∈[0,2], F(c,δ) has a maximum value at δ=1. So, we have
max0≤δ≤1F(c,δ)=F(c,1)=G(c). |
On a simplification, we find that
F(c,δ)=F(c,1)=G(c)=116[(ϑ2+2ϑ+512(1+ϑ)3(3+ϑ))c4+{c2(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)+(4−c2)(2+ϑ)2}(4−c2)]. | (6.6) |
Equivalently,
F(c,δ)=F(c,1)=G(c)=116[(ϑ2+2ϑ+512(1+ϑ)3(3+ϑ))c4+c2(4−c2)(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)+(4−c2)2(2+ϑ)2]. |
Now we note that
G′(c)=116[4(ϑ2+2ϑ+512(1+ϑ)3(3+ϑ))c3+8c−4c3(1+ϑ)(3+ϑ)+(4c3−16c)(2+ϑ)2]. |
If G′(c)=0, then the root is c=0. Also, we have
G″ |
is negative for c = 0, which means that the function \mathcal{G}(c) can take the maximum value at c = 0, also which is
|a_2 a_4-a_3^2|\leq \frac{1}{(2+\vartheta)^2}. |
Remark 2.
When \vartheta = 1 , then f\in \mathcal{R}_{sin} and we get
|a_2 a_4-a_3^2|\leq \frac{1}{9}. |
Also by fixing \vartheta = 0 , then f\in \mathcal{S}^*_{sin} and we get
|a_2 a_4-a_3^2|\leq \frac{1}{4}. |
In the present paper, we mainly get upper bounds of the second-order Hankel determinant of new class of starlike functions connected with the sine function. Also, we can discuss the related research of the coefficient problem and Fekete-Szegö inequality. Further for this function class we state the application of Poisson distribution related to Fekete-Szegö inequality. By fixing \vartheta = 0 and \vartheta = 1 we can state the above results for f\in \mathcal{R}_{sin} and f\in \mathcal{S}^*_{sin}. For motivating further researches on the subject-matter of this, we have chosen to draw the attention of the interested readers toward a considerably large number of related recent publications (see, for example, [46,47,48,49,50,51]) and developments in the area of mathematical analysis, which are not as closely related to the subject-matter of this presentation as many of the other publications cited here. In conclusion, with an opinion mostly to encouraging and inspiring further researches on applications of the basic (or q- ) analysis and the basic (or q- ) calculus in geometric function theory of complex analysis along the lines (see[52]), considering our present investigation and based on recently-published works on the Fekete-Szegö and Hankel determinant problem (see, for details, [8,23,47,48,49,50,51,52,53], one can extend or generalize our results for f\in \mathcal{RS}_{sin}(\vartheta) is left as an exercise to interested readers. In addition, we choose to reiterate an important observation, which was presented in the recently-published review-cum-expository review article by Srivastava ([52], p. 340, [54] pp. 1511–1512), who pointed out the fact that the results for the above-mentioned or new q- analogues can easily (and possibly trivially) be translated into the corresponding results for the so-called (p; q)- analogues (with 0 < |q| < p \leq 1 ) by applying some obvious parametric and argument variations with the additional parameter p being redundant.
