For partial differential-difference equations, a review of results regarding the relation between the type of the equation and dynamical properties of its solutions is provided. This includes the case of elliptic equations with timelike independent variables: Their solutions acquire dynamical properties (more exactly, behave as solutions of parabolic equations). The following approach to classify differential-difference equations into types, based on the property of differential-difference operators to be Fourier multipliers is applied in the following manner: An operator is treated to be elliptic if the real part of its symbol is positive, while the parabolic and hyperbolic types are defined correspondingly. It is shown that the proposed approach (being a natural extension of the classical notion of the ellipticity) is reasonable. On the other hand, fundamental novelties (compared with the classical theory of partial differential equations) occur as well. We provide conditions which guarantee the following results. For the half-space (half-plane) Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations, integral representations (of the Poisson type) of solutions are constructed, which are infinitely differentiable outside the boundary hyperplane (plane), and the asymptotic closeness of solutions (as the timelike independent variable unboundedly increases) takes place. For the Cauchy problem for parabolic equations, the same is valid, but we deal with the classical time instead of the timelike independent variable. For hyperbolic equations, multiparameter families of infinitely smooth global solutions are constructed. The said (sufficient) conditions restrict the sign of the real part of the symbol for the differential-difference operator with respect to spatial or spacelike independent variables. In a number of special cases, they might be weakened such that symbols with sign-changing real parts are admitted. The objective of the study is to observe the current stage of the classification issues for partial differential-difference equations in terms of the aforementioned approach: The ellipticity of a Fourier multiplier is defined by means of the sign (of there real part) of its symbol. Since both differential and translation operators are Fourier multipliers, methods of Fourier analysis are applicable in this study: We apply the Fourier transformation to the original partial differential-difference equation, solve the obtained ordinary differential equation, and apply the inverse Fourier transformation to the obtained solution. The main contribution obtained within this study is an efficient (workable) type concept for the fundamentally new extension of the class of partial differential equations, which is the class of partial differential-difference equations.
Citation: Andrey Muravnik. Nonclassical dynamical behavior of solutions of partial differential-difference equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1842-1858. doi: 10.3934/math.2025085
For partial differential-difference equations, a review of results regarding the relation between the type of the equation and dynamical properties of its solutions is provided. This includes the case of elliptic equations with timelike independent variables: Their solutions acquire dynamical properties (more exactly, behave as solutions of parabolic equations). The following approach to classify differential-difference equations into types, based on the property of differential-difference operators to be Fourier multipliers is applied in the following manner: An operator is treated to be elliptic if the real part of its symbol is positive, while the parabolic and hyperbolic types are defined correspondingly. It is shown that the proposed approach (being a natural extension of the classical notion of the ellipticity) is reasonable. On the other hand, fundamental novelties (compared with the classical theory of partial differential equations) occur as well. We provide conditions which guarantee the following results. For the half-space (half-plane) Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations, integral representations (of the Poisson type) of solutions are constructed, which are infinitely differentiable outside the boundary hyperplane (plane), and the asymptotic closeness of solutions (as the timelike independent variable unboundedly increases) takes place. For the Cauchy problem for parabolic equations, the same is valid, but we deal with the classical time instead of the timelike independent variable. For hyperbolic equations, multiparameter families of infinitely smooth global solutions are constructed. The said (sufficient) conditions restrict the sign of the real part of the symbol for the differential-difference operator with respect to spatial or spacelike independent variables. In a number of special cases, they might be weakened such that symbols with sign-changing real parts are admitted. The objective of the study is to observe the current stage of the classification issues for partial differential-difference equations in terms of the aforementioned approach: The ellipticity of a Fourier multiplier is defined by means of the sign (of there real part) of its symbol. Since both differential and translation operators are Fourier multipliers, methods of Fourier analysis are applicable in this study: We apply the Fourier transformation to the original partial differential-difference equation, solve the obtained ordinary differential equation, and apply the inverse Fourier transformation to the obtained solution. The main contribution obtained within this study is an efficient (workable) type concept for the fundamentally new extension of the class of partial differential equations, which is the class of partial differential-difference equations.
