Processing math: 100%
Research article

Combinatorial identities concerning trigonometric functions and Fibonacci/Lucas numbers

  • Received: 29 December 2023 Revised: 29 February 2024 Accepted: 05 March 2024 Published: 07 March 2024
  • MSC : 05A19, 11B65

  • In this work, by means of the generating function method and the De Moivre's formula, we derive some interesting combinatorial identities concerning trigonometric functions and Fibonacci/Lucas numbers. One of them confirms the formula proposed recently by Svinin (2022).

    Citation: Yulei Chen, Yingming Zhu, Dongwei Guo. Combinatorial identities concerning trigonometric functions and Fibonacci/Lucas numbers[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9348-9363. doi: 10.3934/math.2024455

    Related Papers:

    [1] Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Amr Kamel Amin, Nasr Anwer Zeyada . Some new identities of a type of generalized numbers involving four parameters. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12962-12980. doi: 10.3934/math.2022718
    [2] Ümit Tokeşer, Tuğba Mert, Yakup Dündar . Some properties and Vajda theorems of split dual Fibonacci and split dual Lucas octonions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8645-8653. doi: 10.3934/math.2022483
    [3] Kritkhajohn Onphaeng, Prapanpong Pongsriiam . Exact divisibility by powers of the integers in the Lucas sequence of the first kind. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6739-6748. doi: 10.3934/math.2020433
    [4] Utkal Keshari Dutta, Prasanta Kumar Ray . On the finite reciprocal sums of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(6): 1569-1581. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.6.1569
    [5] Tingting Du, Li Wang . On the power sums problem of bi-periodic Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 7810-7818. doi: 10.3934/math.2024379
    [6] Faik Babadağ . A new approach to Jacobsthal, Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers and dual vectors. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18596-18606. doi: 10.3934/math.2023946
    [7] Tingting Du, Zhengang Wu . Some identities involving the bi-periodic Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 5838-5846. doi: 10.3934/math.2023294
    [8] Rajiniganth Pandurangan, Sabri T. M. Thabet, Imed Kedim, Miguel Vivas-Cortez . On the Generalized $ \overline{\theta({\tt{t}})} $-Fibonacci sequences and its bifurcation analysis. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 972-987. doi: 10.3934/math.2025046
    [9] Man Chen, Huaifeng Chen . On ideal matrices whose entries are the generalized $ k- $Horadam numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 1981-1997. doi: 10.3934/math.2025093
    [10] Faik Babadağ, Ali Atasoy . On hyper-dual vectors and angles with Pell, Pell-Lucas numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30655-30666. doi: 10.3934/math.20241480
  • In this work, by means of the generating function method and the De Moivre's formula, we derive some interesting combinatorial identities concerning trigonometric functions and Fibonacci/Lucas numbers. One of them confirms the formula proposed recently by Svinin (2022).



    The Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are defined by the following recurrence relations [5,6]

    {F0=0,F1=1,Fn=Fn1+Fn2,n2and{L0=2,L1=1,Ln=Ln1+Ln2,n2

    with the explicit formulae of Binet forms

    Fn=αnβnαβandLn=αn+βn,

    where α=1+52 and β=152. It is interesting that they can be expressed by binomial coefficients, which can be found in Koshy [8, Eqs 12.1 and 13.5] and [1]

    n12k=0(nk1k)=Fnandn2k=0nnk(nkk)=Lnwithn>0.

    In fact, there are two general binomial identities, which can be found in Carlitz [2, Page 23], Comtet [3, §4.9] and [5]

    0k<n/2(1)k(nk1k)(uv)k(u+v)n2k1=unvnuv,0k<n/2(1)knnk(nkk)(uv)k(u+v)n2k=un+vn.

    When specifying u=α and v=β, they reduce to the formulae mentioned above.

    Recently, Svinin [10] proposed a problem, where including demands to show that

    n13k=012k+1(nk12k)(427)k=4n13n1(2n+1), (1.1)

    which can be rewritten as

    n13k=02n+1nk(nk2k+1)(427)k=4n13n1.

    When making attempts to resolve (1.1), we find that a series of similar identities, concerning trigonometric function or Fibonacci/Lucas numbers, can be established. In the process of proving some of these formulae, we will use the De Moivre's formula

    (cosθ+isinθ)n=cosnθ+isinnθ,

    by which we can get the following identities

    (cosθ+isinθ)n+(cosθisinθ)n=2cos(nθ), (1.2)
    (cosθ+isinθ)n(cosθisinθ)n=2isin(nθ), (1.3)

    where i denotes the imaginary unit.