The first-named author (Huo Tang) was partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China under Grant 11561001, the Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region under Grant NJYT-18-A14, the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of the People's Republic of China under Grant 2018MS01026, and the Higher School Foundation of Inner Mongolia of the People's Republic of China under Grant NJZY20200, the Program for Key Laboratory Construction of Chifeng University (No.CFXYZD202004), the Research and Innovation Team of Complex Analysis and Nonlinear Dynamic Systems of Chifeng University (No.cfxykycxtd202005) and the Youth Science Foundation of Chifeng University (No.cfxyqn202133).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] | S. S. Miller, P. T. Mocanu, Differential subordinations: Theory and applications, Series on Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 225, CRC Press, 2000. |
[2] |
L. De Branges, A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture, Acta Math., 154 (1985), 137–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02392821 doi: 10.1007/BF02392821
![]() |
[3] | W. Ma, D. Minda, A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions, In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Complex Analysis at the Nankai Institute of Mathematics, International Press, 1992,157–169. |
[4] | W. Janowski, Extremal problems for a family of functions with positive real part and for some related families, Annales Polonici Mathematici, Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences, 23 (1970), 159–177. |
[5] | M. S. Robertson, Certain classes of starlike functions, Mich. Math. J., 32 (1985), 135–140. |
[6] | F. Ronning, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 118 (1993), 189–196. |
[7] |
J. Sokół, Radius problem in the class \mathcal{SL} ^{\ast }, Appl. Math. Comput., 214 (2009), 569–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.04.031 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.04.031
![]() |
[8] |
M. Mohsin, S. N. Malik, Upper bound of third hankel determinant for class of analytic functions related with lemniscate of bernoulli, J. Inequal. Appl., 2013 (2013), 412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-412 doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-412
![]() |
[9] | R. K. Raina, J. Sokół, On coefficient estimates for a certain class of starlike functions, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 44 (2015), 1427–1433. |
[10] |
K. Sharma, N. K. Jain, V. Ravichandran, Starlike functions associated with a cardioid, Afr. Mat., 27 (2016), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-015-0387-7 doi: 10.1007/s13370-015-0387-7
![]() |
[11] |
L. Shi, I. Ali, M. Arif, N. E. Cho, S. Hussain, H. Khan, A study of third hankel determinant problem for certain subfamilies of analytic functions involving cardioid domain, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050418 doi: 10.3390/math7050418
![]() |
[12] |
R. Mendiratta, S. Nagpal, V. Ravichandran, On a subclass of strongly starlike functions associated with exponential function, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 38 (2015), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-014-0026-8 doi: 10.1007/s40840-014-0026-8
![]() |
[13] |
L. Shi, H. M. Srivastava, M. Arif, S. Hussain, H. Khan, An investigation of the third Hankel determinant problem for certain subfamilies of univalent functions involving the exponential function, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050598 doi: 10.3390/sym11050598
![]() |
[14] |
A. Alotaibi, M. Arif, M. A. Alghamdi, S. Hussain, Starlikeness associated with cosine hyperbolic function, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071118 doi: 10.3390/math8071118
![]() |
[15] |
N. E. Cho, V. Kumar, S. S. Kumar, V. Ravichandran, Radius problems for starlike functions associated with the sine function, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc., 45 (2019), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-018-0127-5 doi: 10.1007/s41980-018-0127-5
![]() |
[16] |
M. Arif, M. Raza, H. Tang, S. Hussain, H. Khan, Hankel determinant of order three for familiar subsets of analytic functions related with sine function, Open Math., 17 (2019), 1615–1630. https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2019-0132 doi: 10.1515/math-2019-0132
![]() |
[17] |
K. Bano, M. Raza, Starlike functions associated with cosine functions, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc., 47 (2021), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-020-00456-9 doi: 10.1007/s41980-020-00456-9
![]() |
[18] |
N. E. Cho, S. Kumar, V. Kumar, V. Ravichandran, H. M. Srivasatava, Starlike functions related to the Bell numbers, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020219 doi: 10.3390/sym11020219
![]() |
[19] |
L. Shi, I. Ali, M. Arif, N. E. Cho, S. Hussain, H. Khan, A study of third Hankel determinant problem for certain subfamilies of analytic functions involving cardioid domain, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050418 doi: 10.3390/math7050418
![]() |
[20] |