| [1] |
A. B. Muravnik, Wiener Tauberian theorem and half-space problems for parabolic and elliptic equations, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 8174–8191. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024397 doi: 10.3934/math.2024397
|
| [2] | A. L. Skubachevskiĭ, Elliptic functional differential equations and applications, Basel-Boston-Berlin: Birkhäuser, 1997. |
| [3] |
A. L. Skubachevskiĭ, Nonclassical boundary-value problems. Ⅰ, J. Math. Sci., 155 (2008), 199–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-008-9218-9 doi: 10.1007/s10958-008-9218-9
|
| [4] |
A. L. Skubachevskiĭ, Nonclassical boundary-value problems. Ⅱ, J. Math. Sci., 166 (2010), 377–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-010-9873-5 doi: 10.1007/s10958-010-9873-5
|
| [5] |
A. L. Skubachevskiĭ, Boundary-value problems for elliptic functional-differential equations and their applications, Russ. Math. Surv., 71 (2016), 801–906. https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9739 doi: 10.1070/RM9739
|
| [6] | V. D. Repnikov, S. D. Eidel'man, Necessary and sufficient conditions for the establishment of a solution of the Cauchy problem, Sov. Math., Dokl., 7 (1966), 388–391. |
| [7] |
A. B. Muravnik, Functional differential parabolic equations: Integral transformations and qualitative properties of solutions of the Cauchy problem, J. Math. Sci., 216 (2016), 345–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-016-2904-0 doi: 10.1007/s10958-016-2904-0
|
| [8] | I. M. Gel'fand, G. E. Shilov, Fourier transforms of rapidly increasing functions and questions of uniqueness of the solution of Cauchy problem, Uspekhi Matem. Nauk., 8 (1953), 3–54 (in Russian). |
| [9] |
A. B. Muravnik, On hyperbolic equations with arbitrarily directed translations of potentials, Math. Notes, 115 (2024), 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434624050122 doi: 10.1134/S0001434624050122
|
| [10] |
A. B. Muravnik, Multidimensional hyperbolic equations with nonlocal potentials: Families of global solutions, Mathematics, 12 (2024), 2091. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12132091 doi: 10.3390/math12132091
|
| [11] |
N. V. Zaitseva, A. B. Muravnik, A classical solution to a hyperbolic differential-difference equation with a translation by an arbitrary vector, Russ. Math., 67 (2023), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X23050110 doi: 10.3103/S1066369X23050110
|
| [12] |
A. B. Muravnik, Half-plane differential-difference elliptic problems with general-kind nonlocal potentials, Complex Var. Elliptic, 67 (2022), 1101–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2020.1857372 doi: 10.1080/17476933.2020.1857372
|
| [13] |
A. B. Muravnik, Asymptotic properties of solutions of two-dimensional differential-difference elliptic problems, J. Math. Sci., 259 (2021), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-021-05667-x doi: 10.1007/s10958-021-05667-x
|
| [14] |
A. B. Muravnik, Differential-difference elliptic equations with nonlocal potentials in half-spaces, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11122698 doi: 10.3390/math11122698
|
| [15] |
V. V. Liiko, A. B. Muravnik, Elliptic equations with arbitrarily directed translations in half-spaces, B. Irkutsk State U. M., 43 (2023), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2023.43.64 doi: 10.26516/1997-7670.2023.43.64
|
| [16] | F. O. Porper, S. D. Eidel'man, Theorems on the proximity of solutions of parabolic equations and the stabilization of the solution of the Cauchy problem, Sov. Math. Dokl., 16 (1975), 288–292. |
| [17] | F. O. Porper, S. D. Eidel'man, The asymptotic behavior of classical and generalized solutions of one-dimensional second-order parabolic equations, Trans. Mosc. Math. Soc., 36 (1979), 83–131. |
| [18] |
F. O. Porper, S. D. Eidel'man, Theorems on the asymptotic proximity of solutions of many-dimensional parabolic second-order equations, Russ. Math. Surv., 35 (1980), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1980v035n01ABEH001599 doi: 10.1070/RM1980v035n01ABEH001599
|
| [19] |
A. G. Sorokina, Closeness of solutions of Cauchy's problem for second-order parabolic equations, Math. Notes, 34 (1983), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01160869 doi: 10.1007/BF01160869
|
| [20] |
F. O. Porper, S. D. Eidel'man, Two-sided estimates of fundamental solutions of second-order parabolic equations, and some applications, Russ. Math. Surv., 39 (1984), 119–178. https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1984v039n03ABEH003164 doi: 10.1070/RM1984v039n03ABEH003164
|
| [21] | V. D. Repnikov, Asymptotic proximity and stabilization of solutions of a parabolic equation, Differ. Equ., 24 (1988), 115–121. |
| [22] | F. O. Porper, S. D. Eidel'man, Theorems on the asymptotic proximity of fundamental solutions of parabolic equations, Sov. Math. Dokl., 344 (1995), 586–589. |
| [23] | F. O. Porper, S. D. Eidel'man, On asymptotic proximity of solutions of the Cauchy problem for second-order parabolic equations, Ukr. Math. J., 47 (1995), 798–807. |
| [24] | A. L. Skubachevskiĭ, Some nonlocal elliptic boundary-value problems, Differ Equ., 18 (1983), 1132–1139. |
| [25] | A. L. Skubachevskiĭ, Smoothness of generalized solutions of the first boundary-value problem for an elliptic difference-differential equation, Math. Notes, 34 (1983), 537–541. |
| [26] | V. V. Zhikov, M. M. Sirazhudinov, The averaging of nondivergence second order elliptic and parabolic operators and the stabilization of solutions of the Cauchy problem, Math. USSR-Sb., 44 (1983), 149–166. |
| [27] | V. D. Repnikov, Limit relations between solutions of some equations of hyperbolic, parabolic, and elliptic types, Differ. Uravn., 27 (1991), 165–167. |
| [28] | V. N. Denisov, Asymptotic behavior of the solutions of elliptic equations, Russian Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math., 47 (1993), 333–337. |
Andrey Muravnik. Nonclassical dynamical behavior of solutions of partial differential-difference equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 1842-1858. doi: 10.3934/math.2025085
DownLoad: