
The main aim of this paper is to study the Cauchy problem for nonlinear differential equations of fractional order containing the weighted Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function. The equivalence of this problem and a nonlinear Volterra-type integral equation of the second kind have been presented. In addition, the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the considered Cauchy problem are proved using Banach's fixed point theorem and the method of successive approximations. Finally, we obtain a new estimate of the weighted Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of a function with respect to functions at their extreme points. With the assistance of the estimate obtained, we develop the comparison theorems of fractional differential inequalities, strict as well as nonstrict, involving weighted Riemann-Liouville differential operators of a function with respect to functions of order δ, 0<δ<1.
Citation: Iman Ben Othmane, Lamine Nisse, Thabet Abdeljawad. On Cauchy-type problems with weighted R-L fractional derivatives of a function with respect to another function and comparison theorems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14106-14129. doi: 10.3934/math.2024686
[1] | Xiaoyong Xu, Fengying Zhou . Orthonormal Euler wavelets method for time-fractional Cattaneo equation with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2736-2762. doi: 10.3934/math.2023144 |
[2] | Aslı Alkan, Halil Anaç . A new study on the Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27979-27997. doi: 10.3934/math.20241358 |
[3] | Alessandra Jannelli, Maria Paola Speciale . On the numerical solutions of coupled nonlinear time-fractional reaction-diffusion equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 9109-9125. doi: 10.3934/math.2021529 |
[4] | Junseok Kim . A normalized Caputo–Fabrizio fractional diffusion equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6195-6208. doi: 10.3934/math.2025282 |
[5] | Ritu Agarwal, Mahaveer Prasad Yadav, Dumitru Baleanu, S. D. Purohit . Existence and uniqueness of miscible flow equation through porous media with a non singular fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1062-1073. doi: 10.3934/math.2020074 |
[6] | Muhammed Naeem, Noufe H. Aljahdaly, Rasool Shah, Wajaree Weera . The study of fractional-order convection-reaction-diffusion equation via an Elzake Atangana-Baleanu operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18080-18098. doi: 10.3934/math.2022995 |
[7] | Chaeyoung Lee, Yunjae Nam, Minjoon Bang, Seokjun Ham, Junseok Kim . Numerical investigation of the dynamics for a normalized time-fractional diffusion equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 26671-26687. doi: 10.3934/math.20241297 |
[8] | Krunal B. Kachhia, Jyotindra C. Prajapati . Generalized iterative method for the solution of linear and nonlinear fractional differential equations with composite fractional derivative operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 2888-2898. doi: 10.3934/math.2020186 |
[9] | Sami Ul Haq, Saeed Ullah Jan, Syed Inayat Ali Shah, Ilyas Khan, Jagdev Singh . Heat and mass transfer of fractional second grade fluid with slippage and ramped wall temperature using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3056-3088. doi: 10.3934/math.2020198 |
[10] | Yumei Chen, Jiajie Zhang, Chao Pan . Numerical approximation of a variable-order time fractional advection-reaction-diffusion model via shifted Gegenbauer polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15612-15632. doi: 10.3934/math.2022855 |
The main aim of this paper is to study the Cauchy problem for nonlinear differential equations of fractional order containing the weighted Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function. The equivalence of this problem and a nonlinear Volterra-type integral equation of the second kind have been presented. In addition, the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the considered Cauchy problem are proved using Banach's fixed point theorem and the method of successive approximations. Finally, we obtain a new estimate of the weighted Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of a function with respect to functions at their extreme points. With the assistance of the estimate obtained, we develop the comparison theorems of fractional differential inequalities, strict as well as nonstrict, involving weighted Riemann-Liouville differential operators of a function with respect to functions of order δ, 0<δ<1.
In the literature of fractional calculus, we have lots of operators of fractional derivative as: the Hillfer-Prabhakar derivatives [1], the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative [2,3]. In recent years fractional calculus has received considerable attention to solving the mathematics, engineering, mathematical physics and biological problems. Fractional calculus has been playing a Vitol roll in the viscoelastic and diffusion models. In [4], Hristov works on integral solution of fractional subdivisional differential equation by applying integral approach. In [5,6], Hristov established the relation between Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and Cattaneo heat diffusion equation with Jeffrey's kernel the derivative of heat diffusion equation. Hristov was the first researcher who developed the physical importance of the recently defined Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with non-singular kernel in heat diffusion equation. In [7], Hristov used recently developed Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative and Mittag-leffler function to construct adequate physical form of heat diffusion equation, for others models see in [8].
In the classical diffusion equation we obtained diffusion equation of fractional order when just replacing ordinary derivative by a specific fractional derivative operator. In this work, we use the Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative. Here, we present the solution in analytical form of one and two-dimensional spaces of the fractional diffusion equations. Koca et al. [9] generalized the Hristov model of elastic heat diffusion (EHD) equation and solved it explicitly difference scheme and also numerical approximation for first and second order approximation was introduced. Alkahtani et al. [10] introduced solution in terms of numerical results of the CCHD (complete Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion) equation by applying the numerical scheme "Crank-Nicholson". Hristov [11] introduced an approximate solution of the Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion (CHD) equation by using many more method like the "heat-balance integral method" (HBIM) and "Double integral-balance method" and also to obtained the approximate solution of the CHD equation using HBIM and DIM were proposed in [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In [9] Koca et al gives the analytical solution of the CHD equation. In this article, we continue the work concerning the analytical solution stated by Koca et al. in [9]. In this article, we investigate complete Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion (CCHD) equation and FDE (fractional diffusion equation) in one and two dimensional spaces and find their analytic solution under the Dirichlet boundary conditions by using an integral transform method. This method uses both the Fourier sine transform and the Elzaki transform. With the help of this method we demonstrate the analytical solutions of the fractional diffusion equations (FDE) in term of the Mittag-Leffer function [19,20].
In this portion, we study important definitions related to fractional calculus and Elzaki transform to understand the further results.
The Elzaki transform [21] of the function f(t) is given by
E[f(t)]=T(v)=v∫∞0f(t)e−tvdt,t>0,v∈(−k1,k2) | (2.1) |
then the Elzaki transform of the convolution of f(t) and g(t) is express as
E[(f∗g)(t)]=1vM(v)N(v) | (2.2) |
Where
(f∗g)(t)=∫t0f(x−t)g(t)dt | (2.3) |
Whenever the integral is defined.
Caputo-Fabrizio [2] fractional time derivative is defined as
Dαtf(t)=M(α)(1−α)∫ta˙f(t)e[−α(t−τ)1−α]dτ | (2.4) |
We suppose the function M(α) and a = 0
Elzaki transform of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative
E[Dαtf(t)]=1(1−α)v∫∞0e−tvt∫a˙f(t)e[−α(t−τ)1−α]dτdt |
The convolution property of Elzaki transform is defined as
E[Dαtf(t)]=v(1−α)⋅E[˙f(t)]∗(e−αt(1−α))=v(1−α)⋅1v[T(v)v−v(f(0))]⋅v21+α(1−α)v=vT(v)−v3f(0)1−α(1−v)E[Dαtf(t)]=vE[f(t)]−v3f(0)1−α(1−v). | (2.5) |
Prabhakar introduced the generalized Mittag-Leffler function [22,23], in the following form
Eδσ,η(z)=∑∞r=0Γ(δ+k)Γ(δ)Γ(σk+η)zrr! | (2.6) |
Where σ,δ,η∈C and R(σ)>0
Another important result which will be used in this study [24], is given by
tη−1Eδσ,η(ωtσ)=Eδσ,η,ω(t),σ,δ,η,ω∈C,t∈R with R(η),R(σ)>0. | (2.7) |
The well known Prabhakar integral is expressed in the similar way, replacing kernel by function and is defined as follows [24,25].
The Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative of g(t) of order μ denoted by Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+g(t) and defined as
Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+g(t)=(E−γνσ,ν(1−μ),ω,0++ddt(E−γ(1−ν)σ,(1−ν)(1−μ),ω,0+g))(t), | (2.8) |
Where μ∈(0,1),v∈[0,1] and γ,ω∈R,σ>0, and E0σ,0,ω,0+g=g.
The Elzaki transform of the Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative of fractional order is given by
E(E−γvσ,v(1−μ),ω,0+ddt(E−γ(1−v)σ,(1−v)(1−μ),ω,0+g))(p)=p−μ(1−ωpσ)γE[g](p)−pv(1−μ)+1(1−ωpσ)γv[E−γ(1−v)σ,(1−v)(1−μ),ω,0+g(t)]t=0+ | (2.9) |
Proof: By taking Elzaki transform of Hilfer-Prabhakar fractional derivative and using (2.7), (2.8) and convolution theorem of Elzaki transform, we have
E(Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+g(t))(p)=1pE[tν(1−μ)−1E−γνσ,ν(1−μ)(ωtσ)](p)⋅E[ddt(Eσ,(1−ν)(1−μ),ω,0+g)](p),=pv(1−μ)(1−ωpσ)γv⋅E[ddt(Eσ,(1−v)(1−μ),ω,0+g)](p)=pv(1−μ)(1−ωpσ)γv[pvμ−v−μ(1−ωpσ)γ(1−v)E[g](p)−p(E−γ(1−v)σ,(1−v)(1−μ),ω,0+g)t=0+] |
on simplification, we get the required result (2.9).
One more formula for Elzaki transform is given by
E[tη−1Eδσ,η(ωtσ)]=pη+1[1−ωpσ]−δ | (2.10) |
Fourier sine transform of function f(x) is defined as
Fsine{f(x)}=ˆfsine(k)=√2/π∫∞0f(x)sine(kx)dx | (2.11) |
In this portion, we analyze the FDE (fractional diffusion equation) in one and two-dimensional spaces. The phenomena of diffusion equation [5,25] is express in the following from
∂u(x,t)∂t=k2∂2u(x,t)∂x2 | (3.1) |
where k2=Kρcp.
● K entitled the thermal conductivity, ρ for the specific heat, Cp for the density of the material, u for the temperature distribution of the material.
The FDE characterise by the Hilfer-Prabhakar fractional derivatives is demonstrate in one-dimensional space by the following equation [4,25,26,27]
Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+u(x,t)=k2∂2u(x,t)∂x2,k2 means diffusion coefficient | (3.2) |
Where Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+ represents the Hilfer-Prabhakar fractional derivatives operator defined by
Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+f(t)=(E−γvσ,ν(1−μ),ω,0+ddt(E−γ(1−ν)σ,(1−ν)(1−μ),ω,0+f))(t) | (3.3) |
where γ,ω∈R,σ>0 and E0σ,0,ω,0+f=f. In this article, we used Dirichlet boundary conditions:
● u(x,0)=0 when x>0,
● u(0,t)=1 when t>0
In two-dimensional space the fractional diffusion equation is given by [26]
Dγ,μ,vσ,ω,0+u(x,y,t)=k2{∂2u(x,y,t)∂x2+∂2u(x,y,t)∂y2} | (3.4) |
with B.C.
● u(x,y,0)=0 when x,y>0
● u(0,y,t)=u(x,0,t)=1 when t>0
The boundary conditions play a vital role in the integral method. Note that, when the boundary conditions change, the form of the analytic solution will changes also. There are many methods exist in literature to obtained the analytical solution of the fractional diffusion equation as the Elzaki transform, as the FST (Fourier sine transform) [28] and many more. This paper proposes an integral method consisting of applying both the Elzaki transform and Fourier sine transform.
In this portion, we look into to get the analytical solution of the fractional diffusion equation in 1-dimsional space defined by (3.2), under the Dirichlet boundary conditions defined in a section 3. We can say that the initially temperature of the material is zero and the temp. of the plate (for all is keep up constant U0 = 1. For more detail see in [15,17]. In this article, we assume the following integral method (see in [28]), described as follows:
● Using the FST
● Using the Elzaki transform
➢ Using IET (inverse Elzaki transform)
➢ Using IFST (inverse Fourier sine transform)
To solve the Eq (3.2), first we applying the FST and then multiply by 2 π sin η x and integrating it between 0 to , we arrive at:
Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+us(η,t)=k2{2πηus(0,t)−η2us(η,t)}Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+us(η,t)=2k2ηπ−k2η2us(η,t) |
where us(η,t) denote the Fourier sine transform of u(x,t). After rearranging, we arrive at the following FDE defined as
Dγ,μ,νσ,ω,0+us(η,t)+k2η2us(η,t)=2k2ηπ | (4.1) |
applying the Elzaki transform to both sides of Eq (4.1), and by using (2.9), we have
p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ¯us(η,p)−pν(1−μ)+1(1−ωpσ)γvf(η)+k2η2¯us(η,p)=2k2ηp2π¯us(η,p)[p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ+k2η2]=2k2ηp2π+pv(1−μ)+1(1−ωpσ)γvf(η) |
¯us(η,p)=2k2ηp2π[p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ+k2η2]+pv(1−μ)+1(1−ωpσ)γvf(η)[p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ+k2η2]¯us(η,p)=2k2ηp2πp−μ(1−ωpσ)γ[1+k2η2p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ]+pν(1−μ)+1(1−ωpσ)γνf(η)p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ[1+k2η2p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ] |
¯us(η,p)=2k2ηπpμ+2(1−ωpσ)−γ[1+k2η2p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ]−1+pv(1−μ)+μ+1(1−ωpσ)γv−γf(η)[1+k2η2p−μ(1−ωpσ)γ]−1 |
¯us(η,p)=2π∞∑n=0(−1)nk2n+2η2n+1p(μ(n+1)+1)+1(1−ωpσ)−(n+1)γ+∑∞n=0(−1)nk2nη2np(ν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ)+1(1−ωpσ)−γ((n+1)−v)f(η) | (4.2) |
Where ¯us(η,p) denoted the Elzaki transform of us(η,t). Now, we applying the inverse of the Elzaki transform to both sides of Eq (4.2) and using the Eq (2.10) as follows:
us(η,t)=2π∞∑n=0(−1)nk2n+2η2n+1tμ(n+1)E(n+1)γσ,μ(n+1)+1(ωtσ)+∑∞n=0(−1)nk2nη2ntν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ−1Eγ((n+1)−v)σ,(v(1−μ)+(n+1)μ(ωtσ)f(η) | (4.3) |
Finally, to obtained the analytical solution of Eq (3.2), we applying the inverse of the Fourier sine transform to both sides of Eq (4.3), then we arrive at the following result
u(x,t)=2π∫∞0sinηx(∞∑n=0(−1)nk2n+2η2n+1tμ(n+1)E(n+1)γσ,μ(n+1)+1(ωtσ))dη+2π∫∞0f(η)sinηx(∑∞n=0(−1)nk2nη2ntν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ−1Eγ((n+1)−ν)σ,(ν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ)(ωtσ))dη. | (4.4) |
This is complete analytical solution of the fractional diffusion Eq (3.2).
In this portion, we find the analytical solution of the FDE in two-dimensional space defined by (3.4), with same boundary conditions.
We follow the same process as we done in the section 4. Now applying the Fourier sine transform and multiplying Eq (3.4) by 2πsinωxsinηy and integrating it between 0 to ∞ w.r.to x and y, we arrive at
Dγ,μ,νσ,τ,0+us(ω,η,t)=k2{2(ω2+η2)πωηus(0,0,t)−(ω2+η2)us(ω,η,t)}Dγ,μ,νσ,τ,0+us(ω,η,t)=2k2(ω2+η2)πωη−k2(ω2+η2)us(ω,η,t) |
where us(ω,η,t) denotes the Fourier sine transform of u(x,y,t). After Rearranging, the fractional diffusion equation defined as
Dγ,μ,νσ,τ,0+us(ω,η,t)+k2(ω2+η2)us(ω,η,t)=2k2(ω2+η2)πωη | (5.1) |
We apply the Elzaki transform to both sides of Eq (5.1) and by using (2.9), we have
p−μ(1−τpσ)γ¯us(ω,η,p)−pν(1−μ)+1(1−τpσ)γvf(ω,η)+k2(ω2+η2)¯us(ω,η,p)=2k2(ω2+η2)p2πωη |
¯us(ω,η,p)[p−μ(1−τpσ)γ+k2(ω2+η2)]=2k2(ω2+η2)p2πωη+pν(1−μ)+1(1−τpσ)γνf(ω,η) |
¯us(ω,η,p)=2k2(ω2+η2)p2πωη[p−μ(1−τpσ)γ+k2(ω2+η2)]+pν(1−μ)+1(1−τpσ)γνf(ω,η)[p−μ(1−τpσ)γ+k2(ω2+η2)] |
¯us(ω,η,p)=2πωη∞∑n=0(−1)nk2n+2(ω2+η2)n+1p(μ(n+1)+1)+1(1−τpσ)−(n+1)γ+∑∞n=0(−1)nk2n(ω2+η2)np(ν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ)+1(1−τpσ)−γ((n+1)−v)f(ω,η) | (5.2) |
Where ¯us(ω,η,p) denoted the Elzaki transform of us(ω,η,t). The third step of the solution, we applying the inverse of the Elzaki transform to both sides of Eq (5.2) and using the Eq (2.10) as follows:
us(ω,η,t)=2πωη∞∑n=0(−1)nk2n+2(ω2+η2)n+1tμ(n+1)E(n+1)γσ,μ(n+1)+1(τtσ)+∑∞n=0(−1)nk2n(ω2+η2)ntν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ−1Eγ((n+1)−v)σ,(ν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ)(τtσ)f(ω,η) | (5.3) |
Now, we apply the inverse Fourier sine transform to both sides of Eq (5.3)
u(x,y,t)=4π2∫∞0sinωxω∫∞0sinηyη{∞∑n=0(−1)nk2n+2(ω2+η2)n+1tμ(n+1)E(n+1)γσ,μ(n+1)+1(τtσ)}dωdη+4π2∞∫0∞∫0sinωxsinηyf(ω,η)⋅{∑∞n=0(−1)nk2n(ω2+η2)ntν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ−1Eγ((n+1)−ν)σ,(ν(1−μ)+(n+1)μ(τtσ)}dωdη | (5.4) |
This is complete analytical solution of the fractional diffusion Eq (3.4).
Hristov in [7,8] described the Cattaneo constitutive equation with Jeffrey's kernel to the Caputo-Fabrizio time fractional derivative. Diffusion phenomena, of heat or mass are generally express as [5]:
ρCp∂T∂t=−∂q∂x;q(x,t)=−k∂T(x,t)∂x⇒ρCp∂T∂t=k∂2T∂x2 | (6.1) |
where q(x,t) the flux of heat and it is express by the following relationship
q(x,t)=−∫t−∞R(x,t)∇T(x,t−s)ds | (6.2) |
where R(x,t) is space independent it can be denoted by the Jeffrey kernel R(t)=exp(−(t−s)/τ) where τ is relaxation time [5,9]. The energy balance produces the Cattaneo equation and defined as [5]:
∂T(x,t)∂t=k2Tρcp∫t0exp(−(t−s)/τ)∂T(x,s)∂xds | (6.3) |
In continuation of the Eq (6.3), the Jeffrey type intero-differential equation [5] express in the following form
∂T(x,t)∂t=k1ρcp∂2T(x,t)∂x2+k2Tρcp∫t−∞exp(−(t−s)/τ)∂2T(x,s)∂x2ds | (6.4) |
In the end, by applying the concept of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative recently introduced in [2], Hristov comes to the complete Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion equation [5,6] and defined as
∂T(x,t)∂t=a1∂2T(x,t)∂x2+a2(1−α)CF0Dαt(∂2T(x,t)∂x2) | (6.5) |
where T denote the temperature distribution, a1=k1ρcp and a2=k2ρcp with ρ=const, Cp=constant. The constant k1 and k2 is effective thermal conductivity and the elastic conductivity. denotes the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, see in [2].The boundary conditions defined in the following form
● u(x,0)=0 for x>0,
● u(0,t)=1 for t>0
The Eq (6.5) is known as the entire Cattaneo-Hristov equation of transition heat diffusion equation and for detail see [10].
The second term of the Cattaneo-Hristov equation is express as
∂T(x,t)∂t=a2(1−α)CF0Dαt(∂2T(x,t)∂x2) | (6.6) |
is known as the elastic part of the heat diffusion equation process and it was subject of investigations done by Koca et al. in [9].
In this part, we explore to find the analytical solution of the complete Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion Eq (6.5) with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative by applying Elzaki transform. The boundary conditions considered in this paper are particular cases which we can obtain with Cattaneo-Hristov model of diffusion. All these results obtained in this part can be change when the boundary conditions are changes. Now, before applying the Fourier sine transform and the Elzaki transform, we recall the Elzaki transform of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative given by
E[CF0Dαtf(t)]=vE[f(t)]−v3f(0)1−α(1−v) | (6.7) |
To obtained the solution of the CCHD equation first we multiply the Eq (6.5) by 2πsinωx and integrating it between limit 0 to ∞; we arrive at
∂Ts(ω,t)∂t=a1{2πωTs(0,t)−ω2Ts(ω,t)}+a2(1−α)CF0Dαt{2πωTs(0,t)−ω2Ts(ω,t)}=a1{2πω−ω2Ts(ω,t)}+a2ω2(1−α)CF0DαtTs(ω,t) | (6.8) |
where Ts(ω,t)=Fs[T(x;t)].
Now, taking Elzaki transform to both sides of Eq (6.8), we arrive at
ˉTs(ω,t)v−vTs(ω,0)+a1ω2ˉTs(ω,t)+a2ω2(1−α){vˉTs(ω,t)−v3Ts(ω,0)1−α(1−v)}=2a1ωv2πˉTs(ω,t)[1v+a1ω2+a2ω2(1−α)v1−α(1−v)]=2a1ωv2πˉTs(ω,t)[(1−α(1−v))+a1ω2v(1−α(1−v))+a2ω2(1−α)v2v(1−α(1−v))]=2a1ωv2πˉTs(ω,t)=2a1ωv3π(1−α+αv)[(1−α+αv)+a1ω2v(1−α+αv)+a2ω2(1−α)v2] | (6.9) |
where ˉTs(ω,t) denotes the Elzaki transform of Ts(ω,t). Let that λ=α1−α with α≠1 and then Eq (6.9) can be rewritten as follows
ˉTs(ω,t)=2a1ωv3(1+λv)π[(1+λv)+a1ω2v(1+λv)+a2ω2v2]ˉTs(ω,t)=2a1ωv3(1+λv)π[1+(λ+a1ω2)v+(a1ω2λ+a2ω2)v2] |
Put (λ+a1ω2)=−θ1,(a1ω2λ+a2ω2)=θ2,
ˉTs(ω,t)=2a1ωv3(1+λv)π[1−θ1v+θ2v2]ˉTs(ω,t)=2a1ω(v3+λv4)π(1−θ1v)[1+θ2v21−θ1v]−1 |
ˉTs(ω,t)=2ωa1π[∞∑n=0(−1)n(θ2)nv2n+3(1−θ1v)n+1+∞∑n=0(−1)nλ(θ2)nv2n+4(1−θ1v)n+1] |
ˉTs(ω,t)=2π∞∑n=0(−1)na1ω(θ2)nv(2n+2)+1(1−θ1v)−(n+1)+2π∞∑n=0(−1)na1ωλ(θ2)nv(2n+3)+1(1−θ1v)−(n+1) |
Appling the inverse of Elzaki transform and using Eq (2.7), we get
Ts(ω,t)=2π∞∑n=0(−1)na1ω(θ2)nt(2n+1)E(n+1)1,(2n+2)(θ1t)+2π∑∞n=0(−1)na1ωλ(θ2)nt(2n+2)E(n+1)1,(2n+3)(θ1t) | (6.10) |
Now, we taking the inverse of Fourier sine transform and we obtained the solution of the Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion equation
T(x,t)=2π∫∞0sinωx⋅ω[∞∑n=0(−1)na1(θ2)nt(2n+1)E(n+1)1,(2n+2)(θ1t)]dω+2π∫∞0sinωx⋅ω[∞∑n=0(−1)na1λ(θ2)nt(2n+2)E(n+1)1,(2n+3)(θ1t)]dω |
This is complete solution of the Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion Eq (6.5).
In this article, we explore the complete Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion equation and fractional diffusion equations in one and two dimensional spaces and find their analytic solution under the defined boundary conditions by using the Elzaki transform. We also find the solution of fractional diffusion equation associated with Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative in terms of Mittag-Leffler function for both one and two dimensional space equations. In this article, we establish new results of Elzaki transform of Caputo-Fabrizio and Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative which will be very helpful to find the analytical solution of various fractional differential equations.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | A. Carpinteri, F. Mainardi, Fractals and fractional calculus in continuum mechanics, Vienna: Springer, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2664-6 |
[2] | R. Hilfer, Applications of fractional calculus in physics, Singapore: World Scientific, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/3779 |
[3] |
R. L. Magin, Fractional calculus in bioengineering, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 32 (2004), 1–104. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v32.i1.10 doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v32.i1.10
![]() |
[4] | F. Mainardi, Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity: An introduction to mathematical models, London: Imperial College Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848163300 |
[5] |
C. Kou, J. Liu, Y. Ye, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the Cauchy-type problems of fractional differential equations, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2010 (2010), 142175. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/142175 doi: 10.1155/2010/142175
![]() |
[6] |
A. Y. A. Salamooni, D. D. Pawar, Existence and uniqueness of generalised fractional Cauchy-type problem, Univers. J. Math. Appl., 3 (2020), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.32323/ujma.756304 doi: 10.32323/ujma.756304
![]() |
[7] | Y. Adjabi, F. Jarad, D. Baleanu, T. Abdeljawad, On Cauchy problems with Caputo Hadamard fractional derivatives, J. Comput. Anal. Appl., 21 (2016), 661–681. |
[8] | K. Diethelm, A. D. Freed, On the solution of nonlinear fractional differential equations used in the modeling of viscoplasticity, In: Scientific computing in chemical engineering II, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60185-9_24 |
[9] |
W. G. Gl¨ockle, T. F. Nonnenmacher, A fractional calculus approach to self-similar protein dynamics, Biophys. J., 68 (1995), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80157-8 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80157-8
![]() |
[10] |
M. Caputo, Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent II, Geophys. J. Int., 13 (1967), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x
![]() |
[11] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier, 2006. |
[12] | V. Kiryakova, Generalized fractional calculus and applications, New York: Wiley, 1993. |
[13] | U. N. Katugampola, A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl., 6 (2014), 1–15. |
[14] |
F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, D. Baleanu, On the generalized fractional derivatives and their Caputo modification, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 10 (2017), 2607–2619. https://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.010.05.27 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.05.27
![]() |
[15] |
F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, Generalized fractional derivatives and Laplace transform, Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. S, 13 (2020), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020039 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020039
![]() |
[16] |
O. P. Agarwal, Some generalized fractional calculus operators and their applications in integral equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 15 (2012), 700–711. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13540-012-0047-7 doi: 10.2478/s13540-012-0047-7
![]() |
[17] |
O. P. Agrawal, Generalized multi parameters fractional variational calculus, Int. J. Differ. Equ., 2012 (2012), 521750. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/521750 doi: 10.1155/2012/521750
![]() |
[18] |
F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, K. Shah, On the weighted fractioinal operators on a function with respact to another function, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2040011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20400113 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20400113
![]() |
[19] |
A. Fernandez, H. M. Fahad, Weighted fractional calculus: A general class of operators, Fractal Fract., 6 (2022), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6040208 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6040208
![]() |
[20] |
M. Al-Refai, A. M. Jarrah, Fundamental results on weighted Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Chaos Soliton Fract., 126 (2019), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.035 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.035
![]() |
[21] |
M. Al-Refai, On weighted Atangana-Baleanu fractional operators, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2471-z doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2471-z
![]() |
[22] |
M. S. Abdo, T. Abdeljawad, S. M. Ali, K. Shah, F. Jarad, Existence of positive solutions for weighted fractional order differential equations, Chaos Soliton Fract., 141 (2020), 110341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110341 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110341
![]() |
[23] |
M. A. Bayrak, A. Demir, E. Ozbilge, On solution of fractional partial differential equation by the weighted fractional operator, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 4805–4819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.044 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.044
![]() |
[24] |
J. G. Liu, X. J. Yang, Y. Y. Feng, L. L. Geng, Fundamental results to the weighted Caputo-type differential operator, Appl. Math. Lett., 121 (2021), 107421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107421 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107421
![]() |
[25] |
A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with non-local and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A doi: 10.2298/TSCI160111018A
![]() |
[26] | M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. |
[27] |
V. Lakshmikantham, A. S. Vatsala, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. Theor., 69 (2008), 2677–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042
![]() |
[28] | V. Lakshmiknantham, A. S. Vatsala, Theory of fractional differential inequalities and applications, Commun. Appl. Anal., 11 (2007), 395–402. |
[29] | V. Lakshmikantham, S. Leela, J. Vasundhara Devi, Theory of fractional dynamic systems, Cambridge: Cambridge Scientific Publishers, 2009. |
[30] |
J. Vasundhara Devi, F. A. Mc Rae, Z. Drici, Variational Lyapunov method for fractional differential equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 64 (2012), 2982–2989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.070 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.070
![]() |
[31] | V. Lakshmikantham, S. Leela, Differential and integral inequalities, New York: Academic Press, 1969. |
[32] |
B. Fei, Y. Zhu, Comparison theorems for generalized Caputo fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. Differ. Equ., 10 (2022), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.12988/nade.2022.91143 doi: 10.12988/nade.2022.91143
![]() |
[33] |
J. V. C. Sousa, E. C. Oliveira, On the ψ-Hilfer fractional derivative, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 60 (2018), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.005
![]() |