J. Dzoik, R. K. Raina, J. Sokół, On a class of starlike functions related to a shell-like curve connected with Fibonacci numbers, Math. Comput. Model., 57 (2013), 1203–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.10.023 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2012.10.023
![]() |
[21] |
S. Kanas, D. Răducanu, Some class of analytic functions related to conic domains, Math. Slovaca, 64 (2014), 1183–1196. https://doi.org/10.2478/s12175-014-0268-9 doi: 10.2478/s12175-014-0268-9
![]() |
[22] | S. Kumar, V. Ravichandran, A subclass starlike functions associated with a rational function, South East Asian Bull. Math., 40 (2016), 199–212. |
[23] |
J. W. Noonan, D. K. Thomas, On the second Hankel determinant of areally mean p-valent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 223 (1976), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1976-0422607-9 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1976-0422607-9
![]() |
[24] |
M. Fekete, G. Szegö, Eine benberkung uber ungerada schlichte funktionen, J. London Math. Soc., s1-8 (1933), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-8.2.85 doi: 10.1112/jlms/s1-8.2.85
![]() |
[25] |
W. Koepf, On the Fekete-Szegö problem for close-to-convex functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 101 (1987), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2046556 doi: 10.2307/2046556
![]() |
[26] |
W. Koepf, On the Fekete-Szegö problem for close-to-convex functions Ⅱ, Arch. Math., 49 (1987), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194100 doi: 10.1007/BF01194100
![]() |
[27] |
D. Bansal, Upper bound of second Hankel determinant for a new class of analytic functions, Appl. Math. Lett., 26 (2013), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2012.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2012.04.002
![]() |
[28] | A. Janteng, S. A. Halim, M. Darus, Coefficient inequality for a function whose derivative has a positive real part, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 7(2006), 50. |
[29] | A. Janteng, S. A. Halim, M. Darus, Hankel determinant for starlike and convex functions, Int. J. Math. Anal., 1 (2007), 619–625. |
[30] |
S. K. Lee, V. Ravichandran, S. Subramaniam, Bounds for the second Hankel determinant of certain univalent functions, J. Inequal. Appl., 2013 (2013), 281. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-281 doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-281
![]() |
[31] |
G. Murugusundaramoorthy, T. Bulboac\breve{a}, Hankel determinants for new subclasses of analytic functions related to a Shell shaped region, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061041 doi: 10.3390/math8061041
![]() |
[32] |
S. K. Lee, K. Kanika, V. Ravichandran, Radius of starlikeness for classes of analytic functions, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 43 (2020), 4469–4493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-020-01028-0 doi: 10.1007/s40840-020-01028-0
![]() |
[33] |
M. G. Khan, B. Ahmad, J. Sokol, Z. Muhammad, W. K. Mashwani, R. Chinram, et al., Coefficient problems in a class of functions with bounded turning associated with sine function, Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math., 14 (2021), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v14i1.3902 doi: 10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v14i1.3902
![]() |
[34] | H. Y. Zhang, H. Tang, L. N. Ma, Upper bound of third Hankel determinant for a class of analytic functions, Pure Appl. Math., 33 (2017), 211–220. |
[35] |
H. Y. Zhang, H. Tang, A study of fourth-order Hankel determinants for starlike functions connected with the sine function, J. Funct. Spaces, 2021 (2021), 9991460. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9991460 doi: 10.1155/2021/9991460
![]() |
[36] |
H. Y. Zhang, R. Srivastava, H. Tang, Third-order Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for starlike functions connected with the sine function, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050404 doi: 10.3390/math7050404
![]() |
[37] |
Z. Paweł, O. Milutin, T. Nikola, Third Hankel determinant for univalent starlike functions, RACSAM, 115 (2021), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-020-00977-2 doi: 10.1007/s13398-020-00977-2
![]() |
[38] |
H. Tang, S. Khan, S. Hussain, N. Khan, Hankel and Toeplitz determinant for a subclass of multivalent q-starlike functions of order \alpha, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 5421–5439. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021320 doi: 10.3934/math.2021320
![]() |
[39] | U. Grenander, G. Szegö, Toeplitz forms and their applications, California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1958. |
[40] |
R. J. Libera, E. J. Zlotkiewicz, Coefficient bounds for the inverse of a function with derivative in P, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 87 (1983), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1983-0681830-8 doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1983-0681830-8
![]() |
[41] | W. Ma, D. Minda, A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions, In: Proceedings of the Conference on Complex Analysis, International Press, 1992. |
[42] |
S. Porwal, An application of a Poisson distribution series on certain analytic functions, J. Complex Anal., 2014 (2014), 984135. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/984135 doi: 10.1155/2014/984135
![]() |
[43] |
G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Subclasses of starlike and convex functions involving Poisson distribution series, Afr. Mat., 28 (2017), 1357–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-017-0520-x doi: 10.1007/s13370-017-0520-x
![]() |
[44] | G. Murugusundaramoorthy, K. Vijaya, S. Porwal, Some inclusion results of certain subclass of analytic functions associated with Poisson distribution series, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 45 (2016), 1101–1107. |
[45] |
S. Porwal, M. Kumar, A unified study on starlike and convex functions associated with Poisson distribution series, Afr. Mat., 27 (2016), 1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-016-0398-z doi: 10.1007/s13370-016-0398-z
![]() |
[46] | H. M. Srivastava, G. Kaur, G. Singh, Estimates of the fourth Hankel determinant for a class of analytic functions with bounded turnings involving cardioid domains, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 22 (2021), 511–526. |
[47] |
H. M. Srivastava, B. Khan, N. Khan, M. Tahir, S. Ahmad, N. Khan, Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant for a subclass of q- starlike functions associated with the q- exponential function, Bull. Sci. Math., 167 (2021), 102942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulsci.2020.102942 doi: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2020.102942
![]() |
[48] |
Q. X. Hu, H. M. Srivastava, B. Ahmad, N. Khan, M. G. Khan, W. K. Mashwani, et al., A subclass of multivalent Janowski type q- starlike functions and its consequences, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071275 doi: 10.3390/sym13071275
![]() |
[49] |
H. M. Srivastava, A. K. Wanas, R. Srivastava, Applications of the q- Srivastava-Attiya operator involving a certain family of bi-univalent functions associated with the Horadam polynomials, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071230 doi: 10.3390/sym13071230
![]() |
[50] |
H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Darus, S. Khan, Q. Z. Ahmad, S. Hussain, Fekete-Szegö type problems and their applications for a subclass of q- starlike functions with respect to symmetrical points, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050842 doi: 10.3390/math8050842
![]() |
[51] |
H. M. Srivastava, C. Kizilateş, A parametric kind of the Fubini-type polynomials, RACSAM, 113 (2019), 3253–3267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-019-00687-4 doi: 10.1007/s13398-019-00687-4
![]() |
[52] |
H. M. Srivastava, Operators of basic (or q-) calculus and fractional q- calculus and their applications in geometric function theory of complex analysis, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 44 (2020), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-019-00815-0 doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00815-0
![]() |
[53] |
B. Khan, Z. G. Liu, H. M. Srivastava, N. Khan, M. Daru, M. Tahir, A study of some families of multivalent q- starlike functions involving higher-order q- derivatives, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1470. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091470 doi: 10.3390/math8091470
![]() |
[54] | H. M. Srivastava, Some parametric and argument variations of the operators of fractional calculus and related special functions and integral transformations, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 22 (2021), 1501–1520. |
1. | Mohsan Raza, Amina Riaz, Qin Xin, Sarfraz Nawaz Malik, Hankel Determinants and Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Functions Related to Symmetric Booth Lemniscate, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1366, 10.3390/sym14071366 | |
2. | Halit Orhan, Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlă, Fekete-Szegö Inequalities for Some Certain Subclass of Analytic Functions Defined with Ruscheweyh Derivative Operator, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 560, 10.3390/axioms11100560 | |
3. | Alina Alb Lupaş, Adriana Cătaş, Properties of a Subclass of Analytic Functions Defined by Using an Atangana–Baleanu Fractional Integral Operator, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 649, 10.3390/sym14040649 | |
4. | Zongtao Li, Dong Guo, Jinrong Liang, Hankel Determinant for a Subclass of Starlike Functions with Respect to Symmetric Points Subordinate to the Exponential Function, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1604, 10.3390/sym15081604 | |
5. | Dong Guo, Huo Tang, Jun Zhang, Zongtao Li, Qingbing Xu, En Ao, Improved Upper Bounds of the Third-Order Hankel Determinant for Ozaki Close-to-Convex Functions, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1176, 10.3390/sym15061176 | |
6. | Wenzheng Hu, Jian Deng, Hankel determinants, Fekete-Szegö inequality, and estimates of initial coefficients for certain subclasses of analytic functions, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 6445, 10.3934/math.2024314 | |
7. | Dong Liu, Adeel Ahmad, Huma Ikhlas, Saqib Hussain, Saima Noor, Huo Tang, On Sharp Coefficients and Hankel Determinants for a Novel Class of Analytic Functions, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 191, 10.3390/axioms14030191 |