    In the following sections, we will evaluate, by means of generating functions and binomial linear relations, the following binomial sums

    nδ3k=0τn+δnυk(nυkτk+δ)xk,withτ,υ,δ{0,1,2}.

    Specifically, in the next section, we shall consider the sums

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)xk,

    where δ{0,1}. Then in Section 3, we will examine the binomial sums

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)xk.

    Finally in Section 4, the paper will end with two formulae, one of which is equivalent to (1.1).

    For convenience, throughout the paper we shall make use of the notations: for a real number x, the symbol x denotes the greatest integer x. When n is a natural number, the symbol inj stands for "i is congruent to j modulo n". For a formal power series f(x), its coefficient of xn denote by [xn]f(x). Considering two formal power series f(x) and g(x), the following two equalities are well known [4,9]

    [xn]xf(x)=[xn1]f(x), (1.4)
    [xn](αf(x)+βg(x))=α[xn]f(x)+β[xn]g(x), (1.5)

    which will be used frequently in the proofs in subsequent sections.

    Lemma 1. The generating function of the sequence An(x)=nk=0(nk+δ2k+δ)xk is

    A(z,x,δ)=n=0An(x)zn=1(1z)δ+1xz3(1z)δ1. (2.1)

    Proof. By exchanging the summation order, we have

    A(z,x,δ)=n=0nk=0(nk+δ2k+δ)xkzn=k=0xkn=k(nk+δ2k+δ)zn.

    Making the replacement nn+kδ, the last equation becomes

    A(z,x,δ)=k=0xkzkδn=0(n2k+δ)zn=k=0xkzkδn=2k+δ(n2k+δ)zn.

    Keeping in mind the formula [11, Eq 5.57]

    k=0(kn)zk=zn(1z)n+1,

    we get the generating function

    A(z,x,δ)=k=0xkz3k(1z)2k+δ+1=1(1z)δ+1xz3(1z)δ1.

    Firstly, we establish four combinatorial identities concerning trigonometric functions.

    Theorem 2 (nN).

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)2k={2n+2cosnπ2,δ=0;2n+2sin(2n1)π4,δ=1. (2.2)

    Proof. Letting δ=1 and x=2 in (2.1), we have

    A(z,2,1)=1(1z)22z3=1(12z)(1+iz)(1iz).

    According to partial fraction decomposition, it can be decomposed into

    A(z,2,1)=1(12z)(1+iz)(1iz)=A12z+B1+iz+C1iz,

    where A,B and C are three parameters to be determined. Multiplying both sides of the equation by 12z and taking the limit at z12 yields

    A=limz1212z(12z)(1+iz)(1iz)=limz121(1+iz)(1iz)=45.

    Similarly, multiplying both sides of the equation by 1+iz and taking the limit at zi yields

    B=limzi1+iz(12z)(1+iz)(1iz)=limzi1(12z)(1iz)=2i+110.

    Multiplying both sides of the equation by 1iz and taking the limit at zi yields

    C=limzi1iz(12z)(1+iz)(1iz)=limzi1(12z)(1+iz)=2i110.

    Therefore, we can decompose the rational fraction

    A(z,2,1)=1(1z)22z3=45112z+2i+11011+iz2i11011iz.

    Keeping in mind (1.4) and the fact that 11x=n=0xn, we can determine the coefficient of zn

    [zn]1(1z)22z3=2n+25+110{[in+(i)n]2i[in(i)n]}.

    By means of the relations (1.2) and (1.3), we can get the formulae

    in+(i)n=2cosnπ2andin(i)n=2isinnπ2,

    which results in the following binomial summation formula

    nk=0(nk2k+1)2k=2n+1+sinnπ22cosnπ25. (2.3)

    Noting that when δ=0 and x=2

    A(z,2,0)=(1z)A(z,2,1),

    we have

    [zn]A(z,2,0)=[zn]A(z,2,1)[zn1]A(z,2,1),

    which yields another combinatorial identity below.

    nk=0(nk2k)2k=2n+1+3cosnπ2+sinnπ25. (2.4)

    Then by means of the binomial relation below

    2n+δnk(nk2k+δ)=3(nk2k+δ)(nk12k+δ), (2.5)

    and after a little manipulation, we can derive, from (2.4) and (2.3), the identity in Theorem 2.

    Theorem 3 (nN).

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)(4)k={2n+1cos(nθ1)+(1)n,δ=0;2n+12sin(nθ1+θ2)(1)n2,δ=1, (2.6)

    where θ1=arctan73 and θ2=arctan77.

    Proof. Letting δ=1 and x=4 in (2.1), we have

    (1z)2+4z3=4(z+1)(z3+7i8)(z37i8).

    By using partial fractional decomposition, we get the generating function

    A(z,4,1)=1(1z)2+4z3=1811+z+49+137i1121137i2z+49137i112113+7i2z.

    Computing the coefficient of zn, we obtain

    [zn]A(z,4,1)=(1)n8+11122n{49[(3+7i)n+(37i)n]137i[(3+7i)n(37i)n]}.

    By means of the relations (1.2) and (1.3), we have

    (3+7i)n+(37i)n=24ncos(narctan73),(3+7i)n(37i)n=24nisin(narctan73),

    we can establish the following combinatorial identity:

    nk=0(nk2k+1)(4)k=2n56{7cos(narctan73)+117sin(narctan73)}(1)n8. (2.7)

    Keeping in mind the relations

    A(z,4,0)=(1z)A(z,4,1)

    and

    [zn]A(z,4,0)=[zn]A(z,4,1)[zn1]A(z,4,1),

    we can derive the identity below:

    nk=0(nk2k)(4)k=(1)n4+2n28{21cos(narctan73)+7sin(narctan73)}. (2.8)

    By employing the relation (2.5), we can get, from (2.8) and (2.7), the identity in Theorem 3.

    Theorem 4 (nN).

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)(18)k={23ncos(nθ1)+(2)n,δ=0;3n16sin(nθ1+θ2)(2)n3,δ=1, (2.9)

    where θ1=arctan52 and θ2=arctan55.

    Proof. By setting t=1 and x=18 in (2.1), we have

    (1z)2+18z3=18(z+12)(z2+5i9)(z25i9).

    By means of the partial fractional decomposition, we can get the generating function

    A(z,18,1)=42111+2z+85+165i21011(25i)z+85165i21011(2+5i)z,

    and determine the coefficient of zn

    [zn]A(z,18,1)=4(2)n21+3n210{85[(23+53i)n+(2353i)n]165i[(23+53i)n(2353i)n]}.

    Then we can derive, by utilizing the relations

    (23+53i)n+(2353i)n=2cos(narctan52),(23+53i)n(2353i)n=2isin(narctan52),

    the following summation formula:

    nk=0(nk2k+1)(18)k=4(2)n121+3n105χ(n), (2.10)

    where

    χ(n)=10cos(narctan52)+135sin(narctan52).

    According to the relation

    A(z,18,0)=(1z)A(z,18,1),

    we have

    [zn]A(z,18,0)=[zn]A(z,18,1)[zn1]A(z,18,1),

    which leads to the following binomial sum:

    nk=0(nk2k)(18)k=2(2)n7+3n35{25cos(narctan52)+5sin(narctan52)}. (2.11)

    By means of the binomial relation (2.5), we can get, from (2.11) and (2.10), the summation formula stated in Theorem 4.

    Theorem 5 (nN).

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)36k={4n+2(3)ncos(nθ1),δ=0;4n3+(3)n1sin(nθ1+θ2),δ=1, (2.12)

    where θ1=arctan22 and θ2=arctan22.

    Proof. Letting δ=1 and x=36 in (2.1), we have

    (1z)236z3=36(z14)(z22i19)(z+22i+19),

    which results in, by the partial fractional decomposition, the generating function

    A(z,36,1)=1633114z+68+192i26411+(1+22i)z+68192i26411+(122i)z.

    Computing it's coefficient of zn, we have

    [zn]A(z,36,1)=4n+233+(1)n264{68[(1+22i)n+(122i)n]+192i[(1+22i)n(122i)n]}.

    Combining it with the relations

    (1+22i)n+(122i)n=23ncos(narctan22),(1+22i)n(122i)n=23nisin(narctan22),

    we can obtain the following identity:

    nk=0(nk2k+1)36k=4n+133(3)n132η(n), (2.13)

    where

    η(n)=16cos(narctan22)+132sin(narctan22).

    According to the relation between the generating functions of δ=1 and δ=0

    A(z,36,0)=(1z)A(z,36,1),

    we have

    [zn]A(z,36,0)=[zn]A(z,36,1)[zn1]A(z,36,1),

    which yields the summation formula below:

    nk=0(nk2k)36k=4n+111+(3)n22{14cos(narctan22)2sin(narctan22)}. (2.14)

    Now, employing the binomial relation (2.5), we can get, from (2.14) and (2.13), the identity stated in Theorem 5.

    In this section, three identities concerning Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are derived.

    For λ{0,±1,2,12}, letting δ=1 and x=x(λ)=(λ2+λ)2(λ2+λ+1)3 in (2.1), we have

    (1z)2xz3=(λ2+λ)2(λ2+λ+1)3(z(λ2+λ+1))(zλ2+λ+1λ2)(zλ2+λ+1(λ+1)2).

    By means of the partial fractional decomposition, we can get the generating function

    A(z,x(λ),1)=1(λ21)(λ2+2λ)11zλ2+λ+1λ4(λ21)(2λ+1)11λ2λ2+λ+1z+(λ+1)4(λ2+λ)(2λ+1)11(λ+1)2λ2+λ+1z.

    Evaluating the coefficient of zn, we get

    [zn]A(z,x(λ),1)={1(λ21)(λ2+2λ)λ2n+4(λ21)(2λ+1)+(λ+1)2n+4(λ2+2λ)(2λ+1)}×1(λ2+λ+1)n=2λ+1λ2n+4(λ2+2λ)+(λ+1)2n+4(λ21)(λ21)(λ2+2λ)(2λ+1)(λ2+λ+1)n,

    which results in the following identity:

    nk=0(nk2k+1)((λ2+λ)2(λ2+λ+1)3)k=2λ+1λ2n+2(λ2+2λ)+(λ+1)2n+2(λ21)(λ21)(λ2+2λ)(2λ+1)(λ2+λ+1)n1. (2.15)

    Theorem 6 (nN).

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)(564)k={5n+L2n4n,δ=0;5nF2n+14n1,δ=1. (2.16)
    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)(9512)k={9n+L4n8n,δ=0;32n+1L4n+238n1,δ=1. (2.17)
    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)(5216)k={5n+L4n6n,δ=0;F4n+25n6n1,δ=1. (2.18)

    Proof. Letting λ=α2, λ=α4 and λ=α4 in (2.15), we can get the following three combinatorial identities:

    λ=α2nk=0(nk2k+1)(564)k=5n+1F2nF2n+5114n1,λ=α4nk=0(nk2k+1)(9512)k=32n+32F4n+4F4n+8578n1,λ=α4nk=0(nk2k+1)(5216)k=F4n+55n+196n1.

    Observing that the generating function

    A(z,x(λ),0)=(1z)A(z,x(λ),1),

    we can establish another three identities below about Fibonacci and Lucas numbers:

    nk=0(nk2k)(564)k=5n+1+10F2n+3L2n114n,nk=0(nk2k)(9512)k=232n+2+9F4n+4L4n+4388n,nk=0(nk2k)(5216)k=5n+1+L4n+396n.

    Applying the binomial relation (2.5) to the above six identities, we can recover the three summation formulae stated in Theorem 6 .

    Lemma 7. The generating function of the sequence Bn(x)=nk=0(n2kk)xk is

    B(z,x)=n=0nk=0(n2kk)xkzn=11zxz3. (3.1)

    Proof. Exchanging the summation order, we can evaluate

    B(z,x)=n=0nk=0(n2kk)xkzn=k=0xkn=k(n2kk)zn.

    By making the replacement nn+2k, the last equation becomes

    B(z,x)=k=0xkz2kn=0(nk)zn.

    By means of the formula

    k=0(kn)zk=zn(1z)n+1,

    we get the generating function

    B(z,x)=k=0xkz3k(1z)k+1=11zxz3.

    Analogously, in this section we establish another three formulae concerning trigonometric functions.

    Theorem 8 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(2)k=2n+22cosnπ4+(1)n. (3.2)

    Proof. Letting x=2 in Lemma 7, we have the generating function

    B(z,2)=11z+2z3=1511+z+2i511(1+i)z+2+i511(1i)z.

    By extracting the coefficient of zn, we get

    [zn]B(z,2)==(1)n5+2i5(1+i)n+2+i5(1i)n=(1)n5+15{2[(1+i)n+(1i)n]+i[(1i)n(1+i)n]}.

    By means of the identities [7, Eqs. 1.90 and 1.96]

    n2k=0(n2k)(1)k=(1+i)n+(1i)n2=2n2cosnπ4,n12k=0(n2k+1)(1)k=(1+i)n(1i)n2i=2n2sinnπ4,

    we obtain the following identity

    nk=0(n2kk)(2)k=15{2n+22(2cosnπ4+sinnπ4)+(1)n}.

    Then the desired identity follows by using the binomial relation (3.7).

    Theorem 9 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)18k=2(6)ncos(narctan5)+3n. (3.3)

    Proof. Letting x=18 in Lemma 7, we have the generating function

    B(z,18)=11z18z3=37113z+10+5i3511+(5i+1)z+105i3511(5i1)z.

    Evaluating the coefficient of zn, we get

    [zn]B(z,18)=3n+17+(1)n35{10[(1+5i)n+(15i)n]+5i[(1+5i)n(15i)n]}.

    Keeping in mind that

    (cosθ+isinθ)n+(cosθisinθ)n=2cos(nθ),(cosθ+isinθ)n(cosθisinθ)n=2isin(nθ),

    we have

    (1+5i)n+(15i)n=6n2{(16+56i)n+(1656i)n}=6n2{(cost+isint)n+(costisint)n}=26n2cos(nt),

    and

    (1+5i)n(15i)n=6n2{(16+56i)n(1656i)n}=6n2{(cost+isint)n(costisint)n}=26n2isin(nt),

    where tant=5, which yield the identity

    nk=0(n2kk)18k=3n+17+2(6)n35{10cos(narctan5)5sin(narctan5)}.

    The desired identity follows by means of (3.7).

    Theorem 10 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(36)k=2(23)ncos(narctan2)+(3)n. (3.4)

    Proof. Letting x=36 in Lemma 7, we have the generating function

    B(z,36)=136z3z+1=31111+3z+8+2i22112(12i)z+82i22112(1+2i)z.

    and its coefficient of zn

    [zn]B(z,36)=3(3)n11+2n22{8[(12i)n+(1+2i)n]+2i[(12i)n(1+2i)n]}.

    By means of the following results

    (12i)n+(1+2i)n=23n2cos(narctan2),

    and

    (12i)n(1+2i)n=23n2isin(narctan2),

    we can get the identity

    nk=0(n2kk)(36)k=3(3)n11+(23)n11{8cos(narctan2)+2sin(narctan2)}.

    Then the proof completes by the aid of (3.7).

    For x=x(λ)=(λ2+λ)2(λ2+λ+1)3, λ{0,±1,2,12}, we have

    1zxz3=(λ2+λ)2(λ2+λ+1)3(z+λ2+λ+1λ)(zλ2+λ+1λ+1)(zλ2+λ+1λ2+λ).

    By means of the partial fractional decomposition, we can get the generating function

    B(z,x(λ))=λ(λ+2)(2λ+1)11+λλ2+λ+1zλ+1(2λ+1)(λ1)11λ+1λ2+λ+1z+λ(λ+1)(λ+2)(λ1)11λ(λ+1)λ2+λ+1z.

    Evaluating the coefficient of zn, we get

    [zn]B(z,x(λ))=1(λ2+λ+1)n{(1)nλn+1(λ+2)(2λ+1)(λ+1)n+1(2λ+1)(λ1)+(λ2+λ)n+1(λ+2)(λ1)},

    which results in the following identity:

    nk=0(1)k(n2kk)((λ2+λ)2(λ2+λ+1)3)k=1(λ2+λ+1)n{(1)nλn+1(λ+2)(2λ+1)(λ+1)n+1(2λ+1)(λ1)+(λ2+λ)n+1(λ+2)(λ1)}. (3.5)

    Theorem 11 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(18)k=Ln+12n. (3.6)

    Proof. Let λ=α in (3.5), we have x(λ)=18 and

    nk=0(n2kk)(18)k=Fn+312n.

    By means of the relation

    nn2k(n2kk)=3(n2kk)2(n2k1k), (3.7)

    we have

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(18)k=3nk=0(n2kk)(18)k2n1k=0(n2k1k)(18)k=3Fn+332n2Fn+222n1=3Fn+34Fn+2+12n.

    Then the proof follows by using

    3Fn+34Fn+2=Ln.

    Theorem 12 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(564)k={5n2Ln+14n,n20;5n+12Fn14n,n21. (3.8)

    Proof. Let λ=α2 in (3.5), we have x(λ)=564 and

    nk=0(n2kk)(564)k={1114n{1+5n+22(Ln+4Fn)},n20;1114n{5n+12(4Ln+5Fn)1},n21.

    Then the proof follows by using the relation (3.7).

    Theorem 13 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(5216)k={5n2L2n+16n,n20;5n+12F2n+16n,n21. (3.9)

    Proof. Let λ=α4 in (3.5), we have x(λ)=5216 and

    nk=0(n2kk)(5216)k={196n{5n+22F2n+31},n20;196n{5n+12L2n+31},n21.

    By means of the relation (3.7), we can complete the proof.

    Theorem 14 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(9512)k=3nL2n+(1)n8n. (3.10)

    Proof. Let λ=α4 in (3.5), we have x(λ)=9512 and

    nk=0(n2kk)(9512)k=3n+1(8F2n+3L2n)+(1)n198n.

    By using the binomial relation (3.7), we can get the identity stated in the theorem.

    There should be more interesting identities by choosing appropriate parameters λ or x in Lemmas 2.1 and 7. For instance, by setting δ=1 and x=427 in (2.1), we have the generating function

    A(z,427,1)=274z327z2+54z27=1691143z+427z(1z3)2791(1z3)2.

    Extracting the coefficient of zn1, we can get the following identity:

    nk=0(nk2k+1)(427)k=4n+13n43n+1. (4.1)

    In view of (1.4) and (1.5), as well as the relation

    A(z,427,0)=(1z)A(z,427,1),

    we have

    [zn]A(z,427,0)=[zn]A(z,427,1)[zn1]A(z,427,1),

    and derive immediately another summation formula below:

    nk=0(nk2k)(427)k=4n+1+6n+53n+2. (4.2)

    By means of the binomial relation (2.5), we can get, from (4.2) and (4.1), the theorem below.

    Theorem 15 (nN).

    nδ3k=02n+δnk(nk2k+δ)(427)k={4n+23n,δ=0;4n13n1,δ=1. (4.3)

    In fact, the case of δ=1 is equivalent to the identity (1.1) anticipated in the introduction because of the binomial relation

    1nk(nk2k+1)=12k+1(nk12k).

    Analogously, by letting x=427 in Lemma 7, we have the generating function

    B(z,427)=19+3z43z(2z3)2+8(2z3)2,

    which yields, by evaluating the coefficient of zn, the identity

    nk=0(n2kk)(427)k=2n+1(3n+4)+(1)n3n+2.

    Then using the binomial relation (3.7), we can get the following theorem.

    Theorem 16 (nN).

    n3k=0nn2k(n2kk)(427)k=2n+1+(1)n3n. (4.4)

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors are sincerely grateful to the anonymous referees for their careful reading and valuable suggestions, that have improved the manuscript during the revision. This work was supported by Zhoukou Normal University high-level talents start-up funds research project, China, (ZKNUC2022007).

    The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.



    [1] Z. Akyuz, S. Halici, On some combinatorial identities involving the terms of generalized Fibonacci and Lucas sequences, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 42 (2013), 431–435.
    [2] L. Carlitz, A Fibonacci array, Fibonacci Quart., 1 (1963), 17–28.
    [3] L. Comtet, Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions, Revised and enlarged edition, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1974.
    [4] D. Guo, Summation formulae involving Stirling and Lah numbers, Forum Math., 32 (2020), 1407–1414. https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2020-0108 doi: 10.1515/forum-2020-0108
    [5] D. Guo, W. Chu, Binomial Sums with Pell and Lucas Polynomials, Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin, 28 (2021), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.36045/j.bbms.200525 doi: 10.36045/j.bbms.200525
    [6] D. Guo, W. Chu, Inverse Tangent Series Involving Pell and Pell-Lucas Polynomials, Math. Slovaca, 72 (2022), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1515/ms-2022-0059 doi: 10.1515/ms-2022-0059
    [7] H. W. Gould, Combinatorial Identities: A Standardized Set of Tables Listing 500 Binomial Coefficient Summations, West Virginia, Morgantown Printing and Binding Co., 1972.
    [8] T. Koshy, Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Applications, New York: Wiley, 2001.
    [9] D. Merlini, R. Sprugnoli, M. C. Verri, The method of coefficients, Amer. Math. Monthly, 114 (2007), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2007.11920390 doi: 10.1080/00029890.2007.11920390
    [10] A. K. Svinin, Problem H-895, Fibonacci Quart., 60 (2022), P185.
    [11] R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, O. Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science (2nd ed.), Addison–Wesley Publ. Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1994.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yulei Chen, Dongwei Guo, Combinatorial Identities Concerning Binomial Quotients, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 746, 10.3390/sym16060746
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(960) PDF downloads(47) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog