Single wave solutions of the fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation in space-time with accuracy via the beta derivative and mEDAM approach

Ikram Ullah; Muhammad Bilal; Javed Iqbal; Hasan Bulut; Funda Turk; Ikram Ullah; Muhammad Bilal; Javed Iqbal; Hasan Bulut; Funda Turk

doi:10.3934/math.2025030

AIMS Mathematics

2025, Volume 10, Issue 1: 672-693. doi: 10.3934/math.2025030

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Single wave solutions of the fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation in space-time with accuracy via the beta derivative and mEDAM approach

1.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China
2.
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Khyber Pukhton Khwkha, Pakistan
3.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Fırat University, Elazıg 23119, Türkiye
4.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Bartın University, Bartın 74100, Türkiye

Received: 18 November 2024 Revised: 28 December 2024 Accepted: 30 December 2024 Published: 13 January 2025
MSC : 65F10, 65H10, 90C30, 90C33

The nonlinear wave behavior in the tropical and mid-latitude troposphere has been simulated using the space-time fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs model. These waves are the consequence of interactions between equatorial and mid-latitude waves, fluid flow in dynamic systems, weak scattering, and extended linkages. The mEDAM method has been used to obtain new and extended closed-form solitary wave solutions of the previously published nonlinear fractional partial differential equation via the beta derivative. A wave transformation converts the fractional-order equation into an ordinary differential equation. Several soliton, single, kink, double, triple, anti-kink, and other soliton types are examples of known conventional wave shapes. The answers are displayed using the latest Python code, which enhances the usage of 2D and 3D plotlines, as well as contour plotlines, to emphasise the tangible utility of the solutions. The results of the study are clear, flexible, and easier to replicate.

Keywords:

beta derivative,
modified extended direct algebraic method,
space-time fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation,
soliton solutions

Citation: Ikram Ullah, Muhammad Bilal, Javed Iqbal, Hasan Bulut, Funda Turk. Single wave solutions of the fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation in space-time with accuracy via the beta derivative and mEDAM approach[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 672-693. doi: 10.3934/math.2025030

Related Papers:

[1]	Muqeem Ahmad, Mobin Ahmad, Fatemah Mofarreh . Bi-slant lightlike submanifolds of golden semi-Riemannian manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19526-19545. doi: 10.3934/math.2023996
[2]	Aliya Naaz Siddiqui, Meraj Ali Khan, Amira Ishan . Contact CR $\delta$ -invariant: an optimal estimate for Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29220-29234. doi: 10.3934/math.20241416
[3]	Biswabismita Bag, Meraj Ali Khan, Tanumoy Pal, Shyamal Kumar Hui . Geometric analysis on warped product semi-slant submanifolds of a locally metallic Riemannian space form. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8131-8143. doi: 10.3934/math.2025373
[4]	Mehmet Gülbahar . Qualar curvatures of pseudo Riemannian manifolds and pseudo Riemannian submanifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1366-1376. doi: 10.3934/math.2021085
[5]	Oğuzhan Bahadır . On lightlike geometry of indefinite Sasakian statistical manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12845-12862. doi: 10.3934/math.2021741
[6]	Richa Agarwal, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, Shahid Ali, Abdul Haseeb . On Riemannian warped-twisted product submersions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2925-2937. doi: 10.3934/math.2024144
[7]	Fatimah Alghamdi, Fatemah Mofarreh, Akram Ali, Mohamed Lemine Bouleryah . Some rigidity theorems for totally real submanifolds in complex space forms. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8191-8202. doi: 10.3934/math.2025376
[8]	Fatemah Mofarreh, S. K. Srivastava, Anuj Kumar, Akram Ali . Geometric inequalities of $\mathcal{PR}$ -warped product submanifold in para-Kenmotsu manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19481-19509. doi: 10.3934/math.20221069
[9]	Mehmet Atçeken, Tuğba Mert . Characterizations for totally geodesic submanifolds of a $K$ -paracontact manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7320-7332. doi: 10.3934/math.2021430
[10]	Yusuf Dogru . $\eta$ -Ricci-Bourguignon solitons with a semi-symmetric metric and semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11943-11952. doi: 10.3934/math.2023603

Abstract

1. Introduction

The concept of lightlike submanifolds in geometry was initially established and expounded upon in a work produced by Duggal and Bejancu ^[1]. A nondegenerate screen distribution was employed in order to produce a nonintersecting lightlike transversal vector bundle of the tangent bundle. They defined the CR-lightlike submanifold as a generalization of lightlike real hypersurfaces of indefinite Kaehler manifolds and showed that CR-lightlike submanifolds do not contain invariant and totally real lightlike submanifolds. Further, they defined and studied GCR-lightlike submanifolds of Kaehler manifolds as an umbrella of invariant submanifolds, screen real submanifolds, and CR-lightlike and SCR-lightlike submanifolds in ^[2,3], respectively. Subsequently, B. Sahin and R. Gunes investigated geodesic property of CR-lightlike submanifolds ^[4] and the integrability of distributions in CR-lightlike submanifolds ^[5]. In the year 2010, Duggal and Sahin published a book ^[6]pertaining to the field of differential geometry, specifically focusing on the study of lightlike submanifolds. This book provides a comprehensive examination of recent advancements in lightlike geometry, encompassing novel geometric findings, accompanied by rigorous proofs, and exploring their practical implications in the field of mathematical physics. The investigation of the geometric properties of lightlike hypersurfaces and lightlike submanifolds has been the subject of research in several studies (see ^{[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]}).

Crasmareanu and Hretcanu^[15] created a special example of polynomial structure ^[16] on a differentiable manifold, and it is known as the golden structure $(\overline{M}, g)$ . Hretcanu C. E. ^[17] explored Riemannian submanifolds with the golden structure. M. Ahmad and M. A. Qayyoom studied geometrical properties of Riemannian submanifolds with golden structure ^{[18,19,20,21]} and metallic structure ^[22,23]. The integrability of golden structures was examined by A. Gizer et al. ^[24]. Lightlike hypersurfaces of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold was investigated by N. Poyraz and E. Yasar ^[25]. The golden structure was also explored in the studies ^{[26,27,28,29]}.

In this research, we investigate the CR-lightlike submanifolds of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold, drawing inspiration from the aforementioned studies. This paper has the following outlines: Some preliminaries of CR-lightlike submanifolds are defined in Section 2. We establish a number of properties of CR-lightlike submanifolds on golden semi-Riemannian manifolds in Section 3. In Section 4, we look into several CR-lightlike submanifolds characteristics that are totally umbilical. We provide a complex illustration of CR-lightlike submanifolds of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold in the final section.

2. Opening statements

Assume that $(\overline{\aleph}, g)$ is a semi-Riemannian manifold with $(k + j)$ -dimension, $k, j \ge 1$ , and $g$ as a semi-Riemannian metric on $\overline{\aleph}.$ We suppose that $\overline{\aleph}$ is not a Riemannian manifold and the symbol $q$ stands for the constant index of $g$ .

^[15] Let $\overline{\aleph}$ be endowed with a tensor field $\psi$ of type $(1, 1)$ such that

$\begin{equation} \psi^{2} = \psi+I, \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $I$ represents the identity transformation on $\Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph})$ . The structure $\psi$ is referred to as a golden structure. A metric $g$ is considered $\psi$ -compatible if

$\begin{equation} g(\psi \gamma, \zeta) = g(\gamma, \psi \zeta) \end{equation}$

(2.2)

for all $\gamma$ , $\zeta$ vector fields on $\Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph})$ , then $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is called a golden Riemannian manifold. If we substitute $\psi \gamma$ into $\gamma$ in (2.2), then from (2.1) we have

$\begin{equation} g(\psi \gamma, \psi \zeta) = g(\psi \gamma, \zeta)+g(\gamma, \zeta). \end{equation}$

(2.3)

for any $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon \overline{\aleph}).$

If $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is a golden Riemannian manifold and $\psi$ is parallel with regard to the Levi-Civita connection $\overline{\nabla}$ on $\overline{\aleph}:$

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}\psi = 0, \end{equation}$

(2.4)

then $(\overline{\aleph}, g, \psi)$ is referred to as a semi-Riemannian manifold with locally golden properties.

The golden structure is the particular case of metallic structure ^[22,23] with $p = 1, \ q = 1$ defined by

$\psi^{2} = p\psi+ qI,$

where $p$ and $q$ are positive integers.

^[1] Consider the case where $\aleph$ is a lightlike submanifold of $k$ of $\overline{\aleph}.$ There is the radical distribution, or $Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)$ , on $\aleph$ that applies to this situation such that $Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) = \Upsilon\aleph \cap \Upsilon\aleph^{\bot},$ $\forall$ $p \in \aleph.$ Since $Rad\Upsilon\aleph$ has rank $r \ge 0,$ $\aleph$ is referred to as an $r$ -lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph}.$ Assume that $\aleph$ is a submanifold of $\aleph$ that is $r$ -lightlike. A screen distribution is what we refer to as the complementary distribution of a Rad distribution on $\Upsilon \aleph$ , then

$\begin{equation} \label{1e1} \nonumber \Upsilon \aleph = Rad\Upsilon\aleph \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph). \end{equation}$

As $S(\Upsilon\aleph)$ is a nondegenerate vector sub-bundle of $\Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph},$ we have

$\begin{equation} \label{1e2} \nonumber \Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph} = S(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot}, \end{equation}$

where $S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot}$ consists of the orthogonal vector sub-bundle that is complementary to $S(\Upsilon\aleph)$ in $\Upsilon\overline{\aleph}|_{\aleph}.$ $S(\Upsilon\aleph), S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})$ is an orthogonal direct decomposition, and they are nondegenerate.

$\begin{equation} \label{1e3} \nonumber S(\Upsilon\aleph)^{\bot} = S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})^{\bot}. \end{equation}$

Let the vector bundle

$\begin{equation} \label{1e4} \nonumber tr(\Upsilon\aleph) = ltr(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}). \end{equation}$

Thus,

$\begin{equation} \label{1e5} \nonumber \Upsilon\overline{\aleph} = \Upsilon\aleph \oplus tr(\Upsilon\aleph) = S(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}) \bot (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)\oplus ltr(\Upsilon\aleph). \end{equation}$

Assume that the Levi-Civita connection is $\overline{\nabla}$ on $\overline{\aleph}.$ We have

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta + h(\gamma, \zeta), \; \forall \, \gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph) \end{equation}$

(2.5)

and

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = - A_{h}\zeta + \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}h, \; \forall \gamma \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)\; and \; h \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)), \end{equation}$

(2.6)

where $\{ \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, A_{h}\gamma \}$ and $\{ h(\gamma, \zeta), \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}h \}$ belongs to $\Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)$ and $\Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ respectively.

Using projection $L : tr(\Upsilon\aleph) \rightarrow ltr(\Upsilon\aleph),$ and $S: tr(\Upsilon\aleph) \rightarrow S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot}),$ we have

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta + h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta) + h^{s}(\gamma, \zeta), \end{equation}$

(2.7)

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\aleph = - A_{\aleph}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}\aleph + \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \aleph), \end{equation}$

(2.8)

and

$\begin{equation} \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \chi = - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s} + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi) \end{equation}$

(2.9)

for any $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \aleph \in \Gamma (ltr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ and $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ where $h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta) = Lh(\gamma, \zeta), \; h^{s}(\gamma, \zeta) = Sh(\gamma, \zeta), \; \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}\aleph, \; \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi) \in \Gamma (ltr(\mathcal{T}\aleph)), \; \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\; \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \aleph) \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ and $\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \; A_{\aleph}\gamma, \; A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph).$

The projection morphism of $\Upsilon\aleph$ on the screen is represented by $P$ , and we take the distribution into consideration.

$\begin{array}{c} \nabla_{\gamma}P\zeta = \nabla_{\gamma}^{*}P\zeta + h^{*}(\gamma, P\zeta), \\ \nabla_{\gamma}\xi = - A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{*t}\xi, \end{array}$

(2.10)

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma(\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma(Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)).$

Thus, we have the subsequent equation.

$\begin{equation} {g}(h^{*}(\gamma, P\zeta), \aleph) = g(A_{\aleph}\gamma, P\zeta), \end{equation}$

(2.11)

Consider that $\overline{\nabla}$ is a metric connection. We get

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}{g})(\zeta, \eta) = {g}(h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta), \eta)+ {g}(h^{l}(\gamma, \zeta \eta), \zeta). \end{equation}$

(2.12)

Using the characteristics of a linear connection, we can obtain

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \eta) = \nabla_{\gamma}^{l}(h^{l}(\zeta, \eta))- h^{l}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \eta)-h^{l}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\eta), \end{equation}$

(2.13)

$\begin{equation} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \eta) = \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}(h^{s}(\zeta, \eta))- h^{s}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \eta)-h^{s}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\eta). \end{equation}$

(2.14)

Based on the description of a CR-lightlike submanifold in ^[4], we have

$\Upsilon\aleph = \lambda \oplus \lambda',$

where $\lambda = Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot {\psi} Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot \lambda_{0}.$

$S$ and $Q$ stand for the projection on $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ , respectively, then

$\begin{equation} \label{1e11} \nonumber {\psi}\gamma = f\gamma + w\gamma \end{equation}$

for $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph),$ where $f\gamma = {\psi}S\gamma$ and $w\gamma = {\psi}Q\gamma.$

On the other hand, we have

$\begin{equation} \label{1e12} \nonumber {\psi}\zeta = B\zeta + C\zeta \end{equation}$

for any $\zeta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ $B\zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph)$ and $C\zeta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ unless $\aleph_{1}$ and $\aleph_{2}$ are denoted as ${\psi}L_{1}$ and ${\psi}L_{2},$ respectively.

Lemma 2.1. Assume that the screen distribution is totally geodesic and that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold, then $\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon N)),$ where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)).$

Proof. For $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph)),$

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - h(\gamma, \zeta), \aleph)\\ & = & - {g} (\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \aleph). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.8),

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) & = & - {g}(\zeta, -A_{\aleph}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{\bot}\aleph) \\ & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\aleph}\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.11),

${g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) = {g}(h^{*}(\gamma, \zeta), \aleph).$

Since screen distribution is totally geodesic, $h^{*}(\gamma, \zeta) = 0,$

${g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta, \aleph) = 0.$

Using Lemma 1.2 in ^[1] p.g. 142, we have

$\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)),$

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon \aleph)).$

Theorem 2.2. Assume that $\aleph$ is a locally golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ with CR-lightlike properties, then $\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma = \psi\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma$ for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

Proof. Assume that $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$ Using (2.5), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\psi\gamma-h(\gamma, \psi\gamma), \zeta)\\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta) \\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma, \zeta) & = & {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta), \\ {g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma - \psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma), \zeta) & = & 0. \end{eqnarray}$

Nondegeneracy of $\lambda_{0}$ implies

$\nabla_{\gamma}\psi\gamma = \psi(\nabla_{\gamma}\gamma),$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

3. Geodesic CR-lightlike submanifolds

Definition 3.1. ^[4] A CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold is mixed geodesic if $h$ satisfies

$h(\gamma, \alpha) = 0,$

where $h$ stands for second fundamental form, $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda),$ and $\alpha \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

For $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda)$ and $\alpha, \beta \in \Gamma (\lambda')$ if

$h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

and

$h(\alpha, \beta) = 0,$

then it is known as $\lambda$ -geodesic and $\lambda'$ -geodesic, respectively.

Theorem 3.2. Assume $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph}$ , which is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold. $\aleph$ is totally geodesic if

$(L_{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

and

$(L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

for $\alpha, \beta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)) \;$ , and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. Since $\aleph$ is totally geodesic, then

$h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$

for $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph).$

We know that $h(\gamma, \zeta) = 0$ if

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0$

and

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0.$

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma} \zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \xi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \xi] + \overline{\nabla}_{\xi}\gamma \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \xi]) + {g}(\gamma, [\xi, \zeta]) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\xi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\xi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) - {g}(\xi, h(\gamma, \zeta))) \\ 2{g}(h(\gamma, \zeta) & = & - (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Since ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0,$ we have

$\begin{equation} \label{2e1} \nonumber (L_{\xi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0. \end{equation}$

Similarly,

$\begin{eqnarray} \ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, [\gamma, \chi]) + {g}(\gamma, [\chi, \zeta]) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\chi, \gamma) \\ {} & = & - (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) + {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\zeta}\chi, \gamma) \\ 2{g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Since ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0,$ we get

$\begin{equation} \label{2e2} \nonumber (L_{\chi}{g})(\gamma, \zeta) = 0 \end{equation}$

for $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Lemma 3.3. Assume that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold whose submanifold $\aleph$ is CR-lightlike, then

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, \zeta)$

for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda') \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. Using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {g} (h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & {g}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.9), it follows that

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - {g}(\zeta, - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \chi)) \\ {} & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma) - {g} (\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi) - {g}(\zeta, \lambda^{s}(\gamma, \chi)) \\ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g}(\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma), \end{eqnarray}$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda') \; , \; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Theorem 3.4. Assume that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold and $\overline{\aleph}$ is mixed geodesic if

$A^{*}_{\xi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot {\psi}L_{1})$

and

$A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot {\psi}L_{1})$

for $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)), \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. For $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \; \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda'), \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})),$ we get

Using (2.5),

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \xi) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Again using (2.5), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & - {g}(\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}\xi + h(\gamma, \xi)) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\zeta, \nabla_{\gamma}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.10), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) & = & - {g}( \zeta, - A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma + \nabla^{*t}_{\gamma}\xi) \\ {g}( \zeta, A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma)& = & 0. \end{eqnarray}$

Since the CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ is mixed geodesic, we have

${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \xi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g}( \zeta, A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma) = 0$

$\Rightarrow A_{\xi}^{*}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot {\psi}L_{1}),$

where $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda), \zeta \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

From (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g} (\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - {g} (\zeta, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & - {g} (\zeta, - A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi))\\ {g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) & = & {g} (\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

Since, $\aleph$ is mixed geodesic, then ${g}(h(\gamma, \zeta), \chi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g} (\zeta, A_{\chi}\gamma) = 0.$

$A_{\chi}\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0} \bot Rad(\Upsilon\aleph) \bot\psi_{1}).$

Theorem 3.5. Suppose that $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph},$ then $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ -geodesic if $A_{\chi}\eta$ and $A_{\xi}^{*}\eta$ have no component in $\aleph_{2}\bot {\psi}Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)$ for $\eta \in \Gamma (\lambda'), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)), \; \;$ and $\; \chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. From (2.5), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta - \nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi) \\ {} & = & - \overline{g}(\nabla_{\gamma}\zeta, \chi), \end{eqnarray}$

where $\chi, \beta \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & - {g}(\beta, - A_{\chi}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{s}+ \lambda^{l}(\eta, \chi)) \\ {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) & = & {g}(\beta, A_{\chi}\eta) . \end{eqnarray}$

(3.1)

Since $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ -geodesic, then ${g}(h(\eta, \beta), \chi) = 0.$

From (3.1), we get

${g}(\beta, A_{\chi}\eta) = 0.$

Now,

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta - \nabla_{\eta}\beta, \xi) \\ {} & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\beta, \xi) = - {g}(\beta, \overline{\nabla}_{\eta} \xi). \end{eqnarray}$

From (2.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & - {g}(\eta, - A_{\xi}^{*}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{*t}\xi) \\ {g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\xi}^{*}\beta, \eta). \label{2e4} \end{eqnarray}$

Since $\aleph$ is $\lambda'$ - geodesic, then

${g}(h(\eta, \beta), \xi) = 0$

$\Rightarrow {g}( A_{\xi}^{*}\beta, \eta) = 0.$

Thus, $A_{\chi}\eta$ and $A^{*}_{\xi}\eta$ have no component in $M_{2}\bot \psi Rad(\Upsilon\aleph).$

Lemma 3.6. Assume that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold that has a CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ . Due to the distribution's integrability, the following criteria hold.

(ⅰ) $\psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) - {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi}\zeta),$

(ⅱ) ${g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma), \xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi} \xi),$

(ⅲ) ${g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}(A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi),$

where $\gamma, \zeta \in \Gamma (\Upsilon\aleph), \; \xi \in \Gamma (Rad(\Upsilon\aleph)),$ and $\chi \in \Gamma (S(\Upsilon\aleph^{\bot})).$

Proof. From Eq (2.9), we obtain

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\chi + A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma - \nabla_{\psi\gamma}^{s}\chi, \zeta) \\ {} & = & - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & - {g}(\chi, {\nabla}_{\psi\gamma}\zeta + h({\psi}\gamma, \zeta)) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta)\\ {} & = & - {g}(\chi, h(\gamma, {\psi}\zeta)) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Again, using (2.5), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}{\psi}\zeta - \nabla_{\gamma}{\psi}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) \\ {} & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\chi, {\psi}\zeta) + {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) & = & {g}(- A_{\chi}\gamma + \nabla_{\gamma}^{s}\chi + \lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) + \\ {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \zeta) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi}\zeta) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \zeta) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi}\zeta). \end{eqnarray}$

(ⅱ) Using (2.9), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma - \nabla_{{\psi}\gamma}^{s}\chi + {\nabla}_{{\psi}\gamma}\chi, \xi ) \\ {} & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \xi) - {g}(\chi, \overline{\nabla}_{{\psi}\gamma}\xi ). \end{eqnarray}$

Using (2.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} {} {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \xi) + {g}(\chi, A^{*}_{\xi}{\psi}\gamma ) - {g}(\chi, \nabla^{*t}_{{\psi}\gamma}, \xi) \\ {g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma), \xi) & = & {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi} \xi). \end{eqnarray}$

(ⅲ) Replacing $\zeta$ by $\psi\xi$ in (ⅰ), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), {\psi^{2}}\xi) = {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, {\psi^{2}}\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

Using Definition 2.1 in ^[18] p.g. 9, we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), (\psi+I)\xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, (\psi+I)\xi)\\ \psi{g}(\lambda^{l}({\psi}\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \psi\xi) - {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - \\ && {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \xi).\\ {g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, \chi), \xi) & = & {g}(A_{\chi}{\psi}\gamma, \psi\xi) - {g}( A_{\chi}\gamma, \psi\xi). \end{eqnarray}$

4. Totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifolds

Definition 4.1. ^[12] A CR-lightlike submanifold of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold is totally umbilical if there is a smooth transversal vector field $H \in tr\ \Gamma (\Upsilon \aleph)$ that satisfies

$h(\chi, \eta) = H g(\chi, \eta),$

where $h$ is stands for second fundamental form and $\chi, \ \eta \in \ \Gamma (\Upsilon \aleph).$

Theorem 4.2. Assume that the screen distribution is totally geodesic and that $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ , then

$A_{\psi \eta}\chi = A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \; \forall \; \chi, \eta \in \Gamma \lambda'.$

Proof. Given that $\overline{\aleph}$ is a golden semi-Riemannian manifold,

$\psi\overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\chi = \overline{\nabla}_{\eta}\psi\chi.$

Using (2.5) and (2.6), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi(\nabla_{\eta}\chi) + \psi(h(\eta, \chi)) & = & - A_{\psi\chi}\eta + \nabla_{\eta}^{t}\psi\chi. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.1)

Interchanging $\eta$ and $\chi$ , we obtain

$\begin{equation} \psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta) + \psi(h(\chi, \eta)) = - A_{\psi \eta}\chi + \nabla_{\chi}^{t}\psi \eta. \end{equation}$

(4.2)

Subtracting Eqs (4.1) and (4.2), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \psi(\nabla_{\eta}\chi - \nabla_{\chi}\eta) - \nabla_{\eta}^{t}\psi\chi + \nabla_{\chi}^{t}\psi \eta & = & A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta. \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

Taking the inner product with $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0})$ in (4.3), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \gamma) - {g}(\psi(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \gamma) & = & {g}(A_{\psi \eta}\chi, \gamma) \\ && -{g}(A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma). \\ {g}(A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma) = {g}&(\nabla_{\chi}\eta,&- \psi\gamma) {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.4)

Now,

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & {g}(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\eta - h(\chi, \eta), \psi\gamma) \\ {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & - {g}(\eta, (\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\psi)\gamma - \psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\gamma)). \end{eqnarray}$

Since $\psi$ is parallel to $\overline{\nabla},$ i.e., $\overline{\nabla}_{\gamma}\psi = 0,$

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = - \psi(\overline{\nabla}_{\chi}\gamma)).$

Using (2.7), we have

$\begin{eqnarray} {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = &- {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma + h^{s}(\chi, \gamma) + h^{l}(\chi, \gamma))\\ {g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) & = & - {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma) - {g}(\psi \eta, h^{s}(\chi, \gamma)) - {g}(\psi \eta, h^{l}(\chi, \gamma)). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.5)

Since $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold and the screen distribution is totally geodesic,

$h^{s}(\chi, \gamma) = H^{s}{g}(\chi, \gamma) = 0$

and

$h^{l}(\chi, \gamma) = H^{l}{g}(\chi, \gamma) = 0,$

where $\chi \in \Gamma (\lambda')$ and $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}).$

From (4.5), we have

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = - {g} (\psi \eta, \nabla_{\chi}\gamma).$

From Lemma 2.1, we get

${g}(\nabla_{\chi}\eta, \psi\gamma) = 0.$

Similarly,

${g}(\nabla_{\eta}\chi, \psi\gamma) = 0$

Using (4.4), we have

$g(A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi\chi}\eta, \gamma) = 0.$

Since $\lambda_{0}$ is nondegenerate,

$A_{\psi \eta}\chi - A_{\psi \chi}\eta = 0$

$\Rightarrow A_{\psi \eta}\chi = A_{\psi\chi}\eta.$

Theorem 4.3. Let $\aleph$ be the totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of the golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ . Consequently, $\aleph$ 's sectional curvature, which is CR-lightlike, vanishes, resulting in $\overline{K}(\pi) = 0,$ for the entire CR-lightlike section $\pi.$

Proof. We know that $\aleph$ is a totally umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold of $\overline{\aleph},$ then from (2.13) and (2.14),

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma}H^{l}-H^{l}\{ (\nabla_{\gamma}g)(\zeta, \omega)\} , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.6)

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma}H^{s}-H^{s}\{ (\nabla_{\gamma}g)(\zeta, \omega)\} \end{eqnarray}$

(4.7)

for a CR-lightlike section $\pi = \gamma\wedge \omega, \; \gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda_{0}), \omega \in \Gamma (\lambda').$

From (2.12), we have $(\nabla_{U}g)(\zeta, \omega) = 0.$ Therefore, from (4.6) and (4.7), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{l})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma}H^{l} , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.8)

$\begin{eqnarray} (\nabla_{\gamma}h^{s})(\zeta, \omega) = g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma}H^{s} . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.9)

Now, from (4.8) and (4.9), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \{\overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta)\omega \}^{tr} & = & g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}- g(\gamma, \omega)\nabla^{l}_{\zeta} H^{l} + g(\zeta, \omega)\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}) \\ && - g(\gamma, \omega)\lambda^{l}(\zeta, H^{s})+g(\zeta, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}-g(\gamma, \omega)\nabla^{s}_{\zeta}H^{s} \\ && +g(\zeta, \omega)\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l})-g(\gamma, \omega)\lambda^{s}(\zeta, H^{l}). \end{eqnarray}$

(4.10)

For any $\beta \in \Gamma (tr(\Upsilon\aleph))$ , from Equation (4.10), we get

$\begin{eqnarray} \overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta, \omega, \beta ) & = & g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}, \beta)- g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\zeta} H^{l}, \beta) + \\ && g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}), \zeta) - g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\lambda^{l}(\zeta, H^{s}), \beta)+ \\ && g(\zeta, \omega) {g}(\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}, \beta)-g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\nabla^{s}_{\zeta}H^{s}, \beta) \\ && +g(\zeta, \omega){g}(\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l}), \beta)- g(\gamma, \omega){g}(\lambda^{s}(\zeta, H^{l}, \beta). \label{4e11} \end{eqnarray}$

$\begin{eqnarray} {R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega ) & = & g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\gamma} H^{l}, \psi\omega)- g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{l}_{\omega} H^{l}, \psi\omega) + \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{l}(\gamma, H^{s}), \psi\omega) - g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{l}(\omega, H^{s}), \psi\omega)+ \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma) {g}(\nabla^{s}_{\gamma} H^{s}, \psi\omega)-g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\nabla^{s}_{\omega}H^{s}, \psi\omega) + \\ && g(\omega, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{s}(\gamma, H^{l}), \psi\omega)- g(\gamma, \psi\gamma){g}(\lambda^{s}(\omega, H^{l}, \psi U). \label{4e13} \end{eqnarray}$

For any unit vectors $\gamma \in \Gamma (\lambda)$ and $\omega \in \Gamma (\lambda'),$ we have

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega) = \overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \gamma, \omega) = 0.$

We have

$K(\gamma) = K_{N}(\gamma \wedge \zeta) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \zeta)\zeta, \gamma),$

where

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \gamma, \omega) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega)\gamma, \omega)$

$\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega, \psi\gamma, \psi\omega) = g(\overline{R}(\gamma, \omega)\psi\gamma, \psi\omega)$

i.e.,

$\overline{K}(\pi) = 0$

for all CR-sections $\pi.$

5. Example

Example 5.1. We consider a semi-Riemannian manifold $R_{2}^{6}$ and a submanifold $\aleph$ of co-dimension $2$ in $R_{2}^{6},$ given by equations

$\upsilon_{5} = \upsilon_{1}{\mathrm{cos}}\alpha - \upsilon_{2}{\mathrm{sin}}\alpha - \upsilon_{3}z_{4} {\mathrm{tan}}\alpha,$

$\upsilon_{6} = \upsilon_{1}{\mathrm{sin}}\alpha - \upsilon_{2}{\mathrm{cos}}\alpha - \upsilon_{3}\upsilon_{4},$

where $\alpha \in R - \{ \frac{\pi}{2} + k\pi; \ k \in z \}.$ The structure on $R^{6}_{2}$ is defined by

$\psi( \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} , \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}) = (\overline{\phi} \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \overline{\phi} \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}}, \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} ).$

Now,

$\psi^{2} ( \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} , \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}) = ((\overline{\phi}+ 1) \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}}, (\overline{\phi} + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}}, (\phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{3}}, (\phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}},$

$( \phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}}, ( \phi + 1) \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} )$

$\psi^{2} = \psi + I.$

It follows that $(R_{2}^{6}, \psi)$ is a golden semi-Reimannian manifold.

The tangent bundle $\Upsilon\aleph$ is spanned by

$Z_{0} = - {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \mathrm{cos}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} - \phi \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}},$

$Z_{1} = - \phi \ {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \phi \ {\mathrm{cos}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}} + \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}},$

$Z_{2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{5}} - \overline{\phi} \ {\mathrm{sin}}\alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{1}},$

$Z_{3} = - \overline{\phi} \ {\mathrm{cos}} \alpha \ \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{2}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{4}} + i \frac{\partial}{\partial \upsilon_{6}}.$

Thus, $\aleph$ is a 1-lightlike submanifold of $R_{2}^{6}$ with $Rad\Upsilon\aleph = \mathrm{Span}\{X_{0}\}$ . Using golden structure of $R_{2}^{6},$ we obtain that $X_{1} = \psi(X_{0}).$ Thus, $\psi(Rad\Upsilon\aleph)$ is a distribution on $\aleph.$ Hence, the $\aleph$ is a CR-lightlike submanifold.

6. Conclusions

In general relativity, particularly in the context of the black hole theory, lightlike geometry finds its uses. An investigation is made into the geometry of the $\aleph$ golden semi-Riemannian manifolds that are CR-lightlike in nature. There are many intriguing findings on completely umbilical and completely geodesic CR-lightlike submanifolds that are examined. We present a required condition for a CR-lightlike submanifold to be completely geodesic. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the sectional curvature $K$ of an entirely umbilical CR-lightlike submanifold $\aleph$ of a golden semi-Riemannian manifold $\overline{\aleph}$ disappears.

Use of AI tools declaration

The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Acknowledgments

The present work (manuscript number IU/R $\&$ D/2022-MCN0001708) received financial assistance from Integral University in Lucknow, India as a part of the seed money project IUL/IIRC/SMP/2021/010. All of the authors would like to express their gratitude to the university for this support. The authors are highly grateful to editors and referees for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving the paper. The present manuscript represents the corrected version of preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2210.10445. The revised version incorporates the identities of all those who have made contributions, taking into account their respective skills and understanding.

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interests.

References

[1]	L. Wei, Y. Yang, Optimal order finite difference/local discontinuous Galerkin method for variable-order time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 383 (2021), 113129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.113129 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113129
[2]	Y. Y. Wang, Y. P. Zhang, C. Q. Dai, Re-study on localized structures based on variable separation solutions from the modified tanh-function method, Nonlinear Dyn., 83 (2016), 1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2406-5 doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-2406-5
[3]	H. Zhang, X. Jiang, X. Yang, A time-space spectral method for the time-space fractional Fokker–Planck equation and its inverse problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 320 (2018), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.09.040 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.09.040
[4]	K. J. Wang, S. Li, Study on the local fractional (3+1)-dimensional modified Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation by a simple approach, Fractals, 32 (2024), 2450091. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X24500919 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X24500919
[5]	K. Diethelm, N. J. Ford, The analysis of fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 265 (2002), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.7194 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7194
[6]	X. Jiang, H. Qi, Thermal wave model of bioheat transfer with modified Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 45 (2012), 485101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/48/485101 doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/45/48/485101
[7]	M. T. Islam, M. A. Akter, Distinct solutions of nonlinear space–time fractional evolution equations appearing in mathematical physics via a new technique, PDE Appl. Math., 3 (2021), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100031 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100031
[8]	B. Ghanbari, K. S. Nisar, M. Aldhaifallah, Abundant solitary wave solutions to an extended nonlinear Schrödinger's equation with conformable derivative using an efficient integration method, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02787-7 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02787-7
[9]	U. H. M. Zaman, M. A. Arefin, M. A. Akbar, M. H. Uddin, Study of the soliton propagation of the fractional nonlinear type evolution equation through a novel technique, PLos One, 18 (2023), e0285178. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285178 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285178
[10]	H. C. Yaslan, A. Girgin, Exp-function method for the conformable space-time fractional STO, ZKBBM and coupled Boussinesq equations, Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci., 26 (2019), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2019.1580815 doi: 10.1080/25765299.2019.1580815
[11]	M. M. Khater, D. Kumar, New exact solutions for the time fractional coupled Boussinesq-Burger equation and approximate long water wave equation in shallow water, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 2 (2017), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2017.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2017.07.001
[12]	S. X. Deng, X. X. Ge, Analytical solution to local fractional Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation on fractal media, Ther. Sci., 25 (2021), 4449–4455. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI2106449D doi: 10.2298/TSCI2106449D
[13]	S. Javeed, S. Saif, A. Waheed, D. Baleanu, Exact solutions of fractional mBBM equation and coupled system of fractional Boussinesq-Burgers, Results Phys., 9 (2018), 1275–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.026 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.026
[14]	M. Khater, D. Lu, R. A. Attia, Dispersive long wave of nonlinear fractional Wu-Zhang system via a modified auxiliary equation method, AIP Adv., 9 (2019), 025003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5087647 doi: 10.1063/1.5087647
[15]	Z. Z. Si, Y. Y. Wang, C. Q. Dai, Switching, explosion, and chaos of multi-wavelength soliton states in ultrafast fiber lasers, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astronomy, 67 (2024), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2365-7 doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2365-7
[16]	X. Lü, S. J. Chen, G. Z. Liu, W. X. Ma, Study on lump behavior for a new (3+1)-dimensional generalised Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, East Asian J. Appl. Math., 11 (2021), 594–603. https://doi.org/10.4208/eajam.101120.180221 doi: 10.4208/eajam.101120.180221
[17]	Z. Liang, Z. Li-Feng, L. Chong-Yin, Some new exact solutions of Jacobian elliptic function about the generalized Boussinesq equation and Boussinesq-Burgers equation, Chinese Phys. B, 17 (2008), 403. https://doi.org10.1088/1674-1056/17/2/009 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/17/2/009
[18]	R. Ali, E. Tag-eldin, A comparative analysis of generalized and extended (G' G)-Expansion methods for travelling wave solutions of fractional Maccari's system with complex structure, Alex. Eng. J., 79 (2023), 508–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.007
[19]	S. Guo, L. Mei, Y. Li, Y. Sun, The improved fractional sub-equation method and its applications to the space–time fractional differential equations in fluid mechanics, Phys. Lett. A, 376 (2012), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.10.056 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.10.056
[20]	K. J. Wang, S. Li, Complexiton, complex multiple kink soliton and the rational wave solutions to the generalized (3+1)-dimensional kadomtsev-petviashvili equation, Phys. Scripta, 99 (2024), 075214. https://doi.org10.1088/1402-4896/ad5062 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad5062
[21]	S. S. Ray, R. K. Bera, Analytical solution of a fractional diffusion equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 174 (2006), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.082 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.082
[22]	M. Dehghan, J. Manafian, A. Saadatmandi, Solving nonlinear fractional partial differential equations using the homotopy analysis method, Numer. Meth. PDE: Int. J., 26 (2010), 448–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20460 doi: 10.1002/num.20460
[23]	M. A. Khatun, M. A. Arefin, M. A. Akbar, M. H. Uddin, Numerous explicit soliton solutions to the fractional simplified Camassa-Holm equation through two reliable techniques, Ain Shams Eng. J., 14 (2023), 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102214 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102214
[24]	V. K. Srivastava, M. K. Awasthi, S. Kumar, Analytical approximations of two and three dimensional time-fractional telegraphic equation by reduced differential transform method, Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 1 (2014), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbas.2014.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ejbas.2014.01.002
[25]	V. Ala, U. Demirbilek, K. R. Mamedov, An application of improved Bernoulli sub-equation function method to the nonlinear conformable time-fractional SRLW equation, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 3751–3761. https://doi:10.3934/math.2020243 doi: 10.3934/math.2020243
[26]	I. Ullah, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, S. Barak, Pioneering the plethora of soliton for the (3+1)-dimensional fractional heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation, Phys. Scripta, 99 (2024), 095229. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad6ae6 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad6ae6
[27]	U. H. M. Zaman, M. A. Arefin, M. A. Akbar, M. H. Uddin, Analyzing numerous travelling wave behavior to the fractional-order nonlinear Phi-4 and Allen-Cahn equations throughout a novel technique, Results Phys., 37 (2022), 105486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105486 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105486
[28]	U. H. M. Zaman, M. A. Arefin, M. A. Akbar, M. H. Uddin, Solitary wave solution to the space-time fractional modified Equal Width equation in plasma and optical fiber systems, Results Phys., 52 (2023), 106903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106903 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106903
[29]	R. M. Zulqarnain, W. X. Ma, K. B. Mehdi, I. Siddique, A. M. Hassan, S. Askar, Physically significant solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional Landau-Ginsburg-Higgs equation via three consistent methods, Front. Phys., 11 (2023), 1205060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1205060 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2023.1205060
[30]	I. Ullah, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, Study of traveling soliton and fronts phenomena in fractional Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation, Phys. Scripta, 99 (2024), 055259. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad3c7e doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad3c7e
[31]	M. Bilal, J. Iqbal, I. Ullah, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, Using extended direct algebraic method to investigate families of solitary wave solutions for the space-time fractional modified benjamin bona mahony equation, Phys. Scripta, 100 (2024), 015283. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad96e9 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad96e9
[32]	I. Ullah, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, M. M. Alam, A. S. Hendy, S. Barak, Dynamics behaviours of kink solitons in conformable Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 23 (2024), 268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-024-01119-4 doi: 10.1007/s12346-024-01119-4
[33]	M. Bilal, J. Iqbal, R. Ali, F. A. Awwad, E. A. Ismail, Exploring families of solitary wave solutions for the fractional coupled Higgs system using modified extended direct algebraic method, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7090653 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7090653
[34]	M. Bilal, J. Iqbal, I. Ullah, K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, Using extended direct algebraic method to investigate families of solitary wave solutions for the space-time fractional modified benjamin bona mahony equation, Phys. Scripta, 100 (2024), 015283. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad96e9 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad96e9
[35]	A. Khan, I. Ullah, J. Iqbal, K. Shah, M. Bilal, An innovative method for solving the nonlinear fractional diffusion reaction equation with quadratic nonlinearity analysis, Phys. Scripta, 100 (2024), 015209. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad952b doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad952b
[36]	I. Ullah, M. Bilal, A. Sharma, H. Khan, S. Bhardwaj, S. K. Sharma, A novel approach is proposed for obtaining exact travelling wave solutions to the space-time fractional Phi-4 equation, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 32674–32695. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241564 doi: 10.3934/math.20241564
[37]	I. Ullah, Dynamics behaviours of N-kink solitons in conformable Fisher-Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation, Eng. Comput., 41 (2024), 2404–2426. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-04-2024-0358 doi: 10.1108/EC-04-2024-0358
[38]	M. Bilal, J. Iqbal, K. Shah, B. Abdalla, T. Abdeljawad, I. Ullah, Analytical solutions of the space-time fractional Kundu-Eckhaus equation by using modified extended direct algebraic method, PDE Appl. Math., 11 (2024), 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100832 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100832

This article has been cited by:

Bang-Yen Chen, Majid Ali Choudhary, Afshan Perween, A Comprehensive Review of Golden Riemannian Manifolds, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 724, 10.3390/axioms13100724

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)