Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Bernstein collocation method for neutral type functional differential equation

  • Received: 01 February 2021 Accepted: 09 March 2021 Published: 22 March 2021
  • Functional differential equations of neutral type are a class of differential equations in which the derivative of the unknown functions depends on the history of the function and its derivative as well. Due to this nature the explicit solutions of these equations are not easy to compute and sometime even not possible. Therefore, one must use some numerical technique to find an approximate solution to these equations. In this paper, we used a spectral collocation method which is based on Bernstein polynomials to find the approximate solution. The disadvantage of using Bernstein polynomials is that they are not orthogonal and therefore one cannot use the properties of orthogonal polynomials for the efficient evaluation of differential equations. In order to avoid this issue and to fully use the properties of orthogonal polynomials, a change of basis transformation from Bernstein to Legendre polynomials is used. An error analysis in infinity norm is provided, followed by several numerical examples to justify the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed scheme.

    Citation: Ishtiaq Ali. Bernstein collocation method for neutral type functional differential equation[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2764-2774. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021140

    Related Papers:

    [1] Anastacia Dlamini, Emile F. Doungmo Goufo, Melusi Khumalo . On the Caputo-Fabrizio fractal fractional representation for the Lorenz chaotic system. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12395-12421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021717
    [2] A. E. Matouk . Chaos and hidden chaos in a 4D dynamical system using the fractal-fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6233-6257. doi: 10.3934/math.2025284
    [3] Ihtisham Ul Haq, Shabir Ahmad, Sayed Saifullah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Ali Akgül . Analysis of fractal fractional Lorenz type and financial chaotic systems with exponential decay kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18809-18823. doi: 10.3934/math.20221035
    [4] Xiaolei Dong, Yuming Qin . Finite fractal dimension of pullback attractors for a nonclassical diffusion equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8064-8079. doi: 10.3934/math.2022449
    [5] Muhammad Farman, Aqeel Ahmad, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Umer Saleem, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Velusamy Vijayakumar . Dynamical behavior of tumor-immune system with fractal-fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8751-8773. doi: 10.3934/math.2022489
    [6] Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad, Manar A. Alqudah . Neural networking study of worms in a wireless sensor model in the sense of fractal fractional. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26406-26424. doi: 10.3934/math.20231348
    [7] Muhammad Sarwar, Aiman Mukheimer, Syed Khayyam Shah, Arshad Khan . Existence of solutions of fractal fractional partial differential equations through different contractions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12399-12411. doi: 10.3934/math.2024606
    [8] Narcisse Batangouna . A robust family of exponential attractors for a time semi-discretization of the Ginzburg-Landau equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1399-1415. doi: 10.3934/math.2022082
    [9] Amir Ali, Abid Ullah Khan, Obaid Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah . Semi-analytical and numerical computation of fractal-fractional sine-Gordon equation with non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14975-14990. doi: 10.3934/math.2022820
    [10] Daniel Clemente-López, Esteban Tlelo-Cuautle, Luis-Gerardo de la Fraga, José de Jesús Rangel-Magdaleno, Jesus Manuel Munoz-Pacheco . Poincaré maps for detecting chaos in fractional-order systems with hidden attractors for its Kaplan-Yorke dimension optimization. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5871-5894. doi: 10.3934/math.2022326
  • Functional differential equations of neutral type are a class of differential equations in which the derivative of the unknown functions depends on the history of the function and its derivative as well. Due to this nature the explicit solutions of these equations are not easy to compute and sometime even not possible. Therefore, one must use some numerical technique to find an approximate solution to these equations. In this paper, we used a spectral collocation method which is based on Bernstein polynomials to find the approximate solution. The disadvantage of using Bernstein polynomials is that they are not orthogonal and therefore one cannot use the properties of orthogonal polynomials for the efficient evaluation of differential equations. In order to avoid this issue and to fully use the properties of orthogonal polynomials, a change of basis transformation from Bernstein to Legendre polynomials is used. An error analysis in infinity norm is provided, followed by several numerical examples to justify the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed scheme.



    Very recently the concept of fractal differentiation and fractional differentiation have been combined to produce new differentiation operators [1,2,3,4]. The new operators were constructed using three different kernels namely, power law, exponential decay and the generalised Mittag-Leffler function. The new operators have two parameters, the first is considered as fractional order and the second as fractal dimension.

    The operators were tested to model some real world problems [9,10,11] surprisingly, the new differential and integral operators were found to be powerful mathematical tools able to capture even hidden complexities of nature [5,6,16]. Very detailed attractors could be captured when modelling with such differential and integral operators [8]. One of the great advantage of these new operators is that they can at the same time capture processes following power law, exponential decay law, fading memory, crossover and self-similar processes. This unique and outstanding capacity makes these new operators suitable tools to model many complex real world problems. Additionally when the fractal dimension is one, we recover all the existing fractional differential and integral operators, if the fractional order is one, we recover the so-call fractal differential and integral operators. Finally if the fractal and fractional orders tend to 1 we recover classical differential and integral operators. Therefore, it is believed that these new operators are the future for modeling.

    On the other hand, modeling real-life problems have been always of interest of researchers. Mathematicians especially have introduced and developed a variety of well-known and sophisticated tools to model problems arising from other sciences such as biology, finance, epidemiology, and geology. The list is not exhaustive. Moreover, they used these tools to investigate solutions to many important and crucial problems that humans are challenging in their daily life. Among these tools are differential equations and fractal differential equations for instance. Nevertheless, the continuous improvement leads constantly their researches in order to obtain better solutions that aim at reaching the reality. Fractal-fractional differential operators can be seen as an enhanced instrument for modeling important practical problems. One of the main motivations for this article was to introduce methods for solving fractal-fractional problems that have not been considered before. By using the proposed methods, approximate solutions to these problems can be determined more easily and with higher accuracy. In addition, the methods can be applied to real-world problems. In this work, we present applications of such numerical schemes in solving chaotic models that involve the new class of differential operators. We consider some well-known chaotic models with fractal-fractional differential operators, so that we can compare our results with those in the literature. The article is organized as follows: In section 2, we give a brief overview of some basic definitions of fractal-fractional differential calculus. Two efficient and effective numerical methods for determining approximate solutions to fractal-fractional problems are presented in section 3. The first is for the Caputo fractal derivative second is for Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo fractal-fractional derivative and the thierd is for the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo fractal-fractional derivative. The kernels used in these two definitions are singular and non-singular, respectively. Several numerical simulations for chaotic systems are described in section 4 we find the numerical analysis for Duffing attractor. Numerical analysis for EL-Niˆno Southern Oscillation is find in section 5. In section 6–9, we analysis numerical analysis for Ikeda system, numerical analysis for Dadras attractor and numerical analysis for Aizawa attractor, numerical analysis for Thomas attractor and numerical analysis for 4 Wings attractor. In section 9 we introduce a new Atangana Sonal attractor and find the solution of this. The results obtained are accurate, interesting, and meaningful. Finally, we present our overall conclusions.

    Definition 2.1. [3] The fractal fractional derivative of f(t) with order ϖκ in the Riemann-Liouville sense is defined as follows:

    FFRLDκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=1Γ(mκ)ddtϖt0(ts)mκ1f(s)ds, (2.1)

    where m1<κ,ϖmN and df(s)dsϖ=limtsf(t)f(s)tϖsϖ.

    Definition 2.2. [3] The Caputo-Fabrizio fractal-fractional derivative of f(t) with order ϖκ in the Riemann-Liouville sense is defined as follows:

    FFCFRDκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=M(κ)(1κ)ddtϖt0exp(κ1κ(ts))f(s)ds, (2.2)

    where κ>0,ϖmN and M(0)=M(1)=1.

    Definition 2.3. [2] The Atangan-Baleanu fractal-fractional derivative of f(t) with order ϖκ in the Riemann-Liouville sense is defined as follows:

    FFABRDκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=AB(κ)(1κ)ddtϖt0Eκ(κ1κ(ts)κ)f(s)ds, (2.3)

    where 0<κ,ϖ1 and AB(κ)=1κ+κΓ(κ).

    Definition 2.4. [3] The fractal-fractional derivative of with order ϖκ in the Liouville-Caputo sense is defined as follows:

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=1Γ(mκ)ddtϖt0(ts)mκ1(ddsτf(s))ds, (2.4)

    where m1<κ,ϖmN and df(s)dsϖ=limtsf(t)f(s)tϖsϖ.

    Definition 2.5. [2] The Caputo-Fabrizio fractal-fractional derivative of f(t) with order ϖκ in the Liouville-Caputo sense is defined as follows:

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=M(κ)(1κ)t0exp(κ1κ(ts))(ddsϖf(s))ds, (2.5)

    where κ>0,ϖmN and M(0)=M(1)=1.

    Definition 2.6. [4] The Atangana-Baleanu fractal-fractional derivative of f(t) with order ϖκ in the Liouville-Caputo sense is defined as follows:

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=AB(κ)(1κ)t0Eκ(κ1κ(ts)κ)(ddsϖf(s))ds, (2.6)

    where 0<κ,ϖ1 and AB(κ)=1κ+κΓ(κ).

    Definition 2.7. [2] The Liouville-Caputo fractal-fractional integral of f(t) with order κ is defined as follows:

    FFCIκ0,t{f(t)}=ϖΓ(κ)t0(ts)κ1sϖ1f(s)ds. (2.7)

    Definition 2.8. [3] The Caputo-Fabrizio fractal-fractional integral of f(t) with order κ is defined as follows:

    FFCFIκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=κϖM(κ)t0sκ1f(s)ds+ϖ(1κ)tϖ1M(κ)f(t). (2.8)

    Definition 2.9. [3] The Atangana-Baleanu fractal-fractional integral of f(t) with order κ is defined as follows:

    FFABIκ,ϖ0,t{f(t)}=κϖAB(κ)t0sκ1(ts)κ1f(s)ds+ϖ(1κ)tϖ1AB(κ)f(t). (2.9)

    In this section, we have given three numerical schemes for Caputo-fractal-fractional, Caputo-Fabrizio-fractal fractional and the Atangana-Baleanu fractal-fractional derivative operators [7].

    Consider the following differential equations in the fractal-fractional Liouville-Caputo sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=f(t,u(t),v(t)). (3.1)

    Equation (3.1) can be converted to the Volterra case and the numerical scheme of this system using a Caputo-fractal-fractional approach at tn+1 is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖΓ(κ)tn+10sϖ1(tn+1s)κ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.2)

    We can approximate the above integral to

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖΓ(κ)nj=0tj+1tjsϖ1(tn+1s)κ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.3)

    With in the finite interval [tj,tj+1], we approximate the function sϖ1,f(t,u,v) using the Lagrangian piecewise interpolation such that

    E(s)=stj1tjtj1tϖ1jf(tj,uj,vj)stjtjtj1tϖ1j1f(tj1,uj1,vj1). (3.4)

    So we obtain

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖΓ(κ)nj=0tj+1tjsϖ1(tn+1s)κ1E(s)ds. (3.5)

    Solving the integral of the right hand side, we obtain the following numerical scheme

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1jf(tj,uj,vj)((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1f(tj1,uj1,vj1)((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (3.6)

    Consider the following differential equations in the Caputo-Fabrizio-fractal-fractional derivative

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=f(t,u(t),v(t)). (3.7)

    Applying the Caputo-Fabrizio integral, we obtain

    u(t)=u0+ϖtϖ1(1κ)M(κ)f(t,u,v)+κϖM(κ)t0sϖ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.8)

    Here we present the detailed derivation of the numerical scheme. Thus, at tn+1 we have

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)f(tn,un,vn)+κϖM(κ)tn+10sϖ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.9)

    Taking the difference between the consecutive terms, we obtain

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)f(tn,un,vn)ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)f(tn1,un1,vn1)+κϖM(κ)tn+1tnsϖ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.10)

    Now using the Lagrange polynomial piece-wise interpolation and integrating, we obtain

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)f(tn,un,vn)ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)f(tn1,un1,vn1)+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1nf(tn,un,vn)Δt2tϖ1n1f(tn1,un1,vn1)]. (3.11)

    Consider the following differential equations in the Atangana-Baleanu fractal-fractional derivative in the Liouville-Caputo sense

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=f(t,u(t),v(t)). (3.12)

    Applying the Atangana-Baleanu integral, we have

    u(t)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)f(t,u,v)+κϖAB(κ)Γ(κ)t0sϖ1(ts)κ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.13)

    At tn+1, we have the following

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+κϖAB(κ)Γ(κ)tn+10sϖ1(tn+1s)κ1f(s,u,v)ds+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)f(tn,un,vn), (3.14)

    the above system can be expressed as

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)f(tn,un,vn)+κϖAB(κ)Γ(κ)nj=0tj+1tjsϖ1(tn+1s)κ1f(s,u,v)ds. (3.15)

    Approximating sϖ1f(s,u,v) in [tj,tj+1], we have the following numerical scheme

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)f(tn,un,vn)+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1jf(tj,uj,vj)[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1f(tj1,uj1,vj1)((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (3.16)

    The Duffing Pendulum is a kind of a forced oscillator with damping, the mathematical model represented in state variable as when we apply Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative is given by

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u1(t)}=Au2(t), (4.1)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u2(t)}=u1(t)u31(t)au2(t)+bcos(ωt), (4.2)

    where initial conditions are u1(0)=0.01, u2(0)=0.5 and the constant are κ=0.25, b=0.3, ω=1, h=0.01, and t=100. The numerical scheme is given by

    u1(tn+1)=u01+Aϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1ju2(t)j((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1Au2(t)j1((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))],u2(tn+1)=u01+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(u1(t)ju31(t)jau2(tjτ)+bcosωtj)×((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))(tϖ1j1u1(t)j1u31(t)j1au2(tj1τ)+bcosωtj1)((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (4.3)

    Numerical simulation of the Caputo-power law case are depicted in Figures 13 for different values of fractional order κ and fractal dimension ϖ.

    Figure 1.  Numerical simulation for κ=ϖ=1 and A = 1 with classical differentiation for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 2.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.9,ϖ=0.4 and A = 1 with classical differentiation for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 3.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.9,ϖ=1 and A = 1 with classical differentiation for Duffing attractor.

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u1(t)}=Au2(t), (4.4)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u2(t)}=u1(t)u31(t)au2(t)+bcosωt, (4.5)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u1(tn+1)=un1+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)u2(t)nϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)u2(t)n1+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1nu2(t)nΔt2tϖ1n1u2(t)n1],u2(tn+1)=un1+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(u1(t)nu31(t)nau2(tnτ)+bcosωtn)ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(u1(t)n1u31(t)n1au2(tn1τ)+bcosωtn1)+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(u1(t)nu31(t)nau2(tnτ)+bcosωtn)Δt2tϖ1n1(u1(t)n1u31(t)n1au2(tn1τ)+bcosωtn1)]. (4.6)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u1(t)}=Au2(t), (4.7)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u2(t)}=u1(t)u31(t)au2(t)+bcosωt, (4.8)

    The differential and integral operators used in the case of Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio have kernel with no crossover in waiting time distribution. Therefore to include the effect of crossover in waiting time distribution, we make use of the differential operator whose kernel has crossover behavior, thus the Atangana-Baleanu operators are used here. Also the numerical simulation is presented in Figures 48.

    Figure 4.  Numerical solution for κ=0.99,ϖ=0.99 and A = 70 with the power law kernel for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 5.  Numerical solution for κ=0.8,ϖ=0.99 and A = 70 with the power law kernel for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 6.  Numerical solution for κ=0.8,ϖ=0.99 and A = 40 with the power law kernel for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 7.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.99,ϖ=1 and A = 40 with the generalized Mittag-Leffler function for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 8.  Numerical simulation for κ=1,ϖ=0.99 and A = 40 with the generalized Mittag-Leffler function for Duffing attractor.

    Additionally adapting the previously used numerical scheme, we obtain the following:

    u1(tn+1)=u1(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)u2(t)n+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1ju2(t)j[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1u2(t)j1((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))],u2(tn+1)=u2(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(u1(t)nu31(t)nau2(tnτ)+bcosωtn)+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(u1(t)ju31(t)jau2(tjτ)+bcosωtj)[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(u1(t)j1u31(t)j1au2(tj1τ)+bcosωtj1)((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (4.9)

    The EL-Niˆno Southern Oscillation known as ENSO is an unconventional repetitive variation in sea area temperatures over the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean and winds that affect the climate change of much of the tropics and sub-tropics The natural behavior of this dynamical system can be classified in two phases. The first phase is the warming phase of the sea temperature, this phase was named EL-Niˆno. The second phase known as EL-Niˆno is the cooling phase. The results of some data collection showed that, the Southern Oscillation is following atmospheric component, more importantly the phenomena is coupled with the sea temperature change. On the other hand, the EL-Niˆno is followed by high air surface pressure in the side of tropical western Pacific and La Nina is accompanied with low pressure. In this section, we consider the mathematical model able to replicate such natural occurrence, nevertheless, here we consider the model with different non-local differential and integral operators.

    The behavior of this phenomena is described by the following equation as in Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=tanh(κu(tτ))+bcos(2πt), (5.1)

    where κ=100 and b=1.

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(tanh(κu(tjτ))+bcos(2πtj))×((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(tanh(κu(tj1τ))+bcos(2πtj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (5.2)

    The above numerical solution is depicted in Figures 913, for different value of fractional order and fractal dimension. In this exercise, we chose to simulate the case with Caputo derivative. The numerical simulation depend on the fractional order and the fractal dimension. More precisely for the values 0.8 and 0.5, we observed a very strange behavior where the oscillation are vanishing.

    Figure 9.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.99,ϖ=0.9 and A = 70 with the generalized Mittag-Leffler function for Duffing attractor.
    Figure 10.  Numerical simulation at κ = 0.9, ϖ = 0.9 for EL-Niˆno Southern Oscillation.
    Figure 11.  Numerical simulation at κ = 0.8, ϖ = 0.5 for EL-Niˆno Southern Oscillation.
    Figure 12.  Numerical simulation at κ = 0.6, ϖ = 0.9 for EL-Niˆno Southern Oscillation.
    Figure 13.  Numerical simulation at κ = 0.9, ϖ = 1 for EL-Niˆno Southern Oscillation.

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=tanh(κu(tτ))+bcos(2πt). (5.3)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(tanh(κu(tnτ))+bcos(2πtn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(tanh(κu(tn1τ))+bcos(2πtn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(tanh(κu(tnτ))+bcos(2πtn))Δt2tϖ1n1tanh(κu(tn1τ))+bcos(2πtn1)]. (5.4)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=tanh(κu(tτ))+bcos(2πt). (5.5)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(tanh(κu(tnτ))+bcos(2πtn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(tanh(κu(tjτ))+bcos(2πtj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(tanh(κu(tj1τ))+bcos(2πtj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (5.6)

    Consider the ikeda delay system in Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=bu(t)+asin(cx(tτ)). (6.1)

    In [12], the author proposed a second delay parameter. The below given equation is resultant solution

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=bu(tτ1)+asin(cu(tτ2)), (6.2)

    here we consider a = 24, b = 3 and c = 1 and the delays τ1=0.01 and τ2=0.1.

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(bu(tjτ1)+asin(cu(tjτ2)))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(bu(tj1τ1)+asin(cu(tj1τ2)))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (6.3)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u1(t)}=bu(tτ1)+asin(cu(tτ2)). (6.4)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(bu(tnτ1)+asin(cu(tnτ2)))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(bu(tn1τ1)+asin(cu(tn1τ2)))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(bu(tnτ1)+asin(cu(tnτ2)))Δt2tϖ1n1(bu(tn1τ1)+asin(cu(tn1τ2)))]. (6.5)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=bu(tτ1)+asin(cu(tτ2)). (6.6)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(bu(tnτ1)+asin(cu(tnτ2)))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(bu(tjτ1)+asin(cu(tjτ2)))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(bu(tj1τ1)+asin(cu(tj1τ2)))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (6.7)

    Consider the Dadras system described [13] by the following equation as in Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=w(t)Au(t)+Bv(t)w(t),FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Cv(t)u(t)w(t)+w(t),FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Du(t)v(t)Ew(t), (7.1)

    where A = 3, B = 2.7, C = 1.7, D = 2 and E = 9.

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(w(tj)Au(tj)+Bv(tj)w(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(w(tj1)Au(tj1)+Bv(tj1)w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))],v(tn+1)=v0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Cv(tj)u(tj)w(tj)+w(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Cv(tj1)u(tj1)w(tj1)+w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))],w(tn+1)=w0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Du(tj)v(tj)Ew(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Du(tj1)v(tj1)Ew(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (7.2)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=w(t)Au(t)+Bv(t)w(t),FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Cv(t)u(t)w(t)+w(t),FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Du(t)v(t)Ew(t). (7.3)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(w(tn)Au(tn)+Bv(tn)w(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(w(tn1)Au(tn1)+Bv(tn1)w(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(w(tn)Au(tn)+Bv(tn)w(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(w(tn1)Au(tn1)+Bv(tn1)w(tn1))], (7.4)
    v(tn+1)=vn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Cv(tn)u(tn)w(tn)+w(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Cv(tn1)u(tn1)w(tn1)+w(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Cv(tn)u(tn)w(tn)+w(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Cv(tn1)u(tn1)w(tn1)+w(tn1))], (7.5)
    w(tn+1)=wn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn)v(tn)Ew(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn1)v(tn1)Ew(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Du(tn)v(tn)Ew(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Du(tn1)v(tn1)Ew(tn1))]. (7.6)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=w(t)Au(t)+Bv(t)w(t),FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Cv(t)u(t)w(t)+w(t),FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Du(t)v(t)Ew(t). (7.7)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(w(tn)Au(tn)+Bv(tn)w(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(w(tj)Au(tj)+Bv(tj)w(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(w(tj1)Au(tj1)+Bv(tj1)w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (7.8)
    v(tn+1)=v(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Cv(tn)u(tn)w(tn)+w(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Cv(tj)u(tj)w(tj)+w(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Cv(tj1)u(tj1)w(tj1)+w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (7.9)
    w(tn+1)=w(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Du(tn)v(tn)Ew(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Du(tj)v(tj)Ew(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Du(tj1)v(tj1)Ew(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (7.10)

    Numerical simulation are depicted in Figures 1417 for the value of κ=0.8 and value of ϖ=0.9. The used numerical model is that with the fractal-fractional differential operator. The model with this new differential operator display some important behavior.

    Figure 14.  Numerical solution of x-y-z phase for Dadras attractor.
    Figure 15.  Numerical simulation of x-y phase for Dadras attractor.
    Figure 16.  Numerical simulation of z-x phase for Dadras attractor.
    Figure 17.  Numerical simulation of y-z phase for Dadras attractor.

    A very strange attractor have been studied in the last past years, although such system of equations have not being attracting attention of many researchers, but the attractor is very strange as the system is able to display very interesting attractor in form of sphere. The model under investigation is called Aizawa attractor, this system when applied iteratively on three-dimensional coordinates, it is important to point out that, evolving in such a way as to have the consequential synchronizes map out a three dimensional shape, in this case a sphere with a tube-like structure powerful one of it's axis. In this section, we consider the model using the fractal-fractional with power law, exponential decay law and the generalized Mittag-Leffler function.

    Consider the Aizawa system described by the following equation as in Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=(w(t)B)u(t)Dv(t), (8.1)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Du(t)+(w(t)B)v(t), (8.2)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=C+Aw(t)13w3(t)(u2(t)+v2(t))(1+Ew(t))+Fw(t)u3(t), (8.3)

    where A=0.95, B=0.7, C=0.6, D=3.5, E=0.25, and F=0.1. The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j((w(tj)B)u(tj)Dv(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1((w(tj1)B)u(tj1)Dv(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (8.4)
    v(tn+1)=v0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Du(tj)+(w(tj)B)v(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Du(tj1)+(w(tj1)B)v(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (8.5)
    w(tn+1)=w0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(C+Aw(tj)13w3(tj)(u2(tj)+v2(tj))(1+Ew(tj))+Fw(tj)u3(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(C+Aw(tj1)13w3(tj1)(u2(tj1)+v2(tj1))(1+Ew(tj1))+Fw(tj1)u3(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (8.6)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=(w(t)B)u(t)Dv(t), (8.7)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Du(t)+(w(t)B)v(t), (8.8)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=C+Aw(t)13w3(t)(u2(t)+v2(t))(1+Ew(t))+Fw(t)u3(t). (8.9)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)((w(tn)B)u(tn)Dv(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)((w(tn1)B)u(tn1)Dv(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n((w(tn)B)u(tn)Dv(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1((w(tn1)B)u(tn1)Dv(tn1))], (8.10)
    v(tn+1)=vn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn)+(w(tn)B)v(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn1)+(w(tn1)B)v(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Du(tn)+(w(tn)B)v(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Du(tn1)+(w(tn1)B)v(tn1))], (8.11)
    w(tn+1)=wn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(C+Aw(tn)13w3(tn)(u2(tn)+v2(tn))(1+Ew(tn))+Fw(tn)u3(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(C+Aw(tn1)13w3(tn1)(u2(tn1)+v2(tn1))×(1+Ew(tn1))+Fw(tn1)u3(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(C+Aw(tn)13w3(tn)(u2(tn)+v2(tn))×(1+Ew(tn))+Fw(tn)u3(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(C+Aw(tn1)13w3(tn1)(u2(tn1)+v2(tn1))×(1+Ew(tn1))+Fw(tn1)u3(tn1))]. (8.12)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=(w(t)B)u(t)Dv(t), (8.13)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Du(t)+(w(t)B)v(t), (8.14)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=C+Aw(t)13w3(t)(u2(t)+v2(t))(1+Ew(t))+Fw(t)u3(t). (8.15)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)((w(tn)B)u(tn)Dv(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j((w(tj)B)u(tj)Dv(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(w(tj1)B)u(tj1)Dv(tj1)((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (8.16)
    v(tn+1)=v(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Du(tn)+(w(tn)B)v(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Du(tj)+(w(tj)B)v(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Du(tj1)+(w(tj1)B)v(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (8.17)
    w(tn+1)=w(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(C+Aw(tn)13w3(tn)(u2(tn)+v2(tn))(1+Ew(tn))+Fw(tn)u3(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(C+Aw(tj)13w3(tj)(u2(tj)+v2(tj))(1+Ew(tj))+Fw(tj)u3(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(C+Aw(tj1)13w3(tj1)(u2(tj1)+v2(tj1))(1+Ew(tj1))+Fw(tj1)u3(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (8.18)

    Numerical simulation are depicted in Figures 1821 for the value of κ=0.8 and value of ϖ=0.9. The used numerical model is that with the fractal-fractional differential operator. The model with this new differential operator display some important behavior.

    Figure 18.  Numerical solution of x-y-z phase for Aizawa attractor.
    Figure 19.  Numerical solution of y-x phase for Aizawa attractor.
    Figure 20.  Numerical solution of z-x phase for Aizawa attractor.
    Figure 21.  Numerical solution of z-y phase for Aizawa attractor.

    Consider the Thomas system described by the following equation as in Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=Au(t)+sinv(t), (9.1)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Av(t)+sinw(t), (9.2)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Aw(t)+sinu(t). (9.3)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Au(tj)+sinv(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Au(tj1)+sinv(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (9.4)
    v(tn+1)=v0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Av(tj)+sinw(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Av(tj1)+sinw(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (9.5)
    w(tn+1)=w0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Aw(tj)+sinu(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Aw(tj1)+sinu(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (9.6)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=Au(t)+sinv(t), (9.7)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Av(t)+sinw(t), (9.8)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Aw(t)+sinu(t). (9.9)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Au(tn)+sinv(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Au(tn1)+sinv(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Au(tn)+sinv(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Au(tn1)+sinv(tn1))], (9.10)
    v(tn+1)=vn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Av(tn)+sinw(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Av(tn1)+sinw(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Av(tn)+sinw(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Av(tn1)+sinw(tn1))], (9.11)
    w(tn+1)=wn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Aw(tn)+sinu(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Aw(tn1)+sinu(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Aw(tn)+sinu(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Aw(tn1)+sinu(tn1))]. (9.12)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=Au(t)+sinv(t), (9.13)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Av(t)+sinw(t), (9.14)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Aw(t)+sinu(t), (9.15)

    where A=0.19.

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Au(tn)+sinv(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Au(tj)+sinv(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Au(tj1)+sinv(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (9.16)
    v(tn+1)=v(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Av(tn)+sinw(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Av(tj)+sinw(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Av(tj1)+sinw(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (9.17)
    w(tn+1)=w(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Aw(tn)+sinu(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Aw(tj)+sinu(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Aw(tj1)+sinu(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (9.18)

    Numerical simulation are depicted in Figures 2225 for the value of κ=0.9 and value of ϖ=0.9. The used numerical model is that with the fractal-fractional differential operator. The model with this new differential operator display some important behavior.

    Figure 22.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.9,ϖ=0.9 0f x-y phase for Thomas attractor.
    Figure 23.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.9,ϖ=0.9 of z-x phase for Thomas attractor.
    Figure 24.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.9,ϖ=0.9 of z-y phase for Thomas attractor.
    Figure 25.  Numerical simulation for κ=0.9,ϖ=0.9 of x-y-z phase for Thomas attractor.

    Consider the 4 Wings system proposed in [15] and modifying in [14] is described by the following equation as in Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative sense

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=Au(t)Bv(t)w(t), (10.1)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Cv(t)+u(t)w(t), (10.2)
    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Du(t)Ew(t)+u(t)v(t), (10.3)

    where A=4, B=6, C=10, D=5, and E=1.

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Au(tj)Bv(tj)w(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Au(tj1)Bv(tj1)w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (10.4)
    v(tn+1)=v0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Cv(tj)+u(tj)w(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Cv(tj1)+u(tj1)w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (10.5)
    w(tn+1)=w0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(Du(tj)Ew(tj)+u(tj)v(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Du(tj1)Ew(tj1)+u(tj1)v(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (10.6)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=Au(t)Bv(t)w(t), (10.7)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Cv(t)+u(t)w(t), (10.8)
    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Du(t)Ew(t)+u(t)v(t). (10.9)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=un+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Au(tn)Bv(tn)w(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Au(tn1)Bv(tn1)w(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Au(tn)Bv(tn)w(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Au(tn1)Bv(tn1)w(tn1))], (10.10)
    v(tn+1)=vn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Cv(tn)+u(tn)w(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Cv(tn1)+u(tn1)w(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Cv(tn)+u(tn)w(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Cv(tn1)+u(tn1)w(tn1))], (10.11)
    w(tn+1)=wn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn)Ew(tn)+u(tn)v(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn1)Ew(tn1)+u(tn1)v(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Du(tn)Ew(tn)+u(tn)v(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Du(tn1)Ew(tn1)+u(tn1)v(tn1))], (10.12)
    w(tn+1)=wn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn)Ew(tn)+u(tn)v(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Du(tn1)Ew(tn1)+u(tn1)v(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(Du(tn)Ew(tn)+u(tn)v(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(Du(tn1)Ew(tn1)+u(tn1)v(tn1))]. (10.13)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{u(t)}=Au(t)Bv(t)w(t), (10.14)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{v(t)}=Cv(t)+u(t)w(t), (10.15)
    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{w(t)}=Du(t)Ew(t)+u(t)v(t). (10.16)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    u(tn+1)=u(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Au(tn)Bv(tn)w(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Au(tj)Bv(tj)w(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Au(tj1)Bv(tj1)w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (10.17)
    v(tn+1)=v(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Cv(tn)+u(tn)w(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Cv(tj)+u(tj)w(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Cv(tj1)+u(tj1)w(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (10.18)
    w(tn+1)=w(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Du(tn)Ew(tn)+u(tn)v(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Du(tj)Ew(tj)+u(tj)v(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Du(tj1)Ew(tj1)+u(tj1)v(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (10.19)

    Numerical simulation are depicted in Figures 2629 for the value of κ=0.9 and value of ϖ=0.8. The used numerical model is that with the fractal-fractional differential operator. The model with this new differential operator display some important behavior.

    Figure 26.  Numerical simulation for Z-Y phase with κ=0.9 and ϖ=0.8 for wing attractor.
    Figure 27.  Numerical simulation for Y-X phase with κ=0.9 and ϖ=0.8 for wing attractor.
    Figure 28.  Numerical simulation for Z-X phase with κ=0.9 and ϖ=0.8 for wing attractor.
    Figure 29.  Numerical simulation for X-Y-Z phase with κ=0.9 and ϖ=0.8 for wing attractor.

    We introduce the following attractor called AS attractor

    dx(t)dt=Ay(t),dy(t)dt=x(t)x3(t)ay(t)+bcos(ct),dz(t)dt=By(t)+sin(y(t))+x(t), (11.1)

    where the initial conditions

    x(0)=0.01,y(0)=0.5,z(0)=0.6
    a=0.25,b=0.3,c=1.

    The mathematical model represented in state variable as when we apply Caputo-fractal-fractional derivative is given by

    FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{x(t)}=Ay(t),FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{y(t)}=x(t)x3(t)ay(t)+bcos(ct),FFCDκ,ϖ0,t{z(t)}=By(t)+sin(y(t))+x(t). (11.2)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    x(tn+1)=x0+Aϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(y(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(Ay(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))],y(tn+1)=y0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(x(tj)x3(tj)ay(tj)+bcos(ctj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(x(tj1)x3(tj1)ay(tj1)+bcos(ctj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))],z(tn+1)=z0+ϖ(Δt)κΓ(κ+2)nj=0[tϖ1j(By(tj)+sin(y(tj))+x(tj))((n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ))tϖ1j1(By(tj1)+sin(y(tj1))+x(tj1)((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (11.3)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo, we have

    FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{x(t)}=Ay(t),FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{y(t)}=x(t)x3(t)ay(t)+bcos(ct),FFCFCDκ,ϖ0,t{z(t)}=By(t)+sin(y(t))+x(t). (11.4)
    x(tn+1)=xn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(Ay(tn)))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(Ay(tn1)))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n((Ay(tn)))Δt2tϖ1n1(Ay(tn1))], (11.5)
    y(tn+1)=yn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(x(tn)x3(tn)ay(tn)+bcos(ctn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(x(tn1)x3(tn1)ay(tn1)+bcos(ctn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(x(tn)x3(tn)ay(tn)+bcos(ctn))Δt2tϖ1n1(x(tn1)x3(tn1)ay(tn1)+bcos(ctn1))], (11.6)
    z(tn+1)=zn+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)M(κ)(By(tn)+sin(y(tn))+x(tn))ϖtϖ1n1(1κ)M(κ)(By(tn1)+sin(y(tn1))+x(tn1))+κϖM(κ)×[32(Δt)tϖ1n(By(tn)+sin(y(tn))+x(tn))Δt2tϖ1n1(By(tn1)+sin(y(tn1))+x(tn1))]. (11.7)

    Involving the fractal-fractional derivative in the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo sense, we have

    FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{x(t)}=Ay(t),FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{y(t)}=x(t)x3(t)ay(t)+bcos(ct),FFABCDκ,ϖ0,t{z(t)}=By(t)+sin(y(t))+x(t). (11.8)

    The numerical scheme is given by

    x(tn+1)=x(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(Ay(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(Ay(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(Ay(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (11.9)
    y(tn+1)=y(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(x(tn)x3(tn)ay(tn)+bcos(ctn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(x(tj)x3(tj)ay(tj)+bcos(ctj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(x(tj1)x3(tj1)ay(tj1)+bcos(ctj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))], (11.10)
    z(tn+1)=z(0)+ϖtϖ1n(1κ)AB(κ)(By(tn)+sin(y(tn))+x(tn))+ϖΔtκAB(κ)Γ(κ+2)×nj=0[tϖ1j(By(tj)+sin(y(tj))+x(tj))[(n+1j)κ(nj+2+κ)(nj)κ(nj+2+2κ)]tϖ1j1(By(tj1)+sin(y(tj1))+x(tj1))((n+1j)κ+1(nj)κ(nj+1+κ))]. (11.11)

    We present the numerical simulation in the following Figures 3042 for different values of fractional order and fractal dimension.

    Figure 30.  Numerical simulation for y-z phase with the Mittag-Leffler kernel.
    Figure 31.  Numerical simulation for y-z phase with the power law kernel.
    Figure 32.  Numerical simulation of x-y-z with Mittag-Leffler kernel.
    Figure 33.  Numerical simulation for x-y phase with the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel.
    Figure 34.  Numerical simulation for x-z phase with the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel.
    Figure 35.  Numerical simulation for y-z phase with the generalized Mittag-Leffler function.
    Figure 36.  Numerical simulation for x-y-z phase with the power law kernel.
    Figure 37.  Numerical simulation for x-y-z phase with classical differentiation.
    Figure 38.  Numerical simulation x-y-z phase with power law and A = 70.
    Figure 39.  Numerical simulation for x-y-z phase with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel and A = 70.
    Figure 40.  Numerical simulation for x-y phase with the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel.
    Figure 41.  Numerical simulation for x-z phase with generalized Mittag-Leffler function.
    Figure 42.  Numerical simulation for y-z phase with the generalized Mittag-Leffler function.

    Fractal-fractional differential operators have been introduced very recently; however, the new concept has not yet attracted attention of many scholars. In fact, few works have being done where such differential and integral operators are used. The advantages if this work is that it considers operators capturing new complexities of nature with great success. Such differential and integral operators are sophisticated tools to model complex real world problems. Moreover, in order to evaluate the efficiency and the capabilities of the new differential and integral operators, we investigate the behavior of some well-known chaotic attractors and see if one will capture more complexities compared to existing differential and integral operators. Additionally, we introduced a new chaotic model with alternative attractors and we showed by numerical simulation that these new differential and integral operators are powerful mathematical operators able to capture heterogeneity. Since any new numerical method should be validated in terms of convergence, stability and consistency of solutions, these are important research directions left to future work.

    The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the United Arab Emirates University for the financial support through UPAR Grant No. 31S369.

    The authors have declared no conflict of interest.



    [1] R. Farouki, Legendre-Bernstein basis transformations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 119 (2000), 145–160. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00376-9
    [2] R. Farouki, T. Goodman, T. Sauer, Construction of orthogonal bases for polynomials in Bernstein form on triangular and simplex domains, Comput. Aided Geom. Des., 20 (2003), 209–230.
    [3] K. Höllig, J. Hörner, Approximation and Modeling with B-Splines, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM): Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013.
    [4] G. Farin, Curves and Surface for Computer Aided Geometric Design, Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, (1993), 32–58.
    [5] R. Farouki, V. Rajan, Algorithms for polynomials in Bernstein form, Comput. Aided Geom. Des., 5 (1988), 1–26.
    [6] K. Höllig, J. Hörner, Approximation and Modelling with B-Splines, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 132 (2013), 32–58.
    [7] Y. Liu, Numerical solution of implicit neutral functional differential equations, SIAM J. Nume. Anal., 36 (1999), 516–528. doi: 10.1137/S003614299731867X
    [8] I. Ali, H. Brunner, T. Tang, A spectral method for pantograph-type delay differential equations and its convergence analysis, J. Comput. Math., 27 (2009), 254–265.
    [9] I. Ali, H. Brunner, T. Tang, Spectral methods for pantograph-type differential and integral equations with multiple delays, Front. Math. China, 4 (2009), 49–61. doi: 10.1007/s11464-009-0010-z
    [10] C. Canuto, M. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, T. A. Zang, Spectral Methods: Fundamentals in Single Domains, Springer, Berlin, 2006.
    [11] J. Shen, T. Tang, Spectral and High-Order Methods with Applications, Science Press, Beijing, 2006.
    [12] H. Brunner, Collocation Methods for Volterra Integral and Related Functional Equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
    [13] H. Brunner, Q. Hu, Optimal superconvergence results for delay integro-differential equations of pantograph type, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 45 (2007), 986–1004. doi: 10.1137/060660357
    [14] H. Brunner, Q. Hu, Q. Lin, Geometric meshes in Collocation Methods for Volterra Integral with proportional delay, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 21 (2001), 783–798. doi: 10.1093/imanum/21.4.783
    [15] A. Bellen, M. Zennaro, Numerical Methods for Delay Differentials Equations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
    [16] A. Bellen, Preservation of superconvergence in the numerical integration of delay differential equations with proportional delay, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 22 (2002), 529–536. doi: 10.1093/imanum/22.4.529
    [17] A. Bataineh, O. Işik, N. Aloushoush, et al., Bernstein operational matrix with error analysis for solving high order delay differential equations, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 3 (2017), 1749–1762. doi: 10.1007/s40819-016-0212-5
    [18] P. Sahu, R. Saha, A new numerical approach for the solution of nonlinear Fredholm integral equations system of second kind by using Bernstein collocation method, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 38 (2015), 274–280. doi: 10.1002/mma.3067
    [19] P. Sahu, R. Saha, Legendre spectral collocation method for the solution of the model describing biological species living together, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 296 (2016), 47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.09.011
    [20] M. Bhatti, P. Bracken, Solutions of differential equations in a Bernstein polynomial basis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 205 (2007), 272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2006.05.002
    [21] G. Mastroianni, D. Occorsio, Optimal systems of nodes for Lagrange interpolation on bounded intervals: A survey, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 134 (2001), 325–341. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00557-4
    [22] A. Iserles, On nonlinear delay differential equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 344 (1994), 441–447. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1994-1225574-4
    [23] D. Trif, Direct operational tau method for pantograph-type equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012), 2194–2203.
    [24] E. Ishiwata, Y. Muroya, Rational approximation method for delay differential equations with proportional delay, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 741–747.
    [25] I. Ali, S. Khan, Analysis of stochastic delayed SIRS model with exponential birth and saturated incidence rate, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 138 (2020), 110008. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110008
    [26] S. Khan, I. Ali, Applications of Legendre spectral collocation method for solving system of time delay differential equations, Adv. Mech. Eng., 12 (2020), 1–13.
    [27] S. Khan, M. Ali, I. Ali, A spectral collocation method for stochastic Volterra integro-differential equations and its error analysis, Adv. Differ. Equations, 1 (2019), 161.
    [28] S. Khan, I. Ali, Application of Legendre spectral-collocation method to delay differential and stochastic delay differential equation, AIP Adv., 8 (2018), 035301. doi: 10.1063/1.5016680
    [29] O. Isik, Z. Güney, M. Sezer, Bernstein series solutions of pantograph equations using polynomial interpolation, J. Differ. Equations Appl., 18 (2012), 357–374. doi: 10.1080/10236198.2010.496456
    [30] A. Romero, P. Galvín, J. Cámara-Molina, A. Tadeu, On the formulation of a BEM in the Bezíer-Bernstein space for the solution of Helmholtz equation, Appl. Math. Modell., 74 (2019), 301–319. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.05.001
    [31] A. Romero, P. Galvín, A. Tadeu, An accurate treatment of non-homogeneous boundary conditions for development of the BEM, Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem., 116 (2020), 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.04.008
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Manal Alqhtani, Kolade M. Owolabi, Khaled M. Saad, Edson Pindza, Spatiotemporal chaos in spatially extended fractional dynamical systems, 2023, 119, 10075704, 107118, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107118
    2. Nadiyah Hussain Alharthi, Abdon Atangana, Badr S. Alkahtani, Some results on the existence of Fractal-fractional ODE with power law, 2023, 20, 25900374, 100398, 10.1016/j.rinam.2023.100398
    3. Tianxian Zhang, Yongqi Zhao, Xiangliang Xu, Si Wu, Yujuan Gu, Solution and dynamics analysis of fractal-fractional multi-scroll Chen chaotic system based on Adomain decomposition method, 2024, 178, 09600779, 114268, 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114268
    4. Sonal Jain, Salah Boulaaras, A new approach of modeling crossover behaviors in heat conduction is a piecewise heat equation with variable coefficients and constant fractional order, 2024, 0, 1937-1632, 0, 10.3934/dcdss.2024155
    5. Yanli Ma, Xuewu Zuo, Kolade M. Owolabi, Stability Analysis of SIRS Model considering Pulse Vaccination and Elimination Disturbance, 2024, 2024, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2024/6617911
    6. V. S. Verma, Harshita Kaushik, Ram Singh, Sonal Jain, Ali Akgül, Stability and Hopf bifurcation of TB-COVID-19 coinfection model with impact of time delay, 2024, 2254-3902, 10.1007/s40324-024-00366-4
    7. Ahlem Yahiaoui, Med-Salem Rezaoui, Omar Djidel, Rafik Guefaifia, Salah Boulaaras, Kirchhoff-type problems with the non-local fractional d(z,.)-Laplacian operator, 2025, 2025, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-025-03291-w
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2820) PDF downloads(153) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog